Page 1
Reconciling Federal, State, and Institutional Policies Determining Educational Access for Undocumented Students:
Implications for Professional Practice
Funded by the TG Public Bene!t Grant Program
February 2012
A Report Prepared by
Page 3
1
Reconciling Federal, State, and Institutional Policies Determining Educational Access for Undocumented Students:
Implications for Professional Practice
Page 4
2
Authors & Contributors
Page 7
5
Executive Summary
T
Page 8
6
Plyler v. Doe
(1982)
Page 9
7
Signi!cance of the Issue
Page 10
8
Survey Design and Data Collection
Page 12
10
1. The Impact of State Policy Environments on Institutional Access for Undocumented Students
2. The Impact of Institutional Characteristics on Institutional Access Policies for Undocumented Students
3. The Impact of Demographic Shifts on Access Policies for Undocumented Students
Page 13
11
4. The Role of Professional Organizations Regarding Access Policies for Undocumented Students
Introduction
U
Plyler v. Doe
Page 15
13
Organization of This Report
Page 16
14
The Issue in ContextNormative Values and Beliefs: Higher Education and the Search for Universal Access
R
Page 17
15
Postsecondary Opportunities for Undocumented Students
Page 19
17
Legal ContextFederal Legislation Governing Educational Access
Plyler v. Doe
Page 20
18
Plyler
Plyler
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (1996)
Page 21
19
Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act (DREAM Act)
State Mediation of the Federal Law: Legal Context
Page 24
22
Sociopolitical Context
Page 25
23
Economic Factors
Labor Competition
Page 26
24
Unemployment Rates
Page 27
25
proposed
Ideology and Political A!liation
45
Page 28
26
Population and Settlement Patterns
Page 30
28
Regional Di"erences
7
8—
9
8
Page 31
29
Institutional Context
Institutional Autonomy
Page 32
30
Boundary Organizations
Professionalization of Boundary Organizations
Page 33
31
Minority-Serving Institutions
Two-Year and Four-Year Institutions
Page 34
32
Open Admissions
Page 35
33
Research StudyTheoretical Model
Page 36
34
Research Questions
Page 37
35
O
Methodology
Survey Design and Data Collection
Page 38
36
Respondents
Financial Aid Director Respondents
Enrollment Manager Respondents
Page 39
37
Analytic Framework
Page 40
38
Description of Variables
Dependent Variables
Independent Variables
n= 420 171
n= 408
n= 389 143
Page 41
39
Results
AACRAO Admission Results: Inclusive Admission Policy
AACRAO Financial Aid Results: O"er of Financial Aid & In-State Residency Tuition Policy
Page 42
40
df n p
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
8
8
8
4
Page 43
41
NASFAA Admission Results: Inclusive Admission Policy
Page 44
42
NASFAA Financial Aid Results: O"er of Financial Aid & In-State Residency Tuition Policy
n
Page 48
46
Discussion
The State Political Context
Institutions as Organizational Catalysts for Change
Page 49
47
The Role of the Professional Association
Page 50
48
Implications for Access
Page 51
49
Recommendations
State and Federal Policy
Page 52
50
Professional Practice
Research
Page 53
51
Institutional Case Studies
I
Case OneCedar Oak College: Focusing on Social Justice
Institutional History and Local Signi#cance
Page 55
53
Current Policies A"ecting Undocumented Students and the Creation of the Justice Fund
Page 56
54
Case TwoRockford Valley University: Avoiding the ‘Hornet’s Nest’
Institutional History and Local Signi#cance
Page 57
55
Current Admissions and Financial Aid Policies A"ecting Undocumented Students
Page 58
56
Implications for Institutional Leaders
Page 59
57
Conclusions
State Level
Page 60
58
Institutional Level
Professional Organizations on Access Policies for Undocumented Students
Page 61
59
Appendix 1.Partnering Organizations and Their RolesNational Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators (NASFAA)
T
Page 62
60
American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions O!cers (AACRAO)
Research Partnerships with NASFAA and AACRAO
Page 63
61
Appendix 2.
References