12
HOUSING DENSITIES

Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Charles Correa's presentation at the Urban Typhoon Workshop Koliwada-Dharavi, Mumbai, India - March 17, 2008

Citation preview

Page 1: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

HOUSING DENSITIES

Page 2: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

Green areas:

4 acres per 1000 population

i.e. 16 m2 / person

Schools and Hospitals

- 8 m2

- 6 m2

TOTAL - 14 m2

AMENITIES PER PERSON

Of which, neighbourhood:

Which at most could be reduced to 10 m2

This means . . .

Page 3: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

A family of 5 persons in a Luxury apartment of 200m2

occupies a built-up area of 40m2 / person

Page 4: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

301814125040m2 100 m2 140 m2 50 m2 10 m2200 m2 240 m2 50 m2 90 m2 20 m2 60 m2

40

+ =

0

5

10

20

40

2 5 101 20

50

30

1814

1112

Built-up Area

50

Avg

. Are

a p

er P

erso

n

No. of Floors

Amenities Area / person

m2

Total

Total area/person

curve flattens out

40m2 / person

Page 5: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

A family of 5 persons in a EWS Unit of 25m2

occupies a built-up area of 5 m2 / person

Page 6: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

1512.51110.510.2 50 m2 55 m2 20 m2 30 m2100 m2 105 m2200 m2 205 m2 15 m2 10 m2 5 m2

40

+ =

0

5

10

20

40

2 5 101 20

Built-up Area

50

Avg

. Are

a p

er P

erso

n

No. of Floors

Amenities Area / person

15 12.5 11 10.5 10.2 10.1

m2

Total

Total area/person

curve flattens out

5 m2 / person

Page 7: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

Thus regardless of the size of units (25m2 or 200m2)

Therefore for a site of 1 Hectare i.e. 10,000 m2

10,000m2

Amenities = 10 m2/person

Avg

. Are

a p

er P

erso

n

2 5 101 20 40No. of Floors

50

10

20

40

0

5

i.e 200 families

= 1000 person

the curve flattens between 10.5 to 11 m2/person

10m2/person

Total area/person

EWS Luxury

Maximum population will be

Page 8: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

Each families built-up 25 m2

25 X 200 familyTotal built-up area/ Hectare

= 5,000 m2/hectare

i.e. an F.S.I. of 5,000 m2

= 0.5

EWS Luxury Apt

200 m2

200 X 200 family

= 40,000 m2/hectare

40,000 m2

= 4.0(This is global F.S.I. including schools, hospitals, etc.)

10,000 m2 10,000 m2

200 families

Page 9: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

Total Site area 224 HectaresDHARAVI

i.e 134.40 hectare

Therefore, maximum number of person

i.e. 1,34,400 persons

Housing (60%)

Roads(20%)

Work (20%)

Maximum area for housing is 60%

134,00,000 m2

10,000 m2

Page 10: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

Avg

. A

rea

per

Pe

rso

n

No. of Floors

50

2 5 101 20 40

510

20

40

0

60

Amenities = 10 m2/person

Avg

. A

rea

per

Pe

rso

n

No. of Floors

50

2 5 101 20 40

510

20

40

0

Note the curve flattens between 10.5 to 11 m2/person

because the amenities were calculated at 10 m2/person

Amenities = 20 m2/person

EWS Luxury

EWS Luxury

Page 11: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

2. The only way to Increase EWS densities beyond 1000 persons per hectare is by NOT providing sufficient amenities – which is what we do!

3. For luxury apartments of 200m2 , the global FSI could be as high as 4.0, but for EWS units of 25m2 no land is saved by increasing the global FSI beyond 0.5 (which means an FSI of about 1.0 on the building site itself).

Conclusions

1. Maximum density is determined not by building heights but by the area of amenities provided per capita.

4. Thus EWS housing is not a problem of constructing taller buildings, but a question of determining the amenities per capita the city should provide – which is an issue to be addressed by Education and Health experts, not Architects and Engineers

5. The area for amenties should depend on the number of persons living on that site - and CANNOT be a fixed percentage (e.g., 15% stipulated in existing Municipal rules).

Page 12: Charles Correa on Housing Density 5th Dec07

In short:

To grant a higher FSI in order to “house the poor” is a fallacy.