Upload
independent
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
http://hpq.sagepub.com/Journal of Health Psychology
http://hpq.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/03/25/1359105310396395The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/1359105310396395
published online 25 March 2011J Health PsycholKate Tchanturia
qualitative studyA brief emotion focused intervention for inpatients with anorexia nervosa: A
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
can be found at:Journal of Health PsychologyAdditional services and information for
http://hpq.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsEmail Alerts:
http://hpq.sagepub.com/subscriptionsSubscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Article
Introduction
Background
Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a life threatening illness with the highest mortality rate of any psychiatric disorder (Treasure et al., 2010). Treatment outcomes are poor with 20 percent remaining chronically ill, often requiring repeated hospital admissions and remaining dependent on state benefits (Steinhausen, 1999). The development of new and effective treatments for AN are urgently needed.
Targeting the core maintaining factors of AN is an essential step in generating treatment advances (Shafran and de Silva, 2003). One model that highlights these factors is Schmidt
and Treasure’s (2006) cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model for AN. Within this model, emotion avoidance, cognitive rigidity,
1 King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Division of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders
2 Eating Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Corresponding author:Dr. Kate Tchanturia, P0 59 Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. Email: [email protected]
A brief emotion focused intervention for inpatients with anorexia nervosa: A qualitative study
Claire Money2, Rebecca Genders 2,Janet Treasure1,2, Ulrike Schmidt1,2
and Kate Tchanturia1,2
AbstractCognitive Remediation and Emotion Skills Training (CREST), a brief social cognition intervention, was developed for inpatients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN). CREST was piloted and evaluated in 28 Anorexia Nervosa patients on a specialist eating disorder inpatient unit. Content analysis was employed to qualitatively explore patients’ experience of the intervention. Results suggest that patients perceived CREST positively. Main themes identified were that patients’ valued education regarding the function of emotions and found learning strategies to manage and express emotions helpful. The clinical and research implications are discussed.
Keywordsanorexia nervosa, cognitive remediation and emotion skills training (CREST), emotion processing, inpatient treatment, qualitative research
Journal of Health Psychology1–12© The Author(s) 2011Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermission.navDOI: 10.1177/1359105310396395hpq.sagepub.com
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
2 Journal of Health Psychology
pro-anorectic beliefs and the response of close others are put forward as core maintaining fac-tors and are suggested as the focus for new treatments for AN.
The aim of the current study was to evaluate a brief 10 session treatment package, which has been piloted in a specialist eating disorder (ED) inpatient unit to address one of the maintaining features of AN; namely emotion processing dif-ficulties. We were interested in patients’ per-spective about the acceptability and feasibility of this brief intervention that was targeting edu-cation and micro skills training for inpatients with AN. Emotions in AN have received increasing attention in the literature and there is a need to further understand the particular role they play in the development, maintenance and recovery from this disorder.
Emotions in AN
Addressing emotional skills in AN has histori-cal importance (Bruch, 1962), and recently two qualitative studies have explored the salient issues pertaining to emotions and social cogni-tion in AN. Kyriacou et al. (2009) conducted focus groups with AN patients, carers and clini-cians and identified difficulties in recognizing, understanding, expressing and tolerating emo-tions. With regards to treatment, one theme highlighted by patients and carers was a need for psycho-education on emotions. In addition, Fox (2009) explored individual AN patients accounts of their experience of emotions and emotion management. This study emphasized important themes including a poor development of meta-emotional skills and a sense of confu-sion about emotion states experienced. In par-ticular, difficulties with tolerating and managing anger and sadness were highlighted and patients often referred to early experiences where emo-tions were either overwhelming in the family environment or were avoided. This resulted in the avoidance or suppression of emotions and, in part, the AN served as a function to suppress and avoid feeling (Fox, 2009). There is some evidence that people with AN perceive illness
helping them to stop feeling emotions (Serpell et al., 1999).
Numerous experimental and self-report stud-ies have also found difficulties in affect recogni-tion and regulation in this population, with particular problems in recognizing, labelling and describing emotions, and with linking feel-ings to bodily sensations (e.g. Castro et al., 2010; Hambrook et al., 2010; Harrison et al., 2009; Jansch et al., 2009; Oldershaw et al., 2011; Russell et al., 2009; Schmidt et al., 1993). Moreover, patients with AN often suppress neg-ative feelings and subjugate their own needs in an attempt to preserve close relationships (Geller et al., 2000; Hartmann et al., 2009).
If emotional processing skills are impaired in AN, and there is some evidence that these difficulties may predict long-term outcome (Speranza et al., 2007), then it seems logical to target emotional difficulties in the comprehen-sive treatment of AN.
