18
Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development Choosing a methological approach Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected] Briefs No.1

Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable developmentChoosing a methological approach

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

BriefsNo.1

Page 2: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

When evaluating the impacts of

projects into sustainable development,

there are methodological choices to

be done.

Selected approaches should

fit into the nature of

environmental

challenges

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Page 3: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

High and multiple values at stake

shelter

Sou

rce:

ww

w.o

xfam

.org

.uk

food security

in the decision making process

health cash incomes

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Page 4: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

ressources property &

tenure

advocacycapacities &

knowledge

biodiversity

High and multiple values at stakein the decision making process

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Page 5: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Short-term projects outcomes

Multiple time and spatial scales

Natural resources renewal rates: renewal/ non renewal

Wide socio-ecological processes time scales

Imag

eso

urc

e: w

ww

.so

cial

ph

y.co

m

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Page 6: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Uncertainty of phenomena

Changing environmental conditions

Lack of predictability, incomplete knowledge

Constraints of probabilistic approaches

Ken

net

h O

diw

ou

r/IR

IN

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Page 7: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Scientific research, technical consultancy, local knowledge

Convergence of Knowledge forms

Multiple understanding frames

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected] Imag

eso

urc

e: A

soci

ació

n A

ND

ES

Page 8: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Who cares?

Local people and communities | women

|future generations | global citizens

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected] Imag

eso

urc

e: A

soci

ació

n A

ND

ES

Page 9: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

It becomes necessary to move

from scientific research and

consultancy advice to

Integrated Assessment

Enhancing the

quality of the evaluation process & results reliability

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Page 10: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Adopting a “weak comparability” of values approach

StrongsustainabilityEstimating the impacts of

projects on a multiple set of

relevant dimensions of

sustainable development

Evidencing externalities and

distributional impacts

Using an appropiate

combination of non-

compensatory methodologies

Imag

eso

urc

e: w

ww

.info

rmat

ion

ng.

com

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Ecosystem services and

bio-cultural heritage

Page 11: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Adopting a “weak comparability” of values approach

Incommensurabilityof valuesLooking at the diversity of impacts in

multiple dimensions and terms:

monetary, bio-physical, human

wellbeing (health, incomes,

empowerment, happiness, equality),

cultural (symbolic, aesthetic, spiritual),

others.

Imag

eso

urc

e: w

ww

.sp

earm

intd

eco

r.co

m

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Page 12: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Adopting a “weak comparability” of values approach

Imag

eso

urc

e: w

ww

.sp

earm

intd

eco

r.co

m

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Does the meal

price constitute

the ecosystem

value?

Page 13: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Adopting a “weak comparability” of values approach

Willingness to pay does not

incorporate unperceived

but existent things

Imag

eso

urc

e: w

ww

.sp

earm

intd

eco

r.co

m

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

price & valueare not equivalent

Page 14: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Adopting a “weak comparability” of values approach

Multiple valuationlanguagesSharing experiences to develop a

common framework of

understanding as a basis for

evaluation

Combining analytical procedures

with deliberative approaches

Using quantitative and qualitative

methodologies to assess impacts

and changesNeus Martí Sanz | [email protected] Imag

eso

urc

e: A

soci

ació

n A

ND

ES

Page 15: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

The evaluation process acknowledges

phenomena complexity & uncertainty...

... but stills providing envidences of projects

contribution to sustainable development

Precautionary principleis operationalized into

decision making

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Page 16: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Managing analytical constraints

Process & ResultsreliabilityHighlighting and prioritizing

evaluation goals

Recognizing systems complexity :

from the attribution to the

contribution approach

Caution when comparing results.

Clear identification of the

evaluation subject and object

Reflecting how analytical

constraints may be affecting

evaluation resultsNeus Martí Sanz | [email protected] Im

age

sou

rce:

ww

w.c

limat

ecen

tre.

org

Page 17: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Integrating the evaluation innovation management

InnovationIntegrating innovative practices into

the evaluation cycle. Reflective &

iterative learning exercises

Processing innovation results.

Validating and integrating them

into evaluation practices and

procedures

Moving from consultancy formulas

to adaptive learning processes

Imag

eso

urc

e: w

ww

. ub

cfar

m_u

bc_

ca

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]

Page 18: Evaluating projects contribution to sustainable development

Main idea

When evaluating the impacts of projects into

sustainable development, the nature of

environmental challenges requires

enhancing process quality to get reliable results

Evaluation result becomes then a

compromise solution between involved parties and evaluation criteria rather than an optimalsolution

Neus Martí Sanz | [email protected]