Upload
umich
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 1 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/)
XQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar
August 26, 2015
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html)
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/author)
The XQs (Ten Questions) series is a conversation with the author of new and exciting works in South Asian Studies, whose
aim is not to “review” but to contextualize, historicize and promote new scholarship. Previously: I
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs_i_a_conversation_with_teena_purohit.html), II
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xqs_ii_a_conversation_with_kavita_saraswathi_datla.html), III
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/optical_character_recognition/xqs_iii_a_conversation_with_arafaat_valiani.html).
ABOUT CHAPATI MYSTERY (HTTP://WWW.CHAPATIMYSTERY.COM/ABOUT) ·
SEPOY, ELSEWHERE (HTTP://WWW.CHAPATIMYSTERY.COM/ME_ELSEWHERE) ·
ABOUT THE AUTHORS (HTTP://WWW.CHAPATIMYSTERY.COM/ABOUT_THE_AUTHORS) ·
CM BOOKS (HTTP://WWW.CHAPATIMYSTERY.COM/CM_BOOKS) · ARCHIVES (HTTP://WWW.CHAPATIMYSTERY.COM/ARCHIVES) ·
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 2 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/08/Anwar_Pic.jpg)Nausheen H Anwar
received her PhD from Columbia University. She is currently
Assistant Professor of Urban Studies in the Social Sciences &
Liberal Arts Department (SSLA)at the Institute of Business
Administration (IBA), Karachi. Her book, Infrastructure Redux:
Crisis, Progress in Industrial Pakistan & Beyond
(http://www.palgrave.com/page/detail/infrastructure-redux-
nausheen-anwar/?isb=9781137448163) was published by
Palgrave Macmillan in 2015.
[Interview conducted by Patwari, via email, July 29th-August 24th, 2015]
1. In Karachi, issues such as electricity outages and water scarcity are never far from one’s mind. One way to
make sense of these is the failed/failing state narrative, or that the state is missing. In your terrific book,
Infrastructure Redux: Crisis, Progress in Industrial Pakistan & Beyond, you argue that the state is not missing in this
infrastructural crisis, or at least that this is not an adequate framework for understanding Pakistan’s
infrastructural woes. Would you elaborate?
At a basic level, my work calls for a reorientation of the ‘state failure’ argument. This line of argumentation has
been invoked with particular regularity in Pakistan and that too with damaging consequences in terms of seeing
the political-economy as something that has descended into a permanent state of ‘chaos’. Not only is this an over-
simplification, but it also elides the complex and contradictory terrain on which the state-led project of
infrastructure development has unfolded in historical and contemporary contexts. While there is no doubt that
Pakistan’s electricity problems have worsened in the last decade and the state is no longer able to provide
uninterrupted electricity, yet it would be a truism to read this problematic as a straightforward illustration of
state failure in the overall planning and provision of infrastructure. I have endeavored to situate the
infrastructure crisis within a bigger story of the ways in which infrastructure itself has been historically
transformed; as a developmental concept, a policy tool and as a technology of rule, and above all to capture the
state-infrastructure nexus in relational terms. While incessant electricity breakdowns point to state disconnect,
the development of other types of infrastructures such as roads, motorways, highways, ports, signal the state’s
ongoing involvement. In the specific context of my research in industrializing urban Punjab, I encountered
contradictory narratives about the state’s role in infrastructure planning and provision. These narratives do not
mesh with easy explanations of a failed Pakistani state. I contend that rather than seeing the state as absent or
missing in the planning and provision of infrastructure, it is far more constructive to examine the ways in which
its presence has been reconfigured, for instance through firm-led infrastructural initiatives, privatization and
deregulation and processes of globalization. These contradictory narratives enable us to interrogate the
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 3 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
relational context in which state-firm relations are assembled on ground, and how such processes hinge on
dynamics of state patronage. For instance, in Chapter 2 on Sialkot, I discuss how road building discourses have
played a key role in bringing together the state, firms and infrastructures, and I contrast this with the electricity
case study in Chapter 3 on Faisalabad. So in a sense the messy terrain of building state-firm relations and the
accompanying symbolic aspects of infrastructures also force us to pose important questions about the
marginalizing and liberating powers of such technologies.
