33
INNOVATION STRATEGIES IN TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AREAS CASE OF SAKARYA TEKNOKENT Assoc. Prof. İzzet Kılınç Duzce University, Department of Management Information Systems Aslıhan Ünal Ph.D. Candidate Duzce University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Business Administration

Imisc 2016 sunum

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Imisc 2016 sunum

INNOVATION STRATEGIES IN TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AREAS

CASE OF SAKARYA TEKNOKENTAssoc. Prof. İzzet Kılınç Duzce University, Department of Management Information Systems Aslıhan ÜnalPh.D. Candidate Duzce University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Business Administration

Page 2: Imisc 2016 sunum

2

Contents

• Concepts and Background• Aim of the research• Sample• Methodology• Findings• Conclusion• Limitations and recommendations

Page 3: Imisc 2016 sunum

3

«The best way to predict the future is to invent it»

Alan Kay

Page 4: Imisc 2016 sunum

4

Innovation

In today’s world enterprises should innovate to be successful, to be competitive, and

to be leader in market.

The change have never been so rapid, and the new ideas have never become old such faster through the history.

A high and increasing level of productivity and innovation is indicator of

competitiveness (Porter and Ketels, 2003).

Page 5: Imisc 2016 sunum

5

?Innovation is an ambiguous concept, and attributed to different definitions

unusual and extraordinary

New idea

Value

Page 6: Imisc 2016 sunum

6

Definitions of Innovation

«process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one» (Schumpeter).

«The successful exploitation of new ideas» (UK Department of Trade and Industry, 1998).

«An innovation is the implementation of a new or significantly improved product (good or service), or process, a new marketing method, or a new organizational method in business practices, workplace organization or external relations» (OECD, 2005).

Page 7: Imisc 2016 sunum

7

Strategy

• «strategos» the art of army general

• In business after World War II

• «Strategy has become a catchall term used to mean whatever one wants it to mean» (Hambrick and Fredericson, 2001).

Page 8: Imisc 2016 sunum

8

Definitions of Strategy• «Strategy is the determination of the basic long-term goals of an enterprise, and

the adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resources necessary for carrying out these goals» (Chandler, 1962)

• «A rule for making decisions» (Ansoff, 1965)

• «A pattern in a stream of decisions» (Mintzberg, 1978)

• «Strategy is revolution; everything else is tactics!» (Hamel, 1996)

Page 9: Imisc 2016 sunum

9

Strategy is the way…

The way to the aim…

Page 10: Imisc 2016 sunum

10

Innovation Strategy

• Organizations should innovate, and adopt a strategy either deliberate or emergent.

• The way organizations follow while innovating is their innovation strategy.

• «Innovation strategy determines to what degree and I what way a firm attempts to use innovation to execute its business strategy» (Gilbert, 1994).

• Innovation strategy contains the strategic goals and activities for the product and process innovations aimed at (Vahs, 2002).

Page 11: Imisc 2016 sunum

11

Classifications of business strategies in innovating

Author(s) Classifications

Ansoff and Steward (1967) First to the market, follow the market leader, applied engineering, develop me-too products.

Freeman (1974) Offensive, defensive, imitative, dependent, traditional, opportunistic.

Miles and Snow (1978) Prospective, defender, analyzer, reactor.Porter (1980) Cost leadership (innovation follower),

Product differentiation based on innovations. Venkatraman (1989) Aggressiveness, analysis, defensiveness, futurity, proactiveness,

riskinessSatpathy, Agrawal and Mohapatra (2015)

Pioneer, fast follower, imitative, dependent, Low-cost, specialization

Page 12: Imisc 2016 sunum

12

Venkatraman’s 6 dimensions of strategic orientation

Dimensions DefinitionsAggressiveness The posture adopted by an organization in its allocation of resources in order to improve

its market position faster than its competitors in the target market.Analysis The posture of overall problem solving, tendency to searching for roots of problems and

finding best possible alternative solutions.Defensiveness The dimension refers to defensive behavior of organizations as cost reduction,

efficiency seeking methods, defending core technology and concept of domain defense. Futurity Temporal considerations in key strategic decisions, in terms of relative emphasis of

longer-term consideration. Forecasting sales, customer preferences, formal tracking of environmental trends are emphasized in organizations adopt futurity

Proactiveness Participation in emerging industries, continuous search for market opportunities and experimentation with potential responses to changing environmental trends

Riskiness This dimension reflects to what extent an organization take risk in resource allocation decisions, choice of products and markets.

