100
Strictly Confidential September 2014 Point Frederick Capital Point Frederick Capital Point Frederick Capital Management, LLC Asbury Automotive: Car Dealers Are Now Where U.S. Home Builders Were In Mid-2008 And Asbury May Be The Most Cyclically Vulnerable In The Space Chand Sooran & Anand Kalola

Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Our short case on the car dealer Asbury Automotive.

Citation preview

Page 1: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

Point Frederick Capital

Management, LLC

Asbury Automotive: Car Dealers Are Now Where U.S.

Home Builders Were In Mid-2008 And Asbury May Be The

Most Cyclically Vulnerable In The Space

Chand Sooran & Anand Kalola

Page 2: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

Important Information

2

This material has been prepared by Point Frederick Capital Management, LLC (the “Investment Manager” or “Point Frederick”). The information in this material is for illustration and

discussion purposes only. It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed or used as, investment, tax or legal advice, any recommendation or opinion regarding the

appropriateness or suitability of any investment or strategy, or an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, an interest in any security, including an interest in the private fund

described herein (the “Fund”) or any other private fund or pool advised by the Investment Manager or any of its affiliates. This information is qualified in its entirety by the

information contained in the Fund’s confidential offering documents (the “Offering Memorandum”). Any offer or solicitation o f an investment in the Fund may be made only by

delivery of the Offering Memorandum to qualified investors. Prospective investors should rely solely on the Offering Memorandum in making any investment decision. The Offering

Memorandum contains important information, including, among other information, a description of the Fund’s risks, investment program, fees and expenses, and should be read

carefully before any investment decision is made. This material does not take into account the particular investment objectives, restrictions, or financial, legal or tax situation of any

specific investor. An investment in the Fund is not suitable for all investors.

No representation is made that the Investment Manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment objectives, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be

achieved or successful or that the Fund or any underlying investment will make any profit or will not sustain losses. An investment in the Fund involves risk, as disclosed in the

Offering Memorandum. The Investment Manager may engage in investment practices or trading strategies that may increase the risk of investment loss and a loss of principal may

occur. The risk management techniques which may be utilized by the Investment Manager cannot provide any assurance that the Fund will not be exposed to risks of significant

trading losses.

Any descriptions involving investment process, investment examples, statistical analysis, investment strategies or risk management techniques are provided for illustration purposes

only, will not apply in all situations, may not be fully indicative of any present or future investments, may be changed in the discretion of the Investment Manager and are not

intended to reflect performance.

Any opinions, assumptions, assessments, statements or the like (collectively, “Statements”) regarding future events or which are forward-looking, including regarding portfolio

characteristics and limits, constitute only subjective views, beliefs, outlooks, estimations or intentions of the Investment Manager, should not be relied on, are subject to change due

to a variety of factors, including fluctuating market conditions and economic factors, and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, many of which cannot be

predicted or quantified and are beyond the Investment Manager’s or the Fund’s control. Future evidence and actual results (including actual composition and investment

characteristics of a portfolio) could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying these Statements, which are subject to change without notice. In light of

these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance and no representation is given that these Statements are now, or wil l prove to be accurate, or complete in any way. The

Investment Manager undertakes no responsibility or obligation to revise or update such Statements. Statements expressed herein may not necessarily be shared by all personnel

of the Investment Manager and its affiliates.

This material is not complete, is subject to change and does not contain material information regarding the Fund, including specific information relating to an investment in the Fund

and related risks factors. Certain information has been provided by and/or is based on third party sources and, although believed to be reliable, has not been independently

verified. The Investment Manager is not responsible for errors or omissions from these sources. No representation is made with respect to the accuracy, completeness or

timeliness of information and the Investment Manager assumes no obligation to update or otherwise revise such information.

This information is confidential, is the property of the Investment Manager, is intended only for intended recipients and their authorized agents and representatives and may not be

reproduced or distributed to any other person without prior written consent.

2

Page 3: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

INVESTMENT THESIS AND CONCLUSION

Page 4: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

4

Asbury Automotive Has Had A Terrific Run But Faces A

Number Of Cyclical Challenges And One Structural Risk

Recommendation: We contend that Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. is a compelling short investment

for its pronounced and industry-leading exposure to the peaking North American new and used car

cycles, and for its growing reliance on ancillary revenue, the most profitable of which is derived from

marketing financial transactions to its customers on behalf of third party lenders and insurers.

Industry Challenges Abound

• Autos have made full V-shaped recovery from the post-2008

trough, erasing any pent-up demand for cars

• US auto OEMs have pulled forward demand from subsequent

periods, as they seek to justify their expansion of manufacturing

capacity

• Credit became steadily easier with longer lease terms, higher

loan-to-value, inflated residual values, and a return to lending to

subprime borrowers, taking consumer auto finance to peak

levels

• Higher interest rates, reduced/toppy credit availability, and

persistent anemic economic growth weigh on future prospects

• Easy financing led to bigger car purchases ; tighter financing

suggests a move to less expensive auto purchases

• Used car prices have started falling with greater supply

coming off lease and may be the leading edge of broader price

declines

Company-Specific Issues

• ABG is exposed to the recent decline in luxury / full-size used

car pricing as 85% of the Company’s car sales are luxury / mid-

line imports

• 25% of ABG’s new financing arrangements are for subprime

customers, much higher than peer auto dealers , suggesting the

exhaustion of the buyer base in its geographies

• The Company obtains a large and growing part of its gross

margin from its financial services business, which may be

restricted by potential CFPB proposals to cap all markups in a

move to contain disparate impact

• Any downturn in unit volumes has pronounced pejorative

implications for its parts and service and financing gross profit

• Margins have been declining steadily in new and used car

sales

• Lack of new dealer acquisitions at an attractive cash flow

multiple may limit future growth

Page 5: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

5

-

100.00

200.00

300.00

400.00

500.00

600.00

9/12/2008 9/12/2009 9/12/2010 9/12/2011 9/12/2012 9/12/2013 9/12/2014

Axis

Tit

le

Post-Lehman Share Price Performance: ABG vs. Index Of Auto Dealers

Auto Dealers

ABG

Reference: Bloomberg, Point Frederick Capital

Asbury Automotive Stock Has Markedly Outperformed Its

Peer Group In The Past Twelve Months

Page 6: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

BUSINESS AND BUSINESS MODEL

Page 7: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

7

Asbury Automotive Is One Of The Largest Auto Dealers In

The US, Concentrated Principally In The US Southeast & NJ

Company Description:

Asbury Automotive Group (“Asbury”, “ABG”, or the “Company”) is the 7th largest U.S.-based franchised automotive

retailer, operating 102 franchises with 81 dealership locations. Asbury sells and services 29 vehicle brands with

85% of new vehicle sales comprising luxury / mid-line imports. The Company has developed its dealership

portfolio via acquisition of large, locally-branded dealerships, primarily in the South and Southeastern U.S. During

fiscal year 2013, ABG sold over 150,000 retail vehicles and generated over $5.3 billion in sales. ABG has a market

capitalization of $2.0 billion as of 9/22/2014.

Reference: Company, Point Frederick Capital

Business Model:

Asbury has four business units: (i) sale of new cars; (ii) sale of used cars; (iii) finance and insurance; and (iv) parts

and service. To become an authorized dealer, Asbury obtains franchise agreements from OEMs or acquires

existing dealership franchises. The sale of new and used cars is typically a low margin business which allows the

Company to establish a relationship with the customer as well as get the chance to arrange financing. As part of

the finance and insurance unit and at the time of a sale of a vehicle, Asbury arranges financing and other prepaid

services/guarantees (for roughly ¾ of auto sales) in partnership with OEM and non-OEM lenders. Asbury typically

earns a marketing fee, net of a chargeback for contracts terminated or cancelled (usually within 90 days).

Chargebacks amount to anywhere between 9-14% of financing revenue. The marketing fee may include spread

income participation in excess returns on assets backing guarantees. The Company’s parts and service division

provides replacement parts, collision repair services, or vehicle maintenance for cars it has sold and for other cars

with whose owners they can establish relationships.

