Upload
the-karen-martin-group-inc
View
12.099
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Consultant – We help clients in all industries establish and grow Lean management systems, globally.
Author & Speaker:
Karen Martin, President
The Karen Martin Group, Inc.
@karenmartinopex
2
www.ksmartin.com/subscribe
Shingo Award Winning
Shingo Award Winning
ON SALE NOW!
After the Webinar…
3
• Please provide feedback• Materials: www.slideshare.net/karenmartingroup• Recorded webinars:
• www.ksmartin.com/webinars• www.youtube.com/karenmartingroup• www.vimeo.com/karenmartingroup• www.slideshare.net/karenmartingroup
www.ksmartin.com/webinars
4
5
6
You will learn…
• The similarities and differences between value stream maps (VSM) and metrics-based process maps (MBPM).
• The circumstances under which to select each type of map.
• Tips for successful mapping activities.
Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 8
Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan
Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy
When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.
Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes
Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes
Information flow Essential component Less obvious
Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers
Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work
How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days
Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 9
Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan
Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy
When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.
Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes
Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes
Information flow Essential component Less obvious
Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers
Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work
How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days
What problem are you trying to solve?
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 10
Desired State (or known standard)
Current State
Gap = Problem
Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 11
Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan
Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy
When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.
Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes
Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes
Information flow Essential component Less obvious
Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers
Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work
How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days
Value Stream Transformation is Strategic
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 12For more information, see Value Stream Mapping, Karen Martin & Mike Osterling
Process Improvement is Tactical
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 13For more information, see Metrics-Based Process Mapping, Karen Martin & Mike Osterling
Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 14
Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan
Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy
When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.
Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes
Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes
Information flow Essential component Less obvious
Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers
Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work
How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days
Work: Degrees of Granularity
Value Stream
Process Process Process
Step StepStep
15
Macro Perspective
• Define strategic direction (“what”)
• Heavy leadership involvement
• Value Stream Mapping
Micro Perspective
• Identify the tactical “how”
• Heavy frontline involvement
• Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Which do you need? Macro or Micro View?
16
Work: Levels of Granularity
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 17
Negotiate contract
Process order
Configure software
Value Stream
Process Negotiate pricing Approve Negotiate
terms Approve Execute
Degrees of Granularity: Hiring Value Stream
Hire
Recruit Select Onboard
Write job description
Post externally
Post internally
18
Process-level Perspective
Value-stream Perspective
What problem are you trying to solve?
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 19
Desired State (or known standard)
Current State
Gap = Problem
Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 20
Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan
Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy
When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.
Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes
Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes
Information flow Essential component Less obvious
Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers
Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work
How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days
Visualize the entire cycle of value delivery on a single sheet of paper
21
Timeline
3
Basic Value Stream Map
Work Flow
Information Flow
1
2
Customer
0.0 hrs.0.5 days
1.0 hrs.5.0 days
3.6 hrs.0.6 days
0.0 hrs.1.0 days
0.2 hrs.0.5 days
16.0 hrs. 0.0 hrs.7.0 days
8.0 hrs. 0.0 hrs.7.0 days
0.1 hrs.26.0 days
0.0 hrs.0.2 days Total LT =
Total PT = Activity Ra
SAP
Summary Invoice (Excel)Obtain Order;
Enter Order in Offline Order
Form
Sales (Key at night)
LT = 4.5 hrs.PT = 18 mins.%C&A: 80%
1Review & Release
Credit Holds
Sales
LT = 4 hrs.PT = 10 mins.%C&A: 99%
3Issue DO To Transporter; Create Pick
List
WH1
LT = 8 hrs.PT = 1 mins.%C&A: 95%
5Pick
& Load Order
Logistics
LT = 4 hrs.PT = 15 mins.%C&A: 95%
6Collect
POD from Customer
Transporter
LT = 2 days
7 Collect POD From
Transporter
WH1
LT = 7 daysPT = 1 mins.%C&A: 99%
8Deliver POD to
Accounting
MessengerBatch = 1x/day
LT = 1 days
9Review POD
For Accuracy
Accounting
LT = 7 daysPT = 2 mins.%C&A: 99%
10Deliv er Bill; Collect from Customer;
Deposit
SalesBatch = 1x monthly
LT = 26 daysPT = 5 mins.
