Research Methods in Social Psychology

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Research Methods in Social Psychology

Last Time

• psychology relies on empirical methods• theories are general propositions about

causal relationships amongst constructs

• hypotheses are conceptual statements that require operationalization

• science is a process of “conjecture and refutation”

Our Proposition

• Hypothesis: Southern white males are more prone to aggression than are Northern white males. (conjecture)

• We’ll look at different strategies to examine hypotheses. (refutation)

Refutation

• putting theories to the test

• What evidence supports (and, more importantly, disconfirms) our theories?

Descriptive Research

• assesses the amount or average level of a given variable in a population– e.g., public opinion surveys

• not a true test of an hypothesis– What is the white male homicide rate

in the South?

Descriptive Research

• What is the white male homicide rate in the South?

Region

Homicide Rates (White Male Offender Rate)

New England 2.62 Middle Atlantic 1.90 Midwest 2.92 Pacific 4.62 Mountain 4.67 Southwest 5.13 South 8.23

adapted from Nisbett (1993)

Descriptive Research

• critical issues– random sampling– basis of comparison

• informative, but not a hypothesis test– What else could account for the

findings?

Correlational Research

• investigates whether changes in one variable are related to changes in another variable– What is the relationship between

being from the South and aggressive behavior?

Correlational Research

• correlation coefficients– range from +1.00 to -1.00– positive correlation:

increase/decrease in the same direction

Correlational Research

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Correlational Research

• correlation coefficients– range from +1.00 to -1.00– negative correlation:

increase/decrease in opposite directions

Correlational Research

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Correlational Research

• correlation coefficients– range from +1.00 to -1.00– strength of the relationship:

closeness to +1.00/-1.00, not by the valence (+/-)

– Which indicates a stronger correlation: -.74 or +.21?

Correlational Research

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Correlational Research

• What is the relationship between being from the South and aggressive behavior?– Nisbett (1993)

• homicide rate and “southernness”: rs = .37 & .52

– in the social sciences (Cohen, 1992) • r = .50 (strong)• r = .30 (moderate)• r = .10 (small)

Correlational Research

• strengths of this approach– can be a random sample– actual behavior– has good generalizability (i.e.,

external validity)– potential for numerous variables

Correlational Research

• weakness of this approach– cannot infer a cause-effect

relationship

• factors for inferring causality– association -- yes– temporal priority -- no– rule out a spurious relationship -- no

Correlational Research

• temporal priority

southernness

homicide rates

time

Correlational Research

• temporal priority

southernness

homicide rates

homicide rates

southernness

or

time

time

Correlational Research

• temporal priority

• direction of causality problem

southernness

homicide rates

homicide rates

southernness

or

time

time

Correlational Research

• rule out a spurious relationship

southernness

homicide rates

another variable

spurious

Correlational Research

• rule out a spurious relationship

southernness

homicide rates

poverty

rs = .38 & .42

(Nisbett, 1993)

Correlational Research

• rule out a spurious relationship

• 3rd variable problem

southernness

homicide rates

another variable

spurious

Correlational Research

• strengths– potential for numerous variables– good generalizability

• weaknesses– cannot make causal conclusions

• direction of causality• 3rd variable problem

Addressing Problems with Correlational Research

• direction of causality problem– Does “southernness” lead to more

aggression or does a propensity for aggression lead to more “southernness”?

– solution: we cause (i.e., manipulate) one of the variables• insult one group on Southerners, but not

another

Addressing Problems with Correlational Research

• direction of causality problem– if we control who is insulted, then

measure aggressiveness, we know the direction of causality

– but, we still have the 3rd variable problem• SES• poor social skills

Addressing Problems with Correlational Research

• random assignment to condition– if SES or social skills have an effect

on aggression, it should be equal for both groups

– We can address the problems of correlational research by doing experiments.

Experimental Design

• characteristics– manipulation of a variable

• solves the direction of causality problem

– randomly assign to conditions• solves the 3rd variable problem

Experimental Design

• language of experiments– independent variable– dependent variable– operational variable– random assignment

Experimental Design

• testing theory– Does the independent variable cause

changes in the dependent variable?

southernness

aggressioncause

Experimental Design

• the Southern culture of honor hypothesis– Cohen et al. (1996)– 2 (Southern/Northern) X 2 (insult/no

insult)– “chicken”, cortisol, testosterone

Experimental Design

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

NorthernSouthern

Insult No Insult

Dis

tan

ce a

t w

hic

h p

art

icip

an

ts

gave

way

to c

on

fed

era

te (

inch

es)

Experimental Design

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

NorthernSouthern

Insult No Insult

Dis

tan

ce a

t w

hic

h p

art

icip

an

ts

gave

way

to c

on

fed

era

te (

inch

es)

Experimental Design

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

NorthernSouthern

Insult No Insult

Perc

en

tag

e C

han

ge i

n C

ort

isol

Leve

l

Experimental Design

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

NorthernSouthern

Insult No Insult

Perc

en

tag

e C

han

ge i

n C

ort

isol

Leve

l

Experimental Design

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

NorthernSouthern

Insult No Insult

Perc

en

tag

e C

han

ge i

n

Test

ost

ero

ne L

eve

l

Experimental Design

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

NorthernSouthern

Insult No Insult

Perc

en

tag

e C

han

ge i

n

Test

ost

ero

ne L

eve

l

Experimental Design

• strengths– allows for causal conclusions to be

made -- best test of theory

• weaknesses– not all questions are amenable to

experiments– concerns about generalizability

Methodological Challenges

• expectancy effects• demand characteristics of the

situation• social desirability concerns• ethical dilemmas

Summary

• refutation: process of testing theories

• descriptive research is informative, but limited in theory testing

• correlational research is more informative, but does not allow for causal explanations

• experiments are the best test of theories

Next Time

• social cognition– how we think about the social world

Recommended