278
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT _______________________________________________________________ For OVER AN EXTENT OF 8.000 HECTARES OF QUARTZITE & SILICA SAND MINE In Sy.No. 677 (Old Sy.No. 425) of Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. Proposed By Sri P. VENKATA SIVA REDDY D.No. 1/21, Gundlakunta Village, Peddamudium Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh Prepared By ____________________________________________________________________________________ M/s. GLOBAL ENVIRO LABS (Accredited by Quality Council of India NABET, New Delhi) 2-2-1075/14/A/1, Tilaknagar “X” Roads, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad 500 013. Ph.: 040-27407969 Email: [email protected]

draft environmental impact assessment - Andhra Pradesh

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT _______________________________________________________________

For

OVER AN EXTENT OF 8.000 HECTARES OF QUARTZITE & SILICA SAND MINE

In

Sy.No. 677 (Old Sy.No. 425) of Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.

Proposed By

Sri P. VENKATA SIVA REDDY D.No. 1/21, Gundlakunta Village, Peddamudium Mandal,

Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh

Prepared By

____________________________________________________________________________________

M/s. GLOBAL ENVIRO LABS (Accredited by Quality Council of India – NABET, New Delhi)

2-2-1075/14/A/1, Tilaknagar “X” Roads, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad – 500 013. Ph.: 040-27407969

Email: [email protected]

Scanned with CamScanner

21

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FORPROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

Terms of Reference (TOR) for preparation of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and

Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for "Mining of Minerals" as per the EIA Notification, 2006 has

been devised to improve the quality of the reports and facilitate decision-making transparent and easy.

TOR will help the project proponents to prepare report with relevant project specific data and easily

interpretable information. TOR for mining of minerals is expected to cover all environmental related

features.

Mining of minerals plays a positive role in the process of country's economic development. In addition

to the contribution towards economic growth, mining can also be a major source of degradation of physical

as well as social environment, unless it is properly managed. Environmental impacts can arise during all

activities of the mining process. Minimizing the damage due to mining operations depends on sound

environmental practices in a framework of balanced environmental legislation. The potential adverse effects

of mining activities include air pollution, surface and groundwater pollution, noise and vibration, damage to

local ecology, natural topography and drainage, depletion of water resources etc. All these environmental

components are required to be considered while selecting a proper methodology of mining, mitigation

measures to reduce pollution load, conservation of natural resources etc.

The projects of mining of minerals as stated in the schedule require prior environment clearance

under the EIA notification, 2006. Category 'A' Projects are handled in the MoEF&CC and Category 'B'

projects are being handled by the respective State Environment Impact Assessment Authorities (SEIAAs)

notified by MoEF&CC and following the procedure prescribed under the EIA Notification, 2006. As per

this Notification, as amended, the projects of mining of minerals with mining lease area equal to or greater

than 50 hectare are to be handled at the level of the MoEF&CC for grant of EC. Such projects with mining

lease area less than 50 hectare are to be handled by the respective State Environment Impact Assessment

Authority (SEIAA).

1(a):STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTING ENVIRONMENTIMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR NON-COAL MINING PROJECTS ANDINFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN EIA/EMP REPORT

1) Year-wise production details since 1994 should be given, clearly stating the highest production achieved

in any one year prior to 1994. It may also be categorically informed whether there had been any

increase in production after the EIA Notification 1994 came into force, w.r.t. the highest production

achieved prior to 1994.

2) A copy of the document in support of the fact that the Proponent is the rightful lessee of the mine

should be given.

3) All documents including approved mine plan, EIA and Public Hearing should be compatible with one

another in terms of the mine lease area, production levels, waste generation and its management,

mining technology etc. and should be in the name of the lessee.

4) All corner coordinates of the mine lease area, superimposed on a High Resolution Imagery/ toposheet,

topographic sheet, geomorphology and geology of the areashould be provided. Such an Imagery of

the proposed area should clearly show the land use and other ecological features of the study area

(core and buffer zone).

22

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

5) Information should be provided in Survey of India Toposheet in 1:50,000 scale indicating geological

map of the area, geomorphology of land forms of the area, existing minerals and mining history of

the area, important water bodies, streams and rivers and soil characteristics.

6) Details about the land proposed for mining activities should be givenwith information as to whether

mining conforms to the land use policy of the State; land diversion for mining should have approval

from State land use board or the concerned authority.

7) It should be clearly stated whether the proponent Company has a well laid down Environment

Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be spelt out in the EIA Report with description

of the prescribed operating process/procedures to bring into focus any infringement/deviation/

violation of the environmental or forest norms/ conditions? The hierarchical system or administrative

order of the Company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the

EC conditions may also be given. The system of reporting of non-compliances / violations of

environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the Company and/or shareholders or stakeholders

at large,may also be detailed in the EIA Report.

8) Issues relating to Mine Safety, including subsidence study in case of underground mining and slope

study in case of open cast mining, blasting study etc. should be detailed. The proposed safeguard

measures in each case should also be provided.

9) The study rea will comprise of 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease periphery and the data

contained in the EIA such as waste generation etc. should be for the life of the mine / lease period.

10) Land use of the study rea delineating forest area, agricultural land, grazing land, wildlife sanctuary,

national park, migratory routes of fauna, water bodies, human settlements and other ecological

features should be indicated. Land use plan of the mine lease area should be prepared to encompass

preoperational, operational and post operational phases and submitted. Impact, if any, of change of

land use should be given.

11) Details of the land for any Over Burden Dumps outside the mine lease, such as extent of land area,

distance from mine lease, its land use, R&R issues, if any, should be given.

12) A Certificate from the Competent Authority in the State Forest Department should be provided,

confirming the involvement of forest land, if any, in the project area. In the event of any contrary

claim by the Project Proponent regarding the status of forests, the site may be inspected by the State

Forest Department along with the Regional Office of the Ministry to ascertain the status of forests,

based on which, the Certificate in this regard as mentioned above be issued. In all such cases, it

would be desirable for representative of the State Forest Department to assist the Expert Appraisal

Committees.

13) Status of forestry clearance for the broken up area and virgin forestland involved in the Project

including deposition of net present value (NPV) and compensatory afforestation (CA) should be

indicated. A copy of the forestry clearance should also be furnished.

14) Implementation status of recognition of forest rights under the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional

Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 should be indicated.

23

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FORPROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

15) The vegetation in the RF / PF areas in the study area, with necessary details, should be given.

16) A study shall be got done to ascertain the impact of the Mining Project on wildlife of the study area

and details furnished. Impact of the project on the wildlife in the surrounding and any other protected

area and accordingly, detailed mitigative measures required, should be worked out with cost

implications and submitted.

17) Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Ramsar site Tiger/

Elephant Reserves/(existing as well as proposed), if any, within 10 km of the mine lease should be

clearly indicated, supported by a location map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden.

Necessary clearance, as may be applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically

sensitive areas as mentioned above, should be obtained from the Standing Committee of National

Board of Wildlife and copy furnished.

18) A detailed biological study of the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km radius of the periphery

of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, endangered, endemic and RET

Species duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based on such

primary field survey, clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In case of any scheduled-

I fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan alongwith budgetary provisions for their

conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife Department and

details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for implementing the same should be made as part

of the project cost.

19) Proximity to Areas declared as 'Critically Polluted' or the Project areas likely to come under the

'Aravali Range', (attracting court restrictions for mining operations), should also be indicated and

where so required, clearance certifications from the prescribed Authorities, such as the SPCB or

State Mining Department should be secured and furnished to the effect that the proposed mining

activities could be considered.

20) Similarly, for coastal Projects, A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies

demarcating LTL. HTL, CRZ area, location of the mine lease w.r.t CRZ, coastal features such as

mangroves, if any, should be furnished. (Note: The Mining Projects falling under CRZ would also

need to obtain approval of the concerned Coastal Zone Management Authority).

21) R&R Plan/compensation details for the Project Affected People (PAP) should be furnished. While

preparing the R&R Plan, the relevant State/National Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy should

be kept in view. In respect of SCs /STs and other weaker sections of the society in the study area, a

need based sample survey, family-wise, should be undertaken to assess their requirements, and

action programmes prepared and submitted accordingly, integrating the sectoral programmes of

line departments of the State Government. It may be clearly brought out whether the village(s)

located in the mine lease area will be shifted or not. The issues relating to shifting of village(s)

including their R&R and socio-economic aspects should be discussed in the Report.

22) One season (non-monsoon) [i.e. March-May (Summer Season); October-December (post monsoon

season) ; December-February (winter season)]primary baseline data on ambient air quality as per

24

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

CPCB Notification of 2009, water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna shall be collected and

the AAQ and other data so compiled presented date-wise in the EIA and EMP Report. Site-specific

meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the monitoring stations should be such

as to represent whole of the study area and justified keeping in view the pre-dominant downwind

direction and location of sensitive receptors. There should be at least one monitoring station within

500 m of the mine lease in the pre-dominant downwind direction. The mineralogical composition of

PM10, particularly for free silica, should be given.

23) Air quality modeling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on the air quality

of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles for transportation of

mineral. The details of the model used and input parameters used for modeling should be provided.

The air quality contours may be shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site,

location of sensitive receptors, if any, and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant

wind direction may also be indicated on the map.

24) The water requirement for the Project, its availability and source should be furnished. A detailed

water balance should also be provided. Fresh water requirement for the Project should be indicated.

25) Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of water for the

Project should be provided.

26) Description of water conservation measures proposed to be adopted in the Project should be given.

Details of rainwater harvesting proposed in the Project, if any, should be provided.

27) Impact of the Project on the water quality, both surface and groundwater, should be assessed and

necessary safeguard measures, if any required, should be provided.

28) Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether working will intersect groundwater.

Necessary data and documentation in this regard may be provided. In case the working will intersect

groundwater table, a detailed Hydro Geological Study should be undertaken and Report furnished.

The Report inter-alia, shall include details of the aquifers present and impact of mining activities on

these aquifers. Necessary permission from Central Ground Water Authority for working below

ground water and for pumping of ground water should also be obtained and copy furnished.

29) Details of any stream, seasonal or otherwise, passing through the lease area and modification /

diversion proposed, if any, and the impact of the same on the hydrology should be brought out.

30) Information on site elevation, working depth, groundwater table etc. Should be provided both in

AMSL and bgl. A schematic diagram may also be provided for the same.

31) A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a tabular form (indicating

the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and time frame) and submitted, keeping in mind,

the same will have to be executed up front on commencement of the Project. Phase-wise plan of

plantation and compensatory afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be covered

under plantation and the species to be planted. The details of plantation already done should be

given.The plant species selected for green belt should have greater ecological value and should be

25

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FORPROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

of good utility value to the local population with emphasis on local and native species and the

species which are tolerant to pollution.

32) Impact on local transport infrastructure due to the Project should be indicated. Projected increase in

truck traffic as a result of the Project in the present road network (including those outside the

Project area) should be worked out, indicating whether it is capable of handling the incremental

load. Arrangement for improving the infrastructure, if contemplated (including action to be taken

by other agencies such as State Government) should be covered. Project Proponent shall conduct

Impact of Transportation study as per Indian Road Congress Guidelines.

33) Details of the onsite shelter and facilities to be provided to the mine workers should be included in

the EIA Report.

34) Conceptual post mining land use and Reclamation and Restoration of mined out areas (with plans

and with adequate number of sections) should be given in the EIA report.

35) Occupational Health impacts of the Project should be anticipated and the proposed preventive

measures spelt out in detail. Details of pre-placement medical examination and periodical medical

examination schedules should be incorporated in the EMP. The project specific occupational health

mitigation measures with required facilities proposed in the mining area may be detailed.

36) Public health implications of the Project and related activities for the population in the impact zone

should be systematically evaluated and the proposed remedial measures should be detailed along

with budgetary allocations.

37) Measures of socio economic significance and influence to the local community proposed to be

provided by the Project Proponent should be indicated. As far as possible, quantitative dimensions

may be given with time frames for implementation.

38) Detailed environmental management plan (EMP) to mitigate the environmental impacts which,

should inter-alia include the impacts of change of land use, loss of agricultural and grazing land, if

any, occupational health impacts besides other impacts specific to the proposed Project.

39) Public Hearing points raised and commitment of the Project Proponent on the same along with time

bound Action Plan with budgetary provisions to implement the same should be provided and also

incorporated in the final EIA/EMP Report of the Project.

40) Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with direction /order passed by any Court of

Law against the Project should be given.

41) The cost of the Project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well as the cost towards implementation

of EMP should be clearly spelt out.

42) A Disaster management Plan shall be prepared and included in the EIA/EMP Report.

43) Benefits of the Project if the Project is implemented should be spelt out. The benefits of the Project

shall clearly indicate environmental, social, economic, employment potential, etc.

26

STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) FOR EIA/EMP REPORT FOR PROJECTS/ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENT CLEARANCE

44) Besides the above, the below mentioned general points are also to be followed:-

a) Executive Summary of the EIA/EMP Report

b) All documents to be properly referenced with index and continuous page numbering.

c) Where data are presented in the Report especially in Tables, the period in which the data

were collected and the sources should be indicated.

d) Project Proponent shall enclose all the analysis/testing reports of water, air, soil, noise etc.

using the MoEF&CC/NABL accredited laboratories. All the original analysis/testing reports

should be available during appraisal of the Project.

e) Where the documents provided are in a language other than English, an English translation

should be provided.

f) The Questionnaire for environmental appraisal of mining projects as devised earlier by the

Ministry shall also be filled and submitted.

g) While preparing the EIA report, the instructions for the Proponents and instructions for the

Consultants issued by MoEF&CC vide O.M. No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 4th August,

2009, which are available on the website of this Ministry, should be followed.

h) Changes, if any made in the basic scope and project parameters (as submitted in Form-I and

the PFR for securing the TOR) should be brought to the attention of MoEF&CC with reasons

for such changes and permission should be sought, as the TOR may also have to be altered.

Post Public Hearing changes in structure and content of the draft EIA/EMP (other than

modifications arising out of the P.H. process) will entail conducting the PH again with the

revised documentation.

i) As per the circular no. J-11011/618/2010-IA.II(I) dated 30.5.2012, certified report of the

status of compliance of the conditions stipulated in the environment clearance for the existing

operations of the project, should be obtained from the Regional Office of Ministry of

Environment, Forest and Climate Change, as may be applicable.

i) The EIA report should also include (i) surface plan of the area indicating contours of main

topographic features, drainage and mining area, (ii) geological maps and sections and (iii)

sections of the mine pit and external dumps, if any, clearly showing the land features of the

adjoining area.

****

Compliance to the Standard TORs issued by MoEF&CC

Sl.No TOR Compliance

1.

Year-wise production details since 1994 should be given, clearly stating the highest production achieved in any one year prior to 1994. It may also be categorically informed whether there had been any increase in production after the EIA Notification, 1994 came into force w.r.t. the highest production achieved prior to 1994.

The proposed mine is Fresh mine. After obtaining EC, CFE, CFO we will start the production

2. A copy of the document in support of the fact that the Proponent is the rightful lessee of the mine should be given.

The lease was granted by Director of Mines & Geology, A.P, Ibrahimpatnam, vide Proceedings No. 11779/R5-2/2018 Dt: 08.01.2019 and same copy enclosed in the approved mining plan at end of the EIA report

3.

All documents including approved mine plan, EIA and public hearing should be compatible with one another in terms of the mine lease area, production levels, waste generation and its management and mining technology and should be in the name of the lessee.

Contents in all documents are synchronizing with one another in terms of mine lease area, production levels, waste generation, its management and mining technology.

4.

All corner coordinates of the mine lease area, superimposed on a High-Resolution Imagery / toposheet should be provided. Such an imagery of the proposed area should clearly show the land use and other ecological features of the study area (core and buffer zone).

Presented in Draft EIA report in page no. 8,65 &66

5.

Information should be provided in Survey of India Topo sheet in 1:50,000 scale indicating geological map of the area, geomorphology of land forms of the area, existing minerals and mining history of the area, important water bodies, streams and rivers and soil characteristics.

Topomap is enclosed in Draft EIA report in page no 8 and Geomorphology map is enclosed in page no 45

6.

Details about the land proposed for mining activities should be given with information as to whether mining conforms to the land use policy of the State; land diversion for mining should have approval from State land use board or the concerned authority.

The ML area is Government land. Mine Lease area granted by Director of Mines & Geology, A.P, Ibrahimpatnam, vide Proceedings No. 11779/R5-2/2018 Dt: 08.01.2019, copy is enclosed at end of the Draft EIA report

7.

Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be spelt out in the EIA report with description of the prescribed operating process / procedures to bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms/ conditions? The hierarchical system or administrative order of the Company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions may also be given. The system of reporting of non-compliances / violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the Company and/or shareholders or stakeholders at large may also be detailed in the EIA report.

As the ML area is a new mine, the lessee has formed Environmental policy, standard operating procedures, Hierarchical system, system of report non-compliance to lessee and same is presented in EIA report in page nos 2,3

8.

Issues relating to Mine Safety, including subsidence study in case of underground mining and slope study in case of open cast mining, blasting study etc. should be detailed. The proposed safeguard measures in each case should also be provided.

Presented in draft EIA report in page no 104 to 119.

9.

The study area will comprise of 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease periphery and the data contained in the EIA such as waste generation etc should be for the life of the mine / lease period.

The Draft EIA report is prepared as per the condition only

10

Land use of the study area delineating forest area, agricultural land, grazing land, wildlife sanctuary, national park, migratory routes of fauna, water bodies, human settlements and other ecological features should be indicated. Land use plan of the mine lease area should be prepared to encompass preoperational, operational and post operational phases and submitted. Impact, if any, of change of land use should be given.

Presented EIA report from page no 53-64

11.

Details of the land for any Over Burden Dumps outside the mine lease, such as extent of land area, distance from mine lease, its land use, R&R issues, if any, should be given.

There is no dumping of waste in outside the lease area. Presented in page no 24

12.

A Certificate from the Competent Authority in the State Forest Department should be provided, confirming the involvement of forest land, if any, in the project area. In the event of any contrary claim by the Project Proponent regarding the status of forests, the site may be inspected by the State Forest Department along with the Regional Office of the Ministry to ascertain the status of Forests, based on which, the Certificate in this regard as mentioned above be issued. In all such cases, it would be desirable for representative of the State Forest Department to assist the Expert Appraisal Committees.

The ML area is Government land. No forest land is involved in the ML area

13.

Status of forestry clearance for the broken-up area and virgin forestland involved in the Project including deposition of net present value (NPV) and compensatory afforestation (CA) should be indicated. A copy of the forestry clearance should also be furnished.

The ML area is Government land. No forest land is involved in the ML area

14.

Implementation status of recognition of forest rights under the Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 should be indicated.

The ML area is Government land. No forest land is involved in the ML area

15. The vegetation in the RF / PF areas in the study area, with necessary details, should be given.

Detailed biological study was carried out by Experts and presented Draft EIA report as detailed study of flora & fauna & Enclosed as Annexure D

16.

A study shall be got done to ascertain the impact of the Mining Project on wildlife of the study area and details furnished. Impact of the project on the wildlife in the surrounding and any other protected area and accordingly detailed mitigative measures required, should be worked out with cost implications and submitted.

Detailed biological study was carried out by Experts and presented Draft EIA report as detailed study of flora & fauna & Enclosed as Annexure D.

17.

Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Tiger / Elephant Reserves / (existing as well as proposed), if any, within 10 km of the mine lease should be clearly indicated, supported by a location map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden. Necessary clearance, as may be applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as mentioned above, should be obtained from the State Wildlife Department / Chief Wildlife Warden under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and copy furnished.

There are no National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Tiger /Elephant Reserves existing and proposed within 10 Kms radius of the mine lease area

18.

A detailed biological study of the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km radius of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based on such primary field survey, clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In case of any scheduled-I fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan for their conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for implementing the same should be made as part of the project cost.

Please refer to ANNEXURE - D for detailed Biological study of area covering both core and buffer zone has been furnished in Draft EIA report

19.

Proximity to Areas declared as ‘Critically Polluted’ or the Project areas attracting court

restrictions for mining operations should also be indicated and where so required, clearance / certifications from the prescribed Authorities, such as the SPCB or State Mining Dept. Should be secured and furnished to the effect that the proposed mining activities could be considered.

There are no critically polluted areas within 10km study area.

20.

Similarly, for coastal Projects, A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies demarcating LTL. HTL, CRZ area, location of the mine lease w.r.t CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any, should be furnished. (Note:

Not applicable

The Mining Projects falling under CRZ would also need to obtain approval of the concerned Coastal Zone Management Authority).

21.

R&R Plan / compensation details for the Project Affected People (PAP) should be furnished. While preparing the R&R Plan, the relevant State / National Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy should be kept in view. In respect of SCs / STs and other weaker sections of the society in the study area, a need-based sample survey, family-wise, should be undertaken to assess their requirements, and action programmes prepared and submitted accordingly, integrating the sectoral programmes of line departments of the State Government. It may be clearly brought out whether the village located in the mine lease area will be shifted or not. The issues relating to shifting of Village including their R&R and socio-economic aspects should be discussed in the report.

The mine lease area Government waste land. Hence No R&R is required.

22.

One season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality (PM10, SO2 and NOx), water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna shall be collected and the AAQ and other data so compiled presented date-wise in the EIA and EMP Report. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the monitoring stations should be such as to represent whole of the study area and justified keeping in view the pre-dominant downwind direction and location of sensitive receptors. There should be at lease one monitoring station within 500 m of the mine lease in the pre-dominant downwind direction. The mineralogical composition of PM10, particularly for free silica, should be given.

Presented in EIA report from page no 28-73

Enclosed as Annexure A,B,C,D, E & F

23.

Air quality modeling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on the air quality of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles for transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and input parameters used for modeling should be provided. The air quality contours may be shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site, location of sensitive receptors, if any, and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant wind direction may also be indicated on the map.

Presented in Draft EIA report from page no 74-80

24.

The water requirement for the Project, its availability and source should be furnished. A detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water requirement for the Project should be indicated.

Presented in Draft EIA report in page no 82

25. Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of water for the Project should be provided.

Water required for proposed mining operations will be met from ground water resource from nearby villages.

26.

Description of water conservation measures proposed to be adopted in the Project should be given. Details of rainwater harvesting proposed in the Project, if any, should be provided.

Presented in Draft EIA report from page no 94,95

27

Impact of the project on the water quality, both surface and groundwater should be assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if any required, should be provided.

Presented in Draft EIA report from page no 83

28.

Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether working will intersect groundwater. Necessary data and documentation in this regard may be provided. In case the working will intersect groundwater table, a detailed Hydro Geological Study should be undertaken and Report furnished. Necessary permission from Central Ground Water Authority for working below ground water and for pumping of ground water should also be

The subject area is a hilly terrain. The maximum relief is 94m. The ultimate pit limit of mining is 18m and GWL is 30m below general ground level of 80m and mine workings are proposed on higher and will not affect water regime. So, the mine workings will not intersect the ground water.

obtained and copy furnished.

29.

Details of any stream, seasonal or otherwise, passing through the lease area and modification / diversion proposed, if any, and the impact of the same on the hydrology should be brought out.

Hydrogeology study presented in Draft EIA report in page no 46 - 49

30.

Information on site elevation, working depth, groundwater table etc. Should be provided both in AMSL and bgl. A schematic diagram may also be provided for the same.

Presented in Draft EIA report in page no 15-17

31.

A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a tabular form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and time frame) and submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up front on commencement of the Project. Phase-wise plan of plantation and compensatory afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be covered under plantation and the species to be planted. The details of plantation already done should be given. The plant species selected for green belt should have greater ecological value and should be of good utility value to the local population with emphasis on local and native species and the species which are tolerant to pollution.

Presented in Draft EIA report from page no 96-99 and Annexure D

32

Impact on local transport infrastructure due to the Project should be indicated. Projected increase in truck traffic as a result of the Project in the present road network (including those outside the Project area) should be worked out, indicating whether it is capable of handling the incremental load. Arrangement for improving the infrastructure, if contemplated (including action to be taken by other agencies such as State Government) should be covered. Project Proponent shall conduct Impact of Transportation study as per Indian Road Congress Guidelines.

The transportation shall be carried out from lease through village road and the mine lease applied area has good accessibility from kadapa to Tadipatri highway road. The area which is located at a distance of 2.1 km from Chinthakunta village due east. The village Mangapatnam is located at 10km away from muddanur due EW. Muddanur is located on state highway between kadapa to Tadipatri at 70 km distance from kadapa and 60 Km from Tadipatri. A cart track is available up to the applied area from the village Chinthakunta. The ML area is well connected to all major cities by road. The roads are already developed to mining

lease area. So existing road is not required to expand due to this project. Due to this mining production approximately 224 numbers of tricks per day will be added to the traffic density of the area. Steps will be taken to care by providing peripheral development trough district authority and the govt. agencies for road repairing/ maintenance. Awareness campaign among dumper /truck drivers will be generated for clearance of road and lower down the pollution load due to transportation.

33. Details of the onsite shelter and facilities to be provided to the mine workers should be included in the EIA report.

The workers in the mines will be provided rest shed, first aid centre, ambulance facility. The hazardous protecting equipment also will be provided to the employees such as helmet, ear muff , mask etc. Presented in Draft EIA report in page no 25

34.

Conceptual post mining land use and Reclamation and Restoration of mined out areas (with plans and with adequate number of sections) should be given in the EIA report.

Presented in Draft EIA report in page no 22.

35.

Occupational Health impacts of the Project should be anticipated and the proposed preventive measures spelt out in detail. Details of pre-placement medical examination and periodical medical examination schedules should be incorporated in the EMP. The project specific occupational health mitigation measures with required facilities proposed in the mining area may be detailed.

Presented in Draft EIA report from page no 71-73, 89-90, 103,104, 112-113

36.

Public health implications of the Project and related activities for the population in the impact zone should be systematically evaluated and the proposed remedial measures should be detailed along with budgetary allocations.

There are 21 villages in the study area with 24591 population. All control measure for air emission, Noise control, solid waste management will be taken as per norms. Hence there will not be any impact on population.

37.

Measures of socio economic significance and influence to the local community proposed to be provided by the Project Proponent should be indicated. As far as possible, quantitative

Presented inDraft EIA report from page no 117,118

dimensions may be given with time frames for implementation.

38.

Detailed environmental management plan to mitigate the environmental impacts which, should inter-alia include the impacts of change of land use, loss of agricultural and grazing land, if any, occupational health impacts besides other impacts specific to the proposed Project.

Presented in EIA report from page no 91-105

39.

Public hearing points raised and commitment of the project proponent on the same along with time bound action plan to implement the same should be provided and also incorporated in the final EIA / EMP Report of the Project.

-

40. Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with direction / order passed by any Court of Law against the project should be given.

No litigation or court cases are pending against the project.

41. The cost of the project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well as the cost towards implementation of EMP should clearly be spelt out.

Presented in Draft EIA report from page no 105

42. A Disaster management Plan shall be prepared and included in the EIA/EMP Report.

Presented in Draft EIA report from page no 114-115

43

Benefits of the Project if the Project is implemented should be spelt out. The benefits of the Project shall clearly indicate environmental, social, economic, employment potential, etc.

Presented in EIA report from page no 120-121

44 Besides the above, the below mentioned general points are also to be followed

a. Executive Summary of the EIA/EMP Report Executive Summary is provided over and above the Draft EIA report

b. All documents to be properly referenced with index and continuous page numbering.

Index and Page numbers are given in EIA report

c.

Where data are presented in the Report especially in Tables, the period in which the data were collected and the sources should be indicated.

Draft EIA report is prepared with compliances of the condition

d. Project Proponent shall enclose all the analysis/testing reports of water, air, soil, noise

All the original analysis reports will be submitted along with Final EIA report to

etc. using the MoEF&CC/NABL accredited laboratories. All the original analysis/testing reports should be available during appraisal of the Project.

the SEAC committee at the time of appraisal.

Air, Water, Noise and Soil analysis data is enclosed in Draft EIA report as annexure A, B, C

e. Where the documents provided are in a language other than English, an English translation should be provided

The Drat EIA report and all the enclosures are prepared in English.

f. The Questionnaire for environmental appraisal of mining projects as devised earlier by the Ministry shall also be filled and submitted.

The Questionnaire for environmental appraisal of mining projects will be submitted along with Final EIA report to the SEAC committee at the time of appraisal.

g.

While preparing the EIA report, the instructions for the Proponents and instructions for the Consultants issued by MoEF&CC vide O.M. No. J-11013/41/2006-IA. II(I) dated 4th August, 2009, which are available on the website of this Ministry, should be followed.

The instructions are fallowed as per the condition.

h.

Changes, if any made in the basic scope and project parameters (as submitted in Form-I and the PFR for securing the TOR) should be brought to the attention of MoEF&CC with reasons for such changes and permission should be sought, as the TOR may also have to be altered. Post Public Hearing changes in structure and content of the draft EIA/EMP (other than modifications arising out of the P.H. process) will entail conducting the PH again with the revised documentation.

NO changes yet.

We will fallow the condition if any changes proposed.

I

As per the circular no. J-11011/618/2010-IA.II(I) dated 30.5.2012, certified report of the status of compliance of the conditions stipulated in the environment clearance for the existing operations of the project, should be obtained from the Regional Office of Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, as may be applicable.

Not Applicable, as it is a NEW project.

J

The EIA report should also include (i) surface plan of the area indicating contours of main topographic features, drainage and mining area, (ii) geological maps and sections and (iii) sections of the mine pit and external dumps, if any, clearly showing the land features of the adjoining area.

All the maps are provided in Draft EIA report.

CONTENTS Particulars Page No:

• Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction 1

1.1 Identification of project & project proponent 2 1.2 Brief description of the proposed mining activity 3 1.3 Scope of the study 10

2.0 Project Description 11 2.1 Type of The Project 11 2.2 Location 11 2.3 Size / Magnitude of Operation 11 2.4 Proposed schedule for approval and implementation 12 2.5 Technology and process description 12 2.6 Mining 12 2.7 Conceptual Plan 22 2.8 Use of Mineral 25 2.9 Site Services 25 2.10 Environment Mitigation Measures 26 2.11 Assessment of new & untested technology for the risk of

Technological failure 27

3.0 Baseline Environment 28 3.1 Air Environment 29 3.2 Ambient Air Quality 34 3.3 Noise Environment 36 3.4 Water Environment 40 3.5 Land Environment 43 3.6 Hydrogeology 46 3.7 Land Use Pattern 53 3.8 Biological Environment 69 3.9 Socio Economic Environment 70 3.10 Occupational Health 71

4.0 Prediction of Impacts & Mitigation Measures 74

4.0 Introduction 74 4.1 Air Environment 74 4.2 Noise Environment 81 4.3 Water Environment 82 4.4 Land Environment 83 4.5 Biological Environment 86 4.6 Socio Economic Environment 88 4.7 Occupational Health 89

5.0 Environmental Management Plan 91

5.0 Introduction 91 5.1 Air Pollution Control Measures 91 5.2 Noise Pollution Control Measures 93 5.3 Water Pollution Control Measures 94 5.4 Land Environment 95 5.5 Environmental Management Plan for Ecology & Biodiversity 96 5.6 Rainwater harvesting 102 5.7 Wild life conservation plan 103 5.8 Occupational health & safety measures to control dust 103 5.9 Budget 104

6.0 Analysis Of Alternatives (Technology & Site) 106

6.1 Alternative Technologies 106 6.2 Alternative Sites Examined BY Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy 106

7.0 Additional Studies 107 7.1 Risk assessment 107 7.2 Risk Control Measures 111

7.3 Disaster Management Plan 114

8.0 Project Benefits 120 8.1 Improvement in Physical Environment 120 8.2 Improvement in Social Infrastructure 120 8.3 Employment Potential 121

9.0. Environmental Monitoring Programme 122 9.1 Environmental Monitoring Programme 122 9.2 Air Quality Monitoring 122 9.3 Noise Level Monitoring 122 9.4 Water Quality Monitoring 122 9.5 Soil Quality Assessment 123 9.6 Conclusion 124

LIST OF TABLES Table No. Description Page No

1.1 Salient features of the study area 4 3.1 Environmental Attributes & Frequency of Monitoring 28 3.2 Ambient Air Quality monitoring stations 32 3.3 Summery of AAQ Monitoring 35 3.4 Noise Monitoring Stations 39 3.5 Noise levels during study period 39 3.6 Location of Water Sampling Stations 40 3.7 Statistics of Land use/Land cover of the study are 62 3.8 Location of Soil Sampling Stations 67 5.1 Budgetary Estimation for Environmental Management 104 9.1 Summary Monitoring Schedule 123

LIST OF FIGURES / DRAWINGS Fig / DRG

Description Page No.

1.1 Location of proposed mining lease area 06 1.2 Site Photos of proposed lease area 07 1.3 Location of Mine site area 09 2.1 Geological map of Lease area 14 2.2 Conceptual Plan of lease area 23 3.1 Wind rose diagram 30 3.2 Location of AAQ sampling stations 33 3.3 Location of Noise sampling stations 38 3.4 Location of Water sampling stations 42 3.5 Geomorphological Map 45 3.6 Drainage map of study area 49 3.7 Ground water Potential Map 51

3.8 Satellite Image of study area 65 3.9 Land Use Land Cover Map of study area 66 3.10 Location of Soil sampling stations 68 4.1 Isopleth Showing GLC’s – Post Project Scenario 80

List of Annexure

Annexure – A Ambient Air Quality Data Annexure – B Water Quality Data Annexure – C Soil Quality Data Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report Annexure – E Demographic Profile of the Study Area Annexure – F Mean Meteorological Data Annexure- G Approved Mining Plan

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

_______________________________________________________________

For

OVER AN EXTENT OF 8.000 HACTARES OF QUARTZITE & SILICA SAND MINE

Sy. No. 677 (Old Sy.No. 425) of Chinthakunta Village, Muddanuru Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh State

Proposed By

Sri P. VENKATA SIVA REDDY D.No. 1/21, Gundlakunta Village, Peddamudium Mandal,

Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.

Prepared By

____________________________________________________________________________________

M/s. GLOBAL ENVIRO LABS (Accredited by Quality Council of India – NABET, New Delhi)

2-2-1075/14/A/1, Tilaknagar “X” Roads, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad – 500 013. Ph.: 040-27407969; E.Mail: [email protected]

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Mining Lease area of 08.000 Ha. Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine of Sri. P. Venkata

Siva Reddy, located in Sy.No. 677 (Old Sy.No. 425) of Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur

Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh State

The lease was granted by Director of Mines & Geology, A.P, Ibrahimpatnam, vide

Proceedings No. 11779/R5-2/2018 Dt: 08.01.2019 for a period of 20 years. A mining

plan was approved by the Deputy Directorate of Mines & Geology, Y.S.R Kadapa vide

Letter No. 463/MP/YGL/2019 Dt:05.02.2019 for a period of 5 years.

The proposed mine is Fresh mine. and proposed maximum production is 3,75,000 TPA

(average production is 2,92,678 TPA) of Quartzite and Silica Sand. The total cost of the

project is 25 Lakhs only.

As per TOR Letter No: SEIAA/AP/KDP/MIN/03/2019/851-283 dated 14th May, 2019,

issued by SEIAA, A.P. the lessee has to obtain Environmental Clearance from State

Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, Andhra Pradesh.

Accordingly, the lessee has evaluated the possible environmental aspects and their

associated impacts that will be arise due to the proposed maximum production of

3,75,000 TPA (average production is 2,92,678 TPA) of Quartzite and Silica Sand and to

delineate the management plan to prevent, control, mitigate or minimize the adverse

environmental impacts envisaged. The data collected for this mining project during post

monsoon season i.e. for the months of October 2019 to December 2019. M/s. Global

Enviro Labs have prepared a Draft EIA covering an area of 10 kms radius from the

project site.

2.0 DETAILS ABOUT THE MINE The proposed mine deals with the proposed maximum production is 3,75,000 TPA

(average production is 2,92,678 TPA) of Quartzite and Silica Sand, in Survey No. 677

(Old Sy.No. 425) of Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District,

Andhra Pradesh State. The lease area will be worked by opencast other than fully

mechanized mining method with drilling and controlled blasting.

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

3

The applied area is located about 1.3 km from Denepalli Village and it is about 10 kms

from Muddanur mandal and Renigunta air port is about 150 km. The applied area is

accessible by means of Jeeps and Lorries.

