Upload
internal-consistency
View
390
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The relationship between a manager and an employee can make for a great work environment. A manager that uses recognition and gratitude can help an employee become more confident, increase social value, and is more likely to help others. Recognition and relationships help build a culture that is collaborative, problem-solving, and cohesive.
Citation preview
Recognition & Relationships: The Crossroads for Culture
Internal ConsistencyHR.com: Rewards and Recognition
InternalConsistency.com 2
About Internal Consistency
• Applying psychology at work to make work a better place.
• Evidence-based Practice
• Philosophies:– Create the culture employees crave– Individuals and systems work together
InternalConsistency.com 3
Agenda• Culture: Sum of all interactions and behavior• Leadership: Influencing via relationships• Relationship: Quality of interactions• Recognition & Gratitude: Motivating interactions• Behaviors leading to strong culture:– Organizational citizenship– Prosocial
InternalConsistency.com 4
5
Culture
Sum of all interactions.
More interactions,More collaborations, More knowledge sharing,More development,More motivation,Stronger culture.
InternalConsistency.com 6
Who’s culture is it?• Top down, bottom up, or inside out?
• Top down– Example behavior
• Bottom up– Unspoken norms
• Inside out– Manager-Follower relationship
InternalConsistency.com 7
Culture Management
• Proactive culture management requires intentional time and focus to align every player’s plan, decision and action to your desired work environment.
InternalConsistency.com 8
Culture-Leadership Connection
• Effective leadership — especially effective day-to-day management practices — is the key to create a high-engagement, high-performance work environment that wows customers and creates superior financial performance.
• Focus on daily practices.
InternalConsistency.com 9
Channels of Influence
• Communication– Promote or Prevent?
• Behavior– Example (to model after)– Reinforced • Keep doing or stop doing?
InternalConsistency.com 10
Importance of Front Line Mgrs
InternalConsistency.com 11
It takes all kinds
• Great man• Trait Approach• Skills Approach• Contingency• Situational• Behavioral
• Transactional• Path-Goal• Servant• Participative
InternalConsistency.com 12
Focus of Leadership ModelsCharacteristics of the
leader MGR
SubSubSub
InternalConsistency.com 13
New Leadership ApproachFocus on what happens
between leaders and followers.MGR
SubSubSub
Leader-Member Exchange
• Leaders and followers evaluate the relationship based on the quality of the interactions.
• Positive interactions are reciprocated with positive outcomes.
InternalConsistency.com 14
InternalConsistency.com 15
Leader-Member Exchange
4 Drivers of High quality relationship:1. Affect: • Mutual liking
2. Loyalty: • Public support for behaviors
3. Contribution: • Achieving tasks toward mutual goals
4. Respect:• Mutual respect for capabilities
InternalConsistency.com 16
Relationships
• Managers and Subordinates have trust, are loyal, contribute, and like another demonstrated with frequent interactions.
• Both refer to the employment contract. Transactional, bare minimum with few interactions.
Qua
lity
of R
elati
onsh
ip
InternalConsistency.com 17
Reciprocation of needs
InternalConsistency.com 18
High Quality Relationships
• High quality relationships– Expanded responsibilities– More power since they receive more information– Followers are more influential and confident– Receive personal concern from leaders
• More frequent interactions=more trust, support.
InternalConsistency.com 19
Low Quality Relationships
• Low quality relationships– Formal employment contract– Lesser attention and support from
leaders– Followers see treatment as unfair
• Less frequent interactions, less trust.
InternalConsistency.com 20
Communication and Behavior
InternalConsistency.com 21
Recognition
• Recognition is a communication tool that reinforces performance related behavior.
• Raising awareness about recent performance.
• Ken Blanchard: “Catch people doing something right”
InternalConsistency.com 22
Creating Alignment
• Align recognition to values, competencies, philosophies– Values are the railroad ties– Recognition are the rails
• Bonus: Recognize risk taking when mistakes are made
InternalConsistency.com 23
Impact of Recognition
• The act of recognizing subordinates’ work– Communicates trust in decision-making– Supports autonomy– Acknowledges contribution– Highlights unique capabilities– Builds rapport and liking– Creates a reciprocal opportunities
InternalConsistency.com 24
How not to…
• Obligatory• Sarcastic praise• Mixed with criticism• Select few• Trivial
InternalConsistency.com 25
Example Script
• ARC– Action: “Hey, about that thing you did…”– Result: “…it really changed something…”– Consequence: “which translates into”
John, your project flowchart for implementations really helped me organize my own projects. I’m much more organized following your flowchart.
