50

value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping
Page 2: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Consultant – We help clients in all industries establish and grow Lean management systems, globally.

Author & Speaker:

Karen Martin, President

The Karen Martin Group, Inc.

@karenmartinopex

2

www.ksmartin.com/subscribe

Shingo Award Winning

Shingo Award Winning

ON SALE NOW!

Page 3: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

After the Webinar…

3

• Please provide feedback• Materials: www.slideshare.net/karenmartingroup• Recorded webinars:

• www.ksmartin.com/webinars• www.youtube.com/karenmartingroup• www.vimeo.com/karenmartingroup• www.slideshare.net/karenmartingroup

Page 4: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

www.ksmartin.com/webinars

4

Page 5: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

5

Page 6: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

6

Page 7: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

You will learn…

• The similarities and differences between value stream maps (VSM) and metrics-based process maps (MBPM).

• The circumstances under which to select each type of map.

• Tips for successful mapping activities.

Page 8: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 8

Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan

Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy

When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.

Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes

Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes

Information flow Essential component Less obvious

Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers

Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work

How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days

Page 9: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 9

Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan

Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy

When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.

Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes

Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes

Information flow Essential component Less obvious

Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers

Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work

How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days

Page 10: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

What problem are you trying to solve?

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 10

Desired State (or known standard)

Current State

Gap = Problem

Page 11: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 11

Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan

Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy

When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.

Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes

Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes

Information flow Essential component Less obvious

Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers

Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work

How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days

Page 12: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Transformation is Strategic

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 12For more information, see Value Stream Mapping, Karen Martin & Mike Osterling

Page 13: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Process Improvement is Tactical

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 13For more information, see Metrics-Based Process Mapping, Karen Martin & Mike Osterling

Page 14: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 14

Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan

Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy

When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.

Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes

Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes

Information flow Essential component Less obvious

Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers

Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work

How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days

Page 15: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Work: Degrees of Granularity

Value Stream

Process Process Process

Step StepStep

15

Macro Perspective

• Define strategic direction (“what”)

• Heavy leadership involvement

• Value Stream Mapping

Micro Perspective

• Identify the tactical “how”

• Heavy frontline involvement

• Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Page 16: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Which do you need? Macro or Micro View?

16

Page 17: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Work: Levels of Granularity

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 17

Negotiate contract

Process order

Configure software

Value Stream

Process Negotiate pricing Approve Negotiate

terms Approve Execute

Page 18: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Degrees of Granularity: Hiring Value Stream

Hire

Recruit Select Onboard

Write job description

Post externally

Post internally

18

Process-level Perspective

Value-stream Perspective

Page 19: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

What problem are you trying to solve?

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 19

Desired State (or known standard)

Current State

Gap = Problem

Page 20: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 20

Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan

Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy

When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.

Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes

Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes

Information flow Essential component Less obvious

Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers

Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work

How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days

Page 21: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Visualize the entire cycle of value delivery on a single sheet of paper

21

Page 22: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Timeline

3

Basic Value Stream Map

Work Flow

Information Flow

1

2

Page 23: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Customer

0.0 hrs.0.5 days

1.0 hrs.5.0 days

3.6 hrs.0.6 days

0.0 hrs.1.0 days

0.2 hrs.0.5 days

16.0 hrs. 0.0 hrs.7.0 days

8.0 hrs. 0.0 hrs.7.0 days

0.1 hrs.26.0 days

0.0 hrs.0.2 days Total LT =

Total PT = Activity Ra

SAP

Summary Invoice (Excel)Obtain Order;

Enter Order in Offline Order

Form

Sales (Key at night)

LT = 4.5 hrs.PT = 18 mins.%C&A: 80%

1Review & Release

Credit Holds

Sales

LT = 4 hrs.PT = 10 mins.%C&A: 99%

3Issue DO To Transporter; Create Pick

List

WH1

LT = 8 hrs.PT = 1 mins.%C&A: 95%

5Pick

& Load Order

Logistics

LT = 4 hrs.PT = 15 mins.%C&A: 95%

6Collect

POD from Customer

Transporter

LT = 2 days

7 Collect POD From

Transporter

WH1

LT = 7 daysPT = 1 mins.%C&A: 99%

8Deliver POD to

Accounting

MessengerBatch = 1x/day

LT = 1 days

9Review POD

For Accuracy

Accounting

LT = 7 daysPT = 2 mins.%C&A: 99%

10Deliv er Bill; Collect from Customer;

Deposit

SalesBatch = 1x monthly

LT = 26 daysPT = 5 mins.

