Upload
khangminh22
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
QUINQUENNIAL REVIEW TEAM IN RESPECT OF KRISHI VIGYAN KENDRA, BIJAPUR
(2005 - 06 to 2009-10) 1. Details on Krishi Vigyan Kendra Name of the District and
State Location/address Phone No. Fax No. e-mail ID
Bijapur Karnataka
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Regional Agril. Research Station, P.O.Box No.18, BIJAPUR-586 101
08352-230758
08352- 230758
2. Details on Programme Coordinator
Name Address Phone No. e-mail ID Dr.S.Y.Wali Programme Co-ordinator KVK, Bijapur
Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Regional Agril. Research Station,P.O.Box No.18, BIJAPUR-586 101
9448495346
[email protected] web: kvkbijapur.org
3. Details on sanction of KVK
ICAR sanction order number Date F1-3(4)/ZC/TOT/2004 06.02.2004
4. Details on the Host institute
Name Location/address Phone No. Fax No. e-mail ID University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad
University of Agricultural Sciences, Krishi Nagar, Dharwad-05
0836-2447494
0836-2748199
2
5. Details on Infrastructural facilities
(a) Land and its utilization
(i) Total land with KVK : 8.4 ha,
ii) Land utilization pattern in KVK (as on 2009-10)
Particulars Area in ha
Buildings 0.4 Demonstration units 0.8 Seed production 6.4 Production of planting materials/seedlings of fruit/vegetable/ tree/etc.
0.0
Cultivable land not in use 0.0 Barren and wasteland 0.4 Any other 0.4 Total (ha) 8.4
(iii) Demonstration units established in KVK farm
Name of the unit Year Amount spent (Rs.) Source of fund (A) Crop husbandry
(B) Animal husbandry (C) Other enterprises
(b) Building infrastructure
(i) Buildings
Name Year of completion
Under construction
Condition of building, if completed
Source of fund
Administrative building
April - 2011 - Completed , Not yet handover
ICAR
Farmers hostel Staff quarters Godown Threshing floor Fencing Any other (specify)
3
(ii) Laboratories
Name Year of establishment
Under establishment
Condition of lab, if completed Source of fund
SWTL 2005 - Completed ICAR
(iii) Utilization of training hostel : Not Applicable
Total capacity of hostel _____________ persons
Category of people
Occupancy (days) Reasons for non-
utilization 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Farmers Officials Total
(iv) Utilization of staff quarters: Not Applicable
Staff quarters
Occupancy Reasons for non
occupation 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
1 2 3 4 5 6
(c) Equipments
Name of equipment Year of purchase
Cost of equipment
(Rs)
Source of fund
Present working condition
Godrej copier G-87152 FFKG-87152 31.3.2001 80234-00 ICAR Good 2 KV Stabilizer 31.3.2001 6000-00 ICAR Good
Ex K-2000 AC portable honda silent generator 29.3.2003 37566-00 ICAR Good
2 KVA Techser UPS(On line) with 4 Batteries 23.9.2003 52300-00 ICAR Good
Public address system 23.9.2003 30240-00 ICAR Good
4
Handy Image Presenter 25.9.2003 53760-00 ICAR Good
TVS 24 Pin Dot matrix Printer 29.9.2003 12800-00 ICAR Good
HP Deskject 1180c Printer 29.9.2003 15999-00 ICAR Good
HP office jet 4110 (All in One) 29.9.2003 9500-00 ICAR Good
Hp scanner (A/4 size) 13.3.2006 3317-00 ICAR Good
Hp computer 4.11.2006 32000-00 ICAR Good
Monitor TFT 17.5 4.11.2006 5500-00 ICAR Good
Hitach cp X 251 2000 LU, XGA 1.12.2006 57188-00 ICAR Good
UPS-Wipro 500 VA (Spl) 20.3.2007 2500-00 ICAR Good
Laptop 31.3.2007 51442-00 NHM Good
HP Laser Jet 31.3.2007 16252-00 UAS Good
Toshiba E-studio 167 Model-DP-1670 24.4.2008 61440-00 RKVY Good
Fax machine 31.3.2009 13950-00 RKVY Good
Laxmark laser printer model-E.250 DN 600x600 resolvation mono A-4 size 24 page minute
2.9.2008 15043-00 RKVY Good
HCL Infinite cove 2 Duo Desktop computer system 13.9.2008 46,000-00 ICAR Good
Usha Design master Zig Zag Pico Embroidery Machine E-98 m-2138 7.3.2009 9020-00 ICAR Good
Sprial candle mould single piece 9.3.2009 3432-00 ICAR Good
Projection screen on tripod stand 30.3.2001 3800-00 ICAR Good
Philips Galaxy overhead projector 31.3.2003 23000-00 ICAR Good
Sony handy camera 20.3.2006 16400-00 ICAR Good
Sony digital camera 24.3.2008 22990-00 FPARP Good
LCD motorised screen Gealalit model 60”x80” wall mount type 2.9.2008 24000-00 ICAR Good
Hitachi LCD projector modle Cp-x-1FF 22.9.2008 40788-00 ICAR Good
Digital Camera (Kodak) 31.3.2006 29000-00 ICAR Good
Single furrow R. P. 30.3.2001 20250-00 ICAR Good
Tine tiller with seeding attachment 30.3.2001 26150-00 ICAR Good
5
Leveler three in one 30.3.2001 14500-00 ICAR Good
Texmo make 0.5 H.P. 10 stage submersible pump set Sl.No. 221838 15.3.2004 7500-00 ICAR Good
Seedrill cum bund farmers 24.8.2007 6050-00 ICAR Good
Aspee Hitech Sprayer 27.2.2008 1650-00 ICAR Good
Aspee Gator Reding sprayer 27.2.2008 3850-00 ICAR Good
Seed-cum fertilizer drill 11.3.2009 17600-00 ICAR Good
Spare silica heater for double distillation water still (Glass ) CAS 4ltr 31.3.2005 5201-00 ICAR Good
Water softner “Bhanu” make aqua water softner model AS-600 31.3.2005 9752-00 ICAR Good
Usha Roopa sweing fancy machine 6.3.2006 8151-00 ICAR Good
Philips mixer 7.3.2006 3706-00 ICAR Good
LPG stove 7.3.2006 1705-00 ICAR Good
Bajaj O.T.G. 16 lit 7.3.2006 2933-00 ICAR Good
Groundnut, sunflower and maize Sheller 7.3.2008 6500-00 ICAR Good
Metal vermicompost sieve 18.3.2008 9900-00 ICAR Good
Humidifier 24.3.2008 13000-00 ICAR Good
Thermograph 24.3.2008 1500-00 ICAR Good
Usha Roopa fancy model sewing machine 29.3.2008 14758-00 ICAR Good
Candle mould candle size 8.5x100 mm 31.3.2008 5605-00 ICAR Good
Hand press type Juicer 31.3.2008 3156-00 ICAR Good
Auto weather station with sensors & software 31.3.2008 153946-00 NHM Good
Trinocular 200m Microscope with accessories 31.3.2008 92250-00 NHM Good
Digital Trinocular Research Microscope with accessories 31.3.2008 85500-00 NHM Good
6
(d) Vehicles
Name of vehicle Year of purchase Cost of vehicle
(Rs)
Source of fund
Present working condition
(A) Four wheelers Tractor 30.03.2001 3,24,238 ICAR Need
repair TOYOTA Qualis 18.12.2004 4,64,034 ICAR Good
(B) Two wheelers Hero Honda passion plus 06.06.2009 40,328 ICAR Good
Hero Honda passion plus 06.06.2009 40,328 ICAR Good
6. Staff in position
(a) Staff as on 31 March, 2010
Sl. No.
Sanctioned post with
designation
No. of sanctioned posts
Name of incumbent Discipline Pay scale Date of
Joining
Probable date
of filling
the vacant posts
A Programme coordinator
1 Dr. H.B.Patil Horticulture 12000-18300 01-04-04
B Subject matter specialists (SMSs)
6
1 SMS Dr. S.S.Karabhantanal
Ag. Entomology 8000-13500 20-01-06
2 SMS Mr. S. M. Vastrad
Plant athology 8000-13500 01-03-06
3 SMS Dr. Prema.B.Patil Home Science 8000-13500 22-06-07
4 SMS Dr. Suresh.B.N Ani.Sci 8000-13500 20-07-09
5 SMS Dr.I.M.Mannikeri Horticulture 8000-13500 16-06-11
6 SMS Vacant Agronomy
C Programme Assistants
3
1 Programme Dr.S.G. Gollagi Soil science 5500-9000 14-11-08
7
Assistant( Lab Tech.) /T-4
Sl. No.
Sanctioned post with
designation
No. of sanctioned posts
Name of incumbent Discipline Pay scale Date of
Joining
Probable date
of filling
the vacant posts
2 Programme Assistant (Computer)/ T-4
Mr. S.C.Rathod Computer 5500-9000 16-12-08
3 Programme Assistant/ Farm Manager
Mr.B.C.Kolhar
Farm manager
5500-9000 10-12-08
D Administrative staff
2
1 Assistant Mr. S.E.Badiger Assistant
8825-16000
01-04-04
2 Jr. Steno Shri.V.M. Haragabal
Jr. Steno. 11400-21600 01-12-08
E Drivers 2 1 Driver
(vehicle) Mr. Yariswamy 7275-13350 23-05-05
2 Driver (tractor)
Mr. A.D. Padnad 4199 01-04-09
F Supporting staff
2
1 SS Grade Mr. P.M. Rathod 5200-8200 16-07-07
2 SS Grade Mr. Sunil Hebbal 3935 01-04-09
Total 16
(b) Change of staff during 2005-06 to 2009-2010
Name of incumbent Designation Discipline Date of
joining Date of leaving
Years/ Months served
Give reasons for leaving KVK
Dr.Sateesh R. Patil Training Associate
Horti-culture
16-10-2000 19-01-2006 5 Y 1 M
Transfer to college
Shri.H.S.Patil Training Associate
Soil science
31-05-2004 16-09-2006 2 Y Temporary
8
Dr.H.B.Patil Programme Co-ordinator
Horti-culture
27-03-2004 31-05-2010 6 Y Transfer from UAS, Dharwad to UHS, Bagalkot
Sri.K.M. Vagadaragi
Training Assistant
Comp.programmer
08-06-2004 06-07-2006 2 Y Temporary
Dr.Turumalesh Training Associate
Animal science
03-07-2004 11-10-2006 2 Y 3 M
Transfer
Dr. Basavarajappa M.P
Training Associate
Pl. Pathology
09-02-2005 24-01-2006 11M Temporary
Sri. Sunulkumar N.M
Training Associate
Entomology
01-01-2005 24-12-2005 1 Y Temporary
Mr. K.Nagappa Training Associate
Animal science
22-03-2005 13-04-2005 1 M Temporary
Mrs.V.B. Hosamani
Training Associate
Agri.Extension
28-03-2005 12-07-2006 1 Y 4 M
Temporary
Mrs.Roopa. U Training Associate
Home science
16-08-2005 10-2-2006 8 M Temporary
Dr.Vishwanath Hegga
Training Associate
Animal science
28-12-2005 23-01-2006 1 M Temporary
Dr. Dhanalaxmi. H SMS Home science
23-01-2006 18-01-2007 1 Y Resigned
Dr.Somangouda G. SMS Agronomy 20-01-2006 14-10-2008 2 Y 9 M
Transfer
Dr.S.Y.Mukartal SMS Animal science
01-12-2008 04-07-2009 8 M Transfer
Dr.S.G.Gollagi Programme Assistant
Soil science
14-11-2008 31-05-2010 1 Y 7 M
Transfer from UAS, Dharwad to UHS, Bagalkot
Mr. B.S.Padashetty Programme Assistant
Farm Manager
30-8-2008 10-12-2008 4 M Temporary
Mr.Asoka Jambagi Programme Assistant
Soil science
04-3-2008 14-11-2008 8 M Temporary
Mr. Channappa Kabadagi
Programme Assistant
Farm Manager
18-8-2007 26-09-2007 1 M Resignation
Mr.Babu Chavhan Driver LVD 23-07-2007 31-03-2009 1 Y 6 M
Transfer from UASD to UHS, Bagalkot
Miss Radha C Badiger
SMS Home science
14-02-2007 22-06-2007 4 M Temporary
Dr. Shridhar D. SMS Horticulture
14-02-2007 14-09-2007 1 M Temporary
7. Budget performance
Sl. No
Particulars Budget Sanctioned (S) and Expenditure (E) (Rs. in lakh) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
S E S E S E S E S E S E A Recurring 1 Pay &
Allowances 20,00,000 17,81,558 20,00,000 17,45,028 2000000 2285027 2000000 1313173 31,00000 3002408 9,100,000 8,345,636
2 Traveling allowances
1,00,000 35,422 50,000 47,625 100000 57804 100000 9,375 100000 88000 450,000 238,226
3 Contingencies
a Stationery etc 1,50,000 1,25,416 65,000 64,759 217000 216385 2,20,000 24,149 210000 209749 642,000 515,042
b POL 1,00,000 99,184 65,000 64,578 140000 139472 1,20,000 24,833 175000 174874 480,000 502,941
c Meals/refreshments etc
75,000 39,440 30,000 29,984 91000 25422 80,000 12,034 105000 72686 381,000 179,566
d Training materials etc
40,000 39,454 10,000 7,879 84000 83996 80,000 516 65000 60944 279,000 192,789
e FLDs 50,000 30,006 30,000 20,255 88000 85408 90,000 12,961 217000 154544 475,000 303,174
f OFTs 30,000 1,600 15,000 4452 42000 9280 30,000 53000 44987 170,000 60,319
g Training of extension personnel
25,000 0 10,000 - 28000 20,000 10000 0 93,000 -
h Maintenance of buildings
20,000 0 - - 25,000 45,000 -
i Extension activities
- - - - 30000 4309 30,000 4,309
j FFS - - - - 25,000 25,000 -
10
k Library - - - - 10000 7500 10,000 10000 9175 30,000 16,675
l SWPTL - - - - 25000 9825 25,000 9,825
Total 26,00,000 21,52,080 22,75,000 19,84,500 2800000 2910294 30,00,000 1,397,041 4,100,000 3,831,501 14,775,000 12,275,416
B Non-recurring - -
1 Civil works 120000 18450 - - 100000 100000 16,00,000 150000 150000 370,000 268,450
2 Equipment/ implements
1,00,000 98,704 3488000 3488000 3,488,000 3,586,704
3 Vehicle 10000 7860 10,000 7,860
4 Library 10,000 9961 10,000 9,961
5 SWPTL
Total 1,30,000 26,310 1,10,000 1,08,661 100000 100000 16,00,000 3638000 3638000 3,738,000 3,764,310
C Revolving fund 1,00,000 - - - - - - - - - - -
Grand Total 27,30,000 21,78,390 23,85,000 20,93,165 3800000 3910294 46,00,000 1,397,041 7738000 7469501 11,538,000 12,776,836
8. Major activities undertaken
(a) Thrust areas
Crop / Enterprise Major problem of the district Major thrust areas emphasized for solving the problems
Bajra Moisture stress, low yielding hybrids
Moisture conservation & inter cultivation of high yielding hybrids
Horsegram Moisture stress, low yielding, Yellow vein mosaic
Moisture conservation & inter cultivation of high yielding hybrids
Groundnut Poor nutrition, Low yielding variety
High yielding varieties and Integrated nutritional management
Sorghum Moisture stress, low yielding hybrids High yielding varieties
Redgram Podborer wilt, SMD,Low yielding hybrids
High yielding and wilt resistant varieties, IPM
Bengalgram Podborer wilt, SMD,Low yielding hybrids
High yielding varieties, IPM
Sunflower Powdery mildew, Low yielding hybrids
High yielding hybrids and moisture conservation & IPM
Greengram Low yielding varieties High yielding varieties
Grape Downy mildew, mealybug and stemborer IPM & IDM
Cotton Bollworm , water scarity Bollworm management & water management
Onion Low yielding variety and pest disease High yielding varieties & IPM & IDM
Lime Canker and mite IPM &IDM
Pomegranate Bacterial blight IDM
Sheep and goat Disease -PPR,FMD,HS,Pox Health management in livestock
Dairy Scarcity of feed and fodder Health management in livestock
Note: Please restrict to 10-12 major problems only
12
(b) Details of targets and achievements
Name of activity
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
Targets
Achieve-ments
Targets
Achieve-ments
Targets
Achieve-ments
Targets Achieve-ments
Targets
Achieve-ments
Targets Achieve-ments
OFT (i)No. of technologies
02 02 03 03 03 03 08 08 13 13 29 29
(ii) No. of farmers
10 10 15 15 15 15 40 40 100 135 180 215
FLD 0 0
(i)No. of technologies
16 15 17 17 16 16 17 17 20 20 86 85
(ii) No. of farmers
200 180 210 204 200 192 270 270 350 365 1230 1211
TRAINING 0 0
(i)No. of courses 120 117 100 113 130 134 110 123 50 62 510 549
(ii) No. of participants
4000 3969 3000 2898 3000 3005 2750 3698 2000 3500 14750 17070
EXTENSION ACTIVITIES
0 0
(i)No. of programmes
40 40 35 40 50 50 706 709 50 62 881 901
(ii) No. of participants
2000 5200 3500 3500 2000 3500 400000 459237 2000 3500 409500 474937
Seed production
40 q 39.95q
Planting material production
Live stock strains production
Bio products production
13
9. Major accomplishments and impact as per the activities undertaken year-wise
(a) Status of institutional training
Item How KVK has done?