Page 8: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

8

Reference: Company

The Business Model Is Co-Dependent: New/Used Vehicle

Sales Lead to Incremental, Higher Margin Parts & Service

and Finance & Insurance Revenue

New Vehicle Sales:

• 55% of total revenue and 21% of total gross profit

→ low margin business

Used Vehicle Sales:

• 26% of total revenue and 14% of total gross profit

→ low margin business

Parts and Service:

• 12% of total revenue and 42% of total gross profit

→ high margin business

Finance and Insurance:

• 4% of total revenue and 24% of total gross profit

→ high margin business

Page 9: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

9

New Vehicle Sales Are A Gateway To More Lucrative

Ancillary Revenue

Acquire Dealership

Purchase of existing

dealership

Utilize Floor-Plan /

OEM-Provided

Financing

Purchase New Car

Inventory Sale to Customer

• New Vehicle Sales includes the arrangement of fixed-term leases

• Leases give ABG dealership first option to purchase vehicles upon lease expiration (to

build used car inventory)

• Provides incremental parts & service and finance & insurance revenue

• Customers who lease historically return to dealerships more often than purchasers of

new vehicles

Start-Up via New

Franchise

Agreement

Incremental Parts

& Service

Revenue

Arrangement of

Finance &

Insurance

Reference: Company

Page 10: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

10

Used Vehicle Sales Are Another Gateway To More Lucrative

Ancillary Revenue

Build Used Car

Inventory

Purchase Trade-Ins,

Off-lease Vehicles or

At Auctions

Utilize Floor-Plan

Financing

Inventory

Management Sale to Customer

• Used vehicle inventory is typically sold as wholesale via auction if a vehicle is not sold at retail

within 60 days

Incremental Parts

& Service

Revenue

Arrangement of

Finance &

Insurance

Reference: Company

Page 11: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

11

Parts And Service Is The Highest Gross Margin Segment

And Caters To A Potentially Broader Population Of Drivers

Car Owner In Need

of Repair /

Maintenance

ABG Provides

Maintenance,

Collision Repair, or

Replacement Part

Bill to Customer

or OEM

Billed to OEM if

Car is Under

Warranty

Customer Pays

Cash If Not

Covered by

Warranty

• 59% of divisional gross profit is customer pay

• The customer does not need to be a pre-existing customer acquired through a car sale

Reference: Company

Page 12: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

12

Finance And Insurance Is A Pure Margin Business Segment

Sale of New / Used

Vehicles

ABG Arranges

Financing and Other

Prepaid Services /

Guarantees

ABG Earns

Marketing Fee,

Including Spread

Income

Participation

Service Contracts

May Lead to Parts

& Service Work

Financing

Provided by OEM

Financing

Provided by

Third-Party

Lender

• Approximately 25% of financing arrangements are for subprime customers

Reference: Company

Page 13: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

13

Reference: Asbury Automotive Shareholder Presentation 04/16/14

Asbury Is Primarily A Southern Auto Dealer, Centered On

Florida And Georgia

Page 14: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

14

Reference: Asbury Automotive Shareholder Presentation 04/16/14

The Company Has A Mix Of Domestic And Foreign Brands

Offering Luxury And Mid-Level Cars

Page 15: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

15

Reference: Asbury Automotive Investor Presentation 06/03/14-06/04/14

The Company Opened Its First “Q Auto”, A Standalone

Dealer Focused Exclusively On Used Cars

There are 40 million used cars sold annually in the US.

Page 16: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

16

Reference: Asbury Automotive Investor Presentation 06/03/14-06/04/14

Auto Sales Margins Are Much Lower Than The Lucrative

Parts and Services and Financing and Insurance Lines

Page 17: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

17

The Bulk Of The Parts And Service Gross Profit Comes From

Commoditized Routine Maintenance Activities

Reference: Asbury Automotive Investor Presentation 06/03/14-06/04/14

Page 18: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

18

Reference: Asbury Automotive Investor Presentation 06/03/14-06/04/14

In Addition To Revenues From Arranging Financing, ABG

Earns Revenue By Selling Other Services And Guarantees

Other products include extended service contracts, guaranteed asset protection, prepaid maintenance,

and credit life and disability coverage.

Page 19: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

19

Reference: Asbury Automotive Investor Presentation 06/03/14-06/04/14

Asbury Owns Roughly 60% Of Its Facilities And Looks To

Increase That Ratio To 75% In The Current Environment

Page 20: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

20

Reference: Asbury Automotive Investor Presentation 06/03/14-06/04/14

The Dealer Market Is Fragmented And Asbury Plans To Grow

By Acquisition, Adding $500m Of Revenue From 2014-2017

The Company argues it has the systems to deal with complexity independent dealers do not have.

Page 21: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

21

Reference: Asbury Automotive Investor Presentation 06/03/14-06/04/14

The Asbury Board Recently Approved An Increase In The

Buyback Program To $100m From $30m

Page 22: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

The auto industry has fully recovered from the devastating trough conditions in the aftermath of the

financial crisis. Numerous secular changes in the factors that drive auto demand suggests trend demand

should be lower than the previous peak. These include weak scrappage, lower driver growth, and fewer

miles driven. The combination of a large number of cars coming off-lease, increasing North American

manufacturing capacity, and a weaker Japanese Yen only exacerbate this problem. Subprime lending

has recovered to prior peak levels; it is becoming more and more difficult to find the incremental buyer.

These factors translate to potentially significantly lower volumes and prices in the auto dealer industry.

Page 23: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

23

Reference: Morgan Stanley, “Auto Credit,” 8/21/14

Supportive Credit Conditions Since 2009 Have Pulled

Forward Demand Through Low Monthly Payment Math

Page 24: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

24

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Generous Loans Via Higher Loan-to-Value Balances….

Page 25: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

25

…Longer Loan Terms…

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Page 26: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

26

…And Increased Subprime Lending…

Roughly 25% of Asbury’s new financing arrangements are for subprime customers. This compares to

16% for CarMax and 12% for Lithia in their most recent quarters.

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Page 27: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

27

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2013

…Have Returned Auto Credit Issuance Close to Prior

Peaks…

Page 28: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

28

...Driving A Full V-Shaped Auto Recovery

Autos recovered earlier than expected but may also peak earlier than expected

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Page 29: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

29

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2014

Consumer Debt Remains At Low Levels

Page 30: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

30

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2014

Credit Default Rates Remain At Low Levels

Page 31: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

31

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2014

While At Low Levels, Repossessions Are Expected To Rise

Page 32: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

32

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2014

Gasoline Prices Remain In Check

Page 33: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

33

Reference: Equifax, "Not Yesterday's Subprime Auto Loan," Economic Trends Commentary 08/26/14

Auto Originations Remain At High Levels With Subprime

Taking a Larger Portion of New Loans

Page 34: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

34

Reference: Equifax, "Not Yesterday's Subprime Auto Loan," Economic Trends Commentary 08/26/14

Within New Subprime Loans, Credit Quality Is Holding Up

Page 35: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

35

Reference: Equifax, "Not Yesterday's Subprime Auto Loan," Economic Trends Commentary 08/26/14

Subprime Auto Loan Write-Offs Remain Low

Page 36: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

36

Reference: Equifax, "Not Yesterday's Subprime Auto Loan," Economic Trends Commentary 08/26/14

Low Subprime Write-Offs Will Lead to More Aggressive

Lending

Page 37: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

37

Easy Credit And Inflated Residual Values Lower Monthly

Affordability, Sending TTM SAAR Values To Prior Peaks

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Page 38: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

38

Reference: Credit Suisse, "Sentiment on Auto Stocks Appears Cautious," 09/12/14

North American OEMs Are Running At Close To Maximum

Capacity…

Page 39: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

39

…But That Is Not Stopping Them From Adding Even More

Manufacturing Capacity

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Page 40: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

40

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2013

New Vehicle Sales Have Recovered Much Faster Than New

Home Sales, On A Relative Basis

Page 41: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

41

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2013

Pent Up Demand Has Led Both New and Used Vehicle Sales

Higher Since 2009

Page 42: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

42

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2014

Used Vehicle Sales Have Benefited Both Franchised and

Independent Dealers

Page 43: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

43

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2013

Used Vehicle Sales As A Percent of Total Vehicles in

Operation Continues to Fall

Page 44: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

44

Reference: National Auto Dealers' Association - Used Car Guide - September 2014.

