1
LIFE SCIENCES VERSUS OVERALL COMPLIANCE WEEK RESPONDENTS - ROLE OF THE CCO Re-assessing third-party relationships COMPLIANCE RISKS & OPERATIONS EXTENDED ENTERPRISE COMPLIANCE RISKS TOOLS & TECHNOLOGY IMPORTANCE OF A COMPLIANCE PROGRAM TOP 3 METRICS LIFE SCIENCES COMPANIES USE TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A COMPLIANCE PROGRAM 30% of the companies reported that compliance is perceived as a good “value-add” function rather than a check-the-box activity 50% of the companies reported that the importance of compliance and ethical conduct is not well communicated and understood by the staff at all levels 10% of the companies are not very confident that all ethics and compliance risks are addressed during due diligence in mergers and acquisitions 77% of the companies are not very confident that all ethics and compliance risks are addressed during due diligence in mergers and acquisitions ANALYSIS OF INTERNAL AUDIT FINDINGS LIFE SCIENCES COMPANIES RANKED THE FOLLOWING REGULATIONS AS THE MOST TIME/RESOURCE CONSUMING 40% of CCOs report directly to the CEO 60% of CCOs meet with the executive committee at least once per quarter 40% 60% Life Sciences 45% of CCOs report directly to the CEO 73% of CCOs meet with the executive committee at least once per quarter 45% 73% Overall 80% of life sciences companies are increasing oversight (i.e., auditing, monitoring) with some changes to business partners 80% of the overall respondents are increasing oversight (i.e., auditing, monitoring) with some changes to business partners 59% 59% 41% of the companies reported that compliance is perceived as a good “value-add” function rather than a check-the-box activity 41% of the companies reported that the importance of compliance and ethical conduct is not well communicated and understood by the staff at all levels 50% 89% COMPLETION OF ANNUAL AND NEW HIRE COMPLIANCE TRAINING COMPARISONS TO COMPETITORS OR SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS 67% 56% OF THE COMPANIES THAT MEASURE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THEIR COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, NONE ARE ‘HIGHLY’ CONFIDENT THAT THE MEASUREMENT OF EFFECTIVENESS IS ACCURATE 68% of the companies monitor employees’ use of company email to look for potential misconduct, although 53% of these monitor only specific individuals when there is an open investigation into possible employee misconduct 20% of the companies monitor employees use of company email to look for potential misconduct, although 50% of these monitor only for specific individuals when there is an open investigation into possible employee misconduct 45% of the overall respondent companies do not have any monitoring procedures to measure the impact that ethical conduct and regulatory compliance might have on the company’s brand reputation or shareholder value, while 27% let the marketing department take point on this issue CONTACT To learn more, please visit: www.deloitte.com/us/centerregulatorystrategies/lshcleadership www.deloitte.com/us/compliancetrends About the survey Deloitte and Compliance Week magazine collaborated to conduct a compliance benchmarking survey. Within the survey, compliance executives were asked about their compliance department’s organizational structure, current compliance industry risks and operational challenges, metrics, and tools and technology. 40% OF LIFE SCIENCES COMPANIES DO NOT USE ANY PREDICTIVE MODELING TECHNIQUES TO BETTER UNDERSTAND COMPLIANCES RISKS, MEASURE EFFECTIVENESS, OR DETERMINE WHERE TO DEVOTE MORE COMPLIANCE RESOURCES 70% of life sciences companies do not have any monitoring procedures to measure the impact that ethical conduct and regulatory compliance might have on the company’s brand reputation or shareholder value, while none let the marketing department take point on this issue 45 70 Insights from In Focus: Compliance Trends Survey 2013 Center for Regulatory Strategies LIFE SCIENCES OVERALL 1. Sunshine rules on physician payments 2. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) 3. Good Clinical Practices (GCPs) LIFE SCIENCES LIFE SCIENCES OVERALL OVERALL 30% 41% 41% Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. In addition, this publication contains the results of a survey conducted by Deloitte. The information obtained during the survey was taken “as is” and was not validated or confirmed by Deloitte. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.

