Upload
ihu-gr
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Abstract The phytoplankton species composi-
tion and seasonal succession were examined in
Lake Kastoria during the period November 1998–
October 1999. A total of 67 species and 19 func-
tional groups were identified. Only 4 out of the 67
species, all Cyanobacteria, were dominant (Lim-
nothrix redekei, Microcystis aeruginosa, Cylindro-
spermopsis raciborskii and Aphanizomenon
gracile). Diatoms were rare, not only in terms of
species number, but also in terms of biomass
(contributing < 5% to the total phytoplankton
biomass) in relation to the rather low silicon con-
centrations throughout the year. The functional
groups S1, SN, M and H1 were found dominant in
the lake. The species A. gracile (functional group
H1) behaved like the species Cylindrospermopsis
raciborskii(functional group SN) which is tolerant
to mixing and poor light conditions. The phyto-
plankton seasonal succession showed similar pat-
terns in all six sampling stations, both at the surface
and the bottom water layer, with minor differences
during Microcystis aeruginosa dominance. Two
steady-state phases were identified within a year
lasting for 4 months under relatively stable physi-
cal conditions. In these steady-states, the Limno-
thrix redekei persistent dominance under low light
availability and low inorganic nitrogen has been
explained by its specific ability such as buoyancy
regulation to exploit resources in the water col-
umn. Moreover, high population densities over the
winter and before the development of daphnids
may contribute to the steady-state dominance of
Limnothrix. Different niches separated vertically
in the water column is one of the explanations for
the Limnothrix–Microcystis steady-state when a
replacement between the two species was observed
in different water layers and areas of the lake. Long
lasting steady-states of Cyanobacteria observed in
Lake Kastoria and in other Mediterranean and
tropical freshwaters may indicate influence of warm
climate properties on phytoplankton dynamics.
Handling editor: K. Martens
Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementarymaterial is available to authorized users in the onlineversion of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0360-4
M. Moustaka-Gouni (&)Department of Botany, School of Biology, AristotleUniversity of Thessaloniki, GR-541 24 Thessaloniki,Greecee-mail: [email protected]
Present Address:E. VardakaDepartment of Fisheries and AquacultureTechnology, Alexander Technological EducationalInstitute of Thessaloniki, Campus of Nea Moudania,P.O. Box 157, GR-632 00 Nea Moudania, Greece
Present Address:E. TryfonAdministration of Environmental Planning, HellenicMinistry for the Environment, Physical Planning andPublic Works, GR-112 51 Athens, Greece
Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140
DOI 10.1007/s10750-006-0360-4
123
PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPER
Phytoplankton species succession in a shallowMediterranean lake (L. Kastoria, Greece): steady-statedominance of Limnothrix redekei, Microcystis aeruginosaand Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii
Maria Moustaka-Gouni Æ Elisabeth Vardaka ÆEleni Tryfon
Received: 29 March 2006 / Revised: 4 July 2006 / Accepted: 8 July 2006 / Published online: 25 September 2006� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006
Keywords Phytoplankton succession ÆFunctional groups Æ Cyanobacteria
steady-states Æ Polymictic Mediterranean lake
Introduction
Phytoplankton dynamics has been the subject of
many studies in freshwaters but only in a few
cases it is examined in relation to equilibrium/
non-equilibrium theories (e.g. Salmaso, 2003).
For identification of equilibrium states in phyto-
plankton seasonal succession, Sommer et al.
(1993) set three criteria: (i) a maximum of three
species of algae contribute more than 80% of total
biomass, (ii) their dominance persists for more than
1–2 weeks and (iii) during that period the total
biomass does not increase significantly. Recent
studies dealing with ‘‘equilibrial’’ species and
assemblages clarify our understanding of steady-
states in phytoplankton succession in a wide spec-
trum of freshwaters, mostly from mid-latitudes
(Naselli-Flores et al., 2003). Different types of
phytoplankton steady-states have been explained
as the result not necessarily of competition but due
to several other processes (e.g. grazing, species
specific abilities; Albay & Akcaalan, 2003; Rojo &
Alvarez-Cobelas, 2003).
Steady-state phases are rarely attained in phy-
toplankton succession. However they have been
observed more regularly in shallow hypertrophic
lakes where Cyanobacteria are primarily the pro-
tagonists (Mischke & Nixdorf, 2003; Nixdorf et al.,
2003). A Limnothrix redekei steady-state assem-
blage has been reported so far only in one case
(Rojo & Alvarez Cobelas, 2003). L. redekei, a
typical phytoplankter in turbid mixed layers
(Reynolds et al., 2002) of lakes and lowland rivers
of central and northern Europe (Meffert, 1989), is
not common in southern Europe (Gkelis et al.,
2005). In contrast, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii
is a low-latitude species known for its invasive
behavior in mid-latitudes (Padisak, 1997). C. rac-
iborskii, Aphanizomenon gracile and Microcystis
aeruginosa have been found dominant in summer
steady-state assemblages of hypertrophic shallow
wetlands in southern Europe (Stoyneva, 2003).
