22
South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror” Page 1 of 22 PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy ). Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014 Subject: Political Science, International Relations, Comparative Politics Online Publication Date: Jul 2014 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943494.013.007 South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror” Seema Kazi Oxford Handbooks Online Abstract and Keywords This chapter focuses on the gender dimensions of the wars in four South Asian countries: Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, and Sri Lanka. Beginning with a critique of normative notions regarding “terror,” it highlights the intersection between an overarching US-led “war on terror” in the South Asian region and domestic “wars of terror” waged by postcolonial states within national borders. The impact of these wars on women’s lives in each national context is emphasized, as is the critical overlap among the gendered global, regional, and local military processes in the region. Women’s security and justice concerns are highlighted, and women’s resistance against war, state repression, and impunity are explored. The chapter suggests greater engagement and mobilization by women and feminists within the region and beyond, to ensure a just and enduring resolution to South Asia’s multiple, albeit interlinked, conflicts. Keywords: Afghanistan, gender, impunity, India, Pakistan, postcolonial states, South Asia, Sri Lanka, security, “terror, ” “war on terror” Introduction The concept of South Asia as a distinct geographic and political entity is a contemporary, roughly six-decade-old construct, formalized by the adoption of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Charter by the heads of state of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and Maldives in 1985. Although Afghanistan is not part of SAARC, it is central to the ongoing wars in the region and is therefore included in this discussion with India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. “Terror” is a generic term usually associated with nonstate groups; the implicit assumption is that there are distinct and self-evident groups of “terrorists” specializing in a unique and singular form of politics—“terrorism” (Tilly 2004, 6). This assumption, however, is incongruent with the empirical reality. Nonstate groups or movements have not always used terror as a form of political mobilization, even as states across the world have practiced “terror” on a far greater and graver scale than their adversaries. A disproportionate focus and emphasis on antistate terror obscures the fact that the major form of “terror” in the world today is that perpetrated by states and their allies, and that quantitatively, nonstate terror pales into relative insignificance by comparison (Sluka 2000, 1). It is equally the case that civilians are the primary victims of violence between states and nonstates. It is therefore prudent to discard reductive or partial notions of “terror” in favor of a citizen-centric understanding of the term. Terror in this discussion is defined as “political violence that targets civilians, independent of whether the actor is a non-state movement or a sovereign state” (Falk 2012, 242). Wars between states and nonstates within national borders existed long before the rise of transnational, nonstate terror groups at the turn of the twenty-first century. The attacks in New York and Washington, D.C., on September 11, 2001, undermined the idea that state security could be achieved by securing national borders through military means. The US-led post-9/11 “global war on terror” unfolded in a geopolitical vacuum, with little opposition to US dominance. It encouraged other nation-states in the world to use “terror” as an excuse to crush and discredit local movements for self-determination and enhance their own repressive powers. Unable and/or unwilling to counter the

South Asia's Gendered Wars on Terror

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 1 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

Subject: PoliticalScience,InternationalRelations,ComparativePolitics

OnlinePublicationDate: Jul2014

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943494.013.007

SouthAsia’sGendered“WarsonTerror”SeemaKazi

OxfordHandbooksOnline

AbstractandKeywords

ThischapterfocusesonthegenderdimensionsofthewarsinfourSouthAsiancountries:Afghanistan,Pakistan,India,andSriLanka.Beginningwithacritiqueofnormativenotionsregarding“terror,”ithighlightstheintersectionbetweenanoverarchingUS-led“waronterror”intheSouthAsianregionanddomestic“warsofterror”wagedbypostcolonialstateswithinnationalborders.Theimpactofthesewarsonwomen’slivesineachnationalcontextisemphasized,asisthecriticaloverlapamongthegenderedglobal,regional,andlocalmilitaryprocessesintheregion.Women’ssecurityandjusticeconcernsarehighlighted,andwomen’sresistanceagainstwar,staterepression,andimpunityareexplored.Thechaptersuggestsgreaterengagementandmobilizationbywomenandfeministswithintheregionandbeyond,toensureajustandenduringresolutiontoSouthAsia’smultiple,albeitinterlinked,conflicts.

Keywords:Afghanistan,gender,impunity,India,Pakistan,postcolonialstates,SouthAsia,SriLanka,security,“terror,”“waronterror”

Introduction

TheconceptofSouthAsiaasadistinctgeographicandpoliticalentityisacontemporary,roughlysix-decade-oldconstruct,formalizedbytheadoptionoftheSouthAsianAssociationforRegionalCooperation(SAARC)CharterbytheheadsofstateofIndia,Pakistan,Bangladesh,SriLanka,Nepal,Bhutan,andMaldivesin1985.AlthoughAfghanistanisnotpartofSAARC,itiscentraltotheongoingwarsintheregionandisthereforeincludedinthisdiscussionwithIndia,Pakistan,andSriLanka.

“Terror”isagenerictermusuallyassociatedwithnonstategroups;theimplicitassumptionisthattherearedistinctandself-evidentgroupsof“terrorists”specializinginauniqueandsingularformofpolitics—“terrorism”(Tilly2004,6).Thisassumption,however,isincongruentwiththeempiricalreality.Nonstategroupsormovementshavenotalwaysusedterrorasaformofpoliticalmobilization,evenasstatesacrosstheworldhavepracticed“terror”onafargreaterandgraverscalethantheiradversaries.Adisproportionatefocusandemphasisonantistateterrorobscuresthefactthatthemajorformof“terror”intheworldtodayisthatperpetratedbystatesandtheirallies,andthatquantitatively,nonstateterrorpalesintorelativeinsignificancebycomparison(Sluka2000,1).Itisequallythecasethatciviliansaretheprimaryvictimsofviolencebetweenstatesandnonstates.Itisthereforeprudenttodiscardreductiveorpartialnotionsof“terror”infavorofacitizen-centricunderstandingoftheterm.Terrorinthisdiscussionisdefinedas“politicalviolencethattargetscivilians,independentofwhethertheactorisanon-statemovementorasovereignstate”(Falk2012,242).

Warsbetweenstatesandnonstateswithinnationalbordersexistedlongbeforetheriseoftransnational,nonstateterrorgroupsattheturnofthetwenty-firstcentury.TheattacksinNewYorkandWashington,D.C.,onSeptember11,2001,underminedtheideathatstatesecuritycouldbeachievedbysecuringnationalbordersthroughmilitarymeans.TheUS-ledpost-9/11“globalwaronterror”unfoldedinageopoliticalvacuum,withlittleoppositiontoUSdominance.Itencouragedothernation-statesintheworldtouse“terror”asanexcusetocrushanddiscreditlocalmovementsforself-determinationandenhancetheirownrepressivepowers.Unableand/orunwillingtocounterthe

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 2 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

UnitedStates,SouthAsianstatesbackedtheUS-led“waragainstterror”inaregionwheretherewerealreadylocal“warsofterror”withinstateborders.

Thechapterthusidentifiestwodistinctdimensionsofthe“warsagainstterror”inSouthAsia:thefirstrelatestotheUS-led“waronterror”inAfghanistanandPakistan,andthesecondconcernsdomestic“warsofterror”withinindividualnation-states,whichinsomeinstanceswerepromptedandreinforcedbytheformer.Thisdistinctionismaintainedthroughoutthechapter.Theneteffectofbothtypesofwarhasbeentorenderwomenincreasinglysubjecttostateandnonstateviolenceandunabletoinfluencedomesticorforeignpolicy,evenastheywereinvokedasajustificationfortheUS-led“waronterror”(StabileandRentschler2005)intheregion.The“waronterror”inAfghanistanprecededthe“warsofterror”inPakistan,India,andSriLanka.Itisthereforeappropriatetobeginthediscussionwiththeformer.

Afghanistan:FromColdWarto“WaronTerror”

LyingwestoftheIndiansubcontinent,AfghanistanisaconfluenceofIndian,Greek,Persian,Turkish,andCentralAsiancultures.Itremainedneutralduringthetwoworldwars,duringwhichtimeitwasruledbyseveralmonarchswhoseattemptsatreformmetwithlimitedsuccess.Untilthe1970sitreceivedaidfromboththeSovietUnionandtheUnitedStates.Afghanistan’sneutralityendedwiththedeepeningoftheColdWarandaseriesofdomesticeconomicandpoliticalcrises.In1973agroupofmilitaryofficersdeposedthemonarch,KingZahirShah;Afghanistanwasproclaimedarepublicbyanewsetofrulers whoselinkswiththeSovietUnionresultedinthecountry’salignmentwiththelatter.Tostrengthenitsregionalinfluence,theSovietUnionsenttroopsintoAfghanistanin1979andinstalleditsprotégé,BabrakKarmal,aspresident.

TheSovietinterventiontransformedAfghanistanintoatragicColdWarbattleground. AconglomerationofarmedIslamistguerrillagroups,themujahideen(holywarriors),belongingtodifferentethnicitiesandgeographicalareas,drewtogethertowagejihad(holywar)againstSoviettroopsonAfghansoil.WithinweeksoftheSovietinvasion,theUnitedStateshaddecidedtoarmtheAfghanresistance. TherealobjectiveofUSsupportforthemujahideenwasnottohelptheAfghansorpromotedemocracy.Rather,asPresidentJimmyCarter’snationalsecurityadvisor,ZbigniewBrzezinski,explained,itwas“togivetheUSSRitsownVietnam”(Sidky2007,858).AfghanistanwastobecomethetextbookcaseofaproxywarduringtheColdWar.SupportfortheUS-backedmujahideenwaschanneledthroughPakistan’sintelligenceagency,theInter-ServicesIntelligence(ISI),withthewillingconsentofitsmilitarydictator,GeneralZia-ul-Haq.Afghanmujahideenthuscametobefunded,trained,andarmedbytheUnitedStatesandPakistan.

Duringthe1979–1989decade,largepartsofAfghanistanwerelaidtowastebyfightingbetweenmujahideenandSoviet-backedforcesontheonehand,andrivalmujahideenfactionsontheother.Thewargreatlydamagedthecountry’spolitical,economic,social,andculturalsystemsandinflictedgreatmiseryonAfghancitizens.ForAfghanwomen,theimpactwasparticularlysevereandunrelenting:

Yearsofwarhaveleftmanysubjectedtoanunusualkindofpain.Wiveshavehadtocopewithhusbandsandfathersleavingtheirfamiliestotakeuparms,invariablyformonthsatatime,sometimesforyears.Mothershavewatchedastheirteenagesonshavebeenforciblytakenawaytocombat.AndforliterallymillionsofAfghanwomen,warhasmeantaforcedmarchtosurvivalasrefugeesinforeignlands.Cutofffromtheirhomesandsolelyresponsibleforthecareoftheirchildren,theyhaveenduredanextraordinaryburden.

(ICRC1999,9)

DuringthetwentiethcenturyAfghanrulershadintroducedmodestgenderequalityreforms,includingtheopeningofgirls’schools,theendofgendersegregation,andwomen’srighttovote. ThesepolicieswerefurtheradvancedbyKingZahirShah,whodeclaredKabulUniversitycoeducationalandgovernmentsupportforvoluntaryremovaloftheveil.However,thebenefitsofthesesocialchangesaccruedlargelytourbanwomen;only8percentofthetotalfemalepopulationreceivedawagedincome.Yetdespitetheirrelativelysmallnumbers,women’sprofessionalenrollmentandparticipationinpubliclifeincreasedduringthe1970s,andbythetimeoftheSovietinvasionurbanAfghanwomenwerefairlyactiveinpubliclife(Ahmed-Ghosh2003).

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 3 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

MikhailGorbachev’sacknowledgmentthatthewarinAfghanistancouldnotbewonprecededacompletewithdrawalofSoviettroopsfromAfghanistanin1989.TheUnitedStateshadprevailedovertheSovietUnioninAfghanistanusingalocalarmyofmujahideen.YetthesocialandpoliticalimpactsoftheUSadministration’sColdWar“victory”werenomorethanachimeraforAfghanwomen.UponseizingKabul,mujahideenfactionssoughttoIslamizethestatethroughanexplicitlygenderedagenda.Womenweredismissedfromjobsandforcedtoweartheveil,andrestrictionswereimposedonfemalemobilityandemployment:

Whereaspreviously70%ofteachers,almosthalfofcivilservantsand40%ofdoctorshadbeenwomen,theywerealtogetherbannedfrompaidemployment,includingtrade,andprohibitedfromleavingtheirhomeswithoutamahram(malerelative).Forwarwidowswhohadbecomethesolebreadwinnersoftheirfamilies,thismeantlevelsofdestitutionthatreducedmanytobeggingorprostitution.

