Upload
independent
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nuclear Physics A!554 ( 1993) 679-700 Non-HoUaad
NUCLEAR PMYSKS A
C~~~~d-pion photoproduction from 3He with
positron-annihilation quasi-monochromatic photons
N. d’Hose , G. Audit, A. Bloch , N. de Botton , L, Ghedira , L. Jammes , J.M. Laget ,
J. Martin, E. Mazzucatto , C. Schuhl , G. Tamas and E. Vincent
Service de Physique Nucleaire, DAPNIA, Centre d’Ettides Nucleaires de Saciay, 91iQJ Gif-sw- Yvette Cedex, France
M. Rodgers and P. Stoler
P. Argan , A. Braghieri and P. Pedroni
IFFY Sezione di Pavia, via Bassi 6, 27100 Pavia, Italy
Received 10 February 1992
Abstrack Cross sections were determined in the d( 1232) excitation region for the reactions 3He(y, rr* )3H, 3He(y, rc+ )nd,nnp and 3He(y, rr- )ppp at several photon energies and pion emission angles. Inclusive charged-pion photoproduction spectra were measured with a mag- netic spectrometer using quasi-monochromatic positron-annihilation photons. Quasi-free mech- anisms have been clearly observed, but pion-nucleon and nucleon-nucleon rescattering and Pauli exclusion mechanisms must be considered to explain the trend of the data for the different channels.
NUCLEAR REACTIONS “He(y, x+ )3H, ‘He(y, z+ )mi,nnp, 3He(y, Z-)PP~ ; EY from
E 210 to 450MeV ; Ok from 20’ to 72” ; measured d*o/dQdP(E,, 0%) ; estimated
du/d~(E*) at 6a z 40.@ ; estimated da/d9 (0%) at ET = 300 MeV.
1. IutrlMluetiou
The measurement of photodisintegration and pion photoproduction on light nuclei has been part of a program at the Saclay Linear Accelerator which seeks to characterize the rn~h~~srns of photon-induced reactions in few-nucleon systems. Such systems ai- low us to study fund~ental processes in the nuclear en~ronment and to compare data with microscopic calculations which are performed using “exact” few-body nuclear wave functions derived from model nucleon-nucleon interactions. Previously reported experi- ments on three-body systems, e.g. 3He ( y, p )np [ref. ’ ) ] and 3He ( y ,pp) n f refs. 2*3 ) I, were
Correspondence to: Dr. F. Lepap, DAPNIA, Dot. Bat. 703, Centre d’Etudes Nucleaires de Saclay, 9 1 f 9 1 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France.
0375-9474/93/%06.00 @ 1993-Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. All rights reserved
680 N. &Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction
performed to emphasize and to study the two- and three-body photon-absorption mech-
anisms. However in the A-resonance region, inclusive pion photoproduction on 3He is
dominated by the quasi-free process on the individual nucleons, although medium correc-
tions are also expected to play important roles. Pion and nucleon final-state interactions
(FSI) from uncorrelated as well as correlated nucleons, meson-exchange currents (MEC)
and possibly off-shell operator effects have to be considered.
In a previous article 4), we described the results of a systematic study of the inclusive
reactions *H ( y, n+ )nn and *H ( y, n- )pp. Multiple-scattering calculations reproduced the
measured momentum spectra rather well, successfully accounting for the enhancement in
the cross section at pion momenta corresponding to the strong interaction ofthe two recoil
nucleons emerging in a relative s-state. However, the momentum-integrated theoretical
cross sections were generally somewhat higher than the experimental values, especially
at the forward pion angles where the discrepancies were about 10%.
In order to further test the multiple-scattering model, and our understanding of the
reaction mechanism in the context of a three-nucleon system, we have performed a similar
study of the inclusive reactions 3He(y,a+)nnp,nd and 3He(y,a-)ppp. We have also
measured the cross section of the exclusive reaction 3He ( y, 7c+ ) 3H, and of the elementary
reaction H(y, rr+ )n under the same kinematics.
This article reports angular distributions of pion spectra obtained at a series of photon
energies from 210 to 450 MeV, which spans the kinematic region from near threshold,
through and beyond the free A, which peaks at Ey N 320 MeV. The results for the
inclusive reactions are compared with a multiple-scattering calculation as described in
refs. 5,6), and for the exclusive reaction with recent DWIA calculations as in refs. 7*8).
