367
Monday 21st July Room: 01 Session: 001: Jewish Philosophy Middle Ages 9.0010.30 The Logic of Falāsifa in JudeoArabic and Hebrew Texts Chair: Steven Harvey Charles Manekin, University of Maryland, USA Title: New Light on Alfarabi's Logical Writings in Medieval Hebrew Philosophy Abstract: It has been argued that some of the logical writings of Alfarabi were among the first philosophical writings of the Arabic Aristotelians translated into Hebrew, antedating the translation of Maimonides' Guide of the Perplexed in 1199. They appear to have been studied throughout the Middle Ages, even after the logical doctrines of Aristotle were available via the commentaries of Averroes. My paper will present the results of my ongoing research into these writings and their transmission, with special emphasis on a short treatise on dialectic, the Art of Disputation, which seems to be extant only in Hebrew, and which, to my knowledge, has escaped the notice of scholars. Ariel Malachi, BarIlan University, Israel Title: Reason, Revelation and Logic: A New Perspective on Yehuda Hallevi and the Islamic "Falāsifa" Abstract: Yehuda Hallevi's attitude towards rationalism and philosophy has been discussed in prior studies, and several approaches have been presented in relation to it. I wish to discuss a new perspective regarding this issue. The main arguments I wish to present are: (a) that in spite of the general notion that Hallevi was an antirationalist thinker, he nonetheless offered the learned reader a rational and coherent attitude towards reason and philosophy. (b) That this attitude relies directly on Aristotelian logic as presented in the writings of the "falāsifa". (c) That this attitude functions as a philosophicalmethodological basis for establishing both the criticism of philosophy as well as the defense of Judaism. In this context, I will argue that as much as Halevi rejected the philosophical premises and as a result, the philosophical conclusions, he did not reject the philosophical method itself, i.e.: the contemporary principles of Logic. Reading the Kuzari, while paying the proper attention to the logical terminology used within, can show how Hallevi established the aforementioned critique and defense, and gives the reader a new perspective regarding the relation between reason and revelation. Furthermore, such reading can be used as a basis for a wider effort of answering some of the questions regarding the Kuzari raised in prior research. Yehudah Halper, Tulane University, USA

The Xth Congress of the European Association for Jewish Studies (Paris, July 2014): 'Roman Policy in the Aftermath of the Great Jewish Revolt: A Reconsideration in Light of New Evidence

  • Upload
    haifa

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  01  

 

Session:  001:    

Jewish  Philosophy  -­‐  Middle  Ages  

9.00-­‐10.30  

The  Logic  of  Falāsifa  in  Judeo-­‐Arabic  and  Hebrew  Texts  

 

Chair:  Steven  Harvey  

 

Charles  Manekin,  University  of  Maryland,  USA  

Title:  New  Light  on  Alfarabi's  Logical  Writings  in  Medieval  Hebrew  Philosophy  

Abstract:  It  has  been  argued  that  some  of  the  logical  writings  of  Alfarabi  were  among  the  first  philosophical  writings   of   the   Arabic   Aristotelians   translated   into   Hebrew,   antedating   the   translation   of   Maimonides'  Guide  of  the  Perplexed  in  1199.  They  appear  to  have  been  studied  throughout  the  Middle  Ages,  even  after  the   logical  doctrines  of  Aristotle  were  available  via   the  commentaries  of  Averroes.  My  paper  will  present  the  results  of  my  ongoing  research   into  these  writings  and  their  transmission,  with  special  emphasis  on  a  short  treatise  on  dialectic,  the  Art  of  Disputation,  which  seems  to  be  extant  only  in  Hebrew,  and  which,  to  my  knowledge,  has  escaped  the  notice  of  scholars.  

 

Ariel  Malachi,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Reason,  Revelation  and  Logic:  A  New  Perspective  on  Yehuda  Hallevi  and  the  Islamic  "Falāsifa"  

Abstract:  Yehuda  Hallevi's  attitude  towards  rationalism  and  philosophy  has  been  discussed  in  prior  studies,  and  several  approaches  have  been  presented  in  relation  to  it.  I  wish  to  discuss  a  new  perspective  regarding  this  issue.  The  main  arguments  I  wish  to  present  are:  (a)  that  in  spite  of  the  general  notion  that  Hallevi  was  an   anti-­‐rationalist   thinker,   he   nonetheless   offered   the   learned   reader   a   rational   and   coherent   attitude  towards  reason  and  philosophy.  (b)  That  this  attitude  relies  directly  on  Aristotelian  logic  as  presented  in  the  writings   of   the   "falāsifa".   (c)   That   this   attitude   functions   as   a   philosophical-­‐methodological   basis   for  establishing  both  the  criticism  of  philosophy  as  well  as  the  defense  of  Judaism.    In  this  context,  I  will  argue  that  as  much  as  Halevi  rejected  the  philosophical  premises  and  as  a  result,  the  philosophical   conclusions,   he   did   not   reject   the   philosophical   method   itself,   i.e.:   the   contemporary  principles  of  Logic.  Reading   the  Kuzari,  while  paying   the  proper  attention   to   the   logical   terminology  used  within,  can  show  how  Hallevi  established  the  aforementioned  critique  and  defense,  and  gives  the  reader  a  new  perspective  regarding  the  relation  between  reason  and  revelation.  Furthermore,  such  reading  can  be  used  as  a  basis  for  a  wider  effort  of  answering  some  of  the  questions  regarding  the  Kuzari  raised   in  prior  research.  

 

Yehudah  Halper,  Tulane  University,  USA  

Title:  The  Logic  of  Metaphysics  in  Hebrew  Commentaries  on  Aristotle's  Metaphysics  

Abstract:  Logic  occupied  a  place  of  high  accolade  among  medieval  thinkers  on  the  grounds  that  it  provides  the  basis  for  scientific  certainty  and  thereby  the  basis  for  a  rational  account  of  the  universe.  Metaphysics,  too,  gives  the  ontological  ground  for  science,  yet  metaphysics  was  often  opened  to  skepticism  by  medieval  Jewish  thinkers,   including  Maimonides.  One  source  for  this  skepticism  is  that  Aristotle  himself  opened  up  such  basic  questions  as  “what  is  being?”  or  “can  there  be  a  scientific  study  of  being?”  in  the  early  books  of  the  Metaphysics.  In  a  similar  vein,  in  the  Long  Commentary  on  Book  Gamma  of  the  Metaphysics,  Averroes  remarks  that  metaphysics  has  its  own  unique  logic  and  suggests  that  this  logic  has  a  dialectical  rather  than  demonstrative  basis.  That  is,  Averroes  suggests  that  the  unique  logical  foundations  of  metaphysics  are  not  demonstrative,   i.e.,   are   not   completely   certain.   This   paper  will   examine   three  medieval   and   renaissance  approaches  to  the  question  of  whether  Aristotle’s  Metaphysics  succeeds  in  developing  a  logic  that  could  be  used   as   the   basis   for   other   sciences.   The   first   approach,   found   in   Averroes’   Middle   Commentary   on  Aristotle’s  Metaphysics,  suggests  that  this  foundational  problem  is  surmountable  and  that  a  reliable  logical  basis   for   science   can   be   made   in   metaphysics.   Averroes’   Middle   Commentary   was   widely   circulated   in  Hebrew  translation  and  was  influential  on  medieval  Jewish  thought.  A  second  approach,  found  in  Abraham  Bibago’s   15th   century   commentary   on   Aristotle’s   Metaphysics,   is   more   skeptical,   suggesting   the  unreliability   of   science,   while   still   encouraging   philosophical   reflection.   Bibago   explains   this   position   in  detailed  comments  comparing  Averroes’  Middle  Commentary  on  the  Metaphysics  with  his  Commentary  on  the   Posterior   Analytics.   For   Bibago,   philosophical   speculation   is   an   unending   task   and   the   ideal   human  pursuit.  The  third  approach  is  that  of  Judah  Moscato,  the  16th  century  Italian  thinker,  who  did  not  write  a  commentary  on  the  Metaphysics,  but  displays  knowledge  of  the  work  in  his  Nefuṣot  Yehudah.  Like  Bibago,  whom   he   read,   Moscato   treated   the   logic   of   metaphysics   as   not   completely   certain   and   questioned  whether   people   could   have   any   significant   knowledge   of   it.   Unlike   Bibago,   Moscato   rejects   Aristotelian  metaphysical   study   as   well   as   Aristotelian   science.   He   replaces   it,   instead,   with   a   Platonist-­‐like   way   of  reading  Biblical  passages  as  images  of  the  divine.  Moscato’s  rejection  of  Aristotelian  logic  and  metaphysics  leads  to  a  mystical  turn.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Cultural  Contacts  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:    

 

Montse  Leyra  Curia,  Universidad  San  Damaso,  Spain  

Title:   R.   Shemuel   Ben   Meir   and   Hugh   and   Andrew   of   St.   Victor’s   ‘in   hebreo’   interpretations   in   their  commentaries  on  the  Pentateuch  

Abstract:   In   their   Latin   commentaries   on   the   Pentateuch,   the   twelfth-­‐century   authors  Hugh   (1090/1100-­‐1141)  and  Andrew  (died  1175)  of  St.  Victor  ascribe  many  interpretations  to  the  Hebrew  text  (in  hebreo)  or  to  the  Hebrews  (Hebrei,  secundum  Hebreos).  Since  the  works  of  B.  Smalley,  scholars  such  as  M.  Awerbuch,  R.   Berndt   and   G.   A.   C.   Hadfield   have   pointed   out   several   close   parallels   to   these   interpretations   in   the  

commentary  on  the  Pentateuch  written  by  R.  Shemuel  Ben  Meir  (1080/85  and  1160),  one  of  the  twelfth-­‐century   Jewish   writers   of   the   Northern   French   school   of   literal   exegesis.   S.   Kamin   and   E.   Touitoo   have  observed  similarities  in  exegetical  method  between  interpretations  by  the  Victorines  and  those  coming  out  of   the  Northern   French   School   of   Jewish   exegesis,   particularly   interpretations   of   Rashbam.  However,   no  systematic   analysis   of   all   Victorine’s   in   hebreo   interpretations   has   been   carried   out   with   respect   to   the  specific  linguistic  principles  and  literary-­‐rhetorical  devices  found  in  Rashbam’s  commentary.  My  first  aim  in  this  paper  is  to  ascertain  whether  in  their  in  hebreo  interpretations  Hugh  and  Andrew  of  St.  Victor  can  be  shown   to  have  employed   linguistic  principles  and   literary-­‐rhetorical  devices   that  are   characteristic  of   the  Northern-­‐French   school   and   can   be   found   in   Rashbam’s   commentary.   Secondly,   I   shall   try   to   point   out  further   parallels   between   the   Victorines’   in   hebreo   references   and   interpretations   in   Rashbam’s  commentary.  My  intention  is  to  determine  whether  Rashbam  can  be  proved  to  have  been  a  direct  source  for  certain  interpretations  of  the  Victorines.  

 

Ari  Ackerman,  Schechter  Institute,  Israel  

Title:  Taxonomy,  Methodology  and  Scholastic  Techniques  in  the  Legal  Writings  of  Hasdai  Crescas  

Abstract:  Hasdai  Crescas,  the  fifteenth  century  Hispano-­‐Jewish  philosopher,  is  justifiably  considered  one  of  the   most   significant   and   innovative   medieval   Jewish   thinkers.   In   his   day,   though,   his   reputation   and  influence  also  extended  to  the  sphere  of  Jewish  law.  Unfortunately,  little  of  Crescas'  literary  output  in  this  area  remains.  I  will  argue  in  my  lecture,  though,  that  part  of  the  rich  and  inventive  legal  universe  of  Hasdai  Crescas  can  be  surfaced.  This  unearthing  is  made  possible  by  our  ability  to  ajar  two  windows  that  allow  us  to  peer   into  Crescas'   novel   and  noteworthy  activity   in   the   realm  of   Jewish   law.   These  apertures   are   two  brief  discussions  on  halakhic  matters   that  are  embedded  within  his  philosophic  works.   The   first—a  short  treatment   of   the   nature   of   codification,   which   criticizes   Maimonides'   Mishneh   Torah—appears   in   the  introduction   to   Crescas'   philosophic   work,   or   Hashem   and   was   probably   intended   as   part   of   the  introduction  to  a  legal  compendium,  entitled  tentatively  Ner  Elohim,  which  Crescas  intended  to  write.  The  second  appears  in  his  philosophic  sermon,  Derashat  ha-­‐Pesach.  From  these  two  texts,  we  can  surmise  the  nature  of  the  legal  code  that  Crescas  intended  to  write.  I  will  focus  on  one  particular  feature  of  his  intended  code:   a   comprehensive   taxonomy   of   halakhah   through   a   series   of   dichotomous   classifications.   I   will  investigate  the  relationship  between  this  aspect  of  his  halakhic  approach  with  his  philosophic  writings.   In  addition,   I  will   argue   that   Crescas'  methodology  of   codification  draws   from   legal   trends   among  Christian  glossators   and   commentators   in   law   schools   of   European   universities   in   the   twelfth   to   the   fourteenth  centuries.  Like  the  Christian  glossators  and  commentators,  Crescas  aspired  to  provide  an  all-­‐comprehensive  taxonomy  by  classifying  the  law  through  a  series  of  subdistionctiones.  

 

Doron  Forte,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  The  Reception  and  Rejection  of  Latin  Scholastic  Wisdom  among  Jewish  philosophers  in  15th  Century  Spain  

Abstract:  The  correspondence  between  Eli  Habilio  and  Rabbi  Shem  Tov  ibn  Shem  Tov  as  a  test  case".  Rabbi  Shem  Tov,   the   last  known  scion  of   the   Ibn  Shem  Tov  Family,  was  one  of   the  most  prominent  and  prolific  Jewish  philosophers  in  the  second  half  of  the  15th  century  in  Spain.  As  a  full-­‐fledged  "old  school"  Averroist,  who   taught  Aristotelian  writings   and   composed   elaborated   commentaries   on   them,   his   attitude   towards  the   expanding   influence   of   Scholastic   thought   upon   Jewish   intellectual   circles   was   characterized   by  suspicion  and  distrust.  Eli  Habilio,  on   the  other  hand,   represents  an  opposite  approach:  Not  only   that  he  denied   the   irrelevancy   of   Scholastic   knowledge,   but   he   emphasized   its   crucial   role   to   the   continuity   and  

revival  of   Jewish  philosophy.  By   translating  many  writings   from  Latin   to  Hebrew,  Habilio  himself   took  an  active   role   in   the   presentation   and   distribution   of   Scholastic   philosophy   among   Jewish   readers.     In   the  lecture  I  will  review  the  general  attitude  of  the  Jewish  philosophers  towards  Scholastic  philosophy  in  15th  century   Spain.   I   will   examine   if   the   correspondence   (that   survived   in   a   single   manuscript)   between   the  figures   mentioned   above   can   be   taken   as   a   trustworthy   representation   of   the   varying   approaches.   The  awareness  to  the  diverse  opinions  towards  Scholasticism  is  crucial,   in  my  mind,  for  true  understanding  of  the  development  of  Jewish  philosophy  at  the  end  of  the  Middle  Ages  and  the  beginning  of  the  Renaissance  era.   Just   as   the   personal   relationship   between   Shem   Tov   and   Habilio   are   not   one-­‐dimensional,   and   we  cannot  speak  of  complete  devotion  and  dedication  (as  I  suggest)  -­‐  so  is  the  attitude  of  Jewish  philosophers  towards  Latin  Scholasticism.  I  think  that  this  purposed  lecture  is  very  fitting  with  the  keynote  theme  of  the  Xth  Congress  and  I  will  be  honored  to  take  part  in  such  a  distinguished  event.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  meeting  of  the  Ex-­‐Com  of  the  EAJS  

 

Session  003:    

Medieval  Jewish  Philosophy    

14.00-­‐15.30  

Under  the  Crescent  

 

Chair  :  Gad  Freudenthal  

 

David  Lemler,  EPHE/ENS,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Saadia’s  Contradictions  on  the  Creation  of  the  World:  a  Conceptual  Approach  

Abstract:  In  his  Commentary  on  Proverbs  30,  3  (CP),  Saadia  states  that  the  creation  of  the  world  is  part  of  «  God’s  science  »,  a  knowledge  man  is  unable  to  access.  However,  he  himself  writes   long  developments  on  that  issue  in  Part  1  of  his  Book  of  Beliefs  and  opinion  (BBO)  and  the  Commentary  on  Sefer  Yetsirah  (CSY)  is  entirely  dedicated  to  it.  Georges  Vajda  («  Sa’adya,  commentateur  du  “Livre  de  la  Création”  ».  Annuaire  de  l’EPHE,  Sciences   religieuses.  1960.  p.  3�35)   suggested   that   this   contradictions  might  be  explained  by   the  different  audiences  of  these  diverse  works,  CP  being  a  popular  exegetical  text  while  BBO  and  CSY  adress  the  educated  scholar.  I  would  like  to  propose  an  alternative  view  on  this  problem.  For  theological  (safeguarding  the  possibility  of  Torah  and  miracles)  as  well  as  philosophical  (proving  God’s  existence)  reasons,  creation  ex  nihilo   was   a   doctrine   of   fundamental   importance   for   Saadia.   This   doctrine   though   raises   a   major  epistemological   problem,  which   Saadia   acknowledges   in   all   his   texts   on   the   issue.  While   it   is   possible   to  think   about   or   to   conceive   of   a   creation   from   nothing,   it   is   however   impossible   to   have   a   proper  representation   of   such   a   thing.   All   known   process   of   genesis,   with   which   absolute   creation   could   be  compared,   always   consist   in   the   reorganization  of   pre-­‐existing   elements.   Saadia   thus   constructs   a  purely  intellectual  concept  of  creation  ex  nihilo   in  his  BBO,  while   recognizing   the   impossibility  of   imagining  how  such  a  creation  took  place.  He  thus  offers  a  concept,  devoid  of  any  proper  imaginative  content.  From  that  point   of   view,   it   seems   possible   to   understand   why   a   rationalist   thinker   like   Saadia   decided   to   write   a  commentary  on  Sefer  Yetsirah   (SY).  The  attempt  at   rationalizing   the  arcane   teachings  of   the  SY  might  be  explained  not  only  by  polemical  motivations  against  contemporary  mystical  and  magical  interpretations  of  this  work  (cf.  BEN-­‐SHAMMAI  H.  «  Saadya’s  Goal  in  his  “Commentary  on  Sefer  Yezira”  ».  In:  LINK-­‐SALINER  R,  

ÉD.   A   Straight   Path:   Studies   in   Medieval   Philosophy   and   Culture.   Essays   in   Honor   of   Arthur   Hyman.  Washington  D.   C.:   Catholic  University   of   America   Press,   1988.   p.   1-­‐9),   but   also   as   a   response   to   internal  difficulties  of  Saadia’s  thought.  CSY  is  an  exegetical  and  philosophical  instrument  that  allows  him  to  «  fill  »  his  concept  of  creation  ex  nihilo.  Saadia  states  that  the  view  expressed  in  the  SY  is  not  identical  with  that  of  the   Torah   and   that   it   merely   describes   the   way   Abraham   imagined   the   process   of   creation.   In   his  Commentary,   Saadia   offers   a   rationalistic   interpretation   of   this   imaginative   cosmogony.   Since   it   is   both  authoritative   (attributed   to   Abraham)   but   not   yet   true   (since   it   does   not   offer   the   view   of   the   Torah  proper),  SY  allows  Saadia  to  elaborate  a  quasi-­‐scientific  discourse  on  an  object,  which,  by  its  very  nature,  is  outside  the  scope  of  science.  Behind   its  apparent  contradictions,  Saadia’s  approach  to  the  question  turns  out  to  offer  a  genuine  and  thorough  attempt  at  coping  with  the  intrinsic  problems  raised  by  the  concept  of  creation  ex  nihilo.  

 

Almuth  Lahmann,  Universität  Bern,  Schweiz,  Switzerland  

Title:  Saadia  Gaon  and  Yaḥyā  ibn  ʿAdī  as  Recipients  of  the  Nicomachean  Ethics?  

Abstract:   It   is   known   that   the   Islamic   philosopher   of   the   tenth   century   al-­‐Fārābī   (ca.   870-­‐950),  who  was  based   in   Baghdad,   overtly   adopted   concepts   of   the   Aristotelian   Ethics.   These   are,   amongst   others,   the  ethical  and  the  intellectual  virtues  and  the  doctrine  of  the  mean  (mesotēs;  tawassuṭ),  which  he  mentions  in  his   works   -­‐   perhaps   most   prominently   in   the   Aphorisms   of   the   statesman   (Fuṣūl   muntazaʿa)   or   in   the  Guidance  on  the  Path  to  Happiness  (at-­‐Tanbīh  ʿalā  sabīl  as-­‐saʿāda).  In  this  paper,  I  want  to  demonstrate  that  two  of  al-­‐Fārābī’s  contemporaries  in  Baghdad  also  refer  to  certain  aspects  of  the  Aristotelian  Ethics.  In  933  Saadia  Gaon  (882-­‐942),  then  the  former  head  of  the  Sura  Academy,  philosopher  and  grammarian,  argues  in  his  Kitāb  al-­‐Amānāt  wa-­‐l-­‐Iʿtiqādāt  (Doctrines  and  Beliefs)  for  a  conduct  of  life,  which  is  based  on  decisions  and  actions  in  just  the  right  time.  Unlike  al-­‐Fārābī,  who  follows  his  teacher  Aristotle  to  conceptualize  ethical  virtues  as  a  mean  between  two  extremes,  Saadia  Gaon  seems  rather  to  transform  this  Aristotelian  ethical  concept.  However,  about  in  the  middle  of  the  10th  century  the  Syrian-­‐orthodox  theologian  and  philosopher  Yaḥyā   ibn   ʿAdī   (892-­‐972),   then   leader  of   the  peripatetic   school   in  Baghdad   composed  his   ethical   treatise  Kitāb   tahḏīb   al-­‐aḫlāq   (The   Reformation   of  Morals).   His   approach   also   seems   to   refer   to   the   Aristotelian  doctrine  of   the  mean,   though   criticizes   it   in   some   respect.  However,   there   is   a   clear  difference  between  Yaḥyā  ibn  ʿAdī  and  Saadia  Gaon  regarding  the  context  of  moral  conduct.  Saadia  Gaon  seems  to  consider  the  individual   in  relation  to  the  social   in  general  whereas  Yaḥyā   ibn   ʿAdī   relates  the   individual  with  what  was  then   the   society   of   the   Abbasid   Empire.   This   paper  will  mainly   focus   on   the   Aristotelian   concept   of   the  mean  (mesotēs).  

 

Mordechai  Cohen,  Yeshiva  University,  USA  

Title:  Halakhic  Hermeneutics  of  a  Poet:  Moses  Ibn  Ezra  vs.  Maimonides    

Abstract:  Recent  scholarship  has  revealed  that  Maimonides  drew  upon  Muslim  jurisprudence  (uṣūl  al-­‐fiqh)  to   develop   his   bold   halakhic   hermeneutical  model   that   integrates   Bible   exegesis   and   talmudic   halakhah.  Given   its   sophistication,   it   is   not   unreasonable   to   conjecture   that   precedents   for   Maimonides’  hermeneutical  system  had  been  circulating  among  earlier  Andalusian  Jewish  scholars  who  adapted  Muslim  terms  and  concepts   to  describe   the  halakhic  process.  To  date,  brief  discussions  of   this  nature  have  been  identified   in  the  writings  of  Baḥya   Ibn  Paquda,   Judah  ha-­‐Levi  and,  most  recently,   in  the  newly  discovered  fragmentary   writings   of   the   eleventh-­‐century   Granada   dayyan   David   ben   Saadia   ha-­‐Ger.   I   would   like   to  bring   to   light   some  relevant   remarks  by   the  poet  and   literary  critic  Moses   Ibn  Ezra   (born  c.  1055,  also   in  Granada).   In   his   poetics,   The   Book   of   Discussion   and   Conversation,   Ibn   Ezra   compares   the   intellectual  

creativity   of   prophets   and   legal   scholars.   While   the   prophets   employ   their   ingenuity   to   render   God’s  message  in  the  most  excellent  poetic  and  rhetorical  format,  the  legal  scholars  actually  augment  the  Law  by  extrapolating  new  conclusions  from  what  is  stated  explicitly  in  scripture—a  concept  he  describes  in  terms  borrow   from  Muslim   jurisprudence.   In  my  paper   I   aim   to  explore   the  unique   literary  perspective  on   this  subject   brought   to   bear   by   Moses   Ibn   Ezra   by   contrast   with   the   legal-­‐philosophical   vantage   point   of  Maimonides  and  his  halakhically-­‐oriented  Andalusian  predecessors.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Sins  and  Transgressions  in  Jewish  Medieval  Thought  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Gad  Freudenthal  

 

Albert  Van  der  Heide,  Leiden  University/Vrije  Universiteit  Amsterdam,  Netherlands  

Title:  Five  centuries  of  Aqedah  Exegesis  

Abstract:  Nearing  the  completion  of  an  anthology  of  Aqedah  exegesis,  I  would  like  to  present  here  some  of  the  results  of  my  analysis  of   those  parts  of  Bible  commentaries,  homilies,  and  works  of   religious   thought  that  deal  with  Abraham's  trial,  the  sacrifice  of  Isaac,  as  told  in  Genesis  22.  Apart  from  the  various  views  on  the   influential   topic  of   the  Aqedah   itself—their  mutual   influence  and  blending—a   long-­‐term  survey   from  Saadya  to  Abrabanel  has  much  to  tell  about  the  nature  and  history  of  medieval  Jewish  Bible  exegesis.  

 

Dror  Ehrlich,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Status  Principle  in  Medieval  Jewish  and  Christian  Discussions  of  Hell  

Abstract:   One   of   the   main   criticisms   of   the   classic   retributivist   doctrine   of   eternal   punishment   in  contemporary   philosophy   of   religion   is   that   it   is   not   morally   justified   to   condemn   a   person   to   infinite  punishment   when   his   wrong   deeds   and   the   amount   of   harm   he   can   cause   are   undoubtedly   finite.   This  criticism  is  based  on  the  assumption  that  the  severity  of  sin,  which  determines  the  level  of  the  appropriate  punishment,  is  measured  according  to  the  extent  of  harm  caused  or  that  was  intended  to  be  caused.  One  of  the  ways  to  address  this  problem  is  by  changing  the  criterion  for  evaluating  the  severity  of  sin.  Instead  of  measuring  it  based  on  the  extent  of  damage,  it  can  be  assessed  by  the  existential  status  of  the  object  of  sin  –  in  other  words,  the  importance  of  the  entity  toward  which  the  transgression  was  directed.  Philosophers  and   theologians  who   follow   this   line  of   thinking  assume   that   in   the   religious   context,   the  object  of   sin   is  God.  Since  God’s  nature  is  infinite  in  essence,  any  sin  carried  out  against  Him  is  infinite  in  severity,  and  thus  justifies  infinite  punishment,  meaning  eternal  hell.  In  contemporary  philosophy  of  religion,  this  principle  is  known  as   “the  Status  Principle”.  However,   it  was  already   introduced  and  discussed   in  medieval  Christian  theology   by   Anselm   of   Canterbury   and   Thomas   Aquinas.   In   this   lecture,   I  would   like   to   show   that   three  Jewish   thinkers   of   the   fourteenth   and   fifteenth   centuries,   who   were   familiar   with,   and   to   some   extent  influenced  by,  Christian  theology,  also  used  this  principle  in  their  discussions  of  eternal  punishment  in  hell.  

The  first  two,  R.  Nissim  Gerondi  and  R.  Hasdai  Crescas,  mention  it  quite  briefly,  but  their  disciple,  R.  Joseph  Albo,   discusses   it   in   a   much   broader   and   systematic   manner.   Apart   of   presenting   and   analyzing   these  discussions,  I  will  try  to  indicate  their  contribution  to  the  relevant  philosophical  discourse  of  our  days.  

 

Adiel  Zimran,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Comparison  of  Adam’s  Sin  in  Medieval  Philosophy:  Judaism,  Christianity  and  Islam    

Abstract:  The  story  of  the  sin  of  Adam,  the  first  man,  appears   in  the  holy  scriptures  of  all   three  religions:  Judaism,  Christianity  and  Islam.  It  describes  the  archetypal  ‘sin’  and  the  ways  in  which  it  is  to  be  corrected.  Embedded   within   the   story   are   many   key   concepts   for   understanding   the   theology   and   sociology   of  religion.  For  example,  the  Garden  of  Eden  symbolizes  the  utopia  to  which  humanity  strives,  while  ‘sin  and  atonement’  describes  the  possible  and  appropriate  relationship  between  man  and  God.    In  this  lecture  I  will  examine  how   the   interpretation  of   the   story  of  Adam’s   sin  developed   in  medieval  philosophy,   through  a  comparison  of   the   three   religions.   This   comparison   is   particularly   interesting   in   view  of   the   fact   that   the  Moslem   conquest   led   to   the   domination   of   the   Arabic   language   throughout   the   empire   and   created   an  intellectual   affinity   between   Jews   and  Muslims.   During   that   period,   some  Muslim   and   Jewish   schools   of  thought  gave  precedence   to   rationality   rather   than  myth,   leading   to  changes   in   the   interpretation  of   the  Holy   Scriptures.   In   light   of   these   changes,   I   will   explore   how   the   ethos   of   ‘the   complete   man’   and   the  fundamental   concepts   of   sin   and   atonement   changed   accordingly.     The   lecture  will   focus   on   three   great  Jewish  thinkers  whose  writings  reveal  differing  attitudes  towards  sin:  Maimonides  (Spain  and  Egypt,  12th  century),   Nahmanides   (Spain,   13th   century),   and   Isaac   Ibn   Latif   (Spain,   13th   century).   I   will   analyze   the  models   presented   by   these   philosophers   in   light   of   commentaries   by   the   Christian   theologian  Augustine  and  the  Muslim  philosopher  Avicenna.  

 

Ram  Ben-­‐Shalom,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Isaac  Nathan  of  Provence  and  the  First  Jewish  Work  on  the  Seven  Deadly  Sins  

Abstract:  Isaac  Nathan  lived  in  Provence  during  the  fifteenth  century.  He  was  the  most  affluent  merchant  in  the  Jewish  community  of  Arles,  and  one  of  the  wealthiest   figures   in  the  city   in  general,  a   financier  taking  part  in  a  wide  range  of  business  activities  and  a  prominent  leader  of  the  Jewish  communities  in  Provence.  Nathan  is  best  known  as  the  author  of  the  first  Hebrew  Concordance  of  the  bible,  Me’ir  Netiv,  a  project  of  far-­‐reaching  importance  undertaken  in  Arles  between  the  years  1437  and  1447.  My  purpose  in  this  lecture  is  to  analyzed  Isaac  Nathan’s  work  Me’ametṣ  Koacḥ  (still  unpublished),  which  is  the  first  Jewish  work  on  the  seven  deadly  sins  and  the  four  virtues.   Isaac  Nathan  came  to  the  conclusion  that  the  Christian  method  of  the  deadly  sins  and  the  virtues  was  the  correct  basis  for  the  organization  of  Jewish  ethics,  rooted  primarily  in   Scripture,   but   also   in   Rabbinic   literature.   He   believed   that   Jews   should   not   hesitate   to   adopt  what   is  fitting  and  true  in  Christian  theological  literature.  Beyond  this  bold  step  of  accepting  the  “other”,  we  find,  in  Meʾameṣ   Ko'aḥ,   an   attempt   to   devise   a   unitary   ethical   method   that   would   be   acceptable   to   Jews   and  Christians  alike.  

 

18.00-­‐19.30:  RFE  Alumni  Meeting  

 

  19.30-­‐21.00:  General  Meeting  of  the  European  Association  for  Jewish  Studies  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  02  

 

Session:  001:    

Modern  Jewish  Thought  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Thinkers  of  Messianism  

Chair:  Myriam  Bienenstock  

 

M.A.  Rosa  Reicher,  University  of  Heidelberg,  Germany  

Title:  The  Ethos  of  ‘Bildung’:  Gershom  Scholem  on  the  Periphery  of  German-­‐Jewish  ‘Bildung’”  

Abstract:   ‘Bildung’   is   a   key   concept   in   the   German   tradition   of   educational   theory.   Originally   meant   to  indicate  a  specific  state  of  mind  and  ideal  of  perfection,  it  now  serves  as  a  symbol  of  the  unity  of  whatever  refers   to   the   field   of   education,   particularly   to   its   organisational   and   functional   aspects.   The   aura   of  ‘Bildung’   is   bestowed   on   its   counterpart   in   the   form   of   preparation   for   the   needs   of   the   day.   However  wrongheaded  or  deplorable  that  may  appear  in  the  light  of  traditional  values  and  ideas,  this  alienated  use  of  the  concept  of  ‘Bildung’  may  be  a  blessing  in  disguise:  it  keeps  alive  the  memory  of  autonomous  learning  as  opposed  to  regular  training  under  the  imperatives  of  the  day.  The  paradigm  of  ‘Bildung’  survives  in  title  if  not   in   substance   as   a   paradigm   to   regain.   For   Hegel,   ‘Bildung   is   a   crucial   concept   that   unifies   issues   of  development,   education,   and   form,   including   logical,   aesthetic,   and   ethical   forms.   The   idea   of   Bildung  expresses  the  emergent  formative  development  of  the  natural  biological  individual  by  the  institutions  and  practices  of  culture,   including,  but  not   limited  to,  explicitly  educational   institutions  and  their  agents   (e.g.,  professors),  along  with  the  development  of  culture  by   individuals.   In   this  connection  Amos  Elon  explains:  "Their  true  home,  we  now  know,  was  not  'Germany,'  but  German  culture  and  language.  Their  true  religion  was  the  bourgeois,  Goethean  ideal  of  Bildung  (high  culture)."  One  of  the  main  concepts  that  influenced  the  Jewish  self-­‐perception   in   the  19th  century  was   ‘Bildung’  –   the   idea  of  self-­‐cultivation  and  education.  This  cultural  and  philosophical  "movement"  focused  on  an  ideal  individual:  enlighten,  humanist  and  free;  a  man  of   the   world,   whose   culture   is   not   rooted   in   any   specific   religion   or   nation,   he   is   the   European   par-­‐excellence.  Because  of  ‘Bildung's’  emphasis  on  the  individual,  many  of  the  Jews  in  Germany  perceived  it  as  an   ideal   tool   for   full  assimilation.  According   to   ‘Bildung’   it  doesn’t  matter  where  one  comes   from,   it  only  matters  where  one  is  headed,  and  therefore  it  is  no  wonder  many  Jews  adopted  ‘Bildung’  enthusiastically.  The   overall   acceptance   of   ‘Bildung’   in   the  minds   of   German-­‐Jewish   intellectuals   changed   the   content   of  both  Judaism  and  Germanism  for  them.  The  very  term  ‘Bildung’  became  part  of  their  Jewishness;  cultural  artifacts  that  in  the  past  were  considered  German  and  foreign,  were  now  perceived  as  the  very  essence  of  their  culture.  In  this  presentation  I  will  discuss  the  rise  of  a  German-­‐Jewish  intellectual  culture  following  the  example   of   Scholems   biography;   this   was   a   culture   that   prized   ‘Bildung’   as   an   integral   part   of   German  ‘Bürgertum’  and  which  soon  elevated  ‘Bildung’  to  a  noticeably  Jewish  value,  as  well.  I  will  explore  the  role  of  Gershom   Scholem   as   a  German-­‐Jewish   intellectual   in   relation   to   the   larger   culture   focussing   on  what  German-­‐Jewish   intellectuals  shared  with   their  non-­‐Jewish  counterparts  and   in  what  ways   the  differed,  as  never  fully  integrated  individuals  and  groups.  The  educational  system  of  the  German  Jewish  society  around  the  turn  of  the  century  was  aligned  with  the  conveying  of  humanistic  ideals  in  language,  scientific,  technical  and   literary   contents.   Hans  Georg  Gadamer   regarded   Scholem   as   a   “pupil   of   a   great   historical   school   of  German  and  romantic  heritage,”  and  George  L.  Mosse  described  Scholem  and  his  concept  of   ‘Bildung’  as  

self-­‐cultivation  in  the  sense  of  Goethe  and  Humbold.  In  addition  I  would  like  to  describe  Gershom  Scholem  as  a  theorist  of  ‘Bildung’.  Aspects  of  his  conception  of  ‘Bildung’  shall  be  worked  out.  The  examination  goes  consequently  essentially  by  three  main  emphases:    

1.  Scholem’s  biography  in  the  shade  of  the  German-­‐Jewish  ‘Bildungsbürgertum’;  

2.  Theoretical  reflection  and  dissociation  of  conceptualities  to  ‘Bildung’  and  Zionism;  

3.  Scholem’s  contributions  and  merits  for  the  development  of  the  science  of  the  Judaism  [Wissenschaft  des  Judentums]   until   today's   time.   A   basic   thesis   of   this   examination   is:   Scholem   requires   a   change   of   the  German-­‐Jewish   paradigm   of   ‘Bildung’.   Here,   paradigm   is   understood   as   a   pattern   of   thought   which  influenced   the   world   view   of   the   time   then.   Zionism,   tradition   and   Jewish   identity   are   included   and  examined  as  paradigms  of   ‘Bildung’.  One  main  part  of  a  successful  Zionist  education  was  for  Scholem  the  Hebrew   education.   Learning   Hebrew   was   a   significant   part   of   a   successful   Zionist   education   which  influences  the  Jewish  Identity.  The  paradigm  change  of  ‘Bildung’  goes:  

─  from  the  German  to  the  Zionist  orientation,  

─  from  the  national/linear  to  the  Zionist/associate  thought,  

─  from  the  partial-­‐German  (single  factors)  to  the  structural  orientation  to  Eretz  Israel,  

─  from  German  language  to  Hebrew  language  as  a  symbol  of  Zionist  identity,  

─  from  German  to  the  German-­‐Jewish  and  finally  to  the  Zionist  identity.  

Aim  of  the  research  of  my  dissertation  is  to  recognize  Zionism  as  a  concept  of  ‘Bildung’  and  furthermore  to  define  this  concept  as  a  new  idea  particularly  from  the  view  of  Gershom  Scholem.  Following  thesis   is  put  forward  to  this:  In  the  understanding  of  ‘Bildung’  of  the  Judaism  Scholem  sees  the  defining  question  of  the  Zionism   and   articulates   an   adequate   criterion   of   its   conception.   The   following   questions   arise   from   this  coherence:  Which  function  should  fulfil  a  Zionist  paradigm  of  ‘Bildung’?  Does  Scholem  develop  the  theory  of   ‘Bildung’   as   a   political   concept?   How   does   Scholem   discuss   the   various   aspects   of   the   concept   of  ‘Bildung’   and   its   function   for   the   Zionism?  Which   role   plays   the   conveying   of   Hebrew   in   a  meaningfully  frame  of  ‘Bildung’,  Zionism  and  Jewish  of  Zionist  identity?  And  finally  according  to  Scholem  what  should  be  the  essential  component  of  a  Zionist-­‐‘Bildung’?  

 

Rony  Klein,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Des  différents  usages  de  la  figure  du  Juif  dans  la  pensée  contemporaine:  le  cas  de  Derrida  

Abstract:   La   pensée   contemporaine,   surtout   française,   a   redécouvert   la   figure   du   Juif   depuis   une  cinquantaine  d'années.  On  a  vu  ainsi  divers  usages  très  divers  de  cette  "figure".  Le  cas  de  Derrida,  dans  les  années  60,  est  particulièrement  intéressant  en  ce  qu'il  se  sert  du  Juif  pour  articuler  sa  pensée  de  l'écriture,  et  ce  dès  son  texte  sur   Jabès  de  1964.  Ce  texte  permet  de  mieux  cerner  certaines  des  grandes  questions  posées  par  la  pensée  juive,  comme  la  question  du  lieu,  de  l'exil  et  de  la  terre,  ou  encore  celle  de  l'écrit  et  de  l'oralité.   Enfin,   il   soulève   le   problème   plus   général   de   l'usage   d'un   certain   judaïsme   de   l'extérieur   de   la  tradition  juive.  

 

Vivian  Liska,  University  of  Antwerp,  Netherlands  

Title:  A  Same  Other,  Another  Same:  Maurice  Blanchot  and  Walter  Benjamin  

Abstract:  Even  though  Walter  Benjamin  and  Maurice  Blanchot  are  considered  two  of  the  most   important  theorists  and  literary  critics  of  the  last  century  –  the  two  who  grant  literature  the  most  radical  and  decisive  role   in   critical   thought   –   their   affinity   is   not   obvious   and   has   rarely   been   examined.   An   analysis   of   their  respective   theories   of   language   and   translation   reveals   how   Blanchot   approaches   and   transforms   the  Jewish  dimension  of  Benjamin's  thought  and  what  is  at  stake  in  this  encounter.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Modern  Jewish  Thought  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Orietta  Ombrosi  

Judaism  in  “Gender  Difference”.  Different  Paths  of  Women's  Judaism  

 

Chair:  

 

Irene  Kajon,  “La  Sapienza”  University  of  Rome,  Italy  

Title:  Margarete  Susman  as  an  Interpreter  of  the  Bible  

Abstract:   Margarete   Susman   is   a   very   interesting   figure   from   different   points   of   view:   for   her   staying  between  'Deutschtum'  and  'Judentum';  because  she  at  the  same  time  was  a  poet  and  a  profound  thinker;  for  her  work  as  a  defender  of  women's  emancipation  and  of  Jewish  people's  culture  and  values.  The  paper  will  deal  with  her  exegesis  of  the  Jewish  Bible,  especially  the  Book  of  Job,  in  the  context  of  the  events  of  her  times  and  in  dialogue  with  other  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  interpreters  (Maimonides,  Kant,  Buber).  

 

Annabel  Herzog,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  A  Loveless  Daughter  of  the  Jewish  People:  Hannah  Arendt  and  Jewishness  as  Pre-­‐political  Factuality  

Abstract:  In  her  entire  work  Hannah  Arendt  emphasized  her  Jewishness  and  her  interest  in  the  fate  of  the  Jewish   people.   For   her,   being   Jewish   was   a   fact,   as   was   being   a   woman.   As   she   argued   in   her   political  philosophy,  however,  such  facts  were  not  enough  for  the  constitution  of  a  meaningful  life.  This  paper  will  focus  on  Arendt's  recently  published  "Jewish  Writings"  as  well  as  on  her  well-­‐known  study  Rahel  Varnhagen  to  discuss  her  understanding  of  Jewishness  in  the  context  of  her  theory  of  political  action.  

 

Orietta  Ombrosi,  “La  Sapienza”  University  of  Rome,  Italy  

Title:  Sarah  Kofman:  a  Smothered  Word  

Abstract:  In  my  speech,  I  would  like  to  think  about  the  question  of  femininity  and  of  Judaism  after  Shoah,  starting  from  French  philosopher  Sarah  Kofman  (1934-­‐1994),  a  forgotten  figure,  for  who  the  writing,  and  in  particular   the  «writing  of   the  disaster»   (Blanchot),  was  essential.  Essential  was,   for  her,  writing,  Essential  

was  the  word.  A  smothered  word.  But  a  word  as  memory,  as  a  duty  of  memory  of  deaths.  Foremost,  the  aim  is  to  question  this  female  Jewish  thinker  who  posed  philosophical  conundrums  –  even  if  not  exclusively  by  means  of   philosophical   conceptuality   –   on   Judaism  after  Auschwitz.  What  happened   to   Judaism  after  this   event?  How  did   she   see   Israel’s   role   and   that   of   the   Jewish  people   take   shape?  On   the  other  hand,  what  happened  to  philosophy,  to  its  “structures”,  and  to  its  “language”?  Finally,  why  did  a  certain  feminine  sensitivity  push  this  intellectual  towards  these  questions  in  particular?  

 

Marina  Arbib,  Interdisciplinary  Centre  Herzliya,  Israel  

Title:  "Flora  Randegger  :  Patriotisme  juif  et  littérature  italienne"  

Abstract:  Ma  présentation  est  axée  sur  une  patriote  juive  de  Trieste,  Flora  Randegger  (1824-­‐1910),  qui,  en  brisant  les  limites  imposées  à  la  femme  par  la  société  du  XIXème  siècle,  se  distinguait  par  ses  initiatives  en  Terre  d'Israël  et  par  ses  écrits  qui  encourageaient  l'esprit  national  juif  dans  la  Diaspora  juive.  Le  but  de  ma  présentation  est  de  montrer  comment  Flora  Randegger  a  encouragé  le  patriotisme  juif  en  prenant  comme  modèle  la  littérature  non  juive  du  romantisme  et  du  "Risorgimento"  italien.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Modern  Jewish  Thought  

14.00-­‐14.30  

Panel:  Orietta  Ombrosi  

Judaism  in  “Gender  Difference”.  Different  Paths  of  Women's  Judaism  

 

Chair:  

 

Chiara  Adorisio,  “La  Sapienza”  University  of  Rome,  Italy  

Title:  “Without  Regard  to  Gender”:  Regina  Jonas'  reflections  on  the  Halakha  and  on  the  History  of  Jewish  Women.  

Abstract:  Regina  Jonas,  was  the  first  woman  who,  after  several  denials,  was  ordained  as  a  rabbi  in  1935  in  Berlin.  In  1930  she  had  concluded  her  studies  at  the  Hochschule  für  die  Wissenschaft  des  Judentums  with  a  thesis  titled  “Can  a  woman  be  a  rabbi  according  to  Halakhic  sources?”.  Deported  to  Theresienstadt  in  1942,  she  met  Leo  Baeck  and  the  philosopher  and  psychologist  Viktor  Frankl  and  held  lectures  in  the  camp.  She  died  in  Auschwitz   in  1944.  Regina  Jonas'  work  has  been  only  recently  rediscovered,  after  a   long  period  of  oblivion.  Using   recently  published  studies  about  her   life  and  her  work,  and  some  of  her   still  unexamined  lectures  about  the  history  of  Jewish  women,  Talmudic  topics,  Biblical  themes,  and  about  Jewish  beliefs  and  ethics,  my  paper  intends  to  reconstruct  Regina  Jonas'  reflections  on  women  and  Judaism.  

 

Ancient  Yiddish    

14.30-­‐15.30  

Old  Yiddish  Literature  

 

Chair:  Jean  Baumgarten  

 

Hilde  Pach,  University  of  Amsterdam,  Netherlands  

Title:  Arranging  Reality.  Editing  Mechanisms  of  the  Dutch  Yiddish  Kurant  

Abstract:   The   Kurant   (Amsterdam   1686-­‐1687)   is   the   world's   oldest   known   Yiddish   newspaper.   Its   main  sources  are  Dutch  newspapers.  Did  the  makers  of  the  Kurant  use  the  selection  and  editing  of  the  material  from  the  sources  as  tools  for  defining  the  identity  of  the  Kurant  and  for  creating  an  imagined  community  of  readers?  

 

Claudia  Rosenzweig,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Elye  hanovi  and  the  Vampire  in  a  Yiddish  Manuscript  from  the  16th  century.  

Abstract:  One  of  the  oldest  attested  genres  in  Yiddish  Literature  is  the  Zauberspruch  or  refues,  a  collection  of  short  recipes  and  folk-­‐medicine,  sometimes  corresponding  to  the  Italian  libri  di  segreti,  with  the  sporadic  presence  of  narrative  elements.  In  this  paper  I  wish  to  present  some  first  remarkes  on  a  recently  discovered  manuscript  dating  from  the  16th  century.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Ancient  Yiddish  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Old  Yiddish  Literature  

 

Chair:  

 

Oren  Roman,  Haifa  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Narrator  in  old-­‐Yiddish  Biblical  Epics:  Between  Spielmann  and  Darshn  

Abstract:  Bearing  in  mind  the  Yiddish  "Shpilman  Teorye"  and  its  rejection  by  Khone  Shmeruk,  I  will  look  into  the   literary   figure   of   the   narrator   of   various   old-­‐Yiddish   biblical   epics,   and   offer   a   close   reading   of   his  speech.  I  will  trace  the  literary  sources  and  models  for  his  function  as  narrator,  and  show  that  these  include  elements   from   both   German   and   Jewish   literary   traditions.   The   influence   of   German   epic   literature   is  evident  at   first   sight,  especially   through  the  use  of   formulas  originating   from  the   language  used   in  works  like  Heldenbuch,  Jüngeres  Hildebarndslied,  etc.  Still  there  are  some  differences  in  the  use  of  these  German  

phrases  in  Jewish  works  that  I  would  like  to  touch  upon,  first  and  foremost  the  narrative  of  religions,  as  well  as  other  aspects  and  tendencies.  On  the  other  hand  we  see  that  the  narrator   is  also  deeply  embedded  in  Jewish  Ashkenazi  oral  traditions,  such  as  those  of  the  Darshn  and  the  Melamed.  The  Darshn,  or  preacher  at  the  synoagogue,   spoke  mainly   in  Yiddish   in  order   to  address   the  entire  public  present   (including  women,  children,  unlearned  men,  etc.).   In   the  rather  rare  cases  when  his  sermons  were  written  down,   they  were  translated  to  Hebrew  and  most   likely  edited,  so  that  no  sermon  reached  us   in   its  original  "popular"  form.  Similarly,   there   are   no   direct   records   of   the  melamed's   methods   of   teaching   children   at   the   traditional  learning  Kheyder,  only  indirect  evidence  such  as  various  Torah  translations,  historical  sources  dealing  with  education  within  the  Jewish  community,  and  modern  recordings  of  traditional  Kheyder  settings.  That  being  said,  it  appears  that  the  narrator  of  old-­‐Yiddish  epics  was  not  only  influenced  by  Yiddish  oral  traditions,  but  in  fact  also  recorded  and  preserved  some  of  the  authentic  rhetorical  tools  of  the  Darshn  and  Melamed  in  the  late  Middle  Ages  and  early  modern  period.  The  dual  nature  of  the  narrator  in  these  old-­‐Yiddish  works,  between  German-­‐Christian   and   traditional   Jewish   cultures   and   literatures,   reflects   the   cultural   duality   of  Ashkenazi  Jewry  in  general.  I  will  try  to  map  in  my  paper  the  relationship  between  these  two  backgrounds  of  the  narrator,  and  point  on  places  where  the  two  complement  each  other,  and  where  they  conflict.  

 

Elisabeth  Singer-­‐Brehm,  Jüdisches  Kulturmuseum  Veitshöchheim,  Germany  

Title:  Yiddish  Versions  of  the  German  Volksbuch  in  Franconian  Genizoth  

Abstract:  In  the  genizoth  of  Franconia  (Germany,  Bavaria)  there  was  found  a  large  number  of  secular,  not  originally  Jewish  literature  written  or  printed  in  Yiddish  like  adaptations  of  famous  chapbooks  (Volksbuch)  or  other  popular  literature.  Although  editions  of  famous  works  of  fiction  like  “Herzog  Ernst”,  “Prinz  Eugen”  oder   “Geschichten   aus   1001   Nacht”   (One   Thousand   and   One   Nights)   were   liked   very  much,   only   a   few  fragments   are   preserved   until   now.   The   genizoth   now   provide   new   fragments   of   this   kind   of   literature.  These   texts   belong   to   known,   but   also   unknown  editions,   some  of   them  are   not   listed   in   bibliographical  catalogues  and  or  are  new  proves  of  lost  or  forgotten  editions.  Some  of  the  literature  has  been  completely  unknown  up   to   the  moment,  when   they  were   identified   in   a   Franconian   genizah.   The  paper  will   give   an  overview  of  these  finds  and  of  the  relevance  for  different  aspects  of  research.  

 

Arnaud  Bikard,  Paris  4-­‐Sorbonne,  France  

Title:  Le  "Seder  Noshim"  est-­‐il  une  œuvre  d'Elia  Lévita?  

Abstract:   En   1927,   dans   ses   "Bilder   fun   der   yidisher   literaturgeshikhte"   (p.   145-­‐148),   Max   Weinreich  décrivait  le  manuscrit  Cambridge  add.  547  et  précisait  déjà  que  sa  partie  centrale  dont  il  citait  d'importants  fragments  présentait  des  particularités  étonnantes,  notamment  un  humour  remarquable  dans  un  texte  qui  commence  comme  un  guide  rituel  de  pureté  pour  les  femmes  ashkénazes.  J.  C.  Frakes  a  édité  en  2004  dans  "Early   Yiddish  Texts  1100-­‐1750",  p.   115-­‐119,  une  partie  du  début  du  manuscrit.   Il   apparaissait   alors  déjà  clairement  que  le  manuscrit  constitue  une  collection  de  trois  textes  différents,  dont  le  premier  est  un  guide  traditionnel  à   l'intention  des  femmes  juives  et   le  troisième  une  série  de  réflexions  sur   la  mort  d'un  poète  connu   par   ailleurs,   Menakhem   Oldendorf.   En   2011,   H.   Fox   et   J.J.   Lewis   éditaient   la   partie   centrale   du  manuscrit  sous   le  titre  "Many  pious  women":  un  poème  dont  près  de  1200  vers  ont  été  conservés  et  qui  présente  des  caractéristiques  littéraires  remarquables  dans  le  cadre  de  la  littérature  yiddish  ancienne.  Les  éditeurs  ne  tranchent  pas  la  question  de  l'auteur  du  poème,  qui  reste  donc  anonyme.  Dans  le  cadre  de  nos  recherches  de  doctorat,  nous  sommes  parvenus  à  la  conviction  que  ce  texte  pouvait  être  attribué,  avec  une  grande  probabilité,  au  poète  yiddish  le  plus  important  de  la  période:  Elia  Lévita.  Notre  intervention  vise  à  présenter  les  arguments  principaux  qui  permettent  de  conforter  cette  attribution.  