(Kandiyoti2005,7)

Paradoxically,withthefallofKabulanditscommunistregime,thecommonpurposebindingthemujahideenalliancedissolved.Intheabsenceofunityamongrivalwarlordfactions, eachofwhichcarvedoutitsownlocalareaofdomination,amilitiaofPashtunIslamists,theTaliban, tookadvantageoftheensuingpoliticalvacuumtoemergeasapowerfulforceacrossthecountry.TheTalibanwereaproductofthesocialforcesunleashedbytheColdWarinAfghanistanandofconvergingPakistaniandSaudi interestsinthewakeofSovietandUSdisengagementfromtheregion.By1996theyhadoverrunthemujahideenalliance,capturedKabul,declaredAfghanistananIslamicEmirate,andimposedapuritanicalandpunitiveversionofIslamonAfghansociety.Lackingpublicsupport,theTalibanexercisedpowerandcontrolthroughfearandterror.Theirregimewascharacterizedbybrutalrepressionofwomen.

Womenandgirlswereforbiddentoattendschool,leavetheirhomeswithoutamaleescort,orworkoutsidethehome.FemaleeducationwasrestrictedtotheageofeightandconfinedtoQuranicknowledge.Thedresscodeoftheburqa(abody-lengthrobecoveringthefaceandbody,withonlyameshforseeingandbreathing)wasforciblyimposedonwomen;houseswithfemaleresidentswereforcedtobemarkedwithpaintedwindows;womenandmenweresegregatedintoseparatehospitals;femalemedicalworkerswerebannedfromworkinginpublichospitals;healthandhumanitarianassistancetogirlsandwomenwasdisallowed;andwomenwerebarredfrompubliclifeandspacealtogether.TheTaliban-createdDepartmentforthePropagationofVirtueandSuppressionofViceenforcedgendersegregation,transgressionsofwhichwerepunishedbypublicbeatings. ThetragedyofAfghanwomenundertheTalibanwassummedupinareportbyPhysiciansforHumanRights:

Kabulin1998[was]acityofbeggars—womenwhohadoncebeenteachersandnurses[were]nowmovinginthestreetslikeghostsundertheirenvelopingburqas,sellingeverypossessionandbeggingsoastofeedtheirchildren.Itisdifficulttofindanothergovernmentorwould-begovernmentintheworldthathasdeliberatelycreatedsuchpovertybyarbitrarilydeprivinghalfthepopulationunderitscontrolofjobs,schooling,mobility,andhealthcare.Suchrestrictionsareliterallylifethreateningtowomenandtotheirchildren.(1998,2–3)

Duringthe1990ssignificantquantitiesofarmsandweaponssuppliedbytheUSCentralIntelligenceAgency(CIA)wereliberallyappropriatedbyPakistan’smilitaryintelligenceagency,theISI.Pakistan’sstrategyofsupportingthemostpoliticallyconservativeandsociallyregressivefactionsofAfghanmujahideenasameansofmaintaininginfluenceinAfghanistanproduceddrovesofIslamistextremistswhoeithercollaboratedwithorjoinedAfghanTalibanforces.

In1996OsamabinLadenrelocatedtoAfghanistanfromSudan.Afterthe1998bombingsofUSembassiesinKenyaandTanzania—allegedlymastermindedbybinLaden—andthelaterrefusaloftheTalibantoturnhimover,theUnitedStatesembarkedonamilitaryoffensive(“OperationEnduringFreedom”)inAfghanistaninlate2001todestroyal-Qaeda bases.BinLadensurvivedtheUSoffensiveandwentontocollaboratewiththeISIinextendingtheIslamistcampaignbeyondPakistanintoIndian-administeredKashmir—aninterventionthatreinforcedtheIndia–PakistanrivalryoverKashmiranddrewbothstatesintoamilitaryandnuclearconfrontation.

OnSeptember11,2001,al-QaedalaunchedaseriesofcoordinatedattacksontheUnitedStatesinNewYorkCityandWashington,D.C.FourpassengerairlineswerehijackedandcrashedintotheWorldTradeCenter,thePentagon,andafieldinPennsylvania;almostthreethousandpeoplediedintheattacks.TheUSresponsetothe

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 4 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

9/11attackscommencedinOctober2001withanaerialoffensiveagainstTalibanandal-QaedabasesinAfghanistan,togetherwithagroundinvasionincollaborationwiththeNorthernAlliance, withtheaimofdislodgingtheTalibanregimeandcreatinganalternativegovernmentthatwouldfacilitateUSaccesstoal-Qaedahideouts.

Priorto9/11thesituationofAfghanwomenhadnotbeenpartofglobaldiscourseonthewarinAfghanistan.Indeed,throughoutthe1990stherewaslittleinternationalconcernorsympathyforthesufferingofAfghanwomeninflictedbytwodecadesofwar.Itwasonlyinthewakeofthe9/11tragedyandtheretaliatoryUS-ledOperationEnduringFreedommilitaryoffensiveagainsttheTalibanandAl-QaedathatAfghanwomenappearedintheUSforeignpolicydiscourseandtheinternationalpublicimagination.

ThestatedjustificationfortheUScounteroffensivewasdemocracy,humanrights,andtherightsofAfghanwomen.OperationEnduringFreedomwasconstructedasamoralmissiontorescueAfghanwomenfromTalibantyranny.Usingtheexcuseofwomen’srightstowagewarinAfghanistanprovedtobeparticularlypowerfulandpersuasive,giventheTaliban’sbrutaltreatmentofwomen.ThisargumentalsodovetailedwithWesternliberalopinion,whereinwomen’soppression,theTaliban,andIslamicfundamentalismexemplifiedthedangerposedbyanenemytobothAmericancitizensandWesterncivilization.TherewasaccordinglyconsiderablepublicsympathyintheUnitedStatesfortheUS-ledoffensivetoupholdAfghanwomen’srights.AstatementbyLauraBush,wifeofex-presidentGeorgeW.Bush,exemplifiedtheinstrumentaluseofgenderinUSforeignpolicy:“BecauseofourrecentmilitarygainsinmuchofAfghanistan,womenarenolongerimprisonedintheirhomes….Thefightagainstterrorismisalsoafightfortherightsanddignityofwomen.”

Theburqa-cladAfghanwomanthusbecameajustificationandrallyingpointfordevastatingaerialassaultsagainstanenemythoughtdeservingofpreciselysuchtreatmentduetoitscrueltiesagainstwomen.TheimageoftheoppressedAfghanwomanandthefundamentalistTalibanwasasmuchpartofUSnationalsecuritydiscourseasitsself-declaredmoralandcivilizationalmissiontobringdemocracytoAfghanistan.CouchingOperationEnduringFreedominthelanguageofwomen’srightsalsohelpedobliterateandeffaceadecade(1979–1989)ofdevastationwreakedonapoorcountrybytheUS–SovietColdWarrivalry.ItalsomaskedthedubiousandopportunisticlocalalliancebetweentheUnitedStatesandmujahideenfactionsoftheerstwhileNorthernAlliance—anotoriouslymisogynistgroupcomprisingsoldierswhohadledcampaignsofrape,torture,andslaughterinAfghanistanbeforetheTalibantakeover.NorthernAlliancememberswerealsocomplicitintheabductionofyounggirlsandwomen,gangrapes,andmurders(Rahman2012,3).AmongthegroupsfavoredbytheUnitedStateswastheHizb-e-IslamifactionledbyGulbuddinHekmatyar —amanknownforthrowingacidonthefacesofwomenwhorefusedtoweartheveil;hisfactionreceivedasmuchas50percentofUSaid.

TheRevolutionaryAssociationoftheWomenofAfghanistan(RAWA)—awell-knownAfghanwomen’sorganization—underlinedthebitterironyoftheUS-ledcoalition’sselectiveuseoftheterm“terrorist”andwomen’ssecurityandjusticeconcerns:

Western-supportedwarlordsstillcontrolmuchofthecountry….[T]heyarenotregardedasterroristssincetheyworkaccordingtothedirectionsofthePentagonandWhiteHouse….ProminentwarlordssuchasAbdulRashidDostum[akeymemberoftheNorthernAlliance]andmanyothershavetheirownindependent“governments”indifferentregionsofAfghanistan…[and]areinvolvedintheabductionandrapingofgirls…andmanyothercrimes.Thelocalpoliceandjudiciaryarecomposedofpeopleappointedbythesewarlords.Thereforethereisnoimplementationoflaw,justiceandsecurityinsuchplaces;andourpeoplehavenodoortoknockforhelp.

(RAWA2009)

By2011therewere150,000troopsinAfghanistan.YetthecrisisofsecuritypersistedandwasexacerbatedwiththeadvanceoftheTalibaninareasthathadbeenpreviouslypeaceful.Therewasalsowidespreadpublicresentmentagainstadiscreditedgovernmenttaintedbycorruption,policeabuses,arbitraryarrestofcivilians,executions,torture,andaproliferationofcriminalgangs.CivilianscontinuedtopaythehighestpriceforAfghanistan’sdeficitofsecurityandgovernance:between16,725and19,013Afghancivilianswerekilledduringthe2001–2012period(WatsonInstitute2013).

ThiscrisisgreatlyimpactedAfghanwomen’saccesstohealthcare,education,employment,mobility,andpoliticalparticipation.In2012agroupofwomeninthecityofKandahartoldresearchersthattheirliveswerenotmuch

15

16

17

18

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 5 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

differentthantheyhadbeenundertheTaliban:

ItisliketheTalibantimesforwomennow.Weareinthesamesituationasthen.Wecannotcomeoutofthehousetoearn…moneyorgetaneducation.Theonlydifferenceisthatourhonourwassafethenbutitisnotnow.Theemergenceofacriminalizedeconomyproducedadramaticincreaseinchild,forcedandearlymarriageofgirlsandwomenduetoincreasedfearsregardingthreatsofrapeandthepotentialthreatofforcedmarriagetomilitiacommanders.

(CortrightandWall2012,20–21)

InastatementtotheUnitedNationsSecurityCouncilin2002,Dr.SimaSamar,ministerforwomen’saffairs,highlightedthelinkbetweenageneralclimateofinsecuritycreatedbytheUS-led“waronterror”inAfghanistanandAfghanwomen’sparticipationinpoliticsandpubliclife:

Therightsofwomen,inparticular,areputatriskbytheabsenceofsecurity.WomencontinuetofearviolenceandtoworryabouttheimpositionofTaliban-likerestrictions.Unlessgreatersecurityisprovided,theinclusionofwomenintheloyajirga[tribalcouncil]maybeunderminedandthedistributionofidentificationcardstoenablewomen’sparticipationinfutureelectionsimperiled.WomeninAfghanistanarefinallybeginningtoseealittlelightafteraverylongdarkness.Butthegainsthathavebeenmadeinthepastfourmonthscouldeasilybelostunlesssecurityisgreatlyimproved.

Inthesameyear,inatraditionalAfghangrandtribalconference,theloyajirga,HamidKarzaiwaselectedpresident.Theelectionwasdominatedbyformerwarlordsandmarredbycomplaintsofinterferenceandnoninclusionofmarginalizedgroups.Dr.SimaSamarwasstrippedofherpostforopposingtheSharia. Astheonlyfemalememberoftheinterimadministration’scabinet,Dr.Samarprotestedagainsttheloyajirga’spatriarchalpolitics:“Thisisnotdemocracy;it’sarubberstamp”(Veit2002,8).

AUN-supportedconstitutionalloyajirgain2003ensuredthat20percentofrepresentativeswerewomeninthedeliberationsforformulatingadraftconstitution.Yetwomen’ssubstantiveparticipationwassubvertedbywarlorddominationandintimidation.MalalaiJoya—afemalecandidateandfoundingmemberoftheRevolutionaryAssociationoftheWomenofAfghanistan(RAWA)—wasprovidedspecialprotectionafterherpubliccriticismofAfghanwarlords.AnAfghannongovernmentalorganization(NGO),WomenforAfghanWomen(WAW),drewupabillofrightsforwomenforinclusionbytheConstitutionalCommission.Uponreleaseofthedraft,however,manyofwomen’sdemands,including,amongothers,therighttoequalitybeforethelawasmenandthereservationof25percentofseatsinthewolesijirga(lowerhouseofparliament),wereexcluded(Grenfell2004,22–25).

ThecreationofagovernmentthroughelectionscouldnotensurepoliticalstabilityinAfghanistan.TheKabulgovernmentwaswidelyperceivedasalliedwiththeUnitedStatesandthereforeillegitimate.Acombinationoffactors—weakcentralauthority;popularangeragainsttheWesternmilitarypresence;corruptionandadestroyedeconomy;increasedtensionswithPakistanoverallegedal-QaedacampsalongthePakistan–Afghanistanborder;frequentairstrikesbytheUnitedStatesagainstallegedTalibanandal-QaedatargetsonAfghanterritory;increasedciviliancasualtiesduringsuchoffensives;andnumerous,oftenbloodyskirmishesbetweenWesternforcesandTalibanmilitantsthroughout2004–2009—contributedtoaclimateofinsecurity,instability,andsocialchaosacrossthecountry.

