View
1.643
Download
1
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given by Harriett Green and Angela Courtney at the Digital Humanities 2013 conference.
Citation preview
Beyond the Scanned Image: A Needs Assessment of Scholarly Users of Digital Collections
Harriett Green, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaigngreen19@illinois.edu | @greenharr
Angela Courtney, Indiana University – Bloomingtonancourtn@indiana.edu | @englishlitlib
Nicki Saylor, Library of Congress American Folklife Center
Digital Humanities 2013 July 18, 2013
Digital Collections: A Bounty
Research on Use of Digital Resources in the Humanities• Council of Library and Information Resources,
Scholarly Work in the Humanities and the Evolving Information Environment
• Log Analysis of Internet Resources in the Arts and Humanities Project (LAIRAH)
• Toolkit for the Impact of Digitised Scholarly Resources (TIDSR)
• Research Portals in the Arts and Humanities (REPAH)
• Ithaka S+R reports• See DH2013 conference abstract for further
citations
Partner Institutions: • Australian National University• Indiana University• Northwestern University• Tufts University• University of California,
Berkeley• University of Chicago• University of Illinois, Urbana-
Champaign• University of Maryland• University of Oxford• University of Wisconsin,
Madison
Mission:
“How can we advance arts and humanities research through the development of shared technology services?”
http://www.projectbamboo.org
Scholars and Digital Collections Study
• Why and how do humanities scholars use digital collections in their research?
• What do scholars need in the functionalities and features of digital collections in order for them to be useful in humanities research?
Needs Assessment Study Participants
• Indiana University• Michigan State
University• Northwestern
University• Penn State
University• University of Chicago• University of Illinois
at Chicago
• University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
• University of Iowa• University of
Maryland• University of
Minnesota• University of
Nebraska at Lincoln• University of
Wisconsin–Madison
Study Components• Survey and interviews conducted at
15 research universities from fall 2011 through spring 2012
• Web-based survey of randomly sampled English and History faculty members
• 17 in-person interviews of randomly sampled fine and performing arts faculty
How do you use digital collections?
• “Topic modeling, Dunning's comparisons, mining word-frequency correlations, assessing changes in style and thematic content over time ”
• “I study the mass media, so I rely on databases of old television and radio recordings.”
• “I am a historian and I use digitized collections of newspapers, magazines, government reports and documents, legal cases, legal manuals and handbooks, books, etc.”
• “High definition images of papyrus as basis for textual reconstructions.”
Use of Digital Collections: Interviews• Use of digital materials versus physical materials“I use the "real" objects if possible. I use digital reproductions if I don't have access to the originals. Since I don't have access to many of the original objects and images I want to study, I would guess about half and half.”
Interviews• Benefits of Original • Completeness of contents• Sensory experience• Integrate print and digital
“I still must and do consult originals, but for teaching I have always had to rely on surrogates, and for my research, the availability of databases particularly for periodicals, historical dictionaries, and other online primary and secondary sources generally has been an enormous boon.”
Interviews• Benefits of Digital• Portability• Wide accessibility• Preservation“I teach contemporary literature so no one expects me to assign a given writer’s drafts of a published novel. Why should it be any different when it comes to digital images of art that may be housed in distant museums or digitized manuscripts that may be too frail to sustain the wear and tear of hundreds of freshmen’s hands?”
Frequency of Use
36
36
20
7
Frequency of Use of Digital Materials
NeverLess than halfEqual for print & digital mat.More than halfAlways
Types of Materials
Texts Images Maps Video Audio Others None0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%100%
93%
58%
42%39%
4%0%
Types of Digital Materials Used
Text Collection Preferences• “links to related material or bibliographic resources”• “metadata must include rigorous bibliographic information and
stated principles, either explicitly derived from existing modern critical editions or stated as unique to this database.”
• “good word search capability allows me to find all instances of the use of a particular term in a given document collection or diary, narrow dates, search for names (and alternate names) of key individuals, etc. ”
• “capability to be read on multiple devices (e.g., iThing, laptop, desktop).”
• “The ability to annotate these texts in private and public environments, where I could keep stuff for myself or share it with others.”
• “The ability to conduct corpus wide inquiries is still severely limited. Search tools are good for finding needles in haystacks, terrible for extracting data for subsequent manipualtions
Image collection preferences• “Images must cooperate with both Powerpoint and
Word.” • “Ability to export in multiple formats (i.e. jpegs and
higher resolution tifs)”• “information on permissions and how to request
them”• “ability to have a folder of images in the collection
to which I can return that contains all of the copyright and original publication material associated with the image”
• “viewing and zooming tools, color accuracy, ability to export, reliable metadata”
Multi-media collections preferences• “video ability to moderate sound and size” • “ability to embed in other sites (I use my own
websites for drafts of work in multi-media)”• “ability to export and listen/view in another
session”• “Annotation tools”• “detailed metadata, a time counter for audio and
video, downloadable”
Interviews• Areas to Improve• Searchability• More content• Annotation and editing tools
• Current challenges• Poor interfaces and user design• Incomplete contents• Too much data?
Bamboo Workshops• Phase 1 Workshops held in 2008-2009• Qualitiative data from focus groups and
workshops gathered and analyzed by Quinn Dombrowski, Scholarly Practices in the Humanities: Directions, Trends and Opportunities internal report
• Gathered data from workshop discussion of scholarly research practices
• Comparative analysis of workshop data and survey data – How do we map expressed scholarly practices to expressed scholarly needs?
Bamboo Themes of Scholarly Practice
SearchabilityGathering/Foraging
Synthesizing/Filtering
Tools for visualizing relationshipsContextualizing
Conceptualizing, Refining, Critiquing
Research Documentation ToolsDocumenting Methods
MetadataManaging Data
Annotation ToolsAnnotating/Documenting
Modeling/Visualizing
Teaching/Research
InteroperabilitySharing/Publishing
Funding
Collaborating
Citation/credit/peer-review
NEEDS: Curation• “The trick is that the digital collection has to be sufficiently
large (pulling from multiple sources) for it to be useful and often it would be preferable for the collection to have the complete run of a magazine so that I can compare media from different decades.”
• “The ability to control your collection, set up your own library and so on and go deeper and deeper, adding tags, etc. Where it’s less of a skill and more of an expectation. “Personalization of text that in print is crucial.” That’s a big gap.”
• “Better interfaces that allow more flexibility and manipulation of digital images, access to geographic systems and maps to spatialize knowledge in ways that cannot be done with print material.”
• Participatory tagging and other forms of shared knowledge building.
NEEDS: Interoperability• “The challenges are (a) finding resources to make
high-quality digital collections, (b) making those digital collections usable and useful, which requires (c) training humanists to be deep designers of technologies.”
• “I theorize models of historiographic placement, searching, and locatability; so I also consider the various functionality of digital tools.”
• “The easier objects are to repurpose, remix, and reuse the better.”
FUTURE: Access to digital content
CLIR, The Idea of Order: Transforming Research Collections for 21st Century Scholarship
“Enabling anything like seamless access to the cultural record will require developing tools to navigate among vast catalogs of born-digital and digitized materials, as well as the records of physical materials.”—ACLS, Our Cultural Commonwealth report (2006)
Thank you!
Harriett E. GreenUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
green19@illinois.edu | @greenharr
Angela CourtneyIndiana University
ancourtn@indiana.edu | @englishlitlib
Nicki Saylor
Recommended