Financing Local Governments in Uganda

Ramathan Ggoobi | Daniel Lukwago

ADVOCATES COALITION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (ACODE)

Plot 96, Kanjokya Street, Kamwokya. P. O. Box 29836, Kampala. Tel: +256 312 812150.

Email: [email protected] / [email protected]: www.acode-u.org

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Ramathan Ggoobi is an Economist and Policy Analyst. He is a Lecturer of Economics at Makerere University Business School (MUBS), where he heads the MUBS Economic Forum. He is also the Chief Economist for Operation Wealth Creation in Uganda. He has extensive knowledge and experience in both quantitative and qualitative research, with special interest in rural economy, economic development, policy analysis and political economy. Ramathan is also a Member of the Board of Directors at Uganda Development Corporation (UDC). He holds an M.A in Economic Policy and Planning, and a B.A. in Economics from Makerere University. He also holds an International Certificate in Sustainable Development (With Distinction), Columbia University U.S.A, 2015, and a Certificate in Energy Economics, Total France. Daniel Lukwago is an Economist, Policy Analyst and Independent Consultant. He is a Director of Nonner Consults, a development consultancy company based in Kampala Uganda. He has more than 15 years working experience in various areas such as policy analysis, public expenditure reviews, poverty assessments, community development and policy advocacy. He previously worked with the World Bank Group in Washington D.C, USA and Kampala, Uganda Office; Advocates Coalition for Development Environment (ACODE); and Uganda Debt Network (UDN). Daniel holds a Masters of Public Administration Degree (MPA) from Columbia University, USA; a Postgraduate Diploma in Monitoring and Evaluation from Uganda Management Institute, Kampala Uganda; and a Bachelor of Science in Quantitative Economics Degree from Makerere University, Kampala.

About ACODE: ACODE is an independent public policy research and advocacy think tank registered in Uganda. Its mission is to make public policies work for people by engaging in contemporary public policy research, community empowerment to demand for improved service delivery and advocacy. ACODE has for the last four consecutive years been ranked in the Global Go To Think Tank Index as one of the top think tanks in the world.

Supported by:

ACODE Policy Research Series No. 92, 2019

9 789970 5650099 789970 5650169 789970 5650239 789970 5650309 789970 5650479 789970 967407

à È 9

9 789970 5660069 789970 5660139 789970 5660209 789970 5660379 789970 5660449 789970 5660519 789970 5660689 789970 5660759 789970 5660829 789970 5660999 789970 5661059 789970 5661129 789970 5661299 789970 5661369 789970 5661439 789970 5661509 789970 5661679 789970 5661749 789970 5661819 789970 5661989 789970 5662049 789970 5662119 789970 5662289 789970 5662359 789970 5662429 789970 5662599 789970 5662669 789970 5662739 789970 5662809 789970 5662979 789970 5663039 789970 5663109 789970 5663279 789970 5663349 789970 5663419 789970 5663589 789970 5663659 789970 5663729 789970 5663899 789970 5664029 789970 5663969 789970 5664199 789970 5664269 789970 5664339 789970 5664409 789970 5664579 789970 5664649 789970 5664719 789970 5664889 789970 5664959 789970 5670039 789970 5670109 789970 5670279 789970 5670349 789970 5670419 789970 5670589 789970 5670659 789970 5670729 789970 5670899 789970 567096

PAKWACHZOMBO

TORORO

BUSIA

KANUNGU

RUBANDAKISORO

Financing Local Governments in Uganda

An analysis of the Proposed National Budget FY 2019/20 and

Proposals for Re-allocation

i

Financing Local Governments in Uganda: An analysis of Proposed National Budget FY 2019/20 and Proposals for Re-allocation


ACODE Policy Research Series No.92, 2019

Financing Local Governments in UgandaAn analysis of Proposed National

Budget FY 2019/20 and Proposals for Re-allocation

The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development, the United States Government, the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development, or the United Kingdom Government.

ii


Published by ACODE P. O. Box 29836, Kampala Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Website: http://www.acode-u.org

Citation:

Ggoobi, R., and Lukwago. D., Financing Local Governments in Uganda: An analysis of Proposed National Budget FY 2019/20 and Proposals for Re-allocation. Kampala: ACODE Policy Research Paper Series No. 92, 2019.

© ACODE 2019

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. ACODE policy work is supported by generous donations and grants from bilateral donors and charitable foundations. Reproduction or use of this publication for academic or charitable purposes or for purposes of informing public policy is excluded from this restriction.

iii


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ACODE acknowledges the contribution of both individuals and organizations that made this work possible. We are grateful for the technical and financial support from USAID and UKAID under the Governance, Accountability, Participation

and Performance (GAPP) Program that enabled us undertake the research that culminated into this publication. The support from the Ministry of Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development as well as Ministry of Local Government during this process is equally acknowledged. The insights and guidance from these Ministries during the course of the research process was invaluable. Dr. Arthur Bainomugisha, Prof. Wilson Winstons Muhwezi, Ms. Lillian Muyomba-Tamale, Mr. George Bogere and the entire ACODE Research staff who provided invaluable input into this publication. We are equally grateful to Prof. Elijah Dickens Mushemeza for reviewing and editing earlier drafts of this publication. In the same vein, we acknowledge the contribution of different political and technical leaders from government ministries, departments and agencies that we interfaced with as we collected data and discussed earlier drafts of this this publication. Their views and perspectives were pivotal in framing the arguments and conclusions embedded in this publication. ACODE is convinced that this publication will be instrumental in informing financing of local governments, especially at a time when the Ministry of Local Government is transitioning into a sector.

iv


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iiiLIST OF FIGURES viLIST OF TABLES viiLIST OF ACRONYMS viiiEXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix

1.0 INTRODUCTION 11.1 Background and Rationale of the Study 11.2 Objectives of the Study 2

2.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 32.1 Data Collection and Analysis 32.2 Approach to identifying budget lines meant for LGs 32.3 Scope of the Study 52.4 Limitations of the Study 5

3.0 MAJOR FINDINGS 63.1 Overview of the FY 2019/20 National Budget 63.2 Budget Allocation to LG programmes 63.3 Budget Allocations to MDAs that are under LG Mandate 83.3.1 Agriculture sector 103.3.2 Education and Sports sector 143.3.3 Health sector 173.3.4 Water and Environment 193.3.5 Works and Transport sector 203.3.6 Social Development sector 223.4 Budget Allocations to MDAs that can be Rationalized 233.5 Justifications for re-allocation of funds from MDAs to LGs 25

4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations 274.1 Conclusion 274.2 Recommendations 27

REFERENCES 29APPENDICES 30

v


APPENDICESAppendix I: Documents reviewed 30Appendix II: Functions and Services for District Councils under LGA (Second

Schedule – Part 2)31

Appendix III: Functions and Services for Urban Councils under LGA (Second Schedule - Part 3)

32

Appendix IV: Detailed Agriculture sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

34

Appendix V: Detailed Education & Sports sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

37

Appendix VI: Detailed Health sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

39

Appendix VII: Detailed of Water & Environment sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

41

Appendix VIII: Detailed of Works & Transport sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

45

Appendix IX: Detailed of Social Development sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

46

Appendix X: Detailed MDAs Budgets Proposed for rationalization for FY 2019/20 (UGX Bn)

47

vi


LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Diagrammatic Representation of Approach to identifying budget lines meant for LGs

4

Figure 2: Total proposed national budget allocations for FY 2019/20 (UGX Bn) 6Figure 3: Proposed 2019/20 National Budget Allocations for LG programmes

(UGX Bn)7

Figure 4: Share of Sector Budgets allocated for LG Programmes 8Figure 5: Total Funds proposed for re-allocation to LGs for FY 2019/20 (UGX

Bn)9

Figure 6: Share of sector funds proposed for re-allocation to LGs 10Figure 7: Agriculture sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs 11Figure 8: Education sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs 14Figure 9: Health sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs 17Figure 10: Water and Environment sector budget proposed for re-allocation to

LGs19

Figure 11: Social Development sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs 22Figure 12: Total Funds Proposed for Rationalization for FY 2019/20 (UGX Bn) 24Figure 13: Share of Sector Funds proposed for Rationalization 25

vii


LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Composition of funds proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn) 10Table 2: Distribution of Agriculture sector budget proposed for re-

allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)12

Table 3: Distribution of Education sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

15

Table 4: Distribution of Health sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

18

Table 5: Distribution of Water & Environment sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

20

Table 6: Distribution of Works & Transport sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

21

Table 7: Distribution of Social Dev’t sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

23

Table 8: Composition of Total Funds proposed for Rationalization (UGX Bn)

24

Table 9: Functions and Services for which LGs are mandated under LGs Act

26

viii


LIST OF ACRONYMS

ACODE - Advocates Coalition for Development and EnvironmentBn - BillionCG - Central GovernmentCOCTU - Control of Trypanosomiasis and Sleeping SicknessDDA - Dairy Development AuthorityFY - Fiscal / Financial YearGAPP - Governance, Accountability, Participation and Performance

ProgramGoU - Government of UgandaICT - Information Communication Technology LG - Local GovernmentLGA - Local Government ActLGFC - Local Government Finance Commission LoGPF - Local Government Parliamentary ForumMAAIF - Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and FisheriesMDAs - Ministries, Departments and AgenciesMoES - Ministry of Education and SportsMoFPED - Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic DevelopmentMoGLSD - Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social DevelopmentMoH - Ministry of Health MoLG - Ministry of Local Government MoWE - Ministry of Water and EnvironmentMoWT - Ministry of Works and TransportNAADS - National Agricultural Advisory ServicesOAG - Office of the Auditor General O&M - Operation and Maintenance REDD - Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest

Degradation

UGX - Uganda Shillings

ix


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Central Government is required by Article 193 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 (as amended) to provide grants to LGs in form of unconditional, conditional and equalisation grants. However, there has been a decline in transfers from Central Government to LGs; the share of the national budget allocated to LG programs reduced to 10 percent in FY2018/19 from 13 percent in 2016/17. The decline is largely attributed to recentralisation of functions and resources that by law are mandated to LGs.Therefore, Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment (ACODE) with support from USAID and UKAID under the Governance, Accountability, Participation and Performance (GAPP) program commissioned this study to analyse the proposed national budget allocations for FY 2019/20 to ascertain budgetary allocations that should be implemented by the Local Governments (LGs) but retained by Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), and recommend for reallocation to LGs with a view of influencing the final budget allocations.The study relied mainly on an extensive document review of all relevant budget documents focusing mainly on the Draft Estimates of Expenditure (Recurrent and Development) FY 2019/20. Identifying budget lines meant for LGs, was done through three stages, by determining whether: budget line was relevant or not to LGs; the identified budget line could be transferred directly to the LGs or not; and the budget line could be rationalized by the MDAs to improve service delivery and also free funds for LGs. The exercise explicitly took a ‘prioritised’ approach to identify LG relevant budgets and did not exhaustively review each and every expenditure item within the national budget. The approach was to identify those sectors with decentralised functions as prescribed in the LG Act (schedule 2), which included: Agriculture, Education, Health, Social Development, Water and Environment, and Works and Transport.

Budget Allocation to LG programmes During FY 2019/20, UGX 3.6 trillion, which is 11 percent of the total national budget inclusive of domestic arrears and appropriation-in-aid, will be allocated to LG programmes through unconditional grants, conditional grants, equalisation grants, projects and donor funding. The education sector will take the highest amount at UGX 1.6 trillion; followed by public sector management at UGX 1.1 trillion; health at UGX 521 billion; works and transport at UGX 187 billion; agriculture at UGX 122 billion; water and environment at UGX 59 billion; social development at UGX 8 billion; and trade, industry and cooperatives at UGX 2 billion. These findings, corroborate with the Office of the Auditor General’s 2016 report which found that MDAs retain the biggest proportions of sector budget allocations despite devolving the responsibility of service delivery to LGs.

x


Budget Allocations to MDAs that are under LG MandateThis study found that UGX 1.066 trillion will be retained by various MDAs during FY 2019/20, yet these funds are supposed to be allocated to LGs as mandated under the Second Schedule of the LGA (CAP 243). The agriculture sector has the highest amount of funds retained by MDAs amounting to UGX 281.4 billion, followed by education and sports sector at UGX 257.2 billion, and health sector at UGX 217.8 billion. Others include water and environment sector at 196.4 billion, works and transport sector at UGX 96.1 billion and social development at UGX 17.1 billion. Over 65 percent of the retained budgets (funds) are financed through external funding. This is because external funding is a major source of development finance for development projects under management of MDAs. Government of Uganda development funds come second at 30 percent, non-wage and wage budgets are 3 percent and 2 percent respectively. In terms of shares, the agriculture sector has the highest share of the budget lines that should be re-allocated to LGs during FY 2019/20 at 28 percent. This is followed by, water and environment at 19 percent, health at 9 percent, social development and education at 8 percent, and works and transport at 1 percent.Out of the UGX 281.4 billion retained by the agriculture sector MDAs, UGX 209 billion are donor funds, UGX 64 billion are GoU development funds, and UGX 8.4 billion are non-wage funds. The crop resources directorate takes a lion’s share of the funds amounting to UGX 163.4 billion (58 percent), followed by the animal resources directorate at UGX 83.4 billion (30 percent). The rest of the funds amounting to UGX 34.6 billion (12 percent) are with Fisheries Resources; Policy, Planning and Support Services; Agriculture Infrastructure, Mechanization and Water for Agricultural Production; and Dairy Development Authority (DDA). Out of the UGX 257.2 billion retained by the education and sports sector MDAs, UGX 224 billion are donor funds, and UGX 31 billion are GoU development funds. Skills Development Directorate takes almost three quarters of the funds amounting to UGX 189.9 billion. This is followed by Pre-Primary and Primary Education Directorate at UGX 51.7 billion (20 percent). The rest of funds amounting to UGX 15.6 billion (6 percent) are with Guidance and Counseling; Physical Education and Sports; Secondary Education; and Special Needs Education. Out of the UGX 217.8 billion retained by the health sector MDAs, UGX 170 billion are donor funds, UGX 9 billion are GoU development funds, UGX 13 billion are non-wage, and UGX 26 billion are wages. Health infrastructure and equipment takes almost the entire funds amounting to UGX 209.8 billion (96 percent). The rest of funds amounting to UGX 8.0 billion are with Public Health Services.Out of the UGX 196.4 billion retained by the water and environment sector MDAs, UGX 77 billion are donor funds, UGX 117 billion are GoU development funds, and UGX 2 billion are non-wage. Rural Water Supply and Sanitation takes the biggest share of the funds retained amounting to UGX 96.3 billion (49 percent). This is followed by

xi


Water for Production at UGX 75.6 billion (38 percent). The rest of funds amounting to UGX 24.5 billion (12 percent) are with Natural Resources Management; Urban Water Supply and Sanitation; and Water Resources Management.The works and transport sector budget funds retained by the MDAs amounts to UGX 96 billion, and the entire funds are GoU development funds. District, urban and community access roads takes the entire funds retained amounting to UGX 95.5 billion. The rest of funds amounting to UGX 0.6 billion are with Transport Services and Infrastructure.Out of the UGX 17.1 billion retained by the Social Development sector MDAs, UGX 13 billion are donor funds, UGX 2.3 billion are GoU development funds, and UGX 1.8 billion are non-wage. Promotion of descent employment takes the biggest share of the funds retained amounting to UGX 9.9 billion (58 percent). The rest of funds amounting to UGX 7.2 billion (42 percent) are with gender, equality and women’s empowerment; and social protection for vulnerable groups.

Budget Allocations to MDAs that can be Rationalized This study found that UGX 530.2 billion budgeted for various MDAs, can be rationalized to improve service delivery and also free funds for LGs. The funds proposed for rationalization are not necessarily relevant to LGs (i.e. prescribed in the LGs Act (schedule 2)), but are large amounts of funds allocated under mainly government buildings and administrative infrastructure; monitoring, supervision and evaluation; purchase of specialised machinery and equipment; and purchase of motor vehicles and other transport equipment; among others.The agriculture sector has the highest funds amounting to UGX 177.5 billion, followed by water and environment sector at 126.1 billion; health sector at UGX 101 billion; education and sports sector at UGX 86.3 billion; social development at UGX 22.88 billion; and works and transport sector at UGX 16.5 billion. Over 51 percent of the budgets that can be rationalized are donor funds. Government of Uganda development funds are second at 26 percent, non-wage and wage budget are 20 percent and 3 percent respectively. In terms of shares, the Agriculture sector has the highest share of its budget that should be rationalized at 18 percent; followed by water and environment at 12 percent, social development at 10 percent, health at 4 percent, education and sports at 3 percent, and works and transport at 0.3 percent.

