12.00 - Dr. Tim Chown - University of Southampton

IPv6 campus deployment experience

Tim ChownUniversity of SouthamptonIrish IPv6 Summit, Dublin

19th May 2010

Topics

• Scope/scenario• Why IPv6• Phased deployment steps• Managing a dual-stack network• Lessons learnt• The future

Scope

• Context of our deployment is a large Electronics and Computer Science department– Approx 3,000 staff/student users– Up to 5,000 systems (>3,000 wireless)– Over 1,000 physical data ports– 4 buildings– Run all our own network and system services– See http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk

• ISP is JANET, the UK academic network– Connectivity via regional academic network (LeNSE)

Why IPv6?

• Not due to immediate lack of address space– Established UK universities have pre-CIDR /16’s

• Rather because universities are places of learning– Important to gain early insights into IPv6 impact– Teach IPv6 to students who will be using it– IPv6 capability for research projects– Prove new technologies in a production environment– Attract students from outside the UK

• Network security aspects – manage the change– Deploy/manage IPv6 proactively

Deployment

• In practice this has happened over many years– IPv6 was first run on our site in 1997– Valuable experience gained through many projects

such as 6NET (http://www.6net.org)

• But while most academic backbone networks support IPv6, there are very few end-site/campus deployments

• From our current position we can say– What we would do if starting from scratch now– What we think is working well– What remains to be done

Phased approach

• IPv6 deployment should be undertaken with a phased approach, broadly:– Advance planning/preparation– Trial/pilot service– Production deployment– Ongoing operation

• There’s no reason not to begin planning now– Gain early experience/insight– Minimise future costs by including

requirements in future procurements

Dual stack vs IPv6-only

• Dual-stack– Continue to operate existing IPv4 systems– Run ‘two networks’ as closely coupled as possible– Allow IPv6-only devices to operate internally– Additional complexity lies within the network

• IPv6-only– Run only IPv6 internally– Complexity lies at the edge in the ‘NAT64’ function

• Currently dual stack is the most viable option

Advance planning

• Begin appropriate training for staff– Need to understand strategic and technical aspects

• Determine IPv6 requirements and ensure these are cited in procurement exercises– Important, but not an easy task

• Survey existing software/systems for IPv6 capability– Assess effort to port to support IPv6 where necessary

• Review policies/processes for IPv6 implications– Security, management, etc.

Trial/pilot service• Speak to (existing) ISP about connectivity and

address allocations (site /48)– Does your current ISP offer IPv6?

• Form internal IPv6 addressing plan– Likely to be administratively congruent with IPv4 plan

• Deploy a limited testbed system– Perhaps single router, on isolated dual-stack DMZ– Gain basic operational experience– Test software and application porting– Understand possible issues in fuller deployment

• Discuss any arising IPv6-specific policy issues

Production deployment

• Determine where to deploy– Specific subnets? WLAN? DMZ?

• Enable IPv6 on the wire in routing infrastructure, host subnets and security components– Firewalls, IDS, …

• Enable IPv6 in network services– DNS, monitoring tools, …

• Enable appropriate application services– Might initially only be web-based services

• Enable clients

Ongoing operation

• Understand where you are• Indentify and track gaps in deployment– Ongoing review/action plans– Dialogue with vendors where necessary

• Identify/evaluate new opportunities– IPv6-only network management– IPv6 multicast–Mobile IPv6?– IPv6-only applications – MS DirectAccess?

What we found ‘easy’

• Getting IPv6 connectivity and address space– Thanks to prior work done by JANET

• General support in host/router platforms– Mac OSX lagging a bit behind

• Enabling core services– DNS, MXes, web servers

• Porting our software/tools to support IPv6– Easier when the software is well-written

• Host (address) autoconfiguration• IPv6 wireless access control via eduroam– Uses 802.1X authentication, independent of IP

version

What’s been ‘harder’

• Managing a dual-stack environment• IP address accountability without DHCPv6– Support for DHCPv6 improving– Admins are comfortable with current DHCP-

based accountability model• Living with multi-addressed hosts– Including dynamic privacy addresses

• Support in some MS applications– Again improved with recent releases

• Some LAN security issues– e.g. rogue RAs have been problematic

Dual stack ‘cost’

• Main operational cost lies in managing a dual-stack infrastructure– Need to manage and monitor IPv4 and IPv6

• Consistency in applying configurations and policy– Monitoring (Nagios)– Firewalls– Integrated DHCPv4 and DHCPv6