In this work, we examine the seasonal succes-
sion of phytoplankton during an annual study in
Lake Kastoria, a highly eutrophic shallow lake.
The phytoplankton species are classified accord-
ing to functional groups proposed by Reynolds
et al. (2002) and Padisak et al. (2003). When
examining succession, we try to identify steady-
state phases and to understand the environmental
factors that promote, maintain and disturb the
dominant species in these phases. This investiga-
tion on a relatively large shallow lake in the
Mediterranean region will contribute to the lim-
ited knowledge of the compositional diversity of
dominants in steady-state phases of shallow lakes,
the frequency and longevity of the phases. More-
over, the study of Cyanobacteria steady-states
may have application in the much needed mea-
sures to restore water quality in eutrophic lakes.
Study site
Lake Kastoria (Fig. 1) is situated at latitude
40�30¢ N, and longitude 21�18¢ E in Northern
Greece. It covers 24 km2, has a maximum depth
of 8 m, an average depth of 4 m and a water
retention time greater than 2 years. The lake’s
outflow discharge is man controlled through
manipulation of the water level when it reaches
its maximum. A substantial water inflow increase
during January–March 1999 caused the lake to
overflow and the local authorities discharged
NN
S6
S5
S4
S3
S2
S1
40° 30' N
21° 18' E
1 km1 km
3 m5 m7 m
Fig. 1 Map of Lake Kastoria showing the six samplingstations (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6) and the depth contours (3 m,5 m, 7 m) in the lake. Insert, map of Greece (solid squareindicates the position of Lake Kastoria)
130 Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140
123
large amounts of water in the spring of that year
in order to control the water level.
Human impact on the lake and its catchment
was diverse. Hydraulic adjustments, fish stock
management with the introduction of cyprinoids
and macrophyte cutting are just some among
them. Moreover, Kastoria is an urban lake that
had been receiving sewage effluents for decades
until 1995. Former studies of Lake Kastoria have
been made that show among other things high
concentrations of inorganic nitrogen and phos-
phorus (Moustaka-Gouni et al., 2006). Never-
theless, there are periods when inorganic nitrogen
and phosphorus fall below the threshold values
used to detect N and P limitation (Reynolds et al.,
2002). Dissolved silicon never exceeded
15 lmol l–1 in the lake water (Table 1). The peak
values of planktic Cyanobacteria biomass indicate
a highly eutrophic system (Vardaka et al., 2000)
that has a history of toxic cyanobacterial blooms
(Lanaras et al., 1989; Cook et al., 2004). Possible
effects of toxic cyanobacterial blooms on hetero-
trophic nanoplankton, both positive and negative,
and a weak structure of microbial food web in the
lake, have recently been reported (Moustaka-
Gouni et al., 2006).
Methods
Sampling was carried out from November 1998 to
October 1999 fortnightly during the warm period
of the year and monthly during the cold period.
Ice cover on the lake, thin in some periods, pro-
hibited sampling in December 1998. Water sam-
ples were collected from six stations in the deeper
area of the lake’s basin (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6;
Fig. 1). The samples were collected from the
surface (0–1 m) and the bottom layer (one meter
above sediment varying from 4 m to 7 m at the
maximum depth).
The methods used for in situ measurements,
chemical analyses of nutrients and microscopical
analysis of phytoplankton have been described by
Moustaka-Gouni et al. (2006). Phytoplankton
counts (cells, filaments, colonies) were performed
using the inverted microscope method. To convert
colony counts of Microcystis aeruginosa to cell
numbers, the average number of cells of 30 colonies
was determined using the equation of Reynolds &
Jaworski (1978). Cell and filament volumes were
estimated from appropriate geometric formulae
after measuring the dimensions of 30 cells/fila-
ments.
The mixing zone (zmix) was identified using
temperature profiles and the euphotic zone (zeu)
calculated as 2.0 times the Secchi depth. An index
of light availability (LI) was calculated according
to Makulla & Sommer (1993):
LI ¼ 2ðSD=zmixÞ � ðD=24Þ
where LI is the light index, SD is Secchi depth
(m), zmix is mixing depth and D is daylength (h).
Phytoplankton functional groups were estab-
lished according to Reynolds et al. (2002) and
Padisak et al. (2003). Species were considered
dominant if they contributed more than 10% to the
total phytoplankton biomass in each individual
sampling date. Steady-state phases (SSI, SSII) were
identified when (i) 1, 2 or 3 phytoplankton species
contributed more than 80% to total biomass, (ii)
their existence or co-existence occurred for more
than 3 weeks and (iii) during that period the species
Table 1 Nutrient concentrations (min, max) during the whole study (November 1998–October 1999) and selected periodsof the year in Lake Kastoria (‘u.d.l.’ denotes ‘under detection limit’)
Nutrient concentration (lmol l–1) Nov 27–Oct 10 Jan 19–Mar 23 Jun 14–Aug 11 Aug 31–Oct 10
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
PO4-P u.d.l. 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.6 0. 6 1.0Total P 1.7 17.7 1.7 2.0 3.9 16.3 3.9 5.8NO3-N 0.4 6.4 1.5 2.5 0.4 1.2 0. 7 1.2NO2-N u.d.l. 0.4 0.1 0.2 u.d.l. 0.2 u.d.l. 0.3NH4-N u.d.l. 8.8 0.4 1.4 u.d.l. 3.2 1.0 5.3Dissolved inorganic nitrogen 0.7 11.9 2.0 3.8 0.7 3.9 2.0 6.6SiO2-Si 9.2 14.7 10.4 11.4 9.7 13.4 9.2 14.7
Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140 131
123
composition of the community was almost
unchanged and the total phytoplankton biomass
differed non-significantly (ANOVA, P > 0.05)
between sampling dates or less than 20% from that
of the previous sampling date value.