Vehicle Forecasts Remain Bullish, As Light Vehicle Sales are

Assumed to Decrease Only Slightly

Page 45: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

45

However, Weak Scrappage, Driver Growth, and Miles Driven

Suggest Trend Light Vehicle Demand Actually May Fall

Weak light vehicle demand drivers suggest longer-term trend may be mid-15m or less

Reference: Credit Suisse, "Sentiment on Auto Stocks Appears Cautious," 09/12/14; Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Page 46: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

46

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2013

Miles Driven Have Steadily Contracted

Page 47: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

47

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2014

Scrappage Remains Relatively Low

Page 48: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

48

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Demand May Fall As The Incremental Light Vehicle Buyer Is

Getting Harder to Find

Page 49: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

49

The Manheim Used Vehicle Price Index Has Topped Out And

Started to Fall – A Leading Indicator?

The combination of rising used car supply from maturing post-crisis leases, aggressive new car

incentives, and a potential crackdown on subprime lending may put pressure on used car pricing

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Page 50: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

50

Used Vehicle Prices Have Fallen for Four Consecutive

Months

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Used Prices Drop Four Months Straight," 09/09/14

Page 51: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

51

Importantly For Asbury, Used Luxury and Full-Size Cars

Have Been Hit Disproportionately…

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Used Prices Drop Four Months Straight," 09/09/14

Page 52: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

52

…While Used Truck Pricing Has Held Up

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Used Prices Drop Four Months Straight," 09/09/14

Page 53: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

53

Since The Crisis, Strapped Consumers Have Been More

Likely To Lease Than To Buy, A Secular Change

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Page 54: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

54

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2013

High Leasing Activity Will Flood Used Car Market Upon

Lease Expirations, Pressuring Prices

Page 55: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

55

A Higher USD/JPY Will Enable

Japanese OEMS To Be Aggressive On New Car Pricing

Reference: Morgan Stanley, "Cutting U.S. Autos to Cautious," 09/08/14

Page 56: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

56

Reference: National Auto Dealers' Association - Used Car Guide - September 2014

New Car Incentives Remain High and Continue to Grow at a

Rapid Rate

Page 57: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

57

Post-Crisis, Used Car and New Car Inflation Have Tracked

One Another

Reference: Morgan Stanley "Used Prices Drop Four Months Straight" 09/09/14

Page 58: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

58

Reference: Manheim Used Car Report - Annual 2013

Used Vehicle Retail Gross Margins Have Been Steadily

Declining

Page 59: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

RISKS

Page 60: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

60

ABG Is Exposed To Both Industry and Company-Specific

Risks

Go-forward auto sales

fall more than expected

due to demand

exhaustion

Geographic

concentration in

Florida, Georgia, and

Texas

Used car prices start to

fall at a rapid rate due

to oversupply, leading

to gross margin

compression

Aggressive new car

incentives further

pressure used car

pricing

Lack of new dealer

acquisitions at an

attractive cash flow

multiple may limit

future growth

Reduced credit

availability and higher

interest rates weigh on

new car demand

Large exposure to

luxury / mid-line

imports, categories that

have seen recent

pricing pressures

Page 61: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

61

The CFPB Seeks To Contain The “Disparate Impact” Of

Mark-Ups On Minorities And May Forbid All Mark-Ups

“To prevent discrimination from recurring at these

lenders, the CFPB has identified at least three

possible ways institutions can limit their fair

lending risk:

• Conduct internal monitoring for

discrimination…;

• Limit discretionary markups…;

• Eliminate dealer discretion for markups …”

[Emphasis added]

Implication: As finance and

insurance represents 24% of total

gross profit, a significant portion

of Asbury’s high margin business

could be in jeopardy.

Reference: “CFPB Proposes New Financial Oversight Of Nonbank Auto Finance Companies,” 9/17/14

http://www.consumerfinance.gov/newsroom/cfpb-proposes-new-federal-oversight-of-nonbank-auto-finance-companies/

Page 62: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

VALUATION AND REWARD/RISK ANALYSIS

Page 63: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

63

Our Analysis Implies A Reward/Risk Ratio of 2.6x With A

Downside Per Share Price Of $32

($ in M, except for per share data)

Base Upside Downside

Lease-Adjusted EV $2,790 $3,192 $1,738

Less: 2015E Lease Expense @ 7x (210) (210) (210)

Enterprise Value $2,580 $2,982 $1,528

Less: Net Debt (542) (542) (542)

Less: Preferred SH - - -

Less: Noncontrolling Interest - - -

Equity Value $2,039 $2,440 $986

Per SH $66.84 $80.00 $32.34

2015E EBITDAR $331 $353 $306

2015E EBITDA $301 $323 $276

2015E EPS $4.54 $5.00 $4.04

Adj EV/2015E EBITDAR 8.4x 9.0x 5.7x

EV/2015E EBITDA 8.6x 9.2x 5.5x

P/2015E EPS 14.7x 16.0x 8.0x

Consensus 2015E EBITDA $323

Consensus 2015E EPS $4.74

Reward/Risk 2.6x

Target % Return -51.6%

Page 64: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

FINANCIALS – BASE CASE

Page 65: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

65

Base Case New Vehicle Economics

NEW VEHICLES

New Vehicle - Units 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 18,663 14,248 16,371 16,712 19,429 21,994 23,330 24,377 25,245

Mid-line Import 48,435 38,766 42,431 40,560 48,136 51,632 52,354 53,506 55,173

Mid-line Domestic 9,277 7,234 8,181 9,353 10,147 11,082 11,141 11,237 11,237

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 76,375 60,248 66,983 66,625 77,712 84,708 86,825 89,121 91,656

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 3,086 1,785 2,451 2,679 2,365 1,258 2,831 1,573 1,573

Total New Vehicle Units 79,461 62,033 69,434 69,304 80,077 85,966 90,173 91,893 94,428

New Vehicle - Units - Mix % 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 23.5% 23.0% 23.6% 24.1% 24.3% 25.6% 25.9% 26.5% 26.7%

Mid-line Import 61.0% 62.5% 61.1% 58.5% 60.1% 60.1% 58.1% 58.2% 58.4%

Mid-line Domestic 11.7% 11.7% 11.8% 13.5% 12.7% 12.9% 12.4% 12.2% 11.9%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 96.1% 97.1% 96.5% 96.1% 97.0% 98.5% 96.3% 97.0% 97.1%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 3.9% 2.9% 3.5% 3.9% 3.0% 1.5% 3.1% 1.7% 1.7%

Total New Vehicle Units 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

New Vehicle - Units - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury -23.7% 14.9% 2.1% 16.3% 13.2% 10.8% 3.6%

Mid-line Import -20.0% 9.5% -4.4% 18.7% 7.3% 3.6% 3.1%

Mid-line Domestic -22.0% 13.1% 14.3% 8.5% 9.2% 1.4% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS -21.1% 11.2% -0.5% 16.6% 9.0% 5.2% 2.8%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions -42.2% 37.3% 9.3% -11.7% -46.8% 25.0% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Units -21.9% 11.9% -0.2% 15.5% 7.4% 6.9% 2.8%

Page 66: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

66

Base Case New Vehicle Economics

New Vehicle - Revenue per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 46,938$ 46,722$ 48,665$ 49,569$ 49,596$ 49,891$ 53,292$ 50,330$ 49,352$

Mid-line Import 24,747$ 24,408$ 25,140$ 26,159$ 26,392$ 26,805$ 27,068$ 26,400$ 25,608$

Mid-line Domestic 32,036$ 34,241$ 37,673$ 37,507$ 36,888$ 36,735$ 38,549$ 39,059$ 39,059$

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 31,055$ 30,866$ 32,420$ 33,624$ 33,564$ 34,098$ 35,379$ 34,542$ 33,797$

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total New Vehicle Units 29,849$ 29,978$ 31,391$ 32,324$ 32,572$ 34,341$ 36,081$ 33,946$ 32,805$

