64
Rhetorical Evaluation of User Interfaces and other PhD stuff. Omar Sosa-Tzec School of Informatics & Computing Indiana University Bloomington info i609 Advanced Seminar I Informatics

Presentation at Seminar I: Rhetorical Evaluation of User Interfaces

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Rhetorical Evaluationof User Interfaces and other PhD stuff.

Omar Sosa-TzecSchool of Informatics & ComputingIndiana University Bloomington

info i609 Advanced Seminar I Informatics

Hola!

Mérida, Yucatán

Image source: http://goo.gl/EKw66m

BSc in Computer ScienceUniversity of Yucatan

Connection with HCI & Design

• Web Design

• Usability

• Software Engineering

• Object-Oriented Hypermedia Design

Guanajuato, Guanajuato

Image source: http://goo.gl/4Kf7Vi

MSc in Computer ScienceCenter for Research in Mathematics

Connection with HCI & Design

• Usability

• Software Engineering

• Algorithm Design

San Andrés Cholula, Puebla

Photography by Jorge Gutierrez

MSc in Information DesignUniversity of the Americas Puebla

Connection with HCI & Design

• Information Design, Visualization and Architecture

• Interface Design& Evaluation

• Design Theory

Influences

Rhetoric Semiotics

Influences

Hanno Ehses Clarisse de SouzaRhetoric for

Graphic DesignSemiotic Engineering

& Communicability Evaluation

How can rhetoric beapplied to web design?

How can unconventional GUIsbe evaluated?

Rhetoric and Interaction Design

User InterfaceDesigner User

SpeechSpeaker. ListenerRhetorical appeals: LogosEthosPathos

Accomplisha task.

Takeaction.

Sosa-Tzec, et al. (2009)

Rhetoric and Interaction Design

Logos

Ethos Pathos

Information Architecture Functionality

Design Thinking Emotional DesignUser Appropriation

Sosa-Tzec, et al. (2009)

Bloomington, Indiana

Human-Computer

InteractionDesign

What is the problem?

What are the consequences ofthe interactive systems that we design?

How do interactive systems affect the people’s everyday?

How are we, designers and researchers, contributing on making people to affect

other people?

What does it meanfor the members in

the team?

Swipe to the right for Like

Swipe tothe le!t for Nope

What does it meanbeing put on the

“nope” list?

A problematic of HCI and Design

Us, designers and researchers, contribute on deploying artifacts that affect the everyday of

people, including their beliefs and attitude

An Approachto HCI Design

HCI Design

Rhetoric

Rhetoric as lenses for HCI

• Persuasion

• Content & Form

• Contingencies & People

• Metaphor, Metonymy, and other rhetorical figures

• And so on...

Rhetorical Evaluationof User Interfaces

Sosa-Tzec, O., & Siegel, M.A. (forthcoming). Rhetorical Evaluation of User Interfaces.In Proc. of 8th Nordic Conference of Human-Computer Interaction,

NordiCHI 2014, ACM Press (2014).

Situation

Evaluation

PurposePreventing others from seeing the content of the businessman’s laptop

FunctionProviding a feeling of privacy

Purpose vs. Function: Example

Purpose vs. Function

Anti-intentionalistNot seeing the creator's intention as determining the correct interpretation of the work

Schema of rhetorical evaluation for user interfaces

Sosa-Tzec, & Siegel (2014)

evaluator

apparent function

function

interactionuser interface

Visual ComponentsAudio ComponentsPhysical Components

UI Section(Changes Over Time)

reflectionLegitimacy / Soundness

The app

Adding a new goal

Short and long swipe to the right

Short and long swipe to the left

Schema of rhetorical evaluation for user interfaces

Sosa-Tzec, & Siegel (2014)

evaluator

apparent function

function

interactionuser interface

Visual ComponentsAudio ComponentsPhysical Components

UI Section(Changes Over Time)

reflectionLegitimacy / Soundness

Outcome

Outcome of the evaluation

Apparent function Function performed bythe UI components

Outcome of the evaluation

Make goal tracking simpler

Apparent function Function performed bythe UI components

Outcome of the evaluation

Make goal tracking simpler Interaction by gesturesas embodied commitment

Apparent function Function performed bythe UI components

Make goal tracking simpler

Interaction by gestures as embodied commitment

Moving forward

Interaction by gestures as embodied commitment

Moving backwards

Discussion

Discussion

Evaluating an interface requires for the evaluator to learn about the system and

its purpose

Discussion

The evaluation considers the interaction with the system

Discussion

This form of rhetorical evaluation is placed between

structural approaches and hermeneutic approaches

Discussion

This form of rhetorical evaluation fosters reflection

and interaction criticism

Conclusion

Conclusion

• Approach for evaluating user interfaces based on the notion of function from visual rhetoric

• Apparent function

• Function performed by UI components and interaction with the system

• Reflection and interaction criticism

Conclusion

The goal is obtaining a wider perspective regarding the

design of interactive systems, one that takes into account experiences, communication,

and meaning.

References

1. Bardzell, J. Interaction criticism and aesthetics. In Proc. CHI 2009. ACM Press (2009), 2357-2366.

2. de Souza, C. S. The semiotic engineering of human- computer interaction. MIT Press, 2005.

3. Foss, S. K. A rhetorical schema for the evaluation of visual imagery. Communication Studies, 45, 3-4 (1994), 213-224.

4. Gross, S., Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. Skeu the evolution: skeuomorphs, style, and the material of tangible interactions. In Proc. TEI 2014. ACM Press (2014), 53- 60.

5. Hill, C. A., & Helmers, M. (Eds.). Defining visual rhetorics. Routledge, 2012.

6. Hurtienne, J., & Israel, J. H. Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. In Proc. TEI 2007. ACM Press (2014), 127- 134.

7. Nelson H. G. & Stolterman, E. The Design Way. MIT Press, 2012.

8. Schön, D. A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic books, 1983.

9. Sosa-Tzec, O., Cortina-Arteaga, S., & Holguin-Molina, R. Métodos y Proceso de Diseño de Información para una GUI en un Cliente IM bajo un enfoque Calm Technology. CLIHC 2007. Workshop at Interact 2007.

Acknowledgments

Chung-Ching Huang

Jordan E. Beck

Phaedra Pezzullo

Ian Wood

Erik Stolterman

HCI/d Faculty, Gabriele Ferri and PhD Students

Thank you!

http://tzec.com

The images here shown are property of their author, and some of them have been taken from the results of a web search. All of them are employed for mere academic purposes.