Upload
urjanet
View
741
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Investor’s Perspective of Sustainability
Chris HaglerSoutheast Practice Leader, Climate Change & Sustainability Services
Ernst & Young
SPARK15 Conference
The investor perspective
November 10, 2015
Page 3 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Disclaimer
► This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice.
► The views expressed by panelists are not necessarily those of Ernst & Young LLP.
Page 4 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
How companies are reacting2.
Why investors care and how we know they do
Emerging standards3.
4.
What’s next?5.
What’s in store
1.
So what?
Page 5 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015Page 5 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
1.Why investors care and how we know they do
Page 6 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
The drivers of market value have changedInvestors care about what drives market value
► Innovation and intellectual capital
► Human capital► Risk management► Brand management► Carbon exposure, etc.
Market value 100%
Book value in % of market value
Physical and financial assetsOther factors
Source: Intangible Asset Market Value Study,” Ocean Tomo, 2015.*January 1, 2015
Ocean Tomo study – components of S&P 500 market value
1975 1985 1995 2005 2015*0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Page 7 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Support for shareholder E+S proposals by threshold in the past six years2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
> 30% support 15% 18% 27% 31% 23% 30%
> 20% support 30% 38% 44% 52% 45% 54%
> 10% support 40% 48% 52% 59% 62% 65%
Increasing shareholder proposals focusing on ESG – many focused on transparency
► Proposals focusing on environmental and social (E+S) topics account for 60% of shareholder proposals submitted as a broad category compared to 45% in 2013.1
► A growing number of these proposals are reaching the threshold level of 30% support, the level at which many boards take note.
Source: Taking flight: environmental sustainability proposals gain more attention, Ernst & Young LLP, 2013. 1Other major proposal categories are board-focused, compensation and anti-takeover/strategic proposals.
2014 top E+S proposal topic areas
Page 8 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Question
56?
Page 9 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
The number of companies that file an integrated report
A reasonable water use ratio for a packaging companyThe number of countries whose governments or exchanges require or highly recommend sustainability reportingThe percentage of water to bourbon in a mint julep
Answer
56 is …
H2O
Page 10 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Stock exchanges, as representatives of investors, are driving increased transparencyThe governments or stock exchanges of 56 countries have required or encouraged some level of sustainability reporting:
Australia France Malaysia South AfricaArgentina Germany Malta South KoreaAustria Greece Mexico SpainBangladesh Hong Kong Netherlands SwedenBelgium Hungary Nigeria SwitzerlandBrazil Iceland Norway TaiwanBulgaria India Pakistan ThailandCanada Indonesia Philippines TurkeyChina Ireland Poland UKCroatia Italy Portugal USCzech Republic Ivory Coast Republic of Cyprus ZimbabweDenmark Japan RomaniaEcuador Latvia RussiaEstonia Lithuania SingaporeFinland Luxembourg Slovakia
Source: “Corporate social responsibility disclosure efforts by national governments and stock exchanges,” Harvard Kennedy School’s Hauser Institute for Civil Society, http://hausercenter.org/iri/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/CSR-3-27-15.pdf, March 2015; “Sustainability reporting policies worldwide — today’s best practice, tomorrow’s trends,” Global Reporting Initiative, https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/carrots-and-sticks.pdf, 2013.
Page 11 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Stock exchanges are encouraging or requiring ESG disclosure: INCR proposal
► Governance and ethical oversight► Environmental impact► Government relations and political
involvement► Climate change► Diversity► Employee relations► Human rights► Product and service impact and integrity► Supply chain and subcontracting► Communities and community relations
► ESG materiality assessment in financial disclosure
► ESG issues disclosure ► ESG disclosure index link to Global
Reporting Initiative (GRI)► Exchange monitoring of overall level of
disclosure and quality
The Investor Network on Climate Risk (INCR) recommended a listing standard on corporate sustainability disclosure to include:
Source: “Investor Network on Climate Risk,” INCR, http://www.ceres.org/investor-network/incr/incr, accessed 2015.
Page 12 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Question
61?
Page 13 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Answer
61 is …
The number of NGOs that are focused on carbon reduction
The current temperature outside
The % of investors that consider sustainability information relevant to all sectors
The % of companies that say that their shareholders are the primary audience for their sustainability report
Page 14 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Increasing interest from investors on all fronts
Percentage of respondents who …
Consider corporate social responsibility or sustainability reports essential or important when making investment decisions
Believe companies are motivated to report nonfinancialinformation to demonstrate management risk
Consider mandatory board oversight of nonfinancialperformance reporting essential or important
Consider nonfinancial data relevant to all sectors
Use a structured, methodical evaluation of environmental andsocial impact information
Consider integrated reports essential or important whenmaking investment decisions
2015 2014 2015 2014
Source: “Non-Financial Performance Reporting and Investment Decision Making,” prepared for EY by Institutional Investor Research, 10 February 2015. For more information see EY.com’s Climate Change and Sustainability Services page.