The CREST intervention
Cognitive Remediation and Emotion Skills Training (CREST) is a 10 session individual treatment for inpatients with severe AN, which targets thinking skills, emotion recognition, management and expression through psycho-education and skills-based strategies. This is a new area of intervention as other emotion focused treatments in AN, such as Dolhanty and Greenberg’s (2009) emotion focused therapy and Wildes and Marcus’s (2010) emotion acceptance behaviour therapy, tend to target patients in outpatient therapy. It is important to consider that in the early stages of inpatient treatment patients are often severely under-weight, with low levels of concentration, thus finding it difficult to engage in psychological therapy. Considering these factors, and the reported difficulties in keeping patients in treat-ment (Waller et al., 2009), brief and low inten-sity interventions may be useful for patients in the acute stage of illness. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of brief interventions for AN include Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT)
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Money et al. 3
(Tchanturia et al., 2007; 2008). Indeed the treat-ment package under investigation in the current study includes elements of CRT.
The first two sessions focus on thinking styles: bigger picture thinking and flexibility, and are derived from CRT (Tchanturia et al., 2007; 2008). This initial emphasis on meta-cognition also serves to target cognitive rigidity, an additional hypothesized maintaining factor for AN (Schmidt and Treasure, 2006). Although our main aim was to focus on emotions in this intervention we also wanted to build on previous work on CRT and encourage reflection on thinking styles, advan-tages of being more flexible and ‘think big’ ver-sus getting too caught up with details.
The following eight sessions target emotions with basic education regarding the function of emotions and a focus on emotion recognition, in particular labelling and identifying emotion states. In these sessions, materials and tasks are used to facilitate reflection on current and new strategies to manage, tolerate and express emotion. The intervention is not related to eating, weight or shape concerns and was intentionally designed to broaden the patient’s perspective of their current state and focus on everyday emotional skills. This manualized therapy was designed to be delivered by clinicians within the multi-disciplinary team.
An ‘end of therapy reflection’ form is com-pleted in the final session of CREST and pro-vides patients with the opportunity to reflect and consolidate what they have learnt during the sessions.
Aims and objectives
The objective of this study is to explore patients’ experiences of CREST. Qualitative methodology was employed to analyse patients’ subjective feedback in their end of therapy reflection forms.
Method
Content analysis
Content analysis involves analysing verbal or written data (Cole, 1988) by establishing
categories within the data, and counting the fre-quency with which they occur (Joffe and Yardley, 2003). These results can be used as evidence for the existence of a phenomenon and how frequently it occurs, and then used as a guide for action (Krippendorff, 1980). The pri-mary form of content analysis employed in this study was based on the ‘inductive’ method (Elo and Kyngas, 2007), as we sought to derive generic and sub-categories from the data alone, and were not searching for predefined catego-ries (‘deductive’ analysis).
The rational for adopting this method of qualitative analysis was to explore service users’ views regarding the acceptability and feasibility of this new 10 session intervention. This small scale study is part of a larger quantitative study which involves participants completing several neuro-psychological measures and self-report questionnaires. Therefore a methodology that would analyse ‘end of therapy reflection forms’ was used as it was the least time consuming and pressurizing for the patients involved.
Participants
Consecutive admissions to the inpatient unit of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust ED Service were offered CREST. Twenty-eight patients completed CREST and were included in this study. All had a DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association (APA), 1994) diagnosis of AN. One patient was male, and the mean age of the group was 25 (range 13–40). The mean Body Mass Index (BMI; kg/m2) before starting CREST was 14.7 (range 11.5–18.1). Eleven patients did not complete all 10 sessions of CREST and were not included in this study. The reasons for non-completion varied. Four patients were discharged from the ward before CREST was completed and seven decided to dis-engage from the inpatient treatment.
Data collection
All patients included in this study completed 10 sessions of CREST and an end of therapy
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
4 Journal of Health Psychology
reflection form in their final session with the therapist. This contained five open-ended ques-tions (see Tables 1–3). The patient and therapist both kept a copy of the reflection form. The therapist copy was given to a researcher who anonymized the reflections and then transcribed them into text files ready for data analysis. Patients receiving CREST provided informed consent. The study had been approved by the local ethics committee.
Data analysis
Two researchers separately read all text derived from the end of therapy reflections. They were blind to the identity of the respon-dents. Each question in the end of therapy reflection was analysed individually based on Elo and Kyngas (2007) and Joffe and Yardley (2003). After independently searching the data for codes or instances, the two researchers held a consensus meeting to agree on how these could be grouped together as categories, and to assign titles to categories. This process has been referred to as abstraction (Joffe and Yardley, 2003) and involves developing higher order, or main categories, then to group generic categories under these headings, and third to group together sub-categories where similar events or instances occur. In this study, the main categories had been predetermined by the questions asked in the end of therapy reflection. Therefore the researchers’ main task was to organize the data into generic cat-egories and sub-categories.
Reliability of methodology
Consistent with guidelines outlined by Elliott (1999), the first two authors undertook the ini-tial analysis separately and then agreed on categories with the Principal Investigator. All identified categories were included in the analysis. The data were then re-analysed to check for consistency and to allow the authors complete immersion and familiarization with the data.