Page 13: Imisc 2016 sunum

13

Researches on innovation strategies in Turkey

Author(s) Sector Findings

Deniz (2008) SMEs in Malatya SMEs mostly adopted defensiveness

Akman & Yılmaz (2008) Software enterprises Proactiveness, analysis and futurity that were adopted by firms have positive effect on innovation capability

Örücü et.al. (2011) SMEs in Balıkesir SMEs mostly adopted defensiveness

Çetinkaya-Bozkurt & Kalkan (2014)

SMEs in Burdur SMEs adopted analyzer and defender strategy

Karabulut (2015) Manufacturing organizations Organizations mostly adopted a defensive strategy.

Page 14: Imisc 2016 sunum

14

Case of Sakarya Teknokent

Page 15: Imisc 2016 sunum

15

Research goal

The goal of this research is to determine innovation strategies of the enterprises operating in Sakarya Teknokent (ST).

RQ: Which dimension(s) of Venkatraman (1989)’s typology adopted by enterprises in ST for innovating?

Page 16: Imisc 2016 sunum

16

Sakarya Teknokent Inc. was found in 2009 and has been operating since 2010 in technology development area in Sakarya University. Its main

service is to provide qualified offices to organizations for research and development activities or provide land to organizations that want to build their own buildings according to build-operate transfer

model. 63 firms operate in Sakarya Teknokent (ST) in total and 18 of them belong to academicians (www.sakaryateknokent.com).

Page 17: Imisc 2016 sunum

17

Sample and Data

• Semi-structured interviews with 4 owner-managers and 7 authorized managers.

• 10 open ended questions supported by probes.

•Venkatraman (1989)’s 6 basic dimensions: Aggressiveness, analysis, defensiveness, futurity, proactiveness and riskiness, and the scale that Akman and Yılmaz (2008) used in their study in order to measure dimensions of innovation strategy, was utilized.

Page 18: Imisc 2016 sunum

18

Descriptive features of enterprisesEnterprises Participant’s poistion Number of staff Field of activity

E1 Owner-manager 4 SoftwareE2 Owner-manager 4 SoftwareE3 Owner-manager 6 R&DE4 Authorized-manager 5 SoftwareE5 Authorized-manager 9 R&DE6 Authorized-manager 25 R&DE7 Authorized-manager 25 SoftwareE8 Authorized-manager 2 R&DE9 Authorized-manager 10 SoftwareE10 Owner-manager 5 SoftwareE11 Authorized-manager 10 R&D

Page 19: Imisc 2016 sunum

19

Content analysis process

1st step: 9 audio records and 2 drafts were deshiphered into Word documents.2nd step: All 11 Word documents included in analysis.3rd step: Yılmaz and Akman (2008) 6 dimensions was prepared as a pre-determined coding scheme.4th step: Coding scheme was tested on a sample.5th step: All the documents were coded.6th step: Coding consistensy was assessed.7th step: Conclusions was drawn from the data8th step: Findings were reproted.

Page 20: Imisc 2016 sunum

20

FindingsDimensions of Innovation Strategy Enterprises TotalAGGRESSIVENESSPrice is decreased frequently to increase market share E-10 1Pricing below competitive price E-1, 2, 3 3Sacrifice profits in order to introduce a new product to the market earlier than competitors

E-1, 2, 3 3

ANALYSIS (in new product development activities)Coordination between different departments is very important to be successful

E-1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11

8

While making a decision, information systems of the firm provide an efficient support

E-2, 4, 7, 11 4

We use analytical methods for decision-making E-2, 3, 6, 7, 8,11 6Using various planning techniques E-2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11 7

Page 21: Imisc 2016 sunum

21

FindingsDimensions of Innovation Strategy Enterprises TotalDEFENSIVENESS (To compete competitors’ new products)Making changes in product development method sometimes E-2, 3, 4, 6, 8 5Developing quality and performance of current products continually