2. Description of the experiment
The experimental set-up was similar to that described in ref. 4), and is shown schemat-
ically in fig. 1.
Quasi-monochromatic photons were produced by the method of positron annihilation
in-flight. The annihilation photons were produced by passing a positron beam (typi-
cally 50nA average current at 1% duty factor) through a 8.9 cm thick liquid-hydrogen
conversion target with thin mylar windows (0.0 12 cm). In addition to monochromatic
annihilation photons, a continuous energy spectrum of bremsstrahlung photons was also
produced. In order to eliminate the pion spectra due to the bremsstrahlung contribu-
tion, a second pion yield was obtained at each kinematic setting using a copper radiator
of the same thickness in radiation lengths (0.015 cm) which produced a nearly pure
bremsstrahlung spectrum because of its high Z. After passing through the radiator the
positrons were swept by a magnet into a Faraday cup where their integrated charge was
measured. The photon beam was collimated to a 3 cm diameter cross section at the tar-
get position, and its flux was monitored downstream by a Wilson-type gas quantameter
whose calibration constant was determined with an accuracy better than 1%. Such a facil-
ity gives typically 5 x lo7 annihilation photons per second in the 150 to 550 MeV energy
N. d’Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction 681
Fig. 1. The experimental set-up.
range with a few MeV resolution.
The cryogenic targets consisted of two identical stacked vertical cylinders, each having
a diameter of 7 cm, height 4.5 cm, and walls consisting of 0.005 cm thick stainless steel.
The two cells contained liquid 3He and hydrogen.
The pions were detected by two magnetic spectrometers with nominal maximum mo-
menta of 400 and 700 MeV/c. Solid angles for these spectrometers were respectively
3.34 and 2.24 msr, and momentum acceptance 9O/o and 12%. Each focal plane was instru-
mented with an array of plastic scintillator detectors, which were used for momentum
analysis (in 16 channels) and particle identification.
The experimental procedure consisted in the measurement of pion spectra for hydrogen
and copper radiators for the same quantameter integration. As previously indicated, the
subsequent subtraction of these spectra yields essentially the contribution of the annihila-
tion component of the hydrogen photon spectrum, since the bremsstrahlung component
is to first order well approximated by the copper photon spectrum. Figs. 2a, 2b and 2c
show measured pion spectra for the elementary reaction H (y, n+ )n, obtained (a) with a
hydrogen radiator, (b) with a copper radiator, (c) the result of subtracting (b) from (a),
and (d) the result of applying the correction to account for the negative tail in (c) The
spectrum shape was calculated by folding the photon spectrum with the response func-
tion of our experimental set-up. (The dashed line corresponds to the initial calculation
which was further corrected to fit on the best the bremsstrahlung spectrum on hydrogen
radiator). Since the subtraction corresponds to equal quantameter integrations on the
hydrogen and copper radiators, the resulting spectrum displays below the annihilation
peak a low-energy tail whose shape is due to a slight difference between the hydrogen
and copper bremsstrahlung spectra. A small correction has been made in order to elim-
H
(6 ,
x+)n
S
W L
e ra
diat
eur
H
Es
: 33
7.9
MeV
230
240
251)
26
6 2?
0 28
0 29
0 33
0 24
6 25
0 26
0 27
0 2a
o 29
0
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
Pn+f
W'/c
J
6.0
I ,
f ,
f ,
1 ,
-2.0
I
I ,I
, I
L 1,
1
)
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
PTtc
lM*V
/c
J
Fig.
2.
II+
phot
opro
duct
ion
spec
trum
on
hyd
roge
n at
E,
= 33
7.9
MeV
and
B,+
= 4
0.6”
.
