Upload
brian-marshall
View
1.556
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
McGladrey & Pullen presentation on revised revenue recognition exposure draft at December 2011 Executive Enterprise Institute Advanced SEC/FASB Reporting and Compliance Conference
Citation preview
1 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Brian Marshall, Partner, McGladrey & Pullen, LLP December 2011
Latest issues in revenue recognition
2 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
McGladrey overview
5th largest accounting firm in the U.S. Provide assurance, tax and consulting services 7,000 professionals in more than 80 offices
nationwide $1.3 billion in total revenue and more than
50,000 clients US member of RSM International (RSMI) – 6th
largest global network of accounting and consulting firms with $3.9 billion in total revenue - 700 offices in 83 countries with more than 32,500
professionals
3 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Agenda
Revised revenue recognition Exposure Draft Updated multiple deliverable arrangements
guidance
4 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Revised revenue recognition Exposure Draft - “Revenue from
Contracts with Customers”
5 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Overview
Preliminary Views document issued in December 2008 Exposure Draft issued in June 2010 Revised Exposure Draft issued in November
2011 Final standard expected in late 2012
6 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Overview
Scope - Applicable to all industries & entities - Specific contracts with customers outside of scope:
• Financial instruments • Guarantees (other than warranties) • Insurance • Leases • Certain nonmonetary exchanges
- Contracts with performance obligations in multiple standards
7 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Overview
Core principle - Recognize revenue to depict the transfer of
promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services
8 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Overview
Approach to comply with this core principle 1. Identify the contract with a customer 2. Identify the separate performance obligations in the
contract 3. Determine the transaction price 4. Allocate the transaction price to the separate
performance obligations 5. Recognize revenue when (or as) each separate
performance obligation is satisfied
9 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
1. Identify the contract with a customer
Contract is an enforceable agreement between parties Can be written, oral or implied Contract combination
- Required for contracts entered into at or near the same time if certain other criteria are met
Contract modifications - Treat separately if separate performance obligation
is added with consideration consistent with standalone selling price
- Otherwise combine with original contract
10 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
2. Identify separate performance obligations
Promise in a contract to transfer a good or service Account for separately if distinct based on meeting
either of the following criteria: - Good or service is regularly sold separately by the entity; or - Customer can benefit from good or service on its own or
together with other readily available resources
However, bundle of promised goods or services is accounted for as one performance obligation if: - Highly interrelated and require significant integration service;
and - Significantly modified or customized to fulfill contract
11 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
3. Determine the transaction price
Amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled to from a customer Variable consideration
- Estimate based on probability-weighted or most-likely amount
Time value of money - Only affects transaction price if significant financing
component - Can ignore if time between payment and transfer of
goods or services is one year or less
12 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
3. Determine the transaction price
Noncash consideration - Measure at fair value or by reference to standalone
selling price of related goods or services Consideration payable to a customer
- Reduction of transaction price unless in exchange for distinct good or service
Collectibility - Not considered in transaction price - Record allowance adjacent to revenue
13 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
4. Allocate the transaction price
Generally based on relative standalone selling price of performance obligations Standalone selling price
- Observable price when sold separately (best) - Otherwise estimate:
• Cost plus margin • Adjusted market assessment • Residual technique allowed if highly variable or uncertain • Others?
Subsequent changes allocated on a relative standalone selling price basis unless certain criteria are met
14 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
5. Recognize revenue
Recognize revenue as performance obligations are satisfied based on transfer of control Determine if satisfied (and revenue recognized)
over time, based on whether entity’s performance: - Creates or enhances an asset the customer controls; or - Does not create an asset with an alternative use and one
of following criteria is met: • Customer receives a benefit as entity performs tasks • Another entity would not need to reperform tasks performed to
date • Vendor has right to payment for performance to date
Select method of progress toward completion (output or input)
15 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
5. Recognize revenue
If prior criteria not met then satisfied at a point in time Recognize revenue when customer obtains control
based on following indicators: - Entity has right to payment - Entity has transferred physical possession - Customer has legal title and risks and rewards of ownership - Customer has accepted goods or services
Recognize amount allocated to performance obligation except for certain variable consideration, which is limited to reasonably assured amount based on: - Experience with similar performance obligations - Whether that experience is predictive of outcome
16 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Onerous performance obligations
Only applicable to performance obligations satisfied over period > 1 year Recognize liability if allocated transaction price is
less than lower of: - Direct costs to satisfy performance obligation; or - Amount to be paid to exit the performance obligation Direct costs include:
- Direct labor & materials - Allocated costs directly related to contract - Costs explicitly chargeable to the customer - Other costs incurred only because contract entered into
17 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Contract costs
Capitalize direct costs of fulfilling a contract or anticipated contract if those costs: - Generate or enhance a resource that will be used to
satisfy performance obligations in the future (e.g., setup costs); and
- Are expected to be recovered Capitalize incremental costs to obtain contract if
expected to be recovered Practical expedient to expense costs as
incurred if amortization period would have been less than one year
18 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Return rights
Defer revenue and record refund liability for goods expected to be returned Adjust refund liability (and revenue) for changes
in return expectations Record asset (rather than cost of sales) for right
to recover products at former carrying amount less costs of recovery
19 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Warranties
Customer option to purchase separately - Separate performance obligation (warranty service) No customer option to purchase separately and