Recommendations In line with the above-mentioned findings, we recommend the following:a. Parliament and MoFPED should re-allocate UGX 1.01 trillion which is budgeted/

allocated to various MDAs because these funds are supposed to be allocated to LGs as mandated under the Second Schedule of the LGA (CAP 243).

xii


b. Parliament, MoFPED and MDAs should rationalize UGX 530.2 billion budgeted by various MDAs on certain expenditures to free funds for LGs.

c. MoLG, LGFC, and MoFPED should implement the Fiscal Decentralisation Strategy to reduce the number of grants and evolve the system in a manner that will ensure consistency, autonomy, predictability and adequacy to meet the minimum costs of service delivery by LGs.

d. MoLG, LGFC, and ULGA should ensure that LGs are represented in negotiations with development partners when negotiating external assistance that are intended to support the decentralised services.

e. Parliament and MoFPED should amend the Public Finance Management Act (2015) to require the MoFPED to provide separate medium term financing plan for local government service delivery along with the national medium term expenditure plan.

1


1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of a study commissioned by the Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment (ACODE) to analyse the proposed national budget allocations for FY 2019/20 to ascertain budgetary allocations that should be implemented by the Local Governments but retained by Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs), and recommend for reallocation to LGs with a view of influencing the final budget allocations. This section outlines the background to the study, the problem, the rationale of the study, and the specific objectives. 1.1 Background and Rationale of the StudyGovernment of Uganda embraced the policy of decentralisation by devolution, which recognises local governments as frontline actors in the provision of services to the citizens. This policy shift is well enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 (as amended), and the Local Governments Act (CAP 243). According to Article 191 of the Constitution and Sec 80 of the LGA (CAP 243), LGs are required to prepare their own development plans and budgets, mobilise revenues locally to facilitate funding for recurrent and development expenditure for service delivery.The Central Government in accordance with Article 193 of the Constitution is required to provide grants to LGs in three categories, namely: (i) Unconditional grants, which are the minimum grants paid to LGs to run decentralised services (ii) Conditional grants that are given to LGs to finance programmes agreed upon between the central government and the local governments, and (iii) Equalisation grants that are given to those LGs lagging behind the national average standards in service delivery. However, there is widespread concern that LG financing is not sufficient to meet the level of demand for service delivery. Reports have shown that there has been a decline in transfers from central Government to LGs, in relative and per capita terms. For example, according to approved budget estimates the share of the national budget allocated to LG programmes reduced to 10 percent in FY2018/19 from 13 percent in 2016/17. The decline is largely attributed to recentralisation of functions and resources which by law are mandated to LGs. Research has shown that recentralisation of previously decentralised functions has had a negative impact on service delivery, accountability and citizen empowerment, and also increased financial dependency of LGs (Lwanga, 2016). In November 2018, ACODE in partnership with the Uganda Local Governments’ Association (ULGA) and the Parliament of Ugandan organised a national dialogue under the Local Government Parliamentary Forum (LoGPF). The dialogue was intended to promote interface between Parliament and LGs in order to influence the national policy agenda for enhanced accountability from both national and LG levels. The decreasing trends in LG financing emerged as one of the key issues that negatively impacted services delivery and effectiveness of decentralisation in Uganda.

2


It is upon this background that ACODE commissioned this study to analyse the proposed budget allocations for FY 2019/20 to ascertain budgetary allocations that should be implemented by the LGs but retained by MDAs, and recommend for reallocation to LGs with a view of influencing the final budget allocations. This report, therefore, presents the findings of the budget analysis. It is intended to stimulate and offer evidence to the Parliamentary Committees to re-allocate public money from the MDAs to the LGs. The report gives a detailed analysis of the budget allocations that end up being retained by the MDAs but may be re-allocated to LGs to enable them deliver on their mandate and enhance service delivery in the country.

1.2 Objectives of the Study a) To analyse and identify budget lines allocated to MDAs that should be re-allocated

to LGs in FY 2019/20 Budget, and b) To recommend to Parliament, Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic

Development (MoFPED); Ministry of Local Government (MoLG) and the Local Government Finance Commission (LGFC) to cause re-allocation of money retained by MDAs in contravention of the legal establishment.

3


2.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGYThe study adopted a mixed approach combining qualitative and quantitative techniques in order to enhance the validity of the findings.

2.1 Data Collection and AnalysisThe study relied mainly on an extensive document review which included a critical review of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 (as amended); LGA (CAP, 1997 (as amended); Draft Estimates of Revenue and Expenditure (Recurrent and Development) FY 2019/20; the National Budget Framework Paper FY 2019/20; the Sector Budget Framework Papers for FY 2019/20; Ministerial Policy Statements FY 2019/20; Sector Investment Plans for Agriculture, Health, Education, Water, Environment and Natural Resources, Roads and Social Development; Budget Performance Reports; Auditor General’s Reports; and the Budget Call Circulars. These documents were analysed and critiqued to answer the study objective (s).

2.2 Approach to identifying budget lines meant for LGsOverall, the methodology aimed to classify relevant budget allocations through three stages, by determining whether: (i) the budget line was relevant or not to LGs i.e. contained in the LGA Schedule 2; (ii) the identified budget line could be transferred directly or not to the LGs; and (iii) the budget line could be rationalized or not by the MDAs to improve service delivery and also free funds for LGs. The exercise explicitly took a ‘prioritised’ approach to identifying LG relevant budgets and did not exhaustively review each and every expenditure item within the national budget. The approach was to identify those sectors with decentralised functions as prescribed in the LG Act (schedule 2), and then drills down into the details of sector budgets in order to identify and categorise budget lines that can be re-allocated to LGs.Box 1: Criteria used in identifying budget lines meant for LGs.a) Selected sectors with decentralised functions as prescribed in the LGs Act (schedule

2) i.e. agriculture, education, health, water & environment, works& transport, and social development).

b) Identified budget lines within sector budgets which fall under the mandate of LGs as prescribed in the LG Act (schedule 2) but allocated to MDAs.

c) Analysed the budget lines under (b) to obtain the aggregate amount of funds to be allocated to LGs.

d) Identified budget lines which are not necessarily relevant to LGs, but contain large amounts of funds, which can be rationalized to free funds for LGs.

e) Analysed the budget lines under (d) to obtain the aggregate amount of funds that can be rationalized to improve service delivery and also free resources to LGs.

Figure 1 shows a summary stylized view of the process. As can be seen, where issues of classification are uncertain, further investigation is undertaken in order to determine the exact nature of the budget item. This involved a detailed review of the

4


relevant Ministerial Policy Statements that outline the spending plans of the MDAs in more detail.Once the relevant MDAs were identified, the analysis moved to a detailed review of the individual programmes, sub-programmes and outputs within each MDA’s budget. Since the budget is very brief, it was relatively easy for the team to review and exclude certain items from the expenditure analysis on the basis that they were not related to LGs (e.g. ‘Rural Water Supply and Sanitation’). Where budget items were less clear in their relationship to LG -relevant activities, further investigation was undertaken. The first reference point was the Ministerial Policy Statements which contain more information on the activities of the MDAs concerned, including detail on the programmes being implemented. Using this information, it was possible to finalize the decision as to whether budget items were relevant or not to LGs.

Key MDAs identified

Step 2 (a).Can the Budget Output be transferred directly

to LGs?

Budget Output inMDA budget identified

YESYES

NO

NO

Maybe

Step 2 (b).Can the Budget Output be rationalized to free funds for LGs LGs?

Step 3.Record Budget Output accordingly for analysis

Step 1.Is the Budget Output

relevant to LGs; contained in the LGA

(Sch.2)?

Obtain further information on budget Item from Ministerial

Policy Statements and then review item again

from Step 1.

Discard item from analysis

Figure 1: Diagrammatic Representation of Approach to identifying budget lines meant for LGs

Source: Authors

The study team identified budget lines which are not necessarily relevant to LGs, but contain large amounts of funds. These are mainly: Government buildings and administrative infrastructure; monitoring, supervision and Evaluation; Purchase of Specialised Machinery and Equipment; and Purchase of motor vehicles and other transport equipment; among others. These budget lines can be rationalized to improve service delivery and also free funds that may be allocated to LGs. In this study, we define rationalization to mean actions of making government budget more efficient by allocating funds to areas which have greater impact on service delivery.

5


2.3 Scope of the Study The analysis focused on sectors with decentralised component of service delivery, that is, agriculture, education, health, social development; water and environment, and works and transport. The analysis covered the FY 2019/20 and where relevant compared with FY 2018/19. 2.4 Limitations of the Study Firstly, the analysis did not include public sector management mainly because of its less relevance to service delivery at LG level. The analysis of donor funds could not establish which proportions of the funds were grants or loans. This was mainly due to lack of detailed information in the budget and sector documents. Secondly, most of the Ministerial Policy Statements for FY 2019/20 lacked detailed information that would further enrich the study. Thirdly, time constraints could also not allow the researchers to consult and/or interview the relevant MDA officials to give more insights on the budget lines. However, despite these limitations the criteria and data used in this analysis were sufficient to give credible recommendations.

6


3.0 FINDINGS 3.1 Overview of the FY 2019/20 National Budget The budget strategy for FY 2019/20 focuses on increasing the growth of the economy and achieving inclusive growth. This is consistent with the medium term budget theme of ‘Industrialisation for Job Creation and Shared Prosperity’. The total proposed budget for FY 2019/20 was UGX 38.95 trillion. Figure 2 shows sector allocations inclusive of domestic arrears and appropriation-in-aid.1 Interest Payments takes the biggest share of the budget of UGX 10.00 trillion (25.7 percent), followed by Works and Transport sector at UGX 6.41 trillion (16.4 percent), Security at UGX 3.61 trillion (9.3 percent), Education at UGX 3.29 trillion (8.4 percent) and Energy at UGX 2.95 trillion (7.6 percent). Other sectors, apart from Education and Works, that have a direct bearing to service delivery at Local Government level such as Health, Agriculture, Water and Environment, and Social Development were respectively proposed to be allocated UGX 2.53 trillion (6.5 percent), 1.01 trillion (2.6 percent), UGX 1.04 trillion (2.7 percent), and UGX 219 billion (0.6 percent).

3.2 Budget Allocation to LG programmes The analysis of the proposed budget FY 2019/20, shows that UGX 3.6 trillion, which is 11 percent of the total national budget inclusive of domestic arrears and appropriation-in-aid will be allocated to LG programmes. This clearly shows that a small component

1 Appropriation-in-aid is income that a government department is authorized to retain and spend at source, rather than surrender to the Consolidated Fund.

10,004

6,407

3,606 3,285 2,951 2,530

2,051 1,931 1,637 1,043 1,011 908 561 219 193 172 159 157 123

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

UGX

(Bill

ion)

Figure 2: Total proposed national budget allocations for FY 2019/2020

Source: Authors’ calculations based on the proposed FY 2019/20 National Budget

7


of the national budget is allocated towards LGs programmes. The funds are provided through unconditional grants, conditional grants, equalisation grants, projects and donor funding. As shown in Figure 3, the education sector will take the highest amount at UGX 1.6 trillion, mainly to due to the large wage component for teachers’ salaries. The education sector will be followed by public sector management at UGX 1.1 trillion; health at UGX 521 billion; works and transport at UGX 187 billion; agriculture at UGX 122 billion; water and environment at UGX 59 billion; social development at UGX 8 billion; and trade industry and cooperatives at UGX 2 billion. It should be noted that 57 percent (UGX 2.032 trillion) of the budget allocated for LG programmes is for wages.

Figure 3: Proposed 2019/20 National Budget Allocations for LG programmes (UGX Bn)


In terms of share of the total sector budget, education has the highest amount of the sector budget allocated to LG programmes standing at 50 percent followed by health at 21 percent, agriculture at 12 percent; water and environment at 6 percent; social development at 3.5 percent and works and transport sector at 3 percent (see figure 4). The education and health sectors’ relatively large shares are mainly on account of their high wage bills.

8


3.3 Budget Allocations to MDAs that are under LG MandateThis study focused on the MDAs under the six sectors of agriculture, health, education, water and environment, works and transport, and social development. During the FY 2019/20, the six sectors will receive a total of UGX 14.5 trillion (45 percent of the total national budget). The works and transport sector takes the biggest share of UGX 6.4 trillion (44 percent), followed by education at UGX 3.3 trillion (22.7 percent), and health at UGX 2.5 trillion (17 percent). Other sectors under our scope of analysis such as agriculture, water and environment, and social development will respectively receive 1.01 trillion (7 percent), UGX 1.04 trillion (7.2 percent), and UGX 219 billion (1.5 percent). It should be noted that these figures are inclusive of domestic arrears and appropriation-in-aid. The respective sector budgets exclusive of the two items above are: works and transport (UGX 6.24 trillion), education (UGX 2.85 trillion), health (UGX 2.43 trillion), water and environment (UGX 996.7 billion), agriculture (UGX 822.4 billion), and social development (UGX 180.1 billion). The sector budgets are supposed to be spent at both national and local government levels. LGs are the implementers of the government programmes within their jurisdiction whereas the MDAs are mandated with mainly policy formulation, regulation, setting national standards, coordination, monitoring, supervision, and provision of technical support to LGs in the implementation of programmes. Thus, the largest amount sector of budgets ought to be spent by LGs. However, the 2016 report by the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) found that MDAs retain the biggest proportions of sector budget allocations despite devolving the responsibility of service delivery to LGs (OAG, 2016). The report pointed out the sectors of water and environment, works and

Figure 4: Share of Sector Budgets allocated for LG Programmes


9


transport, agriculture and health retained on average more than 80 percent of sector allocations at the centre. This is confirmed by the findings as presented in Figure 4. Under this sub-section we unearth and present the amount of funds that are meant to be appropriated directly to LGs, but instead are retained / allocated to MDAs contrary to the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 (as amended) and LGA (CAP 243). We are cognizant of the fact that most MDAs activities are eventually implemented at the local government level directly or indirectly (through LGs). However, the agency which controls the budget (funds) matters. The current practice of MDAs controlling the budget (funds) has undesirable implications on service delivery as elaborated in the preceding sections.After a careful analysis of the FY 2019/20 budget allocations to the six sectors under review, this study found that UGX 1.066 trillion will be retained by various MDAs, yet these funds are supposed to be allocated to LGs as mandated under the Second Schedule of the LGA (CAP 243). As shown in Figure 5, the agriculture sector has the highest amount of retained funds by MDAs amounting to UGX 281.4 billion, followed by education and sports sector at UGX 257.2 billion, and health sector at UGX 217.8 billion. Others include water and environment sector at 196.4 billion, works and transport sector at UGX 96.1 billion and social development at UGX 17.1 billion.

Figure 5: Total Funds proposed for re-allocation to LGs for FY 2019/20 (UGX Bn)


Local Governments; 1,066

Agriculture; 281.4

Education; 257.2

Health; 217.8

Water; 196.4

Works; 96.1

Social Development; 17.1

In terms of composition, 65 percent of the retained budgets (funds) are donor funds. This is mainly because most projects the MDAs are implementing are funded by donors. Government of Uganda development funds are second at 30 percent, non-wage and wage budgets are 3 percent and 2 percent respectively (see Table 1). It should be noted that donor funds have a wage and non-wage components, which this study was not be able to analyse.

10


Table 1: Composition of funds proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)Sector Wage Non-Wage GoU (Dev’t) Donor Funding Total Agriculture - 8.4 64.0 209 281.4Education - 3 31 224 257.2Health 26 13 9 170 217.8Water - 2 117 77 196.4Works - - 96 - 96.1Social Dev’t - 2 2 13 17.1TOTAL 26 28 319 692 1,066


Further analysis shows that agriculture has the highest share of the sector budget that should be re-allocated to LGs during FY 2019/19 at 28 percent. followed by water and environment at 19 percent, health at 9 percent, social development and education at 8 percent, and works and transport at 1 percent (see Figure 6).

Figure 6: Share of sector funds proposed for re-allocation to LGs


3.3.1 Agriculture Sector As noted in the preceding sub-section, the agriculture sector has the highest amount budget funds retained by the centre that could be re-allocated to the LGs standing at UGX 281.4 billion, of which UGX 209 billion are donor funds, UGX 64 billion are GoU development funds, and UGX 8.4 billion are non-wage funds (see Figure 7).

11


As shown in Table 2, the crop resources directorate takes a lion’s share of the funds retained by the agriculture sector that could be re-allocated to the LGs amounting to UGX 163.4 billion (58 percent) followed by the animal resources directorate at UGX 83.4 billion (30 percent); the rest of funds amounting to UGX 34.6 billion (12 percent) are with fisheries resources; policy, planning and support services; agriculture infrastructure, mechanisation and water for agricultural production; and Dairy Development Authority (DDA). Details on the distribution of agriculture sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs are contained in Appendix IV.

Figure 7: Agriculture sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs


12


Tabl

e 2:

Dis

trib

utio

n of

agr

icul

ture

sec

tor b

udge

t pro

pose

d fo

r re-

allo

catio

n to

LG

s (U

GX

Bn)

VOTE

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Out

puts

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

ors

Tota

l

DD

AD

airy

Dev

elop

men

t an

d Re

gula

tion

Dai

ry M

arke

t Acc

ess

& Va

lue

Addi

tion

Supp

ort t

o da

iry d

evel

opm

ent

-0.