InternalConsistency.com 26
Structure
• Liked Best/Next time:– “I liked it best when you …”• Recognizing competency in the individual• Reinforces the action
– “Next time how can we..”• Demonstrates support from manager• Gives employee responsibility to resolve problems
InternalConsistency.com 27
Organizational Citizenship Behaviors
• High quality social exchange motivates subordinates to perform OCB’s
• Interaction is reciprocal and relies on degree of exchange– Greater autonomy allows for OCB’s
• Outcome: positive social working environment
InternalConsistency.com 28
Organizational Citizenship• Altruism:• Courtesy:• Conscientiousness:
• Sportsmanship:
InternalConsistency.com 29
Organizational Citizenship
• Performing beyond stated job requirements
• Going beyond without expecting rewards– Willingness to work overtime– Helping colleagues– Accepting tasks that are beyond normal
requirements
InternalConsistency.com 30
Gratitude, now backed by research!
Psychology has been great at studying the abnormalities“Asking what’s wrong?”
Now turning to studying when we are optimal“Asking what’s right?”
InternalConsistency.com 31
Pro-Social Behavior
• Voluntarily helping another
• Offering support, assistance, cooperation
• Establish & maintain interpersonal relationships
InternalConsistency.com 32
Role of Gratitude
• Removes uncertainty whether helping will be effective
• People will withhold if/when they feel uncertain about their ability to help competently and effectively (Grant, 2010)
InternalConsistency.com 33
Communal
• Social worth – sense of being valued by others– Feel that their actions matter in other people’s
lives– Belongingness
• Withhold because of uncertainty whether help will be valued.
InternalConsistency.com 34
Agency
• Positive feedback that the helper has succeed in helping and can benefit others.
• More willing to help others because they feel their efforts will increase odds of genuinely helping others.
InternalConsistency.com 35
Gratitude- Returning the FavorCan you review this?
Ok, here’s my feedback.
InternalConsistency.com 36
Thank you so much! I’m really grateful.
Yeah, sure. Let me help you with that.
Can you review this?
Ok, here’s my feedback.
Can you review a second?
Gratitude- Returning the Favor
InternalConsistency.com 37
Gratitude- Paying it ForwardThank you so much! I’m really grateful.
Let me help you with that.
Let m
e he
lp yo
u w
ith th
at.
InternalConsistency.com 38
Data
No Gratitude Gratitude0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
32%
66%
25%
55%
Returning the Favor and Paying it Forward
Return the Favor Paying it Forward
Like
lihoo
d of
Hel
ping
Gratitude doubles the likelihood that some one will Extend their assistance/ help them/ give additional help.
InternalConsistency.com 39
Gratitude: What’s at work?• It isn’t • Quid quo pro• “I’m happier now and more likely to help”
• What’s REALLY happening is:– “What I’m offering is valuable”
• When their social value increases, they are more likely to see their help as competent, when when feeling like their help is seen as effective, the more likely to offer such help.
InternalConsistency.com 40
Gratitude- More than warm fuzzyThank you so much! I’m really grateful.
Let m
e he
lp yo
u w
ith th
at.
41
Thankful for Gratitude
• Prosocial Behaviors are essential for collaborative, high quality relationships.
InternalConsistency.com
Before After Rcving Grat20
30
40
50
60
70
41
63
Prosocial Behavior Before and After Gratitude
Gratitude
Control
InternalConsistency.com 42
Taking action:
• Organizational Level:– Invest in a framework to facilitate communication
and track recognition.• HR Level:– Increase importance of relationships– Share success stories
• Individual Manager Level:– Seek new opportunities to recognize performance– Leadership assessment and coaching
InternalConsistency.com 43
Day to day
• Start each day with gratitude:– For self: will shape your outlook on the day– For others: start others day on a positive note
• Opportunity detective:– Finding mistakes is easy– Look for good in others
InternalConsistency.com 44
Gratitude/Recognizing
• What are ways others impact your day-to-day work?
• Who helps you most often?• Who helps you least often?• When has someone gone out of their way to
help?• What might be under your radar?• What types of assistance do you most
appreciate?
InternalConsistency.com 45
Conclusion• Culture is the summation of behaviors – Reinforced and guided by leaders.
• Relationships between leaders and followers can be improved – With more frequent positive interactions.
• Recognition and gratitude can be used to facilitate such positive interactions.
• With more frequent positive interactions, relationships improve resulting newly established norms feeding a positive culture.
InternalConsistency.com 46
Sources• Chiun Lo, M.,Ramayah, T., Swee Hui, J. (2006). An investigation of Leader Member
Exchange effects on organizational citizenship behavior in Malaysia. Journal of Business and Management, 12, 5-23.
• Grant, A., & Gino, F. (2010). A little goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 946-955.
• Othman, R., Fang Ee, F., Lay Shi, N. (2010). Understanding dysfunctional Leader-Member Exchange: Antecedents and outcomes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(4), 337-350.
• Sine, H., Nahrgang, J., and Morgeson, F. P. (2009). Understanding why they don’t see eye to eye: Examination of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1048-1057.
• http://www.managementexchange.com/story/culture-eats-strategy
InternalConsistency.com 47
Thank you!
Questions?Comments?