11

COLOR LEGEND

Logistics / W arehouse

Sales

Order Management

Production

10%

90%

Produce Product

Plant 1

LT = 280 mins.PT = 215 mins.%C&A: 99%

4BPick

& Load Order

WH2

LT = 40 mins.PT = 3 mins.%C&A: 99%

5B

40 Days Delivery to Payment Received3.5 Days Order Receipt to Ship

Monthly Sales VolumeWk 1 = 14-23%Wk 2 = 19-24%Wk 3 = 23-25%Wk 4 = 30-42%

Obtain & Revise Sales

Forecast

Sales

LT = 0 daysPT = 270 mins.%C&A: 99%

1B

Hold S&OP Meeting

6-7 People

LT = 5 daysPT = 3 hrs.%C&A: 99%

2BCreate

ProductionPlan

Production Planning

LT = 5 daysPT = 1 hrs.%C&A: 99%

3B

Produce Product

Plant 2

LT = 280 mins.PT = 215 mins.%C&A: 99%

4C

Offline Order Form

Enter Payment;

Clear Billing

Accounting

LT = 2 hrs.PT = 1 mins.%C&A: 99%

12

Accounting

Delivery Order(DO)

Pick List

Proof of Delivery (POD)

Transfer Report

Prod. Plan

Check Stock &

Reallocate

Logistics & Warehouse

Batch = 1x/day

LT = 4 hrs.PT = 2 mins.%C&A: 99%

4

Prod. Plan

plier

Receive Material

Store

3C

Current State Value Stream MapOrder to Cash

Page 24: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Customer

3.0 hrs.21.0 days

1.0 hrs.5.0 days

3.6 hrs.0.6 days

0.0 hrs.0.5 days

15.0 hrs.30.0 days

0.0 hrs.7.0 days

8.0 hrs. 0.0 hrs.5.0 days

0.1 hrs.26.0 days

0.0 hrs.0.2 days Tota

Tota Acti

SAP

Collect Order From Customer

Sales

LT = 15 mins.PT = 15 mins.%C&A: 99%

2

Collect Customer

Orders

Order Mgmt

LT = 15 mins.PT = 15 mins.%C&A: 99%

2B

Review & Release

Credit Holds

Sales

LT = 4 hrs.PT = 10 mins.

3Issue DO

To Transporter

WH1

LT = 4 hrs.PT = 1 mins.

4Load & Prepare Invoice

Logistics

LT = 4 hrs.PT = 15 hrs.

5Collect

POD from Customer

Transporter

LT = 2 days

6Enter POD

WH1

LT = 7 daysPT = 1 mins.%C&A: 99%

7Deliver POD to

Accounting

Messenger

LT = 1 days

8 Rev iew PODfor Accuracy; Email Receipt

to Sales

Accounting

LT = 5 daysPT = 2 mins.

9

Produce Product

Plant 1

LT = 285 mins.PT = 215 mins.%C&A: 99%

3B

Pick & Stage

WH2

PT = 15 mins.%C&A: 95%

4B

Create Production

Plan

Production Planning

LT = 5 daysPT = 1 hrs.%C&A: 99%

2C

2%

Produce Product

Plant 2

LT = 285 mins.PT = 215 mins.%C&A: 99%

3C

Accept Customer e-Payment

Bank

LT = 30 daysPT = 0 hrs.%C&A: 99%

6B

Enter Payment,

Clear Billing

Accounting

LT = 2 hrs.PT = 1 mins.

11

Invoice70%30%

Hold S&OP Meeting

LT = 1 mo.PT = 3 hrs.

1

40 Days Delivery to Payment Received1.5 Days Order Receipt to Ship

Monthly Sales VolumeWk 1 = 25%Wk 2 = 25%Wk 3 = 25%Wk 4 = 25%

Prod. Plan

Prod. Plan

Pick List

Invoice Excel Sheet

Inv entory Report

Deliv er Receipt &

Collect from Customer

SalesBatch = 1x

monthly

LT = 26 daysPT = 5 mins.