64-

0.64

MAA

IF

Cro

p Re

sour

ces

Nat

iona

l Oil

Palm

Pro

ject

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-8.

00-

8.00

Cro

p pe

sts

and

dise

ases

con

trol p

hase

2C

ontro

l of p

est &

dis

ease

s in

prio

rity

com

mod

ities

-0.

611.

001.

61

Cro

p pe

sts

and

dise

ases

con

trol p

hase

2C

rop

pest

and

dis

ease

con

trol

mea

sure

s1.

040.

501.

452.

99

Nat

iona

l Oil

Palm

Pro

ject

Cro

p pr

oduc

tion

tech

nolo

gy p

rom

otio

n0.

702.

004.

006.

70M

ultis

ecto

ral F

ood

Safe

ty &

Nut

ritio

n Pr

ojec

tFo

od a

nd n

utrit

ion

secu

rity

-0.

2622

.83

23.0

9En

hanc

ing

Nat

iona

l Foo

d Se

curit

y th

roug

h in

crea

sed

Rice

pro

duct

ion

in E

aste

rn U

gand

aPr

omot

ion

of P

rodu

ctio

n &

Prod

uctiv

ity

of p

riorit

y co

mm

oditi

es0.

480.

6076

.03

77.1

1

Nat

iona

l Oil

Palm

Pro

ject

Road

s, S

treet

s &

Hig

hway

s-

-33

.70

33.7

0Ag

ricul

ture

Clu

ster

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Incr

ease

d va

lue

addi

tion

in th

e se

ctor

--

10.1

810

.18

Dire

ctor

ate

of

Anim

al R

esou

rces

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ctIm

prov

ed a

cces

s to

wat

er fo

r liv

esto

ck0.

15-

6.58

6.73

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ctLi

vest

ock

Infra

stru

ctur

e C

onst

ruct

ion

-10

.11

3.78

13.8

9Re

gion

al P

asto

ral L

ivel

ihoo

d Im

prov

emen

t Pro

ject

Live

stoc

k m

arke

ting

faci

lity

cons

truct

ion

--

27.7

327

.73

Dev

elop

ing

A M

arke

t-Orie

nted

And

En

viro

nmen

tally

Sus

tain

able

Bee

f Mea

t Ind

ustry

In

Uga

nda

Prom

otio

n of

prio

rity

anim

al p

rodu

cts

& pr

oduc

tivity

-4.

217.

9812

.19

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ctVe

ctor

and

dis

ease

con

trol i

n pr

iorit

y an

imal

com

mod

ities

0.27

9.04

1.09

10.4

0

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ctVe

ctor

& d

isea

se c

ontro

l mea

sure

s0.

149.

910.

4610

.51

Live

stoc

k H

ealth

and

Ent

omol

ogy

Con

trol o

f Try

ptan

omia

sis

& Sl

eepi

ng

Sick

ness

(CO

CTU

)1.

95-

-1.

95

Fish

erie

s Re

sour

ces

Supp

ort t

o Su

stai

nabl

e Fi

sher

ies

Dev

elop

men

t Pr

ojec

tFi

sher

ies

Infra

stru

ctur

e C

onst

ruct

ion

-2.

76-

2.76

Dep

artm

ent o

f Fis

herie

s C

ontro

l, Re

gula

tion

and

Qua

lity

Assu

ranc

ePr

omot

ion

of s

usta

inab

le fi

sher

ies

2.80

3.19

2.46

8.45

13


VOTE

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Out

puts

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

ors

Tota

l

MAA

IF

Dire

ctor

ate

of

Agric

ultu

ral

Exte

nsio

n &

Skills

M

anag

emen

t

Dep

artm

ent o

f Agr

icul

tura

l Inv

estm

ent &

En

terp

rise

Dev

elop

men

t (D

AIED

)Pr

ovis

ion

of V

alue

Add

ition

ext

ensi

on

serv

ices

0.91

0.42

-1.

33

Agric

ultu

re

Infra

stru

ctur

e,

Mec

hani

zatio

n &

Wat

er fo

r Ag

ricul

tura

l Pr

oduc

tion

Impr

ovin

g Ac

cess

and

Use

of A

gric

ultu

ral

Equi

pmen

t and

Mec

hani

satio

n th

roug

h th

e us

e of

la

bour

Sav

ing

Tech

nolo

gies

Valle

y Ta

nk C

onst

ruct

ion

(live

stoc

k)-

10.1

6-

10.1

6

Polic

y, Pl

anni

ng &

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sAg

ricul

ture

Val

ue C

hain

Dev

elop

men

tIm

prov

ing

Valu

e Ad

ditio

n &

Mar

ket

Acce

ss-

1.60

9.70

11.3

0

Tota

l8.

464

.020

9.0

281.

4So

urce

: Aut

hors

’ cal

cula

tions

bas

ed o

n th

e pr

opos

ed F

Y 20

19/2

0 N

atio

nal B

udge

t

14


As shown in Table 3, skills development directorate takes almost three quarters of the funds retained by the sector that could be re-allocated to the LGs amounting to UGX 189.9 billion followed by pre-primary and primary education directorate at UGX 51.7 billion (20 percent); the rest of funds amounts to UGX 15.6 billion (6 percent) are with guidance and counseling; physical education and sports; secondary education; and special needs education. Details on the distribution of education and sports sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs are contained in Appendix V.

Figure 8: Education sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs


3.3.2 Education and Sports sector The education and sports sector budget funds retained by the MDAs that could be re-allocated to the LGs amount to UGX 257.2 billion, of which UGX 224 billion are donor funds, and UGX 31 billion are GoU development funds (see Figure 8).

15


Tabl

e 3:

Dis

trib

utio

n of

Edu

catio

n se

ctor

bud

get p

ropo

sed

for r

e-al

loca

tion

to L

Gs

(UG

X B

n)

VOTE

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Out

puts

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

ors

Tota

l

MoE

S

Gui

danc

e &

coun

selin

gG

uida

nce

and

coun

selin

gG

uida

nce

& C

ouns

elin

g Se

rvic

es T

otal

0.48

--

0.48

Phys

ical

Ed

ucat

ion

& Sp

orts

Spor

ts a

nd P

ESp

orts

Man

agem

ent &

Cap

acity

Dev

elop

men

t0.

45-

-0.

45

Pre-

Prim

ary

and

Prim

ary

Educ

atio

n

Emer

genc

y C

onst

ruct

ion

of P

rimar

y Sc

hool

s Ph

ase

II

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

& A

dmin

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e -

2.16

-2.

16

Emer

genc

y C

onst

ruct

ion

of P

rimar

y Sc

hool

s Ph

ase

II

Purc

hase

of S

peci

alis

ed M

achi

nery

and

Eq

uipm

ent

-0.

80-

0.80

Uga

nda

Teac

her &

Sch

ool

Effe

ctiv

enes

s Pr

ojec

t

Cla

ssro

om c

onst

ruct

ion

and

reha

bilit

atio

n (P

rimar

y)

-0.

1948

.04

48.2

2

Basi

c Ed

ucat

ion

Mon

itorin

g &

Supe

rvis

ion

of P

rimar

y Sc

hool

s0.

340.

18-

0.52

Seco

ndar

y Ed

ucat

ion

Seco

ndar

y Ed

ucat

ion

Mon

itorin

g &

Supe

rvis

ion

of S

econ

dary

Sch

ools

0.

25-

-0.

25

Dev

elop

men

t of S

econ

dary

Edu

catio

n Ph

ase

IIC

onst

ruct

ion

and

reha

bilit

atio

n of

lear

ning

faci

litie

s (S

econ

dary

) -

5.99

-5.

99

Priv

ate

Scho

ols

Dep

artm

ent

Mon

itorin

g U

SE P

lace

men

ts in

Priv

ate

Scho

ols

Tota

l0.

34-

-0.

34

Dev

elop

men

t of S

econ

dary

Edu

catio

n Ph

ase

IIC

onst

ruct

ion

& re

habi

litat

ion

of le

arni

ng fa

cilit

ies

(Sec

onda

ry)

-5.

99-

5.99

16


VOTE

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Out

puts

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

ors

Tota

l

MoE

S

Spec

ial N

eeds

Ed

ucat

ion

Spec

ial N

eeds

Edu

catio

n an

d C

aree

r G

uida

nce

Mon

itorin

g &

Supe

rvis

ion

of S

peci

al N

eeds

Fa

cilit

ies

0.21

0.02

-0.

24

Dev

elop

men

t and

Impr

ovem

ent o

f Sp

ecia

l Nee

ds E

duca

tion

(SN

E)G

over

nmen

t Bui

ldin

gs &

Adm

inis

trativ

e In

frast

ruct

ure

Tota

l-

0.83

-0.

83

Dev

elop

men

t and

Impr

ovem

ent o

f Sp

ecia

l Nee

ds E

duca

tion

(SN

E)Pu

rcha

se o

f offi

ce &

Res

iden

tial F

urni

ture

and

Fi

tting

s -

0.10

-0.

10

Dev

elop

men

t and

Impr

ovem

ent o

f Sp

ecia

l Nee

ds E

duca

tion

(SN

E)Pu

rcha

se o

f Spe

cial

ised

Mac

hine

ry &

Equ

ipm

ent

-0.

30-

0.30

Spec

ial N

eeds

Edu

catio

n an

d C

aree

r G

uida

nce

Spec

ial N

eeds

Edu

catio

n Se

rvic

es

0.63

--

0.63

Skills

Dev

’t

Dev

elop

men

t of B

TVET

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of le

arni

ng fa

cilit

ies

(BTE

VET)

-11

.62

173.

9018

5.52

BTVE

TM

onito

ring

and

Supe

rvis

ion

of B

TVET

Inst

itutio

ns

0.22

--

0.22

Dev

elop

men

t of B

TVET

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of a

ccom

mod

atio

n fa

cilit

ies

(BTV

ET)

--

1.69

1.69

Dev

elop

men

t of B

TVET

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of a

ccom

mod

atio

n fa

cilit

ies

(BTV

ET)

-2.

47-

2.47

Tota

l2.

9130

.65

223.

6225

7.18

Sour

ce: A

utho

rs’ c

alcu

latio

ns b

ased

on

the

prop

osed

FY

2019

/20

Nat

iona

l Bud

get

17


3.3.3 Health sector The health sector budget funds retained by the MDAs that could be re-allocated to the LGs stand at UGX 217.8 billion, of which UGX 170 billion are donor funds, UGX 9 billion are GoU development funds, UGX 13 billion are non-wage, and UGX 26 billion are wages (see Figure 9).

Figure 9: Health sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs


As shown in Table 4, Health infrastructure and equipment takes almost the entire funds retained by the sector that could be re-allocated to the LGs amounting to UGX 209.8 billion (96 percent). The rest of funds amounting to UGX 8.0 billion are with Public Health Services. Details on the distribution of Health sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs are contained in Appendix VI.

18


Tabl

e 4:

Dis

trib

utio

n of

Hea

lth s

ecto

r bud

get p

ropo

sed

for r

e-al

loca

tion

to L

Gs

(UG

X B

n)

VOTE

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

O

utpu

tsW

age

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

D

onor

s To

tal

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

es

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Ser

vice

s (c

ontro

l of c

omm

unic

able

and

no

n-co

mm

unic

able

dis

ease

s)2.

820.

78-

-3.

61

East

Afri

ca P

ublic

Hea

lth

Labo

rato

ry N

etw

ork

proj

ect

Phas

e II

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Ser

vice

s (c

ontro

l of c

omm

unic

able

and

no

n-co

mm

unic

able

dis

ease

s)1.

060.

70-

2.58

4.34

Hea

lth

infra

stru

ctur

e &

equi

pmen

t

Inst

itutio

nal S

uppo

rt to

MoH

Supp

ort t

o Lo

cal G

over

nmen

ts22

.45

11.4

02.

2348

.67

84.7

5Re

habi

litat

ion

& C

onst

ruct

ion

of G

ener

al H

ospi

tals

Hos

pita

l Con

stru

ctio

n/re

habi

litat

ion

--

5.44

72.6

078

.05

Italia

n Su

ppor

t to

Hea

lth

Sect

or D

ev’t

Plan

- Kar

amoj

a In

frast

ruct

ure

Dev

’t Pr

ojec

t Ph

ase

II

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

--

-2.

482.

48

Reno

vatio

n &

Equ

ippi

ng o

f Ka

yung

a &

Yum

be G

ener

al

Hos

pita

ls

Purc

hase

of S

peci

alis

ed

Mac

hine

ry &

Equ

ipm

ent

--

1.16

24.1

725

.33

Uga

nda

Repr

oduc

tive

Mat

erna

l & C

hild

Hea

lth

Serv

ices

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ct

Hea

lth c

entre

con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

--

-19

.22

19.2

2

Tota

l26

.34

12.8

88.

8416

9.72

217.

78So

urce

: Aut

hors

’ cal

cula

tions

bas

ed o

n th

e pr

opos

ed F

Y 20

19/2

0 N

atio

nal B

udge

t

19


3.3.4 Water and Environment The water and environment sector budget funds retained by the centre that could be re-allocated to the LGs stand at UGX 196.4 billion, of which UGX 77 billion are donor funds, UGX 117 billion are GoU development funds, and UGX 2 billion are non-wage (see Figure 10).

Figure 10: Water and Environment budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs


As shown in Table 5, rural water supply and sanitation takes the biggest share of the funds retained by the sector that could be re-allocated to the LGs amounting to UGX 96.3 billion (49 percent) followed by water for production at UGX 75.6 billion (38 percent); the rest of funds amounting to UGX 24.5 billion (12 percent) are with natural resources management; urban water supply and sanitation; and water resources management. Details on the distribution of water & environment sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs are contained in Appendix VII.

20


Tabl

e 5:

Dis

trib

utio

n of

Wat

er &

Env

ironm

ent s

ecto

r bud

get p

ropo

sed

for r

e-al

loca

tion

to L

Gs

(UG

X B

n)VO

TEPr

ogra

mm

eSu

b Pr

ogra

mO

utpu

tsN

on-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

ors

Tota

l

MoW

E

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

The

Nat

iona

l RED

D-P

lus

Proj

ect

Prom

otio

n of

Kno

wle

dge

of E

nviro

nmen

t an

d N

atur

al R

esou

rces

0.

130.

200.

210.

53

The

Nat

iona

l RED

D-P

lus

Proj

ect

Rest

orat

ion

of d

egra

ded

and

Prot

ectio

n of

eco

syst

ems

2.27

1.99

1.60

5.86

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Sola

r Pow

ered

Min

i-Pip

ed W

ater

Sc

hem

es in

rura

l Are

as

Con

stru

ctio

n of

Pip

ed W

ater

Sup

ply

Syst

ems

(Rur

al)

-29

.34

50.3

179

.65

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Prom

otio

n of

san

itatio

n an

d hy

gien

e ed

ucat

ion

0.01

1.32

0.50

1.83

Sola

r Pow

ered

Min

i-Pip

ed W

ater

Sc

hem

es in

rura

l Are

as

Con

stru

ctio

n of

Poi

nt W

ater

Sou

rces

-

5.50

-5.

50

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-3.

20-

3.20

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Bac

k up

sup

port

for O

& M

of R

ural

W

ater

0.

014.

801.

346.

15

Urb

an W

ater

Su

pply

&

Sani

tatio

n

Kara

moj

a Sm

all T

own

and

Rura

l gro

wth

C

ente

rs W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

n Pr

ojec

t

Impr

oved

san

itatio

n se

rvic

es a

nd

hygi

ene

-1.

732.

404.

13

Wat

er fo

r Pr

oduc

tion

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Phas

e II

Con

stru

ctio

n of

Bul

k W

ater

Sup

ply

Sche

mes

-

20.4

410

.40

30.8

4

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Regi

onal

Cen

ter-

Nor

th (W

fPRC

-N) b

ased

in L

ira

Con

stru

ctio

n of

Wat

er S

urfa

ce R

eser

voirs

-

44.7

4-

44.7

4

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

t W

ater

Man

agem

ent Z

ones

Pro

ject

C

atch

men

t-bas

ed IW

RM e

stab

lishe

d -

4.18

9.75

13.9

4

Tota

l2.

4111

7.43

76.5

119

6.36

Sour

ce: A

utho

rs’ c

alcu

latio

ns b

ased

on

the

prop

osed

FY

2019

/20

Nat

iona

l Bud

get

3.3.