A. Planning
i. Scheduling of training Based on problem identification, case identification, competency identification and target group analysis. Based on the OFT’s, FLD’s and problems of the district, need based on demand by farmers
ii. Job analysis of participants
Based on duties, tasks and competencies interviews, observation and self-logging techniques.
iii. Trainees’ knowledge analysis
Questionnaire
iv. Training needs assessment
Based on the problems of the district
B. Preparation
i. Organization of content (course content and syllabus)
Prepared in local language with technical know how
ii. Lesson plan Prepared in accordance with time
C. Implementation of training
i. Conduct of training (methodology followed)
Presentation, White marker board, practical involvement, method demonstration
ii. Mid-review (modification of training schedule based on needs of participants)
Subject of interest by the farmer were additionally covered
D. Training evaluation
i. Job improvement plan Based on the feedback from the participants
ii. Review and revision of training based on post training evaluation
By conducting an examination (Post evaluation), Contacting over phone
iii. Monitoring and evaluation (post training contact and usefulness of training)
Farmers were further informed through SMS service
(b) Details of training programmes conducted
ON-CAMPUS
(i) Training programmes conducted for extension functionaries
Discipline Training programmes for extension personnel 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants Crop production 03 90 3 60 3 75 09 201 08 139 31 715 Horticulture 03 70 4 100 Livestock Fisheries Home science Agriculture engineering Agro-forestry Plant Protection 01 30 01 30 02 60 02 60 06 180 Total 4 120 03 60 07 175 11 261 10 199 38 815
15
(ii).Training programmes conducted for farmers/farm women
Discipline Training programmes for farmers 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants Crop production 42 1587 8 213 18 417 33 1064 46 1256 147 4537 Horticulture 17 325 8 107 10 210 16 423 18 430 69 1495 Livestock 8 366 4 96 6 142 18 604 Fisheries Home science 7 127 1 36 3 73 8 182 15 447 34 865 Agriculture engineering
Agro-forestry 1 50 1 50 Plant protection 7 253 8 216 9 286 7 250 11 315 14 218 Total 74 2405 17 356 32 750 61 1765 85 2275 269 7551
OFF-CAMPUS
(i) Training programmes conducted for extension functionaries
Discipline Training programmes for extension personnel
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants
Crop production 02 32 1 32 3 75 4 102 6 102 14 311
Horticulture 03 45 1 40 1 25 2 65
Total 05 75 02 72 04 100 04 102 06 102 16 376
16
(ii).Training programmes conducted for farmers/farm women
Discipline Training programmes for farmers 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants Crop production 26 834 18 522 17 7.3 14 503 48 1953 123 4515 Horticulture 4 240 4 108 7 179 21 492 12 346 48 1365 Livestock 3 154 3 154 Fisheries Home science 2 47 1 20 9 310 2 90 4 154 18 621 Total 32 1121 23 650 33 1192 37 1085 67 2607 192 6655
BOTH ON AND OFF-CAMPUS (TOTAL)
(i) Training programmes conducted for extension functionaries
Discipline Training programmes for extension personnel 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants Crop production 4 120 4 92 6 150 15 363 16 301 47 1058 Horticulture 3 45 1 40 5 125 9 210 Total 9 197 5 132 11 275 15 363 16 301 56 1268
17
(ii).Training programmes conducted for farmers/farm women
Discipline Training programmes for farmers 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants Crop production 68 2421 26 735 35 1120 47 1567 94 3209 270 9052 Horticulture 21 565 12 215 17 389 37 915 30 776 117 2860 Livestock 8 366 4 96 9 296 21 758 Fisheries Home science 9 174 2 56 12 383 10 272 19 601 52 1486 Agriculture engineering Agro-forestry 1 50 1 50 Total 106 3526 40 1006 65 1942 98 2850 152 4882 461 14206
(iii) Vocational training programmes for rural youth
Discipline Vocational training programmes for rural youth 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants No. Participants Crop production 10 368 3 276 18 600 16 566 47 1810 Horticulture Livestock 3 74 1 47 2 142 3 136 9 399 Fisheries Home science 5 92 8 260 4 79 5 82 7 117 29 630 Total 18 534 9 307 7 355 25 824 26 819 85 2869
(iv) Sponsored training programmes conducted
Year Course Title No. of courses
No. of participants
Fund (Rs.)
Sponsoring Agency
2005-06 1. Wheat Production
technology 01 65 6,34,000 National Centre for
Organic Farming (GOI)
2. Improved production technology for legumes 01 67 AME Fond. Bijapur
(GOI) 3. Soil and water
conservation 01 35 KSDA, Bijapur (GOI)
4. Banana cultivation 01 35 SHG group (GOI) 5. Vermiculture 01 45 KSDA,Bijapur (GOI) 6. Vermiculture and
biofertilizers production 01 65 RUDSET, Bijapur (GOI)
7. Vermiculture and biofertilizers production 01 65 AME Fond. Bijapur c
8. Self employment opportunities Agriculture
01 43 NYK, Bijapur (GOI)
9. Improved production technology in oilseeds 01 90 KSDA, Bijapur
(GOI) 10. IPM in pulses 01 36 KSDA, Bijapur
(GOI) 11. Indigenous technology in
pest management 01 39 KSDA, Bijapur (GOI)
2006-07 12. IPM in pulses 01 25 4,00,000 KSDA (GOK) 13. Disease management in
pulses 01 25 KSDA (GOK)
14. IPM in rabi crops 01 25 KSDA (GOK) 15. Sunflower pest
management 01 25 KSDA (GOK)
16. Disease management in rabi crops
01 25 KSDA (GOK)
17. IDM in Sunflower 01 25 KSDA (GOK) 18. Disease management
through indigenous technology
01 36 KSDA (GOK)
19. IPM in Maize 01 55 KSDA (GOK) 20. Bio fungicides in disease
management 01 22 KSDA (GOK)
21. Safe use of fungicides 01 26 KSDA (GOK) 22. Organic Farming 01 61 KSDA (GOK) 23. Disease management in
horticulture crops
01 25 KSDH (GOK)
19
Year Course Title No. of courses
No. of participants
Fund (Rs.)
Sponsoring Agency
2007-08 24. Vermi technology 01 45 20,00,000 Government of
Karnataka 25. Improved production
technology in Pomegranate 01 50 Dept.of Horticulture
26. Pest and disease management in pulses
01 35 Watershed development
27. Vermicompost and Biofertilizer production
01 65 DATC
28. Vermicompost and Biofertilizer production
01 38 DATC
2008-09 29. Increasing production and
productivity of fruit crops 04 110 1,00,000 KSDA & ATMA
2009-10 30. Increasing production and
productivity of field and horticulture crops
09 270
2,70,000 KSDA & ATMA
(c) Frontline demonstrations
(i) Frontline demonstrations in kharif season crops (condition : rainfed/irrigated)
Year Crop
category Crop and Variety
No. of
farmers
Area (ha)
Average yield (q/ha) Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha) Economics of check (Rs./ha) Demo Check %
increase
Gross Cost
Gross Return
Net Return BCR Gross
Cost Gross
Return Net
Return BCR
2005-06
Onion
Telagi red with organic farming
3 1.2 177 230 -23.6 26050 135700 110650 5.2 38000 167900 129900 3.4
Onion
Telagi red with organic farming
2 0.8 163 240 -32.3 28,200 127140 98940 4.5 41,000 187200 146200 4.5
2006-07 Bajra
(rainfed) Pvt. Hybrid 12 5 10.75 9.5 13.2 4500 6900 2400 1.5 4750 5700 950 1.2
Sugarcane (irrigated ) CO-671 12 5 111.2 74.5 49 30000 89600 59600 2.9 3200 59200 21200 3.00
Onion (summer irrigated)
Agri. Found light red
50 20 262.5 195 34.6 27000 236250 209250 8.75 25979 165750 139771 8.75
Lime (irrigated )
Kagzi lime 05 02 282 277 1.8 35000 110800 75800 3.16 33000 99000 66000 2.75
2007-08 Bajra
(rainfed) ICTP 8203 12 7.5 9.5 10.75 -13.2 3800 7840 4040 2.0 4000 8160 4160 2.06/
2.04 Oinon
(rainfed) Arka kalyan 5 2 67 61 9.8 16420 60300 43800 3.6 15300 54900 39600 3.67/
3.58 Drumstick
(irrigated) KDM-1 10 2
21
Custard apple (irrigated)
Arka sahana 10 2
2008-09 Onion ,
(rainfed ) Agri found red 12 5 74 63 17.5 9920 59200 49280 5.96 9500 50400 40900 5.30
Lime (irrigated) Kagazi 10 2 220 212 3.80 38000 105600 67600 2.78 31500 63000 31500 2.00
2009-10 Bajra
(rainfed) MH-946 12 05 12.0 12.50 4.0 1500 9600 8100 6.4 1500 10000 8500 6.6
Onion (rainfed)
Arka kalyan 12 5 86 76 13.15 9920 68800 58880 6.9 9500 60800 51300 6.4
Total 14 14 167 64.5 1474.95 1461.25 77.75 230310 1017730 788340 53.65 217229 932010 679981
Note: Perennial crops can be included under kharif season
22
(ii) Frontline demonstrations in rabi season crops (condition: rainfed/irrigated)
Year Crop category
Crop and Variety
No. of farmers
Area (ha)
Average yield (q/ha) Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha)
Economics of check (Rs./ha)
Demo Check % increase
Gross Cost
Gross Return
Net Return BCR Gross
Cost Gross
Return Net
Return BCR
2005-06 Rabi sorghum Rabi
sorghum CSV-216R
10 10 15.6 11.8 32.6 3,200 17,160 13,960 5.3 3100 12980 98000 4.18
Rabi sorghum Rabi sorghum DSV-5
10 10 12.24 9.6 27.5 3,200 13,464 10,264 4.2 3100 10560 7460 3.4
Wheat DWR-162 Vs Local
11 5 32.0 27.5 16.36 8,200 41,600 33400 5.0 8200 35750 27550 4.3
Onion Telagi red 5 2.4 247.5 230 7.6 26,000 1,98,500 122500 5.7 28700 138000 10930 4.8 2006-07
Sorghum (Rainfed
DSV-5 8 3.2 8.1 7.1 14.5 5250 9841 4591 1.8 5000 8626 3626 1.87
2007-08 Sorghum
(Rainfed) DSV-5 10 10 19.25 16.35 17.73 7210 28875 21665 4.0 5400 24525 19125 4.54/
4.00 Sorghum
(Rainfed) CSV-18 12 12 16.43 15.10 8.48 5410 24645 19235 4.5 5100 22650 17550 4.55/
4.44 Sorghum
(Rainfed) CSV-22 8 8 22.0 18.43 15.60 5410 33000 27590 6.0 5100 27645 22545 6.00/
5.42 Pomegranate
(Irrigated) Ganesh 10 4 54 37 45.9 51260 189000 137740 3.6 45000 92500 47500 3.68/
2.00 2008-09
Sorghum rabi. RF
CSV-22 50 20 21.0 17.0 23.5 5152 22050 16898 4.30 5050 17000 11950 3.37
Wheat rabi, (Irrigated)
DWR-225 10 5 37.0 31.0 19.35 7500 55250 47750 7.37 6200 42000 35800 6.77
23
Pomegranate (Irrigated)
Ganesh 12 5 48 35 37.1 58500 187000 128500 3.20 51200 159000 107800 3.10
Grape (irrigated)
Thomson seedless
10 4 245 210 16.6 86000 221000 135000 2.37 95000 187200 92900 1.97
Custard apple Arka sahana
10 4
2009-10 Sorghum
rainfed CSV-22 50 20 23.5 19.0 23.68 5660 23500 178400 4.15 5660 19000 13340 3.35
Wheat (irrigated)
DWR-225 10 5 35.5 28.0 26.78 8200 47925 39725 5.84 8200 37800 29600 4.6
Pomegranate (irrigated)
Ganesh 12 5 52 41 26.82 36800 166400 129600 4.52 31500 123000 91500 3.9
Grape (irrigated)
Thomson seedless
10 4 232 19.1 16.6 98000 324800 226800 3.31 107000 267400 160400 2.50
Total 18 18 258 136.6
24
(iii) Frontline demonstrations on pulses (condition: rainfed/irrigated)
Year Crop and Variety
No. of farmers
Area (ha)
Average yield (q/ha) Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha)
Economics of check (Rs./ha)
Demo Check % increase
Gross Cost
Gross Return
Net Return BCR Gross
Cost Gross Return
Net Return BCR
2005-06 Redgram
(WRP-1) 12 5 9.5 10.6 -10-38 3643 17100 13457 4.6 3840 19080 15240 4.9
Redgram(Asha) 12 5 19.1 15.55 22.83 4388 30560 26172 6.96 4680 24880 20200 5.3 Chickpea
(Annigeri-1) 11 5 8.61 7.52 14.36 3100 12054 8954 3.88 450 10540 6090 2.3
2006-07 Redgram
(WRP-1) 12 5 8.75 9.64 -9.23 11625 15750 4125 1.35 13000 19280 6280 1.35
Bengalgram (A-1)
21 10 9.38 9.22 1.75 6710 22512 15802 3.35 7010 22128 15117 3.36
2007-08 Greengram
Selection-4 rainfed
12 5 3.08 2.46 25.20 3675 9856 6181 2.6 3900 7872 3972 2.68/2.01
Bengalgram GBS-964, rainfed
10 5 10.20 9.15 11.50 6800 23460 16660 3.45 7000 21045 14045 3.45/3.00
Bengalgram A-1, rainfed
10 10 10.35 8.90 16.29 9600 22770 13170 2.3 8600 19580 10980 2.37/2.28
2008-09 Redgram
BSMR-736, rainfed
12 5 20.0 11.0 69.5 12000 70000 58000 5.83 10800 41300 30500 3.82
25
Bengalgram GBS-964, Rainfed
12 5 8.50 7.70 10.38 8725 19550 10825 2.24 9240 14120 6880 1.74
Horsegram GPM-6 , Rainfed
12 5 Vitiated
2009-10 Greengram Sel-
4, Rainfed 12 5 3.15 2.50 26.0 4675 12600 7925 2.69 4615 10000 5385 2.16
Redgram , BSMR-736, Rainfed
12 5 12.0 12.5 -4 11575 60000 48425 5.2 14600 62500 47400 4.2
Bengalgram, JG-11, Rainfed
12 5 16.36 14.2 15.2 6800 32720 25920 4.81 7000 28400 21400 4.05
Horsegram , GPM-6, Rainfed
12 5 Vitiated
Total 15 184 85 138.98
26
(iv) Frontline demonstrations on oil seeds (condition: rainfed/irrigated)
Year Crop and Variety
No. of farmers
Area
(ha)
Average yield (q/ha) Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha)
Economics of check (Rs./ha)
Demo Check % increa
se
Gross Cost
Gross Return
Net Return BCR Gross
Cost Gross
Return Net
Return BCR
2005-06 Sunflower
Pvt. Hybrid 12 5 10.19 8 27.4 2425 17323 14898 7.1 2800 13600 10800 4.8
Groundnut TMV-2
12 5 11.75 9.8 20.5 7625 21150 13525 2.7 7800 17640 9840 2.2
Groundnut TMV-2
10 5 23% 19.4 19.1 7560 41580 34020 5.5 8200 34920 26720 4.2
2006-07 Sunflower
Pvt. Hybrid 25 10 4.27 3.85 9.83 7750 10675 2925 1.3 8250 9625 1375 1.38
Groundnut GPBD-4
6 5 19.75 17.83 10.76 15500 51975 36475 3.3 16500 48141 31641 3.35
2007-08 Sunflower
SB-275 Rainfed
10 5 8.95 7.66 16.84 8000 25060 17060 3.1 8500 21448 12948 3.13/
2.52
Groundnut GPBD-4 Irrigated
12 5 20.25 18.20 11.26 12500 48600 34100 3.8 12000 43680 31680 3.88/
3.64
2008-09 Sunflower
SB-275 Rainfed
25 10 6.5 4.25 52.9
11520 14300 2780 1.24 10080 8500 -1580
0.8
27
Groundnut TMV-2 Summer irrigated
12 5 21.1 19.5 7.95
11000 52750 41750 4.79 12100 48750 36650 4.02
2009-10 Sunflower
SB-275 Rainfed
10 10 6.80 5.56 22.30 6450 14960 8510 2.3 6700 12232 5532 1.82
Summer groundnut GPBD-4 Irrigated
12 5 20.0 16.25 23.07
11500 60000 48500 5.2 12000 48750 36600 4.06
Groundnut GPBD-4 Rainfed
12 5 Vitiated
Total 14 158 75 129.79
28
(v) Frontline demonstrations on cotton (condition: rainfed/irrigated)
Year Crop and Variety
No. of farmers
Area (ha)
Average yield (q/ha) Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha)
Economics of check (Rs./ha)
Demo Check % increase
Gross Cost
Gross Return
Net Return BCR Gross
Cost Gross
Return Net
Return BCR
2005-06 Cotton
(DHH-11) 10 10 22.75 17.13 21.16 21475 41600 20125 1.9 14000 30834 16834 2.2
2006-07 Cotton
RCH-2Bt Irrigated
25 10 20.12 16.88 19.19 20500 40240 19740 1.9 25750 33760 8010 1.96
Cotton Pvt. Hybrid , Irrigated
25 10 19.32 18.88 02 25500 38640 13140 1.5 25500 37760 12260 1.51
2007-08 Cotton
RCH-2Bt, Irrigated
30 12 19.95 17.08 16.80 21700 45885 24185 2.1 26350 39284 12934 2.11/1.49
2008-09 Cotton
RCH-2Bt, Irrigated
50 20 30.05 24.0 27.08 16900 67100 50200 3.94 17500 52800 35300 3.01
2009-10 Cotton
MRC-7531, Hybrids
50 20 24.5 19.36 26.5 18200 61250 43050 3.36 19600 48400 28800 2.48
Total 06 190 82 136.69
29
(vi) Frontline demonstrations on crop hybrids (condition: rainfed/irrigated)
Year Variety No. of farmers
Area (ha)
Average yield (q/ha) Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha)
Economics of check (Rs./ha)
Demo Check % increase
Gross Cost
Gross Return
Net Return BCR Gross
Cost Gross
Return Net
Return BCR
2005-06 Bajra pioneer
12 05 10.75 9.5 13.2 4500 6900 2400 1.5 4750 5700 950 1.53
Cotton (DHH-11)
10 10 22.75 17.13 21.16 21475 41600 20125 1.9 14000 30834 168341 2.2
Sunflower Pvt hybrid
12 5 10.19 8 27.4 2425 17323 14898 7.1 2500 13600 11100 5.4
2006-07 Sunflower Pvt. Hybrid
25 10 4.27 3.85 9.83 7750 10675 2925 1.4 8250 9625 1375 1.38
Cotton RCH-2Bt Irrigated
25 10 20.12 16.88 19.19 20500 40240 19740 1.96 25750 33760 8010 1.96
Cotton Pvt. Hybrid , Irrigated
25 10 19.32 18.88 02
25500 38640 13140 1.5 25500 37760 12260 1.51
2007-08 Sunflower SB-275 Rainfed
10 5 8.95 7.66 16.84 8000 25060 17060 3.13 8500 21448 12948 3.13/2.52
Cotton RCH-2Bt, Irrigated
30 12 19.95 17.08 16.80 21700 45885 24185 2.11 26350 39284 12934 2.11/1.49
