Dubai westford - master class on flexible business models

Flexible business models for sustainability

Dr Steyn Heckroodt – Senior Lecturer: Strategy

www: Lectureonbusiness.com

210/04/23 Dr S Heckroodt

Morphing of strategy

• Morphing is a special effect in motion pictures and animations that changes (or morphs) one image or shape into another through a seamless transition

• What has morphed?• Our thinking• How and why?



• Plait of environment and business• Environment – Pong – simple, non-complex, stable,

yes at times a bit disrupted

4

Time

Environmental change

Organisational strategy



5

Time



ScanningScenario planningStrategy selectionStructure for implementationForecasting


• Post WW 2 – Sun Tzu – the Art of War• Thinking – analytical – molecular• Segment and categorise• Simplify• East and West• Socialist and capitalist

6

Quick paradigm history


• In strategy – environmental scanning 1970s• 80s – Porters and PESTLEs• Tools and techniques• Boxed – simplified• Scenario planning• Forecasting dominated• Larger manufacturing organisations IBMs and other

mass producing concerns – economies of scale• Product push

7

70s and 80s


• 90s – New jargon• Pull versus push • Demand chain versus supply chain• Customer focus, centricity• Information era• Systemic thinking (Ackoff)• Dots and Coms• Windows and Apple

8

90s


• 2000s• Complexity and complex thinking modes• Thinking modes and paradigms • Order and un-order, rules and heuristics,

epistemology and ontology• Credit crunch• Transient (temporary) versus sustainable

competitiveness • Fad trends versus long-term trends

9

2000s


What the complexity boils down to

10

Time




• 4Ps to SAVE• Design thinking (from forecasting to back-casting

and foresight)• Five-forces disciples (dominate existing markets)

versus blue-ocean enthusiasts (look to creating new opportunities)

• Industry to arena (Garmin)• PESTLE: Conceptual positioning to relational status

11

Paradigm shifts to helpmanaging complexity


Environment

12 © Dr Heckroodt, S © Dr Heckroodt, S

Labour Government

Public Pressure Groups

Exchange rate Interest rate

Fuel/Energy price Staff

ShareholdersColleagues


ENVIRONMENT


Labour Government






Environment

ENVIRONMENT


Labour Government






Environment

ENVIRONMENT


Labour Government






Environment

• Strategy thinking paradigms change as our view(s) of the environment varies

• Deterministic, intended, selected and planned• Continuously emerging and amplifying with

unpredictable and unknown emergent processes• As the environment is becoming more sweeping

and random in its change though (Immelt), how can flexible business models help?

16

So ...To answer the why


• Understand how strategy, business models and tactics (the trio) interconnect and affect each other and how this can help guide the search for novel, interesting and profitable new ways to compete.

17

To answer that...


• Strategy – the selection of a particular business model

• Tactics – the choices available to an organisation based on the business model choice

• Business Model – the logic of the organisation, the way it operates and how it creates value. – Content– Structure– Governance of transactions creating value

18

Distinguish between…


• Content – the goods or information exchanged, as well as to resources and capabilities required

• Structure – the stakeholders that participate, their links, and the way they choose to operate

• Governance – the way flows of information, resources and goods are controlled by the relevant stakeholders

19

‘

Business model


• Is to be flexible an organisation’s ability to reposition itself in a market by dismantling its current strategy?

or• Is to be flexible an organisation’s ability to

reposition itself in a market by dismantling its current business model?

20

Here’s the question…


• Merging market focused (in- pond & downstream) and network focused approaches (upstream)

21

Flexibility defined

Market Focus

Network Focus

In-pond

• Organisations with strong, long-term, inter-organisation relationships both upstream and downstream

22

1. Network influencer

DELL


• Organisations buying and selling on the basis of price, quantity and delivery agreements. Upstream transactional relationships are suppliers of commodity products (milk, sugar,). Downstream customers include retailers

23

2. Transactional model

TRADER


• Utilise long-term relationships upstream, and ownership downstream

24

3. Franchise model

ZARA

ZARA


• Supplier-focused organisations• Long-term relationships upstream, but sell

downstream through transactional relationships, on the basis of price, quantity and delivery agreements. Downstream customers include retailers and wholesalers.

25

4. Agent model

MOBILE/BANKS


• Organisations with transactional relationships upstream and long-term relationships downstream. They have a sales focus; close relationships with downstream retailers, while purchasing supplies purely on the basis of price and quality

26

5. Sales-orientatedmodel

EXPORTERS


• Organisations with transactional relationships upstream and corporate ownership downstream. Downstream customers included retailers and business-to-business customers

27

6. Retail model

SPINNEYS

SPINNEYS


Shor

t le

ad ti

mes

Long

le

ad ti

mes

Supp

ly c

hara

cter

istic

s

Demand characteristics

Lean plan and optimize

Hybrid&

Postponement

Continuous replenishment

Agile quick response

Predictable Unpredictable

28Source: Amended from Christopher, M. Logistics and Supply Chain Management. Pearson Education

• Embed flexibility when aligning market demands with organisational supply

Network architectures need to

• Business models are made of concrete choices and the consequences of these choices

• Different designs have different specific logics of operation and create different value for their stakeholders

29

Aspects for design ofbusiness models


• Choice Consequence• Secondary airports Low airport fees• Lowest ticket prices Large volume• Low commissions Low cost• Standardized fleet Bargaining power• Single-class Economies of scale• No meals Faster turnaround• Nothing free Additional revenue• No unions Flexibility in staff

30

Ryan Air exp.


• Every organization has a business model• It makes some choices, which have consequences• But not every organization has a strategy – a plan of

action for different contingencies that may arise• In this sense flexibility refers to morphing from one

business model to another whilst maintaining the strategic direction, vision and mission

• Model - are crucial in determining organisations’ value creation

31

Now – the point


• Content – goods or information exchanged, as well as to resources and capabilities required

• Structure – stakeholders, their links, and the way they choose to operate

• Governance – the way flows of information, resources and goods are controlled

• These issues are all interrelated – the question is• “How does one build a sustainable competitive

advantage?” (long-term and transient)32

Business modelconsists of...


• If the business model is a reflection of the organisation’s strategic choice, strategy proper is not the model

• Strategy proper is the choice and creation/creator of the model

• Flexibility for purposes of sustainability would refer to morphing between models – not strategies

• Different scenarios calls for different models• Strategic contingencies consist of different models

33

Let’s try and answer...


• This makes strategy a high-order choice that has profound implications on competitive outcomes

• Choosing a particular business model means choosing a particular way to compete– A particular logic of the organisation– A particular way to operate and to create value for the

organisation’s stakeholders– A particular content, structure and governance of

transactions

34

Sustainability contained


35

The trio

Possible Business Models Tactics:

Competitive choices enabled

by each Business Model

Strategy plan of which Business

Model to use


Case study

36

Dominant attribute

QualityPrice

ConvenienceDemand

WW case study


37Source: Amended from Heckroodt, S. Strategic Thinking – GAME OVER. Epubsa.co.za

Staff

Landlord

Landlord

Strategic thinking mode – pro-active partnering

Strategic thinking mode – reactive flexibility – willingness and ability to adapt

Staff

WW case study

38

Landlord

WW case study


Strategic fitas a juncture

OrganisationAbility

Internal Information Live

External Information Live

Strategic planning = alive = moves beyond

annual event

OpportunityThreat

PROBABILITYIM

PACT

Strategic appropriateness