2.1 MINING

This is a fresh mine. The proposed mining is planned to be carried out by opencast other

than fully mechanized mining method with drilling and controlled blasting. The ROM

will be sorted into different sizes by feeding it to the crusher proposed to be established

outside the applied area. The ROM will be loaded into tippers and tractors using

Excavator. Mining will be carried out by formation of benches of each 6.0m high. The

site inspection reveals that the East to West portion of the applied area is suitable for

development during first 5 years. As the workings are proposed on higher elevations no

ground water is expected into the working pits. The rainwater that accumulates in the

workings during monsoon will be bailed out by installing a diesel operated pump set. The

mine will work in one shift of eight hours duration and six days in a week, for 300 days

in a year.

3.0 COLLECTION OF BASELINE DATA

The data collected for this mining project to know the existing quality of air, water, soil

characteristics, flora & fauna, noise levels and socio-economic details of the study area

during the post monsoon season i.e. for the months of October 2019 to December 2019.

3.1 AIR ENVIRONMENT In order to assess the existing ambient air quality in the study area of 10 km radius of the

mine area, a network of 8 ambient air quality stations were selected and samples were

collected to analyze for various parameters like PM2.5, PM10, SO2, and NOx

concentrations. The sampling stations were selected based on the Topography/ Terrain of

the study area, Populated areas, Residential areas etc.

The values of ambient air quality of all the monitoring stations for various parameters

during the study period (October 2019 to December 2019) will be as following.

The maximum value of PM2.5 in the proposed project area (core zone) is 27 μg/m3,

PM10 is 33 μg/m3, SO2 is 6.1 μg/m3 and NOx is 6.7 μg/m3.

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

4

The average value of PM2.5 in the buffer zone in the range of 15-29 μg/m3, PM10 in the

range of 25-48 μg/m3, SO2 in the range of 5.2 – 7.1 μg/m3 and NOx in the range of 6.6 –

7.9 μg/m3.

The concentrations of various parameters in the air quality of the study area were found

to be well within the norms prescribed by NAAQ.

3.2 NOISE ENVIRONMENT In order to know the baseline noise levels, in and around the Mine site, Noise levels were

measured at the Mine complex and also at 6 villages in the study area. The day-night

noise levels were monitored at all locations and the maximum noise levels ranging from

55.2 dBA to 65.3 dBA the noise levels recorded at all the stations were found to be less

than the standards prescribed.

3.3 WATER ENVIRONMENT

In order to assess the Groundwater quality impacts 6 nos of samples were collected.

These samples were analyzed for various physical and chemical and bacteriological

parameters to know the potability levels.

All the water samples collected shows that the parameters well within the drinking water

standards specified in IS 10500.

3.4 LAND ENVIRONMENT

6 nos. of soil samples were collected and analyzed for Physical & Chemical parameters.

3.5 BIOLOGICAL ENVIORONMENT

The details of flora and fauna present in the study area were described elaborately in the

EIA report

3.6 SOICIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

The detailed description of the Socio-Economic Environment is presented in the EIA

report.

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

5

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

4.1 AIR ENVIRONMENT

The impacts on air environment from a mining activity depend on various factors like

production capacity, machinery involved, operations and maintenance of various

equipments and vehicle. Apart from these, there will be other activities associated viz

transportation of mineral and waste, stocking facilities and dump management within the

mine lease area that may contribute to pollution.

An attempt has been made to predict the incremental rise of various ground level

concentrations above the baseline status in respect of air pollution due to proposed

production for a max. quantity of 3,75,000 TPA of Quartzite and Silica sand has been

considered. The Industrial Source Complex – Short Term model (ISCST3) is a

computerized air quality model, which was approved by United States Environmental

Protection Agency for mining applications is used for predicting the Ground Level

Concentrations (GLC) due to the mining activity.

The maximum ground level concentration is estimated to be about 11.16 μg/m3 within the

mine area, where mining operations are being carried out. The concentration was found

to reduce to a value of less than 3.72 μg/m3 at a distance of about 0.5 km from the mining

operations. The impact of mining operations would be negligible beyond 1.0 km.

The net concentration of PM10 in the mine area and buffer zone is well within the

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Hence there will not be any adverse

impact on air environment due to the proposed mining activity.

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

6

Air Environments in Core & Buffer Zones – Post Project Scenario

μg/m3 CORE ZONE BUFFER ZONE

Village Name Baseline Concentration (PM10)

Predicted Concentration

Overall Scenario

Baseline Concentration PM10 (Max)

33 Down wind direction

40 3.72 43.72

Predicted Concentration (Max)

11.16 Kammavaripalle 55 <2.48 57.48

Overall Scenario 44.16 Chinthakunta 60 <2.48 62.48 Aravetipalle 50 <2.48 52.48 Denepalle 52 <2.48 54.48 Mangapatnam 56 <2.48 58.48 Shettivaripalle 48 <2.48 50.48

Specified NAAQ limit 100 Specified NAAQ limit for Residential area 100 4.2 WATER ENVIRONMENT The Mining activity is on hill area and will not have any effect on the ground water and

the static water table in this area is below 30-80 m.

There are no major streams and rivers, which can get effected by the mining. Hence,

there will be no effect on the surface water

The rainwater drains the slopes of the area and joins to seasonal nallahs, which is running

in outside the area.

Water samples collected from bore wells located in the buffer zone have indicated that

the ground water is free from heavy metal concentration and after implementation

proposed mining activity will not interference on the water quality.

Water Consumption & Wastewater Generation

The water requirement for this mining activity will be 12 KLD. Breakup details are:

Dust suppression purpose:8.0 KLD, Domestic purpose: 1.0 KLD, Greenbelt purpose: 2.0 KLD

There is no generation & discharge of wastewater from this mine. About 0.5 KLD of

Domestic Effluent will be generated from this mine and this will be sent to septic tank

fallowed by soak pit

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

7

4.3 NOISE ENVIRONMENT The ambient noise levels in the mine area will be in with in stipulated standards. Hence,

there will not be any adverse impact on noise environment due to the proposed mining

activity.

4.4 LAND ENVIRONMENT

RECLAMATION Reclamation of mined out portions are not proposed during plan period as the mining

operations will not reach to the full extent of mineral deposit. Progressive trenching and

embankment by safety bunding will be taken up. As a measure of protection 2m corridor

all along the lease corridor a protection bund will be raised, a safety pit will be excavated

with 1.5m width and one-meter depth will be excavated to avoid the trespassing of the

human and cattle / wild life into the lease hold area. The pit slope will be maintained a

23o in order to protect humans and cattle / wild life protection.

WASTE GENERATION

About 5% intercalated waste will generate and average waste per annum is 12,323.2

Tons and maximum waste per annum is 15,789 Tones and total waste in 5 years is

61616 Tons will be generated which will be dump over an area of 0.247 Ha (height is

40 m) in E& W side of the Quarry Lease area. The generated waste will be utilized to

strengthen the internal roads of the quarry lease area.

As the ore body is exposed on the hill top, open cast method has been adopted. A bench

height of 3m is proposed and width of the bench will be more than 6 m. The total area is

proposed to be opened into benches in descending order. All active dumps will be

reclaimed concurrent to mining operations and at the foot of the dump retaining walls

will be constructed to avoid wash off the material. At foot of the hills the check dams

will be constructed across the valleys & also gully plugs will be constructed at the gullies.

Nature of top soil/ waste and mineral rejects

There is little top soil will be generated during the scheme period however this will be

utilized for afforestation purpose.

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

8

4.5 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT

The direct and the most destructive impacts of the project are limited to the mine lease

area only. There is going to be a change in the land use and land cover owing to the

mining activity. The existing flora and vegetation of the mine lease is going to be lost

slowly in a phased manner owing to digging or dumping of overburden and waste.

Among the plant species that are going to be lost, the annuals and therophytes are highly

resilient and they can come back once the intensity and frequency of disturbances

decrease. As there are no rare or endangered or endemic or threatened (REET) species,

continuation of mining will not pose any additional problem to any REET species.

Hence, the impact of the project on flora is negligible. As far as the fauna s concerned,

the proposed mining could endanger the habitat of some unseen reptiles and rodents that

may be present in burrows. But it is incapable of posing any additional threat to any

Schedule I species either directly or indirectly.

i). Loss of the existing flora and trees: The flora of the project site is going to be damaged

or lost to a when a mine pit is opened and when dump is created. Since there are no RET

species, there shall not be any loss of any species.

ii). Loss of fodder and grazing land for locals: Green fodder is produced only during the

rainy season. During that time, shortage of green fodder is uncommon. During the rest of

the year when there is shortage of both green and dry fodder, the core area contributes

very little. Hence the overall loss of fodder can be made good by growing forage crops.

iii). Enhanced soil erosion due mining: Operations relating to mining shall enhance the

chances of soil erosion and dust emissions. Integrated soil and water conservation

measures involving physical and biological systems are incorporated. Legumes like

Subabul and Hamata are proposed to be grown for soil conservation, improvement of soil

fertility and perennial fodder production.

4.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

It will be obvious to assume that the activities of the mining operations have to be

produced some improvements in the socio-economic levels in the study area.

The proposed mining activities will provide employment to local persons of different

skills and trades. The employment potential ameliorated economic conditions of these

families directly and provided employment to many other families indirectly who are

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

9

involved in business and service-oriented activities. This in-turn will improve the socio-

economic conditions of the area.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

The major objective and benefit of utilizing EIA in mining initial stage itself is to prevent

avoidable losses of environmental resources and values as a result of well-planned EMP.

Environmental Management Plan includes protection/mitigation/enhancement measures

as well as suggestions for the post project-monitoring programme to implemented y the

project proponent.

5.1 AIR ENVIRONMENT

Dust is the major pollutant generated from the mining operations. Dust control measures

are as fallowes.

• Watering blast hole followed by charging of blast holes.

• Avoiding blasting under unfavorable wind and atmospheric conditions.

• Applying water for dust suppression on mine haul roads.

• Regular Compaction & grading of haul roads and service roads to clear

accumulation of loose material.

• Compaction & gradation on both sides of Haul Roads.

• Controlling speed of dumpers / trucks.

• Avoid overloading of dumpers and consequent spillage on the roads.

• Good maintenance of vehicles & machinery.

• Water sprinklers of fixed type will be provided at the mine approach roads from

mine face / benches to crush hopper to prevent the generation of dust.

• Transfer chutes will be provided at mineral discharge points, loading points etc.,

to minimize discharge height and spread of air borne dust.

• The operators cabin in the drills, dumpers and other HEMMs are provided with

dust free enclosure and persons working at high dust prone areas will be provided

with dust mask.

• Good housekeeping at the mining, loading will be practiced.

• Avoiding over filling of tippers and consequent spillage on the roads.

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

10

• Silica sand and quartzite carrying trucks will be effectively covered by tarpaulin

to avoid escape of silica sand and quartzite to the atmosphere.

• Air quality will be regularly monitored both in the core zone and the buffer zone.

5.2 WATER ENVIRONMENT There will not be any wastewater generation from the proposed mining activity.

The salient features on the mitigation measures are:

❖ Garland drain will be provided to check soil wash off during monsoons.

❖ Construction of check dams & Gully plugs across seasonal/perennial nallahs

flowing through the ML area

❖ Run-off from the mining area will be passed through a series of arrestor dams

with filter beds to allow settling of solid particles.

❖ Contour bunding and trenches are proposed during monsoon to minimize soil

erosion.

❖ Arrestor wall, protective bunds and trenches will be provided

❖ Water quality monitoring will be carried out in all the seasons

5.3 NOISE ENVIRONMENT To control noise pollution during the proposed mining operations following steps will be

practiced.

• Actual noise emissions of the equipment will be ensured that they will be as

low as possible.

• Fitting effective mufflers to the equipment wherever required.

• The high temperature time in the afternoon will be selected for blasting which

will naturally reduce the noise pollution.

• For further reduction of noise and vibration, well-advanced and effective

technique of blasting with non-electrical initiation system will be adopted.

• All roads will be maintained in good condition to reduce vehicle noise. Vehicle

noise is exacerbated by high speed and by deceleration and acceleration and

these will be avoided.

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

11

• The workers will be provided with protection equipment, earmuffs and

earplugs as a protection from the high noise level generated at the mine site

wherever required.

• Noise levels will be controlled by using optimum explosive charge, proper

delay detonators and proper stemming to prevent blow out of holes as well as

usage of the sequential blasting machine in combination with non-electric

initiation systems.

• Speed of trucks will be limited to moderate speed of 25 KMPH to prevent

undue noise form empty trucks.

• Planting of trees has been taken up along the mining lease boundary for

controlling noise apart from earmarking the limit of the mine pit boundary.

• Proper maintenance will be done for noise generating machinery including

transport vehicles

5.4 LAND ENVIRONMENT 5.4.1 WASTE MANAGEMENT

About 5% intercalated waste will generate and average waste per annum is 12,323.2

Tons and maximum waste per annum is 15,789 Tones and total waste in 5 years is

61616 Tons will be generated which will be dump over an area of 0.247 Ha (height is

40 m) in E& W side of the Quarry Lease area. The generated waste will be utilized to

strengthen the internal roads of the quarry lease area.

As the ore body is exposed on the hill top, open cast method has been adopted. A bench

height of 3m is proposed and width of the bench will be more than 6 m. The total area is

proposed to be opened into benches in descending order. All active dumps will be

reclaimed concurrent to mining operations and at the foot of the dump retaining walls

will be constructed to avoid wash off the material. At foot of the hills the check dams

will be constructed across the valleys & also gully plugs will be constructed at the gullies.

Nature of top soil/ waste and mineral rejects

There is little top soil will be generated during the scheme period however this will be

utilized for afforestation purpose.

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

12

5.5 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONEMNT The project proponent is duty bound to strictly follow the procedures outlined in the

approved mining plan including the progressive mine closure and restoration plan. To

begin with, they are going to one row of Hill Neem (Chukrasia tabularis), the only tree

that remains green even during the hot summer in Kadapa region. It can be easily grown

from stem cuttings. It has thick foliage and evergreen. This will be done during the first

year at a cost of Rs.1,00,000/-. Stem cuttings can be procured from the hills and seeds

are readily available as there are road-side avenue trees in the district. Seedlings will be

grown in seed beds and the saplings shall be transplanted at a spacing of 2x3m during the

rainy season. It is cost effective and performance is ensured.

The top fertile soil shall be stored in paces / areas where deposits are not found.

Overburden shall be stored separately as stated in the approved mining plan. Once the

mining is over in any pit, it shall be back filled with the stone waste at the bottom level

followed by the overburden and then with the top soil at the top. After filling and

levelling is over, nitrogen enriching leguminous fodder plants like Hamata

(Stylosanthes hamata) shall be grown. Once the Hamata grass establishes, pits shall be

made at a spacing of 2m x 3m and saplings of Chukrasia tabularis, Conocarpus

lancifolius, Acacia holosericea, neem etc are transplanted. After transplantation, regular

maintenance of weeding, watering, application of fertilizers and other protective and

productive measures shall be undertaken. Acacia holosericea, neem and Hill Neem

(Chukrasia tabularis) are already grown in the similar mine lease areas in the District.

Scarified seeds of Conocarpus lancifolius, and Silver wattle (Acacia holosericea) will be

pelletized with dung and placed in small pits in the backfilled areas of the mine lease

areas. The seeds germinate and some of them are going to survive. All gaps will be filled

with stem cuttings of Hill Neem (Chukrasia tabularis) which grows well. There shall

be sufficient water in the mining area for dust suppression and afforestation and watering

the plants.

The proposed Afforestation plan is provided in Draft EIA report. Because of semiarid

conditions, nutrient poor soils, dry climate and acute shortage of water, it is practically

impossible to grow 1500 to 2000 trees per Ha. It is beyond the carrying capacity of the

Executive Summary - Sri P. Venkata Siva Reddy-08 Ha

13

soil and climate. A list of plants suggested for greenbelt, avenue plantations and eco-

restoration of back filled areas is provided in Draft EIA report.

5.6 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY

❖ Providing a working environment that is conducive to safety & health

❖ The management of occupational safety & health is the prime responsibility of

mine management from the executive level to the first line supervisory level

❖ Employee involvement and commitment in the implementation of health and

safety guidelines

❖ Provision of all necessary resources

❖ Implementing safety and health management system and assessing the

effectiveness through periodic audits

❖ Setting of safety and health objectives based on comprehensive strategic plans

and measure performance against these plans

❖ Monitoring the effects of mining activities on safety and health and conducting

regular performance reviews

❖ Provision of necessary personal protective equipments

❖ Establishing and maintaining a system of medical surveillance for employees

❖ Ensuring employees at all levels receive appropriate training and are competent to

carry out their duties and responsibilities

5.7 IMPLEMENTATION OF EMP & MONITORING PROGRAMME The lessee will ensure the implementation of the measures within the mine area and

carryout efficient monitoring. In order to implement the measures suggested for

mitigating the adverse impacts on the environment, it is suggested to monitor the

environmental parameters regularly.

5.8 CONCLUSION The mine is proposed to produce maximum production of 3,75,000 TPA (average

production is 2,92,678 TPA) of Quartzite & Silica Sand. The mine shall be worked,

fulfilling all statutory obligations as prescribed by DMG, DGMS, MoEF and APPCB.

The proposals are submitted for Environmental clearance to SEIAA, A.P.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

1

1. INTRODUCTION 1.0. PREAMBLE

The Mining Lease area of 08.000 Ha. Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine of Sri. P. Venkata

Siva Reddy, located in Sy.No. 677 (Old Sy.No. 425) of Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur

Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh State.

The lease was granted by Director of Mines & Geology, A.P, Ibrahimpatnam, vide

Proceedings No. 11779/R5-2/2018 Dt: 08.01.2019 for a period of 20 years. A mining

plan was approved by the Deputy Directorate of Mines & Geology, Y.S.R Kadapa vide

Letter No. 463/MP/YGL/2019 Dt:05.02.2019 for a period of 5 years.

The proposed mine is Fresh mine and proposed maximum production is 3,75,000 TPA

(average production is 2,92,678 TPA) of Quartzite and Silica Sand. The total cost of the

project is 25 Lakhs only.

As per the Honorable Ministries Notification S.O. 1533, the proposed mine lease area

shall obtain Environmental clearance before starting operations. Accordingly, Form-I

along with Draft TOR for EIA study and Pre-feasibility report has been submitted to the

SEIAA, A.P. A presentation was made before the State Expert Appraisal Committee

(SEAC) on 30 March, 2019 for the approval of TOR for EIA study. And accordingly,

TOR has been issued by the SEIAA vide letter No. SEIAA/AP/KDP/MIN/03/2019/851-

283 dated 14th May, 2019.

This report furnishes the details of location of Site, Description of the project, prevailing

baseline status w.r.t Air Environment, Water Environment, Noise Environment, Land

Environment, Biological Environment and Socio-economic Environment. This report

also helps in identification of environmental impacts and suggesting mitigation measures

to be followed during Operation of the project as part of Environmental Management

Plan. This report also acts as guidance manual for the proponent for following the

Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and for adopting post project Environmental

Monitoring Program as per statutory norms.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

2

1.1 IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT & PROJECT PROPONENT:

The applicant Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy, is a Lessee. He is having more than 10 years’

experience in mining business and he is resident of Gundlakunta Village,Peddamudium

Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa. Having come to know the availability of Quartzite in

disintegrated highly weathered Quartzite and Silica Sand near Chintakunta Village,

Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District they have applied for mining lease. The

Quartzite is having good quality and easily poundable by (it is economically highly

feasible). In local area few mines are already working and they are supplying quartzite to

few industries situated at Hyderabad. They have examined the area thoroughly and then

satisfied themselves with the quality and quantity of the mineral available in the area. The

Director of Mines and Geology have recommended for sanction of mining lease in their

favour.

Environment Policy:

Resolution: On this 1st day of October, 2019 the Lessee has taken a decision on

Environment policy of the mine.

Sri Jelani Basha Sahib is committed to operate the 08.000 Ha. ML Area in Survey No.

677 (Old Sy.No.425) of Chintakunta Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District,

Andhra Pradesh with the following objectives.

• To produce quartzite strictly complying with all the Environmental regulations.

• Strict monitoring and compliance of the conditions stipulated in Environmental

clearance.

• Strict monitoring and compliance of the conditions stipulated in Consent for

Establishment issued by APPCB.

• Ensuring Implementation and regular operation of air emission control measures

such as water sprinklers, etc.

• Periodical monitoring of all environmental parameters such as Ambient air

quality, water quality, noise levels, soil quality, etc. and submission of the same to

statutory authorities periodically.

• Maintaining good housekeeping practices.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

3

Lessee

Mines Manager

Environmental Engineer

• Development of greenbelt as per norms.

• The compliance of the EC conditions / APPCB norms will be reported to the

Lessee periodically.

• Compliance to Environment Protection Act & Rules

• Compliance to Mines Acts & Rules

• No Environmental violations will be carried out.

Hierarchy to implement Environment Policy:

An Environmental Engineer will be appointed to look after all environmental issues and

ensure compliance with Environmental Clearance conditions / APPCB norms and will

report to Mines Manager who will report to Lessee. Subsequently it will be discussed in

the meeting and it will be made aware of the Environmental Policy and compliance on

Environmental Clearance/APPCB norms to Lessee. The following will be the

organization chart pertaining to Environment Policy.

1.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED MINING ACTIVITY:

1.2.1 NATURE:

This proposal involves mining of quartzite & Silica Sand. The formation of Quartzite and

Silica Sand is highly disintegrated and weathered quartzite is having almost horizontal

beds with multiple joints and prominent bedding structure.

1.2.2 SIZE OF THE PROJECT:

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy has proposed to undertake mining activity over a Mining

lease area of 08.000 Ha. with proposed average production capacity of 2,92,678 TPA and

maximum production is 3,75,000 TPA of Quartzite and Silica Sand.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

4

S.NO. PRODUCT PRODUCTION CAPACITY (TPA)

1. Quartzite & Silica Sand Average- 2,92,678 TPA Maximum -3,75,000 TPA

1.2.3 LOCATION OF THE MINE:

The proposed mining will be taken up Survey No.677 (Old Sy.No.425) Chintakunta

Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh in a ML area of

08.000 Ha. The following environmental factors of the location of the mine area.

Extent of Mining Lease area 08.000 Hectares Road Network A metal road of 2.8 km. length is connected to the ML

area from Chintakunata village

Nearest rail head Muddanur Railway station – 10 Kms Nearest port facility Krishnapatnam port – 250 Kms. Nearest Airport Renigunta Airport – 150 Kms. Defence Installations There are no defense installations within 10 Kms

radius from the mining area. Historic & religious places There are no Historic & religious places with in the 10

Kms radius from the mining area Nearest reserved forest Yamavaram RF (N)-2.0 Km

Gandikota Sounth RF (WN)-2.8 Km Bhanukotamala RF(SW)-2.7 Km Kosinepalli RF (NNE)-7.0 Km

Wildlife Sanctuaries / Bird Sanctuaries / National Parks / Elephant corridor / Tiger reserves

There are no Wildlife Sanctuaries / Bird Sanctuaries / National Parks / Elephant corridor / Tiger reserves within 10 Km. radius.

Archaeologically & Historically Important Site

Pre-Historic rock painting is present at distance of 700 mtrs

Nearest village Denepalli – 1.3 Kms. Major crops Paddy, Ground nut, Cotton, Tobaco, Bengal Gram,

Red gram, Millets etc., Rehabilitation & Re-settlement Nil Products Quartzite & Silica Sand Total project cost Rs. 25 Lakhs Present use of land Govt. Waste land Intersection of ground water Ground water is at 40m below General ground level Source of water Ground water Details of water bodies / lakes / rivers / nallahs

Water Canal (N)-1.2 Km, Stream (NE) -2.0 Km, Water Pond (SW)-0.5 Km

Forest land in the lease area Nil

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

5

The following area the coordinates of the ML area.

Point North - Latitude East - Longitude Format : hddd° mm' ss.sssss"

P N 14°42'10.14673" E 78°18'59.86765" Q N 14°42'14.17508" E 78°19'06.19832" R N 14°41'57.15394" E 78°19'00.69795" S N 14°41'58.89408" E 78°18'53.72312" T N 14°42'05.20511" E 78°18'57.17098"

The lease sketch of ML area is shown in Fig.1.1. The photographs of the ML area are

shown in Fig. 1.2. The topographical map showing the location of the mine area is shown

in Fig. 1.3

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

6

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

7

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

8

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

9

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

10

1.2.4 IMPORTANCE OF PROJECT:

The proposed project is to mine the quartzite present in 08.000 Ha of land in Survey No.

677 (old Sy No.425), Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District,

Andhra Pradesh using manual opencast method by using drilling & Controlled blasting.

The mineral quartzite will be crushed and screened for different mesh sizes as required by

the user industry. After crushing it is mainly used in the industry such as Castings,

foundries, Ceramics, paint etc. A small portion of the quartzite (Silica sand) produced in

this area will be in the construction industry. This will replace the river/stream sand

which is causing severe adverse effect to ground water potential.

Mineral Chemical Specification Physical Size

Quartzite and Silica sand + 99% Silica 10 mm to 100 mm

Benefit to the region:

With the establishment of the proposed mining activity, there will be employment

opportunities to the local people during operation of the mining. Priority will be given to

locals in employment. There will be upliftment of the socio-economic status of the people

in the area due to the proposed project.

In the light of the above scenario Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy is proposed to Quartzite &

Silica sand mining at Survey No. 677 (old Sy No.425), Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur

Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh.

1.3. SCOPE OF THE STUDY:

The scope of work includes a detailed characterization of the environment in an area of

10 Km. radius of the Mine Lease Area for various environmental parameters like Air,

Water, Noise, Land, Biological and Social-economic aspects. This Draft EIA Report is

prepared in accordance with the Terms of Reference issued vide No. Lr.No:

SEIAA/AP/KDP/MIN/03/2019/851-283 dated 14th May, 2019 by the Honorable

SEIAA,A.P.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

11

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 TYPE OF THE PROJECT:

The proposed project is for mining of Quartzite & Silica sand by manual open cast

method by using drilling & Controlled blasting in 08.000 Ha. in Survey No. 677 (old Sy

No.425), Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra

Pradesh.

Use of Silica sand and quartzite:

Silica sand and quartzite used for water purification and manufacture of glass, synthetic

foundry moulding catalysts, disodium ultramarine etc. it is also used for acid heat

resistant ceramics, refractories, pottery glaze, enamel etc. Silica sand and quartzite of 150

mesh is used in Sawing stone, grinding and surfacing glass and polishing marble

Rounded Grains of silica sand and quartzite are used for sand blasting it is also used as a

filler in paints 'Wood Paste' moulded hard rubber goods, gypsum Plasters, oxychloride

acoustic plasters and soap.

2.2 LOCATION:

The proposed mining activity in the ML area, located at Survey No. 677 (old Sy No.425),

Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. Land

use of the ML area is Government waste land.

DISTRICT/STATE MANDAL VILLAGE SURVEY No. AREA

Y.S.R Kadapa (A.P.) Muddanur Chinthakunta 677 (old Sy No.425)

08.000 Ha.

2.3 SIZE / MAGNITUDE OF OPERATION:

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy has proposed to undertake mining activity over a Mining

lease area of 08.000 Ha. with proposed maximum production of 3,75,000 TPA (average

production is 2,92,678 TPA) of Quartzite and Silica Sand.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

12

S.NO. PRODUCT PRODUCTION CAPACITY (TPA)

1. Quartzite & Silica Sand Average- 2,92,678 TPA Maximum -3,75,000 TPA

The Mining Lease area of 08.000 Ha. Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine of Sri. P. Venkata

Siva Reddy, located in Sy.No. 677 (old Sy No.425) of Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur

Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh State.

The lease was granted by Director of Mines & Geology, A.P Ibrahimpatnam, vide

Proceedings No. 11779/R5-2/2018 Dt: 08.01.2019 for a period of 20 years. A mining

plan was approved by the Deputy Directorate of Mines & Geology, Y.S.R Kadapa vide

Letter No. 463/MP/YGL/2019 Dt:05.02.2019 for a period of 5 years.

2.4 PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION:

Excavation with proposed capacities will be taken up after obtaining Environmental

Clearance from SEIAA, A.P & CFE from APPCB.

2.5 TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION:

2.5.1 NUMBER OF TRUCKS:

73 No’s of trucks per day (Truck capacity 17Tons) will be required to transport quartzite

and Silica Sand to outside agencies. All the trucks will be covered with tarpaulins. The

existing road is capable of absorbing this additional truck movement.

2.6. MINING:

2.6.1 TOPOGRAPHY OF THE AREA:

The subject area is a hilly terrain. The highest R.L is from the assumed bench mark 356m

and lowest R.L is 262m. The maximum relief is 94m. There is no perennial water course

in around the area. Natural vegetation is scanty. The applied area falling in South

eastern flank of the hillock. Below the hill is plain ground where cultivated with crops

like groundnut, Maize, Sunflower etc.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

13

2.6.2 REGIONAL GEOLOGY:

Geologically the area falls in Gandikota Quartzite and Tadipatri formation of Chitravathi

Group of Cuddapah Super group. It is mainly consisting of Quartzite and Shale.

2.6.3 LOCAL GEOLOGY:

Quartzite (Silica Sand) and shales are the main rock units exposed in the subject area.

During the geological mapping the formations encountered in the subject area are the

Shales belongs to Tadipatri formation, Chitravati group of lower Cuddapah and this

Shales over lain by Quartzite’s belongs to Panyam stage of Kurnool group of Proterozoic

age. Geology and structural map of study area is shown in Fig.2.1

The lithounits are as follows.

1. Quartzite sand stones (Silica Sand).

2. Shale.

Quartzite is used in the manufacture of silica refractoriness and as a flux in iron and steel

industry, and manufacture of silica sand which is mostly used in the glass, sodium silicate

industries and foundries.

LITHOLOGY:

By ground observation in the area the lithological sequence is found as under:

Surface Soil; Quartzite (Silica sand); Shale

The rock units exposed in the ML area are belong to Cuddapah and Kurnool groups of

proterozoic age and consisting of quartzite and shales.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

14

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

15

2.6.4 EXPLORATION:

(i) Already carried out in the area:

Quarry Lease area is covered by sheetrock and partly covered by boulders. The lessee

was carried out bore hole at time of prospecting. 25m depth of Quartzite and Slica Sand

available. Corners of the lease area were having any boundary pillars fixed with DGPS

by the time of site visit. Applicant has agreed to install pyramidal monuments of suitable

size with concrete properly painted and labeled with high visible colour for every corner

of the lease boundary. The subject area is demarcated on the ground with reference to

revenue stones. Later topographical survey of the area was carried out. The ABM ‘B’

(262.080) is connected to Grid of N1627332 & E210842 located in south West Corner of

the QL area. Based on topographical survey and geological features, collected from the

surface data, the surface geological plan is prepared on 1:2000 scale with 2.0 m contour

interval and the geology of the applied area, and section lines are shown in the Geological

plan of ML area is shown in Fig.2.2.

2.6.5 RESERVES:

Reserves estimated as are follows.

Category Quartzite & Silica Sand Total Geological Resources 62,02,476 tons Blocked Under buffer zone (7.5 m) + Bench Slopes 4,20, 585 tons

Mineable Quartzite Reserves 57,81,891 tons

The total mineable geological reserves are as follows:

Total Mineable reserves 1,03,38,298 tons

Proposed annual production after the ensuing scheme period will be around 57,81,891

tons. So, life of the mine based on average production is 57,81,891 / 2,92,678 =

19.76years Say 20 Years and Life of the mine based on maximum production is

57,81,891 / 3,75,000 = 15.4 years Say 15 Years. After the proposed exploration during

scheme period the reserves will be re-assessed and the life of the mine will be changed as

per the re assessed reserves and then a clear conceptual plan will be drawn and submitted.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

16

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

17

2.6.6 LIFE OF THE MINE:

Total Mineable Reserves = 57,81,891 tons

Life of the Mine based on average production = 57,81,891 / 2,92,678 = 19.76 years Say

20 Years

Life of the Mine based on Maximum production = 57,81,891 / 3,75,000 = 15.4 years Say

15 Years.

2.6.7 MINING METHODOLOGY:

This is a fresh mine. The proposed mining is planned to be carried out by opencast other

than fully mechanized mining method with drilling and controlled blasting. The ROM

will be sorted into different sizes by feeding it to the crusher proposed to be established

outside the applied area. The ROM will be loaded into tippers and tractors using

Excavator. Mining will be carried out by formation of benches of each 6.0m high. The

site inspection reveals that the East to West portion of the applied area is suitable for

development during first 5 years programme and as shown in production and

Development plan is shown in figure 2.3

YEAR WISE PRODUCTION PLAN PROPOSED FOR THREE YEARS AS PER AMP: Year Production 1st year 180532 tons 2nd year 253654 tons 3rd year 324774 tons 4th year 329431 tons 5th year 375000 tons (Max) Total 1463391 tons Average 2,92,678 tons

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

18

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

19

2.6.8 DRILLING AND BLASTING:

Since the mining is proposed to work by other than fully mechanized and the benches are

kept 06m height and the Quartzite is a material which is hard to very hard in nature it

requires the drilling and blasting to exploit the same.

The broad blasting parameters are determined for the blasting pattern and blast design,

which are as follows:

Blast whole diameter is normally 115mm and the depth of the hole is 6.6m inclusive of

sub grade drilling of 0.5 to 1.0 meters to avoid toe formation.

Blasting pattern is generally square or staggered with burden ranging from 3.0 to 3.5

meters and spacing of 3.5 to 4.0 meters.

Usually single / double row of holes is blasted along free face to achieve optimum

powder factor, best fragmentation and minimized adverse impacts on account of blasting.

Maximum numbers of holes will be blasted at a time in a round are generally limited to

15 to 20 with normal delay detonators to mitigate adverse impacts such as air blast, throw

and the ground vibration.

Holes are electrically detonated using electric detonators. ANFO types of explosives are

used for blasting with 20 to 25 percent, proportion of primer/ booster cartridges and rest

as column charge. About 20 kgs of explosives are loaded in 115 mm diameter holes and

powder factor ranging between 8 to 10 tons per kgs of explosives will be achieved.

For using the ANFO necessary permission from DGMS under rule 155 (1) of MMR 1960

will be taken.

The proposed bench heights will maintain 06m. The orientations of the proposed benches

are South- Northern direction & advancing from South to North. The yearly average

ROM proposed will be 3,05,001 tonnes/annum.

DRILLING:

Type Nos. Size of hole mm

Size of Capacity

Make Motive Power

1)Tractor Mounted compressor 2)DTH Drilling Rig

1 1

- 115mm

140 m3

-

VT4 Atlas Atlas copco

Diesel (Fuel) Compressed Air

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

20

Drilling will be carried out by using down the hole rigs having the diameter of 100 mm.

Holes will be drilled vertically to a depth of 6.6metres with spacing and Burden as 3.0 x

2.5metres.

DRILLING EQUIPMENT: Drilling is proposed to be operated with 1 wagon drill and 1

compressor.

The detailed calculations are given below:

Yearly average quantity is 3,05,001 tons.

The total handling mineral and waste estimated is about 2,92,678 Tons ore + 12323 Tons

waste = 3,05,001 Tons shall require drilling and blasting. Drilling shall be done using 3.5

m x 4.0 m burden and spacing. The calculations requirement of drilling machines is as

given below: Total material handled (max) per annum shall be 3,05,001 Tons.

Hole depth -6.6 m

Burden -3.5 m

Spacing -4 m

Therefore, the drills required per year are calculated as under:

Rock broken / hole of 6.6 m depth

Burden x Spacing x Depth x bulk density

3.5 m x 4 m x 6.6m x2.5 t/cum = 231 Tons

Therefore, rock broken /m = 231/7m = 33 Tons /m

Drilling meterage required /annum = 305001 /33 = 9242 m

Therefore, drilling required per day =9242M/300 days = 30.81/day

(6m + 10% = 6.6m) = 9242 M/annum or 31 m per day

Average drilling rate per day : 5.14m / hr

Output of machine for 1shifs : 5.14m x 6hrs x 1 shifts = 31m

Number of machines required : 31/67 =0.46

So 1 Wagon drill will be sufficient.