Page 15 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Number of customers using ESG data76% increase from 2013 to 2014
Investors are pulling information from Bloomberg when making decisions
“Bloomberg collects ESG data from published company material and integrates it into the Equities, Bloomberg Industries and Fixed Income platforms. Bloomberg covers more than 10,000 companies with ESG data and more than 16,000 companies with executive compensation data in 52 countries. ESG data is fully integrated with all of Bloomberg’s analytics.”
“Customers using ESG data increased 76% in 2014,” Bloomberg, http://www.bloomberg.com/bcause/customers-using-esg-data-increased-76-in-2014, accessed 2015.
20127,779
20115,747
20104,704
20092,415Unique users
20139,669
ESG data distribution – user type
201417,010
32%26%5%
4%4%
4%2% 2% 2%AnalystPortfolio ManagerInvestor Rela-tionsTraderRisk/Mid/Back OfficeSalesperson
Portfolio manager
Analyst
Trader
Investor relations
Risk/mid/back office
Salesperson
Page 16 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Investors are including a more complete understanding of performance
How do you and your investment team evaluate nonfinancial disclosures that relate to the environmental and social aspects of a company’s performance?
Source: “Non-Financial Performance Reporting and Investment Decision Making,” prepared for EY by Institutional Investor Research, 10 February 2015. For more information see EY.com’s Climate Change and Sustainability Services page.
We usually conduct a structured, methodical evaluation of environmental and social impact statements and disclosures.
We usually rely on guidelines or information from third parties, such as the UN Principles for Responsible Investments or other relevant guidelines.
We usually evaluate environmental and social impact statements informally.
We conduct little or no review.
37.0%
19.6%
15.6%
12.9%
26.5%
31.9%
20.9%
35.6%
2014 2015
Page 17 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Investment decisions change with a more complete picture of performance
— Analyst with $425 billion asset management firm
How would the following disclosures about a prospective investment affect your investment decision?
Reconsider investment
Rule out investment immediately
No change in investment plan
Source: “Non-Financial Performance Reporting and Investment Decision Making,” prepared for EY by Institutional Investor Research, 10 February 2015. For more information see EY.com’s Climate Change and Sustainability Services page.
Risks in supplychain not addressed
Risk or history ofpoor environmentalperformance
Human rights riskfrom operations
Risk from resourcescarcity – e.g., water
No link to financialperformance
Risk fromclimate change
2015 2015
9.1%
15.4%
72.6%
12.0%
9.1%
75.6%
15.3%
19.1%
63.2%
17.7%
13.5%
68.6%
17.9%
15.5%
57.0%
27.5%
8.7%
61.5%
29.8%
Page 18 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Investors vote with their dollarsSustainable, responsible and impact investing trends
$1.72 trillion in US-domiciled assets at the start of 2014 held by 202 institutional investors or money managers that filed shareholder resolutions on ESG issues from 2012 through 2014
2012 2014$0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00
$3.74
$6.57
76% increase
After eliminating double-counting for assets involved in both strategies, the overall total of socially responsible investment (SRI) assets was $6.57 trillion.
$6.20 trillion in US-domiciled assets as of January 1, 2014, held by 480 institutional investors, 308 money managers and 880 community investment institutions
Source: "The Report on US Sustainable, Responsible and Impact Investing Trends," Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment (US SIF), http://www.ussif.org/blog_home.asp?Display=55, 2014.
Trilli
ons
Page 19 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015Page 19 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
2.How companies are reacting Investors’ desire for more transparency
Page 20 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
A wide variety of stakeholders are asking for increased transparency
SRI
groups
Certifications
GRI
Carbon
Disclosure
Project
(CDP)
Expectations
for more
sustainable
products
SEC –
disclosure
guidance
FTC – green
guides
Corporate
initiatives
Human Rights
Watch
EPA – GHG
reporting
Government
NGOs
Investors
Recruiting
and retention
Industry
associations
(ACC, NAIC,
ICMM, AAFA)
Employee
engagement
programs
EmployeesSupply
chain and
industry
Customers
Communities
Permitting or
expansion
challenges
“License to
operate”
Shareholder
resolutions
Customer
surveys/
questionnaires
Increasing number of
climate change and
sustainability lawsuits
International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC)
and Sustainability Accounting Standards
Board (SASB)
Page 21 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Question
15 ?
Page 22 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
The age of my youngest child
The number of NGOs that are focused on carbon
The current temperature outside
The % of companies that say that their shareholders are the primary audience for their sustainability report
Answer
15 is …
Page 23 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
SuppliersAnalysts
PolicymakersNGOs
ShareholdersEmployeesCustomers
3%6%7%7%
15%22%
37%
Who do you perceive to be the most important audiences for your sustainability report?Rank the top three stakeholder groups in order of importance in driving your sustainability initiatives:(weighted average)
Source: Six trends in corporate sustainability, EY, 2013.