New Vehicle - Units - Revenue per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury -0.5% 4.2% 1.9% 0.1% 0.6% 0.9% -1.9%

Mid-line Import -1.4% 3.0% 4.1% 0.9% 1.6% -1.5% -3.0%

Mid-line Domestic 6.9% 10.0% -0.4% -1.7% -0.4% 6.3% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS -0.6% 5.0% 3.7% -0.2% 1.6% 1.3% -2.2%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Units 0.4% 4.7% 3.0% 0.8% 5.4% -1.2% -3.4%

NEW VEHICLES

New Vehicle - Gross Profit - $ per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 3,461$ 3,530$ 3,763$ 3,812$ 3,778$ 3,615$ 3,897$ 3,647$ 3,455$

Mid-line Import 1,652$ 1,656$ 1,402$ 1,585$ 1,411$ 1,381$ 1,425$ 1,443$ 1,408$

Mid-line Domestic 2,167$ 2,322$ 2,726$ 2,555$ 2,483$ 2,391$ 2,463$ 2,396$ 2,246$

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 2,156$ 2,179$ 2,141$ 2,280$ 2,143$ 2,093$ 2,203$ 2,166$ 2,075$

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total New Vehicle Units 2,073$ 2,117$ 2,070$ 2,192$ 2,079$ 2,109$ 2,242$ 2,124$ 2,014$

New Vehicle - Gross Profit - $ per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 2.0% 6.6% 1.3% -0.9% -4.3% 0.9% -5.3%

Mid-line Import 0.3% -15.3% 13.1% -11.0% -2.1% 4.5% -2.4%

Mid-line Domestic 7.2% 17.4% -6.3% -2.8% -3.7% 0.2% -6.2%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 1.1% -1.8% 6.5% -6.0% -2.3% 3.5% -4.2%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions

Total New Vehicle Units 2.1% -2.2% 5.9% -5.1% 1.4% 0.7% -5.2%

Page 67: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

67

Base Case New Vehicle Economics

New Vehicle - Gross Profit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 65 50 62 64 73 80 86 89 87

Mid-line Import 80 64 60 64 68 71 74 77 78

Mid-line Domestic 20 17 22 24 25 27 27 27 25

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 165 131 143 152 167 177 187 193 190

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions - - 0 - - 4 6 2 -

Total New Vehicle Units 165 131 144 152 167 181 193 195 190

New Vehicle - Gross Profit - Margin % 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 7.4% 7.6% 7.7% 7.7% 7.6% 7.2% 7.8% 7.2% 7.0%

Mid-line Import 6.7% 6.8% 5.6% 6.1% 5.3% 5.2% 5.3% 5.5% 5.5%

Mid-line Domestic 6.8% 6.8% 7.2% 6.8% 6.7% 6.5% 6.7% 6.1% 5.8%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 6.9% 7.1% 6.6% 6.8% 6.4% 6.1% 6.5% 6.3% 6.1%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 9.6% 5.1% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Units 6.9% 7.1% 6.6% 6.8% 6.4% 6.1% 6.5% 6.3% 6.1%

Page 68: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

68

Base Case Used Vehicle Economics

USED VEHICLES

Used Vehicles Retail - Units 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 44,241 39,373 46,329 54,009 57,434 67,768 69,859 70,702 70,702

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions - - 144 - - 1,686 2,892 1,206 -

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 44,241 39,373 46,473 54,009 57,434 69,454 72,751 71,908 70,702

Used Vehicles Retail - Units - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS -11.0% 17.7% 16.6% 6.3% 18.0% 4.3% 0.0%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units -11.0% 18.0% 16.2% 6.3% 20.9% 3.5% -1.7%

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 17,843$ 18,251$ 18,930$ 18,923$ 19,187$ 19,778$ 20,790$ 19,824$ 18,833$

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,522$ 33,689$ 18,408$ -$

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 17,843$ 18,251$ 18,936$ 18,923$ 19,187$ 19,796$ 21,103$ 19,800$ 18,833$

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 2.3% 3.7% 0.0% 1.4% 3.1% 0.2% -5.0%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 2.3% 3.8% -0.1% 1.4% 3.2% 0.0% -4.9%

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 719 877 1,022 1,102 1,340 1,409 1,402 1,332

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions - 3 - - 35 57 22 -

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 719 880 1,022 1,102 1,375 1,466 1,424 1,332

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS -9.0% 22.0% 16.5% 7.8% 21.6% 4.6% -5.0%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units -9.0% 22.5% 16.1% 7.8% 24.8% 3.6% -6.5%

Page 69: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

69

Base Case Used Vehicle Economics

Used Vehicles Retail -Gross Profit per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 2,029$ 2,001$ 1,881$ 1,819$ 1,769$ 1,818$ 1,717$ 1,536$

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,305$ 2,254$ 1,327$ -$

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 2,029$ 2,003$ 1,881$ 1,819$ 1,758$ 1,829$ 1,710$ 1,536$

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 0.1% -1.4% -6.0% -3.3% -2.8% -3.0% -10.5%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 0.1% -1.3% -6.1% -3.3% -3.4% -2.7% -10.2%

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 90 80 93 102 105 120 123 121 109

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions - - 0 - - 2 4 2 -

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 90 80 93 102 105 122 127 123 109

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit - Margin % 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 11.4% 11.1% 10.6% 9.9% 9.5% 8.9% 9.2% 8.7% 8.2%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.4% 11.0% 7.2% 0.0%

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 11.4% 11.1% 10.6% 9.9% 9.5% 8.9% 9.2% 8.6% 8.2%

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS -10.9% 16.0% 9.6% 2.9% 14.7% 1.2% -10.5%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units -10.9% 16.5% 9.1% 2.9% 16.8% 0.7% -11.7%

Page 70: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

70

Base Case Financials

FINANCIAL RESULTS

Financial Results 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Total Revenue 4,093 3,406 3,936 4,141 4,642 5,335 5,623 5,617 5,562

Growth % yoy -16.8% 15.6% 5.2% 12.1% 14.9% 5.3% -1.0%

EBITDA 150 123 153 155 211 250 278 296 301

Margin % 3.7% 3.6% 3.9% 3.7% 4.5% 4.7% 4.9% 5.3% 5.4%

Growth % yoy -18.0% 23.9% 1.2% 36.2% 18.8% 18.1% 1.6%

EBIT 129 101 132 132 188 226 252 270 275

Margin % 3.2% 3.0% 3.3% 3.2% 4.1% 4.2% 4.5% 4.8% 4.9%

Growth % yoy -21.7% 30.2% 0.4% 42.3% 20.1% 19.5% 1.7%

NOPAT 240 65 88 83 118 142 158 168 172

Margin % 5.9% 1.9% 2.2% 2.0% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8% 3.0% 3.1%

Growth % yoy -72.8% 35.6% -6.3% 42.9% 19.6% 18.3% 2.6%

PF Net Income 198 31 55 48 86 108 124 135 139

Margin % 4.8% 0.9% 1.4% 1.2% 1.8% 2.0% 2.2% 2.4% 2.5%

Growth % yoy -84.5% 79.7% -12.0% 76.9% 26.1% 25.0% 3.0%

PF FD EPS 6.24$ 0.93$ 1.65$ 1.48$ 2.72$ 3.47$ 4.08$ 4.41$ 4.54$

Growth % yoy -85.1% 77.6% -10.1% 83.0% 27.7% 27.2% 3.0%

Cash Flow from Operations 529 111 10 (181) (21) 51 107 204 198

Margin % 12.9% 3.3% 0.3% -4.4% -0.4% 1.0% 1.9% 3.6% 3.6%

Growth % yoy -79.0% -91.1% -1930.3% -88.6% -344.9% 90.9% -2.8%

CapEx 69 8 30 22 56 50 65 46 30

Margin % 1.7% 0.2% 0.8% 0.5% 1.2% 0.9% 1.2% 0.8% 0.5%

Growth % yoy -88.0% 262.7% -26.9% 156.4% -11.5% -7.2% -35.2%

Page 71: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

71

Base Case Financials

Financial Results 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Levered Free Cash Flow 460 103 (20) (204) (78) (1) 40 157 168