2008-09 Sunflower SB-275 Rainfed
25 10 6.5 4.25 52.9 11520 14300 2780 1.24 10080 8500 -1580 0.8
30
Cotton RCH-2Bt, Irrigated
50 20 30.05 24.0 27.08 16900 67100 50200 3.94 17500 52800 35300 3.01
2009-10 MH-946 12 05 12.0 12.50 4.0 1500 9600 8100 6.4 1500 10000 8500 6.6 Sunflower
SB-275 Rainfed
10 10 6.80 5.56 22.30 6450 14960 8510 2.3 6700 12232 5532 1.82
Cotton MRC-7531, Hybrids
50 20 24.5 19.36 26.5
18200 61250 43050 3.36 19600 48400 28800 2.48
Total 13 296 132 196.15
(vii) Frontline demonstrations on livestock
Year Technology No. of farmers
Area/units Average yield (q/ha) Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha)
Economics of check (Rs./ha)
Demo Check % increase
Gross Cost
Gross Return
Net Return BCR Gross
Cost Gross
Return Net
Return BCR
2009-10 Feed
enrichment with Azolla
20 20 12.98 12.16 6.74
Eradiction of ecto parasites
30 30 11.78 12.28 4.24
Total 02 50 50
31
(x) Frontline demonstrations on farm enterprises (Home sciences)
Year Enterprise No. of farmers
Are (ha)
Average yield (q/ha) Economics of demonstration (Rs./ha)
Economics of check (Rs./ha)
Demo Check % increase
Gross Cost
Gross Return
Net Return BCR Gross
Cost Gross Return
Net Return BCR
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Maize Sheller 15 15 3.0kg/30min 2.25 kg/ 30 min 33% Sarala kurupi 15 15 No accepted Improved
sickle 10 10 586 sq.ft/
30min 488sq.ft/30min 20%
2008-09 Groundnut
decorticator 10 10 9.2kg/hr 4.7kg/hr 95.74%
Maize Sheller 10 10 5.25kg/hr 2.96kg/hr 77.36% Oorja chulla 10 10 76.6kg/
pellets/ month
155 kg wood/ month
50.55%
Modified kurupi
05 05 Not accepted
2009-10 Groundnut
decorticator 10 10 9.2kg/hr 4.69kg/hr 96.16%
Maize Sheller 10 10 5.25kg/hr 2.93kg/hr 79.18% Oorja chulla 10 10 34.3kg
pellets/ month
58.5kg wood/ month
41.37%
Total 10 105 105
32
(c) On-farm trials
A. TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (i) Technology assessment (crops)
Year Crop and title of OFT
No. of
trials
Result of best performing technology
option
Feedback from the farmers
Gross cost (Rs./ha/unit)
Gross return (Rs. /ha/ unit)
Net return (Rs. /ha/
unit) BC
Ratio
2005-06 Wheat , Furrow sowing in
wheat 05 3.7 percent increase in yield
Saving of 2500 per acre on weeding
6200 2700 3500 3.78
Lime, Bahar management in lime 05
12 percent more marketable yield with on diseased fruits
Fruits with no spots 3000 78000 75000
-
2006-07 Wheat , weed management in
wheat 05 4.7 % increase in yield & 2000/- saving in weeding
Saving in weeding & increase in yield 6800 30 q/ha 22500 3.14
Onion, Management of onion blight through chemicals 05
10.1 % increase in yield over T2 and 30.0% over T1
very effective chemical 12000 98 q/ha 45300 4.35
Bengalgram, podborer management in bengalgram through spinosad
05 9.26 % increase in yield Very effective 3500 11.50q/ha 14200 3.18
2007-08 Maize, management of root
grub in maize 05 4.75% infested plants 0.50 grubs per 10 plants
Accepted by the farmers 2000 3970 kg/ha 17730 2.76
Onion, management of onion blight through chemicals 05
10.1 % increase in yield over T2 and 30.0% over T1
Satisfied with the recommendation 12000 10200 kg/ha
51200 3.76
Wheat , weed management in wheat 05 Less manual labour
161.5kg/ 5gunta Saving in weeding and increase in yield 6200 32.3q/ha 22500 3.14
2008-09 Cropping system,
sustainability in onion sorghum production system
05 60q/ha 16g/ha
Extra returns from onion crop 1200 60 q onion
16 q sorghum
29950 2.86
33
Pomegranate scab management 05 6.22 t/ha Marketable fruits
harvested 32000 30 q/ ha 90382 6.13
Grape , use of garlic extract for bud breaking 05 46% bud burst
percentage
Brinjal , management of shoot & fruit borer 05 580 q/ha More effective 34000 580 q/ha 244860 6.42
Onion, thrips management 05 78 q/ha Acceptable option is effective 12000 78 q/ha 52480 5.9
Bengalgram wilt management 05 8.7 q/ha very less wilt observed 2400 8.7 q/ha 7580 2.28 2009-10
Cropping systems , sustainability in onion sorghum production system
05 68 q/ha 16.2 q/ha
Extra returns ( onion yield is bonus) 1200
68 q/ha (onion) 16.2 q/ha ( sorghum)
54360 5.18
Pomegranate scab management 05 6.14 t/ha Fungicide manages
disease effectively 36000 6.14 t/ha 126000 3.86
Grape , downey mildew management 05 19.8 t/ha Disease managed
effectivelly 43000 19.8 t/ha 324700 3.6
Redgram ,transplanting in redgram 05 23 q/ha Late flowering 8400 23 q/ha 67500 6.19
Grape, use of garlic extract for bud breaking 05 5000 kg/ha (110 days for
monthly ) Early flowering 2000 5000kg/ha 3000 2.5
Brinjal , management of shoot & fruit borer 05 590 q/ha Alternate option more
effective 38000 590 q/ha 416000 8.42
Onion, thrips management 05 85 q/ha Alternate option more effective 16000 85 q/ha 53000 4.6
Total 21 105 277900 1721742 82.05
34
(iv) Technology assessment (Home Sciences )
Year
Value addition/enterprise/implement
and title of OFT
No. of
trials
Result of best performing
technology option Feedback from the farmers Gross cost
(Rs./ha/unit)
Gross Return
(Rs. /ha/ unit)
Net return
(Rs. /ha/ unit)
BC Ratio
2008-09 Grape , use of padded tongs for
dormex application 5 No sores
Reduces injury but is not economical
2009-10 Grape , use of padded tongs for
dormex application No sores
Reduces injury but is not economical
Envirofit chulla 10
20.55 % of fuel is saved
It emits less smoke compared to traditional chulla. It saves time of cooking It is portable
Cloth gloves for harvesting bengalgram
10 22% of extra area could be covered while harvesting
It prevents the formation of boils and cuts on the palms. It saves labour expenses
Cloth gloves for harvesting sunflower
10
15.09% of extra area could be covered while harvesting
It prevents the formation of boils and cuts on the palms. It saves labour expenses
Groundnut stripper 10
17.78 % more groundnut pods can be stripped using stripper
It saves labour. Extra pods can be placed but mud & leaves also fall along with the pods as a result it takes time for cleaning .
Total 06 45
35
C. Broad-basing of frontline extension S. No. Activity No. of activities/No. of units carried out Total
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 i. Planting/livestock materials produced and distributed 200
drumstick
ii. Fodder grass introduced (ha) 0.5 ha iii. Fruit trees introduced 100 sapota
100custard apple
100 sapota 100custard apple
iv. Goatery introduced 10 15 v. Improved hand tools and implements introduced 10 10 10 10 10
vi. Any other (specify) Total 10 420 225 10 10
36
D. Impact of KVK in terms of agricultural and animal productivity, socio-economic conditions and employment generation during
QRT period ( 5 years : 2005-06 to 2009-10) in the adopted villages
(i) Before and after KVK technological interventions
Sl. No.
Item Unit Prior to KVK (just prior to this QRT period : 2004-05)
Post KVK activities (Just after this QRT period: 2010-11)
1 Change in cropping pattern % 7.5 21.50 2 Change in productivity of (a) Cereal crops kg/ha 829 876
(b) Pulses kg/ha 629 705
(c) Oilseeds kg/ha 482 731
(d) overall kg/ha 647 771
(e) Total livestock No’s 1083961 1362330
(f) Fisheries (Fish catch) Ton 1236 7031 (g) Enterprises (small scale) No’s 6107 805 (31.83%) 3 Average use of high yielding varieties % 25% 85%
4 Average use of livestock breeds % 10% 25.68
5 Average use of high yielding fish fingerlings ha 10 15
6 Average use of fertilizers (NPK nutrients) ton 38127 60480(58.63%)
7 Average use of FYM and other bio-fertilizers kg/ha 2 t/ha 4 t/ha
37
8 Farmers using tractor/machinery % 10% 36.14% (20162) 9 Change in net return in adopted villages Rs./ha (a) Major crops Redgram- BSMR-736 8825 13428
Groundnut GPBD-4 19920 26039
Bt Cotton 13260 19740
Wider row in sunflower 2765 6308
Pomegranate Bacterial blight management 56,000 2,48,000 Sorghum (CSV 22) 8,000 12,000 (b) Major fisheries (c) Major other enterprises Vermicompost production units No’s 20 226
10 Employment generation Mandays /month
(a) Among farmers 08 43 (b) Among farm women 02 18 (c) Among rural youth 10 155 (d) Among SHGs 04 10
11 Any other specify
38
(ii) Details of major output and outcome through technological interventions during 2005-06 to 2009-10
Crop / enterprise
Major Problem tackled
Type of interventio
n (s)
Period of interventio
n
Major output w.r.t.
primary parameter
Major output w.r.t. secondary parameter
Major outcome
District level impact
Major constraints for non
significant impact
Before After Before After
Sunflower Moisture conservation
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
8q 10q Craks observed
No craks observed
Better moisture and powdery mildew management
As a high renumaretive rainfed crop as well as wide row moisture conservation technology has helped the farmers and increased the area to 1200 ha
Groundnut Water management
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
17 q 19 q 20% Crop area increased under irrigation
Groundnut area increased & water saving technology
Summer groundnut area is restricted to canal / river bank there is no water shortage
39
Pigeanpea Integrated pest management
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
12 q 12.5 q
Podborer damage(35%)
Less podborer damage (12%)
Saving in plant protection & eco friendly
Use of pheromone trap & live board purchase had better impact
Chickpea High yielding variety
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
14.2 13.3 More wilt in chickpea
Less wilt & shiny bold seeds
One quintal additional yield is harvested
Area under JG 11 is increased 400ha
Greengram High yielding variety
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
2.50 3.15 Shattering observed
No shattering observed
Better yields because of bold seeds & non shattering
Very rarely district received rainfall in the month of June
Sorghum High yielding variety
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
19.0 23.5 Lodging observed
Non lodging More yields as there was no lodging
Area under CSV 22 is increased to 600 ha
Bajra Moisture conservation
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
12.5 12.0 Craks observed
No craks observed
Better moisture conservation practices
- Very rarely district received rainfall in the month of June
40
Wheat Weed management
OFT 2005-06
To
2009-10
28 30 High cost of weeding by manual weeding
Saving of 4000/- in weeding
weeds can be effectively managed
- -
Pomegranate
Bacterial blight management
OFT/FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
64 76 30% disease observed
8% disease observed
With management of BLB good quality fruits produced and increase in net income
With this demonstrations area under pomegranate is increasing
Grape Mealybug management
OFT/FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
20 23 Grape quality deterioration
Good quality marketable yield
Quality fruits produced
Area under grape is increasing as IPM practices have managed this pest effectively .
Onion Introduction of variety
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
64 78 28% disease observed
8.06 % disease observed
Good quality vegetable produced with less blotch disease
More area under arka kalyan coming
41
Cotton Low yields
Bollworm
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
18 23 More cost of plant protection
Less plant protection expenditure
Quality cotton produced & uniform maturity
Area under Bt.Cotton is now 5553 ha (2009-10) from 3043 ha ( 2005-06)
Lime Canker management
FLD 2005-06
To
2009-10
210 240 18.6% disease observed
22.8 % disease observed
Quality lime produced
Rate for the quality fruits is 2.5 folds more than canker affected fruits
(iii) Write case studies documented in detail in each year (2005-06 to 2009-10)
2. Impact of Vermicompost production on extent of reduction in inorganic fertilizers
1. No of samples : 65 2. Farmers using vermicompost (1-5 years) : 52 3. Farmers using vermicompost 1st time (< 1 year) : 08 4. Farmers not doing Vermiculture : 05
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
No. of Trainings given 08 13 15 18 20 74
No. of beneficiaries 240 390 375 540 500 2045
No. of self employed 10 43 48 55 70 226
Large scale producer 02 09 11 13 18 53
Table 1: All crops
N=81
(acres)
Chemical fertilizer (qty) Chemical fertilizers cost (Rs.)
Vermicompost quantity (q)
*Vermicompost cost(Rs.)
N(kg) P(kg) K(kg)
A. 45.39 44.82 31.75 1408.39 - -
B 9.44 7.73 6.30 351.81 7.35 441
Actual Increase / Decrease
-35.95 -37.09 -25.45 -1056.58 - -
Increase / Decrease (%)
-79.20 -82.75 -80.16 -75.02 - -
A : Before using vermicompost, B : At the time of vermicompost usage
* : Vermicompost production cost (Rs 60/- quintal)
43
Table 2: Cereals
N=24
(acres)
Chemical fertilizer (qty) Chemical fertilizers cost (Rs.)
Vermicompost quantity (q)
*Vermicompost cost(Rs.)
Yield (q)
N(kg) P(kg) K(kg)
A. 23.37 22.10 3.18 681.77 4.91
B 6.2 1.02 0.0 -83.33 6.40 384 6.39
Actual Increase / Decrease
-17.17
-21.08 -3.18 -598.44 +1.48
Increase / Decrease (%)
-73.47
-95.38 -100 -87.78 +30.14
Table 3: Pulses
N=06
(acres)
Chemical fertilizer (qty) Chemical fertilizers cost (Rs.)
Vermicompost quantity (q)
*Vermicompost cost(Rs.)
Yield (q)
N(kg) P(kg)
K(kg)
A. 22.19 27.3 0 622.77 4.03
B 5.19 8.3 0 130 6.50 390 5.29
Actual Increase / Decrease
-16.9 -18.6 -0 -492.77 +1.26
Increase / Decrease (%)
-76.5 -69.6 -0 -79.13 +31.27
44
Table 4: Oilseeds
N=22
(acres)
Chemical fertilizer (qty) Chemical fertilizers cost (Rs.)
Vermicompost quantity (q)
*Vermicompost cost(Rs.)
Yield (q)
N(kg) P(kg)
K(kg)
A. 27.60 18.6 14.79 550.43 2.54
B 2.52 1.05 0 44.55 6.52 391.2 4.21
Actual Increase / Decrease
-25.08 -17.5 -14.79 -505.88 +1.67
Increase / Decrease (%)
-90.87 -94.4 -100 -91.91 +65.74
Table 5: Commercial crops
N=14
(acres)
Chemical fertilizer (qty) Chemical fertilizers cost (Rs.)
Vermicompost quantity (q)
*Vermicompost cost(Rs.)
Yield (q)
N(kg) P(kg) K(kg)
A. 130.5 104.5 87.86 3797.66 40.60
B 19.3 21.3 22.61 730.36 13.20 792 46.60
Actual Increase / Decrease
-110.7 -83.42 -65.25 -3067.3 +6.00
Increase / Decrease (%)
-84.83 -79.79 -74.27 -80.77 +14.78
45
Table 6: Fruit crops
N=06
(acres)
Chemical fertilizer (qty) Chemical fertilizers cost (Rs.)
Vermicompost quantity (q)
*Vermicompost cost(Rs.)
Yield (q)
N(kg) P(kg) K(kg)
A. 42.89 51.58 40.74 2335 90.83
B 19.08 17.25 19.50 962.08 4.63 277.8 83.67
Actual Increase / Decrease
-23.81 -34.33 -21.24 -1372.92 -7.16
Increase / Decrease (%)
-55.51 -66.56 -52.14 -58.80 -7.88
Table 7: Vegetables
N=06
(acres)
Chemical fertilizer (qty) Chemical fertilizers cost (Rs.)
Vermicompost quantity (q)
*Vermicompost cost(Rs.)
Yield (q)
N(kg) P(kg) K(kg)
A. 46.33 24.55 9.20 1135.42 34.33
B 10.47 8.25 4.92 327.08 6.5 390 40.21
Actual Increase / Decrease
-35.86 -16.3 -4.28 -808.34 +5.88
Increase / Decrease (%)
-77.40 -66.40 -46.52 -71.19 +17.13
46
Table 8: All Rainfed crops
N=34
(acres)
Chemical fertilizer (qty) Chemical fertilizers cost (Rs.)
Vermicompost quantity (q)
*Vermicompost cost(Rs.)
Yield (q)
N(kg) P(kg) K(kg)
A. 21.86 17.60 7.70 537.47 2.92
B 0.68 0.11 0.11 8.24 3.73
Actual Increase / Decrease
-21.18 -17.49 -7.59 -529.23 6.98 418.8 +0.81
Increase / Decrease (%)
-96.89 -99.38 -98.57 -98.47 +27.74
Table 9: All Irrigated crops
N=47
(acres)
Chemical fertilizer (qty) Chemical fertilizers cost (Rs.)