Thegravesecuritysituationimpededwomen’sparticipationinpubliclife.Womencontestedthepresidentialandprovincialcouncilelections,yetduetotheescalatingviolence,femalevoterturnoutwaslow,withreducedwomen’sparticipationascandidatesforprovincialcouncilelections.Women’spresenceinthecivilservicesregisteredamodestincrease(from22percentin2006to25percentin2011),whilewomen’spresenceinthejudicial(4.7percent)andsecurity(5percent)sectorswasminimal.In2012therewere1,300femalepoliceofficersinaforcewithmorethan143,000members(CortrightandWall2012,15).

ThenewconstitutionofAfghanistan,drawnupin2004,guaranteedgenderequalityandwomen’srighttovote;25percentofseatsinthewolesijirga(lowerhouse)werereservedforwomen,andaseparateMinistryofWomen’sAffairs(MOWA)wascreated.Importantasthesegainswere,theydidnottranslateintosubstantivechangeforAfghanwomen.TheAfghanParliamentcomprisedanumberofreactionary,conservativeelementshostiletowomen’srights;femalemembersofparliamentlackeddecision-makingpower;andthefewwomeninparliament

19

20

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 6 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

andthecabinetwerefrequentlyalignedwithwarlords(CortrightandWall2012,10).ThecontradictionbetweentheAfghangovernment’sstatedpolicyandactualpracticeregardingwomen’srightswasapparentonthedayofthesigningoftheUNConventionontheEliminationofAllFormsofDiscriminationagainstWomen(CEDAW)intolaw.OnthatdaytheKarzaigovernmentalsosignedablatantlydiscriminatoryShiitefamilylaw. Womenwhoprotestedagainstthelegislationweredeemedun-IslamicanddenouncedasWesternagentsandprostitutes(CortrightandWall2012,11).

Generallyspeaking,theUSadministration’sself-declaredmissionto“save”Afghanwomenachievedlittleinitsdiscreditedandunwinnable“waronterror”.ItsmilitaryinterventioninAfghanistanalsoservedtodiscreditthewomen’srightsargument,becauseitwaswidelyperceivedtobeassociatedwithWesterninterests.AfterthekillingofbinLadeninPakistanin2011,theUSadministrationannouncedanearlierthanscheduledwithdrawalofUSforcesfromAfghanistan.Atthetimeofwriting,USforceswerebeingwithdrawn,withprospectsofdirectpeacetalksamongthegovernmentinKabul,theUnitedStates,andtheTaliban.

ThepoliticalforcescreatedandcultivatedbytheCIA–ISImilitarystrategicallianceinAfghanistanduringthedecadeofthe1970s–1980sintersectedwithandreinforcedthosecreatedbyapost-9/11binLadenandal-QaedapresenceintheAfghanistan–Pakistanregion.Inanironictwist,theIslamistmilitantsnurturedbyPakistan’smilitaryintelligenceagency,theISI,asstrategicassetsinAfghanistanturnedtowagingwaragainstthePakistanistate.

Pakistan:WarWithoutEnd

Pakistan’sdescentintoviolenceandchaosinthetwenty-firstcenturyisrootedinthesameColdWarmachinationsthathadinflictedcollectivesufferingandmiseryonthepeopleofAfghanistan.Throughoutthe1979–1989decade,theUnitedStateschanneledaidtosomeofthemostchauvinistandmisogynistIslamistgroupsinPakistan,breedingviolence,extremism,anda“Kalashnikovculture”acrosstheAfghanistan–Pakistanborderlands(Riedel2008,33).DuringmuchthesameperiodGeneralZia-ul-Haq’smilitaryregime(1977–1988)transformedPakistanintoasiteandconduitforbankrollingCIA-backedmilitaryoperationsbymujahideenfightersinAfghanistan.

ThePakistanregime’scollaborationwiththeUnitedStatesinAfghanistanparalleledadomesticpolicyofIslamization.WomenborethebruntofanovertlygenderedIslamizationprogram:nonmaritalsexandadulterywerecriminalized,andthousandsofwomenaccusedof“honorcrimes”wereimprisoned.Womenwereunabletoseekredressthroughthecriminallaw,asvictimsofrapeandsexualabuseweredeemedguiltyofillicitsex,andthevalueofawoman’stestimonywasdeemedhalfthatofaman’s(Lau2007,1296).TheselawsformedpartofalargerIslamizationagendathatincludedanantiblasphemylawwithamandatorydeathpenaltyforanyonedefamingtheProphetMohammed;itwasroutinelymisusedagainstreligiousminoritiesbyextremistgroups(MRG2010).

StatepolicyofusingIslamtopromotemisogynistandsectarianagendaswastakenfurtherbytheISI,whosecultivationofmujahideengroupsincludingal-QaedatomaintaininfluenceinAfghanistanbredacultureofweapons,violence,andanarchyinPakistan’snorthwesternborderlandsadjoiningAfghanistanandaclimateofviolence,fear,andintolerancewithinthecountry.ThecoreidiomofbothGeneralZia-ul-Haqandthemujahideenwasreligion.WhiletheformerhadusedSharialawtoIslamizePakistanduringthe1980s,theTalibanandalliedIslamistgroupsadvancedavariationofthesameagendaduringthe1990sthroughindiscriminateviolenceandterror.

Pakistan’scorruptanddiscreditedciviliangovernments(BenazirBhutto,1988–1990,1993–1996;NawazSharif,1990–1993,1997–1999),togetherwiththecontinueddominanceofthemilitaryanditscollaborationwithIslamistgroups,weakenedtheauthorityofthePakistanistateanditscapacitytoimposelawandorder.In1999GeneralPervezMusharrafseizedpowerthroughamilitarycoupd’état.Inthewakeof9/11andtheUS-led“waronterror”againstbinLadenandal-QaedainAfghanistan,PakistanonceagainbecameacloseandcrucialUSally.GeneralMusharraf’sdomesticandforeignpolicieswereatoddswithhispubliccommitmenttoclampdownonextremistgroupsinPakistan:violencebyIslamistgroupscontinued,andTalibanandal-Qaedafugitivesremainedelusive(Mir2009,383–384).Musharraf’slackofapopularmandate,hisfixingofelections,andattacksagainstPakistan’sinstitutions—especiallythejudiciary—andthemilitary’scontinuedpatronageofIslamistextremistgroupsunderhiscommandfurthererodedthefalteringintegrityandauthorityofthestate(LevyandScott-Clarke2007).

21

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 7 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

PakistanwasostensiblycommittedtotheUS-ledpost-9/11“waronterror”intheregion.Yetitsinternalcontradictionsimpededanymeaningfulprogresstowardeliminatingthedomesticrootsofthisterror.Forpreciselythisreason,ademocraticallyelectedciviliangovernmentin2009possessedthemandate,yetlackedthepowerorauthority,tocontainIslamistterror.Thestate’scapacitytogovern,eliminateinternalthreats,orprotectcitizen’srights,especiallythoseofwomenandreligiousminorities,wasdangerouslyundermined.Islamistgroupssteppeduptheirwaragainstthestate,heighteningthedriftandchaoswithinPakistan.In2010aspateofkillingsofreligiousminoritiesbytheTalibanwentunpunishedevenasitsperpetrators“congratulatedPakistanisfortheattacks,callingpeoplefromtheAhmediyyaandShiacommunities‘theenemiesofIslamandcommonpeople’andurgingPakistanistotakethe‘initiative’andkilleverysuchpersoninrange”(HumanRightsWatch2010).

Moreominously,therewasincreasingevidenceoflinksamongthePakistanimilitary,itsintelligenceagency(theISI),andIslamistmilitants. UnderinternationalpressuretocurtailtheactivitiesofPakistan-basedIslamistmilitantgroupsinAfghanistanandIndian-administeredKashmir, IslamistmilitancyrelocatedtoPakistan’sfar-flungtribalareasadjoiningAfghanistantoperpetrateattacksagainstthestate.Thisplacedthemilitary—theprincipalpatronofIslamistterrorinPakistan—intheparadoxicalpositionofhavingtowagewaragainsttheveryconstituencyithadsupportedfordecades.

UnderassaultfromTalibanforcessince2007,theSwatValleyinnorthwesternPakistanadjoiningAfghanistanfelltotheTalibanin2009.AgenderedparalleladministrationwasswiftlyestablishedbytheTaliban,withprohibitionsagainstwomen’spresenceinmarketsandotherpublicplaces. TheTalibandestroyedapproximatelytwohundredgirls’schools,bannedfemaleeducation,andimposedSharialaw. ThewarintheSwatValleyhadaprofoundeffectonwomen,whereadeeplycompromisedandweakenedPakistanistatecededitssovereigntytoIslamistsandwasnolongerinapositiontoprotectwomen’srights.

AccordingtoPakistan’sNationalCommissionontheStatusofWomen,womenfactoryworkersinMingora,Swat’smaintown,wereunabletoreturntowork.AwomanfromSwatdescribedthegenderedfalloutofthesecuritydeficitcreatedbyPakistan’sdomesticwarofterror:“‘WeworrytheTalibanwillreturnandthepersecutionwillstartagain.Ineveryneighbourhoodtherearepeoplewhoarelinkedtothemilitantsandwhokeepaneyeontheactivitiesofuswomen,’saidSumiraBibi,20,whoworksatacosmeticsfactoryinMingora”(IRIN2010a).Women’spremonitionsinSwatwereeerilyprescient:theTalibanpresenceandassaultagainstwomencontinued.Talibanmilitantsgunneddownayounggirl,MalalaYousafzai,inSwatforendorsinggirls’education. BythetimethePakistanimilitaryretookSwat,thewarhadcreatedtensofthousandsofrefugeesandahumanitariantragedy.

UnderpressurefromtheUnitedStates,thePakistanimilitarylaunchedoffensivesintheremote,mountainous,andsociallyconservativeareasofNorthandSouthWaziristan,whichhadbecomeTaliban andal-Qaeda havensafter9/11andtheUScounteroffensiveinAfghanistan;militantsfleeingtheUSassaulthadcrossedthebordertotakeshelterinWaziristan’smountainousterrain.FacingstiffresistanceandunabletooverwhelmTalibanforcesinWaziristan,themilitaryenteredintoahastyandtemporarypeaceagreementwiththelatter,whichworkedtotheiradvantage.InSouthWaziristanTalibandecreesenforcedagenderedregime,includingadresscodeforwomen.AlocalresidentofMiramshah,NorthWaziristan’smaintown,describedthestricturesagainstwomenbytheTaliban:

Tribesmenwereinformedthroughmosqueloudspeakers…thatnowomanwouldbeallowedtoleavehomeandcastavote….[P]amphletswerehandedoutinMiramshahwarningtribesmennottoletwomenvoteinthegeneralelections,threateningpunishmentforthosewhodid.“Takeourwords,thiskindofdisgracefulactwillnotbetoleratedandanyoneinfluencingwomentocastavotewillbepunished,”saidthepamphlet,signedby“mujahideen”andthrownfromvehiclesintoshops.

(Al-Arabiya2013)

Women’srightsworkersfacedever-presentdanger,especiallyintheAfghanistan–Pakistanborderlands,whereideologiesnurturedduringtheColdWarandfortifiedbyapost-9/11“waronterror”andISI-backedIslamizationcontinuedtoextractadeadlypricefromwomen:

FaridaAfridi,a25-year-oldwomanworkingforTribalNGOsConsortiumintheKhyberAgencywasshotdeadbymilitantswhileonherwaytowork.“ThemilitantsarelabellingtheNGOs,especiallywherewomenareworking,asspreadingobscenitiesandvulgarities,”saidatribalelderintheregion,who

22

23

24

25

26

27 28

29

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 8 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

spokeanonymouslyforfearofbeingtargetedforhiscommentsandfortalkingtoafemalejournalist.

(Langevine2012)

By2011thedeadlyportentsofIslamistterrorhadseepedintoPakistan’sPunjabheartland.ThegovernorofPunjabwasmurderedforcriticizingthemisuseofablasphemylawagainstreligiousminorities.Pakistan’sonlyChristiancabinetmember,ShahbazBhatti,metwiththesamefate.Ahmadis,Christians,Hindus,andShias,aswellasmoderateSunnis,weretargetedbyIslamistgroups. Suicidebombings,killings,andassassinationsbyTalibanandal-Qaeda-alliedgroupstargetedallsectionsofPakistanisociety,includingjournalists.

Pakistan’s“waronterror”hadtheeffectofheighteninginstabilityandreinforcingolderconflicts.Baluchistan—Pakistan’spoorest,albeitmineral-richprovince—turnedintoastrategicTalibanbase andahideoutfortheQuettashura,aTalibanwarcouncilheadedbyMullahOmar,anAfghanwarveteranleadingmilitaryoperationsagainstWesterntroops.TheanarchycreatedbytheTalibanincursionintoBaluchistanreignitedolderfaultlinesofconflict:anongoingBaluchiantistatemovementforself-determinationmorphedintodeadlyattacksagainstnon-Baluchicivilians.During2008–2010ethnicandreligiousminority(PunjabiandShiite)teachersweremurderedbyBaluchinationalistsinaretaliatoryresponseagainstthePakistanistateforabusesbyitssecurityforces(HumanRightsWatch2010).

