28
Economics of Quality The Connection Between Quality and Profits www.quantumassocinc.com 847.919.6127 1 Quantum Associates, Inc

Economics of quality 2012 rev

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The economics of quality focuses priorities and resources on achieving both customer satisfaction and profits. It adds a financial dimension to the quality improvement process.

Citation preview

Page 1: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Economics of Quality

The Connection Between Quality and Profits

www.quantumassocinc.com847.919.6127

1Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 2: Economics of quality 2012 rev

About Quantum Associates

Quantum Associates, Inc

2

O Certified professionals with an average of 20+ years hands-on industry experience in Lean, Six Sigma, Theory of Constraints, Quality Management, Business Process Improvement, Change Management, and ISO 9000

O Experience with Clients in various industry sectors (chemicals, product safety, food processing, pharmaceuticals, automotive, tool and die, retail, non-profits, government, etc.). We can leverage this know-how and experience to help improve your organization

O We deliver sustainable solutions that can double your labor and working capital productivity while simultaneously reducing your costs at least 20%

Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 3: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Is It Management’s Fault?

O It is time that we re-examine the issue of "top management support" that Deming proposed

O Prior to Deming's death in 1993, the quality movement was showing real, bottom-line results in organizations. These accomplishments were attained without the benefit of ISO 9000 registrations

3Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 4: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Is It Management’s Fault?

O Since Deming's death in 1993, the quality profession as a whole has declined

O Top management no longer calls upon the quality professional's skills to drive fundamental business competitiveness improvements. Instead, quality professionals are often relegated to compliance activities

4Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 5: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Is It Management’s Fault?

O Quality managers are operating in an environment where top management has spent lots of money on quality programs, such as ISO 9000 or Six Sigma, that quality professionals recommended, but these programs have not delivered the expected results

5Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 6: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Is It Management’s Fault?

O The best way to regain top management support for fundamental quality techniques is to demonstrate the techniques' effectiveness

O Make it easy and riskless for top management to endorse basic -- not trendy, not expensive -- quality methods again

6Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 7: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Is It Management’s Fault?

O Find a problem in your organization where quality techniques could solve a problem. Ideally, the problem would be a high-profile, nagging issue affecting profitability. Attack the problem using solid, basic quality techniques

O Since management only understands the “language of money” we should use an economics of quality approach

Quantum Associates, Inc 7

Page 8: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Economics of QualityO Conduct Cost of Poor Quality

AssessmentO Perform Cost Driver analysisO Select ProjectsO Measure ResultsO Monitor Ongoing Performance and

Management Reporting

Quantum Associates, Inc 8

Page 9: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O Identify and quantify the financial impact of non-value-added activities and waste driven by poor quality across the entire business

O The cost of poor quality assessment approach has two unique elements:O Define non value-added activities and waste

in terms of the failure to meet customer requirements.

O The white collar, service, support, indirect, and management functions participate in the improvement process.

9Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 10: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O The Elimination of Non Value-Added Activities and Waste to Improve Financial Performance Gives Top Management a New Perspective on Using Quality to Manage Costs

10Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 11: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O White Collar, Indirect Costs of Poor Quality Are Often 300% to 500% Greater Than The Direct Costs of Poor Quality

11

Cost of Poor Quality

Warranty Claims

White Collar rework

Rework/Scrap

Unscheduled Overtime

Policy Allowances

Premium Transportation

Past Due Accounts receivable

Obsolete & excess inventory

Cash Impact

Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 12: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O Cost of Poor Quality Assessment Focuses on Internal and External Customer Failures

O Internal FailureO Costs of non value-added activities and

waste associated with the failure of processes. products, services, and materials to meet customer requirements prior to receipt by the external customer:O Scrap – Rework – Rejects – Safety stockO Downtime due to failure of product or

peopleO Productivity losses due to failure of product

or services12Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 13: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O External FailureO Costs of non value-added activities and

waste associated with the failure of processes, products, services, and materials to meet customer requirements received by the customer:

O Returned goods – Recall costs – Warranty claims

O Liability insurance – Downgraded productO Damaged reputation - Penalties

13Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 14: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O Scrap – the total cost of material, labor and overhead for defective products or services that is wasted or disposed of because the product or service does not conform to requirements

O Problem in identifying and quantifying the cost of poor quality (the failure to meet customer requirements) is to:O Identify the customersO Use terminology that makes sense to the

customers14Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 15: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O Survey the internal and external customer and not the internal or external supplierO Ask users of IT how useful are the

reports that are produced. What type of answers would you expect?

