18
PERT PROGRAM EVALUATION REVIEW TECHNIQUE VINCI VIVEKA

Pert- program evaluation and review technique

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

PERTPROGRAM EVALUATION REVIEW

TECHNIQUE

Page 2: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

•A statistical tool, used in project management

• It is designed to analyze and represent the tasks involved in completing a given project.

•A decision making tool designed to save time in achieving end objectives.

•It is one of the techniques of scientific management.

•It was developed for the U.S. Navy Special Projects Office in 1957 to support the U.S. Navy's Polaris nuclear submarine project

Page 3: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

PERT

PERT chart is a tool that facilitates decision making.

PERT is a method to analyze the involved tasks in completing a given project, especially the time needed to complete each task and to identify the minimum time needed to complete the total project.

PERT is valuable to manage where multiple tasks are occurring simultaneously to reduce idleness.

For this it takes into consideration three factors: 1. Time 2. Resources 3. Technical Performance Specifications.

Page 4: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

TERMINOLOGY

PERT Event: a point that marks the start or completion of one or more activities. It consumes no time and uses no resources. When it marks the completion of one or more tasks, it is not “reached” (does not occur) until all of the activities leading to that event have been completed.eg- start and finish*

Predecessor Event: an event that immediately precedes some other event without any other events intervening. An event can have multiple predecessor events and can be the predecessor of multiple events. Eg: A and b are predecessor of C*

Successor Event: an event that immediately follows some other event without any other intervening events. An event can have multiple successor events and can be the successor of multiple events.eg: D is the successor of C*.

*(refer Gantt Diagram)

Page 5: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

Optimistic Time (O): the minimum possible time required to accomplish a task, assuming everything proceeds better than is normally expected

Pessimistic Time (P): the maximum possible time required to accomplish a task, assuming everything goes wrong (but excluding major catastrophes).

Most Likely Time (M): the best estimate of the time required to accomplish a task, assuming everything proceeds as normal.

Expected Time (TE): the best estimate of the time required to accomplish a task, accounting for the fact that things don't always proceed as normal (the implication being that the expected time is the average time the task would require if the task were repeated on a number of occasions over an extended period of time).

TE = (O + 4M + P) ÷ 6

Page 6: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

PERT Activity: the actual performance of a task which consumes time and requires resources (such as labor, materials, space, machinery). It can be understood as representing the time, effort, and resources required to move from one event to another. A PERT activity cannot be performed until the predecessor event has occurred. Eg: A,B,C,D*

Float or Slack is a measure of the excess time and resources available to complete a task. It is the amount of time that a project task can be delayed without causing a delay in any subsequent tasks (free float) or the whole project (total float). Positive slack would indicate ahead of schedule; negative slack would indicate behind schedule; and zero slack would indicate on schedule.

Critical Path: the longest possible continuous pathway taken from the initial event to the terminal event. It determines the total calendar time required for the project; and, therefore, any time delays along the critical path will delay the reaching of the terminal event by at least the same amount.

Page 7: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

Activity

Predecessor

Time Estimates Te

O M P

A - 2 8 6 4.00

B - 3 5 9 5.33

C A,B 4 5 7 5.17

D C 4 6 10 6.13

TE = (O + 4M + P) ÷ 6

Page 8: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

Gantt Chart ( According to the table in previous chart)

A

B

C DFINIS

HSTART

Activity On Node (AON) Diagram

Page 9: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

NODE

A NODE LOOKS LIKE-

A

EARLYSTART

DURATION EARLY FINISH

ALATE

STARTSLACK LATE

FINISH

Page 10: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VIN

CI V

IVEK

AIn order to determine these following are the steps-EARLY FINISH [ EF ]Formula for EF= ES + Duration.

Duration can be taken from the table it is represented by TeFor the first activity i.e. START Early Start [ ES] =0, As start is a pert event its duration is zero.Therefore, for STARTES=0 Duration =0 ; EF= ES + Duration => EF=0

EF of the predecessor event becomes ES of its successor.