Compliance Trends Survey 2013

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The 2013 Compliance Trends Survey suggests that compliance officers are making slow but steady progress toward the ideal of a strong, independent compliance function — although in many, but not all, industry sectors (especially the less highly regulated sectors) the size of the “typical” compliance function appears to remain relatively small in both manpower and budget dollars. For more information, visit https://www.deloitte.com/view/en_US/us/Insights/centers/center-regulatory-strategies/256ad7d579d50410VgnVCM3000003456f70aRCRD.htm

Citation preview

Page 1: Compliance Trends Survey 2013

LIFE SCIENCES VERSUS OVERALL COMPLIANCE WEEK RESPONDENTS - ROLE OF THE CCO

Re-assessing third-party relationships

COMPLIANCE RISKS & OPERATIONS

EXTENDED ENTERPRISE COMPLIANCE RISKS

TOOLS & TECHNOLOGY

IMPORTANCE OF A COMPLIANCE PROGRAM

TOP 3METRICS LIFE SCIENCES COMPANIESUSE TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESSOF A COMPLIANCE PROGRAM

30% of the companies reportedthat compliance is perceived

as a good “value-add” functionrather than a check-the-box activity

50% of the companies reported thatthe importance of compliance and

ethical conduct is not wellcommunicated and understood

by the staff at all levels

10% of the companies are not veryconfident that all ethics and compliancerisks are addressed during due diligencein mergers and acquisitions

77% of the companies arenot very confident that all ethicsand compliance risks are addressedduring due diligence in mergersand acquisitions

ANALYSIS OF INTERNALAUDIT FINDINGS

LIFE SCIENCES COMPANIES RANKED THE FOLLOWING REGULATIONS AS THE MOST TIME/RESOURCE CONSUMING

40% of CCOs reportdirectly to the CEO

60% of CCOs meet withthe executive committeeat least once per quarter

40%

60%Life

Sciences

45% of CCOs reportdirectly to the CEO

73% of CCOs meet withthe executive committeeat least once per quarter

45%

73%Overall

80%of life sciences companies are increasingoversight (i.e., auditing, monitoring) withsome changes to business partners

80%of the overall respondents areincreasing oversight (i.e., auditing,monitoring) with some changes tobusiness partners

59%59%

41% of the companies reportedthat compliance is perceivedas a good “value-add” functionrather than a check-the-box activity

41% of the companies reported that theimportance of compliance and ethicalconduct is not well communicatedand understood by thestaff at all levels

50%

89%COMPLETION OF ANNUAL ANDNEW HIRE COMPLIANCE TRAINING

COMPARISONS TO COMPETITORSOR SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONS

67% 56%

OF THE COMPANIES THAT MEASURE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THEIR COMPLIANCE PROGRAM,NONE ARE ‘HIGHLY’ CONFIDENT THAT THE MEASUREMENT OF EFFECTIVENESS IS ACCURATE

68% of the companies monitor employees’use of company email to look for potentialmisconduct, although 53% of thesemonitor only specific individuals whenthere is an open investigation into possibleemployee misconduct

20% of the companies monitor employeesuse of company email to look for potentialmisconduct, although 50% of thesemonitor only for specific individuals whenthere is an open investigation into possibleemployee misconduct

45% of the overall respondent companies do not have anymonitoring procedures to measure the impact that ethicalconduct and regulatory compliance might have on thecompany’s brand reputation or shareholder value, while 27%let the marketing department take point on this issue

CONTACT To learn more, please visit:

www.deloitte.com/us/centerregulatorystrategies/lshcleadership

www.deloitte.com/us/compliancetrends

About the surveyDeloitte and Compliance Week magazine collaborated to conduct a compliancebenchmarking survey. Within the survey, compliance executives were asked about theircompliance department’s organizational structure, current compliance industry risks andoperational challenges, metrics, and tools and technology.

40% OF LIFE SCIENCES COMPANIES DO NOT USE ANY PREDICTIVE MODELING TECHNIQUESTO BETTER UNDERSTAND COMPLIANCES RISKS, MEASURE EFFECTIVENESS, OR DETERMINEWHERE TO DEVOTE MORE COMPLIANCE RESOURCES

70% of life sciences companies do not have any monitoringprocedures to measure the impact that ethical conduct andregulatory compliance might have on the company’s brandreputation or shareholder value, while none let the marketingdepartment take point on this issue

45

70

Insights from

In Focus: Compliance Trends Survey 2013

Center for Regulatory Strategies

LIFE SCIENCES OVERALL

1. Sunshine rules on physician payments2. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)3. Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)

LIFE SCIENCES

LIFE SCIENCES

OVERALL

OVERALL

30% 41%

41%

Copyright © 2013 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited

This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional adviceor services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business.Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor.

In addition, this publication contains the results of a survey conducted by Deloitte. The information obtained during the survey was taken “as is” and was not validated or confirmed by Deloitte.

Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication.

As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.