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Infrastructure-Redux.jpg)
2. What is your book’s main argument?
The focus of this book is on industrial infrastructures of production and circulation: ports, roads, electricity. It
looks at how these material technologies undergird visions of progress and mediate relations between the state
and capitalist firms. The book explores the impact of disintegrating infrastructures on different sized firms in
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 4 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
diverse export-oriented industries in urban Punjab, and analyzes the conditions through which infrastructures’
disruptions and facilitations bring to fore struggles to reshape modern industrial life in Pakistan. The main
argument is that in the present conjuncture of an infrastructure crisis the apparent absence of the state in the
planning and provision of industrial infrastructure is somewhat misleading. It’s not that the state is missing but
rather its presence is reconfigured through a variety of firm-led infrastructural initiatives. Moreover, the
strategies of capitalist firms operate within a moral economy in which a pervasive narrative of national moral
decline and uncertainty explains the disintegration of a specific type of public infrastructure: electricity. An
important point is that the contradictory narratives of state absence and presence emerge from the uneven
terrain of infrastructural expansion and contraction, and infrastructure’s mediation of state–firm relations
amidst a highly uncertain political-economic landscape. The basic context of these competing narratives of crisis
and progress can be understood in terms of the patron–client model that has historically defined relations of
power between the Pakistani state and industrialists. The main argument is bolstered by case study data
generated through surveys and ethnographic methods in export-oriented industrial and industrializing districts
of Sialkot and Faisalabad in Punjab, Pakistan.
3. Critiques of the term ‘Neoliberalism’ are now emerging. In her recent essay
(http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/against-students/), Sara Ahmed, for instance, has taken issue with its
sweeping application. In your book you take issue with the term as well. Can you explain what you see as the
main problem with it?
My main problem with the term is that it has been taken as an explanation for everything: from the establishment
of market relations to the spread of administrative control, and yet remains a highly obscure concept. Often it is
the simplistic picture of neoliberalism that is taken for granted, particularly the replacement of governmental
authority by free market rules. In the Pakistani context of an infrastructural transition, privatization measures,
infrastructure ‘unbundling’, road building projects, firms’ strategic responses to infrastructure innovations
anchored in patron–client frames—these dynamics do not really tell us what neoliberalism is about. The cases of
the roads, ports and electricity infrastructures do not conform to the image of an ‘absent’ or ‘withered away’
state that is often seen as a hallmark of neoliberalism. In Pakistan, private capital and competition has been
introduced through reforms in the electricity generation industry, but with very ambiguous effects alongside
greater state interventions through the prism of regulation. I could have argued that this process represents a
localized version of neoliberalism, but I believe this approach has limited analytical value. Certain scholars like
James Ferguson consider the possibility of abandoning altogether the term neoliberalism. Others, for instance,
Stephen Collier in his book Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Modernity, Biopolitics (2011), underscore that a
revised understanding of neoliberalism and its attendant transformations are needed. While it is clear that
pinning down neoliberalism is an important task, as social scientists we need to consider carefully the use of the
term.
4. I loved the chapter on developmentalism. Can you tell us what the similarities and differences are in the
colonial and postcolonial development in Pakistan? Where does PL-480 fit the story of development in
Pakistan?
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 5 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
After Pakistan’s independence in 1947, with the expansion of the field of development economics and the
extensive use of foreign financing and expertise from the Ford Foundation and the World Bank to finance
infrastructure projects, foreign advisors like Gustav Papanek, Richard Gilbert and economists like Mahbub ul
Haq, Habibur Rahman and others who worked in the Planning Commission, had articulated ideas that abided by
developmental logic, as the book illustrates in Chapter 1. They had pushed conceptions of material progress
rooted in capitalist accumulation and a centralized institutional means for surmounting the challenge of a
‘backward’ Pakistan. Their writings particularly signaled the intensely metonymic relationship between
infrastructure and the state, a relationship that instead of dissolving after colonialism’s end had come to
represent the very promise of independent rule and progress in the mid-20th century. The PL-480 story is
related to the role of foreign advisors like the American economist Richard Gilbert who headed the highly
influential Harvard Advisory Group (HAG) for almost eight years during the Ayub Khan era. Gilbert had made
deep inroads in the Planning Commission and believed the HAG was required for a much longer period. Gilbert
succeeded in getting PL-480 for Pakistan to support the Public Works Programme. Alongside this achievement,
Gilbert had also sold Ayub Khan the idea that in making the Planning Commission stronger, Pakistan would be
able to secure more foreign aid. For his achievements, Ayub Khan awarded Gilbert the Sitar-i-Pakistan at the
