Upload
edgewater
View
3.469
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Edgewater Technology, AQS and ISO joined forces to share best practices for replacing policy administration and rating systems for P&C insurance companies.
Citation preview
1
Best Practices for Rating and Policy Administration System Replacement
June 18th 2009
2
2
Martin HigginsDirector, Edgewater Technology, Inc.
Todd MeyerSenior Sales Consultant, ISO
Susan DalySales Consultant, AQS
Today’s Speakers
3
3
• About Edgewater
• The Nature of the Beast
• Best Practices Summary
• How AQS can help
• How ISO Rating Service can help
• Final Thoughts
• Q&A
Agenda
4
4
• Technology Management Consulting Firm • Provide a unique blend of specialty IT services • Leverage proven industry expertise in strategy, technology and enterprise performance
management• Focus on middle and Global 2000 market
• Stable and Proven• Founded in 1992• Headquartered in Wakefield, MA• 300 Employees, 240 Consultants• 600 Clients• Large North American footprint• +2,000 projects completed to date• Publicly traded (NASDAQ: EDGW)
• Insurance Practice• Over 50 clients• Expertise in policy administration, rating, system selection
About Edgewater
5
5
The Nature of the Beast(Why best practices are important)
Best Practices
6
6
53%18%
29%
Challenged
Failed
Successful
Source: Standish Group 2006
Project Resolution Statistics
7
7
He Said… She Said…System doesn’t work; not what we needed. You changed your minds; You don’t know what you
want or need.
You delivered limited functionality. You continually changed project scope.
The system failed in the field and in production. You didn’t perform the required “business process reengineering” to make it work.
Your software, services, and expertise were oversold. You conducted your reference checks and due diligence. What didn’t you know?
No one can use system! Poor training. “Required staff” never came to primary training or refresher training.
The system is “fundamentally flawed.” We only need 2 more months to test/fix issues.
You never told us that! You gave poor advice! You didn’t follow our recommendations; you changed/delayed making key decisions.
The system is full of bugs! Bad data conversion/poor interfaces caused the problems. Systems always have bugs!
You baited, then switched! You provided unqualified, unstable, uncommitted staff, project manager(s), steering committee.
No, you baited, then switched! You provided unqualified, unstable, uncommitted staff, project manager(s), steering committee.
Source: WSR Consulting Group, LLC
The Challenges and Failures
8
8
Excerpt from Edgewater Whitepaper
Best Practices Summary
9
9
Project
Inception
System
Selection
Requirement
Definition
Negotiation
Planning
System
Integration
Data
Conversion
Build or
Modify
Deploy
& Maintain
8 Steps to System Implementation
10
10
Do you really need a new system?
• Common motivation for a new system• Speed time to market for new products• Improve efficiency of business processes• Reduce cost of change (ISO updates)• Enhance back-office integration• Rising cost of legacy technology• Improve agent communication and involvement• Expand reporting capabilities
• Commitment & Investment Requirements
• Significant Risk
• What about refacing or repurposing existing systems?
ProjectInception
11
11
• Build support for the initiative internally
• Identify the team• Sponsor and stakeholders
• Define a solid business case • What do you hope to gain?• Expected ROI or cost/benefit• Your Criteria for Success
• Get to know the market• Consider talking to industry experts • Identify potential solutions (Is there a fit out there?)
• Custom Build?
Yes! Now what? ProjectInception
12
12
Selecting a System
•Here be Dragons!• Most treacherous step• Mistake here can doom the initiative
from the onset
•Clearly define the selection criteria
•Define approach schedule and team
•Invest the time to do it right!
System Selection
13
13
Vendor Market 101
•Over 50 rating and administration vendors
•Product Types• Code vs. tool based
• Support for out of the box product definitions
• Best of breed vs. 1-stop-shop
•Delivery Models
•Ongoing Updates
System Selection
14
14
• Is the technology sustainable?
• Is the vendor sustainable?
• Can the system be customized and still get maintenance releases from the vendor?
• Can I customize the system in house?
• What do really get out of the box?• ISO content?• Big part of the TCO
• How will it integrate with my back-end systems?• Favor standard formats like XML
• What do your customers think of you?
Questions to Ask System Selection
15
15
• Business requirements• Consider current and future• Level of detail is very important
• For example, “The system must support OOS endorsements”• Most vendors will meet this requirement• What does that really mean?
