Upload
universitaeuropeadiroma
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RESEARCH REPORT
Modification of EEG power spectra and EEG connectivityin autobiographical memory: a sLORETA study
Claudio Imperatori • Riccardo Brunetti • Benedetto Farina •
Anna Maria Speranza • Anna Losurdo • Elisa Testani •
Anna Contardi • Giacomo Della Marca
Received: 3 June 2013 / Accepted: 24 February 2014
� Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Abstract The aim of the present study was to explore the
modifications of scalp EEG power spectra and EEG con-
nectivity during the autobiographical memory test (AM-T)
and during the retrieval of an autobiographical event (the
high school final examination, Task 2). Seventeen healthy
volunteers were enrolled (9 women and 8 men, mean age
23.4 ± 2.8 years, range 19–30). EEG was recorded at
baseline and while performing the autobiographical mem-
ory (AM) tasks, by means of 19 surface electrodes and a
nasopharyngeal electrode. EEG analysis was conducted by
means of the standardized LOw Resolution Electric
Tomography (sLORETA) software. Power spectra and
lagged EEG coherence were compared between EEG
acquired during the memory tasks and baseline recording.
The frequency bands considered were as follows: delta
(0.5–4 Hz); theta (4.5–7.5 Hz); alpha (8–12.5 Hz); beta1
(13–17.5 Hz); beta2 (18–30 Hz); gamma (30.5–60 Hz).
During AM-T, we observed a significant delta power
increase in left frontal and midline cortices (T = 3.554;
p \ 0.05) and increased EEG connectivity in delta band in
prefrontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital areas, and for
gamma bands in the left temporo-parietal regions
(T = 4.154; p \ 0.05). In Task 2, we measured an
increased power in the gamma band located in the left
posterior midline areas (T = 3.960; p \ 0.05) and a sig-
nificant increase in delta band connectivity in the pre-
frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital areas, and in the
gamma band involving right temporo-parietal areas
(T = 4.579; p \ 0.05). These results indicate that AM
retrieval engages in a complex network which is mediated
by both low- (delta) and high-frequency (gamma) EEG
bands.
Keywords Autobiographical memory � sLORETA � EEG
power spectra � EEG connectivity
Introduction
Autobiographical memory (AM) is a complex form of
explicit memory referring to the ability to remember events
from one’s own life, and it is believed to be a dynamic
integration between episodic memory (EM) and semantic
memory (SM) (Cabeza and St Jacques 2007; Levine et al.
2004). EM is defined as a system characterized by an au-
tonoetic consciousness, reflecting the ability to remember
unique past events together with their associated contextual
details (Tulving 1985, 1987). In contrast, SM is charac-
terized by noetic consciousness, and it refers to the
knowledge of facts about the world and about our life
(Tulving 1985, 1987).
Autobiographical memories are characterized by both
elements of these memory systems such as vivid and
emotional images (EM) of people during a particular event
(i.e., high school final examination) with the knowledge
about concepts and facts related to this special day (SM).
Retrieving autobiographical information involves two dif-
ferent phases: event construction and elaboration (Conway
et al. 2001, 2003; Daselaar et al. 2008; Holland et al. 2011).
C. Imperatori � R. Brunetti � B. Farina (&) � A. Contardi
Department of Human Science, European University of Rome,
Rome, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
A. M. Speranza
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza
University, Rome, Italy
A. Losurdo � E. Testani � G. Della Marca
Department of Neurosciences, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
123
Cogn Process
DOI 10.1007/s10339-014-0605-5
The first one is characterized by a dynamic and inferential
process based on an initial cue, and by a subsequent con-
tinuous monitoring and evaluation of the search results; the
second phase is characterized by the emerging of different
aspects and details about the autobiographical recall kept in
mind (Holland et al. 2011).
The complexity of the AM is reflected by its neurobio-
logical underpinnings. The study of AM neural substrates
has received significant attention in the last decade, and
recent neuroimaging investigations (Cabeza and St Jacques
2007; Holland et al. 2011; Rugg and Vilberg 2013; Svo-
boda et al. 2006) offered the possibility to map a relatively
consistent cooperation between different brain areas, pre-
dominantly left-lateralized, involving in particular the
prefrontal cortex (PFC) and different structures of the
mesial temporal lobe (MTL).
Cabeza and St Jacques (2007), in a review of functional
neuroimaging studies of AM, proposed a complex brain
network in which ‘memory search process,’ ‘monitoring
phase,’ and ‘self-referential process’ seem to involve,
respectively, left lateral PFC, medial PFC, and ventrome-
dial PFC. Moreover, the hippocampus and the retrosplenial
cortex are involved in the recollection during event elab-
oration process, whereas the amygdala, the occipital area,
and the cuneus/precuneus region are, respectively,
involved in emotional processing and in visual imagery
(Cabeza and St Jacques 2007).
Several electrophysiology studies confirmed the
involvement of PFC and MTL in AM. EEG and event-
related potentials (ERP) studies documented modifications
in brain electrical activity during the different phases of
AM retrieval. Conway et al. (Conway et al. 2001, 2003)
documented changes in slow cortical potentials during
construction and event elaboration phases: the first is
characterized by enhanced EEG activity in the left frontal
lobe, whereas the second is characterized by enhanced
EEG activity in posterior temporal and occipital lobes.
Furthermore, Steinvorth et al. (2010), using intracranial
ERP recordings in a single case, reported an increase in
gamma, theta, and delta frequency bands in the left en-
torhinal cortex: gamma was predominant in superficial
layers (which project to the hippocampus) during the pre-
sentation of the memory cue, whereas theta and delta were
prolonged and dominant in deep layers (which project to
neocortices) during memory retrieval. These authors also
observed that this last activation pattern was exclusive for
AM and was not observed in SM tasks (Steinvorth et al.