Margin % 11.2% 3.0% -0.5% -4.9% -1.7% 0.0% 0.7% 2.8% 3.0%

Growth % yoy -77.7% -119.7% 907.9% -61.7% -99.4% -31459.8%

Total Debt 600 538 544 459 466 554 549 549 549

Less: Liquid Assets (92) (85) (21) (11) (6) (5) (7) (112) (272)

Net Debt 508 453 523 447 460 549 542 436 277

Total Debt/EBITDA 4.0x 4.4x 3.6x 3.0x 2.2x 2.2x 2.2x 1.9x 1.8x

Net Debt/EBITDA 3.4x 3.7x 3.4x 2.9x 2.2x 2.2x 2.2x 1.5x 0.9x

Total EBITDA/Interest Expense 2.2x 2.2x 2.9x 2.8x 4.0x 4.6x 5.2x 5.7x 5.7x

ROE % 0.0% 12.56% 19.16% 14.82% 21.25% 21.99% 25.38% 22.63% 18.89%

RNOA % 0.0% 9.37% 10.93% 10.71% 13.73% 13.63% 15.16% 15.65% 16.64%

Page 72: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

COMPARABLE ANALYSIS AND HISTORICAL

TRADING RANGES

Page 73: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

73

ABG Trades In-Line With Auto Dealer Comparables On A

FWD P/E and EV/EBITDA Basis

SUMMARY AUTO DEALER COMPARABLES

($ in M) LTM

Market Cap.

Enterprise

Value(1) Revenue EBITDA FCF Yield % EBITDA % P / 2014E

EV / 2014E

Revenue

EV / 2014E

EBITDA 2014 PEG

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. $2,039 $2,580 $5,404 $267 1.9% 4.9% 15.5x 0.4x 8.5x 94.2%

Lithia Motors Inc. $2,097 $2,340 $4,237 $235 (2.8%) 5.5% 15.9x 0.5x 8.6x 62.9%

CarMax Inc. $11,954 $11,758 $13,013 $973 (8.9%) 7.5% 21.9x 0.9x 11.7x 159.7%

Penske Automotive Group, Inc. $3,867 $4,912 $15,768 $543 1.5% 3.4% 13.1x 0.3x 8.5x 93.0%

Sonic Automotive Inc. $1,274 $2,069 $8,763 $300 0.5% 3.4% 12.5x 0.2x 7.1x 96.5%

AutoNation Inc. $6,113 $7,927 $17,238 $845 3.0% 4.9% 15.0x 0.4x 9.0x 94.2%

MEDIAN (excl. ABG) $3,867 $4,912 $13,013 $543 0.5% 4.9% 15.0x 0.4x 8.6x 94.2%

2014E Growth 2015E Growth

Rev EBITDA Rev EBITDA

Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. 13.8% 24.3% 6.2% 6.4%

Lithia Motors Inc. 33.2% 29.0% 44.9% 32.1%

CarMax Inc. 10.9% 7.1% 12.0% 11.1%

Penske Automotive Group, Inc. 18.7% 15.0% 6.8% 9.5%

Sonic Automotive Inc. 8.4% (2.7%) 4.3% 12.2%

AutoNation Inc. 12.4% 6.6% 5.6% 8.5%

MEDIAN (excl. ABG) 12.4% 7.1% 6.8% 11.1%

(1) Excludes floor plan financing.

Page 74: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

74

On A FWD P/E Basis, ABG Is Currently Trading Toward The

High End Of Its Historically Range Of 7x – 16x

Page 75: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

DEBT MATURITY SCHEDULE

Page 76: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

76

The Company Has Pushed Out Its Debt Maturity Schedule

Reference: Asbury Automotive Investor Presentation 06/03/14-06/04/14

Page 77: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

DOWNSIDE FINANCIALS

Page 78: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

78

Downside Case New Vehicle Economics

NEW VEHICLES

New Vehicle - Units 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 18,663 14,248 16,371 16,712 19,429 21,994 23,330 24,076 23,626

Mid-line Import 48,435 38,766 42,431 40,560 48,136 51,632 52,354 52,998 52,401

Mid-line Domestic 9,277 7,234 8,181 9,353 10,147 11,082 11,141 11,141 10,960

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 76,375 60,248 66,983 66,625 77,712 84,708 86,825 88,214 86,987

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 3,086 1,785 2,451 2,679 2,365 1,258 2,831 1,573 1,573

Total New Vehicle Units 79,461 62,033 69,434 69,304 80,077 85,966 90,173 90,986 89,759

New Vehicle - Units - Mix % 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 23.5% 23.0% 23.6% 24.1% 24.3% 25.6% 25.9% 26.5% 26.3%

Mid-line Import 61.0% 62.5% 61.1% 58.5% 60.1% 60.1% 58.1% 58.2% 58.4%

Mid-line Domestic 11.7% 11.7% 11.8% 13.5% 12.7% 12.9% 12.4% 12.2% 12.2%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 96.1% 97.1% 96.5% 96.1% 97.0% 98.5% 96.3% 97.0% 96.9%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 3.9% 2.9% 3.5% 3.9% 3.0% 1.5% 3.1% 1.7% 1.8%

Total New Vehicle Units 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

New Vehicle - Units - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury -23.7% 14.9% 2.1% 16.3% 13.2% 9.5% -1.9%

Mid-line Import -20.0% 9.5% -4.4% 18.7% 7.3% 2.6% -1.1%

Mid-line Domestic -22.0% 13.1% 14.3% 8.5% 9.2% 0.5% -1.6%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS -21.1% 11.2% -0.5% 16.6% 9.0% 4.1% -1.4%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions -42.2% 37.3% 9.3% -11.7% -46.8% 25.0% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Units -21.9% 11.9% -0.2% 15.5% 7.4% 5.8% -1.3%

Page 79: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

79

Downside Case New Vehicle Economics

New Vehicle - Revenue per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 46,938$ 46,722$ 48,665$ 49,569$ 49,596$ 49,891$ 53,292$ 50,006$ 49,067$

Mid-line Import 24,747$ 24,408$ 25,140$ 26,159$ 26,392$ 26,805$ 27,068$ 26,595$ 26,101$

Mid-line Domestic 32,036$ 34,241$ 37,673$ 37,507$ 36,888$ 36,735$ 38,549$ 38,345$ 38,348$

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 31,055$ 30,866$ 32,420$ 33,624$ 33,564$ 34,098$ 35,379$ 34,468$ 33,882$

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total New Vehicle Units 29,849$ 29,978$ 31,391$ 32,324$ 32,572$ 34,341$ 36,081$ 33,869$ 32,835$

New Vehicle - Units - Revenue per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury -0.5% 4.2% 1.9% 0.1% 0.6% 0.2% -1.9%

Mid-line Import -1.4% 3.0% 4.1% 0.9% 1.6% -0.8% -1.9%

Mid-line Domestic 6.9% 10.0% -0.4% -1.7% -0.4% 4.4% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS -0.6% 5.0% 3.7% -0.2% 1.6% 1.1% -1.7%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Units 0.4% 4.7% 3.0% 0.8% 5.4% -1.4% -3.1%

NEW VEHICLES

New Vehicle - Gross Profit - $ per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 3,461$ 3,530$ 3,763$ 3,812$ 3,778$ 3,615$ 3,897$ 3,584$ 3,309$

Mid-line Import 1,652$ 1,656$ 1,402$ 1,585$ 1,411$ 1,381$ 1,425$ 1,415$ 1,305$

Mid-line Domestic 2,167$ 2,322$ 2,726$ 2,555$ 2,483$ 2,391$ 2,463$ 2,381$ 2,234$

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 2,156$ 2,179$ 2,141$ 2,280$ 2,143$ 2,093$ 2,203$ 2,129$ 1,966$

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total New Vehicle Units 2,073$ 2,117$ 2,070$ 2,192$ 2,079$ 2,109$ 2,242$ 2,087$ 1,905$

New Vehicle - Gross Profit - $ per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 2.0% 6.6% 1.3% -0.9% -4.3% -0.8% -7.7%

