Upload
independent
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1
Simple tools for assessing water quality and trophic status intransitional water ecosystems
G. Giordani a,*, J.M. Zaldıvar b, P. Viaroli a
aDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Parma, Via Usberti 11/A, I-43100 Parma, ItalybEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Via E. Fermi 2749, TP 272. I-21027 Ispra
(VA), Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 4 March 2008
Received in revised form
10 November 2008
Accepted 12 November 2008
Keywords:
Phanerogams
Opportunistic macroalgae
Phytoplankton chlorophyll-a
Nutrients
Oxygen
Water quality index
a b s t r a c t
In this study we have developed an index for assessing trophic status and water quality in
transitional aquatic ecosystems of Southern Europe. The index has been developed from the
water quality index of the U.S. National Sanitation Foundation and integrates the main
causal factors (inorganic nutrients), the key biological elements (primary producers) and
indicator of effects (oxygen) of eutrophication. Six main variables have been used: relative
coverage of benthic phanerogams and opportunistic macroalgae species, and concentra-
tions of dissolved oxygen, phytoplankton chlorophyll-a, dissolved inorganic nitrogen and
phosphorus. Non-linear functions are used to transform each measured variable into its
quality value. Each quality value is then multiplied by a weighting factor, to take into
account the relative contribution of each variable to the overall water quality. Finally, the
index value is calculated as the sum of the weighted quality values, ranging from 0 (poorest
state) to 100 (best condition). The index has been tested and validated in six transitional
water ecosystems which differ in anthropogenic pressures and eutrophication levels, for
which data sets were available from 1989 to 2004: Sacca di Goro (Northern Adriatic Sea, Italy),
Lesina Lagoon (Southern Adriatic Sea, Italy), Ria Formosa (Algarve, Southern Portugal), Mar
Menor (Murcia, Southern Spain), Etang de Thau (Herault, Southern France) and Gulf of Gera
(Lesvos Island, Greece). The index assessments have been compared with evaluations from
the IFREMER (French Research Institute for the Exploitation of the Sea) classification scheme
(France) and the trophic index TRIX (Italy), which are currently used for national monitoring
of coastal waters and lagoons. Based on the conclusions of this study we suggest to use the
index for monitoring water quality in shallow coastal transitional waters, where benthic
vegetation controls primary productivity, which makes indices based on phytoplankton
only (e.g., TRIX) unsuitable.
# 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
avai lable at www.sc iencedi rec t .com
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolind
1. Introduction
Several indicators and indices are available for assessing
trophic status and quality of aquatic ecosystems and their
evolution under different anthropogenic pressures and inher-
ent threats (Jørgensen et al., 2005; Niemeijer and de Groot,
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 0521 905976; fax: +39 0521 905402.E-mail address: [email protected] (G. Giordani).
1470-160X/$ – see front matter # 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reservedoi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.007
2008). Nonetheless, little attention has been given to the
development of specific tools for transitional waters (TW),
despite their ecological and economical importance (Basset
et al., 2006). TW comprise shallow aquatic ecosystems, which
are highly dynamic and heterogeneous (McLusky and Elliott,
2007), thus indicators and indices developed for deeper
d.
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1 983
ecosystems (e.g., coastal marine waters and lakes) are
unsuitable for monitoring TW. Furthermore, the existing tools
specific for TW are generally currently under new develop-
ment or their validity is restricted to areas/habitats where they
have been developed (Jørgensen et al., 2005; Magni et al., 2005).
The implementation of the Water Framework Directive
(WFD) in the European Union is supporting the development of
assessment tools specific for TW, here considered as an
ecosystem distinct from coastal waters (McLusky and Elliott,
2007) and from which they have to be evaluated separately for
their ecological and chemical status (Borja, 2005). TW
monitoring requires indicators and descriptors that incorpo-
rate the specific ecosystem features, mainly shallowness and
degree of confinement. Moreover, they have to consider
ecosystem status and vulnerability to specific perturbations
such as nutrient loadings, contamination of toxic compounds
and resource exploitation, e.g., aquaculture (Rice, 2003).
Presently, aggregated indices would meet most of above
criteria, depending on the selected variables and algorithms
used in the integration processes. Among them, a series of
water quality indices (WQIs) have been developed for aquatic
ecosystems in which simple quality vectors are obtained from
several measured variables (Stambuk-Giljanovic, 1999; Cude,
2001). WQIs are user-friendly and can be easily handled in
automatic systems and computational tools (Mocenni et al., in
press).
The idea to use an integrated index that reflects the
composite influence of significant variables on water quality
was firstly proposed by Brown et al. (1970) and later improved
by the National Sanitation Foundation (McClelland, 1974). This
index, called the National Sanitation Foundation Water
Quality Index (NSFWQI), is actually used for water quality
monitoring of different U.S. water supplies. Recently, many
different types of WQIs have been developed but there is still a
need to develop new WQIs based on fewer variables which can
be used to compare sites with similar water quality char-
acteristics (Said et al., 2004).
Vollenweider et al. (1998) developed a trophic index (TRIX)
which integrates oxygen saturation, phytoplankton chloro-
phyll-a, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations to assess the
trophic state of coastal marine waters, this is presently also
applied to coastal lagoons. TRIX is founded on the assumption
that eutrophication processes depend primarily on phyto-
plankton community, and assumes the reference system
proposed by Vollenweider et al. (1992) and Nixon (1995).
Pettine et al. (2007) recently developed a new TRIX version in
order to fulfil the WFD requirements for marine coastal waters
dominated by phytoplankton. In the last few years, other
multi-metric indices were developed including benthic com-
ponents, however, they required high numbers of variables to
be measured. A comprehensive review on indicators and tools
for assessing eutrophication and water quality in transitional
aquatic ecosystems is reported by Zaldıvar et al. (2008).