N. d’Htxe et al. I ~ha~g~d-~io~ ~hato~rod~tion 683
inate the negative part of the spectrum and to keep only the annihilation contribution. The photon spectrum was calculated using annihilation and bremsstrahlung differential cross sections due to Tsai 9, together with an analytical treatment of positron multiple- scattering, collision and radiation losses inside the radiator. The positron-beam emittance and momentum dispersion as defined by the analyzing slits in the beam transport system were also folded into the calculation. We have also taken into account the kinematic variation of the momenta of pions entering the spectrometers at different angles and the variation of the cross section with the photon energy. The results shown in figs. 2a, 2b, 2c agree very well with the data except for a small discrepancy in the low-energy range of the spectrum which can be accounted for by a loo/b empirical correction applied to the calculated hydrogen bremsstrahlung distribution. This does not affect at all the dominant annihilation contribution. The data thus corrected (fig. 2d) yields a final spectrum due to the positron-annihilation photons only. Uncertainties in the positron-beam divergence at the radiator (typically 3 x 10m3 rad as measured using wire chambers profile moni- tors) and in the radiator thicknesses gives an error in the absolute number of photons estimated at i4%.
The measured pion spectra were corrected for the following effects: (a) The relative efftciency of the momentum channels in the spectrometer ladder coun-
ters was checked by changing the magnetic field in small steps in order to allow the overlap of the different channels.
(b) The in-flight pion decay between target and detectors, and contamination by muons were calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation which includes the exact geometry, the field map of the spectrometers, and utilizes the theoretical pion-photoproduction dif- ferential cross section. Muon contamination ranged from S”k to 15% depending on the kinematical conditions.
(c f The nuclear abso~tion in the target and the detectors was calculated using experi- mental pion cross sections for H [refs. l”,li ) 1, ‘He and 4He [ refs. 12*13 I] and predictions from Landau for 3He [ref. I4 ) 1. The correction ranged from 4% to TONI depending on the pion momentum and the target nucleus.
(d) The contamination due to electrons and target walls were found to be about 0.6% and 2% respectively of the contribution of 3He target for both the “400 MeV/c” and the “700 MeV/c” magnetic spectrometer. This was observed by setting the spectrometer magnetic fields for negatively charged particles and looking for events originating in the hydrogen target. Fu~he~ore we did not see any counts above the pion maximum momentum allowed by kinematics.
As a verification of the overall system normalization, the differential cross section for H ( y, II+ )n extracted from our experimental procedure was compared to previous mea- surements and theoretical cross sections calculated using the Blomqvist-Laget model 5 ). An angular distribution obtained for 300 MeV photon incident energy and an excitation curve obtained for 8,+ = 40.6” are shown in fig. 3. Statistical errors are better than 5%, and systematic errors (which are not taken into account on the figure) are estimated to be about 6% ; the overall agreement is satisfactory within the quoted errors.
684 N. d’Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction
I I I I I I
H (E.n+)n
$ 20 - t3s+,ab = 40.6’ 9
,?_?---i-+-.,,,+
+ ‘\ ‘\ -
=L 4 ‘\
&y/’
,,/f ” ‘.
0 cr
d .$ ,. __+&Le*-q- 0 LEBEDEV 68
- 0 BONN 70
V ORSAV 67
. SACLAY a)
0 I I I I I
200 250 300 350 400
Eli ( MeV 1
I III ( 1111 1 III
H (x,n+)n
- Ea = 300.0 MeV
A STANFORD 58
n STANFORD 66
V ORSAY 67
0 BONN 70
l SACLAY
b) - 0 I I , , I I I I I I III
0 50 100
efl+cnl 1 deg.1
Fig. 3. (a) The differential n+ photoproduction cross section in the laboratory as a function of the photon energy for 0,+ = 40.6”. The dashed curve is a fit on the experimental data. (b) The c.m. differential II+ photoproduction cross section on hydrogen as a function of the c.m. angle for
Ey = 300 MeV. The curve is the Blomqvist-Laget calculation.
3. Results
Fig. 4 shows the IC+ momentum spectrum for photoproduction on 3He at EY =
337.9 MeV and 9,+ = 40.6”. Two features are apparent. The narrow peak at the high-
momentum limit corresponds to the exclusive channel 3He(y, a+ )3H. The large broad
peak with a maximum near P,+ = 274 MeV/c is the contribution corresponding to the
inclusive channels 3He(y, a+ )nd and 3He( y, 7c+ )nnp. The latter is a clear signature of the
absorption of the interacting photon by a quasi-free proton in the nucleus. Its maximum
occurs at the momentum of a rr+ emitted at the same angle as in the reaction H(y, n+ )n
N. d’Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction 685
t 3He (y,n+l
220 240 260 260
P,,+ (MeV/c)
300 320
Fig. 4. Typical II+ photoproduction spectrum on 3He measured at photon energy Ey = 337.9 MeV and pion emission angle 13 = 40.6O. The solid curve gives the theoretical predictions without normalization. The dotted curve presents a quasi-free calculation. The shape is given by the nucleon momentum distribution in 3He, and the amplitude is adjusted to the data. All the calculations are
folded with the experimental response.
if we take into account the binding energy. The broadening is due to the Fermi motion
of the active nucleon in 3He.