Mid-line Import 0.3% -15.3% 13.1% -11.0% -2.1% 2.5% -7.8%

Mid-line Domestic 7.2% 17.4% -6.3% -2.8% -3.7% -0.4% -6.2%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 1.1% -1.8% 6.5% -6.0% -2.3% 1.7% -7.7%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions

Total New Vehicle Units 2.1% -2.2% 5.9% -5.1% 1.4% -1.0% -8.7%

Page 80: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

80

Downside Case New Vehicle Economics

New Vehicle - Gross Profit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 65 50 62 64 73 80 86 86 78

Mid-line Import 80 64 60 64 68 71 74 75 68

Mid-line Domestic 20 17 22 24 25 27 27 27 24

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 165 131 143 152 167 177 187 188 171

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions - - 0 - - 4 6 2 -

Total New Vehicle Units 165 131 144 152 167 181 193 190 171

New Vehicle - Gross Profit - Margin % 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 7.4% 7.6% 7.7% 7.7% 7.6% 7.2% 7.8% 7.2% 6.7%

Mid-line Import 6.7% 6.8% 5.6% 6.1% 5.3% 5.2% 5.3% 5.3% 5.0%

Mid-line Domestic 6.8% 6.8% 7.2% 6.8% 6.7% 6.5% 6.7% 6.2% 5.8%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 6.9% 7.1% 6.6% 6.8% 6.4% 6.1% 6.5% 6.2% 5.8%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 9.6% 5.1% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Units 6.9% 7.1% 6.6% 6.8% 6.4% 6.1% 6.5% 6.2% 5.8%

Page 81: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

81

Downside Case Used Vehicle Economics

USED VEHICLES

Used Vehicles Retail - Units 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 44,241 39,373 46,329 54,009 57,434 67,768 69,859 70,130 70,130

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions - - 144 - - 1,686 2,892 1,206 -

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 44,241 39,373 46,473 54,009 57,434 69,454 72,751 71,336 70,130

Used Vehicles Retail - Units - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS -11.0% 17.7% 16.6% 6.3% 18.0% 3.5% 0.0%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units -11.0% 18.0% 16.2% 6.3% 20.9% 2.7% -1.7%

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 17,843$ 18,251$ 18,930$ 18,923$ 19,187$ 19,778$ 20,790$ 19,955$ 19,556$

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,522$ 33,689$ 18,408$

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 17,843$ 18,251$ 18,936$ 18,923$ 19,187$ 19,796$ 21,103$ 19,929$ 19,556$

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 2.3% 3.7% 0.0% 1.4% 3.1% 0.9% -2.0%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 2.3% 3.8% -0.1% 1.4% 3.2% 0.7% -1.9%

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 719 877 1,022 1,102 1,340 1,409 1,399 1,371

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions - 3 - - 35 57 22 -

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 719 880 1,022 1,102 1,375 1,466 1,422 1,371

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS -9.0% 22.0% 16.5% 7.8% 21.6% 4.4% -2.0%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units -9.0% 22.5% 16.1% 7.8% 24.8% 3.4% -3.5%

Page 82: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

82

Downside Case Used Vehicle Economics

Used Vehicles Retail -Gross Profit per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 2,029$ 2,001$ 1,881$ 1,819$ 1,769$ 1,818$ 1,673$ 1,467$

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,305$ 2,254$ 1,327$ -$

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 2,029$ 2,003$ 1,881$ 1,819$ 1,758$ 1,829$ 1,667$ 1,467$

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 0.1% -1.4% -6.0% -3.3% -2.8% -5.5% -12.3%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 0.1% -1.3% -6.1% -3.3% -3.4% -5.2% -12.0%

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 90 80 93 102 105 120 123 117 103

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions - - 0 - - 2 4 2 -

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 90 80 93 102 105 122 127 119 103

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit - Margin % 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 11.4% 11.1% 10.6% 9.9% 9.5% 8.9% 9.2% 8.4% 7.5%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.4% 11.0% 7.2% 0.0%

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 11.4% 11.1% 10.6% 9.9% 9.5% 8.9% 9.2% 8.4% 7.5%

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS -10.9% 16.0% 9.6% 2.9% 14.7% -2.2% -12.3%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units -10.9% 16.5% 9.1% 2.9% 16.8% -2.6% -13.5%

Page 83: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

83

Downside Case Financials

FINANCIAL RESULTS

Financial Results 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Total Revenue 4,093 3,406 3,936 4,141 4,642 5,335 5,623 5,559 5,382

Growth % yoy -16.8% 15.6% 5.2% 12.1% 14.9% 4.2% -3.2%

EBITDA 150 123 153 155 211 250 278 288 276

Margin % 3.7% 3.6% 3.9% 3.7% 4.5% 4.7% 4.9% 5.2% 5.1%

Growth % yoy -18.0% 23.9% 1.2% 36.2% 18.8% 15.2% -4.3%

EBIT 129 101 132 132 188 226 252 263 250

Margin % 3.2% 3.0% 3.3% 3.2% 4.1% 4.2% 4.5% 4.7% 4.7%

Growth % yoy -21.7% 30.2% 0.4% 42.3% 20.1% 16.3% -4.8%

NOPAT 240 65 88 83 118 142 158 163 157

Margin % 5.9% 1.9% 2.2% 2.0% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8% 2.9% 2.9%

Growth % yoy -72.8% 35.6% -6.3% 42.9% 19.6% 15.0% -4.0%

PF Net Income 198 31 55 48 86 108 124 130 124

Margin % 4.8% 0.9% 1.4% 1.2% 1.8% 2.0% 2.2% 2.3% 2.3%

Growth % yoy -84.5% 79.7% -12.0% 76.9% 26.1% 20.7% -5.2%

PF FD EPS 6.24$ 0.93$ 1.65$ 1.48$ 2.72$ 3.47$ 4.08$ 4.26$ 4.04$

Growth % yoy -85.1% 77.6% -10.1% 83.0% 27.7% 22.9% -5.2%

Cash Flow from Operations 529 111 10 (181) (21) 51 107 207 200

Margin % 12.9% 3.3% 0.3% -4.4% -0.4% 1.0% 1.9% 3.7% 3.7%

Growth % yoy -79.0% -91.1% -1930.3% -88.6% -344.9% 94.3% -3.7%

CapEx 69 8 30 22 56 50 65 46 30

Margin % 1.7% 0.2% 0.8% 0.5% 1.2% 0.9% 1.2% 0.8% 0.6%

Growth % yoy -88.0% 262.7% -26.9% 156.4% -11.5% -7.2% -35.2%

Page 84: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

84

Downside Case Financials

Financial Results 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Levered Free Cash Flow 460 103 (20) (204) (78) (1) 40 160 170

Margin % 11.2% 3.0% -0.5% -4.9% -1.7% 0.0% 0.7% 2.9% 3.2%

Growth % yoy -77.7% -119.7% 5.8%

Total Debt 600 538 544 459 466 554 549 549 549

Less: Liquid Assets (92) (85) (21) (11) (6) (5) (7) (112) (264)

Net Debt 508 453 523 447 460 549 542 437 285

Total Debt/EBITDA 4.0x 4.4x 3.6x 3.0x 2.2x 2.2x 2.2x 1.9x 2.0x

Net Debt/EBITDA 3.4x 3.7x 3.4x 2.9x 2.2x 2.2x 2.2x 1.5x 1.0x

Total EBITDA/Interest Expense 2.2x 2.2x 2.9x 2.8x 4.0x 4.6x 5.2x 5.5x 5.2x

ROE % 0.0% 12.56% 19.16% 14.82% 21.25% 21.99% 25.38% 22.03% 17.28%

RNOA % 0.0% 9.37% 10.93% 10.71% 13.73% 13.63% 15.16% 15.22% 15.21%

Page 85: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

UPSIDE FINANCIALS

Page 86: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

86

Upside Case New Vehicle Economics

NEW VEHICLES

New Vehicle - Units 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 18,663 14,248 16,371 16,712 19,429 21,994 23,330 24,696 27,533