Results
Tables 1–3 present the main results of the con-tent analysis that include the following: the main category (i.e. the reflection question); the generic and sub-categories which were derived from the data analysis; and quotes to illustrate the sub-categories.
Following is a summary of the key findings under their main category headings.
Main category: What have you learnt about yourself from this therapy?
Patients recognized that they either bottled up or avoided/blocked emotions (50%). One par-ticipant commented: ‘How I used to block my emotions and not be able to sit with them . . . .’ This complements research that suggests EDs serve the purpose of avoiding or regulating emotion (Davies et al., 2010; Kyriacou et al., 2009). Following CREST, patients reported that they were developing skills to express/commu-nicate emotions (25%) and felt more able to identify emotions and consider the positive function of emotion (39%).
Main category: Were there any aspects that were particularly helpful?
The analysis suggested that patients found learn-ing new strategies to manage emotions helpful (71%), in particular learning to label emotions correctly and acting on them early on as exempli-fied by one patient: ‘ . . . for me, looking at ways to reduce emotions getting to that extreme point by acting on feelings before they start to spiral out of control.’ This finding is important as learning new strategies to manage emotions may reduce com-pensatory ED behaviours, such as restriction, bingeing and purging. Learning about the function of emotions was also reported as being helpful (61%). In particular, education around emotions communicating needs was found to be beneficial as the following quote suggests: ‘The idea that each and every emotion is simply an indicator that I need something, or a guide to determine how I
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Money et al. 5
behave.’ This is a significant finding in the light of research which has found that people with AN suppress emotions and discount their own emo-tional needs due to a fear of them impacting negatively on relationships (Geller et al., 2000; Hambrook et al., 2010). Increasing patients’ rec-ognition and understanding that emotions signal important needs may help in encouraging patients to take corrective action to meet these needs rather than suppress them. This compliments a study by Graham et al. (2008) who found that appropriately expressing negative emotions is associated with positive relationship outcomes and can help elicit care and support.
Main category: Were there any aspects that were particularly unhelpful?
There was little that patients found unhelpful. One person commented on the manualized nature of the intervention and found it too struc-tured, and two patients (7%) commented that it was not personalized enough. Two patients (7%) also found the sessions that focused on thinking styles unhelpful, and four patients (14%) found sessions that explored recognizing emotions in others unhelpful.
Main category: What could be improved?
Nearly a third of the patients stated that more sessions would be helpful, and seven patients (25%) asked for a stronger focus on topics such as managing emotions, and the needs that emo-tions are communicating. This aspect of the intervention was addressed by exploring with the patient what needs a number of different emotions may be communicating. This was fur-ther extended by exploring how patients could act on and communicate these needs.
Main category: What strategies have you learnt to use in the future?
A key finding was that patients found learning practical skills beneficial. Over 60 percent of
the patients reported that in future they would try to express their emotions by talking to peo-ple, for example someone said: ‘ . . . expressing emotions in relation to difficult situations – voice what I am thinking or feeling.’ Having a positive attitude was also commented on by 25 percent of the patients alongside labelling and acknowledging emotions. Also of significance in terms of strategies learnt was having an emo-tional awareness that included recognizing the benefits of experiencing emotions (22%). For example: ‘Negative emotions can have a posi-tive effect as they can alert me to the fact that something needs to change and inspire me to take positive action.’ Exercises which increased patients’ awareness of the functions of emo-tions, in particular negative ones, asked patients to consider why we have negative emotions and how they can be helpful (e.g. anger helps us to stand up for ourselves). These findings also support studies that have looked into positive outcomes from emotional awareness and coach-ing training (Dolhanty and Greenberg, 2009; Farrell and Shaw, 1994).
Therapists who conducted CREST found the experience to be extremely valuable in initiating a non-threatening, collaborative relationship. CREST provided therapists an opportunity to engage patients early on in an inpatient admission, and begin to explore and reflect on the nature and function of emotions alongside considering strategies to manage and express emotions. It was felt that CREST enabled thinking about feeling, which in turn paved the way for more in-depth psychological work to be carried out once CREST was completed.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of AN patients’ experience of an emotion focused intervention on an inpatient unit. The data appears to offer important insights and information into patients’ percep-tion and experience of CREST. It also draws attention to areas of the therapy that may be
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
6 Journal of Health Psychology
Tabl
e 1.
Res
ults
from
con
tent
ana
lysi
s on
ref
lect
ion
ques
tion
1: W
hat
have
you
lear
nt a
bout
you
rsel
f fro
m t
his
ther
apy?
Mai
n ca
tego
ryG
ener
ic C
ateg
ory
Sub
Cat
egor
yFr
eque
ncy
Exam
ple
Wha
t ha
ve y
ou
lear
nt a
bout
yo
urse
lf fr
om
thi
s th
erap
y?