Vermicompost quantity (q)
*Vermicompost cost(Rs.)
Yield (q)
N(kg) P(kg) K(kg)
A. 63.99 66.34 50.76 2097.03 - 36.81
B 16.60 13.76 11.19 623.47 7.74 464.4 48.77
Actual Increase / Decrease
-47.39 -52.58 -39.57 -1473.56 +11.96
Increase / Decrease (%)
-74.06 -79.26 -77.96 70.27 +25.45
47
Results:
1) Use of vermicompost has reduced the use of chemical fertilizer by 80 per cent
2) Farmers spending on fertilizer have been reduced upto 75 %
3) The average yield has increased from 14-65 %
4) Per cent decrease in chemical fertilizers use is more in oilseeds (95%) followed by cereals
(89 %) , commercial crops (80%), pulses (70%), vegetables (63%) and fruit crops(58%)
5) Per cent yield is more in oilseeds (65%), followed by pulses (31 %) , cereals (30%),
vegetables (17%) and commercial crops (14%),
6) Reduction in use of chemical fertilizer is more in rainfed (98%) compared to irrigated
(76%)
7) Per cent increase in yield is high in both rainfed (28%) and irrigated (25.45%)
48
2005-06
1. Impact of Vermicompost production training programmes
A total of 60 trained and 60 untrained respondents were selected from six villages viz.,
Yarnal, Utnal, Telgi, Akalwadi, Mangooli and Tikota. From each village there were 10 trained
and 10 untrained respondents.
RESULTS:
KNOWLEDGE OF TRAINED AND UNTRAINED FARMERS REGARDING
INDIVIDUAL ASPECTS OF VERMICOMPOST
Regarding the statement that use of vermicompost improves soil structure and texture,
soil aeration and soil microbial activity was perceived correctly by 90.00 per cent of trained and
36.67 per cent of untrained farmers. While, 86.67 per cent and 28.33 per cent of trained and
untrained farmers respectively had correct knowledge that use of vermicompost increase water
percolation in soil to deeper layers and reduce the incidence of moisture stress to crops.
S. No. Statement
Trained farmers
n=60
Un untrained farmers n=60
F % F %
1. Use of vermicompost improves
a. Soil structure and texture 0 0.00 0 0.00
b. Soil aeration 6 10.00 37 61.67
c. Soil microbial activity 0 0.00 1 1.67
d. All 54 90.00 22 36.67
2. Use of vermicompost increase
a. Water percolation in soil to deeper layer 1 1.67 0 0.00
b. Reduces the incidence of moisture stress to the crop
7 11.67 37 61.67
c. Both 52 86.67 17 28.33
d. None of these 0 0.00 3 5.00
49
Majority of trained farmers (70.00%) and only 16.67 per cent of untrained farmers
perceived correctly that use of vermicompost loosen the soil there by increase availability of
water to the crop and easy movement of air in the soil. While, 65.00 per cent and 13.33 per cent
of trained and untrained farmers respectively had correct knowledge that use of vermicompost
improves availability of micro and major nutrients to the crop.
Sl. S. No.
Statement Trained farmers
n=60
un trained farmers
n=60 F % F %
1. Use of vermicompost loosen the soil there by
a. Increase availability of water to the crop
4 6.67 0 0.00
b. Easy movement of air in the soil 14 23.33 48 80.00
c. Both 42 70.00 10 16.67
d. None of these 0 0.00 2 3.33
2. Vermicompost will improve availability of
a. Micronutrients 21 35.00 43 71.67
b. Only major nutrients 0 0.00 9 15.00
c. Both 39 65.00 6 13.13
Regarding suitability of vermicompost to different types of soil 68.33 per cent and 43.33
per cent of trained and untrained farmers exhibited correct knowledge. While, utility of
vermicompost to all types of crops, seasons and types of soil was perceived correctly by 66.67
per cent of trained farmers and 40.00 per cent untrained farmers.
Sl.
No. Statement Trained
farmers n=60
Untrained farmers
n=60 F % F %
1. Vermicompost is suitable to
a. Only red soil 4 6.67 0 0.00
b. Only black soil 15 25.00 34 56.67
50
c. All types of soils 41 68.33 26 43.37
2. Vermicompost can be used in
a. Selected crop only 20 33.33 26 43.33
b. Only in kharif or rabi season 0 0.00 10 16.67
c. All crops and all season 40 66.67 24 40.00
Regarding effectiveness of vermicompost over farm yard manure 76.67 per cent of
trained farmers and 35.00 per cent of untrained farmers had correct knowledge that it is twice
effective than farm yard manure. While, cent per cent of trained farmers and 71.67 per cent of
untrained farmers perceived that moisture retention capacity of vermicompost is three times
more than the soil.
S. No.
Statement Trained farmers
n=60
Untrained farmers
n=60 F % F %
1. Vermicompost is effective than FYM
a. Two times 46 76.67 21 35.00
b. Four times 14 23.33 28 46.67
c. 10 times 0 0.00 6 10.00
d. 4-10 time 0 0.00 5 8.33
2. Moisture retension capacity of vermicompost is _____ time more than the soil
a. 1 time 0 0.00 6 10.00
b. 10 times 0 0.00 11 18.33
c. 100 times 0 0.00 0 0.00
3 times 60 100.00 43 71.67
51
A high majority of trained (96.67%) and only 1.67 per cent obtained farmers had correct
knowledge that use of vermicompost increase the crop resistance to pest and disease. While, cent
per cent of trained farmers and 81.67 per cent of untrained farmers perceived that use of
vermicompost increases shelf life of flowers, fruits, vegetables and grains.
Sl.
No.
Statement Trained farmers n=60
Untrained farmers
n=60
F % F %
1. Use of vermicompost helps to
a. Increase the crop resistance to pest and disease
58 96.67 1 1.67
b. No No change 2 3.33 19 31.67
c. Decrease the crop resistance to pest and disease
0 0.00 0 0.00
d. No idea 0 0.00 40 66.67
2. Shelf life of flowers, fruits, vegetables and grains
a. Increases with use of vermicompost
60 100.00 49 81.67
b. Decreases with use of vermicompost
0 0.00 0 0.00
c. No change 0 0.00 0 0.00
d. No idea 0 0.00 11 18.33
Knowledge about techniques of vermicomposting and its sub aspects.
Regarding pit size (10 x 1 x 0.3 mt3), cent per cent of trained farmers and 36.67 per cent
of untrained farmers had correct knowledge. While, 53.33 per cent and 15.00 per cent of trained
and untrained farmers respectively had correct knowledge about preparation of pit (above ground
and below ground).
Sl. No.
Statement Trained farmers
n=60
Untrained farmers
n=60 F % F %
1. Pit size should be
a. 10 x 1 x 0.3 mt 60 100.00 22 36.67
52
b. 10 x 10 x 2 mt 0 0.00 24 40.00
c. 10 x 2 x 2 mts 0 0.00 11 18.33
d. None of these 0 0.00 3 5.00
2. Pit can be made
a. Only above the ground 3 5.00 11 18.33
b. Only below the ground 25 41.67 40 66.67
c. Both 32 53.33 9 15.00
Regarding pit filling operation 96.67 per cent and 26.67 per cent of trained farmers and
untrained farmers had correct knowledge that it should be filled after one week of pit formation.
While, 66.67 per cent of trained and 60.00 per cent of untrained farmers had correct knowledge
about raw materials used for filling the pit.
Sl. No.
Statement Trained farmers
n=60
Untrained farmers n=60
F % F %
1. The pit should be filled
a. 15 days after pit formation 2 3.33 4 6.67
b. One week after pit formation 58 96.67 16 26.67
c. Immediately after pit formation 0 0.00 7 11.67
d. No idea 0 0.00 33 55.00
2. Materials used for filling up of pits
a. Any agriculture wastes 20 33.33 22 36.67
b. Waste paper and plastics 0 0.00 0 0.00
c. Only crop residues 0 0.00 2 3.33
d. A and C 40 66.67 36 60.00
53
Cent per cent of trained and three fourth (75.00%) of untrained farmers had correct
knowledge of filling pit layer wise. While, 98.33 per cent and only 26.67 per cent of trained and
untrained farmers respectively had correct knowledge regarding release of worms in to the pit
i.e., 7 days after filling the pit.
Sl. No.
Statement Trained farmers
n=60
Untrained farmers n=60
F % F %
1. Pits can be filled
a. As per convenience 0 0.00 7 11.67
b. Layer wise 60 100.00 45 75.00
c. There is no definite procedure 0 0.00 0 0.00
d. No idea 0 0.00 8 13.33
2. Worms are released to pit
a. Immediately after filling the pit 0 0.00 32 53.33
b. 7 days after filling the pit 59 98.33 16 26.67
c. 15 days after filling the pit 0 0.00 0 0.00
d. After decomposed matter 1 1.67 12 20.00
Regarding watering of pit 98.33 per cent of trained and 38.33 per cent of untrained
farmers had correct knowledge (based on optimum moisture level).
Regarding vermiwash preparation 90.00 per cent of trained farmers had correct
knowledge.
Sl. No.
Statement Trained farmers
n=60
Untrained farmers
n=60 F % F %
Do you know preparation of vermiwash
a. Yes 54 90.00 0 0.00
b. No 6 10.00 60 100.00
54
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELECTED INDEPENDENT VARIABLES WITH
KNOWLEDGE
The data revealed that there was a positive and significant relationship between
knowledge of trained and untrained farmers with independent variables viz., education, extension
participation and mass media participation. Further, it was observed that variables
cosmopoliteness, innovativeness and scientific orientation had positive and significant
relationship with knowledge level of trained farmers. All other variables exhibited non-
significant relationship with knowledge level.
Independent variables Pearson Correlation
coefficient ‘r’ value
Pearson Correlation coefficient ‘r’
value
Trained n=60 Untrained n=60
Age 0.030 NS 0.116 NS
Education 0.275* 0.276*
Land holding 0.046 NS 0.006 NS
Annual income 0.067 NS 0.030 NS
Extension participation 0.665** 0.326*
Mass media participation
0.328* 0.339**
Cosmopoliteness 0.262* 0.057 NS
Innovativeness 0.274* 0.101NS
Risk orientation 0.143NS 0.072NS
Scientific orientation 0.326* 0.094 NS
** - Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level , * - Correlation is significant at 0.05 level NS – Non significant
55
OVERALL ADOPTION LEVEL OF THE TRAINED FARMERS REGARDING
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES OF VERMICOMPOST
The data revealed that 45.00 per cent of trained respondents belonged to high adoption
level category while 40.00 per cent trained respondents belonged to medium adoption level
whereas 15.00 per cent of the trained respondents had low adoption level.
Sl. NO. Categories F %
Low (Mean- 0.425SD) 9 15.00
Medium (Mean + 0.425SD) 24 40.00
High (Mean + 0.425SD) 27 45.00
Mean 5.93
SD 1.80
56
ADOPTION PATTERN OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICES OF VERMICOMPOST BY
THE TRAINED FARMERS
The adoption pattern of vermicompost by the respondents regarding individual aspects of
vermicompost.
Cent per cent of the respondents fully adopted recommended practices of
vermicomposting with respect to materials used for pit construction, pit position, time of filling
the pit after treatment, raw material used for filling the pit, sequential method of filling the pit
and its harvest. While, 96.67 per cent considered recommended points for selection of site, 95.00
per cent fully adopted method of harvesting, 93.33 per cent left the worms to the pit, 90.00 per
cent followed pit size , 80.00 per cent followed method of watering and 16.67 per cent treated
the pit before filling with chemical dose as recommended.
Sl. No. Statements
Trained (n-60)
Fully adopted Partially adopted
Not adopted
1. Points considered for selection of site
3.33 96.67 0.00
2. Pit size (10 x 1 x 0.3 mts) 10.00 90.00 0.00
3. Materials used for pit construction 100.00 0.00 0.00
4. Pit position : Below the ground/ above the ground
100.00 0.00 0.00
5. Raw materials used for filling the pit
100.00 0.00 0.00
6. Sequential method of filling the pit as per the procedure
100.00 0.00 0.00
7. Leaving the worms to the pit 7.66 93.33 0.00
8. Method of watering 20.00 80.00 0.00
9. Harvesting of vermicompost 100.00 0.00 0.00
10. Method of harvesting 5.00 95.00 0.00
57
CONSTRAINTS FACED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN ADOPTION OF
VERMICOMPOST PRACTICES
The data revealed that cent per cent of the respondents expressed unavailability of
sufficient raw material as major constraint followed by lack of handling skills in use of
vermiwash (71.67%) and financial problems to expand vermicompost enterprise (66.67%).
Sl. No. Constraints Trained (n-60)
F %
1. Unavailability of sufficient raw material for making vermicompost
60 100.00
2. Lack of handling skills in use of vermiwash 43 71.67
3. Financial problem to expand vermicompost enterprise 40 66.67
II. Impact of Frontline Demonstrations
a) Popularization of Improved varieties
1) Groundnut: The new variety of groundnut GPBD-4 was introduced into different villages
along the Krishna river belt in the summer seasons of 2005-06 and 2006-07, 2007-08 &2008-09.
The acceptance of this variety is highly encouraging. In the year 2009-10, the area under this
variety was more than 400 ha.
2) Pigeonpea: Farmers of Indi and Sindagi talukas of this district have been growing Maruthi
and local varieties of redgram. These varieties are not responsive to high moisture. The Asha
variety which not only responds to moisture but is also resistant to wilt and sterility mosaic
disease. This variety was demonstrated in the year 2005-06 and 2006-07. This variety had
occupied more than 800 ha in 2009-10.
3) Sorghum: Bijapur is considered as rabi sorghum bowl of Karnataka and M 35-1 is important
variety grown the region. This variety is round seeded bold, lustrous and tolerant to drought and
shoot fly. However it is non responsive to moisture and susceptible to lodging and charcoal rot.
In this direction, KVK, Bijapur through many training programmes, personal discussion and
FLDS combined, made a good number of farmers having deep black soil to raise this new variety
DSV 5. The area under this variety was about 100 ha.
58
4) Cotton hybrid : RCH-2 (Bt-cotton) was demonstrated in area of 25 acres in chikkarugi and
Golasar villages of Sindagi and Indi talukas, respectively in 2006-07 to 2009-10 .The
performance of this hybrid was highly encouraging and it out yielded the non-Bt hybrid by
nearly 20 percent coupled with about 22 percent reduction in cost of cultivation. Net returns per
hectare obtained with demonstration and local check were Rs 19,740/- and Rs 8010/-
respectively. The additional net returns with this Bt cotton hybrid is Rs-11730/- ha.
The field day was attended by more than 200 farmers and they were convinced about the
superiority of this technology (RCH-2). During this year the area under said hybrid is about 1200
ha with expected additional returns of Rs.14,76,000/-
b) Insitu Moisture conservation in sunflower
A significant impact of KVK activities is seen in the field of moisture conservation.
Sunflower crop being highly exhaustive crop, it loves moisture. Due to uneven and erratic nature
of rainfall, it suffers heavily. In order to combat this problem wider row spacing (120 cm
interrow) was demonstrated. This technology helps in conservation of moisture as it enables
farmer to take up repeated inter cultivation. This repeated intercultivation helps in conservation
of moisture as it fills the cracks. Besides moisture conservation wider row spacing facilitates the
farmer to collect the mass of eggs laid on leaves by Black headed hairy caterpillar. The impact of
concerted efforts made by KVK in the form of training programme and FLD have been paying
dividends and this technology was adopted in 1200 ha in B. Bagewadi taluka.
59
2007-08
10.C. Success Stories / Case studies
Wealth from waste: Smt. Shantabai C. Ambali
Smt. Shantabai C. Ambali belongs to Harnal village, Sindagi taluk, Bijapur district. She
being basically from agriculture background, has completed her S.S.L.C. She owns 7 acres of
irrigated land. Sugarcane, pomegranate, maize, cotton etc are being cultivated in this land.
Earlier, only inorganic fertilizers were being used continuously for these crops. The continuous
use of these inorganic has decreased the yield instead of increasing.
She got detail information about the establishment and use of vermicompost when she
attended the agriculture trainings in the year 2005-06. She went back to her village and
established ten pits of 33 ft length, 4 ft width and 1.5 ft depth and started production of
vermicompost. For the production of vermicompost, the agricultural waste from her field was
utilized and produced 56t of vermicompost worth of Rs. 1.12 lakh . In the year 2005-06, she took
loan of 2.5 lakh from Syndicate bank and started the production on a larger scale with 25
vermicompost pits with 100 tonnes of vermicompost.In 2007-08 about 200 ton of vermicompost
is produced from same unit & she got Rs. 7.0 lakh profit and is subsequent year, she started
enriching the vermicompost with neem cake and getting profit of Rs. 10 lakh per annuam from
2009-10 onwards . she has started selling the vermicompost in the name of Indian organic
fertilizer and her receipt per Annam is 10 lakh . there is proverb is that if a man is educated , he
educates himself, Whereas a women is educated she educates the whole family / community.
The farmers and farm women from neighbouring villages are visiting this larger unit.
Many of them have already started producing vermicompost by seeing this unit.
There is a famous saying that “If man is educated, he educates himself whereas a
women is educated, she educates the whole family” and hence she has become a good example
for others.
60
Tailoring makes a family’s life : Smt. Vimala A. Chikkalki
Smt. Vimala A. Chikkalki belongs to Hitanalli village of Bijpaur district. She has
completed her education upto 9th standard and engaged in household activities. The spare time
left after her routine work was being wasted without any constructive work. The financial status
of her family was also poor. She read the information about the trainings being conducted in
Krishi Vigyan Kendra in newspapers and collected detailed information about it by approaching
the KVK. She took training in tailoring as she was interested in it. She purchased one sewing
machine with her own money and started the business on a smaller scale. She is getting monthly
income of Rs.2500/- . From this income, she has purchased two more sewing machines. She has
formed a batch of 10 girls and started giving training to them in her own village. She collects
100/- fees from each of them. Apart from making other girls self-dependent, there is also an
increase in her own income. This has also helped in providing good education to her children.