Mid-line Import 48,435 38,766 42,431 40,560 48,136 51,632 52,354 53,896 56,808

Mid-line Domestic 9,277 7,234 8,181 9,353 10,147 11,082 11,141 11,237 11,237

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 76,375 60,248 66,983 66,625 77,712 84,708 86,825 89,829 95,577

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 3,086 1,785 2,451 2,679 2,365 1,258 2,831 1,573 1,573

Total New Vehicle Units 79,461 62,033 69,434 69,304 80,077 85,966 90,173 92,601 98,349

New Vehicle - Units - Mix % 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 23.5% 23.0% 23.6% 24.1% 24.3% 25.6% 25.9% 26.7% 28.0%

Mid-line Import 61.0% 62.5% 61.1% 58.5% 60.1% 60.1% 58.1% 58.2% 57.8%

Mid-line Domestic 11.7% 11.7% 11.8% 13.5% 12.7% 12.9% 12.4% 12.1% 11.4%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 96.1% 97.1% 96.5% 96.1% 97.0% 98.5% 96.3% 97.0% 97.2%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 3.9% 2.9% 3.5% 3.9% 3.0% 1.5% 3.1% 1.7% 1.6%

Total New Vehicle Units 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

New Vehicle - Units - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury -23.7% 14.9% 2.1% 16.3% 13.2% 12.3% 11.5%

Mid-line Import -20.0% 9.5% -4.4% 18.7% 7.3% 4.4% 5.4%

Mid-line Domestic -22.0% 13.1% 14.3% 8.5% 9.2% 1.4% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS -21.1% 11.2% -0.5% 16.6% 9.0% 6.0% 6.4%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions -42.2% 37.3% 9.3% -11.7% -46.8% 25.0% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Units -21.9% 11.9% -0.2% 15.5% 7.4% 7.7% 6.2%

Page 87: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

87

Upside Case New Vehicle Economics

New Vehicle - Revenue per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 46,938$ 46,722$ 48,665$ 49,569$ 49,596$ 49,891$ 53,292$ 50,601$ 51,363$

Mid-line Import 24,747$ 24,408$ 25,140$ 26,159$ 26,392$ 26,805$ 27,068$ 26,595$ 26,108$

Mid-line Domestic 32,036$ 34,241$ 37,673$ 37,507$ 36,888$ 36,735$ 38,549$ 39,242$ 41,204$

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 31,055$ 30,866$ 32,420$ 33,624$ 33,564$ 34,098$ 35,379$ 34,777$ 35,158$

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total New Vehicle Units 29,849$ 29,978$ 31,391$ 32,324$ 32,572$ 34,341$ 36,081$ 34,179$ 34,167$

New Vehicle - Units - Revenue per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury -0.5% 4.2% 1.9% 0.1% 0.6% 1.4% 1.5%

Mid-line Import -1.4% 3.0% 4.1% 0.9% 1.6% -0.8% -1.8%

Mid-line Domestic 6.9% 10.0% -0.4% -1.7% -0.4% 6.8% 5.0%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS -0.6% 5.0% 3.7% -0.2% 1.6% 2.0% 1.1%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Units 0.4% 4.7% 3.0% 0.8% 5.4% -0.5% 0.0%

NEW VEHICLES

New Vehicle - Gross Profit - $ per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 3,461$ 3,530$ 3,763$ 3,812$ 3,778$ 3,615$ 3,897$ 3,695$ 3,728$

Mid-line Import 1,652$ 1,656$ 1,402$ 1,585$ 1,411$ 1,381$ 1,425$ 1,454$ 1,430$

Mid-line Domestic 2,167$ 2,322$ 2,726$ 2,555$ 2,483$ 2,391$ 2,463$ 2,503$ 2,634$

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 2,156$ 2,179$ 2,141$ 2,280$ 2,143$ 2,093$ 2,203$ 2,201$ 2,234$

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total New Vehicle Units 2,073$ 2,117$ 2,070$ 2,192$ 2,079$ 2,109$ 2,242$ 2,158$ 2,171$

New Vehicle - Gross Profit - $ per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 2.0% 6.6% 1.3% -0.9% -4.3% 2.2% 0.9%

Mid-line Import 0.3% -15.3% 13.1% -11.0% -2.1% 5.3% -1.6%

Mid-line Domestic 7.2% 17.4% -6.3% -2.8% -3.7% 4.7% 5.3%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 1.1% -1.8% 6.5% -6.0% -2.3% 5.2% 1.5%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions

Total New Vehicle Units 2.1% -2.2% 5.9% -5.1% 1.4% 2.3% 0.6%

Page 88: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

88

Upside Case New Vehicle Economics

New Vehicle - Gross Profit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 65 50 62 64 73 80 86 91 103

Mid-line Import 80 64 60 64 68 71 74 78 81

Mid-line Domestic 20 17 22 24 25 27 27 28 30

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 165 131 143 152 167 177 187 198 213

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions - - 0 - - 4 6 2 -

Total New Vehicle Units 165 131 144 152 167 181 193 200 213

New Vehicle - Gross Profit - Margin % 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Luxury 7.4% 7.6% 7.7% 7.7% 7.6% 7.2% 7.8% 7.3% 7.3%

Mid-line Import 6.7% 6.8% 5.6% 6.1% 5.3% 5.2% 5.3% 5.5% 5.5%

Mid-line Domestic 6.8% 6.8% 7.2% 6.8% 6.7% 6.5% 6.7% 6.4% 6.4%

Total New Vehicle Retail Units - SS 6.9% 7.1% 6.6% 6.8% 6.4% 6.1% 6.5% 6.3% 6.4%

Plus: New Vehicle Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 9.6% 5.1% 0.0%

Total New Vehicle Units 6.9% 7.1% 6.6% 6.8% 6.4% 6.1% 6.5% 6.3% 6.4%

Page 89: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

89

Upside Case Used Vehicle Economics

USED VEHICLES

Used Vehicles Retail - Units 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 44,241 39,373 46,329 54,009 57,434 67,768 69,859 70,702 72,470

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions - - 144 - - 1,686 2,892 1,206 -

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 44,241 39,373 46,473 54,009 57,434 69,454 72,751 71,908 72,470

Used Vehicles Retail - Units - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS -11.0% 17.7% 16.6% 6.3% 18.0% 4.3% 2.5%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units -11.0% 18.0% 16.2% 6.3% 20.9% 3.5% 0.8%

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 17,843$ 18,251$ 18,930$ 18,923$ 19,187$ 19,778$ 20,790$ 20,557$ 21,071$

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,522$ 33,689$ 18,408$

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 17,843$ 18,251$ 18,936$ 18,923$ 19,187$ 19,796$ 21,103$ 20,521$ 21,071$

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 2.3% 3.7% 0.0% 1.4% 3.1% 3.9% 2.5%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 2.3% 3.8% -0.1% 1.4% 3.2% 3.7% 2.7%

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 719 877 1,022 1,102 1,340 1,409 1,453 1,527

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions - 3 - - 35 57 22 -

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 719 880 1,022 1,102 1,375 1,466 1,476 1,527

Used Vehicles Retail - Revenue - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS -9.0% 22.0% 16.5% 7.8% 21.6% 8.4% 5.1%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units -9.0% 22.5% 16.1% 7.8% 24.8% 7.3% 3.5%

Page 90: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

90

Upside Case Used Vehicle Economics

Used Vehicles Retail -Gross Profit per Unit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 2,029$ 2,001$ 1,881$ 1,819$ 1,769$ 1,818$ 1,784$ 1,791$

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,305$ 2,254$ 1,327$ -$

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 2,029$ 2,003$ 1,881$ 1,819$ 1,758$ 1,829$ 1,776$ 1,791$

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit per Unit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 0.1% -1.4% -6.0% -3.3% -2.8% 0.8% 0.4%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 0.1% -1.3% -6.1% -3.3% -3.4% 1.0% 0.9%

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 90 80 93 102 105 120 123 126 130

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions - - 0 - - 2 4 2 -

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 90 80 93 102 105 122 127 128 130

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit - Margin % 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS 11.4% 11.1% 10.6% 9.9% 9.5% 8.9% 9.2% 8.7% 8.5%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.4% 11.0% 7.2% 0.0%