Thi
ngs
I hav
e le
arnt
ab
out
mys
elf
Bott
le u
p em
otio
ns8
‘How
I de
al w
ith e
mot
ions
- t
hat
I bot
tle t
hem
up
until
the
y ex
plod
e.’
Bloc
k/av
oid
my
emot
ions
6
‘How
I us
ed t
o bl
ock
my
emot
ions
and
not
be
able
to
sit
with
the
m.’
It’s
ok t
o ex
pres
s yo
ur fe
elin
gs6
‘It’s
ok t
o ta
lk a
bout
you
r pr
oble
ms,
it m
akes
you
feel
bet
ter
afte
rwar
ds.’
Not
get
ting
need
s m
et5
‘ . .
. run
into
diff
icul
ties
whe
n I d
on’t
look
aft
er o
wn
need
s.’G
ood
at c
arin
g fo
r ot
hers
5‘I
have
als
o le
arnt
tha
t I a
m a
gre
at fr
iend
to
othe
rs b
ut n
ot
a gr
eat
frie
nd t
o m
ysel
f.’Sk
ills
I hav
e be
gun
usin
gEx
pres
sing
/com
mun
icat
ing
mor
e7
‘ . .
. bet
ter
at b
eing
abl
e to
exp
ress
feel
ings
– m
ore
open
in
com
mun
icat
ing
posi
tive
and
nega
tives
.’Po
sitiv
e in
tent
ions
of n
egat
ive
emot
ions
6
‘Neg
ativ
e fe
elin
gs a
ren’
t al
way
s ba
d –
they
tea
ch/p
rote
ct.’
Iden
tifyi
ng e
mot
ions
5‘H
ow t
o na
me
emot
ions
and
how
to
find
the
righ
t w
ords
fo
r ho
w I’
m fe
elin
g.’Lo
ok a
t th
e bi
gger
pic
ture
4‘ .
. . i
t’s a
lrig
ht n
ot t
o w
orry
abo
ut t
he li
ttle
det
ails
bei
ng
perf
ect
and
to lo
ok a
t th
e bi
gger
pic
ture
.’Em
otio
ns a
re fl
uid
4‘ .
. . t
hat
emot
ions
are
flui
d an
d ch
ange
thr
ough
out
the
day.’
Oth
er p
eopl
e’s
pers
pect
ives
3‘B
eing
mor
e aw
are
of o
ther
peo
ple’
s pe
rspe
ctiv
es’
Ack
now
ledg
ing/
acce
ptin
g em
otio
ns3
‘ . .
. it
is o
k an
d ac
cept
able
to
feel
sad
at
times
.’
Skill
s I w
ould
like
to
use
Be m
ore
asse
rtiv
e3
‘Nee
d to
be
asse
rtiv
e.’
Be m
ore
open
3
‘Tha
t I n
eed
to fo
cus
on c
omm
unic
atin
g m
y em
otio
ns t
o th
ose
arou
nd m
e.’
Be m
ore
posi
tive
3‘I
wou
ld li
ke t
o be
mor
e po
sitiv
e. B
eing
mor
e pr
o-ac
tive
can
mak
e po
sitiv
e th
ings
hap
pen.
’
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Money et al. 7
Tabl
e 2.
Res
ults
from
con
tent
ana
lysi
s on
ref
lect
ion
ques
tion
2 an
d 3:
Wer
e th
ere
any
aspe
cts
that
wer
e pa
rtic
ular
ly h
elpf
ul?
Part
icul
arly
unh
elpf
ul?
Mai
n ca
tego
ryG
ener
ic C
ateg
ory
Sub
Cat
egor
yFr
eque
ncy
Exam
ple
Wer
e th
ere
any
aspe
cts
whi
ch w
ere
part
icul
arly
hel
pfu
l?
Emot
iona
l str
ateg
ies
lear
ntLa
belli
ng 5
‘Loo
king
mor
e sp
ecifi
cally
at
diffe
rent
em
otio
ns
(e.g
. lab
ellin
g).’
Act
ing
befo
re e
mot
ions
sp
iral
4‘A
lso
for
me
look
ing
at w
ays
to r
educ
e em
otio
ns
gett
ing
to t
hat
extr
eme
poin
t by
act
ing
on fe
elin
gs
befo
re t
hey
star
t to
spi
ral o
ut o
f con
trol
.’C
omm
unic
atin
g fe
elin
gs 3
‘ . .
. tal
king
abo
ut y
our
prob
lem
s ca
n ac
tual
ly h
elp
you
deal
with
the
m.’
Non
-spe
cific
str
ateg
ies
3‘S
trat
egie
s to
man
age
diffi
cult
situ
atio
ns t
hat
occu
rred
dur
ing
the
wee
k.’
Rec
ogni
zing
the
pos
itive
in
tent
ions
of e
mot
ions
3
‘Loo
king
at
emot
ions
in a
diff
eren
t w
ay e
.g. p
ositi
ve
mea
ning
s of
neg
ativ
e em
otio
ns.’