11
COLOR LEGEND
Logistics / W arehouse
Sales
Order Management
Production
10%
90%
Produce Product
Plant 1
LT = 280 mins.PT = 215 mins.%C&A: 99%
4BPick
& Load Order
WH2
LT = 40 mins.PT = 3 mins.%C&A: 99%
5B
40 Days Delivery to Payment Received3.5 Days Order Receipt to Ship
Monthly Sales VolumeWk 1 = 14-23%Wk 2 = 19-24%Wk 3 = 23-25%Wk 4 = 30-42%
Obtain & Revise Sales
Forecast
Sales
LT = 0 daysPT = 270 mins.%C&A: 99%
1B
Hold S&OP Meeting
6-7 People
LT = 5 daysPT = 3 hrs.%C&A: 99%
2BCreate
ProductionPlan
Production Planning
LT = 5 daysPT = 1 hrs.%C&A: 99%
3B
Produce Product
Plant 2
LT = 280 mins.PT = 215 mins.%C&A: 99%
4C
Offline Order Form
Enter Payment;
Clear Billing
Accounting
LT = 2 hrs.PT = 1 mins.%C&A: 99%
12
Accounting
Delivery Order(DO)
Pick List
Proof of Delivery (POD)
Transfer Report
Prod. Plan
Check Stock &
Reallocate
Logistics & Warehouse
Batch = 1x/day
LT = 4 hrs.PT = 2 mins.%C&A: 99%
4
Prod. Plan
plier
Receive Material
Store
3C
Current State Value Stream MapOrder to Cash
Customer
3.0 hrs.21.0 days
1.0 hrs.5.0 days
3.6 hrs.0.6 days
0.0 hrs.0.5 days
15.0 hrs.30.0 days
0.0 hrs.7.0 days
8.0 hrs. 0.0 hrs.5.0 days
0.1 hrs.26.0 days
0.0 hrs.0.2 days Tota
Tota Acti
SAP
Collect Order From Customer
Sales
LT = 15 mins.PT = 15 mins.%C&A: 99%
2
Collect Customer
Orders
Order Mgmt
LT = 15 mins.PT = 15 mins.%C&A: 99%
2B
Review & Release
Credit Holds
Sales
LT = 4 hrs.PT = 10 mins.
3Issue DO
To Transporter
WH1
LT = 4 hrs.PT = 1 mins.
4Load & Prepare Invoice
Logistics
LT = 4 hrs.PT = 15 hrs.
5Collect
POD from Customer
Transporter
LT = 2 days
6Enter POD
WH1
LT = 7 daysPT = 1 mins.%C&A: 99%
7Deliver POD to
Accounting
Messenger
LT = 1 days
8 Rev iew PODfor Accuracy; Email Receipt
to Sales
Accounting
LT = 5 daysPT = 2 mins.
9
Produce Product
Plant 1
LT = 285 mins.PT = 215 mins.%C&A: 99%
3B
Pick & Stage
WH2
PT = 15 mins.%C&A: 95%
4B
Create Production
Plan
Production Planning
LT = 5 daysPT = 1 hrs.%C&A: 99%
2C
2%
Produce Product
Plant 2
LT = 285 mins.PT = 215 mins.%C&A: 99%
3C
Accept Customer e-Payment
Bank
LT = 30 daysPT = 0 hrs.%C&A: 99%
6B
Enter Payment,
Clear Billing
Accounting
LT = 2 hrs.PT = 1 mins.
11
Invoice70%30%
Hold S&OP Meeting
LT = 1 mo.PT = 3 hrs.