In the present study, we implemented an index that is
tailored for transitional ecosystems, adopting the WQI
approach: the Transitional Water Quality Index (TWQI). The
TWQI approach has been tested and validated at different
temporal and spatial scales in six transitional water ecosys-
tems which differ in levels of eutrophication: Sacca di Goro
and Lesina lagoons (Italy), Etang de Thau (France), Ria Formosa
(Portugal), Mar Menor (Spain) and Gulf of Gera (Greece). The
TWQI assessments were then compared with the evaluations
from the IFREMER (French Research Institute for the Exploita-
tion of the Sea) classification scheme and the TRIX index,
considering also other eight French Mediterranean lagoons
described by Souchu et al. (2000).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Assumptions and metrics of Transitional WaterQuality Index (TWQI)
TWQI was implemented using six variables, namely: dissolved
oxygen (DO), phytoplankton chloropyll-a (Chl-a), dissolved
inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP) concentrations
plus coverage of benthic phanerogams (Ph) and opportunistic
macroalgae (Ma) species. These variables represent the main
causal factors (inorganic nutrients), the key biological ele-
ments (primary producers) and indicator of effects (oxygen) of
eutrophication and water quality in shallow transitional
waters (Vollenweider et al., 1998; Orfanidis et al., 2003; Viaroli
et al., 2008). As for the other WQIs, non-linear functions were a
priori established and applied to transform each measured
variable into its quality value (QV). Each QV was then
multiplied by a weighting factor, to take into account the
relative contribution of each variable to the overall water
quality. Both utility functions and weighting factor were
derived from literature and expert assessment. Finally, TWQI
was calculated as the sum of the weighted QVs, ranging from 0
(poorest state) to 100 (best condition).
The QV assigned to DO (QVDO) increased from 0 to 100,
spanning complete anoxia to 100–125% oxygen saturation
(Fig. 1a). DO values higher than 125%, common in highly
productive transitional ecosystems, were also considered
critical, since oversaturation is often coupled to phytoplank-
ton or macroalgal biomass accumulation. The accumulated
biomass fuels respiration processes, which in turn can lead to
complete anoxia (Viaroli and Christian, 2003). Therefore, at
oxygen saturation greater than 125%, QVDO decreased with
QVDO = 0 at 250%, according to previous studies (Vollenweider
et al., 1998; Stambuk-Giljanovic, 1999; Cude, 2001).
Chl-a is a measure of the active phytoplankton biomass,
although the cellular Chl-a content is often species-specific
and depends on the physiological status of phytoplankton
cells (Felip and Catalan, 2000). In this study, we used
thresholds and fixed boundaries from common classification
criteria for eutrophication (Vollenweider and Kerekes, 1982).
QVchla = 0 was attained at concentrations Chl-a > 30 mg m�3,
whilst optimal conditions (QVchla = 100) were assigned to Chl-
a < 6 mg m�3 (Fig. 1b). The concentration range proposed here
is typical of Mediterranean coastal lagoons and continental
estuaries (Giordani et al., 2005; EPA, 2005).
DIN and DIP concentrations result from external loadings
and internal recycling and have been widely used as criteria
for assessing trophic status in lentic water bodies (Vollen-
weider and Kerekes, 1982). DIN is now recognised as the
main driver of coastal eutrophication, whilst DIP is often
assumed as the main limiting factor (de Jonge et al., 2002;
Howarth and Marino, 2006). For this reason, simple models
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1984
have been developed which allow for estimating the net
ecosystem metabolism from DIP as a measures of lagoon
trophic potential (Giordani et al., 2008a). Utility functions for
DIN and DIP were established considering the main criteria
for trophic status classification (Vollenweider and Kerekes,
1982; Vollenweider et al., 1998). QVDIN was assumed to be
inversely related to DIN concentrations with QVDIN = 100 at
DIN = 0 mM and QVDIN = 0 at DIN > 100 mM (Fig. 1c). The most
significant decrease of QVDIN was imposed in the 0–20 mM
range, because the main transformation in the productivity
assets usually occurs within this range (Viaroli et al., 2008).
Fig. 1 – Relationships among analytical measurements of (a) di
dissolved inorganic and total nitrogen (DIN-TN), (d) dissolved in
coverage (Ma), (f) phanerogam coverage (Ph) and respective TW
calculation.
Moreover, other classification schemes report DIN = 20 mM
as a critical threshold for coastal lagoons (Souchu et al.,
2000; EPA, 2005). A similar utility function was set for DIP,
with QVDIP = 100 at DIP = 0 mM and QVDIP = 0 at DIP > 6 mM
(Fig. 1d). The use of total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP),
in place of DIN and DIP, would be recommended if such data
are available, because dissolved organic and particulate
species can greatly contribute to the nitrogen and phos-
phorus bulk. Utility functions for TN and TP follow similar
patterns as for DIN and DIP, except for the wider ranges
(Fig. 1c and d).
ssolved oxygen saturation (DO), (b) chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), (c)
organic and total phosphorus (DIP-TP), (e) macroalgal
QI Q values (QV). wf: weighting factors used in TWQI
Table 1 – Trophic state, geographical and morphometric data of the TW ecosystems considered in this study. t: theoreticalwater residence time.