Lear
ning
abo
ut e
mot
ions
Rel
atio
n to
nee
ds
7‘T
he id
ea t
hat
each
and
eve
ry e
mot
ion
is s
impl
y an
indi
cato
r th
at I
need
som
ethi
ng, o
r a
guid
e to
de
term
ine
how
I be
have
.’A
war
enes
s of
ow
n di
fficu
lties
5
‘ . .
. bei
ng m
ore
awar
e of
the
issu
es a
nd d
iffic
ultie
s th
at n
eed
atte
ndin
g to
.’Fl
uidi
ty o
f em
otio
ns 4
‘Kno
win
g th
ere
are
diffe
rent
em
otio
ns t
hat
we
feel
, it
is o
k to
hav
e ot
her
emot
ions
rat
her
than
just
fe
elin
g th
e sa
me
all t
he t
ime.
’A
spec
ts o
f the
app
roac
hR
efle
ctio
n tim
e 6
‘Hav
ing
time/
spac
e to
ref
lect
on
emot
ions
and
w
hat
they
act
ually
mea
n to
me
in e
very
day
life.
’D
oing
hom
ewor
k 5
‘Hom
ewor
k al
low
s tim
e to
com
e up
with
goo
d ex
ampl
es/r
efle
ct m
ore.
’Em
path
y of
the
rapi
st 4
‘I w
as m
et w
ith a
ver
y ca
ring
and
com
pass
iona
te
appr
oach
and
som
eone
list
enin
g to
how
it w
as
for
me.
’St
ruct
ure/
the
mes
3‘S
truc
ture
/hav
ing
them
es t
o ea
ch s
essi
on.’
All
sess
ions
wer
e he
lpfu
ln/
a 6
‘To
be h
ones
t ev
ery
sess
ion
has
been
ben
efic
ial.’
Wer
e th
ere
any
aspe
cts
whi
ch w
ere
part
icul
arly
unh
elp
ful?
Asp
ects
of t
he a
ppro
ach
Initi
ally
too
bas
ic 3
‘Fir
st fe
w s
essi
ons
seem
ed a
litt
le b
asic
.’N
ot p
erso
naliz
ed
2‘T
asks
[w
ere]
sta
tistic
bas
ed r
athe
r th
an p
erso
nal
base
d.’
Too
stru
ctur
ed 1
‘Som
etim
es t
oo s
truc
ture
d.’
Ende
d to
o qu
ickl
y 1
‘ . .
. it
cam
e to
an
end
too
quic
kly.’
(Con
tinue
d)
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
8 Journal of Health Psychology
considered for change that will be helpful in the future development of the intervention.
Overall summary
Our qualitative findings suggest that CREST is an acceptable intervention for an inpatient group of AN patients. In a population that is known to have difficulty in correctly identify-ing and expressing emotion (Castro et al., 2010; Davies et al., 2010; Harrison et al., 2009; Jansch et al., 2009; Oldershaw et al., 2011,), CREST could be a helpful step in providing information about basic (micro) emotion processing skills. Alongside enhancing these skills, CREST had a secondary benefit of increasing assertiveness with over a third of patients reporting this being a strategy they would use in the future. This highlights an improvement in patients’ confi-dence and perceived ability to express thoughts and emotions. This is an area that Kyriacou et al. (2009) and Fox (2009) highlighted that patients with AN have difficulty with. This could also have a positive impact on reducing inter-personal problems known to be difficult to this population (Fairburn et al., 2003; Hartmaan et al., 2009; Schmidt and Treasure 2006) and encourage more social interaction.
With reports of high drop-out rates in treat-ment (Waller et al., 2009) and difficulties in engaging patients with AN, CREST provides an opportunity to engage patients in a brief, low intensity therapeutic intervention and to build rapport at the outset of an inpatient admission. CREST encourages inter-session work and this was responded to positively with patients com-menting on valuing the reflection time and enjoying a specific task-based approach. This is important on an inpatient unit where patients are often severely underweight (BMI < 15) and are thought to struggle to engage with in-depth psychological work initially (Schmidt and Treasure, 2006; Whitney et al., 2008).
There are two recently reported innovative treatments targeting emotions in AN (Dolhanty and Greenberg, 2009 – case study; Wildes and Marcus, 2010 – case series). The first is called M
ain
cate
gory
Gen
eric
Cat
egor
ySu
b C
ateg
ory
Freq
uenc
yEx
ampl
e
Cer
tain
tas
ks/ s
essi
ons
Faci
al e
xpre
ssio
ns 4
‘Did
n’t
gain
a lo
t fr
om t
he fa
cial
exp
ress
ions
ex
erci
ses.’
CRT
ses
sion
s 2
‘Not
sur
e at
firs
t –
thin
king
abo
ut t
hink
ing.’
