30
From Systems Thinking To Systems Doing Collaboration Excellence for Sustainable Results

Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

From Systems Thinking To Systems Doing

Collaboration Excellence for Sustainable Results

Page 2: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

2© Interaction Associates Inc.

1.

2.

3 Minutes

Get in trios with folks you don’t know

List ways all three of you are connected that have nothing to do with:

• This conference, • Systems thinking, or • With family

Page 3: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

3© Interaction Associates Inc.

Page 4: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

4© Interaction Associates Inc.

Page 5: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

5© Interaction Associates Inc.

Systems Doing

Adapted from Sweeney & Schley 2010

1. seeing systems

3. engaging systems

2. mapping systemsYOU

ARE HERE

Page 6: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

6© Interaction Associates Inc.

Living Systems Principles

InterdependenceSystem IntegrityDiversityCooperation & PartnershipRightness of Size

Living CyclesWaste = FoodFeedbackNonlinearity

Emergent PropertiesFluxShared Resources

Adapted from Linda Booth Sweeney

Andy Atkins
As with prior page, bullets can be in list or scattered. Build will involve changing color of red bulleted items to a contrasting color
Page 7: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

7© Interaction Associates Inc.

At your table, pick two or more principles and discuss how collaboration is required for these principles to operate effectively in organizations.

Be prepared to provide examples to the group.

1.

2.

5 Minute

s

Page 8: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

8© Interaction Associates Inc.

Living Systems Principles

InterdependenceSystem IntegrityDiversityCooperation & PartnershipRightness of Size

Living CyclesWaste = FoodFeedbackNonlinearity

Emergent PropertiesFluxShared Resources

Adapted from Linda Booth Sweeney

Andy Atkins
As with prior page, bullets can be in list or scattered. Build will involve changing color of red bulleted items to a contrasting color
Page 9: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

9© Interaction Associates Inc.

Page 10: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

10© Interaction Associates Inc.

Page 11: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

11© Interaction Associates Inc.

Stakeholder?

Who’s a

Andy Atkins
Three part build in concentric circles.1) FIRM in middle of page2) next ring (Core Stakeholders: Competitors, Investors, etc.)3) Outer ring (Fringe Stakeholders)
Page 12: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

12© Interaction Associates Inc.

Identifying

Key Stakeholders

Page 13: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

13© Interaction Associates Inc.

Affected by current situation or outcome

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 14: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

14© Interaction Associates Inc.

Decision makers

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 15: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

15© Interaction Associates Inc.

Ratify or Veto

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 16: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

16© Interaction Associates Inc.

Consulted before decision

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 17: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

17© Interaction Associates Inc.

Informed after decision

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 18: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

18© Interaction Associates Inc.

Access to resources

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 19: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

19© Interaction Associates Inc.

Expertise

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 20: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

20© Interaction Associates Inc.

Involved in implementation

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 21: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

21© Interaction Associates Inc.

Passionate

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 22: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

22© Interaction Associates Inc.

Good connector to other stakeholders

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

Page 23: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

23© Interaction Associates Inc.

Adversarial

Divergent Non-Legitimate

Poor Isolated

Weak Non-Human

Illiterate Disinterested

FRINGE STAKEHOLDERS

Competitors

Employees

Communities Regulators

CustomersSuppliers

InvestorsNGOs

CORE STAKEHOLDERS

S. Hart and S. Sharma, 2004 “Engaging Fringe Stakeholders for Competitive Imagination”

FIRM

Page 24: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

24© Interaction Associates Inc.

Stakeholder Analysis

KEY STAKEHOLDERS

IMPORTANCE

LEVEL OF SUPPORT

IF OPPOSED, WHAT IS UNDERLYING INTEREST OR NEED?

ISSUES, WINS, MINDSET

ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY & COMMENTS

Andy Atkins
Want to illustrate layour of Stakeholder Analysis matrix, but am concerned about legibility. Any creative ideas???
Page 25: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

25© Interaction Associates Inc.

1.

2.

15 Minutes

In a different trio, identify one juicy or complex issue facing a member of the group. (Can be an issue facing a person or the organization.)

Identify multiple stakeholders and complete full row for 2 stakeholders.

Trio members are encouraged to pressure test ideas and coach through exercise.

Page 26: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

26© Interaction Associates Inc.

involvingstakeholders in decisions?

Why do we resist

Page 27: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

27© Interaction Associates Inc.

Andy Atkins
Build by starting with the axes, then adding circles from lower left to upper right. Fallback should build with or immediately after Consensus
Page 28: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

28© Interaction Associates Inc.

1.

2.

10 Minutes

In same trio, choose 1 decision that will need to be made related to the issue just discussed.

Choose the method you will use and the rationale.

Trio members are encouraged to pressure test ideas and coach through exercise.

Page 29: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

29© Interaction Associates Inc.

Involvement Mapping

Page 30: Systems thinking conf ia 2011 final

Thank You!

http://svy.mk/wkbook