View
364
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Joe Peterson of Caltrans on the Caltrans move to "Superpave" delivered at the CalAPA Fall Asphalt Pavement Conference Oct. 24, 2013 in Sacramento, Calif.
Citation preview
California’s Transition Hveem To Superpave
Trivia
Pilot Projects• 6 Projects Completed• 13 Projects in Construction• 14 Approved Mix Designs• Placed over 100,000 tons of HMA-SP (Type A) and
RHMA-SP-G• Superpave HMA has been placed in high traffic
areas such as LA-405, and low volume country roads, all with great success.
o
Studies• University of California Pavement Research Study• Completed: December 2012• Looked at 15 Existing Hveem JMF’s from around
the State• Study showed all 15 mix designs with some
adjustments in OBC , grading and dust proportion would meet the Superpave specification.
• Report is available at:o http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/Translab/ormt/superpave/index.htm
Superpave MethodologyAASHTO M 323
Volumetric requirements
AASHTO R 35Mix Design evaluation
AASHTO T 312SGC Mixture Compaction
AASHTO R 30Mixture Conditioning
AASHTO T 324Hamburg Test
SP 2SUPERPAVE Mix Design Handbook
VolumetricsAir Voids, VMA, VFA
AASHTO T 283Moisture Sensitivity
Job MixFormula
JMF DESIG
N
Basis for Design• Gyrations Compaction AASHTO T 312
Type A RHMA-GNinitial 8 Ndesign =50-150Ndesign 85
Nmax 130
• Air Voids AASHTO T 269Type A RHMA-G
Ninitial >8.0% Ndesign=Specifications Ndesign =4.0%Nmax >2.0%
Design VolumetricsAsphalt Institute SP-2
HMA Type A-SP• VMA
o 1/4” grading 18.0 (-1.0, +3.0)o 3/8” grading 16.0 (-1.0, +3.0)o 1/2” grading 14.5 (-1.0, +3.0)o 3/4” grading 13.5 (-1.0, +3.0)
• DPo 1/4” & 3/8” grading 0.6-1.3o 1/2” & 3/4” grading 0.6-1.3o 1” grading 0.6-1.3
DesignVolumetricsAsphalt Institute SP-2
RHMA G-SP• VMA
o 1/2” grading 19.0-24.0o 3/4” grading 19.0-24.0
• DPo All grading’s Report Only
Hamburg Wheel TrackerAASHTO T324
Testing Temperatureso PG 58 45 degrees C o PG 64 50 degrees Co PG 70 + 55 degrees C
Hamburg Wheel TrackerAASHTO T324
HMA Type A-SP
• Maximum 1/2” Ruttingo PG 58 10,000 passeso PG 64 15,000 passeso PG 70 20,000 passeso PG 76 (+) 25,000 passes
• Inflection pointo PG 58 10,000 passeso PG 64 10,000 passeso PG 70 12,500 passeso PG 76 (+) 15,000 passes
Hamburg Wheel TrackerAASHTO T324
RHMAG-SP
• Maximum 1/2” Ruttingo PG 58 15,000 passeso PG 64 20,000 passeso PG 70 25,000 passes
• Inflection pointo PG 58 10,000 passeso PG 64 10,000 passeso PG 70 12,500 passes
Inflection Point Defined
Moisture Sensitivity AASHTO T283
HMA Type A-SP & RHMA-G-SP• Minimum Dry Strength Break
o 100 psi 4” or 6” sample (gyratory)• Minimum Wet Strength Break
o 70 psi 4” or 6” sample (gyratory) • Ratio is no longer measured• Testing done on plant produced material
CRUSHED/FRACTUREDFACES
AASHTO T335* • Percent of crushed particles Type A RHMA
Coarse aggregate (% min.)One fractured face 95 --- Two fractured faces 90
90
Fine aggregate (% min) 70 70
(Passing No. 4 sieveand retained on No. 8 sieve.
*Crushed Face defined as 50% of projected face
RAP Utilization• JMF Design: RAP
o0% to 25% o RAP fractionated into:• + #3/8” Sieve• - #3/8” Sieve
oAllowable stockpile variance, binder content: +/-2.0%
oRice Specific Gravity• Allowable stockpile variance Gmm= +/-0.060
Binder Content/Air Voids
Plant Produced Material• Asphalt Binder Content %
HMA Type A-SP RHMA G-SP
- 0.30, +0.5 - 0.40, +0.5
• Air Voids Content %HMA Type A-SP RHMA G-SP 4 +/- 1.5 Specification +/- 1.5
*Bulk SPG by Weigh wax weigh
PRODUCTION
PARAMETERS
Production QC and QA• Aggregate Quality• Aggregate Grading• Binder Content• HMA Moisture• VMA, DP, & Air voids• Hamburg Wheel Tracker• Moisture Susceptibility
Density QC• Percent of theoretical maximum
density by Nuclear gauge (%) HMA Type A-SP RHMA G-SP 92 – 97 92 – 97
Verify gauge correlation to cores every 10,000 tons utilizing the average of 2 cores
Density QC• Percent of theoretical maximum density
by coreo 2 per paving day
HMA Type A-SP RHMA G-SP 92 – 97 92 – 97
Verify gauge correlation to cores every 10,000 tons utilizing the average of 2 cores
Minor Hot Mix Asphalt• 1000 tons or less total production for:
o Caltrans Projectso Projects within State Right-A-Way
• Requires a JMF submittal• Mandatory use of liquid antistrip• Requires a production start up
evaluation • Requires quality control testing
Minor Hot Mix Asphalt• Verification is done on laboratory
produced material (No hot drop)• Verifications times remain the same• AASHTO T 324 does not apply• AASHTO T 283 does not apply• CT 204 does not apply• FAA and F&E do not apply
Minor Hot Mix Asphalt• Verification consists of testing
for:oAggregate qualityoAggregate gradationoAsphalt binder contentoAir VoidsoVMA
Minor Hot Mix Asphalt• QC testing consists of:
oAggregate gradationoAsphalt binder contentoAir VoidsoVMAoDensity by Nuclear gage (if applicable)
Minor Hot Mix Asphalt• QA consists of testing for:
oAggregate gradationoAsphalt binder contentoAir VoidsoVMA
Quality HMA
Mix Design
sampling
QC
QA
QUESTIONS?
?