1
40 Days Delivery to Payment Received1.5 Days Order Receipt to Ship
Monthly Sales VolumeWk 1 = 25%Wk 2 = 25%Wk 3 = 25%Wk 4 = 25%
Prod. Plan
Prod. Plan
Pick List
Invoice Excel Sheet
Inv entory Report
Deliv er Receipt &
Collect from Customer
SalesBatch = 1x
monthly
LT = 26 daysPT = 5 mins.
10
POD
50%
50%
98%
COLOR LEGEND
Logistics / W arehouse
Sales
Order Management
Production
Accounting
Future State Value Stream MapOrder to Cash
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 25
Current State Value Stream MapOutpatient Imaging
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 26
Future State Value Stream MapOutpatient Imaging
Traditional Mapping Method:Process Flow Chart
How is this process performing?
Look up Customer in EclipseSALES
New Customer?
Enter OrderSALES
Print Ship TicketSALES
Load TrucksSHIPPING
Enter Customer Information
ADMIN
Perform Credit Check
FINANCEOkay?
Notify Sales COD Only; Notify Admin
to update Customer Profile
FINANCE
Yes
No
No
YesProduct in Stock?
Yes
Order MaterialPURCHASING
No
Receive MaterialRECEIVING
Complete New Hire
Setup Form
Complete Drug test within 24
hours
HR Receives results within
3 days and issues offer
letter
P: Setup New hire as a vendorIT: Setup user logins and provide hardware, if needed, F: Assign vehicle, issue cell phone order uniforms and guides, if needed.
Submit Candidate
for background check and drug test.
HR Issues Employee ID and Notifies
HM & Support Organizations
Signs offer letter and
required yellow forms. Fax to
HR
Call candidate to welcome
and remind to complete
forms
Gather Support items to transfer to new hire on
day one
New Hire Setup Process MapGood training tool, but how do we know what to improve?
Cand
idat
eHi
ring
Man
ager
Adm
inis
trat
orHu
man
Res
ourc
esSu
ppor
t Tea
m [I
T,
Purc
hasi
ng (P
), Fl
eet (
F)]
Value Stream Map ≠ Swim Lane Process Map
Ben
efits
Ad
min
istr
ator Receive
negative drug
screen results
Complete “New Hire Approval” form; send to recruiterR
ecru
iter Sign “New
Hire Approval”
form
Rec
ruite
r Sign “New Hire
Approval” form
Set up employee in SAP; notify hiring
manager
Hiri
ng
Man
ager
Request laptop on “New Hire
Equip. Request”
form
IT
Man
ager Approve
“New Hire Equip.
Request”
29
Metrics-Based Process Mapping (MBPM)
The Improved State Becomes Standard Work0
10
156-1
0Activity PT LT %C&A Activity PT LT %C&A Activity PT LT %C&A Activity PT LT %C&A Activity PT LT %C&A
1 Fax PO to Sales Rep 0 0 45%
2
Review PO; clarify with
customer as needed
20 2 90% Fax PO to warehouse 10 4 90%
5
6
Check inventory levels; notify
Sales Rep re: status
5 4 95% Fax PO to Sales Rep 5 0.33 90%
0 20 10 5 50 2 4 4 0.33
45% 90% 90% 95% 90%0 20 10 5 5
Rolled %C&ACritical Path LT
Total PT
Critical Path PT
5431 2
Mary Townsend
Hours Worked per Day Sally DampierOccurrences per Year Sam Parks
Current State Metrics-Based Process Map
Dave Morgan25-Jun-088 Facilitator
Process Details
Michael Prichard
Order FulfillmentProcess NameSpecific Conditions Domestic orders through sales force
37,500
Date Mapped
Sean Michaels
Sales Rep
Ryan AustinDiane O'SheaMapping Team
LT Units
Function / Department
PT Units
Step # ►
Customer
Finance
Warehouse / Shipping
Seconds
Minutes
Hours
Days
Seconds
Minutes
Hours
Days
Excel tool included with Metrics-Based Process Mapping book
Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 32
Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan
Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy
When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.
Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes
Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes
Information flow Essential component Less obvious
Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers
Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work
How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days
Current State Value Stream MapOutpatient Imaging
34
Value Stream Maps Help Visualize Problems
Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 35
Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan
Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy
When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.
Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes
Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes
Information flow Essential component Less obvious
Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers
Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work
How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days
VSM & MBPM: Same Metrics
36
Barriers to flow
# peoplePTLT%C&A
Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 37
Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan
Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy
When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.
Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes
Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes
Information flow Essential component Less obvious
Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers
Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work
How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 38
Real-World VSM Facilitation Examples• Two VPs arguing over which leader’s area should perform a
certain process• Discussion about outsourcing a functional area that will result
in 30 people being laid off• Candid discussion about the risk of losing the company’s #1
customer• Candid discussion about a legal or regulatory matter• Value stream needs level loading, work balancing and pull
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 39
Real-World MBPM Facilitation Examples• Frontline team member begins to recognize that the work he
does is 100% non-value-adding• Supervisor dictates future state improvement ideas• Manager reveals that she doesn’t support the targets begin
set (nor the objective of the mapping session)• Team doesn’t feel authorized to make tactical decisions• Two team members have obvious tension between them• A team member shuts down
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 40
Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 41
Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping
Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan
Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy
When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.
Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes
Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes
Information flow Essential component Less obvious
Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)
Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers
Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work
How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days
Prepare Understand Current State
DesignFuture State
Develop Transformation
Plan
Execute Transformation
Plan
Three Consecutive Days4 Weeks Prior to Mapping
Following Mapping
Repeat
Value Stream MappingPhases and Timing
42
Prepare Understand Current State
DesignFuture State
Develop Transformation Plan or Execute
Execute Transformation
Plan
1-2 Consecutive Days4 Weeks Prior to Mapping
Following Mapping
Repeat
Metrics-Based Process MappingPhases and Timing
43
4
Mapping Tips
45
12 13 24 35 4
51 62 73 84 95 10
12 13 24 35 4
1234
Specific Conditions
Engineer to order, requires both hardware & software customization
Value Stream Champion Nancy Little
Demand Rate 1,000 per yearFacilitator Dave Parks
Value Stream Mapping CharterScope Accountable Parties Logistics
Value Stream Capital equipmentExecutive
Sponsor Allen WardEvent Dates
& TimesJuly 24-26, 20138:00 am - 5:00 pm
Last Step Production ships product
Boundaries & Limitations
No new software; only minor changes to existing IT systems; no additional staff; no budget changes
Briefing Attendees
** required *optional
** Allen W (COO), Joe M (CIO), Sal T (VP Sales)* Bruce R (VP Ops), Carlos P (HR), Su T (CFO), Bill M (VP CS)
Base-camp Location Surf's Up - Room A
Trigger Customer submits RFQFirst Step Sales reviews the RFQ Logistics
Coordinator Dave ParksMeals
Provided Continential breakfast & lunch
Desire to stay ahead of the competition & deepen customer loyalty. Function / Title Name Contact InformationForecasted growth of 15% for next fiscal year. Sales, Director Sean Michaels
Briefing Dates &
Times
July 24, 25, & 264:00-5:00 pmImprovement Time
FrameFuture state design is fully realized by December 31, 2013.
Current State Problems & Business Needs Mapping Team
Competition's RFQ LT is 1 wk; PO to delivery is 4 wks Scrum Master Ryan Austin Goals & Measurable Target Conditions Engineering, Vice President Nancy Little
Unclear & incorrect information flowing through value stream. IT, Director Diana MarieRFQ lead time = 2 weeks; PO to software dev lead time = 5 weeks Finance, Controller Dave Gerald
Improve quality of information flowing throughout value stream. Customer (contract manufacturer) JR Hunt
Reduce RFQ LT from 2 weeks to 3 days (70% improvement). Manufacturing, Director Ambreen MotiwalaReduce PO to software dev LT from 5 wks to 3 wks (40% improvement) Customer Service, Manager Danny Tran
Faster delivery; less hassle; less cost. Function Name Contact InformationBetter working relationships between sales, estimating & engineering. Planning / Purchasing, Planner Lourdes Dwyer
Benefits to Customers & Business On-Call Support
Relevant Data Agreement
Freed capacity to absorb additional business w/o increasing staff. Production Supervisor Tom St. James
Operational: LT in segments (RFQ to quote; PO to development). Signature: Signature: Signature:
Sales effectiveness: RFQ conversion rate. Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion FacilitatorFinancial: Estimate-to-actual cost comparison.
