Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
A
Presentation
On
Selection of Steel manufacturing
factory location in Gujarat and
factor analysis
Presented by
Utkarsh Amaravat
Important factors for steel
manufacturing facility location
• Availability of raw materials. (RM)
• Transportation. (T)
• Skilled manpower. (M)
• Steel market. (SM)
• Nearer to port if export. (P)
• Industrial support. (IS)
• Taxation and Govt. benefit. (G)
• Land. (L)
Paired comparison of factorsRM T M SM P IS G L Dummy Total
RM 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 6/36
T 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 7/36
M 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 5/36
SM 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 4/36
P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1/36
IS 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2/36
G 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 3/36
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8/36
Dummy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/36
For steel manufacturing facility,
available location in Gujarat• Ahmedabad (ah)
• Baroda (b)
• Rajkot (r)
• Mudra (m)
• Surat (su)
• Jamnagar (j)
• Porbandar (p)
• Bharuch (bh)
• Anand (a)
• Sanand (s)
For availability of raw material (RM)
factor, paired comparison of locations -
ah b r m su j p bh a s Total
ah - 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
b 0 - 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
r 0 0 - 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 5
m 0 0 0 - 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
su 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 9
j 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 1
p 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0
bh 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 - 1 0 5
a 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 - 0 3
s 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 - 5
For transportation (T) factor, paired
comparison of locations -ah b r m su j p bh a s Total
ah - 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 5
b 1 - 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
r 0 0 - 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 3
m 0 0 0 - 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
su 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 9
j 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 1
p 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0
bh 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 - 1 1 7
a 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 - 1 6
s 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 - 4
For skilled manpower (M) factor, paired comparison of locations -
ah b r m su j p bh a s Total
ah - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
b 0 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
r 0 0 - 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 4
m 0 0 0 - 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
su 0 0 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 7
j 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 1
p 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0
bh 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 - 1 1 5
a 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 - 1 5
s 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 - 4
For steel market (SM) factor, paired
comparison of locations -ah b r m su j p bh a s Total
ah - 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
b 1 - 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8
r 0 0 - 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 6
m 0 0 0 - 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
su 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 9
j 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 1
p 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0
bh 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 - 1 0 4
a 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 - 0 3
s 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 - 5
For nearer to port (P) factor, paired
comparison of locations -ah b r m su j p bh a s Total
ah - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
b 1 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
r 1 1 - 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 5
m 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
su 1 1 1 0 - 0 0 1 1 1 6
j 1 1 1 0 1 - 1 1 1 1 8
p 1 1 1 0 1 0 - 1 1 1 7
bh 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 1 4
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0
s 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - 2
For industrial support (IS) factor,
paired comparison of locations -ah b r m su j p bh a s Total
ah - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b 1 - 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
r 1 1 - 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
m 1 1 1 - 1 1 0 1 1 1 8
su 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 1
j 1 1 1 0 1 - 0 1 1 0 6
p 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 9
bh 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 - 0 0 4
a 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 - 0 5
s 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 - 7
For land (L) factor, paired
comparison of locations -ah b r m su j p bh a s Total
ah - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
b 1 - 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
r 1 1 - 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
m 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
su 1 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 1
j 1 1 1 0 1 - 0 1 1 0 6
p 1 1 1 0 1 1 - 1 1 1 8
bh 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 - 0 0 4
a 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 - 0 5
s 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 - 7
Factor Rating Table -L
8/36
T
7/36
RM
6/36
M
5/36
SM
4/36
G
3/36
IS
2/36
P
1/36TOTAL
ah o 35/36 48/36 45/36 28/36 0 2/36 1/36 159/36
b 16/36 49/36 42/36 40/36 32/36 6/36 16/36 3/36 204/36
r 24/36 21/36 30/36 20/36 24/36 9/36 14/36 5/36 147/36
m 72/36 14/36 12/36 10/36 8/36 24/36 4/36 9/36 153/36
su 8/36 63/36 54/36 35/36 36/36 3/36 12/36 6/36 217/36
j 48/36 7/36 6/36 5/36 4/36 18/36 2/36 8/36 98/36
p 64/36 0 0 0 0 27/36 0 7/36 98/36
bh 32/36 49/36 30/36 25/36 16/36 12/36 10/36 4/36 178/36
a 40/36 42/36 18/36 25/36 12/36 15/36 8/36 0 160/36
s 56/36 28/36 30/36 20/36 20/36 21/36 6/36 2/36 183/36
Conclusion
After factor rating analysis, one would like toselect first Surat, second Baroda and thirdSanand for steel manufacturing plant location.
Thank You…