2010). Therefore, it has been proposed that changes in low-
frequency bands could endorse a long-range cortical
interaction within complex and spread brain networks
(Steinvorth et al. 2010; Toth et al. 2012). It has also been
proposed that the encoding and maintenance of memory
traces in MTL rely on the crucial modulation of brain
activity in theta and gamma frequencies (Duzel et al. 2010;
Steinvorth et al. 2010).
The aim of the present study was to explore the modi-
fications of scalp EEG power spectra and EEG connectivity
during AM tasks. For these reason, we used the AM test
(AM-T) (Williams and Broadbent 1986), one of the most
common and validated tests used to study AM both clini-
cally and experimentally (Van Vreeswijk and De Wilde
2004; Williams et al. 2007). Furthermore, in order to
explore the AM network organization in a more ecological
situation, we also explored the EEG modifications during
the retrieval of a single autobiographical event (namely, the
high school final examination, Task 2), based on concrete
questions (‘what,’ ‘where,’ ‘who’).
In order to detect modifications of EEG frequencies, and
their topographic distribution, we used the standardized
LOw Resolution brain Electric Tomography (sLORETA)
software, a validated method for localizing the electric
activity in the brain based on multichannel surface EEG
recordings (Pascual-Marqui et al. 1994). Furthermore, a
nasopharyngeal (NP) electrode was introduced via the
nostril and positioned with the tip touching the posterior
pharyngeal wall. This electrode is known to record EEG
activity originating from MTL structures (Zijlmans et al.
2008); in this way, we were able to collect the signal as
close as possible to the MTL and achieve a more accurate
source reconstruction for that region.
Materials and methods
Seventeen healthy volunteers were enrolled for the exper-
iment, 9 women and 8 men. Mean age was
23.4 ± 2.8 years (age range 19–30 years). The only
inclusion criterion was the consent to participate. Exclusion
criteria were as follows: left handedness; history of medi-
cal, psychiatric, and neurologic diseases; head trauma;
assumption of central nervous system active drugs in the
3 weeks before the study; presence of EEG abnormalities
at the baseline recording. The research was approved by
the Catholic University’s and Universita Europea’s ethics
review boards. Both the ethics review boards issued a
formal written waiver of informed consent because the
research involved no more than minimal risk, and the data
were analyzed anonymously. All subjects gave their writ-
ten informed consent to participate.
AM tasks
After electrode montage, the subjects were invited to sit in
a comfortable armchair, with eyes closed, in a quiet, semi-
dark silent room for a 5-min resting EEG recording
(baseline condition). Afterward, the subjects were
Cogn Process
123
instructed to perform the AM-T (Williams and Broadbent
1986): participants were asked to remain silent with their
eyes closed and to recall several autobiographical episodic
memories linked to 10 cue words. The cue words were read
out loud by a researcher (B.F.): five positive words (happy,
proud, faithful, tender, friendly) and five negative words
(tired, ashamed, painful, sad, weakness) translated and
adapted to Italian from Moradi et al. (2008). The AM-T
lasted 5 min.
Upon completing, the AM-T subjects were instructed to
remain seated with their eyes closed for 5 min before
starting the second task. In Task 2, participants were
instructed to recall and concentrate on the autobiographical
event of their high school exit examination. Subjects were
asked to remember as many details as possible about that
experience (e.g., people, emotions, venue, etc.). The sub-
ject was requested to perform the memory task for 5 min.
At the end of this session, the subjects were asked whether
they were able to successfully perform the task.
EEG recordings
Continuous EEG recordings were performed at baseline
and during the two AM tasks. EEG was recorded by means
of a Micromed System Plus digital EEGraph (Micromed�S.p.A., Mogliano Veneto, TV, Italy). EEG montage
included 19 standard scalp leads positioned according to
the 10–20 system (recording sites: Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4,
F8, T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4, T5, P3, Pz, P4, T6, O1, O2), EOG,
and EKG. Moreover, a NP electrode was used to record
EEG activity in proximity of MTL structures. NP electrode
was introduced via the nostril and positioned with the tip
touching the posterior pharyngeal wall. The reference
electrodes were placed on the linked mastoids. Impedances
were kept below 5 KX before starting the recording and
checked again at the end. In particular, impedances of the
mastoids reference electrodes were checked to be identical.
Sampling frequency was 256 Hz; A/D conversion was
made at 16 bit; preamplifiers amplitude range was
±3,200 lV and low-frequency pre-filters were set at
0.15 Hz. The following band-pass filters were used:
HFF = 0.2 Hz; LFF = 128 Hz. The line noise (in Italy:
50 Hz) was removed by using a 50 Hz notch filter. Offline
artifact rejection (eye movements, blinks, muscular acti-
vations, or movement artifacts) was performed visually on
the raw EEG trace, by posing a marker at the onset of the
artifact signal and a further marker at the end of the artifact.
Successively, the artifact segment (that is, the EEG signal
interval included between the two markers) was deleted,
and this cancellation involved all the EEG traces acquired
within that interval. In this way, all the EEG intervals
characterized by the presence of artifacts were excluded
from the analysis. After artifact rejection, the remaining
EEG intervals were exported into American Standard Code
for Information Interchange (ASCII) files and imported
into the sLORETA software. We analyzed segments of
EEG recorded in baseline (BL) state and during tasks.
Since the duration of both tasks (AM-T and Task 2) and BL
was about 5 min, we decided to analyze at least 2 min of
artifact-free recording (not necessarily consecutive) for
each of the three condition (baseline, AM-T, Task 2), in all
subjects. The average time analyzed was 146 ± 19 s. This
procedure has been already used to investigate modifica-
tions of EEG power spectra during a working memory task
(N-back) (Imperatori et al. 2013), and in order to assess
EEG connectivity and EEG power spectra in dissociative
disorders (Farina et al. 2013). All EEG analyses were
performed by means of the sLORETA software (Pascual-
Marqui et al. 1994).
