© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1

Broadband Quality ScoreAPPENDIX

A global study of broadband qualitySeptember 2009

Sponsored by

Sponsored bySponsored by

Broadband Leadership 2009

Sponsored bySponsored by

Top Changes BB Leadership (2008‐2009)CHANGES IN ABSOLUTE TERMS CHANGES IN RELATIVE TERMS

Sponsored bySponsored by

BQS by Stage of Economic Development

Note: development stage based on GCI 

report by World Economic Forum 2009

Stage

3 Economic

Development

(Innovation‐Driven

)

country BQS 09 GDP/Capita (BQS/100,000 GDP per cap 1 Korea 65.99 27,600 2392 Japan 63.92 34,000 1883 Slovakia 37.44 21,900 1714 Portugal 36.53 22,200 1655 Estonia  32.46 21,000 1556 Sweden 56.75 38,100 1497 Czech Republic 38.01 25,900 1478 Denmark 44.89 37,100 1219 Slovenia 35.46 29,600 12010 Netherlands 45.59 40,400 11311 France 37.39 33,200 11312 Taiwan 34.43 31,100 11113 Malta 26.77 24,700 10814 New Zealand 28.60 28,000 10215 Germany 36.03 35,400 10216 Finland 37.34 36,900 10117 Greece 31.89 32,000 10018 Switzerland 39.85 41,800 9519 Belgium 35.29 37,400 9420 Italy  28.10 31,300 9021 Austria 33.90 40,200 8422 United Kingdom 30.77 36,500 8423 Spain 29.25 34,700 8424 Argentina 23.87 28,600 8325 Canada 31.34 39,100 8026 Australia 29.96 38,100 7927 United States 36.79 46,900 7828 Iceland 32.10 41,800 7729 Hong Kong 33.44 43,700 7730 Norway 38.38 59,300 6531 Ireland 28.26 45,300 6232 Singapore 31.91 51,500 6233 Malaysia 23.26 39,900 5834 Luxembourg 26.59 81,000 33

Sponsored bySponsored by

Stage

1 Economic

Development

(Factor‐Driven)

Stage

2 Economic

Development

(Efficiency‐Driven)

Moving

from

stage

1 to

2 in 

Economic

Development

Moving

from

stage

2 to

3 in 

Economic

Development

BQS by Stage of Economic Development

Sponsored bySponsored by

Countries By Download Speed

Sponsored by

Sponsored bySponsored by

Countries By Upload Speed

Sponsored bySponsored by

Countries By Latency

Sponsored bySponsored by

Penetration 2009

Sponsored bySponsored by

Top Changes in Penetration (2008‐2009)

Sponsored bySponsored by

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Napoli

Mon

treal

Palma

Cracov

Valencia

Ankara

Lond

onBarcelon

aMelbo

urne

Sydn

eyKh

arkiv

Luxembo

urg

Guangzhou

Wellington

Christchurch

Zaragoza

Nanjing

Otawa

Toronto

Madrid

Brisbane

Salvador

Dub

linAuckland

Rome

Harbin

Lodz

Kiev

Sevilla

Warsaw

Perth

Malaga

Belo Horizon

teMilan

Brazilia

Santiago

Birkirkara

Chen

gdu

Sao Paulo

Pretoria

Rosario

Soweto

Doh

aBu

enos Aires

San Jose

Jiddah

Rio de

 Jane

iro

Nicosia

Mun

ich

Mecca

Guadalajaraç

Shangai

Cebu

Riyadh

Bangkok

Al‐M

anam

ahKu

ala Lumpu

rManila

Al Jizah

Faisalabad

Tunis

Med

ellin

Mum

bay

Fortaleza

Davao

Islamabad

Rabat

Mexico DF

Laho

reDurban

BQS by cities (100 ‐

200)

Ready for today’ Below today´s

applications threshold

Sponsored bySponsored by

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

Dubai

Ciud

ad Ju

arez

Taegu

Pusan

Med

ina

Manakau

Kumasi

Kano

Ar Rayyan

Córdob

a

Beijing

Bogota

Cali

Cape

 Town

Casablanca

Shen

yang

Tianjin

Ecatep

ec

Hano

i

Ho Chi M

inh City  

Bengaluru

Jakarta

Johann

esbu

rg

Karachi

Surabaya

Alexandria

Cairo

Calcutta

Delhi

Mom

basa

Accra

Nairo

bi

Lagos

Ibadan

BQS by cities (200‐

242)

Below today´s

applications thresholdLeapfrog 

Opportunity