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units 11.4% 11.1% 10.6% 9.9% 9.5% 8.9% 9.2% 8.7% 8.5%

Used Vehicles Retail - Gross Profit - Growth % yoy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Used Vehicle Retail Units - SS -10.9% 16.0% 9.6% 2.9% 14.7% 5.2% 2.9%

Used Vehicle Retail Units - Acquisitions

Total Used Vehicle Retail Units -10.9% 16.5% 9.1% 2.9% 16.8% 4.6% 1.6%

Page 91: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

91

Upside Case Financials

FINANCIAL RESULTS

Financial Results 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

Total Revenue 4,093 3,406 3,936 4,141 4,642 5,335 5,623 5,719 6,043

Growth % yoy -16.8% 15.6% 5.2% 12.1% 14.9% 7.2% 5.7%

EBITDA 150 123 153 155 211 250 278 300 323

Margin % 3.7% 3.6% 3.9% 3.7% 4.5% 4.7% 4.9% 5.2% 5.3%

Growth % yoy -18.0% 23.9% 1.2% 36.2% 18.8% 19.9% 7.5%

EBIT 129 101 132 132 188 226 252 275 297

Margin % 3.2% 3.0% 3.3% 3.2% 4.1% 4.2% 4.5% 4.8% 4.9%

Growth % yoy -21.7% 30.2% 0.4% 42.3% 20.1% 21.5% 8.2%

NOPAT 240 65 88 83 118 142 158 170 186

Margin % 5.9% 1.9% 2.2% 2.0% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8% 3.0% 3.1%

Growth % yoy -72.8% 35.6% -6.3% 42.9% 19.6% 20.2% 9.0%

PF Net Income 198 31 55 48 86 108 124 138 153

Margin % 4.8% 0.9% 1.4% 1.2% 1.8% 2.0% 2.2% 2.4% 2.5%

Growth % yoy -84.5% 79.7% -12.0% 76.9% 26.1% 27.6% 10.9%

PF FD EPS 6.24$ 0.93$ 1.65$ 1.48$ 2.72$ 3.47$ 4.08$ 4.51$ 5.00$

Growth % yoy -85.1% 77.6% -10.1% 83.0% 27.7% 29.8% 10.9%

Cash Flow from Operations 529 111 10 (181) (21) 51 107 188 143

Margin % 12.9% 3.3% 0.3% -4.4% -0.4% 1.0% 1.9% 3.3% 2.4%

Growth % yoy -79.0% -91.1% -1930.3% -88.6% -344.9% 76.0% -23.7%

Page 92: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

92

Upside Case Financials

Financial Results 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM 2014 2015

CapEx 69 8 30 22 56 50 65 46 30

Margin % 1.7% 0.2% 0.8% 0.5% 1.2% 0.9% 1.2% 0.8% 0.5%

Growth % yoy -88.0% 262.7% -26.9% 156.4% -11.5% -7.2% -35.2%

Levered Free Cash Flow 460 103 (20) (204) (78) (1) 40 141 113

Margin % 11.2% 3.0% -0.5% -4.9% -1.7% 0.0% 0.7% 2.5% 1.9%

Growth % yoy -77.7% -119.7% -19.5%

Total Debt 600 538 544 459 466 554 549 549 549

Less: Liquid Assets (92) (85) (21) (11) (6) (5) (7) (107) (251)

Net Debt 508 453 523 447 460 549 542 442 297

Total Debt/EBITDA 4.0x 4.4x 3.6x 3.0x 2.2x 2.2x 2.2x 1.8x 1.7x

Net Debt/EBITDA 3.4x 3.7x 3.4x 2.9x 2.2x 2.2x 2.2x 1.5x 0.9x

Total EBITDA/Interest Expense 2.2x 2.2x 2.9x 2.8x 4.0x 4.6x 5.2x 5.7x 6.1x

ROE % 0.0% 12.56% 19.16% 14.82% 21.25% 21.99% 25.38% 22.99% 20.32%

RNOA % 0.0% 9.37% 10.93% 10.71% 13.73% 13.63% 15.16% 15.91% 17.85%

Page 93: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

Red Team Analysis

Page 94: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

94

What Does The Red Team Analysis Suggest How This Could

Go Wrong?

ABG is sold to a strategic buyer as part of a larger

dealer roll-up strategy.

Continued, unprecedented demand for high quality

used vehicles results in the stabilization of used car

pricing.

ABG successfully completes a leveraged

recapitalization, using excess cash proceeds for

additional stock buybacks.

ABG is able to consistently locate and acquire mildly

underperforming independent dealerships at attractive

cash flow multiples, thereby adding value to the

enterprise.

Page 95: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

95

What Is The Market Missing?

The price of used cars could come under severe

pressure, the result of four years of extremely strong

new car sales and leasing volumes as well as easy

credit conditions.

The market may be overestimating management’s

ability to build enterprise value through small tuck-in

acquisitions.

With newly added car manufacturing capacity and a

weak Japanese Yen, OEMs will maintain aggressive

new car incentives.

The market may be overlooking ABG’s exposure to

subprime customers. As 25% of new loan originations

are to subprime customers, ABG’s F&I and new/used

car business would be materially impacted if U.S.

regulators impose tighter lending standards as a

preemptive measure to stem excessive lending.

Page 96: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

96

Fall in New Car

Demand

Used Car Over-

Supply

New Car Incentives

Stricter Financing

Negative Industry

Dynamics

Increased Rates

End of Easy Credit

Downside

ABG Tremendous Downside Despite Fantastic Recent

Performance

Page 97: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Strictly Confidential September 2014

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

BIOS

Page 98: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

98

Biographies

Chand Sooran, Chief Investment Officer

Chand has broad and deep experience investing across the capital structure. Most recently, he helped start up the

distressed value team at CQS as the #2 with positions across the capital structure, eventually running a parallel

long/short value equity book independently. His role as Portfolio Manager included membership in the HoldCo

creditors’ committee in the Six Flags Chapter 11 case and membership in the steering committee and the

creditors’ committee for Nell noteholders in the LyondellBasell Chapter 11 case. Prior to that, he worked as a

Senior Analyst at Columbus Hill Capital Management, a high profile value fund, covering Airlines, Telecoms, Media

and Technology in equities and in credit. Notably, he was a member of the ad hoc creditors’ committee in Delta

Airlines. Before joining Columbus Hill, Chand was a research analyst for five years in an internal multi-strategy

hedge fund at Lehman Brothers where he worked on a variety of strategies including distressed debt, deep value,

special situations, long/short equity and emerging markets. This included work as an unsecured creditor in the

UAL Chapter 11 case, special situations driven by litigation and other general value investing. Prior to going to

business school at MIT Sloan, he spent approximately six years trading foreign exchange, principally as a market

maker for foreign exchange options. In addition to being a graduate of MIT, Chand is a graduate of the University

of Toronto Schools, the Royal Military College of Canada and Queen’s University, as well as being a CFA

Charterholder and being certified as a Financial Risk Manager by the Global Association of Risk Professionals.

After graduating from RMC, Chand was a commissioned officer in the Royal Canadian Navy.

Page 99: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

99

Biographies

Anand Kalola, Senior Analyst

Anand Kalola has over seven years of finance industry experience. Most recently, Anand was a Senior Associate

at Prospect Capital where he was responsible for originating, executing, and managing middle-market

investments. Prior to Prospect, he worked as a Senior Associate at Chanin Capital Partners/Duff & Phelps

Restructuring with a focus on executing financial restructurings. Anand began his career as a Financial Analyst

with the leveraged finance group at CIBC World Markets in Los Angeles. He holds a BS in Economics and a BA in

Biological Basis of Behavior from the University of Pennsylvania. He is also a CFA Charterholder.

Page 100: Pf capital asbury automotive 092214 final

Point Frederick CapitalPoint Frederick Capital

No representation is made that the Investment manager’s or the Fund’s investment process, investment strategies, goals or risk management techniques will or are likely to be achieved or be successful. See Important Information on Page 2.

Presentation for: Chand Sooran

Contact Information

100

Chand Sooran

Chief Investment Officer, Manager & Founding Member

[email protected]

646.380.6675

100