Upload
upm
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MECHANISM OF ROOT GROWTH ANDPROMOTION OF NODULATION IN
VEGETABLE SOYBEAN BY AZOSPIRILLUMBRASILENSE
Abul Hossain Molla,1,* Zulkifli H. Shamsuddin,2 and
Halimi Mohd. Saud2
1Department of Crop Botany, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur
Rahman Agril. University, Gazipur 1703, Bangladesh2Department of Land Management, Faculty of Agriculture,
Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor,
D.E., Malaysia
ABSTRACT
Stimulation of root growth and promotion of nodulation in
vegetable soybean (Glycine max ) by Azospirillum brasilense was
studied under lightroom conditions to understand the possible
mechanism of root growth as well as the enhancement of nodule
initiation when co-inoculated with Bradyrhizobium. Root growth
stimulation of vegetable soybean was positively influenced by the
cell-free supernatant of Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 as well as Sp7
itself, and by indole acetic acid (IAA) application. The cell-free
supernatant of Sp7 treated plants produced the highest number of
roots and root length plant21 followed by bacterial cells of Sp7
2177
Copyright q 2001 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. www.dekker.com
*Corresponding author. Current address: Biochemical Engineering Lab., Dept. of
Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM
Serdang, Selangor DE, Malaysia. E-mail: [email protected]
COMMUN. SOIL SCI. PLANT ANAL., 32(13&14), 2177–2187 (2001)
ORDER REPRINTS
and IAA log109M) application. Control plants were the lowest.
The cell-free supernatant of Sp7 may contain growth stimulants
similar to IAA, which was responsible for enhanced root growth.
Nitrite and nitrate did not show positive role in increasing root
growth in vegetable soybean. Co-inoculation of Azospirillum with
Bradyrhizobium significantly ðP , 0:05Þ promoted nodulation in
vegetable soybean. Bradyrhizobium strain UPMR48 performed
superior role on promotion of nodule growth by co-inoculation to
the strain TAL102. Azospirillum has the potential as a co-
inoculant with Bradyrhizobium in vegetable soybean cultivation.
INTRODUCTION
Vegetable soybean is a nutritious leguminous vegetable, not only rich in
protein, cholesterol-free fat, and vitamins (1), but also sugar, iron, phosphorus
and globulin (2). Traditionally, soybean is cultivated with inoculation of
Bradyrhizobium. In recent years, there have been studied on the possible
enhancement of root growth and nodulation of legumes when inoculated with a
mixture of inoculants. One of the possible inoculant is the free-living diazotroph,
such as Azospirillum sp.
Azospirillum is a free-living atmospheric N2 fixer and potential PGPR
(plant growth promoting rhizobacteria), which positively influences plant growth,
and yield of several leguminous and non-leguminous crops (3,4,5,6,7). A positive
influence on root growth, resulting in higher nutrient and water uptake, is the key
benefit to plants of Azospirillum application. It has many modes of stimulating
root growth but most studies cited phytohormones synthesis as one of the
principal mechanisms (8). Phytohormones, mostly IAA, are synthesized by
Azospirillum and plays a key role in enhancing root growth (9,10,11). Auxin
(IAA) has no effect on lateral root growth formation, nitrite, either added directly
or excreted by Azospirillum in nitrate respiration, causes a drastic change in
lateral root formation in wheat (12), although the negative effect of nitrite to root
growth is well known. In addition to increase root growth in non-legumes (4,5,13)
and legumes (14) by Azospirillum application, it also enhances biological
nitrogen fixation activity (15,16). Encouraging but inconsistent results on
increased nodulation, acetylene reduction activity, nutrient uptake, and yield have
been reported in different legumes (6,7,17). Besides inhibition of nodulation,
decreased infection thread developments were also reported in white clover (18)
and Medicago (19) when co-inoculated with Azospirillum. The issues of
increased root growth and enhanced nodulation in co-inoculation by Azospirillum
are still contradictory as well as inconsistent. The cited reports were, to some
extent, crop specific.