Frequency analysis
EEG frequency analysis was performed by means of fast
Fourier transform algorithm, with a 2-s interval on the EEG
signal, in all scalp locations. The following frequency
bands were considered: delta (0.5–4 Hz); theta
(4.5–7.5 Hz); alpha (8–12.5 Hz); beta1 (13–17.5 Hz);
beta2 (18–30 Hz); gamma (30.5–60 Hz). For frequency
analysis, monopolar EEG traces (each electrode referred to
joint mastoids) were used. Topographic sources of EEG
activities were determined using the sLORETA software.
The sLORETA software computes the current distribution
throughout the brain volume. In order to find a solution for
the 3-dimensional distribution of the EEG signal, the
sLORETA method assumes that neighboring neurons are
simultaneously and synchronously activated. This
assumption rests on evidence from single-cell recordings in
the brain that shows strong synchronization of adjacent
neurons (Kreiter and Singer 1992; Murphy et al. 1992).
The computational task is to select the smoothest of all
possible 3-dimensional current distributions, a common
procedure in signal processing (Grave de Peralta-Menen-
dez and Gonzalez-Andino 1998; Grave de Peralta Me-
nendez et al. 2000). The result is a true 3-dimensional
tomography, in which the localization of brain signals is
preserved with a low amount of dispersion (Pascual-Mar-
qui et al. 1994).
Connectivity analysis
The connectivity analysis was performed by the computa-
tion of lagged coherence. This approach allows to better
evaluate ‘true’ connectivity. Two measures of coherence
can be calculated between EEG signals: ‘lagged coherence’
Cogn Process
123
and ‘instantaneous coherence.’ These measures evaluate,
respectively, the contribution of potentials generated by
local neural networks and of potentials due to volume
conduction. The lagged coherence is a much more appro-
priate measure of electrophysiological connectivity,
because it removes the confounding effect of instantaneous
dependence due to volume conduction and low spatial
resolution (Pascual-Marqui 2007a). Furthermore, the lag-
ged component is purely physiological and affected mini-
mally by low spatial resolution, which affects the
instantaneous component (Pascual-Marqui et al. 2011).
However, other techniques such as the imaginary
coherence have been previously developed (Nolte et al.
2004), it is important to note that when there exists a
lagged connection, the imaginary part of the coherence
fails to detect it by tending to zero if the instantaneous
component is large. This is not the case for the lagged
coherence which asymptotically tends to a nonzero value,
detecting the presence of a physiological lagged connection
(Pascual-Marqui et al. 2011). For these reasons in the
present study, lagged coherence was calculated. The
sLORETA software computes instantaneous coherence
qx�y(x), in the case of univariate series, by the formula
(Pascual-Marqui 2007b):
Fig. 1 3D sLORETA
representation of the scalp
electrodes placement
Cogn Process
123
q2x:yðxÞ ¼
½ReðSyxxÞ�SyxxSxxx
whereas the lagged coherence qx$y(x) is calculated by the
formula (Pascual-Marqui 2007b):
q2x$yðxÞ ¼ 1� exp½�Fx$yðxÞ�
¼ 1
�
Syyx Syxx
Sxyx Sxxx
� ����������
Syyx O
OT Sxxx
� ���������
� �
ReSyyx Syxx
Sxyx Sxxx
� ����������
ReSyyx O
OT Sxxx
� ���������
� �
In this formula, ‘x’ is the discrete frequency considered,
‘Re’ indicates the real part of an element; Sxxx, Syyx, Sxyx,
and Syxx denote complex valued covariance matrices.
Fx$y(x) is the lagged linear dependence, ‘O’ is a matrix of
zeros, and the superscript ‘T’ stands for ‘transposed.’
The EEG coherence analysis was performed on the same
blocks of EEG tracings used for power spectra analysis.
Coherence values were computed for each frequency band
(delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma), in the frequency range of
0.5–60 Hz. In order to evaluate the modifications of con-
nectivity, 20 region of interests (ROIs) were defined: one in
the temporal mesial region, placed on the midline, corre-
sponding to the site of the NP electrode, and 19 for the
scalp (one for each scalp electrode). In Fig. 1, we reported
the sLORETA representation of the scalp electrodes.
We chose the ‘single nearest voxel’ option: in this way,
each ROI consisted of a single voxel, the one closest to
each seed. Then, the sLORETA computed the coherence
values between all these ROIs (total 20 9 20 = 400 con-
nections). The sLORETA also computed the source
reconstruction algorithm previously described (Pascual-
Marqui and Biscay-Lirio 1993; Pascual-Marqui et al. 1994,
1995).
Statistical analysis
Power spectra analysis and EEG connectivity (lagged
coherence) were compared among conditions, for each
frequency band. The conditions analyzed were three:
baseline (BL), AM-T, and exam recall (Task 2). All
comparisons were performed by using the statistical non-
parametric mapping methodology supplied by the sLO-
RETA (Nichols and Holmes 2002). This methodology is
based on the Fisher’s permutation test: a subset of non-
parametric statistics. In particular, this is a type of statis-
tical significance test in which the distribution of the test
statistic under the null hypothesis is obtained by calculating
all possible values of the test statistic under rearrangements
of the labels on the observed data points. Correction of
significance for multiple testing was computed for the two
comparisons between conditions for each frequency band:
for the correction, we applied the nonparametric random-
ization procedure available in the sLORETA program
package (Nichols and Holmes 2002).
T-level thresholds were computed by the statistical
software implemented in the sLORETA, which correspond
to the statistical significance thresholds (p \ 0.05 and
p \ 0.01) (for details see, Friston et al. 1990; Friston et al.
1991).
Results
EEG recordings suitable for the analysis were obtained in
all cases. Visual evaluation of the EEG recordings showed
no relevant modifications of the background rhythm fre-
quency, focal abnormalities, or epileptic discharges. No
subject showed evidence of drowsiness or sleep during the
recordings. In a post-session interview, all subjects repor-
ted that they had no difficulties and no major distractions
while performing the tasks.