TherewasanadditionalgenderdimensiontotheUS–Pakistanjoint“waronterror.”DuringtheruleofGeneralPervezMusharraftherewasadramaticincreaseinthedisappearanceofterrorsuspects.Womenformedassociationstodemandaccountabilityfortheir“disappeared”malekin.Oneofthewomen,AmnaMasoodJanjua,hastriedinvaintolocateherhusband,whodisappearedmysteriouslyfromabusstationintheirhometownofRawalpindiinJuly2005.Shebelievesherhusband,aschoolprincipalandbusinessman,isoneofthehundredsofpeoplewhohavebeendetainedwithoutchargebyPakistan’sintelligenceagenciesinthestate’swaragainstmilitantorganizationsandhavenotbeenseensince(Masood2009).AUSsecurityofficialconfirmedthatthedisappearancesintheimmediateaftermathofthe9/11attackswereanoutcomeof

theclosecooperationwithPakistaninthefightagainstterrorism,andthat“Pakistanhadhandedoverterrorsuspectstous.”TheallegationsofwomenlikeMrs.Masood“wouldn’tsurpriseme,”theofficialsaid,stressinghoweverthattheywereunproven.Inoverfiveyears,Mrs.Masood’sgroupregistered1,030disappearances.“Somehadbeentakenbypoliceandplainclothesmenforquestioningandnevercameback,”Mrs.Masoodsaid.“Othersjustmysteriouslydisappeared,likemyhusband—laterwefoundoutthattheyhadbeenarrested.”Ninety-ninepercentaremen.

(Mekhennet2012)

TheinstabilityandinsecuritygeneratedbytheUS–PakistancollaborationduringtheColdWarandpost-9/11“waronterror”createdaclimateinwhichwomenweresubjecttohighlevelsofviolenceandkillingacrossthecountry.Inits2009report,TheHumanRightsCommissionofPakistanreported1,384murders,928rapes,and604“honorkillings”ofwomen.In2012therewasa7percentincreaseinviolenceagainstwomen(TheNation2012).NeitherciviliangovernmentsnorPakistan’spowerfulmilitaryhasbeenabletocontrolthegamutofIslamistforcesproducedbybothwars.Indeed,themilitaryisitselfgreatlycompromisedbycolludingwiththeveryforcesitwassubsequentlybattlingtosubdue.Ontheotherhand,USpolicytopromote“democracy”inPakistanisatoddswithitsclosecollaborationwithmilitaryregimesinthecountry,itscomplicityinarbitraryandillegaldetentions,anddronestrikesintheremotenorthwesternregionthatpromoteacultureofimpunityandincreaseIslamizationoflocalpopulationsintheregion.AnewdemocraticallyelectedgovernmentheadedbythePakistanMuslimLeague(PML)wassworninafterelectionsin2013.Whetherithasthecapacity,competence,orwilltostemthetideofviolenceandextremismacrossPakistanremainstobeseen.

India:DemocracyatWar

DemocracyismodernIndia’ssingularandmostenduringachievementinaSouthAsianregioncharacterizedbywar,militaryintervention,andauthoritarianrule.Indiahascontinuedtobeafunctioningdemocracy,yetithassimultaneouslywitnessedincreasingpoliticalviolenceandadeepeningcrisisofgovernabilityoverthedecades(Kohli1990).Thepostindependencesecular-nationalistconsensusraisedhopesforastable,secular,and

30

31

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 9 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

democraticIndia.However,withinthefirsttwodecades(1947–1967)ofindependence,theorderandstabilityprovidedbyapan-IndiaCongressPartyhaderoded,togetherwithadeclineintheoveralllegitimacyofthepoliticalsystem.

OnemajordimensionofthecrisishasbeentheIndianstate’sfailuretoaccommodatetheaspirationsofethnicminoritiesandtheconsequentemergenceofanumberofsecessionistmovementsinthenortheasternregion,wheredemandsforgreaterautonomyorself-determinationweremetbymilitarilybackedrepression.Thestate’sresorttoextralegalmeanstoaddresspoliticalgrievanceresultedintheriseofextremist/militantgroups,whosetargetingofstatesecurityforcesrationalizedeverhigherlevelsofrepressionagainstciviliansandself-perpetuatingcyclesofviolenceandabuse.Linksbetweenlocalmilitantgroupsandsympatheticcross-nationalconstituenciesreinforcedastate-centricdiscourseof“terror”thatsoughttodiscreditanddelegitimizelocalpopularresistancepreciselyonthiscount.Presentlymorethanfifty-sixmillioncitizensineightstatesacrossIndia(seetable1)livedailyunderpatentlyundemocraticandextraordinarilyrepressiveconditionsevenasIndiais,simultaneously,theworld’slargestdemocracy.

Table1:StatesandPopulationundertheArmedForcesSpecialPowersAct(AFSPA)

StatesinIndiaundertheAFSPA StatePopulation

Assam 31,169,272

Manipur 2,721,756

Meghalaya 2,964,007

Mizoram 1,091,014

Nagaland 1,980,602

Tripura 3,671,032

ArunachalPradesh(TirapandChanglangdistricts)

259,949

JammuandKashmir 12,548,926

TOTAL 56,406,558

Source:PopulationCensusofIndia(2011).

India’sdomesticconflictshavenotbeenaccordedtheinternationalattentiontheydeserve.TheIndianstatedoesnotacknowledgetheexistenceofdomesticarmedconflictforfearofaccordinglegitimacytoarmedgroups. Ithasemployedargumentsaroundsovereigntytodeflectcriticismregardingitshumanrightsrecordinconflictzones.TheempiricalcontextofconflictzonesinIndiaisbroadlysimilarintermsofapervasiveandintrusivesecuritypresence;repressivesecuritylegislation;andthesuspensionof,amongothers,therighttolife,therighttofreespeechandpeacefulassembly,therighttobefreeofinhumanordegradingtreatment,andtherighttoafairtrial.India’sparadoxofademocracyatwarissynonymouswithincreasedrelianceonthemilitaryasameansofassertingauthorityinthenortheasternregionandinKashmir:

Indiahasnotfoughtanywarinthepast25yearsbutitsarmedforcesremainthebusiestpeacetimearmyfightinginternalwars.Officialsrefusetoprovideexactforcedeployment.However,morethanone-thirdofthearmyisengagedinJammuandKashmirandthenorth-easternstates.

(Navlakha1997,299)

32

33

34

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 10 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

Amongotherlaws,securitylegislationsuchastheArmedForcesSpecialPowersAct(AFSPA),inforceinallconflictzones,empowersthemilitarytosearchhomesandarrestcitizenswithoutwarrant,destroyhousesandvillages,andshootunarmedcivilianswiththeintenttokill.Soldiersandsecurityforcesareaccordedimmunityfromprosecutionforcommittinganyoftheseacts,evenascitizensinconflictzonesaredenieddemocraticrightsandcivilliberties—includingtheextraordinarydenialoftherighttolife.TheAFSPAviolatesthenonderogableprovisionsofinternationalhumanrightslaw,includingtherighttolifeandtherighttobefreefromarbitrarydeprivationofliberty,torture,andcruel,inhuman,ordegradingpunishment,asenshrinedintheInternationalCovenantonCivilandPoliticalRights(ICCPR),towhichIndiaisasignatory.TheAFSPAalsoviolatesarticle21oftheconstitutionofIndia. RepressivelegislationsuchastheAFSPAallowsmilitaryforcestowagewaragainstrecalcitrantpopulationswithimpunity.AnAmnestyInternationalreportonthenortheasternstateofManipurcapturesthemethodologyoftheIndianstate’soffensiveagainstdomestic“terror”:

AhardlinecombingoperationlaunchedinAugust1987haskilledatleast14Manipurvillagers,torturedothersanddetainedmanymore;125houseshavebeenburnedanddismantled,[and]grainstores,vegetableplots,domesticgoods,andlivestocklooted.Womenhavebeensexuallyabused[and]beaten;norhavechildren(severaldozen)beenspared.

(Talwalker1991,89)

India’sdomesticconflictzonesaredeeplygendered.Reliableinformationregardingthenatureandscaleofviolenceandrepressionagainstwomenintheseregionsisnotavailable;forculturalreasonsmanyrapesgounacknowledgedandunreported.However,anincreasingbodyofevidencetestifiestothemultipleanddauntingchallengesfacedbywomeninIndia’sconflictzones:asvictimsandsurvivorsofdirectviolencebystateforcesandnonstategroups;widowsgrievingforthelossoftheirhusbands;femaleheadsofhousehold,burdenedwiththeresponsibilityofensuringtheeconomicsurvivaloftheirfamilies;orcitizensdemandingjusticeandaccountabilityfromthestateforthedeathordisappearanceoflovedones.Thetraumaoflosingkinmembersandthestressofwidowhoodandresponsibilityforthefamilyinflictmentaldisorders,depression,insomnia,andpoorphysicalhealthonwomen.Widowhoodaffectsnutritionlevelsbecauseitisoftenaccompaniedbypoverty,andaccesstohealthcareisespeciallydifficultinruralareas.Therearelargenumbersofyoungwomenandwidowswithverylittlehopeofformingamaritalrelationshipintheabsenceofeligiblemales(HumanRightsLawNetwork2010,34).

SexualviolenceagainstwomenhasbeenintegraltotheIndianstate’scounteroffensiveinconflictzones.ItisusedasaweaponofwartoinflictindividualandcollectivedishonoronethnicminoritiesunwillingtointegratewithintheIndianUnion.InthenortheasternstateofNagaland,forexample,inalettertoPrimeMinisterIndiraGandhidatedSeptember14,1971,KuhoviJimomicondemnedthesexualoffensiveoftheIndianArmyagainstgirlsinherstate,whichsheassertedwascondoned,ifnotactivelyendorsed,bythehighestexecutiveauthoritiesoftheIndianstate:

Hon’blePrimeMinister,

InthewakeofthebestialdebaucheryexhibitedbyofficersoftheIndianArmy,IsendherewithaprotestnotetotheGovernmentandpeopleofIndia.MassrapecommittedbyIndiantroopsagainstwomenresidentsofCheswezumion9-12-1970when18girlswereraped;9marriedgirlswereraped.TheanimalpassionoftheIndianarmypersonnelthatfelluponthefemalepopulationofMaoSongSongtownon24March1971….ThesexualdepravityoftheIndianarmypersonnelagainsttheNagagirlsisatacticalmoveoftheIndianarmyoffensiveinNagaland.IthasbeenwidelydemonstratedinallpartsofthecountryduringthesixteenyearsoftheIndo-Nagaconflict.ThereisglaringevidencethattheIndianArmyisconductingmilitarismandsexualdebaucherythroughunderhanddirectivesreceivedfromtheHighCommand.

(Desai1991,81–82)

Women’ssexualsubjugationbystateforceshasremainedunchangedfordecades.In2004inthenortheasternstateofManipur,ThangjamManoramaDeviwasarrestedatherhomeatnightandtakenintocustodybysoldiersoftheAssamRiflesonsuspicionoflinkstoseparatistmilitantgroups.Hercorpsewasfoundbyvillagersalittledistancefromherhome.Shehadbeenshotthroughthelowerhalfofherbody,raisingsuspicionthattheshooting

35

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 11 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

hadbeenusedtohideevidenceofrape.TheAssamRifles(astate-supportedparamilitaryoutfitinIndia’snortheasternregionresponsibleforthekilling)claimedshehadbeenshotwhiletryingtoescape.AfterManorama’smurder,agroupofManipuriwomenprotestedbystrippingnakedinfrontofthemilitaryheadquartersatthestatecapital,Imphal,holdingabannerthatread,“IndianArmyRapeUs”(HumanRightsWatch2008,2–4).

Impunityforperpetratorsofviolenceagainstwomeninconflictzones,aself-servingpolicythatdeniestheexistenceofdomesticwarzonesandsupportsaprotectiveveneerofformaldemocracy,allowsIndia’sappallingrecordinitsconflictzonestogounquestioned.Justiceforcrimesagainstwomenbysecurityforcesisrarely,ifever,enforced.Nineyearsafterherdaughter’sdeath,

thefrailmotherofManoramaThangjam,whowasarrested,rapedandshotdeadallegedlybysomepersonnelof17AssamRiflesonJuly11,2004,[told]Ms.Manjooaboutthetragicdeathofthegirl[and]ferventlyappealedtoherforjustice.RashidaManjoo,U.N.SpecialRapporteuronviolenceagainstwomen,itscausesandconsequences,brokedownandweptforafewminutesuncontrollably…duringaconsultativemeetinghere.Itwasattendedbyabout200humanrightsdefenders,familiesofvictimsandcivilsocietyorganisations.

(Laithangbam2013)

Inanextraordinaryprotest,IromSharmilaChanu,awomanfromthenortheasternstateofManipur,hasbeenonahungerstrikeforthirteenyearstopressfortherevocationoftheAFSPA.ShewaspreventedfrommeetingRashidaManjooduringthelatter’svisittoManipur.