HOSSAIN MOLLA, SHAMSUDDIN, AND SAUD2178
ORDER REPRINTS
In the present study, attempts were made (a) to evaluate the stimulation of
root initiation by Azospirillum brasilense, in comparison to combined N, in the
form of nitrate and nitrite with IAA application, and (b) to investigate the effect of
co-inoculation on the promotion of nodulation in vegetable soybean.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Root Growth Stimulation
The experiment was conducted in test tubes (2.6 cm� 20 cm) with seven
treatments; (i) control (2N, without N), (ii) Sp7 (Azospirillum brasilense )
inoculation, (iii) cell-free supernatant of Sp7, (iv) 0.4 mM nitrite, (v) 0.4 mM
nitrate, (vi) IAA (log106M) and (vii) IAA (log10
9M). Strain Sp7 (A. brasilense )
was used from lab oratory stock obtained from Dr. Johanna Dobereiner, Embrapa
National Centre for Agrobiol. Res., Seropedica 23851-970, Brazil. A 30-mL
amount of nutrient (N-free) solution (20) was added to each test tube and a single,
uniform, healthy, surface sterilized, sprouted seed of vegetable soybean
(AGS190) of AVRDC (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre,
Taiwan) was placed in mouth of each test tube and was sealed by aluminum foil.
The seedlings were allowed to grow inside the test tube on the surface of nutrient
solution and kept upright with a suitable piece of sponge. The whole set of test
tubes was prepared in advance and sterilized before sowing the sprouted seeds.
For cell-free supernatant of Sp7, the inoculant was centrifuged (17310 g) 10 min
followed by sieving through 0.20-mm membrane Millipore to remove the
bacterial cells. Forty-eight-hour old bacterial cells (Sp7) and its cell-free
supernatant were used with a concentration of 1.83� 109 cfu mL21 were grown in
Okon broth (21). Half (0.5) mL of cell-free supernatant was applied to the
respective test tubes before placement of the sprouted seeds. For Sp7 treatment
the same amount (0.5 mL) of bacterial cell’s suspension was applied in each test
tube similar to cell-free supernatant. All of these tasks were ensured at sterile
environment. The plants were allowed to grow for 10 days at room temperature
with 12 h light (37.4mmol m22 s21) provided by cool-white fluorescent lamps in
an incubation room.
The experiment was conducted in completely randomized design (CRD)
and replicated seven times. Analyses of variance and comparison means were
done separately by Statistical Analysis System (SAS) package (22) and the least
significant difference (LSD) test was used to compare among the treatments.
Root numbers, root length, root fresh and dry weight were recorded and root
length was measured by grid line intersections method proposed by Newman (23)
and Tennant (24). For dry weight measurement, the samples were kept at 808C to
constant weight.
ROOT GROWTH AND NODULATION OF VEGETABLE SOYBEAN 2179
ORDER REPRINTS
Promotion of Nodulation
Promotion of nodulation was studied in glasshouses in Leonard jars by co-
inoculation of Azospirillum (Sp7) and Bradyrhizobium japonicum (TAL102 and
UPMR48) in vegetable soybean (AGS190), with six treatments; (i) control with N
(+N), (ii) control without N (2N), (iii) TAL102, (iv) UPMR48, (v) Sp7 + TAL102
and (vi) Sp7 + UPMR48. Bradyrhizobium strain TAL102 was obtained from
University of Hawaii, College of Tropical Agriculture & Human Resources,
Department of Agronomy & Soil Science (NifTAL), Hawaii 96779, USA and
UPMR48 was locally isolated from soybean nodules. Surface-sterilized uniform
sized sprouted seedlings were sown in sterile jars containing vermiculite, and
nutrient solution (20). The inocula were twenty-four-hour old Azospirillum Sp7
in Okon broth (21) with a concentration of 1.01 � 109 cfu ml21 and
Bradyrhizobium TAL102 & UPMR48 were 72 h old in YM broth (25) with
concentrations of 4.9� 106 and 4.6� 106 cfu mL21 respectively. Sprouted seeds
were inoculated by immersing it in respective Bradyrhizobia bacterial suspension
for 1 h for single inoculation. For co-inoculation, the seeds were first soaked for
30 min in Azospirillum suspension followed by 30 min in Bradyrhizobia
suspension. Non-absorbent cotton wool was used on the surface of vermiculite to
avoid contamination. The plants were harvested 30 days after sowing.