 

Karolina  Szymaniak,  Jewish  Historical  Institute,  Krakow,  Poland  

Title:  Prophets,  Messiahs,  and  National  Redemption.  Polish  Romantic  Phantasms  and  the  Modern  Yiddish  Literary  Criticism    

Abstract:  In  the  paper,  I  would  like  to  analyze  different  responses  to  Polish  Romantic  literature  found  in  the  Yiddish  literary  criticism  prior  to  the  Second  World  War  and  the  Holocaust,  with  a  special  emphasis  on  the  interwar  period.  This  literature,  influenced  by  diaspora  experience  and  Messianism,  played  a  central  role  in  the   formation   of   Polish   national   repertoires.   These   in   turn,   as   recent   scholarship   has   shown   (mainly,  however,   with   regard   to   Zionism   only),   were   appropriated   in   different   ways   by   the   Jewish   national  discourses.   Romantic   imagery   and   phantasms   seem   thus   a   particularly   important   and   fruitful   area   for  explorations  of  patterns  of  multidirectional  influence  and  Polish-­‐Jewish  cultural  exchange.  The  responses  to  Polish  Romantic  literature,  approving  or  critical,  consist  an  important  group  in  the  corpus  of  Yiddish  literary  criticism  dealing  with  Polish  literature  in  general.  That  many  of  them  appeared  in  the  period  immediately  following  First  World  War  and  the  establishment  of  the  Second  Polish  Republic,  bears  only  witness  to  the  importance   literary   criticism   and   the   Romantic   tradition   had   in   renegotiating   new   terms   of   the   Polish-­‐Jewish   coexistence   in   the   changed   political   and   cultural   situation.   Yiddish   literature   in   Poland   had   to  redefine   itself   under   the  new  political   realities   in   relation   to   the  new  political   state  organization  with   its  developing  network  of  cultural  institutions.  Literary  criticism  with  its  different  agendas  became  one  of  the  arenas   used   by   Yiddish   literature   to   negotiate   and   define   its   role   with   respect   to   the   Polish   literary  establishment.  The  texts  in  question  form  a  varied  group.  They  consider  the  role  Romantic  literature  played  in  forming  modern  Polish  literature  and  culture  and  shaping  Polish  Jewish  relations,  as  well  as  analyze  the  Messianic  motifs   and   Diaspora   experience   expressed   in   this   literature   and   their   relation   to   Judaism   and  Jewish   literary   tradition.   Some   of   the   critics   reveal   a   true   fascination   with   Polish   Romantic   tradition,  treating  it  as  a  model  for  the  Yiddish/Jewish  literature,  while  others  reject  it  on  different  grounds  –  as  one  of   the   factors  provincializing  Polish   literature  or  as  a   tradition  shaping   the  oppressive  Polish  nationalism.    The   paper   will   include   analysis   of   such   authors   as   A.   Tseytlin,   S.   Asch,   Y.Y.   Singer,   L.   Finkelshteyn,   Y.  Viltshinsky,  and  others.  The  close  reading  of  critical  texts  and  their  cultural  and  political  contexts,  will  help  me  examine  the  ways  in  which  Yiddish  culture,  as  a  minority  culture,  strived  to  establish  and  negotiate  its  own  position  and  independence  in  relation  to  Polish  literature,  responded  to  different  forms  of  oppression,  and  resisted  the  hegemony  of  Polish  culture,  not  denying,  however,   its  cultural   interrelations  with   it,  but  rather   trying   to   redefine   them   on   its   own   terms.   The   paper   is   part   of   a   larger   project   concerning   the  multifaceted  Polish-­‐Yiddish  cultural  contacts  seen  through  the  lens  of  literary  discourses.  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  03  

 

Session:  001:    

Rabbinic  Exegesis/Traditions  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Tamar  Kadari,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  "Honey  and  Milk  beneath  Your  Tongue"  (Song  of  Songs  4:11):  On  an  Allegorical  Code  in  the  Rabbinic  Commentary  on  the  Song  of  Song  

Abstract:  In  this  lecture  I  will  call  attention  to  a  unique  and  interesting  phenomenon  in  rabbinic  literature.  A  set   of   images   in   the   Song   of   Songs   relating   to   milk,   nursing,   and   a   mother's   breasts   and   home   were  interpreted  by  the  sages  by  means  of  a  single  allegorical  code.  The  sages  use  the  image  of  milk  as  a  symbol  of  Torah,  the  mother's  home  as  representing  Mount  Sinai,  and  the  act  of  nursing  as  the  process  of  teaching  and   transmitting   the   written   and   oral   Torah.   In   my   lecture   I   will   analyze   a   passage   from   midrash   Shir  Hashirim  Rabbah  on  the  verse,  "If  only  you  were  like  a  brother,  who  was  nursed  at  my  mother's  breasts"  (Songs  8:1),  and  I  will  compare  it  to  its  parallel  in  midrash  Pesikta  de  Rav  Kahana.  Based  on  this  comparison  I  will  highlight  the  extraordinary  ideas  that  appear  in  midrash  Shir  HaShirim  Rabbah,  and  I  will  contend  that  they   were   influenced   by   Jewish-­‐Christian   polemic   about   the   question   of   the   rightful   owners   and  interpreters  of  Torah.  By  invoking  early  Christian  sources  I  will  demonstrate  that  the  question  of  who  is  the  real   Israel   and   who   controls   the   true   keys   to   unlocking   the   secrets   of   Torah   stood   at   the   heart   of   the  polemic  between  Jews  and  Christians   in  the  early  centuries  of  the  Common  Era,  and  shaped  midrash  Shir  Hashirim  Rabbah  as  we  know  it.  

 

Gerhard  Langer,  Institut  für  Judaistik  Wien,  Austria  

Title:  Leviticus  Rabbah  in  the  Context  of  the  House  of  Study  

Abstract:  Burton  Visotzky  has  shown,  that  Leviticus  Rabbah  functions  as  a  collection  of  midrashic  materials  mostly   known   from  other   textual   contexts,   adapted   to  a  Hellenistic   form  of  proems  and   "gufa".  Visotzky  calls  it  "a  fifth-­‐century  Galilean  miscellany  of  rabbinic  traditions  tangentially  related  to  Leviticus,  with  quasi-­‐encyclopedic  chapter  divisions”  (Golden  Bells  and  Pomegranates,  179).  In  my  paper  I  try  to  argue  for  a  less  pessimistic  view  regarding   the   thematical  unity  of  different  chapters,  which  on   the   first   sight  seem  to  be  only   loosely  connected,  but  can  be  defined  on  a  deeper   level  as  organized  and  structured.   I  will   focus  on  the  element  of  study,  learning  and  teaching,  which  binds  different  contexts  together.  

 

Adiel  Kadari,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Did  Elijah  Show  Respect  to  Royalty?  

Abstract:   Of   all   the   Biblical   prophets,   Elijah   was   accorded   a   unique   status   in   rabbinic   literature.   He   is  mentioned  hundreds  of   times   in   the  Talmud  and  midrash   in  various  contexts,  both  aggadic  and  halakhic,  contemporaneous   and   eschatological.   In   this   lecture,   part   of   a   larger   research   project   dealing   with   the  depiction  of  Elijah   in  rabbinic   literature,   I  will   focus  on  an  exegetical  tradition  that  describes  the  figure  of  Elijah  as  one  who  showed  respect  to  royalty.  This  exegetical   tradition  will  be  compared  to  early  Christian  injunctions  to  respect  imperial  rule.  The  Book  of  Kings  relates  that  at  the  end  of  the  description  of  Elijah’s  dramatic  confrontation  on  Mount  Carmel,  when  a  heavy  rain  started  to  fall,  Elijah  girded  his  loins  and  ran  ahead  of  King  Ahab’s  chariot,  an  act  that  was  explained  in  tannaitic  sources  as  a  gesture  of  respect  for  the  monarch.  This  explanation,  which  does  not  accord  with  the  Biblical  depiction  of  Elijah  as  a  zealous  defender  of  God’s  words  who  did  not  hesitate  to  offer  scathing  criticism  of  King  Ahab,  was  accepted  by  medieval  and  modern   Biblical   commentators.   In   this   lecture   I   wish   to   offer   a   critical   examination   of   this   exegetical  tradition  so  as  to  uncover  the  ideological  stance  that  it  reflects  and  the  conflicting  ideas  with  which  it  is  in  tension.  My  discussion  will  focus  on  a  passage  from  the  Mekhilta  d’Rabbi  Yishmael,  Bo,  Masekhta  d’Pisha,  section   13,  which   is   the   earliest   instance  of   this   exegetical   tradition.   I  will   consider   the   redaction  of   this  passage   and   the   ideas   that   it   expresses,   and   I   will   compare   it   to   the   figure   of   Elijah   in   Second   Temple  sources.  In  this  context,   I  will  compare  the  Mekhilta’s  approach  to  the  various  New  Testament  charges  to  respect  the  imperial  authorities,  including  “Fear  God,  honor  the  king.”  (First  Peter,  2:17).  In  addition,  I  will  try  to  point  to  various   layers  within  the  Mekhilta  passage,  each  of  which  expresses  a  different   ideological  stance  with   regard   to   the   attitude   towards   the  monarchy.   Finally,   I  will   offer   a   hypothesis   regarding   the  historical  context  that  gave  rise  to  this  exegetical  tradition,  and  the  identity  of  its  authors,  and  I  will  point  to  the  commonalities  between  Jewish  and  Christian  religious  and   ideological  ways  of  dealing  with   life  under  Roman  pagan  rule.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Survie  et  néant  dans  la  longue  durée  juive  

 

Organizer:  Misgav  Har-­‐Peled  

 

Misgav  Har-­‐Peled,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Election,  extermination  et  survie  

Abstract:   A   Sinaï,   au   moment   de   la   conclusion   du   pacte   avec   Yahvé,   suite   à   «   l’affaire   »   du   veau   d’or,  l’Eternel  souhaite  exterminer  Israël,  son  peuple.  Cette  anecdote  nous  servira  comme  point  de  départ  pour  observer  le  lien  que  le  judaïsme  antique  faisait  entre  élection  et  la  menace  d’extermination.  Il  sera  proposé  que  par  le  biais  d’une  réflexion  sur  la  possibilité  de  l’extermination  du  peuple  élu,  le  judaïsme  pensait  entre  autre   l’élection   comme   un   état   d’exception;   une   survie,   vue   comme   une   existence   conditionnée   qui  oscillent  entre  la  bénédiction  et  la  malédiction,  entre  l’éternité  et  le  néant.  On  s’interrogera  notamment  sur  la  contradiction  entre  les  menaces  d’extermination  du  peuple  élu  dans  la  Bible  d’un  côté  et  la  négation  de  la  possibilité  d’une  extermination  totale  du  peuple,  comme  elle  manifeste  dans   l’idée  du  reste  d’Israël   («  sherit   Israel  »).  Dans  un  deuxième  moment  de   la   réflexion  on  proposera  certaines  hypothèses  quant  à   la  

manière   dont   la   dialectique   de   l’élection   entre   extermination   et   éternité   se   développa   dans   le   judaïsme  rabbinique.  

 

Amos  Squverer,  CRPMS-­‐  Paris  Diderot,  France  

Title:  Le  vœu  totalisant  de  l’extermination  et  l’acte  monothéiste:  relecture  du  traité  Avoda  Zara  

Abstract:  Le  vœu  profond  qui  se  cache  derrière  un  discours  d’extermination  est  la  croyance  en  la  totalité  -­‐soit   une   position   intégriste.   Dans   l’extermination,   on   cultive   l’idée     d’un   déracinement   possible,   d’une  résolution  définitive,  d’une  «   solution   finale  »  qui   va  nous  débarrasser  de   ce  qui  empêche  cette   totalité.  Nous  proposons  de  saisir  le  judaïsme  comme  un  discours  qui,  par  structure,  résiste  à  ce  vœu  de  totalisation  en   ayant   comme   vocation   de   réintroduire   un   point   manque   qui   échappe   à   la   totalisation.   L’acte  monothéiste   est   celui   de   la   de-­‐totalisation  par   soustraction.  A   concevoir   ainsi   le   judaïsme,   on   comprend  pourquoi   il  manie  un   rapport   très   serré  et   intime  avec  un  discours  de   l’extermination.   Le  discours   juif   se  constitue  comme  l’envers  d’un  discours  totalisant.  Plus  encore,  on  comprend  pourquoi  la  structure  même  de   la   discursivité   juive   a   pour   nécessité   ce   fond   discursif   totalisant   qui   permet   l’émergence  même  de   la  spécificité   juive.   En   étant   un   discours   qui   émerge   dans   ce   mouvement   antitotalitaire,   il   est   conduit  inévitablement  à  former  un  couple  avec  des  conceptions  totalisantes.  Le  judaïsme  peut  même  être  conduit,  dans  certains  contextes  historiques,  à   inventer  cette  altérité  pour  réaffirmer   le  mouvement  ou  mettre  en  acte  l’opération,  qui  crée  son  identité.  Notre  intervention  propose  de  mettre  en  travail  ce  mouvement  pour  éclairer  la  posture  rabbinique  envers  l’idolâtrie  telle  qu’elle  est  déployée  dans  le  traité  de  l’idolâtrie  (Avoda  Zara).   Il   s’agit   de   saisir   ce   couple   éternel   idolâtrie/monothéisme   comme   une   matrice   qui   donne   à  comprendre  ce  qui  est  en  jeu  dans  cette  dialectique  ou  tension  discursive  judaïsme/extermination.  

 

Ron  Naiweld,  CNRS,  France  

Title:  L’idéologie  de  survie  et  ses  racines  dans  les  discours  juifs  et  chrétiens  

Abstract:  Je  voudrais  présenter  la  thèse  suivante  :  les  racines  de  l’angoisse  de  l’extermination  (hashmada)  dans   le   judaïsme   médiéval   sont   à   trouver   dans   la   manière   des   auteurs   chrétiens   de   l’antiquité   tardive  d’associer  le  peuple  juif  au  judaïsme.  Ces  auteurs  établissaient  un  lien  existentiel  entre  les  deux  entités,  ce  qui   fait   que   la   disparition   de   l’une   entraine   l’extermination   de   l’autre.   En   effet,   la   lecture   des   textes  chrétiens  concernant  les  juifs,  de  Paul,   Ignace  ou  Tertullien,  nous  permet  de  déceler  comment  le  discours  chrétien   développe   une   structure   dans   laquelle   le   «   judaïsme   »   devient   un   système   de   pensée   et   des  pratiques   qui   prend   du   sens   seulement   dans   la  mesure   où   il   est   adopté   par   les  membres   d’une   ethnie  spécifique   –   les   juifs.   Ce   lien   entre   la   «   religion   »   juive   d’une   part   et   l’ethnos   juif   de   l’autre   peut   nous  paraître  évident  aujourd’hui,  mais  les  discours  juifs  antiques,  comme  de  Philon  ou  des  rabbins,  font  souvent  preuve  d’une  tendance  universaliste  claire.  Certes,  dans  les  deux  discours  (Philonien  et  rabbinique),  les  juifs  constitue  toujours  un  groupe  ethnique,  mais  il  s’agit  d’un  ethnos  qui  ouvre  sa  porte  aux  membres  d’autres  peuples  ;  une  personne  appartenant  à  un  autre  ethnos  peut  se  judaïser  et  appartenir,  au  moins  de  facto,  au  peuple   juif,   avec   tous   les   avantages   matériels,   sociaux   et   spirituels   que   cela   pourrait   avoir.   Cette  acceptation   de   l’ethnos   juif   (ou   du   judaïsme)   apparaît   déjà,   selon   Shaye   Cohen,   dans   l’époque   des  Maccabées.   C’est   seulement   chez   certains   auteurs   patristiques,   et   cela   pour   des   raisons   intérieures   au  discours   chrétiens   (notamment   les   conflits   avec   les   autres   sectes   chrétiennes  et   la  quête  de   légitimation  dans   l’espace   romain),   que   l’on   trouve   un   effort   global   de   fermer   les   portes   de   l’ethnos   juif.   Le  christianisme   développe   une   image   du  monde   où   le   «   judaïsme   »   occupe   un   rôle   déterminant   –   par   sa  fausseté,  il  est  le  symbole  de  la  vérité  ;  par  sa  matérialité,  il  désigne  l’esprit.  Or  puisque  le  judaïsme  ne  peut  être  soutenu  que  par  des  juifs,  la  disparition  de  ces  derniers  est  une  éventualité  qu’il  faut  éviter  à  tout  prix.  

Un  monde  sans  juifs  est  un  monde  sans  judaïsme,  où  le  christianisme  n’a  aucun  support.  La  christianisation  de   l’empire   romain   fait   que   cette   image   chrétienne   du   monde   se   propage   sur   les   plans   juridique   et  idéologique.  Les  autorités  chrétiennes  conservent  les  juifs,  tout  en  veillant  (avec  ou  sans  succès)  à  ce  que  le  judaïsme  ne  se  diffuse  pas  au-­‐delà  de  ceux  qui  sont  déjà  juifs.  Cette  image,  à  son  tour,  est  intériorisée  par  les   juifs   eux-­‐mêmes   en   terre   chrétienne,   lesquels   acceptent   l’identification   entre   le   «   judaïsme   »   et  l’ethnicité  juive.  En  effet,  au  moins  dans  le  monde  chrétien,  le  judaïsme  est  littéralement  ce  qui  maintient  les  juifs  vivants  !  

 

Youval  Rotman,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  “Extermination”  of  the  converted  believer  as  means  of  survival    

Abstract:  The   following  presentation  will   focus  on   the  question  of   conversions  as  an  existential   threat   to  Judaism.  While  not  a  threat  on  the  life  of  the  individual  on  the  private  level,  conversions  from  Judaism  was  formulated  as  a  public  death,  and  was  regarded  as  an  existential  threat  to  the  existence  of  Judaism  on  the  public  level.  This  was  especially  the  case  in  the  Middle  Ages,  when  conversions  to  Christianity  and  to  Islam  became  a  cultural  and  political  policy.  Jews  responded  to  this  policy  by  perceiving  conversions  of  Jews  as  an  extermination  de   jure  of   the   individual.  Conversion  out  of   Judaism  became   in   the  monotheistic  medieval  world   to  designate   a   symbolic   death  of   the   individual   believer   to   the   Jewish   collective  –shmad  –   a   term  derived  from  the  Hebrew  verb  ‘to  exterminate.’  However,  the  perception  of  conversion  out  of  Judaism  as  social  death,  as  the  ‘extermination’  of  the  converted  Jewish  believer  de  jure  to  his  community,  must  also  be  considered  as  means  of  survival  of  the  Jewish  collective.  In  other  words,  naming  and  marking  the  converted  Jews  as  ‘self-­‐exterminated  Jew’  (mshumad),  was  aimed  to  identify  conversion  as  a  threat  to  the  existence  of   the   Jewish   collective,   and   hence   also   as  means   of   its   survival.   Putting   the   converted   Jew   ‘ex’   of   the  Jewish  collective  ‘terminus’  was  aimed  also  to  protect  the  existence  of  this  collective  and  its  borders.  The  paper  will  examine  the  particular  way  in  which  Jewish  communities  formulated  and  addressed  the  subject  of  conversion  on  the  level  of  the  Jewish  collective.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Contemporary  Israel  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Satire,  Humor,  Language  and  Identity  in  Israel  

 

Chair:  Yonith  Benhamou  

 

Yonith  Benhamou,  EHESS,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Jewish  Humor  and  Satire  in  the  Yishuv:  towards  Israeliness  (1925-­‐1948)    

Abstract:  Only  at  the  end  of  the  18th  century  with  the  emergence  of  the  Haskalah  movement  (the  Jewish  Enlightenment)   in   Eastern   Europe   most   Jewish   parodic   and   satirical   texts   appear.   Visual   parody,  

illustrations  and  cartoons   come  up   relatively   late   in   the   Jewish  press  when  we  compare   it   to  non-­‐Jewish  journals   in   a   same   country.   In   the   Yiddish   press,   cartoons   as   well   as   satirical   literature   were   built   on  religious  traditional  texts,  used  a  subversive  style,  and  were  published  in  secular  Jewish  humoristic  journals.  Paradoxically,   this   practice   combined   texts   considered  as   sacred  with  profane  humor.   It   reminded  about  the   traditional   Purim-­‐shpil   (Purim   plays)   whose   comical   main   resource   was   the   parody   of   prayers   and  sacred  texts  which  gave  rise  to  the  reversal  and  transgression  of  the  prohibited.  Although  this  whole  world  suddenly   disappeared   with   the   Shoah,   taking   away   Jewish   humor   and   its   productions,   this   tradition  persevered  in  the  Yishuv  (Jewish  settlements  in  Palestine  before  the  creation  of  the  State  of  Israel).  Several  satirical  magazines  continued   to  be  published  during   Jewish  holidays  and  especially  during  Purim,  and   to  make  a  mockery  of  the  Passover  Haggadah.  The  immigrants  from  the  third  and  fourth  aliyah  continued  to  perpetuate  the  art  of  satire  and  developed  it.  At  the  end  of  the  20’s  and  the  beginning  of  the  30’s,  with  the  arrival  of  composers,  actors,  painters,  and  singers  from  Russia,  Hungary  and  Poland,  an  artistic  ferment  was  born.  This  cultural   renaissance  gave  rise   to  the   first  satirical  cabaret   (Ha-­‐kumkum)  brought   to  Tel-­‐Aviv  by  Avigdor  HaMeiri,  an   immigrant  born   in  Hungary  who  came  to  Palestine  from  Odessa.  A  similar  revolution  took  place  in  the  Hebrew  press.  The  popular  success  of  the  famous  column  “Ha-­‐tur  Ha-­‐shevii”  (“the  seventh  column”)  from  Nathan  Alterman  in  the  daily  newspaper  Davar  (Word)  proved  it.  It  had  the  particularity  to  deal  with  political  affairs  in  rhymed  prose.  In  Hebrew  journals,  some  humoristic  illustrations  and  cartoons  started  to  appear,  drawn  by  the  pioneers  of  Israeli  pictorial  satire  that  were  Arye  Navon  and  Yehoshua  Edri.  Most   of   the   caricatures   were   published   in   the   Saturday   editions   of   the   daily   newspapers.   Yet,   with   the  Westernization  and  secularization  of  the  country,  satire  and  parody  distanced  themselves  from  folklore  and  religious  texts  and  ceased  to  be  associated  exclusively  with  Jewish  holidays.  They  started  to  portray  a  “state  in   the   making”,   while   they   were   progressively   becoming   more   politicized.   This   allowed   them   to   better  embrace  the  Zionist  cause  and  national  values,  as  well  as  to  leave  the  field  of  the  sacred  in  order  to  better  take  root  in  the  field  of  the  profane,  from  Jewish  to  Israeli  culture.  

 

Juliana  Portenoy-­‐Schlesinger,  Universidade  de  São  Paulo,  Brasil  

Title:  The  Language  in  the  Centre  of  the  Identity  Battle  and  the  Last  Stronghold  of  the  New  Israeli  Arab  

Abstract:  This  paper  analyses  the  role  language  plays  in  Sayed  Kashua’s  chronicles  in  Haaretz  newspaper.  As  tools  of   identity,  both  Hebrew  and  Arabic  are,  according   to   the   interpretation  of   these  chronicles,  at   the  same  time  fixed  and  flexible  ways  to  deal  with  the  other  and  with  oneself  in  the  battle  of  cultural  and  moral  integrity  in  Israel.  

 

Jan  Zouplna,  Oriental  Institute,  Czech  Academy  of  Sciences  

Title:  Culture,  Language  and  Identity  in  early  Revisionist  Zionism  

Abstract:  The  differences   that  existed   in   the  views  of   the   founders  of   the  Revisionist  Union   (RU)  and   the  official  Zionism  of  the  interwar  era  were  not  insignificant.  No  less  apparent  were  those  with  Revisionist  off-­‐shoots,  which  were  later  to  constitute  the  Israeli  right.  Interestingly,  these  differences  went  far  beyond  the  realm  of  politics  in  the  strict  sense  of  the  term.  It  was  not  the  culture,  but  the  social  organism  (state/polity)  and  territory  that  were  regarded  as  the  essential  characteristics  of  nationhood  by  the  Revisionist  leaders  of  the   1920s   and   early   1930s.   Small   wonder,   therefore,   that   criticism   of   the   excessive   “culturalism”   of  contemporary  Zionism  was  enlisted  early  on.  Its  focus  on  cultural  projects  in  Palestine,  such  as  the  one  of  the   Hebrew   University   in   Jerusalem,   was   met   with   high-­‐handed   contempt.   In   terms   of   language,   early  Revisionism  was  not   shy  of  an  unorthodox  approach  either.  Nominally,   the  RU  considered,   in  agreement  with  other  Zionist  factions,  the  “hebraization”  of  Jewry  to  be  an  integral  part  of  its  platform.  In  practice,  RU  

leaders  objected  to  any  form  of  subsidizing  Hebrew  language  schools  and  culture.  Overall,  the  RU  founders  displayed   a   clear   preference   for   non-­‐Jewish   languages   in   both   private   communication   and   party  propaganda.   However,   the   identity   of   Revisionist   acculturated   elites   was   not   based   on   a   simple   set   of  negative   elements.   The   objective   of   establishing,   to   use   their   terms,   a   bridgehead   of   Europe   in   the   East  contained  an  affirmative  identity  component.  Modern  Jewish  identity  was  seen  as  a  fusion  of  Judaism  and  post-­‐enlightenment  Europe.  Accusing  rival  factions  of  sticking  to  the  mentality  of  the  ghetto,  combining  a  distrust   of   and   servility   in   relation   to   non-­‐Jews,   the  RU   founders   instead   accentuated   the   existence   of   a  community  of  historical  bonds  which  had  shaped  the  Jews  and  Europe  alike.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Contemporary  Israel  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Media  and  Identity  in  Israel  and  the  Jewish  World  

 

Chair:  Yaakov  Shavit  

 

Gideon  Kouts,  Université  Paris  8,  France  

Title:  The  Wanderings  of  "Ha-­‐Levanon":  The  Palestinian  and  Oriental  Connection  

Abstract:  Ha-­‐Levanon  (The  Lebanon),  the  first  Hebrew  monthly  in  Palestine  (1863)  was  carried  by  its  editor,  Yehiel   Bril,   from   the  Holy   Land   to  destinations   abroad   shortly   after   it  was   founded.   Its   stops  were  Paris,  where   it   appeared   in   1865-­‐   1870   as   a   strictly   Orthodox   Jewish   weekly;   Mainz,   Germany,   where   it   was  published  in  1871-­‐  1882;  and  London  in  1886,  where  it  reached  the  end  of  its  career  and  where  Bril  passed  away.   In   his   wanderings,   Bril   had   to   adjust   to   different   countries   and   regimes-­‐   a   living   example   of   the  “wandering  Jew”  embodied  in  the  press.  Ha-­‐Levanon’s  “Palestinian”  orientation  was  evident  from  the  start.  This  is  not  surprising,  since  in  his  first  journalistic  “posting”  Bril  was  the  first  Hebrew  foreign  correspondent  in   Palestine   (of   Ha-­‐Magid).   The   subtitle   of   The   Lebanon,   published   in   Jerusalem   and   indicative   of   its  contents  as  the  tradition  of  this  press  warranted,  was:  “Messenger  of  Peace  from  Jerusalem,  bringing  news  from  the  entire  Holy  Land,  divulging  secrets  from  Syria,  Yemen  and  India:  everything  that  an  Israelite  would  want  to  know...”.  The  first   two   items   in  the  subtitle  were  mirrored   in  the  first   two  sections  of   the  paper.  The   paper’s   Palestinian-­‐Oriental   orientation   was   proclaimed   openly   by   its   editors   (Bril,   I.M.   Salomon.  Michal  Hacohen)  in  an  “announcement”  that  they  published  before  Ha-­‐Levanon  made  its  debut,  addressed  specifically  to  the  European  public,  and  inspired  by  their  wish  to  satisfy  these  distant  brethren  curiosity.  The  contents  of  the  current-­‐affairs  articles,  however,  caused  internal  dissent.  It  was  hard  for  Bril  and  his  peers  not  to  become  “involved”,  and  Bril  brought  with  him  this  involvement  to  Paris,  Mainz  and  London  as  well.  

 

Ouzi  Elyada,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  Les  récits  de  catastrophes  dans  la  presse  populaire  hébraïque  de  Jérusalem  :  Le  cas  du  ‘Titanic’  

Abstract:  Depuis   l’apparition  de   la  presse  populaire  moderne  en  Europe  dans   la  deuxième  moitié  de  XIXe  siècle,   les   faits   divers   et   notamment   les   récits   de   catastrophes   y   occupent   une   place   centrale.   Les  producteurs   de   la   presse   populaire   cherchent   d’abord   à   émouvoir   et   à   divertir   le   lecteur,   et   non   pas   à  l’informer  et  ils  trouvent  dans  les  récits  de  catastrophes  naturelles  et  humaines  le  matériel  qu’il  fallait  pour  créer  une  histoire  spectaculaire  et  sensationnelle  qui   fait   trembler   le   lecteur.  Ce  genre  de  récit,   serve   les  rédacteurs  pour  propager  une  vision  de  monde  déterministe  et   fataliste,  une  vision  qui  minimise   le   libre  arbitre  de  l’individu  et  souligne  l’importance  du  hasard  et  du  destin.  Eliezer  Ben  Yehuda  et  son  fils  Itamar  Ben-­‐Avi  ont  fondé  en  Eretz-­‐Israel  le  premier  journal  populaire  qui  portait  le  titre  «  Hazevi  »,  et  plus  tard,  »  Haor   ».   De   son   apparition   en   1884,   d’abord   comme   hebdomadaire,   le   journal   accordait   une   attention  particulière   aux   faits   divers,   et   aux   histoires   de   catastrophes   en   particulière.   Cette   démarche   a   été  renforcée  après  la  transformation  de  «  Hazevi  »  en  organe  quotidien  en  1908.  Les  histoires  spectaculaires  et   sensationnelles   de   crimes   et   de   catastrophes   servaient   comme   moyen   pour   persuader   et   séduire   le  lecteur  à  acheter  le  journal  populaire,  jour  après  jour.  Dans  ce  papier  je  vais  examiner  comment  «  Hazevi  »,  devenu  en  1910  «  Haor  »,  avait  couvert  en  avril-­‐mai  1912  l’évènement  spectaculaire  de  la  catastrophe  du  ‘Titanic’  et  quelle  signification  il  accordait  à  cet  évènement.  

 

Dan  Caspi  &  Nelly  Elias,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Media  and  Minorities  in  Israel:  Four  Research  Traditions  

Abstract:  This  paper  enumerates  four  social  science  research  traditions  that   impacted  the  study  of  media  and  minorities  in  Israel;  melting-­‐pot,  pluralistic,  multi-­‐culturalism  and  hybrid  tradition.  Each  was  shaped  in  a  specific   sociocultural   and   historic   context,   based   on   the   dominant   social   and   academic   paradigms   of   its  time,  yet  remained  intact  even  as  circumstances  changed.  The  survey  of  the  following  research  traditions  may  reveal  the  maturation  process  of  Israeli  social  science.  In  retrospect,  it  appears  preferable  to  view  the  four  research  traditions  as  cotemporaneous  and  competitive.  

 

Orly  Tsarfaty,  Emek  Yezreel  College,  Israel  

Title:  Struggle  between  Identities:  Chabbad  Movement  and  the  Israeli-­‐Arab  Peace  Process  

Abstract:  The  ultra-­‐orthodox-­‐Jewish  society   in  Israel   is  a  subculture  preserving  a  traditional  Jewish  way  of  life   founded   on   the   Bible   and   on   the   Jewish   Law   Books.   The   Zionist   movement’s   concept   of   human  redemption  was  an  essential  contradiction  to  the  religious  belief  of  miraculous  messianic  redemption.  This  controversy  on  a  theological  and  ideological  level  between  the  orthodox  and  the  secular-­‐Zionist  Jews  lies  at  the   foundation   of   the   orthodox   negation   of   the   very   existence   of   the   State   of   Israel   and   of   the   secular  democratic  culture  prevailing  here.  This  society  is  however  united  in  its  struggle  against  the  secular  society  and  its  cultural  hegemony.  The  ultra-­‐orthodox  negate  the  modern  way  of  life  and  everything  it  stands  for,  among   others   the   use   of   mass   media,   particularly   the   visual   media.   An   analysis   of   the   communication  patterns  in  this  community  shows  the  preservation  of  traditional  communication  patterns.  The  use  of  the  newspaper   is   recognized  by  all   factions  of  orthodox  society  as  a   legitimate  medium.  Though   the  Hassidic  Chabbad  movement,   it   is   not   the  biggest   court,   it   is   the  most   active   and   the  best   known   to   Jews   in   the  world  and  in  Israel.  Their  Hassidic  doctrine  grants  a  central  place  to  teaching  the  rules  of  Chassidism  to  all  Jews,  based  on  the  belief  that  such  activity  will  accelerate  the  messianic  revelation.  For  this  purpose,  they  make   use   of   all   the  media,   including   visual  media.   In   the   second  half   of   the   Eighties   Chabbad,   began   to  publish  her  two  own  weekly  papers:  “Sichat  Hashavoua”  (The  weekly  conversation)  and  “Kfa  Chabbad”.  At  the  beginning  of   the  Nineties,  Chabbad  Chassidim  were  undergoing  a  peak  of  messianic  expectation.  The  papers   were   extensively   broaching   the   subject   and   the   preparations   necessary   for   the   Messiah’s  

Revelation.  With  the  beginning  of  the  Israeli-­‐Palestinian  peace  process,  after  the  signature  of  the  first  Oslo  Agreement   (1993)  Chabbad,  began  a  public  political  struggle,  unprecedented  for   them  and  for   the  whole  orthodox   community   in   Israel.   Chabbad`s   opposition   to   a   peace  process   that  would   entail   any   territorial  compromise,   as   expressed   in   their   papers,   opened   the  public   discussion  of   the   issues   at   the   core   of   the  controversy  within  Israeli  society.  The  struggle  for  the  borders  of  the  State  of  Israel  did  not  remain  in  the  realm   of   political   discussions,   but   took   on   a   religious   and   cultural   character.   Chabbad   contributed   to   a  strong   identification   between   religious/secular   identity   and   ideology,   by   equating   the   “correct”   Jewish  identity  with  the  opposition  to  giving  up  parts  of  the  Land  of  Israel.  

   

Monday  21  July  

Room:  04  

 

Session:  001:  

Archeology  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  Paul  Salmona  

 

David  Gurevich,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  The  Question  of  Josephus'  "Serpent's  Pool"  in  Jerusalem    

Abstract:  An  unroofed  water  pool  was  posited  by  scholars  in  a  location  north-­‐west  of  the  Damascus  Gate,  in  the  upper  part  of   the  Tyropoeon  valley   in  Jerusalem.  This  pool  cannot  be  found  today.  However,   in  1901  Clermont-­‐Ganneau  suggested  situating  at  this  point  the  Lacus  Legerii,  a  water  reservoir  mentioned   in  the  Crusader   sources.   A   pool   at   the   discussed   location   was   indicated   on  Wilson's  map   from   the   year   1902.  Furthermore,  a  study  conducted  by  Broshi  in  1990,  identified  the  pool  with  the  "Serpent's  Pool"  mentioned  by   Josephus   (War,   5.108).   Nevertheless,   based   on   the   careful   analysis   of   a   cartographic   material,   rare  photographs  and  German  aerial  photographs  of  Jerusalem  from  World  War  I,  the  present  paper  proposes  to   negate   the   existence   of   a   pool   in   this   location.   Therefore,   the   former   identification   of   the   "Serpent's  pool"   shall  be   re-­‐evaluated.   Josephus's  description   (War,  5.108)   suggests   that   the   "Serpent's  pool"  was  a  prominent   landmark   in   the   area   between  Mount   Scopus   and   the   northern   city  walls   of   the   late   Second  Temple  period.  Another  water  pool,  known  as  "The  Pool  near  the  Tombs  of  the  Kings",  was  located  in  the  Upper  Kidron  valley.  The  pools  was  excavated  partially  in  the  19th  century  by  Wilson  and  Schick.  However,  this  reservoir  was   ignored  by  contemporary  studies,  such  as  the  Israel  Survey,  and  its   location  appears  to  have  been   lost  ever   since   the  19th  century.  The   research  conducted  by   the  author  has   reestablished   the  location  of   this   reservoir  near   the  Nahalat   Shim'on  neighborhood,  1200  m.  north   to   the  Damascus  Gate.  Based  on  the  above  conclusions,  the  possibility  of  identifying  the  "Serpent's  Pool"  with  "The  Pool  near  the  Tombs  of  the  Kings"  is  suggested  as  a  central  source  of  inquiry  for  future  studies.  

 

Baruch  Eyal,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Jewish  Elite  in  Jerusalem  and  Roman  Culture:  Self  Identity  in  Changing  Circumstances  as  Reflected  in  a  Palatial  Complex  

Abstract:   The   Palatial   Building   uncovered   in   the   upper   city   of   Jerusalem   is   one   the   most   impressive  buildings  known  from  the  Land  of  Israel  in  the  Roman  Period.  The  structure's  size,  dated  to  the  first  century  BCE   –   first   century   CE,   is   more   than   600   square  meters,   and   it   includes   a   large   courtyard,   a   system   of  rooms,  and  ritual  baths.  One  of  the  striking  features  of  the  building  is  the  use  of  decoration  –  mosaics  and  walls  plastered  with  stuccos  and  frescos.  The  decoration  on  the  structure's  walls  includes  two  types  which  appear  one  after  the  other.  During  the  first  phase  the  builders  applied  colorful  frescos,  also  known  as  the  second  style  of  Pompeii  and  are  dated  to  the  first  century  CE.  This   fresco  was   later  replaced  with  stucco,  imitating  ashlar  stones.  This  type  of  decoration  is  known  as  the  first  style  of  Pompeii,  and  was  common  in  

Rome  during  the  second-­‐first  centuries  BCE.  It  appears,  therefore,  that  the  order  of  the  styles  was  reversed  –   the   more   colorful,   second   style   of   Pompeii   was   used   during   the   earlier   phase,   while   the   "older"   and  simpler   first   style   of   Pompeii   was   used   later.   Not   only   was   this   style   used   in   the   Palatial   building   in  Jerusalem  about   a   century   after   it  went   out   of   fashion   in   the  Hellenistic  world   in   general   and   in   Italy   in  particular,  but  this  style  was  adopted   in  this  building  after  the  newer  and  more  modern  style  was  known  and   used.   I   would   like   to   suggest   that   it   is   possible   that   the   phenomenon   is   connected   with   the   social  processes  that  were  operating   in   Judea  and  Jerusalem  on  the  eve  of   the  Great  Revolt.  During  this  period  the  Jews  redefined  themselves  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  the  Roman  culture,  as  can  be  seen  also  in  the  "eighteen  decrees"  mentioned  in  Mishnah  Shabbat  1:4  (and  parallels)  on  the  eve  of  the  War  of  Destruction.  It  appears  that  the  adoption  of   the   archaic   and   "conservative"   style  was   part   of   the   Jews'   renegotiation   of   their   identity,   in  contrast  and  perhaps  even  in  resistance  to  the  contemporary  Roman  culture.  The  use  of  the  "archaic"  style  is   not   a   result   of   being   conservative,   if   at   all   this   is   "active   conservatism"     on   behalf   of   the   head   of   the  household,  who  wanted  to  show  his  wealth  and  status  on  the  one  hand,  while  on  the  other  did  not  wish  to  be  seen  as  "Roman"  anymore.  This  goal  was  achieved  by  using  decoration  style  which  appeared  archaic  and  rooted  in  the  past.  

 

Alexander  Bar-­‐Magen  Numhauser,  Universidad  Autónoma  de  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  A  Supposed  Coin  with  Hebrew  Characters  from  the  8th  Century  CE  Iberian  Peninsula.  A  Numismatic  and  Historiographical  Review.    

Abstract:  The  relatively  recent  publication  of  a  19th  Century  manuscript  written  the  numismatist  D.  Antonio  Delgado  y  Hernández   in  2001  presented  new  evidence  over  a  coin  (a  gold  solidus)  parallel   to  "transition"  Arab-­‐Byzantine   coins   of   the   8th   Century   with   a   unique   central   inscription   in   its   obverse   that   received  multiple   interpretations.   As   Antonio   Delgado's   interpretation   of   the   characters   as   Hebrew   remained  unpublished   for   a   century   and   a   half,   later   scholars   discarded   such   interpretation  without   a   satisfactory  alternative  reading.  In  this  paper  a  physical  and  historiographical  review  of  that  rare  coin  series  shed  new  light   over   the   reading   of   such   characters,   their   interpretation,   and   their   potential   relevance   for   the  archaeology  and  history  of  the  Jewish  people.  However  it  raises  more  questions  regarding  the  context  and  reason  why  such  coins  were  originally  struck,  particularly  in  a  time  where  frontiers  of  cultural  and  religious  nature  were  being  broken  and  transformed  in  the  Western  Mediterranean.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002:  

Archeology  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  

 

Enrico  Tromba,  EPHE,  Paris,  France  –  Università  di  Bologna,  Italy  

Title:  The  Synagogue  of  Bova  Marina  (IV  –  VI  century  CE):  Analysis  of  the  structure  and  the  possible  relation  with  the  buildings  of  the  land  of  Israel  

Abstract:  The  project  will  seek  to  analyze  the  structure  of  the  synagogue  of  Bova  Marina,  in  the  province  of  Reggio  Calabria,  southern  Italy.  The  building  lived  two  phases  of  life  between  the  fourth  and  the  beginning  of   the   seventh   century   ce.   We   will   present   the   structure   of   the   synagogue,   the   various   possible  interpretations  and  the  important  archaeological  finds:  from  ceramics  to  tomb  structures,  up  to  the  mosaic  of   fine   workmanship.   At   the   same   time   we   will   present   the   possible   case   of   a   parallel   with   the  contemporary  buildings  of  the  Land  of  Israel.  

 

Roxane  Amsellem,  Paris  Ouest  Nanterre,  France  

Title:  La  symbolique  de  la  couronne  dans  l'iconographie  juive  tardo-­‐antique.  

Abstract:  La  couronne  est  un  symbole  employé  dès  l’époque  du  second  Temple.  Elle  apparaît  notamment  sur   les   ossuaires,   les   linteaux   des   tombeaux   et   les   sarcophages   retrouvés   en   Judée.   Elle   est   également  présente  sur  les  pièces  de  monnaies  juives  dès  la  période  maccabéenne.  En  diaspora,  elle  est  attestée,  dès  le  IIIe  siècle  avant  notre  ère,  sur  des  stèles  honorifiques  de  Délos  de  la  communauté  juive  de  Samarie.  Elle  est  représentée,  sur  divers  supports,  en  contextes  variés,  tout  au   long  de   la  période  tardo-­‐antique,  et  ce,  massivement  en  Palestine.  Par  conséquent,  la  couronne  compte  parmi  l’un  des  symboles  les  plus  usités  du  répertoire   iconographique   juif.   Elle   est   communément   figurée   sous   la   forme   d’une   épaisse   couronne   de  feuillages   composites.   Par   ailleurs,   cette   dernière   est,   à   maintes   reprises,   accompagnée   de   symboles  adjacents.   Ces   combinaisons   de   motifs   sont   très   diverses   et   aucune   ne   semble   l’emporter   sur   l’autre   :  candélabres,   aigles,   poissons,   volatiles,   palmes,   cédrats,   conques,   lions,   fleurs,   vigne.   Deux   courants   se  distinguent   quant   à   l’interprétation   de   ce   symbole   :   pour   les   uns   (Rharmani,   Hachlili),   sa   présence   est  essentiellement  décorative,  dénuée  d’une  symbolique  particulière;  pour   les  autres  (Goodenough,  Levine),  ce  symbole  est  extérieur  au  judaïsme  et  proviendrait  de  répertoire  gréco-­‐romain.  De  fait,  elle  symboliserait  la   Victoire   (Niké)   et   ferait   donc   partie   des   symboles   païens   introduits   dans   le   répertoire   juif.   Nous  proposerons   alors   une   autre   lecture   du   symbole   en   nous   appuyant   sur   la   littérature   juive   antérieure   et  contemporaine   de   ces   vestiges   archéologiques.   Après   avoir   présenté   les   principales   occurrences   de   ce  motif   dans   le   patrimoine   archéologique   juif   en   Palestine   et   en   diaspora,   nous   examinerons   dans   quelles  circonstances   apparait   ce   même   symbole   tout   d’abord   dans   la   bible,   puis   dans   littérature  intertestamentaire,   rabbinique   et   mystique   juive.   Ainsi,   nous   démontrerons   que   l’étude   de   ces   corpus  littéraires  s’avère  décisive  pour  la  compréhension  de  ce  symbole,  dont  la  dimension  proprement  juive  fut  ignorée  jusqu’à  présent.  

 

Ben  Zion  Rosenfeld,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Stages  of  the  Compilation  of  the  Rekhov  Inscription  in  light  of  Interdisciplinary  Inquiry  

Abstract:  One  of   the  most   impressive   inscriptions   from   the  Roman  Byzantine  period   in   the   land  of   Israel  was   uncovered   in   the   ancient   synagogue   in   the   village   of   Rekhov   in   the   Beit   She'an   valley.   Since   its  publication  forty  years  ago,   it  has  been  analyzed  from  various  perspectives,  and  much  progress  has  been  made  in  understanding  the  text  and  its  historical  context.  Nevertheless,  it  has  been  recognized  that  the  text  is   compiled   of   various   segments,   and   individual   research   of   each   segment   has   revealed   difficulties   and  dilemmas   that   have   not   yet   been   resolved.   In   the   current   research   the   authors   aim   to   contribute   to  understanding  the  way  in  which  the  segments  were  compiled  and  the  process  that  can  be  traced  through  which   the   inscription   reached   the   form   that   was   uncovered.   The   research   method   is   to   utilize  interdisciplinary   methods,   incorporating   geographic   perspective   and   literary   comparison,   to   achieve   the  above  objective.  In  order  to  provide  an  example  for  this  approach  it  is  important  to  highlight  the  period  of  Rabbi   Judah   the  prince   (Rebbi).   It  will   be   shown   that   the  need   to   formulate   the   inscription   is   connected  

with   his   emendations   concerning   the   borders   of   the   holy   land   regarding   separation   of   tithes   and  observance   of   the   Sabbatical   year.   Rebbi's   directives   related   primarily   to   the   Galilee,   and   reflect,   in   our  opinion,  demographic  changes  and  shift  of  the  Jewish  population.  These  minor  migrations  from  one  area  in  Palestine   to   another  were   a   result   of   economic   processes   that   effected   the   feasibility   and   opportunities  involved   in   residing   in   certain   areas.   This   discussion   of   the   borders   of   Palestine   begins   in   the   Tannaitic  period   and   continues   in   the   Jerusalem   Talmud   in   which   paragraphs   found   in   the   text   our   found   in   the  Talmud  in  scattered  locations.  Each  location  discussed,  indicates  population  shifts  that  require  restating  the  borders  of  the  county  concerning  Jewish  law.  Each  part  of  the  inscription  was  created  locally  and  reflected  the  demography  of  that  area.  The  parts  were  compiled  in  the  third  and  fourth  century  locally.   In  the  fifth  century  they  were  all  inscribed  on  the  wall  of  the  synagogue,  and  in  the  sixth  century  they  were  inscribed  on   the   floor   in  mosaic   adding   a   paragraph   relating   to   the   Sebaste   area.   Our   conclusion  will   be   that   the  inscription   in   Rekhov   reflects   the   last   stage   of   a   long   process   of   compilation   that   reflects   demographic,  historic  and  economic  processes  that  affected  the  Jews  of  the  Galilee.  The  geographic  viewpoint  dictated  the  structure  of  each  part  of  the  inscription  that  was  compiled  locally  and  later  recorded  collectively  in  the  inscription.  

 

Esther  Schneidenbach,  Ludwig-­‐Maximilians  Universität,  München,  Germany  

Title:  The  cultural  Connection  of  the  Jewish  Congregations  in  Ancient  Rome  

Abstract:   The   inscriptions   from   the   Jewish   catacombs   in   Rome   bear   witness   of   the   existence   of   several  Jewish   synagogue  names   in   antiquity.   It   can  be  noticed   that   the  different   Jewish   congregations  of  Rome  had  widespread  cultural  connections.  These  relations  were  expressed  by  the  naming  of  the  congregations.  Based  on  an  analysis   of   the   congregational   names  mentioned   in   the   inscriptions,   the   synagogues   can  be  differentiated  into  several  groups.  This  paper  analyses  the  groups  that  can  be  distinguished  and  the  cultural  connections  expressed  by  their  names.  Based  on  an  analysis  of  the  congregation  names  mentioned  in  the  inscriptions,  the  synagogues  can  be  differentiated  in  two  main  groups  corresponding  to  their  connections  to   Rome   or   outside   of   Rome   expressed   by   their   naming.   It   can   be   concluded   that   the   different   Jewish  congregations  of  Rome  either  wanted  to  express  a  closer  connection  to  Rome  or  else  to  towns  and  regions  outside  of  Rome,  as  for  instance  in  Asia  Minor,  North  Africa,  Syria  or  Palestine.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003:  

Archeology  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Les  catacombes  juives  de  Roma  

 

Organizer:  Cinzia  Vismara  

 

Cinzia  Vismara,  Università  degli  Studi  di  Cassino,  Italy  

Title:  Les  nouvelles  recherches  sur  les  catacombes  juives  de  Rome  

Abstract:   Le   point   sur   les   activités   de   recherche   menées   sur   les   catacombes   juives   de   Rome   après  "Archéologie  et  Judaïsme  

 

Alessandra  Negroni,  Pontificio  Istituto  di  Archeologia  Cristiana,  Rome,  Italy  

Title:  The  Inscriptions  from  the  Monteverde  Catacomb  

Abstract:   A   new   complete   study   on   the  Monteverde   Catacomb   and   the   inscriptions   taken   from   it   gives  some  addictional  informations  on  the  ancient  Jewish  community  of  Rome  that  used  this  cemetery.  

 

Elsa  Laurenzi,  University  of  Rome  “La  Sapienza”,  Italy  

Title:  La  catacombe  de  Vigna  Randanini.  

Abstract:  Nouveautés  concernant  les  catacombes  juives  de  Rome  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004:  

Archeology,  Middle  Ages  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Max  Polonovski  

 

Philippe  Blanchard,  Inrap,  France  

Title:   Cimetières   et   pratiques   funéraires   des   communautés   juives   médiévales   en   Europe   :   Premières  synthèses  

Abstract:  Proposition  de  synthèse  à  partir  de  plusieurs  sites  funéraires  fouillés  en  Europe.  

 

Marco  Milanese,  Università  Degli  Studi  Di  Sassari,  Italy    

Title:  Nouvelles  données  historiques  et  archéologiques  sur  les  Juifs  à  Alghero  

Abstract  :  La  subvention  vise  à  résumer  les  résultats  les  plus  récents  du  projet  d'archéologie  et  d'histoire  de  la  ville  juive  de  Alghero.  

 

Hayah  Katz,  The  Open  University  of  Israel  

Title:  Religion  and  Archeology:  the  Attitude  of  Jews  and  Christians  Societies  to  the  Archaeology  of  the  Land  of  Israel    

Abstract:  The  beginning  of  the  archaeological  research  in  the  Land  of  Israel  began  in  the  late  19th  century  by   religious  Christians,   some  of  whom  were  officials  of   the  Christian  establishment   such  as  Louis  Hugues  Vincent  and  Roland  Guérin  de  Vaux  who  served  as   the  directors  of   the  L'École  Biblique  et  Archéologique  Française  that  had  been  established  in  Jerusalem  in  1890.  American  researchers  were  also  characterized  by  a   religious  worldview.   The  most   important   scholar   among   them  was  William   Foxwell   Albright,   who  was  born   in   the   Republic   of   Chile   when   his   parents   were   missionaries.   Moreover,   many   of   the   American  archaeologists   -­‐   to   the   present   -­‐   have   received   their   academic   education   in   theological   seminars.  Apparently,  one  should  expect  as   in   the  Christian  world,   religious   Jewish  scholars  will  assume  role   in   the  archaeology   field   also.   But   until   the   1980's   the   Jewish   religious   society   disapproved   of   engaging   in  archeology,  both  academically  and  publically.  The  aim  of  this  paper  is  to  examine  what  the  reasons  are  for  these  differences  between  Jews  and  Christians  societies,  and  what  factors  have  led  to  the  interest  of  Jewish  religious  society  in  archeology  today.  

 

Michaela  Selmi  Wallisova,  The  Czech  Society  of  Archaelogy,  Czech  Republic  

Title:  The  "Jewish  Garden"  in  Prague  -­‐  New  Perspectives  of  Research.  

Abstract:  A  contribution  to  the  burial  rite  of  Prague  Jewish  minority  during  the  Middle  Ages,  based  upon  a  rescue  excavation  in  modern  Vladislavova  street.  The  excavation  revealed  part  of  the  former  cemetery  (the  so  called  Jewish  garden)  with  graves  from  1274-­‐1478.  From  the  total  number  of  401  ex-­‐posed  graves  some  were  scientifically  documented.  Apart  from  spatial  analysis,  information  was  also  gained  concerning  burial  practises,   from   which   some   have   no   analogies   in   European   literature.   Questions   addressed   by   the  excavation  of  this  cemetery  are  of  relevance  to  regions  beyond  Bohemia.  In  the  years  2009-­‐2013  we  have  new  results  from  the  other  3  excavations  from  the  border  of  monument  reservation  (the  so  called  "Jewish  Garden").   The   excavations   were   small   but   very   important   for   archaeological   dating   of   Jewish   cemetery.  Finding   of   three   early   medieval   graves   in   street   Na   Perstyne   (Old   Town)   open   new   question   about   the  earlier  Jewish  cemetery  that  if  it  is  the  same  with  the  cemetery  in  Vladislavova  street.  

 

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  05  

 

Session:  001:  

Visual  Arts  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Carl  S.  Ehrlich,  Israel  and  Golda  Koschitzky  Centre  for  Jewish  Studies,  Toronto,  Canada  

Title:  Shooting  Esther  

Abstract:  Since   the  dawn  of  cinema  as  a  narrative  art-­‐form,   the  biblical   story  of  Esther  has  served  as   the  source  material   for  a  number  of  dramatic  film  treatments.  While  the  reason  for  this  may  be  found  in  the  book's  paradigmatic   juxtaposition  of  good  and  evil  and  its   liberal  dose  of  sex  and  violence,  this  paper  will  concentrate   on   the   dialogue   between   the   biblical   source   and   its   interpretative   treatments   on   the   silver  screen  as  examples  of  the  midrashic  tradition.  Particular  attention  will  be  paid  to  Raoul  Walsh  and  Mario  Bava's   "Esther   and   the   King"   (1960),   Amos  Gitai's   "Esther"   (1986),  Michael   Sajbel’s   “One  Night  with   the  King”  (2006),  and  David  White's  "The  Book  of  Esther"  (2013).  In  what  manner  are  these  reworkings  of  the  story  faithful  to  their  source  material?  In  what  manner  do  they  deviate  from  it?  May  one  distinguish  Jewish  from  Christian  retellings?  These  are  some  of  the  questions  that  will  be  addressed  in  this  presentation.  

 

Jon  Solomon,  University  of  Illinois  at  Urbana-­‐Champaign,  USA  

Title:  Judah  Ben-­‐Hur,  the  Proto-­‐Christian  Jewish  Hero,  and  Secular  Commerce  

Abstract:   From   its   earliest   conception   Lew   Wallace’s   best-­‐selling   novel   Ben-­‐Hur   (1880)   depended   on  political,   cultural,   and   theological   conflicts   between   ancient   Judaism   and   its   Roman   overlords.   Wallace  himself   claimed   that  he  conceived  of   the  novel  only  after  an  1876  encounter  with  Robert   Ingersoll,   “The  Great   Agnostic,”   and   primarily   to   explore   the   divinity   of   the   Christ.   However,   my   recent   research   has  demonstrated  that  already  by  December,  1873,  Wallace  was  researching  ancient  Judaism  at  the  Library  of  Congress,  and  in  November,  1874,  he  mentioned  in  his  correspondence  “a  Jewish  boy  that  I  have  got  into  terrible  trouble  and  must  get  out  of  it  as  best  I  can.”  Focusing  on  “Old  Testament  vengeance,”  the  Indiana  lawyer   had   not   yet   inserted   the   Christian   element   into   his   novel.   After   the   Ingersoll   encounter,  Wallace  reconceived   the   novel   to   incorporate   the   passion   of   Christ,   to   which   his   protagonist   Jewish   hero   is   an  eyewitness.   At   the   novel’s   climax   and   denouement,   the   formerly   anti-­‐Roman   Jew   has   become   a  philanthropic   proto-­‐Christian   hero   but   maintains   his   Jewish   family   structure.   The   novel   sold   millions   of  copies   among   the   Anglo-­‐American   reading   public   and   then,   after   being   translated   into  many   languages,  most  of  Europe.  For  two  decades  a  dramatic  adaptation  toured  the  U.S.  and  Canada  as  well  as  England  and  Australia,  and  then  MGM’s  1925  film  adaptation  played  in  most  of  the  European  urban  centers.  As  a  result  of   its   unparalleled   popularity,   dozens   of   companies,   brands,   and   products   were   named   “Ben-­‐Hur.”   My  recent  research  in  ephemera  and  other  non-­‐tradition  scholarly  resources  has  uncovered  this  long-­‐forgotten  

aspect  of  the  book’s  reception  and  has  accounted  for  why  most  of  these  commercial  applications  ignored  Judah  Ben-­‐Hur’s  Jewish  origins  and  culture.  

