View
824
Download
2
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Citation theoriesand their application to altmetrics
Rodrigo CostasCentre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS-Leiden University), the Netherlands
Stefanie HausteinUniversité de Montréal, Canada
@RodrigoCostas1
@stefhaustein
2
Types of altmetrics• Research impact on (mostly) social media• Heterogeneity• Reference management: reader counts • Recommending: recommendations • Blogging: blog mentions • Microblogging: microposts• others Need to differentiate!
Lack of meaning and theoretical foundations
3
Altmetrics in the light of citation theory• Normative theory (Kaplan, 1965; Merton, 1973) ‘Ethos of science’ (Merton, 1973)• Communism• Universalism
• Social constructivist theoryDeviation from normative behavior• Persuasion• Matthew effect
• Concept symbols (Small, 1978)symbolic act: association of document with concept
• Disinterestedness• Organized skepticism
• Perfunctory citations• Negative citations, etc.
Research Evaluation
Content Analysis & Science Mapping
4
Altmetrics in the light of citation theory• Normative theory (Kaplan, 1965; Merton, 1973) ‘Ethos of science’ (Merton, 1973)• Communism• Universalism
• Social constructivist theoryDeviation from normative behavior• Persuasion• Matthew effect
• Concept symbols (Small, 1978)symbolic act: association of document with concept
• Disinterestedness• Organized skepticism
• Perfunctory citations• Negative citations, etc.
How do these theoriesapply to altmetrics?• Saved in Mendeley• Mentioned in a tweet• Reviewed on F1000• Cited in a blog post
5
Normative theory• F1000– Faculty members are “world's leading scientists”– Reviewers “must sign a statement to indicate that
the article has been selected […] entirely on its scientific merit and […] not been influenced”
• Mendeley– Pre-citation context– Anonymous nature of saving process– Not all papers are read
6
Normative theory• Blogs
– similar to citations– “The post author should have read and
understood the entire work cited [and] report accurately and thoughtfully on the research.” (ResearchBlogging)
– open uncontrolled nature of blogs• Twitter
– brevity– humor and entertainment aspect– diffusion channel– diverse user groups and user motivations
7
Social constructivist theory• Twitter– Matthew effect (internally):
reinforced by Twitter affordancesextremely skewed distributions
– Matthew effect (externally): popularity of high-impact journals
• Blogs– Persuasion: driving force in blogging– Matthew effect: focus on high-impact journals
8
Social constructivist theory• Mendeley– Matthew effect: popularity of high-impact journals– Anonymous nature of saving to Mendeley
• F1000– Matthew effect (externally): focus on high-impact
journals– Subjectivity of reviewers– Recommendations are linked to reviewers
Concept symbols• Blogs– Authors associated cited documents with concept
• Twitter, F1000, Mendeley– Concepts condensed in tags
#altmetrics
10
Conclusions• Normative approach• High applicability for F1000• Moderate for Mendeley• Low applicability for Twitter or blogs
• Social constructivist approach• High applicability for Twitter and blogs• Moderate for F1000
• Concept symbols• High applicability for Twitter, F1000, Mendeley
and blogsTheory highlights heterogeneity of acts
11
Conclusions and outlook• Research evaluation
• Higher applicability for Mendeley and F1000• No applicability for Twitter
• Content analysis and mapping• High applicability for F1000, Mendeley, Twitter and blogs
but as exploration and description of ‘perception of science’
Theoretical discussions help to:• uncover acts behind metrics• interprete meaning of metrics
Need for other theories and frameworks
12
Questions?
http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05701
Recommended