5 W

orks

and

Tra

nspo

rt s

ecto

r Th

e w

orks

and

tran

spor

t sec

tor b

udge

t fun

ds re

tain

ed b

y th

e M

DAs

that

cou

ld b

e re

-allo

cate

d to

the

LGs

stan

d at

UG

X 96

bi

llion,

the

entir

e am

ount

are

GoU

dev

elop

men

t fun

ds. A

s sh

own

in T

able

6, D

istri

ct, u

rban

and

com

mun

ity a

cces

s ro

ads

take

the

entir

e fu

nds

reta

ined

by

the

sect

or th

at c

ould

be

re-a

lloca

ted

to th

e LG

s am

ount

ing

to U

GX

95.5

billi

on. T

he re

st o

f fu

nds

amou

ntin

g to

UG

X 0.

6 bi

llion

are

with

tran

spor

t ser

vice

s an

d in

frast

ruct

ure.

Det

ails

on

the

dist

ribut

ion

of w

orks

and

tra

nspo

rt se

ctor

bud

get p

ropo

sed

for r

e-al

loca

tion

to L

Gs

are

cont

aine

d in

App

endi

x VI

II.

21


Table 6: Distribution of Works & Transport sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

VOTE Programme Sub Program Outputs GoU (Dev’t)

Total

MoWT District, Urban and Community Access Roads

Rehab. of Districts Roads

Monitoring and capacity building support for district road works

5.37

5.37

District, Urban and Community Access Roads


Roads, Streets and Highways

54.07

54.07



Major Bridges 17.00

17.00



Purchase of Office and ICT Equipment, including Software

0.70

0.70



Purchase of Motor Vehicles and Other Transport Equipment

3.36

3.36


Urban Roads Re-sealing

Monitoring and capacity building support for district road works

0.94

0.94




0.60

0.60



Purchase of Office and ICT Equipment, including Software

0.05

0.05



Urban roads construction and rehabilitation (Bitumen standard)

12.50

12.50

MoWT District, Urban and Community Access Roads


Purchase of Motor Vehicles and Other Transport Equipment

0.90

0.90

Transport Services and Infrastructure

Improvement of Gulu Municipal Council Roads (Preparatory Survey)


0.60

0.60

Total 96.10 96.10 Source: Authors’ calculations based on the proposed FY 2019/20 National Budget

Information in the works and transport sector budget framework paper for FY 2019/20 shows that emphasis in the coming financial year will be put on upgrading national roads from gravel to tarmac (400km), rehabilitation of national roads (332.4km), and construction of 58 bridges. Although rehabilitation of some 1,000km of the District, Urban and Community Access Roads (DUCAR) network in selected districts is mentioned, resource allocation to LGs does not match the proposed targets.

22


3.3.6 Social Development sector The social development sector budget funds retained by the MDAs that could be re-allocated to the LGs stand at UGX 17.1 billion, of which UGX 13 billion are donor funds, UGX 2.3 billion are GoU development funds, and UGX 1.8 billion are non-wage (see Figure 11).

Figure 11: Social Development budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs


As shown in Table 7, Promotion of descent employment takes the biggest share of the funds retained by the sector that could be re-allocated to the LGs amounting to UGX 9.9 billion (58 percent). The rest of funds amounting to UGX 7.2 billion (42 percent) are with gender, equality and women’s empowerment; and social protection for vulnerable groups. Details on the distribution of social development sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs are contained in Appendix IX.

23


Table 7: Distribution of Social Dev’t sector budget proposed for re-allocation to LGs (UGX Bn)

Vote Programme Sub Program Outputs Non-Wage

GoU (Dev’t)

Donors Total

MoG

LSD

Promotion of descent Employment

Labour and Industrial Relations

Inspection of Workplaces and Investigation on violation of labour standards

0.18 0.26 9.43 9.9

Gender, Equality and Women’s Empowerment

Uganda Women Entrepreneurs Fund (UWEP)

Advocacy and Networking

- 2.03 3.57 5.6

Social Protection for Vulnerable Groups

Disability and Elderly

Support to the Renovation and Maintenance of Centres for Vulnerable Groups

1.61 - - 1.6

Total 1.79 2.30 12.99 17.1Source: Authors’ calculations based on the proposed FY 2019/20 National Budget

3.4 Budget Allocations to MDAs that can be Rationalized Under this sub-section we unearth and present the amount of funds that can be rationalized to improve service delivery and also free funds for LGs. After a careful analysis of the FY 2019/20 budget allocations to the six sectors under review, this study found that UGX 530.2 billion budgeted by various MDAs, can be rationalized to improve service delivery and also free funds for LGs. As shown in Figure 12, the agriculture sector has the highest funds available amounting to UGX 177.5 billion, followed by water and environment sector at 126.1billion, health sector at UGX 101billion, education and sports sector at UGX 86.3 billion, social development at UGX 22.88 billion and works and transport sector at UGX 16.5 billion. Details on the sector budgets proposed for rationalization are contained in Appendix X.

24


Figure 12: Total Funds Proposed for Rationalization for FY 2019/20 (UGX Bn)


In terms of composition, 51 percent of the budgets that can be rationalized are donor funds. Government of Uganda development funds are second at 26 percent, non-wage and wage budget are 20 percent and 3 percent respectively (see Table 8). It should be noted that donor funds have a wage and non-wage component, which this study was not able to analyse.

Table 8: Composition of Total Funds proposed for Rationalization (UGX Bn)

Sector Wage Non-Wage GoU (Dev’t) Donor Funding Total Agriculture - 68.7 75.3 33.5 177.5Education 8.3 33.0 4.1 40.9 86.3Health - - 22.9 78.1 101.0Water - - 32.1 94.0 126.1Works 8.1 1.8 4.1 2.5 16.5Social Dev’t - - 0.6 22.2 22.8TOTAL 16.4 103.5 139.1 271.2 530.2


Further analysis shows that the agriculture sector has the highest share of its budget that should be rationalized to improve service delivery and also free funds for LGs during FY 2019/19 at 18 percent followed by water and environment at 12 percent, social development at 10 percent; health at 4 percent; education and sports at 3 percent, and works and transport at 0.3 percent (see Figure 13).

Local Governments; 530.2

Agriculture; 177.5

Water; 126.1

Health; 101.0

Education; 86.3

Works; 16.5

Social Development; 22.8

25


Figure 13: Share of Sector Funds proposed for Rationalization


3.5 Justifications for re-allocation of funds from MDAs to LGs The proposed re-allocations of the FY 2019/20 national budget from MDAs to LGs are grounded in existing legal and policy frameworks as enshrined in the Constitution the LGA (CAP 243) and the Decentralisation Policy. Worth noting is that the sixth schedule of the Constitution limited the central government’s functions to indivisible and non-excludable public functions such as defence, security, law and order, National policy formulation, setting national standards, coordination, monitoring, supervision and guidance. Whereas, the LGA (second Schedule) provides for the functions and services for which district and urban councils are responsible subject to article 176 (2) of the Constitution, and Sections 96 and 97 of the LGA. The schedule lists, among others, medical and health services, education services, water services, road services, and agricultural extension services. Thus, the LGA (second Schedule) provides the legal basis which the authors of this paper used to propose re-allocation of funds from MDAs to LGs as shown in Table 9. Details are provided in Appendices II and III.

26


Table 9: Functions and Services for which LGs are mandated under LGs Act

Sector LGs Act (section of the Second Schedule)Agriculture Part 2: 4, 5, & 6 and Part 3: 1, 2, &3Education Part 2: 2, & 13 and Part 3: 1Health Part 2: 2, & 12 and Part 3: 1Water Part 2: 2, 3, 5 & 15 and Part 3: 1 &3Works and Transport Part 2: 4, & 17 and Part 3: 1Social Development Part 2: 5, 13 and Part 3: 1, 2 & 3

Source: Authors’ based on the LG Act (CAP, 243) (Second Schedule)

In addition, research and audit reports have shown that poor fiscal devolution and/or recentralisation of previously decentralised functions has had a negative impact on service delivery, accountability and citizen empowerment, and also increased financial dependency of LGs, which does not foster good governance (Lwanga, 2016). The Auditor General’s report of 2016, found that MDAs retain the biggest proportions of sector budget allocations despite devolving the responsibility of service delivery to LGs (OAG, 2016). Other studies have found that most MDAs that receive substantial budget allocations are more embroiled in ‘mandate wars’ among and between themselves, which has led to persistence of gaps in public service delivery.The Government of Uganda launched the Local Economic Development (LED) Policy in 2014, which aims at increasing business support to local investors, enhance growth of private sector investment in LGs, and increasing locally generated revenue by LGs. To actualize the implementation of this policy, LGs will require substantial amount of funds some of which are retained by various MDAs as shown section 3.3.

27


4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations4.1 ConclusionFinancing of LGs is critical to the success of decentralisation policy in Uganda. However, the current level of LG financing is not sufficient to meet the level of demand for service delivery. There has been a decline in transfers from Central Government to LGs, in relative and per capita terms attributed to recentralisation of functions and resources which by law are mandated to LGs. This study found that that UGX 1.066 trillion will be retained by various MDAs, yet these funds are supposed to be allocated to LGs as mandated under the Second Schedule of the LGA (CAP 243).

4.2 Recommendations In line with the above-mentioned findings, we recommend the following:Recommendations Responsible

PartyReallocate UGX 1.066 trillion which is budgeted / allocated to various MDAs. These funds are supposed to be allocated to LGs as mandated under the Second Schedule of the LGA (CAP 243). These funds should be re-allocated from the following sectors as follows: 1.1 Agriculture, UGX 281.4 Bn 1.2 Education, UGX 257.2 Bn1.3 Health, UGX 217.8 Bn1.4 Social Development, UGX 17.1 Bn1.5 Water and Environment, UGX 196.4Bn1.6 Works and Transport, UGX 96.1 Bn

Parliament and MoFPED

Rationalize UGX 530.2 billion budgeted by various MDAs on certain expenditures to free funds for LGs. These funds should be rationalized from the following sectors as follows:1.7 Agriculture, UGX 177.5 Bn1.8 Education, UGX 86.3 Bn1.9 Health, UGX 101.0 Bn1.10 Social Development, UGX 22.8 Bn 1.11 Water and Environment, UGX 126.1 Bn1.12 Works and Transport, UGX 16.5 Bn

Parliament, MoFPED and MDAs

MoFPED should work with the sector ministries to establish the unit cost of delivery of delegated services at LGs in order to facilitate proper planning and resource allocation.

MoFPED, & PPDA

The current projects and other sector grant disbursements made directly to LGs should be integrated into the formal grant system in a transparent and equitable distribution manner.

MoFPED, &LGFC

Implement the Fiscal Decentralisation Strategy to reduce the number of grants and evolve the system in a manner that will ensure consistency, autonomy, predictability and adequacy to meet the minimum costs of service delivery by LGs.

MoLG, LGFC, & MoFPED

28


Recommendations Responsible Party

Government transfers should be calculated by a formula that take into account the variables considered relevant to local government service delivery mandate.

LGFC, &MoFPED

LGs should be represented in negotiations with development partners when negotiating external assistance that are intended to support the decentralised services.

MoLG, LGFC, &ULGA

The Public Finance Management Act, 2015 should be amended to require the MoFPED to provide separate medium term financing plan for local government service delivery along with the national medium term expenditure plan and to submit them to Parliament for approval.

Parliament & MoFPED

29


ReferencesHart T. & Welham B (2016), Fiscal Decentralisation: A public financial

management introductory guide,. Overseas Development InstituteLGFC (2012), Review of Local Government Financing: Financing Management

and Accountability for Decentralised Service Delivery. KampalaLGFC (2017), Strategic Plan FY2017/2018– FY2020/2021Lwanga M. M. (2016), Drivers of Recentralization in Uganda and Effect on Service

Delivery. Uganda Christian University, MukonoMoFPED (2019), Draft Estimates of Revenue and Expenditure (Recurrent and

Development) FY 2019/20 MoFPED (2019), National Budget Framework Paper FY 2019/20 – FY 2023/24MoLG (2014), Local Economic Development Policy 2014OAG (2016), Financing of Local Governments in Uganda through Central

Government Grants and Local Government RevenuesRepublic of Uganda (1995), Constitution of the Republic of UgandaRepublic of Uganda (1997), Local Governments Act, 1997 Republic of Uganda (2003), Local Government Finance Commission Act, 2003Republic of Uganda (2015), Public Finance Management Act, 2015Republic of Uganda (2019), Conditional Grant Utilisation Agreement for FY 201/20

between MoH and LGsRepublic of Uganda (2019), Conditional Grant Utilisation Agreement for FY 201/20

between MoWT and LGsRepublic of Uganda (2019), Conditional Grant Utilisation Agreement for FY 201/20

between MoES and LGsRepublic of Uganda (2019), Conditional Grant Utilisation Agreement for FY 201/20

between MoWE and LGsRepublic of Uganda (2019), Conditional Grant Utilisation Agreement for FY 201/20

between MAAIF and LGs

30


APPENDICES

Appendix I: Documents ReviewedS/N Document Purpose1. Local Governments Act (CAP 243) To obtain an understanding of the functions and services for

which LGs are responsible (under Schedule 2) To obtain an understanding of the criteria used or formulae

in financing LGs To obtain an understanding of the funds disbursement process of financing LGs To obtain an understanding of the roles of the different key

players in financing LGs2. Constitution of the Republic of

Uganda, 1995 (as amended) To obtain an understanding of the legal basis for the

preparation and approval of the national budget. To establish the legal basis for the finances of the Local

Governments3. Public Finance Management Act,

2015 To obtain an understanding of the development of

fiscal policy framework, regulation of public financial management, and the responsibilities of persons and entities.

4. Local Government Finance Commission (LGFC), Strategic Plan FY2017/2018– FY2020/2021

To get the role of LGFC To get an understanding of the sources of revenue to local governments

5. Local Government Finance Commission Act, 2003.

To understand the functions of the Commission

6. FY2019/20 Budget To identify and analyse budget lines allocated to MDAs that by law should be have been allocated to LGs

7. National Budget Framework Papers, and Sector Budget Framework Papers for FY 2019/20 (for Agriculture, Health, Education, Water & Environment, Works & Transport, and Social Development)

To obtain the total budget ceiling for each selected Sector, To establish the sector priorities which by law are LG

mandates

8. Auditor General’s Report (2016) To establish the findings by the AG on the “Financing of Local Governments in Uganda through Central Government Grants and Local Government Revenues”

9. Budget Call Circulars (1st and 2nd) for FY 2019/20

To obtain an understanding of the total indicative resource envelopes and expenditure ceilings for the selected six Sectors and the LGs

To understand the specific budget interventions and overall budget strategy for FY 2019/20

10. Ministerial Policy Statements (2019/20) for the six selected sectors

To track sector priorities of MDAs for the FY 2019/20

11. Conditional Grant Utilisation Agreements (between Ministries and Local Governments) for FY 2019/20

To establish implementation issues agreed between the two parties with regard to utilisation of conditional grants.

31


Appendix II: Functions and Services for District Councils under LGA (Second Schedule – Part 2) S/N Function/Service1. Education services, which cover nursery, primary, secondary, trade, special education and technical

education 2. Medical and health services, including - a) hospitals, other than hospitals providing referral and medical

training; b) health centres, dispensaries, sub-dispensaries and first-aid posts; c) maternity and child welfare services; d) the control of communicable diseases, including HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis; e) control of the spread of disease in the district; f) rural ambulance services; g) primary health care services; h) vector control; i) environment sanitation; j) health education.

3. Water services: The provision and maintenance of water supplies in liaison with the Ministry responsible for natural resources, where applicable.

4. Road services: The construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of roads not under the responsibility of the Government.

5. All decentralised services and activities which include but are not limited to – a) crop, animal and fisheries husbandry extension services; b) entomological services and vermin control; c) human resources management and development; d) recurrent and development budget; e) district statistical services; f) district project identification; g) district planning; h) local government development planning; i) land administration; j) land surveying; k) physical planning; l) forests and wetlands; m) licensing of produce buying; n) trade licences; o) trade development services; p) commercial inspectorate; q) cooperative development; r) industrial relations; s) social rehabilitation; t) labour matters; w) probation and welfare; x) street children and orphans; y) women in development; z) community development; aa) youth affairs; ab) cultural affairs; ac) district information services.

6. Regulating, controlling, managing, administering, promoting and licensing any of the things or services which the council is empowered or required to do, and establishing, maintaining, carrying on, controlling, managing or administering and prescribing the forms in connection therewith to fix fees or charges to be levied in that respect.

7. Aiding and supporting the establishment and maintenance of schools, hospitals, libraries, art galleries, museums, tourist centres, homes for the aged, destitute or infirm or for the orphans, and providing bursaries to assist in the education of children of persons residing in the district, making donations to charitable and philanthropic, welfare, youth, persons with disabilities, women and sports organisations.

8. Preserving public decency, and preventing offences against public order in public places and preventing damage to property of the Government and the council.

9. Undertaking private works and services and charging, recovering the costs and contracting out public services to the private sector.