AmongalltherebellionsbyethnicminoritiesagainsttheIndianstate,therevoltinIndian-administeredKashmirwasdifferentbyvirtueofitsinternational/externaldimensions.Kashmir’srevolt(1989–1990)reignitedafesteringrivalrybetweenIndiaandPakistanovertheterritoryofKashmir.Kashmir’srevoltagainsttheIndianstateanditsdemandforself-determinationwasmetwithacounteroffensivebasedoncoerciverepression.SensinganopportunitytopindownarchrivalIndia,Pakistan’spolitical-militaryestablishmentdivertedaconglomerationofIslamistgroupsfromAfghanistanandPakistantofightIndianmilitaryforcesinKashmir.Pakistan’smilitaryinterventioninKashmirinflamedtheIndian–PakistanirivalryovertheterritoryevenasitprovidedtheIndianstatewithanopportunityto(mis)representtheKashmirimovementforself-determinationascross-border“terror”emanatingfromPakistan.Asaresult,thelong-standingpoliticaldisputebetweenthepeopleofKashmirandtheIndianstatethatwas,infact,thesourceoftherevolt,wascompletelyovershadowedbythemilitarizedandnuclearizedIndian–PakistanirivalryoverKashmir’sterritory.Intheaftermathof9/11andinternational,especiallyWestern,fearsregardingIslamistterror,itbecamerelativelyeasyforIndiatoclaimtobeavictimofPakistan-sponsored“terror”inKashmir.India’sself-servingofferof“unconditionalandunambiguous”(Puri2001,3805)supporttothepost-9/11US-led“waronterror”intheregionhelpedpaperoveritsownextraordinarilyrepressive“warofterror”inKashmir.

TheexperienceofKashmiriwomenundertheformidableantiterrorcounteroffensivebytheIndianstatewasnotverydifferentfromthatofwomeninNagalandorManipur.Indeed,Kashmirhasthedubiousdistinctionofhavingthehighestincidenceofsexualviolenceintheworld(MSF2006)—alittle-knownfactinternationally.RapeandsexualabuseofKashmiriMuslimwomenbyIndianstatesecurityforcesisfrequentandroutinelygoesun-investigatedandunpunished.AcaseinpointistheKashmirivillageofKunanPoshpora.InFebruary1991hundredsofIndiansoldiersarrivedatKunanPoshporaatnight.AccordingtoAmnestyInternational,themenfromthevillageweretakenfromtheirhomesduringthenightandinterrogatedandtorturedaboutmilitantactivity,whilelargenumbersofwomenandgirlsbetweenthirteenandeightyyearsofagewererapedatgunpointintheirhomes.ThereportquotedlocalmagistrateS.M.Yasin,whotestified:

Thearmedforceshadturnedviolentandbehavedlikebeasts.Villagerssaidthatlocalpolicehadnotpermittedthewomentobemedicallyexamined.Mr.Yasinrequestedaninquiryintotheincidentandpunishmentfortheculprits.ThestatecommissionerofKashmirsaidthatofficialsinDelhihaddeniedthechargeswithoutfirstcheckingwithKashmiriofficials.MembersofaKashmirihumanrightsdelegationweretoldthatthepoliceinvestigationorderedintotheincidenthadnotproceededbecausethepoliceofficerassignedtocarryouttheinvestigationwasonleave.

(AmnestyInternational1991)

36

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 12 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

Officialresponsetosexualabusebystateforcesinconflictzoneshascenteredonsilence,denial,orobfuscationofevidence.UndertheAFSPA,enforcedinallconflictzones,legalimpunityforsexualviolenceimpedesinvestigationandprosecutionoftheperpetratorsandpreemptsjusticeforthevictims/survivors.TheIndianStatePartywasreprimandedbytheCEDAWCommitteeforitscontinuedtolerationofabusesbyitsarmedforcesinconflictzonesandwasurgedtoabolishtheAFSPA:

WhentheCommitteeontheEliminationofDiscriminationagainstWomenconsideredIndia’ssecondandthirdperiodicreportsin2007itnotedthegenderaspectoftheabusescreatedortoleratedbythecontinuedapplicationoftheArmedForcesSpecialPowersActinthedisturbedareasofIndia.IturgedtheIndianauthoritiestotakestepsto“abolishorreform”theActandto“ensurethatinvestigationandprosecutionofactsofviolenceagainstwomenbythemilitaryindisturbedareas[includingManipur]andduringdetentionandarrestisnotimpeded.”

(AsianHumanRightsCommission2011,15)

The“warsofterror”wagedbytheIndianstateagainstethnicminoritiesinthenortheastandinKashmirareindicativeofadeepandcorrosivepoliticalcrisiswherebyalldemandsforgreaterautonomyareconstruedasathreattothenation-state.Thosemakingsuchdemandsaredeemed“undeservingofrights”andaresubjecttorepressionwithimpunity.ThepoliticalcostsofIndia’sdomestic“warsofterror”arehigh;ethnicgrievancesandasenseofinjusticerundeep.Therationalizationofevergreaterlevelsofrepressionagainstdissidentpopulationsinconflictzones,includingsexualandotherformsofviolenceagainstwomen,reinforcespopulargrievancesandpreemptsthepossibilityofdemocraticandlegalconflictresolution.

SriLanka:StateofTotalWar

ThesituationinSriLankaisparticularlytragic,giventhecountry’spostindependencesocioeconomicachievements.Untilthe1970s,priortothebeginningoftheSinhalese–Tamilethnicconflict,SriLankawasadevelopingcountrymakingimpressiveprogress.Asubstantialsocialwelfareprogram,includinghealthandeducation,contributedtosignificantincreasesinwomen’slifeexpectancyrates,from41.6yearsin1946to74.2yearsinthe1990s,andinwomen’sliteracy,from67.3percentin1963to87.9percentin1994(Basu2005,6).Despitethewar,SriLankacontinuedtoregisterhigheconomicgrowthratesandsocialindicators;thecripplingeconomic,social,andphysicalcostsofwarwerelargelyconfinedtotheTamil-inhabitedareasofnorthernandeasternSriLanka,whichwitnessedsomeofthemostdestructiveandbrutalfightingduringtheclosingphaseofthewar.

TheSinhalesearethedominantethnicgroup,comprisingapproximately75percentoftheSriLankanpopulation.TheTamilminority residesinthenorthernandeasternpartsoftheisland.TamilsarepartoftheDravidianethnicgroupofpeninsularIndia,alsoregardedasthecommunity’sculturalhomeland.MuchlikeIndia’sdomesticwars,thewarinSriLankawasprecipitatedbytheaccumulationofpopulargrievancesinthewakeofinstitutionalizeddiscriminationagainsttheTamilethnicminority:

TheSinhala-OnlyActof1956,making…SinhalathesolelanguageaffectedtheadvancementofTamilsinpublicsectoremployment.[The]landdistributionpolicybythestatefacilitatedanincreaseinthenumbersofSinhalasettlersinareaspredominantlyoccupiedbyTamilsandMuslims.Accesstoresources,electoraloutcomesandpoliticalrepresentationforTamil-speakingpeopleswereallaffected.Thefrustrationatnon-violenteffortsbypost-independenceTamilpoliticalpartiestohavetheirgrievancesheardbySinhala-dominatedgovernments,andsubsequentlytosecureself-determinationthroughpeacefulmeans,ledtotheriseofmilitancyamongTamilyouthinthelate1970s.Eventsleadingtotheanti-TamilpogrominJuly983aredeemedtheofficialbeginningofthearmedethnicconflict.

(Tambiah2004,79)

Sinhalesenationalism,itsoppositiontoTamilmovesforpoliticaldecentralization,andtheprogressivedemiseofmoderateTamilgroups allowedtheLiberationTigersofTamilEelam(LTTE)toemergeasthesolerepresentativeofTamilaspirationsforself-determinationinthetraditionalTamilhomelandsofnorthernandeasternSriLanka.Both

37

38

39

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 13 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

areastransformedintositesofwarandterrorastheLTTElauncheditsarmedstruggleagainsttheSriLankanstate.

WomenwereintegraltoLTTE’sideologyandagenda.In1983theLTTEestablishedawomen’swingwhosecadresincludedyounggirls.Intheearlyphaseofwomen’srecruitmentintotheLTTE,theywereengagedinpropaganda,surveillance,andmedicalandfund-raisingactivities.Subsequently,duetoashortageofpersonnel,womenwereincorporatedintoawell-organizedwomen’smilitarywingandgivencombatroles.TheywerealsopartoftheLTTE’ssuicidesquadsanditsnavalforce(Basu2005,9).AmritaBasuarguesthatfemalerecruitsjoinedtheLTTEbecausetheycouldrelateculturallytoitsgenderedappealsregardingsacrificeandnation(2005,10).Thismay,however,beonlyapartialexplanationinacontextinwhichinordinateattentionpaidtotheLTTEfemalesuicidebomberandthestereotypingoffemaleTamilresistancefightersbytheLTTEandtheSriLankanstatehaveimpededpublicdisseminationofinformationregardingthesubjectivelives,thesocioeconomicandeducationalfactors,aswellastheevents,politicalchoices,andconvictionsthatshapedanddrovewomen’sdecisionstojointheLTTE(DeMel2007,199).

TheeliminationofmoderateTamilgroupsbytheLTTEanditsestablishmentofadefactostateinnorthernandeasternSriLankaprecededaNorwegian-brokeredtwenty-monthcease-fire(2002)betweenLTTEandgovernmentforces.Repeatedcease-fireviolationsoccurredthroughout2006.Inthesameyearmilitaryoperationsinthenorthernandeasterndistricts promptedLTTEattacksagainstSriLankanforcesinbothregionsandaspateofsuicideattacksandbombingsintheSouth,includinginColombo,thecapital.TheLTTEalsoassassinatedTamilsaffiliatedwithotherpoliticalfactions, Tamildissidents, andMuslimandSinhalesecitizens(Tambiah2004,80).TheSriLankanstate’scounteroffensivecenteredonbombingandshellingTamilcivilianareasinthenorthandeast;attacksonTamilcivilians;andtheuseofterror,torture,disappearance,andrapeasweaponsofwar.

Thedestructionandruininflictedbydecadesofwarisevidentinthephysicaldesolationofthenorthernandeasternprovinces,wheremanytownsresembleEuropeancitiesaftertheSecondWorldWar(Sebastiann.d.).By2002itwasestimatedthatsome70,000peoplehadlosttheirlivesintheconflict;upto600,000peopleweredisplaced:75,000livingincampsinSriLankaforinternallydisplacedpeopleandapproximately500,000havingleftSriLanka(Alison2003,38).

ThecostsofthreedecadesofwarforwomeninSriLankahavebeengruesomeandchilling.SexualviolenceandabuseofTamilwomenbySriLankansecurityforceswasintegraltothestate’soffensiveagainsttheLTTE.ThepresenceofarmedfemaleLTTEcadresimpartedasexualizededgetotheanti-LTTEcounteroffensive.Therehasasyetbeennosubstantivestudyonsexualcrimesagainstwomenduringthewar,althoughagrowingbodyofevidencepointstothecomplicityofstateforcesinthewidespreadsexualabuseofTamilwomeninthenorthandeast.Women’saffiliationorlinkswiththeLTTEbecameajustificationforrapeandsexualabusebystateforces:

TheyaskedallsixofusifwehadanylinkswiththeLTTE.IdidnotwanttolieandgetcaughtsoItoldthemthatIhadworkedfortheLTTE.IwastakentoVeppankulamcampinVavuniya.IwasquestionedandtorturedbySriLankanarmypersonnelandsomewereinuniform.Iwasrapedmanytimes.Icannotrecallhowmanytimes.Iwaskeptindetentionfor15days.Finally,IagreedtosignpapersandadmitthatIwasafullmemberoftheLTTE.Ijustwantedtherapesandtorturetostop.

(HumanRightsWatch2013,1)

Rapewasalsousedasaninstrumenttoinstillfearandterror.UM,atwenty-five-yearoldwoman,wasdetainedatArunachalamcampaftershemanagedtofleethefightinginthenortherndistrictofMullivaikalduringthefinalweeksoftheconflictinApril2009.InhertestimonytoHumanRightsWatch,shenarratedherordeal:

TheyquestionedmeaboutmylinkswiththeLTTEandaskedaboutmyactivities.IsaidIwasforcedtoworkforLTTEanddidn’tknowanything.Theydidn’tbelieveme.Theybeatme,pulledmyhair,andbangedmyheadonawall.Theybeatmewiththeirhandsandkickedmewiththeirboots.Oneofthesoldierssaid,“Wewillteachyoualesson.”IlostconsciousnessthatdayandwhenIcameto,IrealizedIhadbeenraped.Thenmoresoldierscameandrapedme.Thiswentonformanydays.Ican’trememberhowmanytimesandhowmanysoldiersrapedme.