1965 Independence Day ceremony.
What is Interesting is that Pakistan’s post-independence phase of economic reconstruction also corresponded
with colonial practices in terms of an increasingly centralized state structure through which development as
infrastructure materialized. Even though investment plans originated at the provincial levels where local agencies
identified projects that were reviewed by provincial ministries, the planning agencies at the center retained
considerable influence. Noteworthy are the Pakistani government’s expressions of ‘backwardness’ and the
prioritization of the economy’s development and this has resonance with the way the colonial masters had also
deployed the idea of progress, by making technological transformations and scientific knowledge central to the
process. Both colonial and the early managers of the Pakistani state cast the idea of progress in elitist and
paternalistic terms and in a structural frame that was overwhelmingly bureaucratic, centralized and military
backed. Daniel Haines in his book Building the Empire, Building the Nation (2013), examines the state-led
expansion and renovation of the huge irrigation system in the province of Sindh and the ceremonies surrounding
the construction of barrages in the 20th century. He argues that despite changing political contexts, the
ceremonies displayed similarities in their deployment of the idea of ‘progress’. Still, I have underscored in the
book that there is a fundamental difference in the way the colonial masters and the independent government
tied infrastructure technology with development. In the post-independence frame, the rhetoric of progress
turned distinctly toward industrialization, the acceleration of gross national product (GNP) growth as well as the
socioeconomic transformation of Pakistani society. These shifts reflected the independent government’s urgent
concerns to turn Pakistan into an economically viable and, to the extent possible, autonomous territorial unit.
The trade war that had erupted in 1949 with India and had brought to an end Pakistan’s practice of exporting
electricity from its neighbor further heightened a sense of urgency.
5. What was Arthur Lewis’ model of Functional Inequality, especially as it relates to the rural/urban workers?
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 6 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
In the immediate aftermath of independence, both foreign experts’ and the state’s expressions of economic
‘backwardness’ meant that industrialization was prioritized in order for Pakistan to catch up with the world.
Moreover, it was presumed that industrialization and material infrastructures would bind together the nation’s
far-flung regions: East and West Pakistan. As Pakistan’s industrial growth rate shot up in the early decades, this
development unfolded at the expense of the agricultural sector. The bias toward agriculture and the emphasis on
rapid industrialization constituted a strategy that resonated with the ideas of the development economist W.
Arthur Lewis, particularly his emphasis on a ‘modified classical model’ of economic development that called upon
the state to intervene directly in regulating industries, investing in business and using its powers of fiscal,
monetary and commercial management to facilitate rapid economic growth. By adopting Lewis’ model, the
state’s concerted efforts to promote rapid industrialization depended on squeezing maximum profits by paying
nonagricultural workers a subsistence wage, and it was primarily poor migrants from rural areas who played a
vital role in this neoclassical schema. Foreign and Pakistani economists had agreed on this approach of keeping
the rural population at a subsistence level and paying workers near-subsistence wages. The idea was that this
would stimulate faster accumulation of profits that would then be reinvested in the capitalist sector. Of
particular importance here is the way economists’ formulations of Lewis’ core assumptions of economic growth
and premised on the principal role of the capitalist sector assumed away the critical need for implementing land
reforms in Pakistan. Hence, even foreign experts like Gustav Papanek emphasized that this was necessary ‘in
order to create industry and industrialists’. This also reflected General Ayub Khan’s strategy to advantage profits
at the expense of labor, and amendments in labor laws, as I discuss in Chapter 4, aimed to curtail labor’s right to
strike.