The average temperatures 34.2 (max.) and 22.5 (min.), available sun shine
6.5 h and 77.3% humidity were recorded in the glasshouse. Completely
randomized design was laid out to conduct this experiment along with six
replications. ANOVA and means comparison were done in SAS package and to
compare differences among the treatments it was tested by Duncan’s Multiple
Range Test.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Root Growth Stimulation
Root growth of vegetable soybean was influenced by the cell-free
supernatant of Sp7 and Sp7 inoculation, compared to combined N and control
(uninoculated) plants. Enhanced root initiation was also observed in IAA
(log109M) treated plants (Table 1). Secondary and tertiary root numbers increased
significantly ðP , 0:05Þ, especially by the cell-free supernatant of Sp7 followed
by Sp7 inoculation and IAA (log109M) application. Primary and total root length
also increased significantly ðP , 0:05Þ by Sp7 inoculation, cell-free supernatant
of Sp7 and IAA (log109M) application. Nitrite and nitrate did not have any effect
on root growth except for tertiary roots and total root length for nitrate.
HOSSAIN MOLLA, SHAMSUDDIN, AND SAUD2180
ORDER REPRINTS
Table 1. Root Growth of Vegetable Soybean (AGS190) Studied Under IAA, Combine N and Azospirillum Application. In Each Column,
Common Letters Are Not Significantly Different ðP , 0:05Þ by LSD
Treatments
Secondary Root
(Number Plant21)
Tertiary Root
(Number Plant21)
Primary Root
Length (cm/Plant21)
Total Root Length
(cm/Plant21)
Root Fresh Weight
(mg/Plant21)
Root Dry Weight
(mg/Plant21)
Control (2N) 07.20 e 04.80 c 2.90 b 31.90 d 206.00 ab 12.80 c
Sp7 17.20 b 10.60 b 6.36 a 70.00 a 172.00 b 13.60 bc
Supernatant (Sp7) 25.00 a 14.20 a 6.38 a 73.20 a 222.60 ab 17.00 abc
0.4 mM NaNO2 06.00 e 05.40 c 2.80 b 30.80 d 195.60 ab 18.80 abc
0.4 mM NaNO3 09.80 de 08.60 b 3.64 b 45.20 c 224.00 ab 21.40 ab
IAA (log106M) 12.20 cd 07.60 bc 2.92 b 32.20 d 228.00 ab 18.20 abc
IAA (log109M) 14.80 bc 09.20 b 5.30 a 58.30 b 236.00 a 24.80 a
LSD (5%) 04.90 03.03 1.09 11.32 63.61 07.93
RO
OT
GR
OW
TH
AN
DN
OD
UL
AT
ION
OF
VE
GE
TA
BL
ES
OY
BE
AN
21
81
ORDER REPRINTS
The root fresh weights were similar in all treatments, but the highest value
of fresh and root dry weight were observed with IAA (log109M) application. The
lowest values of all root parameters except root fresh weight were observed in
control treated plants. The lowest root fresh weight was observed in Sp7
inoculation. Increased root dry weight was observed in all treatments compared
to control plants, but values were not statistically significant.
Azospirillum brasilense Sp7 stimulated root growth of vegetable soybean,
similar trend of observations in other crops were reported by several authors
mainly in non-legumes (4,5,13). The cell-free supernatant of Sp7 showed
superior results in root growth stimulation compared to Sp7 bacterial cells. This
might be a consequence of environmental factors of test tubes on bacterial cells
growth. The limited space, environmental factors and solution pH of the test tubes
may not allow the bacterial cells to grow and function optimally, whilst the cell-
free supernatant would not have this problem. Bacterial cells multiplication
induced the pH of the test tubes solution into more acidic than the initial (data
were not presented). The stimulation of root growth of vegetable soybean by the
cell-free supernatant of Sp7 might be due to the production of phytohormone(s).
Azospirillum brasilense synthesis of IAA, Indole Lactic Acid (ILA) and
Gibbrellic Acid (GA) in broth culture which increased root development in pearl
millet has been reported by Tien et al. (9). Bashan and Levanony (26), and Patten
and Glick (11) also reported about production of IAA, GA and cytokinins by
Azospirillum and which is liable for enhancement of plant cell growth and
multiplication. Nitrate and nitrite did not increase root growth in vegetable
soybean, but the opposite results were reported by Bothe et al. (12) in wheat
seedlings. It might be that the concentration of nitrite and nitrate, which was used
in this study, was not favorable for soybean root growth. For the two
concentration of IAA, the higher concentration (log106M) produced poor root
growth compared to the lower concentration (log109M).
