9
Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition Tom Evens iMinds-MICT, Ghent University Private Television in Europe ‘Connecting to the Future’ Brussels, 19 April 2013

Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Strategies for power and control in online television markets:

towards co-opetition

Tom Evens iMinds-MICT, Ghent University

Private Television in Europe ‘Connecting to the Future’Brussels, 19 April 2013

Page 2: Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Ecology of change Changing configurations of power and control

Growing opportunities for new entrants Opportunities shaped or blocked by pre-existing power

structures and incumbents’ foreclosing strategies

Prominent opportunity: over-the-top (OTT) TV Traditional TV content and broadband delivery platforms Emerging players, burgeoning market

Strategic impact of OTT Bypass traditional gatekeepers Establish direct-to-consumer relationship

Page 3: Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Broadcaster

Producer

Distributor

Consumer

OTT operator TV Everywhere

Advertiser

= OVER-THE-TOP TV = MANAGED NETWORKS

Page 4: Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Game consolesStreaming players Set-top boxes Connected TV’s

Co

nte

nt

C

lou

d N

etw

ork

Dev

ice

Page 5: Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Co-opetition and alliances Rivals simultaneously compete and cooperate Horizontal partnerships & complementary resources

Strategic alliances: access new markets and resources Share resources and competencies Complex value systems, multi-stakeholder environment

Ecosystems compete through business models Institutionalise technological innovation (cannibalisation) Adapt to changes in external environment Create and capture value

Page 6: Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Battles and conflicts Gatekeepers employ controlling points

No longer technological in nature (abundance) Commercial and artificial bottlenecks Monopoly control creates competitive advantage

Resource dependency & power imbalance Power play strategies by all parties (market foreclosure) Restrain access to critical resources Favour own ecosystem and interests

Page 7: Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Platform leadership

14/04/2023 7

Intense platform competition Goal: control the future TV ecosystem

Secure access via controlling points Occupy a critical position in the ecosystem Gain bargaining power vis-à-vis competitors

No battlefield, rather a chess game Alliances, partnerships and collaboration key to success Embed in existing ecosystem or control your own one

Ability to create and capture value Co-create, co-design, co-develop with the ecosystem Develop compelling user experience Experiment innovative business models

Page 8: Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Foresight OTT could have far-reaching implications

New players manoeuvring in this emerging market Incumbents re-invent bottlenecks to control OTT

Strategy: stop abundance, create scarcity OTT market still immature, outcome is uncertain Double-edged sword for viewers

More control of consumption (multiplatform, interactivity) Erosion of advertising-based revenue model Emergence of subscriptions, also on the web Endangers key values of public goods, non-excludability

and universality

Page 9: Strategies for power and control in online television markets: towards co-opetition

Tom.Evens[at]UGent.be

http://www.mict.be

http://be.linkedin.com/in/tomevens