(HumanRightsWatch2013,1)

TheSriLankancivilwarendedafterclosetothreedecades,withtheSriLankangovernmentclaimingvictoryover

40

41 42

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 14 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

LTTE“terror”in2009.CrediblechargesofwarcrimesandsexualviolencehavebeenconsistentlydeniedbySriLankanauthorities.OfficialinvestigationsbytheUNhowever,concludedthat

whileboththegovernmentandtheLTTEcommittedatrocitiesinthefinalmonthsofthewar,thegovernmentwasresponsibleforthemajorityofdeathsandallegationsofwarcrimeswerecredible.Some40,000civilianswerekilledinthefirstfivemonthsof2009.Familiesandcommunitiesweredestroyedbeyondrecognition.Inonesurveyofthewar-tornareas,80%ofwomenwereeitherwidowed,unmarried,divorcedorlivingseparatelyfromtheirhusbands.Amongthem,70%wereheadinghouseholdsandthemajorityhadnojobs.

(“WhattheWomenSay”2013,2)

ThespiralofsexualviolenceproducedbythewarpermeatedtheintersticesofSriLankansociety,leadingtoadramaticescalationinsexualviolenceagainstwomeninthewar-affectednorthernandeasterndistricts,withatleastfivereportedincidentsofrapeeveryday;bothregionsalsoreportedincreasesinsexworkandforcedmarriage(“WhattheWomenSay”2013,2).Thedestructionofthesocialfabric,togetherwiththegeneraldevastationofthewar,fueledincreasedalcoholismamongTamilmenanddomesticviolenceinTamilhouseholds;women’seducationandemploymentwereseverelycurtailed(InternationalCrisisGroup2011).EvenaftertheformalcessationofmilitaryhostilitiesandthedecimationoftheLTTE,thereislittleofficialconcernforhumansecurity,andwomenremainmarginalizedfromdecisionsregardingsecurity:“Whiletherearesomefemalecivilianofficialsandsomeprogramsnominallydirectedatwomen,allactivitiesoccurwithinamale,Sinhalesemilitarystructure.Thevisionofsecuritythegovernmenthaspursuedisamasculine,militarizedone”(ibid.).Inadditiontobeingunderstatesurveillanceandthreat,femalekinofthedead,disappeared,ordetainedaresubjecttosuspicionandhostilitybythelargercommunity.Forinstance,familiesofthosewhowerekilledordisappearedduring2006–2008feltstigmatizedandtargetedatthetimeandfearedtheywouldbeidentifiedasafamilythatsupportedtheLTTE.Thesefamilieswereshunnedbythecommunityduetofeartheywereunderarmysurveillance.Oftenwomenhavelittleknowledgeofthelegalsystemandhavethereforebeenunabletoseeklegalrecoursetopursuecasesofdisappearanceanddetentionofmalekin.Inaddition,fearofostracism,socialstigma,andretaliationbytheperpetratorsforcewomentokeepsilent.TheirordealisheightenedduetothecultureofimpunityenforcedthroughlegislationsuchasthePreventionofTerrorismAct(“WhattheWomenSay”2013).

Againstthebackdropofphysicalandeconomicdestruction,femalesurvivorsofwarhavelittlemeansofearninganindependentincome.Thekilling,detention,ordisappearanceofalargenumberofTamilmenhasinflictednewformsofvulnerabilityonTamilwomen.Economicallyunderprivilegedwomenlacktheresourcestotakecareoftheirfamiliesorofthoseinjuredormaimedinwar.Foreconomicallyunderprivilegedwomen,thedeath,disappearance,ordetentionofmalefamilymembersdeprivesthemoftheirmajorsourceofeconomicsupport.Therehasbeenariseinthenumberoffemale-headedhouseholds,withincreasingnumbersofwomenseekingeconomicopportunitiestosupporttheirfamilies.AccordingtothereportbyaUNagency:

FifteenmonthsaftertheendoffightingbetweenSriLankangovernmentforcesandtheTamilTigers,womeninthenortharetakingupanewandchallengingroleasbreadwinnerswithmoreandmorebecomingdaylabourerstosupporttheirfamilies.AsurveyconductedbytheJaffna-basedCentreforWomenandDevelopment,anon-profitgroup,revealedthatthenorthernregionhadapproximately40,000female-headedhouseholds.“Threefactorshavereducedthemale-headedhouseholdsinnumber:thewar,disappearancesorbeinginmilitarycustody,”saidSarojaSivachandran,thecentre’sdirector….Althoughup-to-datestatisticsarehardtocomebybecausemanypeopleremaindisplaced…governmentofficialssaythenorthernandeasternregionscombinedarehometosome89,000warwidows.

(IRIN2010b)

Emergencylawsputinplaceduringthewarhavebeenextended.Lawsunderwhichsuspectscanbearrestedandputindetentionwithouttrialandsecurityforcescancarryoutsearchoperationswithoutawarrantareusedagainstdissenters,includingSinhaleseoppositionpoliticiansandjournalists.TherehasbeenaconcentrationofpowerwithinthecurrentrulingRajapaksafamilysincetheendofthewar.Asaresult,thesuppressionoffreemediaandofcriticalcivilsocietyactivismisrelativelyeasy,asisimpunityforperpetratorsofviolenceandsexualabuseagainstwomen.TheSriLankanstate’sunwillingnesstoenditsmilitarypresenceandoperationsinTamil

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 15 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

areasortodevolvepoweronprovincialandlocalinstitutionsensuresthepersistenceoftheverygrievancesthatproducedSriLanka’stragicanddevastatingwar.

Conclusion

Afghanistan,Pakistan,India,andSriLankasharearichethnicdiversity.However,postcolonialstatebuildinginIndiaandSriLankahasbeenpremisedontheforcedassimilationofpoliticalunitspeopledbyethnicminoritieswithinaunitaryconceptofthenation-state.Minoritieswhorejectintegrationhavebeensubjecttopunitiverepression,generatingpowerfulantistatemovementsandtheriseofmilitantgroupsopposedtothestate.India’sandSriLanka’sdomestic“warsofterror”originatedinthefailureofbothstatestohonor,craft,and/orimplementdemocraticpower-sharingagreementswithethnicminoritiesandasingularcontemptonthepartofbothstatesforthelegitimateclaimsofsuchminoritiestoself-governanceintheirtraditionalhomelands.The“legitimate”/stateterrorand“illegitimate”/nonstateterrorbinaryintheIndianandSriLankanstatenarrativeismisleadinganddivertspublicattentionawayfromthepoliticaloriginsofthesewars.Italsomaskstheuseofterroronagrandscalebybothstatesagainstnonstatemovementsforself-determination.

ThewarsofterrorinIndiaandSriLankainvolvedhighlevelsofviolenceandsexualabuseagainstwomen.AlthoughSriLanka’swaragainsttheLTTEhasended,thelackofpublicaccountabilityandthepersistenceofhighlymilitarizedpostwarsystemsofgovernanceinthenorthandeastofthecountryareinimicaltothehumansecurityordevelopmentinterestsofTamilwomen.Unlesswomen’sconcerns,vulnerabilities,andinterestsaretakenonboard,thereislittlepossibilityofanenduringorsustainablepeaceinSriLanka.India’srefusaltodeclaretheexistenceofdomesticwarzonesdenieswomenintheseareastheprotectionoftheGenevaConventions.Further,theIndianstate’spolicyofnegotiatingpoliticalconflictthroughmilitarymeans,itsenhancementoftherepressivepowersofthestate,itsdenialofcitizens’rightsandlibertiesinconflictzones,andtheimpunityprovidedtosecurityforcesguiltyofhumanrightsabusegreatlydiminishIndia’sclaimtodemocracy.

Incontrasttothe“warsonterror”inAfghanistanandPakistan,whichweretheoutcomeofarangeoffactors—theColdWar,dominanceofthemilitaryinpolitics,Islamization,andISIcollaborationwiththeUnitedStates—IndiaandSriLanka’sdomestic“warsofterror”werelegitimizedthroughinvocationsofsovereigntyandnationalsecurity.Paradoxically,both“democracies”haveretainedhighlymilitarizedandrepressivesystemsofgovernanceintheirrespectiveconflictzones,withfarhigherlevelsofsexualviolencethanintheirweakerandIslamistmilitancy-riddenneighbors(AfghanistanandPakistan).

TheoriginsofthewarsinAfghanistanandPakistanarerootedintheUS–PakistancollusionduringtheColdWarandthepost-9/11“waronterror”thatfosteredandstrengthenedextremistmilitantgroupsintheregion.RemnantsofolderAfghan-basedColdWarmujahideengroupsmergedwithnewerpost-9/11localandforeignIslamistmilitantgroupsinPakistan.ThesereconfiguredgroupscarriedoutcampaignsofterroragainstthePakistanistateinurbancitiesandremotemountainousareas,wagedwaragainstgovernmentandUSforcesinAfghanistan,andfoughtIndiantroopsinIndian-administeredKashmir.

TheUnitedStates,India,andAfghanistanclaimedtobefighting“warsonterror”againstPakistan-basedIslamistgroups.Yettheirdominantpatriarchal,state-centric,andsecurity-centricnarrativeeffacedthehistory(1979–1989)ofUS-ledviolenceandterrorinAfghanistanincollaborationwithamercenaryandmisogynistarmyoflocalwarlords;ignoredtheKashmiristruggleforself-determinationandtheIndianstate’styrannyinKashmir,whichinturnwasexploitedbyIslamistmilitantgroupsintheAfghanistan–Pakistanregion;andoverlookedthecollaborativeroleofsectionsofthePakistanistateincreatingandsupportingIslamistmilitantgroupsintheregion.EachofthesestrandsfueledtheparallelandintersectingwarsonandofterrorinSouthAsiathathavegeneratedextraordinarylevelsofmilitarizationacrosstheregion,reinforcedacultureofimpunity,createdgenderedformsofinsecurityandvulnerabilityforwomen,reinforcedgenderinequality,andgreatlyerodedinstitutionalmechanismsofjusticeandaccountability.

WomenhaveresistedandsurvivedtheoverarchingUS-led“waronterror”againstIslamistgroupsintheAfghanistan–Pakistanregion.AfghanwomensurvivedtheviolenceoftheUS–SovietColdWarconfrontationinAfghanistanandresistedtherestrictionsanddepredationsforcedonthembytheTaliban.DespitetheretreatoftheTalibanandtheemergenceofaciviliangovernment,Afghanistancontinuestoexperienceacripplingcrisisofsecurityandgovernance.Afghanwomenremainfarfromsecuringsubstantiverepresentationindemocratic

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 16 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

structuresandprocessesoraccessingeducational,social,andpoliticalspaces.Western-backedpro-womenpolicieshaveoftenproducedabacklashagainstwomenandgirlsbecauseoftheirperceivedassociationwithWesterninterests.RealtransformativechangeremainscontingentuponthewithdrawalofWesternmilitaryforces;demilitarization;thecreationofinstitutionsandmechanismsforsocialinteractionandmediation;andarepresentative,inclusive,gender-responsive,andwarlord-freegovernmentreceptivetowomen’ssecurity,development,andjusticeconcerns.Pakistan’scollusionwiththeUnitedStatesina“waronterror”inAfghanistanledto“warsofterror”withinPakistan.Bothwarsrenderedwomenevermorevulnerabletoviolenceanddiscriminationbymilitantgroups,withanincreasinglycompromisedPakistanistateunabletoprotectwomen’srights.

Thereexistsabroadregional/transnationalfeministpoliticaloppositiontowarandmilitarization. Thisisreflectedinthegrowingbodyofscholarlyliteratureinthearea,whichhasthepotentialtodevelopintoamoresubstantivetransnationalallianceintheregion.Partofthereasonthishasnotyethappenedliesinthedeeplyentrenchedstate-andsecurity-centricdiscourse,whichwomenhavechallengedyethavebeenunabletodislodge.AstheexamplesoftheRAWAoppositiontoUSforeignpolicyinAfghanistanandIromSharmila’sthirteen-yearprotestagainstrepressivelawsinIndia(discussedpreviously)indicatewomen’soppositionisignoredbygovernmentsandthemedia.Further,asecurity-centricdiscourseprivilegingthenation-stateconflatescriticismwithtreasonandsupportforthe“enemy,”makingitmuchmoredifficultforwomentochallengethe“nationalist”paradigmandwidentheanalyticframe.Feministscholarshiphasunderscoredtheillegitimacyofnationalsecurityregimesfromagenderperspective.Ithasthepotentialtouseitsknowledgeandresourcestodevelopacomparative,transnationalanalyticframetochallengethegenderedinsecuritiesandinequalitiesinflictedbyandrocentric,state-centric,andsecurity-centricnational,regional,andinternationalregimes.

References

Ahmed-Ghosh,Huma.(2003).“TheHistoryofWomeninAfghanistan:LessonsLearntfortheFuture.”JournalofInternationalWomen’sStudies4,no.3:1–14.