3.1. THE 3He(y,lr+)3H CHANNEL
Table 1 gives the differential cross sections obtained at the various kinematics studied
in the present experiment. The variation of the cross section as a function of photon energy
for fixed values of momentum transfer to the nucleus (Q* = 0.48, 1 .OO, 2.20,3.10 and 3.9
fm-* ) are shown in fig. 5. For the three largest momentum transfers, our results (filled
circles) are compared to earlier data from Illinois (open circles) [ref. “) ] and Orsay
(triangles) [ref. I6 ) ] which are in good agreement, and recent data from Bonn (squares)
[ref. I’) ] which exhibit a large variation in cross section as a function of photon energy
which is not in accord with other data. The new and specific feature of our experiment
is the use of monochromatic photons.
This reaction was first studied theoretically in the framework of the plane-wave impulse
approximation (PWIA) (short-dashed) [ refs. “,19) 1. The corresponding results overesti-
mated the experimental data. Two recent calculations 7S8 ) have been performed within the
framework of the distorted-wave impulse approximation (DWIA) and have attempted to
deal with pion rescattering mechanisms. Realistic correlated three-body wave functions
obtained from Faddeev calculations were used. The elementary pion-photoproduction
amplitude is the most recent unitary version of the Blomqvist-Laget amplitude 20) which
describes the real and imaginary parts not only for the resonance magnetic M: multipole
but also for the resonance electric ET multipole. The pion-nucleus final-state interaction
was described in terms of an optical potential including the spin and isospin dependence
686 N. d’Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction
12.50
2.50
0.00
7.50
5.00
s 2.50
2 0.00 c: 5 4.00
-Cl 3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2.00
1.50
1 .oo
0.50
0.00
1 .oo
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
I I I
!.2 fm.2 5 Q2 5 2.4 frn4
200 300
E, WeV)
400
Fig. 5. Energy dependence of the differential cross section for the channel 3He(y, 7c+ )3H at fixed values of momentum transfer Q2 to the nucleus.
N. d’Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction 681
TABLE 1
3He(y,n+)3H
EY
(MeV)
e Q2 da/d9
(de;; (fme2) W/sr)
5.68f0.97 208.2 28.0
40.6
114.0
0.28
0.48
2.20
6.52zt0.39
1.16zt0.49
248.1 33.2 0.48 5.83f0.88
40.6 0.68 6.00f0.49
50.7 1.00 6.08f0.88
82.7 2.20 2.40f0.52
106.9 3.10 1.74kO.30
133.0 3.90 1.02f0.15
218.0 40.6 0.87 6.08f0.43
297.7 20.0 0.28 5.70zko.47
27.1 0.48 7.13zk0.83
40.6 1 .oo 5.78f0.33
63.9 2.20 4.20f0.7 1
72.0 2.68 2.52f0.42
79.4 3.10 1.57f0.33
93.2 3.90 0.58&O. 11
EY 4+ (MeV) (deg. 1
308.0 40.6
Q2 (fme2)
1.07
da/dG’
W/w)
7.15ztO.38
61.1 2.20
63.3 2.33
68.4 2.65
337.9 40.6 1.30
54.4 2.20
56.3 2.33
60.7 2.65
347.6 23.0 0.48
34.0 1 .oo
40.6 1.38
52.7 2.20
397.5 20.0 0.48
29.4 1 .oo
40.6 1.82
45.1 2.20
447.3 40.6 2.32
2.81f0.18
3.38f0.34
2.23f0.26
5.26f0.37
2.66f0.30
2.1160.22
1.25f0.15
8.60h0.53
5.02f0.50
3.99f0.31
1.47f0.25
9.64zt1.52
5.16f0.93
2.52f0.24
1.13f0.24
1.35f0.17
which turns out to be very important for a nucleus like ‘He. Furthermore in one of the
calculations ’ ) the two-step charge-exchange 3He( y, rr”) 3He (no, n+ ) ‘H has also been in-
troduced. These complete calculations give better agreement with the experimental data,
except for the smallest Q2.