A one way ANOVA test was used to compare
the means of phytoplankton biomass among
sampling dates. A Pearson correlation analysis
was used to determine relationships between
biological variables. The relationship between the
biomass of dominant species and temperature was
analyzed using non-linear regression analysis.
Principal Component Analysis (PCA; Legendre
& Legendre, 1998) was used to examine the
relationship between physical and chemical
properties of the water and the relative domi-
nance of phytoplankton dominant species during
the period of their coexistence. In PCA analysis
and when necessary, log transformation of values
were made to achieve normality.
Results
Phytoplankton species composition
and biomass
A total of 67 phytoplankton species have been
identified (Table 2) in the water samples exam-
ined throughout the year. Chlorophytes contrib-
uted the highest number of species (29) followed
by Cyanobacteria (20), diatoms (5), dinophytes
(4), cryptophytes (3), euglenophytes (2), xantho-
phytes (2), chrysophytes (1) and prymnesiophytes
(1). The functional group J was the best repre-
sented in number of species followed by M and
H1 (Table 2).
Phytoplankton biomass consisted mainly of
Cyanobacteria (contributing 91.8% to the annual
mean biomass) (Fig. 2). Abrupt seasonal varia-
tions in total phytoplankton biomass with almost
constant contribution by different taxonomic
groups have been observed throughout the year.
Nevertheless, periods with rather constant species
composition and biomass have also been recog-
nized (phases SSI and SSII; Fig. 2).
Only 4 out of the 67 species were dominant
throughout the year. These species, all Cyano-
bacteria, belong to different functional groups of
phytoplankton: Limnothrix redekei to S1,
Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii to SN, Microcystis
aeruginosa to M and Aphanizomenon gracile to
H1. The species Aphanizomenon issatschenkoi
(H1), Ceratium hirundinella (LM), Cryptomonas
sp. (Y), Peridinium sp. (LO), Monoraphidium
griffithii (X1), Phacotus lenticularis (YPh) and
Nitzschia acicularis (D) contributed < 10% to the
total phytoplankton biomass. The nanoflagellates
Rhodomonas minuta (X2) and Chrysochromulina
parva (X2), although abundant, contributed < 5%
to the total phytoplankton biomass.
The four dominant species made up 91% of
mean total phytoplankton biomass influencing
significantly the temporal distribution of the total
phytoplankton biomass (r = 0.989, P < 0.001).
Limnothrix redekei persisted throughout the year
showing the highest biomass during the cold
period of the year (Fig. 3a). Cylindrospermopsis
raciborskii and Aphanizomenon gracile devel-
oped during the summer when the temperature
exceeded 20�C (Fig. 3b, c). Microcystis aerugin-
osa population increased from late summer to
autumn in the range of 17–27�C (Fig. 3d).
PCA was used to examine how dominant spe-
cies are grouped in relation to physical and
chemical parameters during the summer–autumn
period (Fig. 4) when all dominant species coex-
isted. The first two axes with the largest eigen-
values explain 37.7 and 29.5% of the total
variance in the data, respectively. Cylindro-
spermopsis highest dominance (>40%) is differ-
entiated along axis I by lower nitrate and
ammonia nitrogen concentrations, lower zmix:zeu
and N:LI ratios. Along axis II, Cylindrosperm-
opsis and Aphanizomenon dominance together
with Limnothrix is differentiated by higher tem-
peratures while Microcystis co-dominance with
Limnothrix is differentiated by higher phosphate
phosphorus concentrations, and higher zmix:zeu
and N:LI ratios.