 

Charlotte  Klink,  Stuttgart  State  Academy  of  Art  and  Design,  Germany  

Title:  "Missed  Encounters:  Repetition  and  Re-­‐Narration  in  the  Works  of  Yael  Bartana  and  Keren  Cytter"  

Abstract:  “She  came  back.  But  I  don’t  mean  in  my  head.  I  went  back  in  time.  And  I  didn’t  have  to  need  to  keep  moving  on  forward.  The  future  could  keep  on  waiting.  Only  the  past,  beautiful  past.  She  was  my  past.  And  she  is  the  present.  And  I  was  her.  And  she  was  with  me.  And  when  I  looked  at  her  and  she  looked  at  me,  time  stopped.  Stopped.  And  if  she  would  have  stopped  looking  at  me  for  a  moment,  I  would  have  gone  back  in  time,  and  she  would  look  at  me  again.”  (Keren  Cytter,  "Time",  2005,  video,  19:20  min).  In  my  paper,  I   discuss   the   video   works   of   the   two   Isreali   artists   Keren   Cytter   and   Yael   Bartana   and   ask   about   their  relation   to   the   notion   of   repetition.   Video   art   already  manifests   this   repetition   in   its  materiality:   in   the  museum   or   the   gallery,   video   art   is   usually   presented   in   a   loop.   Video   art   thus   presents   a   basic  phenomenon  within  contemporary  art  that  offers  the  opportunity  to  explore  the  concept  of  repetition  in  its  relation  to  a  new.  Yet  in  the  work  of  those  two  artists,  it  is  possible  to  see  another  form  of  repetition  that  is  not  only  based  in  the  material  condition  of  video  art.  In  their  works,  Yael  Bartana  and  Keren  Cytter  create,  in  very  different  manners,  figures  of  re-­‐narration.  Keren  Cytter’s  famous  trilogy  And  Europe  will  be  Stunned  re-­‐narrates   history   by   quoting   the   aesthetic   of   Nazi   propaganda   films   and   Zionist   films   by   creating   a  fictional  movement  that  demands  the  return  of  3  million  Jews  to  Poland  and  claims:  “We  need  the  other,  and  there’s  no  closer  other  for  us  than  you!  Come!  The  same  but  changed.”  (Yael  Bartana,  Mary  Kazmary  (Nightmare),   2007,   video,   10:50   min)   Keren   Cytter   approaches   repetition   in   her   work   from   a   different  perspective,  by  fragmenting  the  loop  and  the  narration  in  her  videos.  Cytter  shows  states  of  transition  that  are  most  of  the  time  linked  to  a  transition  of  countries,  namely  from  Israel  to  European  countries  such  as  the   Netherlands   and   Germany.   Moreover,   her   works   expose   transitions   in   the   love   stories   of   their  protagonists.  In  her  works,  the  spectator  is  left  alone  in  a  position  where  he  has  to  create  a  new  narration  from  the  fragments  and  shattered  images  he  or  she  gets  to  see.  What  is  the  status  of  these  re-­‐narrations,  what   new   is   addressed   by   this   demand   “the   same   but   changed”?   Is   this   way   of   re-­‐narrating,   and,  effectively,   creating   a   new  position   to   think,   speak   and   act   from,   a   result   of  working   though   repetition?  How  can  this  question  be  linked  to  the  relation  and  encounter  of  Jewish  and  Non-­‐Jewish  after  the  Shoah?  Following  Jacques  Lacan’s  famous  dictum  that  “what  has  been  rejected  from  the  symbolic  reappears  in  the  real,”  (Jacques  Lacan,  Seminar  III:  The  Psychoses,  p.46)  I’d  like  to  ask  in  what  way  it  is  necessary  for  Keren  Cytter   and   Yael   Bartana   to   start   from   a   repetition   in   order   to   be   able   to   create   a   new   narration   and  therefore  a  new  reality  that  is  precisely  not  a  return  of  the  real.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002:  

Jewish  Art  and  Heritage  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Jewish  Museums  at  the  Intersection  of  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  Cultures  

 

Organizer:  Kathrin  Pieren  

 

Kathrin  Pieren,  University  of  Southampton,  UK  

Title:  From  Roots  to  Routes,  Nation  to  Migration  -­‐  Interpretations  of  Collections  in  British  Jewish  Museums  in  the  20th  and  21st  Century  

Abstract:   ‘The  Ben  Uri   –   The   London   Jewish  Museum  of  Art’   and   the   Jewish  Museum  London  have  both  operated  through  most  of  the  20th  century  and   into  the  21st.  The  former  was  founded   in  1915  as  an  art  society   by  middle   class  migrants   from   Eastern   Europe   to   develop   a   Jewish   style   in   art,   promote   Jewish  artists   often   of   immigrant   background,   and   to   form   a   collection   of   art   by   Jewish   artists   of   all   times   and  styles.   The   latter  was   also   initiated   by   art   connoisseurs,   this   time   (1932)   from   among   the   British   Jewish  establishment,   and   by   the   first   academically   trained   historian   of   Anglo-­‐Jewish   history,   with   the   aim   to  rescue  Jewish  collections  before  they  could  be  sold  abroad  and  to  display  objects  of  beauty  mostly  for  the  religious   education   of   British   Jews   in   order   to   strengthen   the   community.   Ever   since,   both   organisations  have   made   important   changes   in   their   acquisition   policies   and   in   the   interpretation   of   their   collections  through  display  and  programming.  Many  of  these  are  related  to  changes  in  Jewish-­‐non  Jewish  relations  in  the  wider  society  and  in  the  targeted  and  actual  audiences.  My  presentation  will  draw  both  on  my  recent  research  about  the  early  history  of  these  institutions  and  my  current  project  about  their  history  in  the  last  60   years.   I  will   identify   to  what   extent   changes   in   Jewish-­‐non   Jewish   relations  were   responsible   for   this  development   and   how   these   have   interacted   with   changes   in   museology   and   historiography   over   the  course  of  a  century.  

 

Otto  Lohr,  Bavarian  State  Office  for  Museums,  Dep.  of  Jewish  Museums,  Germany  

Title:  Jewish  Museums  in  Bavaria  Created  by  non-­‐Jews  for  a  non-­‐Jewish  Audience  

Abstract:   There   are   around   20   Jewish   museums   in   Bavaria   which   are   run   by   cities,   villages,   a   private  association  and  a  foundation.  Only  one  belongs  to  a  Jewish  community.  The  conceptions  are  mostly  done  by   non-­‐Jews   for   a   mostly   non-­‐Jewish   audience.   In   my   paper   I   will   talk   about   how   non-­‐Jewish   museum  professionals   are   dealing   with   Jewish   heritage,   especially   with   the   re-­‐use   of   former   synagogues   as  museums,  showing  the  whole  range  of  preservation  from  a  complete  restoration  to  the  preservation  of  a  status  quo  appearance,   in  which   former  synagogues  become  a  testimony  of   local  history.  A  second  point  will   be   a   short   analysis   of   the   conceptions   of   the   Jewish  museums   in   Bavaria.   They   all   focus   on   similar  topics,   dealing   mostly   with   Bavarian-­‐Jewish   history,   particularly   from   the   18th   to   21st   century.   The  permanent   exhibitions   talk   about   the   peaceful   coexistence   of   the   diverse   religious   communities   and   the  tensions   between   them.   They   focus   on   locally  well-­‐known   Jewish   persons   or   families   and   generally   end  with  the  transportation  of  the  last  Jew  to  one  of  the  concentration  camps.  Some  give  an  introduction  into  religious  rituals  and  customs  and  document  the  festivals  of  the  Jewish  year.  An  issue  that  will  be  addressed  is   what   the   permanent   exhibitions   say   about   being   Jewish   today   and   how   contemporary   Jewish   life   is  represented.   A   third   point   will   be   the   question   whether   there   are   differences   in   conception   and  presentation  to  the  only  Jewish  museum  in  Bavaria  which  belongs  to  a  Jewish  community.  

 

Julia   Roos,   Network   "Jewish   life   Erfurt",   Germany,   &   Rebekka   Schubert,   Topf   and   Sons   -­‐   Place   of  Remembrance  

Title:   Jewish-­‐German   History   and   Presence   in   Erfurt"   -­‐   A   Collaborative   Project   between   the   Network  "Jewish  Life  in  Erfurt"  and  the  Topf    

Abstract:   In   our   lecture   we   will   introduce   the   educational   programme   „Jewish-­‐German   history   and  presence   in   Erfurt“,  which  was   conceived   two  years   ago  and   since   then  has   attracted   some  very  diverse  visitor  groups.  Our  presentation  highlights  the  relationship  between  unique  elements  of  Jewish  history  and  presence   in  Erfurt  and  shows  how  they  are   interpreted  for  the  public.  Various  buildings,  monuments  and  locations  reflect  Jewish  history  and  presence  in  Erfurt.  The  Old  Synagogue  tells  the  story  of  the  beginnings  of   Jewish   settlement   in  Erfurt   in   the   late  11th  century  when   Jews  and  Christians   lived  next  door   to  each  other   in   the   city   center,   but   also   gives   an   account   of   the   devastating   pogrom   in   1349  when   the   whole  Jewish  community  was  killed  by  non-­‐Jewish  inhabitants.  The  Small  Synagogue  is  a  monument  to  the  restart  of  Jewish  life  in  the  early  19th  century.  Built  in  1840,  by  1880  this  synagogue  was  already  too  small  and  the  Great  Synagogue  was  built.   In  November  1938  the  National  Socialists  burned  down  the  Great  Synagogue,  but  on  its  site  was  built  the  New  Synagogue  where  Jewish  life  takes  place  today.  In  our  project,  we  not  only  want  to  link  these  places  to  throw  light  on  the  particular  history  of  the  Erfurt  Jewish  community  from  the  Middle  Ages  until  today,  but  also  to  relate  the  history  and  presence  of  these  monuments  to  the  city’s  non-­‐Jewish  history.  For  that  purpose  cooperation  was  established  with  ‘Topf  &  Sons  –  Place  of  Remembrance’  also  situated  in  Erfurt.  Their  exhibition  discusses  the  former  J.  A.  Topf  &  Sons  company’s  complicity  in  the  genocide  of   the  European  Jews,  Sinti  and  Romany.  As  “the  builder  of   the  Auschwitz  ovens”  the  company  played   a   key   role   in   the   construction   of   the   crematoria   of   several   Nazi   concentration   camps   and   the  ventilation  system   for   the  gas  chambers   in  Auschwitz.  Based  on   these  historical   sites  we  want   to  discuss  three   topics   relevant   to   the   present:   (a)   the   history   of   the   Old   Synagogue   –   relating   to   “Jewish   life   in  medieval   Erfurt”   -­‐   serves   to   highlight   problems   of   integration   and   exclusion.   (b)   The   Small   Synagogue   –  illustrating  Erfurt’s  Jewish  history  in  the  19th  century  -­‐  helps  to  ask  questions  about  identity  building.  And  (c)   the   example   of   Topf   &   Sons   raises   the   issue   of   personal   responsibility:   here   the   lecture   asks   how   a  perfectly  ordinary   firm  was   involved   in   the  Nazi  mass  murder   in   the  concentration  camps.  The  disturbing  point   highlighted   by   this   example   is   that   the   involved   persons   were   neither   Anti-­‐Semitic   nor   radical  National   Socialists   and   also   the   business   with   the   SS   represented   no   more   than   2.5   percent   of   the  company’s  total  sales.  Based  on  these  observations  we  reflect  on  responsibility  in  everyday  working  life  and  how  we  can  transfer  that  learning  into  educational  programs.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003:  

Jewish  Archives  

14.00-­‐15.30  

New  Perspectives  on  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  Relations  in  Modern  European  Culture    

Based  on  Judaica  Europeana  Digital  Collections  

 

Organizer:  Lena  Stanley-­‐Clamp  

 

Frank  Mecklenburg,  Leo  Baeck  Institute,  New  York,  USA    

Title:  When  German  Jews  were  Germans:   family   relations,  business  and  political   involvement   from  1871-­‐1933  in  the  light  of  the  Leo  Baeck  Institute  Archives'  collections.  

Abstract:  The  sixty  odd  years  prior  to  1933  were  a  uniquely  flourishing  period  for  Central  European  Jews.  Until  1933,  and  in  strictly  legal  terms  until  the  Nuremberg  Laws  of  1935,  German  Jews  were  Germans  like  all  other  citizens,  equal  before  the  law,  increasingly  involved  and  successful  in  business,  in  the  professions,  in  education  and  in  politics.  Jewish  communities  in  large  cities  were  engaging  in  major  projects  right  up  into  the  1930s,  such  as  the  Jewish  adult  education  program  of  the  Frankfurt  Lehrhaus,  in  publishing  at  Schocken  Verlag,   or   the  Welt   Verlag,   or   the   construction   of   the   Prinzregentenstrasse   synagogue   and   the   Berkaer  Strasse  old  age  home  in  Berlin.  The  emergence  of  modern  Jewish  social,  cultural  and  religious  institutions  took  place  in  a  gradually  more  secular  society  with  increasing  contacts  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews,  most  notable   and   significant   in   family   relations.   I   will   talk   about   the   development   of   Jewish   –   non-­‐Jewish  relations   in   Germany   during   the   period   of   1871   until   1933   in   light   of   the   collections   of   the   Leo   Baeck  Institute  Archives.  On  the  one  hand   looking  at   the  different  categories  of  documents  donated  to   the  LBI,  collected  and  preserved  in  the  archives,  and  what  is  currently  still  being  donated;  on  the  other  hand,  how  did  family  relations,  business  contacts  and  cooperation,  and  political  involvement  develop  during  those  six  decades.   I  want   to   take   a  particular   look,   how  does   this   appear   from   the  perspective  of   1933.   Since   the  collections  in  the  LBI  Archives  are  largely  based  on  the  papers  of  individuals  and  families,  they  provide  more  of  a  citizen’s  perspective.  

 

Rachel  Heuberger,  Frankfurt  University  Library,  Germany  

Title:   Jewish  patronage   in   non-­‐Jewish   society.   The  history   of   the  Rothschild   Library   in   Frankfurt   on  Main  from  paper  to  online.  

Abstract:  In  the  19th  century  many  Jews  were  among  the  leading  philanthropists  of  Frankfurt  on  Main  and  played  an  outstanding  role  in  fostering  culture  and  arts  in  the  city.  The  Rothschild  family  exceeded  them  all,  financing  the  largest  number  of  social,  cultural  and  scientific  institutions.  In  focus  here  is  the  "  Freiherrlich  Carl   von  Rothschild'sche  Bibliothek”   (Rothschild  Collection),   founded  by  Hannah  Louise  von  Rothschild   in  1897  in  memory  of  her  father  Mayer  Carl  von  Rothschild.  It  was  established  after  the  model  of  the  English  Free  Public   Library  and  offered  academic   literature  and  modern   fiction   free   to  all.   The   library   symbolizes  not  only  the  Rothschilds’  commitment  to  public  education  and  culture,  the  important  role  of  the  Rothschild  women   and   their   joint   action   in   this   process,   but   points   also   to   their   modern   approach   and   innovative  actions.  Starting  with  Mayer  Carl's  private  collection  of  3,500   titles,   the   library  grew   to  130,000  books   in  1945,  specializing  in  Art,  Music  and  Modern  Fiction  in  various  European  languages.  It  is  part  of  the  Frankfurt  University   Library,  where   it   serves   today   as   the   indispensable  historic   resources   for   university   disciplines  such  as  German  and  English  Literature,  Philology,  Linguistics,  Art  History  and  Music  Studies.  Under  National  Socialism   the   name   of   the   philanthropist   Rothschild   family   was   erased,   however   the   valuable   collection  remained   undamaged.  More   than   20,000   press-­‐clippings   from   newspapers   all   over   the  world   about   the  Rothschild   family   and   their   business   from   1886-­‐1916   have   been   preserved,   a   unique   resource   of   the  family’s  history.  These  clippings  have  been  digitized  and  processed  with  optical  character  recognition  and  are  accessible  at  http://sammlungen.ub.uni-­‐frankfurt.de/rothschild/nav/index/all.  A  virtual  exhibition  tells  the  story  of  the  library  and  the  Rothschild  family,  see:  http://www.ub.uni-­‐frankfurt.de/judaica/vjv_01.html  

 

Lyudmila  Sholokhova,  YIVO  Institute  for  Jewish  Research,  New  York,  USA  

Title:  Evolving  Yiddish  audience’s  interest  in  theater  in  Europe  in  the  19th  -­‐  1st  half  of  the  20th  centuries:  Yiddish  plays  in  the  YIVO  Library  digital  collections.  

Abstract:  The  YIVO  Institute  for  Jewish  Research   in  New  York,  the  first  Yiddish  academic   institution   in  the  world,   was   established   in   Vilna,   Poland   (now-­‐   Vilnius,   Lithuania)   in   1925.   It   emerged   in   the   midst   of  

blossoming  of  Yiddish   culture,   literature  and   social  movements   in  Europe.  The  YIVO  Library  and  Archives  consequently  reflected  on  major  interests,  activities  and  tastes  of  Yiddish  speaking  population  that  mostly  resided  or  originated   in  Eastern  Europe.  Theater  was  among  the  most  admired  pastimes  available  at  that  time   for   the   Yiddish-­‐speaking   Jews.   Rich   and   vivid   vocabulary   of   Yiddish   language  was   able   to   bring   out  colorful   humor   in   the   simple   shund-­‐style   Yiddish   plays;   but   it   would   reach   much   higher   levels   in  communicating   sophisticated   ideas   of   the   Yiddish   classical   and   contemporary   drama   works   of   Abraham  Goldfaden,  Sholem  Aleichem,  Isaac  Leib  Peretz,  Mendele  Moykher  Sforim,  Jacob  Dinezon  and  many  others.  Theater  was   also   a  powerful   vehicle   for   introducing   Yiddish   audience   to   the   treasures  of   the  world-­‐class  theater  dramas.  Yiddish  translations  and  adaptations  of  European  plays  significantly  extended  repertoire  of  the   Yiddish   theater   in   general,   played   important   role   in   educating   the   audience   while   simultaneously  setting  up  new  opportunities   and   challenges   for   the   talented   Yiddish   actors.   Among   the   famous   authors  whose   masterpieces   were   made   available   in   Yiddish   translation   were   William   Shakespeare,   Alexandre  Dumas,  Henrik   Ibsen,   Leo  Tolstoy,  Nikolai  Gogol,  Anton  Chekhov,  Emile  Zola  etc.   The  Library  of   the  YIVO  Institute   for   Jewish  Research   is  proud  to  possess  one  of   the  world’s   largest  collections  of  Yiddish   theater  works  from  1850  to  1950,  the  period  that  coincided  with  the  flourishing  of  Jewish  theater  in  Europe  and  the  United   States.   Materials   from   the   YIVO   collections   include   many   European   editions   often   not   available  anywhere  else   in  the  world.  Microfilms  of  the  Yiddish  theater  works  have  been  recently  digitized  and  are  now   available   online   through   the   YIVO   Library   online   catalog   and   Internet   Archive’s   website.   This  presentation  is  based  on  the  YIVO  digital  collection  of  Yiddish  theater  masterpieces  and  aims  at  exploring  the  range  Yiddish  theater  works’  editions   in  Europe  and  their   influence  on  developing   literary  and  artistic  tastes  of  Yiddish-­‐speaking  population  in  European  countries.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004:  

Jewish  Archives  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  “Yerusha”  Endangered  Archives    

 

Chair  Robin  Nobel  

 

Efim  Melamed,  Project  Judaica  -­‐  Jewish  Theological  Seminary,  Ukraine  

Title:  Jewish  Archives  in  Ukraine:  challenges  of  access  to  them  in  the  Soviet  period  and  now  

Abstract:  The  paper  will  discuss  various  aspects  of  threat  to  which  Jewish  records  were  and  are  exposed  in  Ukraine  and   that’s  why  didn't   survive  or   for  many  years   remained   in  oblivion.   In  particular,   in   the  Soviet  Union  when  most  of  them  were  either  destroyed  or  inaccessible  to  researchers  because  of  unofficial  taboo  imposed  on   Jewish   studies,   and   later  because  of   acute   shortage  of   specialists,   lack  of   information   about  them  etc.  

 

Gabor  Kadar,  Yerusha  Project  RFE  

Title:  Endangered  Jewish  Archives  in  Europe  

Abstract:  The  panel  will  explore  the  problem  of  endangered  Jewish  archives  that  are  at  risk  of  both  decay  in  non-­‐institutional  settings  and  oblivion  in  massive  state  and  regional  archives.  

 

Ivan  Ceresnjes,  Center  for  Jewish  Art,  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Situation  of  Jewish  Archives  in  Central  Asia  and  the  former  Yugoslavia  

Abstract:  Since  I  have  done  some  research  in  the  National  Library  of  Uzbekistan  in  Tashkent  my  knowledge  about  the  content  is  limited  to  the  part  that  is  in  Russian  language,  and  only  referring  to  the  subject  I  am  dealing   with,   the   material   remnants   of   the   built   Jewish   heritage   –   a   minor   part   covering   19.   and   20.  century.  The  majority  of  the  content  is  in  Uzbek  and  local  Turan  vernaculars  so  it  was  not  accessible  for  my  work  without  (limited)  local  assistance.  Nevertheless,  the  accessibility  to  the  material  has  largely  improved  in  the  last  15  years.  In  countries  of  former  Yugoslavia  I  would  like  to  talk  about  the  Croatian  Historical  Archive  in  Dubrovnik  that  exist   since   early   15c,   has  been   institutionalized   in   18c,   and   is  working   till   today.   It   consists   of   over   3000  volumes   (each  volume  contains  approx.  200-­‐400   folios  or  400-­‐600  pages)  or  8500   linear  meters   (120396  boxes).  The  mayor  languages  are  the  Dubrovnik’s  Croatian  vernacular  from  17  18c,  Italian  and  some  Latin.  In   that  Archive   I   am   researching  data’s   about   the  everyday   life  of   Jews   living   in   the  Ghetto   in  Dubrovnik  until  year  1808  –  abolishing  of  the  Free  Republic  of  Dubrovnik.  Aside  of  that,  since  the  consequences  of  transitional  period  after  the  dissolution  of  former  Yugoslavia  are  still  affecting  all  fields  of  research  and  in  many  parts  of  new  countries,  especially  in  small  provincial  archives  the  access  is  often  limited  and  difficult.  

 

Jean-­‐Claude  Kuperminc,  Alliance  Israélite  Universelle,  Paris,  France  

Title:  French  Jewish  Archives  in  Yerusha:  a  New  Development  

Abstract:  Since  1965,  the  Commission  française  des  archives  juives  has  tried  to  preserve  and  give  a  better  access  to  the  archives  related  to  the  Jews   in  France.   In  2014,  within  the  Yerusha  Project  managed  by  the  Rothschild   Foundation   Europe,   CFAJ   is   assembling   data   to   create   a   large   mapping   of   French   archive  repositories   dealing   with   Jewish   subjects.   The   presentation   will   show   the   methods   and   state   of  advancement  of  the  work.  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  06  

 

Session:  001:  

Magic  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Jewish  Magic  from  Antiquity  to  the  Modern  World  

Organizers:  Emma  Abate  and  Gideon  Bohak  

 

Chair:  Yuval  Harari  

 

Avigail  Manekin-­‐Bamberger,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Scribes  of  the  Aramaic  Incantation  Bowls  as  Legal  Magicians  

Abstract:  The  Aramaic   incantation  bowls  were  usually  designated  to  protect  one's  household  by  expelling  demons.  In  order  to  do  so  the  bowls  employed  different  magical  practices  such  as  writing  the  divine  names,  curses  and  incantations.  But  alongside  these  anticipated  magical  practices,  the  incantation  bowls  also  use  legal   formulae.   Such   formulae   can   be   found   in   oaths   and   incantations,   vows,   pronouncements   of  excommunication   and  more   surprisingly,   divorce   formulae.   These   legal   formulae   are   not   just   allusive   of  legal   discourse   but   employ   specific   terms   and   technicalities   that   have   parallels   in   the   Bible   and   Second  Temple   literature,  Rabbinic   literature  and  archeological   findings.   In  my  paper   I  shall  discuss  the  nature  of  these   common   legal   formulae   by   demonstrating   verbal   parallels   in   the   divorce   formula   between   the  Talmud,  archeological  findings  of  divorce  documents  and  the  bowls.  The  study  of  these  parallels  will  shed  light  on  the  nature  of  the  bowl  scribes,  not  just  as  magicians  but  as  magicians  with  specific  legal  disciplinary  knowledge,  or  in  other  words:  legal  magicians.  

 

James  Nathan  Ford,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  'Jesus  the  Healer'  in  the  Jewish  Magic  Bowls  

Abstract:   Appeals   to   Jesus   and   his   healing   powers   can   occasionally   be   found   in   Syriac   incantation   bowls  prepared  by  Christian  practitioners,  where  they  are  to  be  expected.  It  is  well  known,  however,  that  magic  is  eclectic  and  magicians  often  draw  upon  magical  and  religious   traditions  other   than  their  own,  even   from  sources   actively   opposed   by   their   own   orthodox   coreligionists.   A   case   in   point   is   the   Jewish   incantation  bowl   Moussaieff   163,   published   by   Dan   Levene   (1999),   which   opens   with   an   appeal   to   the   ancient  Mesopotamian  deity  ‘Šamiš  king  of  the  gods’  and  closes  with  a  curse  of  the  opponent  ‘in  the  name  of  Jesus  who  conquered  the  height  and  the  depth  by  his  cross  and  in  the  name  of  his  exalted  father  and  in  the  name  of  his  holy  spirit’.   It  has  been  suggested  that  since  the  opponent,  Isha  son  of  Ifra  Hurmiz,  was  a  Christian,  the   Jewish  practitioner  may  have   invoked  the  power  of   Jesus  here   in  order   ‘to  hit  his  opponent  with   the  weapon  most  close  to  his  heart’  (Shaked  1999).  Other  Jewish  bowls  occasionally  mention  Jesus  in  passing  in  lists  of  magic  or  divine  names  which  the  practitioner  may  or  may  not  have  recognized  (see  Bohak  2005/6  and  Müller-­‐Kessler  2005).  In  this  paper  I  will  present  a  series  of  new  Jewish  incantation  bowls  of  a  different  

nature,   in  which  an  explicit   appeal   to   ‘Jesus   the  Healer’   to  act  on  behalf  of   the   client  holds  a  prominent  position.    

 

Marco  Moriggi,  Università  degli  Studi  di  Catania,  Italy  

Title:  Jewish  Divorce  Formulae  in  Syriac  Incantation  Bowls  

Abstract:  In  a  series  of  Syriac  incantation  bowls  published  between  1913  and  the  present  day  a  peculiar  text  is  documented.   It  mentions  Rab  Joshua  bar  Perahya  sitting   in  a  court  of   law  and  performing  an  exorcism  against  demons,  devils,   liliths  and  other  evil  beings  haunting  the  house  of  the  client  and  causing   illnesses  and  misfortunes  to  the  members  of  his/her  family.  This  spell  is  well  attested  in  Jewish  Babylonian  Aramaic  bowls  and  it  is  now  evident  that  a  Jewish  Babylonian  Aramaic  model  is  at  the  base  of  what  is  found  in  Syriac  bowls.  Divorce  formulas  are  frequently  used  in  Jewish  Babylonian  Aramaic  bowls  to  cast  away  demons  and  hateful  supernatural  beings.  The  new  edition  of  the  Syriac  bowls  featuring  this  formula  which  the  present  author  is  going  to  publish  allows  for  a  reconsideration  of  the  theme  of  the  Jewish  divorce  formula  in  Syriac  incantation  bowls,  both  on  the  linguistic  and  cultural  points  of  view.  In  the  light  of  all  its  features,  including  figures  of   speech   referred   to   a  heavenly   ascension  and  a   lot  drawn,   the   formula  does  not   seem   to  have  been  understood  as  a  simple  Syriac  transcription  of  a  Jewish  Babylonian  Aramaic  model  (or  of  an  oral  spell  uttered  in  Jewish  Babylonian  Aramaic),  but  as  a  tool  to  be  effectively  employed  in  a  Syriac  magic  context,  where  it  had  been  well  integrated  with  other  non-­‐Jewish  themes.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  break  

 

Session:  002  

Magic  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Jewish  Magic  from  Antiquity  to  the  Modern  World  

 

Chair:  Yuval  Harari  

 

Alessia  Bellusci,  Tel  Aviv  University  (TAU);  Italian  National  Council  of  Research  (CNR)  

Title:  The  Ritual  of  Dream  Request  in  the  Late  Antique  Jewish  and  Graeco-­‐Egyptian  Magical  Traditions  

Abstract:   In   my   lecture,   I   will   discuss   a   specific   dream   technique   of   induced   divination   called   “dream  request,”  which  is  attested  in  several  cultures  from  antiquity.  Known  under  diverse  names  and  practiced  in  slightly   different   forms,   the   ritual   of   “dream   request”   corresponds   in   Old   Babylonian,   Graeco-­‐Roman,  Jewish,   Christian   and   Islamic   sources   to   a   technique,   with   which   users   artificially   induce   a   dream   on   a  certain  topic,  in  order  to  foretell  the  future  or  receive  a  certain  answer  to  an  issue  pertaining  to  their  life.  Used  for  a  wide  range  of  different  purposes,  the  recipes  for  “dream  request,"  which  reached  us,  generally  prescribe  to  observe  ascetic  norms  and  recite  specific  formulae,  and  often  present  magical  features.  In  my  paper,  I  will  focus  on  the  technique  of  “dream  request”  within  the  Jewish  tradition.  Although  of  much  more  ancient  origin,  this  technique  – ‐­-שאלת חלום   is  attested  to  in  Jewish  sources  only  from  the  tenth  century  C.E.  

onwards.   Later   on,   the   “dream   request”   became   a   common  practice   in   Jewish   culture   and  developed   in  several  variants,  often  corresponding  to  different  cultural  and  ideological  currents.  Using  late  antique  and  medieval  Jewish  sources  -­‐  chiefly  the  magical  fragments  from  the  Cairo  Genizah  and  Sefer  Ha-­‐Razim  -­‐  I  will  attempt   to  outline   some   stages  of   development  of   the   Jewish   technique  of   “dream   request.”   I  will   then  compare   my   findings   in   the   Jewish   corpora   to   the   recipes   for   “dream   request”   -­‐   in   “Ὀνειραιτητόν”   -­‐  preserved   in   the   corpus   of   Greek   and   Demotic   Magical   Papyri,   which   exhibit   close   textual   and   ritual  features.  The  evaluation  of  literary  and  ritualistic  similarities,  as  well  as  differences,  in  the  development  of  the   Jewish  and  Graeco-­‐Egyptian   traditions  on  “dream  request”  will  bring  us   to  a  better  understanding  of  this  specific  oneiric  technique  in  both  cultures.  Furthermore,  it  will  provide  a  case-­‐study  for  undertaking  a  re-­‐thinking  of  the  Jewish  and  Graeco-­‐Egyptian  magical  traditions  in  light  of  a  comparative  re-­‐examination  of  the  relevant  sources  pertaining  to  these  two  cultures.  

 

Gideon  Bohak,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  A  Late  Antique  Babylonian  Magical  Text  in  Modern  Jewish  Amulets  from  Morocco  

Abstract:  The  text  known  as  the  "Pishra  de-­‐Rabbi  Hanina  ben  Dosa"  is  an  anti-­‐witchcraft  spell,  intended  to  dissolve  all  evil  magic  acts  performed  against  a  certain  individual.  It  is  written  in  Babylonian  Jewish  Aramaic,  and   displays   the   direct   influence   of   older   Babylonian   spells   against  witches.  Moreover,   it   seems   to   have  enjoyed  a  great  popularity   in  the  Jewish  magical   tradition,  as  may  be  seen  from  its  attestation   in  at   least  nine   different   fragments   from   the   Cairo   Genizah.   It   is   also   found   in   medieval   Jewish   manuscripts   from  Ashkenaz  and  from  the  Orient,  and  was  thus  far  edited  only  from  one,  poorly  preserved,  Ashkenazi  copy.  But  perhaps  its  most  surprising  attestation  is  on  two  twentieth  century  amulets  from  Morocco,  which  were  beautifully  produced  by  an  experienced  scribe.  In  my  talk,  I  shall  briefly  survey  the  origins  and  transmission-­‐history  of  the  Pishra,  but  focus  especially  on  the  two  amulets  from  Morocco,  and  on  the  ancient  origins  of  some  Modern  Jewish  amulets.  

 

Joseph  E.  Sanzo,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel    

Title:  “Jewish”  Elements  on  “Christian”  Amulets?  Toward  a  New  Taxonomy  of  Late  Antique  Ritual  Practice  

Abstract:   Scholars  have   long  noted   that   the   language  on  amulets  and  other   “magical”   artifacts   from   late  antiquity   often   draws   upon   the   sacred   texts,   liturgies,   and   other   known   traditions   of   Judaism   and  Christianity.   In  fact,  one  can  even  find  specialized  studies  on  “Jewish  magic”  or  “Christian  magic.”  But  the  magical  record  does  not  always  reflect  such  clear  distinctions  between  these  respective  traditions.  Indeed,  traditional   “Jewish”   elements   are   sometimes   utilized   on   otherwise   “Christian”   magical   texts   (and   vice-­‐versa).   The   intersections  of   “Jewish”  and   “Christian”  magical   traditions   thus   raise   fundamental  questions  about   the   governing   taxonomies   of   scholars.   For   instance,   what   is   the   best   way   to   think   about   the  categories   “Christian”  and  “Jewish”  as   it   relates   to   late  antique   ritual  practice?   In  my  presentation,   I  will  analyze   the   use   of   (allegedly)   “Jewish”   elements   on   “Christian”   amulets   from   late   antiquity.   I   will  demonstrate   that   certain   official   conceptions   of   “Christianity”   (and   “Judaism”)   have   guided   scholarly  classifications  of  amuletic   language.  As  a  result,  elements  that  fall  outside  of  the  traditional  definitions  of  “Christianity”  are  labeled  as  “Jewish”  (or  “pagan”).  In  contrast  to  this  standard  approach,  I  will  establish  a  new  taxonomy  of  “Christian”  ritual  practice,  which  is  predominantly  orientated  around  the  language  found  on   the   late   antique   amulets   themselves.   This   shift   in   reference  will   result   in   the   incorporation   of   select  “Jewish”   (and   “pagan”)   elements   into   the   category   “Christian.”   This   new   taxonomy   will   not   only   allow  amulets  to  be  understood  on  their  own  terms,  but  it  will  also  require  scholars  to  take  into  consideration  a  

larger  (and  more  diverse)  body  of  amulets  when  assessing  “Christian”  ritual  practice  and  will  thus  provide  a  more  robust  framework  for  comparing  “Christian”  and  “Jewish”  magical  traditions.  

 

Rivka  Elitzur-­‐Leiman,  Bible  Lands  Museum  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:   Victim   or   Assailant?   -­‐   A  New  Understanding   of   the   Ancient   Smamit   Legend   in   Light   of   an   Aramaic  Amulet  from  the  Bible  Lands  Museu  

Abstract:   The  Aramaic   amulet   to   be   discussed   in   the   presentation  was   created   to   exorcize   a   child-­‐killing  demon   from  a  pregnant  woman.   This   amulet   includes  a   legend,  which   is   attested   in   several  other  magic  objects  (lamellae  and  incantation  bowls),  narrating  the  story  of  Smamit,  a  woman  whose  12  children  were  killed  by   the  demon  Sideros.  At   first   glance,   the   legend  on   this   amulet   seems   to  match   its   counterparts.  However,  a  careful  reading  suggests  that  it  offers  a  rather  different  version  of  the  story.  While  in  the  other  magic   objects   the   story   tells   of   three   angels   coming   to   Smamit's   aid   and   subduing   Sideros,   the   amulet  under  discussion  describes  how  Smamit  herself,   full  of  sorrow  and  envy,  has  turned   into  a  heinous  child-­‐killing  demon,   a  metamorphosis  which  has   caused   the   three   angles   to   seize   and  adjure  her.   This   amulet  contains  many  significant  features  attested  in  a  variety  of  other  traditions  and  periods.  

 

13.00-­‐13.55:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Magic  

13.55-­‐15.45  

Panel:  Jewish  Magic  from  Antiquity  to  the  Modern  World  

 

Chair:  Bill  Rebiger  

 

Katelyn  Mesler,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Did  Medieval  European  Jews  Practice  ‘Envoultement’?  

Abstract:  When  Christians  of  Late  Medieval  Europe  discussed  sorcery,  they  often  referred  to  envoultement,  which  involved  sticking  pins   into  a  wax  effigy   in  order  to  cause  injury,   illness,  death,  or  altered  emotional  states   (such   as   madness   or   love).   This   practice   is   well   attested   in   treatises   of   practical   magic,  condemnations  of  magic,  and  trials  against  sorcerers  and  witches.  Notably,  some  of  these  texts  also  exhibit  a   tendency   to  associate  envoultement  with   Jews.   For  example,   there  are   sorcery   trials  of   the   fourteenth  century   that   present   Jews   as   hired   professionals   in   the   production   and   use   of   wax   figurines.   But   did  contemporary  Jews  actually  practice  envoultement?   In  this  paper,   I  will  consider  the  evidence  of  Hebrew  sources  to  investigate  medieval  European  Jews’  familiarity  with  the  practice  and,  furthermore,  to  consider  the  extent  to  which  envoultement  figured  in  the  repertoire  of  Jewish  magic  in  the  Latin  West.  

 

Ephraim  Kanarfogel,  Yeshiva  University,  USA  

Title:   Magical   Practices   in   the   Writings   of   the   Tosafists   of   Northern   France   during   the   Twelfth   and  Thirteenth  Centuries  

Abstract:  Although  known  primarily  as  prolific  expositors  of  the  Talmud  and  scholars  of  Jewish   law,   it  has  recently  been  demonstrated   that   the  Tosafists,  not  only   in  Germany  but   in  northern  France  as  well,   had  ongoing  interests  in  a  series  of  mystical  teachings  and  especially  in  magical  practices  and  theories.  Indeed,  Isaac  of  Dampierre  (d.  1189),  arguably  the  leading  Tosafist  of  his  day,  betrays  such  interests  in  a  variety  of  texts   and   contexts.   On   the   basis   of   a   number   of   manuscript   passages   and   a   concomitant   re-­‐reading   of  printed  Tosafist  texts,  this  paper  will  trace  and  describe  these  interests  and  applications,  focusing  on  three  different  aspects:  curing  the  sick,  catching  thieves  and  contracting  marriages.  

 

Emma  Abate,  LabEx-­‐Hastec/IRHT,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Sefer  ha-­‐Shorashim  versus  Raziel.  Lexicography  Facing  the  Magical  Heritage.  

Abstract:   The   purpose   of   my   communication   is   to   deal   with   the   definition   of   “magic”   and   the  representation  of  demons  in  the  Middle  Ages  taking  into  account  sources  other  than  the  traditional  genres  embodied   by   the   magical   heritage.   In   particular,   the   way   in   which   different   items   related   to   magic  (“sorcery”,  “witchcraft”,  “necromancy”  etc.)  and  demonology  (names  of  demons  like  Azazel,  Samael,  Satan,  Lilith   etc.)   are   treated   in   Jewish  medieval   lexicons   and   exegetical   works   will   be   considered.   I   will   focus  notably   on   the   dictionary   of   biblical   roots   by   David   Ben   Yosef   Qimhi   (1160-­‐1235)   known   as   Sefer   ha-­‐Shorashim,  the  most  celebrated  and  widespread  lexicon  in  the  Middle  Ages  until  the  Early  Modern  Period.  Sefer   ha   Shorashim   was   a   source   of   inspiration   of   exegetical   works   by   Jewish   intellectuals   from   the  Renaissance   like   Elia   Levita   (1469-­‐1549),   who  was   author   himself   of   lexicons   (such   as  Meturgeman   and  Tishbi),  and  by  Christian  kabbalists  like  Johannes  Reuchlin  (1455-­‐1522),  Sante  Pagnini  (1470-­‐1541),  Gilles  of  Viterbo  (1469-­‐1532),  who  translated  it  into  Latin.  Beyond  its  prestige  and  influence  on  the  development  of  the  Hebrew  linguistic  thought  and  knowledge,  Sefer  ha-­‐Shorashim  requires  to  be  considered  as  a  treasure  trove  of  Jewish  traditions,  symbols,  beliefs  and  memories,  therefore  including  also  the  magical  imagery.  In  Sefer  ha-­‐Shorashim,  each  entry  provides  a  chain  of  biblical  references  according  to  different  conjugations,  grammatical  forms  and  meanings  of  the  Hebrew  roots.  Notwithstanding  his  rationalism  and  lack  of  interest  towards  the  esoteric  exegesis,  Qimhi  often  adds   interpretations  and  commentaries  gathering   information  from  rabbinic,  philosophical,  midrashic  and  popular  sources.  This  way,  he  offers  an  external  and  outsider  insight  on  different  conceptions  and  approaches  to  magical  themes.  By  examining  a  range  of  entries  related  to  “magic”  in  comparison  with  materials  taken  from  magical  sources,  I  intend  to  present  the  way  by  which  Qimhi’s  definitions  and  exegesis  on  the  topic  developed  during  the  Middle  Ages  reaching  the  milieu  of  the  Christian  Kabbalist  of  the  Renaissance.  

 

Flavia  Buzzetta,  Officina  di  Studi  Medievali,  Palermo,  Italy  

Title:  La  transformation  de  la  magie  juive  en  cabale  chez  Jean  Pic  de  la  Mirandole  

Abstract:  L’exposé  se  propose  de  prendre  en  examen  l’acquisition  de  la  magie  juive  et  sa  transformation  en  cabale   chrétienne   chez   Jean   Pic   de   la   Mirandole,   à   l’aube   de   la   Renaissance.   Cette   recherche   vise   à  démontrer   l’évolution   et   le   passage   de   l’expression   cabala   practica   en   pars   practica   cabalae   ou   opus  cabalae.   La   première   est   utilisée   dans   le   Liber   de   homine   (Vat.   Ebr.   189   ff.   398r-­‐509v),   traduction   latine  d’un   texte   ashkénaze,   effectuée   par   Flavius   Mithridate   pour   Jean   Pic   de   la   Mirandole   à   la   fin   du   ‘400.  Compilé  à   l’origine  dans   le   cercle  d’Eleazar  de  Worms,   ce   traité   considère   la   cabala  practica   comme  une  techniques   de  magie   linguistique.   L’identification   de   la   fonction   de   cette   pratique   est   développée   sur   la  base  d’une  analyse  des  différentes  typologies  de  magie  qu’on  repère  dans  le  Liber.  La  deuxième  expression  

est  utilisée  par  Jean  Pic  de  la  Mirandole  dans  les  Conclusiones  cabalisticae  secundum  opinionem  propriam.  Dans  le  système  de  pensée  du  Comte  la  cabala  practica  constitue  le  coté  pratique  de  la  scientia  cabalae  et  deviendra  un  savoir  totalisant  qui  pourra  être  considéré  à  la  fois  magie  cabalistique  ou  cabale  magique.  

 

15.45-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

Magic  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Jewish  Magic  from  Antiquity  to  the  Modern  World  

 

Chair:  Bill  Rebiger  

 

Marco  Simon  Francisco,  Universidad  de  Zaragoza,  Spain  

Title:  Solomonic  Magic  and  the  Inquisitorial  Trials  in  Aragón.  

Abstract:  This  paper  aims  to  analyze  several  judicial  processes  that  took  place  in  Aragón  at  the  beginning  of  the   16th   century   against   some   people   accused   of   practicing   nigromancy.   Special   interest   has   the  proceeding  against  the  priest  Joan  Vicente  (possibly  the  best  source  for  the  knowledge  of  witchcraft  in  the  Spain  of  the  Renaissance),  that  brings  to  light  some  rituals  transmitted  from  the  Ancient  World  (such  as  the  performing   of   magic   circles,   the   uttering   of   voces   magicae   and   the   use   of   water   containers   or   rings   to  invoke   the  demons).  The  possible  ways  of   transmission  of   this  ancient  material  are  posed   (the  “Clavicula  Salomonis”  or  the  “Book  of  the  Rings”  are  mentioned  belonging  to  the  nigromants),  perhaps  through  the  arrival   of   Byzantine   texts   from   the   13th   century,   as   well   as   the   importance   of   the   Ebro   valley   in   the  translation  of  works  from  Arabic  to  Latin,  particularly  in  the  first  half  of  the  12th  Century.  

 

Giuseppe  Veltri  &  Michael  Kohs,  Martin  Luther  Universität  Halle-­‐Wittenberg,  Germany  

Title:  The  Interplay  of  Writing  and  Images  in  Mafteah  Shelomoh  

Mafteah   Shelomoh,   the   Hebrew   version   of   the   Clavicula   Salomonis,   the   'Key   of   Solomon',   is   a   rather  heterogeneous   handbook   of   astral  magic   and   necromancy.   The   very   few   extant  manuscripts   of  Mafteah  Shelomoh   show,   unlike   other   Jewish  magical   handbooks,   a   remarkably   high   amount   of   visual   elements,  probably  because  Mafteah  Shelomoh   is  a   translation   from  a  Latin  or   Italian  Vorlage  and  not  a  »genuine«  Jewish  text.  These  visual  elements  and  their   interplay  with  the  text  have  not  been  addressed  by  scholarly  research  up  to  now.  Based  on  the  analysis  of  MS  Gollancz  (published  by  Hermann  Gollancz  as  a  facsimile  in  1914)  and  MS  British  Library  Or.  6360/Or.  14,759  we  will  take  a  closer  look  at  the  visual/graphic  dimension  of  magical  writing  in  Mafteah  Shelomoh.  We  will  demonstrate  how  visual  or  para-­‐textual  means  are  used  to  structure   the  manuscript   and   how  magical   and   astrological   signs,   geometric   diagrams,   figurative   images  enrich   the   verbal   text   and   contribute   to   its   very   textuality.   Furthermore,   in   comparing   the   different  manuscripts,   we   will   try   to   elucidate   the   scribes'   different   strategies   for   implementing   and,   potentially,  transforming  their  Vorlage.  The  two  manuscripts  show  are  different  image  repertoire  and  in  some  cases  the  

process   of   translating   and  writing   is   reflected   by   the   scribe   in   the   text,   for   instance,   when   he   explicitly  admits,  not   to  understand   the  Vorlage  or  when  he  uses  explanatory  glosses.   Finally,  we  are  going   to  ask  whether   it   is  possible   to   identify   specific   Jewish  visual  elements   in  Mafteah  Shelomoh,   that  might   justify  calling  Mafteah  Shelomoh  an  iconographically  Judaized  Renaissance  handbook  of  magic.  

 

Reimund  Leicht,  Hebrew  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Fragmentary  Hebrew  Translation  of  the  Picatrix  and  its  Sources  

Abstract:   Among   the   medieval   Hebrew   translations   of   the   famous   magical   handbook   Picatrix   there   are  fragments   of   a   version   which   has   aroused   considerable   confusion   among   modern   scholars.   Although   a  colophon  declares  that  it  was  not  translated  directly  from  the  Arabic  but  from  a  Christian  version,  the  text  does  not  reveal  any  influence  of  the  Latin  Picatrix  tradition.  This  paper  will  try  to  solve  this  riddle  and  will  argue  for  an  old  vernacular  version  as  a  Vorlage  of  the  Hebrew  translation.  

 

Tamar  Alexander,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  The  Prophet  Elijah  and  the  Virgin  Mary,  between  Sephardic  Incantations  and  Hispanic  Incantations    

Abstract:  This  lecture  is  part  of  a  comprehensive  project  I  am  conducting  with  Dr.  Eliezer  Papo  on  Sephardic  incantations.  The  corpus  we  have  found  consists  of  200  incantations  in  Ladino,  Hebrew,  and  Aramaic  from  8  manuscripts   and   other   printed   sources   in   books   such   as   collections   of   charms   and   folk   healing.   The  incantations,   just   like   other   components   of   Sephardic   culture,   are   influenced   from   the   culture   of   the  country  of  origin,  Spain;  from  the  culture  of  the  countries  in  which  the  Spanish  exiles  lived  (such  as  Turkey,  Greece,   or   the   former   Yugoslavia)   and   from   internal   Jewish   canonic   Hebrew   sources,   such   as   the   Bible,  Midrashim,  and  the  Talmud.  The  link  to  the  sources  is  expressed,  first  of  all,   in  the  linguistic  design  of  the  incantations   written   in   Ladino,   Hebrew,   or   Aramaic,   or   in   a   mixture   of   languages.   We   found   that   the  linguistic  division  is  congruent  with  the  gender  division.  Incantations  offered  by  women  are  in  Ladino;  those  written   by   rabbis   are   in   Hebrew   mixed   with   Aramaic,   while   those   that   mix   Hebrew   and   Ladino   were  composed   by   uneducated   men.   In   this   lecture,   I   wish   to   look   at   the   cultural   links   between   Jewish  incantations  and  Spanish  Christian  incantations:  (a)  parallel  or  identical  incantations  that  moved  easily  from  one   culture   to   another;   (b)   incantations   that   underwent   processes   of   change   and   adaptation   to   Jewish  culture;  and  (c)  uniquely  Jewish  incantations.  We  shall  construct  the  comparison  according  to  parameters  of   structure,   form,   and   content,   such   as   the   figures   appearing   in   the   incantations,   main   motifs,   and  linguistic  formulations,  mainly  openings  and  closings.  We  shall  examine  the  correlation  between  the  gender  division   and   cultural   influence   and   see   that  women’s   incantations   cross   cultural   boundaries  more   easily  than  those  of  men.  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  07  

 

Session:  001:  

Bible  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  Yigal  Levin  

 

Tracy  Lemos,  Huron  University  College,  University  of  Western  Ontario,  Canada  

Title:  Archaeological  Evidence  for  Interethnic  Violence  in  the  Iron-­‐II  Levant  

Abstract:   The   violence   that   occurred   between   certain   groups   in   ancient   Israel   and   other   parts   of   the  Levantine   region   is   well   attested.   Between   the   9th   and   6th   centuries   BCE,   the   Neo-­‐Assyrian   and   Neo-­‐Babylonian   empires   mounted   several   military   campaigns   in   the   area   that   often   left   clear   marks   in   the  archaeological   record.  But  what  of  violence  between  the   Israelites  and  other  small  groups  of   the  ancient  Levant?   This   violence   is   described   or   referred   to   not   only   in   biblical   texts   but   also   in   such   extrabiblical  materials   as   the  Mesha   Inscription.   This   paper  will   examine   the  difficult   question  of  whether  or  not   it   is  possible  to  trace  this  violence  archaeologically.  

 

Tziona  Grossmark,  Tel  Hai  College,  Israel  

Title:  A  Neo-­‐Assyrian  Cylinder   Seal   from  Omrit   and   its   Contribution   to   the   Study  of   the  Assyrian  Military  Presence  in  the  Galilee  

Abstract:  During  the  2010  season  of  excavations  at  Horvat  Omrit,  a  Neo-­‐Assyrian  cylinder  seal  was  found  in  space  4-­‐2.  Although  found  in  a  much  later  context  (Roman  Period),  this  find,  as  we  will  show  hereinafter,  contributes  to  both  the  establishment  of  the  chronology  of   its  glyptic  sub-­‐group  and  to  the  tracing  of  the  presence  of  the  Neo-­‐Assyrian  army  in  the  Galilee.  

 

Isaac  Kalimi,  Johannes  Gutenberg-­‐Universität  Mainz,  Germany  

Title:   The   Love  of  God  and  Royal  Apology:   Solomon’s  Birth   Story   in   Its   Biblical   and  Ancient  Near   Eastern  Context  

Abstract:  The  birth  story  of  Solomon  (2  Sam  12:24-­‐25)  is  a  unique  example  of  its  kind  in  the  ancient  Israelite  historiography  about   the  kingdom  era.  Though   the  birth-­‐name  of   the  new  born  child  was  “Solomon,”  he  received   an   additional   name   by   the   divine  messenger,   Nathan:   “Yedidyah,”   stating   that   “the   Lord   loved  him.”   The   purpose   and  meaning   of   this   name   and   phrase   should   be   understood   as   two   complimentary  approaches:  within   the   immediate   context   (2   Samuel   11–12)   as  well   as  within   the  wider   context   of   the  story  regarding  Solomon’s  rising  to  power  (1  Kings  1–2).  The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to  show  that  usurpers  and  kings  out  of  a  royal  line  of  throne  attempted  to  legitimize  their  kingship  by  introducing  themselves  as  beloved/preferred   of   a   patronage   god(s)   and   occasionally   sometimes   taking   a   new   throne-­‐name.   This  

historical   and   literary   phenomenon   reflects   clearly   also   from   Mesopotamian,   Anatolian,   and   Egyptian  writings   from  different  periods.  The  content  and  tendency  of   the  text   in  Samuel   is  well  correlated  within  the  surrounding  ancient  Near  Eastern  cultural  settings.  This  comparative-­‐historical  discussion  also  coheres  and  supports  the  literary-­‐critical  discussion  of  biblical  texts  in  this  and  in  my  other  study.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  break  

 

Session:  002  

Bible  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  Isaac  Kalimi  

 

Yisca  Zimran,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Isaiah  the  Son  of  Amoz  and  the  Faith  of  the  Nations.  

Abstract:  The  eschatological  vision  of  the  “end  of  days”  appears  in  Isaiah  2:2-­‐5.  In  this  vision,  Isaiah  foresees  that   all   nations   shall   stream   to   the  mountain  of   the   Lord’s  house,   recognize   the  existence  of   the  God  of  Israel,  and  walk  in  His  paths.  There  are  even  those  who  argue  that  Isaiah  actually  declares  that  the  nations  will  abandon  their  idols  and  worship  only  the  God  of  Israel.  In  this  prophecy,  the  God  of  Israel  is  depicted  as  a   universal   deity   whose   sphere   of   influence   includes   nations   other   than   Israel,   and   as   a   righteous   God.  There   is  a  measure  of   innovation   in  this  presentation,  as  well  as   in  the  future  that   Isaiah  foresees  for  the  nations-­‐-­‐  an  innovation  that  is  present  in  several  other  prophecies  in  the  Book  of  Isaiah.  The  idea  expressed  in   Isaiah’s   prophecy   regarding   the   nations’   faith   is   adopted   by   several   other   biblical   prophets,   such   as  Jeremiah  (in  16:  19-­‐20)  and  Zephaniah  (3:9).  Others,  such  as  Micah  (4:5)  and  Joel  (4:9-­‐17)  objected  to  it.  I  will   begin   this   lecture   by   first   examining   whether   Isaiah’s   vision   does   indeed   include   an   account   of   the  future   repentance   of   the   nations.   I   will   move   from   there   to   consider   the   connections   between   this  prophecy  and   the  various  world   views   found   in   the  Book  of   Isaiah,  on   the  one  hand,  while  on   the  other  exploring  its  linkage  to  the  historical  context  of  the  relationship  between  Israel  and  the  nations  during  the  eighth  century  BCE.  As  a  part  of  this  discussion,  I  will  analyze  how  other  prophets-­‐-­‐whether  contemporaries  of  Isaiah  or  subsequent  to  him—regarded  his  worldview,  and  how  their  attitudes  influenced  the  structure  and  formulation  of  their  own  prophesies  dealing  with  similar  issues.  

