Upload
dr-mustafa-degerli
View
39
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DESIGN MANAGEMENT
Mustafa Değerli
2016
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 1 of 13
Table of Contents
Title of My Promised Research ..................................................................................................................... 2
List of Annotated Bibliography (AB) for My Promised Research .................................................................. 3
AB#1 .............................................................................................................................................................. 4
AB#2 .............................................................................................................................................................. 5
AB#3 .............................................................................................................................................................. 6
AB#4 .............................................................................................................................................................. 7
AB#5 .............................................................................................................................................................. 8
AB#6 .............................................................................................................................................................. 9
AB#7 ............................................................................................................................................................ 10
AB#8 ............................................................................................................................................................ 11
AB#9 ............................................................................................................................................................ 12
AB#10 .......................................................................................................................................................... 13
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 2 of 13
Title of My Promised Research
A Study on Improving Collaborations of Electrical & Electronics Engineers and Computer
Engineers in Systems Projects
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 3 of 13
List of Annotated Bibliography (AB) for My Promised Research
Careau, E., Vincent, C., & Swaine, B. R. (2014). Observed interprofessional collaboration
(OPIC) during interdisciplinary team meetings: Development and validation of a tool
in a rehabilitation setting. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and
Education, 4(1), 1-19.
Emmitt, S. & Ruikar, K. (2013). Collaborative design management. New York: Routledge,
Taylor & Francis Group.
Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of
Interprofessional Care, 19(1), 188-196.
Kim, K. (2013). Developing guidelines for collaborative spaces supporting
interdisciplinary engineering design teams (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Klein, J. T. (2005). Interdisciplinary teamwork: The dynamics of collaboration and
integration. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.),
Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science (pp. 23–50).
Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Nancarrow, S. A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P., & Roots, A. (2013). Ten
principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human Resources for Health, 11(19),
1-11.
Schultz, R. & Johnson, A. (2005, June), Practicing real world design, teamwork, and
communications through multidisciplinary systems engineering projects. American
Society for Engineering Education. Paper presented at 2005 American Society for
Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon.
Shelby, K. R. (2014). Systems engineering knowledge asset (SEKA) management for
higher performing engineering teams: People, process and technology toward
effective knowledge-workers (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC.
(UMI 3611730).
Youngwerth, J. & Twaddle, M. (2011). Cultures of interdisciplinary teams: How to foster
good dynamics. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(5), 650-654.
Zhu, H. & Meuth, R. J. (2015, June), Assessment of communication, teamwork, and
engineering motivation in inter-disciplinary projects implemented in an introduction
to engineering course. American Society for Engineering Education. Paper presented
at 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Seattle,
WA.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 4 of 13
AB#1
Careau, E., Vincent, C., & Swaine, B. R. (2014). Observed interprofessional collaboration
(OPIC) during interdisciplinary team meetings: Development and validation of a tool
in a rehabilitation setting. Journal of Research in Interprofessional Practice and
Education, 4(1), 1-19.
This paper gives details about an observation based tool to evaluate interprofessional
collaboration interactional factors arising during interdisciplinary team meetings and
examination of the first validation of the tool in a rehabilitation setting. The items were
developed and pre-tested iteratively by construct experts and non-experts. Interrater
reliability was determined between two observers, subsequent to the analysis of 30 video
recordings of meetings in two rehabilitation centers involving a total of 152 participants.
As a result of the research explained in the subject paper, an observation grid consisting of
20 items that can be answered on a three-point scale and demonstrating satisfactory
interrater reliability was developed. The paper provides a tool which is composed of 20
items; two phases: building a common vision of the situation and development of a
common action plan; and ten dimensions: purpose of the meeting, team composition,
expertise affirmation and recognition, attainment of consensus, person-centered practice,
communication, respectful attitude, facilitation/mediation, shared decision-making, and
adoption of a common action plan. The paper concludes with that the tool designed for
evaluating interprofessional collaboration interactional factors during interdisciplinary
meetings based on team performance.