• Do you expect automatic rollback and roll-forward?
• How will your back-end systems respond?
• What will the DEC look like?
Selecting a System: Requirements System Selection
16
16
•RFI and/or RFP? •Limited short list
• Based on well-defined requirements
•Scripted demonstrations• Script the demos!
•Proof of concept• Really needed? What risk is being addressed?• Make meaningful and reusable
•Perform the due diligence
Selecting a System: Evaluation System Selection
17
17
Project Management and Planning
•Project Management• Critical as selecting the right vendor• Look for relevant prior experience
• Hire if necessary
•Building the Plan• What lines and states first?• Look for quick wins (low volume,
low customization)• Build on early success• “Don’t eat an elephant in one bite!”
• Conversion and roll-out
Negotiation &Planning
18
18
• Requirements approach depends on product• High functionality OOB → Gap analysis• Low or no functionality OOB → Detailed requirements
• Gap analysis is lowest risk
• Involve the right combination of business users• High Business Knowledge • Progressive Thinkers
• Consider business process reengineering
• Consider cost of modifications• Varies depending on vendor• Code-based or limited content = $$$$• Configuration-based or high content = $
Requirements or Gap Analysis RequirementDefinition
19
19
•Strongly consider a blended approach• If vendor allows it• Institutionalizes knowledge about system early
•Insist on frequent releases• Only reliable way to track progress
•Testing• Early and often• Clearly defined test plans• Plan for broken builds• Include smoke, system, and user
Development/Customization Build orModify
20
20
• With integration, one size does not fit all• Pick the right product to start with
• Consider the following interfaces• Agency upload and download (use a tool)
• Real-time interfaces
• Batch interfaces
• Reporting and business intelligence
• For all but the simplest cases, use a product!• BizTalk, WebSphere Integrator, ESB
• Consider using experts to get you started
System Integration System Integration
21
21
• Is automation required?• Number of policies• True cost of automation (specs, development, testing,
environments, cleanup, etc.)• How cl3an is y0ur d@ta? Exception cases• Consider manual entry if practical
• Use the vendor’s API if possible• Data integration (ETL) is last resort
• What about historical data?• Consider a historical repository
• Consider BI up front
Data Conversion Data Conversion
22
22
• Externally facing or internal only• Internal is better to start with
• Most common strategies• Renewal (lower risk, higher cost)• Big Bang (higher risk, lower cost)
• Consider limited agency rollout
• Automate regulatory updates• Minimize interpretation• Maintenance of ISO content
•3,100 ISO filings in 2006 for commercial/lines•Over 2,200 affect the 9 primary lines
Deployment and Maintenance Deploy & Maintain
23
23
• Select the right product• Out-of-the-box functionality
• Ability to customize without forking
• Integration Friendly
• Build the right Team• Project Management, Partners
• Don’t bite off more than you can chew
• Minimize Risk in all areas• Requirements, Development, Conversion and Rollout
• Consider life after implementation
Best Practices Summary
24
24
How AQS Can Help
Best Practices
25
25
• AQS has 40 customers• Average tenure 16 years
• Stability and experience• Founded in 1979• More than 200 dedicated employees• Average employee tenure – 7+ years• Average insurance experience – 12 years
• Why AQS?• Experts in both insurance and technology• Decision support tools• Streamlined maintenance of ISO updates• Experience delivering and implementing rating & policy system
implementations for small, medium & large Carriers• Multiple implementation options
• Vendor Support (full service)• Self Service• Hybrid (shared)
AQS Overview
26
26
AQS Access
Quote & Policy
Access
ISO Rating
Service
Designer
AccessPolicy
Management
External
Integration
Browser-based UI that is client centric, insures valid policy data entry
Premium calculation engine
- ISO based algorithms
- Extensible architecture
Full policy life cycle management
Toolset used to
Create ISO & Client
Customized Ratebooks
ISO Rating Service
ISO Rating
Service
Generates policy xml for
each issued transaction.
Stages and publishes xml for downstream systems.
AQS Access and ISO Rating Service
27
27
AQS Advantage
Enter Edit
Engine
Rating
Engine
Transaction
Gateway
Document
Generation
ISO Stat
Generation
Policy
ManagementIntegrator
Sophisticated browser-based
UI that ensures valid policy
data entry
Premium calculation engine
- Data-driven algorithms
- Extensible architecture
Document selection, data
capture, and pdf generation.