The different calculations are also presented in fig. 5. Those of ref. ’ ) : in the frame-
work of pion plane-wave (short-dashed), of distorted-wave (long-dashed) and with the
addition of the charge-exchange contributions (solid curves). The calculations of ref. 8,
made in distorted-wave are also indicated (dot-dashed curve) (the double-dot-dashed
curve does not include the ET multipole contribution).
3.2. THE ‘He(y, II+ )nd,nnp AND 3He(y, 1~~ )ppp CHANNELS
Figs. 6-10 present all the measured spectra with their statistical errors. In the momen-
tum region covered by the experiment the shape is well reproduced by a simple model
based on a quasi-free production on nucleons in 3He. The nucleon momentum distribu-
tion is empirically taken to be a sum of gaussians which reproduce the observed momen-
tum distributions obtained in the reactions ‘He (e,e’p)d and 3He (e,e’p)n [ref. ” ) 1.
2.0 I ’ 1 s I ’ I a I ’ , ’ 9 ’
1.5 - “y;y$y 71;+ _. I$,= 248.lMeV
, I 7c
+.
7l - 8, = 40.6O
1.0 L
.f
:ii ft i : 0.5 - *,0 - .A; (‘;
T - -0.5 I . t c I . I L L . I . I .
80 100 120 140 160 140 160 180 200 220
-0.25 * ’ * ’ . ’ ’ ’ ’ * ’ ’ I . ’ ’ ’ . ’ 160 180 200 220 240 200 220 240 260 280
PTL WV/c)
Fig. 6. x photoproduction on 3He at 40.6’ for E, = 208.2, 248.1, 278.0 MeV. The solid curve presents the theoretical predictions. The dotted curve indicates a quasi-free cal- culation. The shape is given by the nucleon momentum distribution in 3He, and the amplitude is
adjusted to the data. Ali the calculations are foided with the experimental response.
N. dWose et al. / Cogged-pio~ phot~pr~ucti~~ 689
2”. . . . . . . * . . . . . . . ,ffi I ,
- 0.5
, . I .
s * t I . -025 200 220 240 260 280 220 240 260 280 300
3 -0.5 I . * . t . f , . t . I .
220 240 260 280 300 300 320 340 360 380
%
-0.251 . ’ ’ . ’ ’ ’ . ’ . ’ . ’ . ’ * ’ 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420
Px WWc)
Fig. 7. A photoproduction on 3He at 40.6O for E y = 308.0, 337.9, 347.6, 397.5, 447.3MeV. (See also the caption of fig. 6.)
N. d’Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction
I 1 I u I ’
+ I=!
I I I I I I I
-
+
- - :
I ’ I ’ I r
‘#
. . 1+1.-’
.:’
<
. . .
h I I I I I I -
692 N. &Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction
-0.5 I .I. I .I . I. I .I.,. 180 200 220 240 260 220 240 260 280 300
P,(MWc)
Fig. 10. II photoproduction on 3He at backward angles 63.3” and 68.4” at E, = 308.0 MeV, and 54.S’, 56.3” and 60.7O at Ey = 337.9 MeV. (See also the caption of fig. 6.)
The effects of FSI on the high-momentum part of the pion spectrum, due to the strong
interaction of the nucleons emerging in a relative s-state was accounted for by an em-
pirical correction based upon the Watson formula 23). This simple model, folded with
the experimental response has an amplitude adjusted to the data (dotted curves). It is
used as an aid in eliminating the effects of the bremsstrahlung tail which was discussed
in sect. 2.
The solid curves are theoretical results without any renormalization. They were ob-
tained by means of a multiple-scattering calculation which was carried out within a la-
grangian framework utilizing the complete Blomqvist-Laget elementary operator 536P20).
The 3He wave function is the solution to Faddeev equations using a Reid nucleon-nucleon
interaction. The continuum wave function is taken as the sum of a plane wave and half-
N. #Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction 693
-. x+nd quasi-libre
;; I.0
5 - n+nd + K+ nnp
E
$
.z
%
2 0.5
B
200 250 300
P,+ (MeV/c)
Fig. 11. The different contributions for the theoretical model.
b’
Fig. 12. The different multiple-scattering processes which are considered in the theoretical model.
off-shell nucleon-nucleon scattering amplitude for the same potential. Fig. 1 I presents the contributions of the different multiple-scattering processes which were included in
the calculation.