warranty does not provide an additional service - Recognize revenue and accrue expected costs - Consider following in determination of whether
additional service is being provided: • Whether warranty is required by law
• Length of warranty period
• Nature of tasks to be performed
20 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Optional goods or services
Considered a performance obligation if provides a material right customer otherwise would not receive Estimate standalone selling price of option
using: - Directly observable option price, - Option discount adjusted for likelihood of exercise
and discount available without the option
21 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Other issues
Customers’ unexercised rights (“Breakage”) - Relatively consistent with current US GAAP Licensing and rights to use
- Same guidance as for other goods or services - Revenue recognized at point in time if separate
performance obligation Repurchase agreements
- Entity obligation (forward) or right (call option) to repurchase asset
- Customer right to require entity to repurchase (put option)
22 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Treatment similar to current US GAAP
Nonrefundable upfront fees Principal vs. agent considerations Consignment arrangements Bill-and-hold arrangements Customer acceptance
23 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Balance sheet presentation
Asset/liability based on comparison of entity’s performance to customer’s performance Entity > customer = asset Entity < customer = liability Receivables are classified separately from other
asset - Unconditional right to receive consideration
24 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Disclosures / transition / effective date
Disclosure objective: - Quantitative and qualitative information regarding
nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and related cash flows
Retrospective transition with certain practical expedients Effective date no earlier than 2015 for public
entities and 2016 for nonpublic entities. Comments due by March 13
25 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Updated multiple deliverable arrangements guidance
(ASU 2009-13 & 14)
26 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
ASU 2009-13 (EITF 08-1), “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” Response to criticisms of EITF 00-21 (ASC 605-
25) - Often unable to separate into multiple units of
accounting (lack of fair value of the undelivered items)
- Accounting often did not match economics Allows more flexibility in determining values of
separate elements Effective for arrangements entered into or
materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after 6/15/2010
27 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
ASU 2009-13 - Separation guidance
Delivered item is a separate unit of accounting if the following criteria are met: - The delivered item has value to the customer on a
standalone basis • Does vendor sell the item separately? • Can customer resell item on a standalone basis?
- There is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s)
- If the arrangement includes a general right of return, delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is probable and within control of vendor
28 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
ASU 2009-13 - Allocation guidance
Allocate consideration using relative selling price method - Eliminates requirement for objective and reliable
evidence of FV of undelivered items - Eliminates use of residual method; probably results in
earlier recognition Hierarchy of evidence to use for allocation
- Vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of selling price
- Third-party evidence (TPE) of selling price - Best estimate of standalone selling price
• No practicality exception provided
29 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
ASU 2009-13 - Estimating standalone selling price
No specific methodology prescribed Gather all reasonably available data points Adjust based on:
- Market conditions - Entity-specific factors Consider all information that is reasonably
available without undue cost or effort to determine estimated selling price
30 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
ASU 2009-13 - Disclosures
Ongoing disclosures - Quantitative and qualitative information about significant
judgments used in applying ASU 2009-13 and changes in those judgments or in the application that may significantly affect the allocation of revenue
- Inputs, methods, and significant assumptions used in evaluating arrangements and the significant deliverables in those arrangements
Transition disclosures (if adopt prospectively) - Qualitative description of how the ASU was adopted - Supplement with quantitative disclosures if material
31 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
ASU 2009-14 (EITF 09-3), “Certain Revenue Arrangements that Include Software Elements”
EITF consensus in ASU 2009-13 (EITF 08-1) led to this Issue Effective date mirrors ASU 2009-13 Should scope of ASC 985-605 (SOP 97-2)
and/or criteria be eased? - ASC 985-605 seen as very conservative
• No VSOE = no separation; defer until established or delivered
- Does scope capture more arrangements than intended? • Are underlying economics being distorted as a result?
32 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
ASU 2009-14 - Overview
EITF agreed to amend scope of ASC 985-605 - Tangible products containing software components and non-
software components that function together to deliver the product's essential functionality should be considered non-software deliverables
The following are excluded from ASC 985-605 scope: - Non-software components of software-reliant tangible products - Software components bundled with tangible products if the
software components and non-software components function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality
- Undelivered elements that relate to software that is essential to the above described tangible product’s functionality
33 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
ASU 2009-14 - Determining “Function Together to Deliver the Product’s Essential Functionality”
Rebuttable presumption that software elements are essential to the functionality of the tangible product if sales of the tangible product without the software elements are infrequent
The evaluation to determine whether or not the tangible product and software are functioning together is done at the product level, not the model level
The separate standalone sale of the software does not cause a presumption that the software is not essential to the functionality of the tangible product
34 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
ASU 2009-14 - Determining “Function Together to Deliver the Product’s Essential Functionality”
Software elements do not need to be embedded on a device to be considered essential to the device’s functionality
The non-software elements of the tangible product must substantively contribute to the tangible product’s essential functionality
Entities will need to evaluate existing product lines to determine which software stays within the scope of ASC 985-605 and which does not
35 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
McGladrey thought leadership
Accounting publications and resource site: http://mcgladrey.com/Assurance/Accounting-Resources
36 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
McGladrey thought leadership
Publications subscription site: http://mcgladrey.com/Publications/Publication-Subscription
37 ©2011 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP. All Rights Reserved.
QUESTIONS?