25
Credit Access to SMEs in La2n America Some lessons about ins2tu2onal building Ignacio De Leon, Ph.D. Presented at the Law & Development Society Workshop, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, March 9, 2011

Access to credit and secured transactions in Latin America: A case of legal reform

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Credit  Access  to  SMEs  in  La2n  America  

Some  lessons  about  ins2tu2onal  building  

Ignacio  De  Leon,  Ph.D.  

Presented  at  the  Law  &  Development  Society  Workshop,    Faculty  of  Law,  University  of  Toronto,  March  9,  2011  

THE  PROBLEM  Why  should  developing  countries  reform  their  ST  laws?  

Why  collateral  is  important?  

•  US:  movables  property  account  for  60%  of  small-­‐business  capital  stock.  The  asset-­‐based  industry  has  increased  40-­‐fold  since  the  mid-­‐1970s.  This  industry  has  grown  12%  annually  over  the  last  decade  

•  OECD  countries:  Borrowers  with  collateral  get  9  2mes  as  much  credit  as  those  without  it.  Longer  repayment  periods  (11  2mes  as  long)  and  lower  interest  rates  (up  to  50%)  

•  Eastern  &  Central  Europe:  Law  reforms  in  Slovakia  (2002)  more  than  70%  of  new  business  credit  has  been  secured  by  movables.  Credit  to  SMEs  has  increased  by  10%.  In  Albania,  interest  rates  fell  by  5%  since  2001  law  reforms  

Gross  Domes2c  Investment  in  Developing  Countries  vs.  other  sources  (2005)  (US$  billion)  

-­‐500  

0  

500  

1000  

1500  

2000  

2500  

3000  

Actual  gross  investment   Loans  by  IFIs   Foreign  Aid  

H.  Fleisig,  “The  Economics  of  Collateral  and  Collateral  Reform”,  in  Secured  TransacEons  Reform  and  Access  to  Credit  (F.  Dahan,  Simpson  eds),  Edwad  Elgar,  2005  

Access  to  Finance  (%  of  firms)    

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

25  

30  

35  

Low  income   lower  middle  income   Upper  Middle  Income   High  Income  

World  Bank  database  

Access  to  Finance  (regions)  

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

25  

30  

35  

40  

45  

50  

Africa   East  Asia  &  Pacific   Eastern  Europe  &  Central  Asia  

La2n  America   Middle  East  &  North  Africa  

South  Asia  

World  Bank  database  

Percentage  of  firms  who  did  not  apply  for  loans  because  of  collateral  requirements  

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

25  

30  

35  

Africa   East  Asia  &  Pacific   Eastern  Europe  &  Central  Asia  

La2n  America   South  Asia   OECD  

World  Bank  database  

Two  tools  of  reform  Credit  informa6on  registries  or  

bureaus  •  Informa2on  sharing    •  Ex  ante  credit  informa2on  •  Informa2on  sharing  helps  

creditors  assess  the  creditworthiness  of  clients  

•  Purpose:  to  measure  the  scope  and  accessibility  of  credit  informa2on  available  through  public  credit  registries  and  private  credit  bureaus  and  provides  informa2on  on  coverage  

Secured  transac6ons  and  bankruptcy  laws  

•  Control  rights  •  Ex  post  enforcement  

•  Legal  rights  can  facilitate  the  use  of  collateral  and  the  ability  to  enforce  claims  in  the  event  of  default  

•  Purpose:  to  measure  how  well  collateral  and  bankruptcy  laws  facilitate  lending  

Secured  lending  reforms  complement  former  government  lending  policies  

CREDIT  BUREAUS  AND  REGISTRIES  Credit  informa2on  ins2tu2onal  building  

Credit  bureaus  in  La2n  America:  Overall  Ok,  but…  

•  18  economies  already  have  good  systems  •  La2n  America  has  the  largest  percentage  of  economies  with  systems  that  include  data  from  u2li2es,  retailers  and  trade  creditors.    

•  However,  12  economies,  most  of  them  small  economies  or  Caribbean  island  states,  lack  any  kind  of  credit  bureau  (ex.  Jamaica)  

SECURED  TRANSACTIONS  LEGAL  REFORMS  

Iden2fica2on  of  interna2onal  best  prac2ces  

Best  prac2ces  

•  Where  – OAS  Model  Law  on  Secured  Lending  

– UNCITRAL  Legisla2ve  Guide  to  Secured  Transac2ons  

•  Goals  – Unifying  ST  laws  – Unifying  collateral  registries  – Easing  out-­‐of-­‐court  enforcement  

Unifying  laws  

•  Broad  scope  of  permissible  collateral  – Tangible  and  intangible  property  – Assets  that  do  not  yet  exist  – Changing  pool  of  assets/no  specificity  

•  Ease  of  Security  Interest  Crea2on  – Formali2es  should  be  kept  to  a  minimum  

•  Clear  and  comprehensive  priority  rules  – “First  in  2me,  first  in  priority”  

Flexible  defini2on  of  collateral  is  needed  

•  Ex.  A  computer  sales  company  wan2ng  to  use  its  inventory  as  collateral  where  the  law  requires  that  each  computer  be  iden2fied  by  serial  number,  color,  weight  and  value.  Using  the  inventory  as  collateral  would  be  almost  impossible—because  any  changes  to  it  would  have  to  be  recorded  at  the  registry  or  in  the  loan  agreement  

•  Only  15  La2n  American  countries  (out  of  32)  allow  a  general  descrip2on  of  assets  

Priority  to  secured  creditors    

•  Eastern  Europe  and  Central  Asia:  69%  of  countries  give  the  highest  priority  possible  in  bankruptcy  to  secured  creditors  (including,  in  several  cases,  priority  over  labor  and  tax  claims).    