Despite our statistical tests were two-tailed, all our
comparisons generated positive T values.
Power spectra analysis
In the comparison between AM-T and BL, the thresholds
for significance were T = 3.554, corresponding to
p \ 0.05, and T = 4.559, corresponding to p \ 0.01. Sig-
nificant modifications were documented in the delta
(0.5–4 Hz) frequency band: in the AM-T condition,
increased power of delta activity was observed in frontal
and midline cortices. sLORETA software localized these
modification in the dorsolateral PFC (Brodmann areas, BA
9; T = 3.682, corresponding to p = 0,043), in anterior
PFC (BA 10; T = 3.801, corresponding to p = 0.038), in
orbitofrontal cortex (OFC, BA 11; T = 4.323, corre-
sponding to p = 0.016), in ventral anterior cingulate cortex
(ACC, BA 32, T = 4.204, corresponding to p = 0.021),
and in anterior (dorsal and ventral) cingulate cortex (BA
24; T = 4.086, corresponding to p = 0.026) (Fig. 2a).
In the comparison between Task 2 and BL, the thresh-
olds for significance were T = 3.960, corresponding to
p \ 0.05, and T = 4.872, corresponding to p \ 0.01. The
only significant modification was observed in the gamma
(30–60 Hz): during Task 2, an increase in gamma power
was recorded in the posterior midline areas. sLORETA
software localized this modification in left precuneus (BA
7; T = 4.169, corresponding to p = 0.025) (Fig. 2b).
Finally, in the comparison between AM-T and Task 2,
the thresholds for significance were T = 8.808,
Cogn Process
123
Fig
.2
Res
ult
so
fth
esL
OR
ET
Aco
mp
aris
on
of
EE
Gp
ow
ersp
ectr
ain
all
freq
uen
cyb
and
s.P
an
elA
AM
-Tv
ersu
sB
asel
ine;
Pa
nel
BT
ask
2v
ersu
sB
asel
ine.
Co
lore
dsp
ots
ind
icat
ear
eas
wh
ere
stat
isti
call
ysi
gn
ifica
nt
incr
ease
ind
elta
EE
Gsp
ectr
alp
ow
erw
asm
easu
red
.L
evel
so
fsi
gn
ifica
nce
are
rep
rese
nte
din
the
cen
ter
of
the
fig
ure
.R
edco
lou
rin
dic
ates
sig
nifi
can
tin
crea
sein
po
wer
spec
tra;
blu
eco
lou
rin
dic
ates
sig
nifi
can
tre
du
ctio
nin
po
wer
spec
tra.
Th
resh
old
val
ues
(T)
for
stat
isti
cal
sig
nifi
can
ce(c
orr
esp
on
din
gto
p\
0.0
5)
are
rep
ort
edin
the
fig
ure
cen
ter.
InA
M-T
,
sig
nifi
can
tm
od
ifica
tio
ns
wer
eo
bse
rved
ind
elta
ban
din
do
rso
late
ral
PF
C(B
A9
),in
ante
rio
rP
FC
(BA
10
),in
OF
C(B
A1
1),
inv
entr
al,
and
inA
CC
(BA
32
,2
4).
InT
ask
2,
sig
nifi
can
t
mo
difi
cati
on
sw
ere
ob
serv
edin
del
tab
and
inth
ele
ftp
recu
neu
s(B
A7
).B
AB
rod
man
nar
eas,
LH
left
hem
isp
her
e,A
ante
rio
r,P
po
ster
ior
Cogn Process
123
corresponding to p \ 0.05, and T = 8.821, corresponding
to p \ 0.01. No significant differences were observed, in
all frequency bands.
Lagged coherence analysis
In the comparison between AM-T and BL, the thresholds
for significance were T = 4.154, corresponding to
p \ 0.05, and T = 4,984, corresponding to p \ 0.01. Sig-
nificant modifications were observed in the delta
(0.5–4 Hz; T = 4.522, corresponding to p = 0.031) as well
as in the gamma (30–60 Hz; T = 4.346, corresponding to
p = 0.039) frequency bands. In the delta band, the AM-T
condition was associated with a widespread increase in
lagged coherence, involving the prefrontal, temporal,
parietal, and occipital ROIs (Fig. 3a). In the gamma band,
AM-T was associated with increased coherence between
mesial temporal and left parieto-occipital ROIs (Fig. 3a).
In the comparison between Task 2 and BL, the thresh-
olds for significance were T = 4.579, corresponding to
p \ 0.05, and T = 5.572, corresponding to p \ 0.01. As
for AM-T, significant modifications involved the delta
(0.5–4 Hz; T = 5.236, corresponding to p = 0.027) as well
as the gamma (30–60 Hz; T = 4.904, corresponding to
p = 0.041) bands. In the delta band, the Task 2 condition
was associated with a widespread increase in lagged
coherence, involving the prefrontal, temporal, parietal, and
occipital ROIs (Fig. 3b). In the gamma band, Task 2 was
associated with increased coherence between mesial tem-
poral and right parieto-occipital ROIs (Fig. 3b).
Finally, in the comparison between AM-T and Task 2,
the thresholds for significance were T = 4.096, corre-
sponding to p \ 0.05, and T = 4,901, corresponding to
p \ 0.01. No significant differences were observed, in all
frequency bands.
Discussion
The principal aim of this study was to explore the modi-
fications of EEG power spectra and connectivity induced
by two different AM tasks: a standardized, validated AM
task (Williams and Broadbent 1986) and a more ecological
retrieval of a single autobiographical event.
The results indicate that the AM-T is associated with
increased delta band power in left PFC and in ACC:
bilateral, widespread increase in EEG connectivity also in
the delta band, and increase in left temporo-parietal con-
nections in the gamma band.