She is educating her son in a residential school. She has made insurance policies in the name of
her three children through the income that she has generated from tailoring. Overall from this
enterprise, her quality of life has improved in a span of one year and is leading a successful life.
Candle light brightens the life : Smt. Renuka Talwar
Smt. Renuka Talwar is a resident of Muddebihal, Bijapur district. After the death of her
husband, she was working as a farm labour. She has two daughters. Therefore, with an idea to
start an enterprise at home itself, she joined a self-help group. She was given training on candle
making at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bijapur. After the training, she was given candle mould by
Department of Agriculture. She has started her business on a small scale by preparing 150-200
candles of one and five rupee and marketing locally. She is earning a net profit of Rs. 80/- to
100/- per day. She is saving an amount of Rs. 1500/- to 2000/- monthly in a bank. This saved
amount has helped her to some extent in getting her elder daughter married.
61
Popularization of value added Sorghum products
Will Sorghum flakes be a boon to Sorghum growers?
Rabi sorghum is an important crop of the district and is being grown in more than 2.0
lakh hectares of agricultural land. Due to less income from this crop, alternate utility i.e value
addition to this crop was explored. In order to add value to sorghum an entrepreneur by name
Smt. Shobhalaxmi Tarase was identified. Till today she was producing only rice, maize and ragi
flakes. Since Sorghum is readily available in Bijapur district, she was motivated to prepare flakes
out of it. She being highly creative and having inclination to bring about change, readily agreed
to prepare sorghum flakes.
She was briefed about the quality characteristics of four special varieties of sorghum viz.,
Maldandi, Kempu jola (Atharga red), Kagimoti (Pop sorghum) and Sakkri mukkri. The samples
of these variety were provided to her to prepare flakes. The flakes prepared out of these four
varieties were organoleptically evaluated at Krishi Vigyan Kendra in collaboration with
Sorghum improvement project scientists. The results revealed that good quality flakes can be
produced from Maldandi and Kempu jola varieties and was also accepted by the consumers.
Realizing the profit that can be obtained from these flakes, she produced it in larger quantity and
marketed it locally. She has earned net profit of Rs. 7500/- from 5.40 q of Atharga red sorghum
flakes. There is greater demand for these flakes due to its natural red colour, crispiness and taste.
Based on this, she prepared flakes out of 10 q of Maldandi and has earned net profit of Rs.
6000/-. Sample of these have been sent to Bangalore and Tanjavur and reply is awaited.
Rice flakes are being normally consumed in Northern Karnataka. But from nutritional
point of view and quality, sorghum flakes are superior to rice and there are hopes that it will
establish its demand in food processing industry. This inturn may change the future of sorghum
growing farmers.
62
2008-09 Success Stories
Nandabasappa S. Choudhary – an organic farmer
Shri.NandaBasappa Choudhary of Baluti was one of the participating farmer of Front
Line Demonstration’s conducted on groundnut and onion in he year 2005-06. With this link, he
attended training programme on production of vermicompost in the year 2005-06. This inspired
him to take up organic farming as the soils of his field had become infertile due to continuous
usage of inorganic fertilizers and pesticides. After attending the training on vermicompost
production he started his own vermicompost production. Now he has 20 vermicompost pits with
annual production of 100 tons of vermicompost and 5 quintals of worms. He also has vermiwash
production unit in his field. He owns 80 acres of agricultural land and has adopted organic
farming in his field. He has large area under sugarcane which is being grown by using
vermicompost and residue incorporation without any fertilizers. The productivity of sugarcane is
very high as he has followed paired row method of cultivation where pest infestation particularly
wooly aphid is very low. He is also growing horticultural crops like banana, lime, mango, betel
vine and arecanut. He has small area under mulberry plantation and in the remaining area he is
cultivating crops like maize and onion.
He uses the vermicompost produced in his unit along with vermiwash for cultivation of
crops and for protection of crops from pest and diseases. In addition to vermiwash he uses plant
extract for plant protection.
In order to support large scale vermicompost production he has 19 animals in addition to
the farm waste available. The dung and urine collected goes to vermicompost via bio- gas plants,
he owns In this manner, Mr.Nand Basappa Choudhary is earning nearly 32 lakhs every year
from his lands by following organic farming and integrated farming system.
I. Impact of Frontline Demonstrations
1) Onion: Onion is grown in Bijapur though out the year and popular varieties are Telagi Red
and Pursangi which are local with low yields and low keeping quality. KVK, Bijapur along with
NHRDF, Hubli through many training programmes, personal discussion and FLDS combined,
made a good number of farmers to grow new variety Agri Found Light Red having good keeping
quality and high yields. The area under this variety is now about 80 ha.
63
2009-10
11.C. Details of impact analysis of KVK activities carried out during the reporting period
IMPACT OF FRONTLINE DEMONSTRATIONS
1) Cotton: In cotton, bollworm is an important insect pest. In order to combat the bollworm
menace Bt cotton genotypes were demonstrated in the year 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09. The
area under Bt cotton was 5553 ha in 2009-10.
2) Sorghum: Bijapur is considered as rabi sorghum bowl of Karnataka and M 35-1 is important
variety grown in this region. This variety is round seeded, bold, lustrous and tolerant to drought
and shoot fly. However it is non responsive to moisture and susceptible to lodging and charcoal
rot. In this direction, KVK, Bijapur through many training programmes, personal discussion and
FLDs combined, made a good number of farmers having deep black soil to raise this new variety
CSV 22 (07-08, 08-09). This variety has crossed 600 ha in 2008-09.
3) Pomegranate: Pomegranate is one of the important fruit crop of the district with high returns
per unit area. This crop is facing a threat in the form of bacterial blight. For effective
management of this problem, technology was transferred to farmers through trainings (61
programmes, 741 participants) and front line demonstrations (2007-08 and 2008-09). This
technology was adopted in the area to extent of 480ha in 2008-09.
64
(iv) Write large scale adoption of technologies documented in detail in each year
(2005-06 to 2009-10)
Year- 2005-06
Cases of large scale adoption
Sunflower is a very important oil seed crop of Bijapur district. This crop is being
cultivated in all the seasons under rainfed and irrigated situations. The area under this crop
varies from 1.5 lakh ha. to 2.0 lakh ha. from year to year. Of this total area nearly 90 per cent
will be under rainfed. The major constraint for raising this crop under rainfed situations is
moisture. Keeping this constraint in mind, the wider row (120 cm) technology was demonstrated
in Bijapur and B. Bagewadi talukas. In the demonstrations the results were very encouraging
and the yield increase was upto 60.0 per cent as the rainfall was deficit since last five years. This
technology has impressed the farmers and has been adopted by in an area of nearly 1200 ha. in
B. Bagewadi taluka during this year.
2006-07
Cases of large scale adoption
1) Training Programme on Pomegranate
Pomegranate is considered as an ideal crop of this region because of its drought tolerance
nature (Suitability, nutritional values and scope for export) However the crop faced a severe
problem of bacterial blight during the year 2002-03. Farmers even could not get the cost of
cultivation. The University of Agricultural Sciences, Bijapur campus developed package for the
management of this disease and several trainings (61 trainings with 741 participants) and
awareness programmes were organized about the disease management. Many farmers not only
from this district even from other states have accepted this technology. As a result of training on
production technology with emphasis on high quality fruit production 500 tonnes of fruits were
exported in the year 2006-07.
2. Impact of training Programme on Pomegranate
Good number of trainings (71 trainings with 741 participants) and awareness
programmes were organized about the disease management. Many farmers not only from this
district even from other states have accepted this technology.
65
Knowledge Level of Farmers in Management of Bacterial Blight in Pomegranate
A study was undertaken with sample size of 50 trained farmers to asses their knowledge
level of bacterial blight management in pomegranate. In this study, cent percent of the
respondents had correct knowledge that oily spots appears during cloudy weather or at the time
of drizzling. Majority of farmers had knowledge on bacterial blight that the affected plants
should be removed and burnt (96.00%), application of Bordeaux mixture 1% before pruning, and
disinfection of secature and spray of ethrel for defoliation was known to 92 per cent of them. A
great majority of farmers had knowledge on fortnightly sprays of Blitox with streptocycline and
spray of micro nutrients like boron, zinc sulphate, magnesium sulphate and calcium nitrate
(88%) and 84% of them expected subsidy to be given by the Government. While less than 30 per
cent of farmers had knowledge of different crop seasons to control the blight (32%), after
pruning affected branches are pasted with 1% Bordeaux mixture (36%).
Table : Specific knowledge of farmers on bacterial blight management pomegranate N=50
Sl.No Specific Knowledge No. Percent
1. Application of BM 1% before pruning 46 92.00
2. Disinfections of secature with sodium hypochlorite 20ml / lit
46 92.00
3. Disinfecting soil with bleaching powder 40 80.00
4. Spray of ethrel for defoliation 46 92.00
5. Season of cropping to over come bacterial blight in Pomegranate
Mrig Bahar June-July
Hasta Bahar Sept-Oct
Ambe-Bahar Jan-Feb
16 32.00
6. Pruned twings and defoliated leaves are collected and burnt
36 72.00
7. After copper oxy chloride + streptocycline spray of micronutrients like boron, zinc sulphate magnesium sulphate and calcium nitrate
44 88.00
8. Supply of antibiotic by dept. of horticulture at subsidized rate
0 00.00
66
9. The oily spot will come during cloudy weather at the time of drizzling
50 100.00
10. Do you except GOK to give subsidy on par with Government of Maharashtra
42 84.00
11. After pruning, the disease affected branches are pasted with 1% BM
18 36.00
12. Pasting of Red oxide+blitox+ carbaryl + Nuvan 34 68.00
13. Taking up fortnightly 3 sprays of Blitox Streptocycline 44 88.00
14. As 4th spray do you spray only streptocycline 36 72.00
15. Giving sufficient rest to the plants and spraying 1% BM during rest period with 1 month gap
40 80.00
16. Streptocycline is better than bacterinashak 34 68.00
17. Anti biotic alone is better 16 32.00
18. Antibiotic with COC is better 32 64.00
19. Oily spot appeared fruits are removed and burnt 48 96.00
20. Application of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas to soils 24 48.00
2) Training Programme on grape
Grape is being marketed in fresh as well as dehydrated form. Even with dual way of
marketing there used to be price crash. Hence , effort was made to train the farmers with respect
to production of high quality fruits. Since last two years grape is being exported and nearly 300
tonnes of grapes exported in the year 2006-07.
2007-08: Nil
2008-09 : Nil
E. Details on extension activities
E.1. Extension activities undertaken
Name of programme
No. of activities (NA) and participants (F: farmers and EO: Extension Officials) 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
NA F EO NA F EO NA F E O
NA F EO NA F EO NA F EO
Field Day 9 451 42 6 409 12 6 455 7 261 20 7 595 18 35 2171 477 Kisan Mela 4 4980 62 5 679 3 4680 34 3 5200 57 15 15539 153 Kisan Ghosthi 1 679 3 4680 34 3 5200 57 15 15539 153 Exhibition 2 5,00,000 2 450000 490 4 485000 3 450000 3 450000 14 2335000 490 Film Show 4 313 20 4 333 5 313 3 8 371 10 21 1330 33 Method Demonstrations
1 30 2 1 32 3 2 3 60 2 8 182 6
Farmers Seminar 1 110 3 1 116 2 110 7 2 121 9 6 457 19 Workshop 1 127 5 3 25 10 Group meetings 28 930 23 564 25 775 29 564 2 32 644 6 137 3477 15 Lectures delivered as resource persons
10 250 5 22 305 10 250 8 24 570 15 66 1375 28
Pamphlets 6 2 6 5 12 31 Scientific visit to farmers field
114 142 4 130 146 114 142 49 80 438 430 53
Farmers visit to KVK
198 192 6 119 198 198 192 232 192 747 774 6
Diagnostic visits 6 22 2 12 22 6 22 8 12 22 8 36 88 18 Exposure visits 3 68 - 3 68 3 68 19 2 40 40 11 244 59 Soil health Camp 2 121 5 2 4 121 5 Self Help Group Conveners meetings
6 120 6 2 128 8 248 6
Celebration of important days (specify)
2 132 6 2 155 2 422 28 2 92 8 801 34
68
Newspaper coverage
7 41 25 41 36 150
Radio talks Radio coverage’s
6 6 8 06 26
TV talks 7 13 6 4 06 36 Popular articles 7 15 13 16 10 61 Any Other (Specify)
E.2. Technology Week Observation during 2009-10
Period of observing Technology Week: From 02.01.10 to 6, January 2010
Types of Activities Number of activities Number of Farmers utilized the activities
Demonstration plots laid inside KVK campus 05 9780
Extension Activities 571 40490
Literature provided (No.) 100 50000
Total 1005 14780
69
F. Status of research-extension linkages at district level
Indicators Explain how involvement taken place What kind of mechanism exists for local coordination of the frontline extension demonstrations between the KVKs and state government
In a cluster of village when KVK activities are planned the local agricultural Assistant is involved in selection of farmers and ADA, AO’s , AA’s will always invited to visit the FLD’s plots during training and field days .
What is the frequency of local manangment committee/scientific advisory committee meeting of KVK during last 5 years
Twice a year
No. of monthly workshops organized/participated Bimonthly workshops will be attended regularly and delivered guest lectures on ICM in seasonal crops
Frequency and number of staff participated in seminars at zonal, state and national levels
Staff will be participated in various all related seminars/ workshops
Whether the local NGOs are involved in KVKs programmes, if yes how many and what frequency
Yes, 6 NGOs covered during training /FLDs implementation
Whether the local mahila mandal or farm science clubs are promoted and have become visible intheir activities. If yeas how many and what frequency
Three VVV clubs – FLD/ Trainings will be conducted in collaboration with there clubs
A brief about the extent of contribution of the officials of various line departments and joint programmes undertaken.
KSDA(60%) & KSDH(5%) officials are involved in implementation of FLDs and during training
70
G. Production and supply of technological products
Category 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 Total
Quantity
Value (Rs.)
No. of
farmers
Quantity
Value (Rs.)
No. of
farmers
Quantity
Value (Rs.)
No. of
farmers
Quantity
Value (Rs.)
No. of
farmers
Quantity
Value (Rs.)
No. of
farmers
Quantity
Value (Rs.)
No. of
farmers
Seed Materials -Varieties (Quintal)
- -
Greengram (S-4)
- - 1.95 7020 1.95 7020 20
Redgram (BSMR-736)
- - 7.56 18900 7.56 18900 100
Blackgram ( )
- - 0.30 1320 0.3 1320 2
Bengalgram (GBS-964)
15.48 53784 18.97 85365 34.45 85365 120
Sorghum (M-35-1) 18.86 32256 18 32256 90
Bio Products (Quintal)
76.96 230800 800 112.9 338700 5600 116.9 350700 3800 75.5 226500 4000 113.4 340200 3750 495.6 1486800
71
H. Impact of KVK on farming population (Questions in the following table may be administered to selected five farmers from the adopted villages and another five from non-adopted villages and appended with the report)
(i) General information
Name and address of farmer Laxman Gotyal, Atarga, Tq: Indi Dist:
Bijapur
Enterprises being practiced Horticulture and Agriculture
Enlist improved technologies being adopted
under different enterprises
Horticulture: Pomegranate Bacterial blight
management
Custard Apple: Introduction of new variety
Arka sahana
Ber: Nutrient management and powdery
mildew management
Lime: Canker and mite management
Agriculture: Maize: Nutrient management
Wheat: Introduction of new variety-DWR-225
Sorghum: Introduction of new variety-CSV-22
Redgram: Introduction of new variety-TS-3R
Bengalgram: IPM
When were these improved technologies
received by you (farmer) and from where?
Since from 2005-06 from Krishi Vigyan
Kendra, RARS, Bijapur
(ii) Enlist 10 latest technologies which have been received from the KVK to your village and furnish information on the following
Sl. No Name of the technology Extent of adoption (% approximately)
Reasons for formal adoption
1 Pomegranate Bacterial blight management
85 better management of disease
2 Introduction of new variety Arka sahana
25 Difficult in seedling transport
3 Nutrient management and powdery mildew management in ber
70 With better management of disease more returns
72
4 Canker and mite management 80 With better management of disease quality fruits produced hence more returns
5 Introduction of Bt cotton 90 No bollworm damage and higher returns
6 Introduction of new variety-DWR-225
65 Better management of rust & higher yield
7 Introduction of new variety-CSV-22
60 More yields , highly responsive to moisture
8 Introduction of new variety-TS-3R 85 Less wilt, less podborer damage resulted in higher hence more yields and high returns
9 IPM in bengalgram 55 Less plant protection cost hence more net returns
10 Nutrient management in Maize 80 With better nutrient management, more yields
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
KVK should approach the farmers groups growing particular crop rather than conducting group meeting with village leaders because leaders may influence to include particular farmer who may not at all interested
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
Conducting local need bared research , demonstration training to farmers, field visits etc
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
KVK should take up more of FLD because doing is beliving
Any other comments on the KVK Staff in the KVK is less to all the times they can’t go district end to transfer the technologies.
73
(i) General information
2. Name and address of farmer Ashokgouda Patil, Bommanahalli Tq: Basavana bagewadi Dist: Bijapur
Enterprises being practiced Dryland Agriculture Enlist improved technologies being adopted under different enterprises
Agriculture: Sunflower Powdery mildew management Greengram, Selection-4, Onion-arka kalyan , Bengalgram – JG-11 , GBS-94 Sorghum: Introduction of new variety-CSV-22
When were these improved technologies received by you (farmer) and from where?