694 N. d*Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction
o-- 200 300 400 500
ET (MeV)
Fig. 13. Energy dependence for the z+ and n- extrapolation value according to the theoretical model.
l 3Hely,n+)nd or nnp
0 50 3He( r,n-)ppp - Bn
= 40.6’
01 1 1 I
200 300 400 500 E, (MeV1
Fig. 14. Estimated cross section in the total momentum range as a function of Ey at Bn = 40.6”. As it is mentioned in the text the comparison between experiment and theory is independent of
the extrapolation.
(a) The dotted line is the quasi-free pion-photoprodu~tion mechanism for the case
‘He(y, n+)nd (diagram 12a).
(b) The short-dashed line takes into account also the nucleon and pion rescattering
N. d’ifose et al. / charged-pion photoprod~tion 695
I ET = 300MeV
-s 50 - l 3He (l,n+hd or nnp
> 40- ,I
$j 30- \ 8, 20-
IO -
0 , , , ,
0 IO 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
8, fdegl
Fig. 15. Estimated cross section in the total momentum range as a function of & at Ey = 300 MeV. As it is mentioned in the text the comparison between experiment and theory is independent of
the extrapolation.
@II = 40.6”
0- 300 400
Er (M&l
Fig. 16. Ratio between the cross section for rt+ and II- detected at & = 40.6O as a function of E,. We consider in the lower part only the differential cross sections integrated on the investigated momentum region, and in the upper part the differential cross sections estimated on the total
momentum range.
696 N. &Hose et al. I Charged-pion ~hotoprodu~t~on
TABLE 2
3He(y, 7c+ )nd,nnp
EY
integrated spectrum cross section
B A+ exp./theor. exp. theor. extrapol. exp. theor.
208.2
248.1
278.0
297.7
308.0
337.9
347.6
397.5
447.3
40.6
40.6
40.6
20.0
40.6
72.0
40.6
61.1
63.3
68.4
40.6
54.5
56.3
60.7
23.0
34.0
40.6
40.6
40.6
0.95f0.25
0.83&O. 11
0.74f0.08
0.64&O. 14
0.66f0.09
0.88iO.08
0.79f0.06
0.85f0.06
1.18f0.11
0.93zko.05
0.76ztO.06
0.68320.06
0.85zkO.06
0.78zkO.04
0.65ztO.06
0.72rtO.28
0.79rto.07
7.97f2.19
10.7911.46
13.57fl.35
5.52f 1.22
15.50*2.00
30.56f2.94
19.8611.51
30.88zt 1.96
42.891k4.05
33.18fl.69
22.9011.72
23.81f2.24
29.5812.17
26.94zk 1 SO
12.39hl.31
19.64f2.24
19.78Ikl.74
18.2417.03
16.36il.47
8.48 1.25
13.02 1.28
18.46 1.33
8.66 1.60
23.40 1.37
34.86 1.28
25.90 1.39
36.20 1.32
36.49 1.31
35.54 1.29
30.26 1.50
34.96 I .40
35.00 1.40
34.71 1.38
1.80
1.56
30.39 1.54
25.27 1.82
20.71 2.15
10.51
16.67
24.55
13.86
31.96
44.62
36.00
47.79
47.80
45.85
45.24
48.94
49.00
47.90
46.80
45.99
44.52
9.9612.72
13.81&1.87
18.05ztl.80
8.83A 1.95
21.16zt2.84
39.12f3.76
27.6lzk2.10
40.761t2.59
56.19f5.31
42.8Ok2.18
34.2412.57
33.3313.14
41.4If3.04
37.1812.07
22.30zt2.36
30.64f3.49
30.46f2.68
33.20f12.79
35.1713.16
for 3He(y, a+ )nd (diagram 12b). The antisymmetry of the final-state nucleons is also
treated. Note the deviations to the first curve: a significant quenching of the cross section
in the quasi-free region, an enhancement in the high-momentum region due to neutron-
deuteron s-wave scattering, and an impo~ant tail in the low-momentum region due to
both neutron-deuteron and pion-deuteron rescattering.