10. Selling all by-products resulting from carrying on by or on behalf of the council of any works or services.11. Promoting publicity for the council and the district as a whole.12. Promoting schemes of health, education and road safety sensitisation.13. Providing and managing - a) sporting and recreational facilities and programmes of informal education

for both adults and young people, including the running or provision of community centres; b) the development of social work among adults; c) remedial social welfare programmes aimed at the alleviation of social distress; d) the welfare of children and the elderly; and e) public vehicular parking.

14. The registration of marriages, births and deaths for transmission to the Registrar General.15. Assisting the Government to preserve the environment through protection of forests, wetlands, lake

shores, streams and prevention of environmental degradation.

16. Any other service or function which is not specified in this Schedule.17. Upon delegation by the Government, identification and preservation of sites and objects or buildings of

historical and architectural value.

32


Appendix III: Functions and Services for Urban Councils under LGA (Second Schedule - Part 3) S/N Function/Service

1.

Establish, acquire, erect, maintain, promote, assist or control with the participation of the citizens—(a) lighting of streets and public places;(b) fire brigade services;(c) ambulance services;(d) clinics, dispensaries, health and inoculation centres;(e) cemeteries, crematoria and mortuaries and ancillary services, and provide for the burial of

bodies of destitute persons and of unclaimed bodies;(f) omnibus stations and related office accommodations, cafes, restaurants, refreshment rooms

and other buildings;(g) offices, stores, workshops, depots and other buildings for the purposes of the council;(h) public halls, libraries, art galleries and museums;(i) slaughterhouses, cold storage facilities and premises for the inspection or processing of milk,

meat or hides and skins;(j) markets and piers, jetties and landing places;(k) botanical and zoological gardens;(l) public baths and swimming pools;(m) laundries and other places for the washing of clothes;(n) canteens, social centres, clubs and hospitals, including such facilities for employees and staff;(o) public lavatories and urinals;(p) pounds for stray animals and clinics for the treatment of sick animals;(q) camping and grazing grounds;(r) lairages;(s) dipping tanks;(t) disinfecting stations;(u) public weighing machines;(v) public monuments;(w) sanitary services for the removal and disposal of night soil, rubbish, carcasses of dead animals

and all kinds of refuse and effluent;(x) water supplies outside the jurisdiction of the National Water and Sewerage Corporation;(y) education services which cover primary and secondary schools, special education, trade and

technical schools;(z) maintenance of roads.

2.

Establish, maintain or control public parks, garden and recreation grounds on any land vested in the council and in connection with or for the purposes of that public park, garden or recreation ground to—

(a) establish, erect, maintain and control aquariums, aviaries, piers, pavilions, cafes, restaurants, refreshment rooms and other buildings or erections that the council may deem necessary;

(b) reserve any portion of the public park, garden or recreation ground for any particular game or recreation or for any other specific purposes, exclude the public from those portions and provide for their renting and hiring to the public, clubs or other organisations; and

(c) provide or permit any other person to provide any apparatus, equipment or other amenity.

33


S/N Function/Service

3.

Prohibit, restrict, regulate or license—(a) the sale or hawking of wares or the erection of stalls on any street, or the use of any part of the

street or public place for the purpose of carrying on any trade, business or profession;(b) the depositing on any street, public place or unoccupied land of any refuse, rubbish, derelict

vehicles or any other material or thing, and to provide for the removal and disposal thereof;(c) street decorations and the erection of shelters, temporary buildings, platforms, seats and other

structures at any entertainment, procession, exhibition, ceremony or display, whether in a public place or not;

(d) the placing of banners, wires, ropes or any other impediments over or across any street or public place;

(e) the collection of money or goods in any public place for any charitable or other purpose;(f) the public exhibition of any monstrosity, freak of nature or abnormal person or animal;(g) singing, dancing, drumming, the playing of musical instruments, the production of music or

the making of any noise likely to disturb any person, or any performance for profit in any public place;

(h) the storage or stacking of firewood or other fuel;(i) the washing or drying of clothes other than on private premises;(j) the quarrying of stone, lime, clay, murram or other material;(k) the keeping of dogs, animals and poultry, and provide for the seizure and destruction of

ownerless, unlicensed, diseased or dangerous dogs, and the seizure and disposal of stray animals and poultry;

(l) billiard saloons, dance halls and other places of public resort;(m) lodging houses;(n) the burning of rubbish and grassland;(o) prostitution and brothels;(p) cinema and video halls.

34


Appe

ndix

IV: D

etai

led

Agric

ultu

re s

ecto

r bud

get p

ropo

sed

for r

e-al

loca

tion

to L

Gs (U

GX B

n)

Vote

Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b Pr

ogra

m

Key

Out

put

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

D

onor

Fu

ndin

g To

tal

DD

AD

airy

Dev

elop

men

t an

d Re

gula

tion

Dai

ry M

arke

t Ace

ss a

nd V

alue

Ad

ditio

nSu

ppor

t to

dairy

dev

elop

men

t-

0.64

-0.

64

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sN

atio

nal O

il Pa

lm P

roje

ctAc

quis

ition

of L

and

by G

over

nmen

t-

8.00

-8.

00M

AAIF

Cro

p Re

sour

ces

Agric

ultu

re C

lust

er

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Con

trol o

f pes

t and

dis

ease

s in

prio

rity

com

mod

ities

--

1.00

1.00

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sC

rop

pest

s an

d di

seas

es

cont

rol p

hase

2C

ontro

l of p

est a

nd d

isea

ses

in p

riorit

y co

mm

oditi

es-

0.61

-0.

61

MAA

IFC

rop

Pro

tect

ion

Dep

artm

ent

Cro

p pe

st a

nd d

isea

se c

ontro

l m

easu

res

Cro

p pe

st a

nd d

isea

se c

ontro

l m

easu

res

1.04

--

1.04

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sAg

ricul

ture

Clu

ster

D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ctC

rop

pest

and

dis

ease

con

trol

mea

sure

s-

-1.

451.

45

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sC

rop

pest

s an

d di

seas

es

cont

rol p

hase

2C

rop

pest

and

dis

ease

con

trol

mea

sure

s-

0.50

-0.

50

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sC

rop

Prod

uctio

n D

epar

tmen

tC

rop

prod

uctio

n te

chno

logy

pro

mot

ion

0.70

--

0.70

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sN

atio

nal O

il Pa

lm P

roje

ctC

rop

prod

uctio

n te

chno

logy

pro

mot

ion

-2.

004.

006.

00M

AAIF

Cro

p Re

sour

ces

Mul

tisec

tora

l Foo

d Sa

fety

&

Nut

ritio

n Pr

ojec

tFo

od a

nd n

utrit

ion

secu

rity

-0.

2622

.83

23.0

9

MAA

IFFi

sher

ies

Reso

urce

sSu

ppor

t to

Sust

aina

ble

Fish

erie

s D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ctFi

sher

ies

Infra

stru

ctur

e C

onst

ruct

ion

-0.

76-

0.76

MAA

IFFi

sher

ies

Reso

urce

sPr

omot

ing

com

mer

cial

aq

uacu

lture

in U

gand

a Pr

ojec

tFi

sher

ies

Infra

stru

ctur

e C

onst

ruct

ion

-2.

00-

2.00

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Anim

al P

rodu

ctio

n D

epar

tmen

tIm

prov

ed a

cces

s to

wat

er fo

r liv

esto

ck0.

15-

-0.

15

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ctIm

prov

ed a

cces

s to

wat

er fo

r liv

esto

ck-

-6.

586.

58

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sAg

ricul

ture

Val

ue C

hain

D

evel

opm

ent

Impr

ovin

g Va

lue

addi

tion

and

mar

ket

Acce

ss-

1.60

9.70

11.3

0

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sAg

ricul

ture

Clu

ster

D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ctIn

crea

sed

valu

e ad

ditio

n in

the

sect

or-

-10

.18

10.1

8

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Mea

t Exp

ort S

uppo

rt Se

rvic

esLi

vest

ock

Infra

stru

ctur

e C

onst

ruct

ion

-10

.01

-10

.01

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ctLi

vest

ock

Infra

stru

ctur

e C

onst

ruct

ion

-0.

103.

783.

88

35


Vote

Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b Pr

ogra

m

Key

Out

put

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

D

onor

Fu

ndin

g To

tal

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Polic

ies,

law

s, g

uide

lines

, pla

ns

and

stra

tegi

esLi

vest

ock

mar

ketin

g fa

cilit

y co

nstru

ctio

n-

-27

.73

27.7

3

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Not

hern

Uga

nda

Farm

ers

Live

lihoo

d Im

prov

emen

t Pro

ject

Prom

otio

n of

prio

rity

anim

al p

rodu

cts

and

prod

uctiv

ity-

0.31

3.34

3.65

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Mea

t Exp

ort S

uppo

rt Se

rvic

esPr

omot

ion

of p

riorit

y an

imal

pro

duct

s an

d pr

oduc

tivity

-3.

68-

3.68

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ctPr

omot

ion

of p

riorit

y an

imal

pro

duct

s an

d pr

oduc

tivity

--

0.93

0.93

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Dev

elop

ing

A M

arke

t-O

rient

ed A

nd E

nviro

nmen

tally

Su

stai

nabl

e Be

ef M

eat I

ndus

try

In U

gand

a

Prom

otio

n of

prio

rity

anim

al p

rodu

cts

and

prod

uctiv

ity-

0.22

3.72

3.93

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sD

irect

orat

e of

Cro

p Re

sour

ces

Prom

otio

n of

Pro

duct

ion

& Pr

oduc

tivity

of

prio

rity

com

mod

ities

0.25

--

0.25

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sC

rop

Prod

uctio

n D

epar

tmen

tPr

omot

ion

of P

rodu

ctio

n &

Prod

uctiv

ity

of p

riorit

y co

mm

oditi

es0.

22-

-0.

22

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sAg

ricul

ture

Clu

ster

D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ctPr

omot

ion

of P

rodu

ctio

n &

Prod

uctiv

ity

of p

riorit

y co

mm

oditi

es-

0.20

71.8

872

.08

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sEn

hanc

ing

Nat

iona

l Foo

d Se

curit

y th

roug

h in

crea

sed

Rice

pr

oduc

tion

in E

aste

rn U

gand

a

Prom

otio

n of

Pro

duct

ion

& Pr

oduc

tivity

of

prio

rity

com

mod

ities

-0.

404.

164.

56

MAA

IFFi

sher

ies

Reso

urce

sFi

sher

ies

Reso

urce

s D

epar

tmen

tPr

omot

ion

of s

usta

inab

le fi

sher

ies

0.55

--

0.55

MAA

IFFi

sher

ies

Reso

urce

sSu

ppor

t to

Sust

aina

ble

Fish

erie

s D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ctPr

omot

ion

of s

usta

inab

le fi

sher

ies

-2.

91-

2.91

MAA

IFFi

sher

ies

Reso

urce

sPr

omot

ing

com

mer

cial

aq

uacu

lture

in U

gand

a Pr

ojec

tPr

omot

ion

of s

usta

inab

le fi

sher

ies

-0.

272.

462.

73

MAA

IFFi

sher

ies

Reso

urce

sD

irect

orat

e of

Fis

herie

s Re

sour

ces

Prom

otio

n of

sus

tain

able

fish

erie

s0.

16-

-0.

16

MAA

IFFi

sher

ies

Reso

urce

sD

epar

tmen

t of A

quac

ultu

re

Man

agem

ent a

nd D

evel

opm

ent

Prom

otio

n of

sus

tain

able

fish

erie

s1.

10-

-1.

10

MAA

IFFi

sher

ies

Reso

urce

sD

epar

tmen

t of F

ishe

ries

Con

trol,

Regu

latio

n an

d Q

ualit

y As

sura

nce

Prom

otio

n of

sus

tain

able

fish

erie

s1.

00-

-1.

00

36


Vote

Pr

ogra

mm

e Su

b Pr

ogra

m

Key

Out

put

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

D

onor

Fu

ndin

g To

tal

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e o

f Ag

ricul

tura

l Ex

tens

ion

and

Skills

M

anag

emen

t

Agro

-Eco

nom

ic Im

pact

D

eepe

ning

in th

e Al

berti

ne

Basi

n

Prov

isio

n of

Val

ue A

dditi

on e

xten

sion

se

rvic

es-

0.42

-0.

42

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e o

f Ag

ricul

tura

l Ex

tens

ion

and

Skills

M

anag

emen

t

Dep

artm

ent o

f Agr

icul

tura

l In

vest

men

t and

Ent

erpr

ise

Dev

elop

men

t (D

AIED

)

Prov

isio

n of

Val

ue A

dditi

on e

xten

sion

se

rvic

es0.

91-

-0.

91

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sAg

ricul

ture

Clu

ster

D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ctRo

ads,

Stre

ets

and

Hig

hway

s-

-11

.70

11.7

0

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sN

atio

nal O

il Pa

lm P

roje

ctRo

ads,

Stre

ets

and

Hig

hway

s-

-22

.00

22.0

0M

AAIF

Agric

ultu

re

Infra

stru

ctur

e,

Mec

hani

zatio

n an

d W

ater

for A

gric

ultu

ral

Prod

uctio

n

Impr

ovin

g Ac

cess

and

Use

of

Agric

ultu

ral E

quip

men

t and

M

echa

nisa

tion

thro

ugh

the

use

of la

bour

Sav

ing

Tech

nolo

gies

Valle

y Ta

nk C

onst

ruct

ion

(live

stoc

k)-

10.1

6-

10.1

6

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Live

stoc

k H

ealth

and

En

tom

olog

yVe

ctor

and

dis

ease

con

trol i

n pr

iorit

y an

imal

com

mod

ities

0.27

--

0.27

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Live

stoc

k D

isea

ses

Con

trol

Proj

ect P

hase

2Ve

ctor

and

dis

ease

con

trol i

n pr

iorit

y an

imal

com

mod

ities

-9.

04-

9.04

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ctVe

ctor

and

dis

ease

con

trol i

n pr

iorit

y an

imal

com

mod

ities

--

1.09

1.09

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Live

stoc

k H

ealth

and

En

tom

olog

yVe

ctor

and

dis

ease

con

trol m

easu

res

0.14

--

0.14

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Farm

-Bas

ed B

ee R

eser

ves

Esta

blis

hmen

t Pro

ject

Vect

or a

nd d

isea

se c

ontro

l mea

sure

s-

0.59

-0.

59

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Live

stoc

k D

isea

ses

Con

trol

Proj

ect P

hase

2Ve

ctor

and

dis

ease

con

trol m

easu

res

-8.

97-

8.97

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Mea

t Exp

ort S

uppo

rt Se

rvic

esVe

ctor

and

dis

ease

con

trol m

easu

res

-0.

36-

0.36

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Liv

elih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent P

roje

ctVe

ctor

and

dis

ease

con

trol m

easu

res

--

0.46

0.46

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Live

stoc

k H

ealth

and

En

tom

olog

yC

ontro

l of T

rypt

anom

iasi

s an

d Sl

eepi

ng

Sick

ness

(CO

CTU

)1.

95-

-1.

95

Tota

l 8.

4364

.01

208.

9728

1.41

37


Appe

ndix

V: D

etai

led

Educ

atio

n &

Spo

rts

sect

or b

udge

t pro

pose

d fo

r re-

allo

catio

n to

LGs

(U

GX B

n)

Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MO

ESG

uida

nce

and

Cou

nsel

ling

Gui

danc

e an

d C

ouns

ellin

gG

uida

nce

and

Con

sellin

g Se

rvic

es0.

5-

-0.

5

MO

ESPh

ysic

al E

duca

tion

and

Spor

tsSp

orts

and

PE

Spor

ts M

anag

emen

t and

Cap

acity

D

evel

opm

ent

0.4

--

0.4

MO

ESPr

e-Pr

imar

y an

d Pr

imar

y Ed

ucat

ion

Emer

genc

y C

onst

ruct

ion

of

Prim

ary

Scho

ols

Phas

e II

G

over

nmen

t Bui

ldin

gs a

nd A

dmin

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e-

2.2

-2.

2

MO

ESPr

e-Pr

imar

y an

d Pr

imar

y Ed

ucat

ion

Emer

genc

y C

onst

ruct

ion

of

Prim

ary

Scho

ols

Phas

e II

Pu

rcha

se o

f Spe

cial

ised

Mac

hine

ry a

nd

Equi

pmen

t-

0.8

-0.

8

MO

ESPr

e-Pr

imar

y an

d Pr

imar

y Ed

ucat

ion

Uga

nda

Teac

her a

nd S

choo

l Ef

fect

iven

ess

Proj

ect

Cla

ssro

om c

onst

ruct

ion

and

reha

bilit

atio

n (P

rimar

y)

-0.

248

.048

.2

MO

ESSe

cond

ary

Educ

atio

nD

evel

opm

ent o

f Sec

onda

ry

Educ

atio

n Ph

ase

IIC

onst

ruct

ion

and

reha

bilit

atio

n of

lear

ning

fa

cilit

ies

(Sec

onda

ry)

-6.