Since from 2007-08 from Krishi Vigyan Kendra, RARS, Bijapur
(ii) Enlist 10 latest technologies which have been received from the KVK to your village and furnish information on the following
Sl. No Name of the technology Extent of adoption (% approximately)
Reasons for formal adoption
1 Moisture and powdery mildew management in sunflower
65 better management of moisture and disease
2 Introduction of new variety-CSV-22
60 More yields as due to nonlodging quality grains produced
3 Bengalgram JG-11 75 Uniform size grains, less wilt & higher yield
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
The group meeting should be conducted during summer months only, seeds should be supplied well in advance to the farmers
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
Conducting FLD, training to farmers, diagnostic field visits etc
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
More no of programmes like krishi utsav should be done and Hobli level worker is needed to support KVK technical staff , KVK staff seems to be burden by too many commitments
Any other comments on the KVK -
74
(i) General information
3. Name and address of farmer Shri. Somangouda Patil Kadalewad Tq: sindagi Dist: Bijapur
Enterprises being practiced Dryland Agriculture Enlist improved technologies being adopted under different enterprises
Agriculture: Sunflower Powdery mildew management, Redgram – IPM Sorghum: Introduction of new variety-CSV-22 Cotton Bt, wheat –DWR-225.
When were these improved technologies received by you (farmer) and from where?
Since from 2008-09 from Krishi Vigyan Kendra, RARS, Bijapur 2007-08
(ii) Enlist 10 latest technologies which have been received from the KVK to your village and furnish information on the following
Sl. No Name of the technology Extent of adoption (% approximately)
Reasons for formal adoption
1 Powdery mildew management in sunflower
65 better management of moisture and disease
2 Introduction of new variety- CSV-22
60 More yields as due to nonlodging quality grains produced
3 Redgram- IPM 70 Eco friendly & higher net profit
4 Bt.Cotton 90 Less cost of pl. protection uniform maturity & less bollworm damage
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
Like state Dept. , for all demonstration entire inputs kit should be provided
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
Conducting demonstration, training to farmers, diagnostic field visits etc
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
More no of programmes like krishi utsav should be done in the village level.
Any other comments on the KVK -
75
(i) General information
Name and address of farmer
Nandabasappa Chowdari, Post: Baluti , Tq: B. Bagewadi Dist: Bijapur
Enterprises being practiced Field crops: Groundnut, Redgram, bengalgram, sorghum, wheat, Maize, sunflower, cotton and sugarcane Horticulture crops : Banana, Mango, vegetables and coconut, onion Other enterprises: Vermiculture, dairy
Enlist improved technologies being adopted under different enterprises
Groundnut: GPBD-4 with skip row Bengalgram & redgram: IPM Wheat: DWR-225, Cotton: Bt cotton Sugarcane: wooly aphid management Onion: Agrifound dark red Vermiculture: Complete organic farming practice in his field
When were these improved technologies received by you (farmer) and from where?
From 2004-05 onwards
(ii) Enlist 10 latest technologies which have been received from the KVK to your village and furnish information on the following
Sl. No Name of the technology Extent of adoption (% approximately)
Reasons for formal adoption
1 Groundnut: GPBD-4 with skip row
20% Less foliar diseases
2 Bengalgram IPM 30% Less plant protection chemicals and Higer net profit
3 Redgram: IPM 20% Less plant protection chemicals and Higer net profit
4 Wheat: DWR-225 10% Rust resistant 5 Cotton: Bt cotton 95% Negligible bollworm
incidence 6 Sugarcane: wooly aphid
management 25% Ecofriendly
7 Onion: Agrifound dark red 20% Purple blotch resistant 8 Vermiculture: 25% Less use of inorganic
fertilizers 9 Insitu vermiculture 20% No use of inorganic
fertilizers
76
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
KVK should approach the village leader and president of panchayat for any KVK intervention in the village
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
Yes, training, demonstration and diagnostic field visit
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
In addition to State Departments officials, permission may be given KVK scientists, to inspect agrochemicals merchant in district jurisdiction for better input supply.
Any other comments on the KVK Yes, Like in the state departments, ground level workers are needed for better implementation of technologies
(i) General information
5. Name and address of farmer Smt. Shantabai S. Ambali P: Haranal Tq: Sindagi Dist: Bijapur
Enterprises being practiced Field crops: Redgram, bengalgram, sorghum, wheat, Maize, Bajra, sunflower, sugarcane Horticulture crops : Pomegranate vegetables Other enterprises: Vermiculture, dairy, Biodigeter, Biogas
Enlist improved technologies being adopted under different enterprises
Bengalgram & redgram: IPM Wheat: DWR-225 Cotton: Bt cotton Sugarcane: Pair row method of planting Vermiculture : Complete organic farming practice in his field, Use of biodigeter extract pest and disease management
When were these improved technologies received by you (farmer) and from where?
From 2006 onwards From KVK, Bijapur Campus
77
ii) Enlist 10 latest technologies which have been received from the KVK to your village and furnish information on the following
Sl. No
Name of the technology Extent of adoption (% approximately)
Reasons for formal adoption
1 Bengalgram IPM 30% Less plant protection chemicals and Higer net profit
2 Redgram: IPM 20% Less plant protection chemicals and Higer net profit
3 Redgram transplanting technique
15% Escape of pod borer incidence, come to harvest at early.
4 Wheat: DWR-225 15% Rust resistant 5 Cotton: Bt cotton 90% Negligible bollworm incidence 6 Sugarcane pair row planting 15% Better crop and water management 7 Vermiculture: 30% Less use of inorganic fertilizers 8 Biodigester 20% Ecofriendly pest management and
low cost technology
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
KVK should implement their activities, where the NGO,s are working for better impact.
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
Yes, training, demonstration, conduct of local need based experiments and field visit
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
No
Any other comments on the KVK Yes, Some more staff is required for implementation of technologies and KVK should be collect the improved seeds from FLD farmers for next year distribution
78
Formers from non Adopted villages :
1. Name and address of farmer Sri. Saranu Masali P: Hinchgeri Tq: Indi Dist: Bijapur
Enterprises being practiced Field crops: Redgram, wheat, Maize, sunflower, sugarcane Horticulture crops : vegetables, tomato, chilli, Brinjal Other enterprises: dairy
Enlist improved technologies being adopted under different enterprises
Redgram: IPM and new varieties Tomato private hybrids Cotton: Bt cotton
When were these improved technologies received by you (farmer) and from where?
From 2008 onwards From farmers & KSDA
Sl. No
Name of the technology Extent of adoption (% approximately)
Reasons for formal adoption
1 Redgram: IPM 20% Less plant protection chemicals and Higer net profit
2 Redgram (BSMR-736 sterility resistant)
20% Escape of pod borer incidence, come to harvest at early.
3 Cotton: Bt cotton 95% Negligible bollworm incidence
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
KVK should implement their activities, where the NGO,s are working for better impact.KVK, scientists implement the technology only in few clusters .
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
Yes, training, demonstration, and field visit
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
KVK, intervention should be implemented through local cooperative scientist
Any other comments on the KVK Yes, Some more staff is required for implementation of technologies
79
(i) General information
2. Name and address of farmer Mr. Kallappa Satihal , P: Aheri , Tq: Sindgi Dist: Bijapur
Enterprises being practiced Horticulture and Agriculture Enlist improved technologies being adopted under different enterprises
Horticulture: Onion: production technology Lime: Canker and mite management Agriculture: Maize: Nutrient management Redgram: pest management
When were these improved technologies received by you (farmer) and from where?
Since from 2005-06 from KSDA and KSDH
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
Frontline demonstration s should be conducted in largescale and inputs should supplied to all farmers
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
No
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
KVK should take up more of new technologies in all villages of the district
Any other comments on the KVK KVK is too small to look after entire district compared to KSDA
(i) General information
3. Name and address of farmer Shri. Basappa Choudary , Bisnal , Tq: Basava Bagewadi Dist: Bijapur
Enterprises being practiced Agriculture Enlist improved technologies being adopted under different enterprises
Sunflower powdery mildew management Bengalgram podborer management Cotton boll worm management Sorghum high yielding varieties Onion –sorghum relay cropping
When were these improved technologies received by you (farmer) and from where?
Since from 2006-07 from field day organized by KVK in Bommanahalli
80
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
KVK should work in bigger clusters like 5-6 villages at a time because crops will be similar throught the cluster
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
No
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
KVK should take up more of FLD because doing is beliving
Any other comments on the KVK KVK need to popularize their activities
i) General information
4. Name and address of farmer Ajeet patil, Logavi, Tq: Bijapur Dist: Bijapur Enterprises being practiced Agriculture Enlist improved technologies being adopted under different enterprises
Redgram podborer management Bengalgram podborer management Sorghum high yielding varieties Wheat rust management
When were these improved technologies received by you (farmer) and from where?
Since from 2005-06 from KSDA and KSDH
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
KVK should give advice through mass media so that awareness about technology can be disseminated to adopted as well as non adopted villages
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
Trainings demonstration
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
Yes they should have mobile van to address the farmers during off season for technology dissemination
Any other comments on the KVK Seed supplied to FLD farmers should be recollected by KVK,Staff
81
(i) General information
5. Name and address of farmer Prashat kumar Yalladagi, Kanamadi, Tq: Bijapur Dist: Bijapur
Enterprises being practiced Agriculture Enlist improved technologies being adopted under different enterprises
Pomegranate blight management Bengalgram podborer management Sunflower hybrids Grape downy mildew management
When were these improved technologies received by you (farmer) and from where?
Since from 2006-07 from KSDA
(ii) Enlist 10 latest technologies which have been received from the KVK to your village and furnish information on the following
Sl. No Name of the technology Extent of adoption (% approximately)
Reasons for formal adoption
1 Bacterial blight management in pomegranate
80% Better management of the disease
2 Sunflower private hybrids 80% Higher yield 3 Grape diseases 90% New molecules have
higher efficiency
(iii) Opinion of the farmer
What should be the approach of KVK for training and better adoption of technologies in light of your experience with the technologies introduced in your village
KVK should give advice through mass media so tht awareness about technology can be disseminated to adopted as well as non adopted villages
Do you know the activities of KVK ? If yes, what are those activities?
-
Do you think that roles/activities of KVK need some change? Yes/No If yes, what are your suggestions?
Yes they should have mobile van to address the farmers during off season for technology dissemination
Any other comments on the KVK Demonstrations on grape diseases managed in needed
82
10. Strengths and Weaknesses of the KVK (Please put √ mark)
Particulars Strengths Weaknesses Suggestions to overcome the weaknesses / further improving the strengths
KVK Mandate √
Infrastructural facilities √ Hostel for farmers should be constructed
Manpower
Technical √
Administrative √
Technological backstopping by SAU
√
Human Resource Development for KVK staff
√
Computerization and automation in KVK
√ There is need for improvement
Reporting system by KVKs w.r.t type and frequency of report being submitted
√
Action Plan Meeting √
Annual Review Workshop
√
Coordination support from Zonal Project Directorate
√
Funds for implementing KVK mandated activities
√
Revolving Fund Status √ Need for improvement
Linkage with ATMA √ Need for improvement
83
Linkages with other Development Departments
√ Need for improvement
E-connectivity (wherever exists)
Kisan Mobile Advisory Services
√
Others (Pl. specify)
11. Efforts and achievements made during the last five years towards up-gradation of knowledge and skills of staff of KVK i.e Human Resource Development
S. No.
Activity No. of staff deputed Total 2005-06 2006-
07 2007-
08 2008-
09 2009-
10 A TRAINING (i) National 01 02 03 01 01 08 (ii) Zonal 01 01 01 03 03 09 (iii) State 07 06 13 (iv) District 01 01 02
B Seminars/meetings (i) National 02 02 03 04 04 15 (ii) Zonal 01 01 01 01 01 05 (iii) State 01 01 00 02 (iv) District
C Conferences/Workshops (i) National 01 01 01 01 03 08 (ii) Zonal 01 01 01 03 (iii) State 01 01 (iv) District
D Study leave for higher education (i) PG (ii) PhD 01 01
84
12. Give a brief account of technical back-up, the KVK has been getting from ICAR Institutes and SAU scientists in programme planning, execution of programmes and evaluation
Particulars Organizations ICAR
Institutes SAUs Other (please name)
Monthly interaction 07 15 Half yearly interaction 20 20 Deputation for training (i)Within the State (ii)Outside the State
06 04
16 04
Participation in seminar/ workshop
10 20
Monitoring by the DEE Support in the form of publication of literature
SAC meetings 04 02 Any other specify
13. Enlist the publications made
(i) Research articles
Year Name of publication Copies circulated
User group
2006-07 Impact of fertilizers on growth and development of
earthworm, Eudrillus euginae under insitu Vermiculture.
KARABHANTANAL, S. S. AND AWAKNAVAR, J. S.
Scientific Group
Evaluation of bio pesticides in the management of tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). KARABHANTANAL, S. S. AND AWAKNAVAR, J. S.
Scientific Group
Residues of β-cypluthrin 2.5 EC in tomato fruits. KARABHANTANAL, S. S. AND AWAKNAVAR, J. S.
Scientific Group
Persistence of Thidicarb 75 SP in / on tomato fruits under field condition KARABHANTANAL, S. S. AND AWAKNAVAR, J. S.
Scientific Group
Persistence of Bio-control agents on tomato fruits under field condition KARABHANTANAL, S. S. AND AWAKNAVAR, J. S.
Scientific Group
85
2007-08
Studies on Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Growth and Yield of Onion ( Allium cepa L.) Telagi Red Anagoudar.R.A., Patil.H.B., and Mantur.S.M., 2007, International Journal of Agriculture and Statistical Sciences, 3(2): 421-425.
Scientific Group
Effect of Spacing and Nutrient Sources on Capsicum Under Shade House During Summer and Kharif. Mantur, S. M., Patil,H.B., Patil, S.R., Biradar,D.P. and Patil,D.R., 2007, Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(2) :578-580.
Scientific Group
Biochemical parameters of ber (Ziziphus marutiana Lamk.) cv.Umran as influenced by different packages and storage conditions Radder, Y.B., Patil, H. B.,. and Patil, D.R., 2007, The Asian Journal of Horticulture, 2(2): 19-22.
Scientific Group
Influence of Different Packages and Storage Conditions on Physical Characters of Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk ) cv. Umran. Radder, Y.B., Patil.H.B., and Mantur.S.M., 2007, The Asian Journal of Horticulture, 2(2) : 89-93.
Scientific Group
Growth and yield of green chilli (Capsicum annum L.) cv. Pusa Jwala as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus. Singegol, H.Y., Patil, H. B.,. and Patil, D.R.,2007, The Asian Journal of Horticulture, 2(2): 184-187.
Scientific Group
Studies on the management of grape leaf hopper, Erythroneura sp. Sunita, N. D., Karabhantanal, S. S. and Jagginavar, S.B., 2008, National Conferernce on Pest Management Strategies for Food Security, Raipur, 2-3 May, 2008. pp.61
Scientific Group
Field persistence of Alanycarb 30EC residues in / on tomato fruits. Karabhantanal, S. S., Awaknavar, J. S. and Sunita, N. D., 2008, National Conferernce on Pest Management Strategies for Food Security, Raipur, 2-3 May, 2008. pp.71.
Scientific Group
Oviupositional deterrent properties of Neem seed kernel extract and trap crop effect in the management of the tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera
Scientific Group
86
(Hubner). Karabhantanal, S. S., Awaknavar, J. S. and Sunita, N. D., 2008, National Conferernce on Pest Management Strategies for Food Security, Raipur, 2-3 May, 2008. pp.74
Outbrerak of sunflower powdery mildew in northern Karnataka Vastrad,S.M. and A.R.Satreddi., 2007 National Conferernce on Disease management in field crops, , 2-3 Dec, 2007 p.95
Scientific Group
Total 15 15 (ii) Books/book chapters
Year Name of publication Copies circulated
User group
2008-09 Cotton- White Gold, Wali.S.Y., Vastrad.S.M and
Karbantnal.S.S 500 Scientific
and farmer group
Soil and water Management Sarwad.I.M,.Wali.S.Y., Vastrad.S.M and Karbantnal.S.S
500 Scientific and farmer group
Special sorghum varieties : value addition and entrepreneurship development By Sajjanar,G.M., Patil,P.B., Biradar,B.D., Hemalath,S.,Torapi,V.A., Biradar,D.P., and seetharam,N.
500 Scientific and farmer group
Uttar karnatakadalliya jolada vishista taligala mulya vardane mattu udimegarikeya abhivruddi By Sajjanar,G.M., Patil,P.B., Biradar,B.D., Hemalath,S.,Torapi,V.A., Biradar,D.P., and seetharam,N.
500 Scientific and farmer group
Total 04
(iii) Popular articles
Year Name of publication Copies circulated
User group
2006-07 Kadaleyalli roga nirvahane, VASTRAD, S. M Farmer
group
Yarehulu Krishi vidhanagalu Baravaseya Balake, KARABHANTNAL S.S. and VASTRAD, S. M
Kita nirvahaneyalli lokarudi paddatigalu,
87
SUNITHA, N, D. AND KARABHANTNAL, S. S.,
Draksheyalli roga nirvahane, VASTRAD, S. M
Limbeyalli kazzi roga mattu nirvahane, VASTRAD, S. M
Limbeyalli rogagala nirvahane, VASTRAD, S. M
Raptigagi darkshi pyaking vidhana, PATIL, H.B., PATIL. S.R., AND D. SHRIDHAR.
Ona Drakshi Tayarike PATIL.S.R. PATIL, H.B. AND D. SHRIDHAR
.
Crop insurance VASTRAD, S. M, KARABHANTNAL S.S and PATIL, H.B.
2008-09 Safe Aging Patil,P.B
Suitability of sorghum landrace for flaking , Sajanar,G.M,Biradar,B.D
Hemalatha,S.R and Patil ,P.B.
Total 11
(iv) Technical bulletins
Year Name of publication Copies circulated User group 2006-07 Pomegranate , PATIL.S.R,
KARABHANTANAL, S. S.,and VASTRAD, S. M
1000 Farmers
Total 01
(v) Extension literature like leaflets, pamphlets, folders, newsletters etc.
