Changes to Part L and heavyweight buildings

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Tom de Saulles, building physicist, The Concrete Centre

Citation preview

Changes to Part L and the implications

for heavyweight buildings

Tom De Saulles

The Concrete Centre

Specifying Low Carbon Buildings

Southbank Centre

7 October 2010

0

100

200

300

400

1970 2002 2006 2010 2013 2016

heat

loss

(W/K)

Heat loss from

an average UK home

0

100

200

300

400

1970 2002 2006 2010 2013 2016

Base

year

0

100

200

300

400

1970 2002 2006 2010 2013 2016

Base

year

+275%

heat

loss

(W/K)

Heat loss from

an average UK home

BRE Innovation Park

Brookwood farm, Woking

September 2010.

Code level 5, ICF construction.

(William Lacey Group)

Currently being updated

for Part L 2010, 2013

& 2016.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + WWHR

2. Weather comp.

1. No additional features

2010 (25%) 2013 (44%) 2016 (70%)

Basic fabric spec.Walls: 0.25, floor: 0.18, roof: 0.13

windows: 1.5, air permeability: 5.0

Y-value: 0.08

% improvement over Part L 2006

Meeting 2010, 2013

targets for Part L1(detached house)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + WWHR

2. Weather comp.

1. No additional features

Basic fabric spec.

Enhanced fabric spec.

2010 (25%) 2013 (44%) 2016 (70%)

Walls: 0.25, floor: 0.18, roof: 0.13

windows: 1.5, air permeability: 5.0

Y-value: 0.08

Walls reduced to 0.2

Y-value reduced to 0.05

% improvement over Part L 2006

Meeting 2010, 2013

targets for Part L1(detached house)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + WWHR

2. Weather comp.

1. No additional features

Basic fabric spec.

Enhanced fabric spec.

Govt. fabric energy efficiency spec.

2010 (25%) 2013 (44%) 2016 (70%)

Walls: 0.25, floor: 0.18, roof: 0.13

windows: 1.5, air permeability: 5.0

Y-value: 0.08

Walls reduced to 0.2

Y-value reduced to 0.05

Walls: 0.18, windows: 1.4, floor: 0.18

roof: 0.13 air permeability: 3.0, Y-value: 0.05.

% improvement over Part L 2006

Meeting 2010, 2013

targets for Part L1(detached house)

Flue gas heat recovery

(about £600 for smaller dwellings)

• Zenex Gas Saver

• Ravenheat Energy Catcher

• Alpha Flowsmart

Waste water heat recovery

(from about £200)

• Recoh-vert

• Recoh-tray

• Enviroharvest

• Warmit (AK Industries),

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + WWHR

2. Weather comp.

1. No additional features

Basic fabric spec.

Enhanced fabric spec.

+ Waste water heat recovery

% improvement over Part L 2006

2010 (25%) 2013 (44%) 2016 (70%)

Meeting 2010, 2013

targets for Part L1(detached house)

Govt. fabric energy efficiency spec.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + WWHR

2. Weather comp.

1. No additional features

Basic fabric spec.

Enhanced fabric spec.

+ Waste water heat recovery

+ Flue gas heat recovery2010 (25%) 2013 (44%) 2016 (70%)

Meeting 2010, 2013 & 2016

targets for Part L1(detached house)

% improvement over Part L 2006

Govt. fabric energy efficiency spec.

Weather comp. = weather compensator

WWHR = waste water heat recovery

FGHR = Flue gas heat recovery

■ Basic fabric spec. ■ Enhanced fabric spec.

■ 2016 zero carbon fabric spec. ■ Enhanced 2016 zero carbon fabric spec.

Part L: 2010 (25%) 2013 (44%) 2016 (70%?)

Flat, mid-storey (50m

2)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + WWHR

2. Weather comp.

1. No additional features

End terrace, 2-storey (61 m

2)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + WWHR

2. Weather comp.

1. No additional features

Mid terrace, 2-storey (61m

2)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + WWHR

2. Weather comp.

1. No additional features

End terrace,

3-storey (125m2)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1 kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + 100mm cylinder insulation + WWHR

2. Weather comp. + 100mm cylinder insulation

1. No additional features

Mid terrace,

3-storey (125m2)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1 kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + 100mm cylinder insulation + WWHR

2. weather compensator + 100mm cylinder insulation

1. No additional features

Detached,

2-storey (127m2)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

6. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (2 kWp)

5. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS + PV (1kWp)

4. Weather comp. + WWHR + FGHRS

3. Weather comp. + 100mm cylinder insulation + WWHR

2. weather comp. + 100mm cylinder insulation

1. No additional features

% reduction in CO2 emission over Part L1A 2006

% reduction in CO2 emission over Part L1A 2006

% reduction in CO2 emission over Part L1A 2006

% reduction in CO2 emission over Part L1A 2006

% reduction in CO2 emission over Part L1A 2006

% reduction in CO2 emission over Part L1A 2006

Main findings

Part L1 2010 compliance:

• U-value for external walls, around 0.2 – 0.25 W/m2K

• Air permeability, around 5 m3/(h.m2)

• Renewables are not necessary, but enhancements to services are.

Main findings

Part L1 2010 compliance:

• U-value for external walls, around 0.2 – 0.25 W/m2K

• Air permeability, around 5 m3/(h.m2)

• Renewables are not necessary, but enhancements to services are.

Part L1 2013 compliance:

• Renewables can still be avoided, but a much higher level of fabric performance is needed.

• Alternatively, could use 2010 fabric performance and about 1 kW of PV.

Main findings

Part L1 2010 compliance:

• U-value for external walls, around 0.2 – 0.25 W/m2K

• Air permeability, around 5 m3/(h.m2)

• Renewables are not necessary, but enhancements to services are.