 

Yu  Takeuchi,  Kumamoto  University,  Japan  

Title:  Genealogy  of  the  Righteous  Foreigners  in  the  Hebrew  Bible  

Abstract:  The  Hebrew  Bible,  surprisingly  enough  to  the  eyes  accustomed  to  see  the  Book  as  the  history  of  the   chosen,   recounts   non-­‐ignorable   number   of   stories   of   foreigners   who   behave   apparently   more  righteously  than  the  chosen  people.  Examples  are  not  abundant,  but  not   insignificantly  few:  Mechizedeq,  Jethro,  Naaman,  Job,  the  foreign  sailors  and  the  Ninevites   in  the  Book  of  Jonah,  Tamar,  Rahab,  and  Ruth.  The  paper  briefly  introduces  the  curious  ‘genealogy’  of  these  righteous  foreigners,  and  discusses  their  quite  subversive  role,  in  contrast  with  the  general  schema  that  it  is  the  chosen  who  are  invited  to  know  the  divine  

way,   then   places   these   curiously   righteous   foreigners   among   with   two   other   types   of   ‘foreigners’   (the  enemy   or   the   rejected   on   one   hand,   the   needy   to   protect   on   the   other   hand)   to   consider   the   ethical  significance  of  these  extraordinary  figures  in  the  Hebrew  Bible.  

 

Meir  Bar  Maymon,  Sciences  Po  Paris,  France/  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Living  the  Metaphor-­‐  On  the  Ascription  Process  of  the  (Male)  Biblical  Research  

Abstract:   Biblical   research,   or   any   research   for   this  matter,   is   perceived   as   objective,   thus   rendering   the  scholars   as   ‘academic’   and   essentially   non-­‐political.   I   wish   to   demonstrate   in   this   lecture   how   modern  Biblical   research   takes   part   and   ascribes   itself   to   the   metaphor   of   Jerusalem   as   the   adulterous   deviant  woman  in  Ezekiel  16  and  23.  These  two  chapters,  through  rhetoric  of  pornography,  portray  Jerusalem  as  a  prostitute   and   punish   her   for   her   acts   in   a   horrific  manner   of   stoning,   burning,   rape,   and   cutting   of   her  body.  I  will  elaborate  on  these  chapters  by  reviewing  the  meaning  of  metaphors  and  by  analyzing  Ez.  16,  23  as  a  pornographic  literature.  Moreover,  by  promoting  meta-­‐reading  to  different  commentaries  of  the  book  of   Ezekiel,   I   wish   to   show   how   different   commentators   identify   themselves   with   the   rhetoric   of   these  chapters;  and  to  demonstrate  how  scholars  take  part   in  the  textual  political  process  of  metaphorizing  the  bad  Israel  as  a  deviant  woman,  and  how  their  reading  of  the  text  help  constitute  their  male  self.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Bible  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  Arnaud  Sérandour  

 

Yigal  Levin,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Why  did  the  Zerubbabel’s  Adversaries  Emphasize  their  Foreign  Origins?  

Abstract:   Upon   arriving   in   Jerusalem   sometime   after   538   BCE,   the   returnees   led   by   Zerubbabel   were  approached  by  a  group  of  people  whom  Ezra  4:1  refers  to  as  "the  adversaries  of  Judah  and  Benjamin",  who  requested,  "Let  us  build  with  you,  for  we  worship  your  God  as  you  do,  and  we  have  been  sacrificing  to  him  ever  since  the  days  of  King  Esarhaddon  of  Assyria  who  brought  us  here."  Most  commentators  identify  these  "adversaries"   as   the   people   later   known   as   the   Samaritans,   although   other   proposals   do   exist.   An  apparently  similar  group  are  mentioned   in  verse  10  as  "the  nations  whom  the  great  and  noble  Osnappar  deported  and  settled  in  the  cities  of  Samaria  and  in  the  rest  of  the  province  Beyond  the  River".  This  paper  examines  the  question  of  their  claim  to  foreign  origin:  why  would  they  make  this  claim,  rather  than  claim  to  be   indigenous,   YHWH-­‐worshipping,   Israelites?   Is   this   claim   simply   Judean   propaganda?   Or   would   the  leaders   of   the   "adversaries"   have   considered   it   advantageous   to   be   descended   from   foreign   deportees?  This  question  will  be  examined  in  light  of  Assyrian  deportation  policies  and  the  archaeological  record,  and  we  will  propose  a  solution  that  might  shed  light  on  the  "ethnogenesis"  of  the  Samaritans  during  the  Persian  Period.  

 

Renate  Egger-­‐Wenzel,  University  of  Salzburg,  Austria  

Title:  Identity  and  Acts  of  Resistance  as  Reflected  in  the  Book  of  Tobit  

Abstract:  The  lecture  will  deal  with  the  political  background  presupposed  by  the  author,  the  Jewish  reaction  to  the  dominant  environment,  the  maintenance  of  religious  identity,  and  examples  of  peaceful  co-­‐existence  and  resistance  with  regard  to  the  non-­‐Jewish  world.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

16.00-­‐18.00  

La  lecture  juive  des  Psaumes  en  interaction  

Organizer:  Matthias  Morgenstern  

 

Chair:  Steven  Fraade  

 

Giovanni  Ibba,  Facoltà  Teologica  dell'Italia  Centrale,  Italy  

Title:  L’interprétation  des  Psaumes  dans  les  manuscrits  qumrâniens  1Q16,  4Q171  et  4Q173  

Abstract:  Cette  relation  est  dans  la  session  "Psaumes  et  leur  histoire  de  reception",  organisée  par  Matthias  Morgenstern.  La  relation  se  concentre  sur  les  seuls  commentaires  des  Psaumes  trouvés  dans  les  grottes  de  Qumrân.  Les  manuscrits  qui   les  contiennent  sont  1Q16/1Q171/4Q173  et   ils   sont   tous   très   fragmentaires.  Toutefois,   en   considérant   surtout   4Q171,   on   peut   avoir   quelques   éléments   importants   de   l’idéologie  judaïque  de  ceux  qui  les  ont  composés.  

 

Christophe  Batsch,  Université  de  Lille,  France  

Title:   Retour   sur   les   pesharim   des   Psaumes   à   Qumrân   Abstract:   Dans   le   cadre   du   panel   sur   la   lecture  exégétique   des   Psaumes,   nous   ferons   le   point   sur   l'état   des   études   sur   les   inteprétations   (pesher)   des  Psaumes  dans  les  manuscrits  de  Qumrân.  

 

Matthias  Morgenstern,  Institutum  Judaicum,  Université  de  Tübingen,  Germany  

Title:  "Sion  comme  mère  de  tous  les  peuples"  -­‐  L´exégèse  midrachique  de  Psaume  87    

Abstract:  L´exégèse  de  Psaume  87  sera  examiné  et  résumé  à  partir  des  textes  midrachiques  et  talmudiques  jusqu´aux  adaptations  modernes  de  ces  dernières  interpretations,  notamment  dans  le  commentaire  du  Rabbin  Samson  Raphael  Hirsch  (1808  -­‐  1888).  

 

Annie  Noblesse-­‐Rocher,  Université  de  Strasbourg,  Faculté  de  théologie  Protestante,  France  

Title:  Le  psaume  87  et  son  interprétation  chez  les  Réformateurs  du  16e  s.    

Abstract:  Martin  Bucer  a  conçu  un  volumineux  commentaire  du  psautier,  inspirateur  et  fonds  documentaire  pour  les  autres  commentaires  des  psaumes.  L'importance  exégétique  et  herméneutique  accordée  par  Martin  Bucer  aux  sources  juives  médiévales  est  ici  étudiée  à  propos  de  "Sion,  mère  des  nations"  ainsi  que  sa  postérité  dans  les  commentaires  évangéliques  de  l’époque  moderne  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  08  

 

Session:  001:  

New  Testament  /  Rabbinic  Literature  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Peter  J.  Tomson,  FPG  Brussels  -­‐  KU  Leuven,  Belgium  

Title:  Les  Épîtres  de  Paul  comme  sources  pour  le  Phariséisme  historique  

Abstract:  Dans  les  études  juives  comme  dans  la  théologie  chrétienne,  tant  en  ses  branches  exégétique  que  historique  et  systématique,  l’Apôtre  Paul  compte  depuis  longtemps  pour  le  grand  pourfendeur  du  judaïsme  et  plus  particulièrement  de  son  ancien  milieu  spirituel,  le  Phariséïsme.  En  revanche,  depuis  l’éclosion  de  «  la  nouvelle  perspective  sur  Paul  »  les  exégètes,  eux  au  moins,  commencent  à  apprécier  l’enracinement  juif  de   l’Apôtre.   La   présente   communication   va   explorer   six   exemples   dans   Paul,   trois   fois   deux,   des   trois  disciplines-­‐type   du   judaïsme   «   proto   rabbinique   »,   halakha,   midrash   et   aggada.   Dans   le   domaine   de   la  halakha,  on  étudiera  (1)  les  lois  concernant  le  divorce  et  le  remariage  en  1  Co.  7,39s.  et  Ro.  7,2-­‐4  et  (2)  le  concept  de  la  συνειδησις  (cf. ,דעת  ( מחשבה  en  1  Cο.  10,25-­‐29.  Dans  le  domaine  du  midrash,  on  va  étudier  (3)   la  brève  allusion  à  Hosée  en  1  Co.  15,54s.  dans   laquelle  se  cache  une  tradition  trouvée  aussi  dans   les  targoumim,  et  (4)  l’utilisation  diversifiée  du  terme  σπερμα  Αβρααμ  en  Ro.  4,13-­‐18  et  Ga.  3,16-­‐19.  Dans  le  domaine  de  l’aggada,  on  s’occupera  (5)  de  la  tradition  de  la  source  voyageant  en  1  Co.  10,1-­‐5  et  (6)  de  la  parabole  du  corps  en  1  Co.  12,14-­‐27.  Finalement,  on  résumera  les  conclusions  que  les  épîtres  de  Paul  nous  permettent  à  tirer  quant  au  caractère  du  Phariséïsme  au  milieu  du  premier  siècle  et  à   la  relation  entre   la  tradition  pharisienne  et  la  littérature  rabbinique.  

 

Eran  Shuali,  Université  de  Strasbourg,  France  

Title:   «   Rabbiniser   »   le  Nouveau   Testament   :   l’usage  de   la   littérature   rabbinique  dans   les   traductions   du  Nouveau  Testament  en  hébreu  

Abstract:  Pour  le  traducteur  du  Nouveau  Testament  en  hébreu,  la  littérature  rabbinique  ancienne  constitue  un  outil  inestimable  :  il  y  trouve  un  grand  nombre  de  mots  et  d’expressions  et  même  des  énoncés  entiers  qui   sont   très  proches  de  ceux  de   son   texte   source  et  qui   sont   formulés  directement  dans   la   langue  cible  vers  laquelle  il  traduit.  Dans  cette  étude,  j’examinerai  l’usage  que  les  différentes  personnes  ayant  traduit  le  Nouveau  Testament  en  hébreu  au   cours  des   siècles  ont  en  effet   fait  de   cette   littérature.  Notamment,   je  tâcherai   de   montrer   en   quoi   cet   usage   a   pu   faciliter   la   compréhension   du   Nouveau   Testament   par   les  lecteurs  juifs  visés,  et  en  quoi,  en  revanche,  il  risquait  de  fausser  le  sens  du  texte  original.  Cet  examen  des  pratiques  de  travail  des  traducteurs  permettra  aussi  de  dégager  certaines  de  leurs  conceptions  concernant  les  rapports  historiques  et  théologiques  entre  christianisme  et  judaïsme.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  break  

 

Session:  002  

Jewish  /  Christian  Exegesis  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  

 

Moshe  Blidstein,  University  of  Oxford,  UK  

Title:  Deed  and  Word  in  Late  Ancient  Christian  and  Jewish  Biblical  Exegesis  

Abstract:  Many   Second   Temple   Period   and   Rabbinic   texts   attempt   to   relate   the   normative   value   of   the  actions  of  the  biblical  patriarchs  to  the  law  received  by  Moses  at  Sinai.  Typically  they  uphold  the  Sinai  law  as  primary,  and  seek  to  demonstrate  the  coherence  of  the  patriarchs’  action  with  it.  For  late  ancient  Greek  and  Syriac  Christian  exegetes,  however,  the  biblical  ritual  laws  were  seen  as  temporary  and  non-­‐obligatory,  even   though   the   Hebrew   Bible   was   an   authoritative   text.   This   had   repercussions   for   the   relationship  between   the   normative   value   of   the   patriarchs’   actions   and  Moses’   law:   At   least   for   the  more   literally-­‐minded   exegetes,   the   former   could   be   understood   as   relating   to   the   actions   of   God-­‐fearing   men   and  women,  worthy  of   imitation  by  Christians,  while   the   latter,  which  bore   the  brunt  of  anti-­‐Jewish  polemic,  were   regularly   attacked  as   temporary   concessions   to   the   stiff-­‐necked   Jews,  or  worse.  Motivated  by  anti-­‐Jewish   polemic,   some   Christian   exegetes   took   this   further:   contradictions   between   the   actions   of   the  patriarchs  (even  those  later  than  the  Sinai  revelation,  such  as  Moses  or  David)  and  the  Sinai  law  were  seen  as  intentional  fissures  in  the  text,  which  proved  the  secondary  nature,  or  even  essential  hollowness,  of  the  Sinai   law.   This   perspective   created   a   paradoxical   bifurcation   in   the  derivation  of   norms   from   the  biblical  text:   valid   laws   and   customs   could   be   easily   derived   from   implicit   patriarchal   action,  while   explicit   legal  injunctions   in  the  bible   lost   their  normative  value.   In  my  paper,   I  will  explore  this  hermeneutic   through  a  number  of  case-­‐studies  from  Syriac  exegesis  of  biblical  passages  speaking  of  impurity.  I  will  demonstrate  its  connections  to  Jewish-­‐Christian  polemic  on  these   issues,  and  compare   it   to  the  hermeneutic  deployed  by  Jewish  exegesis  on  these  texts.  

 

Koji  Osawa,  Japan  Society  for  the  Promotion  of  Science,  Japan  

Title:  The  Interpretations  of  the  Golden  Calf  Episode  in  the  Book  of  Exodus  Ch.  32:  A  Comparative  Analysis  of  Judaism  and  Christianity  

Abstract:   In   this  paper,   I   reveal   the  background  of   Jewish  and  Christian   interpretations  of   the  golden  calf  episode   in   the  Book  of  Exodus  chapter  32  by   comparing  and  analyzing   interpretations   that  existed  up   to  about  the  fifth  century  C.E.  The  golden  calf  episode  involved  the  Israelites’  worship  of  a  golden  calf  at  the  foot  of  Mount  Sinai  while  Moses  was  receiving  the  Ten  Commandments  from  God  at  the  top.  The  episode  was   used  by  Christianity   to   attack   Judaism  but  was   also   very   problematic   for   Judaism  on   its   own   terms.  Interestingly,   for   example,   interpretations   by   both   sides   tend   to   defend   Aaron,   who,   according   to   the  account   in   the   Book   of   Exodus,   played   a   very   important   part.   Their   reasons   for   defending   him   are  completely  different,  however.  To  show  both  perspectives,  I  draw  on  the  Jewish  traditions  represented  by  

Tannaim  and  Amoraim  and  the  Christian  traditions  represented  mainly  by  the  Church  Fathers  up  to  Ephrem  the  Syrian.  

 

Andor  Kelenhegyi,  Central  European  University,  Hungary  

Title:   Learning   or   born   to   be   a   sheep...   A   survey   of   the   sheep-­‐shepherd   metaphor   in   early   Jewish   and  Christian  exegesis  

Abstract:  Perhaps  the  most  influential  Biblical  metaphor  describing  governance  and  political  systems  is  that  of  the  shepherd  and  his  flock.  In  the  metaphor  the  shepherd  guides  the  flock  and  protects  it  from  the  raids  of  savage  beasts  which  threaten  the  well-­‐being  of  the  community.  My  paper  examines  the  evolution  of  this  metaphor  which  originates  in  ancient  Near  Eastern  poetry  and  mythology  and  through  the  medium  of  Old  Testament  (OT)  literature  (e.g.  Ezek  34,  Ps.  78,  80)  has  found  its  way  first  to  the  New  Testament  (NT)  (e.g.  Mk  6:34,  Jn  10:11-­‐16)  and  then  to  both  Jewish  and  Christian  exegesis.  The  clarity  and  compactness  of  the  metaphor  enabled   it  to  become  the  archetypical  representation  of  the  relationship  between  God  and  His  chosen  nation.  Contrary  to  usual  exegetical  polemics,  however,  Jewish  and  Christian  interpreters  not  only  disagreed  about  the  identity  of  the  characters,  but  also  concerning  the  nature  of  shepherding  and  political  leadership  as  such.  A  parallel  reading  of  Jewish  and  Christian  interpretations  of  OT  and,  to  a  limited  extent,  NT   loci   of   the   shepherd-­‐metaphor   demonstrates   that   the   two   interpretational   traditions   constructed  profoundly   dissimilar   models   of   political   authority.   The   concurrence   of   two   role-­‐models,   that   of   the  messiah-­‐king   providing   protection   and   that   of   the   educator   providing   moral   guidance,   in   the   tradition  concerning  the   figure  of   Jesus  resulted   in  a   transformation  of   the  entire  shepherd-­‐metaphor.   In  Christian  exegesis,  the  educational  and  proselytizing  aspect  became  the  primary  context  of  interpreting  the  activity  of   leadership.  And  probably  due  to  the  Christian  preoccupation  with  Jesus,  the  shepherd-­‐educator,  rabbis  decided   to   accentuate   the   opposite   model,   in   which   shepherding   correspond   solely   to   political   and  institutional  direction.  

 

Miriam  Ben  Zeev,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Did  the  Romans  Dislike  the  Jews?  –  Latin  Literature  on  Jews  and  Judaism  in  the  Republican  Era  

Abstract:   The  question   to  be  addressed   concerns  Roman  positions   towards   the   Jews  as   early   as   the   first  century  BCE.  Cicero's   testimony  on  the  Jews  and  Judaism  has  been  often  taken  as  a  sign  of  anti-­‐Judaism,  but  it  should  be  evaluated  on  the  background  of  his  political  and  forensic  purposes,  comparing  it  with  the  attitudes  displayed  towards  other  population  groups.  As  for  Varro's  positive  comments  on  Judaism,  which  follow  a  long  tradition  of  Greek  Stoic  philosophical  thought  which  censured  the  cult  of  images;  it  is  doubtful  that   they   attest   to   special   esteem   for   Judaism.   Both   Cicero   and   Varro,   it   appears,   did   not   have   definite  personal   views   regarding   the   Jews.   The   same   impression   we   get   from   Livy's   comments   concerning   the  Temple  of  Jerusalem  and  from  the  longest  and  most  detailed  piece  on  the  Jews  written  in  the  first  century  BCE,   that   of   Pompeius   Trogus,  who  draws  both  on   Jewish   and   anti-­‐Jewish   sources,   displaying   no   sign   of  anti-­‐Jewish  bias.  As   for   Latin  poetry,  Horace’s  and  Ovid’s   references   to   the   Jews  display  not  hostility  but  rather  amusement,  being  kinds  of  jokes,  comic  and  ironic  allusions,  passing  jibes.  In  the  first  century  BCE,  it  appears,   the   Romans   did   not   relate   to   the   Jews   in   a   way   different   from   how   they   felt   towards   other        national  groups.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Tannaitic  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Daniel  Stoekl  Ben  Ezra,  EPHE,  France    

Title:  Mishna  -­‐  towards  an  Interactive  Edition  and  Translation  with  a  Historical  Commentary  

Abstract:   This   paper   shall   present   the   current   state   of   the   CTMishna   project,   a   project   dedicated   to  establishing  an  editio  critica  minor  of  the  Mishna  with  a  French  translation  and  a  brief  historical-­‐philological  commentary  using  digital  humanities.  On  the  historical  side,  special  attention  will  be  paid  to  the  relevance  of  Second  Temple  and  early  Christian  literature  (Aramaic  Levi  Document,  Book  of  the  Watchers,  Josephus,  Barnabas)   in   analyzing   the   historical   and   the   rhetorical   elements   of  mYoma.   Comparing   our   results  with  previous  and  contemporary  proposals  (Cohn,  Safrai,  Neusner,  Instone-­‐Brewer),  I  shall  argue  for  an  origin  in  the   Temple   ritual   for   some   traditions   and   the   rhetorical   retrojection   of   other   late   traditions.   On   the  technological   side,   demonstrations   of   the   use   of   the   electronic   platform   shall   be   made.   The   project   is  undertaken   with   the   generous   support   of   the   team   of   the   Qumranwörterbuch   Göttingen   and   in  collaboration  with   the  digital  Mishna  project  by  Hayim  Lapin  and  the  German  Mishna  project  by  Michael  Krupp.  

 

Hayim  Lapin,  University  of  Maryland/IIAS-­‐Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Toward  a  Digital  Critical  Edition  of  the  Mishnah  

Abstract:  Despite   its  great   importance,   there   is  no  critical  edition  of   the  Mishnah.  This  paper  describes  a  project   to  create  a  digital  edition.  The  presentation  will  describe   the  project,  preview   the  demonstration  version   of   the   project,   outline   the   features   that   are   planned   for   implementation,   and   discuss   the  implications  of  the  project  for  the  study  of  Judaism  and  for  the  digital  humanities.  The  demo  version  is  at  www.digitalmishnah.umd.edu.  

 

Emmanuel  Friedheim,  The  Israel  and  Golda  Koschitzky  Department  of  Jewish  History  

Title:  La  perception  du  non-­‐Juif  dans  la  littérature  tannaïtique  au  regard  de  la  réalité  historique  des  deux  premiers  siècles  de  l'ère  commune  

Abstract:  L'objectif  de  cette  communication,  est  de  clarifier  le  rapport  des  Sages  de  la  littérature  mishnique  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  de  la  gentilité  et  de  définir  la  perception  du  rapport  identitaire  entre  Juifs  et  non-­‐Juifs  aux  yeux  des  Sages.  De  relations  extrêmement  difficiles,  dues  manifestement  au  contexte  historique  accablant,  relatif  au  soulèvement   contre   Rome   de   70,   motivant   haine,   suspicion   et   vigilance,   les   textes   semblent   toutefois  montrer  paradoxalement  que   le   rapport   idéologique  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  de   l'étranger,   fut  globalement   respectueux,  défendant  l'idée  de  l'humanité  du  non-­‐Juif  voire  même  celle  de  fraternité.  Les  frontières  entre  les  identités  religieuses   et   politiques   pointent   alors   dans   le   sens   de   limites   peu   étanches   entre   les   communautés.   En  effet,  des  Sages  réputés  "nationalistes"  et  appuyant  les  insurrections  juives  notamment  celle  de  Bar-­‐Kokhba  feront  preuve  par   ailleurs  d'une   très   large   tolérance  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  de   la   gentilité,   tandis  que  d'autres,   réputés  

d'ordinaire  pour   leur  modération,  pourront  partager  des  positions  très  critiques  envers   leurs  voisins  non-­‐Juifs  et   leurs  cultures.  Les  modes  de  discernement  d'une  réalité  historique  en  évolution  constante,  seront  susceptibles  d'expliquer  ces  appréciations  paradoxales  et  divergentes  à  l'encontre  de  l'environnement  non-­‐Juif  de  Palestine  romaine.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

Hebrew  Literature  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Jewish  and  non  Jewish  Elements  in  Hebrew  Poetry  

 

Chair:  Masha  Itzhaki  

 

Dvora  Bregman,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  On  Hebrew  Baroque  Poetry  

Abstract:   Hebrew   poetry   acquired   the   baroque   style  merging   Gongorism,  Marinism,   Kabala   and  Hebrew  poetic   traditions.   Hebrew   Baroque  main   poets   are  Moses   Zacuto   and   the   brothers   Jacob   and   Immanuel  Frances,   but   others   also   took   an   impressive   part   in   it.   All   represent   various   streams   within   a   common  perception  of  the  style,  expressing  its  various  conventions  in  a  variety  of  individual  ways.  

 

Alexandra  Polyan,  Moscow  State  University,  Russia  

Title:  Cross-­‐Cultural  Interactions  as  Reflected  in  Formal  Structure  of  East  European  Mascilic  Poetry  

Abstract:   It   is   widely   known   that   till   the   very   end   of   the   XIX   century   Hebrew  was   considered   the  most  natural   vehicle   for   writing   poetry.   The  metrical   structure   of   the   poetry   in   non-­‐spoken   Hebrew   changed  several   times.   The  word-­‐counting   system   (piyyut)   gave  place   to  quantitative  prosody  of   Jewish  poetry  of  the  Golden  Age  in  Spain,  the  latter  yielded  to  syllabic  prosody  of  Italian  poetry.  Its  rules  were  formalized  as  late   as   in   the   XVIII   century,   by   the   first   generation   of   Jewish   Enlightenment   in   Germany.   More   than   a  hundred   years   later,   it   was   replaced   by   syllabo-­‐tonic   prosody.   All   the   metrical   transitions   listed   were  inspired  by   change  of  dominant  high-­‐status  non-­‐Jewish   culture   (Arabic   -­‐   Italian   -­‐  German   -­‐  Russian),   and  occurred  with  retardation.  The  fact  that  made  these  metrical  changes  possible  was  the  assumption  (which  was  not  shared  by  all  the  poets  writing  non-­‐spoken  Hebrew)  that  there  was  no  metrical  structure  inherent  in  Hebrew,  and  structure  of  any  high-­‐status  poetic  tradition  could  be  adjusted  to  the  language.  In  my  paper,  I   will   focus   on   the   poetry   of   East-­‐European   Haskalah   (I.   Erter,   I.B.   Levinzon,   A.D.   Lebensohn,   M.J.  Lebensohn,   Y.L.   Gordon,   A.B.   Gotlober   et   al.).   I   will   analyze   its  metrical   structure,   its   language,   and   the  poets'   meta-­‐linguistic   reflection,   and   will   trace   in   it   the   influence   of   polyglossia,   of   formal   structure   of  German  and  Russian  poetry,  of  the  image  of  Hebrew  as  formed  in  the  German  Enlightenment.  

 

Dorit  Lemberger,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   Quasi-­‐metaphor   as   Interaction   between   Jewish   and   Non-­‐Jewish   Culture   in   the   Poetry   of   Yehuda  Amichai  

Abstract:   In   the   poetry   of   Yehuda   Amichai   we   find   many   expressions   of   original   figurative   language  employing   the   language   of   classical   Jewish   sources,   inspired   by   them   to   form   a   pluralistic   position.   This  varied  use  also   includes   references   to  non-­‐Jewish  cultures,  directly  and   indirectly  as  well.   In   some  cases,  this  use  expresses  a  dual  position:  on  one   level,   the   linguistic  expression  refers   to  the  Jewish  context;  on  the   other,   the   expression   constitutes   a   multicultural   position   of   personal   experience.   The   lecture   will  demonstrate   how  Amichai'   poetic   language  operates   at   two   levels:   a   dialogue  between   Jewish   and  non-­‐Jewish  sources  and  an  event   in   the  speaker's   life,  and  an  emblematic  pluralistic  dimension  constituting  a  universal   speaker.   Several   examples   will   be   examined,   drawing   upon   the   concept   of   quasi-­‐metaphor  suggested   by   Frank   Sibley   (1959),   as   a   methodical   concept   for   demonstrating   dual   use   of   language  [followed   by   Sam   Glucksberg   (2001)   and  Malcolm   Budd   (2008)].   The   quasi-­‐metaphor   involves   figurative  forms   which   preserve   the   original   meaning   of   their   components   and,   at   the   same   time,   create   new  meanings,  thereby  reflecting  semantic  and  grammatical  clarity.  The  main  claim  is  that  the  quasi-­‐metaphor  refers   to   a   common   denominator   shared   by   speaker   and   readers,   while   the   original   use   now   shapes   a  personal  experience  emphasizing  the  significant  difference  between  speaker  and  the  original  contexts.  

 

Michèle  Tauber,  MCF  Paris  3,  France  

Title:  Hebrew  Poetry,  Arabic  Poetry:  a  recovered  Relationship?  

Abstract:  As   a   faraway  echoing  of   the  Hebrew  poetry  Golden  Age   in  Muslim  Spain,  we   recently   assist   to  more  and  more  frequent  contacts  between  Hebrew  poetry  and  Arabic  poetry.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  several  Hebrew  and  Arabic  poets  are  sharing  a  mutual  poetic  experience  in  their  publications  and  translations.  Ronny  Somek,  an  Israeli  Hebrew-­‐writing  poet  born  in  Bagdad  has  published  two  compilations  of  tri-­‐lingual  poetry   (Hebrew-­‐Arabic-­‐French)   that   he   shared  with   two   Iraki   Arabic-­‐writing   poets:   Born   in   Bagdad,  with  Abdulkader  El  Janabi  in  1998,  and  Bagdad-­‐Jerusalem,  on  the  Border  of  Fire,  with  Salah  ‘Al  Hamdani  in  2012.  The   poets   Miron   Izakson   and   Naim   Araidi   (who   is   an   Israeli   Druze)   also   published   together   a   trilingual  compilation   (Hebrew-­‐Arabic,   French):   Born   in   Israel   (2003).   Besides   Naim   Araidi   writes   poetry   both   in  Arabic   and   in   Hebrew.   Salman  Masalha   is   also   a   bilingual   author   and   translated   Hebrew   poets   such   as  Hayim  Guri,   Yehuda  Amihai   and  Aharon  Shabtai   into  Arabic,   and  a   compilation  of  Mahmud  Darwich   into  Hebrew.  Last  year  the  poetess  Hamutal  Bar  Yosef  has  published  a  tri-­‐lingual  compilation  (Hebrew-­‐Arabic-­‐French):  Painful  Place.  The  translators  into  Arabic  being  themselves  famous  poets  and  writers  :  Naim  Araidi,  Nida’a  Khuri  –  a  Palestinian  poetss  who  wrote  eleven  compilations  translated   into  manu   languages  –  and  Mahmud  Abassi  who  writes  both    Arabic  and  Hebrew,  and  wrote  many  short  stories  and  children  literature,  a  great  part  of  which  translated  into  Hebrew.    Thus  I  will  try  to  show  in  which  way  and  around  which  themes  contemporary  Hebrew  and  Arabic  poets  create  fertile  poetic  dialogues  through  which  their  cultures  can  converse,  exchange  ideas,  meet  and  feed  each  other  mutually.  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  09  

 

Session:  001:  

Anthropology  and  Folklore  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Sharing  the  Rituals  

 

Chair:  

 

Harvey  Goldberg  &  Hagar  Salamon,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel    

Title:  Jews  and  Muslims  listen  to  the  Ten  Commandments  in  the  Synagogue  

Abstract:   Historical   Ethnography   and   Preliminary   Analysis   by   Hagar   Salamon   and   Harvey   E.   Goldberg.  Ethno-­‐historical   interviews  with   former   residents  of   small   towns   in   southern  Tunisia   and   Libya,   currently  living  in  Israel,  reveal  an  unusual  case  of  Muslim  participation  in  Jewish  synagogue  liturgy.  During  the  two  days  of  Shavuot,  it  was  customary  to  read  aloud  a  Judeo-­‐Arabic  translation-­‐commentary  of  the  Decalogue  at  the  time  of  afternoon  (minḥa)  prayer,  and  we  received  descriptions  of  Muslim  notables  coming  to  listen  to  the  chanting  of  this  piyyut.  While  there  were  some  differences  in  the  details  describing  these  events,  all  interviewees   stressed   the   intense  attentiveness  of   the  Muslim   listeners  who   in  many   instances   gathered  together  with  the  Jews  within  the  synagogue  itself.  Together  with  a  presentation  of  the  main  ethnographic  features,  we  shall  present   initial   lines  of  analysis  regarding  the  significance  of  the  occasion  to  the  Muslim  audience  along  with   indications  of  how  the   local   Jews  viewed  and   interpreted  the  Muslim  attachment  to  this  liturgical  event.  

 

Lionel  Obadia,  Université  Lyon  2,  France  

Title:  Metamorphosis  and  Reinventions  of  Judaism  in  Contact  with  Buddhism  

Asian   religions,   and   more   specifically   Buddhism   and   Hinduism,   are   barely   (if   ever)   considered   as  interlocutors   of   Judaism   in   the   course   of   History,   neither   they   logically   range   among   the   agents   of  transformations   of   the   antique   monotheism.   In   the   last   century,   however,   in   different   context   (in   the  chronological  order:  Europe,  North  America  and  Israel)  Buddhism  (after  Hinduism)  has  been  appealing  for  thousands  of  Jews.  Many  of  them  have  otherwise  returned  to  Judaism  and  have  injected  elements  of  the  Asian  polytheism   tradition   in   the   ancient   semitic  monotheism.  As   a   consequence,   these   "jubus"   (Jewish-­‐Buddhists)  have  partaken  on  a  discreet  yet  significant  changes.  

 

Corinna  R.  Kaiser,  Heinrich  Heine  University  of  Dusseldorf,  Germany  

Title:  Buddha  and  Eliyahu  HaNavi  Meet  at  the  Seder  Table:  Contemporary  Religious  Ritual  as  an  Interfaith  and  Transcultural  Contact  Zone  

Abstract:  Contact  zones,  as  defined  by  Pratt  (1992),  are  spaces  where  different  cultures  meet  and  interact  –  and   not   necessarily   in   a   friendly,   egalitarian   way.   In   my   paper,   which   is   part   of   a   larger   study   of  contemporary   Passover   rituals,   I   analyze   the   politics   and  power   structures   of   the   Passover   Seder   as   one  such   space   where   people   of   different   religions,   cultures,   ethnic   groups,   and   individual   and   cultural  memories  meet  in  a  religious  ritual.  Throughout  most  of  medieval  and  modern  times,  encounters  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  on  or  around  Passover  were  characterized  by  hostility  against   the  Jews  that   found   its  deadly  expression  in  the  blood  libel;  a  bloody  line  of  tradition  that  has  not  yet  dried  up  (cf.  blood  libels  in  the   FSU   and   the  Middle   East   in   the   21st   century).   Conversely,   the   traditional  Haggadah  with   the   Shfoch  Chamatcha  paragraph  did  also  not  develop  with  amicable   interfaith  encounters   in  mind.  These  obstacles  have   been   overridden   after   WWII,   and   in   particular   in   the   US,   by   Passover’s   universalistic   theme   of  oppression  and  liberation  that  offers  a  common  ground  for  transcultural  and  interfaith  Seders.  Inspired  by  an   increasing   Jewish   interest   in   Eastern   religions,   philosophies,   and   spiritual   practices   as   well   as   by   the  solidarity   movement   with   Tibet,   these   ritual   experiments   may   include   non-­‐Jewish   cultural,   ritual,   and  religious  elements  by  way  of  cultural  appropriation,  but  they  also  bring  non-­‐Jews  themselves  to  the  Seder  table.  Exemplified  on  Jewish-­‐Buddhist  Seders  and  Jewish-­‐Buddhist  encounters  that  are  modeled  after  the  Seder,   the   paper   examines   the   historical   and   political   conditions   that   made   this   shift   from   hostility   to  hospitability  (Derrida,  Lévinas)  possible  and  attractive  after  WWII.  Sources  are  not  only  the  ‘Haggadah  for  Jews   &   Buddhist’   (2006)   but   also   related   writings   by   JuBus   (Jewish   Buddhists)   and   other   leaders   and  attendants   of   these   new   Seders.   I   argue   that,   in   spite   of   the   historical   and   theological   barriers,   these  contemporary  religious  rituals  of  the  Passover  Seder  carefully  balance  the  protective  order  of  a  ritual  and  the   inherent   ritual   flexibility   and  may   thus   become   a   contact   zone   in   which   power   relations   have   been  inverted.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002  

Anthropology  and  Folklore  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Crossing  traditions  

 

Chair:  Sylvie-­‐Anne  Goldberg  

 

Maite  Ojeda  Mata,  Universitat  Pompeu  Fabra,  Barcelona,  Spain  

Title:  Relations  between  Jews  and  Muslims  in  the  Cult  of  the  Saints  under  European  Colonialism  in  Morocco  

Abstract:  Issachar  Ben  Ami  has  collected  and  analyzed  splendidly  belief  and  worship  of  the  Jewish  saints  in  Morocco,   as  well   as   relations   between   Jews   and  Muslims   in   the   symbolic   universe   of   beliefs.   But,   those  beliefs,  those  practices  and  those  relationships  between  different  socio-­‐religious  communities  in  Morocco  have  always  been  so?  By  studying  the  impact  of  the  European  colonialism  in  Morocco  I  propose  to  address  these  practices  from  a  social  economic  perspective,  to  approach  its  fluidly,  that  is,  how  beliefs  and  practices  change,   adapt,   evolve,   in   order   to   explore,   in   this   changing   context   that  meant   the   landing   of   European  colonialism   in   the   country,   its   impact   on   relations   between   Jews   and   Muslims   around   the   practice   of  Hilloulah  or  pilgrimage  to  the  tombs  of  Jewish  saints.  

 

Noam  Sienna,  University  of  Toronto,  Canada    

Title:  Henna’s  A  Jewish  Thing?  Jews,  Non-­‐Jews,  and  Henna  Traditions  in  North  Africa  

Abstract:  At  a  henna  party  hosted  by  a  Muslim  student  group  at  an  American  college,  upon  learning  of  the  author’s  research  on  Jewish  henna  traditions,  one  participant  said  with  surprise:  “henna’s  a  Jewish  thing?”  A   year   later,   in   Jerusalem,   at   a   henna   ceremony   for   a   Moroccan-­‐Israeli   couple,   an   elderly   participant  remarked  in  response  to  a  question  about  non-­‐Jewish  henna  ceremonies:  “Do  non-­‐Jews  do  henna?  No,  no,  I’ve  never  heard  of  such  a  thing.  Henna   is  only  a  Jewish  thing.”  These  contrasting  episodes   illustrate  how  particular   rituals   and   practices   are   claimed   simultaneously   by   both   Jews   and  Muslims,   and   point   to   the  cultural  contact  embedded  invisibly  in  the  genealogy  of  those  shared  practices.  This  paper  investigates  the  development   of   henna   ceremonies   among   Jewish   communities   in   North   Africa;   it   challenges   simplistic  binaries  of  defining  ‘Jewish’  or  ‘non-­‐Jewish’  ritual,  exploring  both  the  similarities  between  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish   henna   practices,   and   how   Jewish   henna   ceremonies   hold   uniquely   Jewish   meanings   and  applications.  Jewish  henna  ceremonies  are  often  described  using  the  language  of  ‘borrowing’  or  ‘adoption,’  but  this  model  does  not  do  justice  to  the  ways  in  which  religious  practices  come  into  being  at  the  meeting-­‐point  between  communities.  Rejecting  a  static  and  essentialized  model  of  culture,  where  a  homogeneous  Jewish  community  absorbs  pre-­‐existing  forms  from  its  homogeneous  surroundings,  this  paper  explores  how  henna  ceremonies  among  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  communities  each  represent   innovations   formed  out  of  the   continual   intermingling   of   diverse   populations.   Using   examples   drawn   from   fieldwork   and   historical  records  of  henna  traditions  among  Jewish  communities  of  the  Maghreb,  this  presentation  pushes  towards  a  consideration  of  the  pluralism  and  dynamism  of  religious  communities  and  their  ritual  creativity.  

 

Maria  Haralambakis,  University  of  Manchester,  UK  

Title:  Moses  Gaster  as  a  Collector  and  Translator  of  Romanian  and  Slavonic  Folklore  

Abstract:  Moses  Gaster  (1856–1939)  was  an  intellectual,  bibliophile,  rabbi,  and  activist  for  Jewish  rights.  As  a   scholar   he  was   engaged   in   diverse   fields   of   study,   such   as   Romanian   language   and   literature,   folklore,  Apocrypha,  magic   and  mysticism,   and  Samaritan   studies.  Before  his   expulsion   from  Romania   in  1885,  he  had  published  Literatura  Populara  Română  (1883)  and  signed  the  contract  for  Chrestomatie  Română,  which  eventually   appeared   in   1891.   Soon   after   his   arrival   in   England   he   was   invited   to   present   the   Illchester  lectures   at   the  University   of  Oxford.   They  were   published   in   1887   as   Illchester   Lectures   on  Greeko   (sic)-­‐Slavonic   Literature   and   its   Relation   to   the   Folklore   of   Europe   during   the   Middle   Ages.   It   includes  paraphrases  of  a  large  number  of  stories  (including  apocryphal  narratives  around  biblical  characters),  many  of   which   also   feature   in   Literatura   Populara   Română.   The   publications   mentioned   show   Gaster   as   a  collector,  who  brought  together  a  wide  range  of  material,  often  without  providing  exact  references  to  his  sources.  Besides  presenting  his  material,  a  prominent  aspect  of  the  publications   is  Gaster’s  theory  on  the  origin  and  development  of   folklore.  These   two  aspects  also   feature   in  his  work  Romanian  Bird  and  Beast  Stories   (1915).   It   consists   of   a   very   long   introduction   in   which   Gaster   presented   his   views   on   folklore,  followed  by  his  translations  of  119  numbered  Romanian  stories  about  animals,  and  three  appendices  with  other  material.   Gaster   continued  his  work   of   translating   animal   stories   during   the   rest   of   his   life.   This   is  evidenced  by  his  own  copy  of  this  work,  now  in  the  Rylands  Library  in  Manchester.  It  contains  handwritten  notes,  a  copy  of  a   letter   from  Queen  Elisabeth/Carmen  Sylva,  reviews  of  the  book  from  newspapers,  and  inserted   leaves   with   additional   stories.   Gaster   found   the   stories   in   publications   of   different   Romanian  folklorists,   including   Pauline   Schullerus,   Otescu,   Vasiliu   and   various   contributions   to   the   journals   Ion  Creanga  and  Sezatoarea.  An  edition  and  analysis  of  the  additional  stories  is  in  preparation.  Based  on  a  study  of  all  four  publications  mentioned,  and  especially  illustrated  by  Romanian  Bird  and  Beast  Stories,  this  paper  

will  provide  insight  into  how  Gaster  worked  as  a  collector  and  translator  of  Romanian  and  Slavonic  folklore.  It  will  become  clear  that  on  the  whole  Gaster’s  collecting  took  place  not  in  the  field,  but  in  the  study.  He  did  not  collect  oral  stories  from  ‘the  people’,  but  gathered  them  from  publications  and  manuscripts.  Several  of  Gaster’s   sources   have   been   traced   in   the   course   of   the   research.   Gaster’s  methods   of   collecting  will   be  compared  with  those  of  some  of  his  colleagues  on  whose  work  he  draws.  The  evaluation  of  Gaster’s  work  as  a  translator  is  based  on  a  careful  comparison  of  some  of  the  original  stories  with  Gaster’s  versions.  It  will  be   demonstrated   that,   rather   than   providing   a   literal   translation,   he   usually   paraphrased   the   stories,  contextualizing  them  for  their  new  audience.  This  paper  is  part  of  my  project  which  evaluates  Gaster  as  a  scholar  and  a  collector.  

 

Marina  Shcherbakova,  Russian  Museum  of  Ethnography  (St.  Petersburg)  

Title:  Insights  into  S.  An-­‐sky’s  Political  Shift  based  on  his  Writings  between  1915-­‐1917  

Abstract:  The   legacy  of  the  wartime  writings  of  the  Jewish  Russian   intellectual  and  ethnographer  Semyon  An-­‐sky   (1863   –   1920)   incorporates   his   private   correspondence   and   an   unpublished   diary   he   has   kept  between   January   –  March   and   September   –  October   1915.   The   first   part   of   the   diary   refers   to   An-­‐sky’s  wartime  travel  around  the  Polish  Galicia,  where  he  acted  on  behalf  of  the  Jewish  Committee  to  Help  War  Victims  (EKOPO)  willing  to  bring  relief  to  the  Jews  caught  between  the  Russian  and  Austrian  armies.  In  the  diary  and  in  the  correspondence  with  the  Russian  writer  Fyodor  Sologub  and  his  friend  Rosa  Monoszon  An-­‐sky   reflects   the  war’s   brutality   in   general   and   the   unrelenting   violence   of   the   Russian   army   towards   the  Jewish  people  in  the  battle  zone  in  particular.  The  second  part  of  the  diary  is  written  in  Petrograd,  it  brings  out   the   growing   distance   between  An-­‐sky   and   his   fellow   Jewish   intellectual   and   political   leaders.   An-­‐sky  returns  from  Galicia  with  the  realistic  concept  of  helping  operations  that  could  improve  the  condition  of  the  Jews,  who  fall  victim  during  the  war.  However  his  views  do  not  entirely  fit  into  the  armchair  discussions  and  Jewish  Political  Committee  meetings  he  attends  in  Petrograd.  In  his  private  writings  An-­‐sky  expresses  critics  towards  the  activity  of  the  Jewish  Historical  and  Ethnographic  society,  the  EKOPO  and  other  organizations  he  has  cooperated  with  in  the  1910-­‐s.  At  the  same  time  An-­‐sky  supports  Vladimir  Jabotinsky’s  idea  of  the  Jewish  Legion  and  develops  enthusiasm  about  the  Zionist  movement,  which  has  never  appealed  to  him  as  a  member  of  the  Russian  autonomist  party  “Folkspartei”  before.  In  1915  An-­‐sky  cooperates  with  the  Society  of  the  Jewish  Legion  in  Petrograd,  and  it  seems  to  meet  his  wish  to  see  the  Jew  as  unbowed  and  brave  self-­‐defender  -­‐  this  concept  can  be  found  in  an  appeal  to  the  Galician  Jews  (1914-­‐1915,  draft).  Simultaneously  An-­‐sky  reworks  Chassidic  apocalyptic  legends  that  he  collected  in  Galicia  into  an  article  (1915-­‐1916,  draft)  and  a  book  “Ten  signs  of  the  Messiah”  (1916),  where  he  reflects  the  crisis  of  the  traditional  Jewry.  An-­‐sky’s  political  shift  seems  to  have  grown  from  his  wartime  experience  in  Galicia,  that  revealed  new  threats  to  the  existence  of  the  Jews  in  the  East-­‐European  diaspora  and  the  need  of  confrontation  on  a  new  level.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Modern  Hebrew  Literature  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Agnon's  œuvre  

 

Chair:  

 

Omri  Ben-­‐Yehuda,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Agnon's  Muselmann  

Abstract:  I  am  aiming  in  this  lecture  at  bridging  the  gap  between  holocaust  literature  and  Agnon's  oeuvre.  I  am   also   aiming   at   a   careful   investigation   of   Agnon's   greatest   achievement,   an   immense   book   that   was  published   only   posthumously   and   never   got   a   broad   presence   by   the   critics-­‐   A   City   and   the   Fullness   of  Thereof.   This   book   is   also   the   venue   in  which   Agnon   dealt   at   length  with   the   destruction   of   the   Jewish  community   in   his   hometown   in   Galicia.   Recently   there   were   many   attempts   to   reread   the   scope   of  holocaust  literature  not  only  as  an  aftermath  but  also  with  a  presence  before  Auschwitz  (if  using  diversely  Adorno's   famous   remark).   I  will   read  Agnon's  chronic  while   focusing  especially  on   the  story   (the  missing-­‐one)  from  three  main  theoretical  aspects:  the  discourse  of  "before"  and  "after"  (John  Hillis-­‐Miller,  Michel  Rothberg),  testimony  theory  (Andrea  Frisch,  Shoshana  Felman)  and  bio-­‐politics  (Foucault,  Agamben).  Dan,  the  missing-­‐one  (and  the  protagonist  of  the  story),   is  always  reshaped  by  society's  mechanism  of  defining  and  shaping  one's  body,  and  at  the  end  he  becomes  a  muselmann,  as  this  concept  is  depicted  by  Agamben.  

 

Brigitte  Caland,  INALCO,  France  

Title:  Midlife  Crisis  and  the  Sadomasochistic  Dynamic  in  SY  Agnon’s  Shira  

Abstract:  Through  a  psychoanalytical  approach  of  SY  Agnon’s  Shira,  the  talk  would  investigate  the  material  of  Manfred  Herbst  midlife  crisis  and  his  “in-­‐between”  situation  to  see  how  it  affects  not  only  the  structure  of   the   story   but   also   the   sadomasochistic   dynamic   that   determines   his   relationship   to   the   other  protagonists  of  the  novel  mainly  his  wife  Henrietta  and  the  two  opposite  characters:  Shira,  a  free  spirit,  and  Elizabeth   Neu,   an   observant   Jew,   both   “Objects   of   Desire”.   Manfred   Herbst,   a   Lecturer   at   the   Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem  and  the  main  character  of  the  novel  Shira,  is  an  Ashkenazi  emigrant,  who  arrives  in  Palestine   between   the   two  world  wars.   The   story   takes   place   in   the   holy   city,   during   the   30s  where   the  outside   struggle   reflects   the   inner   one  Herbst   is   suffering   through,   trapped   in   between   two  women:   his  wife,   Henrietta   with   whom   he   has   built   a   family   but   who   rejects   him   physically,   and   nurse   Shira,   who  welcomes  him  but  except  for  a  few  intimate  moments,  only  flirts  with  him.  This  “In  between”  situation  is  the  core  of   the  novel:   two   languages,   two  cultures,  a  native  country  and   the  adopted  one,   the  notion  of  foreigner   and   autochthone,   life   and   death   impulses,   the   explicit   and   the   latent,   the   masculine   and   the  feminine,   fidelity  and   temptation,   love  and  hate,  disgust  and   tenderness,   instinct  and   rational,   attraction  and  repulsion,  glory  and  servitude,  religiosity  and  secularism,  the  academic  world  and  the  family,  creating  tensions,   instabilities,   vulnerabilities   and   frustrations   within   the   couple   as   Herbst   chooses   to   resist   his  impulses  and  stay  with  his  wife.  Couple  deprived  of  sexual  intimacy  tied  by  years  of  shared  memories  that  quarrels   without   altering   the   foundation   of   their   solid   marriage   bound   by   moments   of   happiness   and  overcoming  obstacles,  ties  a  midlife  crisis  does  not  succeed  to  undo.  But  maintaining  the  couple  creates  a  sadomasochistic  dynamic  in  this  uprooted  generation  that  has  lived  through  wars,  carrying  fears  and  daily  uncertainties,  matter  that  the  presentation  will  analyze.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

Jewish/Christian  Calendar  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Sasha  Stern  

 

Israel  Sandman,  University  College  London,  UK  

Title:  Worthy  Rival:  Medieval  Jewish  Fascination  with  the  Easter  Calculation    

Abstract:   Most   Christian   observances   are   set   on   fixed   dates   of   the   solar   calendar,   year   in   year   out.   In  contrast,   the  date  of   Easter   is   variable,  being   calculated   in  a  way   that   largely   recalls   the   Jewish   roots,   in  Passover,  of  this  most  Christian  observance.  The  Easter  date   is  calculated  using  a  system  that  synthesizes  disparate  calendrical  phenomena:  the  season,  which  is  an  aspect  of  the  solar  calendar;  the  lunar  months;  and  the  days  of  the  week.  Part  of  this  system  of  synthesis  entails  the   intercalating  of  a  13th   lunar  month  into  seven  years  within  a  19-­‐year  cycle.  By   the  middle  ages,   the  19-­‐year  cycle  was  used  by  both   Jews,   in  fixing   the   date   of   Passover,   and   by   Christians,   in   fixing   the   date   of   Easter.   Furthermore,   both   Jews   and  Christians  intercalate  according  to  the  same  sequence  within  the  19-­‐year  cycle,  at  years  3,  6,  8,  11,  14,  17,  &  19.  However,   Jews  and  Christians  begin   the  19-­‐year  cycle   two  years  apart.  As  a   result,  only   five  of   the  seven   intercalations   are   shared   by   both   religions.   This   mix   of   correspondence   and   difference   sparked  Jewish   fascination,   giving   rise   to   Jewish   analysis   of   various   aspects   of   Christianity.   I   have   found   this  recorded  in  two  works  that  I  have  been  critically  editing  from  manuscript,  annotating,  and  translating  from  Hebrew  into  English:  the  calendrical  work  by  Abraham  bar  Hayya  (or:  Hiyya),  written  in  France  in  1123;  and  Yesod  Olam,  by  Isaac  Israeli,  written  in  Spain  in  1309/10.  While  each  work  is  on  the  fixed  Jewish  calendar,  each  contains  a  substantial  section  on  calendars  of  various  nations,  and  on  the  Christian  Easter  calculation  and  related  observances.  One  can  see  how  the  latter  author  developed  the  analysis  initiated  by  the  former.  Aspects   of   Christianity   upon  which   these   Jewish   authors   dwell   include:   the   Jewishness   and   humanity   of  Jesus   and  Mary;   the   degree   to  which   Christianity   is   derivative   from   Judaism,   including   historiography   of  Christian   origins   and   observances;   and   the   balance   between,   on   the   one   hand,   respect   for   Judaically  acceptable  Christian  exegesis  of  the  Hebrew  Bible  and  the  Christian  incorporation  of  Jewish  practices,  and,  on   the  other  hand,   scorn   for  Christian  deviance   from  these.   In  addition,   the   first  author  uses   the   literary  device  of  citing  discussion  between  him  and  Christian  clergy;  and  this   is  deemed  important  enough  to  be  cited  in  the  latter  work.  The  Jewish  attitude  is  not  all  negative;  both  Jewish  works  combine  confutation  with  respect  for  that  which  the  Christian  rival  ‘got  right’.  

 

Justine  Isserles,  University  College,  London,  UK  

The  Use  of  Vernacular  and  Latin  in  Julian,  Bloodletting  and  Regimen  Calendars  in  Hebrew  Manuscripts  from  Western  Europe  (13th-­‐15th  c.):  Written  and  Oral  Transmission  

This   paper   will   focus   on   an   intriguing   selection   of   vernacular   and   Latin   words   which   were   recently  uncovered  during  the  editing  of  medieval  Hebrew  calendrical  texts,  within  the  framework  of  a  Leverhulme  Trust  funded  project  at  University  College,  London,  entitled:  Medieval  Jewish  and  Christian  Calendars  from  Franco-­‐Germany  and  England  (12th-­‐15th  c.),  led  by  Prof.  Sacha  Stern.  This  presentation  will  unfold  as  a  survey  of   le’azim  (in  Judeo-­‐German,  Judeo-­‐French  and  Judeo-­‐Provençal)  and   Latin   words   found   in   newly   discovered   Julian,   bloodletting   and   regimen   calendars   in   Hebrew  manuscripts   from   Franco-­‐Germany   and   Southern   France   dated   between   the   13th   and   15th   centuries.  Highlights   of   theses   numerous   terms   will   be   described   within   categories   relative   to   calendars   (months,  

feasts,   fasts,   saint   names,   technical   terms),   commerce   (markets   and   fairs),   astro-­‐medicine   (zodiac   signs,  planets,   humours,   Egyptian   days)   and   medicine   (herbal   remedies   and   potions).   Moreover,   particular  attention  will  be  drawn  to  the  question  of  transmission,  where  examples  of  spellings  of  certain  words  will  shed  light  on  an  oral  and/or  written  reception  of  these  calendars.  Their  description  will  attempt  to  display  the  wealth  of  subjects  where  vernacular  and  Latin  languages  appear  in  medieval  Hebrew  calendrical  texts  for  didactic,  socio-­‐economic,  astro-­‐medical  and  medical  purposes,  revealing  yet  again  new  perspectives  in  medieval  Judeo-­‐Christian  relations  in  Western  Europe.  