System Country Symbol Latitudeand longitude
t (d) Area(km2)
Meandepth (m)
Trophiclevel
Reference
Sacca di Goro Italy SG 44.78–44.848N 3 26 1.5 Very high Viaroli et al. (2006)
12.26–12.398E
Lagoon of Lesina Italy LE 41.85–41.928N 100 52 0.8 Low Manini et al. (2005)
15.31–15.578E
Ria Formosa Portugal RF 36.96–37.168N 1 105 3.5 Medium Newton and
Mudge (2005)
08.25–07.518W
Mar Menor Spain MM 37.63–37.828N 190 135 3.6 High Perez-Ruzafa
et al. (2005)
00.72–00.868W
Etang du Thau France ET 43.33–43.468N 56 75 4.5 Medium Plus et al. (2006)
03.53–03.708E
Gulf of Gera Greece GG 39.00–39.128N 8 43 10 Very low Arhonditsis et al. (2003)
26.44–26.538E
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1 985
The main functional groups of the benthic vegetation
community and their relative coverage were considered for
TWQI, assuming that each of them was associated with
different stages of the eutrophication development in TW
(Orfanidis et al., 2003; Nielsen et al., 2004; Hauxwell and
Valiela, 2004). The general assumption was that phanerogams
prevailed in pristine and unaltered ecosystems, whilst
opportunistic macroalgae species became dominant in
eutrophic and dystrophic TW (Schramm, 1999; Viaroli et al.,
2008). The opportunistic macroalgae species considered in this
study were among those listed in the ESGII group of the
Ecological Evaluation Index (Orfanidis et al., 2003). We
considered the presence and abundance of the functional
groups as sufficient to discriminate the trophic status,
although we recognize that the eco-physiological conditions
of benthic vegetation could add information on buffering
capacity, resistance and resilience of benthic community
(Juanes et al., 2008). The coverage by macroalgae and
phanerogams (Ph) was expressed as % of surface area
colonised by a permanent meadow/stand using an ordinal
transform scale based on an extended Braun-Blanquet cover-
abundance scale (Braun-Blanquet, 1964). Both macroalgae and
phanerogams are known to out-compete phytoplankton, thus
measures of their density and biomass were considered as
complementary to Chl-a measurements. Furthermore, we
assumed that the maximum coverage by benthic vegetation
could not exceed 80% of the total lagoon surface, 20% being
accounted for as unsuitable areas, e.g. deep canals, intertidal
mudflats, etc. For this reason, QVMa = 0 was assigned to a
macroalgal coverage >80% (Fig. 1e). Conversely, the highest
QVMa was assigned to a coverage range <10%, assuming that
small amounts of opportunistic macroalgae can be found
under pristine conditions. The utility function representing
phanerogam coverage was set symmetric of that of macro-
algae, with QVPh = 100 corresponding to 80% coverage, and
QVPh = 0 at 0–10% coverage (Fig. 1f).
Weighing factors were selected based on the ecological
relevance of the considered variables. The highest values (0.23)
were set for benthic vegetation, assuming that it represented
the main driver of the lagoon water quality and trophic status
(Viaroli et al., 2008). A lower weight (0.15) was used for
phytoplankton chlorophyll-a, phytoplankton being less
important due to the shallow depth. Also DO was rated with
0.15, assuming that it depends primarily on benthic vegetation
and phytoplankton. The lowest weight (0.12) was assigned to
dissolved nutrients, as they represent the causal factor of
vegetation status rather than a direct estimate of trophic
status and water quality. DIN and DIP concentrations are also
linked to several biogeochemical processes.
TWQI was then obtained as the sum of weighted QVs. The
sum was considered more appropriate than the unweighted
harmonic mean (Cude, 2001), because QVs close to zero – as
often occurs for QVMa or QVPh – can result in unsuitable values
(TWQI < 1).
2.2. Data sources for TWQI testing
TWQI was tested in six coastal lagoons in the Southern
European Arc, which differ in trophic status and water quality,
namely Sacca di Goro (SG), Lagoon of Lesina (LE), Etang du
Thau (ET), Ria Formosa (RF), Mar Menor (MM) and Gulf of Gera
(GG) (Table 1).
A detailed analysis of spatial and temporal variations of
TWQI was performed in SG. Complete datasets for TWQI
applications to the whole SG were available for seven periods
from 1991 to 1994. QVs were obtained from averages of
variables measured at eight stations representative of the
lagoon (Colombo et al., 1994) and benthic vegetation coverage
was obtained from Viaroli et al. (2006).
A more detailed analysis of the seasonal evolution of TWQI
in SG was performed for a fixed station (st. 17) located in the
confined eastern sub-basin of the lagoon where huge blooms
of floating macroalgae occurred (Viaroli et al., 2006).
TWQI and TRIX responses were tested and compared with
the 0D biogeochemical model developed for SG by Zaldıvar
et al. (2003a,b). Simulations were run with input data from
1997, which represented the average meteorological condi-
tions, nutrient loads and water flushing values of the last two
Fig. 2 – TWQI values estimated for the whole Sacca di Goro
Lagoon on 18/6/91, 27/11/91, 5/5/92, 27/10/92, 24/11/93, 16/
3/94, 7/6/94. Legend as Fig. 1.
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1986
decades (Viaroli et al., 2005, 2006). Additional data were
provided by the Regional Environmental Protection Agency
(http://www.arpa.emr.it) and the Coastal Waters and Fishery
unit of the Province of Ferrara (http://www.provincia.fe.it/
acquecostiere).
In spring and summer 2004, TWQI was further compared
between SG and LE. Four stations were selected in each lagoon
in order to discriminate among the main pressures and
trophic conditions (Giordani et al., 2008b). In LE, station LE1
was close to the town of Lesina, and had bare sediment with
high nutrient concentrations in the water column. Station LE2
was mainly influenced by marine water inflow. Stations LE3
and LE4 were colonized by dense meadows of Zostera noltii and
Ruppia cirrhosa. In SG lagoon, station SG1 was located in the
plume zone of the Po di Volano river, station SG2 was in the
central part of the lagoon, where mussel farming was
performed until 2002, station SG3 was close to the sea mouth
in a sandy area exploited for clam farming, and station SG4
was located in a sheltered and muddy-sand zone impacted by
both clam farming and macroalgal blooms.
