Upload
birmingham
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Radical Production from Alkene Ozonolysis
William Bloss1, Salim Alam1, Andrew Rickard2
Marie Camredon1, Kevin Wyche3, Timo Carr3, Paul Monks3
Amalia Munoz4, Mila Rodenas4, Monica Vasquez4
1 School of Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham
2 NCAS, School of Chemistry, University of Leeds
3 Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester
4 EUPHORE Laboratories, Fundaçion CEAM, Valencia
Alkenes...
Alkene + O3 OH + HO2 + Semi-Volatile Organics
Atmospheric Oxidants Aerosol Precursors
• Urban environments: Alkenes comprise ca. 15 % of NMHCs
• Account for substantial fraction of chemical reactivity (total OH sink)
Chelmsford, London, 2003
• O3 + alkenes comprise 29% of net OH source
(43% during heatwave)
Midday flux in units of 105 molec cm-3 s-1
TORCH and PUMA
Chelmsford, London, 2003
• O3 + alkenes comprise 29% of net OH source
(43% during heatwave)
Midday flux in units of 105 molec cm-3 s-1
TORCH and PUMA
Current atmospheric models...
• Based upon laboratory measurements of yields for individual alkenes...
Current atmospheric models...
• Based upon laboratory measurements of yields for individual alkenes...
OH
Current atmospheric models...
• Based upon laboratory measurements of yields for individual alkenes...
HO2
Wegener et al., 2007:
Mihelcic et al., 1999: Ethene 0.39 (MIESR)
Qi et al., 2006: Ethene 0.38 (PERCA)
Qi et al., 2009: Propene 0.19
Malkin et al., 2009: Isoprene 0.26 (LIF)
Current atmospheric models...
• Based upon laboratory measurements of yields for individual alkenes...
RO2
Qi et al., 2006: Ethene 0.45 (HO2+RO2)
Qi et al., 2009: Propene 0.19
TRAPOZ...
Total Radical Production from Alkene Ozonolysis
Aims :
• Determination of the total radical yields (OH, HO2, RO2) from the ozonolysis of a
range of alkenes of biogenic, anthropogenic origin
• Measurement and identification of the gas-phase degradation products from the
ozonolysis of selected alkenes, monoterpenes
• Improve representation of alkene ozonolysis in chemical mechanisms (MCM)
Approach
• Large Simulation Chamber Experiments with direct radical observations...
TRAPOZ approach
Chamber experiments
• European Photoreactor (EUPHORE), Valencia
• 2 campaigns ~ 60 experiments
• Instruments include: LIF, PERCA, FT-IR,
CIR-TOF-MS and CO,
HCHO, O3 monitors
Types of Experiment
Alkene + O3 - direct OH / HO2 measurements
Alkene + O3 + CO
Alkene + O3 +
• Alkenes investigated:
- Observation of secondary organics
- HO2 and kO3 measurements
- indirect OH measurements
- RO2 measurements
Experimental conditions:
• Dark, no NOx
• Ambient T & p
• [Alkene] ~ 100 - 500 ppb
• [O3] ~ 100 - 500 ppb
• [CO] or [Cyclohexane] ~ 100’s ppm
• Time: 1 hour – 3 hours+ terpenes
Analysis Approach
• All experiments analysed via models
(secondary processes)
• Model based upon MCM v3.1
with updated ozonolysis scheme
• Use Data to constrain fast CI chemistry
O3 + Ethene rate constant
• Excess CO experiment: scavenge OH radicals
• Optimise k(O3 + C2H4) to fit observed O3, ethene decay profiles
Ethene & Ozone
300.0
350.0
400.0
450.0
500.0
550.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Time [mins]
MR
[p
pb
]
Ethene Model
O3 Model
Ethene FTIR
O3 FTIR
k298k = (1.59 0.30) x 10-18 cm3 molecules-1 s-1 (IUPAC)
k298k = (1.45 0.23) x 10-18 cm3 molecules-1 s-1
OH yield ()
[OH]ss = k1 [O3] [Ethene] + k2 [HO2] [O3]
k3 [Alkene] (+ other losses)
• Absolute [OH]ss too low to measure
in this (ethene) system
• Determine OH yield indirectly, using
scavenger approach ...
α = 0.54β
OH yield: cyclohexane scavenger
• OH + cyclohexane cyclohexanol / cyclohexanone
1) Measure yield of c-hexanone from c-hexane + OH
2) Measure amount of c-hexanone in O3 - Alkene system
3) Obtain cumulative OH production and hence derive OH yield
OH yield: cyclohexane scavenger
• OH + cyclohexane cyclohexanol / cyclohexanone
1) Measure yield of c-hexanone from c-hexane + OH
2) Measure amount of c-hexanone in O3 - Alkene system
3) Obtain cumulative OH production and hence derive OH yield
But: c-hexanone yield depends upon co-reactant conditions, concentrations :
Include these processes and fit to known c-hexane, c-hexanone, c-hexOOH...
.