•  Middle  East  and  North  Africa:  16%  of  countries  

•  La2n  America  and  the  Caribbean:  Only  9%  

Unifying  registries  •  Why?  

–  A  centralized  collateral  registry  provides  objec2ve  informa2on  on  whether  assets  are  already  subject  to  the  security  right  of  another  creditor  

–  It  also  helps  clarify  priority  among  creditors  –  Peru  (before  2006  law  reform):  20  types  of  security  interests,  17  registries  –  Mexico:  Non-­‐possessory  pledge  cannot  be  effec2vely  used  because  of  the  lack  

of  a  centralized  registry  system  •  Features  

–  Online  access  for  registra2on  and  searches  –  register  almost  all  types  of  assets  as  collateral,  regardless  of  the  nature  of  the  

par2es  involved;    –  establish  clear  parameters  for  priority;    –  maintain  a  central  database  searchable  by  the  debtor’s  name  or  a  “unique  

iden2fier.”    –  Once  registered,  security  interests  immediately  have  effect  against  third  

par2es.  

Easing  out-­‐of-­‐court  procedures  

•  Court  procedures  are  lengthy  –  Only  14  Latam  countries  (out  of  32)  permit  out-­‐of-­‐court  enforcement  

–  Peruvian  Ministry  of  Economics  and  Finance:  “In  2001  the  judicial  execu2on  of  a  security  interest  took  between  18  and  24  months”    

–  “If  the  creditor  could  recover  the  money  within  3  months  from  the  date  of  non-­‐compliance,  rather  than  18  months,  the  applicable  interest  rate  could  come  down  to  3  %”  

– Mexico:  1.8  yrs  to  complete  a  bankruptcy;  recovery  rate  of  66.7  cents/dollar  (bener  than  average  in  La2n  America)  

•  Legal  culture  of  Judges  is  geared  against  creditors  

LESSONS  OF  SECURED  LENDING  REFORMS  IN  LATIN  AMERICA  

An  overview  of  selected  countries  

Results:  Peru  

•  One  single  reform  (2006  law)  •  Thanks  to  the  reforms,  Peru’s  ranking  in  the  Doing  Business  Legal  Rights  Index  jumped  from  164  to  93  of  178  economies  (World  Bank,  Doing  Business,  2011)  

•  However,  number  of  registries  recorded  is  10%  less  than  a  country  with  a  Civil  Law  system  with  comparable  development  

•  Only  4.5%  of  companies  vs.  7%  in  Poland  •  Difference  between  savings  and  lending  rates  remains  high  (20%)  on  average  since  2006  

Problems  with  reforms:  Peru  

•  Registra2on  form  is  3  pages  long,  must  be  signed  by  both  par2es  and  notarized  

•  Value  of  the  collateral  and  a  descrip2on  of  the  secured  debt  must  be  included  The  type  of  enforcement  (e.g.,  public  sale)  in  case  of  default  must  be  indicated    

•  SUNARP  (Registry)  have  3  days  for  valida2on  (in  prac2ce,  2-­‐4  weeks)  

•  Notaries  must  issue  no2fica2ons  to  creditors  whenever  the  collateral  is  transformed  

•  No  online  service  

Results:  Mexico  

•  Progressive  legal  reforms  (2000  and  2003)  •  No  single  secured  transac2ons  law  •  Reforms  follow  the  OAS  Model  Law  

•  Several  asset  based  mechanisms  (non-­‐possessory  pledge/  guarantee  trust/  fixed  asset  loans,  leasing,  industrial  mortgage,  etc)  

•  Collateral  registry  (RUG)  introduced  in  2009  and  effec2vely  implemented  in  Oct  2010  

Problems:  Mexico  

•  August  2009  reform  to  the  Commercial  Code  provides  for  a  single  registry  for  all  security  interests;    

•  SIGER  is  a  commerce  registry  system  for  business  en22es  and  security  interests  

•  Un2l  2010  registra2on  forms  had  to  be  signed  by  the  creditor,  notarized  and  verified  by  the  registry  (High  costs:  17  days  +  fees  -­‐2%  of  the  credit  amount)  Only  200  registries  in  2010.  

•  Aqer  2010:  Exclusive  e-­‐filers,  elimina2on  of  one  valida2on  step  at  the  registry  office  

Lessons  

•  Timing  of  reforms  will  take  longer  than  expected:  the  poli2cal  economy  of  reforms  maners  

•  Alterna2ve  sources  of  credit  (gov./private)  impact  the  development  of  secured  lending  ins2tu2ons  

•  Informality  delays  implementa2on  of  reforms  

•  Established  legal  tradi2ons  maner  

•  Develop  further  regula2ons  and  guidelines  •  Develop  allies  to  reforms  in  society  

Access  to  Credit:  A  summary  of  the  Legal  Framework  (Jamaica,  Mexico  and  Peru)  

Strength  of  Creditor  Rights