A wider comparison was performed among LE, SG, RF, MM,
ET and GG. The data source for the latter five lagoons was the
EU-funded DITTY project (Aliaume et al., 2007; Giordani et al.,
2008b; Table 1).
Relationships between TWQI and IFREMER quality scheme
and TWQI and TRIX were analysed for RF, MM, ET, SG, GG and
for additional 13 sites in 8 coastal lagoons located in the
Southern Mediterranean French coast, namely: Etang de l’Or
(E, W), Grec, Ingril (N, S), Bages (N, C, S), Campignol, l’Ayrolle,
Gruissan and Leucate (N, S). Details on the IFREMER
Fig. 3 – Seasonal evolution of (a) dissolved oxygen (DO), (b) phy
nitrogen (DIN), (d) dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP), (e) mac
17 of the Sacca di Goro lagoon from 1990 to 1992. (f) comparison
nitrogen and phosphorus (DIN,DIP) and total nitrogen and phos
classification scheme and the French lagoons considered in
this study are reported by Souchu et al. (2000).
3. Results
3.1. TWQI estimations in the Sacca di Goro lagoon
The TWQI evaluation of the whole SG lagoon for the 1991–1994
period is shown in Fig. 2. TWQI spanned 39–48 in the May–June
periods when macroalgal blooms occurred. Values slightly
toplankton chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), (c) dissolved inorganic
roalgal coverage (Ma) and the respective Q values at station
between TWQI estimations based on dissolved inorganic
phorus (TN,TP).
Fig. 4 – Annual evolution of Ulva coverage, TWQI and TRIX
values simulated with the 0D model of Zaldıvar et al.
(2003a,b) for a normal year in the Sacca di Goro lagoon.
The TRIX scale is reversed to have higher quality values
upwards for both indexes.
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1 987
higher (60 < TWQI < 64) were found in the other periods.
TWQI was very sensitive to macroalgal blooms, whilst
phanerogams had negligible effects, as they have nearly
disappeared since the late 80s. QVs of the other variables
underwent opposite patterns. The lowest QVDIN and QVDIP
were attained in autumn and winter (i.e., highest concentra-
tions), whilst DO and Chl-a had low QVs in spring and
summer.
The contribution of individual QVs to TWQI and their
timing over three years (1990–1992) were analyzed at station 17
in SG (Fig. 3). Overall, TWQI was driven by macroalgal biomass,
with water quality deterioration during bloom events and
subsequent dystrophic outbreaks. The total TWQI was kept
low by QVMa in spring and by QVDO and QVDIP in early summer.
Summer phytoplankton blooms also affected TWQI with
QVchla close to zero. By contrast, in late autumn and winter,
TWQI was influenced by high DIN loadings with very low
QVDIN. Basically, one can argue that TWQI responses to the
within system variability were robust and captured the
Fig. 5 – TWQI values in 4 stations of the SG in May (M) and Augus
and, in the right box, TWQI values based on annual mean valu
(ET98), SG in 1990–1993 (SG90-93) and GG in 1996 (GG96). Legen
essential dynamics of the water quality and trophic status.
Water quality varied seasonally with 25 < TWQI < 75. The
lowest values were detected in early summer each year.
Overall, these findings conformed to previous assessments
achieved with conventional descriptors, namely community
productivity and respiration (Viaroli and Christian, 2003;
Viaroli et al., 2005) and sedimentary biogeochemical indicators
(Azzoni et al., 2005; Giordani et al., 2008b).
The 0D model runs for 1997 also provided evidence that
under typical meteorological and hydrological conditions
TWQI ranged from 42 to 65 (Fig. 4), which was close to values
estimated from experimental data (Fig. 2). As usual, the lowest
TWQI occurred in June, during the early phase of the
dystrophic outbreak (Viaroli et al., 2005). QVMa, QVcha and
QVDO were the main drivers of water quality in the lagoon.
QVMa and QVcha were complementary, whilst QVDO was
mainly associated with QVMa.
3.2. TWQI application to lagoons with differenteutrophication levels
The comparison of SG and LE provide evidence of clear
differences between lagoons, with 40 < TWQI< 70 in SG and
TWQI> 70 in LE, in agreement with the expected trophic status
of the two ecosystems (Fig. 5; Table 1). Differences between
lagoons were greater insummer, when inSG TWQIdecreased to
40 at SG1, SG2 and SG4, due to phytoplankton and Ulva blooms,
whilst at SG3, TWQI was almost constant, likely due to marine
water flushing. InLE,noseasonal differences were found,whilst
within-lagoon differences were observed with lower TWQI at
LE1 and LE2, these stations receiving sewage from the urban
area of Lesina, and TWQI peaks up to 98 at LE3 and LE4, where
large meadows of benthic phanerogams developed out-com-
peting phytoplankton and leading to oxygen saturation.
The sensitivity of TWQI was assessed through its applica-
tion in six lagoons with a wide range of trophic conditions
(Table 1). The highest TWQI were found in GG (TWQI = 99), RF
(TWQI = 95) and LE (TWQI = 85), which conformed to hydro-
dynamics and the healthy status of benthic vegetation (Fig. 5).
t (A) 2004, in 4 stations of the LE in May (M) and July (J) 2004
es for RF in 1999 (RF99), MM in 1988 (MM88), ET in 1998
d as Table 1.