0-

6.0

MO

ESPr

e-Pr

imar

y an

d Pr

imar

y Ed

ucat

ion

Basi

c Ed

ucat

ion

Mon

itorin

g an

d Su

perv

isio

n of

Prim

ary

Scho

ols

0.3

--

0.3

MO

ESPr

e-Pr

imar

y an

d Pr

imar

y Ed

ucat

ion

Uga

nda

Teac

her a

nd S

choo

l Ef

fect

iven

ess

Proj

ect

Mon

itorin

g an

d Su

perv

isio

n of

Prim

ary

Scho

ols

-0.

2-

0.2

MO

ESSe

cond

ary

Educ

atio

nSe

cond

ary

Educ

atio

nM

onito

ring

and

Supe

rvis

ion

of S

econ

dary

Sc

hool

s0.

2-

-0.

2

MO

ESSp

ecia

l Nee

ds

Educ

atio

nSp

ecia

l Nee

ds E

duca

tion

and

Car

eer G

uida

nce

Mon

itorin

g an

d Su

perv

isio

n of

Spe

cial

N

eeds

Fac

ilitie

s0.

2-

-0.

2

MO

ESSp

ecia

l Nee

ds

Educ

atio

nD

evel

opm

ent a

nd Im

prov

emen

t of

Spec

ial N

eeds

Edu

catio

n (S

NE)

Mon

itorin

g an

d Su

perv

isio

n of

Spe

cial

N

eeds

Fac

ilitie

s-

0.0

-0.

0

MO

ESSe

cond

ary

Educ

atio

nPr

ivat

e Sc

hool

s D

epar

tmen

tM

onito

ring

USE

Pla

cem

ents

in P

rivat

e Sc

hool

s0.

3-

-0.

3

MO

ESSp

ecia

l Nee

ds

Educ

atio

nD

evel

opm

ent a

nd Im

prov

emen

t of

Spec

ial N

eeds

Edu

catio

n (S

NE)

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Adm

inis

trativ

e In

frast

ruct

ure

-0.

8-

0.8

MO

ESSp

ecia

l Nee

ds

Educ

atio

nD

evel

opm

ent a

nd Im

prov

emen

t of

Spec

ial N

eeds

Edu

catio

n (S

NE)

Purc

hase

of O

ffice

and

Res

iden

tial

Furn

iture

and

Fitt

ings

-0.

1-

0.1

MO

ESSp

ecia

l Nee

ds

Educ

atio

nD

evel

opm

ent a

nd Im

prov

emen

t of

Spec

ial N

eeds

Edu

catio

n (S

NE)

Purc

hase

of S

peci

alis

ed M

achi

nery

&

Equi

pmen

t

Mac

hine

ry a

nd E

quip

men

t

-0.

3-

0.3

38


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MO

ESSp

ecia

l Nee

ds

Educ

atio

nSp

ecia

l Nee

ds E

duca

tion

and

Car

eer G

uida

nce

Spec

ial N

eeds

Edu

catio

n Se

rvic

es0.

6-

-0.

6

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Dev

elop

men

t of B

TVET

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of le

arni

ng

faci

litie

s (B

TEVE

T)-

7.1

-7.

1

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Albe

rtine

Reg

ion

Sust

aina

ble

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of le

arni

ng

faci

litie

s (B

TEVE

T)-

-0.

30.

3

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Skills

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of le

arni

ng

faci

litie

s (B

TEVE

T)-

-33

.333

.3

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Supp

ort t

o th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

of

Skilli

ng U

gand

a St

rate

gy (B

TC)

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of le

arni

ng

faci

litie

s (B

TEVE

T)-

0.1

4.7

4.8

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

The

Tech

nica

l Voc

atio

nal

Educ

atio

n an

d Tr

aini

ng (T

VET-

LEAD

)

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of le

arni

ng

faci

litie

s (B

TEVE

T)-

0.4

-0.

4

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

IDB

fund

ed T

echn

ical

and

Vo

catio

nal E

duca

tion

and

Trai

ning

Ph

ase

III

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of le

arni

ng

faci

litie

s (B

TEVE

T)-

4.1

135.

613

9.7

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

BTVE

TM

onito

ring

and

Supe

rvis

ion

of B

TVET

In

stitu

tions

0.2

--

0.2

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Dev

elop

men

t of B

TVET

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

of

acco

mm

odat

ion

faci

litie

s (B

TVET

)-

2.5

-2.

5

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Albe

rtine

Reg

ion

Sust

aina

ble

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Mon

itorin

g an

d Su

perv

isio

n of

BTV

ET

Inst

itutio

ns-

-0.

10.

1

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Skills

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Mon

itorin

g an

d Su

perv

isio

n of

BTV

ET

Inst

itutio

ns-

-1.

21.

2

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Supp

ort t

o th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

of

Skilli

ng U

gand

a St

rate

gy (B

TC)

Mon

itorin

g an

d Su

perv

isio

n of

BTV

ET

Inst

itutio

ns-

-0.

30.

3

MO

ESSe

cond

ary

Educ

atio

nD

evel

opm

ent o

f Sec

onda

ry

Educ

atio

n Ph

ase

IIC

onst

ruct

ion

and

reha

bilit

atio

n of

lear

ning

fa

cilit

ies

(Sec

onda

ry)

-6.

0-

6.0

Tota

l 2.

930

.722

3.6

257.

2

39


Appe

ndix

VI:

Deta

iled

Heal

th s

ecto

r bud

get p

ropo

sed

for r

e-al

loca

tion

to L

Gs (U

GX B

n)

Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

me

Key

Out

put D

escr

iptio

nW

age

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esC

omm

unity

Hea

lthC

omm

unity

Hea

lth S

ervi

ces

(con

trol o

f co

mm

unic

able

and

non

-com

mun

icab

le

dise

ases

)

1.76

0.08

--

1.84

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esH

ealth

Edu

catio

n,

Prom

otio

n &

Com

mun

icat

ion

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Ser

vice

s (c

ontro

l of

com

mun

icab

le a

nd n

on-c

omm

unic

able

di

seas

es)

0.46

0.36

--

0.83

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esEn

viro

nmen

tal H

ealth

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Ser

vice

s (c

ontro

l of

com

mun

icab

le a

nd n

on-c

omm

unic

able

di

seas

es)

0.60

0.15

--

0.75

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esN

on-C

omm

unic

able

D

isea

ses

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Ser

vice

s (c

ontro

l of

com

mun

icab

le a

nd n

on-c

omm

unic

able

di

seas

es)

-0.

19-

-0.

19

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tIn

stitu

tiona

l Sup

port

to M

oHSu

ppor

t to

Loca

l Gov

ernm

ents

--

1.78

-1.

78

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tU

gand

a Re

prod

uctiv

e M

ater

nal a

nd C

hild

Hea

lth

Serv

ices

Impr

ovem

ent

Proj

ect

Supp

ort t

o Lo

cal G

over

nmen

ts-

--

47.0

247

.02

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esEa

st A

frica

Pub

lic H

ealth

La

bora

tory

Net

wor

k pr

ojec

t Ph

ase

II

Supp

ort t

o Lo

cal G

over

nmen

ts-

--

1.65

1.65

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esU

gand

a Sa

nita

tion

Fund

Pr

ojec

t II

Supp

ort t

o Lo

cal G

over

nmen

ts-

-0.

45-

0.45

MoH

Clin

ical

Hea

lth

Serv

ices

sh

ared

Nat

iona

l Ser

vice

s (In

tern

s al

low

ance

s,

trans

fers

to in

tern

atio

nal

orga

nisa

tions

and

tran

sfer

s to

dis

trict

s)

Supp

ort t

o Lo

cal G

over

nmen

ts22

.45

11.4

0-

-33

.85

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tRe

habi

litat

ion

and

Con

stru

ctio

n of

Gen

eral

H

ospi

tals

Hos

pita

l Con

stru

ctio

n/re

habi

litat

ion

--

-23

.03

23.0

3

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tRe

nova

tion

and

Equi

ppin

g of

Kay

unga

and

Yum

be

Gen

eral

Hos

pita

ls

Hos

pita

l Con

stru

ctio

n/re

habi

litat

ion

--

5.44

41.6

947

.14

40


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

me

Key

Out

put D

escr

iptio

nW

age

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tIta

lian

Supp

ort t

o H

ealth

Se

ctor

Dev

elop

men

t Pla

n-

Kara

moj

a In

frast

ruct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Pha

se

II

Hos

pita

l Con

stru

ctio

n/re

habi

litat

ion

--

-7.

897.

89

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tIta

lian

Supp

ort t

o H

ealth

Se

ctor

Dev

elop

men

t Pla

n-

Kara

moj

a In

frast

ruct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Pha

se

II

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tr

ansp

ort E

quip

men

t-

--

2.48

2.48

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tRe

nova

tion

and

Equi

ppin

g of

Kay

unga

and

Yum

be

Gen

eral

Hos

pita

ls

Purc

hase

of S

peci

alis

ed M

achi

nery

&

Equi

pmen

t-

-1.

1624

.17

25.3

3

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tU

gand

a Re

prod

uctiv

e M

ater

nal a

nd C

hild

Hea

lth

Serv

ices

Impr

ovem

ent

Proj

ect

Hea

lth c

entre

con

stru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

--

-19

.22

19.2

2

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esEa

st A

frica

Pub

lic H

ealth

La

bora

tory

Net

wor

k pr

ojec

t Ph

ase

II

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Ser

vice

s (c

ontro

l of

com

mun

icab

le a

nd n

on-c

omm

unic

able

di

seas

es)

--

-2.

582.

58

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esEn

viro

nmen

tal H

ealth

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Ser

vice

s (c

ontro

l of

com

mun

icab

le a

nd n

on-c

omm

unic

able

di

seas

es)

0.60

0.15

--

0.75

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esRe

prod

uctiv

e an

d C

hild

H

ealth

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Ser

vice

s (c

ontro

l of

com

mun

icab

le a

nd n

on-c

omm

unic

able

di

seas

es)

0.46

0.36

--

0.83

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Se

rvic

esN

on-C

omm

unic

able

D

isea

ses

Com

mun

ity H

ealth

Ser

vice

s (c

ontro

l of

com

mun

icab

le a

nd n

on-c

omm

unic

able

di

seas

es)

-0.

19-

-0.

19

Tota

l26

.34

12.8

88.

8416

9.72

217.

78

41


Appe

ndix

VII:

Det

aile

d of

Wat

er &

Env

ironm

ent s

ecto

r bud

get p

ropo

sed

for r

e-al

loca

tion

to

LGs

(UGX

Bn)

Vo

tePr

ogra

mm

eSu

b Pr

ogra

mK

ey O

utpu

t N

on-

Wag

eG

oU

(Dev

’t)D

onor

Fu

ndin

gTo

tal

MO

WE

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

The

Nat

iona

l RED

D-P

lus

Proj

ect

Prom

otio

n of

Kno

wle

dge

of

Envi

ronm

ent a

nd N

atur

al R

esou

rces

-

0.10

-

0.

10

MO

WE

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

Envi

ronm

ent S

uppo

rt Se

rvic

esPr

omot

ion

of K

now

ledg

e of

En

viro

nmen

t and

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

0.

04

-

-

0.04

M

OW

EN

atur

al R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tFa

rm In

com

e En

hanc

emen

t and

For

estry

C

onse

rvat

ion

Proj

ect P

hase

II (F

IEFO

C II

)Pr

omot

ion

of K

now

ledg

e of

En

viro

nmen

t and

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

-

0.

02

0.21

0.

23

MO

WE

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

Fore

stry

Sup

port

Serv

ices

Prom

otio

n of

Kno

wle

dge

of

Envi

ronm

ent a

nd N

atur

al R

esou

rces

0.09

-

-

0.

09

MO

WE

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

Build

ing

Resi

lient

Com

mun

ities

, Wet

land

Ec

osys

tem

s an

d As

soci

ated

Cat

chm

ents

in

Uga

nda

Prom

otio

n of

Kno

wle

dge

of

Envi

ronm

ent a

nd N

atur

al R

esou

rces

-

0.08

-

0.

08

MO

WE

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

The

Nat

iona

l RED

D-P

lus

Proj

ect

Rest

orat

ion

of d

egra

ded

and

Prot

ectio

n of

eco

syst

ems

-

0.07

-

0.

07

MO

WE

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

Envi

ronm

ent S

uppo

rt Se

rvic

esRe

stor

atio

n of

deg

rade

d an

d Pr

otec

tion

of e

cosy

stem

s

0.

47

-

-

0.47

M

OW

EN

atur

al R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tFa

rm In

com

e En

hanc

emen

t and

For

estry

C

onse

rvat

ion

Proj

ect P

hase

II (F

IEFO

C II

)Re

stor

atio

n of

deg

rade

d an

d Pr

otec

tion

of e

cosy

stem

s

-

0.

02

1.60

1.

62

MO

WE

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

Fore

stry

Sup

port

Serv

ices

Rest

orat

ion

of d

egra

ded

and

Prot

ectio

n of

eco

syst

ems

1.80

-

-

1.

80

MO

WE

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

Build

ing

Resi

lient

Com

mun

ities

, Wet

land

Ec

osys

tem

s an

d As

soci

ated

Cat

chm

ents

in

Uga

nda

Rest

orat

ion

of d

egra

ded

and

Prot

ectio

n of

eco

syst

ems

-

1.90

-

1.

90

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Sola

r Pow

ered

Min

i-Pip

ed W

ater

Sc

hem

es in

rura

l Are

asC

onst

ruct

ion

of P

iped

Wat

er S

uppl

y Sy

stem

s (R

ural

)

-

15

.82

-

15

.82

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Pipe

d W

ater

in R

ural

Are

asC

onst

ruct

ion

of P

iped

Wat

er S

uppl

y Sy

stem

s (R

ural

)

-

12

.51

40.3

4

52.8

5 M

OW

ERu

ral W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nIn

tegr

ated

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

t and

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

(IW

MD

P)

Con

stru

ctio

n of

Pip

ed W

ater

Sup

ply

Syst

ems

(Rur

al)

-

1.00

9.

98

10.9

8

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Prom

otio

n of

san

itatio

n an

d hy

gien

e ed

ucat

ion

0.01

-

-

0.

01

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Sola

r Pow

ered

Min

i-Pip

ed W

ater

Sc

hem

es in

rura

l Are

asPr

omot

ion

of s

anita

tion

and

hygi

ene

educ

atio

n

-

1.

00

-

1.00

42


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Pipe

d W

ater

in R

ural

Are

asPr

omot

ion

of s

anita

tion

and

hygi

ene

educ

atio

n

-

0.

22

0.50

0.

72

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent a

nd D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct

(IWM

DP)

Prom

otio

n of

san

itatio

n an

d hy

gien

e ed

ucat

ion

-

0.10

-

0.

10

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Sola

r Pow

ered

Min

i-Pip

ed W

ater

Sc

hem

es in

rura

l Are

asC

onst

ruct

ion

of P

oint

Wat

er S

ourc

es

-

5.

50

-

5.50

M

OW

EU

rban

Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Kara

moj

a Sm

all T

own

and

Rura

l gro

wth

C

ente

rs W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

n Pr

ojec

t

Impr

oved

san

itatio

n se

rvic

es a

nd

hygi

ene

-

0.19

-

0.

19

MO

WE

Urb

an W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nW

ater

and

San

itatio

n D

evel

opm

ent

Faci

lity

- Eas

t-Pha

se II

Impr

oved

san

itatio

n se

rvic

es a

nd

hygi

ene

-

0.38

-

0.

38

MO

WE

Urb

an W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nW

ater

and

San

itatio

n D

evel

opm

ent

Faci

lity

- Sou

th W

este

rn-P

hase

IIIm

prov

ed s

anita

tion

serv

ices

and

hy

gien

e

-

0.

30

-

0.30

M

OW

EU

rban

Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Stra

tegi

c To

wns

Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Proj

ect (

STW

SSP)

Impr

oved

san

itatio

n se

rvic

es a

nd

hygi

ene

-

0.10

0.

40

0.50

M

OW

EU

rban

Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent a

nd D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct

(IWM

DP)

Impr

oved

san

itatio

n se

rvic

es a

nd

hygi

ene

-

0.07

-

0.

07

MO

WE

Urb

an W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nW

ater

and

San

itatio

n D

evel

opm

ent

Faci

lity

Cen

tral -

Pha

se II

Impr

oved

san

itatio

n se

rvic

es a

nd

hygi

ene

-

0.10

2.

00

2.10

M

OW

EU

rban

Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Wat

er a

nd S

anita

tion

Dev

elop

men

t Fa

cilit

y N

orth

- Ph

ase

IIIm

prov

ed s

anita

tion

serv

ices

and

hy

gien

e

-

0.