Phys
ical
man
ifest
atio
ns
2‘N
ot h
elpf
ul lo
okin
g at
how
em
otio
ns fe
el in
the
bo
dy.’
Emot
ion
switc
hing
1‘D
idn’
t ta
ke t
hat
muc
h fr
om e
mpt
ion
switc
hing
se
ssio
n –
alre
ady
awar
e of
sw
itchi
ng e
mot
ions
.’N
o as
pect
s un
help
ful
n/a
10‘N
one
– le
arne
d so
met
hing
from
eve
ryth
ing.’
Tabl
e 2.
(Co
ntin
ued)
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Money et al. 9
Tabl
e 3.
Res
ults
from
con
tent
ana
lysi
s on
ref
lect
ion
ques
tion
4 an
d 5:
Wha
t co
uld
be im
prov
ed? W
hat
stra
tegi
es h
ave
you
lear
nt t
o us
e in
the
futu
re?
Mai
n ca
tego
ryG
ener
ic C
ateg
ory
Sub
Cat
egor
yFr
eque
ncy
Exam
ple
Wha
t co
uld
be
imp
rove
d?M
ore
sess
ions
Long
er t
hera
py 8
‘The
the
rapy
her
e is
the
bes
t I’v
e en
coun
tere
d, t
he o
nly
criti
cism
is t
here
isn’
t m
ore
of it
.’Fo
llow
up
sess
ions
1‘ .
. . a
follo
w u
p co
urse
of C
RES
T w
ould
be
high
ly b
enef
icia
l.’Ta
ilore
d m
ore
to
indi
vidu
alM
ore
in d
epth
4‘T
akin
g th
e th
erap
y to
a m
ore
in d
epth
leve
l, re
latin
g em
otio
ns t
o an
und
erly
ing
thin
king
and
bel
iefs
and
wor
king
fr
om t
hat
leve
l.’M
ore
pers
onal
ized
2‘If
it w
as p
erso
naliz
ed, t
ailo
red
to m
e/in
divi
dual
rat
her
than
ge
neri
c to
all.’
Mor
e on
cer
tain
top
ics
Man
agin
g em
otio
ns
2‘M
ore
stra
tegi
es –
wha
t to
do
in e
mot
iona
l situ
atio
ns.’
Emot
ions
and
nee
ds 2
‘Mor
e ab
out
emot
ions
and
the
ir r
elat
ions
hip
to n
eeds
.’Le
ss o
n ce
rtai
n to
pics
Faci
al E
xpre
ssio
n 2
‘A fe
w le
ss in
trod
ucto
ry s
essi
ons
e.g.
look
ing
at fa
ces.’
Not
hing
cou
ld b
e im
prov
edn/
a 4
‘Not
hing
. I fo
und
the
num
ber
of s
essi
ons
to b
e ju
st r
ight
an
d th
e le
ngth
of s
essi
ons
appr
opri
ate.
’W
hat
stra
tegi
es h
ave
you
lear
nt t
o u
se in
th
e fu
ture
?
Hav
ing
emot
iona
l aw
aren
ess
Bene
fits
of e
mot
ions
6‘N
egat
ive
emot
ions
can
hav
e a
posi
tive
effe
ct a
s th
ey c
an
aler
t m
e to
the
fact
tha
t so
met
hing
nee
ds t
o ch
ange
and
in
spir
e m
e to
tak
e po
sitiv
e ac
tion.
’Bo
ttlin
g up
is n
ot h
elpf
ul 4
“Rem
embe
ring
bot
tling
up
does
n’t
get
me
anyw
here
apa
rt
from
frus
trat
ed a
nd a
ngry
”Pr
actic
al S
kills
Talk
ing/
Com
mun
icat
ing
17‘ .
. . e
xpre
ssin
g em
otio
ns in
rel
atio
n to
diff
icul
t si
tuat
ions
–
voic
e w
hat
I am
thi
nkin
g or
feel
ing.’
Bein
g m
ore
asse
rtiv
e 9
‘Bei
ng m
ore
asse
rtiv
e by
spe
akin
g up
mor
e w
hen
need
ed.’
Hav
ing
a po
sitiv
e at
titud
e 7
‘Foc
usin
g on
pos
itive
thi
ngs
– re
flect
ing
on p
ositi
ves
and
bein
g pr
o-ac
tive
at m
akin
g po
sitiv
e th
ings
hap
pen.
’La
belli
ng 6
‘Abl
e to
iden
tify
feel
ings
mor
e ac
cura
tely.
’G
ettin
g ne
eds
met
6‘A
skin
g fo
r he
lp w
hen
I nee
d it.
’A
ckno
wle
dgin
g em
otio
ns 6
‘Ack
now
ledg
ing
how
I fe
el.’