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1988
Intermediate conditions were observed in ET (TWQI = 77),
which was assessed as mesotrophic, being colonized by large
meadows of Z. marina and Z. noltii, but with an increasing
impact of chlorophyceans (Plus et al., 2005). Lower TWQI was
estimated for MM (TWQI = 68) due to high DIP concentrations
and significant losses of benthic vegetation following the huge
development of the urban area, tourism and agriculture. The
worst conditions were found in SG (TWQI = 52), conforming to
the observations reported above.
Fig. 7 – Relationships between TRIX and TWQI for systems
not colonized by benthic vegetation (bare) and colonized
by macroalgae (Ma) or phanerogams (Ph) with coverage
>10%. Data relative to the systems considered in this study
listed in Fig. 5. TRIX scale is reversed to have the higher
quality values upwards for both indexes.
4. Discussion and conclusions
4.1. Comparison of TWQI with other indices
TWQI was compared with the IFREMER classification scheme
and with TRIX index. The IFREMER classification scheme was
implemented as an operational tool to assess the eutrophica-
tion level in French Mediterranean lagoons (Souchu et al.,
2000). This tool adopted a classification grid with five classes,
spanning ‘‘very good’’ to ‘‘very bad’’, according to the EU Water
Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). The IFREMER tool com-
prises of 21 descriptors referring to phytoplankton, macro-
phytes, macro-zoobenthos, sediment and water column. A
simplified version was also developed and applied to the
lagoons listed in Table 1, except for LE (Austoni et al., 2004). On
average TWQI was directly comparable with the IFREMER
quality classes, with RF as an exception, it being only included
in the IFREMER ‘‘sufficient’’ class, whereas, it obtained a high
TWQI value (Fig. 6). The IFREMER classification is based on the
worst partial value among the descriptors mentioned above.
Although water quality was good on average, in summer
ammonium concentrations significantly increased causing a
decrease from good to sufficient status (Duarte et al., 2007). A
similar scenario was obtained by comparing summer TWQI
with the IFREMER classification in 13 sites of 8 Mediterranean
coastal lagoons (Souchu et al., 2000). A good agreement was
found between IFREMER classes and TWQI, except for the sites
Fig. 6 – Relationship between TWQI values and IFREMER
quality classes estimated for DITTY sites from Austoni
et al. (2004) and 13 sites of 8 Mediterranean French Coastal
lagoons for water column compartment in summer 1999,
Souchu et al. (2000). IFREMER scheme classification ranges
from 1 to 5 which correspond to bad (1), sufficient (2),
discrete (3), good (4) and very good (5) conditions. Legend
as Table 1.
with the lowest quality (Fig. 6). Once again, differences
between tools depended on the different metrics, the IFREMER
approach being more restrictive and driven by single variables,
whilst TWQI was based on the integration of all the considered
variables.
TRIX integrates several state variables, mainly with linear
metrics (Vollenweider et al., 1998). The main assumption is
that eutrophication depends primarily on phytoplankton
community (Vollenweider et al., 1992; Nixon, 1995). Therefore,
TRIX and TWQI have similar data requirements, except for
benthic vegetation, which is used only in TWQI, and Secchi
depth which is used only in TRIX as an optional parameter.
Thus both indices can be applied using the same datasets with
some integrations. Responses of TRIX and TWQI show good
agreements for sites without benthic vegetation (bare sedi-
ments), whilst when benthic vegetation is present the two
indices give contrasting assessments, with TWQI peaks
coinciding with low TRIX values (Fig. 7). Basically, the
difference is due to the inclusion of benthic vegetation in
TWQI, which is not considered in TRIX, it being developed for
deep coastal waters rather than for shallow TW. In TW the
dominance of benthic vegetation within the primary producer
community can alter the TRIX response, due to oxygen
production and nutrient uptake by macroalgae (Viaroli and
Christian, 2003; Viaroli et al., 2005). For example, lagoons with
high Ulva biomass, which is detrimental for ecosystems
quality, can be rated as ‘‘good status’’ by TRIX due to high
oxygen, and low DIN and chlorophyll-a concentrations. TWQI,
which includes macroalgal coverage as a negative factor, can
lead to the opposite status, capturing the community
degeneration that can be caused by the occurrence of blooms
of opportunistic macroalgal species (Nielsen et al., 2004;
Viaroli et al., 2008). The different responses of TWQI and TRIX
can be more clearly shown using 0D model simulations
(Fig. 4). Whilst the TWQI signals a progressive water quality
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1 989
deterioration following macroalgal growth, TRIX indicates an
improvement of water quality during the growth season of
macroalgae. Furthermore, TWQI seems to better represent the
most critical period when the macroalgal biomass begin to
decompose and dystrophic crisis have the highest probability
of occuring. Also TRIX is less sensitive to changes driven by the
benthic component of the system and remains rather constant
when the benthic community undergoes sudden changes due
to the collapse of macroalgal stands. The main reason is that
TRIX does not contain indicators of benthic metabolism,
which are included in TWQI. Due to its structure, which is
tailored for benthic dominated TW, TWQI is less sensitive to
changes in nutrient and chlorophyll-a concentrations, which
can be induced by external inputs to TW. This behaviour effect
can be seen from late summer onwards when water quality is
mainly affected by DIN concentrations.
4.2. Reliability of TWQI for monitoring TW ecosystems
TWQI seems suitable for monitoring eutrophication processes
in transitional water ecosystems, where, due to the shallow
depth benthic vegetation controls primary productivity,
making ineffective indices based on phytoplankton only.
