12
A Partne r of Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso (1980-2010): A Synthesis of Various Evidence Barron , J., Morris, J., Ouedraogo, I. this work is based on the V1 ‘Targeting and scaling out’ project led by SEI in partnership with INERA, University of Ouagadougou, CSIR-SARI and KNUST, and the FP7 WHaTeR project in cooperation with Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University and INERA

Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

by J. Barron, J. Morris and I. Ouedraogo Presented at the Final Volta Basin Development Challenge Science Workshop, September 2013

Citation preview

Page 1: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

A Partner of

Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso (1980-

2010): A Synthesis of Various Evidence

Barron , J., Morris, J., Ouedraogo, I. this work is based on the V1 ‘Targeting and scaling out’ project led by SEI in partnership with INERA, University of Ouagadougou, CSIR-SARI

and KNUST, and the FP7 WHaTeR project in cooperation with Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University and INERA

Page 2: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

MAIN MESSAGES• Multiple evidence of province-scale adoption rates of at least 20-

40%, and a minimum of 10-20 % in other provinces with >700 mm since 1990s

• Regional cereal yields and adoption of soil water conservation and small reservoir expansion have with similar rates of increase (ca 3%)

• The causality at scale between agricultural water management adoption, crop yields and poverty /food security impacts needs further evidence

• There are multiple methods to develop knowledge on adoption of AWM technologies, but current data is not summarised for efficient use in research or policy

Page 3: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

BACKGROUND Parts of Sudano-Sahel and Sahel have + 10 years of ‘re-greening –land degradation debate: are landscapes changing by climate or by humans? And in which direction?

Douxchamps et al (2012): Little systematic evidence about successful scaling out of AWM technologies

Page 4: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

PURPOSE of STUDY

Quantify the areal extent of AWM adoption at sub-national scale (region) in northern Burkina Faso

Assess the impact of AWM expansion on crop production and poverty (causal link)

Page 5: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

APPROACH

Different sources of data:National statistics (agricultural census)Remote sensing analysis (ASTER)Peer-reviewed and grey literature

Collation to region level, comparison of trendlines of normalised data

Page 6: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

1. RESULTS: Remote sensing (2006 ASTER data)

Ouahigouya (%) Kaya (%)Settlement 2 0Vegetation cover 40 32Water body 1 1Bare soil 2 6SWC/WHT 32 30Cropland 24 31

Page 7: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

2.RESULTS: Literature

MAPS of current setting

Table 4: Summary of the area of SWC measures in use, extracted from peer-reviewed and grey literature Time period Area of SWC

reported, total (ha)Provinces covered in project/ report

Area of SWC reported, weighted per region (ha)

% SWC reported of cultivated area, per region

Literature source - SWC

1983 - 1989 8 000Stone bunds

Yatenga 8 000 4.54 Critchley & Graham 1991; Atampugre 1993

1988 - 2003 89 600Stone bunds

Bam; Namentenga; Sanmatenga; Passore; Yatenga; Zondoma; Boulkiemde; Sanguie

Centre-Nord: 32 990Nord: 36 308 Centre-Ouest: 20 302

Centre-Nord : 11.6%Nord : 11.2%Centre-Ouest : 5.2%

IFAD 2004, Intermediate report

1988 – 2004 60 000 Stone bunds, zai,

earth dams

Bam, Kourwéogo, Oubritenga

Centre-Nord: 28 840Plat.-Central: 31 160

Centre-Nord: 10.1% Plat.-Central: 19.0%

PATECORE 2004, Final report

1970 - 2011 30 000 – 60 000 (estimated)

Zai

Northwestern Burkina Faso – Nord? Yatenga mostly

Nord: 9 – 18% Sawadogo, H. 2011

2004, 2006 No area givenzai and stone bunds

Tougou, Yatenga 49-60% of farmers use SWC on at least one field

Barbier et al (2009)

1970 - 2009 200 000 – 300 000All SWC

Central Plateau – Nord, Centre-Nord, others ?

33 – 39% Reij et al. 2009

Mid 1980s - 2005

100 000 Stone bunds

Northern part of Central Plateau – Nord only?

31% Reij, C, Tappan, G. & Belemvire, A. 2005

2003 130 000 Central Burkina Faso Pretty, J.N, J.I.L Morison, R.E Hine 2003

* The report on the Agricultural Survey 2004/2005 is the latest report available online, and therefore was used for all the publications from 2004 onwards.

Page 8: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

3.RESULTS: Census

25

36

25

28

1815

Page 9: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

4. RESULTS: yield curves 1986-2012

Slope: ~0.03 – 0.04r2: ~0.7-0.8

Page 10: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

4. RESULTS: yield curves 1986-2012Sahel Nord Centre-Nord Plateau-Central

1984 1994 20041984 1994 2004

Page 11: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

LESSONS• Better knowledge on AWM in use is needed for

setting research and development agenda

• There is knowledge but not synthesised in an accessible form

• AWM technology in use beyond documented cases

• More work on causality pathways between AWM Food security and poverty alleviation is needed to scale

Page 12: Agricultural Water Management Technology Expansion and Impact on Crop Yields in Northern Burkina Faso

Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta

We thank all contributors: VBDC colleagues, and FP7 WHaTeR colleagues

funders