Promotion of Nodulation
Promotion of crown, lateral and total nodules number, nodule dry weight
and specific nodule weight were recorded in co-inoculation rather than single
inoculation (Table 2). Higher values of all nodule parameters were observed by
co-inoculation than the respective single inoculation of Bradyrhizobium except
for specific nodule dry weight of Sp7 with TAL102. Total nodule number, nodule
dry weight, and specific nodule dry weight increased significantly ðP , 0:05Þ
with co-inoculation of Sp7 and UPMR48 compared to the single inoculation of
UPMR48. The crown and lateral nodule numbers did not increased significantly
for co-inoculation treatment than the respective single inoculation of
Bradyrhizobium, but the total nodules plant21 was significantly higher in number.
HOSSAIN MOLLA, SHAMSUDDIN, AND SAUD2182
ORDER REPRINTS
Table 2. Co-inoculation Effect of Azospirillum and Bradyrhizobium Strains on Nodulation and Plant Growth of Vegetable Soybean. In
Each Column, Common Letters Are Not Significantly Different ðP , 0:05Þ by DMRT
No. of Nodules Plant21 Dry wt. (g Plant21)
Treatments Crown Lateral Total
Nodule Dry wt.
(mg Plant21)
Specific Nodule dry
wt (mg) Root Shoot
Cont (+N) 00.00 b 00.00 c 00.00 e 00.00 c 00.00 c 0.58 a 2.53 a
Cont (2N) 00.00 b 00.00 c 00.00 e 00.00 c 00.00 c 0.28 b 1.05 b
TAL102 15.00 a 19.67 ab 34.67 c 60.00 b 1.73 b 0.29 b 1.48 b
UPMR48 14.33 a 15.00 b 29.33 d 49.00 b 1.68 b 0.23 b 1.12 b
Sp7 & TAL102 15.67 a 28.67 a 44.33 a 65.00 b 1.41 b 0.26 b 1.36 b
Sp7 & UPMR48 20.33 a 19.67 ab 40.00 b 101.33 a 2.51 a 0.27 b 1.39 b
RO
OT
GR
OW
TH
AN
DN
OD
UL
AT
ION
OF
VE
GE
TA
BL
ES
OY
BE
AN
21
83
ORDER REPRINTS
Promotion percent of all nodule parameters in co-inoculation of Sp7 with
UPMR48 were higher compared to co-inoculation of Sp7 with TAL102 except
for lateral nodule number. In Sp7 with TAL102, the value of specific nodule dry
weight declined compared to its single inoculation (TAL102), i.e. this parameter
was not influenced in co-inoculation (Sp7 with TAL102). Nodule dry weight was
highly promoted (.100%) with Sp7 and UPMR48 (Fig. 1) compared to its single
inoculation (UPMR48). Shoot characters were not influenced (Table 2).
Significantly increased nodule numbers with co-inoculation of Azospir-
illum in soybean (grain) has been reported, but nodule weight and C2H2 reduction
were not affected (17). In the present study co-inoculation of Sp7 with TAL102
increased lateral and total nodules number significantly ðP , 0:05Þ, but specific
nodule weight decreased (Table 2). The observed results implied that the smaller
sized but higher in number nodules plant21 produced in co-inoculation of Sp7
with TAL102 compared to Sp7 and UPMR48 co-inoculation. It was observed
higher nodules number in co-inoculation but not statistically significant in
common bean was reported by Burdman et al. (7) at 41 days after sowing. Similar
trend of results was also reported in chickpea at 52 and 62 days of growth when
co-inoculated with Azospirillum (6). In co-inoculation of Azospirillum with
UPMR48, all nodule parameters were significantly greater ðP , 0:05Þ than the
Figure 1. Promotion percent of nodule growth in vegetable soybean by co-inoculation of
Azospirillum (Sp7) with Bradyrhizobium strains (TAL102 & UPMR48) over its
(Bradyrhizobium ) respective single inoculation. (C.COD = Crown nodule, NDW =
Nodule dry weight, L.NOD = Lateral nodule, T.NOD = Total nodule SNDW = Specific
nodule dry weight).