TWQI integrates the main causal factors (inorganic nutrients),
the key biological elements (primary producers) and an
indicator of eutrophication effects (oxygen). The metrics we
have adopted are simple and allow the contribution of each
component of the index to be taken into account, thus
capturing the intrinsic variability of each of them. The utility
functions we adopted also consider the potential variability of
index components. For example, oxygen concentration is
extremely sensitive to temporal changes due to the natural
dynamics of primary productivity and community respiration
(Viaroli and Christian, 2003). Thus, instantaneous oxygen
concentrations are not suited for assessing the oxygenation
status of a given aquatic ecosystem. Nonetheless, concentra-
tions measured around mid-day may be considered as a good
approximation of oxygen availability, as when oxygen
saturation is either low or very high, an oxygen deficit can
be predicted within the system (see Fig. 1a). Repeated
measurements throughout day-night cycles as well as auto-
mated equipments will ensure better assessment, but with
higher costs.
Cross measurements of oxygen concentration and benthic
vegetation or phytoplankton chlorophyll-a will highlight the
tendency of the system to become anoxic; TW with macro-
algae being more sensitive to oxygen consumption (de Wit
et al., 2001; Viaroli et al., 2008). However, one has to avoid the
risk of tautology, i.e., of using TWQI for assessing the status of
its own components, e.g., benthic vegetation (Bortone, 2005).
Inorganic nutrient species are per se not informative of
water quality in so shallow ecosystems. Nevertheless they can
be used not only for setting boundaries of potential trophic
status, but also for estimating the net ecosystem metabolism
(NEM), which is obtained from DIP concentrations (Giordani
et al., 2008a). However, relationships between TWQI and NEM
are still unclear (data not shown), probably due to the number
of assumptions made for estimating both indices. Further-
more, a much larger data set would be required for testing
possible correlations.
When using simple metrics, large and heterogeneous
datasets are likely to be generated; thus the final assessment
of environmental quality is often made considering large
intervals of variation, thus loosing much of the detailed
information collected (Viaroli et al., 2004). This is particularly
true for TW ecosystems, as has been discussed above, where
few specific indicators are available and, where often, those
that have been developed in other types of water bodies (rivers
and coastal waters) are manipulated to be used in TW.
We believe that the use of simple indices such as TWQI are
meaningful for rapid assessments and repeated surveillance
programs rather than for highly detailed quality evaluations.
Detailed quality assessments require more sensitive tools,
which are clearly very difficult to apply at large scale and over
repeated surveys (because of the need of highly trained
specialists, expensive instrumentation and due to their
generally time consuming application). Finally rapid and
simple assessment tools are especially useful in systems
having long time series of measurements of a few selected
variables of high ecological relevance.
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the European
Commission under contract n8 EVK3-CT-2002-00084 ‘‘Devel-
opment of an Information Technology Tool for the Manage-
ment of European Southern Lagoons under the influence of
river-basin runoff (DITTY)’’ and by the Italian Ministry of
Research and Education under the PRIN project ‘‘Nuovi
Indicatori di stato Trofico e d’Integrita ecologica Di Ambienti
marini costieri e ambienti di transizione (NITIDA)’’. We are
very indebted to Nicholas Murray and the two anonymous
referees for reviewing and commenting on the manuscript.
r e f e r e n c e s
Aliaume, C., Do Chi, T., Viaroli, P., Zaldıvar, J.M., (Eds.), 2007.Coastal lagoons of Southern Europe: Recent changes andfuture scenarios. Transit. Waters Monogr. 1, 127 pp.
Arhonditsis, G., Eleftheriadou, M., Karydis, M., Tsirtsis, G., 2003.Eutrophication risk assessment in coastal embaymentsusing simple statistical models. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 46,1174–1178.
Austoni, M., Viaroli, P., Giordani, G., Zaldivar, J.M., 2004.Intercomparison among the test sites of the DITTY Projectusing the IFREMER classification scheme for coastallagoons. European Communities, EUR report n. 21286 EN,52 pp.
Azzoni, R., Giordani, G., Viaroli, P., 2005. Iron-sulfur-phosphorusinteractions: implications for sediment buffering capacityin a mediterranean eutrophic lagoon (Sacca di Goro, Italy).Hydrobiologia 550, 131–148.
Basset, A., Sabetta, L., Fonnesu, A., Mouillot, D., Do Chi, T.,Viaroli, P., Giordani, G., Reizopoulou, S., Abbiati, M.,Carrada, G.C., 2006. Typology in Mediterranean transitionalwaters: new challenges and perspectives. Aquat. Conserv.16, 441–455.
Borja, A., 2005. The European water framework directive: Achallenge for nearshore, coastal and continental shelfresearch. Cont. Shelf Res. 25, 1768–1783.
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1990
Bortone, S.A., 2005. Estuarine Indicators. CRC Marine SciencesSeries. CRC Press, 531 pp.
Braun-Blanquet, J., 1964. Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzuge derVegetationskunde, 3, Aufl., Wien (in German).
Brown, R.M., McClelland, N., Deininger, R.A., Tozer, R.G., 1970. Awater quality index: Do we dare? Water Sewage Works 117,339–343.
Colombo, G., Bisceglia, R., Zaccaria, V., Gaiani V., 1994.Variazioni spaziali e temporali delle caratteristiche fisico-chimiche delle acque e della biomassa fitoplanctonica nellaSacca di Goro. In: Bencivelli, S., Castaldi, N., (Eds.), StudioIntegrato sull’ecologia della Sacca di Goro, 28 anno diricerche, Provincia di Ferrara, FrancoAngeli editore, pp. 9–82(in Italian).