(c) The long-dashed line takes into account all the processes for 3He(y, X+ )nnp (dia-
gram 12~).
(d) Finally the solid curve is the sum of the two contributions 3He(y, rr+ )nd and
3He(y, ~+)nnp.
This theoretical model yields rather good agreement with the data except for n+ at
forward angles, where it overestimates the data by about 20% (see figs. 6-10, 14, 15).
This trend seems to increase with the photon energy. Two explanations could be given.
697 N. d’Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction
TABLE 3
3He(y, n-JPPP
integrated spectrum cross section
%- exp./theor. exp. theor. extrapol. exp. theor.
40.6 1.01*0.12 5.66YtO.66 5.60 1.18 6.59 6.68f0.78
20.0 1.29Lko.37 2.90f0.83 2.24 1.41 3.16 4.09f1.17
40.6 1.15ztO.08 8.69f0.62 7.56 1.19 9.00 10.34f0.74
72.0 l.Olf0.09 13.3641.18 13.24 1.13 14.96 15.10f1.33
40.6 1.07f0.07 9.12*0.58 8.51 1.19 10.16 10.89kO.69
61.1 0.98f0.05 14.39hO.77 14.74 1.14 16.80 16.40f0.88
40.6 0.711kO.06 8.6210.75 12.14 1.22 14.00 10.52f0.92
40.6 0.85f0.11 8.08f 1.07 9.51 1.27 12.11 10.25-fl.36
EY
278.0
291.1
308.0
347.6
447.3
3He/,
206 300 400
Ey(Mev)
Fig. 17. Ratio between the cross section for K + photoproduction on 3He and * H as a function of E, for a pion emission angle of 40.6O. We consider in the lower part only the differential cross section on 3He integrated on the investigated momentum region, and in the upper part the differential
cross section estimated on the total momentum range.
698 N. d’Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction
First the photoproduction on a nucleon bound in the final deuteron (diagram 12b’) has
not been taken into account. Second the wave function for the final states is not the general
solution of the Faddeev equations for a three-nucleon scattering state, but a truncated
multiple-scattering series: the initial and the final state are not strictly orthogonal.
Another theoretical [ref. 22) ] for n- photoproduction is also presented at E, = 297.7
MeV and 8, = 40.6” on fig. 6. This calculation uses a hyperspherical function where
the initial and final states are described using the same NN potential. No significative
difference with the previous model is observed except for the low-momentum region.
The measured pion spectrum covers on average only 80% of the quasi-free peak (de-
lined on the process ‘He( y, n+ )nd which is represented by the dotted curve in fig. 11).
So it seems important to present the experimental spectra integrated over the measured
pion momentum and to attempt to give an extrapolation. In order to do so, it is im-
possible to rely on the quasi-free model. In fact in the kinematical region of this pion-
photoproduction experiment, the pion-nucleon invariant mass is near that of the mass
of the S such that the pion-nucleon rescattering is at a maximum. This effect quenches
the quasi-free peak and enhances the cross section in the low-momentum part of the pion
spectrum.
The theoretical model takes into account the rescattering effects. Thus, we have ex-
trapolated from the data a tail with the shape of the theoretical spectrum from figs. 6-10,
which is renormalized such that, in the region of their overlap the area under the theoret-
ical curve equals that of the experimental data. Fig. 13 indicates the relative importance
of the extrapolation as a function of the photon energy for rr+ and 7c- at en = 40.6”. It
increases quite significantly for X+ above 300 MeV.
Tables 2 and 3 give the results for n+ and Z- of the integral of the experimental
(column 4) and theoretical (column 5 ) spectra over the pion momentum region covered
by the experiment at each angle (column 2) and energy (column 1). The ratio between
the experimental and theoretical values given for the investigated momentum region is
presented in column 3. The results for the estimated X+ and n- cross sections are given
in column 8, and compared to the theoretical values (column 7). Column 6 shows the
extrapolation.