Date: Date: Date:
Value Stream Scoping DiagramDefining Specific Conditions
Golden State Equipment, Inc.
Capital Equipment
Catalog
Configure to order
Engineer to order
Custom hardware
Custom software
BothNew Product Development
Spares & subassemblies
Catalog
Engineer to order
46
47
12 13 24 35 4
51 62 73 84 95 10
12 13 24 35 4
1234
Specific Conditions
Engineer to order, requires both hardware & software customization
Value Stream Champion Nancy Little
Demand Rate 1,000 per yearFacilitator Dave Parks
Value Stream Mapping CharterScope Accountable Parties Logistics
Value Stream Capital equipmentExecutive
Sponsor Allen WardEvent Dates
& TimesJuly 24-26, 20138:00 am - 5:00 pm
Last Step Production ships product
Boundaries & Limitations
No new software; only minor changes to existing IT systems; no additional staff; no budget changes
Briefing Attendees
** required *optional
** Allen W (COO), Joe M (CIO), Sal T (VP Sales)* Bruce R (VP Ops), Carlos P (HR), Su T (CFO), Bill M (VP CS)
Base-camp Location Surf's Up - Room A
Trigger Customer submits RFQFirst Step Sales reviews the RFQ Logistics
Coordinator Dave ParksMeals
Provided Continential breakfast & lunch
Desire to stay ahead of the competition & deepen customer loyalty. Function / Title Name Contact InformationForecasted growth of 15% for next fiscal year. Sales, Director Sean Michaels
Briefing Dates &
Times
July 24, 25, & 264:00-5:00 pmImprovement Time
FrameFuture state design is fully realized by December 31, 2013.
Current State Problems & Business Needs Mapping Team
Competition's RFQ LT is 1 wk; PO to delivery is 4 wks Scrum Master Ryan Austin Goals & Measurable Target Conditions Engineering, Vice President Nancy Little
Unclear & incorrect information flowing through value stream. IT, Director Diana MarieRFQ lead time = 2 weeks; PO to software dev lead time = 5 weeks Finance, Controller Dave Gerald
Improve quality of information flowing throughout value stream. Customer (contract manufacturer) JR Hunt
Reduce RFQ LT from 2 weeks to 3 days (70% improvement). Manufacturing, Director Ambreen MotiwalaReduce PO to software dev LT from 5 wks to 3 wks (40% improvement) Customer Service, Manager Danny Tran
Faster delivery; less hassle; less cost. Function Name Contact InformationBetter working relationships between sales, estimating & engineering. Planning / Purchasing, Planner Lourdes Dwyer
Benefits to Customers & Business On-Call Support
Relevant Data Agreement
Freed capacity to absorb additional business w/o increasing staff. Production Supervisor Tom St. James
Operational: LT in segments (RFQ to quote; PO to development). Signature: Signature: Signature:
Sales effectiveness: RFQ conversion rate. Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion FacilitatorFinancial: Estimate-to-actual cost comparison.
Date: Date: Date:
10 people max!
Daily Briefings
#1 – Reduce resistance#2 – Build consensus#3 – Gain commitment
49
Mapping results are proportional to the quality of the planning and chartering process
and facilitator skill
© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 50
Karen Martin, [email protected]@karenmartinopex
Blog & newsletter: www.ksmartin.com/subscribe