Phytoplankton seasonal succession
Similar patterns of phytoplankton succession have
been observed in all six sampling stations both at
the surface and the bottom layers (Fig. 5). How-
ever, the spatial similarity in phytoplankton
dominance declined during August–October
132 Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140
123
Table 2 List of taxa and functional groups identified in Lake Kastoria during November 1998–October 1999
Taxa Functional group
CyanobacteriaAphanocapsa elachista W. et G. S. West KAphanothece sp. KChroococcus limneticus Lemm.Merismopedia tenuissima Lemm.Microcystis aeruginosa (Kutz.) Kutz. MM. flos-aquae (Wittr.) Kirchn. MM. ichthyoblabe Kutz. MM. novacekii (Kom.) Comp. MM. wesenbergii (Kom.) Kom. In Kondr. MPannus spumosus HickelSnowella lacustris (Chod.) Kom. et Hind. LO
Synechococcus sp. ZWoronichinia naegeliana (Unger) Elenk. LO
Limnothrix redekei (Van Goor) Meffert S1Anabaena cf. aphanizomenoides Forti H1A. flos-aquae Breb ex Born et Flah. H1A. viguieri Denis et Fremy H1Aphanizomenon gracile (Lemm.) Lemm. (H1) SN
A. issatschenkoi (Usac) Prosk. – Lavr. H1Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Wolosz.) Seen. et Sub. Raju SN
ChlorophyceaeChlamydomonas sp.Phacotus lenticularis (Ehrenb.) SteinAnkistrodesmus sp.Botryococcus braunii Kutz. FCoelastrum microporum Nag. JC. astroideum De – Not. JDictyosphaerium pulchellum WoodLagerheimia sp.Monoraphidium cf. nanum (Ettl.) Hind. X1M. arcuatum (Kors.) Hind. X1M. griffithii (Berk.) Kom. – Legn. X1Nephrochlamys cf. willeana (Printz.) Kors.Oocystis sp. FPediastrum boryanum (Turp.) Menegh. JP. duplex Meyen JP. simplex Meyen JP. tetras (Ehrenb.) Ralfs JPseudodidymocystis fina (Kom.) Hege et DeasonScenedesmus acuminatus (Lagerh.) Chod. JScenedesmus sp. JSelenastrum sp.Tetraedron cf. triangulare Kors.T. caudatum (Corda) Hansg.T. minimum (A. Br.) Hansg.Tetrastrum staurogeniaeforme (Schrod.) Lemm.Elakatothrix genevensis (Reverd.) Hind.Closterium acutum Breb. PStaurastrum cf. chaetoceras (Schrod.) G. M. Smith PStaurastrum sp. P
EuglenophyceaeEuglena sp. W1Trachelomonas volvocinopsis Swir. W2
BacillariophyceaeCyclotella sp. C
Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140 133
123
when Microcystis aeruginosa contributed >50% of
the total phytoplankton biomass in the sampling
stations S2 and S6. Two different types can be
recognized in the course of phytoplankton suc-
cession: (a) the mono-dominance of Limnothrix
redekei and (b) the co-dominance of (i) L. redekei–
Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii-Aphanizomenon
gracile and (ii) Limnothrix redekei–Microcystis
aeruginosa–Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii.
The mono-dominance of Limnothrix was
observed during both the high and low phyto-
plankton biomass periods (January–March and
May–June, respectively). The first period is
identified as a steady-state phase of phytoplank-
ton (SSI; Fig. 5). This species contributing >80%
to the total phytoplankton biomass persisted for
2 months, when composition and total biomass of
phytoplankton did not change considerably (see
Fig. 2). This steady-state phase was observed
almost identically in different areas and layers of
the lake (Fig. 5). The period of the steady-state
phase is characterized by low water temperature
(between 3.9 and 8.2�C) and low light availability
(LI ranged from 0.07 to 0.15) throughout the
isothermally mixed column (see Electronic Sup-
plementary Material). Nitrate and ammonia
nitrogen remained low ( < 2.5 lmol l–1and < 1.4
lmol –1, respectively) and phosphate phosphorus
ranged between 0.2 lmol l–1 and 0.4 lmol l–1,
(Table 1).
Over summer, three species of phytoplankton,
Limnothrix redekei, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii
and Aphanizomenon gracile persisted for 2 months
but, since total phytoplankton biomass changed
considerably (see Fig. 2), no steady-state stage can
be recognized. This period is characterized by
Table 2 continued
Taxa Functional group
Aulacoseira granulata (Ehrenb.) Ralfs DStephanodiscus hantzschii Grun. DNitzschia acicularis W. Smith DSynedra sp. D
CryptophyceaeCryptomonas curvata Ehrenb. YCryptomonas sp. YRhodomonas minuta Skuja X2
DinophyceaeCeratium hirundinella (O. F. Muller) Schrank LM
Gymnodinium sp.Peridiniopsis elpatiewskyi (Ostenf.) Bourr. LO
Peridinium sp. LO
PrymnesiophyceaeChrysochromulina parva Lackey X2
XanthophyceaeGoniochloris sp.Pseudostaurastrum sp.
ChrysophyceaeMallomonas sp. E
Month
N D J F M A M I I A S O
Bio
mas
s (m
g l-1
)
0
1
10
20
30 CyanophytesChlorophytesDiatomsCryptophytesDinophytesPrymnesiophytes
SSI SSII
1998 1999
Fig. 2 Variations of the phytoplankton taxonomic groupsbiomass in Lake Kastoria during November 1998–October1999. Values are means and refer to the surface andbottom layers from all six stations. Periods of steady-statesare indicated as SSI and SSII
134 Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140
123
intermittent thermal stratification (see Electronic
Supplementary Material) and high light availability
(LI up to 1.2; see Electronic Supplementary Mate-
rial). Low N:P (min. 1.4) and N:LI (min. 8.1) re-
source ratios (see Electronic Supplementary
Material) prevailed during the period of Cylindro-
spermopsis raciborskii and Aphanizomenon gracile
dominance.