Support for document
delivery integration options.
ISO Statistical record
coding and generation
Full transactional support.
Maintains policy history.
Policy storage and retrieval.
Generates policy xml for
each issued transaction.
Stages and publishes xml for
downstream systems.
Unattended transaction
processing initiated by
external system.
Advantage Toolset
Rates / Document
Rate & Document
Management Toolset
AQS Advantage: Major Functions
28
28
• XML based integration
• ‘Call-Out’ capability
• Modern .NET architecture for all application components
• Highly configurable
• Preloaded ISO content
• Integrates with ISO Passport data sources
• Performance and Scalability
• Reports – impact analysis, functional specification
• Automated testing tools
AQS Highlights
29
29
AQS Approach
•Best of breed
•Partnerships with functional components for enterprise solutions• Claims
• Billing
• Etc.
30
30
• No duplicate data entry• Support for all policy types/lines of business• Full policy life cycle transaction types• Real-time data validation/error checking• Real-time rate calculations• Easy to use/intuitive navigation• Automatic forms selection/assignment• Automated workflow and referrals• Rating worksheets• Workflow/diary/notes• Customer-centric view (vs. policy-centric)
Benefits for Primary End Users
31
31
• Faster speed to market for new products• Reduced premium leakage• Reduced “adverse selection”• Improved retention of profitable customers• Easier to stay current with ISO• Less costly to maintain content• Web-based for ease of doing business• Automatic “Stat Code” assignment• Best-of-breed product component option
Benefits for Management
32
32
• Single system supports all P/C lines of business
• Tools based• Decision-support tools
• Configurable page design (user interface)
• All changes are automatically documented
• Designer tools
• Ratebook inheritance leverages ISO base content
• Import/export capability (speed, accuracy)
• Ratebook modeling, comparison, and analysis tools
• Functional specification documents
Benefits for Product Specialists
33
33
•Current technologies (.NET, SQL Server, XML)•Highly configurable security model•Proven performance/scalability•Content updates distributed via ISOnet•XML input/output•Integration with downstream systems•Version control (date-driven Ratebooks)•Self-documenting system
Benefits for IT/Systems Personnel
34
34
The ISO Rating Service
Best Practices
35
35
• Maintenance of ISO content • Over 4000 ISO filings last year alone
• Analysis and data entry can be costly
• Expert content from the source
Legacy system maintenance can cost carriers millions of dollars per year!
The Magnitude of the Challenge
36
36
ISO Filings 2005-2008
37
37
How does the ISO Rating Service address this challenge?
38
38
ISO Rating Service
•A single rating solution for multiple ISO programs
•Incorporates ISO-interpreted content
•Content inheritance model allows company-customized rating deviations and state exceptions
•Streamlined delivery of ISO content updates via ISOnet
39
39
Single Rating Solution
40
40
ISO-Interpreted Content
41
41
ISO Rating Service Base
Company-SpecificBase
ISO LOBCountrywide
Company-SpecificLOB Countrywide
ISO LOB State
Company-Specific LOB State
Spans lines of business for company
Spans states for company
Company, LOB-specific state exceptions
ISO Rating Service: Inheritance Methodology
42
42
ISO Rating Service Tools and Information
43
43
Key Benefits
• What does all of this mean for you?• Quick access to ISO-defined content, leveraged to enable faster speed to market for
bringing up new lines, states, and rate plans
• Ability to determine how close your company is with respect to following ISO for loss costs, rules, forms and stat code assignment, allowing your company to remain in compliance and thus reduce exposure to fines
• Use of development tools with a patented inheritance methodology that provide you the ISO-defined content to customize to your needs, resulting in greater accuracy, less redundancy, and reduced costs
• Use of analytical tools to assist with the analysis effort for maintenance going forward, resulting in less time spent preparing for the next release
Powerful Tools Designed with Growth, Quality and Efficiency in Mind!
44
44
Final Thoughts
Best Practices
45
45
• Manage expectations• There will be many bumps in the road
• Play to your strengths
• Be realistic about your weaknesses• Augment if necessary
• Treat vendors as partners• Invest in the relationship• Everybody wants a successful implementation
• White paper available: www.iso.com/edgewater
Final Thoughts
46
46
Any Questions?
Martin HigginsEdgewater [email protected](781) 224 9026
Todd [email protected](781) 224 9026
Susan [email protected](603) 546 2434