• Troubleshooting• Do not want to use different tools/interfaces to

manage each protocol– Some improvements to be made in commercial

apps

Security aspects

• Currently run two firewalls– Commercial IPv4 platform, open source IPv6 platform– Allows experimentation in IPv6 filtering

• Avoiding use of transition tools internally– Simplifies internal network management/security– Support tunnel broker for external access

• Running in-house tools to monitor IPv6-specific attacks– e.g. to detect DAD denial of service (cf. THC toolkit)– Only ‘badness’ seen to date is rogue RAs

Service examples

• Some examples in next few slides of service graphs and management/monitoring tools

• Shows open source solutions in operation– IPv6 transport external web traffic– IPv6 transport external emails– Switch/router configuration monitoring– Packet flow analysis

• Again, it’s important to have these tools managed consistently via one interface

IPv6 web traffic

• Very slow growth on external IPv6 web visits– Advertise web presence via IPv4 and IPv6 DNS records– Less than 1% of IPv6 accesses are via 6to4

IPv6 email

• We also advertise our MXes with both IPv4 and IPv6 DNS records– As per RFC 3974

• Average 250,000 external IPv4 emails per day– 88% spam

• Average 500 external IPv6 emails per day– Currently less than 25% spam

• IPv6 transport email is 0.2% of total email– Again, a very small fraction

IPv6 email traffic

Switch/router monitoring

• NAV– Open source– http://metanav.uninett.no

• Dual-stack aware– Multi-addressed hosts

Integrated dual-stack monitoring

• NAV determines most network properties automatically– e.g. dual-stack subnets on the same vlan

Network flows

• Desirable to collect network flow records– Useful for many tasks

• Netflow v9 includes IPv6 support– Configurable on our Cisco router(s)

• Need to also run a collector/viewer–We use nfsen (http://nfsen.sourceforge.net)

• Allows detailed flow queries, e.g.– Summary of external port 53 DNS flows– Views of individual external port 25 SMTP flows

IPv6 port 53 summary flows

IPv6 port 25 individual flows

New services?

• What can you do beyond deploying IPv6 just to be ‘ready’?– IPv6 Multicast – simpler, more agile?– Mobile IPv6 – improved mobility support?– Applications – from engaged users?– Google IPv6 – is something big on the horizon?– Community/ad-hoc networks – interest here– New use cases – e.g. sensor networks

• Seeing some interesting ‘green shoots’ but no single ‘killer app’

IPv6 multicast

• Used for all our multicast services• Some nice benefits:– Improved, explicit scoping– Embedded RP (RFC 3956) for global groups

• Some new projects building on IPv6 multicast– Student work, e.g. file-sharing applications

• Freeview TV/radio (ECS-TV)– Using VideoLAN tools– Scoped within research buildings only

Issues experienced

• Deploying per se is not the challenge– Managing a dual-stack environment is– You need good, consistent tools– There is increased complexity

• Don’t underestimate staff training– IPv6 will touch on all areas of systems support– Staff who don’t understand will proliferate FUD

• Do understand IPv6 differences– Multi-addressing, rogue RAs, …

• Don’t expect full dual-stack deployment from day 1– It’s perfectly fine to enable IPv6 in stages

The future?• Still some internal services left to make dual-stack• Integrate IPv4 and IPv6 firewall functions• DHCPv6 deployment

– Unless we can improve autoconfiguration accountability, perhaps by wider use of 802.1X

• Wider use of external services– IPv6 transport to root DNS– Google IPv6 Programme

• Possibility of new IPv6-only devices– These would put some focus on ‘NAT64’ solutions

• Plan for IPv6 deployment on wider campus network

Conclusions• If you’re not actively planning for IPv6, begin now

– Checking capabilities in procurements as a minimum– Consider security implications – IPv6 is in your network

anyway• Dual stack IPv6 deployment is possible today

– Running here 4+ years without significant issues– There are some missing bits, but you don’t have to dual-stack

everything from the outset• Look for tools that offer integrated management of

IPv4/IPv6 networks– Even if that might mean changing the tools you use

• Don’t forget training and awareness in your organisation• Don’t expect huge IPv6 traffic volumes (yet)

References

• 6NET (2002-2005 Pan-European project)– http://www.6net.org

• 6DEPLOY (IPv6 training and resources)– http://www.6deploy.org

• JANET IPv6 Technical Guide (under revision)– http://www.webarchive.ja.net/services/publicatio

ns/technical-guides/ipv6-tech-guide-for-web.pdf