16
Slides Pulled From the Following Preso: The Ballad of Ken & Barbie Why We’re Destined to Commit False Positives When Hiring (and what to do about it)

5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Slides from my presentation - “The Ballad of Ken and Barbie: Why We’re Destined to Commit False Positives when Hiring (and what to do about it)” and we’ll deliver the following goods to help you stop missing so much when you hire: A complete rundown of all the False Positives and Hiring Biases that hiring managers are afflicted with. In order to stop the addiction, you have to know what the problem is, right? We’ll break it down in enough detail that you’ll be able to use the slides for your own training. We’ll explore the cliché “Hiring With Your Gut” and breakdown when that good old standard makes sense, when it’s lazy and when it may get someone fired (for a variety of reasons). This may be as close to a legal webinar as FOT ever gets, so don’t miss it. We’ll give you the Top 3 Ways Recruiters and HR Pros actually enable managers to commit false positives when hiring, and what you can do differently today to stop acting in a way that tells your managers it’s OK to be lazy. 5 Golden Strategies to end the False Positive/Hiring Bias plague in your organization today. Ready to kick Ken and Barbie to the curb? We’ll show you how. Just want to get rid of Barbie, but keep Ken? C’mon, we know you’re better than that. Diagram It!! We’ll end the session by taking the 5 Golden Anti-False Positive/Hiring Bias Strategies and showing you where they get inserted into a modern hiring process designed to help your hiring managers and organization miss less when it comes to selection. And isn’t that what you really want? BONUS – Tim Sackett and Kris Dunn will go “point/counter-point” on whether it’s better to hire the most attractive person at all times, or whether your strategy needs to be deeper. You get to vote on who won the debate. Loser has to __________ on video to be share with you in the follow up to the webinar.

Citation preview

Page 1: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

Slides Pulled From the Following Preso:

The Ballad of Ken & BarbieWhy We’re Destined to Commit False Positives

When Hiring (and what to do about it)

Page 2: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

Presenter Info

• Kris Dunn• CHRO at Kinetix (RPO, Recruiting)• Founder of Fistful of Talent , The HR Capitalist • Hoops Junkie

• Tim Sackett• SVP at HRU Technical Resources• Blogger #1 at the aptly named Tim Sackett Project• Contributor at Fistful of Talent

#chequed

Page 3: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover
Page 4: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

1#chequed

Page 5: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover
Page 6: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover
Page 7: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover
Page 8: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover
Page 9: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

2#chequed

Page 10: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

JUST LIKE ME**:Our Five Favorite

False PositivesThat Have Nothing To Do

with the EEOC**or who I wish I was

Page 11: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

DAMN: You Sure Are Pretty

(Please Accept My Offer of Employment)• Aka – Physical attractiveness bias

• Studies show that the more attractive you are, the more all positive skill and behavioral traits get applied to you in an employment setting

• Men at risk of this bias more than women (Shocking!)• Women may penalize other women with

attractiveness higher than their own (Meow!)• Men Like Women Who Have: Youth, symmetrical

face, Low waist-hip ratio, (There’s other stuff we’re not listing)

• Women Like Men Who Have: narrow waist, broad shoulders, symmetrical features

• FOT Thinks this is the most dominant non- Title 7 Bias at Play

• Some would say this naturally plays to age, but it’s broader than that

Page 12: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover
Page 13: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

Short People Got No Reason

• Aka: Height Bias• Randy Neumann said it best: Short

people get the raw end of the deal• $789 more per year, per inch • More pronounced in Sales and

Management positions • Is it height or confidence?• But wait! There’s gender stuff that

affects how height is viewed:– Men actually prefer shorter women

Page 14: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

WAR EAGLE!Where Did You Go to School?

• Aka - Educational Background Bias• Is it the most personal of all biases?

We think so.• Think referral networks, my friend • Flavors:

– “I want a Ivy-League MBA for this role”– Trust artificially assigned to fellow

alumni of the hiring manager– Concept of being over-educated for the

role in question– College Degree requirement– Stigma of “some college” or seeing the

name of the university without a graduation date

Page 15: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

I…I…I..Just Liked Him!

• Really? What did you like about him, Tom? (He was just real… likable!...)

• Aka – Smooth Talker Bias• Studies show that effective

communicators always perform better in interviews

• Fine line between effective communication and buzzword bingo

• Building comfort and dialog with the hiring manager is key, as is “shutting the hell up” once in awhile

• Time of Possession in the interview is the key, as is reacting to the preferred cues of the manager

Page 16: 5 Hiring Biases The EEOC Doesn't Cover

Weight Bias (You Were Expecting Us to Take a Chance with This

Title?)• While obesity certainly can be considered

part of bias related to attractiveness, it deserves it’s own mention

• Impacts women more than men• Impacts white women over other races• 64 extra pounds drops lifetime pay 9%• Obesity = 6.2% less lifetime earnings for

women, 2.3% for men• How to control: Referral networks lesson the

impact of weight bias in most organizations• Linked to concerns around absenteeism and

health beyond attractiveness• Average annual medical costs claims per 100

obese FTEs - $51K (for 100 non-obese – 8K) • The real deal – do qualifications and ability

to perform outweigh cost concerns?