60

-

0.60

M

OW

EW

ater

for P

rodu

ctio

nW

ater

for P

rodu

ctio

n Ph

ase

IIC

onst

ruct

ion

of B

ulk

Wat

er S

uppl

y Sc

hem

es

-

20.4

4

10

.40

30

.84

MO

WE

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Regi

onal

Cen

ter-

Nor

th (W

fPRC

-N) b

ased

in L

iraC

onst

ruct

ion

of W

ater

Sur

face

Re

serv

oirs

-

10.8

6

-

10.8

6 M

OW

EW

ater

for P

rodu

ctio

nW

ater

for P

rodu

ctio

n Re

gion

al C

ente

r-Ea

st (W

fPRC

_E) b

ased

in M

bale

Con

stru

ctio

n of

Wat

er S

urfa

ce

Rese

rvoi

rs

-

13

.72

-

13

.72

MO

WE

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Regi

onal

Cen

tre-

Wes

t (W

fPRC

-W) b

ased

in M

bara

raC

onst

ruct

ion

of W

ater

Sur

face

Re

serv

oirs

-

15.5

6

-

15.5

6 M

OW

EW

ater

for P

rodu

ctio

nW

ater

for P

rodu

ctio

n Ph

ase

IIC

onst

ruct

ion

of W

ater

Sur

face

Re

serv

oirs

-

4.59

-

4.

59

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tW

ater

Man

agem

ent Z

ones

Pro

ject

Cat

chm

ent-b

ased

IWRM

es

tabl

ishe

d

-

1.

65

0.21

1.

85

43


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tM

ulti-

Late

ral L

akes

Edw

ard

& Al

bert

Inte

grat

ed F

ishe

ries

and

Wat

er

Reso

urce

s M

anag

emen

t (LE

AFII)

Cat

chm

ent-b

ased

IWRM

es

tabl

ishe

d

-

1.

58

0.90

2.

48

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tEn

hanc

ing

Resi

lienc

e of

Com

mun

ities

to

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Cat

chm

ent-b

ased

IWRM

es

tabl

ishe

d

-

0.

69

0.15

0.

84

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tIn

ner M

urch

ison

Bay

Cle

anup

Pro

ject

Cat

chm

ent-b

ased

IWRM

es

tabl

ishe

d

-

0.

03

-

0.03

M

OW

EW

ater

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent a

nd D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct

(IWM

DP)

Cat

chm

ent-b

ased

IWRM

es

tabl

ishe

d

-

0.

24

8.50

8.

74

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Back

up

supp

ort f

or O

& M

of R

ural

W

ater

0.01

-

-

0.

01

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Sola

r Pow

ered

Min

i-Pip

ed W

ater

Sc

hem

es in

rura

l Are

asBa

ck u

p su

ppor

t for

O &

M o

f Rur

al

Wat

er

-

4.

43

-

4.43

M

OW

ERu

ral W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nPi

ped

Wat

er in

Rur

al A

reas

Back

up

supp

ort f

or O

& M

of R

ural

W

ater

-

0.37

0.

60

0.97

M

OW

ERu

ral W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nIn

tegr

ated

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

t and

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

(IW

MD

P)

Back

up

supp

ort f

or O

& M

of R

ural

W

ater

-

-

0.

74

0.74

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-

0.10

-

0.

10

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Sola

r Pow

ered

Min

i-Pip

ed W

ater

Sc

hem

es in

rura

l Are

asAc

quis

ition

of L

and

by G

over

nmen

t

-

0.

30

-

0.30

M

OW

ERu

ral W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nPi

ped

Wat

er in

Rur

al A

reas

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-

0.10

-

0.

10

MO

WE

Rura

l Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Res

ourc

es

Man

agem

ent a

nd D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct

(IWM

DP)

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-

0.40

-

0.

40

MO

WE

Urb

an W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nKa

ram

oja

Smal

l Tow

n an

d Ru

ral g

row

th

Cen

ters

Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Proj

ect

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-

0.05

-

0.

05

MO

WE

Urb

an W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nW

ater

and

San

itatio

n D

evel

opm

ent

Faci

lity

- Eas

t-Pha

se II

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-

0.04

-

0.

04

MO

WE

Urb

an W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nW

ater

and

San

itatio

n D

evel

opm

ent

Faci

lity

- Sou

th W

este

rn-P

hase

IIAc

quis

ition

of L

and

by G

over

nmen

t

-

0.

15

-

0.15

44


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MO

WE

Urb

an W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nSt

rate

gic

Tow

ns W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

n Pr

ojec

t (ST

WSS

P)Ac

quis

ition

of L

and

by G

over

nmen

t

-

0.

10

-

0.10

M

OW

EU

rban

Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Wat

er a

nd S

anita

tion

Dev

elop

men

t Fa

cilit

y - S

outh

Wes

tern

-Pha

se II

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-

0.35

-

0.

35

MO

WE

Urb

an W

ater

Sup

ply

and

Sani

tatio

nW

ater

and

San

itatio

n D

evel

opm

ent

Faci

lity

Nor

th -

Phas

e II

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-

0.40

-

0.

40

MO

WE

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Regi

onal

Cen

ter-

Nor

th (W

fPRC

-N) b

ased

in L

iraAc

quis

ition

of L

and

by G

over

nmen

t

-

0.

16

-

0.16

M

OW

EW

ater

for P

rodu

ctio

nW

ater

for P

rodu

ctio

n Re

gion

al C

ente

r-Ea

st (W

fPRC

_E) b

ased

in M

bale

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-

0.05

-

0.

05

MO

WE

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Wat

er fo

r Pro

duct

ion

Phas

e II

Acqu

isiti

on o

f Lan

d by

Gov

ernm

ent

-

1.00

-

1.

00

Tota

l 2.

4111

7.43

76.5

119

6.36

45


Appe

ndix

VIII

: Det

aile

d of

Wor

ks &

Tra

nspo

rt s

ecto

r bud

get p

ropo

sed

for r

e-al

loca

tion

to L

Gs

(UGX

Bn)

Vo

tePr

ogra

mm

eSu

b Pr

ogra

mK

ey O

utpu

t G

oU

(Dev

’t)To

tal

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsRe

hab.

of D

istri

cts

Road

sM

onito

ring

and

capa

city

bui

ldin

g su

ppor

t for

dis

trict

ro

ad w

orks

5.37

5.37

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsRe

hab.

of D

istri

cts

Road

sRo

ads,

Stre

ets

and

Hig

hway

s54

.07

54.0

7

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsRe

hab.

of D

istri

cts

Road

sM

ajor

Brid

ges

17.0

017

.00

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsRe

hab.

of D

istri

cts

Road

sPu

rcha

se o

f Offi

ce a

nd IC

T Eq

uipm

ent,

incl

udin

g

Softw

are

0.70

0.70

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsRe

hab.

of D

istri

cts

Road

sPu

rcha

se o

f Mot

or V

ehic

les

and

Oth

er T

rans

port

Equi

pmen

t3.

363.

36

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsU

rban

Roa

ds R

e-se

alin

gM

onito

ring

and

capa

city

bui

ldin

g su

ppor

t for

dis

trict

ro

ad w

orks

0.94

0.94

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsU

rban

Roa

ds R

e-se

alin

gRo

ads,

Stre

ets

and

Hig

hway

s0.

600.

60

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsU

rban

Roa

ds R

e-se

alin

gPu

rcha

se o

f Offi

ce a

nd IC

T Eq

uipm

ent,

incl

udin

g

Softw

are

0.05

0.05

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsU

rban

Roa

ds R

e-se

alin

gU

rban

road

s co

nstru

ctio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

(Bitu

men

st

anda

rd)

12.5

012

.50

MO

WT

Dis

trict

, Urb

an a

nd C

omm

unity

Ac

cess

Roa

dsU

rban

Roa

ds R

e-se

alin

gPu

rcha

se o

f Mot

or V

ehic

les

and

Oth

er T

rans

port

Equi

pmen

t0.

900.

90

MO

WT

Tran

spor

t Ser

vice

s an

d In

frast

ruct

ure

Impr

ovem

ent o

f Gul

u M

unic

ipal

C

ounc

il Ro

ads

(Pre

para

tory

Sur

vey)

Road

s, S

treet

s an

d H

ighw

ays

0.60

0.60

Tota

l 96

.10

96.1

0

46


Appe

ndix

IX: D

etai

led

of S

ocia

l Dev

elop

men

t sec

tor b

udge

t pro

pose

d fo

r re-

allo

catio

n to

LGs

(U

GX B

n)

Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MoG

LSD

Prom

otio

n of

des

cent

Em

ploy

men

tLa

bour

and

Indu

stria

l Rel

atio

nsIn

spec

tion

of W

orkp

lace

s an

d In

vest

igat

ion

on v

iola

tion

of la

bour

st

anda

rds

0.03

0.00

0.00

0.03

MoG

LSD

Prom

otio

n of

des

cent

Em

ploy

men

tO

ccup

atio

nal S

afet

y an

d H

ealth

Insp

ectio

n of

Wor

kpla

ces

and

Inve

stig

atio

n on

vio

latio

n of

labo

ur

stan

dard

s

0.07

0.00

0.00

0.07

MoG

LSD

Prom

otio

n of

des

cent

Em

ploy

men

tC

hem

ical

Saf

ety

&Sec

urity

(C

HES

ASE)

Pro

ject

Insp

ectio

n of

Wor

kpla

ces

and

Inve

stig

atio

n on

vio

latio

n of

labo

ur

stan

dard

s

0.00

0.26

0.00

0.26

MoG

LSD

Prom

otio

n of

des

cent

Em

ploy

men

tEm

ploy

men

t Ser

vice

sIn

spec

tion

of W

orkp

lace

s an

d In

vest

igat

ion

on v

iola

tion

of la

bour

st

anda

rds

0.08

0.00

0.00

0.08

MoG

LSD

Prom

otio

n of

des

cent

Em

ploy

men

tSt

reng

then

ing

Soci

al R

isk

Man

agem

ent a

nd G

ende

r –

Base

d Vi

olen

ce P

reve

ntio

n an

d Re

spon

se P

roje

ct

Insp

ectio

n of

Wor

kpla

ces

and

Inve

stig

atio

n on

vio

latio

n of

labo

ur

stan

dard

s

0.00

0.00

9.43

9.43

MoG

LSD

Gen

der,

Equa

lity

and

Wom

en’s

Empo

wer

men

t U

gand

a W

omen

Ent

repr

eneu

rs

Fund

(UW

EP)

Advo

cacy

and

Net

wor

king

0.00

2.03

0.00

2.03

MoG

LSD

Prom

otio

n of

des

cent

Em

ploy

men

tPr

omot

ion

of G

reen

Job

s an

d Fa

ir La

bour

Mar

ket i

n U

gand

a (P

ROG

REL)

Advo

cacy

and

Net

wor

king

0.00

0.00

0.40

0.40

MoG

LSD

Prom

otio

n of

des

cent

Em

ploy

men

tSt

reng

then

ing

Soci

al R

isk

Man

agem

ent a

nd G

ende

r –

Base

d Vi

olen

ce P

reve

ntio

n an

d Re

spon

se P

roje

ct

Advo

cacy

and

Net

wor

king

0.00

0.00

3.17

3.17

MoG

LSD

Soci

al P

rote

ctio

n fo

r Vu

lner

able

Gro

ups

Dis

abilit

y an

d El

derly

Supp

ort t

o th

e Re

nova

tion

and

Mai

nten

ance

of C

entre

s fo

r Vul

nera

ble

Gro

ups

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.14

MoG

LSD

Soci

al P

rote

ctio

n fo

r Vu

lner

able

Gro

ups

Yout

h an

d C

hild

ren

Affa

irsSu

ppor

t to

the

Reno

vatio

n an

d M

aint

enan

ce o

f Cen

tres

for V

ulne

rabl

e G

roup

s

1.47

0.00

0.00

1.47

To

tal

1.79

2.30

12.9

917

.09

47


Appe

ndix

X: D

etai

led

MDA

Bud

gets

Pro

pose

d fo

r rat

iona

lizat

ion

for F

Y 20

19/2

0 (U

GX B

n)Vo

tePr

ogra

mm

eSu

b Pr

ogra

mK

ey O

utpu

t Des

crip

tion

Wag

eN

on-

Wag

eG

oU

(Dev

’t)D

onor

Fu

ndin

gTo

tal

MAA

IFAg

ricul

ture

Infra

stru

ctur

e,

Mec

hani

zatio

n an

d W

ater

fo

r Agr

icul

tura

l Pro

duct

ion

Impr

ovin

g Ac

cess

and

Use

of

Agr

icul

tura

l Equ

ipm

ent

and

Mec

hani

satio

n th

roug

h th

e us

e of

labo

ur S

avin

g Te

chno

logi

es

Cre

atin

g an

d En

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t for

Agr

icul

ture

0.00

0.00

1.58

0.00

1.58

MAA

IFAg

ricul

ture

Infra

stru

ctur

e,

Mec

hani

zatio

n an

d W

ater

fo

r Agr

icul

tura

l Pro

duct

ion

Dep

artm

ent o

f Agr

icul

tura

l In

frast

ruct

ure

and

Wat

er fo

r Ag

ricul

tura

l Pro

duct

ion

Cre

atin

g an

d En

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t for

Agr

icul

ture

0.00

0.52

0.00

0.00

0.52

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sSu

ppor

t for

Inst

itutio

nal

Dev

elop

men

tC

reat

ing

and

Enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent f

or A

gric

ultu

re0.

000.

000.

240.

000.

24

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sD

epar

tmen

t of P

lann

ing

Cre

atin

g an

d En

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t for

Agr

icul

ture

0.00

0.91

0.00

0.00

0.91

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sSu

ppor

t to

Agric

ultu

ral

Trai

ning

Inst

itutio

nsC

reat

ing

and

Enab

ling

envi

ronm

ent f

or A

gric

ultu

re0.

000.

000.

300.

000.

30

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sN

atio

nal F

ood

and

Agric

ultu

ral S

tatis

tics

Syst

em (N

FASS

)

Cre

atin

g an

d En

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t for

Agr

icul

ture

0.00

0.00

0.45

0.00

0.45

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sTh

e C

OM

ESA

Seed

H

arm

oniz

atio

n Im

plem

enta

tion

Plan

(C

OM

SHIP

) Pro

ject

Cre

atin

g an

d En

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t for

Agr

icul

ture

0.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sAg

ricul

ture

Val

ue C

hain

D

evel

opm

ent

Cre

atin

g an

d En

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t for

Agr

icul

ture

0.00

0.00

0.66

0.00

0.66

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sH

uman

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Dep

artm

ent

Cre

atin

g an

d En

ablin

g en

viro

nmen

t for

Agr

icul

ture

0.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

1.00

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sEn

hanc

ing

Nat

iona

l Foo

d Se

curit

y th

roug

h in

crea

sed

Rice

pro

duct

ion

in E

aste

rn

Uga

nda

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.30

0.00

0.30

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sC

rop

pest

s an

d di

seas

es

cont

rol p

hase

2Pu

rcha

se o

f Mot

or V

ehic

les

and

Oth

er T

rans

port

Equi

pmen

t0.

000.

000.

190.

000.

19

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sM

ultis

ecto

ral F

ood

Safe

ty &

N

utrit

ion

Proj

ect

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.24

0.24

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sN

atio

nal O

il Pa

lm P

roje

ctPu

rcha

se o

f Mot

or V

ehic

les

and

Oth

er T

rans

port

Equi

pmen

t0.

000.

000.

0023

.08

23.0

8

48


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put D

escr

iptio

nW

age

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Live

stoc

k D

isea

ses

Con

trol

Proj

ect P

hase

2Pu

rcha

se o

f Mot

or V

ehic

les

and

Oth

er T

rans

port

Equi

pmen

t0.

000.

000.

180.

000.

18

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Regi

onal

Pas

tora

l Li

velih

ood

Impr

ovem

ent

Proj

ect

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.20

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e of

Ani

mal

Re

sour

ces

Dev

elop

ing

A M

arke

t-Orie

nted

And

En

viro

nmen

tally

Sus

tain

able

Be

ef M

eat I

ndus

try In

U

gand

a

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.49

1.49

MAA

IFD

irect

orat

e o

f Agr

icul

tura

l Ex

tens

ion

and

Skills

M

anag

emen

t

Agro

-Eco

nom

ic Im

pact

D

eepe

ning

in th

e Al

berti

ne

Basi

n

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

3.50

0.00

3.50

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sSu

ppor

t for

Inst

itutio

nal

Dev

elop

men

tPu

rcha

se o

f Mot

or V

ehic

les

and

Oth

er T

rans

port

Equi

pmen

t0.

000.

000.

270.

000.