Al-Arabiya.(2013).“PakistaniWomenStoppedfromVotinginWaziristan.”Al-Arabiya,May11.Accessibleathttp://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/asia/2013/05/11/Pakistani-women-stopped-from-voting-in-Waziristan-.html(accessedJuly29,2013).

Alison,Miranda.(2003).“CogsintheWheel?WomenintheLiberationofTamilTigersEelam.”CivilWars6,no.4:37–54.

AmnestyInternational.(1991).“RapeandIllTreatmentofWomeninKashmir.”SerialnumberASA20/10/91DistrU/A108/91.

AmnestyInternational.(2012).AmnestyInternationalAnnualReport:Pakistan.London:AmnestyInternational.

AsianHumanRightsCommission.(2011).“TheArmedForcesSpecialPowersAct,1958,inManipurandOtherStatesoftheNortheastofIndia.”AsianHumanRightsCommission(HongKong).Accessibleathttp://www.epaolive.net/download/education/2011/AFSPA_1958_in_Manipur_and_other_NE_States_of_India.pdf(accessedAugust18,2013).

Baker,Aryn.(2009).“Pakistan:BehindtheWaziristanOffensive.”TimeWorld,October18.

Basu,Amrita.(2005).“Women,PoliticalPartiesandSocialMovementsinSouthAsia.”OccasionalPaper4.Geneva:UnitedNationsResearchInstituteforSocialDevelopment(UNRISD).

Cohen,Stephen.(1990).“TheIndianMilitaryandIndianDemocracy.”InIndia’sDemocracy:AnAnalysisofChangingState-SocietyRelations,editedbyA.Kohli,(123–128)Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress.

Cortright,David,andKirstenWall.(2012).AfghanWomenSpeak:EnhancingSecurityandHumanRightsinAfghanistan.UniversityofNotreDame,NotreDame,KrocInstituteforPeaceStudies.

Dawn.(2013).“TalibanBanonClothing.”(Karachi)onlineedition,July14.Accessibleat

43

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 17 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

http://dawn.com/news/1028773/taliban-ban-tight-mens-clothing-in-waziristan(accessedAugust20,2013).

DeMel,Neloufer.(2007).MilitarizingSriLanka:PopularCulture,MemoryandNarrativeintheArmedConflict.NewDelhi:Sage.

Desai,A.R.(1991).ExpandingGovernmentalLawlessnessandOrganisedStruggles:ViolationofDemocraticRightsoftheMinorities,Women,SlumDwellers,PressandSomeOtherViolations.Bombay:PopularPrakashan.

EconomicandPoliticalWeeklyofIndia.(2009).“Pakistan,Swat,TalibanandtheSharia.”44,no.9.pp.6–7.

Falk,Richard.(2012).TheWritingsofRichardFalk.NewDelhi:OrientBlackswan.

Filkins,Dexter.(2011).“TheJournalistandtheSpies.”NewYorker,September19.

Grenfell,Laura.(2004).“TheParticipationofAfghanWomenintheReconstructionProcess.”HumanRightsBrief12,no.1:22–25.

Hirshkind,Charles,andSabaMahmood.(2002).“Feminism,theTalibanandPoliticsofCounter-Insurgency.”AnthropologicalQuarterly75,no.2:339–54.

HumanRightsCommissionofPakistan.(2009).HumanRightsCommissionofPakistan:AnnualReport.PublishedbyHumanRightsCommissionofPakistan(HRCP),Karachi.Quotedonp.24.

HumanRightsLawNetwork.(2010).“Women’sRightsinConflictZones:AFocusonIndia.”HumanRightsLawNetwork.Accessibleathttp://www.hrln.org/hrln/images/stories/pdf/Report%20-%20Women%20Rights%20in%20Conflict%20Zones%20-%20A%20Focus%20on%20India.pdf(accessedAugust5,2013).

HumanRightsWatch.(2008).TheseFellowsMustBeEliminated:RelentlessViolenceandImpunityinManipur.NewYork:HumanRightsWatch.

HumanRightsWatch.(2010).“Pakistan:MassacreofMinorityAhmadis.”June1.Accessibleathttp://www.hrw.org/news/2010/06/01/pakistan-massacre-minority-ahmadis(accessedAugust7,2013).

HumanRightsWatch.(2013).“WeWillTeachYouaLesson.”SexualViolenceagainstTamilsbySriLankanSecurityForces.NewYork:HumanRightsWatch.

InternationalCommitteeoftheRedCross(ICRC).(1999).PeopleonWar:CountryReportAfghanistan.WorldwideConsultationontheRulesofWar.Geneva:InternationalCommitteeoftheRedCross(ICRC).

InternationalCrisisGroup.(2011).SriLanka:Women’sInsecurityintheNorthandEast.AsiaReport217.Brussels:InternationalCrisisGroup.

IRIN.(2010a).“Pakistan:SwatWomenFearTalibanReturn.”IRINHumanitarianNewsandAnalysis,March2.Accessibleathttp://www.irinnews.org/report/88282/pakistan-swat-women-fear-taliban-return(accessedJune20,2013).Citedonp.21.

IRIN.(2010b).“SriLanka:WomenTakeOverasBreadwinnersinNorth.”IRINHumanitarianNewsandAnalysis,September9.Accessibleathttp://www.irinnews.org/report/90429/sri-lanka-women-take-over-as-breadwinners-in-north(accessedonAugust10,2013).

Kandiyoti,Deniz.(2005).“ThePoliticsofGenderandReconstructioninAfghanistan.”OccasionalPaper4.Geneva:UnitedNationsResearchInstituteforSocialDevelopment(UNRISD).

Koelbl,Susanne.(2009).“IslamistsTriumphinSwatValley:BowingDowntotheTaliban.”DerSpiegel,August9.

Kohli,Atul,ed.(1990).India’sDemocracy:AnAnalysisofChangingState-SocietyRelations.Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress.

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 18 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

Laithangbam,Iboyama.(2013).“UNSpecialRapporteurVisitsManipur,Weeps.”TheHindu,April29.Accessibleathttp://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/un-special-rapporteur-visits-manipur-weeps/article4665212.ece(accessedMay23,2013).

LangevineLeiby,Michele.(2012).“Activist’sKillingReverberatesinPakistan.”TheWashingtonPost,July18.Accessibleathttp://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-07-18/world/35486514_1_khyber-agency-human-rights-women-empowerment(accessedAugust15,2013).

Lau,Martin.(2007).“Twenty-FiveYearsofHudoodOrdinances—AReview.”WashingtonandLeeLawReview64,no.4:1291–1314.

Levy,Adrian,andCathyScott-Clarke.(2007).“FriendorFoe?”SanFranciscoChronicle,November11.Accessibleathttp://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/FRIEND-OR-FOE-3301300.php(accessedAugust17,2013).

Masood,Salman.(2009).“Mother’sCampaignforPakistan’sDisappeared.”TheNational,August2.Accessibleathttp://www.thenational.ae/news/world/mothers-campaign-for-pakistans-disappeared(accessedAugust12,2013).

Mekhennet,Souad.(2012).“PakistanCountsItsDisappeared.”NewYorkTimes,January17.

Mir,Amir.(2009).TalibanisationofPakistan:From9/11to26/11.NewDelhi:PentagonSecurityInternational.

MRG.(2010).“PakistanOverview.”InWorldDirectoryofMinoritiesandIndigenousPeoples.London:MinorityRightsGroupInternational.

MSF.(2006).Kashmir:ViolenceandHealth.Amsterdam:MedicinesSansFrontieres.

TheNation.(2012).“ViolenceagainstWomenIncreasedby7PCin2012.”(Karachi)onlineedition,October23.Accessibleathttp://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/karachi/23-Oct-2012/-violence-against-women-increased-by-7pc-in-2012(accessedAugust25,2013).Referenceonp.24correspondswiththeurl.

Navlakha,Gautam.(1997).“InternalMilitarization:BloodontheTracks.”EconomicandPoliticalWeeklyofIndia32,no.6:8–14.

PhysiciansforHumanRightsAfghanistan.(1998).TheTaliban’sWaronWomen:AHealthandHumanRightsCrisis.AReportbyPhysiciansforHumanRights,BostonandWashingtonD.C.

PopulationCensusofIndia.(2011).GovernmentofIndia,MinistryofHomeAffairs,OfficeoftheRegistrarGeneralandCensusCommissioner,India.

Puri,Balraj.(2001).“IndiaandtheWaragainstTerrorism.”EconomicandPoliticalWeeklyofIndia36,no.40:3805–6.

Rahman,Ainab.(2012).“TheWarforAfghanWomen.”SouthAsiaJournal,no.3.

RAWA.(2009).“AfghanWomenBeartheBruntofHypocriticalWaronTerror.”TheCommune,September27.

Riedel,Bruce.(2008).“PakistanandTerror:EyeoftheStorm.”AnnalsoftheAmericanAcademyofPoliticalandSocialScience618:31–45.

Rubin,Michael.(2002).“WhoIsResponsiblefortheTaliban?”MiddleEastReviewofInternationalAffairs6,no.1:1–16.

Samar,Sima.(2002).“StatementbyDr.SimaSamar,ViceChairoftheInterimAdministrationofAfghanistanandMinisterforWomen’sAffairs,totheUnitedNationsSecurityCouncil2002.”Accessibleathttp://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/Afghan-april02/Samar-SecCouncil.htm(accessedAugust5,2013).Dr.SimaSamarQuotedonp.15,para4.

Sebastian,Rita.(n.d.).“EthnicConflictinSriLanka:ItsEcologicalandPoliticalConsequences.”NewDelhi:Kalifor

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 19 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

Women.Accessibleathttp://www.dhf.uu.se/pdffiler/92_1_2/92_1-2_10.pdf(accessedAugust5,2013).

Sidky,H.(2007).“War,ChangingPatternsofWarfare,StateCollapseandTransnationalViolenceinAfghanistan.”ModernAsianStudies41,no.4:849–88.

Sluka,JeffreyA.(2000).“Introduction:StateTerrorandAnthropology.”InDeathSquad:TheAnthropologyofStateTerror,editedbyJ.Sluka,Philadelphia:UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress,pp.1–45.

SouthAsiaFeministDeclaration.(1989).Accessibleathttp://www.sacw.net/Wmov/sasiafeministdecla.html(accessedSeptember29,2013).

Stabile,CarolA.,andCarrieRentschler.(2005).“StatesofInsecurityandtheGenderedPoliticsofFear.”NationalWomen’sStudiesAssociationJournal17,no.3:vii–xxv.

Talwalker,Clare.(1991).“SecurityForcesAbuseHumanRights:AmnestyInternationalReportonOinam.”EconomicandPoliticalWeeklyofIndia26,no.3:89–90.

Tambiah,Yasmin.(2004).“SexualityandWomen’sRightsinArmedConflictinSriLanka.”ReproductiveHealthMatters12,no.23:78–87.

Tilly,Charles.(2004).“Terror,Terrorism,Terrorists.”SociologicalTheory22,no.1:5–13.

Vasudevan,Raksha.(2012).“InternationalEngagementinPost-conflictSriLanka:LessonsfromtheSupposedly‘Powerless’WomenfromtheNorth.”OpenDemocracy,November23.Accessibleathttp://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/raksha-vasudevan/international-engagement-in-post-conflict-sri-lanka-lessons-from-suppo(accessedSeptember30,2013).

Veit,Raphael.(2002).“Afghanistan:WaronTerror/WarinError?”AustralianQuarterly74,no.4:7–11.

Walsh,Declan.(2009).“StrategicBaluchistanBecomesaTargetinWaragainstTaliban.”TheGuardian,December21.

Walsh,Declan.(2012).“TalibanGunDownGirlWhoSpokeUpforRights.”NewYorkTimes,October9.

WatsonInstituteforInternationalStudies.(2013).“Afghanistan:16,725–19,013CiviliansKilled.”CostsofWar.February.BrownUniversity.Accessibleathttp://costsofwar.org/article/afghan-civilians(accessedJuly7,2013).

“WhattheWomenSay:ElusivePeace,PervasiveViolence;SriLankanWomen’sStruggleforSecurityandJustice.”(2013).InternationalCivilSocietyActionNetwork.NationalSecurityinPostWarSriLanka,Brief8.NewYorkandWashington,DC:InternationalCivilSocietyActionNetwork.

Notes:

( )AmongthemwereAbdar-Rahman(1880–1901),Habibullah(1902–1919),Amanullah(1919–1929),KingNadirShah(1930–1933),andKingZahirShah(1934–1973).

( )DaudKhandeposedZahirShahtoproclaimAfghanistanarepublic.HewasfollowedbyNoorMohammedTarakki,HafizullahAmin,andBabrakKarmal,allofwhomwerealignedwiththeSovietUnion.Tarakkiwasmurdered,allegedlyontheordersofhissuccessor,HafizullahAmin,whointurnwasassassinatedbytheSoviets.

( )SovietprotégéBabrakKarmalresignedin1986andwasreplacedbyanotherprotégé,MohammedNajibullah(1987–1993),whowasmurderedbyadvancingTalibanforcesin1996.