I am to utilize the drawings of this paper for the context of meetings done in design phases
of systems projects where electrical & electronics engineers and computer engineers
participate in to collaborate. I am to hypothesize and test some of these points to
characterize the effective collaborations of electrical & electronics engineers and computer
engineers in the scope of design phases of systems projects.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 5 of 13
AB#2
Emmitt, S. & Ruikar, K. (2013). Collaborative design management. New York: Routledge,
Taylor & Francis Group.
Part 8 of this book comprehensively explains the crucial components for collaborative
working strategies. The book’s pertinent part names these schemes as management, people,
process, and technology. For each of these domains, the part of the book clarifies the
importance of these at an all-purpose perspective, and gives impartially adequate amounts
of literature justifications for each domain. To be exact, the part of the book finally
highlights that management, people, process, and technology are the vigorous dimensions
to manage and exploit on the way to ensure and enhance collaborative design management
in general sense.
This is a quite broad and generic reference for my subject work, yet the main rulers (i.e.,
management, people, process, and technology) listed and expanded in the related part of
the book are going to be ordinarily valuable for my work. I consider that collaborations of
electrical & electronics engineers and computer engineers in design phases of systems
projects are also conceivably influenced by these four essentials. I am to utilize this part of
the book to form my hypotheses and prepare my questionnaire for data collection.
Additionally, I will compare the results of my work with the general clauses and comments
made in the related part of this book.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 6 of 13
AB#3
Hall, P. (2005). Interprofessional teamwork: Professional cultures as barriers. Journal of
Interprofessional Care, 19(1), 188-196.
In this article, it is stressed that educational experiences and the socialization process taking
place throughout the training of professionals customarily underpin the common values,
problem solving methodologies, and guff of each profession. Namely, it is noted that
knowledge and culture of each professional groups are formed and sustained either
intentionally or unintentionally in training and education processes. For sure, these so
called professional cultures sometimes add to the challenges of effective interprofessional
teamwork. This article lists the collaborative skills which are crucial aimed at effective
teamwork as cooperation, assertiveness, responsibility, communication, autonomy, and
coordination. Accordingly, this article suggests an understanding with respect to
educational, systemic and personal barriers hindering interprofessional practice. The article
discusses values, educational systems, challenges and opportunities in the subject context.
The article concentrates mostly on the professional culture shaping and driving these
settings. In the subject article, a number of hypotheses are proposed for the context of
development of methodologies to advance the concept and practice of interprofessional
teamwork.
Even though this paper is from health and care domain, I think that its results and drawings
may also be applicable for systems projects engineering design domain. To me, the
drawings are quite generic and can possible be applicable for the context of my research as
collaborations of electrical & electronics engineers and computer engineers and
interprofessional teamwork are highly related and can be treated in the similar contexts.
Specifically, I expect that electrical & electronics engineers and computer engineers are
fairly different professional cultures which has to be seriously taken into account to
improve collaborations of these people. I am to consider the professional cultures as a
separate construct while preparing and drafting my research.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 7 of 13
AB#4
Kim, K. (2013). Developing guidelines for collaborative spaces supporting
interdisciplinary engineering design teams (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
This dissertation examines the effect of physical environment on the effectiveness of
interdisciplinary engineering design teams; explores the impact of interaction strategy
design support on the effectiveness of interdisciplinary engineering design teams; and
constructs behavioral indicators of successful interdisciplinary teamwork. Related study is
conducted in two phases, namely field based pilot study and laboratory based experimental
study. In the subject study, physical room condition (Kiva vs. conference room) and
interaction strategy design support (present vs. absent) are used as independent variables;
and the dependent variables were categorized as team process and output that measured
team effectiveness. As a result, this dissertation’s results designate that the benefits of
having a novel, flexible team design space are only effective when they are combined with
a strategy that allows workers to entirely utilize the features of the space.
In my study, I am also to have a look at the effect of space for collaborations of electrical
& electronics engineers and computer engineers in the scope of design phases of systems
projects. I guess that this possibly will be more central for electrical & electronics engineers
as they need extra and distinctive space for the design. Though, I predict both electronics
engineers and computer engineers may perhaps evaluate the space as a vital factor. I am to
benefit from the approach and drawings of the subject dissertation for my work.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 8 of 13
AB#5
Klein, J. T. (2005). Interdisciplinary teamwork: The dynamics of collaboration and
integration. In S. J. Derry, C. D. Schunn, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.),
Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging cognitive science (pp. 23–50).
Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
This chapter explores the landscape of interdisciplinary teamwork and examines certain
practices in science, industry, and government with a special focus on cases of developing
countries. The chapter endows with basic definitions and backgrounds on both of the
concepts of interdisciplinarity and teamwork. The chapter gives details with respect to
historical and organizational contexts, complexity of interdisciplinary teamwork, problems
in interdisciplinary teamwork, enabling integration, tools and skills, and models of
integration. The chapter firmly concludes that the salient dynamics of interdisciplinary
teamwork are typically governed by organizational structure, tasks and activities,
leadership, team dynamics, problems, enabling factors, and tools, skills, and models. In the
chapter, each of these ruling factors on interdisciplinary teamwork are examined and
elaborated in detail.
This chapter will be reasonably advantageous for my research. As I am to study to
determine principal stimulating factors and thereby provide suggestions on improving
collaborations of electrical & electronics engineers and computer engineers in design
phases of systems projects, I will mostly benefit from the elaborated dynamics of
interdisciplinary teamwork, such as organizational structure, tasks and activities,
leadership, team dynamics, problems, enabling factors, and tools, skills, and models.
Furthermore, I am to take advantage of basic definitions and backgrounds provided in the
chapter to richen the introductory parts of my paper.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 9 of 13
AB#6
Nancarrow, S. A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P., & Roots, A. (2013). Ten
principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human Resources for Health, 11(19),
1-11.
Based on a published systematic review of the pertinent literature on interdisciplinary team
work and the insights of 253 people from 11 teams in the UK, this article tries to identify
the characteristics of a good interdisciplinary team. In the paper, data sources are combined
using qualitative content analysis to attain an outline pinpointing features and suggests ten
competencies meant for effective interdisciplinary team work. The results of the paper
claim that there can be ten features reinforcing effective interdisciplinary team work and
these are: positive leadership and management attributes; communication strategies and
structures; personal rewards, training and development; appropriate resources and
procedures; appropriate skill mix; supportive team climate; individual characteristics that
support interdisciplinary team work; clarity of vision; quality and outcomes of care; and
respecting and understanding roles. The paper describes characteristics of a good
interdisciplinary team with themes, descriptions for each theme, and competency
statements.
This article is to be helpful for my study as it generically lists and elaborates the ten
characteristics of a good interdisciplinary team. As I am to characterize expected conditions
to improve collaborations of electrical & electronics engineers and computer engineers in
the scope of design phases of systems projects, I am to use these ten features while
developing my instrument; and supporting and discussing my drawings.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 10 of 13
AB#7
Schultz, R. & Johnson, A. (2005, June), Practicing real world design, teamwork, and
communications through multidisciplinary systems engineering projects. American
Society for Engineering Education. Paper presented at 2005 American Society for
Engineering Education Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon.
This conference paper gives some information on the subject of collaborations in the
University of North Dakota’s famous aerospace program which provides the students with
numerous experiential learning opportunities that fulfill design, multidisciplinary
teamwork, and communication skill outcomes. The paper firmly designates the large-scale
systems engineering projects at the University of North Dakota. In the paper, seven brief
case studies are provided with an examination of their sustainability and scalability. The
paper additionally reviews the paybacks and the defies related with stimulating practice-
oriented systems engineering projects to help students learn real world design, teamwork,
and communications. The paper continues with that the program’s main contribution is that
the students must learn to communicate well in order to be successful on a large team.
Additionally, the paper suggest that students involved in the program who practice at
designing complex electrical subsystems must also understand the importance of the
integration and test process while building larger systems containing electrical,
mechanical, and software components. The paper concludes that from a real world outlook,
projects conducted in the program provide comparable technical tasks, team environment,
personality conflicts, and ever-changing workforce like in industry.