Look
ing
at t
he b
igge
r pi
ctur
e 5
‘I ha
ve le
arnt
to
look
at
the
bigg
er p
ictu
re w
hen
I am
feel
ing
anxi
ous
or w
orri
ed a
bout
a c
erta
in s
ituat
ion.
’In
terv
ene
befo
re
emot
ions
spi
ral
3‘T
o tr
y an
d de
al w
ith e
mot
ion
befo
re it
get
s ou
t of
con
trol
.’
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
10 Journal of Health Psychology
Emotion Focused Therapy (EFT) that targets case formulation and incorporates a gestalt approach. The second is Emotion Acceptance Behaviour Therapy that incorporates thinking from both acceptance and commitment based therapies and mindfulness based therapies. Both approaches target emotional processing in relation to eating disorders, and involve in-depth work and a long commitment varying form 24 sessions to eighteen months of weekly therapy. CREST differs from these therapies in that it targets inpatients and is a brief prelimi-nary intervention, collaborative and psycho-educational in style and aimed at facilitating engagement early on in an inpatient admission. The hope being that this will encourage and enhance further more in-depth psychological work once the groundwork of basic emotion processing skills has been addressed.
The use of a qualitative approach enriched our understanding of what patients specifically found more and less helpful about this emotion focused intervention. The thoughts and experi-ences of the patient are essential elements, which can significantly influence adherence and outcome of treatment, and need to be care-fully gauged and addressed when developing a therapeutic intervention. With a growing inter-est in conducting research that is congruent with paradigms and methods that are more closely related to practice (Morrow, 2007), the use of content analysis provided a rich source of data derived from the subjective experiences of patients. This would not have been possible with a quantitative methodology alone.
Limitations
The study was conducted on one ward, and future studies may consider implementing and evaluating such an intervention across multiple sites to explore its generalizability. Only patients who completed all sessions of CREST were included in this study, thus potentially biasing the sample. It would have been helpful to have reflection forms for those patients who did not complete CREST. Some of the reasons
given for discontinuing CREST included not seeing any therapeutic value in exploring emo-tions and not seeing the benefit of using a man-ualized intervention as it was viewed as not being individualized enough. This could be a consideration for the future development of CREST. Considering the pathology of this patient group is also important when interpret-ing these findings. Patients may aim to please, perhaps making critical reflections difficult, particularly as the reflection forms were com-pleted with and given directly to the therapist at the end of the final session. However, some negative comments were given, suggesting openness and frankness on the part of the patients. To increase patients’ willingness to give feedback, therapists were explicit in explaining the importance of feedback to aid the development of the intervention.
Recommendations
This study highlighted the acceptability and feasibility of an emotion focused therapy, with over half of the patients suggesting further ses-sions would be beneficial. After evaluating this data and taking into consideration patients’ comments, the CREST manual has undergone some revision with more emphasis on skills and emotion expression. Having been piloted, it would be helpful to trial CREST in comparison to treatment as usual to assess if this interven-tion adds therapeutic value. Qualitative analysis may be supplemented with standardized self-report measures or experimental tasks to pro-vide a firmer evidence base for emotion focused interventions in the AN population.
Conclusions
Recent studies have highlighted the particular difficulty patients with AN have in recognizing and managing emotions. The preliminary find-ings of this study suggest that this emotion focused therapy is of value in an inpatient set-ting and patients generally responded positively to the simple and collaborative style. This kind
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Money et al. 11
of intervention may be instrumental in fostering engagement and rapport, allowing patients to start to think about their own emotion process-ing style and learn new ways of managing and expressing emotion.
Funding
This work is part of the ARIADNE programme (Applied Research into Anorexia Nervosa and Not Otherwise Specified Eating Disorders), funded by a Department of Health NIHR Programme Grant for Applied Research (grant number RP-PG-0606-1043). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. This work was also supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London.
ReferencesAmerican Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. Washington, DC: APA.
Bruch H (1962) Perceptual and conceptual distur-bances in Anorexia Nervosa. Psychosomatic Medicine 24: 187–194.
Cole FL (1988) Content analysis: Process and appli-cation. Clinical Nurse Specialist 2: 53–57.
Davies H, Schmidt U, Stahl D and Tchanturia K (2010) Evoked facial emotional expression and emotional experience in people with anorexia ner-vosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders (in press). PMID: 20957704.
Castro L, Davies H, Hale L, Surguladze S and Tchanturia K (2010) Facial affect recognition in Anorexia Nervosa: Is obsessionality a missing piece of the puzzle? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 44(12): 1118–25.
Dolhanty J and Greenberg LS (2009) Emotion – focused therapy in a case of Anorexia Nervosa. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 16: 366–382.
Elliott R, Fisher C and Rennie D (1999) Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 38(3): 215–229.
Elo S and Kyngas H (2007) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62: 107–115.
Fairburn CG, Cooper Z and Shafran R (2003) Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disor-ders: A ‘transdiagnostic’ theory and treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy 41: 509–528.