Conversely, the Task 2 was characterized by an increase
in gamma power in left parieto-occipital cortex, and sim-
ilarly to AM-T, a widespread increase in EEG connectivity
also in the delta band. Moreover, in Task 2, we observed anFig
.3
Res
ult
so
fth
esL
OR
ET
Aco
mp
aris
on
of
EE
Gla
gg
edco
her
ence
inal
lfr
equ
ency
ban
ds.
Pa
nel
AA
M-T
ver
sus
Bas
elin
e;P
an
elB
Tas
k2
ver
sus
Bas
elin
e.T
hre
sho
ldv
alu
es(T
)fo
r
stat
isti
cal
sig
nifi
can
ce(c
orr
esp
on
din
gto
p\
0.0
5)
are
rep
ort
edin
cen
ter
of
the
fig
ure
;re
dli
nes
ind
icat
eco
nn
ecti
on
sw
hic
hp
rese
nte
dsi
gn
ifica
nt
incr
ease
inco
her
ence
;b
lue
lin
es(n
ot
pre
sen
t)
wo
uld
ind
icat
esi
gn
ifica
nt
red
uct
ion
inco
her
ence
.R
rig
ht,
Lle
ft,
Aan
teri
or,
Pp
ost
erio
r
Cogn Process
123
increase in right temporo-parietal connections in the
gamma band.
The engagement of these brain areas in AM is widely
documented (Cabeza and St Jacques 2007; Maguire 2001;
Svoboda et al. 2006). Different regions of frontal lobes
play a crucial role in AM. In AM-T, we documented the
involvement of dorsolateral PFC (BA 9), in anterior PFC
(BA 10), and in OFC (BA 11).
Medial frontal region (BA 9, 10) seems to be critical in
AM. Indeed, it is documented that this region is involved in
self-referential processing during AMs (Addis et al. 2004;
Cabeza et al. 2004; Levine et al. 2004; Macrae et al. 2004).
This process seems to be the key element of AM so that
several authors (Conway 2005; Conway and Pleydell-Pe-
arce 2000; Conway et al. 2001, 2003) proposed that auto-
biographical memory is constructed within a self-memory
system (SMS), a conceptual model which consists of two
main components: the working self and the autobiograph-
ical memory knowledge base. When these components
interlock in acts of remembering, specific autobiographical
memories can be formed.
Furthermore, the increased delta power in OFC,
observed in our study, could reflect the emotional infor-
mation processing during the AM-T: this is consistent with
previous findings which documented the engagement of
OFC in emotional AM task (Maddock et al. 2001; Mark-
owitsch et al. 2003; Piefke et al. 2003).
The AM-T, as compared with BL, also provoked an
increase in delta power in the anterior cingulate cortex.
Although the role of posterior cingulate cortex in AM has
been established by neuroimaging studies (Svoboda et al.
2006), also ACC seems to play an important role in
memory reconstruction and monitoring process (Cabeza
and Nyberg 2000; Duncan and Owen 2000; Fletcher and
Henson 2001) of AM. BA 24 and 32 are considered
responsible for the cognitive components of ACC (De-
vinsky et al. 1995), and the interaction with PFC could
reflect the response to the erroneous information during
monitoring process of AMs. According to the ‘conflict-
monitoring’ theory (Carter et al. 1999, 2000), it has been
suggested that ACC provides an online conflict signal,
indicating the need to engage brain regions such as dor-
solateral prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex to
implement strategic processes (Carter et al. 1999, 2000).
This has already been documented in different cognitive
tasks such as the Stroop Task (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Our results also documented an increase in gamma band
localized in the left precuneus (BA 7) in Task 2 when
compared with BL. This structure is involved in self-ref-
erential processing, visuo-spatial imagery, and episodic
memory retrieval (Cavanna and Trimble 2006), and it
seems to be an important area in the cortical AM network
(Bullmore and Sporns 2009). In the perspective of AM,
several studies suggest the implication of precuneus in
visual imagery (Addis et al. 2004; Gardini et al. 2006). It is
possible to speculate that the greater activation of precu-
neus in this task could reflect the vividness of a very
stressful event such as the high school exit examination.
The results of the EEG connectivity analysis suggest
that the AM tasks are associated with increased cortical
connectivity, both in the low-frequency (delta) and in the
high-frequency (gamma) EEG bands. The two different
tasks used in this study showed similar effects in the delta
frequency band: in both tasks, a spread bilateral activation
of a cortical network was observed (Fig. 3a, b). Con-
versely, the two AM tasks produced different, localized
changes in the gamma band: while the AM-T was associ-
ated with increased connectivity in the left temporo-pari-
etal areas, the Task 2 induced a similar increase in
connectivity in the right hemisphere.
In this respect, the results are consistent with the find-
ings of functional imaging and neurophysiological studies
of AM described in the literature (Cabeza and St Jacques
2007; Conway et al. 2001, 2003; Maguire 2001; Steinvorth
et al. 2010; Svoboda et al. 2006). In both AM tasks, we
observed two similar EEG connectivity patterns: the first is
associated with the delta band, and it corresponds to a wide
and complex brain network, involving bilateral prefrontal,
temporal, and occipital areas; the second is associated with
the gamma band, and it corresponds to smaller brain net-
works involving posterior areas.
Bilateral activation of functional connections observed
in the first network could reflect the emotional valence of
our AM tasks. The predominant activation of left-side areas
reported in previous studies (Cabeza and St Jacques 2007;
Maguire 2001; Svoboda et al. 2006) is thought to reflect the
contribution of semantic information to AM neutral
retrieval cues (Cabeza and St Jacques 2007). Nevertheless,
AM is also characterized by emotional content and vivid
sensory details (Rubin 2006), and several researches doc-
umented right-lateralized or bilateral activation patterns
during emotional AM tasks (Denkova et al. 2006; Fink
et al. 1996; Markowitsch et al. 2000; Vandekerckhove
et al. 2005). Our results are consistent with Vandekerckh-
ove et al. (2005) which reported bi-hemispheric activation
(including MTL and PCF) during stressful, negative or
positive, AM tasks. Furthermore, we showed that this
complex network is supported by the delta frequency band.