I am to benefit from this paper to hypothesize that whether graduate and undergraduate
programs have a duty to involve practice-oriented systems engineering projects in their
curriculums to let students learn hurly-burly design, teamwork, and communications. More
unambiguously, in my questionnaire and interviews, I am to ask this issue to the
participants to know their perception about involving practice-oriented systems
engineering projects in graduate or undergraduate curriculums will improve something or
not. Explicitly, I am to get participants view about involving systems projects which have
condensed amount of software and hardware, and integrations of these in the graduate and
undergraduate programs.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 11 of 13
AB#8
Shelby, K. R. (2014). Systems engineering knowledge asset (SEKA) management for
higher performing engineering teams: People, process and technology toward
effective knowledge-workers (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC.
(UMI 3611730).
This dissertation studies the surrounding people, process and technology dimensions for
higher performing engineering teams to improve communication, learning and common
knowledge collaboration. The research examines an exclusive information technology
based systems engineering knowledge asset (SEKA) management mechanism. The
selected mechanism integrates multiple techniques for improved collaboration efficacy.
The research methodology applied in the subject research was a modified true experiment
with dual-posttest only, using an A and B group for comparative controls. The subject
research’s findings reflect that SEKA represented in 3-way multiple informational
representations required of referent knowledge constructs improves systems engineering
teams’ consumption of a common knowledge base.
This research’s findings are to be of assistance for my research as I am to hypothesize the
knowledge management’s weight on improving communication, learning and common
knowledge collaborations of electrical & electronics engineers and computer engineers in
the scope of design phases of systems projects. I am to benefit from this dissertation during
both instrument development and discussion of my results.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 12 of 13
AB#9
Youngwerth, J. & Twaddle, M. (2011). Cultures of interdisciplinary teams: How to foster
good dynamics. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(5), 650-654.
In this article, the concept of teamwork and interdisciplinary teams are basically pointed
out. The article gives details about benefits of the interdisciplinary approach and what
makes an interdisciplinary team work sound. In the article, specifically, it is noted that real
team in effect is reliant on communication, interpersonal relations, team composition, and
structure, and organizational factors. Additionally, in the article, barriers and challenges to
effective interdisciplinary team operations are elaborated. Barriers/challenges are listed as
communication breakdown, hierarchical structures, muddied roles of team members, and
systems issues. The article finally notes that communication and collaboration are
identified as exceedingly and mostly critical to the effective functioning of interdisciplinary
teams. Besides, the article concludes that establishing clear goals and roles, mutual respect
and trust among team members, team structure, and organizational support are to aid a team
towards working most effectually.
This paper will be of assistance for my research as it distils the benefits of the
interdisciplinary approach and what makes an interdisciplinary team work well.
Specifically, for the context of my research I am to take into account the issues of
communication breakdown, hierarchical structures, fuzzy roles of team members, and
systems issues for electrical & electronics engineers and computer engineers in the scope
of design phases of systems projects. I am to utilize this article both for instrument
development and general discussion of my research.
Mustafa Değerli – Annotated Bibliography / Design Management Page 13 of 13
AB#10
Zhu, H. & Meuth, R. J. (2015, June), Assessment of communication, teamwork, and
engineering motivation in inter-disciplinary projects implemented in an introduction
to engineering course. American Society for Engineering Education. Paper presented
at 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Seattle,
WA.
This conference paper basically discusses the integration of inter-disciplinary teamwork
into a course, the Introduction to Engineering course, at the Arizona State University.
Explicitly, the implementation of a large practical hands-on design project is discussed in
the text. In the subject paper, measurements of the impact of experience on learners’
knowledge and self-efficacy of the engineering design process, their technical
communication skills, and teamwork are provided. In the context of the subject research,
engineering design self-efficacy was administered before the start of the hands-on design
project and again at the end of the semester after the completion of the design project to
over 80 students in both sections of the course. In the paper, it is claimed that pre- and post-
project results recommend that the interdisciplinary project had a positive impact on the
measured outcomes. Moreover, it also has changed students’ perception of the importance
of various skills in engineering and their expectations of engineering in action in the real
world to a greater extent.
To me, this paper highlights and confirms the view that schools should be laboratories for
real life. That is to say, as students are to be required to work mostly in interdisciplinary
teams in real professional life, they should be equipped with the skills and knowledge for
this context during their education/training period. In my research, I am to hypothesize this
point and to confirm or reject this view based on the views of the participants. Based on
the results, I am to defend my views with the ones provided in this paper. Hence, this paper
will be of assistance for my work.