Farrell JM and Shaw IA (1994) Emotional aware-ness training: A prerequisite to effective cognitive behavioural treatment of borderline personality disorder. Cognitive and Behavioural Practice 1(1): 71–91.
Fox JRE (2009) A qualitative exploration of the per-ception of emotions in anorexia nervosa: A basic emotion and developmental perspective. Journal of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 16: 276–302.
Geller J, Cockell S, Hewitt PL, Goldner EM and Flett GL (2000) Inhibited expression of nega-Inhibited expression of nega-tive emotions and interpersonal orientation in anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders 28: 8–19.
Graham SM, Huang JY, Clark MS and Helgeson VS (2008) The positives of negative emotions: Willingness to express negative emotions pro-motes relationships. Personality and Social Cognition Bulletin 34: 394–406.
Harrison A, Sullivan S, Tchanturia K and Treasure J (2009) Emotion recognition and regula-tion in Anorexia Nervosa. Journal of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 16: 348–356.
Hartmann A, Zeeck A, and Barrett MS (2010) Interpersonal problems in eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders 43(7): 619–627.
Hambrook D, Oldershaw A, Rimes K, Schmidt U, Tchanturia K, Treasure J, et al. (2010) Emotional expression, self-silencing and distress tolerance in anorexia nervosa and chronic fatigue syn-drome. British Journal of Clinical Psychology PMID: 20704779
Jansch C, Harmer C and Cooper MJ (2009) Emotional processing in women with anorexia nervosa and in healthy volunteers. Eating Behaviours 10: 184–191.
Joffe H and Yardley L (2003) Content and the-matic analysis. In: Marks DF and Yardley L (eds) Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. Sage Publications Ltd, 56-69.
Krippendorff K (1980) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Ltd.
Kyriacou O, Easter A and Tchanturia K (2009) Comparing views of patients, parents and clinicians
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from
12 Journal of Health Psychology
on emotions in anorexia: A qualitative study. Journal of Health Psychology 14: 843–854.
Morrow SL (2007) Qualitative research in Counselling Psychology: Conceptual foundations. The Counselling Psychologist 35(2): 209–235.
Oldershaw A, Hambrook D, Stahl D, Tchanturia K, Treasure J and Schmidt U (2011) The socio- emotional processing stream in Anorexia Nervosa. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 35(3): 970–988.
Russell TA, Schmidt U, Doherty L, Young V and Tchanturia K (2009) Aspects of social cogni-tion in anorexia nervosa: affective and cogni-tive theory of mind. Psychiatry Research 168: 181–185.
Schmidt U, Jiwany A and Treasure J (1993) A con-trolled study of alexithymia in eating disorders. Comprehensive psychiatry 34(1): 54–58.
Schmidt U and Treasure J (2006) Anorexia-Nervosa: Valued and visible. A cognitive-interpersonal maintenance model and its implications for research and practice. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 45: 343–366.
Serpell L, Treasure J, Teasdale J and Sullivan V (1999) Anorexia nervosa: Friend or foa? International Journal of Eating Disorders 25: 177–186.
Shafran R and de Silva P (2003) Cognitive behav-Cognitive behav-ioural models. In: Treasure J, Schmidt U and Van Furth E (eds). Handbook of Eating Disorders. Chichester: Wiley, 121–139.
Speranza M, Loas G, Wallier J and Corcos M (2007) Predictive value of alexithymia in
patients with eating disorders: A 3-year pro-spective study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 63: 365–371.
Steinhausen HC (1999) Eating disorders. In: Steinhausen HC and Verhulst FC (eds) Risk and Outcomes in Developmental Psychopathology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 210–230
Tchanturia K, Davies H, Campbell I (2007) Cognitive Remediation for patients with Anorexia Nervosa: Preliminary findings. Annals of General Psychiatry 14: 6–14
Tchanturia K, Davies H, Lopez C, Schmidt U, Treasure J and Wykes T (2008) Neuropsycholo-gical task performance before and after cogni-tive remediation in anorexia nervosa: A pilot case-series. Psychological Medicine 38(9): 1371–1373.
Treasure J, Claudino AM and Zucker N (2010) Eating disorders. The Lancet 375(9714): 583–593.
Waller G, Schmidt U, Treasure J, Murray K, Aleyna J, Emanuelli F, et al. (2009) Problems across care pathways in specialist adult eating disorder ser-vices. Psychiatric Bulletin 33: 26–29.
Whitney J, Easter A and Tchanturia K (2008) Service users’ feedback on cognitive training in the treat-ment of anorexia nervosa: A qualitative study. International Journal of Eating Disorders 41(6): 542–550.
Wildes J and Marcus M (2010) Development of emo-tion acceptance behavior therapy for Anorexia Nervosa: Case series. International Journal of Eating Disorders (in press). PMID: 20721894.
at King's College London - ISS on April 5, 2011hpq.sagepub.comDownloaded from