BLASTING:

Burden x Spacing x Depth x bulk density (3.5m x 4m x 6 x 2.5 t/cum)

Total maximum material requires drilling and blasting shall be 3,05,001 Tons

Quantity broken /hole = 3.5 m x 4 m x 07 m x2.5 t/cum = 245 Tons

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

21

Nos. holes required = 2712 nos /annum

Powder factor = 7 t/kg

Therefore, charge/hole = 245 t/7t/kg = 35 kgs

The distribution of high explosives required @ 7 t/kg powder factor shall be 3,05,001 /7

= 43,572 kgs

ANFO @ 80 % - 43,572 x 80 % = 34,857 Kgs

Booster @ 20 % - 43,572 x 20 % = 8,715 Kgs

TYPE OF EXPLOSIVES TO BE USED: High explosives of slurry cartridge of 100

mm shall be used as a prime charge. This forms 20 % of the total charge, the balance 80

% being ammonium Nitrate fuel oil mixture.

Lessee has proposed to obtain a portable Magazine & ANFO mixing storage approval

from Chief Controller of Explosives and concerned department as early as possible or we

are approached licence dealers and given contract for blasting.

2.6.9 EXTENT OF MECHANIZATION:

The tractor mounted Air compressor is being used for drilling with jackhammers as and

when required. Sometimes the ore and waste can be handling without using any drilling

& blasting with the help of rock breaker fitted with excavator. For conducting of the

proposed operations, the following equipment will be required.

Name of the machinery Capacity Quantity

1 Tippers 17 Tons 03

2 Wheel Loader (if required) 0.6cum 01

3 Hydraulic Excavator/rock breaker 2.0 cum 01

4 Compressors Tractor Mounted Compressor 124 cfm 01

5 Wagon Drills BVB 25 115 mm 01

6 Water Tanker (Drinking & Dust controlling) 5000 Litters 02

The mining machinery proposed is one jack hammer with tractor mounted compressor

and one Wheel Loader fitted with breaker (1.7 cum bucket capacity). For winning of

Quartzite (Silica Sand), drilling and blasting is required.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

22

Drilling: Jack hammer is used for drilling. The diameter of the jack hammer hole is 33m

m and depth of hole is 1.5m. Tractor mounted compressor will be deployed.

2.7 CONCEPTUAL PLAN:

Total Geological resources estimated in the lease area is around 62,02,476 tons. The

Mineable reserves are estimated by excluding the reserves blocked below the safety zone

and ultimate pit limit and available quantity is around 4,20,585 tons. Out of which the

saleable reserves are about 57,81,891 tons are available in this applied area and the

proposed average production is 2,92,678 tons per year.

The expected life of the mine is 20 years. However, the life of the mine may change

based on the further exploration during the course of mining.

During the ensuing plan period proposal of Drilling is not required because entail

reserves are available as out crop.

About 1 to 2 scheme periods are expected to come across within the life of the mine.

Total Quartzite and Silica Sand produced (Minable Reserves) is 57,81,891 tons, total

waste to be generated in the lease area is 2,43,448 tons & this plan period average

quartzite is 2,92,678 and waste will be 12,323 tons. The generated waste quantity will be

dumped temporarily on the surface of the lease area, some quantity is used for road

making and remaining waste will be re-handled and backfilled in the mined-out area. No

backfilling proposed in the present plan period.

Exploration: No exploration is proposed to delineate the mineral in further depths as the

entire deposit can be identified on the bottom shales. It is proposed to reclaim the mined-

out portion after complete extraction of the mineral into a water storage tank by following

the norms and parameters prescribed by the concerned Panchayat Raj department

(Irrigation Division). The waste that stacked during the life of mine will be utilized

properly as per the instructions of Irrigation division while reclaiming the mined-out

portion.

The Progressive closer plan of ML area is shown in Fig.2.4.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

23

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

24

Afforestation: 50 Nos of plant every year during plan period will be afforestated near the

surrounding of dust prone areas such as approach roads, dumps etc., covering an area of

402 sq.m during present plan period.

Lessee has decided to take up the afforestation work all along the lease boundary, old

dumps, and both sides of approach road for development of green belt in future. The

plantation, which is not surviving, shall be replanted periodically prior to rainy season.

As the ore body is exposed on the hill top, open cast method has been adopted. A bench

height of 3m is proposed and width of the bench will be more than 6 m. The total area is

proposed to be opened into benches in descending order. All active dumps will be

reclaimed concurrent to mining operations and at the foot of the dump retaining walls

will be constructed to avoid wash off the material. At foot of the hills the check dams

will be constructed across the valleys & also gully plugs will be constructed at the gullies.

Reclamation & Rehabilitation: No reclamation is proposed as the mining activity is yet

to begin. The degraded land occupied by the mining will not be matured for reclamation

even during the period of scheme. Rehabilitation of some dead dumps will be continued

Waste Management: For winning of Quartzite (Silica Sand), top soil must be removed

as a part of development. The dumping area is selected in southern side of the mine

workings and ultimate pit limit covering an area of 0.247 Ha. As the ore body is exposed

on the hill top, open cast method has been adopted. A bench height of 3m is proposed

and width of the bench will be more than 6 m. The total area is proposed to be opened

into benches in descending order. All active dumps will be reclaimed concurrent to

mining operations and at the foot of the dump retaining walls will be constructed to avoid

wash off the material. At foot of the hills the check dams will be constructed across the

valleys & also gully plugs will be constructed at the gullies.

Nature of top soil/ waste and mineral rejects

There is little top soil will be generated during the scheme period however this will be

utilized for afforestation purpose

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

25

Impact of land use due to mining activity:

• Present land use of the Mine lease area is Govt. waste land.

• Now it is proposed to mine quartzite by manual opencast mining method by using

drilling and blasting.

• Extraction of mineral will not be completed in first five years as working will be

in progress for further extraction of mineral. Therefore, reclamation of the mined-

out area is not proposed.

• But greenbelt will be developed in an area of 0.155 ha.

• Waste generated from mine will be stored in ML area only with protection

measures.

• The mined-out pits will be utilized for rain water harvesting.

2.8 USE OF MINERALS:

Silica sand and quartzite used for water purification and manufacture of glass, synthetic

foundry moulding catalysts, disodium ultramarine etc. it is also used for acid heat

resistant ceramics, refractories, pottery glaze, enamel etc. Silica sand and quartzite of 150

mesh is used in Sawing stone, grinding and surfacing glass and polishing marble

Rounded Grains of silica sand and quartzite are used for sand blasting it is also used as a

filler in paints 'Wood Paste' moulded hard rubber goods, gypsum Plasters, oxychloride

acoustic plasters and soap.

2.9 SITE SERVICES:

The site services provided by the company area in the ML. Shelter to the workers, toilets

& water will be provided to the workers in the mining area. Drinking water has been

provided to all workers. Office cum store room will be provided with first aid room.

Safety measures like helmets, safety shoes etc. will be provided to all the workers. A bus

shuttles will be provided from mine to the district head quarter for medical checkup, apart

from regular visits by the doctors to the mine site.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

26

2.10 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Air Emission:

The air emission of concern from this mining activity will be dust generation. The

following measures will be undertaken to control dust.

• Applying water for dust suppression on mine haul roads.

• Regular Compaction & grading of haul roads and service roads to clear

accumulation of loose material.

• Compaction & gradation on both sides of Haul Roads.

• Controlling speed of dumpers / trucks.

• Avoid overloading of dumpers and consequent spillage on the roads.

• Good maintenance of vehicles & machinery.

• Good housekeeping at the mining, loading will be practiced.

2. Water Pollution:

• No waste water generation from proposed mining activity. Only waste water

generation will be sanitary waste water, which will be treated in septic tank

followed by soak pit. Garland drains will be constructed to collect the runoff from

the area and will enter into settling tank. Clear water will be used for dust

suppression.

3. Noise Pollution:

• Only source of noise generation will be due to mining activities, drilling and

blasting and movement of trucks.

• The machinery will be maintained properly to reduce the noise

• The protective noise reducing gear like earmuffs, the company will provide

earplugs

• Proper maintenance of equipment

• The Ambient noise levels will be within the standards stipulated by MoEF i.e. less

than 75 dBA during day time and less than 70 dBA during night time.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

27

The following measures will help in further reducing the noise levels.

• Proper and regular maintenance of vehicles and other equipment.

• Speed of trucks entering or leaving the ML area will be limited to moderate speed

of 25 Kmph to prevent undue noise from empty trucks.

• All roads will be maintained in good conditions to reduce vehicle noise.

4. Solid Waste:

• For winning of Quartzite (Silica Sand), top soil must be removed as a part of

development. The dumping area is selected in southern side of the mine workings

and ultimate pit limit covering an area of 0.247 Ha. There is little top soil will be

generated during the scheme period however this will be utilized for afforestation

purpose.

5. Green belt:

• Afforestation is proposed in the buffer zone along the ML area covering an area

of 0.402 Ha during the first plan period.

2.11. ASSESSMENT OF NEW & UNTESTED TECHNOLOGY FOR THE RISK OF TECHNOLOGICAL FAILURE: In this lease area manual open cast mining method by using drilling & blasting will be

adopted. Hence no technology failure involved in the proposed mining.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

28

3. BASELINE ENVIRONMENT

This chapter gives an idea and description of environmental status of the study area with

reference to the prominent environmental attributes. The study area covers 10 km. radius

of the mine lease area. Baseline data has been collected from October 2019 to

December 2019.

The impact identification always commences with the collection of baseline data such as

ambient air quality, ground water quality, surface water quality, noise levels, soil quality,

land use pattern, flora & fauna and socio-economic aspects within the study zone of 10

km. radius.

Table 3.1: Environmental Attribute and Frequency of Monitoring Attribute Parameters Frequency of Monitoring

Ambient Air Quality

PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NOx 24 hourly samples twice a week for twelve weeks at eight locations

Meteorology Surface: Wind Speed, direction, Temperature, relative humidity and rainfall

Surface: Continuous monitoring stations for entire study period on hourly basis and also data collection from secondary sources.

Water Quality Physical, Chemical and Bacteriological parameters

Once during the study period

Biology Existing Flora and Fauna Through field visit during the study period and substantiated through secondary sources.

Noise Levels Noise levels in dB(A) Hourly observations for 24 hours per location

Soil Characteristics

Parameters related to agricultural and afforestation potential

Once during the study period.

Land Use Trend of land use change for Different categories

Remote sensing and GIS Study

Socio-economic Aspects

Socio-economic characteristics, labour force characteristics, population statistics and existing amenities in the study area.

(Census Data, 2011)

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

29

3.1. AIR ENVIRONMENT:

3.1.1. METEOROLOGY:

Meteorology of the study area plays an important role in the air pollution studies. The

prevailing micro meteorological conditions at the mine lease area will regulate the

dispersion and dilution of air pollutants in the atmosphere. The predominant wind

directions and the wind speed will decide the direction and distance of the most affected

zone from the proposed activity. The meteorological data collected during the monitoring

period is very useful in interpretation of baseline as input for dispersion models for

predicting the Ground Level Concentrations (GLC).

3.1.2. METEOROLOGICAL DATA RECORDED AT SITE:

A Temporary Weather Monitoring Station has been installed at the site and temperature,

relative humidity, wind direction, wind speed, and rainfall were recorded for one season.

a) Temperature:

The maximum temperature recorded was 37.5ºC and the minimum temperature was

14.2ºC at the Mine Lease area.

b) Relative Humidity:

Relative humidity at the project site was ranging from 42 to 61%.

c) Rainfall:

The Normal annual rainfall of the District is 650 mm. No rainfall during study period.

3.1.3 Wind pattern during Study Period (October 2019 to December 2019) Predominant Wind directions during this period were from the SW to NE sector

accounting to about 80% of the total time. Wind speeds during this period were varying

between 1.5-10.8 kmph. The wind of less than 1.5 kmph were treated as calm, and calm

conditions are nil.

Percentage frequencies of wind in 16 directions have been computed from the recorded

data of summer season during the study period to plot wind rose diagram. Figure 3.1

represents the wind pattern of the study period.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

30

WINDROSE DIAGRAM

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

31

3.1.4. AIR QUALITY:

The ambient air quality with respect to the study zone of 10 km. radius around the project

forms the baseline information. The study area represents mostly rural environment. The

various sources of air pollution in the region are vehicular traffic, dust arising from

unpaved village roads & domestic fuel burning. The Prime objective of baseline air

quality survey is to assess the existing air quality of the area. This will also be useful in

assessing the conformity to standards of the ambient air quality during the mine

operation.

3.1.5 SELECTION OF SAMPLING STATIONS:

The base line status of the ambient air quality can be accessed through scientifically

designed Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Network.

The selection of sampling locations in the air quality surveillance programme is based on

the following.

a) Representation of mine area.

b) Representation of the down wind direction and cross-sectional distribution.

c) Representation of residential areas.

d) Representation of regional background levels.

e) Representation of sensitive receptor.

To assess the ambient air quality level, 8 monitoring stations were set up. Out of these 8

stations, one was set up in core zone, while the rest were outside the mining lease and

within a radius of 10.0 km. Table 3.2 and Fig. No 3.2, presents the location of the air

quality monitoring stations

3.1.6 PARAMETERS MONITORED:

At each Monitoring Station, Particulate Matter (PM2.5), Particulate Matter (PM10), SO2

and NOx are monitored. The sampling was0 carried out for 2 days in a week for one

season (October 2019 to December 2019) to assess the existing status of air pollution

and pollution dispersion pattern over the whole air basin of project site. PM2.5, PM10,

SO2 & NOx were sampled as per MoEF guidelines.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

32

3.1.7 SAMPLING & ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES INSTRUMENTS USED FOR SAMPLING: Envirotech RDS & APM 550 Dust samplers were used for monitoring PM2.5, PM10,

SO2 and NOX. PM2.5 & PM10 are estimated by gravimetric method West & Gaeke

method (IS –5182, part III 1969) has been adopted for estimation of SO2, Jacob –

Hochheiser method (IS –5182, part IV, 1975) has been adopted for estimation of NOx.

Calibration:

Calibration charts have been prepared for all gaseous pollutants. The Calibration is

carried out when new absorbing solutions are prepared.

TABLE 3.2 – AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING STATIONS

S.No STATION DIRECTION

W.R.T ML AREA DISTANCE IN KMS.

W.R.T ML AREA A1 Mine Lease area ---- ---- A2 Down wind direction SE 0.5 A3 Kammavaripalli N 2.1 A4 Chinthakunta ENE 2.1 A5 Arvetipalli SSE 2.5 A6 Denepalli SW 1.3 A7 Mangapatnam WNW 5.3 A8 Shettivaripalli NNW 4.4

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

33

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

34

3.2 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY

BUFFR ZONE

Particulate Matter – PM2.5

Average value of Particulate Matter (PM2.5) monitored in the study area ranging between

15 – 29 μg/m3. Highest value of 38 μg/m3 was recorded at Kammavaripalli in the buffer

zone. The values of PM2.5 monitored in the study area are well within the limits of

NAAQ standards.

Particulate Matter – PM10 Average value of Particulate Matter (PM10) monitored in the study area ranging between

25– 48 μg/m3. Highest value of 60 μg/m3 was recorded at Chinthakunta in the buffer

zone. The values of PM10 monitored in the study area are well within the limits of NAAQ

standards.

Sulphurdioxide - SO2 Average value of Sulphur dioxide in the study area from the monitored data was in the

range of 5.2 – 7.1 μg/m3. Maximum value of sulpurdioxide of 8.0 μg/m3 obtained near

the sampling location A4 (Chinthakunta). The values of SO2 monitored in the study area

are well within the limits of NAAQ standards.

Oxides of Nitrogen - NOx Average value of Oxides of Nitrogen in the study area from the monitored data was in the

range of 6.6 – 7.9 μg/m3. Maximum value of oxides of nitrogen of 8.7 μg/m3 obtained

near the sampling location A3 (Kammavaripalli). The values of NOx monitored in the

study area are well within the limits of NAAQ standards.

CORE ZONE

Ambient air monitoring has been assessed during the months of October 2019 to

December 2019 in one station in the core zone.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

35

Particulate Matter – PM2.5

Average value of Particulate Matter (PM2.5) monitored in the core zone is 20 μg/m3. The

highest value of PM2.5 level 27 μg/m3 was observed. The value of PM2.5 monitored in the

core zone is well within the limits of NAAQ standards.

Particulate Matter – PM10

Average value of Particulate Matter (PM10) monitored in the core zone is 29 μg/m3. The

highest value of PM10 level 33 μg/m3 was observed. The value of PM10 monitored in the

core zone is well within the limits of NAAQ standards.

Sulphur dioxide - SO2

Average value of Sulphur dioxide in the core zone is 5.5 μg/m3. The maximum value of

sulphur dioxide of 6.1 μg/m3 was observed. The values of SO2 monitored in the study

area are well within the limits of NAAQ standards.

Oxides of Nitrogen - NOx

Average value of Nitrogen oxides in the core zone is 6.2 μg/m3. The maximum value of

nitrogen oxides of 6.7 μg/mx was observed.

Summary of AAQ monitoring at each location is given in Table – 3.2 and Percentile

values of ambient air quality is enclosed in Annexure - A.

Table – 3.3: SUMMARY OF AAQ MONITORING Locations 98th Percentile Values * Free silica content in PM10

is observed to be between PM2.5 *PM10 SO2 NOx Mine Lease area 27 33 6.0 6.6 0.9 to 1.4 µg/m3 Down wind direction 22.54 40 5.7 6.9 1.0 to 1.5 µg/m3 Kammavaripalle 38 55 7.0 8.6 1.5 to 2.6 µg/m3 Chinthakunta 35.6 60 7.9 8.7 1.7 to 2.9 µg/m3 Aravetipalle 26.54 50 7.3 7.8 1.2 to 2.4 µg/m3 Denepalle 33.08 52 6.5 8.0 1.3 to 2.2 µg/m3 Mangapatnam 32 54.6 7.4 8.5 1.5 to 2.5 µg/m3 Shettivaripalle 31.54 47.54 6.1 8.1 1.6 to 2.7 µg/m3

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

36

3.3 NOISE ENVIRONMENT

The acoustical environment varies dynamically in magnitude and character through out

most communities. The noise level variation can be temporal, spectral and spatial. The

residential noise level is that level below which the ambient noise does not seem to

dropdown during the given interval of time and is generally characterized by unidentified

sources. Ambient noise level is characterized by significant variations above a base or a

residential noise level. The maximum impact of noise is felt on urban areas, which is

mostly due to the commercial activities and vehicular movement during peak hours of the

day.

Measured noise levels displayed as a function of time provides a useful scheme for

describing the acoustical climate of a community. Noise levels records at each station

with a time interval of about 30 minutes are computed for equivalent noise levels.

Equivalent noise level is a single number descriptor for describing time varying noise

levels. The equivalent noise level is defined as mathematically.

10Log1/ TΣ (10Ln/10)

Where L = sound pressure level a function of time dB (A) & T = Time interval of observations Noise levels during the night time generally drop, therefore to compute Equivalent noise

levels for the night time, noise levels are increased by 10 dB (A) as the night time high

noise levels are judged more annoying compared to the day time.

Noise levels at a particular station are represented as Day- Night equivalent (Ldn). Day-

Night equivalent is the single number index designed to rate environmental noise on daily

/24 hourly basis. Mathematically Ldn is given by

Ldn = 10 log {1/24 (15 x 10(Ld/10) + 9 x 10 (Ln + 10)/10)}

Where

Ld = A weighed equivalent for day time period (7 am to 10 pm) Ln = A weighed equivalent for night time period (10 pm to 7 am)

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

37

Noise levels were measured near highways, residential areas and other settlements

located within 10 km radius around the Mine site.

In order o know the baseline noise levels, in and around the Mine site, Noise levels were

measured at the Mine complex and also at 6 villages in the study area. The day equivalent

noise levels were found to be relatively high due to local activities in the villages. Noise

levels recorded in the nighttime were found to be less.

In order to assess the noise levels in the study area, monitoring was carried out at 7

different locations within 10 km radius of the study area. Noise levels were recorded at

each station with a time interval of one minute for about 30 minutes in each hour and

were computed for equivalent noise levels for day-equivalent, night-equivalent & day-

night equivalent. Details of noise monitoring stations are given in Table – 3.3.

The noise recording stations are shown in Figure – 3.3 and the summary of the minimum,

maximum, day - equivalent, night - equivalent and day-night equivalent values computed

for various location in the study area is given in Table – 3.4

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

38

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

39

Table 3.4: NOISE MONITORING STATIONS

S. No. Code Name of Sampling Location Distance (km)

w.r.t Mine Direction w.r.t

Mine Core Zone

1 N-1 Mine Area -- Buffer Zone 2 N-2 Kammavaripalli 2.1 N 3 N-3 Chinthakunta 2.1 ENE 4 N-4 Arvetipalli 2.5 SSE 5 N-5 Denepalli 1.3 SW 6 N-6 Mangapatnam 5.3 WNW 7 N-7 Shettivaripalli 4.4 NNW Table 3.5: NOISE LEVELS DURING STUDY PERIOD Code Location Noise Levels (Leq) dB (A)

Day time (6 am – 10 pm)

Night time (10 pm – 6 am)

Standards

N1 Mine Area 50.2 46.5 Industrial Daytime – 75

dB(A) Night time – 70

dB(A)

Residential Daytime – 55

dB(A) Night time – 45

dB(A)

N2 Kammavaripalle 57.8 51.7

N3 Chinthakunta 65.3 58.9

N4 Aravetipalle 56.4 51.1

N5 Denepalle 58.2 53.2

N6 Mangapatnam 60.1 54.9

N-7 Shettivaripalle 55.8 50.2

The equivalent day noise levels in the study zone are ranging from 53.2 dB(A) to 65.3

dB(A). It is observed that the noise values obtained were within the prescribed Ambient

Noise Quality Standards.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

40

3.4 WATER ENVIRONMENT Assessment of baseline data on Water environment includes

a) Identification of surface water sources

b) Identification of ground water sources

c) Collection of water samples

d) Analysing water samples collected for physico-chemical and biological

parameters

The surface water sources in the study area are Tank NE of Muddanur located at about

8.5 km, Tank North East of Yamavaram located at about 3.7 km and Eddula Vagu

located at 7.5 km and from Gandikota canal at kammavaripalli village located at 2.4 km

from the Mine lease area. These tanks will not flow throughout the year.

Assessment of water quality in the study area includes the quality assessment of

parameters as per the Indian standard IS 10500 (drinking water standard). The locations

of water sampling are shown in Figure – 3.4.

Six water samples from various locations within 10 km radius were collected for

assessment of the physico-chemical and bacteriological quality. Methodologies adopted

for sampling and analysis were according to the IS methods. Field parameters such as pH,

Temperature, Taste and odour were monitored on site. The parameters thus analysed

were compared with IS 10500. Details of water sampling locations are given in Table –

3.5

Table 3.6: WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS S. No Code Name of Sampling

Location Source Distance (km)

w.r.t Mine Direction w.r.t Mine

Usage

1 GW1 Kammavaripalle Bore well 2.1 N Domestic 2 GW2 Chinthakunta Bore well 2.1 ENE Domestic 3 GW3 Aravetipalle Bore well 2.5 SSE Domestic 4 GW4 Denepalle Bore well 1.3 SW Domestic 5 GW5 Mangapatnam Bore well 5.3 WNW Domestic 6 GW6 Shettivaripalle Bore well 4.4 NNW Domestic

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

41

Surface Water Sampling Locations 7

SW1 Tank NE of Muddanur

Surface 8.6 ESE Irrigation

8 SW2

Tank SW of Yamavaram

Surface 3.8 E Irrigation

9 SW3 Eddula Vagu Surface 7.5 WNW Irrigation 10 SW4 Gandikota Canal Surface 2.5 E Irrigation

11 SW5 Govindamma Cheruvu

Surface 0.08 S Irrigation

Annexure - B represents the water quality data at the above locations. The summary of

the same is given below:

Surface Water Samples Within 10 km Radius:

• pH of the surface water samples collected was in the range between 7.9– 8.42.

• Total dissolved solids in the samples were in the range between 512-568 mg/l.

• Total hardness was found to vary between 82 - 136 mg/l.

• Chlorides concentration was found to vary between 53 - 108 mg/l.

• Fluoride concentration was found to vary between 0.19 - 0.34 mg/l.

• Sulphates concentration was found to vary between 38 – 52 mg/l.

• Heavy metal concentration in all the samples were found to be well within the limits.

Groundwater Samples Within 10 km Radius:

• pH of the ground water samples collected was in the range between 7.37 – 8.12

• Total dissolved solids in the samples were in the range between 795 -1035 mg/l.

• Total hardness was found to vary between 162-235 mg/l.

• Chlorides concentration was found to vary between 71-174 mg/l.

• Fluoride concentration was found to vary between 0.38-0.71 mg/l.

• Sulphates concentration was found to vary between 69-86 mg/l.

• Heavy metal concentration in all the samples laws found to be well within the limits.

Ground water samples collected from 6 locations within 10 km radius of the Mine site

showed all parameters well within the drinking water standards specified in IS 10500.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

42

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

43

3.5 LAND ENVIRONMENT

3.5.1 GEOLOGY

Dr. Y.S.R. District (Y.S.R Kadapa) is underlain by various rock types belonging to late

Archaean or Early Proterozoic era which are succeeded by rocks of Dharwarian Age and

both are traversed by Dolerite Dykes. The older rocks are overlain by Cuddapah Super

Group and Kurnool Group belonging to middle and upper Proterozoic era. The cuddapah

sedimentary basin which is a huge depression over the denuded surfaces of older rocks

extending into neighboring districts occupies the major part of the District. The major

rock types are Quartzites, Shales, Limestones, Phyllites, Granites, Granodiorites and

Granite-Gneiss. The Archeans comprises Peninsular Gneissic Complex represented by

Granite, Granodiorite, Granite-Gneiss and Migmitite. These rock types occur in the south

west part of the District. Both the Archaean and Dharwar are traversed by Dolerite Dykes

and Quartz reefs. Alluvium consisting of gravel, sand, silt and clay occur along the river

courses in the District.

Local Geology:

Local geology comprises Panyam Quartzite capped by Tadpatri Shale formation. The

trend is WNW-ESE with northerly dips. The litho units observed are:

Veneer of Soil cover Quartzite & Sand stone (Silica Sand) Shale (white Shale) Yellow Ochre Quartzite occurring is massive in nature.

GEOMORPHOLOGY: Geomorphology is defined as part of geomorphology dealing with the description of

Earth’s surface features / landforms. The linkage between the physiographic units and

geomorphic units are necessary to relate the landforms and soils.

Geomorphology map is prepared by visual interpretation of high-resolution satellite

imagery with the help of Survey of India Topographic maps and ground truth. Lithology,

drainage and contour maps are considered while preparing the geomorphology map. The

earth’s surface can be classified into different geomorphic units / land forms based on

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

44

their physiographic expression, origin, material content and climatic conditions, etc.

Technical guidelines of National Remote Sensing Centre are taken into consideration in

the classification of geomorphic units. In the study area, the following eight geomorphic

units are delineated from the satellite imagery. Geomorphology map showing figure 3.5.

PPS : Pediplain Shallow Weathered

VFS : Valley Fill Shallow

PD : Pediment

PIC : Pediment-Inselberg Complex

I : Inselberg

DR : Dyke Ridge

RH : Residual Hill

DH : Denudation Hill

Geomorphology map is used for the preparation of ground water prospects map.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

45

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

46

3.6 HYDROGEOLOGY The Mining Lease is located over the escarpment portion of the plateau. The ML area is over the

run off zone. No streams are passing through the proposed QL Area. The catchment area of the

proposed site is small and recharge conditions are poor. However, the buffer zone of 10Kms

radius has good catchment and recharge potential with streams and tanks of considerable storage

potential. The area is a part of Penna River catchment.

All the stream courses are ephemeral in character and carry large volumes of storm flows during

rainy season and remain dry during non - monsoon season. The width of the streams is narrow

and follows the weak planes within the hard rock formations. A drainage map of the area around

the proposed plant is shown as figure 3.6

DRAINAGE MAP

This map consists of all water bodies, rivers, tributaries, perennial & ephemeral streams,

reservoirs, tanks, ponds and the entire drainage network from first order originating in the area to

the last order joining the rivers, tributaries and tanks based on topography. Understanding the

importance of drainage depends on the purpose and the objective of the project. For the present

study purpose the following factors have to be understood and extracted from the study of the

drainage pattern. Drainage network helps in delineation of watersheds. Drainage density and type

of drainage gives information related to runoff, infiltration relief and permeability.

Below Table Showing drainage density-based criteria by smith and Strahler.

Drainage Density

Texture Runoff Infiltration Relief Stratum

< 5.0 Coarse (High) High Low High High Impermeable 5.0 - 13.7 Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Permeable 13.7 - 155.3 Ultra fine

(Low) Low High Low Good Permeable

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

47

Below Table Showing drainage density-based criteria proposed by Long Bein

Drainage Density Areas Runoff 0.55 - 2.09 Steep Impervious Areas High 1.03 Humid Regions High

Below Table showing Drainage Density Based Criteria Proposed by Horton

Drainage Density Stratum Runoff 0.9 - 1.29 Steep Impervious Areas High < 0.9 Permeable High Infiltration Areas Low

Dendritic drainage indicates homogenous rocks, the trellis, rectangular and parallel

drainage patterns indicate structural and lithological controls. The coarse drainage texture

indicates highly porous and permeable rock formations; whereas fine drainage texture is

more common in less pervious formations. Weathering profile controls of ground water

and above all discharge of surface water along the major streams and rivers. Fractured

pattern and other structural features control drainage pattern in hard rocks. Slope /

gradient of area coupled with drainage density decide the weathering profile. These two

factors synthesized with rainfall (of a given area) provide information on the ground

water potential (weathering profile, structural factors) and discharge of surface water

along streams. Weathering profile increases groundwater potential, slope/gradient

together with runoff controls the thickness of weathered zone. Major faults, lineaments

sometimes connects two are more watersheds (Drainage Basins) and act as conduits

(Interconnecting channel ways). Flow of groundwater along these week zones is an

established fact. A proper understanding of the major faults, their influence of

groundwater flow has to be understood from drainage system and its controls. The study

of the drainage for the present purpose is to understand that, to what extent the ground

water would be affected by the water pollutants. Survey of India Topomaps, satellite data

of summer season are the main input data for preparation of drainage map. The drainage

map is prepared using Toposheets of Survey of India on 1:50,000 scale and updated using

latest satellite data wherever deviations and new developments are observed.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

48

Step I: All the rivers its tributaries and drainage network shown on the Toposheets are

captured. The boundaries of all rivers / water bodies with names appearing are captured

from Toposheets. The drainage is drawn from whole to part, i.e., from the rivers to

tributaries to first drains to second order drains to third order drains.

Step II: Based on the post monsoon satellite image extent of water spread and dry parts

are updated. The water bodies which did not exist at the time of survey of Toposheets, if

any are also captured based on satellite imagery. The study area forms part of Mahanadi

river basin the southern of the area from western part, towards East. All these rivers and

rivulets get dry for major part of the year and carry heavy floods during rainy season. The

drainage map of study area has showing in figure below

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

49

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

50

GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Groundwater occurs in the hard rocks occur under water table conditions in the

weathered zone and semi- confined conditions in fractured zones. Eight bore wells and

Two dug wells were inventoried to assess the groundwater conditions. The depth to water

levels in bore wells is reported between 30-80 m with yields ranging between of 50 – 100

lpm. The quality of water is found to be potable.

As the extent of the proposed mine is small the runoff during monsoon is to be diverted

to the first order streams on the south west after duly passing the water through a series of

settling ponds to avoid the sedimentation in the stream. As the mining lease is over run

off zone and only sheet wash is expected very minimal affect on surface water flow. The

artificial recharge is not feasible in the ML area. As such it is suggested to approach the

local government authorities for planning water harvesting measures like de-silting of

tanks, Check dams and percolation pits are suggested to augment the declining water

levels.

GROUND WATER POTENTIAL MAP Ground water prospects of an area depend mainly on Lithology unit (rock type) occurring

at that area. However, within each Lithology unit, the ground water conditions vary

significantly depending upon the geomorphology, structure, slope, soil thickness, depth

and nature of weathered material, presence of fractures / lineaments, surface water

bodies, canals, irrigated areas, etc. All the parameters of the study area are studied and

integrated to arrive at the ground water prospects. Ground water potential map showing

figure 3.6.

The proposed area is categorized as Semi-critical by the Central Groundwater department

and scope for development & stage of groundwater is limited. As the site is not feasible

for extracting groundwater arrangements by way of tanker supply from nearby villages is

suggested for the water requirement of 12 KLD. As the area falls under semi-critical area

thrust should be on providing artificial recharge structures and utilization of surface water

tanks located nearby with due permission from the State Government.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

51

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

52

Bore well water samples have been collected once during study period from six locations

and surface water samples collected from two locations which are listed in the previous

table:

(I) POSSIBLE IMPACT ON GEOLOGY & MITIGATION

1) The area will be broken to a depth of 18.0 mts by forming benches to win the

mineral which results in the formation of a large deep pit of about 65,000 m2

extent. - Although it cannot be reversed the pit can be used for water harvesting to

raise aquaculture at the end of mining operations. A fence to be erected and

watchmen posted for safety and security of men and animals.

2) The top soil should be removed and stacked separately to be utilized for

plantation.

3) The drilling and blasting activity, movement of workmen, quarrying of mineral

and haulage of tractors/ trailers will generate dust and there is likely chance to

settle in the stream, inhalation by workmen and also will have sedimentation

affect over the wind ward side. This should be arrested at the origin by regular

sprinkling of water & placing moist clay bags while blasting and sprinkling of

water at regular intervals on haul roads. The workers should be provided with

masks and earplugs, safety eye glass wear will contain or minimize health hazard.

(II) POSSIBLE IMPACT ON HYDROGEOLOGY & MITIGATION

1. No streams within the proposed QL Area.

2. The site is not feasible for groundwater extraction.

3. Water for the project usage will be met through purchase of water tankers

from the nearby villages.

Hence, no mitigation suggested.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

53

3.7 LAND USE PATTERN:

3.7.1 INTRODUCTION

Land Use (LU) refers to man’s activities and various uses, which are carried on land.

Land Cover (LC) refers to natural vegetation, water bodies, rock / soil, artificial cover

and others resulting due to land transformation. Although land use is generally inferred

based on the cover, yet both the terms land use and land cover are closely related and

interchangeable.

Information on the rate and kind of change in the use of land resources is essential to the

proper planning, management and regulation of the use of such resources. Knowledge

about the existing land use and trends of change is essential if the nation is to tackle the

problems associated with the haphazard and uncontrolled growth. A systematic

framework is needed for updating the land use and land cover maps that will be timely,

relatively inexpensive and appropriate for different needs at both national and state

levels. The rapidly developing technology of remote sensing offers an efficient and

timely approach to the mapping and collection of basic land use and land cover data over

large area. The satellite imageries are potentially more amenable to digital processing

because the remote sensor output can be obtained in digital format. Land use data are

needed in the analysis of environmental processes and problems that must be understood

if living conditions and standards are to be improved from or maintained at current levels.

It is required to carry out the land use / land cover study for the project study area (10 km

radius) to obtain the necessary environmental clearances from statutory authorities. The

objective of the study is to carryout land use / land cover study for the proposed project.

The LU / LC study is carried out using the Satellite Imageries (IRS RS2 LISS III Rabi

and Khariff) in addition to Survey of India toposheets. Appropriate guidelines are

followed while preparing the LU / LC map for the project study area.

3.7.2 OBJECTIVE

The objective of the assignment is to carry out Land use / Land cover study for Sri

P.Venkata Siva Reddy over an Extent of 08.000 Hectare Mine, Sy No: 677 (old Sy

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

54

No.425), Chintakunta Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, Andhra

Pradesh.

3.7.3 SCOPE OF THE WORK

(STANDARD OPERATION PROCEDURE FOR LAND USE / LAND COVER

STUDY)

❖ The lu/lc study shall be carried out for a study area of 10 km radius taking site as

centre using the satellite imageries (IRS RS2 III / IV 5.8m Resolution) for Rabi /

Khariff season.

❖ Procurement of latest satellite imagery (IRS RS2 III / IV 5.8m Resolution) based

on availability) Rabi or Khariff seasons.

❖ Satellite imagery processing and interpretation of land use as per land use classification

covering 10 km radius of proposed Project Site.

❖ Calculation of land use breakup w. r. t. each land use category covering 10 km of

proposed Project Site.

❖ Preparation and submission of reports, satellite imageries and maps.

PRE-FIELD INTERPRETATION:

❖ Collection of Survey of India Topographical maps on 1: 50,000 scale from Survey of

India (SOI).

❖ Procurement of Satellite Imagery from National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC) site Geo

Co-ordinates from site center taken 10 Km radius.

❖ Using ERDAS image processing software processed the raw satellite data.

❖ Using ARCGIS software converting the all base features from the toposheet, and

overlaying the same features on the satellite imagery.

❖ Using remote Sensing techniques tone, color, texture and shadow etc. draft land use map

is prepared.

❖ Before site / ground truthing randomly mark field data checked. With which field work

will be carried out.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

55

SITE / GROUND TRUTHING:

❖ Site visit - capture the Geo-Coordinates of Boundary Pillars and record in field note

book.

❖ Take traverses and observe the land use categories and map it on the field map on draft

map with field photographs.

❖ Observe each land use category like single crop/double crop, industrial area, settlements,

forest lands, water bodies, waste lands and etc.

❖ The buffer zone area will randomly traverse for correlating mapping units.

❖ Collecting secondary data from agricultural department and local people.

❖ POST FIELD WORK:

❖ Using ARCGIS software plotting the data collected during ground truth maps.

❖ Preparation of maps

❖ Preparation of report incorporating identification of impacts, quantification of impacts

and suggesting mitigative measures in consultation with other FAEs.

3.7.4 ROLE OF REMOTE SENSING AND GIS

Remote sensing and GIS are the modern techniques of terrain analysis and information

generation. They not only ensure faster and easier analysis / interpretation but also help to

modify / manipulate the data at will so as to meet the objective of the study.

3.7.4.1 REMOTE SENSING (RS)

➢ Remote Sensing (RS) generally involves in processing of remotely sensed data in

digital form using image-processing techniques, which created a new and wider

dimension in analysis and interpretation. Remote sensing enables one to acquire

information about an object or phenomena from a distance through detection or

measurement of electromagnetic energy coming from the object. The use of remote

sensing techniques for the study of natural resources has been found to be of

considerable value. The information derived from the remote sensing is compatible

with topographic maps of Survey of India on 1:50,000 or 1:25,000 scale. With the use

of high-altitude sensor platform, it is now possible to record extensive areas on a

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

56

single image, which covers a maximum of 34,000 sq. km (185x185km) and minimum

of 3600-sq.km area. Thus, one can have a synoptic view over large area and also an

integrated picture of the landscape. By using the satellite imagery, it is possible to

conduct surveys in areas, which are difficult to access. Some of the advantages of

utilizing remote sensing techniques are given below:

➢ Satellite image serves as a permanent record of a landscape at a point of time from

which land use changes can be monitored and evaluated.

➢ Satellite data is cost effective when compared to conventional methods. It can be

obtained quickly; its information is accurate, reliable and up to date.

➢ Preparation of thematic layers by using satellite imagery is time saving when

compared to conventional method.

➢ Satellite data can be effectively integrated with the conventional data for analysis,

planning and decision-making.

3.7.5 GIS

Geographic Information System (GIS) is a powerful set of tool, which can perform

correlation. GIS is a system for manipulating and analyzing spatial data to provide

information to support planning and decision-making. GIS can also be defined as

“decision support system involving the integration of spatially referenced data in a

problem solving environment’ (Cowen, 1988). It comprises facilities for the input,

management, retrieval, manipulation, analysis and display of spatial data. Its functions

can be grouped as data acquisition, data utilization, data management, output and display.

GIS technology is useful as planning / decision-making tool for resource management.

The selective retrieval and analysis capabilities of GIS are used to manipulate the

database and provide a variety of information for resource management. GIS is an aid to

analyze the thematic maps prepared through remote sensing and field visits. It stores all

the maps prepared and database attached to them in digital format, which permits rapid

access and processing. Combination of Remote sensing and GIS technologies are very

important for assessment and management of natural resources, where integration of data

from different sources is an essential requirement.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

57

3.7.6 DATA USED

The data is used for the preparation of different maps for the study natural resources. The

data is used by using the application of Remote Sensing and GIS technologies.

Details of Sources & the Maps Prepared

Sl. No. Source Maps Prepared 1. Survey of India’s topographic maps and

satellite imageries Base map and Drainage map

2. Satellite Imageries Land use / Land cover

3.7.7 DETAILS OF THE DATA USED

Survey of India’s Topographic Maps

Sl. No. Topographic Map No. Scale Year of Survey Year of Publication

1. 57 J/1 1: 50,000 2010 2011

2. 57 J/2 1: 50,000 2010 2011

3. 57 J/5 1: 50,000 2010 2011

4. 57 J/6 1: 50,000 2010 2011

Satellite data of National Remote Sensing Centre

Sl. No. Season Sensor

path/row Satellite/Sensor Date of Pass

1. Summer 100-63-B IRS RS-2 LISS IV FX 25-March-2019

3.7.7 PROJECT SITE LOCATION

The project site is located at Sy No: 677 (old Sy No.425), Chintakunta Village, Muddanur

Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. The project site covers an Extent of 314 q2

kilometers.

3.7.8 STUDY AREA

As per the Review meeting held in the Office of M/s. Global Enviro Labs site has been

visited in December 2019. A study area of 10 km radius is delineated taking the

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

58

proposed project site as centre. Please refer to Figure No. 1.1 for complete Geo-co-

ordinates of the Project Site. A study area of 10 km radius is delineated taking the

proposed project site as centre

(Latitude - 14°42'10.14673"N & Longitude - 78°18'59.86765"E).

3.7.9 LAND USE / LAND COVER MAP

Land use / land cover map is prepared by visual interpretation of high-resolution satellite

data with the help of Survey of India Topographic maps on 1:50,000 scale. Two seasons’

data (Summer year 2019) is used for the delineation of different units. The units are

confirmed by the ground truth/field visits.

Level-II classification of National (Natural) Resources Information System (NRIS) has

been followed for the delineation of units.

Land use / Land cover map of the study area is integrated with village map and analyzed

with the help of GIS to get the village wise findings of the present land use of the study

area, which is given elaborately in the following tables:

Land use refers to man’s activities and various uses, which are carried on land. Land

cover refers to natural vegetation, water bodies, rock/soil, artificial cover and others

resulting due to land transformation. Although land use is generally inferred based on the

cover, yet both the terms land use and land cover are closely related and interchangeable.

Information on the rate and kind of change in the use of land resources is essential to the

proper planning, management and regulation of the use of such resources.

Knowledge about the existing land use and trends of change is essential if the nation is to

tackle the problems associated with the haphazard and uncontrolled growth. A systematic

framework is needed for updating the land use and land cover maps that will be timely,

relatively inexpensive and appropriate for different needs at national and state level. The

rapidly developing technology of remote sensing offers an efficient and timely approach

to the mapping and collection of basic land use and land cover data over large area. The

satellite imageries are potentially more amenable to digital processing because the remote

sensor output can be obtained in digital format. Land use data are needed in the analysis

of environmental processes and problems that must be understood if living conditions and

standards are to be improved or maintained at current levels.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

59

Basic Concepts of Land Use

Clawson has given nine major ideas or concepts about land. These are:

➢ Location or the relation of a specific parcel of land to the poles, the equator, and the

major oceans and landmasses. There is also relationship between various tracts of

land, as well as a political location.

➢ Activity on the land, for what purpose this piece of land or tract is used.

➢ Natural qualities of land, including its surface and subsurface characteristics and its

vegetative cover.

➢ Improvements to and on the land. This is closely related to the activity.

➢ Intensity of land use or amount of activity per unit area.

➢ Land tenure, i.e. who owns the land, which uses it.

➢ Land prices, land market activity and credit as applied to land.

➢ Interrelations between activities on the land and other economic and social activities.

➢ Interrelations in the use between different tracts of land.

3.7.10 METHODOLOGY FOR LAND USE / LAND COVER MAPPING

The land use / land cover map is prepared by adopting the interpretation techniques of the

image in conjunction with collateral data such as Survey of India topographical maps and

census records. Image classification can be done by using visual interpretation techniques

and digital classification using any of the image processing software. For the present study,

ERDAS 9.1 version software is used for preprocessing, rectification, enhancements and

classifying the satellite data for preparation of land use land cover map for assessing and

monitoring the temporal changes in land use land cover and land developmental activities.

The imagery is interpreted and ground checked for corrections. The final map is prepared

after field check. Flow chart showing the methodology adopted is given in the different land

use / land cover categories in the study area has been carried out based on the NRSC land use

/ land cover classification system.

For analysis and interpretation, and preparation of Lu / Lc map, two types of data are needed:

1. Basic data 2. Ground data

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

60

Basic data includes:

❖ Fused data of LISS IV

❖ Toposheets on 1 : 50,000

❖ Local knowledge

❖ Area map on any scale to transfer details

❖ Reports and other literature of the study area

Ground data: Ground data is very much essential to verify and to increase the accuracy

of the interpreted classes and also to minimize the field work.

Data analysis: For analysis and interpretation of satellite data, the study can be divided

into three parts:

A. Preliminary work

B. Field work

C. Post field work

A. Preliminary work includes:

❖ To see the limitation of satellite data

❖ To lay down the criteria for land use classification to be adopted

❖ To fix the size of mapping units, which depends upon the scale

❖ Interpretation of different land use/land cover classes

❖ Demarcation of doubtful areas

❖ Preparation of field land use/land cover map

B. Field work:

❖ Type of ground data to be collected

❖ Selection of sample area for final classification

❖ Checking of doubtful areas

❖ Change in land use/ land cover due to wrong identification, fresh Development,

nomenclature.

❖ General verification

C. Post field work:

❖ Reinterpretation or analysis or correction of doubtful areas

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

61

❖ Transfer of details on base map

❖ Marginal information

❖ Preparation of final land use/land cover map

Flowchart showing the methodology adopted for LU/LC mapping

Basic data

Data source

IRS LISS IV FMX

Khariff

season

Rabi

season

Preparation

of base

maps

Interpretation and mapping of land

use /land cover categories

Ground verification of doubtful areas

and modification of thematic details

Transfer of Khariff and Rabi season land

use/land cover details on to a single

base map.

Area estimation of each land

use/land cover class.

Final land use/land cover

map with symbols and

colours

Development of

interpretation keys based on

image characteristics.

Validation and final

interpretation key

Secondary data

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

62

The land use / land cover of 08.000 Hectares Mine Lease Area of Sri. P. Venkata Siva

Reddy quartzite mine at Chinthakunta village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa

District, Andhra Pradesh is given in below table. Figure 3.7 shows the Satellite imagery

and Figure 3.8 shows the land use and land cover map of the study area. In the study area,

Built–up land occupies about 10.04 sq. km, Water bodies occupy around 75.36 sq. km.,

forest land around 21.35 sq.km, crop land around 69.70 sq. km and wastelands occupy

around 136.26 Sq. km.

Table : 3.7 Statistics of Land use/Land cover of the study area Sl. No. LAND USE Area in (Sq. km) Area in % 1. BUILT UP LAND

A. Settlements B. Industrial area

9.106

0.942

2.9

0.3

2. WATERBODIES A. Tank/River/canal/Reservoir etc.

75.36

24.4

3. FOREST A. Scrub forest

21.352

6.8

4. CROP LAND A. Single crop B. Double crop

51.496

18.212

16.4

5.8

5. WASTELANDS A. Land with scrub B. Land without scrub C. Sheet rock area D. Mining area

101.736

22.294

8.164

4.082

32.4

7.1

2.6

1.3

TOTAL 314 100

3.7.11. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION

MEASURES

An effort has been made to identify various environmental, social and ecological impacts

due to proposed mining activity operation phases considering present environmental

scenario as baseline.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

63

Quantification of Impacts:

With the establishment of the proposed mining activity the following changes take place

w.r.t land use within the study area.

•Total mine lease area is 19.92 acres. Out of this Greenbelt is 1.992 acres and

Rest is mining use

•Land Use of 19.92 acres (8 Ha.) of land envisaged for the proposed mine lease

area will change from land with scrub to mining use.

•Pucca road is available up to the site. No separate road will be laid. Width of the

road will be increased from 5 m to 10m which is very marginal.

•No township is proposed as part of the mining activity. Hence no increase in

habitation area.

Comparison of land use of pre-project and post project:

Sl. No. LAND USE AREA (Sq. km)

(Pre project)

AREA (Sq. km)

(post project)

% change

1. BUILT- UP LAND C. Settlements D. Industrial area

9.106 0.942

9.106 0.942

2. FOREST A. Scrub forest

75.36

75.36

3. WATERBODIES B. Tank / River/Reservoir/

Major canal etc.

21.352

21.352

4. CROP LAND C. Single crop D. Double crop

51.496 18.212

51.496 18.212

5. WASTELANDS E. Land with scrub F. Land without scrub G. Sheet rock area H. Mining area

101.736 22.294 8.164 4.082

101.736 22.294 8.164 4.082

(-)0.08 % (+)0.08 %

TOTAL 314 314 100

From the above, it can be concluded that there will be increase in mining area of 0.08 %

and land with scrub is reduced by 0.18%, which is negligible. Corresponding mitigation

measures to take care of the adverse impacts are also discussed in following sections.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

64

3.7.12. MITIGATION IMPACT OF LAND USE

Impact on water bodies:

As there are no major water bodies within the one-kilometer radius of the proposed

mining activity. There is a proposed Gandikota back water canal is passing within the 10

Kilometers radius from north west to east and is far away i.e., around 2 kilometers. Hence

there is no adverse impact on the water bodies because of the proposed mining activity.

Impact on agriculture:

Based on the SOI Topo Graphical Maps, NRSC satellite imagery and the ground truth

studies within 2 kilometers radius from the proposed mining activity observed only single

crop and double crop lands. Major land with scrub and land without scrub presently the

proposed mine lease area. Hence there is no adverse impact on agriculture by the

proposed mining activity.

Impact on change in topography of the land & on drainage pattern.

There is no change in the topography as the proposed mining activity is an undulating

land with scrub or waste land.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

65

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

66

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

67

3.7.4 BASELINE DATA ON SOIL QUALITY

The study area is covered with red sandy clay soils. Representative soil samples were

collected from 14 sampling locations within an area of 10 km radius around the proposed

project for analysis of the physico-chemical characteristics of the soil quality. Fig – 3.9

and Table – 3.7 shows the location of soil sampling stations.

Table 3.8: SOIL SAMPLING STATIONS

S. No. Code Location Distance (km) w.r.t Project

Direction w.r.t Project

1 S-1 Kammavaripalle 2.1 N 2 S-2 Chinthakunta 2.1 ENE 3 S-3 Aravetipalle 2.5 SSE 4 S-4 Denepalle 1.3 SW 5 S-5 Mangapatnam 5.3 WNW 6 S-6 Shettivaripalle 4.4 NNW The following are the highlights of soil quality in the study area:

Soil Samples within 10 km Radius:

➢ pH of the soil samples was found to be in the range of 6.54 – 8.12.

➢ Soluble salts were found to be in the range of 86 - 148 mg/kg

➢ Organic content of the soil samples was found to be medium exhibiting in the

range of 0.64% - 1.12% and average fertility

➢ Soils in the area were found to be clayey sandy loam in texture with sand

percentage in the range between 36- 48%, silt between 20 - 38% and Clay 26 -

36%.

➢ Chloride content of the soil samples were in the range of 72 - 90 mg/kg

Results of soil sampling analysis are given in Annexure – C.

• All soils under study are neutral in terms of pH.

• Soils collected in buffer zone are deficient in nutrient content.

• Green belt development in mining area needs proper amendments with regular

addition of nutrients (NPK) and organic fertilizer.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

68

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

69

3.8 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT

A survey of the flora and fauna of the MLA and the buffer zone was carried out keeping

in view of the following terms of reference.

“A detailed biological study for the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 Km radius

of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, duly

authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based on field

survey clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In case of any scheduled-I

fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan for their conservation should be

prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife Department and details furnished.

Necessary allocation of funds for implementing the same should be made as part of the

project cost”

Based on the above, primary survey of flora, both primary and secondary survey of fauna

of the mine lease area (core area) and its buffer zone extending up to a radius of 10 Km

was carried during December 2019 by Dr.K.B.Reddy, Retired Professor of

Environmental Sciences, Acharya Nagarjuna University and the NABET Empaneled

Functional Area Expert in EB and SC. Appropriate data / information available with the

State Forest and Wildlife Department, Biodiversity Board and Botanical Survey of India

as well as the Zoological Survey of India have also been referred and used during the

survey. In addition, relevant publications on flora and fauna of the area have been

consulted.

The basic objectives of the study is to evaluate the status of the flora and fauna of the

Quartzite mine lease area of 08.000 Ha located in Survey No No.677 (old Sy No.425) of

Chinthakunta Village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District , Andhra Pradesh.

and its buffer zone of 10 Km radius with specific reference to the rare or endangered or

endemic or threatened (REET) species in accordance with the approved T.o.R. The study

is also designed to evaluate the adverse impacts of the proposed iron ore mine and to

suggest remedial / mitigation measures in accordance with the objectives as desired by

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

70

the IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment) and the Ministry of

Environment and Forests (M.o.E&F), Government of India (GoI). With these objectives

in mind, the following work was undertaken by a team of experienced professional:

i). Documentation and evaluation of the status of the terrestrial flora of the core area and

surrounding areas (buffer area).

ii) Inventorization of the terrestrial flora of the core area and buffer area.

iii). Prediction of the impacts of the proposed activity on the REET species.

iv). Development of a management / mitigation plan to minimize the impacts the

proposed activity on the biotic environment so that there is no net loss of biodiversity.

Kindly refer to Annexure - D for Detailed Biological Environment report of the study

area.

3.9 SOCIO ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 3.9.1 BASELINE STATUS

A detailed socio-economic survey was conducted covering all villages in the 10 km

radius from the center. The information of socio-economic aspects has been compiled

from various secondary sources including various government and semi-government

offices. The demographic profile of the study area is enclosed in Annexure – E.

The methodology adopted for the study is mainly includes review of secondary data

(Census Statistical Data -2011 and Primary Census Abstract of Census- 2011) with

respect to population, occupational structure and infrastructure facilities available for 10-

km radius study area.

The main occupation of villagers is agriculture and sheep raring. The commencement of

mining activity in this area improves the socio-economic status of the local people by

creation of employment.

The salient observations obtained as a result of the study are discussed hereunder.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

71

SOCIO-ECONOMIC DETAILS WITHIN THE STUDY AREA (10 KMS RADIUS)

S.No. DESCRIPTION NUMBERS DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS

1 Total Villages 21 2 Total no. of House Hold 6215 3 Total Population 24591 4 Total SC Population 3754 5 Total ST Population 246 6 Total Literate Population 13708 7 Total Main Working Population 12252 8 Total Non-Workers 10834 9 Total Marginal Workers 1505 10 Cultivators 3298 11 Agricultural Labor 6570 12 Household Workers 445 13 Other Workers 1939

Amenities (Infrastructure Facilities*) Water facilities Tap 5 River 0 Well 32 Canal 1 Tank 2 Lake 0 Tube Well 3 Spring 0 Hand Pump 30 Others 1 P & T Facilities Post Office 15 Post & Telegraph Office 0 Telegraph Office 0 Telephone Connection 21 Bus 20 Railway 1 Power Supply Available for all purpose in all villages Medical Facilities* Maternity & Child Welfare Center 0 Family Welfare Center 0 Public Health Sub Center 7 RMP 16 Education Facilities Primary School 20 Sr. Secondary School 1 Middle School 4 College 0 (Source: Census Data 2011)

3.10 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

In order to evaluate the impacts on mining on the health of workers, baseline health

studies shall be carried out on every worker before joining their duties. The baseline

health status, their habits will be recorded and a log book will be maintained and the

same shall be updated every quarter.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

72

Disability Evaluation

❖ Degree of dyspnea

❖ Amount of cough and sputum, wheezing

❖ Smoking age started, pack/day, age stopped

❖ Past pulmonary illnesses

❖ Concurrent medical conditions

❖ Medications

❖ Occupational and environmental exposures

❖ Chest physical examination findings

❖ Chest roentgenogram & x- rays

❖ Pulmonary function studies

❖ Baseline audiograms

❖ Urinalysis

Thus, a baseline condition will be established for all the workers and the records shall be

maintained in order to evaluate any occupational diseases due to mining activity or

aggravation of the existing condition due to mining.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY ASSESSMENT An assessment on environmental health & safety will be made on the following

considerations:

Principal Environmental and Occupational Risks that are likely to be created

: INSTANT: Accident due to pit wall sliding Accident due to sliding of dump slopes Accident due to transportation LONG TERM Continuous exposure to air pollutants leading to silicosis, asthma, tuberculosis, etc. Hearing loss due to continuous exposure to high noise

Risk Assessment : As per design of hazard risk assessment matrices for ranking occupational health risks in mining & allied activities

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

73

Rank of Risk to Public Health : Marginal (Occasional) Communication of Risks to public & steps for prevention & control

: Display at approach road Induction training to all the workers on possible risks and steps for prevention & control Refresher training once a year

Assessment of Health Impacts : Preliminary screening Regular Health Camps (once in six months)

Assessor : Occupation Health Specialist with established credentials

Agency for the health impact assessment study

: In-house facility will be provided

Hazardous operations in mine : Drilling & Blasting Members of the Safety Committee

: Mines Manager Safety Officer Worker’s Representative Local Panchayat’s Representative

Functions of Safety Committee : Implementation of OH&S procedures Assessment of work place Exposure

: Medical Officer of Mine

Communication of Non-conformance

: By Circular, Display at relevant areas

Expenditure for tests & treatments of Occupational & non-occupational

: Responsibility of the mine management

Compensation to workers for health impairments due to injury or illness & amount of compensation

: As per ESI / Medical Reimbursement / workmen compensation Act

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

74

4. PREDICTION OF IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES 4.0 INTRODUCTION

Impact prediction is a very important phenomenon in evaluating the environmentally

potential adverse impacts for any proposed mine project. The impact prediction is always

carried out under worst possible conditions so as to mitigate or to eliminate the

environmental hazards. These predictions thus calculated are superimposed over the

baseline data to calculate the net impact on the environment after the proposed mine

Project comes into production.

4.1 AIR ENVIRONMENT The impacts on air environment from a mining activity depend on various factors like

production capacity, machinery involved, operations and maintenance of various

equipments and vehicle. Apart from these, there will be other activities associated viz

transportation of mineral and waste, stocking facilities and dump management within the

mine lease area that may contribute to pollution.

4.1.1 Air Emissions

Prediction of impacts on air environment has been carried out taking into consideration of

the proposed production and increase in emissions.

The proposal for average production of 2,92,678 TPA of Quartzite and silica sand.

Hence, to estimate the impacts, max. production of 3,75,000 TPA of Quartzite and Silica

Sand has been considered. The proposed mining is carried out by manual open cast

method by using drilling & blasting. The air borne particulate matter is the main air

pollutant contributed by mining and mineral process operations. Resultant ground level

concentration for the prevailing meteorological conditions using the mathematical model

were estimated.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

75

4.1.2 QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATION OF IMPACTS ON AIR ENVIRONMENT An attempt has been made to predict the incremental rise of various ground level

concentrations above the baseline status in respect of air pollution due to proposed

production for a max. quantity of 3,75,000 TPA of Quartzite and Silica sand. The

mathematical model employed for predictions in the present study is ISCST3 model,

which was approved by United States Environmental Protection Agency for mining

applications.

The Industrial Source Complex – Short Term model (ISCST3) is a computerized air

quality model specifically designed for computing concentrations and deposition impacts

of various emission sources. The model is based on the well-known Gaussain Plume

formulation for computing concentrations and also the model has been specifically

adapted to incorporate an improved gradient transfer deposition algorithm. Emissions for

each source are apportioned into a series of particle size classes. Gravitational settling

velocity and deposition velocity are calculated.

Salient features of the ISCST3 model are given hereunder.

❖ Excavation operations are considered as area sources.

❖ Transportation of material on haulage roads has been considered as line source

The predicted ground level concentrations for study period computed using EPA

approved ISCST3 model are plotted as isopleths.

4.1.3 SOURCES OF DUST EMISSION The proposed mining is carried out by manual opencast method by using drilling &

blasting. The air borne particulate matter generated by ore handling operations,

transportation and screening of ore is the main air pollutant. The emissions of Sulphur

dioxide (SO2), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) contributed by diesel operated

excavation/loading equipment and vehicles plying on haul roads are marginal. Prediction

of impacts on air environment has been carried out taking into consideration proposed

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

76

production and net increase in emissions. Based on the various operations involved in the

production of minerals, the various emission sources have been identified as given below.

a. Area sources.

b. Line sources.

Extraction of mineral from mine, are considered as area sources. Transportation of

material from mining benches to various end points are considered as line sources. The

impact of above sources on air environment is discussed below:

The other sources of air pollution are the dust generated during the movement of tippers

on the haul road. Water tankers with spraying arrangement will be used for regular water

sprinkling on the haul roads to ensure effective dust suppression. The tippers are well

maintained so that exhaust smoke does not contribute abnormal values of noxious gases

and un-burnt hydrocarbons.

4.1.4 EMISSION DETAILS

All the emissions discussed above are quantified for proposed production of 3,75,000

TPA of Quartzite and Silica Sand. The existing air quality levels are covered in the

baseline scenario.

Excavation, loading and transportation through tippers and screening and crushing are the

major sources, which are of significance. Therefore, the emissions considered for

modeling are from excavation, transportation and screening of quartzite

The emissions are computed based on AP-42 emission factors. Operational hours,

activity rate, wind speed and moisture content have been considered for estimation of

emissions from point and area sources. For line source, apart from operational hours,

activity rate, moisture, silt content and vehicle weight have been considered.

Predictions are carried out for the worst-case scenario of simultaneous operation of

excavators (area sources) and tippers for transportation from mine pit to loading pit (line

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

77

sources) over a distance of 500 m. the manual operations are covered to an extent of 100

m. in the mine.

The number of working days has been taken at 300 days per year with 8 hours of

operation/day, hence the concentrations predicted are considered to be the worst case.

With control measures, the emissions have been taken at 30% of uncontrolled emissions

for handling and 10% of uncontrolled emissions for transportation.

The emissions computed for the proposed production are given below.

4.1.5 METEOROLOGICAL DATA

The meteorological data recorded continuously during the month of October 2019 –

December 2019 on hourly basis on wind speed, wind direction and temperature has been

processed to extract the 24- hourly mean meteorological data as per the guidelines of

IMD and MoEF for application of ISCST3 model. Stability classes computed for the

mean hours is based on guidelines issued by CPCB on modeling. Mixing heights

representative of the region have been taken from the available published literature.

Annexure - H provides the mean meteorological data used for modeling.

EMISSION DETAILS (BASIS – AP-42: EMISSION ESTIMATION TECHNIQUE MANUAL FOR MINING)

A Excavation of Minerals – Area Source Proposed

Quantity, TPA 3,75,000 Operational Hours per year 2400 Activity Rate, t/hr 156.25 Emission of dust, gm/t 0.1 Emission of dust gm/hr 15.62 Area of influence, m2 100 Uncontrolled Emission Rate g/s/m2 0.000013 Controlled emission rate g/s/m2 0.000030

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

78

B Transport of Minerals – Haulage Emissions Proposed

Quantity, TPA 3,75,000 Operational Hours per year 2400 Capacity of each Tipper (T) 17 Total No. of Tippers/year 22058 Lead length/trip, Km 0.5 Total VKT/year Km 11029 +Emission kg/VKT 0.91 Total emission kg/year 10036.3 Uncontrolled emission rate g/s/m 0.00011 Controlled emission rate g/s/m 0.0010 Note: Emission factor computed based on wind speed of 2m/sec and silt content of 10% and moisture of 10% 4.1.6. SUMMARY OF PREDICTED GROUND LEVEL CONCENTRATIONS

Ground level concentrations due to the mining activities have been estimated to know the

incremental raise and extent of impact in the study area.

The maximum ground level concentration is estimated to be about 11.16 μg/m3 within the

mine area, where mining operations are being carried out. The concentration was found

to reduce to a value of less than 3.72 μg/m3 at a distance of about 0.5 km from the mining

operations. The impact of mining operations would be negligible beyond 1.0 km.

Figure – 5.1 represents the spatial distribution of the predicted ground level

concentrations of SPM due to emissions from mine and the following table shows the

over all scenario:

Predicted value superimposed on the existing baseline value gives the overall scenario,

which would prevail during study period once mine is operated for the proposed

production. The following table shows the overall scenario:

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

79

OVERALL SCENARIO:

μg/m3 CORE ZONE BUFFER ZONE

Village Name Baseline Concentration (PM10)

Predicted Concentration

Overall Scenario

Baseline Concentration PM10 (Max)

33 Down wind direction

40 3.72 43.72

Predicted Concentration (Max)

11.16 Kammavaripalle 55 <2.48 57.48

Overall Scenario 44.16 Chinthakunta 60 <2.48 62.48 Aravetipalle 50 <2.48 52.48 Denepalle 52 <2.48 54.48 Mangapatnam 56 <2.48 58.48 Shettivaripalle 48 <2.48 50.48

Specified NAAQ limit 100 Specified NAAQ limit for Residential area 100 4.1.7 PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DUST SUPPRESSION

• Dust suppression arrangements at all dust generation points

• Grading of haul roads time to time and cleaning to remove the accumulated dusty

material.

• Regular maintenance of the transport vehicles

• Avoiding of overloading of tippers and covering of loaded tippers with tarpaulins

during ore transportation.

• Dust mask provision to workers.

• 50 m barrier zone will be maintained all along the mine lease boundary and green

belt will be maintained in the barrier zone.

• Human habitation is on the north direction i.e. (Denepalli at 1.3 km) from the lease

area. Apart from the 50 m barrier zone a 30 m width of wind break of 3 tiers of 10

m each is provided.

• Periodical monitoring of air quality to take steps to control the pollutants.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

80

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

81

4.2 NOISE ENVIRONMENT 4.2.1 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS To reduce the noise levels at source, proper and timely maintenance and up keeping of

mining machinery is being carried out as per instructions of manufacturers.

The main sources of noise in the mine are classified as follows:

• Stationary mining equipment

• Mobile Mining equipment

• Transportation vehicles

• Screening

Impacts of vibrations on the surrounding environment

The drilling & blasting is confined to the mine lease area, so the impact on the

surrounding environment is negligible.

The vibration developed due to haulage of vehicles and drilling will be less feeble with 8

Hz.

4.2.2 PROPOSED MITIGATING MEASURES

The operations of the mining equipment, plying of vehicles and mining machinery

operation are the major sources of undesirable noise in the proposed project area.

The following control measures are proposed for brining down the noise levels.

• Greenbelt will be made around the working areas to screen the noise and also for

arresting fugitive dust

• Maintenance and tuning of machinery would be ensured to reduce undesirable

noise.

• Earplugs and earmuffs will be provided to the workmen.

• Limiting time exposure of workers to excessive noise.

• Carrying out blasting only during daytime and avoiding the same on cloudy days

and when strong wind blows across.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

82

4.3 WATER ENVIRONMENT 4.3.1 Impact on Surface Water Mining activities cause adverse impacts due to mine drainage and siltation due to storm

water. The impact on water environment has been considered under the following heads:

• Water consumption

• Mine seepage and impact on ground water

• Impact on surface water bodies

• Storm water management

4.3.2 Water Consumption The water requirement for this proposed mining activity will be 12 KLD. Breakup details

are:

Sl. No: Purpose Quantity (KLD) 1 Dust suppression purpose 8.0 2 Domestic purpose 1.0 3 Greenbelt purpose 2.0 Total 12 There is no generation & discharge of wastewater from this mine. 4.3.3 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS The stream courses should be well protected by leaving a safety margin of 15.0 m on

either side with raised bunds to prevent storm water entering the natural courses in and

around the quarry lease area during rainy days. No adverse effect is anticipated to water

regime of the area.

4.3.4 IMPACT ON SURROUNDING WATER BODIES:

Water will be required for mining operations mainly for sprinkling on haulage roads and

at open cast faces during mining activity for suppression of dust. Water is also required

for domestic and greenbelt purposes. The water requirement will be 12 KLD. This will be

sourced from ground water.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

83

Impact on surface water quality:

There are no major water bodies present within 10 km. radius. No waste water generation

from mining operation. Only wastewater generation will be sanitary wastewater, which

will be treated in septic tank followed by soak pit. Hence there will not be any impact on

surface water due to mining operations.

Impact on Ground Water Quality:

The mining operation will be maximum of 24 m depth from 356m max. RL the ground

water table is at 40m below General ground level of 262m RL and will not affect water

regime. Hence there will not be any intersect of mining operation with ground water

table. Hence there will not be impact on ground water quality due to mining operations.

4.3.5 MITIGATION MEASURES

• Construction of check dams and gully plugs

• Systematic drainage system for diverting the surface run-off during monsoon

• Plantation of local varieties of species

• Regular monitoring and analyzing the quality of water

• De-silting will be carried out before and immediately after the monsoon season

4.4 LAND ENVIRONMENT 4.4.1 POSSIBLE IMPACT ON GEOLOGY & MITIGATION

1) The area will be broken to a depth of 18.0 mts by forming benches to win the

mineral which results in the formation of a large deep pit of about 65,000 m2 extent. -

Although it cannot be reversed the pit can be used for water harvesting to raise

aquaculture at the end of mining operations. A fence to be erected and watchmen posted

for safety and security of men and animals.

2) The top soil should be removed and stacked separately to be utilized for

plantation.

3) The drilling and blasting activity, movement of workmen, quarrying of mineral

and haulage of tractors/ trailers will generate dust and there is likely chance to settle in

the stream, inhalation by workmen and also will have sedimentation affect over the wind

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

84

ward side. This should be arrested at the origin by regular sprinkling of water & placing

moist clay bags while blasting and sprinkling of water at regular intervals on haul roads.

The workers should be provided with masks and earplugs, safety eye glass wear will

contain or minimize health hazard.

4.4.2 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS ON LAND ENVIRMENT

An effective programme of land restoration will be drawn and implanted to bring back

the status to as near the pre-mining conditions as possible. The salient features are as

enumerated below. A green belt development will be planted meticulously. It is

proposed to reclaim all the worked-out area by suitable soil conservation and

afforestation methods. This operation is carried out concurrent to mining during next

scheme period onwards. The roads shall have avenue trees and thus a green belt

developed. Land degradation will take place by dumping of waste, and the reclamation

of this dumping area shall also be included in the programme. It is always necessary to

keep the area under disturbance at any stage to the minimum possible. This can be

achieved by ensuring reclamation of the excavated area simultaneously with mining

activates by reducing the gap between reclamation and excavation to the minimum.

4.4.3. RECLAMATION

Reclamation of mined out portions are not proposed during first scheme period as the

mining operations will not reach to the full extent of mineral deposit. Progressive

trenching and embankment by safety bunding will be taken up. As a measure of

protection 2m corridor all along the lease corridor a protection bund will be raised, a

safety pit will be excavated with 1.5m width and one-meter depth will be excavated to

avoid the trespassing of the human and cattle / wild life into the lease hold area. The pit

slope will be maintained a 23o in order to protect humans and cattle / wild life protection.

➢ The current land use type of project site is land with scrub. This land will be

converted in to mining area.

➢ As per land break up single crop land, double crop lands and plantations are the

major land use type covering the study area. Crop land and mining area are

influencing factors to the environment.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

85

➢ There are small scale industries within in the study area

➢ Nearest village is Denepalli (1.3 Km) village.

➢ Railway line is observed within the study area of 10 km radius. Muddanur is the

nearest railway station.

➢ The reserved forest areas are devoid of any species of economic value. The forest

is mostly of scrub type consisting of thorny bushes and shrubs of xerophytes

group.

➢ Sugarcane, Jowar, Paddy and groundnut are major rain fed and canal irrigation

crops categorized as single and double crops.

The mining area is hilly and undulating land. The waste filled dump sites shall be

terraced with overall slope in the direction of natural ground level slope. In most cases,

the overall slope of back filled surface shall merge with natural slope.

The topographical impact will be mainly one of color contrast between then mined rock

surfaces and surrounding vegetation (shrubs and grasses). However, the topographical

impact will remain localized, given that the site is contained and the change in

topography will not have appreciable impact on drainage and aesthetics.

The top soil in the mining area is scanty. Whatever is available will have to be excavated

during the development of the mine pits. Most of this soil is rocky in nature and will get

mixed with the over burden. Temporary storage of top soil over burden may cause some

loss of nutrients and this cannot be avoided. The top soil will be subjected to water borne

erosion during rainy season from reclamation areas when in unconsolidated state. A

combination of diversion ditches and garland drains will be constructed to minimize soil

loss. A large amount of soil loss can be arrested in contour trenches, which will be

collected and put back to the reclamation areas. Since the mining area is contained to

only 08.000 Ha. The effect on the land environment will be negligible. There shall be

no leachate from the lease area. There shall be soil erosion of the loose soil of waste

dumps which shall be contained. The adverse effect of the mining activity on the bio

diversity shall be mitigated by employing proper mitigating measures.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

86

4.4.4 PROPOSED MITIGATING MEASURES The land management plays an important role in reducing the adverse impacts caused by

surface mining operation. Land management is required in the key areas like land use

scheme within the ML area, calendar plan, mine bench advancement to arrest

indiscriminate degradation of landform, top soil preservation, overburden management,

soil erosion control and the restoration of the mine pits. On each of these prime areas of

land management, the following schemes are proposed.

Land use

The project covers a total ML area of 08.000 Ha of Government Revenue land. The ML

area is principally degraded land and has sporadic patches of very little shrub vegetal

cover in the hill slopes. It may be observed from the proposed mine general layout. The

core zone landscape can be improved by tree plantation, shrub growth etc., which are

outlined separately under eco-restoration.

4.5 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT 4.5.1 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS

Biological Impact Assessment (BIA) is an important ant integral part of the EIA. For the

purposes of the BIA, the study area is divided in the core and buffer areas. The direct

impacts shall be limited to the core area. Mine lease area is a Govt. land. There are no

National Parks, Wildlife sanctuaries, Biosphere reserves or other protected areas either in

the core area or in the buffer zone.

Prediction of impacts is based both on the direct and indirect; short-term as well as long-

term; irreversible and irreversible impacts that are most likely to occur owing to the

proposed industrial activity during establishment and operation. The ecological factors

that are considered most significant as far as the impact on flora and fauna are concerned:

1. Whether there shall be any reduction in species diversity

2. Whether there shall be any habitat loss or fragmentation

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

87

3. Whether there shall be any additional risk or threat to the rare or endangered or

endemic or threatened (REET)species

4. Whether there shall be any impairment of ecological functions such as

(i) Disruption of food chains, (ii) decline in species population and or (iii) alterations in

predator-prey relationships.

The direct and the most destructive impacts of the project are limited to the mine lease

area only. There is going to be a change in the land use and land cover owing to the

mining activity. The existing flora and vegetation of the mine lease is going to be lost

slowly in a phased manner owing to digging or dumping of overburden and waste.

Among the plant species that are going to be lost, the annuals and therophytes are highly

resilient and they can come back once the intensity and frequency of disturbances

decrease. As there are no rare or endangered or endemic or threatened (REET) species,

continuation of mining will not pose any additional problem to any REET species.

Hence, the impact of the project on flora is negligible. As far as the fauna s concerned,

the proposed mining could endanger the habitat of some unseen reptiles and rodents that

may be present in burrows. But it is incapable of posing any additional threat to any

Schedule I species either directly or indirectly.

Negative Impacts:

i). Loss of the existing flora and trees: The flora of the project site is going to be damaged

or lost to a when a mine pit is opened and when dump is created. Since there are no RET

species, there shall not be any loss of any species.

ii). Loss of fodder and grazing land for locals: Green fodder is produced only during the

rainy season. During that time, shortage of green fodder is uncommon. During the rest of

the year when there is shortage of both green and dry fodder, the core area contributes

very little. Hence the overall loss of fodder can be made good by growing forage crops.

iii). Enhanced soil erosion due mining: Operations relating to mining shall enhance the

chances of soil erosion and dust emissions. Integrated soil and water conservation

measures involving physical and biological systems are incorporated. Legumes like

Subabul and Hamata are proposed to be grown for soil conservation, improvement of soil

fertility and perennial fodder production.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

88

Most probable Scenario:

It is a new mine located in an area where mining and quarrying is common. The ambient

air quality is good as revealed by the air quality monitoring results. Mining activity and

its impacts are restricted to the mining site only. The mine is adjacent to the other mine

leases and there are no problems relating to road connectivity and transport. The mining

activity is unlikely to have any adverse impact on the flora and fauna of the buffer

zone.

4.5.2 PROPOSED MITIGATING MEASURES The mined-out areas will be backfilled and reclaimed with dense poly-culture plantation

with the local species. Water reservoirs will be creating in the abandoned mine pit that

will increase the water availability on the plateau.

4.6 SOCIO- ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

4.6.1 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS The local areas will be benefited by way of generation of employment opportunities,

increased demand for local products and services. There will be an overall improvement

in the income level of the local people.

The project creates employment to about 42 persons once the mine in operation. Priority

will be given to locals for Semi-Skilled and Unskilled jobs. With the development of this

project there will be lot of scope for more industrial investments which in turn will

benefit the nation.

There will be a certain enhancement of educational and medical standards of people in

the study area. There will be generally positive and beneficial impacts by way of

economic improvements, transportation, aesthetic environment and business generation.

There will be an overall upliftment of socio-economic status of people in the area.

4.6.2 PROPOSED MITIGATING MEASURES

Employment opportunities will be provided to the local people. Financial assistance will

be provided for conducting local sports, religious and cultural activities. Medical camps

will be arranged regularly for the villagers.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

89

4.7 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ENVIRONMENT

Occupational health and safety hazards occur during the operational phase of mining and

primarily include the following:

❖ Respiratory hazards

❖ Noise

❖ Physical hazards

❖ Explosive storage and handling

4.7.1 RESPIRATORY HAZARDS

Long-term exposure to silica dust may cause silicosis The following measures are proposed:

❖ Excavators, dumpers, dozers, drills other automated equipments will be enclosed

❖ Use of personal breathing protection will be made compulsory.

NOISE Workers are likely to get exposed to excessive noise levels during quarrying activities The following measures are proposed for implementation

❖ No employee will be exposed to a noise level greater than 75 dB(A) for a duration

of more than 8 hours per day without hearing protection

❖ The use of hearing protection will be enforced actively when the equivalent sound

level reaches <75 dB(A).

❖ Ear muffs provided will be capable of reducing sound levels at the ear to at least

75 dB(A)

❖ Periodic medical hearing checks will be performed on workers exposed to high

noise levels

4.7.2 PHYSICAL HAZARDS The following measures are proposed for control of physical hazards

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

90

❖ Specific personnel training on work-site safety management will be taken up;

❖ Work site assessment will be done by rock scaling of each surface exposed to

workers to prevent accidental rock falling and / or landslide, especially after

blasting activities;

❖ Natural barriers, temporary railing, or specific danger signals will be provided

along rock benches or other pit areas where work is performed at heights more

than 2m from ground level;

❖ Maintenance of yards, roads and footpaths, providing sufficient water drainage

and preventing slippery surfaces with an all-weather surface, such as coarse

gravel will be taken up.

4.7.3 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SURVEY All the persons will undergo preplacement examination at the time of joining for the

following test

❖ General physics tests

❖ Audiometric tests

❖ Full chest, X-ray, Lung function tests, Spirometric tests

Essential medicines will be provided at the site. The medicines and other test facilities

will be provided at free of cost.

The first aid box will be made available at the mine for immediate treatment. Employees

are monitored for occupational diseases by conducting the following tests

❖ Periodic medical examination – yearly

❖ Lung function test – yearly, those who are exposed to dust

❖ Audiometry – yearly

❖ Chest X-ray once in five years

❖ Eye test

First aid training is imparted to the selected employees regularly. The list of first aid

members are displayed at strategic places.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

91

5. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.0 INTRODUCTION

The mining development in the study area needs to intertwined with judicious utilization

natural resources within the limits of permissible assimilative capacity. The assimilative

capacity of the study area is the maximum amount of pollution load that can be

discharged in the environment without affecting the designated use and is governed by

dilution, dispersion and removal due to natural physio-chemical and biological processes.

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is required to ensure sustainable

development in the study area.

This chapter covers the genesis of pollution, the principal sources of pollution, the nature

of pollution, the proposed measures required for meeting the prevailing statutory

requirements of gaseous emissions, wastewater discharge characteristics, noise levels etc.

for environmental management purpose in connection with the mining and mining related

activities in the study area.

This section discusses the management plan for mitigation/abatement impacts and

enhancement of beneficial impacts due to mining. The Environmental Management Plan

(EMP) has been designed within the framework of various Indian legislative and

regulatory requirements on environmental and socio-economic aspects.

Environmental Management Plan giving the environmental protection measures at mine

to meet the stipulated norms of IBM/MoEF are as detailed.

5.1 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES Mitigative measures suggested for air pollution control are based on the baseline ambient

air quality monitoring data. From the point of view of maintenance of an acceptable

ambient air quality in the region, it is desirable that air quality should be monitored on a

regular basis to check it vis-à-vis the standards prescribed by CPCB and in cases of non-

compliance, appropriate mitigative measures shall be adopted.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

92

As per the results of ambient air quality monitoring data, the background concentrations

of SPM, SO2, NOX are within the stipulated CPCB standards.

CONTROLLING DUST LEVELS

Dust is major emission generated in the mining activities. Dust would be generated in the

mines from Drilling, Blasting, and Transportation of ore in Tippers etc. In the proposed

project the following air emission control measures will be provided:

• Watering blast hole followed by charging of blast holes.

• Avoiding blasting under unfavorable wind and atmospheric conditions.

• Applying water for dust suppression on mine haul roads.

• Regular Compaction & grading of haul roads and service roads to clear

accumulation of loose material.

• Compaction & gradation on both sides of Haul Roads.

• Controlling speed of dumpers / trucks.

• Avoid overloading of dumpers and consequent spillage on the roads.

• Good maintenance of vehicles & machinery.

• Water sprinklers of fixed type will be provided at the mine approach roads from

mine face / benches to crush hopper to prevent the generation of dust.

• Transfer chutes will be provided at mineral discharge points, loading points etc.,

to minimize discharge height and spread of air borne dust.

• The operator’s cabin in the drills, dumpers and other HEMMs are provided with

dust free enclosure and persons working at high dust prone areas will be provided

with dust mask.

• Good housekeeping at the mining, loading will be practiced.

• Avoiding over filling of tippers and consequent spillage on the roads.

• Quartzite carrying trucks will be effectively covered by tarpaulin to avoid escape

of quartzite to the atmosphere.

• Air quality will be regularly monitored both in the core zone and the buffer zone

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

93

Measures to minimize dust Inhalation

All the above measures would be adopted to prevent dust generation at site and to be

dispersed in the outside environment. However, for the safety of workers at site, engaged

at strategic locations/dust generation points like loading etc., dust masks would be

provided. Dust masks would prevent inhalation of PM thereby reducing the risk of lung

diseases and other respiratory disorders.

CONTROLLING OF SO2 & NOX LEVELS

The source of SO2 & Nox would be due to vehicular emissions. This can be controlled

by proper & regular maintenance and servicing of vehicles. The emissions of all vehicles

used for transport will be in accordance with the MOEF norms.

5.2 NOISE POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES

The ambient noise level monitoring carried out in and around the proposed mine shows

that ambient noise levels are well within the stipulated limits of CPCB. In an operational

mine major noise sources are operation of mine machineries, equipment & vehicles.

Noise generation may be for an instant, intermittent or continuous period, with low to

high decibels. The noise level predicted at boundary of ML due to the increased in

production level of the mine will be well within the MOEF standards.

In the proposed project the following Noise control measures will be provided.

• Actual noise emissions of the equipment will be ensured that they will be as

low as possible.

• Fitting effective mufflers to the equipment wherever required.

• The high temperature time in the afternoon will be selected for blasting which

will naturally reduce the noise pollution.

• For further reduction of noise and vibration, well-advanced and effective

technique of blasting with non-electrical initiation system will be adopted.

• All roads will be maintained in good condition to reduce vehicle noise. Vehicle

noise is exacerbated by high speed and by deceleration and acceleration and

these will be avoided.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

94

• The workers will be provided with protection equipment, earmuffs and

earplugs as a protection from the high noise level generated at the mine site

wherever required.

• Noise levels will be controlled by using optimum explosive charge, proper

delay detonators and proper stemming to prevent blow out of holes as well as

usage of the sequential blasting machine in combination with non-electric

initiation systems.

• Speed of trucks will be limited to moderate speed of 25 KMPH to prevent

undue noise form empty trucks.

• Planting of trees has been taken up along the mining lease boundary for

controlling noise apart from earmarking the limit of the mine pit boundary.

• Proper maintenance will be done for noise generating machinery including

transport vehicles

5.3 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES The lease area is a part of elevated hillock. It does not have any water body. The

surrounding area is also free from any water tanks or big nallahs in 500m circumference.

To avoid soil erosion, rain water entering on to the waste dumps which are located along

the hill slopes, thus affecting their stability, the mine management proposed to provide

suitable garland drains and Check dams along the ridges of the hills. Therefore, the

impacts due to storm water flow there by soil erosion followed by siltation are minimal.

The salient features on the mitigation measures are:

❖ Garland drain will be provided to check soil wash off during monsoons.

❖ Construction of check dams & Gully plugs across seasonal/perennial nallahs

flowing through the ML area

❖ Run-off from the mining area will be passed through a series of arrestor dams

with filter beds to allow settling of solid particles.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

95

❖ Contour bunding and trenches are proposed during monsoon to minimize soil

erosion.

❖ Arrestor wall, protective bunds and trenches will be provided

❖ Water quality monitoring will be carried out in all the seasons

The impact on the surrounding water regime can thus be minimized ensuring flow of

fairly clean water out of the leasehold area.

5.4 LAND ENVIRONMENT 5.4.1 WASTE MANAGEMENT

About 5% intercalated waste will generate and average waste per annum is 12,323.2

Tons and maximum waste per annum is 15,789 Tones and total waste in 5 years is

61616 Tons will be generated which will be dump over an area of 0.247 Ha (height is

40 m) in E& W side of the Quarry Lease area. The generated waste will be utilized to

strengthen the internal roads of the quarry lease area.

As the ore body is exposed on the hill top, open cast method has been adopted. A bench

height of 3m is proposed and width of the bench will be more than 6 m. The total area is

proposed to be opened into benches in descending order. All active dumps will be

reclaimed concurrent to mining operations and at the foot of the dump retaining walls

will be constructed to avoid wash off the material. At foot of the hills the check dams

will be constructed across the valleys & also gully plugs will be constructed at the gullies.

Nature of top soil/ waste and mineral rejects

There is little top soil will be generated during the scheme period however this will be

utilized for afforestation purpose

Year Production of waste in tons 1st year 7,601 2nd year 10,680 3rd year 13,675 4th year 13,871 5th year 15,789 (max) Total 61,616 Aveg. 12323.2

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

96

5.5 ENVIRONMENTAL MAPANAGEMENT PLANT FOR ECOLOGY & BIODIVERSITY The project proponent is duty bound to strictly follow the procedures outlined in the

approved mining plan including the progressive mine closure and restoration plan. To

begin with, they are going to one row of Hill Neem (Chukrasiatabularis), the only tree

that remains green even during the hot summer in Kadapa region. It can be easily grown

from stem cuttings. It has thick foliage and evergreen. This will be done during the first

year at a cost of Rs.2,00,000/-.Stem cuttings can be procured from the hills and seeds are

readily available as there are road-side avenue trees in the district. Seedlings will be

grown in seed beds and the saplings shall be transplanted at a spacing of 2x3m during the

rainy season. It is cost effective and performance is ensured.

The top fertile soil shall be stored in paces / areas where deposits are not found.

Overburden shall be stored separately as stated in the approved mining plan. Once the

mining is over in any pit, it shall be back filled with the stone waste at the bottom level

followed by the overburden and then with the top soil at the top. After filling and

levelling is over, nitrogen enriching leguminous fodder plants like Hamata

(Stylosantheshamata) shall be grown. Once the Hamata grass establishes, pits shall be

made at a spacing of 2m x 3m and saplings ofChukrasiatabularis, Conocarpuslancifolius,

Acacia holosericea, neem etc are transplanted. After transplantation, regular maintenance

of weeding, watering, application of fertilizers and other protective and productive

measures shall be undertaken. Acacia holosericea, neem and Hill Neem

(Chukrasiatabularis) are already grown in the similar mine lease areas in the District.

Scarified seeds ofConocarpuslancifolius, and Silver wattle (Acacia holosericea) willbe

pelletized with dung and placed in small pits in the backfilled areas of the mine lease

areas. The seeds germinate and some of them are going to survive. All gaps will be filled

with stem cuttings of Hill Neem (Chukrasiatabularis) which grows well. There shall

be sufficient water in the mining area for dust suppression and afforestation and watering

the plants.

Based on suitability, desirability and adaptability, a short list of plants is chosen for

greenbelt, avenue and block plantations and presented below Table.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

97

Table 8. List of trees of trees suggested for greenbelt, block and avenue plantations. Latin name Common name Importance Acacia auriculiformis Astralian wattle Pulwood Acacia holosericea Astralian wattle Pulwood Aegle marmelos Maaredu Religious and medicinal Albizia lebebck Dirisana Multipurpose Azadirachta indica Neem/ Vepa Religious and medicinal Cassia fistula Rela Ornamental Chukrasia tabularis Konda vepa Medicinal Conocarpus lancifolius Conocarpus Dense foliage and resistance to

drought, salinity and pollution

Dendrocalamus strictus Bamboo Bamboo Ficus religiosa Peepal / Raavi Religious Hardwickia binata Yepi Timber and fiber Mangifera indica Mango Fruit Manilkara hexandra Paala chettu Root stock for sapota Mimusops elengi Pogada Mythological Phyllanthus emblica Usiri / Amla Fruit Pithecellobium dulce Seema chinta Fruit Prosopis spicigera Jammi / Sami Mythological Syzygium cumini Neredu Medicinal Tamarindus indica Chinta Fruit Tectona grandis Teku Timber

A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a tabular

form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and time frame) and

submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up front on

commencement of the Project. Phase-wise plan of plantation and compensatory

afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be covered under plantation

and the species to be planted. The details of plantation already done should be given. The

plant species selected for greenbelt should have greater ecological value and should be of

good utility value to the local population with emphasis on local and native species and

the species which are tolerant to pollution.

In a mining project, there are some uncertainties and failures. As and when new reserves

are found or reserves are not found in the area that was identified but found in an area

which was not considered etc may demand modifications and changes in the plan. It is

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

98

also influenced by demand, marking, labour, transport and other problems in case of a

high volume and low-cost minerals like Quartz, and silica sand. In the project under

consideration, both are mixed and hence there are bound to be some operational

problems. Hence, strict year by year commitments and targets are difficult to make. The

proposed plan is as under (Table 7): Because of semiarid conditions, nutrient poor soils,

dry climate and acute shortage of water, it is practically impossible to grow 1500 to 2000

trees per Ha. It is beyond the carrying capacity of the soil and climate. A list of plants

suggested for greenbelt, avenue plantations and eco- restoration of back filled areas is

given in Table 8

Table : Time bound greenbelt and compensatory afforestation plan Year / Phase Proposed work Outlay I year One row of Chukrasia tabularis stem cuttings

shall be grown on all sides along the boundary of the mine lease

Rs1,00,000 1.0 Ha

After closure and backing filling of Pit 1

Restoration of the back filled area with Hamata and Trees

Rs.50,000 0.5 Ha

After closure and backing filling of Pit 2

Restoration of the back filled area with Hamata and Trees

Rs.50,000 0.5 Ha

After closure and backing filling of Pit 3

Restoration of the back filled area with Hamata and Trees

Rs. 50,000 0.5 Ha

After closure and backing filling of Pit 4

Restoration of the back filled area with Hamata and Trees

Rs.50,000 0.5 Ha

Ext Steps after Renewal of mine lease and continuation. 3,00,000 3 Ha

Table:. List of trees of trees suggested for greenbelt, block and avenue plantations.

Latin name Common name Importance

Acacia auriculiformis Astralian wattle Pulwood

Acacia holosericea Astralian wattle Pulwood

Aegle marmelos Maaredu Religious and medicinal

Albizialebebck Dirisana Multipurpose

Azadirachtaindica Neem/ Vepa Religious and medicinal

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

99

Cassia fistula Rela Ornamental

Chukrasiatabularis Konda vepa Medicinal

Conocarpuslancifolius Conocarpus Dense foliage and resistance to

drought, salinity and pollution

Dendrocalamusstrictus Bamboo Bamboo

Ficus religiosa Peepal / Raavi Religious

Hardwickiabinata Yepi Timber and fiber

Mangiferaindica Mango Fruit

Manilkarahexandra Paalachettu Root stock for sapota

Mimusopselengi Pogada Mythological

Phyllanthus emblica Usiri / Amla Fruit

Pithecellobium dulce Seema chinta Fruit

Prosopis spicigera Jammi / Sami Mythological

Syzygiumcumini Neredu Medicinal

Tamarindusindica Chinta Fruit

Tectonagrandis Teku Timber

SOIL CONSERVATION

One of the adverse impacts of a project may be enhanced soil erosion. Any plan or

activity or action that is capable of preventing soil erosion is capable of conserving soil.

Soil erosion is mainly on account of rain and flood or wind. Soil erosion is due to heavy

rains and floods coupled with improper and unplanned land use. The damage due to rains

and floods can be minimized with appropriate prevention and mitigation measures.

Plan for conservation of soil is site and activity specific. It depends on a number of

factors such as intensity of rainfall, slope or gradient, land use and land cover etc. Action

plan for soil conservation should take in to account the following criteria and

considerations:

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

100

i) Soil: Extent or area of vacant land; topography of soil; slope or gradient;

texture, structure and composition of soil; land use and land cover;

connectivity with the adjacent land mass

ii) Rainfall: Intensity and frequency of rainfall and drainage.

Based on the above, engineering or biological or integrated land, water and afforestation

programme are designed. Measures for prevention of surface runoff and water

conservation are capable of preventing soil erosion.

Integrated land, water and greenbelt development Programme:

Integrated land and soil conservation; water, wasteland utilization and greenbelt

development programme is based on the aforesaid practical considerations. It involves

integration of physical or engineering systems and biological systems for sustainable

development. The main objectives of the programme are:

1. Rain water harvesting and ground water recharge

2. Prevention of soil erosion and nutrient enrichment

3. Greenbelt development and fodder production

In order to achieve the objectives in an integrated manner, we plan to integrate physical

or engineering and biological methods and mechanisms. A brief plan is as under:

A: Engineering or Physical methods:

1. Digging of 1m deep, 2 m wide trenches continuous or discontinuous depending

on rocks and gradient along the boundary of the mining site. Trenches shall be

filled with top soil and organic manure in such a way that the trench will be 30

Cm below the adjacent land surface.

2. Bunds will be formed towards the lower part with the soil and rock taken out from

the trench. The trenches will be made in to beds with bunds so that the whole

systems resemble terrace cultivation. Rain water is diverted in to these beds

and only the excess storm water goes down.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

101

3. In addition, infiltration pits, trenches, rock fill check dams and ponds for

temporary storage and infiltration of rain water shall be provided.

4. Locally available farm yard manure (goat manure) and poultry litter shall be used

liberally to promote plant growth and to increase the water holding capacity of the

soil.

B: Biological methods:

Development of two layered thick plant cover is the most effective solution for

integrated land, water, wasteland utilization and greenbelt development.

Drought resistant, non-palatable succulents such as Agave americana will be grown on

the bunds. Rooted stem cuttings of Chukrasia tabularis and Ficus species will be planted

in the beds in trenches during the rainy season. Scarified and soaked seeds of Subabul

will be sown in large numbers after heavy shower. Hamata grass will be grown for

prevention of erosion, trapping of rain water, nutrients and nitrogen fixation. Saplings

grown in poly bags shall be planted in the beds during the rainy season. Drip irrigation

shall be provided to improve water use efficiency.

How it works:

1. Rain water or storm water will flow in to the series of beds which are 30 Cm

below the adjacent land. The top spoil is trapped and the rain water percolates in

to the ground leading to ground water recharge. Run off is reduced and erosion is

checked. All fine soil particles that are carried by the rain water are deposited in

the beds where a two-layer plant cover is developed.

2. As the plants start growing, they bind the soil; reduce the velocity of rain drops

by intercepting the rain drops by plant canopy and enhancing the percolation rate.

Deposition of plant litter will improve the ability of the soils to hold water and

moisture which in turn promotes the growth of ground flora and soil biota such as

earthworms. The trenches get filled up slowly with the transported soils, litter

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

102

and organic debris in about 4 to 5 years. Thereafter, it does not require any

intervention as it transforms in to a self-supporting system.

5.6 RAINWATER HARVESTING Open drains will be made to collect the storm waters from first order seasonal stream and

as well as dumps which will be diverted into settling ponds through a series of check

dams. This will act as rainwater recharging structure. Rainwater Harvesting System

(RWHS) designs and construction details that will be carried out in the nearby villages is

as follows:

Rain Water Harvesting Structure (RWHS) for Ground water Recharge: Size: 1.0m x 1.0m x 1.5m Construction Details of Rain Water harvesting system S.No Volume, Cu.m Description 1 4.5 Excavation in Hard Gravelly and all available soils 2 2.25 65 mm metal 3 1.25 20 mm metal 4 0.675 Coarse sand 5 0.24 CRS masonry in 1:6 prop. 6 4.5 Carting of excavated earth for a lead of 8 km.

RAIN WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE TYPE – II

SIZE 1.0 x 1.0 x 1.5 mts

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

103

5.7 WILD LIFE CONSERVATION PLAN

FENCING THE MINE PITS

The mine will be properly fenced by appropriate methods to prevent accidental fall of any

animal. For this purpose, rubble wall fencing shall be quite useful and cost effective.

BARRIER ZONE

7.5 m all along the Mine lease boundary will be planted with thick vegetation which will

act as a barrier. No mining activity will be carried out in this area.

WATER HOLES & SALT LICKS

Water holes & Salt licks will be made and maintained in the area as per the guidelines of

Local Forest Officer. The mine management will contribute to the conservation plan

prepared by Forest authorities for wild life conservation in the area.

5.8 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY MEASURES TO CONTROL DUST INHALATION

❖ Providing a working environment that is conducive to safety & health

❖ The management of occupational safety & health is the prime responsibility of

mine management from the executive level to the first line supervisory level

❖ Employee involvement and commitment in the implementation of health and

safety guidelines

❖ Provision of all necessary resources

❖ Implementing safety and health management system and assessing the

effectiveness through periodic audits

❖ Setting of safety and health objectives based on comprehensive strategic plans

and measure performance against these plans

❖ Monitoring the effects of mining activities on safety and health and conducting

regular performance reviews

❖ Provision of necessary personal protective equipments

❖ Establishing and maintaining a system of medical surveillance for employees

❖ Ensuring employees at all levels receive appropriate training and are competent to

carry out their duties and responsibilities

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

104

NOISE INDUCED HEARING LOSS (NIHL) Hearing conservation programs exists at all operations. Baseline audiogram forms the

basis for future assessment of employees in terms of hearing loss.

Using engineering initiatives to reduce noise at source is the priority management tool The hearing conservation programme includes the provision of Hearing Protection

Devises (HPDs) and annual audiometry examination of all employees. Apart from

provision of HPDs emphasis is also laid on training the employees responsibility to

protect his/her hearing.

OCCUPATIONAL LUNG DISEASES (OLD) There will be regular health camps for all the workers. Lung function tests, chest X-rays

etc shall be carried out and any health disorders will be evaluated. In house facility for

carrying out this tests and occupation specialists are employed for this facility.

5.9 BUDGET The capital cost for environmental protection and the recurring expenses towards the

pollution control and environmental management measures, socio-economic development

and occupational health and safety, etc are given in details in Table 5.1.

TABLE 5.1: BUDGETARY ESTIMATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

Sl.No Description Item Capital

Cost in RS. Recurring Cost

in Rs. Remarks

1 Air Pollution Dust Suppression Through Water sprinkling.

80,000.00 200,000.00 Water tanker cost @ three Two per day for 8 months

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

105

2 Water

pollution

Garland drain 500m length with 0.5m depth and Siltation Pond with 10m length with 2mt depth & 2mt width and Retaining wall around dump with 40m length with 1m height & 1m width

200,000.00 100,000.00 regular maintenance

3 Green Belt Plantation Development

300,000.00 100,000.00 watering and maintenance

4 Noise Pollution Maintenance of machinery suitably

10,000.00 10,000.00 Included in main cost

PPE’s like Ear muffs 10,000.00 10,000.00 Once in six months

5 Occupational

Health & Safety

Providing First aid kits and fire extinguishers

15,000.00 5,000.00 Once in year, replace by conducting periodical checkup

Providing Personal protective equipment’s to all

employees (Nose Masks, hand gloves, safety shoe and helmets)

300,000.00 467,625.00 Included in air pollution and noise pollution

Training and awareness programs on risk factors during emergencies by the experts

50,000.00 15,000.00

Once in six months and create sign boards about the risk and safety precautions regularly

Periodical medical checkup and supply of medicines

50,000.00 10,000.00 Once in a year and supply of medicines for every three months

6 Environmental

monitoring

Ambient air quality studies – Once in six months – 3 locations

-

25,000.00

MoEF /NABL recognized laboratories

Water quality studies – Once a year – 3 Locations

-

8,000.00

Noise studies – once in six months – 3 Locations

-

7,000.00

Vibration studies – Once in year – 1 location

-

10,000.00

TOTAL 1,015,000.00 967,625.00

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

106

6 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY & SITE)

6.1. ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES:

Mining of quartzite will be taken up by Open cast Semi mechanized method. Hence no

technological failures are anticipated. Hence no alternative technologies are considered

for mining.

6.2. ALTERNATIVE SITES EXAMINED BY SRI P. VENKATA SIVA REDDY:

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy proposed Quartzite & Silica Sand mine over an extent of

08.000 Hect. in Survey No. 677 of Chinthakunta village, Muddanur Mandal, Y.S.R.

Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh. In principle of application of quarry lease Proceedings

issued by Director of Mines and Geology, Ibrahimpatnam, Govt. of A.P for 20 years vide

Proceedings no. 11779/R5-2/2018 Dt: 08.01.2019. Mining Plan was approved by the

Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Kadapa, Government of Andhra Pradesh vide

Letter No. 463/MP/YGL/2019 Dt: 05.02.2019.

Sri. Sri. P. VenkataSiva Reddy have proposed to taken up mining to produce maximum

production of 3,75,000 TPA (average production is 2,92,678 TPA). No alternative sites

have been examined as the Mining lease was granted Dept. of Industries of Commerce

(Mine – I), Govt. of Andhra Pradesh.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

107

7. ADDITIONAL STUDIES

7.1 RISK ASSESSMENT:

Risk assessment is all about prevention of accidents and there is a need to be aware that

there is a risk of an accident before steps can be taken to prevent it happening. This is the

reason, why risk assessments will be carried out. The proposed mining activity will be

opencast semi-mechanized mining project. The anticipated risks are mentioned below:

7.1.1 INUNDATION:

Mining operations will not intercept the ground water table. Therefore, disturbance to

ground water quality or depletion are not envisaged. In order to control the in-rush of

water from the surface or through seepage from the strata during monsoon, sufficient

garland drains will be constructed around the opencast excavation as proposed.

The rain water falling directly into the open excavation will automatically drain out and

there is no need to install pumps except to pump out the rain water collected in the pit

during monsoons from bottom most benches to facilitate mining.

7.1.2. BLASTING:

Blasting causes accidents due improper use of explosives, not taking precautions during

the blasting and release of excessive ground vibrations and fly rocks due to unsystematic

blasting. Control blasting techniques are adopted to minimize the ground vibrations and

ejection of fly rocks. Predesigned blasting parameters will be adopted for the safe

blasting and blasting will be done by the qualified persons taking all the precautions as

prescribed under the Metalli Ferrous Mines Regulations 1961 and the related circular

issued by the Directorate of Mines Safety.

7.1.3. FAILURE OF PIT SLOPE:

Slope failures in mines are mostly associated with circular failure, which is controlled by

the rock mechanics properties such as cohesion, angle of internal friction, joint/shear

planes, ground water

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

108

flow conditions, rock density and the heights to be maintained. To control the above

factors the pits are designed to be developed with benches, with an overall slope angle of

30o. Further the top benches of the will be afforested to provide long term stability. Thus,

the chances of slope failures for the pits are remote. All necessary precautions will be

taken.

7.1.4. FAILURE OF WASTE DUMPS:

Sliding of waste dump will be a severe risk compared with quarry slope failure. Hence, it

is imperative that the degree of hazard against potential failure of waste dump slope

should be identified and that precautionary measures will be adopted, if required. The

height of outside dumps will be restricted to 10m.

The waste dumps will be designed with intermittent berms with an overall slope of 30o. A

strong retaining wall will be constructed at the bottom of the dump to give toe support

and for proper drainage from the waste dump. Garland drains will be provided to collect

the drainage flow. Since the waste dumps will be proposed to be constructed over a hard

rock surface, chances of foundation failures will be remote. As controlled blasting

techniques will be implemented with small size Jackhammer blast holes with limited

explosive charge, there are no chances ground vibrations to reach the dump area and

creating problems of liquefaction. Further the slopes of waste dumps will be afforested to

provide long term stability. Thus, the chances of slope failures for the dumps are remote.

7.1.5. SURFACE FIRE:

Sufficient fire extinguishers will be installed at selected locations on surface like office,

workshop, Garage, Stores etc. for fire protection.

7.1.6. DUST FROM THE DRILLING OPERATION:

The hazard is the inhalation of dust which is created during the drilling operation. While

it is not presently possible to totally remove the hazard, properly applied control

measures can substantially reduce the risk. Control measures vary from using water

during the drilling operation to the provision of local exhaust ventilation which removes

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

109

the dust from the head of the hole to a dust collection unit to the provision of a ventilated

cabin provided for the operator. The most effective of these precautions will be the

provision of a control cabin on the drilling rig provided with a suitable ventilation system

fitted with a dust filter to remove harmful dust and maintain the dust level within the

cabin to below acceptable control levels. Any ventilation equipment should periodically

be examined to ensure that it is maintained to its designed standard.

7.1.7. NOISE:

Drilling, Blasting & movement of vehicles will be given rise to harmful levels of noise.

Both drilling the hole and the operation of the drill rig itself creates noise. It is

impractical to remove the hazard at the hole but new generations of drill rig should be

quieter by virtue of its design. The noise created is harmful to anyone who is within a

zone around the operation of the machine at which the noise level will be above that

considered to be safe for persons to work without having to use control measures.

The noise levels around drilling & blasting equipments should be measured and the risk

assessed. Unless control measures are in place no-one, except those necessary for the

work in hand, should be allowed inside the designated noisy area. In most cases this will

be the operator of the machine. The risk will be highest at older drilling machines. Newer

large drilling machines will be provided with sound insulated operating cabins which

control the noise level within the cabins to acceptable levels. Other control measures will

include providing enclosure, development of green belts in the surrounding areas,

training the operators and providing them with ear protection, although the latter should

only be seen as an interim precaution until a permanent solution can be found. The risk is

very high when no control measures are provided. However, if all the mitigation

measures are provided the risk will be very low.

7.1.8. LOADING:

The main hazard associated with loading is toppling over due to uneven ground, failure

of hydraulic systems, fires and falls while gaining access to operating cabins.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

110

7.1.9. TRANSPORT VEHICLES:

The main hazards arising from the use transport vehicles will be incompetent drivers,

brake failure, lack of all-around visibility from the driver’s position, access to the cab,

vehicle movements particularly reversing, roll over, vibration, noise, dust and

maintenance. The possible risks include the driver and pedestrians likely to be struck by

the vehicle, and drivers of smaller vehicles, which cannot be seen from the cabs of large

vehicles. Visibility defects can be eliminated by the use of visibility aids such rear-view

mirrors.

Good maintenance and regular testing are necessary to reduce the possibility of brake

failure. An area should be earmarked as a testing area where daily tests are carried out on

the effectiveness of a vehicles braking system. Careful attention must be paid to guarding

dangerous parts of the equipment and handling heavy components during maintenance

work. Those most at risk will be the users of the system although casual pedestrians and

vehicle operators may also be at risk.