HOSSAIN MOLLA, SHAMSUDDIN, AND SAUD2184
ORDER REPRINTS
single inoculation of UPMR48, except crown and lateral nodule numbers. The
promotion in percent of nodule growth was highly significant in Sp7 with
UPMR48 compared to Sp7 with TAL102. The specific nodule dry weight did not
increased, but rather it decreased (around 20%) in co-inoculation of Sp7 with
TAL102 compared to its single inoculation. Although the total nodule number
was the highest, the specific nodule weight clearly implied that the nodule sizes
was smaller than that of Sp7 with UPMR48. This may be due to immature growth
of nodules caused by insufficient food supply, delayed initiation of nodules in Sp7
with TAL102 or strain specificity.
CONCLUSIONS
Azospirillum (Sp7) has the potential to synthesize plant hormone, which
can replace IAA to stimulate root growth in vegetable soybean. Nitrate and nitrite
did not have positive effect on root growth of vegetable soybean. In co-
inoculation with Bradyrhizobium, Azospirillum (Sp7) could play an encouraging
role to enhance nodulation in vegetable soybean. UPMR48 is superior to TAL102
for vegetable soybean cultivation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors express their gratitude to the Ministry of Environment and
Technology, Malaysia for providing funds for this study.
REFERENCES
1. Cheng, S-H. Vegetable Soybean Area, Production, Foreign and Domestic
Trade in Taiwan; Proceedings of Vegetable Soybean: Research Needs for
Production and Quality Improvement, Kenting, Taiwan, April 29-May 2,
17–21 AVRDC: Taiwan, 1991.
2. Chotiyarnwong, P. Varities and Varietal Development of Vegetable
Soybean; Proceedings of Vegetable Soybean Production Training Course,
Chiang Mai, Thailand, Feb. 18–24, 1991, 13–18 AVRDC: Taiwan, 1992.
3. Singh, C.; Subba Rao, N.S. Associative Effect of Azospirillum brasilense
with Rhizobium japonicum on Nodulation and Yield of Soybean (Glycine
max ). Plant Soil 1979, 53, 387–392.
4. Okon, Y.; Kapulnik, Y. Development and Function of Azospirillum-inocu-
lated Roots. Plant Soil 1986, 90, 3–16.
ROOT GROWTH AND NODULATION OF VEGETABLE SOYBEAN 2185
ORDER REPRINTS
5. Levanony, H.; Bashan, Y. Enhancement of Cell Division in Wheat Root
Tips Growth of Root Elongation Zone Induced by Azospirillum brasilense
Cd. Can. J. Bot. 1989, 67, 2213–2216.
6. Del Gallo, M.; Fabbri, P. Effect of Soil Organic Matter on Chickpea
Inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium leguminosarum bv.
ciceri. Plant Soil 1991, 137, 171–175.
7. Burdman, S.; Kigel, J.; Okon, Y. Effects of Azospirillum brasilense on
Nodulation and Growth of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ). Soil Biol.
Biochem. 1997, 29, 923–929.
8. Bashan, Y.; Holguin, G. Azospirillum-plant Relationships: Environment and
Physiological Advances (1990–1996). Can. J. Microbiol. 1997, 43,
103–121.
9. Tien, T.M.; Gaskins, M.H.; Hubbell, D.H. Plant Growth Substances
Produced by Azospirillum brasilense and Their Effect on Growth of Pearl
Millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979, 37,
1016–1024.
10. Baca, B.E.; Soto-Urzua, L.; Xochihua-Corona, Y.G.; Cuervo-Garcia, A.
Characterization of Two Aromatic Amino Acid aminotransferases and
Production of Indoleacetic Acid in Azospirillum Stains. Soil Biol. Biochem.
1994, 26, 63–67.
11. Patten, C.L.; Glick, B.R. Bacterial Biosynthesis of Indole-3-Acetic Acid.
Can. J. Microbiol. 1996, 42, 207–220.
12. Bothe, H.; Korsgen, H.; Lehmacher, T.; Hundeshagen, B. Differential
Effects of Azospirillum, Auxin and Combined Nitrogen on the Growth of
the Roots of Wheat. Symbiosis 1992, 13, 167–179.
13. Zimmer, W.; Bothe, H. The Phytohormonal Interactions Between
Azospirillum and Wheat. In Nitrogen Fixation with Non-legumes; Skinner,
F.A. Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1989,
137–145.