6. Speaking of that chapter, can you elaborate on how it ties with the argument of the book?
Since the book also addresses the structural transformations underway in Pakistan’s key industries such as
textile-garments, and the promise of material progress is tied closely to the advancement of such industries, the
story would be incomplete without bringing labor into the larger picture. A point I make is that material progress
is tied not only to infrastructures’ mediatic qualities and relational aspects but also to the immobility and
exclusion of labor. The broader argument of material progress/crisis cannot be showcased without considering
how labor has also been impacted by the infrastructural transitions as well as the industry’s deeper structural
transformations and turn to globalization. Chapter 4 is grounded in descriptive data drawn from a qualitative
survey of 47 export-oriented factories and illustrates the uneven impact of globally driven private regulation and
its interplay with local labor laws in the localized conjuncture of the textile-garment industry in Faisalabad. The
discussion is situated in the context of Pakistan’s post-independence history and political-economy of labor
struggles under different civilian and military regimes. An important issue that I explore in this chapter is the
ostensible absence of the state’s role in labor regulation. This is a truism premised on the extensive deployment
of private regulation of labor standards, for instance codes of conduct adopted by global brands and retailers.
Private regulation is understood as a technology that has replaced state regulation of labor. With suspended
state-led labor inspections, there is greater anxiety of labor violations. My main argument is that even though in
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 7 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
Pakistan enforcement of labor laws is predicated on specific political-economic and institutional contexts, we
cannot assume the absence of state regulation and its axiomatic replacement by private regulation. Again, I
eschew the ‘state failure’ line of argumentation.
7. How do roads and electricity symbolize different things? Here, I’m also interested in your discussion of
nostalgia for the failed dream of development, and infrastructural fetishism and how you tie it to
entrepreneurial subjectivities.
In this book, my objective has been not only to examine the rise and subsequent waning of the policy paradigm
development as infrastructure, but also to explore how, in the present conjuncture of an infrastructure crisis,
state–firm relational engagements reinvigorate the promise of progress. By relational I suggest that the symbolic
logic of material infrastructure operates differently for different industrial groups and for the state, but remains
indissoluble from the built environment and the circuits of economic exchange. Hence, in the book I
conceptualize infrastructure not only as physical form but also as a site of aspirations and desire. In this line of
thinking, infrastructures are understood as sociotechnical systems with mediating capacities. Not only are
material technologies mediating networks of urban systems, as Graham and Marvin discuss in their book
Splintering Urbanism, but they also alter perceptions of time, space and the economy, and generate new kinds of
discourses, subjectivities and mobilities that serve political-economic ambitions and visions of material progress.
Airports, power generators and roads are objects of fantasy and imagination and building and using these tells us
as much about the symbolic as about economic production. Thinking about infrastructure in these terms enables
us to understand how interactions between humans and nonhuman subjects are inherently unstable and always
being remade. When I was observing an airport construction project conceived and led by industrialists in
Sialkot, I was struck by how their interactions and practices entailed a constant need to renew connections with
state officials and military leaders. Since infrastructure elicits powerful temporal imaginaries of connectivity and
progress, I discuss in the book that the disruptions, exclusions and anxieties have generated across the Pakistani
industrial landscape an infrastructure fetishism. But this form of fetishism departs from a Marxian materialist
sense, as I have underscored in the book. So in the context of the persistent crisis, the roads, electricity and ports
that have been in a state of decay—many industrialists have appropriated these in ways that have enabled them
to invest these technologies with their own desires and dreams, and their extensive involvement in the
reconstruction and privatization of these infrastructures also links them with the state. The book emphasizes the
importance of this linkage because it creates the basis for reimagining the state as a pragmatic force that paves
the way for a competitive, global economic order.
Towards the end of Chapter 1, I turn to the matter of ‘development nostalgia’ and in reference to the waning of
the policy paradigm development as infrastructure, particularly as expressed in the writings of prominent Pakistani
economists. By the end of the Ayub Khan era, with the onset of the dismemberment of a ‘United’ Pakistan, the
political-economic tensions that had crystallized around the dominant development model and the
marginalization of East Pakistan, wrought on a new era of considerable upheaval and uncertainty. This new
period of uncertainty that was marked by nationalization, saw both development economists and the Planning
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 8 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
Commission lose their prior footings. This change resulted in not only a loss of policy coordination and project
review, but also growing inconsistency in infrastructure investments. In discussing nostalgia, I underscore how
this moment signals disjuncture and evokes the unachieved expectations of neoclassical modernization and the
unfulfilled promise of modernity.
