Quality measurement of Croatian public and academic libraries: methodology

Quality measurement of Croatian public and academic libraries: methodology

Kornelija Petr, Osijek University, Croatiakpetr@ffos.hr

2

Project

project Evaluation of library and information

services: academic and public libraries funded and approved by Croatian

Ministry of Education, Science and Sport (www.mzos.hr)

PI: Kornelija Petr builds on:

K. Petr’s doctoral thesis on Croatian academic library quality

3

Project’s objectives

look into the views and ability of Croatian public and academic library staff;

single out dimensions of their effectiveness;

identify measures of quality for public and academic libraries

4

Hypothesis

Croatian libraries do not give enough attention to processes of quality measurement;

librarians unprepared to conduct any sort of evaluation at their library;

insufficient awareness of library service quality affects all library processes.

5

Project outcomes

collection of statistical data on state-of-the-art in libraries;

defined dimensions of effectiveness (academic vs public libraries);

demonstrate the evidence of differences in views between library management and staff;

encourage more positive attitude of library staff toward evaluation activities.

6

Library scene in Croatia*

Public libraries (2004) 256 staff: 1062

Academic (+ national and university) libraries HE – 131, national – 1, university – 2 staff: HE – 239, national – 193,

university – 53 (TOTAL: 485)

*Statistical yearbook of the Republic of Croatia, 2006

7

Geographic distribution of libraries

8

Methodology

Questionnaire

Interviews

Analysis of library documentation

9

Questionnaire 1/1

based on questionnaire created by McDonald-Micikas (1994)

two versions: public libraries academic libraries

subversions library staff library directors

10

Questionnaire 1/2

Topics: general information on a library, elements important for library

environment, library in general, library vs faculty/University

management/founder, library and new managerialism, library vs users

11

Questionnaire 1/3

additional topics for library directors: related to education, CPD, attitudes

toward work and quality issues of director’s co-workers

anonimous – no feed back mail

12

Questionnaire 1/4

1547 questionnaires response rate:

50% - 774 question. (Van House, Weil, McClure)

(expected) 1100-1200 question. (between 70%-80%)

13

Interviews 1/1

semi-structured 20-30 interviews

20 – public library directors 10 – academic, national and university

library directors 256 public, 131 academic, 1 national, 2

university libraries =390 libraries 66% - public libraries

14

Interviews 1/2

tentative topics: satisfaction with library services, 'strong' and 'weak' sides of the library, the feeling of being privileged to work

in a particular library, familiarization with user perspective of

library and librarians, user expectations, competition,

15

Interviews 1/3

… relationship with (faculty, University)

management or founder (local community),

satisfaction with a status (only academic libraries),

monitoring of user expectations and opinions, monitoring of performance quality,

dedication to continuous quality improvement, etc.

16

Library documentation

collection of statistical and annual reports

analysis

17

Time table 1/1

Months 1-7: literature review, defining the sample, designin and

testing of the questionnaire, designing the interview questions

Months 8-9: copying and mailing of the questionnaire, contacting

the interviewees and making arrangements for the interviews

Months 10-12: distribution of the questionnaire, collecting of filled-

in questionnaires, reminding letters to libraries that failed to return the questionnaires, collection of library documentation

18

Time table 1/2

Months 13-18: interviews, collection of library

documentation Months 19-20:

input and data processing (data collected through questionnaires), interpretation of results

Months 21-24: transcribing of interviews

19

Time table 1/3

Months 25-27: semantic analysis of the interviews,

intepretation of results Months 28-29:

analysis of library documentation, interpretation of results

Months 30-31: defining of dimensions of effectiveness

for academic and public libraries

20

Time table 1/4

Months 32-34: benchmarking of the results with other

relevant similar research projects in the world

Months 35-37: taxonomy of views and opinions of

Croatian librarians