A second steady-state phase (SSII; Fig. 5)
identified during the period August–October. The
species Microcystis aeruginosa and Limnothrix
redekei constituting 82% of phytoplankton bio-
mass persisted for 3 weeks. For the next 3 weeks,
Microcystis aeruginosa and Limnothrix redekei
still co-dominated and with the minor contribution
of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii made up >80%
of phytoplankton biomass. During the whole per-
iod (August–October), the species composition
was almost unchanged and the total phytoplank-
ton biomass did not change significantly (ANO-
VA, p > 0.05). This phase was different in regard
to the order of dominance (1st Microcystis, 2nd
Lim
noth
rix
rede
kei (
mg
l-1)
0
10
20
30
Temperature (°C)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Mic
rocy
stis
aer
ugin
osa
(mg
l-1)
0
5
10
15
Cyl
indr
ospe
rmop
sis
raci
bors
kii (
mg
l-1)
0
5
10
15
Temperature (°C)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Aph
anis
omen
on g
raci
le (
mg
l-1)
0
4
8
12
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Y = 39.93 e-0.101X, r2 = 0.608, p < 0.001 Y = 0.02 e0.217X, r2 = 0.361, p < 0.001
Y = 3.6 x 10-6 e0.505X, r2 = 0.395, p < 0.001
Fig. 3 Phytoplankton dominant species biomass in rela-tion to water temperature in Lake Kastoria duringNovember 1998–October 1999. (a) Limnothrix redekei,
(b) Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, (c) Aphanizomenongracile, (d) Microcystis aeruginosa
Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140 135
123
Limnothrix or replaced alternatively) in the dif-
ferent water layers and areas of the lake (Fig. 5).
The period is characterized by low light
availability (LI < 0.1) in warm mixed layers (see
Electronic Supplementary Material) and high
concentrations of phosphate phosphorus (0.6 to
1.0 lmol l–1), (Table 1).
Discussion
Phytoplankton flora of Lake Kastoria is poor in
comparison to the rather rich flora of shallow
eutrophic lakes of similar size in the area (Tryfon
& Moustaka-Gouni, 1997; Temponeras et al.,
2000). The low number of species may reflect the
long lasting period of multiple human impacts on
the lake (sewage effluents, hydrological adjust-
ments, fish stock management) resulting in a
strong environmental filter for phytoplankters.
Loss of biodiversity and increase of algal blooms
are the most evident negative ecological impacts
of human activities on the microbial level in
aquatic systems (Paerl et al., 2003). In addition,
the low number of diatoms in the phytoplankton
species list of this shallow lake, in relation with
the rather low silicon concentrations throughout
the year (Table 1), may indicate that past com-
petition has at least partially shaped the phyto-
plankton species pool of the lake (see Sommer,
1990). Of the 33 functional groups described by
Reynolds et al. (2002) and Padisak et al. (2003),
19 were represented in the lake’s phytoplankton.
Diatoms were rare, not only in terms of species
number, but also in terms of biomass (max.
1.2 mg l–1, contributing < 5% to the total phyto-
plankton biomass) (Fig. 2) even during the win-
ter-spring season, the typical period of diatoms
(Sommer et al., 1986). The low diatom biomass is
related to low Si:P < 62.0 and Si:N < 25.0 re-
source ratios during winter (see Electronic Sup-
plementary Material). Nitzschia acicularis
dominated within the diatoms. However, the
biomass of N. acicularis was only 1.4% of the total
phytoplankton biomass, whereas that of Limno-
thrix redekei was 48 times higher. Both species
grow well under low temperatures and low light
availability in mixed layers. However, dominance
of L. redekei has been found associated with
anthropogenic eutrophic conditions in shallow
lakes (Meffert, 1989), while Nitzschia acicularis
perform better in not enriched and deeper mixed
waters (Huszar et al., 2003).
Limnothrix redekei dominance exhibited very
similar patterns in distinct sampling areas and
water layers affecting considerably the patterns of
phytoplankton succession. The similarity of suc-
cession patterns declined when Microcystis aeru-
ginosa, contributing >50% to the total
phytoplankton biomass, formed surface accumu-
lations. Spatial differences (Fig. 5) may arise
through the interaction of the dominants’ behav-
ior (buoyancy regulation, auto-regulated surface
accumulation) and the pelagic zone physical
dynamics under medium speed local winds
(physically induced accumulation).
Limnothrix redekei made up to 99% of the
phytoplankton biomass in winter (Fig. 5) setting
the diversity close to zero (Shannon index based on
biomass Hb = 0.2; Moustaka-Gouni, unpubl.