O Ask Purchasing how useful are the sales forecasts for establishing supplier commitments and issuing purchasing orders. What type of answers would you expect?

15Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 16: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O Using our definition of scrap list a function or process you work in and tabulate the following:O A. Labor CostsO B. Materials or Expense BudgetO C. OverheadO D. Total Costs (A + B + C)O E. Percentage Wasted (% Non-

value-add)O F. Dollars Wasted (D X E)

16Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 17: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O The Hidden factoryO For most manufacturing companies

the hidden cost of poor quality is 75 to 80 percent of total operating costs

O For service companies the hidden cost of poor quality approaches 100 percent of total operating costs

17Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 18: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost of Poor Quality Assessment

O Controllable Poor Quality CostsO Under the control of the function or

process driverO Uncontrollable Poor Quality costs

O Outside the control of the function or process customer

O The percent uncontrollable tells you how much cross-functional cooperation you need to eliminate poor quality costs

18Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 19: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost Driver AnalysisO Helps to prioritize improvement

projects on the basis of both increasing customer satisfaction and profitsO Determines the root causes of the poor

quality costsO Determines the financial impact of each

root causeO Conducts a cost benefit analysisO Identifies projects with the highest

payback and ROI19Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 20: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost Driver AnalysisO Key COPQ Element - Returns

20

Returns

NRG

Poor workmanship

Wrong purchase

$1.5 M

$1.2M

$0.180M

$0.120M

$.960M

Cost Drivers

80%

15%

5%

80%

Critical to select the right projects and manage the link of quality to profits

Confusing instructions

Key COPQ

element

Root cause

NRG = no reason given

Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 21: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Cost Driver AnalysisO Adding a financial dimension to the

root cause analysis demonstrates the financial impact of effective quality management

O Helps selects improvement projects that can make a genuine difference to the business

21Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 22: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Improvement Project Criteria-Financial Performance and

Customer SatisfactionO Select projects based on a logical

connection to financial paybackO Set a BHAG (“Big Hairy Audacious

Goal”), identify appropriate team members, finalize financial and non financial performance measures

O Departmental boundaries do not limit the scope or breadth of solutions

O It is not the quantity of teams that counts, it is the significance of the problems that teams are solving

22Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 23: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Improvement Project Selection

O Most common fatal error is picking the wrong projectO Correct project selection allows the quality

process to contribute to the achievement of business goals and objectives

O Identifying the projects that are capable of generating greater sales or lower costs increases profits

O The “Field of Dreams” strategy doesn’t work

23Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 24: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Improvement Project Selection

O The frequency of defects is an important basis for setting improvement project priorities

O Convert the frequency impact to dollar impact to ensure correct project selection relative to financial impact

O Adding a financial dimension to the root cause analysis demonstrates the financial impact of effective quality management

24Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 25: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Monitor and Measure Progress

O Accurate and timely measurement of improvement team progress provides a powerful support mechanism for the economics of quality process by:O Gaining and maintaining top management

commitment by focusing on issues that make a difference

O Supports the efforts of the individual teams by identifying problems or barriers that hamper success

O Manage on the basis of facts- the connection between quality and profits is grounded in fact-based decision-making

25Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 26: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Monitor and Measure Progress

O The Economics of Quality process has to be managed

O Top level performance measures determine performance against objectives and goals

26Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 27: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Reporting to Top management

O Elevate the Economics of Quality process to the same stature as any other process within the business by linking it to the achievement of meaningful business results

O The Economics of quality approachO Identifies and quantifies the payback and

performance of quality improvementO Answers how quality improvement contributes

to the achievement of lower costs, increased profitability, and improved competitiveness.

O Evaluates quality projects in the same terms that other business investments are evaluated

27Quantum Associates, Inc

Page 28: Economics of quality 2012 rev

Conclusions

OThe Economics of Quality Approach O Focuses priorities and resources

on achieving both increased customer satisfaction and profits

O Adds a financial dimension to the quality improvement process

28Quantum Associates, Inc