Part L1 2013 compliance:

• Renewables can still be avoided, but a much higher level of fabric performance is needed.

• Alternatively, could use 2010 fabric performance and about 1 kW of PV.

Part L1 2016 compliance:

• Need to meet or exceed the Govt. fabric energy efficiency standard. 2 - 3 kW of PV also needed.

This is the thermal capacity of the first

100mm, or up to the first insulating

layer, if this occurs first.

Measured by the ‘K-value’ (KJ/m2/K)

Introduction of thermal mass into Part L1

100mm

Sandwich panel,Up to 230 kJ/m2K

Solid masonry,Up to 190 kJ/m2K

Woodcrete block,Up to 145 kJ/m2K

Brick & block,Up to 190 kJ/m2K

Hemcrete block,Up to 135 kJ/m2K

Insulating clay block,Up to 65 kJ/m2K

Frame construction 2 x plasterboard,Up to 18 kJ/m2K

Frame construction1 x plasterboard,Up to 9 kJ/m2K

Block partition,Up to 100 kJ/m2K

Stud partition,Up to 9 kJ/m2K

How much thermal mass

do floors and walls have?

Hollow coreupper floor, up to 120/160 kJ/m2K

Beam & blockupper floor, up to120/40 kJ/m2K

Timber upper floor, up to 9/18 kJ/m2K

Insitu-concreteground floor,up to 140 kJ/m2K

Beam & blockground floor,up to 110 kJ/m2K

Timber ground floor,up to 20 kJ/m2K

Arup/Concrete Centre thermal properties tool

Sun at midday17º - 40º

South

Heating season: daytime

Heating season: night-time

EXAMPLE:

Highly insulated, airtight semi-detached house with efficient heating and controls.

What difference can thermal mass

make in SAP 2009?

RESULT:

• Moving from low to high thermal mass reduces emissions by about 3-4%

• This is roughly the same as changing the external wall U-value from 0.2 to 0.15

New full fill insulation system

Achieves a U-value of 0.17 - 0.18 with a 100mm cavity

Summertime performance / overheating

• The Zero Carbon Hub is calling for

an improved overheating check that

must be passed by all new homes.

Summertime performance / overheating

• The Zero Carbon Hub is calling for

an improved overheating check that

must be passed by all new homes.

• The check should take account of

future climate change.

• It should also take proper account of

night cooling and thermal mass.

Free passive design tool (currently under development)

Part L2 (2010)

New drivers for passive cooling

• 25% reduction in emissions required by Part L2

Part L2 (2010)

New drivers for passive cooling

• 25% reduction in emissions required by Part L2

• 23% increase in the assumed CO2 emissions from electricity (Part L1 and L2)

Part L2 (2010)

New drivers for passive cooling

• 25% reduction in emissions required by Part L2

• 23% increase in the assumed CO2 emissions from electricity (Part L1 and L2)

• New limits for solar gain in Part L2

Part L2 (2010)

New drivers for passive cooling

• 25% reduction in emissions required by Part L2

• 23% increase in the assumed CO2 emissions from electricity (Part L1 and L2)

• New limits for solar gain in Part L2

• 25 - 60% increase in the cost of electricity expected by 2016 (Ofgem)

Part L2 (2010)

New drivers for passive cooling

• 25% reduction in emissions required by Part L2

• 23% increase in the assumed CO2 emissions from electricity (Part L1 and L2)

• New limits for solar gain in Part L2

• 25 - 60% increase in the cost of electricity expected by 2016 (Ofgem)

• Possible relaxation of peak internal temperature in

BCO specification (from 22°C to 25°C)

Flat slab with natural ventilation Coffered slab & underfloor ventilation

Hollowcore slab (Termodeck®) Water-cooled slab

Manchester University

Business School

Completion: 2011

Architect: Feilden Clegg Bradley

Precast, lattice girder floors with integral water cooling pipes.

Woodland Trust HQ, Lincolnshire

Completion: Autumn 2010

Architect: Feilden Clegg Bradley

Key messages:

• Compliance with Part L1 in 2010, 2013 & 2016 does not present any

particular issues for masonry/concrete housing.

Key messages:

• Compliance with Part L1 in 2010, 2013 & 2016 does not present any

particular issues for masonry/concrete housing.

• Heat recovery systems can help with 2010 and 2013 compliance and

avoid the need for costly renewables.

Key messages:

• Compliance with Part L1 in 2010, 2013 & 2016 does not present any

particular issues for masonry/concrete housing.

• Heat recovery systems can help with 2010 and 2013 compliance and

avoid the need for costly renewables.

• SAP now includes thermal mass, and shows a year-round round benefit

in highly insulated and airtight heavyweight dwellings.

Key messages:

• Compliance with Part L1 in 2010, 2013 & 2016 does not present any

particular issues for masonry/concrete housing.

• Heat recovery systems can help with 2010 and 2013 compliance and

avoid the need for costly renewables.

• SAP now includes thermal mass, and shows a year-round round benefit

in highly insulated and airtight heavyweight dwellings.

• The dwelling overheating check in SAP is likely to be revisited.

Key messages:

• Compliance with Part L1 in 2010, 2013 & 2016 does not present any

particular issues for masonry/concrete housing.

• Heat recovery systems can help with 2010 and 2013 compliance and

avoid the need for costly renewables.

• SAP now includes thermal mass, and shows a year-round round benefit

in highly insulated and airtight heavyweight dwellings.

• The dwelling overheating check in SAP is likely to be revisited.

• There is likely to be a move from air-conditioning to passive cooling

solutions in many new, non-domestic buildings.

Thank you

tdesaulles@concretecentre.com

Recommended