This is consistent with different studies, reporting the
involvement of delta frequency in memory. It is proposed
that delta oscillation plays a crucial role in memory con-
solidation during sleep (Sagar et al. 1985; Sirota et al.
2003), successful explicit memory formation (Fell et al.
2006), working memory (Harmony et al. 1996; Imperatori
et al. 2013), and with AM (Steinvorth et al. 2010). More-
over, the involvement of delta band could reflect the
Cogn Process
123
neurophysiological index of the inter-neuronal exchange
along the distributed brain areas that shape the AM cortical
network (Steinvorth et al. 2010; Toth et al. 2012).
Our results also documented an increase in EEG
coherence in gamma band during both AM tasks in pos-
terior areas. Whereas AM-T is characterized by increase in
gamma coherence in the left hemisphere, Task 2 is char-
acterized by increase in gamma coherence in the right
hemisphere (Fig. 3). The difference between left and right
connectivity could reflect the difference among the two
AM Tasks: in AM-T, participants were instructed to recall
different AMs in response to verbally presented cue words,
whereas in Task 2 we only asked to remember and keep in
mind details about a single autobiographical event.
The crucial role of gamma bands in memory is widely
documented (Duzel et al. 2010; Jutras and Buffalo 2010). In
the present research, the increase in gamma coherence
between parietal and temporal areas could reflect the use of
information arising from correspondences between the cues
and material from the long-term memory. This is in line with
the results reported by Steinvorth et al. (2010), who observed
an increase in gamma power in superficial layers of en-
thorhinal cortex beginning at 200 ms after the cue and lasting
until 12,000 ms at the end of the analyzed time period.
It must be specified that we did not document modi-
fications of EEG coherence and EEG power spectra in the
theta band. In a study by Corsi-Cabrera et al. (2000),
power spectra from wake and sleep in healthy adults were
submitted to principal component analyses to investigate
which frequencies covaried together (Corsi-Cabrera et al.
2000). The results indicated that slow-wave activity can
oscillate at higher frequencies, up to 8 Hz; interestingly,
no theta band was independently identified: According to
the authors, this suggested either that delta and theta
oscillations are two rhythms under the same global
influence or that the traditional division of theta band in
the human cortical EEG is artificial (Corsi-Cabrera et al.
2000).
Furthermore, Lega et al. (2012) recording intracranial
EEG during an EM task revealed that only ‘slow-theta’
(2.5–5 Hz) oscillation was functionally linked to gamma
oscillations suggesting that this EEG pattern plays an
important role in cortico–hippocampal communication.
Moreover, we did not find any significant modification
in the beta bands, although this activity seems to play an
important role in specific memory tasks such as visuo-
spatial working memory (Roberts et al. 2013). However,
the role of beta activity in AM remains controversial and
not constantly documented (Conway et al. 2001, 2003;
Steinvorth et al. 2010).
In conclusion, our findings indicate that AM retrieval
engages in a complex network which is mediated by both
low- (delta) and high-frequency (gamma) EEG bands.
Study limitations
The present study has main limitations. The first is the use
of scalp EEG recordings, which have an intrinsic limit in
space resolution, particularly in the identification of deep
subcortical sources. A further limit is in the montage
applied, which is the one used in standard EEG recording.
It is known that spatial resolution of EEG sources increases
with the number of electrodes, and therefore, high-density
recordings are more reliable in the esteem of EEG rhythms
source analysis. The same kind of limitation, obviously, is
reflected by the sLORETA software, which is, by defini-
tion, a low-resolution electric source analysis software.
Furthermore, it is possible that the modification observed in
the gamma band was influenced by the superimposed
cranial and ocular muscles artifacts, which is particularly
evident in gamma activity (Hipp and Siegel 2013). Finally,
although it is widely used, we compared the AM tasks with
a resting state and this needs caution in the interpretation of
results (Svoboda et al. 2006).
Conflict of interest None.
References
Addis DR, Moscovitch M, Crawley AP, McAndrews MP (2004)
Recollective qualities modulate hippocampal activation during
autobiographical memory retrieval. Hippocampus 14(6):752–762.
doi:10.1002/hipo.10215
Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph
theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev
Neurosci 10(3):186–198. doi:10.1038/nrn2575
Cabeza R, Nyberg L (2000) Imaging cognition II: an empirical review
of 275 PET and fMRI studies. J Cogn Neurosci 12(1):1–47.
doi:10.1162/08989290051137585
Cabeza R, St Jacques P (2007) Functional neuroimaging of autobio-
graphical memory. Trends Cogn Sci 11(5):219–227. doi:10.
1016/j.tics.2007.02.005
Cabeza R, Prince SE, Daselaar SM, Greenberg DL, Budde M, Dolcos
F, LaBar KS, Rubin DC (2004) Brain activity during episodic
retrieval of autobiographical and laboratory events: an fMRI
study using a novel photo paradigm. J Cogn Neurosci
16(9):1583–1594. doi:10.1162/0898929042568578
Carter CS, Botvinick MM, Cohen JD (1999) The contribution of the
anterior cingulate cortex to executive processes in cognition. Rev
Neurosci 10(1):49–57
Carter CS, Macdonald AM, Botvinick M, Ross LL, Stenger VA, Noll
D, Cohen JD (2000) Parsing executive processes: strategic vs.
evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 97(4):1944–1948. doi:10.1073/panas.97/4/1944
Cavanna AE, Trimble MR (2006) The precuneus: a review of its
functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129(Pt
3):564–583. doi:10.1093/brain/awl004
Conway MA (2005) Memory and the self. J Mem Lang
53(4):594–628. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005
Conway MA, Pleydell-Pearce CW (2000) The construction of
autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychol
Rev 107(2):261–288. doi:10.1037//0033-295X
Conway MA, Pleydell-Pearce CW, Whitecross SE (2001) The
neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: a slow cortical
Cogn Process
123
potential study of autobiographical memory retrieval. J Mem
Lang 45:493–524. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2781
Conway MA, Pleydell-Pearce CW, Whitecross SE, Sharpe H (2003)
Neurophysiological correlates of memory for experienced and
imagined events. Neuropsychologia 41(3):334–340. doi:10.