 

Jean-­‐Jacques  Wahl,  European  Association  for  Jewish  Culture,  France  

Title:  The  Omer  Calendar,  Between  Jewish  and  Popular  Art    

Abstract:   If   the   counting   of   the   omer   is   already   recorded   in   the   Bible,   the   calendar   as   a   Judaica   item   is  relatively  new.  There  is  no  religious  rules  linked  with  its  production  leaving  a  large  liberty  to  its  producers.  We  will  try  through  various  examples  to  show  how  in  many  cases  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  artistic  influences  meet  in  its  conception  

 

Ilana  Wartenberg,  University  College  London,  UK  

Title:  Non-­‐Jewish  Calendars  in  Medieval  Hebrew  Treatises  on  the  Jewish  Calendar  

Abstract:  We   possess   textual   evidence   for   a   rich   calendrical   literary   tradition   in   Hebrew.   Its   roots   were  consolidated  during  the  Hebrew  Renaissance  of  the  12th  century.  This  tradition  was  created  by  a  chain  of  treatises   on   the   Jewish   calendar   written   by   prominent   Jewish   scholars   immersed   in   Arabic   science.   The  leading  figures  are  the  Iberian  polymaths  Abraham  bar  Hiyya  and  Abraham  Ibn  Ezra  (12th  century)  as  well  as   Isaac   Israeli   (14th   century).   Some   calendrical   books   encompass  many   layers,   for   example:   algorithmic  (i.e.  how  to  reckon  the  calendar),  scientific  (e.g.  astronomical  theories),  philological  (discussion  of  scientific  terms  that  are  relevant  to  the  calendar)  and  theological  (e.g.  religious  elements  in  the  determination  of  the  Jewish   calendar).   It   is   extremely   interesting   to   find   chapters   on   non-­‐Jewish   calendars   in   some   of   these  treatises.  It  is  important  to  try  to  understand  their  role  in  a  book  on  the  Jewish  calendar  and  whether  their  presence  sheds  any  light  on  the  connection  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  in  the  Middle  Ages.  The  answers  may  seem  clearer  in  the  case  of  the  Christian  and  the  Muslim  calendars,  but  less  so  for  other  calendars.  I  will  present  the  chapters  on  non-­‐Jewish  calendars  in  Abraham  Bar  Hiyya’s  Sefer  ha-­‐‘Ibbur  and  Isaac  Israeli’s  Yesod   Olam.   I   will   discuss   the   Muslim   and   Christian   calendars   briefly,   and   will   focus   on   the   Persian  Zoroastrian  calendar  in  Sefer  ha-­‐‘Ibbur.  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  10  

 

Session:  001:  

Contemporary  Jewish  History  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002  

Contemporary  Jewish  History  

11.00-­‐13.00  

France  post  1945  

 

Chair:  Anne  Grynberg  

 

Joël  Sebban,  Fondation  pour  la  mémoire  de  la  Shoah  –  Université  Paris  I,  France  

Title:  “Counterhistories”  or  Common  History?  Jewish-­‐Christian  Dialogue  in  France  during  the  emancipation  era  (1806-­‐1940)  

Abstract:   In   her  work   "Abraham  Geiger   and   the   Jewish   Jesus,"   the  American  historian   Suzannah  Heschel  defines  the  historical  analysis  of  the  German  theologian  on  the  origins  of  Christianity  as  a  “counterhistory.”  This   concept,   first   introduced   into   postcolonial   historiography,   and   adapted   to   Jewish   history   by   Amos  Funkenstein   and   David   Biale,   refers   to   a   form   of   polemics   in   which   the   sources   of   the   adversary   are  exploited  and  turned   ‘against   the  grain,’   in  Walter  Benjamin’s  phrase.”  Geiger  tries  to  defend  Judaism  by  writing  a  counterhistory  of  Christian  counterhistory:  in  his  eyes,  Christianity  is  a  mere  paganized  Judaism  in  contradiction  with  the  Gospels  themselves.  Judaism  is  the  authentic  source  of  Western  civilization.   In  the  wake  of  this  renowned  predecessor,  a  founder  of  Jewish  studies,  Heschel  aims  at  restoring  contemporary  Jewish   studies   to   their   initial   function   of   counterhistory.   This   work   questions   this   interpretation   of  Christianity  as  “counterhistory”  by  focusing  on  the  French  Jewish  community  in  the  nineteenth  century  and  the  first  half  of  the  twentieth  century  -­‐  from  the  recognition  of  Judaism  as  a  religion  under  the  Napoleonic  Empire  to  the  founding  of  the  first  Jewish-­‐Christian  associations  in  the  1930s.  As  it  was  the  first  community  to   be   emancipated   in   Europe,   it   provides   a   unique   –   and   understudied   –   case   for   examining   Jewish  interpretations  of  Christianity.  I  argue  that  the  Jewish  reflection  on  Christianity  cannot  be  considered  apart  from  the  process  of  acculturation  of  a  minority  within  a  Christian  society.  The  adoption  of  the  way  of   life  and  thought  of  the  majority  culture  left  an  indelible  mark  on  the  interpretation  of  Jewish  writers  regarding  Christian   doctrine,   history,   and   society.   If   this   is   so,   should   one   see   Jewish   thought   on   Christianity   and,  more   broadly   Jewish-­‐Christian   dialogue   in   the   age   of   Emancipation   through   the   polemics   of  

“counterhistory?”  Parallel  to  this  polemical  view,  I  put  forth  an  alternative  history  which  seeks  to  determine  the   communal   heritage   of   the   two   traditions,   linked   by   Biblical   sources,   against   the   rise   of   “new  paganisms.”  

 

Eliezer  Schilt,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:   Dialoguer   autour   de   «   valeurs   communes   »   ?   Un   des   enjeux   du   rapprochement   judéo-­‐chrétien   en  France  après  1945  

Abstract:   Le   réseau   des   acteurs   qui   renouvelle   le   dialogue   judéo-­‐chrétien   en   France   après   la   Seconde  Guerre   mondiale   est   essentiellement   issu   du   milieu   intellectuel   français   (Jacques   Maritain,   Emmanuel  Levinas,  Paul  Claudel,   Jean  Daniélou,  par  exemple).   Il  agit  dans   le  cadre  de   l’association,   "L’Amitié   judéo-­‐chrétienne",   fondée   en   1948   par   l’historien   Jules   Isaac,   et   l’écrivain   Edmond   Fleg.   En   marge   de   cette  association   officielle,   des   intellectuels   comme   Jean-­‐Paul   Sartre,   Albert   Camus   ou   François   Mauriac  s’expriment  aussi  sur  les  liens  nouveaux  qui  se  tissent  entre  Juifs  et  chrétiens.  L’étude  des  échanges  entre  ces   différents   acteurs,   de   leurs   écrits   et   interventions   dans   la   sphère   publique,   permet   de   distinguer   les  enjeux   sociaux   et   politiques   des   années   1950   et   1960   qui   sont   au   cœur   des   relations   judéo-­‐chrétiennes  d’alors  :  par  exemple,  les  premières  leçons  tirées  de  la  Shoah,  le  combat  renouvelé  contre  l’antisémitisme  et  le  racisme  qui  rejoignent  les  enjeux  cruciaux  soulevés  par  le  colonialisme  ou  le  pacifisme,  et  les  réactions  à  la  création  de  l’Etat  d’Israël  et  les  premières  guerres  arabo-­‐israéliennes.  Je  tenterai  de  montrer  dans  cette  communication  qu’autour  de  ces  débats,   les  contacts  entre   Juifs  et  chrétiens  après-­‐guerre  ont   fortement  contribué  aux  réponses,  proposées  en  premier   lieu  par   les   intellectuels   juifs  et  chrétiens,  puis  reprises  en  partie  par  leurs  autorités  religieuses  respectives,  face  aux  changements  profonds  qui  secouent  les  cultures  juives  et  chrétiennes  dans  le  monde  d’après  1945.  

 

Jane  S.  Gabin,  United  Nations  International  School,  USA  

Title:  American  Jewish  Soldiers  and  French  Jewish  Civilians  in  Liberated  Paris  

Abstract:  Inspired  by  the  stories  of  my  own  father,  who  served  in  the  US  Army  and  was  stationed  in  Paris  1944-­‐45,   I   am   studying   incidents   in   which   Jewish   soldiers   reached   out   to   coreligionists   in   the   liberated  population.   Was   this   a   widespread   practice?   Did   it   facilitate   increased   visibility   of   the   French   Jewish  postwar  scene?  How  much  assistance  did  American  soldiers  provide  in  the  punishment  of  collaborators,  or  in   the  reunification  of   families?  This  area  of   research   is   still  ongoing,  as  much  of   the  assistance  rendered  was  personal  and  not  part  of  an  official  military  program.  

 

Anne  Grynberg,  INALCO,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Consensus  et  dissensus  mémoriels  sur  la  question  des  'réparations'  dans  la  France  d'aujourd'hui  

Abstract:   Les   années   1990  ont  marqué  une  étape   fondamentale  dans   la   culture  mémorielle   de  plusieurs  Etats  européens  en  ce  qui  concerne  la  persécution  antijuive  et   les  complicités  de  certains  gouvernements  avec   les   dirigeants   nazis.   Cela   a   été   le   cas   en   France  notamment   :   en  1995,   les   plus   hautes   autorités   de  l’État  ont  reconnu  officiellement  les  responsabilités  du  gouvernement  de  Vichy  et  à  la  suite  du  président  de  la  République,  diverses  administrations  ainsi  que  des  dignitaires  des  Églises  ont  exprimé   leur  repentance.  Deux  ans  plus  tard,   la  Mission  Mattéoli  a  reçu  pour  mission  de  mener  une  recherche  approfondie  sur   les  spoliations  matérielles  subies  par  les  Juifs  sur  le  sol  français,  lesquelles  sont  en  cours  de  dédommagement  depuis   l’instauration   de   la   CIVS   en   1999.   Les   orphelins   de   parents   morts   en   déportation   reçoivent  

désormais  une  pension  ;  la  Fondation  pour  la  Mémoire  de  la  Shoah  (FMS)  a  été  mise  en  place  en  2000  afin  de   soutenir   la   recherche   historique   et   l’enseignement   de   la   Shoah,   d’encourager   la   transmission   de   la  mémoire  et  de  la  culture  juives  et,  en  outre,  de  développer  des  actions  de  solidarité  envers  les  survivants  de   la   Shoah   ;   elle   contribue   de  manière   permanente   au   financement   du  Mémorial   de   la   Shoah   dont   les  archives,   la  bibliothèque  ainsi  que   les  expositions  sont  extrêmement  précieux  et  qui  a  récemment  ouvert  un  mémorial   à   Drancy,   face   à   l’entrée   principale   de   l’ancien   camp.   Sur   la   base   d’archives   inédites   et   de  témoignages   recueillis   dans   le   cadre   du   Comité   d’histoire   auprès   de   la   CIVS   dont   je   suis   la   directrice  scientifique,  je  souhaite  préciser  et  approfondir  un  certain  nombre  de  questions,  dont  la  principale  a  trait  aux  consensus  et  dissensus  mémoriels  dans  la  France  d’aujourd’hui.  La  politique  publique  de  «  réparation  »  menée  ces  dernières  années  a-­‐t-­‐elle  participé  à  ‘apurer  la  dette’  de  l’État  et  de  la  société  française  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  des  Juifs,  du  moins  en  termes  d’indemnisation  financière  ?  Peut-­‐on  aller  jusqu’à  émettre  l’hypothèse  qu’en  reconnaissant  officiellement  aux  Juifs  un  statut  spécifique  de  victimes,  elle  a  permis  à  leurs  descendants  de  mener  un  travail  de  ‘résilience’  indispensable  à  la  réconciliation  et  à  la  (re)construction  d’un  vivre-­‐ensemble  ?  Ou  bien  a-­‐t-­‐elle  au  contraire  réactivé  une  sorte  de  «  concurrence  des  mémoires  »,  voire,  en  réactivant  la  prétendue     collusion   entre   les   Juifs   et   l’argent,   a-­‐t-­‐elle   parfois   entraîné   des   effets   pervers  d’incompréhension   voire   d’hostilité   ?   Vingt   ans   après   l’ouverture   de   cette   ère   nouvelle,   quel   bilan   —  provisoire  —  peut-­‐on  dresser  ?  Et  comment  s'inscrivent  ces  questions  dans  les  contacts  interculturels  en  ce  début  du  XXIe  siècle?  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Hassidism  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Mark  Zvi,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   "Even   from   the   Stories   of   the   Gentiles,   God's   Glory   Cries   Out":   Influences   on   Rabbi   Nachman   of  Breslav's  Stories  

Abstract:  Rabbi  Nachman  of  Breslav  was  the  most  significant  creator  of  the  Hasidic  story.  In  his  theoretical  discourses,  Rabbi  Nachman  discussed  the  significance  of  literature-­‐-­‐not  only  the  Jewish  genre  dealing  with  the  praise  of  the  "tzaddikim"  but  literature  in  general,  including  that  of  the  gentile  world.  Rabbi  Nachman  of  Breslav  viewed  the  latter  as  containing  elevated  spiritual  matters,  and  he  taught  that  the  tzaddik  must  tell  these  stories  in  a  form  that  will  express  those  matters.  In  this  lecture,  I  will  address  three  points:  first,  the  theological  world-­‐view  of  Rabbi  Nachman  of  Breslav  in  whose  framework  a  positive  attitude  to  gentile  literature  developed;  second,  the  stories  to  which  he  was  exposed;  and  third,  how-­‐-­‐  practically  speaking-­‐-­‐  this  ars-­‐poetic,  theological  outlook  expressed  itself  in  Rabbi  Nachman  of  Breslav's  literary  creativity.  

 

Daniel  Reiser,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Modern  Psychology,  Halacha  and  Hasidism  in  the  19th  and  20th  Century  

Abstract:  In  this  lecture  I  deal  with  the  contact  between  Western  European  modern  psychology  and  Hasidic  (Eastern   European)   psychology.   This   is   done   through   analyzing   the   rise   of   psychological   practice   and  hypnosis   in   Western   Europe   and   its   influence   on   some   Jewish   and   Hasidic   figures   in   Eastern   Europe,  especially  at  the  turn  of  the  19th  century  (1880-­‐1920).  Following  the  theory  of  Mesmerism  (Pre-­‐Hypnosis),  founded  by  The  German  physician  Franz  Anton  Mesmer  (1734-­‐1815;  who  established  a  clinic  In  Paris),  the  interest   in   the   "Unconscious"   and   in   the   remarkable   abilities   of  mental   powers   has   been   elevated.   This  interest   was   also   a   major   factor   in   the   development   of   Dynamic   Psychiatry.   Several   German-­‐Jewish  Physicians  took  part  in  this  development  as  Oscar  Berger  (1844-­‐1885)  who  was  a  Prof.  at  the  University  of  Breslau,  being   the   first   at   that   institution   to   lecture  on  nervous  diseases.   In  addition  we  can   find   several  Halachic   Responses   from   the   nineteenth   century   from   Germany   (as   Rabbi   Jacob   Ettlinger   1798-­‐1871)  dealing   with   the   question   of   whether   mesmerism   and   hypnotism   are   witchcraft   (and   thus   are   defined  idolatrous)  or  is  it  permitted  to  be  treated  by  these  methods.  The  change  in  the  character  of  the  Ba'al  Shem  (‘master  of  the  name’),  which  occurred  in  the  eighteenth  century,  from  a  physical-­‐illness  curer  to  a  mental-­‐illness  curer,  a  change  which  appears  for  example  in  the  image  of  the  Ba'al  Shem  of  Michelstadt,  and  the  Ba'al   Shem   Tov   can   be   better   understood   in   the   light   of   the   development   of   western   psychology   and  psychiatric   practices.   In   the   Austro-­‐Hungarian   Empire   in   the   late   19th   century  Hebrew  Books   have   been  published   on  Mesmerism   and   Hypnosis   (especially   in   Vienna   which   was   a  main  meeting   point   between  German   culture  and   Jewish  Culture),  which  enabled   the  exposure  of   these  methods   to  Hasidic   figures   in  East  Europe  (Galicia)  as  Rabbi  Shlomo  Aryeh  Leib  Vinshlboim  (1847-­‐1927)  of  Tyczyn  and  Rabbi  Menachem  Ekstein   of   Rzeszów   (a   Dzików   Hasid   1884-­‐1943).   These   Hasidic   figures   who   represent   traditional   Jewish  culture   have   succeeded,   in   a   very   surprising   way,   to   adapt   new   German-­‐Psychiatric   practices   into   their  Jewish  religion  culture  and  inner  life.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

Christian  Hebraism:  Jewish  Mysticism  and  Hebraica  Veritas  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Saverio  Campanini  

 

Brian  Ogren,  Rice  University,  USA  

Title:  Jewish-­‐Christian  Discourse  on  Creation:  Yohanan  Alemanno  and  Giovanni  Pico  della  Mirandola  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  examine  the  uses  of  kabbalistic   ideas  of  creation  by  the  famed  fifteenth  century  Italian  Humanist  Giovanni  Pico  della  Mirandola,  and  the  possible  influence  on  these  ideas  by  Pico's  Jewish  interlocutor,   Yohanan   Alemanno.   Both   of   these   thinkers,   who   were   known   to   be   in   contact,   wrote  important  commentaries  on   the   first  chapters  of  Genesis  during   the   last  decade  of   the   fifteenth  century.    This   paper   will   explore   some   of   the   commonalities   of   their   respectively   innovative   ideas   on   biblical  creation,   in   order   to   offer   a   new   perspective   on   Jewish-­‐Christian   intellectual   contact   and   the   cross-­‐fertilization  of  ideas.  

 

Marci  Freedman,  University  of  Manchester,  UK  

Title:  A  Professor  Controversiarum  Judaicarum:  Constantijn  L'Empereur  and  the  Jews  

Abstract:  Seventeenth-­‐century  Europe  was  a  golden  age  of  Christian  Hebraism  when  Christian  scholars  both  studied  and  translated  many  of  Judaism’s  religious  tracts  to  achieve  a  deeper  theological  understanding  of  the  Bible.  Alongside  the  study  of  Jewish  texts,  many  Hebraists  wrote  treatises,  and  spoke  out,  against  Jews  and   Judaism.   One   such   Hebraist   was   Constantijn   L’Empereur   who   exemplifies   this   dual   relationship   to  Jewish  literature  and  the  Jews  themselves.  L’Empereur  was  a  Dutch  theologian  at  the  University  of  Leiden  who  styled  himself  as  a  Professor  Controversarium  judaicorum.  A  devout  Calvinist,  L’Empereur  published  a  number  of  works  many  of  which  theologically  attacked  Judaism.    He  also  made  translations  of  Hebrew  texts  for   a   Latin-­‐reading   audience,   such   as   Benjamin   of   Tudela’s   Book   of   Travels   printed   in   1633,   passages   of  which  were  used,  in  conjunction  with  Genesis  49:10,  by  L’Empereur  to  refute  Judaism.  And  yet,  L’Empereur  had   frequent   contact   with   the   Amsterdam   Jewish   community   to   perfect   his   knowledge   of   Hebrew   and  purchase  Hebrew   texts.   This   paper  will   thus   explore   how  Hebraists   navigated   the   tension  between   their  theological  stance  against  Judaism  and  their  more  practical  dealings  with  the  Jews.  

 

Eveline  Van  Staalduine-­‐Sulman,  VU  University  Amsterdam,  Netherlands  

Title:  Translating  a  Jewish  Bible  Translation  into  the  Christian  Scholarly  World  

Abstract:   In   the   sixteenth   century   Christian   Biblical   scholars   were   interested   in   the   ancient   sources,  including   the   Hebrew   Bible   and   its   (Jewish)   Aramaic   translations   (=   Targums).   In   order   to   study   these  translations   scholars   began   to   translate   Targums   into   Latin   and   edit   both   the   Targums   and   their   Latin  translations  in  polyglot  Bibles  and  separate  books.  The  Jewish  culture  of  Bible  interpretation  thus  became  a  part  of  the  Christian  culture  of  Biblical  Studies.  This  lecture  will  (1)  give  a  short  overview  of  the  editions  and  the   Latin   translations;   (2)   answer   the   question   how   the   Targums   were   evaluated   by   Christian   scholars  during  the  sixteenth  century;  and  (3)  present  a  new  line  of   investigation  into  the  effect  of  these  editions-­‐cum-­‐translations   on   other   fields   of   Christian   Biblical   Studies,   especially   the   rapid   rise   of   Biblical  commentaries.  

 

Isaac  Gottlieb,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Rupert  of  Deutz  and  Jewish  Bible  Exegesis  

Abstract:   Rupert   of   Deutz   has   several   explanations   that   seem   to   rely   on   previous   Jewish   commentary,  notably   Rashi.   On   the   other   hand,   certain   twelfth   century   northern   French   exegetes   might   have   been  responding  to  his  work.  Are  these  cases  evidence  for  contacts  between  Christians  and  Jews?  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  11  

 

Session:  001:  

History  of  Jewish  Law  and  the  Law  of  the  Jews  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  John  Tolan  

 

Jerzy  Mazur,  RELMIN,  MSH,  University  of  Nantes,  France  

Title:  “Iudicium  Judaeorum”  –  Royal  Court  for  the  Jews  in  Medieval  Poland-­‐Lithuania    

Abstract:   The  paper  will   analyze   the   importance  of   royal   and  princely   courts   created   to  deal  with   Jewish  matters   in   Poland   and   Lithuania.   This   so   called   “iudicium   Iudaeorum”   comprised   an   important   factor   in  development  of  the  legal  policies  of  the  state  towards  Jews,  and  provided  the  minority  community  with  an  extensive  juridical  protection  in  their  disputes  with  Christians.  The  sources  under  investigation  will  include  the  royal  privileges,  court  records,  as  well  as  selected  rabbinical  responsa.  

 

Tomaso  Perani,  RELMIN,  MSH,  University  of  Nantes,  France  

Title:  The  Legal  Status  of  Jewish  Communities  in  the  Fragmented  Social  Polities  of  the  Late  Medieval  Italian  Cities.  

Abstract:   Tomaso   Perani   will   address   the   question   of   the   legal   status   of   Jewish   minority   within   the  extremely  fragmented  society  of  north   Italian  cities.  He  will  discuss  the  Jewish  position   in  such   important  Italian  urban  centers  as  Bologna  and  Venice,  and  will   look   into   the   issue  of   their   citizenship.  He  will   also  compare  the  status  of  the  Jews  with  that  of  other  migrants  within  the  Italian  context  in  order  to  establish  how  their  origin,  profession  and  religion  influenced  their  legal  status.  

 

Luca  Fois,  RELMIN,  MSH,  University  of  Nantes,  France  

Title:  Physical  Separation  of  Jews  and  Christians  in  Papal  Legislation  and  the  Legal  Commentaries  of  Italian  Jurists.  

Abstract:  Papal  legislation  concerning  the  physical  separation  of  Jews  and  Christians  will  be  discussed  in  the  paper.  The  survey  of  the  well-­‐known  pontifical  laws  on  the  Jewish-­‐Christian  cohabitation  will  be  augmented  by  the  analysis  of  the  legal  commentaries  produced  in  such  university  centers  as  Padua,  Bologna,  and  the  papal  curia  itself.  Examining  this  legal  and  intellectual  tradition  concerning  Jewish-­‐Christian  interaction  will  provide   a   valuable   insight   into   the   medieval   legal   reasoning   on   religious   minorities   and   their   place   in  society.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002  

History  of  Jewish  Law  and  the  Law  of  the  Jews  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  John  Tolan  

 

Ahmed  Oulddali,  RELMIN,  MSH,  University  of  Nantes,  France  

Title:  Les  juifs  en  terre  d’Islam  :  réflexions  sur  le  statut  de  dhimmī.  

Abstract   :   Les   juifs   formaient   l’une  des  minorités   religieuses   importantes  du  monde  musulman  médiéval.  Bien  que  moins  nombreux  que  les  chrétiens  et   les  zoroastriens,   ils  étaient  présents  à  peu  près  sur  tout  le  territoire.   Dans   certaines   régions,   le   judaïsme   était   même   devenu   la   deuxième   religion.   C’est   le   cas   au  Maghreb  à  partir  du  XIIIe  siècle.  En  tant  que  membres  d’une  confession  scripturaire  (ahl  al-­‐kitāb),  les  juifs  avaient   le   statut   de   «   protégés   »   (dhimmīs)   qui   leur   conférait   des   droits   tout   en   leur   imposant   des  obligations.   Parmi   les   droits   dont   ils   bénéficiaient   dans   ce   cadre,   il   y   a   le   libre   exercice   du   culte   et   une  certaine  autonomie  administrative  et  judiciaire.  Notre  communication  se  propose  de  réfléchir  sur  la  portée  et  les  limites  de  ce  statut.  Nous  y  intéressons  également  aux  évolutions  qu’a  connues  la  situation  des  juifs  en  terre  d’Islam.  

 

Nadezda  Koryakina,  RELMIN,  MSH,  University  of  Nantes,  France  

Title:  Jewish  residents  versus  Jewish  foreigners:  the  legal  status  of  a  minority  within  the  minority  in  medieval  Catalonia.    

Abstract:  This  paper  will  concentrate  on  the  legal  and  technical  sense  of  the  word  “status”  -­‐  the  legal  status  as  determined  by  legal  capacity  that  is  the  ability  to  be  the  subject  of  legal  rights  and  duties,  and  to  play  a  role   in   the   legal   system.   Basing   on   Hebrew   responsa   of   the   14th   century,   I   will   consider   the   relations  between  Jewish  residents  of  Medieval  Catalan  cities  and  Jewish   foreigners  arriving   to   those  cities   for   the  purpose   of   commercial   gain.   Some   of   the   questions   I   shall   raise   here   include:   Did   the   individuals   of   the  Jewish   minority   have   the   legal   status   of   “foreigners”?   In   particular,   what   was   the   status   of   minority  merchants?  Were  they  subjects  of  the  kingdom  or  lordship,  or  foreigners?  Did  they  preserve  their  liberties  as  residents  of  their  native  cities  or  they  had  to  submit  to  the  exclusive  jurisdiction  of  the  court  in  the  city  where   they   engaged   in   commercial   activities?   To  what   extent   they   contributed   to   the   tax   paying   in   the  foreign  cities?  What  was  the  primary  criteria  for  their  identification  –  belonging  to  the  Jewish  people  or  to  the  population  of  a  particular  city?  On  the  other  hand,   it  will  be  shown  that   the   rights  of   the   Jewish  city  residents  vs  Jewish  foreigners  were  guaranteed  by  the  Jewish  law.  They  were  protected  by  local  regulations  limiting   the  duration  of   foreigners’   stay   in   the   city  and  by   the   right  of   local   Jewish  authorities   to   impose  taxes  on  the  property  of  the  foreign  businessmen  found  within  the  city  limits.  I  will  also  look  at  the  statutes  of   the   foreigners   in   the   laws   of   Jewish   minority,   i.e.   in   Talmudic   laws   interpreted   by   the   authors   of  rabbinical  responsa  and  the  status  attributed  to  the  Christian  authorities.  It  can  also  be  examined  to  what  extent  the  regulations  concerning  foreigners  in  the  Christian  laws  were  taken  into  account  by  Jewish  legal  experts.  Ultimately  the  following  question  needs  to  be  answered  as  a  conclusion:  did  the  Jewish  minority  constitute  a  distinctive  legal  entity  within  the  public  legal  realm  of  Catalan  cities?  

 

Marisa  Bueno  Sánchez,  RELMIN,  MSH,  University  of  Nantes,  France  

Title:  Urban  Space  Divided?  The  Encounters  of  Religious  and  Civic  Spheres  in  Medieval  Castilian  Towns.  

Abstract:  This  paper  deals  with  the  analysis  of  the  cohabitation  of  Christians  and  Jews  in  Medieval  Ages  and  the  origin  of  physical  frontiers  and  the  origin  of  separate  neighborhoods  for  Christians  and  Jews  in  Medieval  Hispanic   societies.   It   will   be   offer   some   perspectives   regarding   this   situation   in   some   Castilian   Cities  (Burgos,  Toledo,  Ciudad  Real…),  showing  the  contradiction  between  official  prescriptions  and  real  society,  through  documents  by  both   the  Church  and  Crown  and  Archive  documents  which  often  shed  a  different  light  on  the  issue  that  what  the  specific  laws  and  rules  concerning  cohabitation  and  the  use  of  urban  space.  In   fact   on   the   level   of   everyday   life   activities,   there   were   numerous   contacts   and   in   many   cities   many  groups  live  together  as  neighbors  and  not  as  religious  enemies  despite  much  polemic  to  the  contrary.  

 

Emese  Kozma,  Humboldt  University,  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:   Methods   for   the   Study   of   Parallels   in   Medieval   Ashkenazi   Jewish   and   Latin   Christian   Penitential  Practice  

Abstract:   The   lecture   will   present   methods   for   the   study   of   parallel   phenomena   in   medieval   Ashkenazi  Jewish  and  Latin  Christian  penitential   systems  within  a   framework,  which  models   the   relation  of   the   two  cultures  as   “competitive   cultural   attitudes”  and   “competitive   religious   values”,   given   the   fact   that   in   this  time   in   Western   Europe   the   Jews   not   only   lived   among   Christians,   but   the   Christian   culture   became   a  challenge   for   their   religious  values   for   the   first   time   in  history.  As   for  channels,   the  possibility  of  mutual,  even   literary   influences   can   not   be   excluded:   everyday   contact   and   discussions   with   each   other   in   the  vernacular   language  between  individuals  of  the  two  communities  may  have  served  as  a  medium  of  these  influences.   The   methods   within   this   framework   include   systematic,   comparative   phenomenological  description  of   individual,  parallel  elements   in   the  two  systems,   the  establishment  of  similar  and  different  motives   etc.   The  methods  will   be   illustrated  by   examples   (e.   g.   penance   for  murder,   adulterous  woman,  apostate,  private  confession  etc.).  

 

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

History  of  Jewish  Law  and  the  Law  of  the  Jews  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  Jerzy  Mazur  

 

Tirza  Kelman,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Different  Motives  Similar  Outcomes:  R.  Joseph  Caro's  Organization  of  Knowledge  

Abstract:  For  over  three  decades  beginning  in  1522,  R.  Joseph  Caro  was  creating  his  halakhic  magnum  opus-­‐  the   Beit   Yosef.   Soon   after   he   finished   writing   this   monumental   work,   he   wrote   the   well-­‐known   shorter  Shulkhan  Arukh  wich  he  himself  described  as  a  summary  of  the  Beit  Yosef.  It  is  clearly  necessary  to  examine  R.  Joseph  Caro's  project  in  the  light  of  the  important  researched  developments  concerning  the  organization  of   knowledge   in   the   early   modern   period.   In   doing   so,   very   interesting   similarities   and   significant  differences   emerge.   I   shall   explain   these   in   the   light   of   my   assessment   of   R.   Joseph   Caro's   work   and  declared  motives.  

 

Carsten  Wilke,  Central  European  University,  Budapest,  Hungary  

Title:   Abraham   Gomes   Silveyra   (1656-­‐1741):   a   Sephardi   Theologian   at   the   Crossroads   of   Religious  Modernities  

Abstract:   One   of   the   most   elaborate   theological   defenses   ever   written   in   favor   of   Judaism   against  Christianity   is   due   to   the   Amsterdam   preacher   and   poet   Abraham   Gomes   Silveyra   (1656-­‐1741),   who  represents   a   Jewish   facet   of   early   Enlightenment   thought.   His   monumental   apology   of   more   than   four  thousand  folio  pages,  written  during  the  first  quarter  of  the  eighteenth  century  in  baroque-­‐age  Spanish  and  named  Silveyradas  after  himself,  survives  in  three  manuscripts,  respectively   in  possession  of  the  Ets  Haim  Seminary  of  Amsterdam,  the  Royal  Library  of  The  Hague,  and  an  American  private  collector.  Reacting  to  the  missionary  advances  of  an  exiled  Huguenot  pastor,  Isaac  Jacquelot  (1647-­‐1708),  Silveyra's  first  volume  gives  a  translation  of  the   latter's  Dissertations  sur   le  Messie,  the  second  imagines  a  dialogue  with  the  Christian  adversary,   the   third   formulates   objections,   the   fourth   judges   the   controversy,   the   fifth   asks   counter-­‐questions,  and  a  final  volume  adds  a  reasoned  index  of  theological  loci  and  authorities.  Silveyra  framed  his  huge   series   around   1725   by   a   seventh,   preliminary   volume   dealing   with   the   rules   of   interreligious  controversy  and   the  ethics  of   tolerance.  Though  an  article  by  Henry  Méchoulan   (1992)  has  made  known  this  part  of  the  Silveyradas,  the  bulk  of  the  work  has  remained  unstudied.  In  the  framework  of  an  ongoing  research   project,   my   lecture   will   deal   with   the   cross-­‐cultural   effort   undertaken   by   this   Spanish-­‐born  controversist,  who  writes  with  the  rhetorics  and  witticisms  of  Iberian  Golden  Age  literature,  reflects  a  vast  reading   in   the  different   dogmatic   strands  of   post-­‐Reformation  Christian   theology,   and   is   also   among   the  first   Jewish   authors   to   discuss   the   implications   of   Descartes,   Spinoza   and   Bayle   for   religious   thought.  Silveyra  used  his  expertise  in  various  types  of  non-­‐Jewish  discourse  in  order  to  propose  a  defensive  alliance  of  all  faiths  against  the  new  threat  by  a  common  enemy,  irreligion.  

 

Yoreh  Tanhum,  York  University,  Canada  

Title:  Abrahamic  Approaches  to  Wastefulness  

Abstract:  Environmentalism  has  not  yet  made  significant   inroads   into  religious  praxis,  due,   in  part,   to   the  inability  to  find  a  common  language  between  environmentalists  and  religious  communities.  The  prohibition  against  waste  and  wanton  destruction  is  well-­‐developed  in  the  Jewish  tradition.  Studying  the  evolution  of  this  prohibition  provides   insight   into   the  historical,   cultural   and   linguistic  development  of  what  might  be  considered  one  of  Western  culture's  first  environmental  concepts.  The  prohibition  against  wastefulness  is  not  limited  to  the  Jewish  tradition,  but  can  be  found  throughout  the  Abrahamic  traditions.  The  prevalence  of  an  anti-­‐waste  concept   in  the  Hebrew  Bible  (e.g.  Genesis  9:5  and  Deuteronomy  20:19),  New  Testament  (e.g.  John  6:12)  and  Quran  (e.g.  Al-­‐Anaam,  verse  141;  Al-­‐Araf,  verse  31)  offers  a  common  point  of  reference  between  East  and  West.  There  are  many  such  commonalities  between  the  Abrahamic  traditions.  From  an  environmental  perspective,  however,  the  prohibition  against  wastefulness   is  arguably  the  most   important  ethic.   In   this   paper   I  will   present   narratives   from  all   three  major  Abrahamic   traditions   that   demonstrate  

both   environmentally   positive   and   environmentally   questionable   behaviour  with   regard   to  wastefulness.  This  paper  argues  that  one  reason  that  the  prohibition  against  wastefulness  has  not  been  fully  championed  by  adherents  of  these  faiths  is  because  of  the  checkered  history  of  these  traditions  specifically  with  regard  to  this  prohibition.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

History  of  Jewish  Law  and  the  Law  of  the  Jews  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Joshua  Teplitzky  

 

Jay  Berkovitz,  University  of  Massachusetts  Amherst,  USA  

Title:  The  Social  Foundations  of  Legal  Pluralism:  Litigation  and  Jurisprudence  in  the  Pinkas  of  the  Beit  Din  of  Metz,  1771-­‐1789  

Abstract:  The  records  of  the  rabbinic  court  of  Metz  (1771-­‐1789)  contain  the  rudiments  of  a  new  historical  narrative   that   varies   substantially   from   traditional   accounts   of   the   relationship   between   Jews   and   the  surrounding   society.   In   contrast   to  prescriptive   legal   codes,  and  unlike   responsa   that  advance  arguments  based  on  nuanced  readings  of  earlier  legal  opinions,  rabbinic  court  records  provide  clear  images  of  law  as  it  was  practiced  and  of  life  as  it  was  lived.  Brimming  with  details  regarding  the  behavior  of   litigants  and  the  conduct  of  the  court,  the  Pinkas  of  the  Metz  Beit  Din  offers  an  exceptional  opportunity  to  investigate  the  interrelationship  between   law  and   society.   This   paper   seeks   to  demonstrate   the   value   that   these   largely  neglected  records  offer  both  to  historians  and  legal  scholars.   In  remarkable  detail,  the  proceedings  of  the  Metz   Beit   Din   contain   conclusive   evidence   that   the   engagement   of   Jews   with   the   legal   and   economic  dimensions  of  the  society  around  them  was  far  greater  than   is  generally  assumed.  Examples  of  economic  interaction   and   commercial   collaborations  with  members   of   the   general   non-­‐Jewish   population   abound.  Like   their   non-­‐Jewish   neighbors,  Metz   Jews  were   compliant  with   the   encroaching   bureaucratic   demands  imposed  by  state  and  municipal  authorities.  To  protect  their  legal  interests,  whether  in  the  French  courts  or  in  the  Beit  Din,  they  often  consulted  French  lawyers.  Moreover,  Jewish  women  took  an  active  part   in  the  pursuit  of  justice  through  litigation.  Approximately  twenty-­‐five  percent  of  the  suits  brought  before  the  Beit  Din  were  initiated  by  women  and  roughly  forty  percent  of  the  cases  recorded  in  the  Pinkas  involved  women  either  as  claimants  or  defendants.  From  the  standpoint  of   law,  the   judicial  practices  of   the  Metz  Beit  Din  represent  a  striking  counter-­‐example  to  the  dominant  historiographical  assessment  of  Jewish  autonomy  in  the   Middle   Ages   and   early   modern   period.   This   assessment   closely   resembled   the   self-­‐image   of   the  Kehillah,  which   rested  on   the   illusion  of   communal   self-­‐reliance   and   self-­‐containment.   Although   rabbinic  courts  were  never  the  exclusive  forum  for  the  adjudication  of  civil  disputes,  communities  in  early  modern  Ashkenaz   struggled   persistently   to   sustain   the   myth   of   judicial   exclusivity.   The   Metz   Beit   Din,   quite  remarkably,   signified   a   dramatic   turnabout   from   the   paradigm   that   typified   Jewish   self-­‐government   and  adjudication   in   the   preceding   decades.   In   the   last   third   of   the   eighteenth   century,   as   Metz   communal  leaders   became   more   attentive   to   the   complex   relationship   that   drew   the   Jews,   the   state,   and   French  society   together,   the   rabbinic  court  proved   itself   responsive   to  practical  demands  and  to  shifting  cultural  

affinities   by   adapting   to   a   world   of  multiple   jurisdictions   of   comparable   validity.   Implicit   in   the   rabbinic  court’s   adaptational   approach   was   the   acknowledgement   that   the   Jewish   population   was   heavily  dependent  on   the   surrounding   society  not  only   for   its  economic  well-­‐being  but  also   for   the   innumerable  services   that   it   could   not   provide   for   itself.   The   degree   of   social,   economic,   and   cultural   integration  experienced  by  the  Jews  of  Metz  entailed  the  fostering  of  a  working  relationship  between  the  Jewish  and  French  judiciaries.  

 

Rachel  Furst,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Unrecorded  Justice:  The  Record-­‐Keeping  Practices  of  Medieval  Jewish  Courts    

Abstract:   Among   historians   of   pre-­‐modern   European   Jewry,   the   past   decade   has   witnessed   a   renewed  interest  in  the  Jewish  courts  of  medieval  Germany;  however,  both  new  and  older  scholarship  has  focused  mainly   on   the   formal   structure   of   this   parochial   court   system  and   far   less   on  what   happened   inside   the  courtrooms.  This  tendency  can  be  attributed  primarily  to  the  nature  of  available  sources.  The  only  surviving  court  records  from  medieval  Ashkenaz  are  fragments  preserved   in   legal  responsa.  Jewish  courts  did   issue  written  documents,  from  deeds  of  sale  to  bills  of  divorce;  but  litigants  were  expected  to  preserve  their  own  copies,  and  the  court  did  not  maintain  an  official  archive  or  repository  of  records.    This  was  not  an  illiterate  society,   and   the   lack   of   record-­‐keeping   raises   fascinating   questions   about   the   significance   of   judicial  precedent,   the   importance  of   oral   transmission,   and   the   institutional   nature  of   Jewish   courts   during   this  period.   In   the   absence   of   court   records,   how   did   communities   remember   who   had   been   divorced,   or  disenfranchised,   or   declared   illegitimate?     If   the   court   itself   did   not   remember   how   it   ruled,   how   did  laypeople  acquire  knowledge  of  the   law,  and  how  helpful  was  the  knowledge  they  did  acquire?    How  did  the  lack  of  records  affect  a  local  court’s  claims  to  knowledge  and  authority?  These  types  of  questions  have  been  debated  by  medievalists  since  the  publication  of  Michael  Clanchy’s  From  Memory  to  Written  Record  in  1979  but  have  only  recently  garnered  attention  in  the  subfield  of  medieval  Jewish  history.    The  proposed  paper  is  an  attempt  to  consider  the  implications  of  judicial  record-­‐keeping  (or  lack  thereof)  among  the  Jews  of  medieval  Germany  and  its  significance  for  our  understanding  of  Jewish  communal  autonomy,  which  has  often  centered  on  judicial  independence.  

 

Verena  Kasper-­‐Marienberg,  University  of  Graz,  Austria  

Title:   Reflections   of   Jewish   Daily   Life   in   Non-­‐Jewish   Court   Records:   Case   Studies   from   the   Early  Modern  Viennese  Supreme  Court  

Abstract:  Jewish  litigation  in  non-­‐Jewish  courts  of  the  early  modern  period  is  a  highly  discussed  topic  in  the  current   research   of   Jewish   life   throughout   Europe.   Although   we   are   only   beginning   to   gather   statistical  information  regarding  this  phenomenon,  it  is  already  clear  that  it  was  a  widespread  one,  involving  all  social  strata  of  Jewish  society.  This  fact  challenges  not  only  the  common  narratives  of  the  cultural  separation  of  Jewish   communities   from   their   Christian   surroundings,   but   also   the   previously   believed   ideas   about  hierarchical  structures  and  mechanisms  within  Jewish  communities.  The  Imperial  Supreme  Court  in  Vienna  —   like  other  European   local  and  higher  courts—  saw  a  peak  of   Jewish   litigation  during   the  18th  century.  This  presentation  will  highlight  previously  unknown  forms  and  quantities  of  cases  involving  Jewish  men  and  women  at   this   court.   Furthermore,   it  will   investigate   the  potential   of   these   records   as   sources  of   Jewish  daily  life  and  social  practice,  especially  in  their  communal  dimension.  Cases  from  the  Jewish  community  of  Frankfurt   on   the  Main  will   serve   as   examples   for   possible   internal   Jewish   conflicts   that   reached   Gentile  courts.  With  them,  we  can  widen  our  knowledge  about  the  early  modern  Jewish  use  of  competing  judiciary  systems  within  and  outside  the  Jewish  world.  

 

Evelyne  Oliel-­‐Grausz,  Université  Paris  1  Panthéon  Sorbonne/EHESS,  Paris  

Title:   The   Court   of   the  Massari   in   18th   Century   Livorno:   Jewish   Autonomy,   Delegated   Justice,   and   Legal  Pluralism  

Abstract:  According  to  the  privileges  granted  to  the  Jews  by  the  Livornina  in  1593,  the  Massari  (lay  leaders  of   the   community)  were  granted   jurisdiction  over   civil   and   criminal   cases   involving   Jews.  The   jurisdiction  and   the   judicial   procedure   underwent   some   significant   transformations   during   the   17th   century:   the  prerogatives  of   the  Massari  were   restricted   in   criminal   cases,   an  appellate  massari   court  developed,   and  internal  rules  were  established  around  1680  as  to  which  cases  should  be   judged  according  to  Jewish   law,  and  which  according  to  mercantile  and  local  customs.  In  every  respect,  the  court  of  the  Massari  functioned  in  theory  as  an  exclusive  first   instance  Jewish  court  on  the  basis  of  a  delegation  of   justice  granted  by  the  Grand  Duke.  However,  the  Massari  court  records,  the  supplications  addressed  to  the  Grand  ducal  authority  and   the   records  of   the   local   courts   show  a  definite  discrepancy  between  norm  and  practice.  Despite   the  supposedly  autonomous  jurisdiction  of  the  Massari,  court  shopping,  law  hopping  even  between  Jewish  law  and  mercantile  customs,  and  attempts  at  evading  the  judicial  authority  of  the  Massari  were  common.  We  will  argue  that  legal  pluralism  offers  a  more  relevant  frame  of  interpretation  than  the  classical  concept  of  autonomy,  and  that  the  court  of  the  Massari  can  only  be  understood  when  analyzed  within  the  context  of  the  Tuscan  judicial  system,  of  which  it  is  an  integral  part.  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  12  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  Languages  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Judeo-­‐Neo-­‐Aramaic  

Organizers:    Ofra  Tirosh-­‐Becker  &  Geoffrey  Khan  

Chair:  Ofra  Tirosh  Becker  

 

Geoffrey  Khan,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:  The  Jewish  Neo-­‐Aramaic  Dialects  

Abstract:  In  this  paper  I  give  a  survey  of  the  current  state  of  research  on  the  Jewish  Neo-­‐Aramaic  dialects.  These  were  originally  spoken  by  Jews  in  northern  Iraq  and  western  Iran.  They  are  now  highly  endangered,  since  all  the  Aramaic-­‐speaking  Jews  have  left  their  original  places  of  residence  and  have  now  mostly  settled  in  Israel.  The  Jewish  Neo-­‐Aramaic  dialects  are  distinguished  from  the  Christian  dialects  in  their  grammatical  structure  and  their  lexicon,  which  includes  a  Hebrew  component.  They  can  be  classified  into  two  broad  sub-­‐groups,  the  'lishana  deni'  group  and  the  'trans-­‐Zab  group'.  All  dialects  exhibit  ergativity   in  their  perfective  verbal  forms,  but  the  typology  of  this  ergativity  differs  across  the  two  sub-­‐groups.  

 

Eran  Cohen,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Genitive  Constructions  in  Neo-­‐Aramaic  and  the  Ezafe  Construction  in  Kurdish  

Abstract:   The   Jewish   Neo-­‐Aramaic   dialect   of   Zakho   shows   a   unique   situation   with   regard   to   genitive  constructions,  compared  with  all  other  modern  Semitic  languages,  including  former  phases  of  Aramaic.  The  functional   extent  of   these   constructions   is   analogous   to  Akkadian,   four   thousand   years   ago.   This   striking  similarity  between  a  modern  Aramaic  dialect  and  the  most  ancient  phase  of  Semitic  cannot  be  explained  genealogically,  since  there  is  no  evidence  that  Aramaic  in  its  various  phases  has  ever  shown  this  dexterity  of  marking  the  dependent  in  its  genitive  constructions.  The  solution  is  to  be  sought  in  language  contact  with  Northern  Kurdish   (Kurmanjî)  whose  ezafe   constructions   share   some  similarities  with   the  dialect  of   Zakho  and  thus  may  account  for  the  current  state  of  affairs  in  the  latter.  The  paper  describes  the  highlights  of  the  genitive  construction  in  the  Jewish  dialect  of  Zakho  and  the  ezafe  construction  in  Kurmanjî,  and  discusses  the   possibility   that   the   current   state   of   affairs   in   Zakho   exists   mostly   thanks   to   the   situation   in  Kurmanjî.10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break.  

 

Lali  Guledani  &  Tamar  Kurtanidze,  Ilia  State  University,  Tbilisi  Georgia  

Title:  Pronouns  and  Pronominal  Suffixes  in  the  Neo-­‐Aramaic  of  Jews  from  Salmas  

Abstract:   In   this   article   we   would   like   to   discuss   structure   of   Pronouns   and   pronominal   suffixes   in   the  speech  of  Jews  from  Salmas.  We  will  try  to  perform  the  forms  which  are  used  nowadays  by  native  speakers,  

to  discuss  particularities  of  the  pronouns  and  pronominal  suffixes  in  this  Neo  Aramaic  language  and  also  to  compare  them  to  the  forms  existing  in  the  texts  recorded  by  Rubens  Duval  in  the  beginning  of  the  19th  C.  The  texts  for  our  research  are  recorded  from  the  native  speakers,  who  were  born  in  Georgia  or  in  Iran  and  mostly   are   be-­‐   or   trilingual.  We   also  will   try   to   find   influence  of   other   languages   of   environment   on   the  structure,   formation  and  function  of  the  pronouns  and  pronominal  suffixes   in  the  Neo  Aramaic  Dialect  of  Jews  of  Salmas.  The  article  is  the  part  of  the  PhD  work,  which  is  supposed  to  study  phonetic,  morphology  and  syntax  of  this  particular  dialect.  

 

Session:  002  

Jewish  Languages  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Jewish  Languages  

Organizers:  Ofra  Tirosh-­‐Becker  &  Geoffrey  Khan  

 

Chair:  Geoffrey  Khan  

 

Reuven  Enoch,  Ariel  University  of  Samaria,  Israel  

Title:  Passive  Forms  of  Possibility  (Potential)  and  Caution  in  Judeo-­‐Georgian  

Abstract:   In  Georgian  language  forms  of  passive  voice  with  a  prefix  “E”,  occasionally  with  a  prefix  “I”,  can  provide  different  nuances  of  meaning:  possibility  -­‐  caution  of  doing  action  (“metamasheba  bavshvi”  –  “child  is   playing  with  me”,   but   “kals   ar   etamasheba   chadraki”   –   “women   can’t   play   chess   “),   willingness   to   do  action   (“emgereba   bichs”   –   boy   wants   to   sing   “),   position   of   a   person   doing   action   towards   this   action    (“mebevreba  mag  pasi”  –  “I  think  it’s  too  expensive”)  etc.  In  Judeo-­‐Georgian,  the  use  of  such  forms  is  much  more  widespread  than  in  Georgian.  Almost  all  forms  of  passive  voice  with  a  prefix  “E”  can  have  nuances  of  potential,  either  permitting  or  prohibiting  action.  For  example,  in  the  material  that  I  recorded  in  Kutaisi  in  1976   there   is   such   a   dialog:   ”Abel   kal   tma   geeshleba?”   (is   the  women   in  mourning   allowed   to   open  her  hair?)  –  “ras  ambob,  arc  geeshleba  da  arc  deebarcxneba!”   (What  are  you  talking  about;  she  cannot  open  her   hair   or   brush   it).   Apparently,   this   is   connected   to   excessive   regulation   of   life   of   Georgian   Jews   –  according   to   religious   laws,   their   customs   and   prejudices.   These   factors   determine  what   is   allowed   and  what  is  prohibited.  

 

Ofra  Tirosh-­‐Becker,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  A  Judeo-­‐Arabic  Translation  of  the  Scroll  of  Antiochus  from  Ghardaia  (Algeria)  

Abstract:  The  Scroll  of  Antiochus,  also  known  as  the  Scroll  of  the  Hasmoneans,  is  a  popular  account  of  the  wars  of  the  Hasmoneans  and  of  the  origin  of  the  holiday  of  Ḥanukkah.  The  scroll  was  composed  in  Aramaic,  probably   in   Ereẓ   Israel   in   the   talmudic   period.   The   scroll   had  been   translated   into  Hebrew  and   also   into  Latin,  German,  Spanish,  Arabic  and  Persian.  A  North  African  Judeo-­‐Arabic  translation  of  this  scroll  was  first  published   in   1926   and   re-­‐published   in   1953   by   ‘Imran   Ṣaban   of   Ghardaia   (Algeria),   a   Jewish   community  which   lies  along   the  Wadi  Mzab   in   the  northern  Sahara  Desert.   This   community  had  a  unique  custom  of  reading   the   Judeo-­‐Arabic   translation   of   this   Scroll   in   the   synagogue   on   the   Sabbath   of   Ḥanukkah,  

immediately   after   reading   the   Torah   and   the   Hafṭara.   In   this   paper   we   will   discuss   the   Judeo-­‐Arabic  language  of  this  Judeo-­‐Arabic  translation  and  its  characteristic  features.  

 

Benjamin  Hary,  Emory  University,  Atlanta,  GA,  USA  

Title:  Loan  Translations  in  Egyptian  Judeo-­‐Arabic  

Abstract:  Many  Jewish  religiolects  share  a  special  literary  genre,  the  verbatim  translation  of  sacred  religious  and  liturgical  Hebrew/Aramaic  texts  into  the  various  Jewish  religiolects  (šarḥ,  pl.  šurūḥ,  in  Judeo-­‐Arabic;  šarʿ  or  šarḥ  in  Judeo-­‐Neo-­‐Aramaic;  tavsili  in  Judeo-­‐Georgian;  tefila  in  Judeo-­‐Italian;  tamsir  in  Jewish  Malayalam;  ladino   in   Judeo-­‐Spanish;   taytsh   in   Yiddish;   etc.).   The   translations   include   the   Bible,  Midrashic   literature,  Pirkei  Avot  (“Ethics  of  the  Patriarchs,”  a  tractate  of  moral  and  religious  teachings  from  the  Second  Temple  period  and  the  first  centuries  of  the  Common  Era),  the  Passover  Haggadah,  the  Siddur  or  prayer  book,  the  Talmud,  and  more.   In   these   translations   the  phenomenon  of   calque   translation   is  evident.  Borrowing,  or  the  introduction  of  linguistic  features  from  one  language  to  another,  is  common  in  the  texts  of  the  šurūḥ.  Borrowing   is   a   gradual   process:   first   a   linguistic   feature   is   introduced   into   the   host   language   through   a  bilingual  community  and  is  not  yet  adapted  phonologically  or  morphologically.  Once  it  is  integrated  into  the  host   language   and   adopted   by   the   monolingual   community,   it   becomes   part   of   the   host   language  (Mahootian  2006:  513).  One  type  of  borrowing   is  the   loan,  a  “linguistic  unit   (usually  a   lexical   item)  which  has  come  to  be  used  in  a  language  or  dialect  other  than  the  one  where  it  originated”  (Crystal  2003:  275).  According   to  Crystal,   there   are   several   kinds  of   loan  processes:   loan  words,   loan  blends,   loan   shifts,   and  loan   translations.   Loan   translations  are   common   in   Jewish   religiolects;   for  example,   the  phrase   “may  her  memory  be  for  a  blessing”  in  Jewish  English  (Benor)  which  literally  translates  the  Hebrew  /zixrona  livraxa/.  This  paper  investigates  loan  translations,  which  are  also  known  as  “calque  translations,”  in  Egyptian  Judeo-­‐Arabic  and  especially  in  18th-­‐  and  19th-­‐century  šurūḥ.  