Figs. 14 and 15 present the estimated momentum-integrated cross section as a func-
tion of Ey at 8, = 40.6” and as a function of 13~ at E, = 300 MeV, respectively. The
comparison between experiment and theory is obviously independent of the extrapola-
tion. Whereas for n-, experiment and theory agree rather well, for n+ the theory appears
to overestimate experiment, especially when the photon energy increases as it has been
mentioned previously. In fig. 15 we can note the decrease of the cross section at forward
angles due to phase-space reduction and the Pauli antisymmetrization.
The ratio between the cross section for rr+ and 7c- detected at the same angle is pre-
sented in fig. 16. This depends on the extrapolation and is the reason why the two cases
integrated on the investigated momentum region, and estimated on the total momentum
range are separated. The extrapolation is important for x+, as Ey becomes larger than 300
MeV: this trend is clearly apparent in this figure. If we consider only quasi-free processes
N. d’Hose et al. / Charged-pion photoproduction 699
and assume equal cross sections for the neutron and proton, we would expect a ratio of
around Z/N or 2. The main deviation to this simple hypothesis stems from the effects
of rescattering and the Pauli exclusion principle which reduce the phase space more for
the final a-ppp state than for IZ+.
Fig. 17 gives the ratio of the cross sections for n+ photoproduction on ‘He and ‘H,
as a function of Ey at 8, = 40.6” in the two cases defined previously. This ratio is
nearly constant with energy when the cross section is integrated only over the pion-
momentum region covered by the experiment, while it steadily increases when the total
estimated cross section is used. This trend is more important above 300 MeV where the
pion rescattering is dominant.
4. Conclusion
The quasi-free mechanisms have been clearly observed in this experiment in the high-
momentum region, which has also been observed with pionic probes 24). However, multi-
nucleon processes (pion or nucleon rescattering and the Pauli exclusion mechanism) must
be considered to explain the global trends of the data, both in the 3He (y, rr+ )3H and
‘He(y, X*)X channels. They quench the quasi-free peak and shift the strength towards
the low-momentum part of the pion spectrum. Unfortunately, the positron-annihilation
method, as applied in this experiment, prevents the study of the low-momentum tail. This
is due to the large statistical errors at low pion momenta introduced with the subtraction
of a large bremsstrahlung component. The use of tagged photons with the new genera-
tions of high-duty-factor accelerators and large-acceptance detectors would be particularly
welcome to better identify all these different mechanisms.
References
1) N. d’Hose et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 63 (1989) 856 2) G. Audit et al., Phys. Lett. B227 (1989) 331 3) G. Audit et ab, Phys. Rev. C44 (1991) R575 4) J.L. Fame et al., Nucl. Phys. A424 (1984) 383 5) J.M. Laget, Phys. Report 69 (1981) 1 6) J.M. Laget, New vistas in electro-nuclear physics, ed. E.L. Tomusiak et al. (Plenum Press,
New York, 1986) p.361 7) S.S. Kamalov, L. Tiator and C. Bennhold, Few-Body Systems 10 (1991) 143 8) M.K. Cheoun, S. Ishikawa and T. Sasakawa, submitted to Nucl. Phys. 9) Y.S. Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46 (1974) 815
10) E. Pedroni et al., Nucl. Phys. A300 (1978) 321 11) P.M. Ogden et al., Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) 1115 12) F. Binon et al., Nucl. Phys. A298 (1978) 499 13) Y.A. Shcherbakov et al., Nuovo Cim. 31A (1976) 249, 263 14) R.H. Landau, Phys. Rev. Cl5 (1977) 2127 15) J.R. O’Fallon et al., Phys. Rev. 141 (1966) 889 16) D. Bachelier et al., Nucl. Phys. A251 (1975) 433 17) B. Bellinghaussen et al., Nucl. Phys. A470 (1987) 429 18) L. Tiator, A.K. Rej and D. Drechsel, Nucl. Phys. A333 ( 1980) 343
700 N. d%lose et ai. I Charged-pion photo~~~u&tiu~
19) J.L. Ballot, C. Lazard and Z. Marie, Nucl.Phys. A395 (1983) 471 20) J.M. Laget, Nucl. Phys. A481 (1988) 765 21) E. Jans et a/., Nucl. Phys. A475 (1987) 687 22) R.X. Dzhibuti and R.Y. Kezerashvili, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 40 (1984) 443 23) M.L. Goldberger and K.M. Watson, Collision theory (Wiley, New York, 1964) 24) A. Klein et al., Phys. Lett. B187 (1987) 253