(7) HO2 k3
(6b) RO2 k2b
(6a) RO2 k2a
(6c) RO2 k2c
OH
(5a) k1
O2
(5b)
(9) O2
(isomerisation)
OH yield determination from c-hex data
• Fit to observed HO2, chexanone, chexOOH :
• Fit determines [OH] present as f(t)
• Model + known [HO2] also accounts for HO2 + O3 OH + O2 (40 % here)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
0 50 100 150 200
Time (min)
Mix
ing
Rati
o C
6H
11O
, C
6H
11O
OH
& [
HO
2]/
10
8
HO2
Cyclohexyl
hydroperoxide
Cyclohexanone
OH and HO2 yields
• OH yield = 0.13 0.06
• HO2 data determine an overall
HO2 yield of 0.26 0.07
α = 0.54β = 0.13
γ = 0.07
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Time (min)
[HO
2]
mo
lecu
le.c
m-3
(x
10
8)
Standard MCMv3.1 HO2 yield of 0.13
Radical yields vs literature (ethene)
• OH yield consistent with literature
• Our results, other recent studies indicate HO2 production is substantially higher
than currently assumed
Yield of OH Reference
0.13 (± 0.06) This study
0.13 MCMv3.1
0.16 IUPAC
0.18 (± 0.06) Paulson et al 1999
0.14 Kroll et al., 2001
0.20 (± 0.02) Mihelcic et al 1999
Yield of HO2
0.26 (± 0.07) This study
0.13 MCMv3.1
0.39 (± 0.03) Mihelcic et al., 1999
0.38 (± 0.02) Qi et el., 2006
0.50 (± 0.25) / 0.40 (± 0.20) Wegener et al., 2007
(dry/wet)
0.E+00
2.E+09
4.E+09
6.E+09
8.E+09
1.E+10
0 30 60 90
[HO
2] /m
ole
c/c
m3
Time /mins
0.E+00
1.E+06
2.E+06
3.E+06
4.E+06
5.E+06
6.E+06
0 30 60 90
[OH
] /m
ole
c/c
m3
Time / mins
HOx yields from other alkenes
[OH]ss = k1 [O3] [Ethene] + k2 [HO2] [O3]
k3 [Alkene] (+ other losses)
[ use full model for analysis, not steady state expression ]
• For most systems, k1 and k3 are such that [OH] can be observed directly
[cyclohexanone approach not used]
• Model still required to account for HO2 + O3, other 2 chemistry
OH 200 ppb trans-2-butene / 100 ppb O3 HO2
Repeat process for a range of alkenes...
• ethene, propene, cis- / trans-2-butene, isobutene, 1-butene, TME :
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
YO
H
IUPAC YOH
Atkinson et al '97 (cyclohexane) Marston et al '99 (TMB) This study (LIF)
This study (cyclohexane) Mihelcic et al '99 (Prod Alk+OH) Qi et al '09 (PERCA)
C2H4
C3H6
C2B
1-But T2B
i-But TME
Repeat process for a range of alkenes...
• ethene, propene, cis- / trans-2-butene, isobutene, 1-butene, TME :
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
YO
H
IUPAC YOH
Atkinson et al '97 (cyclohexane) Marston et al '99 (TMB) This study (LIF)
This study (cyclohexane) Mihelcic et al '99 (Prod Alk+OH) Qi et al '09 (PERCA)
C2H4
C3H6
C2B
1-But T2B
i-But TME
OH yields consistent with literature
Repeat process for a range of alkenes...
• ethene, propene, cis- / trans-2-butene, isobutene, 1-butene, TME, isoprene :
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
HO
2yie
ld
This study (LIF)
Wegener et al '07
MCM Model
Qi et al '06 / '09 (PERCA)
Mihelcic et al '99
Malkin et al '10
Repeat process for a range of alkenes...
• ethene, propene, cis- / trans-2-butene, isobutene, 1-butene, TME, isoprene :
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
HO
2yie
ld
This study (LIF)
Wegener et al '07
MCM Model
Qi et al '06 / '09 (PERCA)
Mihelcic et al '99
Malkin et al '10
HO2 yields higher than MCM...
HO2 vs OH
y = 1.9517x - 0.0504R² = 0.8618
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
HO
2Y
ield
OH Yield
C2H4
C3H6
C2B
1-But
T2B
i-But
TME
C5H8
Atmospheric Implications....
• Compare [HOx] using standard MCMv3.1 and with revised ozonolysis yields.
Mean Nighttime HOx :
• “Small” anthropogenic alkenes only (C2 – C5)
• Model constrained to observations for VOCs, NOx, O3 etc.
Atmospheric Implications....
• Compare [HOx] using standard MCMv3.1 and with revised ozonolysis yields.
Mean Nighttime HOx :
OH HO2 OH HO2
MCMv3.1 4.8104 2.0107 1.2105 4.0107
This Work 6.2104 2.8107 1.30105 5.1107
• Impact upon daytime or diurnal-average HOx is (proportionately) much smaller
Conclusions
• Measured HOx yields for a range of alkenes
• OH yields are consistent with literature
• HO2 yields are larger than MCM currently assumes
• Results in substantially increased night-time HOx, depending upon conditions
Limitations :
• Dependent upon HOx (and other) instrument accuracy...
• Atmospheric implications partially dependent upon mechanism interpretation
• Real atmosphere: H2O, NO, ...
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
HO
2yie
ld
This study (LIF)
Wegener et al '07
MCM Model
Qi et al '06 / '09 (PERCA)
Mihelcic et al '99
Malkin et al '10
Acknowledgements
• Salim Alam, Marie Camredon* Birmingham (*now at LISA, Paris)
• Andrew Rickard Leeds
• Kevin Wyche, Timo Carr, Paul Monks Leicester
• Amalia Munoz, Mila Rodenas, EUPHORE
Monica Vasquez, Paco Alacreu,
Antonio Caraccosa
• NERC
• Camredon et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2893, 2010
• Alam et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., submitted, 2010