E-1, 2, 3, 4, 6,7, 8, 9 8

Using modern management techniques E-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,11

10

Teamwork approach to product/process development project E-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11

11

FUTURITYOur firm is future oriented E-1, 2,3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8, 9 9Our firm investigates continually for potential products E-2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,

119

Our firm try to forecast beforehand future market trends E-2, 3, 8, 9, 11 5Marketing research activities focus on acquiring knowledge about future customer needs

E-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,11 8

Page 22: Imisc 2016 sunum

22

FindingsDimensions of Innovation Strategy Enterprises TotalPROACTIVENESS

Our firm is an initiator for defining new product in the market E-3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11 6

Our firm researches new product opportunities continually E-2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11 7

Innovation activities are encouraged in our firm E-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 11

Our firm use new product approach to compete its competitors E-3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 6

Our firm tries to be initiator against competitors about producing new product and ideas

E-2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 8

RISKINESSWe support to develop new product that are successful and makes a profit most certainly

E-1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11 8

We act with deliberation when make a decision about developing a new product

E-1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 9

Innovation activities are seen as very risky E-1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 10 6

Innovation activities are not accepted approach None 0

Page 23: Imisc 2016 sunum

23

Aggressiveness• Low price behavior in first enterance to market

• By gaining experience, tend to price around the market price

• Software enterprises > customers are effective on price as they refer the product to their environment

• Specification prevents competition

• Enterprises compete not on price but on options they added to their products

Page 24: Imisc 2016 sunum

24

Analysis

• Marketing Research plays a significant role in decision-making• Customers• Market share of smilar products• Trading valume• Consulting• Pilot practices• Feedbacks• Satatistical data

Page 25: Imisc 2016 sunum

25

Defensiveness

• Improving performance and quality of the current product

• Introducing new options and features to their customers

• Products modified specifically for customers’ requirements

• Teamwork

• Modern management technics as encouraging, supporting, participating, accessibility

Page 26: Imisc 2016 sunum

26

Futurity• Future-oriented

• Following market trends, new foreign products and their domestic modifications

• Trying to forecast future expectations and requirements of customers

• Taking into account how will the condition of market, trends, and also improvements in countries and world’s economic and sociologic behaviors be in the future

• Unpredictability

Page 27: Imisc 2016 sunum

27

Proactiveness• «Initiator» in introducing new products • Innovation activities are encouraged • Stuffs are supported for generating new ideas

«… If we do not encourage innovation, we would not be in Teknokent…»

• Observing and following foreign markets’ new products closely and to match them with domestic market’s demand

«We do not rediscover America!»

Page 28: Imisc 2016 sunum

28

Riskiness

• Although innovation accepted as a powerful tool to be competitive, it is seen also a risky activity by enterprises

• innovation activities and new ideas were not suppressed

• innovating deliberately

• evaluating market conditions carefully

• Plan-B

Page 29: Imisc 2016 sunum

29

Conclusion

• The results of the content analysis indicate that enterprises in ST adopt 5 dimensions of Venkatraman (1989): analysis, defensiveness, futurity, proactiveness, and riskiness.

•Proactiveness and defensiveness come to the forefront.

Page 30: Imisc 2016 sunum

30

Originality

• This research distinguishes from the others for following a qualitative methodology, and specifying on solely defining innovation strategies of TDAs in Turkey

Page 31: Imisc 2016 sunum

31

Limitations

• The sample consist of 11 owner-managers and authorized managers of enterprises in ST, hence findings may be unique to our sample.

• Researches that will include broader sample, and conducted in different TDA’s will provide comprehensive findings

Page 32: Imisc 2016 sunum

32

Recommendations

•The methodology we followed in this research is a deductive approach, and adhered to Venkatraman’s six dimensions of business orientation.

•Explorative, inductive researches as grounded theory-a qualitative pattern-will allow new concepts and relationships to emerge.

Page 33: Imisc 2016 sunum

33

Thank you

«… We have a Violent Fondness for change, and greater eagerness after Novelties..»

Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees