EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study Report

National Highways Authority of India

(MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS)

(GOVERNMENT OF INDIA)

Construction/ Up-gradation of Four/ Two lane

with Paved Shoulder of NH 68 from Tanot-

Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer (Design Ch.

0.000 to 125.573) and NH from Bhadasar

(Mokal)-Sarkaritala up to Pakistan Border

(Design Ch. 0.000 to 67.950) under

Bharatmala Pariyojana (total length

193.523km) on EPC mode in the State of

Rajasthan.

Prepared by Marc Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. In association with DSD Infratech Management

(p) Ltd Marc House, Sector 6-7 (Dividing Road), Opp. Devi Lal Park, Bahadurgarh,Haryana-124507

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Feasibility Study Report

Construction/ Up-gradation of Four/ Two lane with Paved Shoulder of NH 68 from Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer (Design Ch. 0.000 to 125.573) and NH from Bhadasar (Mokal)-Sarkaritala up to Pakistan Border (Design Ch. 0.000 to 67.950) under Bharatmala Pariyojana (total length 193.523km) on EPC Mode in the State of Rajasthan.

Executive Summary

Marc Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. In association with

DSD Infratech Management (P) Ltd.

Page 1

CONTENTS

Executive Summary 1.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 2

1.1.1 Consultancy Services ...................................................................................................... 2

1.1.2 The Report ...................................................................................................................... 3

1.2 An Overview of MoRT&H/NHAI ................................................................................. 3

1.3 Project Description, Possible Alternative Alignments & Technical Engineering

Alternatives ..................................................................................................................... 3

1.3.1 Project Highway Description ........................................................................................ 3

1.3.1.6 Engineering surveys & Investigations ..................................................................... 18

1.3.1.10 VUP/FLYOVERS ...................................................................................................... 29

1.3.1.11 Slip Roads/ Service Roads ........................................................................................ 29

1.3.1.12 Cross drainage structures ......................................................................................... 30

1.3.1.13 Road over Bridge (ROB)/ Road under Bridge ....................................................... 38

1.3.1.14 Pavement Design ........................................................................................................ 38

1.3.1.15 Junctions ..................................................................................................................... 38

1.3.1.16 Drainage ..................................................................................................................... 40

1.3.1.17 Retaining Wall/ Brest wall ........................................................................................ 41

1.3.1.18 Project Facilities ........................................................................................................ 41

1.4 Construction Material .................................................................................................. 44

1.5 Socio-Economic Profile of the Project Influence Area .................................................. 44

1.6 Environmental Screening and Preliminary Environmental Assessment ................ 44

1.7 Initial Social Assessment and Preliminary land Acquisition/Resettlement Plan ... 45

1.7.1 Socio-Economic and Census Survey ........................................................................... 45

1.7.2 Acquisition of Land ...................................................................................................... 46

1.8 Utilit Shifting................................................................................................................. 46

1.9 Estimation of Project Cost ........................................................................................... 46

1.10 Financial Analysis .................................................................................................................. 49

a. Section : 1 Tanot to Ramgarh , Length = 60.463 Km. .......................................................... 49

b. Section : 2 Ramgarh to Jaisalmer , Length = 65.110 Km. ..................................................... 50

c. Section :3. Mokal to Sarkaritala , Length = 67.950 Km. ....................................................... 50

CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................ 50


Executive Summary

Marc Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. in association with

DSD Infratech Management (P) Ltd. Page 2

Chapter 1

Executive Summary

1.1 General

“Bharatmala” is the name given to the ambitious road and highways project of present Union

Government. The project starting from Gujarat and Rajasthan, moving to Punjab and then cover

the entire string of Himalayan states -Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand - and

then portions of borders of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar alongside Terai, and traverse

to Sikkim, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, and right up to the Indo-Myanmar border in Manipur and

Mizoram where it ends. The Government under the scheme plans to construct about 5,300 km of

roads under the Bharatmala Project.

The Strategic Importance of the Project are:

It will improve connectivity in border areas. Currently supplies to India’s troops as well as

military transport happens through poor quality roads which can be a negative factor for

armed force during emergency and war situations “Bharat Mala” is designed to take care of that;

There is a crucial economic factor too behind “Bharat Mala” project as through proper infrastructure of roads borders will open up and border trade will start which will boost up

the economy of hilly area and native people. Roads are the machinery of development as

they drive the economy. States with proper road connectivity are economically at good

position.

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has been entrusted with the assignment of

Project Management Consultancy including preparation of Feasibility Study/ Detailed Project

Report of selected road stretches/corridors of various roads in the States of Bihar, Gujrat,

Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu & Puducherry and Odisha to Two/Four lane

with paved shoulder NH configuration under BHARAT MALA Project.

Construction/ Up-gradation of Four/ Two lane with Paved Shoulder of NH 68 from Tanot-

Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer (Design Ch. 0.000 to 125.573) and NH from Bhadasar

(Mokal)-Sarkaritala up to Pakistan Border (Design Ch. 0.000 to 67.950) under Bharatmala

Pariyojana (total length 193.523km) on EPC Mode in the State of Rajasthan

1.1.1 Consultancy Services

The Consultancy Services for this project has been awarded to Marc Technocrats Pvt. Ltd.

in association with DSD Infratech Management (P) Pvt. Ltd, Bahadurgarh, Haryana.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gujarat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajasthan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjab

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jammu_and_Kashmir

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himachal_Pradesh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uttarakhand

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uttar_Pradesh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bihar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikkim

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assam

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arunachal_Pradesh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manipur

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mizoram


Executive Summary



The Consultancy services are to be provided in three stages as brought out below:

Stage 1 : Inception Report

Stage 2 : Feasibility Report

Stage 3 : Detailed Project Report (DPR)

Inception Report & QAP

The Draft Inception Report including Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) Documents was submitted

vide letter no. Marc/NHAI/BM/05/2015-16/18 dated 29.03.2016.The Inception Report covering

existing project details, detailed approach and methodology, further development of the Project

road, design standards and proposed cross sections, etc. was discussed in detail, with the Client.

The Final Inception Report including QAP documents, incorporating Clients

comments/observations were submitted vide letter no. Marc/NHAI/BM/05/2015-16/53 dated

02.08.2016.

1.1.2 The Report

The report in hand is the Final Feasibility Report, based on the approach & methodology

detailed out in the Inception Report and from the available data, and the results of surveys and

investigations carried out in pursuance to the feasibility studies.

1.2 An Overview of MoRT&H/NHAI

Chapter-2 of Final Feasibility Report presents an overview of MoRT&H/NHAI and the NHAI

Organization and activities and project financing and cost recovery mechanisms.

1.3 Project Description, Possible Alternative Alignments & Technical Engineering

Alternatives

Chapter 3 of Final Feasibility Report describes about the Project Description including

possible Alternative Alignments and Technical Engineering Alternatives.

1.3.1 Project Highway Description

Project Road sections “Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer (NH-68) and Mokal-Sarkaritala upto

Pakistan Border were selected by the NHAI for development programme under Bharat Mala

Project for upgradation to Two/Four lane with Paved Shoulder NH . The total length of these road

sections, under the study as per TOR is 205 Km. The project Road Sections fall under District

Jaisalmer in the state of Rajasthan. Based on various stakeholders consultations a final decision

was taken vide DGMO letter no.NHAI/PIU-Barmer/BM/DPR/Pkg-05/2016-17/1713 dated

26.12.2016 and the Section wise road lengths are as under :


Executive Summary



Sr.no Sections

Existing Chainage Length (km) From To

Section 1 :Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer

1. Jaisalmer Bypass 0.000 5.850 5.850

2. End of Jaisalmer Bypass upto

Mokal (Take off point of

Sarkaritala Road)

5.850 31.650

25.800

3. Mokal to Ramgarh 31.650 74.500 42.850

4. Ramgarh to Tanot 74.500 123.875 49.375

5. Stretch of NH-15 (New NH-68) 323.863 325.877 2.015

Total Length- Section 1 125.890

Section 2 : Mokal To Sarkaritala

1. Mokal to to Sarkaritala BSF

Camp

0.000 68.150 68.150

Total Length- Section 2 68.150

Total Length (Km.) 194.040

Figure 1 : Index Map of Project Highway Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer and Mokal

to Sarkaritala


Executive Summary



Fig.-1.1


Executive Summary



Fig-1.2

Fig.-1.3


Executive Summary



Fig.-1.4

1.3.1.1 Need of the project

Currently supplies to Indian troops and military transport happens through poor quality roads and

military which is a negative factor for armed forces during war situations. The Project road is

designed to take care of that. There is a crucial economic factor also as through proper road

infrastructure borders will open up and border trade will boost.

The Project road lies in Jaisalmer district of Rajasthan and is the major link to Indian Army for

accessing Indo-Pak border during peace time and operation time. The Army conduct exercise in

this area during peace time also. Widening of this road to 2-Lane with paved shoulders would

further improve the connectivity in terms of achieving smooth and safe traffic flow and improve

level of service along with, substantial socio-economic gain in terms of reduced Vehicle

Operating Cost (VOC) and reduced travel time and speed access. Hence improvement of this

road is required.


Executive Summary



1.3.1.2 Built up Location of project road

The Project Highway Traverses through Jaisalmer district in Rajasthan State. The project

highway starts at Tanot and passes through eleven villages Ranao, Ramgarh. Joga, Sanu,

Mokal, Bhadasar, Lanela, Rupsi, Bharamsar and Badabagh. It ends at Jaisalmer (NH-68) Km.

325.877.Existing road width is of 2 Lane configuration. The available ROW varies 25 m to 35

m.A detailed study of the project highway has been carried out in two stretches as described

hereunder:

Stretch – I : From Chainage 0.000 to 123.875 (Jaisalmer to Tanot (NH-68))

From Chainage 323.863 to 325.877 (Jaisalmer to Tanot Old NH-15(NH-68))

Stretch – II : From Chainage 0.000 to 68.150 (Mokal to Sarkaritala).This stretch passes

through villages Sultana and Sarkaribuli.

The map of project road is given in Figure 1.The details of the habitations are given in Table1.2.

Table 1.2

S. No. Buil-up area Existing Chainage Population as per census 2011

Tanot to jaisalmer

1 Lanela 23.200 1049

2 Sanu 48.400 8860

3 Ramgarh 62.800 949443

Mokal to Sarkaritala

1 Sultana 36.350 16377

2 Sarkaribueli 49.250 7700

1.3.1.3 Characteristics of Existing Project

The existing paved carriageway width is intermediate lane, single lane, gravel road and 2-

lane.The road is deficient in meeting horizontal and vertical alignment standards. Salient features

of existing project highway have been summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 : Salient Features of Existing Road

Particulars Details

Terrain Plain & Rolling

Avaiable ROW Average 25-35

Carriageway Configuration Intermediate lane -39.500 Km.


Executive Summary



Particulars Details

Two lane -142.79 Km. Single lane-1.45 Km. Gravel road-10.300 Km.

Number of Junctions Major:15,Minor: 39

Road Geometrics Horizontal and Vertical alignments of existing road have lot of deficiencies

Pavement Condition

Condition

Tanot to Jaisalmer

Mokal to Sarkaritala

Length (Km) Length (Km)

Good 23.00 - Fair 74.890 57.850 Poor 4.00 10.300 (Gravel)

Newly Constructed

24.000 19.37

Total

125.890 68.150

Major Bridge Nil

Minor Bridge Minor bridge-12 nos.

Culvert Pipe culvert-35 nos. Slab-69 nos. Causeway-44 nos.

Side Drains Do not exist in built-up stretches

ROB Nil

VUP/FLYOVER Nil

Road Facility There are seven bus bays/ seven truck lay-bye

The photographs of existing project road showing various components are represented in Figure

2.0-2.9


Executive Summary



Fig. 2.0 Start point

Fig. 2.1 Built up

Fig. 2.2 End point at Sarkaritala

Tanot

Mokal


Executive Summary



Fig. 2.3 At Existing Chainage 49.350 (Mokal to Sarkaritala)

Fig. 2.4 Existing Bypass of Ramgarh

Fig. 2.5 Existing Granular Surface at Chainage 58.000 (Section 2: Mokal To Sarkaritala)


Executive Summary



Fig.2.6 Pavement Condition

Fig. 2.7 On Jaislamer Bypass (Section 1: Jaisalmer to Tanot)

Fig.2.8 Existing Bridge at Chainage 72.975 (Section 1: Jaisalmer to Tanot)


Executive Summary



Fig. 2.9 Existing Bridge at Chainage 44.325 (Section 2: Mokal to Sarkaritala)

1.3.1.4 Traffic Surveys Analysis

The analysis of various traffic surveys i.e. Classified volume count (CVC), Turning Movement

Count (TMC), Origin-Destination (O/D), Axle load, Speed Delay, Willingness to Pay and

analysis for Project facilities which have been carried out on project highways. Summary of

results is given below.

The location wise summary of AADT by vehicles numbers and PCU’s of classified traffic volume

count is given below:

Road

Section Existing Chainage/(Design Chainage)

Location wise AADT

No.of Vehicles PCUs

Tanot To

Jaisalmer

2.000 /(123.573) 5775 8524

3.200/ (122.373) 5934 9585

29.000/(96.573) 2665 5308

60.500/(65.073) 1821 2514

70.600/(55.973) 2446 3061

Mokal To

Sarkaritala

1.000/(1.020) 689 1112

49.500/(49.488) 1420 2492

The Capacity Analysis is given as under:


Executive Summary



The Projected Traffic in term of in PCU’s is as under:

Section-1 Projected Traffic (Without army traffic) Section-2 Projected Traffic

(Without army traffic)

Km 2.000 /

(123.573)

Km 3.200 /

(122.373) Km 29.000

/(96.573)

Km 60.500 /

(65.073)

Km 70.600 /

(55.973)

Km 1.000 /

(1.020)

Km 49.500 /

(48.488)

Year Number PCU Number PCU Number PCU Number PCU Number PCU Number PCU Number PCU

2016 5775 8524 5934 9585 2665 5308 1821 2514 2446 3061 689 1112 1420 2492

2021 8626 12413 8848 13929 4000 7823 2789 3763 3655 4482 1826 4025 2053 3392

2026 12371 17410 12680 19516 5765 11065 4104 5431 5267 6290 2251 4640 2878 4544

2031 17014 23476 17440 26306 7965 15003 5792 7541 7301 8544 2771 5380 3891 5956

2036 22416 30393 22999 34074 10544 19482 7833 10056 9717 11209 3372 6219 5076 7636

2041 28270 37757 29057 42379 13360 24209 10140 12866 12407 14185 4019 7113 6376 9564

2046 34114 45002 35150 50606 16195 28776 12557 15778 15185 17309 4662 7999 7712 11720

2050 39697 51869 40999 58429 18926 33097 14920 18612 17875 20339 5279 8843 8997 13818

From the traffic projections it is seen that section Km. 114.758 to Km. 125.573 (Design Chainage) is done for 4 laning in view of

MoRT&H Circular no RW/NH-33044/37/2015/S&R(R) dated 26 May,2016 .

The following are the upgradation proposals:

(i) 4-Lane with paved shoulders

Jaisalmer Bypass (Km. 114.758 to 125.573 ) = 10.815 Km

(ii) 2-Lane with paved shoulders

Tanot To Jaisalmer Road (Km 0.000 to 114.758) =114.758 Km

Mokal to Sarkaritala BSF Camp( Km 0.000 to 67.950) = 67.950 Km

Total Length =193.523 Km


Executive Summary




Executive Summary



The location wise summary of Tollable Traffic in number of vehicles and PCU’s of classified traffic volume count are given below:

Road

Section Design Chainage (km)

Tollable Traffic

No.of Vehicles PCUs

Tanot To

Jaisalmer

54.57 1032 1547

96.57 2280 4896

122.37 3546 5874

Mokal To

Sarkaritala

1.000 496 854

49.500 387 638

1.3.1.5 Comparison of existing and proposed alignment

The Comparison of Existing and Proposed alignment of stretches are given in below

Table 2.0 : Comparison of existing and proposed alignment of stretch 1 :

Sr.

No.

Existing

Chainage (Km)

Design

Chainage (Km) Design

Length

(Km)

Proposed

Right of

Way

(ROW)

(m)

Existing

Right of

Way

(ROW)

(m)

Name of

Revenue

Village From To From To

1 323.863 325.877 125.573 123.562 2.011 45 45 Jaisalmer(

NH-15)

2 0.000 1.800 123.558 121.762 1.796 45 30 Jaisalmer

bypass

3 1.800 5.850 121.762 117.762 4.000 60 30 Jaisalmer

bypass

4 5.850 5.910 117.762 117.708 0.054 60 35 Jaisalmer

5 5.910 8.883 117.708 114.757 2.951 60 35 Badabagh

6 8.883 11.850 114.757 111.910 2.847 35 35 Badabagh

7 11.850 12.248 111.910 111.392 0.518 35 35 Bharamsar

8 12.248 13.930 111.392 109.711 1.681 60 35 Bharamsar

9 13.930 16.700 109.711 106.940 2.771 35 35 Bharamsar

10 16.700 19.580 106.940 104.060 2.880 35 35 Rupsi

11 19.580 21.240 104.060 102.401 1.659 35 35 Lanela

12 21.240 21.713 102.401 101.928 0.473 163 35

Lanela

(Toll

Plaza)

13 21.713 26.390 101.928 97.225 4.703 35 35 Lanela


Executive Summary



Sr.

No.

Existing

Chainage (Km)

Design


Length

(Km)

Proposed

Right of

Way

(ROW)

(m)

Existing

Right of

Way

(ROW)

(m)

Name of

Revenue


14 26.390 28.850 97.225 94.795 2.430 35 35 Bhadasar

15 28.850 30.100 94.795 93.540 1.255 35 35 Mokal

16 30.100 32.240 93.540 91.400 2.140 60 35 Mokal

17 32.240 41.810 91.400 81.835 9.565 35 35 Mokal

18 41.810 46.504 81.835 77.142 4.693 35 35 Sanu

19 46.504 49.501 77.142 74.145 2.997 25 25 Sanu

20 49.501 51.400 74.145 72.246 1.899 35 35 Sanu

21 51.400 56.504 72.246 67.142 5.104 35 35 Joga

22 56.504 57.800 67.142 65.846 1.296 30 30 Joga

23 57.800 65.375 65.846 RA - 30 30 Ramgarh

24 65.375 74.158 RA RA - 30 - Ramgarh

25 74.158 82.683 RA 41.140 - 35 35 Ramgarh

26 82.683 83.153 41.140 40.670 0.470 163 35

Ramgarh

(Toll

Plaza)

27 83.153 100.730 40.670 23.112 17.558 35 35 Ramgarh

28 100.730 113.450 23.112 10.408 12.704 35 35 Ranao

29 113.450 118.980 10.408 4.887 5.521 30 30 Ranao

30 118.980 123.875 4.887 0.000 4.887 30 30 Tanot

Mokal-Sarkaritala :

Sr.No.

Existing

Chainage

(Km)

Design


Length

(Km)

Proposed

Right of

Way

(ROW)

(m)

Existing

Right of

Way

(ROW)

(m)

Name of

Revenue


1 0.000 4.650 0.000 4.670 4.670 25 25 Mokal

2 4.650 7.170 4.670 7.190 2.520 30 30 Mokal

3 7.170 18.680 7.190 18.700 11.510 30 30 Parewar

4 18.680 19.612 18.700 19.632 0.932 30 30 Parewar

5 19.612 20.130 19.632 20.150 0.518 163 30

Parewar (Toll

Plaza)

6 20.130 21.600 20.150 21.600 1.450 30 30 Kabisbasti

7 21.600 23.800 21.600 23.795 2.195 30 30 Kheyia

8 23.800 27.140 23.795 27.130 3.335 30 30 Tejpal

9 27.140 30.120 27.130 30.110 2.980 30 30 Bada

10 30.120 36.150 30.110 36.140 6.030 30 30 Sultana

11 36.150 36.500 36.140 36.490 0.350 35 35 Sultana

12 36.500 39.370 36.490 39.360 2.870 30 30 Sultana

13 39.370 39.530 39.360 39.520 0.160 30 30 PTM

14 39.530 40.600 39.520 40.590 1.070 30 30 Sarkaribueli


Executive Summary



Sr.No.

Existing

Chainage

(Km)

Design


Length

(Km)

Proposed

Right of

Way

(ROW)

(m)

Existing

Right of

Way

(ROW)

(m)

Name of

Revenue


15 40.600 59.220 40.590 59.202 18.612 35 35 Sarkaribueli

16 59.220 60.120 59.202 RA - 25 25 Sarkaribueli

17 60.120 60.300 RA 60.107 - 30 30 Sarkaribueli

18 60.300 66.850 60.107 66.655 6.548 30 30 Sarkaribueli

19 66.850 68.150 66.655 67.955 1.300 35 35 Sarkaribueli

Note:- RA-Realignment

1.3.1.6 Engineering surveys & Investigations

1.2.1.6.1 Topographic Surveys

Topographic survey has been carried out on the Project Highway. The GTS Bench mark value of

224 m (RL) Rail Track from Jaisalmer railway station is applied all along the Project Road.

1.2.1.6.2 Existing pavement

CBR Value

The soaked CBR values of existing sub-grade soil varies from 8.0 to 12.00%.

Roughness Survey was carried out along the Project Highway. It is observed that roughness is

high, and the surface condition of the road is fair to very poor.

The evaluation of structural strength of existing flexible pavement was carried out using a

Benkelman Beam in accordance with the procedure given in IRC 81-1997.

To assess the characterization of Sub-grade, following tests were conducted on each of the

subgrade samples collected from trial pits:

Grain size distribution (Wet)

Atterberg’s Limits (Liquid limit and plastic limit) Modified Proctor Density at three compaction levels

Four days soaked CBR at three energy levels

The laboratory test results are included in the Chapter 4B Engineering Survey & Investigations.

The road construction materials have been identified by the Consultant and the details are given in

Chapter 4 B Engineering Surveys & Investigations.

As per details obtained from the field verification the existing ROW generally varies from 25 m to

35 m in both sections. Existing ROW for Old NH-15 (New NH-68 ) is 45m.


Executive Summary



1.3.1.7 Design Parameters

The 2/4 Lane Project Highway has been proposed for development as per Manuals of

specification and standards for two/four laning of highways (IRC:SP:73-2015/IRS:SP:84-2014)

and Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) Guidelines. In Case of any deviations

from these guidelines, the reasons have been specifically mentioned in Schedule-D. All efforts

have been made to maintain consistency of design criteria factors on account conditions. Design

criteria adopted for the project is summarized below:

Design Parameters

S. No. Parameters Detail

1 Geometric design

standards

IRC codes, guidelines and special publications. IRS:SP:73-

2015/IRC:SP:84-2014 “Two-Laning/Four Laning of

highway through Public Private Partnership “Manual specifications and standards published by Planning

Commission and orders issued by NHAI from time to time

2 Design Speed (Km/hr) Ruling-100 Km/hr

Mininum-80 Km/hr

3 Roadway Elements Two lane carriageway:2 x 3.5 m

Four lane carriageway: 2x 7.0 m

Paved Shoulders : 2 x 1.5 m

Earthen Shoulders : 2 x 2.0 m

Median : 5.0 m (open country) including 0.5 m

Kerb/Shyness strip on both sides and in Builtup 2.5m

(including kerb/shyness)

4 Service Road/Slip Road

Width

7.5 m and 7.0 m

5 Embankment Slope In filling-1 V:2 H

In cutting - 1 V:1 H

6 Camber Carriageway/Paved Shoulders:2.5%

Unpaved/Earthen Shoulders : 3.0 %

7 Super-elevation Maximum 7 %

8 Desirable minimum for

Horizontal curves

400 m for speed of 100 Km/hr

9 Ruling Gradient 2.5 %


Executive Summary



1.3.1.8 Improvement Proposals

4 laning has been proposed in a length of 10.815 Km. as per design chainage 114.758 to 125.573.

Two Laning has been proposed in the remaining length as given below:

(i) Tanot to Jaisalmer - Ch. 0.000 to Ch. 114.757

(ii) Mokal to Sarkaritala - Ch. 0.000 to Ch. 67.950.

For section Proposed for 2 lane with paved shoulders existing ROW is sufficient while for section

proposed for 4-laning 60/45 m ROW has been proposed.

The following widening options are proposed for 2/4 lane sections.

(i) Proposed Widening to the Left/Right of the Existing Carriageway

(ii) Concentric Widening of Existing Carriageway .

The Summary of proposed Widening Scheme for 2/4 lane section is given below:

Widening Proposals Tanot to Jaisalmer Mokal to sarkaritala

Design Length(Km) Design Length(Km)

Realignments 2.783 1.320

Concentric Widening 122.790 66.630

Total Design Length 125.573 67.950

Concentric widening has been proposed for section 2 lane with paved shoulders.

1.3.1.9 Typical Cross section

The Different type of cross sections for different segments of Two/four lane with paved shoulders

stretch shall be developed as provided in IRC SP-84-2014/IRC SP-73-2015 referred in Schedule D.

The Indicative Typical Cross sections are as below.

Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer:

Sr.

No.

Design Chainage

Design

Length

in Km Description

Reference as

IRC SP 84/IRC SP

73

Start

Chainage

Km.

End

Chainage

Km.

1

0.000 0.547 0.547

4 lane Divided highway without Service

road and with Raised Median (Built-Up

section)

Fig. 2.5 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

2 0.547 40.675 40.128

2X3.5 m Carriageway+2x1.5 Paved

Shoulders +2.0 m Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015


Executive Summary



Sr.

No.

Design Chainage

Design

Length

in Km Description

Reference as

IRC SP 84/IRC SP

73

Start

Chainage

Km.

End

Chainage

Km.

3

40.675 41.125 0.450

Toll Plaza

Fig. 10.2 & 10.6

of IRC:SP:73-

2015

4 41.125 47.660 6.535



Fig.2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

5 47.660 47.760 0.100 Helipad TCS-4

6 47.760 49.510 1.750



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

7 49.510 49.550 0.040

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

8 49.550 50.715 1.165



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

9 50.715 50.736 0.021

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

10 50.736 58.645 7.909



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

11

58.645 61.047 2.402



section)

Fig. 2.5 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

12 61.047 74.747 13.700



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

13

74.747 75.547 0.800



section)

Fig. 2.5 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

14 75.547 79.260 3.713



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

15 79.260 79.360 0.100 Helipad TCS-4

16 79.360 91.400 12.040



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

17 91.400 91.575 0.175 4 lane Divided highway without Service

roads and with Raised Median

Fig. 2.4 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

18 91.575 91.988 0.413

4-lane Structure ( VUP ) Approach with

Slip Road

Fig. 7.11 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

19 91.988 92.013 0.025

2x2-Lane VUP

Fig. 7.11 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

20 92.013 93.375 1.362


Slip Road

Fig. 7.11 of

IRC:SP:73-2015


Executive Summary



Sr.

No.

Design Chainage

Design

Length

in Km Description

Reference as

IRC SP 84/IRC SP

73

Start

Chainage

Km.

End

Chainage

Km.

21 93.375 93.540 0.165



Fig. 2.4 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

22 93.540 95.121 1.581



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

23 95.121 95.139 0.018

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

24 95.139 99.658 4.519



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

25

99.658 100.558 0.900



section)

Fig. 2.5 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

26 100.558 101.869 1.311



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

27 101.869 101.884 0.015

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

28 101.884 101.940 0.056



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

29

101.940 102.390 0.450

Toll Plaza

Fig. 10.2 & 10.6

of IRC:SP:73-

2015

30 102.390 104.321 1.931



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

31 104.321 104.369 0.048

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

32 104.369 106.362 1.993



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

33 106.362 106.369 0.007

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

34 106.369 107.575 1.206



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

35 107.575 107.596 0.021

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

36 107.596 109.230 1.634



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

37 109.230 109.240 0.010

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

38 109.240 109.725 0.485



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015


Executive Summary



Sr.

No.

Design Chainage

Design

Length

in Km Description

Reference as

IRC SP 84/IRC SP

73

Start

Chainage

Km.

End

Chainage

Km.

39 109.725 109.880 0.155



Fig. 2.4 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

40 109.880 110.817 0.937


Slip Road

Fig. 7.12 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

41 110.817 110.835 0.018

2x2-Lane VUP

Fig. 7.12 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

42 110.835 111.182 0.347


Slip Road

Fig. 7.12 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

43 111.182 111.195 0.013 Minor Bridge TCS-2

44 111.195 111.350 0.155



Fig. 2.4 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

45 111.350 111.655 0.305



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

46 111.655 111.665 0.010

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

47 111.665 114.760 3.095



Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-2015

48 114.758 116.512 1.754



Fig. 2.4 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

49 116.512 116.528 0.016

Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.3 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

50 116.528 117.090 0.562



Fig. 2.4 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

51 117.090 117.250 0.160

6-lane Structure ( Flyover ) Approach

with Slip Road

Fig. 7.8 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

52 117.250 117.738 0.488


with Slip Road

Fig. 7.8 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

53 117.738 117.763 0.025

2x3-Lane Flyover

Fig. 7.8 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

54 117.763 118.180 0.417


with Slip Road

Fig. 7.8 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

55

118.180 119.060 0.880


Shoulders +1.5 m Raised Median +2x 1.5

m Separator +2x 7.5 m Slip Road +2x1.5

Footpath

Fig. 2.6 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

56 119.060 119.575 0.515


with Slip Road

Fig. 7.8 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

57 119.575 119.605 0.030 2x3-Lane Flyover Fig. 7.8 of


Executive Summary



Sr.

No.

Design Chainage

Design

Length

in Km Description

Reference as

IRC SP 84/IRC SP

73

Start

Chainage

Km.

End

Chainage

Km.

IRC:SP:84-2014

58 119.605 119.860 0.255


with Slip Road

Fig. 7.8 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

59

119.860 120.760 0.900




Footpath

Fig. 2.6 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

60 120.760 121.000 0.240


with Slip Road

Fig. 7.8 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

61 121.000 121.030 0.030

2x3-Lane Flyover

Fig. 7.8 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

62 121.030 121.555 0.525


with Slip Road

Fig. 7.8 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

63

121.555 121.810 0.255




Footpath

Fig. 2.6 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

64 121.810 122.097 0.287

4-lane Structure ( ROB ) Approach with

Slip Road TCS-1

65 122.097 122.458 0.361

2x2-Lane ROB

Fig. 7.2 A of

IRC:SP:84-2014

66 122.316 122.324 0.008 Minor Bridge TCS-3

67 122.324 122.767 0.443

4-lane Structure ( ROB ) Approach with

Slip Road TCS-1

68

122.767 123.550 0.783




Footpath

Fig. 2.6 of

IRC:SP:84-2014

69 123.550 125.573 2.023



Fig. 2.4 of

IRC:SP:84-2014


Executive Summary



Mokal-Sarkaritala :

Sr.

No.

Design Chainage Design

Length

in Km

Description Reference as

TCS No. Start

Chainage

Km.

End

Chainage

Km.

1 0 12.175 12.175

2X3.5 m Carriageway+2x1.5

Paved Shoulders +2.0 m

Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

1.A 12.175 12.185 0.10 Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

1.B 12.185 13.235 1.05



Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

1.C 13.235 13.245 0.10 Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

1.D 13.245 14.495 1.25



Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

1.E 14.495 14.505 0.01 Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

1.F 14.505 19.675 5.170



Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

1.G 19.675 20.125 0.45 Toll Plaza

Fig. 10.2 &

10.6 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

1.H 20.125 30.974 10.849



Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

2 30.974 31.007 0.033 Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

3 31.007 36.09 5.083



Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

4 36.09 36.54 0.450

4 lane Divided highway without

Service road and with Raised

Median (Built-Up section)

Fig. 2.5 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

5 36.54 44.307 7.767



Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015


Executive Summary



Sr.

No.

Design Chainage Design

Length

in Km

Description Reference as

TCS No. Start

Chainage

Km.

End

Chainage

Km.

6 44.307 44.323 0.016 Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

7 44.323 48.99 4.667



Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73

8 48.99 49.49 0.500 2X7.0 m Carriageway+1x2.5

Median +2x1.5 m Footpath

Fig. 2.5 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

9 49.49 59.863 10.373



Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

10 59.863 59.883 0.020 Minor Bridge

Fig. 7.6 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015

11 59.883 67.95 8.067



Earthen Shoulders

Fig. 2.2 of

IRC:SP:73-

2015


Executive Summary



Proposed cross sections Details


Executive Summary




Executive Summary



1.3.1.10 VUP/FLYOVERS

All structures are proposed with 4/6 lane configuration. The proposed location

of the VUP/FLYOVER are given below.

1.3.1.11 Slip Roads/ Service Roads

The Service Road/Slip Roads are proposed mainly along the Flyover and VUPs. The location of

the slip road/service road is given below.


Sr.

No.

Location of Slip

road (from Design

km to km)

Length

(Km) of

Slip

road

Right hand side (RHS)/Left

hand side (LHS)/ or Both

sides

Width (m)

Start

Chainage

End

Chainage

1 91.575 93.375 1.800 Both Side 7.5

2 109.88 111.182 1.302 Both Side 7.5

3 117.25 121.810 4.560 Both Side 7.5

4 121.810 122.767 0.957 Both Side 7.0

5 122.767 123.550 0.783 Both Side 7.5

6 123.550 -123.358 0.192 RHS 7.5

7 123.550 123.758 0.208 LHS 7.5

Total length of

Service Road

(a) Total length of slip road of 7.5 m width =

(2x8.445)+(0.4)= 17.290 km.

(b) Total length of slip road of 7.0 m width = 2x0.957=1.914

S.

No.

Design Span/ Vertical

Clearance

(m)

Name of Cross

Road

Type of

Structure Remarks Chainage

(Km)

Opening

(m)

1 92.000 1x25 5.5 Mokal to Sarkaritala

Road VUP

4-Lane

Carriageway

2 110.815 1x18 5.5 Rupshi to Baramser VUP 4-Lane

Carriageway

3 117.750 1x25 5.5 To Jaisalmer Flyover 6-Lane

Carriageway

4 119.590 1x30 5.5 Jaisalmer to

Sawalsha Colony Flyover

6-Lane

Carriageway

5 121.015 1x30 5.5 Jaisalmer to

Kishanghat Flyover

6-Lane

Carriageway


Executive Summary



Sr.

No.

Location of Slip

road (from Design

km to km)

Length

(Km) of

Slip

road

Right hand side (RHS)/Left

hand side (LHS)/ or Both

sides

Width (m)

Start

Chainage

End

Chainage

km.

3) At VUP & Flyover locations existing roads shall have to be integrated with slip

road with proper intersections/junctions as per section 3 of IRC:SP 84:2014/

IRC:SP 73:2015.

4) All Junctions with Slip road and cross-road need to be properly developed as

per Section 3 of IRC SP 84-2014/ IRC:SP 73:2015.

Mokal-Sarkaritala :

Sr.

No.

Location of Slip road (from

Design km to km)

Length

(Km)

of Slip

road

Right hand side

(RHS)/Left hand side

(LHS)/ or Both sides

Width

(m) Start

Chainage

End

Chainage

-NIL-

1.3.1.12 Cross drainage structures

Existing Minor bridges in poor condition and inadequate are proposed to be reconstructed.

Bridges in good condition are proposed to be retained or widened. In addition, new bridge

structures proposed where required. Summary of the proposed bridges and is given below:

a) Minor Bridge

Existing bridges to be re-constructed.


Sl.

No.

Existing Chainage (Km) Design Chainage

(Km)

Length

(m)

Improvement

Proposal

1 1.235 122.320 8.0 Reconstruction


3 16.060 107.580 21.0 Reconstruction


5 19.300 104.345 48.0 Reconstruction

6 21.770 101.870 15.0 Reconstruction

7 72.965 50.725 18.0 Widen


9 11.980 111.660 10 New


Executive Summary



Sl.

No.

Existing Chainage (Km) Design Chainage

(Km)

Length

(m)

Improvement

Proposal

Construction

10 12.455 111.100 10 New

Construction

11 14.410 109.230 10 New

Construction

12 Realignment (Ramgarh

bypass)

49.530 40 New

Construction

Mokal-Sarkaritala :

Sr.

No.

Existing Chainage

(Km)

Design

Chainage

(Km)

Length (m) Improvement

Proposal

1 12.160 12.180 10 New

Construction

2 13.220 13.240 10 New

Construction

3 14.500 14.520 10 New

Construction

4 31.00 30.990 33 Widen

5 44.325 44.315 16 Reconstruction

6 Realignment 59.873 20 New

Construction

(b) Culverts

Overall width of all culverts shall be equal to the roadway width of the approaches.

Reconstruction of Existing Culverts

Culverts at the following locations shall be re-constructed as new culverts:

Box Culvert

Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer

Sr. No. Existing

Chainage (Km)

Design

Chainage (Km) No. of Box x Size of Box (mxm)

1 1.460 122.110 1x5.5x2

2 3.407 120.205 1x1.5x1.5

3 5.090 118.470 2x3x2

4 6.290 117.325 1x3.5x2

5 7.620 116.015 1x3.5x2

6 9.020 114.620 1x3x2


Executive Summary



Sr. No. Existing

Chainage (Km)

Design


7 9.438 114.200 1x3.5x2

8 10.190 113.450 1x3.5x2

9 11.055 112.585 1x3.5x2

10 15.750 107.890 1x5.5x2

11 18.260 105.380 1x5.0x2

12 24.980 98.660 1X3x2

13 25.620 98.025 1x2.5x2

14 25.655 97.995 1x3x2

15 26.050 97.600 1x2.5x2

16 29.995 93.650 1x2.5x2

17 31.070 92.575 1x5.5x2

18 32.010 91.635 1x1.5x1.5

19 48.370 75.275 1x3x2

20 51.040 72.605 1x2x2

21 52.810 70.830 1x2.5x2

22 53.185 70.460 1x5.5x2

23 54.135 69.515 1x4x2

24 55.378 68.270 1x2x2

25 55.615 68.030 1x2x2

26 56.560 67.085 1x6x2

27 57.785 65.860 1x2.5x2

28 59.320 64.330 1x2.5x2

29 60.060 63.585 1x3x2

30 61.780 61.690 1x3x2

31 63.745 59.900 1x1.5x1.5

32 63.850 59.800 1x1.5x1.5

33 68.060 55.620 1x3x2

34 68.605 55.080 1x3x2

35 74.487 49.340 1x5x2

36 75.445 48.380 1x2x2

37 75.925 47.900 1x1.5x1.5

38 76.535 47.290 1x1.5x1.5

39 77.435 46.395 1x1.5x1.5

40 80.615 43.210 1x2x2

41 81.395 42.430 1x2x2

42 82.680 41.145 1x2.5x2

43 83.985 39.840 1x2x2


Executive Summary



Sr. No. Existing

Chainage (Km)

Design


44 107.180 16.670 1x1.5x1.5

45 110.080 13.675 1x1.5x1.5

Mokal-Sarkaritala :

Sr. No. Existing Chainage

(Km) Design Chainage (Km)

No. of Box x Size of Box

(mxm)

1 6.625 6.645 2 x 2 x 1.5

2 12.295 12.315 1 x 2 x 2

3 12.530 12.550 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

4 13.385 13.405 1 x 2 x 2

5 14.300 14.320 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

6 14.785 14.805 1 x 2 x 2

7 14.960 14.980 1 x 2 x 2

8 15.725 15.745 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

9 16.505 16.525 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

10 20.495 20.515 1 x 2 x 2

11 24.900 24.895 1 x 2 x 2

12 26.160 26.150 1 x 2 x 2

13 28.260 28.250 1 x 2 x 2

14 29.010 29.000 1 x 2 x 2

15 30.825 30.815 1 x 2 x 2

16 31.255 31.245 1 x 2 x 2

17 31.510 31.500 1 x 2 x 2

18 32.260 32.250 1 x 2 x 2

19 33.845 33.835 1 x 2 x 2

20 34.030 34.020 1 x 2 x 2

21 34.785 34.775 1 x 2 x 2

22 35.555 35.545 1 x 2 x 2

23 35.820 35.810 1 x 2 x 2

24 36.580 36.570 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

25 36.780 36.770 1 x 2 x 2

26 37.215 37.205 1 x 2 x 2

27 37.477 37.465 1 x 2 x 2

28 37.672 37.662 1 x 2 x 2

29 38.010 38.000 1 x 2 x 2

30 38.240 38.230 1 x 2 x 2

31 38.637 38.627 1 x 2 x 2

32 38.955 38.945 1 x 2 x 2

33 39.247 39.237 1 x 2 x 2

34 39.337 39.327 1 x 2 x 2


Executive Summary



Sr. No. Existing Chainage

(Km) Design Chainage (Km)

No. of Box x Size of Box

(mxm)

35 39.457 39.446 1 x 2 x 2

36 39.992 39.982 1 x 2 x 2

37 42.258 42.248 1 x 5.2 x 2

38 42.520 42.510 1 x 2 x 2

39 43.280 43.270 1 x 2 x 2

40 44.255 44.245 1 x 2 x 2

41 47.325 47.315 1 x 2 x 2

42 48.672 48.665 1 x 2 x 2

43 49.520 49.507 1 x 2 x 2

44 52.038 52.025 1 x 2 x 2

45 52.325 52.310 1 x 2 x 2

46 52.840 52.825 1 x 2 x 2

47 53.490 53.475 1 x 2 x 2

48 54.895 54.880 1 x 2 x 2

49 56.435 56.420 1 x 2 x 2

50 57.200 57.180 1 x 2 x 2

51 58.015 57.995 1 x 2 x 2

52 58.075 58.055 1 x 2 x 2

53 58.290 58.272 1 x 2 x 2

54 59.575 59.500 1X4X2

Widening of Existing Culverts

Following culverts shall be widened to the roadway width of the project highway as per manual.

Repairs and strengthening of existing structures where required shall be carried out.

Sr.

No.

Culvert location Type, span and width of existing culvert

(m)

Remark

1 125.140 Slab,1X2.5m,9.90m

2 125.485 Slab,1X2.5m,9.30m

New Culverts

Additional new culverts shall be constructed as per particulars given in the table below:

Box Culverts


Sr.

No. Existing Chainage (Km)

Design Chainage

(Km) No. of Span x opening of span (m)

1 325.640 (NH-15) 123.790 1X1.5X1.5

2 325.130 124.300 1X1.5X1.5

3 0.365 123.205 1x3.0x2.0

4 2.451 121.110 3x2.0


Executive Summary



Sr.


Design Chainage


5 4.435 119.175 1x2.0x2.0

6 6.000 117.620 1x2.0x2.0

7 13.566 110.080 2x3.0x2.0

8 14.170 109.475 2x3.0x2.0

9 17.610 106.030 1x3.0x2.0

10 20.710 102.930 1x2.0x2.0

11 22.432 101.210 1x1.5x1.5

12 22.843 100.800 1x1.5x1.5

13 24.185 99.460 1x1.5x1.5

14 30.571 93.070 1x2.0x2.0

15 32.318 91.325 1x2.0x2.0

16 33.020 90.625 1x2.0x2.0

17 33.740 89.900 1x2.0x2.0

18 34.275 89.375 1x3.0x2.0

19 35.740 87.905 1x2.0x2.0

20 37.670 85.980 1x3.0x2.0

21 39.720 83.925 1x2.0x2.0

22 41.720 81.925 1x2.0x2.0

23 43.710 79.935 1x2.0x2.0

24 45.690 77.955 1x2.0x2.0

25 55.680 67.970 2x3.0x2.0

26 57.260 66.390 1x2.0x2.0

27 59.051 64.640 1x2.0x2.0

28 59.740 63.910 1x3.0x2.0

29 61.210 62.440 1x2.0x2.0

30 62.285 61.370 1x2.0x2.0

31 64.294 59.360 1x2.0x2.0

32 65.775 57.910 1x2.0x2.0

33 66.335 57.3.50 1x2.0x2.0

34 66.630 57.055 1x2.0x2.0

35 70.275 53.410 1x2.0x2.0

36 70.505 53.180 2x3.0x2.0

37 73.720 49.970 2x2.0x2.0

38 80.255 43.570 1x1.5x1.5

39 81.720 42.100 1x1.5x1.5

40 84.400 49.425 1x1.5x1.5

41 85.700 38.125 1x1.5x1.5


Executive Summary



Sr.


Design Chainage


42 87.215 36.610 1x1.5x1.5

43 87.900 35.925 1x1.5x1.5

44 93.300 30.530 1x1.5x1.5

45 94.261 29.570 1x3.0x2.0

46 96.350 27.480 1x1.5x1.5

47 98.000 25.840 1x1.5x1.5

48 100.550 23.295 1x1.5x1.5

49 101.600 22.240 1x1.5x1.5

50 104.100 19.750 1x1.5x1.5

51 106.676 17.170 1x3.0x2.0

52 108.877 14.970 1x1.5x1.5

53 112.420 11.435 1x1.5x1.5

54 115.100 8.765 1x1.5x1.5

55 120.990 2.880 1X1.5X1.5

Mokal-Sarkaritala :

Sr. No.

Existing Chainage

(Km) Design Chainage (Km) No. of Span x opening of span (m)

1 0.195 0.215 2 x 2 x 1.5

2 0.900 0.920 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

3 1.680 1.700 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

4 2.680 2.700 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

5 3.600 3.620 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

6 4.680 4.700 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

7 5.680 5.700 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

8 7.500 7.520 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

9 8.500 8.520 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

10 9.580 9.600 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

11 10.560 10.580 2 x 2 x 1.5

12 11.300 11.320 2 x 2 x 1.5

13 11.760 11.780 2 x 2 x 1.5

14 13.015 13.035 2 x 2 x 1.5

15 17.026 17.045 2 x 2 x 1.5

16 18.475 18.495 2 x 2 x 1.5

17 19.500 19.520 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

18 20.980 20.995 2 x 2 x 1.5

19 21.110 21.110 1 x 3 x 1.5


Executive Summary



Sr. No.

Existing Chainage

(Km) Design Chainage (Km) No. of Span x opening of span (m)

20 21.770 21.770 1 x 3 x 1.5

21 21.965 21.965 1 x 3 x 1.5

22 23.400 23.395 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

23 24.380 24.375 2 x 2 x 1.5

24 25.480 25.475 2 x 2 x 1.5

25 27.583 27.575 2 x 2 x 1.5

26 29.130 29.120 2 x 2 x 1.5

27 30.000 29.995 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

28 32.075 32.068 2 x 2 x 1.5

29 33.020 33.015 2 x 2 x 1.5

30 33.528 33.520 2 x 2 x 1.5

31 37.095 37.085 2 x 2 x 1.5

32 37.273 37.262 2 x 2 x 1.5

33 41.100 41.090 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

34 44.750 44.740 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

35 45.500 45.490 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

36 46.500 46.490 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

37 50.600 50.587 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

38 51.250 51.235 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

39 53.000 52.985 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

40 54.000 53.985 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

41 60.300 60.105 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

42 61.000 60.805 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

43 61.850 61.655 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

44 62.400 62.205 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

45 62.950 62.755 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

46 63.700 63.505 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

47 64.000 63.805 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

48 64.800 64.605 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

49 65.500 65.305 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

50 66.450 66.255 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

51 67.250 67.055 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

52 67.500 67.305 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

53 67.900 67.705 1 x 1.5 x 1.5

Pipe Culverts at Junctions has been proposed as follows:

Section No.of Junctions No. Culverts


Executive Summary



Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-

Jaisalmer:

18 (3-arm) 18 Nos.

Mokal-Sarkaritala 8 (3-arm)

2 (4-arm)

8 Nos.

4 Nos.

1.3.1.13 Road over Bridge (ROB)/ Road under Bridge

Road Over-bridge (ROB) is proposed to be provided at the following level crossing :


S.

No

.

Location of

ROB

(at existing

chainage km)

Location of

ROB

(at Design

chainage

km)

Design

Chainage

Viaduct

Span

Arrangement

Length of

bridge (m)

Remarks

1 1.305 122.295 122.101 to

122.462

7x25.0m+1x36+

6x25.0m 361

2x2-lane as

Figure 7.3

of IRC SP

84-2014

1.3.1.14 Pavement Design

Flexible pavement has been proposed for main carriageway and for slip roads. Rigid

pavement is proposed for Toll Plaza. The flexible pavement design has been worked

out based on the guidelines of IRC 37-2012.

Proposed pavement composition for different sections is given below:

Particular Thickness in mm

Thickness of Bitumen Course (BC) 40 mm

Thickness of Dense Bitumen Macadam

(DBM)

80-100 mm

Thickness of Wet Mix Macadam (WMM) 250 mm

1.3.1.15 Junctions

The Junctions has been provided where major roads, cross roads join the project road.

Major Junctions

The details of major junctions along project stretch are as follows:


Executive Summary




features given in the tables below:

a) Major Junctions (At Grade)


Sr. No.

Existing Design Type of

Junction Name of Cross Road Remarks Chainage

(Km)

Chainage

(Km)

1 0 123.558 T NH-15 BS

2 27.592 96.055 X Chhatrel to Bhadasar BS

3 54.872 68.775 T Kabeerbasti RHS

4 65.38 58.3 T MDR-103 RHS

5 69.647 54.04 X Ramgarh to Sultana BS

6 74.01 49.7 T Ramgarh bypass to Ramgarh LHS

Mokal-Sarkaritala

Sr. No.

Existing Design Type of

Junction Name of Cross Road Remarks Chainage

(Km)

Chainage

(Km)

1 29.712 29.7 T Mokal to Bada RHS

2 30.85 30.84 Y Mokal to Bada LHS

3 49.22 49.21 T Mokal to PTM Chowk RHS

Minor Junctions

The details of minor junctions along project stretch are as follows:


Sr.

No.

Existing Design Type Leads to….. location

Surface

Type

Chainage (km) Chainage

(km) To LHS To RHS

1 324.995 124.44 T COLONY BT

2 325.415 124.02 T Army Camp BT

3 325.72 123.725 T Golden city BT

4 0.08 123.49 y Army Camp BT

5 0.57 123 T Shilp Camp BT

6 0.84 122.72 T Shilp Camp BT

7 1.5 122.14 T Jaisalmer city BT

8 1.9 121.74 T Transport Nagar BT

9 3.35 120.26 T Jaisalmer city BT

10 4.025 119.59 T

Sawalsha

Colony

BT

11 4.378 119.24 T Laxshmi Colony BT



Executive Summary



Sr.

No.

Existing Design Type Leads to….. location

Surface

Type


(km) To LHS To RHS


14 6.69 116.93 T Amar Sagar BT

15 7.99 115.65 T 95 RCC(GREF) BT

16 8.4 115.23 T Badabagh BT

17 10.285 113.37 Y Jethwai BT

18 32.38 91.26 Y

Shree Jagat G

Satnam

BT

19 34.62 89.01 Y

Power house

road

BT

20 42.555 81.09 T

Khennyawas

Rarki

BT

21 47.62 76.02 T

CC Road Sanu

village BT

22 49.28 74.37 T Serawa BT

23 52.03 71.68 T BRO building BT

24 54.872 68.775 KabeerBasti BT

25 62.05 61.6 T Village Road BT

26 72.415 51.24 T Mohangarhvill. BT

27 75.21 48.62 T BSF BT

28 86 37.82 T To Gandhi Gram BT

29 97.28 26.56 T Bandha BT

30 103.29 20.56 T Ranao BT

31 104.62 19.21 Y Village Road BT

Mokal-Sarkaritala :

Sr.

No.

Existing Design

Type

Leads to ……. Location Surface

Type


(km) To LHS To RHS

1 17.615 17.635 T Ratta BT

2 22.46 22.45 X Suthar Khinya

Connect MDR

103 BT

3 25.77 25.76 T Kheya BT

4 30.55 30.54 T Camp Road BT

5 30.832 30.822 T To MDR 103 BT

6 36.085 36.075 T Village Road BT

7 44.05 44.04 Y Ramgarh BT

8 58.348 58.33 T Link road BT

9 59.718 59.7 X BT

10 68.1 67.9 T

BSF Base

Camp BT

1.3.1.16 Drainage


Executive Summary



Drainage system including surface and subsurface drains for the Project Highway shall be

provided as per Section 6 of IRC:SP:84-2014 /IRC: SP:73-2015. Locations of RCC road

side drains shall be as per Cross Section Schedule.

1.3.1.17 Retaining Wall/ Brest wall

Retaining wall / breast wall shall be provided as per site requirements and Cross sections

given to accommodate in the proposed ROW. In addition to the above, retaining wall shall

be provided at the locations where the ROW is insufficient and other locations of high

embankment as per site requirement and decided by the Independent Engineer, IRC

guidelines and standard specifications, as per IRC Manual. The length provided is 51.193

Km.

1.3.1.18 Project Facilities

The following Project facilities have been included in the project.

(a) Toll Plazas

Toll plazas have been provided at locations given bellow: Specifications and

other requirements of the toll plazas shall be strictly as per schedule -D.


S. No. Road Location Design Chainage

in Km From To

1 Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer 40.900 40.670 41.143

2 Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer 102.151 101.933 102.383

Mokal-Sarkaritala

S. No. Road Location Design Chainage

in Km From To

1 Mokal-Sarkaritala 19.900 19.675 20.125

(b) Roadside Furniture

The roadside furniture shall include the provision of the following:

Traffic Signs

Traffic signs include roadside signs, overhead signs and curb mounted signs along the

entire Project Highway as per manual recommended in Schedule D.

Street Lighting/High Mast Lighting

Street lighting and lighting system shall be provided in accordance with Clause 12.3

(IRC:SP:84) & Clause 12.4 (IRC:SP:73), Section 12 of the Manuals of Specifications

and Standards.


Executive Summary



Pedestrian Facilities

(i) Pedestrian guardrail: Provide pedestrian guardrail at each bus stop location.

(ii) Pedestrian facilities shall be provided as per specifications and standards specified in

Technical Schedule D.

For proper approaches to adjoining agricultural fields along excavated drains, 900 mm

dia. NP2 pipes for about 7.5 m in length with adequate cushion over pipe at an interval

of 500m on both sides & wherever required as per site requirements in consultation with

Authority Engineer shall be provided.

Truck Lay-Byes/Helipads

Truck lay-bye/Helipad shall be provided at the following locations:

Truck Lay-Byes


Sr.No. Design Chainage (Km) Side Village

1 11.300 LHS Ranao

2 15.450 LHS Ranao

3 18.960 RHS Ranao

4 23.045 LHS Ramgarh


Mokal-Sarkaritala

Sr.No. Design Chainage (Km) Side Village

1 36.680 LHS Sultana

Helipads


Sr.

No. Design Chainage (Km) Side Village

1 47.710 BHS Ramgarh

2 79.310 BHS Sanu

Area of Helipads shall be provided in 3230 sq.m

Bus-bays

Locations of Bus Shelters are provided in following Table.


Sr. No. Design

Chainage (Km) Side Location Name


Executive Summary



Sr. No. Design

Chainage (Km) Side Location Name

1 6.172 LHS Ranao

2 6.660 RHS Ranao

3 20.335 LHS Ranao

4 20.996 RHS Ranao


6 26.748 RHS Ramgarh




10 68.548 RHS Joga

11 69.005 LHS Joga

12 74.205 RHS Sanu

13 75.763 LHS Sanu

14 80.908 RHS Sanu

15 81.283 LHS Sanu

16 90.938 RHS Mokal

17 95.798 RHS Bhadasar

18 96.318 LHS Bhadasar

19 99.798 LHS Lanela

20 100.443 LHS Lanela

21 111.523 RHS Bramser

22 114.913 RHS Badabagh

23 115.413 LHS Badabagh

24 116.754 RHS Badabagh

Mokal-Sarkaritala :

Sr. No. Design

Chainage (Km) Side

Location Name

1 17.375 LHS Parewar

2 17.865 RHS Parewar

3 22.230 LHS Kheyia

4 22.641 RHS Kheyia

5 29.499 LHS Bada

6 29.915 RHS Bada

7 35.187 LHS Sultana

8 36.890 RHS Sultana

9 48.547 LHS PTM

10 49.720 RHS PTM

Other Provision

Provision of Traffic Aid Posts, Medical Aid Posts, Highway Patrol Unit, Ambulances,

Vehicle Rescue Posts, Crane Services, Operation and Maintenance Center, Rainwater


Executive Summary



harvesting system have been included in the improvement proposal and in the Cost

Estimates.

Toilet Blocks under Swach Bharat Mission and Weight in Motion and Static Weight Bridge

have been proposed in the Improvement Proposal and in the Cost Estimates.

1.4 Construction Material

Due to favorable topography earth material for the project is available in abundance close to the

project road. Soil samples of identification borrow areas mostly conform to MoRTH specification

and will be operated and rehabilitated as per IRC : 37-2012. Stone aggregates will be sourced from

existing licensed quarries. However/contractor may use any source subject to compliance of

statutory/legal requirements. Sand is also available in plenty in nearby areas of the project road.

Water requirement for construction will be met through irrigation department or public health

department.

1.5 Socio-Economic Profile of the Project Influence Area

The socio-economic status of the project influenced districts.

Both the Project road sections lie in Jaisalmer District. Jaisalmer is located within a rectangle

lying between 26°.4’ –28°.23' North parallel and 69°.20'-72°.42' east meridians. It is the largest

district of Rajasthan and one of the largest in the country. The breath (East-West) of the district is

270 Kms and the length (North-South) is 186 Kms. District Jaisalmer is bounded on the north by

Bikaner, on the west & south-west by Indian boarder, on the south by Barmer and Jodhpur, and on

the east by Jodhpur and Bikaner Districts. The length of international boarder attached to District

Jaisalmer is 471 Kms.

The project districts have a lot to offer for Tourism. A number of tourist places and religious and

other famous places are near to the Project road as detailed in Chapter 5 Socio-economic Profile

of Project Influence area.

Jaisalmer district is one of the six districts, those comes under Jodhpur division. District Collector

is head of the district for revenue, Law and order matters. District Collector & District Magistrate

is the head of District Administration. For administration and development, the district is divided

in Sub Divisions and tehsils (sub-districts). The District Jaisalmer has 3 sub-divisions. Each of the

sub-divisions is headed by a Sub-divisional Officer (SDOs) / Magistrates, the officers are

responsible for implementation of law and order matters in their respective sub-divisions.

Infrastructure facilities viz; education, medical, drinking water, communication, postal services

and banking are available in the District.

1.6 Environmental Screening and Preliminary Environmental Assessment

Preliminary environmental assessment / environmental screening has been carried out in the

project area during January-February 2017. The results of the preliminary screening lead to

identification of the nature and extent of environmental issues needing more detailed examination.

The Project Highway lies in following Longitude and Latitude:


Executive Summary



Location Northings Eastings

Jaisalmer 26° 55' 00.90" North 70° 54' 10.84" East

Tanot 27° 48' 45" North 70° 21' 18.55" East

Mokal 27° 8' 0" North 70° 45' 0" East

Sarkaritala 27°42'0" North 70°55' 60" East

The project road sections traverse through the district of Jaiselmer in the state of Rajasthan.

Section 1 starts from Tanot-Ramgarh-Bhadasar-Jaisalmer ( NH-68) and Section 2 is connecting

Mokal - Sarkaritala . Both the sections covering a total length of about 191.875 kms. Section 1 is

running south-east to north-west direction between Longitudes 70056' & 70021' and lies between

Latitudes of 26055’ & 27047’. While section 2 under the project is running from south to north

direction between Longitudes 70045' & 70054' and lies between Latitudes of 27007’ & 27042’ within the state of Rajasthan.

Rajasthan is one of the driest regions in India. Except in the hills of the Aravali range, temperature

in most other parts of the state reaches the 45oC mark during the summer months. Winters are mild

in Rajasthan with the temperatures ranging between 22oC and 8oC. The climate of Rajasthan is

characterized by dry and hot winds. The rainfall, which is characteristically scanty, comes during

the month of July and September. However rainfall is comparatively high in the hilly Aravali

range. The southwest region of the state, being on the tropical region is considerably humid.

The project road does not pass through any protected areas (national park, wild life sanctuary,

reserve/protected forests). Road plantation is done with very thin vegetation cover in open and

barren land use while thin vegetation covers in area with agricultural land use near the canal

crossing and irrigated land

1.7 Initial Social Assessment and Preliminary land Acquisition/Resettlement Plan

It is evident from the screening and secondary records obtained from the NHAI and BRO that the

available ROW is sufficient to accommodate the proposed improvements. Land acquisition will be

required at few proposed locations that will be carried out as per the provisions of the National

Highways Act, 1956 and further amendments.

A resettlement action plan (RAP) will be prepared on the basis of social impact assessment and

through meaningful consultation with the affected persons. The RAP will include measures to

ensure that the displaced persons are (i) informed about their options and entitlements pertaining to

compensation, relocation, and rehabilitation; (ii) consulted on resettlement options and choices;

and (iii) provided with resettlement alternatives. During the identification of the impacts of

resettlement and resettlement planning, and implementation, the client will pay adequate attention

to gender concerns, including specific measures addressing the need of female headed households,

gender-inclusive consultation, information disclosure, and grievance mechanisms, to ensure that

both men and women receive adequate and appropriate compensation for their lost property and

resettlement assistance, if required, as well as assistance to restore and improve their incomes and

living standards.

1.7.1 Socio-Economic and Census Survey


Executive Summary



Base line socio-economic and census survey to assess the impacts on the people, properties and

loss of livelihood due to the proposed project implementation were carried out. The socio-

economic status of the local community and the affected persons are also assessed.

1.7.2 Acquisition of Land

The proposed upgradation of the Project Highway of 193.523 km length is to 2-Lane carriageway

with Paved shoulders in a length of 182.708 km, the remaining section of 10.815 km to 4-Lane

divided carriageway with paved shoulders. To accommodate the required lane configuration,

approximately 58.97 Ha. land is required to be acquired as per preliminary survey and engineering

designs.

Total Land required : 676.788 Ha

Addl. Land required : 58.971 Ha

Govt. Land : 52.959 Ha

Forest Land : 0.320 Ha

Private Land: 5.692 Ha

A tentative land cost has been included in the Project Cost as per DLR rates of Jaisalmer. The

final figures will be drawn after the actual estimations of the affected households / structures (i.e.

the actual numbers of title holders, encroachers and squatters are finalized) and due approvals by

the competent project authorities.

1.8 Utility Shifting

Estimates for utility sifting (Electrical and water pipe lines) have been obtained from JdVNNL

and PHED/Nagar Parishad have been obtained and included in the project cost.

a) Electric Utilities 2.56 Cr.

b) Water Pipe lines (PHED)

c) Water Pipe Line (Nagar Parishad)

13.34 Cr.

4.86Cr.

1.9 Estimation of Project Cost

The Upgradation of the Project Highway is proposed to be implemented in one package.

Sr.

No. Components

Section:1

“Tanot to Jaisalmer”

Section:2

“(Mokal)-Sarkaritala”

Total

1 Length of 2-Lane with

paved shoulder (in Km.) 107.999 67.000 174.999


Executive Summary



2 Length of 4-Lane paved shoulder

(IRC:SP:84-2014) (in Km.) 10.815 - 10.815

3 Length of 4-Lane paved shoulder

(IRC:SP:73-2015) (in Km.) 6.759 0.950 7.709

Total Length in Km. 125.573 67.950 193.523

The summary of Cost Estimate for Flexible Pavement is given below:

Civil cost has been estimated based on MoRTH’s Data Book

The basic rates for material and cartage have been taken from the SOR (2016-17) of

Jaisalmer PWD.

The basic rates for labour has been taken from Labour SOR (2016-17) of Jaisalmer PWD

The basic rates of Bitumen and Steel have been taken from websites of nearest IOCL

refinery and SAIL respectively.

The basic rate of cement has been taken from INAMPRO site.

ABSTRACT OF COST (Design Length 193.523 Km)

Bill

No. Description

Total Amount

( Rs.)

Total

Amount

(Crores)

% cost

1 Site Clearance and Dismantling 58977210 5.90 0.79

2 Earth Work 802536323 80.25 10.82

3 Granular Sub-Base and Base Courses 1450516852 145.05 19.55

4(A) Bituminous Courses (Flexible Pavement) 1924809217 192.48 25.95

5 Culverts 485253938 48.53 6.54

6 Bridges 796395507 79.64 10.74

7 Drainage and Protection Works 1272116056 127.21 17.15

8 Junctions 5507148 0.55 0.07

9 Traffic Signs, marking and Road

Appurtenances 273929474 27.39 3.69

10 Miscellaneous 277490911 27.75 3.74

11 Maintenance during Construction 71019952 7.10 0.96

12 Civil cost of the project 7418552573 741.86 100.00

Civil Cost (A) 7418552573 741.86

Civil Cost per km (Rs. Crores) 3.83

I. Contingencies @ 2.8% (not considered as per

approval of EC ) 0 0.00

II. Supervision consultant Charges @ 2%

14,83,71,051 14.84

III. Administrative Charges @ 1%

7,41,85,526 7.42

IV. Quality Control Charges @ 1% (not 0 0.00


Executive Summary



Bill

No. Description

Total Amount

( Rs.)

Total

Amount

(Crores)

% cost

considered as per approval of EC )

V. Road Safety Audit Charges at 0.5% (not

considered as per approval of EC ) 0 0.00

VI. Escalation @ 5% for 2 year

40,80,20,392 40.80

VII. Maintenance charges @ 5 % for 4 years

37,09,27,629 37.09

Total Project Cost 8,42,00,57,170 842.01

1

Utility relocation

d) Electric Poles 25600000.00 2.56

e) Pipe lines 182000000.00 18.20

2 Land acquisition cost, Cost of Acquisition of

structures and Rehabilitation and resettlement 897500000.00 89.75

3 Environmental (Forest +Tree Cutting) 11000000.00 1.10

Total Capital Cost of Project 9,53,61,57,170 953.62

Cost per km (Rs. Crores) 4.93

Civil Cost of Project per km (Rs. Crores) 3.83


Executive Summary



1.9 Economic Analysis

Economical Analysis has been carried out for the Project Highway using HDM-IV

The sensitivity scenarios take into account possible construction costs overrun, traffic volume,

revenue short falls, interest rate volatility, non-compliance or default by contractors, and political

risks, has also been carried out considering the following four scenarios:

Case-I Base Cost and Base Benefits

Case-II Base Cost plus 15 % and Base Benefits

Case-III Base Cost and Base Benefits minus 15%

Case-IV Base cost plus 15 % and Base Benefits minus 15%

The output of Sensitivity analysis obtained from the HDM-4 is presented in the Table 11.6 for

Case-1, Case-II Case-III and Case-IV for both the alternatives respectively. Summary of the same

is tabulated below:

Sr.

No. Scenario Case-I Case-II Case-III Case-IV

1

With Project Case

(2-Lane with paved

shoulder).

12.8 11.3 10.5 9.20

The economic analysis thus carried out reveals that the project for a period of 30 years &

Discount Rate of 12% for Optimistic Growth Scenario results in Undiscounted NPV (in

million Rs.) 27952.62, Discounted NPV (in million Rs.) 400.90 & EIRR of 12.8% which is

more than the minimum 12% criteria and thus seems to be economically viable for the

present cost & present traffic condition

1.10 Financial Analysis

a. Section : 1 Tanot to Ramgarh , Length = 60.463 Km.

Based on the project structure traffic study and toll rate analysis, financial feasibility

analysis has been carried out as per the methodology outlined in earlier sections. The

minimum Equity IRR (Return on Equity) considered for the project is negative in this

section, VGF during construction 40%. As per current scenario, existing traffic is low.

Financial indicators are presented below:

Section 1: Financial Indicators for 30 Years with VGF 40% during Construction

Equity IRR 30 Years 25 Years

20

Years Project IRR

30

Years 25 Years

20

Years

IRR -0.6% -4.4% (0.000) IRR 0.9% 0.0% -4.8%

NPV at 9% (124.0) (124.0) (121.6) NPV at 9% (91.7) (91.7) (98.3)

NPV at 12% (110.04) (110.04) (108.15)

NPV at

12% (93.20) (93.20) (97.21)

NPV at 15% (98.60) (98.60) (95.33)

NPV at

15% (93.09) (93.09) (95.58)

NPV at 18% (89.14) (89.14) (86.70)

NPV at

18% (92.05) (92.05) (93.61)


Executive Summary



b. Section : 2 Ramgarh to Jaisalmer , Length = 65.110 Km.



minimum Equity IRR (Return on Equity) considered for the project is -3.5% in this



Section 2: Financial Indicators for 30 Years with VGF 40% during Construction

Equity IRR

30

Years

25

Years 20 Years Project

IRR

30

Years 25 Years 20 Years

IRR 6.4% 3.1% -3.5% IRR 8.1% 6.5% 4.0%

NPV at 9% (176.3) (176.3) (215.9) NPV at 9% (106.5) (106.5) (150.6)

NPV at 12% (172.18) (172.18) (196.64)

NPV at

12% (139.20) (139.20) (166.28)

NPV at 15% (165.12) (165.12) (179.42)

NPV at

15% (159.10) (159.10) (175.95)

NPV at 18% (156.96) (156.96) (165.96)

NPV at

18% (170.91) (170.91) (181.54)

c. Section :3. Mokal to Sarkaritala , Length = 67.950 Km.



minimum Equity IRR (Return on Equity) considered for the project is negative in this



Section 3 : Financial Indicators for 30 Years with VGF 40% during Construction

Equity IRR 30 Years 25 Years 20 Years Project IRR 30 Years 25 Years

20

Years

IRR -10.3% -9.9% (0.000) IRR (0.000) -5.8% -14.8%

NPV at 9% (187.5) (187.5) (173.4) NPV at 9% (144.4) (144.4) (146.1)

NPV at 12% (162.73) (162.73) (153.22) NPV at 12% (139.77) (139.77) (140.79)

NPV at 15% (143.34) (143.34) (133.70) NPV at 15% (135.17) (135.17) (135.80)

NPV at 18% (127.87) (127.87) (121.09) NPV at 18% (130.70) (130.70) (131.09)

CONCLUSION

From the above table it can be concluded that the project is not financially Viable on BOT (Toll).

Project viable in EPC mode