Therefore, for AES=0 Duration=4, EF=4

For B,( as A&B both have same Predecessor i.e. START hence B----ES=0 Duration= 5.33 EF=5.33

For C ( as A&B both are C predecessor hence we take the one with higher value)ES=5.33 Duration=5.17 EF=10.5

Page 11: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

For D,ES= 10.5 Duration=6.13 EF=16.63

For FINISH [as FINISH is a pert event its duration is zero]ES=16.63 Duration=0 EF=16.63

LATE START [ LS ]Formula LS=LF – DURATION

In this we start with FINISH, as it is the last activity. LATE FINISH [LF ] of FINISH = its EF.Therefore, LF=EF=16.63 Duration= 0 LS=LF- Duration , Hence LS=16.63

For D, [ LS of successor event becomes LF for its predecessor event ]LF=16.63 Duration=6.13 LS=10.5

For C, LF=10.5 Duration=5.17 LS=5.33

For B,LF=5.33 Duration=5.33 LS= 0

Page 12: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VIN

CI V

IVEK

AFor A, [ as C is also its successor ]LF=5.33 Duration=4 LS=1.33

For START [as A&B both are successor but we take here one with the lower value ]LF=1.33 Duration =0 LS=1.33

SLACK

To determine the critical path we have to find whether any activity has a slack. Activity on the critical path has slack zero.Formula SLACK=LF-EF or SLACK= LS-ES

For START For CLS=1.33 ES=0 SLACK=1.33 LS=5.33 ES=5.33 SLACK=0

For A For DLS=1.33 ES=0 SLACK=1.33 LS= 10.5 ES=10.5 SLACK=0

For B For FINISHLS=5.33 ES=0 SLACK=5.33 LS=1.33 ES=0 SLACK=1.33

Page 13: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

ES=0 DUR=0 EF=0

START

LS=1.33

SLACK=1.33

LF=1.33

ES=0 DUR=4 EF=4

A

LS=0 SLACK=1.33

LF=5.33

ES=5.33 DUR=5.17

EF=10.5

C

LS=5.33 SLACK=0

LF=10.5

ES=0 DUR=5.33

EF=5.33

B

LS=0 SLACK=5.33

LF=5.33

ES=16.63

DUR=0 EF=16.63

FINISH

LS=16.63

SLACK=1.33

LF=16.63

ES=10.5 DUR=6.13

EF=16.33

D

LS=10.5 SLACK=0

LF=16.63

Page 14: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

CRITICAL PATH

It is the longest continous -path way. There can be more than one critical path or the path can change.In the drawn Gantt diagram there are two alternatives to reach FINISH and adding there SLACK timing-START+A+C+D+FINISH=3.99START+B+C+D+FINISH=7.99

Hence , the path START+B+C+D+FINISH is the longest it is the critical path, shown in the diagram in the next slide.

Page 15: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

A

B

C DFINIS

HSTART

CRITICAL PATH[ in red ink ]

Page 16: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

ADVANTAGES:•PERT chart explicitly defines and makes visible dependencies (precedence relationships) between the work breakdown structure (commonly WBS) elements

•PERT facilitates identification of the critical path and makes this visible

•PERT facilitates identification of early start, late start, and slack for each activity

•PERT provides for potentially reduced project duration due to better understanding of dependencies leading to improved overlapping of activities and tasks where feasible.•The large amount of project data can be organized & presented in diagram for use in decision making.

Page 17: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VINCI VIVEKA

DISADVANTAGES:•There can be potentially hundreds or thousands of activities and individual dependency relationships

•PERT is not easily scalable for smaller projects

•The network charts tend to be large and unwieldy requiring several pages to print and requiring special size paper

•The lack of a timeframe on most PERT/CPM charts makes it harder to show status although colours can help (e.g., specific colour for completed nodes)

•When the PERT/CPM charts become unwieldy, they are no longer used to manage the project.

Page 18: Pert- program evaluation and review technique

VIN

CI V

IVEK

A

THANK YOU

Prepared by:VINCI VIVEKAM.ED SCHOLAR [2012-2013]ST. XAVIER’S COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, [email protected]

REFERENCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_Evaluation_and_Review_Technique