Upload
arieffahlevi
View
218
Download
11
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Pizza hut Porter's Case study
Citation preview
PORTER'S FIVE FORCES MODELAND
PORTER'S VALUE CHAINPIZZA HUT
IntroductionPizza Hut is one of the best wide spread international fast food joint. It offers
different styles of pizza along with some side dishes like salads, pastas,
buffalo wings/potato rings, breadsticks, and garlic breads. It is a subsidiary of
Yum! Brands (a Fortune 300 company), the world's largest restaurant
company. It is an American restaurant chain with more than 6,000 Pizza Hut
restaurants in the United States, and more than 5,600 store locations in 94
other countries and territories around the world. It entered India in 1996,
with its first branch in Bangalore and expanding all over thereafter, creating a
large customer base for itself.
Competitive Rivalry
Threat of New
Entrants
Threat of Substitutes
Power of Suppliers
Power of Customers
Porter's Five Forces Model
Competitive Rivalry (Very High)• Pizza Inn competes with some other large global pizza chains, such as Pizza Hut,
Domino’s Pizza, and Papa John. They all engage in international business, fastfood franchise, dine-in and delivery service, which creates intense competition.
• Fierce price discounting and coupons by these top three players also squeezedother pizza sellers.in and delivery service, which creates intense competition.
• Except for those pizza companies, Pizza Inn competes with some small local pizzarestaurants as well. They offer low price products and faster service, taking thecompetitive advantages of Pizza Inn.
• The pizza segment is made more challenging for traditional restaurants by otherclose substitutions, including supermarkets, which not only sell frozen pizzas, butready to bake pizza, and warehouse clubs sell large size pizzas.
Threat of New Entrants (Low)• Pizza chains are dealing with the effects of a deep recession, because of higher
ingredient prices,the slim margins and more competition from non-traditional
channels.
• Existing competitors keep lowering prices and discounting prices, and expanding
distribution channels create barriers to entrants as well.
• Current competitors have first mover advantages, they have mature technology
in specialty production, and a relationship with distribution channels, therefore
if second mover doesn’t have innovation in the industry, they can hardly survive.
Threat of Substitutes (High)• For the quick-service pizza restaurants, it has a high availability of substitute
products.
• Pizza Inn primarily provides pizza which has various substitutes focus on other
fast food chains, such as sandwich chains, chicken fast food chains, family
restaurants etc.
• In much the same way, other traditional food chains offer customers’ fast,
convenient and cheap products and services as well.
• The threat of substitutes influence on the price competition, price is more elastic
since customers have more alternatives.
Power of Customers (Medium/Low)• The buyer bargaining power is low due to the fact that fast food customers are
large in amount, and focus on individual customers.
• Every single customer is unlikely to purchase a large quantity of product, and it’sunexpected that each of them contributes a large proportion of sales.
• QSRs are in high demand, especially in shopping centers, residential areas,college campuses and offices. In addition, buyers are fragmented, with noparticular effect on product or price. Therefore, they will not be hurt by losing asmall amount of customers.
• In the industry, customers are less sensitive to price fluctuations, which isrelatively inelastic, so that providers have large price controlling power.
• Since the QSR is still market demanding in the future because of its speed, priceand convenience, buyer power is relatively low.
Power of Suppliers (Low)• The major suppliers of the fast food industry are raw material suppliers.
Suppliers are weak, because raw materials for food components in the industryare commodity products, such as cheese and flour.
• Many competitive suppliers.
• The industry is labor intensive. However, labor supply is abundant so usuallycompanies are not concerned about their labor force.
• suppliers tend to keep a longterm relationship with the concentratedpurchasers. (less powerful)
• Furthermore, many big fast food chain companies are vertically integrated withthe supplier in order to maintain low costs and high quality products
Value Chain of Pizza Hut
SUPPORT ACTIVITIES
Infrastructure
Human Resource Management
Technology Development
Procurement
PRIMARY ACTIVITIES
Inbound Logistics
Operations
Outbound Logistics
Marketing and Sales
Service and Support
MA
RG
IN
InfrastructureHuman
Resource Management
ProcurementTechnology Development
• Managing employees• Training employees• Appraisals and rewards• Knowledge transfers• Freedom of thoughts• Conducting meetings
• Feedback from customers• Research work • Improvising of their products• Innovation• Launch of new products• Use of IT, databases• Temperature controlled trucks
• Acquiring the resources• Ingredients from local
suppliers• Special ingredients From
Australia
SUPPORT ACTIVITIES
• Funds collection
• Administrative tasks
Inbound Logistics
Operations
Outbound Logistics
Marketing and Sales
Service and
SupportPRIMARY
ACTIVITIES
Purchasing raw materials
• Preparation of pizza base• Customization of pizza• Make pastas and salads• On time delivery
• Customer feels comfortable• Online orders• Home Delivery
• Segmentation• Target Market• Branding• Redefining its menu• Introduction of new products• Pricing• Distribution• Advertising• Promotional offers
• Transporting pizza bases• Serving pizzas hot
http://utsavmahendra.blogspot.com/2012/03/pizza-hut-porters-five-force-model.html
http://www.slideshare.net/singhalshubham/pizza-hut-value-chain-analysis
Reference