10

POD

50%

50%

98%

COLOR LEGEND

Logistics / W arehouse

Sales

Order Management

Production

Accounting

Future State Value Stream MapOrder to Cash

Page 25: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 25

Current State Value Stream MapOutpatient Imaging

Page 26: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 26

Future State Value Stream MapOutpatient Imaging

Page 27: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Traditional Mapping Method:Process Flow Chart

How is this process performing?

Look up Customer in EclipseSALES

New Customer?

Enter OrderSALES

Print Ship TicketSALES

Load TrucksSHIPPING

Enter Customer Information

ADMIN

Perform Credit Check

FINANCEOkay?

Notify Sales COD Only; Notify Admin

to update Customer Profile

FINANCE

Yes

No

No

YesProduct in Stock?

Yes

Order MaterialPURCHASING

No

Receive MaterialRECEIVING

Page 28: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Complete New Hire

Setup Form

Complete Drug test within 24

hours

HR Receives results within

3 days and issues offer

letter

P: Setup New hire as a vendorIT: Setup user logins and provide hardware, if needed, F: Assign vehicle, issue cell phone order uniforms and guides, if needed.

Submit Candidate

for background check and drug test.

HR Issues Employee ID and Notifies

HM & Support Organizations

Signs offer letter and

required yellow forms. Fax to

HR

Call candidate to welcome

and remind to complete

forms

Gather Support items to transfer to new hire on

day one

New Hire Setup Process MapGood training tool, but how do we know what to improve?

Cand

idat

eHi

ring

Man

ager

Adm

inis

trat

orHu

man

Res

ourc

esSu

ppor

t Tea

m [I

T,

Purc

hasi

ng (P

), Fl

eet (

F)]

Page 29: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Map ≠ Swim Lane Process Map

Ben

efits

Ad

min

istr

ator Receive

negative drug

screen results

Complete “New Hire Approval” form; send to recruiterR

ecru

iter Sign “New

Hire Approval”

form

Rec

ruite

r Sign “New Hire

Approval” form

Set up employee in SAP; notify hiring

manager

Hiri

ng

Man

ager

Request laptop on “New Hire

Equip. Request”

form

IT

Man

ager Approve

“New Hire Equip.

Request”

29

Page 30: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Metrics-Based Process Mapping (MBPM)

Page 31: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

The Improved State Becomes Standard Work0

10

156-1

0Activity PT LT %C&A Activity PT LT %C&A Activity PT LT %C&A Activity PT LT %C&A Activity PT LT %C&A

1 Fax PO to Sales Rep 0 0 45%

2

Review PO; clarify with

customer as needed

20 2 90% Fax PO to warehouse 10 4 90%

5

6

Check inventory levels; notify

Sales Rep re: status

5 4 95% Fax PO to Sales Rep 5 0.33 90%

0 20 10 5 50 2 4 4 0.33

45% 90% 90% 95% 90%0 20 10 5 5

Rolled %C&ACritical Path LT

Total PT

Critical Path PT

5431 2

Mary Townsend

Hours Worked per Day Sally DampierOccurrences per Year Sam Parks

Current State Metrics-Based Process Map

Dave Morgan25-Jun-088 Facilitator

Process Details

Michael Prichard

Order FulfillmentProcess NameSpecific Conditions Domestic orders through sales force

37,500

Date Mapped

Sean Michaels

Sales Rep

Ryan AustinDiane O'SheaMapping Team

LT Units

Function / Department

PT Units

Step # ►

Customer

Finance

Warehouse / Shipping

Seconds

Minutes

Hours

Days

Seconds

Minutes

Hours

Days

Excel tool included with Metrics-Based Process Mapping book

Page 32: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 32

Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan

Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy

When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.

Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes

Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes

Information flow Essential component Less obvious

Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers

Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work

How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days

Page 33: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Current State Value Stream MapOutpatient Imaging

Page 34: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

34

Value Stream Maps Help Visualize Problems

Page 35: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 35

Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan

Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy

When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.

Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes

Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes

Information flow Essential component Less obvious

Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers

Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work

How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days

Page 36: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

VSM & MBPM: Same Metrics

36

Barriers to flow

# peoplePTLT%C&A

Page 37: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 37

Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan

Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy

When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.

Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes

Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes

Information flow Essential component Less obvious

Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers

Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work

How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days

Page 38: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 38

Page 39: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Real-World VSM Facilitation Examples• Two VPs arguing over which leader’s area should perform a

certain process• Discussion about outsourcing a functional area that will result

in 30 people being laid off• Candid discussion about the risk of losing the company’s #1

customer• Candid discussion about a legal or regulatory matter• Value stream needs level loading, work balancing and pull

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 39

Page 40: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Real-World MBPM Facilitation Examples• Frontline team member begins to recognize that the work he

does is 100% non-value-adding• Supervisor dictates future state improvement ideas• Manager reveals that she doesn’t support the targets begin

set (nor the objective of the mapping session)• Team doesn’t feel authorized to make tactical decisions• Two team members have obvious tension between them• A team member shuts down

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 40

Page 41: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Mapping vs. Metrics-Based Process Mapping

© 2015 The Karen Martin Group, Inc. 41

Feature Value Stream Mapping Metrics-Based Process Mapping

Purpose / outcome Strategic improvement plan Tactical improvement plan

Team composition Cross-functional; leadership heavy Cross-functional; frontline heavy

When created Precedes kaizen events, projects, etc. During kaizen events, projects, etc.

Perspective Macro – Interconnected processes Micro – Steps within each processes

Physical look Circular loop; request to delivery Swim lanes

Information flow Essential component Less obvious

Key metrics Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Lead time (LT), Process time (PT), Percent Complete & Accurate (%C&A)

Facilitator Must be strong & able to relate to strategic thinkers

Must be strong & able to relate to the people who do the work

How long to create? 3 days 1-2 days

Page 42: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Prepare Understand Current State

DesignFuture State

Develop Transformation

Plan

Execute Transformation

Plan

Three Consecutive Days4 Weeks Prior to Mapping

Following Mapping

Repeat

Value Stream MappingPhases and Timing

42

Page 43: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Prepare Understand Current State

DesignFuture State

Develop Transformation Plan or Execute

Execute Transformation

Plan

1-2 Consecutive Days4 Weeks Prior to Mapping

Following Mapping

Repeat

Metrics-Based Process MappingPhases and Timing

43

Page 44: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

4

Mapping Tips

Page 45: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

45

12 13 24 35 4

51 62 73 84 95 10

12 13 24 35 4

1234

Specific Conditions

Engineer to order, requires both hardware & software customization

Value Stream Champion Nancy Little

Demand Rate 1,000 per yearFacilitator Dave Parks

Value Stream Mapping CharterScope Accountable Parties Logistics

Value Stream Capital equipmentExecutive

Sponsor Allen WardEvent Dates

& TimesJuly 24-26, 20138:00 am - 5:00 pm

Last Step Production ships product

Boundaries & Limitations

No new software; only minor changes to existing IT systems; no additional staff; no budget changes

Briefing Attendees

** required *optional

** Allen W (COO), Joe M (CIO), Sal T (VP Sales)* Bruce R (VP Ops), Carlos P (HR), Su T (CFO), Bill M (VP CS)

Base-camp Location Surf's Up - Room A

Trigger Customer submits RFQFirst Step Sales reviews the RFQ Logistics

Coordinator Dave ParksMeals

Provided Continential breakfast & lunch

Desire to stay ahead of the competition & deepen customer loyalty. Function / Title Name Contact InformationForecasted growth of 15% for next fiscal year. Sales, Director Sean Michaels

Briefing Dates &

Times

July 24, 25, & 264:00-5:00 pmImprovement Time

FrameFuture state design is fully realized by December 31, 2013.