8. Can you recommend five recent works that complement your own?
1. Daniel Haines’ Building the Empire, Building the Nation: Development, Legitimacy and Hydro-Politics in Sind, 1919-
1969
2. Stephen Graham & Simon Marvin’s Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and
the Urban Condition
3. Stephen Collier’s Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Social Modernity, Biopolitics
4. Brian Larkin’s Signal and Noise: Media, Infrastructure and Urban Culture in Nigeria
5. Ashley Carse’s Beyond the Ditch: Politics, Ecology, and Infrastructure at the Panama Canal
9. What is your assessment of “Pakistan Studies” and social science education in Pakistan? Also, would you say
something about the relevance of your terrific work? What fields and conversations you see it joining and
commenting upon, i.e. to South Asian Studies, Urban Studies?
Pakistan Studies has become the establishment’s sanitized version of what constitutes history. Since 1971 or
after the East Pakistan crisis and especially after General Zia ul Haq’s coup in 1977, Pakistan Studies has been
made to assuredly and systematically misrepresent events that have happened throughout Pakistan’s history.
Where would I like Pakistan Studies to go? Well, I would like to see it jettisoned and replaced with courses that
indulge in eclectic historical readings and where state-sanctioned dogma is a distant memory. Is this possible
today in Pakistan? I am optimistic given the growing interest in reviving the social sciences and liberal arts
tradition across numerous universities in Pakistan. This is certainly happening in the institution where I have
worked since 2011 in Karachi. As for the relevance of my work, at the very least I hope the book makes a mark in
terms of having pushed readers to think beyond the state failure narrative. This is important because so much
prominent scholarship on Pakistan has leveraged this analytically narrow line of argumentation. Regarding
connections with Urban Studies, the linkages are certainly there, for instance thinking about industrial-
infrastructural futures is in essence also a reflection on urban futures. And in the South Asian Studies context,
the emphasis on labor and postcolonial industrialization as well as the state’s role in infrastructure development
has resonance with other political-economic settings in the region.
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 9 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
Previous post:Riyaaz – Q & A – II
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/potpurri/riyaaz_-
_q_a_-_ii.html)
Next post:Shahid Amin Reviews I: San Sattavan
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/optical_character_recognition/shahid_amin_reviews_i_san_sattavan.html)
10. Your book went through significant changes from the dissertation. Can you talk a little bit about the
production of the book itself, from formulating dissertation research question to the turning the completed
dissertation into the book?
Like most dissertations, my dissertation also went through a significant makeover not only in terms of cutting
certain sections that were dull, but more so in terms of moving away from a positivist framing. The dissertation
did not have a historical section and the importance of having a chapter that was focused on history surfaced
much later as I reflected on infrastructure’s transformation as a concept and its discursive connection with policy
making agendas in postcolonial Pakistan. The core research questions were semi-structured and also relied on an
open-ended approach that enabled me to come up with new ideas, on multiple working hypotheses that both
informed and were adapted to the information flowing in from the field. Much later, as I reviewed over and over
again my research findings, the relational aspect of the data on infrastructure provision became more and more
apparent to me. In this, the role of the Pakistani state specifically in terms of its relationship with industrialists,
how they saw each other and the strategies both actors deployed and the contrasting perceptions on different
types of material infrastructures – electricity, roads, ports – all these issues I realized much later were embedded
in the mediatic and relational aspects. This certainly helped to wrap up the main argument for the book.
Thank you very much Dr. Anwar!
univerCity (http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/category/univercity), XQs
(http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/category/univercity/xqs)
Leave a Reply
Enter your comment here...Enter your comment here...
01/11/2015 11:03 pmXQ IV: A Conversation with Nausheen H Anwar | Chapati Mystery
Page 10 of 10http://www.chapatimystery.com/archives/univercity/xqs/xq_iv_a_conversation_with_nausheen_h_anwar.html
Proudly powered by WordPress (http://wordpress.org/) | Theme: Zircone by @JuanJavier1979 (http://www.iris-studio.es).