Presentation carlos and gryl final

Where do Critical Thinking and Spatial Citizenship meet?

Proposing a framework of intersections

Vânia Carlos (University of Aveiro / Portugal) | vania.carlos@ua.pt

Inga Gryl (University of Koblenz-Landau/Germany ) | inga.gryl@gmail.com

Introduction

(Rhode-Jüchtern 2004, 16)

Spatial Citizenship

Introduction

Critical Thinking

Hypothesis: The theoretical concept

of Critical Thinking (CT) might be a valuable domain to inspire Spatial Citizenship (SC) and education for SC

Education

BUT

Research questions

Where do SC and CT theoretically intersect? Which ideas related to the educational value

of CT are useful to an education for SC?

Theoretical framework –

Education for Spatial Citizenship

Theoretical framework –

Education for Spatial Citizenship

Implementation strategies

Spatial Domain

Citizenship Education Domain

GISciene & Technology

Geography

Politics

Citizenship Education

Philosophy

Teacher Education

Media Science &

Com-munication

A main goal in education (Dewey, 1993) “good thinking, determined by relevant

criteria” (BAILIN , 2002) “ability for taking control and

responsibility of our mind” (PAUL, 1993) A multifaceted concept: reflective and

centered on rationality, assessment and problem solving (PIETTE 1996).

Linkages between CT and Citizenship (Glaser, 1985)

Theoretical framework –

Critical Thinking in education

"30 Days to Better Thinking and Better Living”, The Foundation for Critical Thinking (2012)

Demands teaching strategies:- expressly focus on CT skills- allow students to freely express

ideas, question, be open-minded- thought-provoking questions,

with adequate time to think - Real world examples- Meaningful social practices

Theoretical framework –

Critical Thinking in education“a form of rational, reflective thinking, focused on deciding on what to believe or do” (ENNIS, 1985): abilities and dispositions

overlapping of both concepts; contribution of CT to SC

a framework of intersections –

Searching papers for…

a framework of intersections –

Keyword-based research

“critical thinking” OR “thinking critically” AND “spatial citizenship” (KA); “critical thinking” OR “thinking critically” AND “spatial” (KB); “critical thinking” OR “thinking critically” AND “citizenship” (KC).

basic components of SC (“spatial” and “citizenship”) combined separately with “critical thinking”:

a framework of intersections –

Keyword-based research

retrie-ved

selected by title

selected by abstract

…AND “spatial citizenship” (KA)

1 0 0

…AND “spatial” (KB) 4 2 0…AND “citizenship” (KC) 6 4 0…AND “spatial citizenship” (KA)

0 0 0

…AND “spatial” (KB) 25 6 0…AND “citizenship” (KC) 257 14 4

a framework of intersections –

Selected papers for content analysis

Critical Thinking paper 1 - BARACK et al. 2007 “Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: a case of critical

thinking” Critical Thinking paper 2 - VIEIRA et al. 2011

“Critical thinking: conceptual clarification and its importance in science” Intersection paper 1 - JOHNSON & MORRIS 2010

“Towards a framework for critical citizenship education” Intersection paper 2 - GIBSON et al 2008

“Developing Global Awareness and Responsible World Citizenship With Global Learning” Intersection paper 3 - DAM & VOLMAN, 2004

“Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: teaching strategies” Intersection paper 4 - HOFREITER et al. 2007

“Teaching and Evaluating Critical Thinking in an Environmental Context”

Categorization according to research questions: - Category C1: concepts (Where do SC and CT theoretically

intersect?) - C1.1: Critical Thinking, C1.2: Spatial and C1.3 Citizenship;

- C2: Educational approach (Which ideas related to the educational value of CT are useful to an education for SC?)

At this: comparison with SC papers basing on content analysis - GRYL & JEKEL (2012); KANWISCHER et al. (2012); QUADE & FELGENHAUER (2012); GRYL et al. (forthcoming): - intersection with SC (o); - extension of SC (+); - not congruent with SC (-).

a framework of intersections –

Content analysis

a framework of intersections –

Content analysis (example…)Critical Thinking - BARACK et al. 2007[C1: concepts] / [C1.1: Critical Thinking] CT “operative example of higher order thinking that can be accounted for due to reliable

and validated tests” (p. 355) (-) measurement not aimed in SC higher-order thinking skills: “non-algorithmic, complex mode of thinking that often

generates multiple solutions” (p. 355), application of multiple criteria, reflection, self-regulation, analysis, evaluation, and synthesis, question-asking, drawing conclusions, problem-solving, and decision-making, metacognition (o)

handling information: identifying the source of information, comparing and reflecting on consistency (o) and evaluate credibility (-) concept of truth-seeking and potential objectivity not compatible

maturity (-) measureable concept not compatible to broader understanding in SC rational thinking (+)[C1: concepts] / [C1.2: spatial domain][C1: concepts] / [C1.3: citizenship domain] “preparing students (...) for active and responsible life within our modern society” (p. 355)

requires higher-order thinking skills (-) concept of citizenship only partly compatible[C2: educational approach] applying concept purposely and persistently (o) “learning experiences focused around, analysis, evaluation, and synthesis, develop skills in

problem solving, inferring, estimating, predicting, generalizing, (...) question posing, decision making, and critical and systemic thinking” (p. 355) (o) and creative thinking (+) concept only basically concerned in SC

real-world problems, open-ended class discussions, inquiry-oriented experiments (+) potential ideas for SC

a framework of intersections –

Content analysis

Conclusions and further development

The presented framework proves the argument 1) CT and SC share a common ground, and 2) CT competences are relevant to an education for SC.

Further analysis- ensuring coherence and compatibility - further investigation, both in theory as well as in

practical application and evaluation in learning environments.

Thanks, Danke, Obrigada!

project PEst-C/CED/UI0194/2011