 

Gabriel  M.  Rosenbaum,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Shabbat  (Saturday)  in  Modern  Egypt:  Customs  and  their  Reflection  in  Spoken  Judeo-­‐Arabic  

Abstract:   Egyptian   Jews,   especially   those  who   lived   in   popular   neighborhoods,   spoke   a   distinctive  Arabic  dialect  differing  in  a  number  of  respects  from  the  Arabic  spoken  by  their  Muslim  and  Christian  neighbors.  This  paper  is  based  on  some  sections  from  my  larger  study  done  in  recent  years  on  spoken  Egyptian  Judeo-­‐Arabic  in  the  twentieth  century.  The  materials  for  this  study  were  collected  from  a  large  number  of  native  speakers,  many  of  whom  are  no  longer  alive.  The  paper  describes  many  lexical   items  originating   in  either  Hebrew   or   Arabic   that   are   connected   to   traditions   and   customs   related   to   the   holy   day   of   Shabbat  (Saturday);  some  of  these  items  are  in  a  mixed  style  (Hebrew-­‐Arabic).  This  vocabulary,  shared  by  the  Jews  of  Egypt,  was  not  understood  by  their  non-­‐Muslim  neighbors.  The  paper  also  refers  to  some  grammatical  peculiarities  of  this  unique  vocabulary.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Jewish  Languages  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Nouvelles  recherches  sur  la  haketía:  langue,  histoire  et  littérature  

Organizer  :  Line.  Amselem  

Chair:  

 

Jacob  Bentolila,  The  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Humour  et  invention  dans  le  lexique  de  la  Haketía    

Abstract:   Ayant   préparé   un   dictionnaire   sur   l'élément   hébraïque   dans   la   Haketía   (le   Judeo-­‐espagnol   de  l'Afrique   du   Nord)   j'ai   constaté   plusieurs   cas   d'invention   ou   innovation   lexicales   où   se   distingue   une  intention   humoristique.   Dans   ma   communication   je   vais   présenter   brièvement   la   conception   de   mon  dictionnaire  en  général  et,  en  particulier,  un  compte  rendu  de  ces  cas  spécifiques.  

 

Line  Amselem,  Université  de  Valenciennes  et  du  Hainaut-­‐Cambrésis,  France  

Title:  "Yahasrá.  Escenas  haquetiescas  de  Solly  Lévy  (Montréal,  E.  D.  I.  J.,  1992)  :  solennité  et  comique  de  la  première  œuvre  publiée  en  haketía."  

Abstract:  La  haketía,  langue  judéo-­‐espagnole  du  Maroc,  est  demeurée  principalement  orale  jusqu’au  départ  de  la  plupart  des  juifs  du  Nord  du  Maroc  dans   la  seconde  moitié  du  XXe  siècle.  Le  premier  auteur  à  avoir  véritablement  écrit  et  publié   son  œuvre  en  haketía  est  Solly  Lévy  avec  son   recueil  de  saynètes  comiques  Yahasrá  (1992).  Nous  voulons  présenter  l’origine  du  projet,  son  contexte,  le  caractère  fondateur,  mémoriel,  voire  politique  de  la  publication,  malgré  sa  tonalité  à  dominante  comique.  

 

Paloma  Díaz-­‐Mas,  CSIC,  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  Attitudes  des  écrivains  et  des  journalistes  espagnols  concernant  la  haketía  

Abstract:  La  présence  coloniale  espagnole  en  Afrique  du  Nord  depuis  le  milieu  du  XIXe  siècle  a  contribué  à  la  connaissance  de  l'existence  des  séfarades  du  Maroc  par  les  Espagnols.  Bien  qu'il  existe  des  études  sur  les  attitudes   des   Espagnols   vers   la   haketía   après   les   premiers   contacts   en   1860,   l'attitude   vers   la   haketia   à  l'époque  du  Protectorat  espagnol  du  Maroc  (1912-­‐1956)  a  été  moins  étudiée.  Dans  cette  communication,  nous   analysons   comment   la   haketía   a   été   traitée   dans   le   oeuvres   des   écrivains   et   des   journalistes  espagnols,  avec  une  attention  particulière  à  l'époque  du  Protectorat.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

Jewish  Languages    

16.00-­‐18.00  

Ladino  

 

Chair:  

 

David  Bunis,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Jewish-­‐Turkish  Linguistic  Encounters  in  the  Ottoman  Empire  

Abstract:  From  the  very  establishment  of   the  Sephardic  exile  communities   in   the  Ottoman  Empire  at   the  end  of  the  fifteenth  century  through  the  twenty-­‐first  century,  Judezmo  (Ladino)  speakers  have   interacted  with   speakers   of   Turkish.   That   interaction   led   to   incorporation   of   thousands   of   Turkish   elements   in  Judezmo.  The  proposed  paper  focuses  on  the  earliest  period  of  the  Jewish-­‐Turkish  linguistic  encounter,  and  the  beginnings  of  the  Turkish  component  in  Judezmo.  

 

Ora  Schwarzwald,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Ladino  Shulḥan  Hapanim  and  Ḥovat  Halevavot:  Thessaloniki  1568  and  Venice  1713  

Abstract:  Two  important  Jewish  books  were  first  published  in  Thessaloniki  in  1568:  Mesa  de  el  alma  (MA;  in  Hebrew  Shulḥan  Hapanim),  and  Ḥovat  Halevavot   'Duty  of  the  Hearts'   (HL).  While  MA  deals  with   issues  of  Halakha,  HL  is  about  Jewish  moral  behavior.  Both  books  were  translations  from  Hebrew  into  Ladino:  MA  by  Meir   Benvenisti   from   Shulḥan   Arukh   by   Yosef   Karo,   and   HL   by   Zadiq   Formon   from   Ibn   Tibon's   Hebrew  translation  of  Bahye  Ibn  Paquda's  book  written  in  (Judeo-­‐)Arabic.  Both  books  were  printed  again  in  Venice  in   1713,   and   there   are   considerable   linguistic   differences   between   these   and   their   earlier   Thessaloniki  versions   (letter   orthography,   vocalization   systems,   choice   of   words,   choice   of   biblical   verses,   and   the  general  setup  of  the  texts).  These  differences  will  be  described  in  detail  and  possible  explanations  for  these  differences  will  be  presented:  the  change  in  the  Judeo-­‐Spanish  language  between  the  times  of  publication;  translation  principle  of  explicitation  and  normalization  in  the  later  texts;  and  source  vs.  target  population  of  the  various  Sephardic  communities  in  Thessaloniki  and  Venice.  

 

Katja  Smid,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Ladino  Practical  Guides  for  Ritual  Slaughter:  the  Case  of  Sefer  Zebah  Todah  (Belgrade,  1860)  

Abstract:   Practical   guides  of   religious  observance  written   from   the  16th   to   the  20th   century  by   Sephardi  Rabbis   in   Judeo-­‐Spanish   have   been   classified   within   the   framework   of   Ladino   rabbinical   literature   and,  despite   its   importance   in   Jewish   life,  have  barely  been   studied  until  now.  One  of   the  oldest   fragmentary  texts   to   be   preserved   in   Judeo-­‐Spanish,   Hilkhot   Shechita   uBediqa   (Constantinople,   circa   1514),   concerns  ritual  slaughter  laws  for  consumption,  and  the  examination  of  animals  according  to  Jewish  dietary  laws.  The  aim  of   this  presentation   is   to  examine  Sefer   Zebah  Todah,   an  aljamiado   (printed   in  Hebrew  Rashi   script)  Ladino  book  (82  pages)  dealing  in  a  comprehensive  way  with  animal  slaughter  laws.  The  work  was  originally  written  in  Hebrew  by  Yosef  ben  Abraham  Molkho,  and  later  translated  into  Judeo-­‐Spanish  by  Refael  Yosef  Ben   Sason   (Belgrade,   1860).   This   paper   will   discuss   the   halakhic   contents   of   the   book,   and   the   specific  Hebrew   and   Judeo-­‐Spanish   terminology   related   to   the   subject.   Ben   Sason’s   introduction   will   be  commented,   in   order   to   disclose   some   ritual,   communal,   geographical,   and   social   specificities   related   to  slaughtering  in  a  small  community  at  the  periphery  of  the  Ottoman  Empire,  and  the  difficulties  it  involved  in  the  mid-­‐19th-­‐century  Sephardi  community  of  Belgrade.  

 

Iskra  Dobreva,  University  of  Sofia,  Bulgaria  

Title:  Judeo-­‐Spanish  as  a  Reference  Point  to  Study  Common  Balkan  Vocabulary  

Abstract:  Unlike  other  Balkan  people,  Sephardic  Jews  were  never  dominated  or  conquered  by  the  Turks;  on  the  contrary,  they  were  welcomed  to  the  Ottoman  lands  and  took  over  quite  prestigious  positions  in  terms  of   their   religious   and   spiritual   freedom   and   autonomy,   and   also   in   judicial   and   economic   independence,  within  the  limits  of  the  respective  Sephardic  community.  This   led  to  the  positive  attitude  towards  Turkish  culture  and  language  and  later  on  in  the  XIX  and  XX  centuries  Turkish  vocabulary  was  reinforced  in  Ladino,  in   order   to   differentiate   it   from   Modern   Spanish.   Quite   the   opposite   occurred   in   the   other   Balkan  languages:  during  the  XIX  and  XX  century  a  common  purifying  trend  is  created  and  aimed  to  ‘cleaning’  the  languages  of   the  newly  established  national  states   from  the  old  Turkish  words  and  expressions,  although  even  today  many  remained  at  the  level  of  archaisms,  stylistically  marked  vocabulary,  etc.  and  still  in  the  XXI  century  thousands  of  words  of  Turkish  and  Greek  origin  exist  in  the  Balkan  languages.  The  Oriental  Judeo-­‐Spanish,  as  transferred  at  the  end  of  the  XV  century  by  Sephardic  Jews  escaping  from  the  Inquisition,  joined  the   Balkan   Linguistic   Area   later   than   the   other   Balkan   languages,   about   a   century   after   the   start   of   the  Turkish  linguistic  dominance,  due  to  economic,  political  and  social  reasons.  Simultaneously,  this  period  was  the   apogee   of   Ottoman   culture   and   the   time   of   most   intense   linguistic   borrowing   from   Turkish   to   the  Balkan  languages.  As  one  of  the  languages  of  the  Balkan  minorities,  side  by  side  with  Roma  and  Armenian,  Judeo-­‐Spanish   is   very   prolific   and   strategic   prism   to   target   Common   Balkan   Vocabulary,   as   Sephardic  communities  were  present   in  the  town  all  over  the  Balkan  Peninsula  and  Asia  Minor.  As   it   is  well  known,  normally,  urban  language  evolves  and  standardizes  much  faster  than  the  language  in  rural  areas.  Sephardic  communities  were  geographically  dispersed  across  the  Balkan  Peninsula,  Greek  islands  and  Mediterranean  coast   of   Asia   Minor.   But   they   were   keeping   personal,   cultural   and   trade   relations   between   these  communities  and  simultaneously,   they  were   in  contact  with  the   languages  spoken   in  the  respective  area,  namely  Greek,  Serbian,  Romanian,  Bulgarian,  etc.  The  presence  of  Latin/Romance  substrata  in  the  Balkans  is   very   strong   and   it   also   contributed   to   the   preservance   of   the   Judeo-­‐Spanish   in   the   Balkans.  Latin/Romance  substrata  existed  till   the  times  of  Roman  Empire,  Balkans  were  part  of  the  Roman  Empire  for   some   centuries   and   Latin,   beside   Greek   was   used   as   the   language   of   scripture   and   administrative-­‐military  order.  Modern  Romanian,  as   the   far  eastern  wing  of  Romances,  as  well   as  Dalmatian  which  was  actively  spoken  in  the  Western  coast  of  the  Balkan  Peninsula  until  the  XVth  century  and  later  declined  until  its  final  disappearance  at  the  end  of  the  XIXth  century,  are  enough  to  name  some  of  the  Balkan  Romance  languages.   Several   toponyms   and   direct   Latin   borrowings   throughout   the   Balkan   places   and   languages  prove   the   solid   existence   of   Latin/Romance   substrata.   Same   refers   to   Greek   substrata   and   direct  borrowings,   which   were   hugely   spread   at   the   Ibero-­‐Romance   varieties   at   the   end   of   the   XVth   century,  Judeo-­‐Spanish  being  one  of   these   varieties.  When   Judeo-­‐Spanish   joined   the  Balkan   linguistic  Area   at   the  end  of  the  XVth  century,  it  found  a  fertile  soil  enriched  with  Greek  and  Roman  substrata.  Unlike  the  other  Balkan  languages,  which  were  local  or  more  precisely  slowly  introduced  within  the  Balkan  Linguistic  Area,  Judeo-­‐Spanish  is  an  imported  language.  It  was  transferred  by  Sephardic  migrants  in  relatively  short  period  from   one   geographic,   political-­‐economic   and   socio-­‐cultural   reality   (the   Iberian   kingdoms   of   Castile   and  Aragon,  Portugal,  Navarre,   etc.)   to   another,   namely   the  Ottoman  Empire.  Moreover,   this   event  occurred  comparatively  late,  since  the  end  of  the  XVth  century  onwards.  These  are  some  of  the  main  factors  which  led  me  to  assume  and  take  the  Oriental  variety  Judeo-­‐Spanish  as  a  reference  point  to  identify  and  analyze  the  Common  Balkan  Vocabulary.  Common  Balkan  Vocabulary  includes  thousands  of  items.  This  vocabulary  does   not   only   include   words   from   Turkish   and   Greek   origin,   but   also   from   French,   Italian   and   other  European  origin.  Original  Sephardic  texts  from  the  XIX  and  XX  centuries,  as  well  as  bilingual  dictionaries  are  used  to  illustrate  this  phenomenon.  

 

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  13  

 

Session:  001:  

Contemporary  Jewish  History  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Shifting  Paradigms  Changing  tradition  

 

Chair:  

 

Ido  Harari,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Re-­‐Orienting  Jews:  conversion,  orientalism  and  the  struggle  to  disjoin  Europe    

Abstract:   In  my  paper  I  would  like  to  examine  some  of  the  ways   in  which  the  move  of  Jews  from  secular,  assimilated  environments  towards  orthodox  religious  observance  has  served  as  a  political  form  of  rejection  and  subversion  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  the  idea  of  Europe  during  the  first  half  of  the  20th  century.  This  examination  will  take  place  through  the  conversion  narratives  of  four  people,  all  raised  in  Jewish  families  during  the  second  half  of  the  19th  century;  all  held,  at  some  point  in  their  early  lives,  non-­‐observant  identities  while  based  in  western-­‐central  Europe;  and  all  embraced,  sometime  in  their   later   life,  orthodox  religion  in  faith,  practice  and  visibility  –  an  embrace  that  was  in  all  cases  accompanied  by  a  certain  "turn  eastward"  and  by  writing  positioning   them   in   opposition   to   the   European   values   underlying   their   previous   lives.   Three   of   these  people  became  Haredi  (Ultra-­‐Orthodox)  Jews:  Nathan  Birnbaum  (1864-­‐1937),  born  in  Vienna  to  immigrants  from  Polish  Galicia;   Jiří   (Mordechai  Gerogo)  Langer   (1894-­‐1943),  born   in  Prague   to  an  assimilated   family;  and  Jacob  Israël  de  Haan  (1881-­‐1924),  born  in  northern  Holland  to  an  observant  family.  The  fourth  became  a  Muslim:  Muhammad  Asad  (1900-­‐1992),  born  as  Leopold  Weiss  in  Galician  Lvov  and  moving  to  Vienna  in  his  late  teens.  In  the  proposed  paper  I  would  like  to  offer  the  above-­‐mentioned  narratives  a  reading  which  sees   them   as   occupying   a   position   of   both   expressions   of   emergent   subaltern   thought   and   subjects   to  analysis   through   the   prism   of   later   postcolonial   theory.   This   reading   is   based   on   explicit   anti-­‐European  sentiments   expressed   in   their   texts,   accompanied   by   erudite   critique   of   what   they   saw   as  western/European  values  –  thus  deliberately  placing  their  writers  in  different  locations  "outside  the  fold"  of  early   20th   century   mainstream   West-­‐European   Jewry   –   just   as   it   recognizes   substantial   elements   of  conventional  European  modes  of  thought  directing  various  aspects  of  their  reflection  about  their  religious  and   cultural   re-­‐orientation.   However,   in   my   paper   I   hope   to   show   that   despite   the   undeniable   (and  understandable)   "western"   strands   in   their   writings   and   worldviews   (worldviews   which   were   also   very  different  from  one  another  in  ways  I  cannot  begin  to  discuss  here),  they  all  offer  radical  reformulations  of  the  relationship  between  Jews  and  Europe,  between  Jews  and  the  east   (Asian  and  European),  and  of   the  positioning   of   Jews   and   Judaism   between   these   worlds.   These   reformulations,   I   believe,   are   at   least   as  relevant  today  as  they  were  when  first  put  to  print  and  paper.  

 

Eliyahu  Stern,  Yale  University,  USA  

Title:  Catholic  Judaism:  The  Eastern  European  Reception  of  Jacques-­‐Bénigne  Bossuet's  Theory  of  Tradition    

Abstract:   Much   has   been   written   about   the   influence   exerted   upon   nineteenth-­‐century   German   and  Western   European   Jewish   thinkers   by   Protestant   ideas.     Scholars   have   described   how   German   Jews  reinterpreted   Judaism  as  a  “religion”  based  on  universally  held  beliefs  and  ethics.   Judaism’s  national  and  political  elements  were  ignored  or  dismissed  with  the  hope  of  Jews  being  deemed  worthy  of  being  granted  citizenship  and  civil   rights   in   their   respective   locales.  Studies  on  modern   Jewish   thought  have   focused  on  German  Jewish  thinkers’—such  as  Moses  Mendelssohn,  Abraham  Geiger  and  Hermann  Cohen—intellectual  debts   to  Protestant   theories  proffered  by   the   likes  of  Gottfried  Wilhelm  Leibniz,  Georg  Wilhelm  Friedrich  Hegel,   and   Immanuel   Kant.   Though   the   overwhelming  majority   of   Jews   lived   in   Eastern   European   lands  largely   comprised   of   Catholic   and   Orthodox   adherents,   only   a   few   studies   have   charted   the   intellectual  relationship  between  Jewish  and  Catholic  thought  in  the  modern  period.    This  talk  addresses  this  lacuna  by  exploring  the  influence  exerted  by  Catholic  and  Russian  Orthodox  ideas  on  eastern  European  Jewry  in  the  first  half  of  the  nineteenth-­‐century.  Specifically,  it  will  bring  to  light  new  archival  documents  describing  the  way  the  enlighteners  Isaac  Ber  Levensohn  (1788-­‐1860)  and  Shmuel  Yosef  Fuenn  (1819-­‐1891)  appropriated  the  Catholic  idea  of  “Tradition”  as  articulated  by  the  French  Bishop  Jacques-­‐Bénigne  Bossuet  (1627  –1704).  This   act   of   intellectual   borrowing   allowed   Judaism   to   be   understood   in   terms   congenial   to   Polish   and  Russian  audiences.  It  also  provided  Jews  with  a  theory  for  the  development  and  transformation  of  Judaism  in  modernity  and  perhaps  most  provocatively  an  acceptable  mouthpiece  for  criticizing  Protestantism.  

 

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002  

Contemporary  Jewish  History  

11.00-­‐13.00  

German  Perceptions  of  Jewish  "Otherness"  in  post-­‐Emancipation  Era  

 

Chair:  

 

Aya  Elyada,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Jewish  Culture  and  the  German  Volkskunde  at  the  Turn  of  the  Century  

Abstract:   Already   before   the   official   establishment   of   Jewish   Volkskunde   in   Germany   at   the   end   of   the  nineteenth  century,  various  aspects  of  both  ancient  and  contemporary  Jewish  culture  were  discussed  and  debated  in  the  works  of  German  scholars  of  folklore  and  ethnology,  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  alike.  My  paper  will  examine   one   aspect   of   Jewish   culture   that   gained   attention   in   several  works   of   the  German  Volkskunde  during  the  nineteenth  and  early  twentieth  century:  the  Yiddish  language  and  literature,  which  served  as  the  foundation   for   the   cultural   world   of   the   broad  masses   of   Ashkenazi   Jewry   for   almost   a   millennium.   By  analyzing   this   topic   in   the  writings  of   leading  German  folklorists  such  as  Richard  Andree   (1835-­‐1912)  and  others,  the  paper  aims  to  advance  our  knowledge  and  understanding  of  the  scholarly  discourse  on  Yiddish  in  turn-­‐of-­‐the-­‐century  Germany.  Moreover,  by  discussing  a  hitherto  largely  neglected  aspect  in  the  work  of  German  Volkskundler,  the  paper  aims  to  shed  new  light  on  their  broader  understanding  and  perceptions  of  the  Jews,  their  culture,  and  their  place  in  European  society.  

 

Ofer  Ashkenazi,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  'The  Jew  Has  no  Shame!':  Jews  and  'Jews'  in  the  Popular  German  Film-­‐Comedies  of  the  1920s  

Abstract:  Comedies  with  stereotypical  "Jewish"  characters  constituted  one  of  the  most  popular  film  genres  of   the  Weimar  Republic.  Noting   the  clumsy,   lazy  and  deceitful  protagonists  of   these   films   (who  exhibited  “typical”   Jewish   gestures   and   physiognomy),   scholars   have   read   them   mostly   as   an   indication   for   the  popularity  of  anti-­‐Semitic  sentiments   in  pre-­‐Hitler  Germany.  The  many  Jewish  directors,  scriptwriters  and  actors   among   the   filmmakers  of   this   genre  have  been   commonly  depicted   as   “self-­‐hating”   Jews  or  mere  opportunists.   Contrary   to   this   view,   I   will   argue   that   this   genre   provided   a   useful   arena   for   the  contemplation  of  Jewish  identity  and  its  integration  into  the  educated  middle-­‐class  in  modern  Germany.  In  fact,  most  filmmakers  of  this  genre  appropriated  anti-­‐Jewish  stereotypes  in  order  to  portray  the  experience  of   acculturation   from   the   perspective   of   the   assimilation-­‐seeking   “outsider.”   My   talk   will   suggest   an  alternative  analysis  of   the   films  Family  Day  at   the  Prellsteins   (Steinhoff,  1927),  Hercules  Maier   (Schünzel,  1927)   and   Meyer   from   Berlin   (Lubitsch,   1920).   My   analysis   will   demonstrate   how,   while   comically  exaggerating   Jewish   stereotypes,   Weimar   filmmakers   introduced   Jewish   hopes   and   fears   into   the  mainstream  culture  of  modern  Germany.  

 

Tuvia  Singer,  Hebrew  University,  Israel  

Title:   From   Detachment   to  Mobility   –   the   Anti-­‐Semitic   Discourse   on   Jewish   Nomadism   in   Germany   and  Austria  at  the  Fin  de  Siècle  

Abstract:  The  legend  of  the  Wandering  Jew,  which  crystallized  at  the  beginning  of  the  seventeenth  century  in  Protestant  circles  and  was  based  on  a  (mis)reading  of  the  Gospels,  featured  a  Jew  named  Ahasuerus  who  refused  to   let   Jesus,  on  his  way   to  being  crucified,   rest  against   the  walls  of  his  house,  and  was   therefore  doomed   to   eternal   wandering.   In   the   following   centuries,   the   legend   spread   quickly   all   over   Europe   in  dozens   of   languages   and   adaptations.   However,   the   turn   of   the   19th   and   20th   centuries   (fin   de   siècle),  particularly  in  Austria  and  Germany,  was  unique  in  the  multiplicity  and  diversity  of  works  that  centered  on  this   legend.   Above   all,   the   discourse   on   the   Wandering   Jew   greatly   increased   among   ideologies   and  movements  that  were  opposed  to  one  another,  such  as  anti-­‐Semitic  and  Zionist  discourses.  I  will  compare  the   interpretation   of   the   figure   of   the  Wandering   Jew   at   the   turn   of   19th   and   20th   centuries   with   the  interpretation   of   the   figure   in   previous   periods.   The   anti-­‐Semitic   discourse   at   the   turn   of   the   centuries  focused  on  the  act  of  wandering,  while  the  discourse  of  previous  periods  had  concentrated  on  the  result  of  the   wandering   –   i.e.   detachment.   I   would   like   to   engage   with   the   reason   to   this   interpretative  transformation   from  detachment   to  eternal  mobility  and   its   significance   to   the  connection  between  "the  Jewish  spirit"  to  modernity,  according  to  the  anti-­‐Semitic  discourse.  

 

Valentina  Wiedner,  Johann  Wolfgang  Goethe-­‐University  Frankfurt/Main,  Germany  

Title:  Labeling  and  Self-­‐definition  of  the  German-­‐Jewish  Orthodoxy  in  ‘Der  Israelit’  (1860-­‐1880)  

Abstract:  The  term  “neo-­‐orthodox”  was  –  and  partly  still  is  –  common  in  the  scientific  secondary  literature  to  describe  the  small  orthodox  part  of  the  German-­‐Jewish  society  in  especially  the  second  half  of  the  19th  century.  In  the  contemporary  period  however  it  was  interestingly  used  by  the  Reform  Jews,  as  well  as  the  term  “hyperorthodox”,  to  define  the  German-­‐Jewish  Orthodoxy  in  a  negative  and  pejorative  way.  Naturally  it   was   vehemently   refused   in   the   considered   time-­‐frame   by   the   orthodox   Jews   as   self-­‐description.   The  presentation  will  show  how  one  of  the  most  popular  German–Jewish  orthodox  newspaper  (“Der  Israelit”)  in  

the  period  1860   to  1880  explained   the  denial   concerning   the   term  “neo-­‐orthodox”  and  will  as  well  point  out  why  the  Jewish  Orthodoxy  for  the  most  part  insisted  upon  the  self-­‐definition  as  “law-­‐abiding”  as  one  of  the   central   themes   in   their   demarcation   toward   the  Reform   Jews.   The  paper  will   analyze   the  arguments  used   by   the   German-­‐Jewish   Orthodoxy   to   justify   the   preservation   of   the   “religion   of   their   fathers”   in  contrast  to  the  development  of  the  Reform  Movement  and  the  proceeding  diminishment  of  faith.  The  talk  is  part  of  my  dissertation  project  „Break-­‐up  and  preservation:  the  German-­‐Jewish  (Neo-­‐)Orthodoxy  and  its  relationship  to  Tradition,  State  and  Patriotism”,  which  will  be  finished  in  2015.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Contemporary  Jewish  History  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Constructions  of  Jewish  Identity  at  the  Dawn  of  Globalization:  Georgia  and  Germany  

Organizer:  Elisabeth  Hollender  

Chair:  Elisabeth  Hollender  

 

Nino  Pirtskhalava,  Ilia  State  University  Tbilisi,  Georgia  

Title:  Georgian  Jews  between  State  and  Homeland  during  the  19th  and  20th  Centuries    

Abstract:   With   regard   to   the   investigation   of   the   historical   experience   and   the   question   of   a   linguistic-­‐cultural  search  of  identity  of  the  Jews  in  Georgia  it  is  of  extreme  importance  to  take  into  consideration  the  issue  of   the   political   status   of  Georgia  where  Georgian-­‐speaking   Jewry   is   one  of   the  oldest   communities  (with  an  approximately  2,600-­‐year  history  in  the  region).  The  emphasizing  of  the  importance  of  the  last  two  centuries   (the  19th  and  20th)   should  enable  a  more   systematic   approach  and   the   focus  on   the  essential  issues   of   Jewish   identity   in   Georgia   as   a   country   that   lost   twice   its   independence,   once   after   Georgian  annexation  by  the  Russian  Empire  in  1801  and  later  by  the  modernized  Tsarist  Empire  as  Soviet  Empire.  The  research  will  concentrate  on  finding  out  the  formation  of   the   identity  narrative  of   the  Jews   in  Georgia  as  “Georgian  Jews”  within  the  Russian  Empire  as  state  including  its  whole  oppressive  system  on  the  one  hand  and  within  Georgia  as   the  homeland  or   fatherland  on   the  other  hand,  where  despite   their  attempts,   the  authorities   could  not   completely   annihilate   the  practice  of   Judaism  and,   even   in   the   late  1960s  and  70s,  most  Georgian   Jews  managed   to   observe   their   traditions.   The   Jewish   population   of  Georgia   has   steadily  decreased  over  the  years  during  the  last  two  centuries  due  to  aliya.  In  the  second  half  of  the  19th  century  (1863),   groups   of   Jews   began   the   return   to   the   Holy   Land,  mostly   for   religious   reasons.   Later,   after   the  Russian  Revolution   the  Red  Army   invaded  Georgia   in   February  1921,  prompting  a  mass  exodus   from   the  region.  Approximately  1,500–2,000   Jews   left  Georgia.   In   the  middle  of   the20th  century  huge  numbers  of  Georgian  Jews  applied  for  exit  visas   in  order  to  immigrate  to  Israel.   In  1969,  several  families  wrote  to  the  Human  Rights  Commission  of   the  United  Nations  demanding  permission   to  make  aliya.  This  was   the   first  public  insistence  by  Soviet  Jews  for  immigration  to  Israel.  In  July  1971,  a  group  of  Georgian  Jews  went  on  a  hunger  strike  outside  a  Moscow  post  office.  As  a  result,  the  determination  of  the  Jews  of  Georgia  led  the  Soviets   to   lessen   their   harsh   anti-­‐Jewish   policies.   During   the   1970s,   about   30,000   Georgian   Jews   have  moved  to   Israel  and  thousands  of  others   left   for  other  countries.  Approximately  17  percent  of   the  Soviet  Jewish  population  emigrated  at  this  time.  In  this  context  one  could  argue  that  Georgian  Jews  left  not  their  

fatherland,  but  the  Soviet  state,  the  modernized  version  of  the  Russian  Tsarist  Empire  or  the  so-­‐called  “jail  of   the  nations”   (de  Custine).  The  Georgian   Jews  perceived   this   state   from  the  perspective  of  a  double  or  even   triple  detachment.   It   is  precisely   the  detachment  obtained   through   this   triple  alienating  experience  that  an  acuity  was  gained  that  made  the  lack  of  intimacy  with  the  state  bearable.  Because  unlike  Georgia  as  a   fatherland,   the   Russian   Empire   could   only   be   a   state   thanks   to   the   chimeric   functioning   of   the   state  machinery,  but  never  become  a  homeland.  

 

Irakli  Chkhaidze,  Iv.  Javakhishvili  Tbilisi  State  University,  Georgia  

Title:  The  Issue  of  Georgian  Jews  in  the  Periodicals  at  the  turn  of  20th  Century  

Abstract:  Beyond  the  well-­‐described  phenomenon  of  the  Georgian  Jewish  community,  the  Georgian  Jewish  identity   forming  narrative   and   its   peculiarities   still   remain  poorly   researched   realm  of   study.  History   and  culture   of   the  diminishing  Georgian   Jewish   community   are   less   familiar   for   the  world   scientific   circles   as  they  are  not  placed  in  the  wider  context  of  the  World  Jewish  Diaspora.The  paper  aims  at  analyzing  the  issue  of   Georgian   Jews   in   the   periodicals   at   the   turn   of   20th   Century.   The   Georgian   Jewish   identity   forming  narrative   is   originated   in   parallel   to   the   process   of   Georgian   nation-­‐building   in   the   period   of   time.   It’s  important  and   interesting  to  explore  how  the  process  was  reflected   in  the  newly   formed  Georgian  press.  My   PhD   dissertation   deals   with   the   formation   of  multiethnic   Georgian   nation   in   the   post-­‐Soviet   period.  Origins   of   the   process  we   have   to   search   for   late   19th   and   early   20th   centuries.   Jewish  minority   played  important  role  in  the  process  at  the  dawn  of  Globalization.  Thus  the  issue  is  closely  related  to  my  PhD  thesis  in  terms  of  methodological  background  as  well  as  empirical  research.  

 

Nino  Chikovani,  Iv.  Javakhishvili,  Tbilisi  State  University,  Georgia  

Title:   Historical   and   Historiographical   Context   of   the   Jewish   Identity   Forming   Narrative   in   Georgia  (Beginning  of  the  20th  Century)  

Abstract:  The  paper  aims  to  present  the  historical  and  historiographical  context  of  formation  of  the  Jewish  identity   narrative   in   Georgia   at   the   turn   of   the   20th   century.   This   was   a   period   when   the   process   of  formation  of  this  narrative  started  in  Georgia.  The  Georgian  intellectuals  –  founder  fathers  of  the  Georgian  nationalism  –  were  the  first  who  tried  to  comprehend  the  history  of  the  Georgian  Jewry.  Their  articles  and  essays  on  the  Jewish  Question  were  actively  published  in  the  Georgian  periodicals.  At  the  beginning  of  the  20th  century,  the  idea  of  awaking  of  the  Jewish  consciousness  was  born  among  the  portion  of  the  Georgian  Jews  as  well.  Historical  context  of  the  above  mentioned  processes  was  defined  by  the  developments  of  the  second  half  of  the  19th  century.  Under  the  Russian  imperial  rule,  Georgia  was  reunited,  first  politically  and  then  economically.  Concentration  of  the  growing  number  of  Georgians  in  the  towns,  where  the  people  with  different   faith  and   culture   lived,   forged  a   growing   sense  of   the  distinction  between  Georgians  and  other  peoples,   definition   and   re-­‐definition   of   the   ethnic   boundaries.   Contrary   to   his   aims,   the   Russian   Empire  strengthened  the  national  consent  among  the  Georgian  intellectuals.  The  end  of  the  19th  century  was  the  time  of  formation  of  the  Georgian  scientific  historiography.  As  in  other  similar  cases  where  the  professional  historiography   was   formed   as   a   response   to   the   imperial   challenge,   the   Georgian   historical   master-­‐narrative  was   aimed  at   strengthening  of   the   identity   of  Georgians;   therefore,   history   should  depict   their  difference   from   “others”   –   inside   of   the   country   as   well   as   outside   of   it.   As   different   from   the   wider  intellectual  discourse,  this  narrative  was  mostly  concentrated  on  the  history  of  ethnic  Georgians,  although  placing   it   in   the  wider   context   of   the   Caucasus   and   the  Middle   East.   Different   ethnic   groups   residing   in  Georgia  were  mentioned   casually.   The  model   of   identity   set   by   the   Georgian   historical  master-­‐narrative  determined  the  framework  for  the  formation  of  the  Jewish  identity  narrative  in  Georgia.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

Visual  Arts    

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Absence  and  Presence  of  Jews  in  the  Making  of  Visual  Culture  

Organizer:  Michael  Berkowitz  

 

Chair:  Joachim  Schlör  

 

Michael  Berkowitz,  UCL,  UK  

Title:  European  Jews  and  Photography:  Autobiography,  Evasion,  and  Integrity  

Abstract:   The   presentation,   based   on   archival   research   and   little-­‐examined   literary   texts,   might   be  described   as   "between   realism   and   fictions:   retouching   and   the   quest   for   honesty   among   Jewish  photographers   in   Eastern   Europe   and   beyond."   It   will   concentrate   on   the   autobiographical   work   of   I.   J.  Singer  (interwar  Warsaw)  and  Bernard  Gotfryd  (Radom  ghetto),  and  also  draw  on  writings  of  Hans  Keilson,  Giselle  Freund,  Lotte  Jacobi,  Alfred  Stieglitz,  and  H.  W.  Barnett.  Special  attention  will  be  paid  to  articulated  and  unarticulated  reflections  on  relations  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  in  the  photographic  realm.  

 

Peter  Leese,  University  of  Copenhagen,  Denmark  

Title:  Ruminative  Memory:  the  Late  films  of  Robert  Vas  

Abstract:   Born   in  Budapest,   Robert  Vas   (1931-­‐78)  was   thirteen   at   the   time  of   the  German  occupation   in  1944.   He   escaped   the   fate   of  many   other   Hungarian   Jews  when   his   family   obtained   ‘Schutz-­‐Passes’   and  moved  into  what  he  called  a  ‘privileged’  ghetto  near  the  Danube.  Shortly  after  the  war  his  mother  died  and  his  father  fled  to  Australia.  He  then  became  part  of  the  postwar  communist  youth  movement  and  later  on,  in  the  defining  moment  of  his  life,  an  active  participant  in  the  Hungarian  Uprising  in  1956.  After  the  failure  of  1956  he  escaped  to  London  and  established  himself  as  a  highly  original  documentary  film-­‐maker  whose  work   developed   from   the   techniques   of   Humphrey   Jennings.   Vas’s   films   are   at   once   subjective   and  ethnographic;   edited   with   a   brilliant   eye   for   metaphor   and   surrealist   juxtaposition.   Today   he   is   barely  known   except   for   his   first   film,   Refuge   England   (1959),   a   semi-­‐autobiographical   short   which   follows   a  Hungarian   refugee’s   first   day   in   London.   This   paper   explores   some   of   the   themes   in   Vas’s   late  work,   by  which  time  he  was  a  freelance  director  producing  films  for  the  BBC.  Stalin  (1973),  Nine  Days  in  ’26  (1974),  My  Homeland  (1976)  consider  respectively  the  career  of  the  Soviet  leader,  the  General  Strike  of  1926,  and  Vas’s  memory   of   Hungary   and   1956.   Despite   their   disparate   subjects   these   films   are   held   together   by   a  particular  mode  of   recollection.   The  director  understood  his   art   as  political,   and  he   saw   imagination  and  self-­‐expression  as  the  most  profound  of  human  acts.  Yet  these  judgments  were  also  bound  up  with  his  past,  and  with  his  critical  need  to  recall  and  testify.  Vas’s  later  films  are,  then,  about  the  techniques  he  finds  to  

transform   his   own   focused   attention   on   bad   feelings   and   experiences   (ruminative  memory)   into   artistic  reflection.  

 

Shelley  Hornstein,  York  University,  Canada  

Title:  The  World  in  a  Picture:  Albert  Kahn,  Architectural  Tourism  and  the  Archives  of  the  Planet  

Abstract:  On   the   heels   of   the  Dreyfus   affair   and   an   intense   period   of   nation   building,   the   Jewish   French  banker,  Albert  Kahn,  established  the  Archives  of  the  Planet,  an  ambitious  project  funding  photographers  to  tour   and   photograph   the   world   between   1908-­‐1931.   The   collection   (72,000   color   photographs)  demonstrates   Kahn’s   desire   to   capture   the   memory   of   places   and   disappearing   sites   in   architectural  photography   and   promote   universal   tolerance   of   other   cultures   primarily   to   his   fellow   compatriots.   This  transnational  project  –  avant   la   lettre  –  made   its  way  to  French  students  and  communities  through  slide-­‐lectures  by  geographers,  architects  and  photographers  that  he  financed,  thereby  promoting  human  rights  and  cosmopolitanism  through   identity  politics  and  outside  of   Jewish  circles   in  particular.  He  spearheaded  the  use  of  the  1907   invention  by  the  Lumière  Brothers’  color  “autochrome”  photography  on  glass  plates,  the   first   industrially-­‐produced   color   process   in   the   world,   yet   only   suitable   as   projections.   His   lifelong  mission  was  to  mobilize  shifts   in  thinking  about  the  “planet”  through  stunning   images  about  architecture  and   indigenous   cultures.   Kahn   was   deeply   influenced   by   his   friend,   Henri   Bergson,   whose   ideas   about  memory  and  “spatialized”  time  shaped  first,  his  travel  scholarships,  Autour  du  Monde  (Around  the  World),  1898,  then,  the  Archives  project.    This  paper  argues  that  Kahn’s  vision  of  humanitarian  ideals  of  people  and  places,   internationalization   and   national   identities   across   borders   in   a   time   of   cultural  modernity   –  well  before   the   internet   –   was   borne   from   his   grounding   in   Jewish   education.   The   ideas   of   this   little-­‐known  revolutionary   traveller,   who   also   established   a   pioneering   research   institute   (Centre   de   Documentation  Sociale),  1920  at  the  Ecole  Normale  Superieure,  Paris,  demonstrates  his  unwavering  commitment  to  higher  education   and   the   evolution   of   mutual   respect   across   cultures,   races   and   religions   through   a   grand  photographic  project.  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  14  

 

Session:  001:  

Books  within  Books:  Medieval  Hebrew  Fragments  in  European  Libraries  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  Martha  Keil  

 

Andreas  Lehnardt,  Mainz  University,  Germany  

Title:  Newly  Discovered  Hebrew  Binding  Fragments  in  Germany  

Abstract:   In  the  last  months  several  new  Hebrew  binding  fragments  have  been  discovered  and  published.  The  paper  will  present  the  findings  and  discuss  their  significance  for  further  research.  The  session  will  also  celebrate  the  publication  of  a  new  volume  of  the  "European  Genizah:  Texts  and  Studies"  series.  Together  with  Judith  Schlanger  /  Andreas  Lehnardt  edited  the  proceedings  of  a  2011  EAJS  colloquium  in  Oxford.  

 

Ursula  Schattner-­‐Rieser,  Instiute  for  Biblical  Sciences  and  historical  Theology  

Title:  New  Hebraica  Fragments  from  the  Genizat  Tirolensia  

Abstract:   In   contrast   to   the   East   of  Austria,   its  western  part   and  especially   the  Genizat   Tirolensia   ist   still  widely  unexplored.  Until  recently  the  Tyrolean  libraries  had  never  been  checked  systematically  on  Hebrew  and   Aramaic   fragments   of   medieval   Hebrew   books   and   documents   recovered   from   book   bindings   and  notarial   files   and   the   18   fragments   of   the   University   library   are   chance   finds.   However   a   systematically  recording   is   promising:   in   less   than   a   year   eight   new   fragments   have   been   found   and   identified.   The  establishment  of   Jews   in  North-­‐   and  South  Tyrol   is   documented   since   the  13th   century.  Among   the  new  finds   are   unique   Talmud   fragments,   a   Haftarah   exemplary,   Halakhah   commentaries   from   Ashkenazic,  Sephardic   and   Italian   provenance   shedding   new   light   on   the   spiritual   life   of   the   Jews   of  medieval   Tyrol.  Further  findings  are  to  be  expected  and  it  is  obvious  that  the  history  of  the  Jews  of  this  border  region  has  to  be  rewritten  and  completed.  In  this  paper  we  want  to  present  the  new  findings  and  the  material  for  a  new  cross-­‐border   project  within   the   European  network   "Books  within   books:  Hebrew   Fragments   in   European  Libraries".  

 

Magdalena  Jánošiková,  Oxford  Centre  for  Jewish  Studies,  UK  

Title:  Moravian  Hebrew  Fragments  in  the  Context  of  the  Moravian  Book  Culture  

Abstract:   The   paper   looks   at   the   Hebrew   fragments   incorporated   into   other   bindings   as   the   wider  phenomenon  that   reflects   the  book  culture   in  Moravia.  Around  a  hundred  of   fragments  are   found   in   the  oldest  preserved  bodies  of  books  as  well  as  in  newer  ones.  We  will  focus  on  the  book  culture  in  Moravia  to  reveal  what  the  unifying  factors  in  the  production  of  the  binding  could  tell  us  about  the  Hebrew  fragments.  And,  vice  versa,  what  could  fragments  tell  us  about  the  books  of  the  XVth-­‐XVIIth  century.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002  

Books  within  Books  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  Andreas  Lehnardt  

 

Tamás  Visi,  Kurt  and  Ursula  Schubert  Centre  for  Jewish  Studies,  Palacky  University,  Olomouc,  Czech  Republic  

Title:  Liturgical  Fragments  from  Moravia  

Abstract:  The  paper  will  examine  Hebrew  fragments  of  liturgical  content  that  have  been  preserved  in  book  bindings.  On  the  basis  of  marginal  corrections  in  liturgical  fragments  as  well  as  rabbinic  texts  such  as  Eizik  Tirna's   Sefer   ha-­‐minhagim   some   trends   in   the   development   of   Jewish   liturgy   in   late   medieval   Central  Europe  will  be  identified  and  analyzed.  

 

Tamas  Turan,  The  Hungarian  Academy  of  Sciences,  Hungary  

Title:  The  Beginnings  of  the  Research  on  Hebrew  Manuscript  Fragments  in  Europe  -­‐  A  Centennial  Tribute  to  Alexander  Scheiber  

Abstract:   Hebrew   manuscript   fragments   were   occasionally   found   and   described   in   scholarly   literature  already   in   the   19th   century.   The   lecture  will   trace   the   increasing   scholarly   attention   paid   to   this   type   of  source  material,  which  culminated  in  more  systematic  research  projects  aiming  at  finding  and  utilizing  such  fragments  in  recent  decades.  In  Hungary  Hebrew  manuscript  leaves  were  found  and  described  since  1877.  Alexander   Scheiber   (1913-­‐1985),   rector   of   the   Rabbinical   Seminary   in   Budapest   after   WWII,   not   only  continued   this   research  but   also  pioneered   in  doing  quasi-­‐systematic   investigations   in  Hungary   since   the  early  1960s.  

 

Alina  Lisitsyna,  Russian  State  Library,  Russian  Federation  

Title:  Undescribed  Fragments  from  the  Gunzburg  Collection:  Classification,  Origin,  Context  

Abstract:   The   paper   deals   with   more   than   300   uncatalogued   handwrtitten   fragments   from   the   barons  Gunzburgs`  collection,  which  is  kept  in  the  Russian  State  Librray  in  Moscow.  The  main  part  of  the  collection  was  described  at  the  end  of  the  19th  century  by  the  Gunzburgs`  librraians  Senior  Sachs  and  Samuel  Wiener  and  this  part  still  remains  unknown  to  the  public.  It  consists  of  fragments  of  different  genres  such  as  Biblical  commentaries,  Midrash,  philosophical  treatises,  private  letters,  mariiage  contracts  in  Hebrew,  Aramaic  and  Judaeo-­‐Arabic.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Books  within  Books  II  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  Judith  Kogel  

 

Mauro  Perani,  University  of  Bologna,  Italy  

Title:  An  Incredible  Romance  Story  at  the  University  Library  of  Bologna:  the  Rediscovery  of  the  Oldest  Sefer  Torah  in  our  Possession  

Abstract:  An  ancient  scroll  for  liturgical  use,  36  meters  long,  containing  the  Hebrew  Pentateuch,  copied  at  the  end  of  the  12th  century  in  an  elegant  oriental  square  script  by  a  scribe  in  accordance  with  the  writing  and  graphic  Babylonian  tradition  is  given  as  a  present  in  1304  to  the  friar  Eimerico  Giliani  in  Bologna  when  he  becomes   the  General  Master  of   the  Order  of   the  Dominicans  at   their   convent.   The  Scroll  was  at   that  time  already  known  to  be  very  ancient  by  Jewish  scholars,  and  shows  graphic  signs  different  from  those  of  more   recent   Sifre   Torah.   Bernard   de   Montfaucon,   in   1702   says   that   in   Bologna   in   the   convent   of   the  Dominicans  this  Sefer  Torah  was  shown  and  reported  the  information  on  its  antiquity.  About  eighty  years  later  Benjamin  Kennicot  in  his  Dissertatio  generalis  in  Vetus  Testamentum  Hebraicum  (Oxford  ,  1780)  dates  the  Scroll  to  the  end  of  the  11th  century,  and  Giovanni  Bernardo  De  Rossi,  a  few  years   later,   in  his  Variæ  lectiones  Veteris  Testament  (Parma  1784)  dates  it  from  the  beginning  of  the  13th  century.  When  Napoleon  extends  his  empire  over  Italy  Northern,  suppresses  religious  orders  and  delivery  their  manuscripts  to  public  institutions:  the  booklore  of  the  convent  of  St.  Salvatore  and  that  of  San  Domenico  in  Bologna,  where  the  Sefer   Torah   was   held,   are   deposited   in   the   University   Library   of   Bologna.   Then   almost   all   the   Hebrew  manuscripts,   including   our   Roll,   are   brought   to   the   Bibliothèque   Nationale   in   Paris,   but   with   the   anti-­‐Napoleonic  Restoration,  almost  all   return   to  Bologna.   In   the  1889,   the   librarian   in   the  Bologna  University  Library  Leonello  Modona,  a  Jews  from  Cento,  writes  the  first  catalogue  of  the  small  collection  of  Bologna.  But  some  time  before,  after  consulting  the  two  Torah  Scrolls,  the  ancient  one  and  another  from  the  15th  century,  someone  replaces  the  two  scrolls  swapping  their  containers  and  self-­‐mark.  For  this  reason,  in  the  catalog  of  Modona,   the  data   relating   to   the   roll  1,   the  ancient  one,  are  attributed   to   the   roll  2,   and  vice  versa.   In  2013,  Mauro  Perani,  wanting   compile  a  new  catalogue  of   the  collection,   realizes   that  what  had  become  wrongly   the   roll   2   shows   an   ancient   oriental   square   script,   dating   back   to   the   12   century,   date  confirmed  by  two  carbon  14  exam,  while  the  other  Sefer  can  be  dated  to  the  15  century.  However,  it  is  not  yet   clear   the   exchange,   revealed   by   further   research   carried   out   by   a   Librarian   charged   with   the  manuscripts  room,  and  started  thanks  to  a  suspicion  arose  following  the  sure  date  of  our  ancient  scroll.  It  is  copied   in  Babylonian   tradition   for   the  use  of   tagin,   particular   and   curled   letters,   as  well   as   the   layout  of  some  particular  texts.  The  Bologna  Sefer  Torah  is  a  rare  example  of  the  Babylonian  tradition,  disappeared  after  the  12th  century,  when  the  Palestinian  one  prevailed,  but  attested  in  Sefer  tagin  composed  in  the  8th  century  and  quoted  by  Sa‘adyah  Ga  ‘on.  

 

Silvia  Di  Donato,  EPHE,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Themes  and  Forms  of  Re-­‐used  Hebrew  Fragments  in  the  so-­‐called  "French  Genizah":  New  Researches  on  Parisian  fragments  

Abstract:  New  researches  on  nearly  150  Parisian  fragments  of  re-­‐used  medieval  Hebrew  manuscripts  and  documents  recovered  from  book  bindings  offer  new  material  for  the  history  of  the  Jewish  knowledge  and  Hebrew  book  heritage  of  the  middle  Ages.  I  will  present  and  analyse  some  historical,  textual  and  material  aspects  of  the  French  fragments  I  am  studying  within  the  project  “Books  within  books:  Hebrew  Fragments  in  European  Libraries”.  

 

Silvia  di  Donato,  Emma  Abate  and  Elodie  Attia,    

Title:  Books  within  Books  database.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

Books  within  Books  II  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Judith  Kogel  

 

Esperança  Valls  Pujol,  Universitat  de  Girona,  Spain  

Title:  The  Last  Fragments  of  Hebrew  Manuscripts  Recovered  from  the  Historical  Archive  of  Girona  (2013)    

Abstract:   The   Arxiu   Històric   de   Girona,   has   a   collection   of   Hebrew   manuscripts   were   reused   as   book  bindings  of  medieval  notarial  books.  Between  September  2012  and  February  2013  has  been  restored  144  new   fragments.   Now   the   collection   has   a   total   of   1094   manuscripts.   These   new   documents   contain  exegetical   commentaries,   resolutions   adopted   by   the   community,   sale   deeds,   loans   records,   sales  inventories   of   local  merchants,   a   part   of   a   testament,   various   issues   of   jurisprudence   and   fragments   of  poetic  compositions.  The  aim  of  this  paper  is  to  present  an  overview  of  these  new  documents.  

 

Donatella  Melini,  Università  di  Pavia,  Italy,  &  Roberta  Tonnarelli,  EPHE,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Jewish  Fragments  and  Musical  Instruments:  an  Unusual  Relation    

Abstract:  Our  paper’s  aim  is  to  communicate  the  existence  of  a  particular  typology  of  fragments  of  Jewish  codices:  fragments  held  within  musical  instruments  and  their  function.  During  an  archival  campaign  about  the  16th-­‐17th  lutherie  a  very  interesting  viol  was  found;  inside  it,  in  fact,  we  found  some  parchment  strips  coming  from  Jewish  codices.  This  circumstance  absolutely  unusual  both   in  the  field  of   lutherie  and   in  the  field  of  the  research  of  reused  Jewish  manuscripts  stimulated  many  questions  about  their  presence  inside  the   instrument   (when   they   were   inserted,   where   they   come   from,   etc.).   An   interdisciplinary   approach  immediately  appeared  as  necessary;  scholars  of  the  Jewish  culture  could,  in  fact,  help  to  trace  the  history  of  this  musical  instrument.  A  complete  codicological  and  paleographic  analysis  of  the  strips  will  be  conducted  

considering  these  fragments  within  the  phenomena  of  reused  fragments,  the  so-­‐called  Genizah.  Besides  it  would   be   very   important   to   search   for   other   instruments   that   share   the   same   particularity;   this   could  increase  on  one  side  our  knowledge  about  a  particular  (and  unknown)  aspect  of  lutherie  and  on  the  other  side  could  provide  new  research  path  in  Jewish  studies  by  considering  the  musical   instruments  as  a  place  (an  unusual  place)  for  the  retrieval  of  these  fragments.  

 

Piergabriele  Mancuso,  Medici  Archive  Project,  Florence,  Italy    

Title:  The  "Natione  Israelitica"  Archival  Fund:  a  Documentary  and  Material  Source  for  the  Study  of  Jewish  History  

Abstract:  The  "Natione  Israelitica"  is  a  72  volume  set  containing  virtually  all  sentences  and  cases  passed  by  the  Hebrew  courts  in  Florence  between  1620  and  the  beginning  of  the  19th  century.  These  volumes  which  are  now  kept   in   the  state  archive   in  Florence  contain  an   incredible  source  of   information  concerning   the  life,   family   ties  and  socio-­‐economic   status  of   the   Jews  of  Florence  and  Tuscany.   In   spite  of   this  and  even  thought  the  volumes  of  the  "Natione  Israelitica"  are  among  the  very  few  pieces  of  material  culture  produce  in  the  Ghetto  of  Florence,  and  although  this   is  one  of  the  very  few  archival   funds  containing  official  texts  and   legislation  written   in  Hebrew,  they  have  never  been  the  object  of  a  systematic  study.  According  to  a  recent   survey,   some   of   these   volumes   were   bound   using   waste   materials,   among   which   music   scores  containing  sections  of  a  melodrama  on  a  sacred  subject  and  some  instrumental  music  probably  produced  inside  the  ghetto  around  the  end  of  the  17th  century.  The  aim  of  this  paper  is  to  outline  briefly  the  history  of  this  fund,  and  to  describe  its  main  textual,  linguistic  and  material  features  with  special  emphasis  on  the  music  scores  recently  discovered,  probably  the  most  ancient  testimonies  of  artistic  music  production  in  the  ghetto  of  Florence  during  the  Grand  Ducal  age.  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  15  

 

Session:  001:  

Musicology  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  Hervé  Roten  

 

Hervé  Roten,  Institut  Européen  des  Musiques  Juives,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Conservation  and  Valorization  of   Jewish  Musical  Archives  at   the  Numerical  Era:  The  Example  of   the  European  Institute  for  Jewish  Music  (Paris)  

Abstract:   Transmitted   only   by   oral   tradition   until   now,   Jewish   musics   constitute   a   complex   and   plural  heritage  characterized  by  Diaspora.  Consequently,  we  have  to  speak  about  Jewish  Musics,  and  not  Jewish  Music,  each  of  them  having  a  specific  geocultural  context.  So,  the  study  of  Jewish  Music  is  related  to  many  other   fields,   as   history,   sociology,   symbolism…To   preserve   Jewish   Musical   Traditions,   to   make   them  available  to  everybody,  this  is  the  goal  of  the  European  Institute  for  Jewish  Musics,  created  in  2009,  which  owns  today  the  most   important  collection  of  numerical  documents  online:  about  50.000  audio  and  video  recordings   and  more   than  150.000  pages  of   scores,   books   and  miscellaneous   archives.   This   presentation  will  introduce  to  the  different  tasks  of  gathering,  digitalizing  and  uploading  of  the  archives  of  the  European  Institute  for  Jewish  Musics.  