Page 24 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015Page 24Page 24 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
3. Emerging standards
Page 25 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Legend
Sustainability reporting standards and frameworksKey differences: geography • stakeholders • scope
GRI: Global Reporting Initiative
SASB: Sustainability Accounting Standards Board
IIRC: International Integrated Reporting Council
CDP: formerly Carbon Disclosure Project
Emerging standards
Global reporting standard designed to provide organizations guidance on reporting non-financial information to a broad group of stakeholders
Sector- and industry-specific sustainability disclosure standards for reporting material non-financial information, encouraging disclosure in 10K filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
A reporting standard designed to demonstrate the linkages between an organization’s strategy, governance and financial performance and the social, environmental and economic context within which it operates
Investor and customer requests drive reporting on climate, water, supply chain and forest
Global
US
Stakeholders
NGOsSuppliers
Regu
lato
rs
Local
community
Employees
Managem
ent
Inve
stor
s
Customers
Page 26 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Materiality is the common thread among reporting frameworks
Framework DefinitionSASB SASB adheres to the US Supreme Court
definition of materiality, defined as “presented a substantial likelihood that the disclosure of the omitted fact would have been viewed as having significantly altered the ‘total mix’ of information made available.”
GRI G4 Aspects that reflect the organization’s significant economic, environmental, or social impacts [in terms of whether they positively or negatively influence the organization’s ability to deliver its vision and strategy], and substantially influence the assessments and decisions of stakeholders.
IIRC Aspects that are material to assessing the organization’s ability to create value [for the providers of financial capital] in the short, medium and long term.
Page 27 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Company-wide materiality matrixExample 1:
Management would determine line placement in the materiality matrix.
Likeliness to occur Low
Medium
High
Magnitude of effectLow
Medium
Low High
Low
High
Financial per-formance
Innovation
Materials and scarcity of resources
Energy consumption
Water consumption
Biodiversity
Emissions and ef -fluents
Diversity and in-clusion Labor relations
Health and safety
Training and de-velopment
Employee turnover
Human rights
Customer health and safety
Strategic giving
Local development (poverty reduction)
Product safety
Product labeling and packaging
Product/service transport
Brand loyalty
Governance and ethics
Environmental compliance
Impact on organization
Influ
ence
on
stak
ehol
ders
’ ass
essm
ents
and
de
cisi
ons
Page 28 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Company-wide materiality matrix
Impact on organization
Influ
ence
of s
take
hold
ers’
asse
ssm
ents
and
dec
ision
s
Magnitude of effectLow
Medium
High
Diversity and inclusion
Water consumption
Governance
Financial performance
Brand loyalty
Environmental compliance
Human rights
Product safety
Customer health and safetyTransportation
Product and packaging labeling
Strategic givingLocal development
Biodiversity Employee turnover Training
Health and safety
Energy consumptionMaterials and scarcity of resourcesEmissions
Example 2:
Likeliness to occur Low
Medium
High
Management would determine the grids in the materiality matrix.
Page 29 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Question
72 ?
Page 30 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
A reasonable number of lost days for a manufacturing company
My age in dog years
The percentage of global 50 that has a focus on water reduction and replenishment
The percentage of S&P 500 companies that published a sustainability report in 2013
Answer
72 is …
Page 31 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Current reporting trends
“Trends in External Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Update on the USA,” GRI, July 2014.
90% of the world’s largest 250 companies issued a corporate responsibility report
82% of which refer to the GRI guidelines10% of the world’s largest 250 companies did not issue a report
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
S&P 500 companies that published a sustainability report
2011
2013
US-based companies that published a third-party assured, GRI-based sustainability report
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%
2013
2011
Page 32 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015Page 32 The investor perspective │ Spark15 November 2015
4. So what?
Page 33 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Why this matters to you? The whole picture
Page 34 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015Page 34Page 34 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
5. What’s next?
Page 35 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Where we see this going
Need for transparency on ESG issues will only increase
More demand from global stock exchanges, investors and regulators
Better understanding of how environmental and social issues impact the economic performance of an organization and how they intersect
More use of non-financial information in business and investment decision-making
– Head of sustainability research at a UK asset management firm, EY’s Tomorrow’s Investment Rules 2.0 report
Page 36 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Continue the researchA new point of view for business leaders
ey.com/us/sustainability
Page 37 The investor perspective │ Spark15, November 2015
Continue the conversation
Chris HaglerSoutheast Region Leader, Climate Change and Sustainability Services
Atlanta, GA+1 404 817 [email protected]
EY | Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory
About EYEY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction andadvisory services. The insights and quality services wedeliver help build trust and confidence in the capitalmarkets and in economies the world over. We developoutstanding leaders who team to deliver on ourpromises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we playa critical role in building a better working world for ourpeople, for our clients and for our communities.
EY refers to the global organization, and may refer toone or more, of the member firms of Ernst & YoungGlobal Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity.Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited byguarantee, does not provide services to clients. For moreinformation about our organization, please visit ey.com.
Ernst & Young LLP is a client-serving member firm ofErnst & Young Global Limited operating in the US.
© 2015 Ernst & Young LLP.All Rights Reserved.
1510-1721157ED NoneThis material has been prepared for general informational purposesonly and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or otherprofessional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice.
ey.com