Cude, C.G., 2001. Oregon Water Quality Index: a tool forevaluating water quality management effectiveness. J. Am.Water Resour. As. 37, 125–137.
de Jonge, V.N., Elliott, M., Orive, E., 2002. Causes, historicaldevelopment, effects and future challenges of a commonenvironmental problem: eutrophication. Hydrobiologia 475/476, 1–19.
de Wit, R., Stal, L.J., Lomstein, B.A., Herbert, R.A., van Gemerden,H., Viaroli, P., Ceccherelli, V.U., Rodrıguez-Valera, F., Bartoli,M., Giordani, G., Azzoni, R., Shaub, B., Welsh, D.T., Donnely,A., Cifuentes, A., Anton, J., Finster, K., Nielsen, L.B.,Underlien Pedersen, A.G., Neubauer, A.T., Colangelo, M.A.,Heijs, S.K., 2001. ROBUST: The ROle of BUffering capacitiesin STabilising coastal lagoon ecosystems. Cont. Shelf Res.21, 2021–2041.
Duarte, P., Azevedo, B., Ribeiro, C., Pereira, A., Falcao, M., Serpa,D., Bandeira, R., Reia, J., 2007. Management orientedmathematical modelling of Ria Formosa (South Portugal).Transit. Waters Monogr. 1, 13–51.
EPA, 2005. National Coastal Condition, Report II. Report of U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, 286 pp. Available at:http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/nccr/.
Felip, M., Catalan, J., 2000. The relationship betweenphytoplankton biovolume and chlorophyll in a deepoligotrophic lake: decoupling in their spatial and temporalmaxima. J. Plankton Res. 22, 91–105.
Giordani, G., Viaroli, P., Swaney, D.P., Murray, C.N., Zaldıvar,J.M., Marshall Crossland, J.I., (Eds.), 2005. Nutrient fluxes intransitional zones of the Italian coast. LOICZ Reports &Studies No. 28, LOICZ, Texel, the Netherlands, ii + 157 pp.
Giordani, G., Austoni, M., Zaldıvar, J.M., Swaney, D.P., Viaroli, P.,2008a. Modelling ecosystem functions and properties atdifferent time and spatial scales in shallow coastal lagoons:an application of the LOICZ biogeochemical model. Estuar.Coast. Shelf S. 77, 264–277.
Giordani, G., Azzoni, R., Viaroli, P., 2008b. A rapid assessment ofthe sedimentary buffering capacity towards free sulphides.Hydrobiologia 611, 55–66.
Hauxwell, J., Valiela, I., 2004. Effects of nutrient loading onshallow seagrass-dominated coastal systems: patterns andprocesses. In: Nielsen, S.L., Banta, G.T., Pedersen, M.F.(Eds.), Estuarine Nutrient Cycling: The Influence of PrimaryProducers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, TheNetherlands, pp. 59–92.
Howarth, R.W., Marino, R., 2006. Nitrogen as the limitingnutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems:Evolving views over three decades. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51,364–376.
Jørgensen, S.E., Constanza, R., Xu, F.L. (Eds.), 2005. Handbook ofEcological Indicators for Assessment of Ecosystem Health.CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 439 pp.
Juanes, J.A., Guinda, X., Puente, A., Revilla, J.A., 2008.Macroalgae, a suitable indicator of the ecological status ofrocky communities in the NE Atlantic. Ecol. Indic. 8,351–359.
Magni, P., Hyland, J., Manzella, G., Rumhor, H., Viaroli, P.,Zenetos, A., (Eds.), 2005. Indicators of stress in the marinebenthos. Proceedings of the Workshop ‘‘Indicators of Stressin the Marine Benthos’’, Torregrande-Oristano (IT). 8–9October 2004. IOC Workshop Reports 195, iv + 45 pp.
Manini, E., Breber, P., D’Adamo, R., Spagnoli, F., Danovaro, R.,2005. Lagoon of Lesina. In: Giordani, G., Viaroli, P., Swaney,D.P., Murray, C.N., Zaldıvar, J.M., Marshall Crossland, J.I.,(Eds.), Nutrient fluxes in transitional zones of the Italiancoast. LOICZ Reports & Studies No. 28, LOICZ, Texel, TheNetherlands, pp. 49–54.
McClelland, N.I., 1974. Water Quality Index Application in theKansas River Basin, US Environmental Protection Agency,Kansas City, MO, EPA-907/9-74-001.
McLusky, D.S., Elliott, M., 2007. Transitional waters: A newapproach, semantics or just muddying the waters? Estuar.Coast. Shelf S. 71, 359–363.
Mocenni, C., Casini, M., Paoletti, S., Giordani, G., Viaroli, P.,Zaldıvar, J.M. A decision support system for themanagement of the Sacca di Goro (Italy). In: Marcomini, A.,Suter II, G.W., Critto, A., (Eds.), Decision Support Systems forRisk Based Management of Contaminated Sites, in press.
Newton, A., Mudge, S.M., 2005. Lagoon-sea exchanges, nutrientdynamics and water quality management of the RiaFormosa (Portugal). Estuar. Coast. Shelf S. 62, 405–414.
Nielsen, S.L., Banta, G.T., Pedersen, M.F. (Eds.), 2004. EstuarineNutrient Cycling: The Influence of Primary Producers.Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands,p. 303 pp.
Niemeijer, D., de Groot, R.S., 2008. A conceptual framework forselecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol. Indic. 8, 14–25.
Nixon, S.W., 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition,social causes and future concerns. Ophelia 41, 199–219.
Orfanidis, S., Panayotidis, P., Stamatis, N., 2003. An insight tothe ecological evaluation index (EEI). Ecol. Indic. 3, 27–33.