 

Title  :  Préservation  et  valorisation  des  archives  musicales  juive  à  l’ère  du  numérique.  L’exemple  de  l’Institut  Européen  des  Musiques  Juives  (Paris)    

Longtemps  véhiculée  par   la  seule  tradition  orale,   les  musiques   juives  forment  un  patrimoine  complexe  et  pluriel  caractérisé  par  le  champ  de  la  diaspora.    Ainsi  n’existe-­‐t-­‐il  pas  une  musique  juive,  mais  des  musiques  juives,  chacune  d’entre  elles  relevant  d’un  contexte  géoculturel  spécifique.  L’étude  des  musiques  juives  est  par  conséquent  riche  d’enseignements  dans  un  grand  nombre  de  domaines  :  musical,  mais  aussi  historique,  sociologique,  symbolique,  etc.  Préserver   les  traditions  musicales  juives,   les  mettre  à   la  portée  de  tous,  tel  est  l'objectif  de  l'Institut  Européen  des  Musiques  Juives  (IEMJ)  créé  en  2009,  et  qui  recèle,  à  ce  jour,  la  plus  importante  collection  de  documents  numériques  accessibles  en  ligne,  soit  près  de  50.000  enregistrements  audio,   vidéo   et   plus   de   150.000   pages   de   partitions,   livres,   revues   et   archives   diverses.   Cette  communication   aura   pour   objectif   de   présenter   le   travail   de   collecte,   de   numérisation   et   de   mise   à  disposition  des  archives  numériques  de  l'Institut  Européen  des  Musiques  Juives.  

 

Andreas  Schmitges,  University  of  Halle-­‐Wittenberg,  Germany  

Title:   Funem   (sh)eynem   vortsl   aroys?!–  Approaches   to   the   Study   of   Parallel   Eastern   Yiddish   and  German  Folksongs  

Abstract:  A  considerable  amount  of  folksongs  in  the  Yiddish  and  German  tradition  share  common  roots  in  texts,  motifs  and  melodies.  This  paper  presents  first  results  of  a  broader  study  and  will  give  insight  into  the  history  of  the  research  done  so  far  by  researchers  of  the  twentieth  century  as  well  as  outlining  first  results  of  the  analysis  of  these  parallels.  At  first  sight,  the  existence  of  a  parallel  repertoire  of  Eastern  Yiddish  and  German   Folksongs   is   not   surprising.   It   is   rather   astonishing   that   not  much   scholarly   attention   has   been  given   to   the   topic   in   the   twentieth   century.   This   study   hopes   to   gain   scientific   insight   into   the   following  themes:   1.   Adding   another   layer   to   the   research   of   Yiddish   Folksong.   2.   Development   of   a   historically  informed  performance  style  for  Yiddish  Folk  Song  through  intercultural  comparison.  3.  Intersections  of  the  Yiddish-­‐German   parallels   with   a   universal   European   repertoire.   4.   New   socio-­‐musical   perspectives  concerning  the  European  perception  of  Yiddish  music  1.  Adding  another  layer  to  the  research  of  Yiddish  Folksong  Scholars   like   Y.L.   Cahan   have   –   in   early   twentieth   century   research   –   stressed   the  meaning   of   a   parallel  Yiddish-­‐German   Folksong   repertoire.   Beginning   with   the   Ashkenaz   I   period,   where  many  melodies   were  shared  by  the  Jewish  and  the  gentile  population,  the  process  continues  in  Ashkenaz  II  where  many  texts  are  still   shared   but   the   music   develops   its   own   Jewish   identity.   First   answers   to   the   question   of   how   this  repertoire  developed  historically,  socially  and  geographically  will  be  given.    2.   Development   of   a   historically   informed   performance   style   for   Yiddish   Folk   Song   through   intercultural  comparison  The   revival   of   Yiddish  music   has   among  musician-­‐protagonists   of   this  movement   started   a   discussion   on  questions  of  style  and  expression.  Very  often  this  debate  hasn’t  been  mirrored  by  scholarly  research.  The  comparison  of   Yiddish  and  German  Folksongs  offers   the  unique  possibility  of   gaining   insight   into   stylistic  and  philological  matters,  as  very  often  it  allows  a  deeper  understanding  of  the  history  of  Yiddish  Songs.  This  historical   trace   leads   back   to   their   earliest   sources   and   helps   understanding   their   development   into  important  elements  of  Jewish  identity  and  Jewish  and  Yiddish  expression.  To  analyze  these  expressions  on  the   basis   of   their   early   history   and   their   German   (and   European)   parallels   will   enhance   a   scholarly  discussion  on  historically  informed  performance  style.  3.  Intersections  of  the  Yiddish-­‐German  parallels  with  a  universal  European  repertoire  Some  of  the  Yiddish-­‐German  parallels  are  part  of  a  pan-­‐European  parallel  song  repertoire  that  has  not  been  studied  in  full  yet.  In  this  field,  the  role  of  Yiddish  culture  as  a  transnational  European  culture  is  not  to  be  underestimated  as  many  musical  elements  may  have  been  preserved  over   long  periods  and  geographical  changes.  4.  New  socio-­‐musical  perspectives  concerning  the  pan-­‐European  perception  of  Yiddish  music.  The  success  of  Yiddish  Folk  Music  in  the  USA  and  Europe  since  the  1980s  has  started  -­‐  within  and  outside  the   Jewish   Community   -­‐   a   discussion   on   its   authenticity,   role   and   meaning.   The   fact   that   some   of   the  musical  and  textual   repertoire  of   this  music   is  actually  shared  by  many  European  cultures  will  add  a  new  layer  to  the  discussion  as  well  as  help  to  improve  the  understanding  of  the  character  of  Yiddish  versus  other  European  Folk  Music.    

Alexandre  Cerveux,  Université  Paris-­‐Sorbonne  &  EPHE,  France  

Title:   "Muzikologye"   or   sketches   of  Musicology   in   Yiddish:   a   Glimpse   at   A.   Z.   Idelsohn's   Archives   (1882-­‐1938)  

Abstract:  The  pioneering  contribution  of  hazzan  and  scholar  Abraham  Zvi  Idelsohn  to  the  field  of  Jewish  musicology  is  well  known.  His  major  works,  Oẓar  Neginot  Israel  (10  vol.,  1914-­‐1932)  and  Jewish  Music  In  Its  Historical  Development  (1929)  are  part  of  the  original  core  of  musicological  writings  concerning  Jewish  music.  Thanks  to  his  priceless  efforts,  through  which  we  obtain  a  sense  of  the  urgency  he  felt  to  record  and  save  the  traditional  music  of  the  Jewish  people,  we  have  the  opportunity  to  rediscover  the  traditional  music  of  the  eastern  European  Jews.  

By   taking   a   closer   look   at   Idelsohn’s   archive,   now   housed   in   the   National   Library   of   Israel,   one   notes  valuable  paper  cuttings  and   journal  articles   in  Yiddish.  Most  of   them  originated  from  the  USA  or  Canada,  some   from   South   Africa,   mainly   appearing   in   journals   published   in   the   late   1920s   to   the   1940s.   This  preliminary  study  aims  to  determine  whether  Yiddish  has  been  used  as  a  scientific  language  in  the  field  of  musicology.  Alongside  the  efforts  achieved  by  scholars  in  linguistics,  Yiddish  history  or  history  itself,  others  contributed   to   the  Yiddish  press  by   submitting  articles   in  Yiddish.  A   technical   jargon   is   employed,  mixing  both  neologisms  and  Hebraisms.  Further  attempts  to  use  Yiddish  in  subsequent  music  writings  in  the  USA,  from  the  1940s  onwards,  should  also  be  mentioned.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002  

Musicology  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  Hervé  Roten  

 

Rachel  Adelstein,  Corpus  Christi  College,  Cambridge  University,  UK  

Title:  Feminine  Overtures:  Jewish  Women  Musicians  Encountering  Non-­‐Jewish  Society  

Abstract:  In  encounters  between  Jewish  communities  and  their  host  cultures,  women  have  often  played  a  key   role   as  mediators.  Historian  Deborah  Hertz   has   observed   that   the   relative   fluidity   of  women’s   social  status  gave  them  much  greater  opportunities  to  cross  European  social  borders,  and  they  and  their  families  took  advantage  of   this  mobility.  Wealthy   Jewish   society  hostesses   in  eighteenth-­‐  and  nineteenth-­‐century  Berlin  negotiated  and  blurred  the  boundaries  between  German  and  Jew,  Jew  and  Christian,  Orthodoxy  and  Reform,   and   public   and   private   spaces.   Similarly,   in   the   United   States   in   the   twentieth   century,   Jewish  immigrant   women’s   relative   familiarity   with   business   practice   helped   them   to   make   a   place   for   their  communities   in   American   society.     One   highly   public   setting   for   such   encounters   has   been   the   musical  stage.    In  this  paper,  I  explore  the  cases  of  two  female  Jewish  musicians  whose  public  musical  lives  allowed  them  not  only   to   facilitate   connections  between   themselves  and   their  non-­‐Jewish  audiences,  but   also   to  provoke  new  questions  about  the  changing  position  of  Jews  in  their  host  cultures.    I  draw  first  on  the  case  of   Sara   Levy   (1761   –   1854),   a   maternal   great-­‐aunt   of   Felix   and   Fanny   Mendelssohn,   a   harpsichord  performer,  and  musical  hostess,  whose  devotion  to  the  music  of  the  Bach  family  helped  to  bring  about  the  nineteenth-­‐century  Bach   revival.  Next,   I   examine  Sophie  Tucker   (1887  –  1966),   the  American  entertainer  whose   rejection   of   blackface   helped   to   complicate   American   ideas   of   race,   Jewishness,   and   the   public  presentation   of   women.   I   argue   that,   for   both   Levy   and   Tucker,   their   status   as   socially   fluid   outsiders  allowed  them  both  the  freedom  to  undertake  important  projects  that  were  outside  the  norms  of  their  host  cultures,  and  also  to  draw  attention  to  the  question  of  what  place  Jews  should  have  in  those  host  cultures.  

 

Merav  Rosenfeld,  Institute  of  Musical  Research,  University  of  London,  UK  

Title:  Rabbi  ‘Ovadyah  Yosef  and  His  Halakhic  Rulings  on  Arabic  Music  in  Jewish  Worship  

Abstract:  Rabbi  ‘Ovadyah  Yosef,  who  was  born  in  Baghdad  in  1920  and  immigrated  to  Israel  at  the  age  of  four,  grew  up  to  be  one  of  the  most  influential  rabbinic  figures  in  the  political,  religious  and  cultural  life  of  the   new   state.   He   died   only   recently   in   October   2013,   and   according   to   press   reports   several   hundred  thousand  people,  from  all  walks  of  life  and  diverse  political  and  cultural  backgrounds,  attended  his  funeral.  In  1984,  Yosef  became   the   spiritual   leader  of   the  ultra-­‐orthodox  party  Shas  which  aspired   to   restore   the  shattered  identity  of  Arab-­‐Jews.  He  brought  to  the  public  attention  the  phrase  lehaḥzir   ‘atarah  leyoshnah  [renewing  the  crown’s  glory],  which  was  understood  by  Shas’s  voters  as  its  agenda  to  revive  their  Judaeo-­‐Arabic   tradition   as   lived   in   their  Arabo-­‐Islamic   diasporas.  However,   Rabbi   Yosef’s   aspiration   seems   to   be  quite   different.   Recent   studies   on   Yosef’s   halakhic   rulings   show   that   for   him,   lehaḥzir   ‘atarah   leyoshnah  means  to  renew  the  nation’s  life  in  the  Land  of  Israel,  cleared  of  any  diasporic  traditions,  and  united  under  the  halakhic  rulings  established  by  the  sixteenth  century  Rabbi  Qaro  of  Safed.  Yosef  regard  Qaro  as  Mara  D‘atra,   namely,   the   higher   halakhic   authority   for   Jews   living   in   the   Land   of   Israel.   This   paper   examines  Yosef’s  view  of  music’s  role  in  Jewish  worship,  as  reflected  in  his  monumental  halakhic  work  Yeḥaveh  Da‘at  [Present  an  Opinion].  It  presents  him  both  as  a  gifted  poet  and  cantor  as  well  as  a  great  admirer  of  Arabic  music,   and   suggests   that   in   matters   of   music,   Yosef   was   a   great   supporter   of   diasporic   traditions,   and  particularly  of  those  inherent  to  Middle-­‐Easter  Judaism.  The  paper  shows  that  Yosef  appreciates  that  Arabic  music  is  central  to  the  Judaeo-­‐Arabic  tradition  and  hence  should  be  preserved.  He  refers  to  Arab-­‐Jews,  both  inside  and  outside  Israel,  discusses  with  great  sympathy  their  beloved  music,  and  analyses  its  varied  aspects  in   the   context   of   the   Judaeo-­‐Arabic   heritage,   both   in   the   diaspora   and   in   Israel.   Furthermore,   Yosef  encourages  using  music  in  all  types  of  worship,  describing  its  benefit  in  worshipping  God  with  joy  and  love.  

 

Judith  Cohen,  York  University,  Toronto,  Canada  

Title:  Singing  together  again:  Performing  Sephardic  and  Sufi  women's  Songs  in  Larache,  Morocco  

Abstract:  The  Judeo-­‐Spanish  speaking  Jews  of  the  former  Spanish  Protectorate   in  northern  Morocco  have  all   but   disappeared:   only   a   few  dozen   still   live   there.   In   April   2013   I   had   the   unexpected   opportunity   of  spending  two  weeks  living  in  a  Muslim  household  in  the  town  of  Larache  (El  Araïsh)  and  working  with  local  young  women  Muslim  singers  who  perform  Sufi  hadrá.  Through  the  medium  of  old  Sephardic  wedding  and  hilulá  songs,  we  worked  through  religion,   language,  age,  cultural  differences  to  present  a   joint  concert  of  Sephardic  and  Muslim  songs,  given  in  the  town's  remaining  Catholic  church.  Not  only  did  this  echo  the  (oft-­‐contested)   concept   of   "medieval   three   religions   conviviality",   it   provided   a   new  model   of   understanding  and  cooperation  through  traditional  songs  and  traditional  singing  styles.  In  the  summer  of  2013,  I  returned  briefly,   during   a   research   trip   to   Spain,   to   establish   contact   with   traditional   older   women   wedding   and  henna  singers  and  explore  further  research  possibilities.  Because  my  own  repertoire  and  performance  style  were  based  on  my  years  of  direct  fieldwork  and  participant  observation,  as  well  as  bibliographical  research,  while  preparing  my  doctoral  dissertation   in   the  1980s,  at  a   time  when  many  women  were  still  alive  who  remembered   the   old   songs   and   practices,   I  was   able   to   relate   to   both   these   young   singers  who   did   not  remember  the  Jewish  presence  in  their  town,  and  to  older  people,  who  did  remember  them  vividly.  On  the  musical   level,   I   explored  wedding   song   themes  and  performance  practice,   and  parallels  between  Muslim  and   Sephardic   Jewish   customs,   again   referring   to   my   years   of   fieldwork   in   Moroccan   Sephardic  communities   in   Canada   and   elsewhere.   In   this   paper,   I   explore   the   possibilities   afforded   by   combining  scholarly   inquiry   as   a   trained   ethnomusicologist   with   active   education   and   performance   activities,   as   a  veteran  singer  and  workshop  leader,  to  further,  as  much  as  possible,  both  scholarly  knowledge  and  human  understanding.  Note  1.  The  possible  topics  do  not  include  Folklore/Anthropology/Ethnography,  where  I  feel  this   fits  better  than  musicology.  Note  2.  Although  I  have  been   informed  that  one  or  more  concerts   is/are  already   planned,   I   would   like   to   offer   an   informal   concert   of   music   related   to   this   topic.   An   alternate  possibility  is  to  offer  this  as,   instead  of  a  paper,  a  longer  (40-­‐45  minutes  at  least)  combined  performance-­‐

lecture,  which  would  include  both  live  (by  myself)  and  videotaped  (in  Morocco)  excerpts  of  the  music  which  forms  the  basis  of  this  proposal.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Jewish  and  Muslim  Cultures  

 

Chair:  

 

Elisha  Russ-­‐Fishbane,  Wesleyan  University,  USA  

Title:  Jews  and  Other  Infidels  in  Sufi  Literature  

Abstract:  Recent  scholarship  has  explored  the  attitude  toward  Sufism  in  medieval  Jewish  literature  and  has  called  attention   to  a  movement  of   Jewish-­‐Sufism   that   flourished   in   thirteenth-­‐century  Egypt.   Scholarship  examining  the  image  of  Jews  and  Judaism  in  Sufi  literature,  by  contrast,  is  a  major  desideratum,  one  which  the  present  paper  aims  to  address.  A  number  of  Sufi  poems,   from  Nizami  to  Rumi  to   ibn  Arabi,   famously  promote  a  universalism  transcending  confessional  boundaries.  A  careful  reading  of  classical  Sufi  literature,  both   in   Arabic   and   Persian   (including   the   above-­‐mentioned   authors),   reveals   the   need   for   a   more  systematic   and   nuanced   study   of   the   question.     In   each   of   the   different   genres   of   Sufi   literature  (hagiographical,   poetic,   exegetical,   and   systematic),   the   Jew   is   depicted   in   typological   fashion   either   as  archetypal   infidel,   diabolical   deceiver,   or   as   ultimate   symbol   of   humiliation   and   servility.     Somewhat  paradoxically,  the  image  of  Jewish  humiliation  was  occasionally  utilized  as  a  model  of  ultimate  humility  to  which   the  Sufi  devotee  must  aspire.  This  paper  proposes  a   fresh  approach   to   the   representation  of   Jews  and   Judaism   in   the   Sufi   religious   imagination,   adding   a   new   dimension   to   the   study   of   Jewish-­‐Islamic  engagement  in  the  medieval  Islamic  world.  

 

Renee  Levine  Melammed,  The  Schechter  Institute  of  Jewish  Studies,  Israel  

Title:  Jewish  Women  in  Mediterranean  Society  and  the  Influence  of  Islamic  Culture  (950-­‐1250)  

Abstract:   In  what   is  known  as  Genizah  society,   the   lives  of   Jewish  women  were   influenced  by   Islamic   law  and   culture   in   numerous   ways,   many   of   which   have   been   examined   by   S.D.   Goitein,   Mordechai   Akiva  Friedman  as  well  as  by  myself.   Jewish  men  were   imitating   the  surrounding  culture  when   they  wed  more  than  one  wife,  had  concubines  or   sexual   relations  with  maidservants.  Temporary  marriage  arrangements  (iftida)   occasionally   took  place.   Yet   there  were   additional  ways   in  which   their   lives  were   affected  by   the  Islamic  surroundings:  When  and  why  would  a  woman  go  to  or  threaten  to  go  to  a  Muslim  court?  Does  the  language  they  used,  the  less  formal  Judeo-­‐Arabic  noted  by  Joel  Kraemer,  reflect  aspects  of  Muslim  culture?  Did  they  come  into  contact  with  Muslim  women  or  men  on  a  daily  basis?  Can  any  differences  be  discerned  from   these   sources   between  women's   lives   in  medieval   Cairo   and   those   in   other  Mediterranean   Jewish  

communities?  This  paper  will  attempt  to  answer  these  questions  while  looking  at  Jewish  women's  lives  as  reflected  in  legal  and  epistolary  documents  found  in  the  Cairo  Genizah  (950-­‐1250).  

 

Roni  Shweka,  Friedberg  Genizah  Project,  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  "And  every  day  they  are  doing  a  quarrel,  even  in  the  synagogue":  Disturbing  Episodes  From  Jerusalem  at  the  Beginning  of  the  13th  century  

Abstract:  Almost  one  hundred  years  ago  Jacob  Mann  published  in  his  classic  work  "The  Jews  in  Egypt  and  in  Palestine  Under  the  Fatimid  Caliphs"   (vol.  1,  pg  241;  vol.  2,  pp.  304-­‐305)  a  Genizah  fragment   (T-­‐S  8J33.4)  that  contains  the  end  of  an  epistle  written  by  Yehiel  b.  Isaac  from  Jerusalem,  around  the  turn  of  the  12th  and  the  13th  centuries.  The  writer  inquires  a  rabbi  in  Egypt  what  to  do  with  the  money  the  rabbi  sent  him  for  building  a  ritual  bath.  Yehiel  argues  they  don't  need  to  build  another  one,  as  the  community  has  already  one  in  his  own  house.    With  the  use  of  the  FGP  module  for  joining  fragments  I  succeeded  to  find  more  fragments  from  this  epistle  and   from   other   writings   of   Yehiel   which   reveals   a   harsh   controversy   in   the   little   Jewish   community   of  Jerusalem  at  that  time  concerning  the  building  of  the  ritual  bath  and  other  issues.  It  turns  out  that  someone  already  started  to  build  a  bath  in  his  yard,  and  Yehiel  was  willing  to  pay  him  all  the  expenses  he  had  so  far  but   to   stop   him   from   continue   building   the   bath.   Yehiel   describes   some   other   severe   accidents   in   the  community  of  Jerusalem  in  these  unpublished  fragments,  altogether  portraying  an  unpleasant  picture  of  a  community  in  a  quarrel.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

Contemporary  Israel  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Israel,  Islam  and  Jewish-­‐Arab  Conflict  

 

Chair  

 

Nesya  Shemer,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   Bible,   Quran   and   Anti-­‐Judaism:   Sheikh   Yusuf   al-­‐Qaradawi   on   the   Theological   Roots   of   the   Israeli-­‐  Palestinian  Conflict  

Abstract:  Sheikh  Dr.  Yusuf  al-­‐Qaradawi   is  considered  as  the  most   influential   Islamic  religious  figure  today.  Born   in   1926,   Qaradawi   graduated   Al-­‐Azhar   University   in   Cairo   and   received   his   Ph.D.   in   1973.   He   is  acknowledged  as  the  spiritual  leader  of  the  Muslim  Brotherhood  and  serves  as  a  member  of  the  board  of  prominent   international   Islamic  organizations.  Sheikh  Qardawi   is  one  of   the  greatest  enemies  of   Israel   in  Sunni   Islam.  He  sees  the  Israeli  -­‐  Palestinian  conflict  as  a  political  conflict,  since  the  Jews  have  occupied  a  Muslim   territory,   but   not   only   politics   are   involved   here.   In   Qaradawi’s   view   the   conflict   has   long  theological  roots  that  reach  through  the  complicated  relations  between  Abraham  and  his  two  wives  Hagar  and  Sarah.  A  straight  line  connects,  in  Qaradawi’s  opinion,  from  the  succession  struggles  of  Genesis  and  the  

Israeli   -­‐  Palestinian  conflict.  This   lecture  will  discuss  Qaradawi’s   interpretation   to  Genesis   stories   such  as,  the  expulsion  of  Hagar  and  Ishmael,  the  Binding  of  Ishmael  and  the  buying  of  the  tomb  of  the  Patriarchs.  In  this  lecture  we  will  see  how  these  Bible  Stories  went  to  a  process  of  Islamization  and  Palestinization  in  favor  the  Palestinian  struggle.  

 

Elad  Ben-­‐Dror,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Jewish-­‐Arab  Conflict  and  the  Demise  of  the  Musta‘arib  Communities  in  the  Arab  Villages  in  the  Galilee  Abstract:  

Musta‘arib  Jewish  communities  existed  in  the  Galilee  for  centuries.  The  Jews  spoke  Arabic  and  looked  much  like   the   local  Arabs,  but  were  meticulous   in   their   religious  observance.   Itzhak  Ben-­‐Zvi  counted  around  30  such  communities  during  the  centuries  between  the  Crusades  and  the  start  of  Ottoman  rule.  Persecution  by   local   rulers,  heavy   taxes,  and  other  hardships   left  only   three  Musta‘arib  communities   in   the  Galilee   in  the  late  Ottoman  period:  Kafr  Yassif,  Shefar‘am,  and  Peqi‘in.  Muslims,  Christians,  and  Druze  lived  there  as  neighbors;  the  intercommunal  conflicts  meant  that  the  tensions  were  not  focused  on  the  Jews.  Ultimately  even   these   Jewish   communities   collapsed,   one   after   another—precisely   during   the   period   of   the   Zionist  settlement   in   Palestine.   My   lecture   deals   with   the   destruction   of   the   last   three   Musta‘arib   Galilean  communities,  especially  Peqi‘in.  The  main  thesis  is  that  the  intensifying  Jewish-­‐Arab  conflict  made  survival  of   the  centuries-­‐long  coexistence   in   these  villages  nearly   impossible.  The  history  of  Peqi‘in   illustrates   this  well.   In   the   1920s,   the   ancient   Jewish   community   became   a   symbol   for   the   Zionist   Yishuv   and   was  enthusiastically  adopted  by  Ben-­‐Zvi.  Money  was  raised  and  JNF  officials  attempted  to  purchase  land  in  the  village   for   the   Peqi‘in   Jews.   The   Zionist   efforts   led   to   a   steep   rise   in   land   prices   and   poisoned   the  atmosphere  between  the  Jews  and  their  non-­‐Jewish  neighbors.  Later,  especially  after  the  1929  Arab  riots,  the   Zionists   viewed   the   protection   of   the   community   as   a   test   of   the   loyalty   of   the   Druze,   who  were   a  majority   in  Peqi‘in.  Senior  Zionist  officials  pressured  the  Galilee  Druze   leadership  to  guarantee  the  Jewish  villagers’   safety.  On   the  other   side,   the   local  Arabs  assaulted   the  Peqi‘in   Jews  and  depicted   the  Druze  as  traitors  to  Arab  interests.  The  Peqi‘in  Jews  were  caught  in  the  middle;  in  1938  they  were  forced  to  abandon  the   village   after   a   nearly   fatal   Arab   attack.   Centuries   of   coexistence   in   the   Galilee   and   the   Musta‘arib  community  came  to  an  end  precisely  when  new  Jewish  settlements  were  established  in  Palestine  and  the  Zionist  enterprise  became  entrenched.  

   

Monday  21st  July  

Room:  16  

 

Session:  001:  

Modern  Hebrew  Literature  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Foreign  Writers  in  Paris:  Avraham  Shlonsky,  Zalman  Shneour  and  Blaise  Cendrars  

Organizer:  Lilach  Nethanel  

Chair:  Lilach  Nethanel  

 

Lilach  Nethanel,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Poetic  Difference  The  Problem  of  the  Site  in  Two  Poems  by  Zalman  Shneour  

Abstract:   This   paper   addresses   the   literary   representation   of   the   urban   site   in   two   Hebrew   poems   by  Zalman  Shneour:  'On  the  Seine'  (Al  Hof  Ha'Seine)  [1907],  and  'Vilna'  (Vilnius)  [1917].  These  poems,  framing  the   second  decade  of   Shneour's  poetry,  were  written   in  a   changing  biographical   and   ideological   context.  The   restless  mobility   of   Shneour   himself,   as   of   the   generation   of   early   20th   century  modernist   Hebrew  writers,  was  pointed  out   in  Shimon  Halkin's  critical  writings   [Halkin,  1980]  as  well  as   in  Shachar  Pinsker's  recent   book   [Pinsker,   2011].   This  mobility   is   also   inscribed   in   the   thematic   outlines   of   Shneour's   literary  writings.   The   second   decade   of   his   poetry   is   introduced   and   concluded   by   the   description   of   two   urban  sites,  Paris  and  Vilna.  The  poem  'On  the  Seine'  was  written  during  Shneour's  first  stay  in  Paris,  and  it  was  included  in  the  collection  of  poetry  which  he  published  in  1923  Berlin,  under  the  title  Gesharim  [Bridges].  The  poem  'Vilna'  was  probably  written  during  World  War  I.  It  was  first  published  in  a  special  edition  in  post-­‐war  Berlin,  and  was  later  on  included  in  a  second  poetry  collection  entitled  Hezionot  [Visions]  from  1923.  The  reading  of  these   'local'  poems  describing  Vilnius  and  Paris  should  refer  to  the  context  of  the  Hebrew  publishing  initiatives  in  Berlin,  where  they  were  edited  and  printed.  Shneour's  poems  express  what  I  shall  call  a   'poetic  difference'   regarding   the  actual  presence   in   the   represented  site,   its   local   language  and  the  described  historical  time.  His  1907  Hebrew  poem  on  Paris  is  to  be  read  by  its  linguistic  difference  from  the  proper  names  of   the  monuments  mentioned   in   it;   the  1917  poem  on  Vilna   is   to  be  shifted   from  Pre-­‐war  Jewish  Vilna  and  be  replaced  in  post-­‐War  Berlin,  with  the  immigration  wave  of  Eastern  European  Jews.  This  reading   of   the   poetic   difference   is   an   introductive   chapter   to   a   future   monographic   study   on   Zalman  Shneour's  early  years,  as   it  evokes   the   fundamental  problem  of   the  mimetic   representation   in  early  20th  century  Hebrew  literature.  

 

Roy  Greenwald,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Shlonsky  in  Paris:  From  Post-­‐Symbolism  to  Neo-­‐Symbolism  

Abstract:  In  1930  the  poet  Avraham  Shlonsky  traveled  to  Paris  to  raise  funds  and  increase  subscriptions  for  Ketuvim,  the  literary  magazine  of  which  he  was  a  leading  member.  His  trip  would  become  highly  significant  for  the  direction  of  Hebrew  poetry  in  Eretz  Yisrael.  While  in  Paris,  Shlonsky  wrote  the  “Karchiel”  poems,  in  which   feverish   trade   is   a   defining   feature   of   the   urban   landscape.   The   great  metropolis   in   these   poems  becomes   the   site  of  a   rampant   inflation,  which  depletes   the  value  not  only  of  material   assets  but  of   the  

spiritual  ones  of  Western  culture  at  large.  The  “Karchiel”  poems  were  included  four  years  later  in  Shlonsky’s  book  Avnei  Bohu,  a  book  that  became  a  founding  text  for  the  neo-­‐symbolist  school  in  Eretz  Yisrael.  The  rise  of  this  school  has  always  been  –  and  largely  remains  –  one  of  the  great  questions  for  the  research  of  the  history  of  new  Hebrew  poetry.  My  paper   focuses  on  Shlonsky’s  poetry   in  order   to  explain   the  rise  of   the  neo-­‐Symbolist  school.  It  seeks  to  trace  the  influence  of  French  Symbolism  on  Shlonsky’s  poetics  as  well  as  to  explore  the  way  that  the  political  and  economic  conditions  in  Europe  at  the  time  found  expression  in  his  poetry.  

 

Amotz  Giladi,  Strasburg  University,  France  

Title:   Transnationalism   and   Nationalism   in   the   Parisian   Literary   Field   of   the   Early   20th   Century:   the  Trajectory  of  Blaise  Cendrars  

Abstract:  The  poet  and  writer  Blaise  Cendrars  (1887-­‐1961),  born   in  Switzerland,  arrived   in  France   in  1912  and   became   intensely   active   in   the   Parisian   avant-­‐garde   circles.   Highly   internationalized,   these   circles  included  many  foreign  creators  and  maintained  multiple  relations  with  avant-­‐garde  groups  across  Europe.  Cendrars’s   double   culture,   both   French   and   German,   made   of   him   a   particularly   adapted   actor   of   the  transnational   avant-­‐garde   network.   Jewish   creators,  mainly   from   Eastern   Europe,  were   highly   present   in  the  Parisian   avant-­‐garde   circles,  which  became  an  arena  of   cooperation  between   Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  artists.   Let   us   mention,   for   example,   the   friendship   between   Cendrars   and  Marc   Chagall,   to   whom   the  former   dedicated   a   poem   in   prose,   as   well   as   one   of   his   "Nineteen   Elastic   Poems".   As   for   Chagall,   he  painted  a  portrait  of  Cendrars  which   is  unfortunately   lost.  Yet,  foreign  avant-­‐garde  writers,  who  occupied  marginal   positions   in   the   Parisian   society   and   literary   field,   were   subjected   to   the   increasing   French  nationalism  and  xenophobia,  which  attained  their  paroxysm  during  World  War  I.  In  these  circumstances,  it  was  difficult   for  foreigners  to  stay   in  France  without   joining  the  French  army.  Cendrars  did  so  at  the  very  beginning  of  the  war,  after  signing  a  manifesto  inciting  all  foreigners  living  in  France  to  join  the  French  army  as  well.  The  war,  from  which  Cendrars  returned  after  loosing  his  right  arm,  was  a  major  trauma  for  himself  and  for  his  generation  of  avant-­‐garde  creators,  whose  transnational  vision  was  put  to  the  test.  During  the  1920s,  Cendrars  drifted  away  from  the  avant-­‐garde  circles,  passed  from  poetry  to  novel  writing  and  started  working   as   a   reporter   for   major   French   newspapers.   Thus,   he   left   the   margins   of   the   literary   field   and  moved   towards   a   more   central   position.   Moreover,   having   been   naturalized,   he   tended   hence   forth   to  repress  his  foreign  origins.  He  even  adopted  French  nationalism  and  xenophobia,  and  during  the  1930s,  in  the  context  of  the  Front  Populaire’s  government  led  by  Léon  Blum,  he  took  anti-­‐Semitic,  far-­‐right  positions.  Through  Cendrars’s   trajectory,   I  propose   to  deal  with  early  20th  century  Paris  as  an   intercultural  melting  pot,  but  also  as  an  example  of  increased  cultural  nationalization  processes.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002  

Modern  Hebrew  Literature  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Jewish  National  Renewal  

 

Chair:  

 

Yoav  Ronel,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Berdyczewski  and  the  European  Love:  Hybrid  Subjectivity  and  Identity  in  Miriam  

Abstract:   The   writings   of   the   19th   century   Jewish   author   Micha   Yosef   Berdyczewski's   were   canonically  defined   by   many   (including   Berdyczewski   himself),   as   a   project   to   found   a   modern   Jewish   identity   and  subjectivity.   Berdyczewski   famously   claimed   that   the   Jewish   national   revival   should   start   not   from   the  collective   people,   but   from   the   subject,   by   founding   a   new   Jewish   subject,   one   that,   unlike   Orthodox  Judaism,   is  not  alienated  from  his  body.  This  Berdyczewskyan  reunion  of  body  and  spirit,  as  Hanan  Hever  states,   will   come   through   an   opening   up   of   theseparatist   Jewish   culture   to   non-­‐Jewish   modernity   and  thought   in   general,   and   to   the   fertile   forces  of   erotic,   romantic   European   love   in  particular.   The  modern  Jewish  national   identity  depends  on   the   revival  of   the  subject   through  romantic   love.   In  my   lecture   I  will  offer  a   reading  of  Berdyczewski's   Jewish  adaptation  and  his   interpretation  of   romantic  European   love,  as  portrayed  in  his  final  novel  Miriam,  a  bildungsroman  seemingly  focused  on  the  life  of  a  young  Jewish  girl  in  a   19th   Jewish   community   in   Ukraine.   As   Zipora   Kagan   has   shown,   this   novel   serves   as   a   monument   or  testament  of  a  heterogeneous  Jewish  culture.  I  will  claim  that  the  novel  offers  an  examination  of  romantic-­‐erotic   European   love,   as   it   clashes   and   integrates   with   a   Jewish   culture.   Besides   references   to   Flaubert  Madam  Bovary  and  Tolstoy's  Anna  Karenina,   the  novel  uses  classic   tropes  and  scenes  from  the  European  love  arsenal:   the  structuring  of   the  new,   loving   Jewish  subject/identity.  Thus,  a  non-­‐Jewish  essence   flows  into   the   formation  of   the   Jewish   subject.  My   reading  of  Miriam  will   deal  with   its  unique  and  destructive  love-­‐discourse:   I   will   try   to   show   that   Berdyczewski's   reading   of   European   love   reveals   the   inherent  destructive   potential   of   the   romantic   love-­‐discourse,   what   Zahi   Zamir   (following   Denis   de-­‐Rougemont)  refers  to  as  a  "tormenting  love  model";  furthermore,  that  this  love  serves  as  a  volatile  and  problematic  base  for  a  national  identity  or  modern  subject.  Through  a  reading  of  Freud’s  Moses  and  Monotheism  I  will  claim  that   this  novel,  written   in   the  author's  dying  days,   should  be   read  as  a  will;  one   that  will  undermine   the  stable   concepts  of   Jewish   identity   attributed   to  his   earlier  works.   I  will   present  Miriam  as   a  destabilizing  text:  while  the  early  Berdyczewski  used  romantic  love  as  the  vessel  of  the  becoming  of  the  modern  Jewish  identity,   this   novel   presents   love   as   a   disaster,   thus   questioning   the   possibility   of   a   stable  national/subjective  identity;  as  a  text  which  deals  with  the  impossibility  of  a  stable,  homogenous  identity.  Finally,  I  will  claim  that  following  this  disaster,  the  novel’s  finale  and  its  heroine’s  cultural  choice,  a  hybrid  one,  opens  up  a  possibility  of  a  hybrid   (following  Homy  Bhabha),   Jewish/non-­‐Jewish   identity.  An   identity  that   isn't   constructed  upon  an  erotic   and  utopian  homogenous   concept  of   love  and   identity,   but  upon  a  culturally  mobile  and  responsible,  heterogeneous  selfhood.  

 

Shira  Stav,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Food,  Incest  and  Auto-­‐Anti-­‐Semitism  in  UN  Gnessin's  Short  Stories  

Abstract:  This  talk  discusses  two  short  stories  by  the  great  early  20th  century  Hebrew  writer,  UN  Gnessin:  "Pre-­‐fast   meal"   ("Seuda   Mafseket",   1905)   and   "In   the   gardens"   ("Ba-­‐ganim",   1910).   I   propose   that   the  former,   less-­‐known   story,   contains   a   certain   implicit   structure   that   is   fully   developed   in   the   latter,   well-­‐known   story.   In   both   stories   Gnessin  weaves   ties   between   food   and   incestuous   seduction   and   between  sexuality  and  the  self-­‐perception  of  the  Jews.  "Pre-­‐fast  meal"  depicts  the  relationship  between  a  father  and  his  teenage  daughter.  The  time  frame  is  the  first  Yom-­‐Kippur's  eve  following  the  death  of  the  mother.  The  main   conflict   in   the   story   consists   in   the  mourning   father's   request  of   his   daughter   to   join  him   in   eating  meat  at  the  Pre-­‐fast  meal,  whereas  she  practices  vegetarianism  and  holds  secular  views.  "In  the  Gardens"  tells  the  story  of  a  young  educated  Jew  who  has  just  returned  from  many  years  of  travelling  and  goes  out  to  stroll   in   the   countryside,   where   he   has   not   been   for   years.   There   he   encounters   a   vulgar   Jewish   vassal  

farmer,  who  provides   fish  and  other   foods   to   the   local  urban  community.  The  young   lad  experiences   the  silence  and  the  blooming  nature  around  him  as  a  powerful  attack  on  his  being.  At  the  climax  of  the  story  he  secretly   witnesses   a   brutal   ritual,   when   the   farmer   has   sex   with   his   retarded   daughter   and   lashes   her.  Incestuous  desire  in  these  stories  is  a  theme  that  sharpens  the  tensions  between  urbanity  and  country-­‐life,  between  seclusion  inside  definite  borders  and  their  transgression,  between  Anti-­‐Semitism  and  Jewish  self-­‐perception.  Following  theoretical  accounts  of   incest   in  Levi-­‐Strauss,  Kristeva,  David  Bakan,  Sander  Gilman  and  others,   I  will  show  how  the  non-­‐obvious  connection  between  the  two  stories  is  revealed  through  the  incest  theme,  which  expresses  an  anxiety  of  stagnation.  Gnessin  portrays  incest  as  a  disease:  the  disease  of  closed   spaces   and   degeneration,   'the   disease   of   the   Jews'.   Reading   both   stories   together   shows   that  Gnessin   considered   it   an   incurable   disease.   On   this   reading,   in   Gnessin's   stories   the   tensions   between  tradition   and   secularization,   between   segregation   and   assimilation,   and   between   disintegration   and  renewal  overlay   real  and  symbolic   incestuous  affairs.  As  opposed  to   the   traditional  view  that   incest   is  an  obvious  tool  of  creating  psychological  drama,  the  present  proposal  takes  it  to  play  diverse  roles  in  literary  structures:   ideological,   social,   national   political   and   gender   roles.   The   juxtaposition   of   these   stories  highlights  incest  as  a  focal  point  where  the  main  concerns  and  worries  of  Hebrew  literature  at  the  turn  of  the  20th  century  converge.  

 

Rhona  Burns,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  "Jews  do  not  ride  Horses!":  On  the  method  of  symbols  in  Sussati  by  Mendele  Mocher  Sforim  

Abstract:  In  modern  western  imagination,  it  seems  that  the  image  of  the  horse  always  carried  with  it  some  meanings   of   status.   More   than   anything,   when   coupled   to   Man,   from   Napoleon   on   horseback   to   the  Hollywood  cowboys,  the  horse  is  associated,  in  western  modern  thought,  with  power  and  control.  It  seems  then,  that  we  shouldn’t  be  very  surprised  to  find  the  image  of  a  horse  standing  at  the  center  of  a  literary  piece   (Sussati),   which   was   regarded   by   Fichmann   as   "the   greatest   national   poetry   in   the   new   Hebrew  literature".  For  what  would  be  more  fitting  than  "national  poetry",  using  this  ancient   image  as  a  symbol?  But  how  is  the  horse  portrayed  in  the  "Jewish  Imagination"?  "Jews  do  not  ride  horses!",  states  resolutely  the    Melamed  in  the  Hebrew  story  Don  Kishot  Me'astropoley  by  Bucki  Ben  yagli.  Avot  Yeshurun  expressed  a  similar  notion  when  warning  his   listeners,   in   a   recorded   interview,   that   "it   is   shameful   for   a  horse   to  be  ridden  by   a   Jew!".   The  biblical  warning   for   the   Israelite   kings-­‐  warning   them  against  obtaining   too  many  horses-­‐   also   comes   to  mind   in   this   context.  And   indeed,   as   a   loyal  member  of   the   "Jewish   Imagination",  Mendele's  horse  is  no  heroic  horse-­‐  rather  it's  a  tortured  and  beaten  up  mare,  which    her  owner  (Israel  by  name)  prefers  walking  beside  her  instead  of  riding  her.  This  mare  is  presented  to  us  as  an  "eternal  mare"  ( עולמית סוסה ),  with  no  hope   for  change.  Werses  has  already  analyzed   the  piece  as  consisting  of  a  "serial  structure",  an  anti-­‐linear  structure,  which  clearly  doesn't  lead  us  to  a  "solution".  How  then  does  this  fit  with  the  national  aim  which  stood  behind  the  making  of  this  piece?  In  this  discussion  I  will  examine  the  symbolic  method  in  this  novel.  Following  Amir  Banbaji,  I  also  will  use  the  term  Allegory  as  understood  by  Adorno-­‐  but  unlike   Banbaji   I   will   argue   that   precisely   from   this   allegorical   understanding   of   the   piece,   the   Zionist  meaning  of  the  piece  is  sharpened  rather  than  weakened.  I  will  base  my  argument  further  on  Dan  Meron,  and  on  his  definition  of  Susassti  as  part  of  a  project  he  called  "The  madmen's   library".   I  will  contend  that  the   so   called   "unintelligible"   narrative,   with   which   Banbaji   tries   to   save   Mendele     from   what   he   calls  "Mevak'rei  dor  ha'me'dinah",  actually  strengthens   the  national  context  and   importance  of   the  piece,  and  indeed   serves   to   create   a   complex   national   image,   loyal   to   the   historical,   political   and   cultural  understanding  of  Abramovitch.  I  will  suggest  that  its  fragmentary  character,  which  resists  in  many  ways  to  any  direct  "symbolic"  meaning,   in   fact  contributes  to  the  very  understanding  of  this  piece  as  a  "national"  one.  

 

Riki  Traum-­‐Avidan,  Fairleigh  Dickinson  University,  FDU,  USA  

Title:  A  Non-­‐Jewish  Jew:  The  Case  of  Yoram  Kaniuk  

Abstract:  The  works  of  Yoram  Kaniuk  (1930-­‐2013)  are  interwoven  with  the  Zionist  ethos  and  the  history  of  the  State  of  Israel.  His  narratives  are  imbued  with  references  to  the  national,  political  and  religious  failure  of   the   state   to   live   up   to   the   dream   of   Kaniuk   and   his   generation.   This   failure   had   reached   its   radical  manifestation  in  2011,  two  years  before  his  death,  when  Kaniuk  petitioned  the  Interior  Ministry  to  change  his   stated   religion   from   “Jewish”   to   “No   Religion.”   For   Kaniuk,   the   Jewish   question   is   trapped   in   and  inseparable   from   the   national   question.     This   presentation   traces   Kaniuk’s   gradual   separation   from   his  Jewish  identity,  as  expressed  in  “The  Last  Jew”  (1982)  and  his   last  novella  “An  Old  Man”  (2012).   I  explore  these  two  seminal  works  and  the  different  forms  of  disappointment  they  present,  in  addition  to  prominent  metonymies  of  despair  that  comprise  the  two  novels.  Kaniuk’s  final  novella,  “An  Old  Man”  presents  the  art  of  painting  as  a  form  of  reclamation  that  repositions  Kaniuk  on  a  different  level  of  belonging,  where  religion  and  nationality  have  no  meaning.  I  discuss  the  transformation  from  “The  Last  Jew”  to  “An  Old  Man”  as  one  that  captures  the  conversion  from  an  absurd,  disintegrated  identity  that  struggles  with  historical,  national  and  religious  bonds,  to  an  old,  failed  rootless  being  who  redefines  his  existence  by  means  of  art.  The  art  of  painting  becomes   a  metonym  of   rebirth   and   recreation   and   it   concretizes   Kaniuk’s   declaration  of   having  “No  Religion.”    I  attempt  to  place  Kaniuk  in  a  literary  tradition  of  Jewish  thinkers  and  writers  who  adopt  a  radical  ethical  position  of  reflective  individualism,  which  is  explored  in  Judith  Butler’s  “Parting  Ways.”  This  ethical  position  denies  the  right  of  any  collective  to  monopolize  national,  religious,  or  sexual  categories,  and  instead   demands   individual   autonomy.   In   a   way,   Kaniuk’s   works   present   radical   ethics   as   a   literary  manifestation  of  this  demand  for  personal  autonomy.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003  

Modern  Hebrew  Literature    

14.00-­‐15.30  

From  Exile  to  the  Statehood  Generation  

 

Chair:  

 

Adi  Orian,  The  Hadassah  College,  Israel  

Title:   Jerusalem   as   a   Symbolic   Nation   –   national   discourse   in   the   19th   century   as   reflected   in   Byron's  Hebrew  Melodies  and  its  translation  

Abstract:   A   significant   part   in   the   hold   translations   possess   is   in   the   "immersion,   so   far   as   we   may  experience  it,  in  another  language  being  as  close  as  we  can  come  to  a  second  self,  to  breaking  free  of  the  habitual  skin  or  tortoise-­‐shell  of  our  consciousness."  Indeed  the  translators  into  Hebrew  in  the  19th  century  channeled   and   encouraged   the   wish   of   the   Jewish   people   to   change   and   to   heal   the   Jewish   soul   and  condition,  returning  them  to  their  former  Biblically-­‐inspired  pride  and  glory,  as  they  viewed  it.  The  unique  situation  of  Hebrew  literature  in  the  19th  century  cannot  go  unnoticed.  The  translations  and  their  influence  in  a  period   in  which   Jews  had  no   land  and  no   spoken   language  of   their  own,  became   the  only   source  of  

unity,   replacing  theological  concerns  with  sociological  and  national  ones.  Hebrew   literature   in   this  period  became  the  means  for  an  internal  immigration  to  a  spiritual  Jerusalem  awakening  the  nationalistic  Jewish  spirit,   which   ultimately   led   to   a   physical,   external   immigration   to   the   land   of   Israel   and   later   even   to  statehood.   Lord   Byron's   Hebrew  Melodies   (1815)   encompasses   everything   the   Jewish   society   of   the   day  tended   towards:   it   is   Biblically-­‐based;   focused  on   Jewish   themes  and   concerns;   dealing  with   the   issue  of  crime  and  punishment  and  the  possibility  of  a  realistic-­‐  Edenic  hope  based  in  a  metaphoric  and  eventually  a  physical  Jerusalem.  These  concerns  supported  the  Jewish  dissatisfaction  with  the  weak,  faulty,  exilic,  Jewish  condition,   a   view  which  was   paradoxically   also   based   on   anti-­‐Semitic  models.   In   this   period,   translators  became  the  modern  prophets  of  the  day  conveying  a  sociological  rather  than  a  religious  voice.  Translation  became  the  way  to  decolonize  and  liberate  the  Hebrew  Bible,  the  Hebrew  language  and  through  them  the  Hebrew  people.  Most  of  the  melodies  deal  directly  or  otherwise  with  the  themes  of  exile,  suffering  and  a  wish  for  a  return  to  an  Edenic  state.  Whether  Byron  wrote  about  physical  exile  (which  he  also  experienced)  or   regarded   it   as   a  metaphor   for   a   spiritual,   emotional   exile   from  one's   soul   and   self,   his   Jewish   readers  found   their   then   budding   urgent   desire   for   change   in   the   Jewish   spirit,   society   and   condition   in   these  poems.  The  translators  to  these  poems  emphasized  greatly  this  approach  to  the  point  of  transforming  even  the   'neutral'   love  poems  (such  as  "She  Walks   in  Beauty"  as  a  prime  example)   into  poems  about  exile  and  the   Jewish   relationship   with   God   through   His   Shechina.   Byron's   work   served   as   mediator   between  mythology  and  Jewish  Biblical  pride  and  the  modern  age  causing  Joseph  Klausner,  for  instance,  to  declare  that  no  other  European  poet  has  enriched  the  new  Hebrew  poetry  as  Byron.  It  may  be  equally  added  that,  since  Hebrew  culture  was  a  central  source  of  inspiration  for  the  Jewish  people,  that  Jewish  nationality  and  possibly   nationhood   also  owe  Byron   a   great   debt.   Several   translations   into  Hebrew   for   this  work  will   be  presented   comparatively,   emphasizing   the   Jerusalem   trope,   in   order   to   show   the   ideological   source   and  force  of  translations  in  the  building  of  a  culture,  a  people  and  a  nation.  

 

Dina  Berdichevsky,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Y.H.  Brenner,  Modernist  Aesthetics,  and  the  Exilic  Genre  

Abstract:   In  keeping  with   the  conference's  keynote   theme  "Jewish  and  Non-­‐Jewish  Cultures   in  Contact"   I  propose  a  paper  that  addresses  the  unique  relationship  between  a  European  modernist  aesthetics,  which  saw  a  diasporic  existence  as  the  ultimate  state  of  being,  and  the  Jewish  historical  chaotic  experience  on  the  eve   of   First  World  War.  My   lecture   demonstrates   how   the  Hebrew  writer   Y.H.   Brenner   approached   this  confluence   of   ideas   through  what   I   will   describe   as   his   exilic   genre.   Brenner's   typical   hero   is   an   eternal  wanderer,   living   in   a   continuous   state   of   homelessness   and   constant   transition   between   cities   and  continents,   never   reaching   his   destination.   But   this   diasporic   state   is   as   true   to   Brenner's   concept   of  literature  as  it   is  to  his  heroes.  Brenner  constantly  represents  the  published  text  itself  as  the  "other"  who  comes  from  afar.  Furthermore,  I  argue  that  Brenner's  generic  style,  namely  a  preference  for  the  unfinished  and  fragmentary  qualities  of  the  text,  as  opposed  to  the  idea  of  the  complete  work  of  art,  advocates  for  the  exile  of  literature.  When  literature  is  doomed  to  the  everlasting  wandering  of  the  nomad,  it  can  no  longer  provide  the  experience  of  home  and  becomes  instead  the  vehicle  for  fundamental  alterity.  

 

Chen  Strass,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Political  Metonymies:  Hierarchy  and  Representations  of  Space  in  Israeli  Fiction  

Abstract:   One   of   the   most   utilized   figurative   devices   in   prose,   and   particularly   in   the   representation   of  space,  is  Metonymy.  According  to  one  definition,  metonymy  is  an  expression  of  an  abstract  or  metaphysical  state  by  means  of  a  tangible  and  concrete  state,  or  a  reduction  of  a  higher  order  of  being  to  a  lower  one.  