7.1.10. EXPLOSIVES:

Explosives by virtue of their nature have the potential for the most serious and

catastrophic accidents in the mining industry yet the way they will be used is an excellent

example of how risk assessment is properly applied. For example, no one would allow

any person to use explosives without first having been properly trained in its handling

and use.

Increasingly use of explosives is specialist work. Planning for a round of shots is

necessary to ensure that the face is properly surveyed, holes correctly drilled, direction

logged, the weight of explosive suitable for good fragmentation and the continuity of the

initiator are but a few of the steps necessary to ensure its safe use. Poorly designed shots

can result in misfires, early ignition and flying rock. The more sophisticated type of

explosive demands properly trained persons to carry out the blast design, charge and fire

a round of explosives. Only competent person should be engaged to do this work.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

111

7.2. RISK CONTROL MEASURES:

7.2.1 HOUSE KEEPING:

The provision and maintenance of a safe and healthy workplace will be the most basic

principle of health and safety. Dirty and untidy workplaces or walkways contribute to a

very large proportion of toppling and fall accidents. In the context of surface mining the

provision of well-defined roadways and walkways clear of obstruction, and regular

cleaning up of spillage will greatly reduce the potential for this type of accident. Lack of

maintenance may lead to roadways and walkways being unsuitable for their use.

7.2.2 THE WORK:

The application of risk assessment depends upon a full understanding of all aspects of the

job being undertaken. In carrying out a risk assessment in relation to a particular task the

evaluation must include a review of the knowledge, experience and training of those

persons carrying out the work.

7.2.3 PERSONAL COMPETENCE

If follows that the knowledge, experience and training of personnel involved in work is

critical to the result of any risk assessment. A knowledgeable, experienced well-trained

and competently supervised workforce will be at a lower risk of accidents occurring than

a poorly trained and badly supervised workforce.

7.2.4 CO-ORDINATION:

A qualified & trained person should be given the responsibility for overseeing and

coordinating work. It is essential that the coordinator ensures that everyone engaged in

the work is capable and understands the role of others and their responsibility for each

other. This is particularly important when contract workers undertake part or all of the

work to be carried out.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

112

7.2.5 DANGEROUS PARTS OF MACHINERY:

Parts of machinery such as revolving parts, in running nips and entrapment between

reciprocating parts as defined in European and National standards should be protected to

those standards.

7.2.6 WORKPLACES:

Access to both above and below ground workplaces should be by well constructed and

maintained permanent fixed means. When practical stairways and shallow inclined

walkways are preferred to vertical ladders, which in some circumstances can be the cause

of very high risk. The sides of all workplaces from which persons may fall should always

be protected.

7.2.7 HEALTH HAZARDS:

For the purposes of this document health hazards should be interpreted as being harmful

dust, which will be emitted during surface mining operations, as well as the handling of

heavy loads.

While elimination and often complete suppression at source is not practicable, the norms

for control of health hazards shall be made applicable.

7.2.8 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE):

The PPE should meet ISI standard, suitable for the hazard e.g. a dust respirator fitted with

the correct filter to capture the particular hazardous dust, and maintained to

recommended standards.

As personal protective equipment only affords limited protection it should only be used

as a last resort and then as an interim arrangement until other steps are taken to reduce the

risk of personal injury to an acceptable level.

7.2.9 TRAFFIC MOVEMENT:

The traffic movement should only take place within designated areas and over suitable

roadways.

Adopting one-way traffic movement systems are preferred to two directional traffic

systems. The risk of accidents due to traffic movement is much less with a one.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

113

Whenever mineral will be mined, the first step in winning the product is the preparation

of the site. The four main stages in the site preparation are:

1. Planning 2. Surveying 3. Laying out Planning:

The risk of injuries can be significantly reduced if sufficient regard will be given to

health and safety at the planning stage of a new mine. Using trained drivers can largely

eliminate the danger of being struck by large moving vehicles and providing the vehicles

with suitable appliances, such as aids to ensure the driver has all round visibility.

Designing and implementing one-way traffic systems and ensuring that open edges of

roadways are suitably protected to prevent accidental driving off the edge can further

reduce the danger. Additionally, ensuring that the vehicles are properly maintained in

good working condition, particularly the braking system, will go a long way to help the

driver control the vehicle. Well-designed access and working platforms will also reduce

the possibility of a fall.

Surveying:

Surveying has its hazards, for example surveyors are likely to be seriously injured if they

fall from heights or are thrown out of overturning vehicles. Since the hazards are created

by ground formation it is unlikely that they can be removed. Those normally at risk

would be the surveying team of the surveyor and assistants. Individuals working at the

edge of vertical faces or on very steep undulating ground will be at greater risk than those

working on level ground. Driving over steep rough terrain is more dangerous than driving

over gentle slopes. It is necessary to give clear positive instruction and ensure vehicles

used to gain access to the areas to be surveyed are well maintained and suitable for the

terrain over which access is to be gained.

Lay Out:

There are many different ways of opening of mines, but careful planning particularly

concerning the mine layout will reduce hazards. Good well-maintained equipment is

essential to reduce the risk of injuries. If suitable equipment will not be used, for example

if poor and badly constructed scaffolding is used there will be a much higher probability

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

114

of persons falling from heights or the scaffolding collapsing than if good properly

constructed scaffolding will be used. To reduce the risk of injuries, the vehicle drivers

and those giving signals should be well trained. The lack of training and competence in

the use of such equipment is the biggest cause of accidents.

7.3. DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN:

The complete mining operation will be carried out under the management control and

direction of a qualified mine manager. The DGMS have been issuing a number of

standing orders, model standing orders and circulars to be followed by the mine

management in case of disaster, if any. Moreover, mining staff is being sent to refresher

courses from time to time to keep them alert. Natural calamities such as earthquakes,

landslides, floods etc., can also contribute to disaster. However, following

natural/industrial hazards may occur during normal operation.

• Inundation of mine pit due to flood/excessive rains.

• Accident due to transport & others.

In order to take care of above hazard/disasters the following control measures have been

adopted.

• Regular inspection of the mine for the observance of any visible cracks.

• Checking and regular maintenance of garland drains and earthen bunds to avoid

any inflow of surface water in the mine pit during rainy season.

• Provision of high capacity pumps for pumping out water from the mining pit.

• All safety precautions and provisions of metalliferous mine regulation 1961 is

strictly followed during all mining operations.

• Entry of unauthorized persons is prohibited.

• Fire fighting and first-aid provisions in the mine’s office complex and mining

area.

• Provisions of all the safety appliances such as safety boot, helmets, goggles etc.

are made available to the employees and regular check for their use.

• Cleaning of mine faces is regularly done.

• Regular maintenance and testing of all mining equipment as per manufacture’s

guidelines.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

115

• Suppression of dust on the haulage roads.

• Increasing the awareness of safety and disaster through competitions, posters and

other similar drives.

The management is able to deal with the situation efficiently to reduce confusion keeping

in view of the likely sources of danger in the mine.

7.3.1. STRUCTURE OF THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN OUTLINE OF

DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN:

The purpose of disaster management plan is to restore the normalcy for early resumption

of mining operation due to an unexpected, sudden occurrence resulting to abnormalities

in the course of mining activity leading to a serious danger to workers or any machinery

or the environment.

7.3.2 SYSTEM OF COMMUNICATION:

Having an internal direct communication system for the department head and to their line

of command. Having the telephone nos. and addresses of adjoining mines, rescue station,

police station, Fire service station, local hospital, electricity supply agency and standing

consultative committee members.

7.3.3 FACILITIES & ACCOMMODATION:

Accommodation and facilities for medical centre, rescue room and for various working

groups will be provided.

7.3.4 FIRST AID & MEDICAL FACILITIES:

The mine management will be provided first aid / medical centre for use in emergency

situation. All casualties would be registered and will be given first aid. It will have proper

telephone / wireless set for quick communication with hospitals where the complicated

cases are to be sent.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

116

7.3.5 DISASTER MANAGEMENT TEAM:

In order to handle disaster/emergency situations, an organization chart entrusting

responsibility to various project personnel has been prepared with their specific roles

during emergency.

The composition of the management team:

1. Agent (Mines)

2. Mines Manager

7.3.6 INFRASTRUCTURE:

Following infrastructure and operational system shall be provided to meet any

emergencies.

Emergency control room:

This is situated in an area away from the places of fire and has been provided with the

following facilities:

a. Master plan of the mines.

b. First aid boxes.

c. Telephone line

d. Emergency lighting system.

e. Transport facility.

Emergency control room will function as control base.

Transport Services:

Transportation will be provided to deal with the situation.

Functions of Public Relations Group:

To make a cordial relation with government officials and other social service

organization and working groups. To liaise with representatives of the mine to ameliorate

the situation of panic, tension, sentiments, grievances and misgivings created by any

disaster. To ameliorate the injured, survivors and family members of affected persons by

providing material, finance, moral support and establishing contact with relatives of

victims.

Security:

Manning of security posts

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

117

7.3.7 CARE AND MAINTENANCE DURING TEMPORARY DISCONTINUANCE: If the mine will be discontinued temporarily for more than 120 days, notice will be given

30 days before the date of such discontinuance to the concerned authorities. During

discontinuance period safety arrangement and fencing will be provided to avoid the entry

of unauthorized persons. The accessibility to the mine from the surface will be prevented

by providing fencing arrangement.

7.3.8 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES:

The effects of air pollution on human health are well documented. There are

controversies in many respects, but there is ample evidence to show that air pollution is

definitely a contributing factor to chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Health and Safety

Measures to control dust inhalation; precautions would be adopted to prevent dust

generation at site and dispersing in the environment. For the safety of workers at site,

engaged at strategic dust generation points like loading and unloading points etc., dust

masks would be provided. Dust masks would prevent inhalation of PM thereby reducing

the risk of lung diseases and other respiratory disorders.

Regular health monitoring of workers will be carried out. Lung function test and

audiometry test are the essential part of health checkups as mine workers are prone to

these. To attenuate noise levels, mostly the silencers will be used during operations

wherever possible. Mufflers will be provided to all workers.

The mines management prepares particular budget of Rs.3000 per employee/year for the

health maintenance of all the employees who will be employed at the mine site. Peak

labour force at the site will be 42 during operations, leading to an expenditure of Rs.3.36

lakhs per annum.

Training will be imparted to all the workers for health and safety measures so that they

can use the protective equipment’s essentially and effectively. One resource person will

be developed within the organization to impart the training to all the employees on

regular basis.

Anticipated Occupational & Safety Hazards:

• Health Impact due to

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

118

✓ Physical activity

✓ Extremes of age, poor physical condition, fatigue

✓ Cardiovascular disease

✓ Skin disorders

• Dust exposure

• Noise

• Burns and shocks due electricity

Personal Protective Devices and Measures

Note: PPE’s are purchased based on the manpower requirement EMP for the occupational safety & health hazards:

the health of workers can be protected by adopting the following measures:

• Good Housekeeping practices

• Well engineered ventilation & exhaust system

• Enclosure

• Enforcement of usage of Personal Protective Devices.

• Regular Work Environment Monitoring

• Statistical Monitoring

• Air emission control systems such as water sprinklers, greenbelt development

Frequency of Periodical Examination:

• For employees - <30 Years once in a year

• Between 31-50 Years once in a year

ITEM PROPOSED NUMBERS Industrial Safety helmets 50 Crash helmets 45 Face shield with replacement acrylic vision 50 Ear plug and nose masks 85 Breathing apparatus 05 Leather apron 85 Leather hand gloves 85 Canvas cum leather hand gloves with leather plam 85 Industrial safety shoes with steel toe 45

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

119

• Between 41-50 Years once in a yea

• Above >50 years once in a year

Plan of pre placement and periodical health status of workers:

Pre-employment checkup will be made mandatory and following test will be conducted:

• Plan of evaluation of health of workers

• Chest x rays

• Audiometry

• Spirometry

• Vision testing (Far & Near vision, color vision and any other ocular defect)

• ECG

• Silicosis

• Haemogram (examination of the blood)

• Urine (Routine and Microscopic)

• Complete physical examination

Musculo-skeletal disorders (MSD)

Backache

Pain in minor and major joints

Fatigue, etc.

• Medical records of each employee will be maintained separately and will be

updated as per finding during monitoring.

• Medical records of the employee at the end of his/her term will be updated.

Proposed Budget for Occupational Health & Safety

Expenditure Head Operation and maintenance per annum (42 workers)

Awareness programme Rs. 25,000

Safety equipments Rs. 3,17,625

Medical checkup Rs. 50,000

Medicines to workers & their families Rs. 75,000

Total Rs. 4,67,625

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

120

8. PROJECT BENEFITS 8.1 IMPROVEMENT IN THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT:

8.1.1 AFFORESTATION PLAN:

Under plantation program, it is suggested to develop green belt all along the boundary of

mine lease area. The species to be grown in the areas will be dust tolerant and fast-

growing species so that a permanent green belt is created. The greenbelt will be in

accordance with the CPCB guidelines.

Apart from the green belts and aesthetic plantation for eliminating fugitive emission and

noise control, all other massive plantation efforts will be executed with the assistance of

experts and cooperation of the local community.

8.2. IMPROVEMENT IN THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE:

Local people mainly depend upon agricultural, where the income is irregular and low.

Jobs in the mines will increase there per capital income and improve the life style of the

people. Proper arrangements will be made for safe and healthy conditions such as dust

suppression during loading, unloading & transporting etc. Development of allied business

centers will help to improve social standards of the surrounding villagers.

Infrastructural facilities and earning avenues will improve due to mining activities.

General economic level within the buffer zone will improve, which in turn improves

quality of life; level of education and training, Direct and indirect employment

opportunities will go up. Awareness of Safety and Environment, through the conducting

of Mines Safety & Environment Week, is likely to go up.

CSR activities will be taken up in the villages mainly consisting of contribution to

education, health, training of women self-help groups and contribution to infrastructure.

CSR budget is allocated based 2% of annual quartzite production.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

121

ITEM PARTICULARS EXPENDITURE (RS. IN LAKHS PER

ANNUAM)

1. Education

• Computers & Digital Lab 2.0

2. Health camps 1.0

3. Skill development programmes in villages 1.5

4 Plantation of fruit bearing & medicinal tree species in villages under CSR

0.5

5. Village development programmes like Infrastructure, water supply and sanitation etc in nearby villages

2.0

Total 7.0 Mining will be done with the vision of leaving the positive impact on socio- economics

of people living in the nearby villages. The villages in the buffer zone depend upon

agriculture. Mining operations in the subject area have positive impact by providing job

opportunities. Besides, there is indirect employment in transportation of quartzite to

destinations.

8.3. EMPLOYMENT POTENTIAL:

Following are the personnel proposed to employ to carry out the mining activity.

The mine shall have the following manpower organization.

a. Highly skilled - Second Class Mines Manager - 1

Mine Supervisor - 1

b. Skilled & Semi-skilled

Bore Compressor Operators - 1

Bore Compressor Assistants - 2

Excavator Backhoe Operator - 1

Excavator Backhoe Assistants - 1

Pick-up Drivers - 1

Security Guard - 2

Tippers Drivers & Assistants - 8

Total personnel in Mining Operations - 12

Personnel involved in Crusher Operations - 12

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

122

9: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME

9.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME All the environmental parameters viz. air, water, noise, soil will be monitored regularly in

order to detect any changes from the baseline status. Monitoring program will be

followed till the mining operations continue; every year as per the schedule given below:

9.2 AIR QUALITY MONITORING Four locations in core zone and four locations in the buffer zone will be monitored for

four weeks in every season except monsoon. The Respirable particulate matter shall be

analyzed every 6 months for quartzite concentration.

9.3 NOISE LEVELS MONITORING Noise levels in the working area will be monitored once in every season till the

continuation of operations. Ambient noise levels will also be monitored once in a season

in the buffer zone order to get the overall look of the noise status and its effects on the

surrounding community.

9.4 WATER QUALITY MONITORING Water quality will be monitored in every season. The concentration of heavy metals

especially manganese shall be checked for likely contamination. Seasonal streams near

the mine lease will be used to study the surface water quality. Ground water quality will

also be monitored in order to know the impacts of mining operations. This data will be

compared to baseline to evaluate the weightage of the adopted mitigation measures and if

further corrective measures are needed. Water levels will also be monitored on seasonal

basis in surrounding wells, to assess the impact on ground water regime quantitatively.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

123

9.5 SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT Soil samples will be collected from the core and buffer core zone in the areas where

plantation has started and quality will be checked once every year except monsoon in

order to observe any deviations in the impacts of the operations and the corresponding

improvement in the fertility of the soil in core zone soil.

The monitoring system will also include: (i) Study for slope failures and excess erosions both along the pit and the waste

dumps.

(ii) Study the efficiency of dust collection units established in the screening &

crushing plant.

(iii) Periodic analysis of mine drainage and settling pond discharge water at regular

intervals to monitor suspended solid content in particular and other parameters in

general.

(iv) Study of bunds at the waste dumps area and to maintain the slit arresting

arrangement.

TABLE 9.1: SUMMARY – MONITORING SCHEDULE

S.

No. Monitoring

activity Location Frequency of monitoring

Major parameters to be monitored

1. Micrometeorology At Mine office Weekly once Temp., R.H., rainfall wind speed and directions.

2. Ambient air quality (AAQ)

At least 2 fixed locations in the ML area and 3 fixed locations at the foot hills/ nearby villages based on wind direction and one should be at down wind direction

Preferably monthly once for 24 hours period.

PM2.5, RPM, SO2

and NOx

3. Dust fall rate At one of the AAQ stations in ML area.

Quarterly Total dust fall rate MT/sq.km/month.

4. Work zone noise Noise prone areas of ML area

Bi-monthly once Leq. noi.

Draft EIA Report for 08.000 Ha. of Quartzite & Silica Sand Mine located in Chinthakunta (V), Muddanuru (M), Kadapa District, A.P.

Sri. P. Venkata Siva Reddy

Global Enviro Labs, Hyderabad

124

5. Drinking water From drinking water tap

Quarterly As per IS:10500 (91)

6. Inventory of flora Core zone Every year status, survival rate. 7. Soil quality Core zone Every year Soil fertility for

growth of plants

Environment for implementation of Environment Management Plan Environment

Management Cell will be formed under the control of the Project Manager. The

responsibilities of this cell will be:

1. Implementation of pollution control measures.

2. Monitoring programme implementation.

3. Post-plantation care.

4. To check the efficiency of pollution control measures taken.

5. Any other activity as may be related to environment

6. Seeking expert’s advice when needed.

9.6 CONCLUSION

The mine is proposed to produce maximum production of 3,75,000 TPA (average

production is 2,92,678 TPA) of Quartzite & Silica Sand. The mine shall be worked,

fulfilling all statutory obligations as prescribed by DMG, DGMS, MoEF and APPCB.

The proposals are submitted for Environmental clearance to SEIAA, A.P.

Annexure – A Ambient Air Quality Data Station : A1, Mine Lease Area

S.No. Month Week Date PM 2.5 (µg/m3)

PM 10 (µg/m3)

SO2 (µg/m3) Nox (µg/m3) 06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

1

Oct-19

1st 4/10/2019 13 22 4.2 4.9 4 4.4 5.7 6.6 6.1 6.1

2 7/10/2019 22 31 5.2 4.4 5.7 5.1 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 3

2nd 11/10/2019 17 30 5.4 4.8 6 5.4 6.7 6.8 5.8 6.4

4 14/10/2019 25 33 4.7 5.2 5.8 5.2 6.3 6.2 6.2 6.2 5

3rd 18/10/2019 22 20 4.9 5.8 5.7 5.5 5.9 5.8 6.1 5.9

6 21/10/2019 14 22 5 4.8 6.2 5.3 6.8 6.4 5.8 6.3 7

4th 25/10/2019 27 26 6.1 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.2 5.8 6.8 6.3

8 28/10/2019 19 23 6.1 4.7 5.7 5.5 5.3 5.9 5.9 5.7 1

1st 1/11/2019 16 32 6 6 5.1 5.7 5.5 6 6 5.8

2 Nov-19 4/11/2019 18 29 5.7 4.7 4.8 5.1 5.7 6.7 5.7 6.0 3

2nd 8/11/2019 26 31 6.2 5.7 4.7 5.5 6.7 6.8 6.3 6.6

4 11/11/2019 19 30 5.6 5.5 5.2 5.4 6.6 5.5 6.6 6.2 5

3rd 15/11/2019 27 25 4.7 6.2 5.9 5.6 5.9 5.8 6.1 5.9

6 18/11/2019 21 22 4.5 5.1 6 5.2 6 6.6 5.9 6.2 7

4th 22/11/2019 17 27 4.9 4.5 5.8 5.1 5.8 6.4 6 6.1

8 25/11/2019 19 29 5.7 4.4 4.4 4.8 6.2 6.8 6.3 6.4 1

Dec-19

1st 29/11/2019 25 33 5.9 5.9 4.9 5.6 6.4 5.8 5.7 6.0

2 2/12/2019 19 30 6 5.7 5.2 5.6 6.6 6.6 6.8 6.7 3

2nd 6/12/2019 27 20 5.2 4.9 6.2 5.4 5.8 5.6 6 5.8

4 9/12/2019 22 29 5.9 6 5.7 5.9 6.8 5.7 6.2 6.2 5

3rd 13/12/2019 19 33 5.2 6.2 6.1 5.8 6.2 6.4 6.7 6.4

6 16/12/2019 13 32 4.8 6.1 5.8 5.6 5.7 6.8 5.9 6.1 7

4th 20/12/2019 26 27 4.9 5.9 6.1 5.6 5.8 6.2 6.4 6.1

8 23/12/2019 23 33 4.4 4.8 4.6 4.6 6.7 5.7 6.8 6.4

PM 2.5 PM 10 SO2 Nox Min 13 20 4.4 5.7 Max 27 33 6.1 6.7 Mean 20 29 5.5 6.2 10th percentile 14.6 22 4.9 5.8 30th percentile 18.9 25.9 5.2 6.0 50th percentile 20 29 5.5 6.2 95th percentile 27 33 5.9 6.6 98th percentile 27 33 6.0 6.6 AAQ Standards 60 100 80.0 80.0

Station : A2, Downwind direction

S.No. Month Week Date PM 2.5 (µg/m3)

PM 10 (µg/m3)

SO2 (µg/m3) Nox (µg/m3) 06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

1 Oct-19 1st 4/10/2019 19 35 3.6 5.4 5.2 4.7 6.9 7.1 5.8 6.6 2 7/10/2019 17 39 4.2 4.6 4.5 4.4 5.5 6.9 6.2 6.2 3 2nd 11/10/2019 13 29 3.9 5.3 5.1 4.8 7 6.1 5.9 6.3 4 14/10/2019 22 38 4 5 4.5 4.5 5.8 6 6.1 6.0 5 3rd 18/10/2019 16 37 4.3 6 6 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.6 6 21/10/2019 20 26 4.5 5.4 5.3 5.1 7.2 6.3 7 6.8 7 4th 25/10/2019 19 33 3.8 5.2 4.9 4.6 6.4 5.9 5.6 6.0 8 28/10/2019 17 31 5 4.6 5.5 5.0 6 7.2 6 6.4 1 1st 1/11/2019 21 27 4.4 5.3 4.4 4.7 6.4 6.4 6.9 6.6 2 Nov-19 4/11/2019 15 40 5.7 4.9 4.9 5.2 5.7 6.9 7.2 6.6 3 2nd 8/11/2019 16 28 6 5 6 5.7 6.1 6.9 6.3 6.4 4 11/11/2019 17 26 3.9 5.2 5.3 4.8 7.2 7.2 6.1 6.8 5 3rd 15/11/2019 13 40 6 6 4.4 5.5 5.9 5.6 5.8 5.8 6 18/11/2019 20 36 3.8 5.6 5.1 4.8 7.1 6.4 6.9 6.8 7 4th 22/11/2019 19 35 4.2 4.8 6 5.0 6 5.8 7 6.3 8 25/11/2019 13 35 5.1 4.9 4.5 4.8 7.2 5.5 5.7 6.1 1 Dec-19 1st 29/11/2019 22 36 4.9 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.9 6.9 7.2 6.7 2 2/12/2019 23 40 4 4.7 4.5 4.4 5.5 5.5 6.9 6.0 3 2nd 6/12/2019 14 37 5.5 5.9 5.9 5.8 6.4 6.6 6.4 6.5 4 9/12/2019 20 34 4.2 5.4 5.5 5.0 6 6.4 6.1 6.2 5 3rd 13/12/2019 19 32 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.1 7.2 6.3 7.1 6.9 6 16/12/2019 22 32 3.7 6 5.3 5.0 7 5.7 5.6 6.1 7 4th 20/12/2019 19 40 4.8 4.6 5.5 5.0 6.1 6 7 6.4 8 23/12/2019 14 39 5.6 4.5 4.4 4.8 6.9 5.6 6.9 6.5

PM 2.5 PM 10 SO2 Nox Min 13 26 4.4 5.6 Max 23 40 5.8 6.9 Mean 19 35 5.0 6.4 10th percentile 13.3 27.3 4.5 6.0 30th percentile 16 32 4.8 6.2 50th percentile 19 35 5.0 6.4 95th percentile 22 40 5.6 6.8 98th percentile 22.54 40 5.7 6.9 AAQ Standards 60 100 80 80

Station : A3,Kammavaripalle

S.No. Month Week Date PM 2.5 (µg/m3)

PM 10 (µg/m3)

SO2 (µg/m3) Nox (µg/m3) 06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

1

Oct-19

1st 4/10/2019 27 47 6.5 5.8 6.5 6.3 7.3 8.8 7.2 7.8

2 7/10/2019 25 51 7 6.4 6.1 6.5 7 7.1 7 7.0 3

2nd 11/10/2019 36 55 7.2 6 6.7 6.6 8.5 7.8 8.7 8.3

4 14/10/2019 29 40 6 7.3 7.4 6.9 9 9 7.9 8.6 5

3rd 18/10/2019 30 42 7.5 6.3 5.7 6.5 7.1 7.4 7 7.2

6 21/10/2019 25 41 5.5 6.8 5.9 6.1 7.2 6.4 8.6 7.4 7

4th 25/10/2019 26 48 6.1 5.5 6.3 6.0 8.8 8.3 7.1 8.1

8 28/10/2019 33 46 6.3 5.7 7 6.3 7.5 8.7 8.4 8.2 1

1st 1/11/2019 24 44 5.6 7.4 6.8 6.6 7 7.2 7.6 7.3

2 Nov-19 4/11/2019 37 45 7.5 5.6 5.9 6.3 8.6 8.4 8.4 8.5 3

2nd 8/11/2019 24 49 6.9 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.2 7.2 7.4 7.3

4 11/11/2019 29 55 6.3 6.8 7 6.7 7.9 8.5 9 8.5 5

3rd 15/11/2019 30 46 5.7 6.4 5.7 5.9 7.1 8.3 8.9 8.1

6 18/11/2019 24 40 6.5 6.7 6 6.4 8.2 7.1 8.8 8.0 7

4th 22/11/2019 25 42 6 7.3 6.3 6.5 7.3 8.9 7.5 7.9

8 25/11/2019 38 48 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 7.5 8.5 7.1 7.7 1

Dec-19

1st 29/11/2019 27 55 7 7.2 6.5 6.9 9 7.6 8.4 8.3

2 2/12/2019 28 44 6.1 5.9 7.4 6.5 7.2 8.8 7.5 7.8 3

2nd 6/12/2019 38 48 5.7 7.3 7.3 6.8 8.8 7 7.9 7.9

4 9/12/2019 29 41 6.3 6.1 6.3 6.2 8.9 7.4 8.4 8.2 5

3rd 13/12/2019 30 50 5.5 5.5 5.9 5.6 7 7.8 7 7.3

6 16/12/2019 32 46 5.7 6 6.3 6.0 7.2 7.5 8.4 7.7 7

4th 20/12/2019 28 42 7.4 6.4 6 6.6 8.4 8.5 8.7 8.5

8 23/12/2019 33 47 6.5 5.8 5.7 6.0 7.1 8.7 7 7.6

PM 2.5 PM 10 SO2 Nox Min 24 40 5.6 7.0 Max 38 55 7.1 8.6 Mean 29 46 6.4 7.9 10th percentile 24.3 41 5.9 7.3 30th percentile 26.9 43.8 6.2 7.7 50th percentile 29 46 6.4 7.9 95th percentile 37.85 55 6.9 8.5 98th percentile 38 55 7.0 8.6 AAQ Standards 60 100 80 80

Station : A4, Chinthakunta

S.No. Month Week Date PM 2.5 (µg/m3)

PM 10 (µg/m3)

SO2 (µg/m3) Nox (µg/m3) 06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

1

Oct-19

1st 4/10/2019 25 60 8.2 6.4 6.7 7.1 7.1 7.3 9 7.8

2 9/10/2019 28 49 6.9 7.8 8.1 7.6 8.9 8.8 8.3 8.7 3

2nd 11/10/2019 23 45 6.8 6.7 7 6.8 8 9 8.4 8.5

4 14/10/2019 34 48 7 7.1 7 7.0 7.9 6.5 8.1 7.5 5

3rd 18/10/2019 20 54 7.1 6.4 6.3 6.6 7.5 8.8 7.2 7.8

6 21/10/2019 37 42 8.2 7.5 6.8 7.5 8.1 7.1 7.9 7.7 7

4th 25/10/2019 30 54 7.1 6.4 6.5 6.7 8.3 9 8 8.4

8 28/10/2019 21 48 7.4 8.1 7.4 7.6 6.5 8.7 8.5 7.9 1

1st 1/11/2019 30 60 8 6.9 5.9 6.9 8.8 8.1 7.3 8.1

2 Nov-19 4/11/2019 24 40 6.7 8.3 8.2 7.7 9 7.3 7.9 8.1 3

2nd 8/11/2019 27 54 7.1 7 6.7 6.9 7.2 8.5 6.5 7.4

4 11/11/2019 20 43 6.6 6.5 7.9 7.0 8.3 8.9 7.2 8.1 5

3rd 15/11/2019 22 55 7.3 7.3 6.7 7.1 8.9 8.3 9 8.7

6 18/11/2019 33 40 7.9 6.7 6.3 7.0 6.9 8.3 8.4 7.9 7

4th 22/11/2019 21 38 8.2 8.1 7.8 8.0 7.5 6.8 7.1 7.1

8 25/11/2019 25 55 7.1 7.1 7.3 7.2 7 8.7 9 8.2 1

Dec-19

1st 29/11/2019 30 42 7.5 6.3 6.3 6.7 8.7 8 7.4 8.0

2 2/12/2019 29 60 6.9 8 5.7 6.9 8.1 7.5 6.9 7.5 3

2nd 6/12/2019 22 54 7.1 7.6 6.9 7.2 7.1 6.5 9 7.5

4 9/12/2019 34 47 8.2 6.8 6.6 7.2 7.9 6.5 7 7.1 5

3rd 13/12/2019 29 45 7 5.9 7.1 6.7 8.4 7.2 7.9 7.8

6 16/12/2019 34 43 7.9 7.4 8 7.8 7 9 8.7 8.2 7

4th 20/12/2019 21 50 8.1 6.9 8.2 7.7 8 8.8 8.6 8.5

8 23/12/2019 32 43 8.2 7.5 6.9 7.2 7.4 9 7.1 7.8

PM 2.5 PM 10 SO2 Nox Min 20 38 6.6 7.1 Max 37 60 8.0 8.7 Mean 27.5 48 7.1 7.9 10th percentile 21 40.6 6.7 7.4 30th percentile 22.9 43 6.9 7.8 50th percentile 27.5 48 7.1 7.9 95th percentile 34 60 7.8 8.6 98th percentile 35.62 60 7.9 8.7 AAQ Standards 60 100 80 80

Station : A5, Aravetipalle

S.No. Month Week Date PM 2.5 (µg/m3)

PM 10 (µg/m3)

SO2 (µg/m3) Nox (µg/m3) 06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

1

Oct-19

1st 1/10/2019 25 45 6.5 7 6 6.5 6.5 7.4 6.7 6.9

2 5/10/2019 20 40 7.5 6.4 6.9 6.9 7.5 7.9 7.7 7.7 3

2nd 8/10/2019 23 50 7.2 7.3 7.2 7.2 6.7 7.5 8 7.4

4 12/10/2019 18 38 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.4 6.9 6.8 6.9 6.9 5

3rd 15/10/2019 16 32 6.6 7.6 6.3 6.8 7.5 7.7 6.6 7.3

6 19/10/2019 20 45 6.7 6.6 6 6.4 7.3 7.1 7.3 7.2 7

4th 22/10/2019 22 40 6.8 6.9 6.2 6.6 6.6 8 7.9 7.5

8 26/10/2019 15 35 7.2 6.5 7.2 7.0 7.5 7.3 6.7 7.2 1

1st 29/10/2019 20 32 7 7 7.6 7.2 8 6.5 6.8 7.1

2 Nov-19 2/11/2019 18 42 6.3 6.8 7 6.7 6.8 7.5 7.5 7.3 3

2nd 5/11/2019 21 50 7 7.6 6.7 7.1 7.5 7.4 7.2 7.4

4 9/11/2019 20 43 7.5 6.4 7.3 7.1 7.9 7.9 6.5 7.4 5

3rd 12/11/2019 23 40 6.4 6.2 6 6.2 7 6.5 7.2 6.9

6 16/11/2019 27 50 7.2 6.1 7.5 6.9 6.7 8 6.7 7.1 7

4th 19/11/2019 20 38 7.5 7.5 6.4 7.1 6.6 7 7.9 7.2

8 23/11/2019 26 32 6.8 6.9 7 6.9 6.5 7.4 6.8 6.9 1

Dec-19

1st 26/11/2019 21 35 6.9 7.5 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.5 6.5 7.1

2 30/11/2019 23 50 6.2 6.3 6 6.2 6.9 6.6 7.3 6.9 3

2nd 3/12/2019 25 43 7 7 6.2 6.7 7.5 7.3 7.7 7.5

4 7/12/2019 20 40 7.6 6.7 7.5 7.3 6.6 7.2 6.5 6.8 5

3rd 10/12/2019 23 44 6.5 6.2 6.4 6.4 7.7 6.7 6.9 7.1

6 14/12/2019 26 45 6.9 7.1 6 6.7 6.6 6.5 7.4 6.8 7

4th 17/12/2019 19 42 6.4 6.5 6.2 6.4 8 7.9 8 8.0

8 21/12/2019 21 38 7.5 7.4 6.9 7.3 7.7 7.4 6.9 7.3

PM 2.5 PM 10 SO2 Nox Min 15 32 6.2 6.8 Max 27 50 7.3 8.0 Mean 21 41 6.9 7.2 10th percentile 18 32.9 6.4 6.9 30th percentile 20 38 6.6 7.1 50th percentile 21 41 6.9 7.2 95th percentile 26 50 7.3 7.7 98th percentile 26.54 50 7.3 7.8 AAQ Standards 60 100 80 80

Station : A6, Denepalle

S.No. Month Week Date PM 2.5 (µg/m3)

PM 10 (µg/m3)

SO2 (µg/m3) Nox (µg/m3) 06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

1

Oct-19

1st 1/10/2019 25 40 5.5 6 6.9 6.1 7.2 7.5 7.5 7.4

2 5/10/2019 32 45 6.3 5.3 6.5 6.0 8.2 8.5 7.1 7.9 3

2nd 8/10/2019 25 43 6.4 5.5 5.6 5.8 7.8 7.9 8.2 8.0

4 12/10/2019 27 39 5.6 6.4 5.5 5.8 7 7.5 8.5 7.7 5

3rd 15/10/2019 32 35 7 5.5 6.9 6.5 8.5 7.4 7.1 7.7

6 19/10/2019 28 40 5.4 6.3 5.5 5.7 7.1 8.3 7.4 7.6 7

4th 22/10/2019 34 35 5.9 5.6 6.2 5.9 7.5 8 8.5 8.0

8 26/10/2019 23 38 6 6.5 6.4 6.3 8.5 7.2 7 7.6 1

1st 29/10/2019 28 43 5.5 5.9 7 6.1 7.8 8.5 7.3 7.9

2 Nov-19 2/11/2019 25 41 7 5.5 6.9 6.5 8 7.6 8.3 8.0 3

2nd 5/11/2019 28 39 5.8 6.9 5.6 6.1 7.1 8.3 7.5 7.6

4 9/11/2019 31 38 5.6 5.5 6.1 5.7 7.4 7 7.9 7.4 5

3rd 12/11/2019 25 45 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.3 7.9 7.4 7.4 7.6

6 16/11/2019 27 35 5.6 6.5 6.8 6.3 7.5 8.5 7.2 7.7 7

4th 19/11/2019 24 48 5.9 6.1 5.5 5.8 7.2 8.2 7.3 7.6

8 23/11/2019 28 36 6.9 5.7 6.5 6.4 7.6 7.3 8.4 7.8 1

Dec-19

1st 26/11/2019 26 33 5.5 6 6 5.8 8.2 7.6 7.1 7.6

2 30/11/2019 27 41 5.8 6.3 7 6.4 8.5 7.9 7.5 8.0 3

2nd 3/12/2019 29 38 7 5.6 5.9 6.2 7 8.3 7.1 7.5

4 7/12/2019 32 45 5.7 6.9 5.6 6.1 8.5 7.5 8 8.0 5

3rd 10/12/2019 25 40 7 5.9 5.7 6.2 7.9 7.2 8.3 7.8

6 14/12/2019 25 52 5.5 5.7 7 6.1 7.5 8.5 7 7.7 7

4th 17/12/2019 23 38 6 5.6 6 5.9 7.1 8.3 8 7.8

8 21/12/2019 28 52 5.9 5.8 5.9 5.9 6 7.1 8.5 7.2

PM 2.5 PM 10 SO2 Nox Min 23 33 5.7 7.2 Max 34 52 6.5 8.0 Mean 27 40 6.1 7.7 10th percentile 24.3 35 5.8 7.4 30th percentile 25 38 5.9 7.6 50th percentile 27 40 6.1 7.7 95th percentile 32 51.4 6.5 8.0 98th percentile 33.08 52 6.5 8.0 AAQ Standards 60 100 80 80

Station : A7, Mangapatnam

S.No. Month Week Date PM 2.5 (µg/m3)

PM 10 (µg/m3)

SO2 (µg/m3) Nox (µg/m3) 06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

1

Oct-19

1st 1/10/2019 17 51 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.6 7.5 7.5 9 8.0

2 5/10/2019 19 52 6.3 5.4 7.2 6.3 7.2 7.2 6.8 7.1 3

2nd 8/10/2019 23 45 5.6 7.7 6.4 6.6 8.2 6.7 8.1 7.7

4 12/10/2019 27 53 6.4 5.9 5.6 6.0 8.9 7.6 6.5 7.7 5

3rd 15/10/2019 21 42 5.8 7.3 7.3 6.8 6.9 6.5 8.9 7.4

6 19/10/2019 18 45 7.6 5.7 5.4 6.2 6.5 6.9 7.5 7.0 7

4th 22/10/2019 25 50 5.4 6.3 7.3 6.3 9.1 8.3 8.3 8.6

8 26/10/2019 24 39 5.6 7.5 5.9 6.3 8.3 9.2 6.5 8.0 1

1st 29/11/2019 27 41 6 5.5 5.5 5.7 7.6 8.9 7.1 7.9

2 Nov-19 2/11/2019 30 45 7.5 6.4 7.3 7.1 6.9 6.6 9 7.5 3

2nd 5/11/2019 21 47 5.5 7.3 6.4 6.4 8.2 6.8 6.8 7.3

4 9/11/2019 30 53 6.9 5.6 5.7 6.1 8.8 8.9 7.2 8.3 5

3rd 12/11/2019 23 45 7.7 6.3 7.2 7.1 6.5 6.9 8.8 7.4

6 16/11/2019 32 50 5.8 7.5 5.4 6.2 8.3 7.7 8.1 8.0 7

4th 19/11/2019 28 45 6.4 6.8 7.3 6.8 7.3 7.5 6.8 7.2

8 23/11/2019 26 52 7.5 7.9 6 7.1 8.2 6.6 8.9 7.9 1

Dec-19

1st 26/11/2019 32 42 6 5.8 5.5 5.8 6.6 6.5 7.5 6.9

2 30/11/2019 29 47 5.5 5.9 5.9 5.8 9 9.1 7.1 8.4 3

2nd 3/12/2019 17 50 6.7 7.5 7.3 7.2 6.5 6.7 7.2 6.8

4 7/12/2019 30 39 6.2 5.5 7.6 6.4 7.2 7.6 6.6 7.1 5

3rd 10/12/2019 22 44 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.7 6.7 8.4 7.5 7.5

6 14/12/2019 27 50 7.2 6.4 7.5 7.0 7.5 6.9 9 7.8 7

4th 17/12/2019 21 40 6 7.6 5.8 6.5 8.1 6.5 6.5 7.0

8 21/12/2019 25 56 5.5 6.4 5.7 5.9 8.9 8.4 7.3 8.2

PM 2.5 PM 10 SO2 Nox Min 17 39 5.7 6.8 Max 32 56 7.6 8.6 Mean 25 46 6.4 7.6 10th percentile 18.3 40.3 5.8 7.0 30th percentile 21.9 44.9 6.2 7.3 50th percentile 25 46 6.4 7.6 95th percentile 31.7 53 7.2 8.4 98th percentile 32 54.62 7.4 8.5 AAQ Standards 60 100 80 80

Station : A8, Shettivaripalle

S.No. Month Week Date PM 2.5 (µg/m3)

PM 10 (µg/m3)

SO2 (µg/m3) Nox (µg/m3) 06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

06-14 hrs

15-22 hrs

23-06 hrs

24 hrs average

1

Oct-19

1st 1/10/2019 16 33 5.4 5.4 6.3 5.7 7.3 7.1 6.1 6.8

2 5/10/2019 27 40 5.1 4.8 6.5 5.5 7.9 8.4 6.3 7.5 3

2nd 8/10/2019 22 36 6.2 5.9 5.4 5.8 8.4 7.2 6.2 7.3

4 12/10/2019 15 39 5.4 5.7 5 5.4 6.1 6.1 8.4 6.9 5

3rd 15/10/2019 19 29 5.9 5 6.2 5.7 8.2 8.3 7.9 8.1

6 19/10/2019 30 25 6.3 6.1 5.1 5.8 6.5 7.3 7.3 7.0 7

4th 22/10/2019 25 38 6 5 5.5 5.5 7.9 6.5 6.5 7.0

8 26/10/2019 20 32 5 5.9 6.4 5.8 6.3 7.5 8.2 7.3 1

1st 29/10/2019 19 47 6.1 5.4 6.3 5.9 8.3 7.3 8.5 8.0

2 Nov-19 2/11/2019 27 29 6.2 6.3 5.7 6.1 6.5 7.8 6.9 7.1 3

2nd 5/11/2019 15 48 5.9 5 5.1 5.3 6 7.5 8.4 7.3

4 9/11/2019 31 34 5.5 5.4 5.9 5.6 8.4 8.3 6 7.6 5

3rd 12/11/2019 17 36 5.9 5.9 5.3 5.7 6.2 6.2 7.4 6.6

6 16/11/2019 27 40 6.3 5.7 6.3 6.1 8.5 6.5 7.2 7.4 7

4th 19/11/2019 20 38 5.7 6.1 6 5.9 8.2 8.2 6.1 7.5

8 23/11/2019 31 47 5 6.3 5.5 5.6 6.5 8.1 8.1 7.6 1

Dec-19

1st 26/11/2019 16 32 5.9 5.5 6.3 5.9 7.5 7.5 6.1 7.0

2 30/11/2019 27 39 5.3 6 5.7 5.7 8.4 7.4 7.1 7.6 3

2nd 3/12/2019 30 40 5.9 5.7 6.1 5.9 7.9 6.1 6 6.7

4 7/12/2019 22 38 5 5.5 5 5.2 7.3 6.5 6.5 6.8 5

3rd 10/12/2019 31 29 5.4 6.2 5.4 5.7 6 8.4 7.9 7.4

6 14/12/2019 21 32 5.1 5 6.2 5.4 7.2 7.1 7.3 7.2 7

4th 17/12/2019 32 39 5.4 6.3 5.1 5.6 8.5 7.8 6 7.4

8 21/12/2019 25 45 6.1 5 6.1 5.7 6.2 6.1 8.4 6.9

PM 2.5 PM 10 SO2 Nox Min 15 25 5.2 6.6 Max 32 48 6.1 8.1 Mean 23.5 38 5.7 7.3 10th percentile 16 29 5.4 6.8 30th percentile 19.9 32.9 5.6 7.0 50th percentile 23.5 38 5.7 7.3 95th percentile 31 47 6.0 8.0 98th percentile 31.54 47.54 6.1 8.1 AAQ Standards 60 100 80 80

Annexure – B Water Quality Data

SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS

S.No Description Unit SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 SW 4 SW 5

1 Ph 7.92 7.76 8.42 8.11 7.9 IS:3025 (Part–10) 1984 2 Electric conductivity (Mcrosiemens/cm) 732 778 714 745 725 3 Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L) 542 568 512 530 560 IS:3025 (Part–16) 1984 4 Total hardness as CaCO3 (mg/L) 136 122 82 110 92 IS:3025 (Part–21 1983 5 Calcium as CaCO3 (mg/L) 112 74 54 62 70 IS:3025 (Part–40) 1991 6 Magnesium as CaCO3 (mg/L) 24 48 28 48 36 7 Total Alkalinity (mg/L) 32 24 46 118 110 IS:3025 (Part–13) 1964 8 Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/L) 24 32 18 28 26 9 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/L) 8 12 4 5 6

10 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) 6.8 5.4 6.2 4.6 4.9 11 Oil & Grease (mg/L) 0.15 0.12 0.31 0.1 0.1 12 Chlorides as Cl (mg/L) 74 108 92 53 59 IS:3025 (Part–32) 1988 13 Flourides as F (mg/L) 0.19 0.26 0.34 0.2 0.3 IS:3025 (Part–23) 1964 14 Nitrates as NO3 (mg/L) 0.14 0.25 0.08 0.95 0.6 IS:3025 (Part–34) 1988 15 Nitrites as NO2 (mg/L) 0.35 0.18 0.22 0.24 0.21 16 Sulphates as SO4 (mg/L) 52 46 38 40 37 IS:3025 (Part–24) 1986 17 Phosphates as PO4 (mg/L) 4.5 5.9 5.1 4.2 5.3 18 Sodium as Na (mg/L) 64 92 74 64 66 19 Potassium as K (mg/L) 0.82 0.74 0.68 1.2 0.77 20 Iron as Fe (mg/L) 0.08 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.04 IS:3025 (Part–32) 1964 21 Boron as B (mg/L) - - - - - IS:3025 (Part–29) 1964 22 Copper as Cu (mg/L) - - - - - IS:3025 (Part–36) 1964 23 Lead as Pb (mg/L) - - - - - 24 Zinc as Zn (mg/L) - - - - - IS:3025 (Part–39) 1964 25 Chromium as Cr (mg/L) - - - - - IS:3025 (Part–38) 1964 26 Aluminium as Al (mg/L) - - - - - IS:3025 (Part–31) 1964 27 Total Coliforms Cfu/100ml 64 58 52 48 49 28 Feacal Coliforms Cfu/100ml 16 8 10 7 6 29 E. coli Cfu/100ml 7 6 4 5 4

Annexure – B Water Quality Data

GROUND WATER ANALYSIS

S.No. Description Units 1 2 3 4 5 6 IS 10500 WATER STANDARDS

DESIRABLE PERMISSIBLE 1 pH 7.96 7.63 7.79 7.45 8.12 7.37 7.5-8.5 7.5-8.5 2 Electric conductivity (Mcrosiemens/cm) 1538 1261 1108 1325 1432 1367 -- -- 3 Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L) 1035 896 795 954 1010 968 500 2000 4 Total hardness as CaCO3 (mg/L) 235 180 186 162 204 214 300 600 5 Calcium as CaCO3 (mg/L) 174 132 144 126 155 160 75 200 6 Magnesium as CaCO3 (mg/L) 61 48 42 36 49 54 30 100 7 Total Alkalinity (mg/L) 124 84 73 84 76 85 200 600 8 Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) 5.2 6.4 5.1 5.3 5.1 6.1 -- -- 9 Chlorides as Cl (mg/L) 122 78 83 84 82 71 250 1000

10 Flourides as F (mg/L) 0.52 0.56 0.63 0.71 0.52 0.38 0.6-1.2 1.5 11 Nitrates as NO3 (mg/L) 1.11 1.25 1.12 1.21 1.32 1.28 45 100 12 Sulphates as SO4 (mg/L) 78 82 73 79 86 69 200 400 13 Phosphates as PO4 (mg/L) 2.01 1.74 1.54 2.01 1.65 2.12 -- -- 14 Sodium as Na (mg/L) 94 78 82 84 89 88 -- -- 15 Potassium as K (mg/L) 0.66 0.54 0.61 0.66 0.54 0.55 -- -- 16 Iron as Fe (mg/L) 0.035 0.019 0.025 0.03 0.032 0.05 0.3 1 17 Boron as B (mg/L) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 1 5 18 Copper as Cu (mg/L) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05 1.5 19 Lead as Pb (mg/L) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05 0.05 20 Zinc as Zn (mg/L) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 5 15 21 Chromium as Cr (mg/L) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.05 0.05 22 Aluminium as Al (mg/L) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 -- --

Annexure – C Soil Quality Data

Soil Quality Data

S. No Parameters 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Ph (1:2 Soil water Extract) 7.93 6.93 8.84 7.25 8.12 6.54

2 Electrical conductivity (micro mhos)

154 178 188 136 124 168 (1:2 Soil water Extract)

3 Total soluble salts, mg/kg 110 129 148 86 132 96 4 Nitrates as N, (mg/kg) 72 59 66 59 55 73 5 Phophorous as (P2O5) (mg/kg) 40 33 52 43 45 50 6 Potassium as (K2O) (mg/kg) 36 27 48 33 31 36 7 Sodium as Na2O (mg/kg) 78 75 104 78 106 78 8 Calcium as Ca (mg/kg) 92 102 107 96 76 112 9 Magnesium as Mg (mg/kg) 104 78 92 92 84 94

10 Chlorides as Cl (mg/kg) 90 72 86 74 86 88 11 Organic carbon (%) 0.76 0.64 1.12 0.79 0.72 0.82 12 Texture 13 Sand (%) 36 40 30 46 42 48 14 Silt (%) 38 24 35 24 20 26 15 Clay (%) 26 36 35 30 38 26

16 Type of Soil Clayey sandy

Clayey sandy

Clayey sandy

Clayey sandy

Sandy Clay

Clayey Loam

17 Copper as Cu mg/kg 0.44 0.82 0.89 0.86 0.72 0.84 18 Zinc as Zn mg/kg 0.85 0.5 0.68 0.74 0.6 0.54 19 Maganese as Mn mg/kg 0.066 0.74 0.42 0.79 0.36 0.62

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

1

Ecology and Biodiversity of P.Venkatasiva Reddy Quartzite and Silica

Sand Mine (08.00 Ha)

T.o.R Lr.No. SEIAA/AP/KDP/MIN/03/2019/851-283 dt.14-5-2019

1(a):STANDARD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR CONDUCTING ENVIRONMENT

IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY FOR NON-COAL MINING PROJECTS AND

INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN EIA/EMP REPORT

Brief Introduction to the mine lease area:

It is a new Quartzite and Silica sand mine of 37,500 TPA located on the slopes

of a hill in survey No.677 of Chintakunta Village, Muddanuru Mandal, Kadapa District , Andhra Pradesh. The total mine lease area (MLA) is 8 Ha. It is a non-

forest wasteland covered with thorny bushes. It extends from the base to the slopes of a hill. It is densely covered with thorny bushes at the bottom of the hill while the slopes are sparsely covered thorny shrubs, grasses, rocks and huge

boulders. Since it is a non-forest wasteland coved by thorny bushes and non-palatable perennial grasses it is unsuitable for cultivation. There are no trees but

many thorny bushes were found. There are no plantations or croplands or water bodies or human settlements in the mine lease area. There are a total of six

similar mines within a radius of 500 m.

There are dry deciduous scrub forests or firewood forests in the buffer zone but

no ecologically sensitive areas such as Biosphere Reserves, National Parks or Wildlife Sanctuaries or Important Bird Areas (IBAs) other protected areas within a distance of 10 Km from the MLA. There are no wetlands or reservoirs or rivers

either in the core area or its buffer zone. Only small seasonal streams and dry village tanks were present. Similarly, there are no reports or indications of

presence of any rare or endangered or threatened (RET) species of flora or fauna

either in the core area or its buffer zone.

Wherever ground water was available, Battayi (Batavia sp), Curry leaf (Murraya koenigii), Muskmelon (Cumis melo), Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus), Honeydew

melon (Cumis melo variety) and vegetables were grown. Jowar, Sorghum, Maize, Sunflower, Cotton, Chillies, Tomato, Groundnut, Red gram, Green gram, Black gram, Horse gram, Chickpea, Onion as well Chrysanthimum, Tagetus were grown.

There are also small plantations of Eucalyptus, Teak and orchards of Batavia, Mango, Sapota, Gauva, Pomegranate, Papaya and Lime. Croplands are small,

scattered and isolated. There is no assured irrigation. Cultivation is dependent on rains and groundwater. There are scattered hillocks sparsely covered with succulents and thorny bushes of Ziziphus horrida. But the most conspicuous

feature of these dry hillocks is the presence of hill neem (Chukrasia tabularis) as

isolated trees especially on hill tops

The mine lease area is not eco-sensitive and there are no National Parks,

Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Ramsar site Tiger/ Elephant

Reserves/(existing as well as proposed), within 10 Km of the mine lease. A

survey of flora and fauna of the mine lease area (core area) and the buffer zone

of 10Km radius was undertaken by the NABET Accredited FAE in E&B (Category

A) during December 2019.

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

2

15) The vegetation in the RF / PF areas in the study area, with necessary details,

should be given.

There are no protected forests within the 10 Km buffer zone unless the

agroforests are treated as protected forests.

A list of Reserved forests (RF), agroforests or plantations and the Orchards

found in the 10 Km buffer zone are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. List of Reserved Forests (RF) and Protected Forests (PF) found in the

buffer zone of the Mine lease

Name of the RF / PF Direction WRT the mine lease Shortest

Distance

Bhanukotamala RF South to Southwest 4Km

Muddulapaya RF Southwest 8 Km

Yamavaram RF Northeast 3.5Km

Gandikota South RF North 5Km

Protected forests (PF) None ---

Private agroforests / plantations Scatted in all directions

Eucalyptus hybrid (clones) Scatted in all directions

Tectona grandis Scatted in all directions

Orchards

Mango (Mangifera indica) Scatted in all directions

Sweet Lime (Citrus aurantifolia) Scatted in all directions

Nearly about 1625.45 Km 2 (35.95%) of total area was under Kadapa Forest Division but only 25.63% or 1,928.69 Km2 was under the notified forest area of the Division as per the Andhra Pradesh State of Forest Report 2011. The forests

of Kadapa forest division belong to the Southern tropical dry deciduous, Southern tropical thorn mixed, Tropical dry evergreen and dry red sanders bearing forest

types as per Champion and Seth's classification. The reserve forests occurring in the buffer zone of the mine lease area are open to moderately dense, dry deciduous scrub jungles. The forests in the buffer zone fall under the Vontimitta

Foest Range of Kadapa Division. There are no dense forests. They are dominated

mostly by thorny fuelwood species.

The important distinction of the forests in Kadapa Division is the occurrence of the most valuable endemic Red Sanders (Pterocaropus santalinus). Red Sanders

occur mostly in hill forests between 800 and 2000 feet and Shorea roxburghii another threatened species replaces Red sanders above 2000 feet. Another

endemic living fossil recorded from the area between the elevation of 800 and 2000 feet in the district is Cycas beddomei. It is endemic to Kadapa and Tirupati Hills and is an endangered plant. But none of these three species are found in

any of the hills in and around the mine lease area. Among the birds, a 246.30 Km2 sanctuary (Sri Lankamalleswara Wildlife Sanctuary) has been created

specifically for Kalivi Kodi or Jerdon's courser (Rhinoptilus bitorquatus) an evasive and endangered nocturnal bird in the district and the sanctuary is over 50 Km

from the mine lease area.

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

3

The wild and forest vegetation is mostly represented by thorny bushes and cacti

along with a few drought resistant shrubs. The vegetation is characteristic of

semiarid climate.

16) A study shall be got done to ascertain the impact of the Mining Project on wildlife of the study area and details furnished. Impact of the project on the wildlife in the surrounding and any other protected area and accordingly, detailed mitigative measures required, should be worked out with cost implications and submitted.

There are no Wildlife sanctuaries or National Parks or Biosphere Reserves or

Important Bird Areas (IBAs) or Wetlands of National or International importance

other than the irrigation tanks. Detailed list of flora, fauna and biodiversity of the

core area (Mine lease area) as well as the 10 Km buffer zone and the most likely

impacts of the mining on Ecology and Biodiversity is given under T.o.R point No.18

17) Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Ramsar site Tiger/ Elephant Reserves/(existing as well as proposed), if any, within 10 km of the mine lease should be clearly indicated, supported by a location map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden. Necessary clearance, as may be applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as mentioned above, should be obtained from the Standing Committee of National Board of Wildlife and copy furnished.

There are no Wildlife sanctuaries or National Parks or Biosphere Reserves or

Important Bird Areas (IBAs) or Wetlands of National or International importance

other than the irrigation tanks. The core area is a revenue wasteland land and it

is unsuitable for cultivation. Hence, no NOC from Standing Committee of National

Board of Wildlife is required.

18) A detailed biological study of the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km radius of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, endangered, endemic and RET Species duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based on such primary field survey, clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In case of any scheduled I fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan along with budgetary provisions for their conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for implementing the same should be made as part of the project cost.

Vegetation and flora of the core area:

The total mine lease area (MLA) is 8 Ha out of which about 50% will not be disturbed during the first five years. The MLA is a non-forest wasteland sparsely

colonized mainly by Ziziphus horrida, Carissa spinarum, Canthium parviflorum, Cymbopogon coloratus, Waltheria indica, Alhagi camelorum, Neem and others as shown in Table 2. There are only a few small Neem trees in the entire mine area.

There are no houses or plantations or croplands in the core area. A list of plants found in the mine lease area is given in Table 2. The MLA is widely covered with

dry perennial grasses of Cymbopon coloratus which is used for thatching purposes and Waltheria indica. In the core area as well as in the wastelands around the

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

4

MLA, Ziziphus horrida, Carissa spinarum, Acacia horrida, Mesquite (Prosopis

juliflora), Calotropis procera, and Waltheria indica were most widespread, abundant and dominant. In addition to the shrubs mentioned above, there are

a few perennial climbers such as Ichnocarpus frutescens (Black creeper), Pergularia daemia, Sarcostemma secamone, Tylophora indica, Swallow root (Decalepis hamiltoni), Aganosma cymosa, Wattakaka volubilis and Cassytha

filiformis.

Most of the grasses and herbaceous species have completed their life and died but yet to be withered away. Most of them could be easily identified based on the presence of a few live shoots, standing dead shoots with fruits or inflorescences

intact and other diagnostic features. Cymbopogon coloratus, a perennial, non-palatable lemon scented grass was extensively abundant both in forest areas as

well non forest hillocks The grasses seemed to cover the huge gaps left by the

perennial shrubs and as such it is expected to be green during the rainy season.

A list of plant species found in the core area (MLA) is given in Table 2. Ziziphus horrida, Carissa spinarum, Prosopis juliflora, Canthium parviflorum, Cymbopogon

coloratus and Waltheria indica were most abundant in the mine lease area.

Table 2. List of trees, shrubs, perennial climbers and grasses found in the mine

lease area (Core area) during the winter season.

Scientific name Local /Common name Family

Acacia horrida Paakithumma Mimosaceae

Acacia leucophloea Tella thumma Mimosaceae

Acacia nilotica Nalla thumma Mimosaceae

Agave americana Kalabanda Agavaceae

Alhagi camelorum Camel thorn Fabaceae

Anisomeles indica Chinna Ranabheri Lamiaceae

Aristolochia indica Eswaraveru Aristolochiaceae

Azadirachta indica Vepa Meliaceae

Azima tetracantha Tella Uppili Salvadoraceae

Benkara malabarica Nalla Balusu Rubiaceae

Breynia vitis-idaea Konda Sambrani Euphorbiaceae

Calotropis procera Jilledu Asclepiadaceae

Canthium dicoccum Balusu Rubiaceae

Capparis sepiaria Nalla vuppi Capparidaceae

Caralluma adscendens Kundeti Kommulu Apocynaceae

Caralluma umbellata Kundeti kommulu Asclipiadaceae

Carissa spinarum Vaaka / Kalivi Apocynaceae

Cassia auriculata Tangedu Caesalpiniaceae

Cissus quadrangularis Nalleru Vitaceae

Cassytha filiformis Green thread creeper Lauraceae

Chukrasia tabularis Konda Vepa Meliaceae

Cissus quadrangularis Nalleru Vitaceae

Colebrookea oppositifolia Indian Squirrel tail Lamiaceae

Cymbopogon coloratus Bodha gaddi Poaceae

Cynodon dactylon Garika gaddi Poaceae

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

5

Decalepis hamiltonii Swallow root Asclepiadaceae

Dodonaea viscosa Bandedu Sapindaceae

Echinops echinatus Mulla banthi Asteraceae

Eremopogon foveolatus Kari Gaddi Poaceae

Euphorbia antiquorum Bontha jamudu Euphorbiaceae

Euphorbia tortillis Naaga jamudu Euphorbia tortillis

Ficus arnottiana Banda Raavi Moraceae

Ficus microcarpa Juvvi Moraceae

Ficus tinctoria Konda Juvvi Moraceae

Gardenia gummifera Bakki Rubiaceae

Hemidesmus indicus Ananta mool Asclepiadaceae

Holoptelia integrifolia Nemali Naara Ulmaceae

Jatropha gossypifolia Wild Castor Euphorbiaceae

Lantana camara Lantana Verbenaceae

Lepidagathis cristata Nakka Pintuka Acanthaceae

Leptadenia reticulata Mukkupala Teega Asclepiadaceae

Maytenus emerginata Danti Celastraceae

Mimosa rubicaulis Pariki kampa Mimosaceae

Opuntia dillenii Brahma Jemudu Cactaceae

Pergularia daemia Dori Asclepiadaceae

Phoenix sylvestris Eetha Arecaceae

Prosopis juliflora Mesquite Mimosaeceae

Prosopis spicigera Jammi chettu Mimosaceae

Physalis peruviana Cape goose berry Solanaceae

Sarcostemma secamone, Moon creeper Asclepiadaceae

Solanum torvum Vusti / Konda Vusti Solanaceae

Tarenna asiatica Kommi Rubiaceae

Tylophora indica Tippa Teega Asclepiadaceae

Waltheria indica Nalla benda Ssterculiaceae

Wattakaka volubilis Doodi paala teega Asclepiadaceae

Wrightia tinctoria Ankudu Chettu Apocynaceae

Ziziphus horrrida Tella regu Rhamnaceae

Ziziphus marutiana Regu Chettu Rhamnaceae

Ziziphus nummularia Nela Regu Rhamnaceae

Vegetation and flora of the buffer area:

There are Gandikota, Yamavaram, Bhaukotamala and Muddulapaya reserved

forest blocks in the buffer zone. There are small and scattered orchards of Mango, Batavia, Guava, Sapota and Pomegranate and small plots of Teak and Eucalyptus. Most part of the buffer zone is represented by current fallows and dry hills with

windmills on top. There are small quarries but no large scale mining activity. Most non cultivable wastelands ware colonized mainly by Ziziphus horrida, Prosopis

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

6

juliflora, Carissa spinarum, Acacia horrida, Canthium parviflorum, Caltropis

procera, Cymbopogon coloratus etc. The people of the area seemed to have given fairly good preference to Neem and hill Neem (Chukraisa tabularis) is easily the

most common and dominant cultivated tree. Almost all tropical native or naturalized exotic species of trees such as Subabul and Eucalyptus are grown as avenue trees. A list of plant species found in the buffer zone of the MLA including

the species found in the reserved forests is given in Table 3. It may be noted that majority of the species found in the study are either thorny scrubs or

xerophytes. Perennial climbers / twiners /stragglers are also fairly common. Ziziphus horrida, Carissa spinarum, Acacia horrida, Canthium parviflorum, Alhagi camelorum, Securinega leucopyra, Wrightia tinctorea, Cassia auriculata, Euporbia

antiuorum, Euphorbia tortillis and Holoptelia integrifolia are quite abundant and widely scattered. There are no rare or endangered or endemic or threatened

(REET) plant species within the buffer zone of 10 Km. Similarly, there are no thick rain forests or biosphere reserves or national parks or wildlife sanctuaries or other ecologically sensitive areas within a radius of 10 Km from the MLA.

Table 3. List of plants found in the buffer zone of the mine lease area.

Scientific name Local / common

name

Family Habit

Abrus precatorius Guriginja Fabaceae Climber

Abutilon indicum Adavibenda Malvaceae Shrub

Acacia eburnea Marmathi Mimosaceae Tree

Acacia leucopholea Tella tumma Mimosaceae Tree

Acacia nilotica Nalla tumma Mimosaceae Tree

Acacia pennata Climbing Acacia Mimosaceae Climber

Acacia sinuata Shikaya Mimosaceae Climber

Achyranthes aspera Uthareni Amaranthaceae Herb

Aegle marmelos Maredu Rutaceae Tree

Albizia lebbeck Dirasana Mimosaceae Tree

Albizia odoratissina Chinduga Mimosaceae Tree

Aloe vera Kalabanda Liliaceae Succulent

Alstonia scholaris Palachettu Apocynaceae Tree

Ampelocissus latifolia Bedasateega Vitaceae Climber

Andrographis

paniculata

Nelavemu Acanthaceae Herb

Anisomeles

malabarica

Mogabeera Lamiaceae Shrub

Annona squamosa Sitaphalam Annonaceae Small tree

Argemone mexicana Bramhadandi Papavaraceae Herb

Aristolochia bracteolata

Gadidagadapa Aristolochiaceae Herb

Aristolochia indica Eswaraveru Aristolochiaceae Climber

Asparagus racemosus Pilliteegalu Liliaceae Climber

Aspidopterys indica Bandikota Malpighiaceae Climber

Atalantia monophylla Kolamukki Rutaceae Shrub

Atalantia recemosa Kada nimma Rutaceae Tree

Azima tetracantha Tella Uppili Salvadoraceae Shrub

Bauhinia malabarica Pulichinta Caesalpiniaceae Tree

Bauhinia tomentosa Kanchini Caesalpiniaceae Tree

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

7

Bauhinia variegata Madapaku chettu Caesalpiniaceae Tree

Boswelia serrata Guggilapumanu Bursaraceae Tree

Breynia vitis-idaea Konda Sambrani Euphorbiaceae Shrub

Buchanania axillaris Sara chettu Anacardiaceae Tree

Butea monosperma Moduga Fabaceae Tree

Cadaba fruticosa Adamorinika Capparaceae Shrub

Cadaba trifoliata Chekondadi Capparaceae Shrub

Caesalpinia bonduc Gacha Caesalpinaceae Shrub

Cajanus cajan Kandulu Fabaceae Shrub

Calycopteris floribunda

Adavi jama Combretaceae Shrub

Canavalia gladiata Thamba Fabaceae Climber

Canthium dicoccum Nalla Balusu Rubiaceae Shrub

Canthium parviflorum Balusu Rubiaceae Shrub

Capparis grandis Dudhuppi Capparaceae Small tree

Capparis sepiaria Nalluppi Capparaceae Thorny climber

Capparis zeylanica Adonda Capparaceae Thorny climber

Cardiospermum canescens

Pedda budda Sapindaceae Climber

Carissa carandas Kalivi Apocynaceae Shrub

Cassia auriculata Thangedu Caesalpinaceae Shrub

Cassia fistula Rela Caesalpiniaceae Tree

Cassia siamea Sima tangedu Caesalpiniaceae Tree

Cassia tora Thantipumokka Caesalpiniaceae Herb

Cayratia pedata Gummaditeega Vitaceae Climber

Cayratia trifolia Kamputeega Vitaceae Climber

Ceiba pentandra Tellaburaga Bombacaceae Tree

Chukrasia tabulariss Konda Vepa Meliaceae Tree

Cissampelos pareira Palateega Menispermaceae Climber

Cissus pallida Nalla teega Vitaceae Climber

Cissus quadrangularis Nalleru Vitaceae Climber

Cleome chelidonii Thota vovinta Capparaceae Herb

Cleome gynandra Vaminta Capparaceae Herb

Cleome viscosa Kukkavaminta Capparaceae Herb

Cocculus hirsutus Dusari teega Menispermaceae Climber

Cochlospermum religiosum

Kondagogu Cochlospermaceae Tree

Combretum albidum Yada teega Combretaceae Climber

Crotalaria

medicaginea

Trefoil rattlepod Fabaceae Herb

Crotalaria

ramosissima

Rattle Pod Fabaceae Herb

Crotalaria retusa Pottigilligichcha Fabaceae Shrub

Crotalaria verrucosa Gilligicha,Yerri janumu

Fabaceae Shrub

Dalbergia sissoo Errasissu Fabaceae Tree

Datura metel Nalla ummetha Solanaceae Herb

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

8

Decaschistia crotonifolia

Kondagogu Malvaceae Shrub

Delonix elata Sunkesula Caesalpiniaceae Tree

Delonix regia Turai Caesalpiniaceae Tree

Desmodium gangeticum

Gitanaram Fabaceae Shrub

Desmodium pulchellum

Deyyapu mokka Fabacea Shrub

Echinops echinatus Mulla banthi Asteraceae Shrub

Ehynchosia

suaveolensis

Adavikandi Fabaceae Shrub

Eucalyptus

comaldulensis

Neelgiri Myrtaceae Tree

Eucalyptus

tereticornis

Eucalyptus Myrtaceae Tree

Euphorbia antiquorum Janku Euphorbiaceae Shrub

Euphorbia nivulia Akujemudu Euphorbiaceae Shrub

Euphorbia tortillis Naaga jamudu Euphorbiaceae Shrub

Ficus benghalensis Marri /Banyan Tree Moraceae Tree

Ficus racemosa Medi chettu Moraceae Tree

Ficus religiosa Peepal / Raavi Moraceae Tree

Flemingia strobilifera Nallabaddu Fabaceae Shrub

Grewia hirsuta Chittijana Tiliacea Shrub

Grewia orientalis Bampudu Tiliaceae Shrub

Grewia tenax Gundukadira Tiliaceae Shrub

Hemidesmus indicus Sugandi pala Asclepiadaceae Climber

Hiptage benghalensis Madhavi-teega Malpighiaceae Climber

Holoptelia integrifolia Nemali Naara Ulmaceae Tree

Indigofera

aspalacthoides

Nela vempali Fabaceae Shrub

Indigofera cassioides Siralli Fabaceae Shrub

Indigofera oblongifolia Kondavempali Fabaceae Shrub

Jatropha gossypiifolia Adavi kanuga Euphorbiaceae Shrub

Justicia adhatoda Addasaramu Acanthaceae Shrub

Lannea coromandelia Gumpini Anacardiaceae Tree

Lantana camara Pulikampa Verbinaceae Shrub

Lepisanthes tetraphylla

Korivi Sapindaceae Tree

Leptadenia reticulata Jiwanti Asclepiadaceae Climber

Leucaena

leucocephala

Subabul Mimosaceae Tree

Limonia acidissima Velaga Rutacea Tree

Maerua apetala Pilli adugu Capparaceae Tree

Melia azedarach Turaka vepa Meliaceae Tree

Mimosa hamata Undra Mimosaceae Shrub

Mimosa prainiana Sandra Mimosaceae Shrub

Naravelia zeylanica Irula Ranunculaceae Climber

Neptunia triquetra Nidrakanti Mimosaceae Herb

Opilia amentacea Pachapa papati Opiliaceae Climber

Pachygone ovata Peddadusara Menispermaceae Climber

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

9

teega

Parkinsonia aculeata Simatumma Caesalpiniaceae Tree

Pavonia odorata Chittibenda Malvaceae Shrub

Physalis peruviana Cape goose berry Solanaceae Shrub

Pithecellobium dulce Seema chinta Mimosaceae Tree

Pleurostylia opposita Piyari Celastraceae Tree

Plumbago zeylanica Chitramulam Plumbaginaceae Shrub

Plumeria alba Tella Devaganneru Apocynaceae Tree

Plumeria rubra Devaganneru Apocynaceae Tree

Polyalthia longifolia Naramaamidi Annonaceae Tree

Polyalthia pendula Ashoka Annonaceae Tree

Pongamia pinnata Kaanuga Fabaceae Tree

Prosopis juliflora English thumma Mimosaceae Tree

Prosopis spicigera Jammia Chettu Mimosaceae Tree

Psoralea corylifolia Bapunga Fabaceae Shrub

Quisqualis indica Rangoon malle Combretaceae Climber

Rhus mysorensisn Sita sundari kampa Anacardiaceae Shrub

Rhynchosia

suaveolens

Gadichikkudu Fabaceae Climber

Rubia cordifolia Isabaddi Rubiaceae Shrub

Sansevieria roxburghiana

Chaga Agavaceae Shrub

Sapindus emarginata Kunkudu Sapindaceae Tree

Schlechera oleosa Pulasaram Sapindaceae Tree

Scutia myrtina Gariki chettu Rhamnaceae Tree

Securinega

lecucopyrus

Tella purugudu Euphorbiaceae Shrub

Securinega virosa Tella pulicheri Euphorbiaceae Shrub

Semecarpus

anacardium

Nalla jeedi Anacardiaceae Tree

Senna alexandrian Alexandrian Sennna Fabaceae Shrub

Sesbania grandiflora Avisa Fabaceae Tree

Sesbania sesban Suiminta Fabaceae Tree

Sida acuta Medabirusaku Malvaceae Shrub

Sida rhombifolia Athibala Malvaceae Shrub

Sida spinosa Nagabala Malvaceae Shrub

Solanum surattense Nelamulaka Solanaceae Shrub

Solanum torvum Vusti / Konda Vusti Solanaceae Shrub

Solanum trilobatum Uchi Solanaceae Shrub

Soymida febrifuga Somi Meliaceae Tree

Sphaeranthus indicus Bodasaramu Asteraceae Herb

Sterculia foetida Gurapa Stercuilaceae Tree

Sterculia urens Kondacheniga Sterculiaceae Tree

Strychnos nux-vomica Nagamusti Loganiaceae Tree

Stylosanthes fruticosa Rameta Fabaceae Shrub

Syzygium cumini Neredu,Tree Myrtaceae Tree

Tarenna asiatica Kommi Rubiaceae Shrub

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

10

Tecoma stans Kondapindi Bignoniaceae Tree

Tephrosia purpurea Vempalli Fabaceae Shrub

Tephrosia villosa Nugu vempali Fabaceae Shrub

Terminalia arjuna Tellamaddi Combretaceae Tree

Tiliacora acuminta Kappatheega Menispermaceae Climber

Tinospora cordifolia Tippateega Menispermaceae Climber

Toddalia asiatica Kondamirapa Rutaceae Tree

Tylophora indica Mekachettu Asclepiadaceae Climber

Ventilago maderaspatana

Erra Shuralata Rhamnaceae Climber

Walsura trifolia Valarasi Meliaceae Tree

Waltheria indica Nalla benda Ssterculiaceae Shrub

Wattakaka volubilis Doodi paala teega Asclepiadaceae Climber

Wrightia tinctoria Palavareni Apocynaceae Tree

Ziziphus horrrida Tella regu Rhamnaceae Tree

Ziziphus marutiana Regu Chettu Rhamnaceae Tree

Ziziphus nummularia Nela Regu Rhamnaceae Tree

Terrestrial Fauna of the study area:

As the core area is not isolated from its surroundings by any barrier, there are no chances for any kind of isolation or restriction of any wild animal to the core area

or the buffer area. As they are capable of moving from place to place either for food or shelter or mate, it is not proper to list them separately for different areas. Hence, common lists are prepared based on available secondary data and on

the basis of direct observation, indirect or circumstantial evidence such as foot prints, feathers, skin, hair, hooves etc. The area of survey and study extends up

to a radius of 10 Km in case of terrestrial fauna. As there are no dense forests or wildlife reserves or other protected areas around the MLA and as the area is surrounded by quarries, croplands and villages the chances of occurrence of any

rare or endangered wildlife is remote. The core area is suitable for terrestrial reptiles such as snakes and lizards because of the presence of large numbers of

termite mounts and rocks. Among the mammals, monkeys, squirrels and rats were found. There are no reports or indications or pointers to the presence of endangered Indian Gray Wolf or Leopard or Hyena etc. There were no attacks on

sheep or goat though sheep and goat rearing is very common. A list of vertebrate species other than birds either spotted or reported from the study area

is given in Table 4. Many terrestrial birds such as Indian Ring dove, Minnows, Finches, Crows, Sparrows, Parrots, Mynas, Swifts, Doves, Pigeons, Egrets and

Weaver birds etc were common. A list of birds either spotted or reported from the study area is given in Table 5. There are no foreign visitors or winter migrants from across the globe. None of the species listed in Schedule I of the Indian

Wildlife (protection) Act was found in the study area.