14. Sarig, S.; Kapulnik, Y.; Okon, Y. Effect of Azospirillum Inoculation on
Nitrogen Fixation and Growth of Several Winter Legumes. Plant Soil 1986,
90, 335–342.
15. Kapulnik, Y.; Okon, Y.; Kigel, I.; Nur, I.; Henis, Y. Effect of Azospirillum
Inoculation on Some Growth Parameters and N-content of Wheat, Sorghum
and Panicum. Plant Soil 1981, 61, 65–70.
16. Boddey, R.M.; Dobereiner, J. Association of Azospirillum and Other
Diazotrophs with Tropical Gramineae. In 12th International Congress of
Soil Science, New Delhi, India, Feb. 8–16; 1982; 28–47.
17. Iruthayathas, E.E.; Gunasekaran, S.; Vlassak, K. Effect of Combined
Inoculation of Azospirillum and Rhizobium on Nodulation and N2-fixation
of Winged Bean and Soybean. Sci. Hort. 1983, 20, 231–240.
HOSSAIN MOLLA, SHAMSUDDIN, AND SAUD2186
ORDER REPRINTS
18. Plazinski, J.; Rolfe, B.G. Interaction of Azospirillum and Rhizobium Strains
Leading to Inhibition of Nodulation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 49,
990–993.
19. Itzigsohn, R.; Kapulnik, Y.; Okon, Y.; Dovrat, A. Physiological and
Morphological Aspects of Interactions Between Rhizobium meliloti and
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa ) in Association with Azospirillum brasilense.
Can. J. Microbiol. 1992, 39, 610–615.
20. Shamsuddin, Z.H. Growth Infectivity and Nodulation Abilities of Some
Winged Bean Rhizobia in Acid Conditions Ph.D. Thesis Murdoch
University: Perth, West Australia.
21. Okon, Y.; Albrecht, S.L.; Burris, R.H. Methods for Growing Spirillum
lipoferum and for Counting it in Pure Culture and in Association with
Plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977, 33, 85–88.
22. SAS, SAS/STAT Guide to Personal Computers, Version 6; SAS Institute:
Cary, NC, 1987.
23. Newman, E.I. Method for Estimating the Total Length of Root in a Sample.
J. Appl. Ecol. 1966, 3, 139–145.
24. Tennant, D. A Test of a Modified Line Intersect Method of Estimating Root
Length. J. Ecol. 1975, 63, 995–1001.
25. Somasegaran, P.; Hoben, H.J. Methods in Legume-Rhizobium Technology;
273 University of Hawaii NifTAL: Honolulu, HI, 1985.
26. Bashan, Y.; Levanony, H. Current Status of Azospirillum Inoculation
Technology: Azospirillum as a Challenge for Agriculture. Can. J. Microbiol.
1990, 36, 591–608.
ROOT GROWTH AND NODULATION OF VEGETABLE SOYBEAN 2187
Order now!
Reprints of this article can also be ordered at
http://www.dekker.com/servlet/product/DOI/101081CSS120000276
Request Permission or Order Reprints Instantly!
Interested in copying and sharing this article? In most cases, U.S. Copyright Law requires that you get permission from the article’s rightsholder before using copyrighted content.
All information and materials found in this article, including but not limited to text, trademarks, patents, logos, graphics and images (the "Materials"), are the copyrighted works and other forms of intellectual property of Marcel Dekker, Inc., or its licensors. All rights not expressly granted are reserved.
Get permission to lawfully reproduce and distribute the Materials or order reprints quickly and painlessly. Simply click on the "Request Permission/Reprints Here" link below and follow the instructions. Visit the U.S. Copyright Office for information on Fair Use limitations of U.S. copyright law. Please refer to The Association of American Publishers’ (AAP) website for guidelines on Fair Use in the Classroom.
The Materials are for your personal use only and cannot be reformatted, reposted, resold or distributed by electronic means or otherwise without permission from Marcel Dekker, Inc. Marcel Dekker, Inc. grants you the limited right to display the Materials only on your personal computer or personal wireless device, and to copy and download single copies of such Materials provided that any copyright, trademark or other notice appearing on such Materials is also retained by, displayed, copied or downloaded as part of the Materials and is not removed or obscured, and provided you do not edit, modify, alter or enhance the Materials. Please refer to our Website User Agreement for more details.