Axis I (37.7%)-1 0 1 2
Axi
s II
(29
.5%
)
-1.6
-0.8
0.0
0.8
1.6 TEMP N:P
N:LI
NH4-N
NO3-N
PO4-P
Lr + Cr = 10 - 20%Lr + Cr = >20 - 40% Cr = >40%
Lr + Ma = >20 - 40%Lr + Cr + Ag = >40%Lr + Ma = >40%
zmix:zeu
Fig. 4 Two-dimensional PCA ordination of the watersamples of Lake Kastoria during the period of phyto-plankton dominants Limnothrix redekei (Lr), Cylindro-spermopsis raciborskii (Cr), Aphanizomenon gracile (Ag)and Microcystis aeruginosa (Ma), coexistence. Physicaland chemical parameters are indicated as vectors. Abbre-viations: TEMP = water temperature (�C); NO3-N = ni-trate nitrogen (lmol l–1); NH4-N = ammonium nitrogen(lmol l–1); PO4-P = phosphate phosphorus (lmol l–1);N:P = atomic ratio of inorganic nitrogen to phosphorous;N:LI = ratio of inorganic nitrogen to light index; zmix:-zeu = ratio of mixing zone to euphotic zone
136 Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140
123
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
% c
ontr
ibut
ion
to t
otal
phy
topl
ankt
on b
iom
ass
0
20
40
60
80
0
20
40
60
80
0
20
40
60
80
Month
N D J F M A M J J A S O0
20
40
60
80
Surface layer Bottom layer
L. redekei M. aeruginosaC. raciborskii A. gracile
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
% c
ontr
ibut
ion
to t
otal
phy
topl
ankt
on b
iom
ass
0
20
40
60
80
0
20
40
60
80
0
20
40
60
80
Month
N D J F M A M J J A S O0
20
40
60
80
SSI SSII SSI SSIIS6
S5
S4
S3
S2
S1
S6
S5
S4
S3
S2
S1
1998 1999 1998 1999
Fig. 5 Seasonal succession of phytoplankton species inLake Kastoria during November 1998–October 1999, aspercentage contribution to total phytoplankton biomass.
The shaded areas represent the periods of steady-states(SSI, SSII)
Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140 137
123
data). An extremely low phytoplankton diversity
(zero) has been reported, to the best of our
knowledge, only in one case (Borics et al., 2000).
The main factors that may have promoted and
maintained the persistent steady-state of L. rede-
kei, were relatively stable physical conditions
(mixing at low temperatures) (see Electronic
Supplementary Material) and rather constant (a)
low light conditions (see Electronic Supplemen-
tary Material) and low nutrient concentrations
(Table 1), and (b) low Si:P, Si:N resource ratios
(see Electronic Supplementary Material) for its
possible competitors. Under these conditions, the
specific abilities of species, such as photoadapta-
tion and buoyancy regulation in the water column
(Reynolds et al., 2002), to effectively exploit re-
sources, may have considerably contributed to the
development of this steady-state. Enhanced cell
gas-vacuolation in a large number of L. redekei
trichomes (up to 50% cell volume; Gkelis et al.,
2005), has been observed during the winter.
Moreover, high population densities over the
winter (up to 90 · 106 trichomes l–1), before the
development of daphnids (Moustaka-Gouni et al.,
2006), may be another key factor for establishing
and maintaining overdominance of L. redekei (e.g.
Nicklisch, 1999).
The disruption of the L. redekei steady-state
phase was a consequence of hydraulic flushing of
the lake water (Moustaka-Gouni et al., 2006)
leading to a dramatic drop of total phytoplankton
biomass and a collapse of L. redekei bloom.
Flushing was very effective in breaking the biomass
increase in this sensitive to flushing species (Rey-
nolds et al., 2002). Then, it was not easy for the slow
growing L. redekei population to compensate for
the losses by growth for the next 2 months.
In the summer, intermittent thermal stratifica-
tion maintained a non-steady-state assemblage of
Nostocales and Oscillatoriales, belonging in similar
functional groups (SN and S1). The concentrations
of dissolved inorganic nitrogen declined to very low
values (0.7–3.9 lmol l–1; Table 1). The N:P
resource ratio dropped below the critical ratio of
Redfield, the N:LI ratio reached minimum (8.1; see
Electronic Supplementary Material) and the
nitrogen fixers Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii and
Aphanizomenon gracile dominated (Fig. 5). Their
dominance was shared with the persistent Limno-
thrix redekei whose habitat properties were differ-
ent in the winter–spring period. The decline of L.
redekei under high light availability and dominance
of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii in nitrogen defi-
cient conditions ( < 0.7 lmol l–1) seems to be the
outcome of their competition. An unusual decrease
of water temperature in late June (Fig. 6) and
heavy rainfall probably disrupted C. raciborskii
biomass increase in the next few weeks. It is well
known that C. raciborskii has a high temperature
optimum for growth (20–30�C) (e.g. Briand et al.,
2004) and can tolerate low light availability in warm
mixed layers (Reynolds et al., 2002). In August,
when high water temperature and poor light
conditions prevailed, a new biomass increase of C.
raciborskii and Aphanizomenon gracile was ob-
served (Figs. 5, 6). In Lake Kastoria, the species A.
gracile behaved like the species Cylindrospermop-
sis raciborskii, which is tolerant to mixing and poor
light conditions. Based on these data, we support
the suggestion of Mischke & Nixdorf (2003) to in-
clude Aphanizomenon gracile into the functional
group SN.