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

11

Table 4: List of Vertebrates other than Birds either observed or reported from the

mining lease area and its surroundings up to a radius of 10 Km.

Note: LC means Least Concern and WPA indicates Schedule of the Wildlife

Protection Act.

(Vide: www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/13143)

Amphibians

Latin name Common name IUCN / WPA

Bufo melonostrictus =

Duttaphrynus melanostictus

Common Indian Toad LC/IV

Microhyla ornata Ornate narrow mouth frog LC/IV

Polypedates leucomystax Common tree frog LC/ IV

Rana cyanophlyctis Indian Skipper Frog LC/IV

Rana limnocharis Asian grass frog LC /IV

Reptiles

Acanthodactylus cantoris Indian Fringe-fingered Lizard LC/IV

Ahaetulla nasuta Common Vine snake LC /II

Argyrogena fasciolata Banded Racer LC/II Bungarus caeruleus Common Krait LC/II

Calotes versicolor Garden lizard LC/IV

Chamaeleon zeylanicus Indian Chameleon LC/IV

Cnemaspis indica Indian day gecko LC /IV

Dryophis nasutus Whip Snake LC/II

Dryophis pulverulentus Tree Snake LC/II

Eryx conicus Common Sand boa LC /II

Eublepharis macularius Common leopard gecko LC /IV

Eutropis carinata (=Mabuya

carinata)

Common keeled skink LC /IV

Eutropis macularia Bronze grass skink LC /IV

Hemidactylus brookii Brook,s House Gecko LC/IV

Hemidactylus frenatus Asian house gecko LC /IV

Hemidactylus prashadi Wall lizard LC/IV

Hemidactylus triedrus Termite hill gecko LC /IV

Ptyas mucosus Rat snake LC/II

Typholops braminus Blind Snake LC/II

Varanus bengalensis Monitor lizard VU /II

Mammals

Bandicota bangalensis Field Rat LC / V

Funambulus palmarum Three Striped Squirrel LC/IV

Golunda ellioti Indian bush Rat LC/IV

Herpestes javanicus Small Indian Mongoose LC/IV

Herpestes edwardsi Common Mongoose LC/IV

Lepus nigricollis Common Hare LC/IV

Macaca mulatta Rhesus monkey LC/ II

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

12

Rattus rattus House Rat LC / IV

Rousettus leschenaulti Fruit bat LC / V

Suncus murinus Musk shrew LC / V

Sus scrofa Wild Boar LC / III

Table 5: List of birds either spotted or reported from the areas around the Mining

Lease Area up to a radius of 10 Km.

Common Name Scientific Name IUCN / WPA

Schedule

Common kingfisher Acedo atthis LC / IV

Common myna Acridotheres tristis LC / IV

Blyth’s reed warbler Acrocephalus dumetorum LC / IV

Common sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos LC / IV

Spotted sandpiper Actitis macularia LC / IV

Small blue kingfisher Alcedo atthis LC / IV

Red munia Amandava amandava LC / IV

Oriental tree pipit Anthus hodgosoni LC / IV

Paddy field Pipit Anthus novaeseelandiae LC / IV

House swift Apus affinis LC / IV

Grey heron Ardea cinerea LC / IV

Indian pond Heron Ardeola grayii LC / IV

Common pochard Aythya ferina LC / IV

Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis LC / IV

Little green heron Butorides striatus LC / IV

Common Indian nightjar Caprimulgus asiaticus LC / IV

Crow pheasant Centropus sinensis LC / IV

Lesser Pied Kingfisher Ceryle rudis LC / IV

Bristled grass bird Chaetornis striatus LC / IV

Kentish plover Charadrius 12lexandrines LC / IV

Little ringed plover Charadrius dubius LC / IV

Yellow eyed babbler Chrysomma sinense LC / IV

Green Bulbul Chloropsis aurifrons LC / IV

Pied crested cuckoo Clamator jacobinus LC / IV

Temmincks stint Claridris temminckii LC / IV

Blue rock pigeon Columba livia LC / IV

Oriental magpie robin Copsychus saularis LC / IV

Black headed cuckoo shrike Coracena melanopetra LC / IV

Blue Jay Coracias benghalensis LC / IV

Large cuckoo shrike Coracina macei LC / IV

Jungle crow Corvus macrorhyncos LC / IV

House crow Corvus splendens LC / V

Large egret Cosmerodius albus LC / IV

Common grey quail Coturnix coturnix LC / IV

Indian cuckoo Cuculus micropterus LC / IV

Grey headed flycatcher Culicicapa ceylonensis LC / IV

Tickells blue flycatcher Cyorns tickelliae LC / IV

Palm swift Cypsiurus parvus LC / IV

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

13

Indian tree pie Dendrocitta vagabunda LC / IV

Yellow fronted pied

woodpecker Dendrocopos mahrattensis

LC / IV

Brown capped pigmy

woodpecker Dendrocopos nanus

LC / IV

Tickell’s Flower pecker Dicaeum erythrorhynchos LC / IV

Black drongo Dicrurus asimilis LC / IV

Greater Rocket tailed drongo Dicrurus paradiseus LC / IV

Golden backed woodpecker Dinopium benghalense LC / IV

Little egret Egretta garzeta LC / IV

Intermediate egret Egretta intermedia LC / IV

Asian koel Eudynamys scolopacea LC / IV

Common kestrel Falco tinnunculus LC / IV

Grey Partridge Francolinus pondicerianaus LC / IV

Common snipe Gallinago gallinago LC / IV

Common moorhen Gallinula chloropus LC / IV

White breasted kingfisher Halcyon smyrnensis LC / IV

Crested tree swift Hemiprocne coronata LC / IV

Black winged stilt Himantopus himantopus LC / IV

Booted warbler Hippolais caligata LC / IV

Striated swallow Hirundo daurica LC / IV

Common swallow Hirundo rustica LC / IV

Wire tailed swallow Hirundo smithii LC / IV

Pheasant tailed jacana Hydrophasianus chirurgus LC / IV

Black tailed godwit Limosa limosa LC / IV

White rumped munia Lochura striata LC / IV

Silver billed munia Lonchura malabarica LC / IV

Spotted munia Lonchura puctulata LC / IV

Blue throat Luscinia svecica LC / IV

Copper smith Megalaima haemocephala LC / IV

Crested bunting Melophus lathami LC / IV

Chestnut headed bee eater Merops etanus LC / IV

Small green bee-eater Merops orientalis LC / IV

Blue cheeked bee eater Merops persicus LC / IV

Blue tailed bee eater Merops philippinus LC / IV

Median egret Mesophoyx intermedia LC / IV

Bronze winged jacana Metopidious indicus LC / IV

Rufous Woodpecker Microternus brachyurus LC / IV

Black kite Milvus migrans LC / IV

Blue rock thrush Monticola solitarius LC / IV

White wagtail Motacilla alba linnaeus LC / IV

Grey wagtail Motacilla cinerea tunstall LC / IV

Yellow wagtail Motacilla flava linnaeus LC / IV

White browed wagtail Motacilla maderaspatensis LC / IV

Purple sunbird Nectarinia asiatica LC / IV

Loten’s sunbird Nectarinia lotenia LC / IV

Purple rumped sunbird Nectarinia zeylonica LC / IV

Eurasian curlew Numenius arquata LC / IV

Night heron Nyticorax nyticorax LC / IV

Common tailorbird Orthotomus sutorius LC / IV

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

14

Great tit Parus major LC / IV

House sparrow Passer domesticus LC / IV

Spot billed kingfisher Pelargopsis capensis LC / IV

Small minivet Pericrocotus cinnamomeus LC / IV

White bellied minivet Pericrocotus erythropygius LC / IV

Yellow throated sparrow Petronia xanthocollis LC / IV

Indian pitta Pitta bracyura LC / IV

Baya weaver Ploceus philippinus LC / IV

Franklins prinia Prinia hodgsonii LC / IV

Plain prinia Prinia inornata LC / IV

Ashy prinia Prinia socialis LC / IV

Rose ringed parakeet Psittacula krameri LC / IV

Red vented bulbul Pycnonotus cafer LC / IV

White browed fantail fly catcher

Rhipidura aureola lesson LC / IV

Red crested pochard Rhodonesa rufina LC / IV

Greater painted snipe Rostratula benghalensis LC / IV

Pied bush chat Saxicola caprata LC / IV

Common stonechat Saxicola torquata LC / IV

Indian robin Saxicoloides fulicata LC / IV

Black bellied tern Sterna acuticauda LC / IV

Spotted dove Streptopelia chinensis LC / IV

Indian Ring dove Streptopelia decaocto LC / IV

Asian pied myna Sturnus contra LC / IV

Brahminy starling Sturnus pagodarum LC / IV

Lesser white throat Sylvia curruca LC / IV

Little grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis LC / IV

Common wood shrike Tephrodornis pondicerianus LC / IV

Wood sandpiper Tringa glareola LC / IV

Common greenshank Tringa nebularia LC / IV

Green sandpiper Tringa ochropus LC / IV

Marsh sandpiper Tringa stagnatilis LC / IV

Common babbler Turdoides caudatus LC / IV

Large grey babbler Turdoides malcolmi LC / IV

Jungle babbler Turdoides striatus LC / IV

Common buttonquail Turnix suscitator LC / IV

Hoopoe Upupa epops LC / IV

Red wattled lapwing Vanellus indicus LC / IV

Yellow wattled lapwing Vanellus malabaricus LC / IV

Oriental white eye Zosterops palpebrosus LC / IV

Note: The conservation status of the birds have been verified with the Birdlife

International’s 2010 update of the IUCN Red List for birds from web sites www.birdlife.org & www.iucnredlist.org and found that there are no REET

category birds in and the around the mine lease area up to a radius of 10 Km.

Aquatic flora and fauna of the study area:

Except for small seasonal drains, there are water no bodies within the MLA. Eddula vagu is a small seasonal rivulet found in the buffer zone. Gandikota Project

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

15

canal has been dug out but the work is incomplete. There are no major Rivers or

reservoirs other than small village tanks. All tanks gathered some water on account of the heavy rains during 2019. A list of aquatic plants found in the

buffer zone is given in Table 6. There are no fisheries and fishing activity in the study area. There are no RET aquatic fauna either in the ML area or its buffer

zone.

Table 6. List of aquatic or semi aquatic macrophytes found in the buffer zone of the

mine lease area.

Latin name Common / local name Family

Alternanthera philoxeroides Alligator weed Solanaceae

Alternanthera sessilis Sessile Joy Weed Solanaceae

Brachiaria mutica Para grass Poaceae

Centella asiatica Brahma Manduki Apiaceae

Chrysopogon aciculatus Spear grass Poaceae

Cynodon dactylon Turf grass Poaceae

Cyperus rotundus Nut grass Cyperaceae

Echinochloa colona Jungle rice Poaceae

Eichhornia crassipes Water Hyacinth Pontederiaceae

Fimbristylis miliacea Lesser Fimbristylis Cyperaceae

Imperata cylindrica Blady grass Poaceae

Ipomoea aquatica Chinese Water Cress Convolvulaceae

Ipomoea carnea Besharum Convolvulaceae

Ludwigia perennis Creeping primrose Onagraceae

Marsilea quadrifolia Water clover Marsiliaceae

Ottelia alismoides Duck Lettuce Hydrocharitaceace

Oxalis corniculata Amrul Oxalidaceae

Paspalidium geminatum Alligator grass Poaceae

Phragmites karka Narkul Poaceae

Pistia stratiotes Water lettuce Araceae

Saccharum spontaneum Kaans grass Poaceae

Schoenoplectus articulatus Bullrush Cyperaceae

Typha angustata Cattail Typhaceae

Rare or endangered or endemic or threatened (REET) flora and fauna of

the study area:

The list of plants found in the core and buffer areas are compared with the list of CITES plants in India (www.bsenvis.nic.in/citesplant.htm). There is no evidence

of occurrence of Red sanders (Pterocarpus santalinus), Shorea roxburghii and Cycas beddomei, the three threatened plants of Kadapa district within the study

area. None of the plants listed are included in Appendix II of CITES or in the RET category of the Botanical Survey of India. Similarly, none of the vertebrates and birds reported from the study area belong to RET category. None of them is

included in Schedule I of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972 and its

amendments thereof.

The MLA is not a habitat for the highly elusive and critically endangered bird known locally as Kalivi Kodi or Jerdon’s courser (Rhinoptilus bitorquatus). The

sprawling 464 square kilometer, Lanka Malleswara Wildlife Sanctuary of

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

16

Rhinoptilus bitorquatus located in Lankamalla Reserved forest is more than 50 Km

away from the MLA.

Predicted Impacts due to the proposed Quartz, Silica sand Mining:

Biological Impact Assessment (BIA) is an important ant integral part of the EIA. For the purposes of the BIA, the study area is divided in the core and buffer areas. The direct impacts shall be limited to the core area. Mine lease area is a private

land. There are no National Parks, Wildlife sanctuaries, Biosphere reserves or other protected areas either in the core area or in the buffer zone.

Prediction of impacts is based both on the direct and indirect; short-term as well

as long-term; irreversible and irreversible impacts that are most likely to occur

owing to the proposed industrial activity during establishment and operation. The

ecological factors that are considered most significant as far as the impact on flora

and fauna are concerned:

1. Whether there shall be any reduction in species diversity

2. Whether there shall be any habitat loss or fragmentation

3. Whether there shall be any additional risk or threat to the rare or endangered or endemic or threatened (REET)species

4. Whether there shall be any impairment of ecological functions such as

(i) Disruption of food chains, (ii) decline in species population and or (iii)

alterations in predator-prey relationships.

The direct and the most destructive impacts of the project are limited to the mine

lease area only. There is going to be a change in the land use and land cover

owing to the mining activity. The existing flora and vegetation of the mine lease

is going to be lost slowly in a phased manner owing to digging or dumping of

overburden and waste. Among the plant species that are going to be lost, the

annuals and therophytes are highly resilient and they can come back once the

intensity and frequency of disturbances decrease. As there are no rare or

endangered or endemic or threatened (REET) species, continuation of mining will

not pose any additional problem to any REET species. Hence, the impact of the

project on flora is negligible. As far as the fauna s concerned, the proposed mining

could endanger the habitat of some unseen reptiles and rodents that may be

present in burrows. But it is incapable of posing any additional threat to any

Schedule I species either directly or indirectly.

Negative Impacts:

i). Loss of the existing flora and trees: The flora of the project site is going to be

damaged or lost to a when a mine pit is opened and when dump is created. Since

there are no RET species, there shall not be any loss of any species.

ii). Loss of fodder and grazing land for locals: Green fodder is produced only

during the rainy season. During that time, shortage of green fodder is uncommon.

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

17

During the rest of the year when there is shortage of both green and dry fodder,

the core area contributes very little. Hence the overall loss of fodder can be made

good by growing forage crops.

iii). Enhanced soil erosion due mining: Operations relating to mining shall enhance

the chances of soil erosion and dust emissions. Integrated soil and water

conservation measures involving physical and biological systems are incorporated.

Legumes like Subabul and Hamata are proposed to be grown for soil conservation,

improvement of soil fertility and perennial fodder production.

Most probable Scenario:

It is a new mine located in an area where mining and quarrying is common. The

ambient air quality is good as revealed by the air quality monitoring results. Mining

activity and its impacts are restricted to the mining site only. The mine is adjacent

to the other mine leases and there are no problems relating to road connectivity

and transport. The mining activity is unlikely to have any adverse impact on the

flora and fauna of the buffer zone.

ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN:

The project proponent is duty bound to strictly follow the procedures outlined in

the approved mining plan including the progressive mine closure and restoration

plan. To begin with, they are going to one row of Hill Neem (Chukrasia tabularis),

the only tree that remains green even during the hot summer in Kadapa region.

It can be easily grown from stem cuttings. It has thick foliage and evergreen. This

will be done during the first year at a cost of Rs.1,00,000/-. Stem cuttings can be

procured from the hills and seeds are readily available as there are road-side

avenue trees in the district. Seedlings will be grown in seed beds and the saplings

shall be transplanted at a spacing of 2x3m during the rainy season. It is cost

effective and performance is ensured.

The top fertile soil shall be stored in paces / areas where deposits are not found.

Overburden shall be stored separately as stated in the approved mining plan. Once

the mining is over in any pit, it shall be back filled with the stone waste at the

bottom level followed by the overburden and then with the top soil at the top.

After filling and levelling is over, nitrogen enriching leguminous fodder plants

like Hamata (Stylosanthes hamata) shall be grown. Once the Hamata grass

establishes, pits shall be made at a spacing of 2m x 3m and saplings of Chukrasia

tabularis, Conocarpus lancifolius, Acacia holosericea, neem etc are transplanted.

After transplantation, regular maintenance of weeding, watering, application of

fertilizers and other protective and productive measures shall be undertaken.

Acacia holosericea, neem and Hill Neem (Chukrasia tabularis) are already grown

in the similar mine lease areas in the District. Scarified seeds of Conocarpus

lancifolius, and Silver wattle (Acacia holosericea) will be pelletized with dung and

placed in small pits in the backfilled areas of the mine lease areas. The seeds

germinate and some of them are going to survive. All gaps will be filled with stem

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

18

cuttings of Hill Neem (Chukrasia tabularis) which grows well. There shall be

sufficient water in the mining area for dust suppression and afforestation and

watering the plants.

31) A time bound Progressive Greenbelt Development Plan shall be prepared in a tabular form (indicating the linear and quantitative coverage, plant species and time frame) and submitted, keeping in mind, the same will have to be executed up front on commencement of the Project. Phase-wise plan of plantation and compensatory afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be covered under plantation and the species to be planted. The details of plantation already done should be given. The plant species selected for greenbelt should have greater ecological value and should be of good utility value to the local population with emphasis on local and native species and the species which are tolerant to pollution.

In a mining project, there are some uncertainties and failures. As and when new

reserves are found or reserves are not found in the area that was identified but

found in an area which was not considered etc may demand modifications and

changes in the plan. It is also influenced by demand, marking, labour, transport

and other problems in case of a high volume and low-cost minerals like Quartz,

and silica sand. In the project under consideration, both are mixed and hence

there are bound to be some operational problems. Hence, strict year by year

commitments and targets are difficult to make. The proposed plan is as under

(Table 7): Because of semiarid conditions, nutrient poor soils, dry climate and

acute shortage of water, it is practically impossible to grow 1500 to 2000 trees

per Ha. It is beyond the carrying capacity of the soil and climate. A list of plants

suggested for greenbelt, avenue plantations and eco- restoration of back filled

areas is given in Table 8

Table 7: Time bound greenbelt and compensatory afforestation plan

Year / Phase Proposed work Outlay

I year One row of Chukrasia tabularis stem cuttings

shall be grown on all sides along the

boundary of the mine lease

Rs1,00,000

1.0 Ha

After closure and

backing filling of Pit

1

Restoration of the back filled area with

Hamata and Trees

Rs.50,000

0.5 Ha

After closure and

backing filling of Pit

2

Restoration of the back filled area with

Hamata and Trees

Rs.50,000

0.5 Ha

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

19

After closure and

backing filling of Pit

3

Restoration of the back filled area with

Hamata and Trees

Rs. 50,000

0.5 Ha

After closure and

backing filling of Pit

4

Restoration of the back filled area with

Hamata and Trees

Rs.50,000

0.5 Ha

Ext Steps after Renewal of mine lease and continuation. 3,00,000

3 Ha

Table 8. List of trees of trees suggested for greenbelt, block and avenue

plantations.

Latin name Common name Importance

Acacia auriculiformis Astralian wattle Pulwood

Acacia holosericea Astralian wattle Pulwood

Aegle marmelos Maaredu Religious and medicinal

Albizia lebebck Dirisana Multipurpose

Azadirachta indica Neem/ Vepa Religious and medicinal

Cassia fistula Rela Ornamental

Chukrasia tabularis Konda vepa Medicinal

Conocarpus lancifolius Conocarpus Dense foliage and

resistance to drought,

salinity and pollution

Dendrocalamus strictus Bamboo Bamboo

Ficus religiosa Peepal / Raavi Religious

Hardwickia binata Yepi Timber and fiber

Mangifera indica Mango Fruit

Manilkara hexandra Paala chettu Root stock for sapota

Mimusops elengi Pogada Mythological

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

20

Phyllanthus emblica Usiri / Amla Fruit

Pithecellobium dulce Seema chinta Fruit

Prosopis spicigera Jammi / Sami Mythological

Syzygium cumini Neredu Medicinal

Tamarindus indica Chinta Fruit

Tectona grandis Teku Timber

Sources of Secondary data and References

1. Alfred J.R.B., A.K Das & A.K Sanyal (2001) Eds. Ecosystems of India: Envis

Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.

2. Andhra Pradesh Forest Department

http://www.forests.ap.gov.in/wildlife_new.html

3. Andhra Pradesh State Biodiversity Board : http://apbiodiversity.ap.nic.in/

4. Avibase - Bird Checklists of the World: Andhra Pradesh

https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/checklist.jsp?region=INseap&region=INseap

5. Checklist of Indian Snakes with English Common names

http://www.bio.utexas.edu/grad/sp/pubs/Indian%20Snakes-Checklist.pdf

6. David Hill, Matthew Fasham, Graham Tucker, Michael Shewary and Philip

Shaw (2005) Eds. Handbook of Biodiversity Methods: Survey, Evaluation and

Monitoring, by Published by Cambridge University Press.

7. Dinesh K.P., C. Radhakrishnan , B.H. Channakeshavamurthy and Nirmal U

Kulkarni (2015): A Checklist of Amphibians of India (Updated till January

2015)

http://mhadeiresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Checklist-of-

Amphibia-of-India_2015-2_updated.pdf

8. India Biodiversity Portal: Checklist of threatened plants of Andhra Pradesh:

https://indiabiodiversity.org/checklist/show/249

9. IRC SP 021: Guidelines on Landscaping and Tree Plantation

by Indian Roads Congress Published 2009

10.Naidu, V.S.G.R (2012). Handbook on Weed Identification. Directorate of

Weed Science Research, Jabalpur, India: PP 354.

11.Official flora and fauna of India

http://www.biodiversityofindia.org/index.php?title=Official_flora_and_fauna

_of_India

Annexure – D Detailed Flora & Fauna Report

21

12.The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2016

13.Taj S.A., & B.S. Balakumar (2014).Predominant Flora of Udayagiri Hills -

Eastern Ghats, Andhra Pradesh, India. Scholars Academic Journal of

Biosciences (SAJB): 2(5): 354-363

14.Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (2011). A Manual on Wildlife species in Trade

by Wildlife Crime Control Bureau, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New

Delhi

Annexure - E

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE STUDY AREA (10 km radius)

Total Population 0-6 years aged population SC Population ST Population Name Total/

Rural Number of households

Total Male Female Sex ratio

Total Male Female Total SC% Total ST%

Kibili Raghavapuram Rural 15 68 29 39 1345 15 8 7 4 6 10 15 Obulapuram Rural 196 802 424 378 892 95 57 38 202 25 0 0 Korrapadu Rural 650 2395 1200 1195 996 300 155 145 147 6 11 0 Mangapatnam Rural 732 2932 1512 1420 939 362 206 156 372 13 5 0 Denepalle Rural 171 672 336 336 1000 104 53 51 168 25 0 0 Aravetipalle Rural 212 799 419 380 907 109 56 53 0 0 23 3 Chintakunta Rural 274 1115 565 550 973 157 81 76 302 27 0 0 Yamavaram Rural 426 1707 835 872 1044 180 88 92 496 29 96 6 Kosinepalle Rural 202 853 434 419 965 102 54 48 28 3 48 6 Kadasani Kothapalle Rural 145 549 263 286 1087 63 33 30 212 39 0 0 Penikalapadu Rural 412 1685 842 843 1001 191 100 91 664 39 0 0 Rajulaguruvaiahpalle Rural 211 868 425 443 1042 75 43 32 0 0 0 0 K.Thimmapuram Rural 193 785 398 387 972 73 40 33 227 29 0 0 Nallaballe Rural 298 1066 532 534 1004 127 59 68 243 23 0 0 Bondalakunta Rural 464 1736 881 855 970 183 99 84 0 0 11 1 Chinnadudyala Rural 158 671 327 344 1052 85 41 44 0 0 0 0 Peddadudyala Rural 73 282 138 144 1043 37 20 17 13 5 0 0 Velpucherla Rural 144 558 277 281 1014 64 29 35 128 23 0 0 V.Raghavapuram Rural 52 180 97 83 856 9 7 2 0 0 0 0 Uppalur Rural 822 3317 1680 1637 974 387 204 183 122 4 9 0 Kolavali Rural 365 1551 779 772 991 177 89 88 426 27 33 2 Total 6215 24591 12393 12198 21070 2895 1522 1373 3754 322 246 32

LITERACY STATUS (10 km radius)

Name

Rural No. of Literates No. of Illiterates

Total Male Female Total Male Female Kibili Raghavapuram Rural 42 20 22 26 9 17 Obulapuram Rural 495 296 199 307 128 179 Korrapadu Rural 1434 830 604 961 370 591 Mangapatnam Rural 1618 972 646 1314 540 774 Denepalle Rural 257 150 107 415 186 229 Aravetipalle Rural 395 238 157 404 181 223 Chintakunta Rural 594 361 233 521 204 317 Yamavaram Rural 983 555 428 724 280 444 Kosinepalle Rural 441 281 160 412 153 259 Kadasani Kothapalle Rural 293 168 125 256 95 161 Penikalapadu Rural 970 583 387 715 259 456 Rajulaguruvaiahpalle Rural 543 309 234 325 116 209 K.Thimmapuram Rural 484 282 202 301 116 185 Nallaballe Rural 633 383 250 433 149 284 Bondalakunta Rural 932 573 359 804 308 496 Chinnadudyala Rural 408 237 171 263 90 173 Peddadudyala Rural 112 68 44 170 70 100 Velpucherla Rural 301 189 112 257 88 169 V.Raghavapuram Rural 91 61 30 89 36 53 Uppalur Rural 1844 1102 742 1473 578 895 Kolavali Rural 838 519 319 713 260 453 Total 13708 8177 5531 10883 4216 6667

OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE STUDY AREA (10 km radius)

Name

Rural

Total working population Total non-working population Total main workers Total marginal workers Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female

Kibili Raghavapuram Rural 38 16 22 30 13 17 38 16 22 0 0 0 Obulapuram Rural 481 273 208 321 151 170 481 273 208 0 0 0 Korrapadu Rural 1574 778 796 821 422 399 1553 768 785 21 10 11 Mangapatnam Rural 1529 873 656 1403 639 764 933 775 158 596 98 498 Denepalle Rural 369 211 158 303 125 178 311 204 107 58 7 51 Aravetipalle Rural 367 233 134 432 186 246 362 233 129 5 0 5 Chintakunta Rural 439 297 142 676 268 408 433 292 141 6 5 1 Yamavaram Rural 915 511 404 792 324 468 828 459 369 87 52 35 Kosinepalle Rural 468 253 215 385 181 204 461 249 212 7 4 3 Kadasani Kothapalle Rural 270 145 125 279 118 161 266 144 122 4 1 3 Penikalapadu Rural 889 513 376 796 329 467 880 508 372 9 5 4 Rajulaguruvaiahpalle Rural 448 249 199 420 176 244 320 223 97 128 26 102 K.Thimmapuram Rural 527 268 259 258 130 128 270 144 126 257 124 133 Nallaballe Rural 528 321 207 538 211 327 521 320 201 7 1 6 Bondalakunta Rural 1002 537 465 734 344 390 914 507 407 88 30 58 Chinnadudyala Rural 319 213 106 352 114 238 314 211 103 5 2 3 Peddadudyala Rural 202 95 107 80 43 37 202 95 107 0 0 0 Velpucherla Rural 340 174 166 218 103 115 339 174 165 1 0 1 V.Raghavapuram Rural 146 76 70 34 21 13 146 76 70 0 0 0 Uppalur Rural 2003 1023 980 1314 657 657 1971 1008 963 32 15 17 Kolavali Rural 903 466 437 648 313 335 709 404 305 194 62 132 Total 13757 7525 6232 10834 4868 5966 12252 7083 5169 1505 442 1063

CATEGORY OF WORKERS IN THE STUDY ARA (10 km radius)

Cultivators Agricultural Labors House hold industry workers Other workers Name Rural Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Kibili Raghavapuram Rural 25 12 13 10 2 8 0 0 0 3 2 1 Obulapuram Rural 224 134 90 235 129 106 15 5 10 7 5 2 Korrapadu Rural 327 270 57 1123 446 677 45 11 34 58 41 17 Mangapatnam Rural 568 478 90 165 117 48 1 1 0 199 179 20 Denepalle Rural 66 55 11 230 135 95 0 0 0 15 14 1 Aravetipalle Rural 91 69 22 242 141 101 0 0 0 29 23 6 Chintakunta Rural 148 144 4 241 108 133 1 1 0 43 39 4 Yamavaram Rural 87 64 23 550 268 282 39 23 16 152 104 48 Kosinepalle Rural 112 98 14 193 52 141 0 0 0 156 99 57 Kadasani Kothapalle Rural 49 36 13 138 50 88 1 0 1 78 58 20 Penikalapadu Rural 170 117 53 436 175 261 1 1 0 273 215 58 Rajulaguruvaiahpalle Rural 161 137 24 79 27 52 10 3 7 70 56 14 K.Thimmapuram Rural 234 117 117 7 4 3 2 1 1 27 22 5 Nallaballe Rural 135 119 16 263 87 176 1 1 0 122 113 9 Bondalakunta Rural 96 78 18 666 306 360 6 2 4 146 121 25 Chinnadudyala Rural 117 84 33 80 31 49 1 1 0 116 95 21 Peddadudyala Rural 55 48 7 147 47 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 Velpucherla Rural 146 75 71 131 53 78 2 1 1 60 45 15 V.Raghavapuram Rural 80 73 7 66 3 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 Uppalur Rural 320 229 91 1224 519 705 255 129 126 172 131 41 Kolavali Rural 87 78 9 344 156 188 65 36 29 213 134 79 Total 3298 2515 783 6570 2856 3714 445 216 229 1939 1496 443

Annexure – F MEAN METEOROLOGY (October 2019 – December 2019)

HOUR WIND

DIRECTION WIND SPEED (m/sec)

TEMPERATURE (oK)

STABILITY CLASS

MIXING HEIGHT (M)

1 SW 2.0 290.9 5 1173.0 2 SWW 1.5 292.0 6 1173.0 3 SW 1.3 293.7 6 1173.0 4 SWW 3.0 296.5 5 1173.0 5 SW 2.7 293.3 5 1173.0 6 SW 2.2 300.9 5 1173.0 7 SWW 2.8 303.7 4 111.7 8 E 0.4 307.0 3 263.3 9 NE 1.3 310.4 2 415.0

10 SW 1.4 307.6 2 566.6 11 SW 1.2 307.0 2 718.2 12 E 1.2 305.9 2 869.8 13 SW 2.3 303.2 2 1021.4 14 W 3.0 300.9 2 1173.0 15 SW 2.8 297.6 3 1173.0 16 SW 2.1 295.4 3 1173.0 17 W 3.0 293.2 4 1173.0 18 NNW 1.3 291.5 5 1173.0 19 SW 2.7 291.6 5 1173.0 20 NW 1.5 288.2 6 1173.0 21 SW 2.4 288.2 6 1173.0 22 SW 1.4 287.6 6 1173.0 23 E 2.6 288.7 5 1173.0 24 SW 1.5 289.3 6 1173.0

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner

Scanned by CamScanner