Quality Assurance introduction

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

What is quality assurance in higher education and how it is done at Fontys University of Applied Science

Citation preview

Quality management

About what we should do because they say so and whatwe do because we want to

And a little bit about James Bond

Everard van Kemenade

Senior consultant Quality Management

Fontys International Projects

QUALITY

MANAGEMENT

What we should do, because “they say so”:

accreditation.

Accreditation = a licence to kill

A licence to kill

Different accreditation systems

– Q Definition

– Objective (improvement or accountability)

– Methods (audits, peer review)

– Responsible agency (government funded or not, employers)

– Voluntary or mandatory

– Object (education/research, existing/new, programs or institutes)

– Public or confidential reports

– Follow up (financial consequences?)

Van Damme (2000), Scheele (2004)

Conformities

Increasing autonomy

Not only top down implementation

Method:

–Self evaluation incl. performance indicators

–Peer review

–Public report

What we have to do in the

Dutch situation

External quality assurance

– Accreditation organised by the

Accreditation Agency (NVAO)

– Compulsory, severe consequences,

– Accountability > improvement

© CHEPS, University of Twente | Don F. Westerheijden | 1998 2

cheps

Higher Ed.

Institution

Visi tingCommittee

InspectorateH igher Ed.

internal Q m anagement

self-study

reportreport of

visitingcommittee

inte

rna

lexte

rnal

s t u d e n t le a r n in g

t e a ch in g

q u a l i t y im p ro ve m en t

s e lf -e v a lu a t io n

p r o g r a m m e

ju d g em e n t s

s i t e v is i t s

M inistry,

press,public, etc.

“met a -ev

aluat io

n”

acco

un

tability

t ransp

arency

Quality Spiral in Dutch Higher Education

Buffer

body

Accreditation Agency (NVAO) accredits

Study

Programme

Legal c

onsequences

QUALITY:

External Quality

Assurance

Self evaluation

Visitation by “customers”

Every six years

The course is the object

Emphasis on primary (educational) process

Change foreseen 2010: more institutional issues

Different views onits

effectivenessVan Kemenade

(2009)

Some results Ph.D study

1. Seperate accountability from

improvement

2. Do not use self evaluation for

accountability, only for improvement

3. Do not model the internal system (just)

to the external demands

Quality is not a thing

It is an event

R. Pirsig.

““Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenanceZen and the art of motorcycle maintenance””

(1972)(1972)

The seventies cult book on quality and values The seventies cult book on quality and values

plan

do

check

act

Deming cycle

QUALITY:

The Fontys case

What we want is:

Continuous improvement

Commitment from all employees

How we organize it at Fontys

Concern auditors

Quality Service Centre

Program Quality Managers:

– Management contracts and

reports (Macon and Marep)

Teams

– Team contracts

Individual

– Personal development plan

Concern Auditor

Top senior staff-function

Advisor Board of Directors

X X + 6Internal

audit

Quality Service Centre

Quality system advise

Assist self-study

Documentary system

Research stakeholders: evaluations

* students

* staff

* alumni

* world of work

* government

EvaluationsStudents

– Every period (course)

– Every year (program)

– Every two year Fontys

Staff

– Every two year Fontys

World of work

– Council

– Alumni/employers yearly

Government

– Accreditation

Tomorrow?

How to get the p-d-c-a cycle

working on program level

Evaluations Summary Improvements Results

MT: Macon

Activity plan

Marep

Marep=management

report

Quality

Study-results

Marketing-results

Educational Development

Financial

Co-operation0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1e kwrt 2e kwrt 3e kwrt 4e kwrt

How to get the p-d-c-a cycle

working: teamplan

Team MTTeam plan

MT Activity-plan Marap

Quality Manager

Reports on evaluations

Quality improvement is

a daily

personal priority

obligation

W. Edwards Deming:

We have to bring back the individual.

How to get the p-d-c-a

cycle working on

individual level

Competence management

Personal development plan

Yearly appraisal meeting with the manager

Shaken not stirred

Thanks for yourattention

Questions

Recommended