Current State Problems & Business Needs Mapping Team

Competition's RFQ LT is 1 wk; PO to delivery is 4 wks Scrum Master Ryan Austin Goals & Measurable Target Conditions Engineering, Vice President Nancy Little

Unclear & incorrect information flowing through value stream. IT, Director Diana MarieRFQ lead time = 2 weeks; PO to software dev lead time = 5 weeks Finance, Controller Dave Gerald

Improve quality of information flowing throughout value stream. Customer (contract manufacturer) JR Hunt

Reduce RFQ LT from 2 weeks to 3 days (70% improvement). Manufacturing, Director Ambreen MotiwalaReduce PO to software dev LT from 5 wks to 3 wks (40% improvement) Customer Service, Manager Danny Tran

Faster delivery; less hassle; less cost. Function Name Contact InformationBetter working relationships between sales, estimating & engineering. Planning / Purchasing, Planner Lourdes Dwyer

Benefits to Customers & Business On-Call Support

Relevant Data Agreement

Freed capacity to absorb additional business w/o increasing staff. Production Supervisor Tom St. James

Operational: LT in segments (RFQ to quote; PO to development). Signature: Signature: Signature:

Sales effectiveness: RFQ conversion rate. Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion FacilitatorFinancial: Estimate-to-actual cost comparison.

Date: Date: Date:

Page 46: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Value Stream Scoping DiagramDefining Specific Conditions

Golden State Equipment, Inc.

Capital Equipment

Catalog

Configure to order

Engineer to order

Custom hardware

Custom software

BothNew Product Development

Spares & subassemblies

Catalog

Engineer to order

46

Page 47: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

47

12 13 24 35 4

51 62 73 84 95 10

12 13 24 35 4

1234

Specific Conditions

Engineer to order, requires both hardware & software customization

Value Stream Champion Nancy Little

Demand Rate 1,000 per yearFacilitator Dave Parks

Value Stream Mapping CharterScope Accountable Parties Logistics

Value Stream Capital equipmentExecutive

Sponsor Allen WardEvent Dates

& TimesJuly 24-26, 20138:00 am - 5:00 pm

Last Step Production ships product

Boundaries & Limitations

No new software; only minor changes to existing IT systems; no additional staff; no budget changes

Briefing Attendees

** required *optional

** Allen W (COO), Joe M (CIO), Sal T (VP Sales)* Bruce R (VP Ops), Carlos P (HR), Su T (CFO), Bill M (VP CS)

Base-camp Location Surf's Up - Room A

Trigger Customer submits RFQFirst Step Sales reviews the RFQ Logistics

Coordinator Dave ParksMeals

Provided Continential breakfast & lunch

Desire to stay ahead of the competition & deepen customer loyalty. Function / Title Name Contact InformationForecasted growth of 15% for next fiscal year. Sales, Director Sean Michaels

Briefing Dates &

Times

July 24, 25, & 264:00-5:00 pmImprovement Time

FrameFuture state design is fully realized by December 31, 2013.

Current State Problems & Business Needs Mapping Team

Competition's RFQ LT is 1 wk; PO to delivery is 4 wks Scrum Master Ryan Austin Goals & Measurable Target Conditions Engineering, Vice President Nancy Little

Unclear & incorrect information flowing through value stream. IT, Director Diana MarieRFQ lead time = 2 weeks; PO to software dev lead time = 5 weeks Finance, Controller Dave Gerald

Improve quality of information flowing throughout value stream. Customer (contract manufacturer) JR Hunt

Reduce RFQ LT from 2 weeks to 3 days (70% improvement). Manufacturing, Director Ambreen MotiwalaReduce PO to software dev LT from 5 wks to 3 wks (40% improvement) Customer Service, Manager Danny Tran

Faster delivery; less hassle; less cost. Function Name Contact InformationBetter working relationships between sales, estimating & engineering. Planning / Purchasing, Planner Lourdes Dwyer

Benefits to Customers & Business On-Call Support

Relevant Data Agreement

Freed capacity to absorb additional business w/o increasing staff. Production Supervisor Tom St. James

Operational: LT in segments (RFQ to quote; PO to development). Signature: Signature: Signature:

Sales effectiveness: RFQ conversion rate. Executive Sponsor Value Stream Champion FacilitatorFinancial: Estimate-to-actual cost comparison.

Date: Date: Date:

10 people max!

Page 48: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

Daily Briefings

#1 – Reduce resistance#2 – Build consensus#3 – Gain commitment

Page 49: value stream mapping and metrics based process mapping

49

Mapping results are proportional to the quality of the planning and chartering process

and facilitator skill