During August–October period, the second
steady-state stage of phytoplankton was observed
with Microcystis aeruginosa and Limnothrix redekei
co-dominants, while Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii
had a minor contribution to the total biomass. Over
J J A S O
Cyl
indr
ospe
rmop
sis
raci
bors
kii (
mg
l-1)
0
2
4
6
8
Cha
nge
in t
he w
ater
tem
pera
ture
(°C
)
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Month
Fig. 6 Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii biomass in relationto water temperature change observed during the time oftwo consecutive sampling dates, in Lake Kastoria duringJune–October 1999. Values are means and refer to thesurface and bottom layers from all six stations
138 Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140
123
this period a replacement between the two major
species was observed in different water layers and
areas of the lake (Fig. 5). Microcystis aeruginosa
was not detected as a single dominant under the
prevailing poor light conditions (LI < 0.1; Fig. 5
and see Electronic Supplementary Material). Under
these conditions, the dominance and water bloom
formation of this species can be explained by its
tolerance to high insolation at the surface layer and
its ability to regulate buoyancy (Reynolds et al.,
2002). M. aeruginosa differs from Limnothrix rede-
kei in its ability of diel migration that allows Mi-
crocystis aeruginosa to accumulate at the surface
layer. Thus, M. aeruginosa and Limnothrix redekei
partially did not compete, but may have different
niches separated vertically in the water column
(Fig. 5). The main factors of constancy during this
steady-state phase were mixing, low light availabil-
ity and high phosphorus concentrations.
In conclusion, the functional groups S1 (Lim-
nothrix redekei), M (Microcystis aeruginosa) and
SN (Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, Aphanizom-
enon gracile) which found in steady-state phases in
the highly eutrophic polymictic Lake Kastoria are
in overwhelming dominance worldwide (Naselli-
Flores et al., 2003). However, the dominant spe-
cies Limnothrix redekei in the steady-state phases
in Lake Kastoria has been found, to the best of our
knowledge, as steady-state species only once in
another hypertrophic shallow lake located also in
southern Europe (Rojo & Alvarez-Cobelas,
2003). In Lake Kastoria, two cyanobacteria stea-
dy-states observed within a year and persisted for
almost 4 months under relatively stable physical
conditions. These results are in agreement with a
few studies in tropical (Komarkova & Tavera,
2003) and Mediterranean freshwaters (Naselli-
Flores & Barone, 2003) characterized by long
lasting steady-states of Cyanobacteria and may
indicate relations between climate factors and
phytoplankton dynamics. If the smoother seasonal
changes in irradiance in lower latitudes compared
to those in higher latitudes, in combination with
other properties of warmer climates, are assumed
to result in smoother changes in physical condi-
tions of the lakes, these may allow persistence of
Cyanobacteria steady-states (e.g. Naselli-Florres
et al., 2003). The few results of persistent steady-
states of Cyanobacteria in warmer climates may
have implications for future investigation of cli-
mate impacts on phytoplankton dynamics due to
global warming.
Acknowledgements We thank Judit Padisak and twoanonymous reviewers for constructive comments andhelpful suggestions. This work was partially funded by theMunicipality of Kastoria, Project 7468 of the ResearchCommittee of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Wethank all participating members of this project.
References
Albay, M. & R. Akcaalan, 2003. Factors influencing thephytoplankton steady state assemblages in a drinking-water reservoir (Omerli reservoir, Istanbul). Hydro-biologia 502: 85–95.
Borics, G., I. Grigorszky, S. Szabo & J. Padisak, 2000.Phytoplankton associations in a small hypertrophicfishpond in East Hungary during a change from bot-tom-up to top-down control. Hydrobiologia 424: 79–90.
Briand, J. F., C. Leboulanger, J. F. Humbert, C. Bernard &P. Dufour, 2004. Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Cy-anobacteria) invasion at mid-latitudes: selection, widephysiological tolerance, or global warming? Journal ofPhycology 40: 231–238.
Cook, C. M., E. Vardaka & T. Lanaras, 2004. Toxic cyano-bacteria in Greek freshwaters, 1987–2000: occurrence,toxicity, and impacts in the Mediterranean region. Actahydrochimica et hydrobiologica 32: 107–124.
Gkelis, S., P. Rajaniemi, E. Vardaka, M. Moustaka-Gouni,T. Lanaras & K. Sivonen, 2005. Limnothrix redekei(Van Goor) Meffert (Cyanobacteria) strains fromLake Kastoria, Greece form a separate phylogeneticgroup. Microbial Ecology 49: 176–182.
Huszar, V., C. Kruk & N. Caraco, 2003. Steady-stateassemblages of phytoplankton in four temperate lakes(NE USA). Hydrobiologia 502: 97–109.
Komarkova, J. & R. Tavera, 2003. Steady state of phyto-plankton assemblage in the tropical Lake Catemaco(Mexico). Hydrobiologia 502: 187–196.
Lanaras, T., S. Tsitsamis, C. Chlichlia & C. M. Cook, 1989.Toxic cyanobacteria in Greek freshwaters. Journal ofApplied Phycology 1: 67–73.
Legendre, P. & L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical ecology, 2ndEnglish edn. Developments in Environmental Mod-elling 20, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Makulla, A. & U. Sommer, 1993. Relationships betweenresource rations and phytoplankton species composi-tion during spring in 5 north German lakes. Limnol-ogy and Oceanography 38: 846–856.