27

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sTh

e C

OM

ESA

Seed

H

arm

oniz

atio

n Im

plem

enta

tion

Plan

(C

OM

SHIP

) Pro

ject

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.25

0.00

0.25

MAA

IFPo

licy,

Plan

ning

and

Su

ppor

t Ser

vice

sAg

ricul

ture

Val

ue C

hain

D

evel

opm

ent

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.30

1.30

MAA

IFAg

ricul

ture

Infra

stru

ctur

e,

Mec

hani

zatio

n an

d W

ater

fo

r Agr

icul

tura

l Pro

duct

ion

Impr

ovin

g Ac

cess

and

Use

of

Agr

icul

tura

l Equ

ipm

ent

and

Mec

hani

satio

n th

roug

h th

e us

e of

labo

ur S

avin

g Te

chno

logi

es

Purc

hase

of S

peci

alis

ed

Mac

hine

ry &

Equ

ipm

ent

0.00

0.00

9.38

0.00

9.38

MAA

IFAg

ricul

ture

Infra

stru

ctur

e,

Mec

hani

zatio

n an

d W

ater

fo

r Agr

icul

tura

l Pro

duct

ion

Supp

ort f

or In

stitu

tiona

l D

evel

opm

ent

Purc

hase

of S

peci

alis

ed

Mac

hine

ry &

Equ

ipm

ent

0.00

0.00

4.00

0.00

4.00

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sC

rop

Prod

uctio

n D

epar

tmen

tQ

ualit

y As

sura

nce

syst

ems

alon

g th

e va

lue

chai

n0.

000.

400.

000.

000.

40

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sAg

ricul

ture

Clu

ster

D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ctQ

ualit

y As

sura

nce

syst

ems

alon

g th

e va

lue

chai

n0.

000.

000.

100.

740.

84

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sC

rop

pest

s an

d di

seas

es

cont

rol p

hase

2Q

ualit

y As

sura

nce

syst

ems

alon

g th

e va

lue

chai

n0.

000.

001.

100.

001.

10

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sD

epar

tmen

t of C

rop

Regu

latio

n an

d C

ertifi

catio

nQ

ualit

y As

sura

nce

syst

ems

alon

g th

e va

lue

chai

n0.

000.

420.

000.

000.

42

49


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put D

escr

iptio

nW

age

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MAA

IFC

rop

Reso

urce

sN

atio

nal O

il Pa

lm P

roje

ctQ

ualit

y As

sura

nce

syst

ems

alon

g th

e va

lue

chai

n0.

000.

000.

606.

487.

08

NAA

DS

Agric

ultu

re A

dvis

ory

Serv

ices

Gov

ernm

ent P

urch

ases

Purc

hase

of S

peci

alis

ed

Mac

hine

ry &

Equ

ipm

ent

0.00

0.00

51.2

30.

0051

.23

UD

CA

Cof

fee

Dev

elop

men

tD

evel

opm

ent S

ervi

ces

Prod

uctio

n, R

esea

rch

& C

oord

inat

ion

0.00

65.4

20.

000.

0065

.42

To

tal -

Agr

icul

ture

0.00

68.6

775

.33

33.5

317

7.53

MO

ESSe

cond

ary

Educ

atio

nSe

cond

ary

Educ

atio

nPo

licie

s, la

ws,

gui

delin

es p

lans

an

d st

rate

gies

0.83

3.17

0.00

0.00

4.00

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

BTVE

TPo

licie

s, la

ws,

gui

delin

es p

lans

an

d st

rate

gies

3.09

0.47

0.00

0.00

3.56

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Albe

rtine

Reg

ion

Sust

aina

ble

Dev

elop

men

t Pr

ojec

t

Polic

ies,

law

s, g

uide

lines

pla

ns

and

stra

tegi

es0.

000.

002.

962.

625.

58

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Skills

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Polic

ies,

law

s, g

uide

lines

pla

ns

and

stra

tegi

es0.

000.

001.

1021

.06

22.1

6

MO

ESQ

ualit

y an

d St

anda

rds

Teac

her E

duca

tion

Polic

ies,

law

s, g

uide

lines

, pla

ns

and

stra

tegi

es4.

421.

080.

000.

005.

50

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Skills

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Purc

hase

of S

peci

aliz

ed

Mac

hine

ry &

Equ

ipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

12.8

312

.83

MO

ESSk

ills D

evel

opm

ent

Supp

ort t

o th

e Im

plem

enta

tion

of S

killin

g U

gand

a St

rate

gy (B

TC)

Purc

hase

of S

peci

alis

ed

Mac

hine

ry &

Equ

ipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.40

4.40

MO

ESH

ighe

r Edu

catio

nH

ighe

r Edu

catio

nSp

onso

rshi

p Sc

hem

e an

d St

aff

Dev

elop

men

t for

Mas

ters

and

Ph

ds

0.00

28.2

90.

000.

0028

.29

To

tal -

Edu

catio

n &

Sp

orts

8.34

33.0

14.

0640

.91

86.3

2

MoH

Phar

mac

eutic

al a

nd o

ther

Su

pplie

sG

loba

l Fun

d fo

r AID

S, T

B an

d M

alar

iaM

onito

ring

and

Eval

uatio

n C

apac

ity Im

prov

emen

t0.

000.

002.

440.

002.

44

MoH

Phar

mac

eutic

al a

nd o

ther

Su

pplie

sG

AVI V

acci

nes

and

Hea

lth

Sect

or D

evel

opm

ent P

lan

Supp

ort

Mon

itorin

g an

d Ev

alua

tion

Cap

acity

Impr

ovem

ent

0.00

0.00

0.09

10.2

110

.30

50


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put D

escr

iptio

nW

age

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tU

gand

a Re

prod

uctiv

e M

ater

nal a

nd C

hild

Hea

lth

Serv

ices

Impr

ovem

ent

Proj

ect

Mon

itorin

g, S

uper

visi

on a

nd

Eval

uatio

n of

Hea

lth S

yste

ms

0.00

0.00

0.28

30.6

430

.91

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tIn

stitu

tiona

l Sup

port

to M

oHM

onito

ring,

Sup

ervi

sion

and

Ev

alua

tion

of H

ealth

Sys

tem

s0.

000.

008.

090.

008.

09

MoH

Phar

mac

eutic

al a

nd o

ther

Su

pplie

sG

AVI V

acci

nes

and

Hea

lth

Sect

or D

evel

opm

ent P

lan

Supp

ort

Prev

entiv

e an

d cu

rativ

e

Med

ical

Sup

plie

s (in

clud

ing

imm

unis

atio

n)

0.00

0.00

12.0

00.

0012

.00

MoH

Hea

lth in

frast

ruct

ure

and

equi

pmen

tIta

lian

Supp

ort t

o H

ealth

Se

ctor

Dev

elop

men

t Pla

n-

Kara

moj

a In

frast

ruct

ure

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

Pha

se

II

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

2.48

2.48

MoH

Phar

mac

eutic

al a

nd o

ther

Su

pplie

sG

AVI V

acci

nes

and

Hea

lth

Sect

or D

evel

opm

ent P

lan

Supp

ort

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

12.1

112

.11

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Ser

vice

sEa

st A

frica

Pub

lic H

ealth

La

bora

tory

Net

wor

k pr

ojec

t Ph

ase

II

Purc

hase

of M

otor

Veh

icle

s an

d O

ther

Tra

nspo

rt Eq

uipm

ent

0.00

0.00

0.00

1.10

1.10

MoH

Phar

mac

eutic

al a

nd o

ther

Su

pplie

sG

AVI V

acci

nes

and

Hea

lth

Sect

or D

evel

opm

ent P

lan

Supp

ort

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Ad

min

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e0.

000.

000.

0012

.71

12.7

1

MoH

Publ

ic H

ealth

Ser

vice

sEa

st A

frica

Pub

lic H

ealth

La

bora

tory

Net

wor

k pr

ojec

t Ph

ase

II

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Ad

min

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e0.

000.

000.

008.

878.

87

To

tal -

Hea

lth

0.00

0.00

22.9

078

.12

101.

02M

OW

EU

rban

Wat

er S

uppl

y an

d Sa

nita

tion

Kara

moj

a Sm

all T

own

and

Rura

l gro

wth

Cen

ters

Wat

er

Supp

ly a

nd S

anita

tion

Proj

ect

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Ad

min

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e0.

000.

001.

500.

001.

50

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tSu

ppor

t for

Hyd

ro-P

ower

D

evt a

nd O

pera

tions

on

Rive

r Nile

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Ad

min

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e0.

000.

001.

730.

512.

24

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tW

ater

Man

agem

ent Z

ones

Pr

ojec

tG

over

nmen

t Bui

ldin

gs a

nd

Adm

inis

trativ

e In

frast

ruct

ure

0.00

0.00

1.02

5.33

6.35

51


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put D

escr

iptio

nW

age

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tM

ulti-

Late

ral L

akes

Edw

ard

& Al

bert

Inte

grat

ed

Fish

erie

s an

d W

ater

Re

sour

ces

Man

agem

ent

(LEA

FII)

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Ad

min

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e0.

000.

001.

025.

336.

35

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tEn

hanc

ing

Resi

lienc

e of

C

omm

uniti

es to

Clim

ate

Cha

nge

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Ad

min

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e0.

000.

000.

701.

502.

20

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tIn

tegr

ated

Wat

er

Reso

urce

s M

anag

emen

t an

d D

evel

opm

ent P

roje

ct

(IWM

DP)

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Ad

min

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e0.

000.

000.

207.

077.

27

MO

WE

Wat

er R

esou

rces

M

anag

emen

tFa

rm In

com

e En

hanc

emen

t an

d Fo

rest

ry C

onse

rvat

ion

Proj

ect P

hase

II (F

IEFO

C II

)

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Ad

min

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e0.

000.

0018

.58

74.2

692

.84

MO

WE

Polic

y, Pl

anni

ng a

nd

Supp

ort S

ervi

ces

Polic

y an

d M

anag

emen

t Su

ppor

tG

over

nmen

t Bui

ldin

gs a

nd

Adm

inis

trativ

e In

frast

ruct

ure

0.00

0.00

5.31

0.00

5.31

MO

WE

Polic

y, Pl

anni

ng a

nd

Supp

ort S

ervi

ces

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Re

sour

ces

Man

agem

ent

and

Dev

elop

men

t Pro

ject

(IW

MD

P)

Gov

ernm

ent B

uild

ings

and

Ad

min

istra

tive

Infra

stru

ctur

e0.

000.

002.

000.

002.

00

To

tal -

Wat

er &

En

viro

nmen

t

0.

000.

0032

.05

94.0

012

6.05

MO

WT

Tran

spor

t Reg

ulat

ion

Mul

tinat

iona

l Lak

e Vi

ctor

ia

Mar

itim

e C

omm

. &Tr

ansp

ort

Proj

ect

Polic

ies,

law

s, g

uide

lines

, pla

ns

and

stra

tegi

es d

evel

oped

0.00

0.00

0.12

2.50

2.62

MO

WT

Tran

spor

t Ser

vice

s an

d In

frast

ruct

ure

Tran

spor

t Inf

rast

ruct

ure

and

Serv

ices

Polic

ies,

law

s, g

uide

lines

, pla

ns

and

stra

tegi

es3.

200.

670.

000.

003.

87

MO

WT

Con

stru

ctio

n St

anda

rds

and

Qua

lity

Assu

ranc

eRo

ads

and

Brid

ges

Polic

ies,

law

s, g

uide

lines

, pla

ns

and

stra

tegi

es1.

700.

200.

000.

001.

90

MO

WT

Con

stru

ctio

n St

anda

rds

and

Qua

lity

Assu

ranc

eC

onst

ruct

ion

Stan

dard

sPo

licie

s, la

ws,

gui

delin

es, p

lans

an

d st

rate

gies

1.20

0.55

0.00

0.00

1.75

MO

WT

Con

stru

ctio

n St

anda

rds

and

Qua

lity

Assu

ranc

eD

evel

opm

ent o

f the

C

onst

ruct

ion

Indu

stry

Polic

ies,

law

s, g

uide

lines

, pla

ns

and

stra

tegi

es0.

000.

004.

000.

004.

00

MO

WT

Mec

hani

cal E

ngin

eerin

g Se

rvic

esM

echa

nica

l Eng

inee

ring

Serv

ices

Polic

ies,

law

s, g

uide

lines

, pla

ns

and

stra

tegi

es.

2.00

0.40

0.00

0.00

2.40

52


Vote

Prog

ram

me

Sub

Prog

ram

Key

Out

put D

escr

iptio

nW

age

Non

-W

age

GoU

(D

ev’t)

Don

or

Fund

ing

Tota

l

To

tal -

Wor

ks a

nd

Tran

spor

t

8.

101.

824.

122.

5016

.54

MoG

LSD

Prom

otio

n of

des

cent

Em

ploy

men

tPr

omot

ion

of G

reen

Job

s an

d Fa

ir La

bour

Mar

ket i

n U

gand

a (P

ROG

REL)

Polic

ies,

Law

s , R

egul

atio

ns

and

Gui

delin

es o

n

Empl

oym

ent a

nd L

abou

r Pr

oduc

tivity

0.00

0.00

0.60

1.58

2.18

MoG

LSD

Prom

otio

n of

des

cent

Em

ploy

men

tSt

reng

then

ing

Soci

al R

isk

Man

agem

ent a

nd G

ende

r –

Base

d Vi

olen

ce P

reve

ntio

n an

d Re

spon

se P

roje

ct

Polic

ies,

Law

s , R

egul

atio

ns

and

Gui

delin

es o

n

Empl

oym

ent a

nd L

abou

r Pr

oduc

tivity

0.00

0.00

0.00

20.5

720

.57

To

tal -

Soc

ial

Dev

elop

men

t

0.

000.

000.

6022

.15

22.7

5


ADVOCATES COALITION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT (ACODE)

Plot 96, Kanjokya Street, Kamwokya. P. O. Box 29836, Kampala. Tel: +256 312 812150.

Email: [email protected] / [email protected]: www.acode-u.org

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Ramathan Ggoobi is an Economist and Policy Analyst. He is a Lecturer of Economics at Makerere University Business School (MUBS), where he heads the MUBS Economic Forum. He is also the Chief Economist for Operation Wealth Creation in Uganda. He has extensive knowledge and experience in both quantitative and qualitative research, with special interest in rural economy, economic development, policy analysis and political economy. Ramathan is also a Member of the Board of Directors at Uganda Development Corporation (UDC). He holds an M.A in Economic Policy and Planning, and a B.A. in Economics from Makerere University. He also holds an International Certificate in Sustainable Development (With Distinction), Columbia University U.S.A, 2015, and a Certificate in Energy Economics, Total France. Daniel Lukwago is an Economist, Policy Analyst and Independent Consultant. He is a Director of Nonner Consults, a development consultancy company based in Kampala Uganda. He has more than 15 years working experience in various areas such as policy analysis, public expenditure reviews, poverty assessments, community development and policy advocacy. He previously worked with the World Bank Group in Washington D.C, USA and Kampala, Uganda Office; Advocates Coalition for Development Environment (ACODE); and Uganda Debt Network (UDN). Daniel holds a Masters of Public Administration Degree (MPA) from Columbia University, USA; a Postgraduate Diploma in Monitoring and Evaluation from Uganda Management Institute, Kampala Uganda; and a Bachelor of Science in Quantitative Economics Degree from Makerere University, Kampala.

About ACODE: ACODE is an independent public policy research and advocacy think tank registered in Uganda. Its mission is to make public policies work for people by engaging in contemporary public policy research, community empowerment to demand for improved service delivery and advocacy. ACODE has for the last four consecutive years been ranked in the Global Go To Think Tank Index as one of the top think tanks in the world.

Supported by:

ACODE Policy Research Series No. 92, 2019

9 789970 5650099 789970 5650169 789970 5650239 789970 5650309 789970 5650479 789970 967407

à È 9

9 789970 5660069 789970 5660139 789970 5660209 789970 5660379 789970 5660449 789970 5660519 789970 5660689 789970 5660759 789970 5660829 789970 5660999 789970 5661059 789970 5661129 789970 5661299 789970 5661369 789970 5661439 789970 5661509 789970 5661679 789970 5661749 789970 5661819 789970 5661989 789970 5662049 789970 5662119 789970 5662289 789970 5662359 789970 5662429 789970 5662599 789970 5662669 789970 5662739 789970 5662809 789970 5662979 789970 5663039 789970 5663109 789970 5663279 789970 5663349 789970 5663419 789970 5663589 789970 5663659 789970 5663729 789970 5663899 789970 5664029 789970 5663969 789970 5664199 789970 5664269 789970 5664339 789970 5664409 789970 5664579 789970 5664649 789970 5664719 789970 5664889 789970 5664959 789970 5670039 789970 5670109 789970 5670279 789970 5670349 789970 5670419 789970 5670589 789970 5670659 789970 5670729 789970 5670899 789970 567096

PAKWACHZOMBO

TORORO

BUSIA

KANUNGU

RUBANDAKISORO

Financing Local Governments in Uganda

An analysis of the Proposed National Budget FY 2019/20 and

Proposals for Re-allocation