1016/S0028393202001653
Corsi-Cabrera M, Guevara MA, Del Rio-Portilla Y, Arce C,
Villanueva-Hernandez Y (2000) EEG bands during wakefulness,
slow-wave and paradoxical sleep as a result of principal
component analysis in man. Sleep 23(6):738–744
Daselaar SM, Rice HJ, Greenberg DL, Cabeza R, LaBar KS, Rubin DC
(2008) The spatiotemporal dynamics of autobiographical mem-
ory: neural correlates of recall, emotional intensity, and reliving.
Cereb Cortex 18(1):217–229. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm048
Denkova E, Botzung A, Scheiber C, Manning L (2006) Implicit emotion
during recollection of past events: a nonverbal fMRI study. Brain
Res 1078(1):143–150. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.061
Devinsky O, Morrell MJ, Vogt BA (1995) Contributions of anterior
cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 118(Pt 1):279–306
Duncan J, Owen AM (2000) Common regions of the human frontal
lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci
23(10):475–483. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01633-7
Duzel E, Penny WD, Burgess N (2010) Brain oscillations and
memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20(2):143–149. doi:10.1016/j.
conb.2010.01.004
Farina B, Speranza AM, Dittoni S, Gnoni V, Trentini C, Vergano CM,
Liotti G, Brunetti R, Testani E, Marca GD (2013) Memories of
attachment hamper EEG cortical connectivity in dissociative
patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. doi:10.1007/
s00406-013-0461-9
Fell J, Fernandez G, Klaver P, Axmacher N, Mormann F, Haupt S,
Elger CE (2006) Rhinal-hippocampal coupling during declara-
tive memory formation: dependence on item characteristics.
Neurosci Lett 407(1):37–41. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.074
Fink GR, Markowitsch HJ, Reinkemeier M, Bruckbauer T, Kessler J,
Heiss WD (1996) Cerebral representation of one’s own past:
neural networks involved in autobiographical memory. J Neuro-
sci 16(13):4275–4282
Fletcher PC, Henson RN (2001) Frontal lobes and human memory:
insights from functional neuroimaging. Brain 124(Pt
5):849–881. doi:10.1093/brain/124.5.849
Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Dolan RJ, Lammertsma AA,
Frackowiak RS (1990) The relationship between global and local
changes in PET scans. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
10(4):458–466. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1990.88
Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RS (1991) Comparing
functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 11(4):690–699. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.
1991.122
Gardini S, Cornoldi C, De Beni R, Venneri A (2006) Left
mediotemporal structures mediate the retrieval of episodic
autobiographical mental images. Neuroimage 30(2):645–655.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.012
Grave de Peralta Menendez R, Gonzalez Andino SL, Morand S,
Michel CM, Landis T (2000) Imaging the electrical activity of
the brain: ELECTRA. Hum Brain Mapp 9(1):1–12
Grave de Peralta-Menendez R, Gonzalez-Andino SL (1998) A critical
analysis of linear inverse solutions to the neuroelectromagnetic
inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45(4):440–448.
doi:10.1109/10.664200
Harmony T, Fernandez T, Silva J, Bernal J, Diaz-Comas L, Reyes A,
Marosi E, Rodriguez M (1996) EEG delta activity: an indicator
of attention to internal processing during performance of mental
tasks. Int J Psychophysiol 24(1–2):161–171
Hipp JF, Siegel M (2013) Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity
from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG. Front Hum
Neurosci 7:338. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00338
Holland AC, Addis DR, Kensinger EA (2011) The neural correlates
of specific versus general autobiographical memory construction
and elaboration. Neuropsychologia 49(12):3164–3177. doi:10.
1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.015
Imperatori C, Farina B, Brunetti R, Gnoni V, Testani E, Quintiliani
MI, Del Gatto C, Indraccolo A, Contardi A, Speranza AM, Della
Marca G (2013) Modifications of EEG power spectra in mesial
temporal lobe during n-back tasks of increasing difficulty. A
sLORETA study. Front Hum Neurosci 7:109. doi:10.3389/
fnhum.2013.00109
Jutras MJ, Buffalo EA (2010) Synchronous neural activity and
memory formation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20(2):150–155. doi:10.
1016/j.conb.2010.02.006
Kreiter AK, Singer W (1992) Oscillatory neuronal responses in the
visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey. Eur J Neurosci
4(4):369–375
Lega BC, Jacobs J, Kahana M (2012) Human hippocampal theta
oscillations and the formation of episodic memories. Hippocam-
pus 22(4):748–761. doi:10.1002/hipo.20937
Levine B, Turner GR, Tisserand D, Hevenor SJ, Graham SJ,
McIntosh AR (2004) The functional neuroanatomy of episodic
and semantic autobiographical remembering: a prospective
functional MRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 16(9):1633–1646.
doi:10.1162/0898929042568587
MacDonald AW 3rd, Cohen JD, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2000)
Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior
cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288(5472):
1835–1838. doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1835
Macrae CN, Moran JM, Heatherton TF, Banfield JF, Kelley WM
(2004) Medial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self.
Cereb Cortex 14(6):647–654. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh025
Maddock RJ, Garrett AS, Buonocore MH (2001) Remembering
familiar people: the posterior cingulate cortex and autobiograph-
ical memory retrieval. Neuroscience 104(3):667–676. doi:10.
