View
298
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
WIRTGEN SURFACE MINING TECHNOLOGY AND CHALLENGES IN COAL IN MONGOLIA
Ulan Batar, 21st February, 2014
The following jobs are not longer required:
Cut, crush, load in one operation with one machine
Surface Miner application
3
4
Mining without blasting
Environmentally friendly:No dust generationNo noise or air overpressureNo ground vibrations
Better exploitation :Mining up to thetenement boundary
Improved safety:No explosives No fly rocks
Advantages: Small particles in constant flow do not harm truck bodies No tire and chassis damages since trucks travel on even and solid ground
5
Smooth truck loading
12
Highly-selective mining
High quality ROM-products (ROM = Run Of Mine)Reduced processing cost (less washing, less crushing)Reduced waste material handlingBetter exploitation of depositBetter stripping ratio
13
Loss and dilution
Interburden dilution
Mixing area along cutting line
Real cutting line
Amplitude area
Real loss- and dilution zone
Continuous loss- and dilution zone (33 % of amplitude)
Additional loss- and dilution through mixing along the cutting line (15 – 20 % of amplitude)
Coal
Interburden
Coal loss
16
Multiple seam depositsHigh-quality coal (mainly coking coal)Long transportation distances to customersWashing
- Improves coal quality (higher sales value)- Reduces transportation costs
Washing requires water- Limited water volume available in mining area- Long transport distances for water
Situation in coal mines in Mongolia
17
High ROM quality coal (selective mining)Reduced or no washingNo crushingNo drilling and blasting
Benefits of Wirtgen Surface Miners
23
Considerations for evaluation
Conventional mining method
WirtgenSurface Miners
Minimum seam thickness for selective recovery coal and parting
2,0 m 0,1 m
Selectivity- Top of seam:
Loss (coal) and adding (parting)
0,3 m 0,02 m
- Bottom of seam:Loss (coal) and adding (parting)
0,1 m 0,02 m
24
Deposit structure - loss and dilution Borehole 283
Seam Density Average thickness
Average ash content
Average heating value
Overburden / Interburden 1,8 t/bcum 55,3 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 3A-1 1,2 t/bcum 0,5 m 14,47 % 3412 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 0,2 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 3A-2 1,2 t/bcum 0,5 m 14,47 % 3412 kcal/kg
Parting / Interburden 1,8 t/bcum 1,29 m + 10,91m=12,2m 100 % 0 kcal/kg
Coal seam 3B-1I 1,2 t/bcum 2,98 m 14,47 % 3412 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 0,1 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 3B-2 1,2 t/bcum 0,9 m 14,47 % 3412 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 0,25 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 3B-3 1,2 t/bcum 0,9 m 14,47 % 3412 kcal/kgInterburden 1,8 t/bcum 25,67 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 2-1 1,2 t/bcum 0,4 m 16,88 % 3379 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 0.4 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 2-2 1,2 t/bcum 0,7 m 16,88 % 3379 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 0,2 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 2-3 1,2 t/bcum 0,75 m 16,88 % 3379 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 0,9 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 2-4 1,2 t/bcum 0,7 m 16,88 % 3379 kcal/kgInterburden 1,8 t/bcum 29,65 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 1-1 1,2 t/bcum 2,69 m 15,74 % 3518 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 0,5 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 1-2 1,2 t/bcum 8,55 m 15,74 % 3518 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 0,55 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 1-3 1,2 t/bcum 8,9 m 15,74 % 3518 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 3,13 m 100 % 0 kcal/kgCoal seam 1-4 1,2 t/bcum 0,6 m 15,74 % 3518 kcal/kgParting 1,8 t/bcum 0,3 m 100 % 0 kcal/kg
25
Comparison conventional mining vs. Surface Mining - Borehole 283
Overburden/Partings Coal Extracted
coal
Averageheatingvalue
Average ash
content
Strip-ping ratio
Annual coal
production
AnnualOB-handling
OB handlingsaving by SM
SurfaceMiner
129,05 bcum/m2
35,2 t/m2 98 % 3393
kcal/kg17,17
% 3,7 3.500.000 t/year
12.833.134 bcum/year
1.803.880bcum/year
Conven-tional
132,93 bcum/m2
31,79 t/m2 78% 2986
kcal/kg24,41
% 4,2 3.500.000 t/year
14.637,014 bcum/year