( )“TwodecadesofwarinAfghanistanhaveleftthecountrydevastated,itspopulationdepleted,andthesurvivorsphysicallyandmentallyexhausted.Thenumbersaredevastating:1.7milliondead,2millioninjuredormaimed,5milliondrivenfromtheirhomes….WarhassweptacrossAfghanistanlikewildfire,leavingbrokenlivesandbarrenlandscapesinitstrail….Warfare…hasphysicallyerasedmanyof[the]country’snaturalresources,reducedtorubblethemonumentsofitsproudhistoryandforeverscarreditspeople”(ICRC1999,5).

1

2

3

4

5

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 20 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

( )“ThedecisiontoarmtheAfghanresistancecamewithintwoweeksoftheSovietinvasion,andquicklygainedmomentum.”In1980PresidentCarterallocatedUS$30milliontotheAfghanresistance.TheReaganadministrationcontributedUS$250milliontoAfghanistan,withSaudiArabiacontributinganequalamount.By1987annualAmericanaidtoAfghanistanreachedUS$630million.ThisfiguredidnotincludecontributionsmadebyotherIslamiccountries,Israel,China,andEurope(Rubin2002,6).

( )TheAmericanCentralIntelligenceAgency(CIA)oversawthepurchaseofweaponsandtrainingfortheiruse;thePakistanISIcontrolledtheirdistributionandtransporttothewarzone.“UpontheweaponsarrivalattheportofKarachiortheIslamabadairport,theISIwouldtransporttheweaponstodepotsnearRawalpindiorQuetta,andthenontotheAfghanborder”(Rubin2002,7).

( )CortrightandWall(2012,7).

( )ThemujahideenalliancedeclaredBurhanuddinRabbanipresidentofAfghanistanin1992.In1996RabbaniandGulbuddinHekmatyar(Hizb-e-Islamifaction)signedanagreementmakingHekmatyarprimeminister.TheaccordcouldnotwithstandtheTalibanadvance.TherewasheavyfightingbetweenTaliban(Pashtun)forcesandthenon-PashtunNorthernAllianceledbyAhmedShahMassoud—anethnicTajik.InMarch1999aUN-brokeredpeaceagreementbetweentheTalibanandtheNorthernAlliancelapsedintorenewedfightingbetweentheforces.

( )TheTalibanemergedinthePashtunprovinceofAfghanistanandiscomprisedlargelyofPashtuns.TheywereledbyMullahOmar,aveteranoftheAfghanwarandaformerstudentatamadrasaormadarsa(religiousseminary)inPakistan.“OmarwasoutragedbytheinfightingofthemujahideenandespeciallybytheincreasingdeprivationstheyexactedontheAfghanpeople”(Riedel2008,34).

( )PakistancreatedandusedtheTalibaninordertomaintaininfluenceinpost–ColdWarAfghanistanandtoachieve“strategicdepth”againstIndia.TheSaudiscultivatedtheSunniTalibanasabulwarkagainstIraniansupportforShiagroupsinsideAfghanistan(Sidky2007,864).

( )SeePhysiciansforHumanRightsAfghanistan(1998,2–3).

( )“TheISIrefusedtorecogniseanyAfghanresistancegroupthatwasnotreligiouslybased.NeitherthePashtunnationalistAfghanMillatparty,normembersoftheAfghanroyalfamilywereabletooperatelegallyinPakistaniterritory”(Rubin2002,7).

( )Al-QaedaisgenerallyassumedtobeanorganizationestablishedbyOsamabinLaden.However,theterm“al-Qaeda”isnotsomuchanorganizationasitisamodeofactivismfollowedbyindividualscommittedtodefendingMuslimsagainstoppression.Theword“al-Qaeda”wasusedbyIslamistswhofoughtinAfghanistanandwhodecidedthattheirstruggledidnotendwiththeexitofSoviettroopsin1989(Burke2004,2–3).

( )In1998,promptedbytheirdeepeningrivalryoverKashmir,IndiaandPakistanconductednuclearteststhatwerewidelycondemnedacrosstheworld.In2001anattackontheIndianParliament,allegedlybyPakistan-basedIslamistmilitants,ledtothedeploymentofoveramilliontroopsontheIndia-PakistanborderinKashmirandfearsofanuclearconfrontation.

( )TheNorthernAlliancewasamujahideengroupopposedtotheTaliban.ItwasledbyAhmedShahMassoud,whowasassassinatedbytheTalibanin2001.

( )LauraBush,quotedbyAinabRahman(2012).

( )WhenquestionedaboutUSsupportforHekmatyar,aCIAofficialinPakistanexplained,“Fanaticsfightbetter”(HirshkindandMahmood2002,343).

( )HirshkindandMahmood(2002).

( )StatementbyDr.SimaSamar,Vice-ChairoftheInterimAdministrationofAfghanistanandMinisterforWomen’sAffairs,totheUNSecurityCouncilonApril25,2002.

( )TheShariaisabodyofIslamicdoctrinallawregulatingthelivesofMuslimsthathasbeensubjecttovaryinginterpretationsovertime.Amongitsmostcontestedprovisionsarethoserelatedtofamilylaws,especiallywomen’s

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 21 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

rightstodivorce,inheritance,property,andtheguardianshipofchildren.

( )Amongothercontroversialprovisions,thelawmandatedawifesubmittingtosexualintercoursewithherhusbandeveryfourthnight(CortrightandWall2012,11).

( )In2010SaleemShehzad,areporterforAsiaTimes,reportedthatISIofficialsknewthehideoutofthetopTalibanleadershipinKarachi,yetdidnotpickthemup.ShehzadalsoexposedlinksamongtheISI,al-Qaeda,andOsamabinLaden.ForafullerexposéseeFilkins(2011).

( )ThestateofJammuandKashmir(includingtheValleyofKashmir,thelocationofthepresentconflict)wasdividedin1948betweenIndiaandPakistanwithouttheconsentofthepeopleofKashmir.Theterm“Indian-administeredKashmir”referstotheterritoryunderIndiancontrol.

( )Self-styledTalibancleric“Fazlullah’sholywarriorsissuednewrulesthatreflecttheirowninterpretationofSharia.Womenarealreadybannedfromvisitingmarkets,underpenaltyofdeath,andgirlsprohibitedfromattendingschool.PoliceofficerswhoobeyordersfromIslamabadriskhavingtheirearscutofforbeingkilled.Some800policemenhavealreadydesertedtheirpoststojointheTaliban”(Koelbl2009).

( )EconomicandPoliticalWeeklyofIndia(2009).

( )“ATalibanspokesman,EhsanullahEhsan,confirmedbyphonethatMs.Yusufzaihasbeenthetarget,callinghercrusadeforeducationrightsan‘obscenity’”(Walsh2012).

( )“SouthWaziristanbecameastrongholdoftheTehrik-e-TalibanPakistan(TTP)—anumbrellagroupofmilitantsthatPakistaniofficialssayhavebeenbehindsome80%ofterroristattacksinthecountryoverthepastfewyears,includingthe2007assassinationofBenazirBhutto”(Baker2009).

( )TherewerereportedlyonethousandUzbekandforeignfightersinSouthWaziristanaffiliatedwithAl-Qaeda(Baker2009).

( )AgovernmentofficialconfirmedthewarningandtoldAFPthatlocalmilitantgroupshadpreviouslybannedthesaleoftightorsee-throughclothes(Dawn2013).

( )ThetrialjudgewhosentencedGovernorSalmanTaseer’sassassintodeathwasforcedtogointohiding.InJanuary2011thirteenShiaworshipperswerekilledinthecityofLahore.InJune2011asectarianorganization,AllPakistanStudentsKhatm-e-NubuwatFederation,distributedpamphletsinthecityofFaisalabadinPunjab,callingforthemurderofmembersbelongingtotheAhmadiyyacommunity.InSeptember2011athirteen-year-oldChristianschoolgirlfromAbbottabadwasaccusedofblasphemyandwasexpelledfromschool,andherfamilywereforcedtogointohiding,formisspellinganUrduword(AmnestyInternational2012).

( )“InBaluchistan,militantsbroadlyknownasthe‘AfghanTaliban’operatewithoutfearorhindrance.ThelongandlargelyunpatrolledbordertouchesKandahar,ZabulandHelmand,wherealmost10,000Britishtroopsarestationed.CommanderstherecomplainthattheTalibanaresuppliedinmen,weaponsandbombpartsfromBaluchistan”(Walsh2009).

( )ThepeopleofNagaland,Mizoram,Manipur,andAssaminthenortheasthaveresistedintegrationwithintheIndianUnion.

( )In1984therewereapproximatelyfortymillionIndianslivingundermilitaryrule,ifnotmilitarylaw,makingIndiaoneofthelargestmilitary-dominatedstates,evenasitwastheworld’slargestdemocracy(Cohen1990,100).

( )BasedontheCommonarticle3ofthe1949GenevaConventionsandarticle1oftheAdditionalProtocolII,theICRCdefinesinternalconflictsas“protractedarmedconfrontationsoccurringbetweengovernmentalarmedforcesandtheforcesofoneormorearmedgroups,orbetweensuchgroupsarisingontheterritoryofaState[partytotheGenevaConventions].Thearmedconfrontationmustreachaminimumlevelofintensityandthepartiesinvolvedintheconflictmustshowaminimumoforganization.”ItispossibletoapplythisdefinitiontothecaseofanumberofarmedconfrontationsinIndia.AlthoughIndiadoesnotofficiallydeclareanyofitszonesofviolenceasconflictzones,ithasbeenfightingarmedgroupsfordecadesinmanyofitsstates(HumanRightsLawNetwork2010,6).

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

South Asia’s Gendered “Wars on Terror”

Page 22 of 22

PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). (c) Oxford University Press, 2014. All RightsReserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in OxfordHandbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy).Subscriber: Oxford University Press - Master Gratis Access; date: 14 July 2014

( )AccordingtoArticle21oftheIndianConstitution,nopersonmaybedeprivedoflifeorpersonallibertyexceptaccordingtoproceduresestablishedbylaw.

( )KashmirwasnotformallypartofBritishIndia.Afterindependence,IndiarenegedonitspromisetoallowthepeopleofKashmiritodeterminetheirpoliticalfuturethroughaplebiscite.TheunresolvedstatusofKashmirwasrecognizedbytheUnitedNations.TheLine-of-ControldividingKashmir,India,andPakistanhasneverbeenacceptedorendorsedbythepeopleofKashmir.

( )Approximatelyfortythousandfemale-headedhouseholdsareknowntoexistinthenorthernareas,mostofthemcreatedbythelossofhusbandsormalekin(Vasudevan2012).

( )TheTamilsofSriLankaaredividedintotwogroups.TheSriLankanTamilscomprisethelargergroup,andtheIndianTamilsaredescendantsofIndianTamilimmigrantswhomigratedtoSriLankatoworkontheplantationsduringthecolonialperiod.

( )TherewereseveralTamilgroupscommittedtofightforTamilrights,includingTamilEelamLiberationOrganisation(TELO),thePeople’sLiberationOrganisationofTamilEelam(PLOTE),theEelamPeople’sRevolutionaryLiberationFront(EPRLF),theEelamRevolutionaryOrganisation(EROS),theTamilUnitedLiberationFront(TULF),andtheEelamNationalDemocraticLiberationFront(ENDLF).

( )TherewasintensefightingandshellingofthenortherndistrictsofJaffna,Mullaitivu,andKilinochhi,andofTrincomalee,Batticaloa,andAmparaidistrictsintheeast.

( )TheLTTEassassinatedleadersandcadresofmoderatefactionsasastrategytoadvanceitsclaimtobeingthesolerepresentativeoftheSriLankanTamilcause.ItisresponsiblefortheassassinationofTULF’sAmrithalingamandYogeswaran,UmaMaheshwariofPLOTE,K.PadmanabhaoftheEPRLF,andTELO’sSriSabaratnam.

( )Amongothers,KetheshLoganathan,LakshmanKadirgamar,andNeelanTiruchelvamwereprominentTamildissidentsdedicatedtocraftingaconstitutionalsolutiontotheconflict.AllthreewerekilledbytheLTTE.

( )TheSouthAsianFeministDeclaration(1989)expressedconcernatthemilitarizationofsocietiesacrosstheSouthAsianregionandviolenceagainstwomenbyuniformedguardiansofthestateunderthebannerofnationalsecurityandsovereignty.

SeemaKaziSeemaKazi(Ph.D.)isFellow,CentreforWomen’sDevelopmentStudies(CWDS),NewDelhi.ShehasworkedonMuslimwomenandminorityrightswithwomen’sgroupsandwithNGOsinIndiaandabroad.HerrecentworkfocusesonwarandgenderinIndian-administeredKashmir.SeemaistheauthorofBetweenDemocracyandNation:GenderandMilitarizationinKashmirandispresentlyengagedinacomparativestudyongenderandgovernanceinSouthAsianconflictzones.

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43