Year Name of publication Copies circulated
User group
2006-07 Production technology of
Bengalgram by S. S. Karabhantanal, S. M Vastrad, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
88
Improved production technology in cotton by S. S. Karabhantanal, S. M Vastrad, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000 S. S. Karabhantanal, S. M Vastrad,
G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
Plant protection in groundnut, by S. M Vastrad, S. S. Karabhantanal, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
Improved production technology in Onion by S. R. Patil, S. S. Karabhantanal, S. M Vastrad,G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
Plant protection in Pigeonpea by S. M Vastrad, S. S. Karabhantanal, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
Vermicompost production Technology by S. S. Karabhantanal, S. M Vastrad, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
2007-08 Production technology of
Bengalgram by S. S. Karabhantanal, S. M Vastrad, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
Improved production technology in maize by S. S. Karabhantanal, S. M Vastrad, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
Plant protection in sunflower by S. S. Karabhantanal, S. M Vastrad, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
Improved production technology in Onion by S. R. Patil, S. S. Karabhantanal, S. M Vastrad,G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
Plant protection in Pigeonpea by S. M Vastrad, S. S. Karabhantanal, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
Improved production technology in rabi sorghum by S. M Vastrad, S. S. Karabhantanal, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
89
Transplanting in pigeon pea by S. M Vastrad, S. S. Karabhantanal, G. Somangouda, H. B. Patil
1000
2008-09 Jolada vishista taligalinda tayari sa
bahudada vaividya ruchikara mattu paushtika tinisugalu by Patil,P.B , Sajjanar,G.M Biradar,B.D
Value added jowar products by Patil,P.B and Sajjanar,G.M
1000
Togari mattu Kadaleyalli Samagra Pheede Nirvahane. By
1000
Savayava Krishigagi Yerehulu Mattu Yaregobbara by S.Y.Wali., S.M. Vastrad and S.S. Karabhantanal
Dalimbe Beleya Rogagalu Mattu Hatoti Kramagalu by S.Y.Wali., S.M. Vastrad and S.S. Karabhantanal
1000
Togari Nati Paddatiya Sudharita Tantrikategalu by S.Y.Wali., S.M. Vastrad and S.S. Karabhantanal
1000
Kadale Beleya Sudharita Besaaya Kramagalu. By S.Y.Wali., S.M. Vastrad and S.S. Karabhantanal
1000
Togari Kayi Korakada Samagra Neervahane by S.Y.Wali., S.M. Vastrad and S.S. Karabhantanal
1000
Besige Sengadalli Adhunika Besaya Tantrikategalu
1000
Peedenasak Balasuva Suraksheet Vidanagalu. By S.Y.Wali., S.M. Vastrad and S.S. Karabhantanal
1000
Suryakantiyalli Naveen Utpadana Tantrikate by S.Y.Wali., S.M. Vastrad and S.S. Karabhantanal
1000
Total 24
90
14. Whether the KVK has E-connectivity facility? (YES/NO): NO
Year of establishment
Programmes undertaken User group exposed Feed-back
15. Whether the KVK has its own website? (YES
Year of creation
Content User hits count Feed-back
2008-09 Annual reports, SAC reports, Mandates of KVK, FLD,OFT, Training , FLD photos etc
280
16. Status of Revolving Fund (Rs. in lakh)
(a) Balance as on March 2010
Year Amount received
Additional amount
generated
Amount refunded to
ICAR
Whether refunded as
per schedule
Net balance
2005-06 1,00,000 20643.34 - - 120646.34 2006-07 13147.34 - - 1,33,490.34 2007-08 -5643 - 127847.34 2008-09 8412 - 136259.34 2009-10 92885 20000 - 209144.34 Total 135087.34 20000 -
(b) Purpose and results
Year Purpose Results 2005-06 Supply of seed materials 2006-07 Supply of seed materials 2007-08 Supply of seed materials 2008-09 Supply of seed materials 2009-10 Supply of seed materials Total Supply of seed materials
91
17. What type of linkages your KVK has with different organizations including NGOs? Please elaborate. Sl. No.
Name of the organization Nature of linkage
2005-06
Department of Agriculture Joint diagnostic surveys, Trainings, FLD
Dept. of Horticulture Joint diagnostic surveys, Trainings
Dept of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Conducting training
Karnataka Milk Federation Conducting training programmes
Rural Development and Self- Employment Training Institute (RUDSET) Bijapur
Conducting training programmes
VVV Clubs Conducting trainings, FLD’s
Self help Groups Conducting trainings
Regional Agricultural Research Station Conducting trainings, demonstrations visits to problematic fields
Agromet Advisory service unit Tips on Weather forecasting
Department of child and women welfare Conducting trainings
2006-07 Mahila Samakhya ,Women SHG’s Self employment
2007-08
Dept of Information and broadcasting Radio talks, tips and TV clippings
2008-09
DANIDA Dairy, Home science, Vermiculture
Dept of Watershed*, KSDA Agriculture and allied, Training/seminars/Group meetings
Dept. of Sericulture Sericulture training, demonstrations
92
2009-10
Banks Conducting trainings
VVV Clubs Conducting trainings
Self help Groups Conducting trainings
Karnataka grape growers association Conducting trainings
18. Please give details of involvement of the KVK in the following Govt. or other programmes (i) Type of KVK involvement in RKVY programme
Type of intervention Nature of linkage Results Technical know how on agril and allied subjects
Implementation of organic farming and KIOSK for Agriculture message
Farmers have been supplied with bio fungicides and Bio fertilizers and are using KIOSKS as ready rekoner
(ii) Type of KVK involvement with wasteland development Type of intervention Nature of linkage Results FLD, Training , Field visits Formation of farm pond Better Water management (iii) Type of KVK involvement with horticultural development Type of intervention Nature of linkage Results Frontline demonstrations, Trainings
Collaborative Better trained farmers harvesting higher quality fruit crops
(iv) Type of KVK involvement with animal health camp (v) Type of KVK involvement with consultancy on land use planning and cropping patterns Type of intervention Nature of linkage Results Development of contingency crop planning
As subject matters specialist Cropping plan during aberrant weather condition
93
(vi) Type of KVK involvement with consultancy on soil analysis and topographic survey Type of intervention Nature of linkage Results Awareness campaign, method demonstration
Advisory service through phone and in person
Awareness of soil testing for proper nutrition
(vii) Type of KVK involvement with ATMA
Type of intervention Nature of linkage Results On Farm Testing of different Organization of Farm Schools and Capacity building through different Training programmes, Krishi Andolan
As a part of interdisciplinary extension wing
Farmers are convinced about use of new molecules in Bengalgram pod borer management, Use of micronutrients in Groundnut and Sugarcane
(viii) Type of KVK involvement with SHM/NHM
Type of intervention Nature of linkage Results Identification of pest & disease, Trainings
Sanctioned two projects pest and disease forecasting units plant health clinics
Weather based tips for farmers for immediate plant protection management
(ix) Type of KVK involvement with other agencies (specify name)
Type of intervention Nature of linkage Results FLD- onion (Agrifund dark red )
NHRDF Area under Agrifound dark red – 100 ha
19. Scientific Advisory Committee Meetings (SAC) conducted
Year Dates Chaired by No. of members attended
No. of special invitees, if any
2005-06 2006-07 16-10-2006
02-08-2007 DE, UASD 36
32
2007-08 21-02-2008 06-08-2008
DE, UASD 35 32
2008-09 18-02-2009
DE, UASD 23
2009-10 21-07-2009 DE, UASD 36 Total 06 194
94
20. What are the major constraints in implementing the mandated activities of the KVK and what are your suggestions to overcome them?
(a) Constraints with respect to KVK functioning
a) Administrative
b) Financial : Quotations are needed for expenditure more than 1000/- it should be
Extended up to 10000/- as in ICAR, Institutes c) Technical
(b) Constraints with respect to professional growth of KVK staff
For KVK scientist there should be separate promotion policy in the universities
21. Please give your suggestions on the following points which may change the agricultural scenario of the KVK district
Human resource development Market-driven entrepreneurship development Providing district-level farming situation-based technology Service-centre for the farmers, including soil and water testing facilities and
diagnostic service for plant and livestock Information and communication technology, etc.
21. Attach your approved Action plan for 2009-10 and indicate how was it formulated and finalized. Attach the minutes of SAC on the proposed Action plan.
ZONAL PROJET DIRECTORATE – ZONE VIII
Indian Council of Agricultural Research
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACTION PLAN MEETING 2009-10
4-6th May 2009
KARNATAKA AND GOA
Name of the KVK : Bijapur
Name of the participant : Dr.H.B.Patil
Designation : Programme Co-ordinator
Details on targets:
I. Technology Assessment S. No Crop /
Enterprise Technology to be assessed
No. of trials
Technology Options Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be recorded
1 2 3 4
1. Grape Use of garlic extract for bud break in grape
5 4.0% Dormex application to three terminal buds after October pruning.
4.0% Dormex application to three terminal buds after October pruning.
Garlic extract 20% and
25 %
1020 % buds sprouting and yield
96
S. No Crop / Enterprise
Technology to be assessed
No. of
trials
Technology Options Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be
recorded 1 2 3 4
2. Cropping system
Relay cropping of onion followed by rabi sorghum
05 Only one crop- Either onion in late kharif or rabi sorghum in rabi,
Only one crop- Either onion in kharif or sorghum in rabi
Relay cropping- Sowing of onion with 16” or 18” seed drill followed by rabi sorghum
2100 Yield of onion sorghum , economics
3. Redgram Increasing Productivity of redgram through transplanting
05 Drill sowing with 90cm x 30cm with onset of monsoon
No recommendation Variety BSMR 736 (SMD resistant)and Transplanting- 150 cm x 90cm
Variety Asha (Wilt and SMD resistant) and Transplanting- 150 cm x 90cm
5000 No of pods / plant , yield
4. Redgram Increasing Productivity of redgram(Gulyal) through transplanting
05 Drill sowing with 90cm x 30cm with onset of monsoon
Drill sowing with 90cm x 30cm
Transplanting- 90cmx60cm
3500 No of pods / plant , yield
5. Sorghum Introduction of new variety for increasing productivity of rabi sorghum in shallow soils
05 M 35-1 M 35-1 Variety - Anuradha
1000 Yields of grain and fodder
97
S. No Crop / Enterprise
Technology to be assessed
No. of
trials
Technology Options Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be
recorded 1 2 3 4
6 Pomegranate
Fruit spot management in pomegranate
05 Carbendezim @ 1 g/lit 2 sprays at an interval of 15 days
Carbendezim @ 1 g/lit 2 sprays at an interval of 15 days
Tricyclozole (1 ml/ lit) 2 sprays
3600 Disease index, Yield
7 Grape Downey mildew Management in grape
05 Metalxyl MZ @ 2.5 g/lit 3 sprays at an interval of 7-10 days
Metalaxyl MZ @ 2.5 g/lit 3 sprays at an interval of 7-10 days
Fenamidon (Sectin @ 2.5 g/lit 2 sprays at an interval of 10 days
13375 Disease index, Yield
8 Brinjal Management of shoot and fruit borer in Brinjal
05 Mixture of minimum two insecticides every spray Yield loss: 25%
carbaryl (2g/lt)- 4 sprays
Carbosulfan (2.0 ml / l)
3 sprays
3300 Fruit damage , yield
9 Onion Thrips management in onion
05 Dimethoate (1.75 ml / l – Two spray )
Dimethoate (1.75 ml / l) 2 sprays
λ- cylhothrin (0.5ml / l) 2 sprays and maize as a border crop
2750 Thrips per plant and yield
98
S. No Crop / Enterprise
Technology to be assessed
No. of
trials
Technology Options Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be
recorded 1 2 3 4
10 Home Science
Assessment of envirofit chulha for fuel efficiency and drudgery reduction.
05 Cooking in Traditional Chulha
No recommendation “Envirofit Chulha”
9000 Efficiency
11 Groundnut Stripper
Groundnut stripper 02 Manually done No recommendation Groundnut stripper
8000 Efficiency
II. Technology Refinement
S. No Crop / Enterprise
Technology to be refined No. of trials
Technology Options Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be recorded
1 &2 3
01 Bengalgram And Sunflower
Cloth gloves for harvesting of
bengalgram and sunflower
10 With bare hand Cloth gloves 1000 Efficiency
Total budget for Technology Assessment and Refinement: Rs. 52625/- = 54000/-
99
Front Line Demonstrations
S. No
Crop / Enterprise
Technology to be demonstrated No. of demo.
Area in ha. / No. of units
Details of Critical inputs Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be recorded
01 Bajra Introduction of new hybrid MH 946 with wide row (120 cm)
12 05 Seeds of MH 946 4 kg/ha
1000 Yield
02 Horsegram Introduction of new variety GPM-6
12 05 Seeds of GPM-6 20 kg/ha
3500 Yield
03 Lime Bacterinashak (0.5g/l)+ Copper oxychloride (2 g/ l ) 3 sprays at an interval of 10 days
12 05 1)Bacterinashak 1 kg 2) COC 3.75 kg
23000 Disease index , yield
04 Onion (Rainfed)
Introduction of Arka Kalyan /Agrifound Dark red Spraying with Difenconazole @ 0.5 ml /lit 2 sprays
12 05 1)Seeds of Arka Kalyan/Agrifound Dark red 2) Difenconazole 2.5 l
14,500 Bulb weight and yield
05 Custard apple Introduction of Improved variety Arka Sahana, moisture conservation technology (basins with inward slopes) and locally available mulching
07 03 500 (493 grafts / ha)
37500 -
06 Drumstick Introduction of Improved variety KDM-1, moisture conservation technology (basins with inward slopes and mulching)
12 05 1)Seeds (250g /ha) 2)Polythene bags
3750 Drumstick / plant , Yield
100
Front Line Demonstrations
S. No
Crop / Enterprise
Technology to be demonstrated No. of demo.
Area in ha. / No. of units
Details of Critical inputs Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be recorded
07 Rabi sorghum CSV 22, Seed treatment with Biofertilizers 20 20 Seed
7.5 kg Azospirillum and PSB 500 g each
4000 Yield
08 Wheat (Irrigated)
UAS-415 12 05 Seeds 150kg 13500 Yield
09 Pomegranate Dusting of bleaching powder@ 25 kg/ha on infected debris
smearing with bacterinashak (0.5 g/lit) + 3g COC + Hurimanja (2 g/lit)
Spraying with Bacterinashak (0.5g/l)+ COC (2g/l) -4-5 sprays follwed by spraying with micronutrients
07 4.5 1)Bacterinashak (1.25 kg/ha) 2)COC 5 kg /ha
Micronutrients 3)Boron 10 kg
4)Zinc 10 kg 5)MgSo4 10 kg
6)CaSo4 10 kg
63,000 Disease index , yield
10 Grape Dihlorovas (8% stem injection)- stem borer
IPM package- Mealy bug
12 05 1) Dihlorovas 1 lit
2)IPM package (DDVP 1 lit, Fish oil resin soap 5 lit, grease 5 kg, Neem oil l lit, COC 1 lit)
27500 No of recovered plants , mealybug infestation , yield
11 Promotion of IFS 05 Integrated farming system 10,000
101
Front Line Demonstrations
S.
No
Crop /
Enterprise
Technology to be demonstrated No.
of
demo.
Area in ha. /
No. of units
Details of Critical inputs Total
budget
(Rs.)
Parameters to
be recorded
12 Cattle Use of enriched dry fodder by urea
and azolla in animal feed
20 20 Feeding animals with
enriched dry fodder ( 2%
urea) supplemented with
1kg azolla / animal /day
11,800 Body weight ,
milk yield ,
growth rate
13 Cattle Treatment of ecto- parasites in
Dairy animals
20 20 Treatment of affected
animal by inj Iver mectin
1ml / 50 kg body wt s/c at
weekly interval
4,000 No. of parasites,
Growth rate
Other activity
1 Goat Up gradation of local breeds of Goats
by Jamunapari/Usmanibad
02 02 Bucks 10000
Total : 2,71,000/-
Grand total : 54,000/- (OFT) + 2,17,000 (FLD)= 2,71,000/-
102
S. No
Crop / Enterprise
Technology to be demonstrated No. of demo.
Area in ha. / No. of units
Details of Critical inputs Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be recorded
15 Sunflower Wider row sowing(120 cm) and spraying with Hexaconazole @ 1 ml/lit
Spinosad @ 0.1 ml/lit
Hexaconazole 625 ml
Spinosad 50 ml
7500 % defoliation , Disease index , yield
16 Groundnut Skip row method(2:1), Seed treatment with biofertilizers and Vermicompost
Rhizobium, PSB Vermicompost 10.0q/ha
14000 Pods/ plant, Yield
17 Sesamum
Introduction of short duration variety DSS -9 with ICM
Seeds (2.5Kgs)
Trichoderma (10g)
Streptocycline (1g)
Hexaconazole (1l)
Monocrotophos (1l)
5350 Yield
18 Summer groundnut
GPBD-4/ DH-86, Seed treatment with Biofertilizers,
Seed 150kg rhizobium & PSB 500g each
37500 Pods/ plant, Yield
19 Greengram SARA method Selection-4- (non shattering variety), Seed treatment with biofertilizers, Vermicompost @ 5 q/ha
Seed 7.5 kg and
Vermicompost 5q/ha
8400 Yield
103
S. No
Crop /
Enterprise
Technology to be demonstrated
No.
of
demo.
Area in ha. / No. of units
Details of Critical inputs Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be recorded
20 Redgram BSMR 736 (high yielder with resistance to sterility mosaic,) Seed treatment with biofertilizers and IPM
Seeds 15 kg
Methomyl 0.4 kg
Neem oil 2 lit
HaNPV (250LE)
Pheromone traps
5 /ha and 10 lures
Spinosad 50 ml
12700 No of pods / plant , pod borer damage , yield
21 Bengalgram JG-11/GBS 964 with ICM
Seeds 15 kg
Biofertilizers Methomyl 0.4 kg
Neem oil 2 lit
HaNPV (250LE)
Pheromone traps
5 /ha and 10 lures
Spinosad 50 ml
18000 No of pods / plant , pod borer damage , yield
104
S. No
Crop /
Enterprise
Technology to be demonstrated
No.
of
demo.
Area in ha. / No. of units
Details of Critical inputs Total budget (Rs.)