1016/S0306-4522(01)00108-7
Maguire EA (2001) Neuroimaging studies of autobiographical event
memory. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356(1413):
1441–1451. doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0944
Markowitsch HJ, Thiel A, Reinkemeier M, Kessler J, Koyuncu A,
Heiss WD (2000) Right amygdalar and temporofrontal activation
during autobiographic, but not during fictitious memory
retrieval. Behav Neurol 12(4):181–190
Markowitsch HJ, Vandekerckhove MM, Lanfermann H, Russ MO
(2003) Engagement of lateral and medial prefrontal areas in the
ecphory of sad and happy autobiographical memories. Cortex
39(4–5):643–665. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70858-X
Moradi AR, Herlihy J, Yasseri G, Shahraray M, Turner S, Dalgleish T
(2008) Specificity of episodic and semantic aspects of autobio-
graphical memory in relation to symptoms of posttraumatic
stress disorder (PTSD). Acta Psychol (Amst) 127(3):645–653.
doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.11.001
Murphy TH, Blatter LA, Wier WG, Baraban JM (1992) Spontaneous
synchronous synaptic calcium transients in cultured cortical
neurons. J Neurosci 12(12):4834–4845
Nichols TE, Holmes AP (2002) Nonparametric permutation tests for
functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain
Mapp 15(1):1–25. doi:10.1002/hbm.1058
Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, Mari Z, Vorbach S, Hallett M (2004)
Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the
imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol 115(10):
2292–2307. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029
Cogn Process
123
Pascual-Marqui RD (2007a) Coherence and phase synchronization:
generalization to pairs of multivariate time series, and removal
of zero-lag contributions. arXiv:07061776v3 [statME] 12 July
2007 (http://www.arxivorg/pdf/07061776)
Pascual-Marqui RD (2007b) Instantaneous and lagged measurements
of linear and nonlinear dependence between groups of multivariate
time series: frequency decomposition. arXiv:07111455 [statME],
2007-November-09, http://www.arxivorg/abs/07111455
Pascual-Marqui RD, Biscay-Lirio R (1993) Spatial resolution of
neuronal generators based on EEG and MEG measurements. Int
J Neurosci 68(1–2):93–105
Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D (1994) Low resolution
electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing
electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol
18(1):49–65. doi:10.1016/0167-8760(84)90014-X
Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D (1995) Segmentation of
brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and
validation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42(7):658–665. doi:10.
1109/10.391164
Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D, Koukkou M, Kochi K, Anderer P,
Saletu B, Tanaka H, Hirata K, John ER, Prichep L, Biscay-Lirio
R, Kinoshita T (2011) Assessing interactions in the brain with
exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography. Philos Trans
A Math Phys Eng Sci 369(1952):3768–3784. doi:10.1098/rsta.
2011.0081
Piefke M, Weiss PH, Zilles K, Markowitsch HJ, Fink GR (2003)
Differential remoteness and emotional tone modulate the neural
correlates of autobiographical memory. Brain 126(Pt
3):650–668. doi:10.1093/brain/awg064
Roberts BM, Hsieh LT, Ranganath C (2013) Oscillatory activity
during maintenance of spatial and temporal information in
working memory. Neuropsychologia 51(2):349–357. doi:10.
1016/j.neuropsychologia
Rubin DC (2006) The basic-systems model of episodic memory.
Perspect Psychol Sci 1(4):277–311. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.
2006.00017X
Rugg MD, Vilberg KL (2013) Brain networks underlying episodic
memory retrieval. Curr Opin Neurobiol 23(2):255–260. doi:10.
1016/j.conb.2012.11.005
Sagar HJ, Cohen NJ, Corkin S, Growdon JH (1985) Dissociations
among processes in remote memory. Ann N Y Acad Sci
444:533–535
Sirota A, Csicsvari J, Buhl D, Buzsaki G (2003) Communication
between neocortex and hippocampus during sleep in rodents.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(4):2065–2069. doi:10.1073/pnas.
0437938100
Steinvorth S, Wang C, Ulbert I, Schomer D, Halgren E (2010) Human
entorhinal gamma and theta oscillations selective for remote
autobiographical memory. Hippocampus 20(1):166–173. doi:10.
1002/hipo.20597
Svoboda E, McKinnon MC, Levine B (2006) The functional
neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: a meta-analysis.
Neuropsychologia 44(12):2189–2208. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsy
chologia.2006.05.023
Toth B, Boha R, Posfai M, Gaal ZA, Konya A, Stam CJ, Molnar M
(2012) EEG synchronization characteristics of functional con-
nectivity and complex network properties of memory mainte-
nance in the delta and theta frequency bands. Int J Psychophysiol
83(3):399–402. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.017
Tulving E (1985) Memory and consciousness. Can Psychol
26(1):1–12
Tulving E (1987) Multiple memory systems and consciousness. Hum
Neurobiol 6(2):67–80
Van Vreeswijk MF, De Wilde EJ (2004) Autobiographical memory
specificity, psychopathology, depressed mood and the use of the
autobiographical memory test: a meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther
42(6):731–743. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00194-3
Vandekerckhove MM, Markowitsch HJ, Mertens M, Woermann FG
(2005) Bi-hemispheric engagement in the retrieval of autobio-
graphical episodes. Behav Neurol 16(4):203–210
Williams JM, Broadbent K (1986) Autobiographical memory in
suicide attempters. J Abnorm Psychol 95(2):144–149
Williams JM, Barnhofer T, Crane C, Herman D, Raes F, Watkins E,
Dalgleish T (2007) Autobiographical memory specificity and
emotional disorder. Psychol Bull 133(1):122–148. doi:10.1037/
0033-2909.133.1.122
Zijlmans M, Huiskamp GM, van Huffelen AC, Spetgens WP, Leijten
FS (2008) Detection of temporal lobe spikes: comparing
nasopharyngeal, cheek and anterior temporal electrodes to
simultaneous subdural recordings. Clin Neurophysiol
119(8):1771–1777. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.04.011
Cogn Process
123