Perez-Ruzafa, A., Fernandez, A., Marcos, C., Gilabert, J., Quispe,J.I., Garcıa-Charton, J.A., 2005. Spatial and temporalvariations of hydrological conditions, nutrients andchlorophyll a in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (MarMenor, Spain). Hydrobiologia 550, 11–27.
Pettine, M., Casentini, B., Fazi, S., Giovanardi, F., Pagnotta, R.,2007. A revisitation of TRIX for trophic status assessment inthe light of the European Water Framework Directive:Application to Italian coastal waters. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 54,1413–1426.
Plus, M., Auby, I., Verlaque, M., Levavasseur, G., 2005. Seasonalvariations in photosynthetic irradiance response curves ofmacrophytes from a Mediterranean coastal lagoon. Aquat.Bot. 81, 157–173.
Plus, M., La Jeunesse, I., Bouraoui, F., Zaldıvar, J.M., Chapelle, A.,Lazure, P., 2006. Modelling water discharges and nitrogeninputs into a Mediterranean lagoon. Impact on the primaryproduction. Ecol. Model. 193, 69–89.
Rice, J., 2003. Environmental health indicators. Ocean Coast.Manage. 46, 235–259.
Said, A., Stevens, D.K., Sehlke, G., 2004. An Innovative Index forEvaluating Water Quality in Streams. Environ. Manage. 34,406–414.
Schramm, W., 1999. Factors influencing seaweed responses toeutrophication: some results from EU-project EUMAC. J.Appl. Phycol. 11, 69–78.
Souchu, P., Ximenes, M.C., Lauret, M., Vaquer, A., Dutriex, E.,2000. Mise a jour d’indicateurs du niveau d’eutrophisationdes milieux lagunaires mediterraneens, Ifremer-Creocean-Universite Montpellier II, 412 pp. (in French).
Stambuk-Giljanovic, N., 1999. Water quality evaluation by indexin Dalmatia. Water Res. 33, 3423–3440.
Viaroli, P., Christian, R.R., 2003. Description of trophic status ofan eutrophic coastal lagoon through potential oxygen
e c o l o g i c a l i n d i c a t o r s 9 ( 2 0 0 9 ) 9 8 2 – 9 9 1 991
production and consumption: defining hyperautotrophyand dystrophy. Ecol. Indic. 3, 237–250.
Viaroli, P., Bartoli, M., Giordani, G., Magni, P., Welsh, D.T., 2004.Biogeochemical indicators as tools for assessing sedimentquality/vulnerability in transitional aquatic ecosystems.Aquat. Conserv. 14, S19–S29.
Viaroli, P., Bartoli, M., Azzoni, R., Giordani, G., Mucchino, C.,Naldi, M., Nizzoli, D., Taje, L., 2005. Nutrient and ironlimitation to Ulva blooms in an eutrophic coastal lagoon(Sacca di Goro, Italy). Hydrobiologia 550, 57–71.
Viaroli, P., Giordani, G., Bartoli, M., Naldi, M., Azzoni, R., Nizzoli,D., Ferrari, I., Zaldıvar, J.M., Bencivelli, S., Castaldelli, G.,Fano, E.A., 2006. The Sacca di Goro lagoon and an arm of thePo River. In: Wangersky, P.J., (Ed.), The Handbook ofEnvironmental Chemistry. Volume H: Estuaries Springer-Verlag GmbH, Berlin, pp. 197–232.
Viaroli, P., Bartoli, M., Giordani, G., Naldi, M., Orfanidis, S.,Zaldivar, J.M., 2008. Community shifts, alternative stablestates, biogeochemical controls and feedbacks in eutrophiccoastal lagoons: a brief overview. Aquat. Conserv. 18,S105–S117.
Vollenweider, R.A., Kerekes, J.J., 1982. Eutrophication of Waters,Monitoring Assessment and Control. O.E.C.D. Paris, 154 pp.
Vollenweider, R.A., Rinaldi, A., Montanari, G., 1992.Eutrophication, structure and dynamics of a marinecoastal system: results of a ten year monitoring along
the Emilia-Romagna coast (Northwest Adriatic Sea). In:Vollenweider, R.A., Marchetti, R., Viviani, R. (Eds.), MarineCoastal Eutrophication, Proceedings of an InternationalConference, Bologna Italy 21–24 March 1990, pp.63–106.
Vollenweider, R.A., Giovanardi, F., Montanari, G., Rinaldi, A.,1998. Characterization of the trophic conditions of marinecoastal waters with special reference to the NW AdriaticSea: proposal for a trophic scale, turbidity and generalizedwater quality index. Environmetrics 9, 329–357.
Zaldıvar, J.M., Cattaneo, E., Plus, M., Murray, C.N., Giordani, G.,Viaroli, P., 2003a. Long-term simulation of mainbiogeochemical events in a coastal lagoon: Sacca di Goro(Northern Adriatic Coast, Italy). Cont. Shelf Res. 23,1847–1875.
Zaldıvar, J.M., Plus, M., Giordani, G., Viaroli, P., 2003b. Modellingthe impact of clams in the biogeochemical cycles of aMediterranean lagoon. In: Ozhan, E. (Ed.), Proceedings ofthe Sixth International Conference on the MediterraneanCoastal Environment, MEDCOAST 03, 7–11 October 2003,Ravenna, Italy, pp. 1291–1302.
Zaldıvar, J.M., Cardoso, A.C., Viaroli, P., Newton, A., De Wit, R.,Ibanez, C., Reizopoulou, S., Somma, F., Razinkovas, A.,Basset, A., Holmer, M., Murray, N.C., 2008. Eutrophication intransitional waters: an overview. Transit. Waters Monogr. 2,1–78.