Parameters to be recorded
22 Cotton Bt cotton and ICM
Bt Cotton seeds 0.5kg/acre
Acetamoprid (50g/ac)
Acephate (400g/ac)
61500 Bollworm incidence , yield
Total budget for Front Line Demonstration: other than oil seed and pulses Rs. 2,71,000/-
Oil seeds and pulses Rs. 170952/-
Cotton Rs. 61,500/-
---------------------------------------------------------
Total: Rs.503452/-
V.SUMMARY OF TARGETS SET FOR 2009-10
S. No Particulars of intervention Target particulars
01 On Farm Trial
No. of technologies 11
No. Of trials 55
On Farm Trial Refinement
No. of technologies 01
No. Of trials 05
02 Front Line Demonstration 17
Oilseeds
No. of technologies 04
No. of demonstration 48
Pulse
No. of technologies 03
No. of demonstration 36
Other crops
No. of technologies 11
No. of demonstration 111
Cotton
No. of technologies 01
No. of demonstration 50
Live stock
No. of technologies 02
No. of demonstration 40
No. of demonstration
Other enterprises -
No. of technologies -
No. of demonstration
106
03 Training Programmes
Farmers and farm women
No. Of courses 48
No. Of farmers 1440
Rural Youth
No. Of courses -
No. Of farmers -
Extension personnel
No. Of courses 11
No. Of farmers 275
Vocational Programmes
No. Of courses 26
No. Of farmers 780
04 Extension Programmes 248+ advisory services
05 Production and supply of seeds, planting materials, livestock and bi-products
Seed(Qtl) 57.0
Planting materials(number) 12000
Livestock (Number)
Bio-products (Number)
06 Diagnostic services
Soil samples(Number) 500
Water samples(Number) 100
Plant samples(Number)
07 Number of technology modules to be prepared in e- linkage
08 Title of Farmers Field School ICM in Bengalgram
09 No. Of database planned to be created 10
107
IV.SUMMARY OF TARGETS SET FOR 2009-10
S. No Particulars of intervention Particulars
01 Training Programmes
Farmers and farm women 48
No. of courses 48
No. of farmers 1440
Rural Youth 26
No. of courses 26
No. of farmers 780
Extension personnel 11
No. of courses 11
No. of farmers 275
02 Extension Programmes 248 + advisory service
03 Production and supply of seeds, planting materials, livestock and bio-products
Seeds (Qtl.) 57.00 q
Planting materials (Number) 12000
Livestock (Number) -
Bio-products (Number) -
04 Diagnostic services
Soil samples (Number) 500
Water samples (Number) 100
Plant samples (Number) -
05 Title of technology modules to be prepared in e-linkage
-
06 Title of Farmers Field School ICM in Bengalgram
Budget for FFS Rs.25,000
108
23. SWPTL
a) Do you have soil testing facility in KVK? If yes, when was it established? Status of establishment of Lab : Established
1. Year of establishment : 01-09-2005 2. List of equipments purchased with amount :
Sl. No. Name of the Equipment Qty Cost (Rs)
1. pH. Meter 01 8,900.00 2. Electrical conductivity Bridge 01 9,790.00 3. Flame Photometer 01 32,040.00 4. Visible spectro phtoto meter 01 40,050.00 5. Electronic automatic KEL Plus digestion system
and Nitrogen distillation system 01 1,42,844.00
6. Shaking machine 01 47,025.00 7. Electronic weighing machine 01 57,000.00 8. Physical balance 01 10,890.00 9. Hot air oven 01 16,471.00
10. Hot plate 01 2,912.00 11 Grinder 01 14,700.00 12. Water distillation unit 01 62,444.00 13. Refrigerator 01 12,285.00
Accessories 1. Electronic acid neutralizer scrubber for KEL plus
digestion and distillation unit 01 42,185.00
2. Combined electrode for pH meter 01 23,451.00 Conductivity cell type for conductivity meter 01 Glass cuvettes, plastic cuvettes and tungston haloen lamp for spectro phtoto meter
01
Software and interfacing accessories for spectro phtoto meter
01
Calcium filter for flame photo meter 01 3. Water softner for water distillation unit 01 16,932.00
Silica heaters for water distillation unit 01 TOTAL(A) 5,39,919.00
B. Laboratory furnitures purchased
(Lab tables, Steel cabinet, Lab stools, Lab racks)
3,19,749.00
TOTAL (A+B) 8,59,668.00 Un spent balance 332.00
109
b) What kind of equipments/apparatus are available for soil testing?
Name of equipment Year of purchase
Cost of equipment
Source of fund (Rs.)
Present working condition
Electronic Weigh Machine 23.12.2004 57000-00 ICAR Shaking machine 4.1.2005 47025-00 ICAR Electronics automatic KEL plus model KES-061 13.1.2005 142844-00 ICAR
Flame Photometer 31.1.2005 32040-00 ICAR pH. Meter 31.1.2005 8900-00 ICAR Visible spectro photo meter 31.1.2005 40050-00 ICAR Hot air oven 18.2.2005 17228-00 ICAR Hot plate 18.2.2005 3046-00 ICAR FCCM-183 analyzer with ATC probe 31.1.2005 9790-00 ICAR BPL make electronic weighing scale with battery 5.1.2005 10890-00 ICAR
Grinder 1.3.2005 15435-00 ICAR Voltas Refrigerator 10.3.2005 10765-00 ICAR V-guard stabilizer 10.3.2005 1220-00 ICAR Double distillation water still (glass) silica capacity-2 ltr 25.3.2005 16000-00 ICAR
Double distillation water still (glass) silica capacity 4ltr 25.3.2005 43050-00 ICAR
Screw type auger head size 1.5 28.3.2005 980-00 ICAR Post hole type auger head size 300 28.3.2005 1350-00 ICAR Soil storage cabinet 28.3.2005 6050-00 ICAR Wooden pestle and mortar and handles 28.3.2005 475-00 ICAR
Faleon secature 31.3.2005 2000-00 ICAR Faleon Budding and grafting knife 31.3.2005 2600-00 ICAR Alamonard make 400mm wall mounting fans 30.3.2005 9600-00 ICAR
110
Rack, angllar, beam and ply wood 31.3.2005 575-00 ICAR Steel cabinet 78” X35” with five compartment 30.3.2005 47934-00 ICAR
Slotten angle rack 6”X3”15 30.3.2005 7105-00 ICAR Lab racks in home woods 30.3.2005 4968-00 ICAR Exhaust fan almonard 30.3.2005 4500-00 ICAR Laboratory table 88”X30”X36 with granite top as per specification 30.3.2005 75776-00 ICAR
Laboratory table 72”X30”X36 with granite top as per specification 30.3.2005 67724-00 ICAR
Laboratory table 58”X30”X36 with granite top as per specification 30.3.2005 50793-00 ICAR
Gas burner- 30.3.2005 1500-00 ICAR Combined electrode type CL51B for pH meter model L1612 31.3.2005 850-00 ICAR
Conductivity cell type CC03B for conductivity meter model CM 183 31.3.2005 1000-00 ICAR
Sieve brass frame 20 emedia 2.00mm 30.3.2005 650-00 ICAR Sieve brass frame 20 emedia 1.00mm 30.3.2005 650-00 ICAR
Sieve brass frame 20 emedia 20cm 30.3.2005 650-00 ICAR Sieve brass frame 20 emedia 20cm 250 micron 30.3.2005 650-00 ICAR
S.S. Insert rack Model KES 06 L1R 31.3.2005 6300-00 ICAR Exhaust manifolo system with tewflon adapter 31.3.2005 7160-00 ICAR
Acid neutralizer scrubber model KEL VAC 30.3.2005 30400-00
ICAR
Viton tube for tried and diacid digestion model KES VT 31.3.2005 9750-00 ICAR
Spare silica heater for double distillation water still (Glass ) CAS 2ltr
31.3.2005 2837-00 ICAR
111
c) How many soil samples were tested so far. Give year-wise details.
Details No. of Samples analyzed
No. of Farmers benefited No. of Villages Amount
realized
2005-2006 Soil Samples 120 120 120 24000 Water Samples 21 21 21 2100 Plant samples Manure samples Others (specify) Total 141 141 141 26100 2006-2007 Soil Samples 129 110 100 25800 Water Samples 21 10 5 2100 Plant samples Manure samples Others (specify) Total 150 120 27900 2007-2008 Soil Samples 62 62 12 12400 Water Samples 5 5 5 500 Plant samples Manure samples Others (specify) Total 67 67 17 12900 2008-2009 Soil Samples 405 391 71 73200(22400)Water Samples 41 30 18 4100 Plant samples Manure samples Others (specify) Total 446 421 89 77300(22400) 2009-10 Soil Samples 183 183 40 36600 Water Samples 15 14 10 1400 Plant samples Manure samples Others (specify) Total 198 197 50 38000
d) Do you also provide recommendations/suggestions to farmers along with soil test results?
Attach a sample copy of ‘Report’ given to the farmers. e) Problems & suggestions to make it more effective
112
24. Details on Rain Water Harvesting structure and micro-irrigation system (wherever applicable)
Amount sanction (Rs.)
Expenditure (Rs.)
Details of infrastructure created / micro irrigation system etc.
Activities conducted Quantity of water harvested in ‘000 litres
Area irrigated / utilization pattern
No. of Training programmes
No. of Demonstration s
No. of plant materials produced
Visit by farmers (No.)
Visit by officials (No.)
10,00000 860762 Farm pond 28 3600 65 31,65,000
Furrow
irrigation
Transplanted Redgram
Sprinkler
Onion production
Drip
Plantation of Sapota
Farm pond
Aquaculture -
25. Electricity to the KVK
a) Do you have electric supply in KVK premises? Yes
b) If yes, on an average, how many hours per day, you receive power supply? If no, what arrangement do you make ? 20 hours per day
26. Telephone facility
a) Do you have telephone with STD facility, Computer facility and Internet connectivity in
your office? If yes, since when? Yes since from 2004-05
b) How many computer terminals in your office has e-connectivity? : NO
c) How frequently you use Internet and for what purposes (other than e-mail). Daily
d) Do you have any other such facility like e-connectivity with other networks? Give details.
e) To what extent, these facilities have been/being used for the benefit of your target groups.
113
27. Post harvest processing a) Do you have a Post-Harvest Technology and value addition demonstration unit in your
KVK. If yes, give details. b) Have you organized training in the area of empowering farmer/farm women/rural youth
in the field of post-harvest, value addition, marketing, grading and packaging etc. If yes, give details.
On Campus
Sl.No Date Topic No. of Participants
Organizer/ Sponsoring agency
1. 26.9.2007 Pickle making 10 KVK, Bijapur
2. 15.2.2008 Jam & Pickle preparation 28 KVK, Bijapur
3. 27.1.2009 Value added products of sorghum
16 KVK, Bijapur
4. 28.1.2009 Value added mushroom products
35 KVK, Bijapur
5. 16.6.2009 Value added jowar products
61 KVK, Bijapur
6. 19.6.2009 Value added milk products 25 KVK, Bijapur
7. 25.11.2009 Value addition to sorghum 12 KVK, Bijapur
Off Campus
Sl.No Date Topic No. of Participants
Organizer/ Sponsoring agency
1. 31.1.2008 Value added products of tomato
20 KVK, Bijapur
2. 24.5.2008 Jam preparation 26 Mahila samukya , Bijapur
3. 25.5.2008 Pickle making 22 Mahila samukya , Bijapur
4. 27.7.2007 Jam & Juice preparation 30 YVK, Bijapur
5. 23.12.2008 Jam & Pickle preparation
30 Department of Agriculture
6. 23.8.2008 Jam preparation 30 KVK & KSDA ,Bijapur
7. 12.1.2009 Value addition to sorghum
50 KSDA, Bijapur
114
8. 26.1.2009 Training on Agro processing
55 KSDA, Bijapur
9. 17.7.2009 Value addition to sorghum
20 KSDA, Bijapur
10. 22.8.2009 Value addition to sorghum
30 KSDA, Bijapur
11. 11.12.2009 Value addition to sorghum
12 DATC, Bijapur
12. 28.1.2009 Value addition to sorghum
20 DATC, Bijapur
c) Do you have agro-processing and agri-based cottage industries training facilities at your KVK ?
28. In the light of expenditure made during the 11th Five Year Plan and keeping in view your future priorities, what are your proposals for additional infrastructure, demonstration units and trainings/extension activities for the 12th Five Year Plan? Give justification and estimated financial requirement for each.
Proposals for XII Plan
Item Name Quantity Amount
(In lakhs) Justification for new
equipment Rotovator 1 1.1 To carry out the farm operations
Reversible single plough 1 0.5 To carry out the farm operations
Reversible double plough 1 0.5 To carry out the farm operations
Bullock cart 1 0.2 Transportation of farm produce
Power tiller 1 1.5
None of the firm participated in
the e-tender
Groundnut decorticator 2 0.1 Mechanized harvesting
Milking machine 1 0.12 Maintenance of Dairy
Milko tester 1 0.5 Maintenance of Dairy
Weighing balance (for milk and
small animals - 50 kg capacity) 1 0.1 Maintenance of Dairy
Automatic Milk packing machine 1 0.25 Maintenance of Dairy
Egg Candler machine 1 0.05 Maintenance of Dairy
Brooding equipment Feeders
Waterers 2 each 1.4 Poultry demonstrations
115
New works to be undertaken during XI plan Amount (Rs. In lakhs) Remarks/ Justification
Demonstration units 16 For demonstration
Storage godown 3 To storage the KVK produce
Threshing and Drying 4.5 For threshing KVK produce
Bore well 2 To irrigate the nursery
Irrigation system 2 For lime and pomegranate mother stock garden
29. What role the KVK has played to
a) Facilitate credit supply to the entrepreneurs to develop enterprises? At the end of in all vocational trainings trainees, a lecture from field officer of
lead bank was arranged.
b) Create awareness among the farmers regarding Kisan Credit Card and Crop Insurance Scheme? A brochure on crop insurance was prepared and distributed to the farmers
during krishi mela and field days.
30. How many villages have been covered by KVKs during 2005-06 to 2009-10? Give the name(s) of the villages and indicate the spread of the activities of the KVK in the district through a map.
Sl.No Taluka Villages
1 Indi Golasar, Atharga, Ramteerth Tanda, Kenganal, Benakanahalli, Sirakanahalli, Hiremasali, Nad(KD) , Salotagi, Kapanimbargi, Gundavan, Dulkhed, Chnnegaon, Lachyan & Baradol.
2 Bijapur Hubanur, Takkalaki, Nidoni, Nagaral, Kumathe, Babaleshwar & Aliabad
3 B.Bagewadi Jainapur, Kudagi, Golasangi, Biraladinni, Muttagi, Talewad, Yaranal, Hattarkihal, Nandihal, Bommanahalli, Donur, Yembatnal , Markabbinhalli, Satalagaon, Masabinal & Satihal
4 Sindagi Yaragal, Chikkarugi, Haranal, Padaganur, Kadlewad, Gabasavalagi & Rampur
117
31. What are the special features of your KVK which attract the farmers to the KVK?
Bijapur district comes under Northern Dry Zone of karnataka (Region II, Zone 3) and is
characterized by the lowest rainfall in Karnataka state with an average rainfall of 579.0 mm. The
district comprises five talukas namely Basavana Bagewadi, Bijapur, Muddebihal, Indi and
Sindagi. The five talukas receive rainfall between 565 to 590 mm. About 60 per cent of the
annual rainfall is received in the normal monsoon season (June-September), 14 per cent in the
pre monsoon (April-May) and about 23 per cent in the post monsoon months (October-
November) generally the remaining months are dry. The mean monthly maximum temperature
varies from 29.3 oC (December) to a maximum of 39.0 0C (May). The moisture content of the air
in the district varies from about 35 per cent during February, March and April to a maximum of
about 70 per cent in July, August and September. The district is characterized by high wind
velocity especially during monsoon months. The wind speed varies between 3.6 KMPH
(December) to 13.2 KMPH (July)
The Kharif crops are mainly grown in shallow eroded black soils (chalka soils), shallow
light soils and sandy loams. On account of their low moisture retentive capacity, better
infiltration rate, these soils get moistened with early rains in the month of June. The important
kharif crops grown are bajra, greengram, groundnut and sunflower. Besides these main crops,
pigeon pea, horsegram and sesamum are the other crops grown. Common mixed cropping
systems in the region are bajra+redgram and groundnut +redgram. Minor pulses like blackgram
and cowpea are also grown as mixed crops along with the above main crops, mainly in talukas
which have shallow black or red sandy loam soils. The monsoon (Kharif) cropping situation
covers to an extent of 25-30% of the total net cropped areas.
In this region, rabi (post- monsoon) crops are predominately grown, covering about 56
percent of the total sown area due occurrence of vertisols and assured rainfall received by North
East monsoon in the months of September and October. The important rabi crops grown are rabi
sorghum, sunflower, bengalgram and wheat. Under well irrigation, where water supply is
assured, generally fruit crops like banana, grape, pomegranate and lime are grown extensively in
Bijapur.
The frontline demonstrations conducted by the KVK over several years on aspects like
moisture conservation, promotion genotypes and management of diseases have substantially
helped in increasing the production and productivity of different crops like sunflower, redgram,
Bt.Cotton, groundnut, sorghum and pomegranate in different cluster villages. These
interventions have generated an additional revenue to the tune of Rs.21 crores.
118
The training cum demonstration programmes organized by KVK has helped in creating
awareness among the farmers about new technologies like new genotypes, moisture conservation
and integrated crop management. Adoption of these improved technologies by several farmers
might have generated an additional income more than the mentioned above.
The training conducted for extension personnel on different aspects of agriculture and
allied subjects will have amplified impact as they will be conveying the technologies to several
needy farmers. Consultancy and field visits have helped in adopting the suitable technologies for
management of crop resulting in good harvest. The other activities like seminars, group
meetings, radio and TV programmes have also contributed for knowledge gain and adoption of
technologies to some extent leading to change in the economic returns.
The need based and skill oriented vocational trainings such as vermiculturing, dairy
management, sheet goat rearing, sericulture and home science activities like candle and agarbatti
making, tailoring and value addition to farm produce have helped in creating self employment
and thereby making many farm families self supportive.
32. Is there any bottleneck in flow of fund to your KVK from the host organization? - No
Place : Bijapur
Date:
SIGNATURE OF PROGRAMME COORDINATOR