Meffert, M. E., 1989. Planktic unsheathed filaments (Cy-anophyceae) with polar and central gas-vacuoles. II.Biology, population dynamics and biotopes of Lim-nothrix redekei (Van Goor) Meffert. Archiv fur Hy-drobiologie 116: 257–282.
Mischke, U. & B. Nixdorf, 2003. Equilibrium phase con-ditions in shallow German lakes: how Cya-
Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140 139
123
noprokaryota species establish a steady state phase inlate summer. Hydrobiologia 502: 123–132.
Moustaka-Gouni, M., E. Vardaka, E. Michaloudi, K. Ar.Kormas, E. Tryfon, H. Mihalatou, S. Gkelis & T.Lanaras, 2006. Plankton food web structure in aeutrophic polymictic lake with a history of toxic cy-anobacterial blooms. Limnology and Oceanography51: 715–727.
Naselli-Flores, L. & R. Barone, 2003. Steady-state assem-blages in a Mediterranean hypertrophic reservoir. Therole of Microcystis ecomorphological variability inmaintaining an apparent equilibrium. Hydrobiologia502: 133–143.
Naselli-Flores, L., J. Padisak, M. T. Dokulil & I. Chorus,2003. Equilibrium/steady-state concept in phyto-plankton ecology. Hydrobiologia 502: 395–403.
Nicklisch, A., 1999. Competition between the cyanobac-terium Limnothrix redekei and some spring species ofdiatoms under P-limitation. International Review ofHydrobiology 84: 233–241.
Nixdorf, B., U. Mischke & J. Rucker, 2003. Phytoplanktonassemblages and steady state in deep and shalloweutrophic lakes – an approach to differentiate thehabitat properties of Oscillatoriales. Hydrobiologia502: 111–121.
Padisak, J., 1997. Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Wol-oszynska) Seenayya et Subba Raju, an expanding,highly adaptive cyanobacterium: worldwide distribu-tion and review of its ecology. Archiv fur Hydrobi-ologie Supplement 107: 563–593.
Padisak, J., G. Borics, G. Feher, I. Grigorszky, I. Oldal, A.Schmidt & Z. Zambone-Doma, 2003. Dominantspecies, functional assemblages and frequency ofequilibrium phases in late summer phytoplanktonassemblages in Hungarian small shallow lakes. Hyd-robiologia 502: 157–168.
Paerl, H. W., J. Dyble, P. H. Moisander, R. T. Noble, M. F.Piehler, J. L. Pinckney, T. F. Steppe, L. Twomey & L.M. Valdes, 2003. Microbial indicators of aquatic eco-system change: current applications to eutrophicationstudies. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 46: 233–246.
Reynolds, C. S. & G. H. M. Jaworski, 1978. Enumerationof natural Microcystis populations. British Phycolog-ical Journal 13: 269–277.
Reynolds, C. S., V. Huszar, C. Kruk, L. Naselli-Flores & S.Melo, 2002. Towards a functional classification of thefreshwater phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Re-search 24: 417–428.
Rojo, C. & M. Alvarez-Cobelas, 2003. Are there steady-state phytoplankton assemblages in the field? Hyd-robiologia 502: 3–12.
Salmaso, N., 2003. Life strategies, dominance patterns andmechanisms promoting species coexistence in phyto-plankton communities along complex environmentalgradients. Hydrobiologia 502: 13–36.
Sommer, U., 1990. Phytoplankton nutrient competition –from laboratory to lake. In Grace, J. B. & D. Tilman(eds), Perspectives on Plant Competition. AcademicPress, San Diego, DC, 193–213.
Sommer, U., Z. M. Gliwicz, W. Lampert & A. Duncan,1986. The PEG-model of seasonal succession ofplanktonic events in fresh waters. Archiv fur Hydro-biologie 106: 433–471.
Sommer, U., J. Padisak, C. S. Reynolds & P. Juhasz-Nagy,1993. Hutchinson’s heritage: the diversity-disturbancerelationship in phytoplankton. Hydrobiologia 249: 1–7.
Stoyneva, M. P., 2003. Steady-state phytoplankton assem-blages in shallow Bulgarian wetlands. Hydrobiologia502: 169–176.
Temponeras, M., J. Kristiansen & M. Moustaka-Gouni,2000. Seasonal variation in phytoplankton composi-tion and physical–chemical features of the shallowLake Doirani, Macedonia, Greece. Hydrobiologia424: 109–122.
Tryfon, E. & M. Moustaka-Gouni, 1997. Species compo-sition and seasonal cycles of phytoplankton withspecial reference to the nanoplankton of Lake MikriPrespa. Hydrobiologia 351: 61–75.
Vardaka, E., M. Moustaka-Gouni & T. Lanaras, 2000.Temporal and spatial distribution of planktic cyano-bacteria in Lake Kastoria, Greece, a shallow, urbanlake. Nordic Journal of Botany 20: 501–511.
140 Hydrobiologia (2007) 575:129–140
123