For  instance,  a  representation  of  a  house,  a  factory  or  alternatively  a  natural  landscape,  is  conditioned  by  a  higher   order   of  meaning   –   the   human   subject.  Metonymy   is   therefore   not   a   “neutral”   figurative   device  merely   based  on   contiguity,   but   it   also   serves   a   hierarchic   structure:   the  metonymic   representation  of   a  given   element   (space)   presupposes   the   existence   of   a   higher   human   order,   and   stipulates   instrumental  subject/object   relations.   In   this   lecture   I   will   discuss   the   ways   in   which   this   supposedly   self-­‐evident  hierarchy,  which  characterizes  most  uses  of  the  metonymic  representation  in  modern  literature,  falls  apart  and  is  reversed  in  the  fiction  of  Israeli  author  Yeshayahu  Koren,  a  member  of  the  “statehood  generation”  (a  group   of   writers   mostly   born   during   the   British   Mandate,   who   published   their   first   works   in   the   years  following   Israel's   independence).  A  primary   characteristic  of  Koren’s  prose   is   the   construction  of   a   space  that   deviates   from   representation   schemes  which   are   common   in   realistic   literature   and   Israeli   prose   in  particular.   One   expression   of   this   deviation   is   the   naturalization   of   socialized   space   (such   as   the  representation  of  an  army  base  and  a  desert  factory  as  natural  spaces).  This  rewriting  of  space  dictates  a  representation  scheme  which  undermines  modern  conceptions  of  human-­‐space  relations,  as  presupposed  by  the  Zionist  spatial  ideology.  In  this  context,  I  will  discuss  the  ways  in  which  Koren's  usage  of  metonymic  representation   is   a   poetic   expression   of   his   deconstruction   of   humanistic   hierarchies;   this   leads,   among  other   things,   to   an   equivalence   of   the   human   subject   and   space.   Koren   undermines   the   subject   whose  consciousness   and   identity   stem   from  modernist-­‐nationalist   conceptions,   and  whose  efforts,   accordingly,  are  aimed  at  conquering  space  and  subjugating  it.  I  would  like  to  argue  that  Koren  proposes  an  alternative  conception   of   space   as   fashioned   by   non-­‐Jewish,   Palestinian   notions   of   space.   In   this   way   he   offers   an  intertwining  of   two  differing  conceptions  of   space.  Accordingly,   I  will  examine   the  ways   in  which  Koren’s  deconstruction  of  the  metonymic  hierarchy  reflects  a  problematization  of  ownership  and  power  relations  in  the  Israeli-­‐Palestinian  space.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  004  

Modern  Hebrew  Literature    

16.00-­‐17.00  

Feeling  of  Strangeness  

 

Chair:  

 

Tamar  Wolf-­‐Monzon,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   The   Boundaries   of   Attraction   to   an   Other   -­‐   A   Discussion   of   Ya’acov   Orland’s   Unpublished   Poem  “Hannale  from  Dorohoi”  

Abstract:  “Hannale  from  Dorohoi”  is  a  lengthy  poem  written  by  the  poet  Ya’acov  Orland  in  the  mid-­‐1940s.  At   the   center  of   the  poem’s  plot,   the  greater  part  of  which   is   still   in  manuscript   form  and  has   yet   to  be  published,   is   the   story   of   the   abduction   of   Hannale,   the   baby   daughter   and   only   child   of   R.   Mendel  Melamed   and   his   wife   Gendel,   by   a   band   of   gypsies   who   swooped   down   on   the   town   of   Dorohoi,  Hannaleh’s   life  among   the  band  of  gypsies  and   the  circumstances  of  her   return   to  her   family  after  many  years  of  being  cut  off  from  it.  However,  the  subplot  raises  various  cultural  and  spiritual  questions,  such  as  the  boundaries  of  the  attraction  to  the  gypsy  other,  fear  of  and  aversion  to  the  gypsy  culture,  especially  on  

the  background  of   the  charm  exerted  by   its  sensuality,  and  on  the  other  hand  –  emotional  affinity  and  a  sense  of   shared   fate  between   the   Jews  and  gypsies  on   the  background  of  World  War   II.   The   lecture  will  explore   the   place   of   the   poem   in   the   context   of   a   broader   poetical   project,   one   that  may   be   called   the  “project   of   the   otherness”   in   Orland’s   oeuvre,   which   also   includes   his   dramatic   works,   both   his   original  plays,  as  well   as   those   that  he   translated   into  Hebrew.   In   these  works,  Orland  undermined   the  accepted  definitions   of   the   concepts   of   belonging   and   otherness,   filling   them  with   new   content,  which   emanated  from  his  own  complex  inner  world  as  a  Jew  and  a  product  of  cosmopolitan  culture.  

 

Smadar  Shiffman,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Pain  and  Joy  of  Two  Homelands  

Abstract:   This   paper   presents   Lea   Goldberg's   dual   attitude   toward   the   issue   of   Europe   as   a   homeland.  Perhaps  the  most  often  quoted  line  by  Goldberg  is  the  line  from  her  poem  "Pine  Tree":  "This  pain  of  two  homelands".  I  wish  to  use  Goldberg's  most  "Zionist"  play,  "Lady  of  the  Castle",  to  show  that  being  planted  in   two   soils,   having   two   homelands,   is,   in   Goldberg's   view,   a   source   of   richness   and   joy   as   well   as   of  constant   conflict   and  pain.   This   play,  which   seems   to  present   the   triumph  of   Zionism  over   the   choice  of  diaspora,  also  foregrounds  the  lost  riches  of  European  culture.  Even  the  staunchest  believer  in  the  Zionist  solution,  Dora,  who  claims  to  miss  the  heat  and  sweat  of  Israel,  also  fears  the  lure  of  her  original,  European  homeland.   I  would   like   to  show,  using   this  play  as  well  as  a   few  of  Goldberg's  poems,   that  Europe   is   the  core  and  origin  of  everything  worth  preserving  and  cherishing,  even  when  Israel  is  associated  with  life  and  Europe   with   death.   Israel,   just   like   the   new   world   established   on   European   ruins,   is   here   presented   as  shallow  and  even  vulgar  when  compared  with  the  depth  and  history  of  European  culture.  Eastern  European  Jewry,  whose  national  concepts  were  based  upon  European  ideas,  cannot  but  be  torn  in  two  between  the  new,   "healthy",   Jew,   working   the   land   of   Israel,   and   the   old   books,   Hebrew   or   Christian,   Talmudic   or  philosophic,  which  give  meaning  to  life.  

 

17.00-­‐18.00  

Women  in  Literature  

 

Chair:  

 

Yonit  Naaman,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Shiksappeal  –  The  Gentile  Woman  as  the  Jewish  Playground    

Abstract:  A  bastard,  a  witch,  an  ominous  vampire,  a  magnificent  object  of  lust,  a  perfect  lady  and  a  whore,  are  among  the  many  designations  ascribed  to  the  non-­‐Jewish  female  discussed  in  this  work.    The  presence  of   the  shiksa   (derived   from  the  Hebrew ,שקצה    the  most  accurate  translation  of  which   is  abomination),   is  pivotal   in   literary  works  written  by  male   Jewish  writers   from   the  end  of   nineteenth   century   to   the  early  decades  of   the   twentieth  century   (marked  as   the  Tchiya  generation).  This   study  aims   to  characterize   this  cultural-­‐historical-­‐religious  encounter  through  an  analysis  of  several  short  stories,  by  H.N  Bialik,  Isaac  Leib  Peretz,   Jacob  Steinberg,   S.Y  Agnon  and  Shalom  Aleichem.  These  writers  were  all  born   in  Eastern  Europe,  lived   among   Christians   and   provided   us  with   fascinating   portraits   of   non-­‐Jewish   females   that   reflect   the  spectrum  of  conventions  and  perceptions  of  the  shiksa  in  Jewish  society.  The  power  relations  between  the  Jewish  male   and   the  Christian   female   inevitably   place   the   latter   in   a  weaker  position,   subjected   to  male  

scrutiny,   objectified   and   sexually   exploited.  On   the   other   hand,   she   also   emblematizes   the   threat   to   the  purity  of  the  Jewish  blood  and  signifies  a  fiat  for  complete  segregation  between  the  two  faith  communities.  In  the   literary  works  discussed  in  this  study,  the  shiksa  plays  a  double  role,  embodying  both  an  outlet  for  aggression   as  well   as   resistance   to  what   is   perceived   as   Christian   oppression.   Each   of   the   stories   in   this  study   depicts   a   shiksa   which   reflects   some   of   the   prevalent   conceptions   pertaining   to   the   points   of  intersection  between  Jewishness  and  masculinity  on  the  one  hand,  and  femininity  and  Christianity  on  the  other.  In  the  stories  I  examined,  the  shiksa  falls  under  the  category  of  the  “other,”  at  times  even  placed  in  an   animalistic   sphere,   which   takes   two  marked   and   even   contradictory   directions:     she   is   (1)   subject   to  dehumanization  and  alienation;  and  (2)  a  signifier  for  the  exalted  and  unattainable,  perhaps  in  light  of  the  failure  of  Jewish  assimilation.  

 

Helena  Rimon,  Ariel  University  of  Samaria,  Israel  

Title:   "Eshet   Hayil"   and   the  Woman   that   "Will   Stop   a   Galloping   Horse":   Images   of   the   Russian-­‐speaking  Female  Immigrants  in  the  Multilingual  Israeli  Literature  

Abstract:   In   this  presentation  we  suggest   to  apply   the  Post-­‐Colonial  approach   in  Women's  Studies   to   the  group   of   texts   that   has   been   investigated   in   this   context:   the   Russian   and   the   Hebrew   prose   writings  depicting  the  Russian-­‐speaking  female  immigrants  in  Israel.  Delving  into  the  writings  of  Daniel  Dotan,  Alona  Kimchi,  Miri   Litvak,  Marina  Grosslender,  Dina  Rubina,   Lina  Gorodetzky,   Elena  Minkina,   Sofia  Ron-­‐Moriah,  Anna   Fain   shows   that   descriptions   of   the   same   historical   situation   in   different   languages   bring   out   and  preserve  entirely  different  cultural  stereotypes  which  can  be  traced  to  different  cultural  traditions.  In  Israeli  works  written  in  Hebrew,  the  Russian  woman  immigrant  usually  is  depicted  as  a  poor  creature,  an  object  of  lust,  a  victim  of  alienation,  as  well  as  –  often  –  a  victim  of  sexual  aggression,  that  is,  a  total  object.    On  the  contrary,  the  Russian  Israeli  women  writers  depict  the  Russian  women  immigrants  –  that  is,  themselves  –  as  strong  and  active,   endowed  with   charisma  and  authority.  At   issue   in   the   two   cases   is   one  and   the   same  social-­‐cultural   group,   the   same   group  which   in  Western   feminist   discourse   of   the   1970-­‐80s   would   have  been  defined  as  doubly  marginal,  disclosed,  and  adapted  for  suffering:  both  as  women  and  as  immigrants.  This   is  precisely  how  Russian  women  are  represented   in   Israeli   literature  written   in  Hebrew.  As  for   Israeli  women’s   literature   composed   in   the   Russian   language,   it   carries   on   an   entirely   different   tradition  which  took  shape  in  19th-­‐century  Russian  culture.  This  is  a  tradition  of  portraying  the  strong  woman,  the  heroine  who,  in  the  words  of  the  poet  Nikolai  Nekrasov,  “will  not  be  timid  in  the  face  of  disaster  but  will  come  to  the  rescue,  will  stop  a  galloping  horse,  will  walk  into  a  burning  house.”  The  Russian  Israeli  women  writings  contaminate   the   Russian   national   myth   with   the   Israeli   reality.   In   the   writings   of   the   religious   women  immigrants,   Sofia   Ron-­‐Moria   (who   writes   in   Hebrew)   and   Anna   Fain   (who   writes   in   Russian),   the   two  national  traditions  –  the  Russian  and  the  Jewish  ones  –  come  as  close  as  possible.  The  image  of  "Woman  of  Valor"  "("Eshet  Chayil")  from  the  Proverbs  (31)  and  the  woman  that  "will  stop  a  galloping  horse"  turn  to  be  the  same  ideal  for  the  female  protagonists  in  their  search  for  identity.  

   

 

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  01  

 

Session:  001:  

Medieval  Jewish  Philosophy  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Under  the  Cross  

 

Chair:  

 

Julia  Schwartzmann,  Western  Galilee  College,  Israel  

Title:  Medieval  Jewish  Philosophers  on  Women  Prophets:  Smooth  Talk  Instead  of  Confrontation  

Abstract:   Medieval   Jewish   philosophers'   infamous   misogyny   had   little   to   do   with   their   own   personal  experiences;  in  fact,  they  inherited  their  low  views  of  women  from  a  millennia-­‐old  philosophical  tradition.  This   stereotypic   negative   attitude   made   sense   to   them   when   they   dealt   with   femininity   as   an   abstract  concept,  but  it  became  burdensome  when  positive  female  characters  of  the  bible  were  at  stake.  To  make  matters  worse,  the  bible  seemed  to  deliberately  challenge  philosophical  doctrines  by  claiming  that  three  of  its  heroines  (Miriam,  Deborah,  and  Huldah)  had  risen  to  the  exalted  rank  of  the  prophets.  Jewish  Medieval  philosophy   is   famous   for  having  developed  a  sophisticated   theoretical  discourse   regarding  prophecy.  The  central  doctrine  of  this  discourse  holds  that  intellectual  perfection  is  a  necessary  precondition  for  achieving  prophecy.    The  presence  of  women  prophets  in  the  bible  constituted  an  obvious  and  profound  challenge  to  the  Jewish  philosophical  world-­‐view:  how  could  women,  with  their  inherently  inferior  intellects,  achieve  the  intellectual  perfection  required  of  prophets?  Both  Maimonides  and  Gersonides  must  have  been  aware  of  this  paradox,  but  neither  addressed  it.  Instead,  they  praised  these  women  prophets  without  explaining  how  their   achievements   could   be   possible   in   philosophical   terms.  Our   disappointment  with   this   philosophical  lacuna  may  be  partially  soothed  by  Isaac  Abravanel's  surprising  change  of  heart.  Abravanel  has  been  known  as   a  women-­‐hater   as  well   as   a   sharp   critic   of  Maimonides'   prophetology.  However,   the   biblical  Deborah  inspired   him   to   temporarily   abandon   both   his   misogyny   and   anti-­‐rationalism   in   order   to   praise   her  exceptional  intellectual  and  political  qualities.  

 

Renate  Smithuis,  University  of  Manchester,  UK  

Title:  The  Sermon  as  a  Conduit  for  Philosophy:  Jacob  Anatoli's  Goad  for  Students  (Malmad  ha-­‐talmidim)  

Abstract:  Jacob  Anatoli  (c.  1194-­‐1256)  appears  to  be  a  relatively  underexposed  thinker  of  the  intellectually  turbulent   period   of   the   thirteenth   century.   Yet   he   played   a   substantial   role   in   the   Maimonidean  controversy.  Originally   a   student   of   Samuel   ibn   Tibbon   in   the   Provence,   he  was   invited   to   the   illustrious  court   of   Frederick   II   in   Sicily,   where   he   joined   the   company   of   a   fellow   admirer   of   the   Guide   for   the  Perplexed,   Michael   Scot   (c.   1175-­‐1232).   Anatoli’s   lasting   fame   rests   on   his   collection   of   philosophical  sermons,  known  as  the  Goad  for  Students  (Malmad  ha-­‐talmidim).   Israel  Bettan’s  verdict  that  “(...)  Anatoli  will   always   rank   high,   not   for   his   contributions   to   philosophy,   if   such   there   be   in   his   work,   but   for   his  homiletical  powers  and  the  significant  role  he  played  as  a  preacher   (...)”   (HUCA  9  [1936]  393-­‐4)  does  not  

seem   to   have   been   challenged   fundamentally.   Thus  Martin   Gordon   in   The   Rationalism   of   Jacob   Anatoli,  having  observed  the  “subtle  inconsistencies  in  his  argumentation,”  ultimately  characterized  him  as  “typical  of   the   mainstream   Maimonideans”   (1974:   374-­‐6).   Anatoli’s   endeavour   to   popularize   Maimonides’  philosophy  via  the  pulpit  brought  him  into  conflict  with  synagogue  goers  and  rabbis  alike.  This   is  perhaps  unsurprising  due  to  the  traditional  ban  on  offering  philosophical  insights  to  the  uneducated.  In  this  paper  I  will  concentrate  on  the  question  of  the  purpose  of  Anatoli’s  sermons,  both  as  spoken  and  as  written  down  in  the  Malmad  ha-­‐talmidim.  Who  were  his  most  likely  target  audience  and  how  did  he  try  to  reach  it?  

 

Jana  Horáková,  University  of  Ostrava,  Czech  Republic  

Title:  Meir  ben  Todros  Ha-­‐Levi  Abulafia’s  letters  to  scholars  of  Lunel  

Abstract:  This  paper  in  general  deals  with  problem  of  philosophy  within  Judaism.  In  particular  case  of  Spain  scholar  Meir  ben  Todros  Ha-­‐Levi  Abulafia  shows  possible  discrepancies  which  philosophy  can  brings,  when  interprets  religious  teaching.  Meir,  more  precisely  his  letters  to  scholars  of  Lunel,  was  the  cause  for  rise  of  so-­‐called   Maimonidean   controversies,   the   main   dispute   over   philosophy   and   rationalism   in   the   Middle  Ages.  In  his  letters  Meir  inquires  question  of  resurrection  of  the  dead  and  interprets  this  question  in  term  of  traditional   Judaism.   He   is   concern   mainly   about   influence   and   impact   of   this   conception   on   “common  believers”,   hence   he   argues   against   philosophical   interpretation   of   resurrection   which   ejects   the   bodily  resurrection.   Meir   is   convinced   that   interpretation   of   resurrection   if   pure   spiritual   terms   and   denial   of  bodily   resurrection   is  dangerous  not  only   for  belief  of  believers  who  are  not  educated   in  philosophy,  but  even  for  this  religious  doctrine  itself.  Because  of  this  we  can  read  his  letters  and  subsequent  reactions  as  an  expression  of  dispute  between   two  different   traditions  which   challenge  each  other,   and  ultimately  as  an  expression  of  dispute  between  two  different  identities.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Abraham  ibn  Ezra:  Thought  and  Exegesis  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  

 

Ayelet  Seidler,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Biblical  Psalms  in  the  Light  of  Medieval  Spanish  Poetry  –  The  Case  of  Avraham  Ibn  Ezra  

Abstract:  Arabic  poetry  has   influenced  and  shaped  the  poetry  of  medieval  Spanish   Jewry.   In   this   respect,  Biblical  poetry  in  general  and  the  Psalms  in  particular  challenged  the  Jewish  poets  of  Spain.  As  the  Psalms  did   not   correlate  with   the   laws   of  writing   poetry   as   formulated   by   both  Arab   and   Jewish   poets,   Spanish  Jewish   poets   were   pressed   hard   to  mediate   between   the   two   poetic   traditions.   It   is   often   claimed   that  poets  of  Spanish  Jewry  accepted  the  literary  shortcomings  of  biblical  poetry  and  argued  that  the  virtue  of  the  Hebrew  hymns  lay  in  there  meaning  (substance).  Some  studies  claim  that  the  prominent  medieval  poet  and  commentator  Rabbi  Abraham  Ibn  Ezra  (ca.1089  -­‐  1164)  was  part  of  this  approach.  In  my  lecture  I  would  

like  to  demonstrate  that,  contrary  to  this  opinion,   in  his  commentary  on  Psalms,  Rabbi  Abraham  Ibn  Ezra  identified  many   different   literary  means   and   extensively   referred   to   their   usage.   Ibn   Ezra   uses   the   code  words  "versus"   ("keneged")  and  "contrary"   ("hefech")   to  point   to   linguistic  affinities   that   in  his  eyes  bear  literary   value.   I   will   compare   the   literary   methods   used   by   Ibn   Ezra   to   those   used   in   medieval   Spanish  poetry.   I  will   argue   that   Ibn   Ezra's   exposure   of   these  methods,   especially   in   his   commentary   on   Psalms,  expresses   his   intent   to   stress   the   literary   virtue   of   this   ancient   Hebrew   poetry.   In   some   cases   it   even  appears  that  his  attempts  at  defining  and  identifying  literary  methods  in  the  Psalms  anticipate  the  findings  of  modern  literary  research.  

 

Mariano  Gomez-­‐Aranda,  CSIC,  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  Abraham  ibn  Ezra’s  Commentary  on  Isaiah  in  the  Context  of  Judeo-­‐Christian  Controversies  

Abstract:  In  the  history  of  Jewish  exegesis,  many  chapters  of  the  book  of  Isaiah  were  interpreted  either  as  referred  to  events  that  had  already  passed  in  biblical  times,  such  as  the  consolations  from  the  threat  of  the  Assyrians   that   took  place  at  Hezekiah’s   time,  or   to   future  events,   such  as   the  consolations   for   the   future  Messianic   time.   Abraham   ibn   Ezra   (1089-­‐1165)   collects   several   of   the   Jewish   interpretations   in   his  commentary  on  Isaiah.  In  my  paper  I   intend  to  prove  that  Ibn  Ezra’s  interpretations  on  the  book  of  Isaiah  must  be  understood  in  the  context  of  Judeo-­‐Christian  controversies  in  which  this  book  was  used  to  prove  that  it  refers  either  to  Messianic  times  or  to  historical  events  that  have  already  passed  in  biblical  times.  

 

Howard  (Haim)  Kreisel,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Some  Comments  on  the  Earliest  Supercommentaries  on  Abraham  Ibn  Ezra's  Torah  Commentary  

Abstract:  The  paper  will  briefly  summarize  the  state  of  research  regarding  the  earliest  supercommentaries  on  the  Torah  Commentary  by  Ibn  Ezra  based  on  my  project  (now  in  an  advanced  stage)  to  publish  five  of  these   supercommentaries,   written   in   the   second   half   of   the   thirteenth   century   and   the   first   half   of   the  fourteenth  -­‐  those  by  Elazar  ben  Mattiyah,  Joseph  Kaspi,  Moshe  Nagari,  Ibn  Yaish,  and  the  author  of  Avvat  Nephesh  (two  of  them  written  in  Provence,  one  in  Italy,  one  in  Byzantium  and  one  in  Spain).  The  paper  will  focus  on  the  purpose  of  these  commentaries,  their  salient  characteristics,  and  the  use  the  commentators  made  of  Maimonides  Guide  of  the  Perplexed  and  Hebrew  translations  of  Averroes'  commentaries.  Special  attention  will  be  paid  to  the  commentary  Avvat  Nephesh.  

 

Chaim  (Harold  R.)  Cohen,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Abraham  ibn  Ezra's  Commentary  on  the  Book  of  Genesis  and  Modern  Biblical  Hebrew  Philology  

Abstract:   The   present   lecture   attempts   to   demonstrate   the   most   significant   contribution   made   by   the  medieval  commentator  R.  Abraham  ibn  Ezra  to  modern  Biblical  Hebrew  philology  by  detailing  some  of  his  most   innovative   philological   comments   with   respect   to   several   specific   textual   problems   in   the   Book   of  Genesis.   In   many   cases,   Ibn   Ezra   was   the   only   medieval   commentator   who   contributed   philologically  towards  the  solution  of  these  specific  textual  problems,  and  overall,  his  philological  contribution  was  surely  the   most   significant   of   any   commentator   of   the   medieval   period.   When   Ibn   Ezra’s   philological  interpretation  is  in  need  of  further  evidence,  modern  Biblical  Hebrew  philology  itself  may  often  be  used  to  provide   the   missing   evidence   (especially   from   ancient   Near   Eastern   sources   which   of   course   were  unavailable  to  Ibn  Ezra).    The  following  five  cases  from  Ibn  Ezra’s  commentary  to  Genesis  will  be  discussed  in  detail:    

1.   Gen   4:10   קול)   “hark!”);   2.   Gen   4:13   עוני)   “my   punishment”);   3.   Gen   14:10   ( שמה ויפלו   “they   threw  themselves   down   therein”);   4.   Gen   37:2   נער)   “assistant,   trainee,   servant”);   5.   Gen   49:11   סותה)   “his  garment”).    For  example,  Gen  4:10  reads  as  follows:   ֹאמֶר ַּי ִיָך ּדְמֵי קֹול יתָ עָׂשִ מֶה ו ִים ָאח ֲֹעק דָמָה מִן אֵלַי צ הָאֲ :  “Then  he  said,  ‘What  have  you  done? !קֹול   The  blood  of  your  brother  cries  out  to  Me  from  the  ground’.”  Since  the  plural  verb ִים  ֲֹעק צ  “cries  out”  requires  a  plural  subject,  namely   ִיָך ּדְמֵי ָאח  “the  blood  of  (pl.)  your  brother”,  the  term קֹול   cannot  be  the  regular  noun  meaning  “voice”  here  understood  as  a  singular  construct  form.  Ibn  Ezra  comments  here  as  follows:   ִים ֲֹעק אֵלַי צ  cannot  be  connected  to .קֹול   A  similar  case  is  Cant  2:8:  

ִים עַל מְדַּלֵג ּבָא זֶה ההִּנֵ ּדֹודִי קֹול ֶָהר קֹול: ‘! הַּגְבָעֹות עַל מְקַּפֵץ ה   My   beloved!   Here   he   comes,   leaping   over  mountains,   bounding  over   hills’.   [The   verb ּבָא    ‘comes’]   refers   to   ּדֹודִי   ‘My  beloved’   [not   to   [קֹול   as   I   have  commented  in  my  Canticles  commentary.  The  meaning  [of  Gen  4:10]  is  that  [God]  heard  the  crying  out  of  his  [brother’s]  blood  that  had  been  spilt  out  on  the  ground.”    Thus   in   these   two   passages,   קֹול   should   be   understood   as   an   interjection   “hark!”,   which   is   syntactically  independent   of   both   subject   and   verb.   Other   passages   in   which   קֹול   must   be   so   interpreted   for   similar  grammatical  or  semantic  reasons  are   Isa  52:8;   Jer  10:22;  Cant  5:2.  Etymologically,   this   interjection   is  best  derived   from  the  Akkadian  verb  qâlu  “to  pay  attention,   listen”   (as   first   suggested  to  me  by   the   late  Prof.  Avigdor  Hurowitz   ל"ז ).    

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Jewish  Philosophy  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Medieval  and  Modern  Jewish  Philosophy  in  Contact  

 

Chair:  Alessandro  Guetta  

 

Michela  Torbidoni,  Martin  Luther  Universität,  Halle  Saale,  Germany  

Title:  The  Usage  of  Classical  Sources  in  Simone  Luzzatto’s  "Socrate"  

Abstract:   Simone   Luzzatto’s   philosophical   work   "Socrate   overo   dell’humano   sapere"   (1651)   has   been  somehow  neglected  by  recent  and  past  researchers.  This  paper  intends  to  enlighten  the  usage  of  classical  sources,  focusing  more  attentively  on  the  many  quotes  from  Lucretius’  poem  "De  rerum  natura"  and  on  the  issue  of  Greek  atomism.  While  presenting  this  classical   issue,  reintroduced  in  the  XVII  century   intellectual  debate   by   Pierre   Gassendi,   special   attention   will   be   paid   to   the   possible   connections   with   Luzzatto’s  penchant   towards   Skepticism.   Luzzatto   uses   these   classical   sources   in   order   to   support   his   philosophical  argumentation,   revealing   the   aspects   of   skepticism   he   shared   and   borrowed   from   that   philosophical  tradition.   Inquiring   the   way   the   Venetian   Rabbi   deals   with   skeptical   main   themes   is   both   useful   and  interesting   in   order   to   investigate   Luzzatto’s   evaluation   of   religious   controversies   and   his   role   in   the  intellectual   fights   against   pseudo-­‐sciences,   as  well   as   in   the   antagonism  between  Aristotelian   knowledge  and  “new  philosophy”,  which  represented  the  main  topics  debated  by  skeptics  during  16th-­‐17th  centuries.  

 

Cristiana  Facchini,  University  of  Bologna,  Italy  

Title:  Early  Modern  Jewish  Responses  to  Blood  Libel  Allegations.  Patterns  and  Models  

Abstract:  My  paper  aims  to  offer  some  new   insights   to  the  problem  of  blood   libel   in  Europe,   focusing  on  Jewish  responses  from  the  17th  century  to  the  19th  century,  claiming  that  these  defenses  provided  a  multi-­‐layered  model  for  defenses  against  other  accusations  as  well,  which  comprises  historical  modes  of  thought  and  legal  practices.  

 

Moises  Orfali,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Les  différents  emplois  de  la  Logique  parmi  les  auteurs  judeo-­‐espagnols  médiévaux  

Abstract:   A   partir   de   conceptions   communes   parmi   les   auteurs   judéo-­‐espagnols   médiévaux   concernant  l'essence  et   l'efficience  de   la   logique  aristotélienne,  sont  apparues  diverses  tendances  ayant  permis  a  ces  auteurs  un  emploi  soutenu  de  la  logique.  Je  voudrais  durant  cette  intervention  traiter  de  ces  tendances.  Il  sera  donc  question  par  exemple  des  exégètes  rabbiniques  qui  utilisèrent  la  logique;  des  grammairiennes  à  fin  d’établir   leurs   règles  grammaticales;  des  polémistes  qui  eurent   recours  à   la   logique  afin  de  mettre  en  forme  leur  argumentaire;  des  scientifiques  –  principalement  des  médecins  –    qui  employèrent  des  textes  de  logique   du   fait   de   l’expansion   de   cette   discipline   en  monde   scolastique   parmi   les   juifs   afin,   d'exercer   la  médicine.   Des  médecins   juifs   de   la   péninsule   soulignèrent   la   nécessité   d'étudier   la  méthode   scolastique  fondée   sur   la   quaestio   et   la   disputatio   et   le   recours   au   raisonnement   dialectique   pour   garantir  nécessairement  des  conclusions  vrai.  Bien  plus,  pour  obtenir  leur  licence,  ces  médecins,  en  Provance  et  en  Aragon,  devait  passer  un  examen  devant  un  jury  mixte  juif  et  chrétien,  qui  sélectionnait  généralement  les  candidats   au   moyen   du   rituel   scolastique   de   questiones   et   responsiones,   disputationes,   rationes   et  argumentationes.   En   plus   d'attester   l'acculturation   des   candidats   juifs,   cet   examen   leur   garantissait   la  reconnaissance  professionnelle  de  la  part  des  autorités  chrétiennes.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Jewish  Philosophy  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Jewish  Thought  in  Vernacular  Language  in  the  Early  Modern  Period  

Organizers:  Giuseppe  Veltri  and  Alessandro  Guetta  

Chair:  

 

Giuseppe  Veltri,  University  of  Halle,  Germany  

Title:  The  language  of  Skepticism  in  Luzzatto's  Socrates  

Abstract:   How   stupid   human   intelligence   can   be,   when   it   is   not   led   by   divine   revelation   is   the   declared  subject  of  the  “serious-­‐playful  exercise”  of  Simone  Luzzatto,  Venetian  Jew”,  titled  “Socrates  or  on  human  

knowledge.”  It  is  much  more,  a  little  encyclopedia  of  modern  thought  nourished  by  the  arsenal  of  skeptical  treatises,   books   and   essays   flourished   above   all   in   his   time.   The   lecture   focuses   on   the   language   of  skepticism  in  the  Socrates  and  the  main  ideas  he  was  dealing  with.  

 

Alessandro  Guetta,  Institut  National  des  Langues  et  Civilisations  Orientales,  Paris,  France    

Title:  Italian  Translation  of  Philosophical  and  Ethical  Jewish  Literature  in  the  Early  Modern  Period  

Abstract:  The  translations  of  Hebrew  Literature  into  Italian  in  the  Late  Renaissance  are  less  known  than  the  parallel  phenomenon   in  Castilian  and  Yiddish,   in   spite  of   their  quality   and  abundance.   I  will   describe   the  translations  of  philosophical  and  ethical  Jewish  works,  asking  the  question  of  the  potential  public  of  these  texts:  Jews  not  enough  familiar  with  Hebrew?  Christians,  in  order  to  show  the  treasures  of  Jewish  wisdom?  Both   Jews   and   Christians,   in   a   cultural   enterprise   implying   the   attempts   to   connect   between   two  intellectual  and  linguistic  worlds?  

 

Sina  Rauschenbach,  University  of  Potsdam,  Germany  

Title:  On   Free   Choice   of   the  Will   –   Christian   Controversy   and   Sephardic   Translation   in   the   Early  Modern  Dutch  World    

Abstract:   Early  Modern  Amsterdam  was  a  prominent  place   for   Sephardic  publications   "On   free   choice  of  the  will"   –   "Del   livre   alvedrio".  Not   only  Menasseh  ben   Israel,   but   also  Abraham  Pereyra,  Daniel   Levi   de  Barrios   (Miguel  de  Barrios)  and  others  devoted  books,  book  chapters,  poems  or   theater  plays   to   such  or  similar  discussions.  Their  interest,  however,  was  mainly  inspired  by  heated  controversies  about  Original  Sin,  Divine   grace,   and   human   destination   in   Dutch   Calvinist   circles   or   in   the   Spanish   world   of   the   Catholic  Reform.  In  my  paper  I  make  use  of  those  controversies  to  analyse  cross  cultural  adaptions  of  early  modern  theological   thought   as  well   as   strategies   of   translation   from  Christian   texts   into   their   Sephardic,   Spanish  counterparts.  

 

Asher  Salah,  Bezalel  Academy  of  Arts,  Israel  

Title:  Imaginary  Libraries  of  Italian  Maskilim  

Abstract:  The  concept  of  “library  awareness”  has  been  elaborated  by  Avriel  Bar  Levav  to  express   the  gap  existing  between  the  books  that  were  physically  available  to  an  author  and  those  that  were  only  mentioned  in   a   specific   text.   The   relationship   between   the   imaginary   libraries   and   the   real   ones   changes   over   the  course   of   time,   depending   on   different   local   contexts   and   varying   considerably   from   author   to   author.  While  most  of   the  works  dedicated   to   the   reading  habits  of   the   Jews   rely  on  what   is   known  about   their  libraries,   through   books   inventories,   inquisitorial   lists,   private   catalogues,   much   remains   to   be   done  concerning   the   textual   references   that   appear   in   the   works   by   Jewish   authors.   What   is   at   stake   in   the  reconstruction  of  the  imaginary  libraries  of  the  Jews,  through  the  overall  analysis  of  the  quotations  and  the  sources  used  in  their  works,   is  not  only  our  understanding  of  the  intertextuality  strategies  enacted  by  the  Jews  in  different  cultural  and  historical  contexts,  but  first  and  foremost  our  knowledge  of  their  intellectual  horizons  and   their   interaction  with   surrounding   societies.   The   interest  of   such  a  demarche   is  particularly  high   for   the   early   modern   and   the   Haskalah,   when   the   traditional   medieval   literary   canons   were  increasingly   under   attack,   when   the   number   of   acceptable   “auctoritates”   exponentially   expanded   and  when  new  techniques  of  standardized  textual  references  made  their  appearance.  My  lecture  is  focused  on  the  readership  of  gentile  sources  through  the  works  of  four  main  figures  of  Italian  Haskalah  Marco  Navarra,  

Lettere  Orientali,  Venezia,  1771,  Elia  Morpurgo,  Discorso,  Gorizia,  1782,  Benedetto  Frizzi,  Difesa  contro  gli  attacchi   fatti   alla   nazione   ebrea,   Pavia,   1784,   Samuel   Romanelli,   Masa   Be-­‐Arav,   Berlin,   1792   raising   the  following   questions:   in  which   contexts,   how   and  why   Christian   authors  were   quoted   by   Italian   Jews?   In  order  to  confront  these  questions   it   is  necessary  to  preliminarily  establish  a  phenomenology  of  quotation  that  distinguishes  first  hand  from  second  hand  readings,  forbidden  from  permitted  references,  citations  in  the   original   language   from   those   in   translation,   trying   to   identify   hidden   and   explicit   sources   and   to  quantify  all  the  extra-­‐textual  evidence  provided  in  a  single  work.  

 

Keynote  Lectures  

18.30-­‐19.30:  Geoffrey  Khan  &  Ben  Outhwaite,  The  Reception  of  Biblical  Hebrew  in  the  Middle  Ages  

19.30-­‐20.30:   Anthony   T.   Grafton   &   Joanna  Weinberg,   Compilation   and   Observation   in   Johann   Buxtorf's  Synagogue  of  the  Jews  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  02  

 

Session:  001:  

Panel:  The  Cairo  Geniza  

Organizers:  Sarah  Fargeon,  Wissem  Gueddich  and  Ben  Outhwaite  

 

9.00-­‐10.30  

Contacts  in  Practice:  Law  in  the  Genizah  Society  

Chair:  Sarah  Fargeon  &  Wissem  Gueddich  

 

Philip  Ackerman-­‐Lieberman,  Vanderbilt  University,  Nashville,  Tennessee,  USA  

Title:  Are  Jewish  Court  Decisions  Bounded  by  Those  of  Muslim  Courts?  

Abstract:  The  judicial  environment  in  Egypt  during  the  Fatimid  period  gave  Jewish  merchants  the  option  of  forum-­‐shopping—choosing   their   legal   venue   based   on   the   expected   outcome.   Well-­‐aware   of   the  opportunities   their   constituents   had   for   forum-­‐shopping,   Jewish   courts  were   careful   not   to  make   rulings  which  would  be  reversed  on  “appeal”   to  a  Muslim  court.  This  care  took  at   least   two  forms:   (i)   relying  on  techniques  of  mediation,  which  required  agreement  of  all  parties  concerned,  rather  than  arbitration,  which  required  the  court  to  make  a  determination  which  may  or  may  not  have  been  accepted  by  the  litigants;  and  (ii)   allowing   for   outcomes   in   the   Jewish   court   which   ran   counter   to   codified   Jewish   law   in   order   to  approximate   the   expected   “competitive”   ruling   in   the   Islamic   court.   These   strategies   were   successful   in  insuring   that   Jews   often   made   recourse   to   the   Jewish   court.   Yet   are   the   rulings   of   the   Jewish   court  “bounded”  by  the  competitive  rulings  their   litigants  could  expect  to  receive   in  Muslim  courts?   If  not,   just  how  far  were  Jewish  courts  willing  to  stray  from  Jewish  law?  What,   if  anything,  shaped  the  boundaries  of  Jewish  law  in  practice?  

 

Amir  Ashur,  Ben  Gurion  University,  Israel  

Title:  Protecting   the  Wife:   Stipulations   in   Jewish  Marriage  Documents   from   the  Cairo  Geniza  and  Parallel  Arabic  Sources  and  their  Social  Background    

Abstract:  In  this  paper  I  will  analyze  some  stipulations  commonly  found  in  Jewish  Marriage  documents  from  the   Cairo   Geniza   and   in   parallel   Arabic   sources.   I   will   concentrate   on   the   'residence'   stipulation   that   is:  choosing  the  Place  of  Residence;  travel  restrictions  and  stipulations  regarding  the  freedom  of  movement  of  the  husband  and  stipulations  aimed  at  supporting  the  wife  financially  during  her  husband's  absence.  I  will  try  to  suggest  that  these  stipulations  are  found  in  both  societies  -­‐  Jewish  and  Muslim  -­‐  due  to  their  common  social  background.  

 

Gregor   Schwarb,   Research   Unit   Intellectual   History   of   the   Islamicate   World,   Freie   Universität   Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  Jewish  adaptations  of  Islamic  Legal  Hermeneutics  (uṣūl  al-­‐fiqh)  

Abstract:  The  paper  consists  of  two  parts:  1)  Uṣūl  al-­‐fiqh  compositions  by  Muslim  authors   i)  preserved   in   Jewish  Genizah  collections,   ii)   recorded   in  Jewish   book&library   inventories   and/or   iii)   cited   in   works   by   Jewish   authors:   Historical   and   doctrinal  contexts.    2)  Two  case  studies:  a)  The  reception  of  ʿAbd  al-­‐Jabbār  b.  Aḥmad  al-­‐Hamadhānī's  (d.  415/1025)  K.  al-­‐ʿUmad  fī  uṣūl  al-­‐fiqh   in  Yeshuʿah  ben  Yehudah's  K.  al-­‐Tawriya;  b)  K.  al-­‐Mulakhkhaṣ   fī  uṣūl  al-­‐fiqh:  an  anonymous  Jewish  adaptation  of  Fakhr  al-­‐Dīn  al-­‐Rāzī’s  (d.  606/1210)  K.  al-­‐Maʿālim  fī  uṣūl  al-­‐fiqh.  I  shall  conclude  with  a  brief  reflection  on  the  "guiding  thread"  of  the  Genizah  panel:  To  what  extent  do  the  documents/texts  mentioned  in  my  paper  "reflect  society  as  a  whole"  and  to  what  extent  is  it  sensible  to  ask  such  a  question’.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Panel:  The  Cairo  Geniza  

Organizers:  Sarah  Fargeon,  Wissem  Gueddich  and  Ben  Outhwaite  

 

11.00-­‐13.00  

Challenging  the  Notion  of  Contact  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  

 

Chair:  Norman  Stillman  

 

Elinoar  Bareket,  Achva  Academic  College,  Israel  

Title:  Nuances  in  Social  Involvement  among  Jewish  and  Muslim  Societies  according  to  Genizah  Documents    

Abstract:  Pluralism  and  Heterogeneity  were  embedded   in  Muslim  society  since   its  beginning.  A  variety  of  Muslim  ethnical   groups   lived   side  by   side   alongside   Jewish   groups.   The   Jews  were  not   the  only   religious  minority  in  Islamic  territories.  Islamic  social  discrimination  was  aimed  toward  the  Dhimmis  in  general  rather  than   Jews   in  particular.  We  can  conclude   from  this   that   the   low  social   status  of   the   Jews  did  not  usually  affect  them  badly.  The  Muslim  society  relied  on  informal  connections  of  loyalty  and  identification.  The  Jews  in  the  Muslim  world  also  adopted,  on  their  side,  an  appeasing  attitude  towards  Islam,  especially  due  to  its  being   a   religion   dedicated   to   an   immaculate   God.   This   tolerant   perception   of   Islam   by   the   Jews   also  reflected  the  respectful  attitude  of  the  Muslim  society  towards  the  Jewish  "People  of  the  Book".  All  these  aspects   resulted   in   a   wide   interaction   between   the   two   societies   in   economic   and   social   matters,   an  interaction   that  blurred   the   lines  between   Jewish  and  Muslim.  Many  Genizah  documents   testify  on  wide  Jewish   involvement   among  Muslim   society   and   the   other  way   around.   This   blurring   of   lines   is   especially  evident   during   the   Fatimid   period,   but   even   during   the   Ayubids   days,   despite   of   the   attitude   being  hardened,  it  is  still  difficult  to  identify  in  certain  documented  cases,  who  is  a  Muslim  and  who  is  a  Jew.  

 

Mordechai  Akiva  Friedman,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Contact  with  non-­‐Jews  in  the  India  Book  Documents  

Abstract:  An  examination  of  data  from  the  India  Book  on  the  circle  of  traders,  Jews  and  trusted  non-­‐Jews.  Information  in  documents  significant  for  study  of  general,  non-­‐Jewish  culture.  

 

Stefan  Reif,  St  John's  College  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:   Attitudes   to   non-­‐Jews   reflected   in   Liturgical   Texts   from   the   Genizah   and   from   other   Manuscript  Codices  

Abstract:  Was   there   a   systematic   approach   to   non-­‐Jews   in   the  medieval   texts   of   Jewish   liturgy?   Or   did  composers  of  the  prayers  respond  to  political,  religious  and  historical  circumstances?  Some  Genizah  texts  will  be  closely  examined  in  order  to  ascertain  the  degree  to  which  these  questions  can  be  clarified  by  the  historian  and  the  extent  to  which  such  texts  differ  from  other  evidence.  

 

Sylvie  Denise  García  de  la  Calle,  Faculty  of  Philosophy  and  Letters,  Granada  University,  Spain  

Title:  Christianity  and  Judaism  in  the  Life  of  Obadiah,  the  Norman  Proselyte,  through  the  Prophecy  of  Joel  

Abstract:   In  the  Cairo  Genizah  there  were  manuscripts  with  Gregorian  notation  and  Hebrew  script.  There  also   appeared   documents   that   point   to   author   of   the   scores   at   Giovanni-­‐Obadiah,   a   twelfth   century  Christian  monk,  born  in  southern  Italy,  who  converted  to  Judaism.  Until  now,  the  study  of  this  personage  has  been  realized  almost  exclusively  from  the  Jewish  point  of  view.  Nevertheless,  like  Obadiah  synthesizes  the  traditions  Christian  and  Jewish  in  its  notation  when  copying  Hebrew  melodies  with  Christian  notation,  also  it  does  in  his  texts.  Obadiah  transcribed  a  Latin  appointment  of  Joel  to  Hebrew  characters.  I  pretend  to  oppose  his   conversion   to   Judaism  with  his   ordination   as   a   Christian  monk   through   the  prophecy  of   Joel,  which  implies  an  intense  dialogue  between  the  two  traditions.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Panel:  The  Cairo  Geniza  

Organizers:  Sarah  Fargeon,  Wissem  Gueddich  and  Ben  Outhwaite  

 

14.00-­‐15.30  

New  Perspectives  on  an  Old  Problem:  Transmitting,  Editing  and  Identifying  Genizah  Texts  

 

Chair:  Mordechai  A.  Friedman  

 

Rebecca  Sebbagh,  Johann  Wolfgang  Goethe-­‐Universität  Frankfurt,  Germany  

Title:  Reworked  She’iltot  in  the  Cairo  Genizah  

Abstract:  The  textual  transmission  of  the  She’iltot  of  Rav  Aḥa  of  Shabḥa  shows  that  this  literature  was  open  to   alterations   for   a   long   time.   Israel   Ta-­‐Shma   stated   in   his   paper   „The   ‘Open’   Book   in  Medieval   Hebrew  Literature:   The   Problem   of   Authorized   Editions”,   Bulletin   of   the   John   Rylands   University   Library   of  Manchester  75,  3   (1993),  p.  18,   that   the  She’iltot  were  by   their   very  nature  prone   to   the  assimilation  of  additional  halakhic  material  of  a  similar  kind  and  to  an  ongoing  process  of  editing.  This  editing  process  was  often  limited  to  only  the  addition  or  the  erasing  of  –  mainly  halakhic  -­‐  textual  blocks  while  the  structure  of  the   she’ilta   was   retained.   In   a   few   cases   the   texts   were   rewritten   and   reworked   completely,   including  structural   changes.   Among   the   more   than   hundred   fragments   containing   She’iltot   texts   from   the   Cairo  Genizah,   there   are   some   texts   which   show   a   complete   revision   of   the   text   and   its   structure.   The  examination  of  these  reworked  texts  shows  that  the  editors  were  mainly  interested  in  certain  parts  of  the  text   and   completely   ignored   other   parts.   An   analysis   of   their   choices   may   help   to   understand   how   the  She’iltot  were  read  and  received  during  the  Middle  Ages.  In  my  presentation  I  wish  to  present  an  example  of   an   altered   and   reworked   she’ilta  which  was   transmitted   in   the   Cairo  Genizah.   The   comparison   of   the  reworked   text  with   the   standard   (printed)   text  of   the   she’ilta  will   demonstrate  how   the   functions  of   the  structural  parts  of  the  she’ilta   formular  were  changed  by  the  editors  and  how  they  adapted  the  different  parts   into   a   new   context.   The   presentation   is   based   on   one   of   the  main   chapters   of  my   doctoral   thesis  which   contains   editions   and   analyses   of   the   Genizah   fragments   of   the   She’iltot,   to   be   presented   at   the  Goethe-­‐University,  Frankfurt/Main,  in  2015.  

 

Moshe  Lavee,  The  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  Geo-­‐cultural  Insights  based  on  Applying  Computational  Tools  in  the  Study  of  Midrash  Fragments  

Abstract:   Recent   advancements   of   computational   tools   enable   us   to   apply   edit   distance   and   network  research  methodologies  to  the  study  of  Midrashic  texts  in  Genizah  fragments.  In  this  lecture  I  will  present  the  outcomes  of  an  examination  of  the  texts  of  Leviticus  Rabbah,  that  strengthen  our  understanding  of  the  strong   connection  between  early  eastern   rabbinic   traditions  persevered   in   the  Genizah  and   the   tradition  documented  in  the  cultural  heritage  of  North  West  European  communities.  It  is  suggested  that  the  use  of  this  advanced  technologies  should  not  only  be  taken  as  a  philological  aid,  aimed  at  establishing  a  stemma  of   the  Midrash  and  reconstructing   its  most  possible  authentic  version;   they  should  also  be  considered  as  contributing  to  the  understanding  of  historical  process  of  cultural   (and  human?)   immigration,  probably  at  the  turn  of  the  millennium.  The  "European  connection"  of  early  genziah  midrashic  traditions  is  also  evident  when   considering   network   research   methodologies   for   the   study   of   rabbinic   enumerations,   and   when  examined   specific   case   studies   that   were   recently   found   in   unnoticed  midrashic   fragments.   Both   reveal  strong  examples  for  Genizah  midrashic  traditions  (in  lost  works  and  in  Judeo-­‐Arabic  adaptations!)  that  only  has  parallels  and  equivalent  sources  in  European  anthologies  and  scholastic  deliberations.  

 

Ariel  Neri,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Towards  Identification  Methodology  of  Genizah  Manuscripts  

Abstract:   During   the   late   Geonic   period,   commentaries   appeared   in   Judeo-­‐Arabic   on   halakhic   topics  concerning  formal  and  informal  duties  of  the   judges.  This  genre  of  monographs  deals  not  only  with  court  procedures  but  rather  also  with  the  jurisprudential  proper  behavior,  or,  the  ethical  code  of  Beit  Din.  In  my  research   I   challenge   the   attribution   of   relevant  Genizah   fragments  made   by   prominent  modern   scholars  and  contend  that  the  inaccuracy  of  their  conclusions  stems  from  inadequate  standards  and  lack  of  clear-­‐cut  criteria   in   modern   research.   I   analyze   the   aforementioned   fragments   in   light   of   a   methodological  

framework  which  has  been  developed  for  this  purpose,  but  which  can  be  applied  to  the  comparative  study  of  Medieval   Judeo-­‐Arabic  halakhic   literature  written   in  Muslim  environments   in  general.   It   is   far   from  my  intention  to  claim  that   this  study  has  made   it  possible   to  attribute  henceforth  every  single   fragment  to  a  specific  author  or  commentary,  or  even  to  identify  it  as  belonging  to  the  genre  of  "Judges’  Duties",  which  itself  is  not  yet  very  well  defined.  Rather,  it  points  to  a  need  for  a  fundamental  inquiry  and  puts  forward  a  number   of   guidelines   upon   which   such   an   inquiry   should   be   based.   Yet,   through   this   methodological  paradigm   I   have   endeavored   to   identify   several   fragments  which   belong   either   to   known  or   anonymous  books  from  the  late  geonic  period.  The  text  which  I  would  like  to  present  and  discuss  through  my  lecture  includes  the  end  of  the  monograph   א'אלקָצ אדב כתאב  of  rav  Hai  Ibn  Shrira  gaon.  The  Genizah  contribution  in  the  current  case  is  clear  as  it  enables  the  identification  of  four  pages  of  Oxford  manuscript  (Ox.  Bodl.  Ms.  Marsh  Or.  509  (cat.  Neub.  581.2)  as  a  single  copy   in   the  world  of   this  book  which  survived  unfortunately  solely   in   a   very   partial   manner.   This   fascinating   identification   is   confirmed   furthermore   by   additional  quotations   from   the   Rishonim   literature,   including   the   text   of   Rav   Hai   Gaon   in   translation   into  medival  Hebrew,  mainly  through  the  writings  of  Rabbi  Yehuda  Albarzeloni  The  contribution  of  the  present  work  to  this  field  of  knowledge  far  exceeds  the  analysis  of  the  texts  under  discussion,  in  that  the  theoretical  model  proposed   in   it  has   ramifications   for   future   research.  The   identificatory   system  has  crucial   contribution   to  our  understanding  of  the  diverse  scientific  methodologies  and  perspectives  of  the  geonic  period  research.  As  a  result,  the  comprehension  of  the  establishment  of  the  Halakha  and  its  development  in  general  benefit  as  well  from  the  extension  and  deepening  of  the  medieval  literacy  outlines.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Panel:  The  Cairo  Geniza  

Organizers:  Sarah  Fargeon,  Wissem  Gueddich  and  Ben  Outhwaite  

 

16.00-­‐18.00  

Widening  the  Boundaries  of  Genizah  Research:  the  Cairo  Collection  and  Genizot  

 

Chair:  Ben  Outhwaite  

 

Ronny  Vollandt,  Free  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  On  the  Jewish  Fragments  of  the  Genizah  of  the  Umayyad  Mosque,  Damascus  

Abstract:   On   his   visit   to   the   Holy   Land,   Kaiser  Wilhelm   II   was   shown   the   qubba   al-­‐khazna,   the   Treasure  Dome,  of   the  Umayyad  Mosque  at  Damascus   and   told  of  manuscripts   it   contained,   shrouded   in  mystery  and  venerated  by  the  locals  to  that  time.  By  diplomatic  means  he  negotiated  with  the  Sublime  Port  that  the  dome  should  be  opened  and  a  German  scholar  be  dispatched  to  sift  through  the  material.  Bruno  Violet  was  chosen   for   that   purpose.   He   spent   about   a   year   in   Damascus   and   separated   from   the   large   bulk   of  fragments   all   texts   of   a   non-­‐muslim   Muslim   provenance.   His   selection,   consisting   mainly   Jewish   and  Christian  texts,  was  sent  to  Berlin   in  order  to  be  photographed  and  supposedly  got   lost  on  the  way  back.  For  a   long   time   it  was  believed   that  also   the  photographs  got   lost  during   the  war,  but   luckily   resurfaced  

again  at  the  Staatsbibliothek  a  couple  of  years  ago.  They  are  kept  today  in  two  folders,  Or.  Sim.  5  and  6,  The  former  contain  a  Syriac   translation  of  Theodore  of  Mopsuestia’s  commentary  on  Qoheleth  and  the   latter  texts  in  contains  various  Semitic  languages,  Arabic  (biblical  and  scientific  texts),  Syriac,  Christian  Palestinian  Aramaic,  Hebrew,  Samaritan  (Bible),  but  also  Coptic  (Bible),  Latin  and  Old  French  (a  chanson  de  geste).   In  my  contribution   I  will   present   the  history  of   the   collection.   In  particular,   I  will   focus  on   the   fragments   in  Hebrew  script,  including  also  Judaeo-­‐Arabic  texts,  and  their  place  in  the  study  of  Hebrew  manuscripts.  

 

Efraim  Lev,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  ‘Exporting’  Genizah  Studies  beyond  the  Realm  of  Jewish  Studies  -­‐  the  Case  of  History  of  Medicine    

Abstract:  Identifying  and  studying  Genizah  manuscripts  creates  a  window  into  the  practical  and  theoretical  medicine  and  pharmacology  of  the  Jewish  community.  The  resulting  synthesis  forms  a  unique  reflection  of  the   wider   "Mediterranean   Society"   and   the   Arab   world   of   the   time.   Given   the   strong   multidisciplinary  nature   of   the   field,   a   decade   ago   we   created   a   research   team   aiming   to   better   understand   practical  medicine   and   pharmacology   in   the   Mediterranean   society.   The   initial   main   projects   were:   A.   The  reconstruction   of   the   medieval   inventory   of   the   practical   materia   medica   of   the   Genizah   community  (shedding  new  light  on  other  issues  such  as  theory  vs.  practice,  linguistics  and  the  commercial  aspects);  B.  Study   of   original   medieval   prescriptions   and   list   of   drugs   from   the   Cairo   Genizah;   C.   Study   of   medical  notebooks,  new  genre  of  medical  writing,  presenting  the  way   in  which  medical  knowledge  was  recorded,  accumulated  and  transferred  by  Jewish  practitioners.  The  results  of  these  projects  were  published  in  more  than  a  dozen  articles  in  a  wide  variety  of  journals  and  in  two  books;  they  were  was  also  presented  in  many  scientific   conferences   and   in   various   prestigious   institutes   around   the   world.   At   present,   there   are   two  more   projects   in   progress   (Prosopography   of   Medieval   Jewish   Practitioners   in   Islamic   Lands,   and  Reconstruction  of  the  Medical  Library  of  the  Jewish  Practitioners),  under  the  new  “Interdisciplinary  Centre  for  the  Broader  Application  of  Genizah  Research”,  that  was  established  at  the  University  of  Haifa.  

 

Micha  J.  Perry,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  11th  Century  Hebrew,  Arabic  and  Latin  Letter  Formularies  from  around  the  Mediterranean  

Abstract:   In  this  paper  I  wish  to  compare  six  Hebrew  letters–all  originating  from  Europe,  but  found  in  the  Cairo   Genizah–for   their   material;   uses;   style;   structure;   and   word   framing,   in   order   to   examine   cultural  exchange  around   the  Mediterranean  basin   in   the  11th   century.   This   comparison  will   be  accompanied  by  another  comparison,  to  the  art  of   letter  writing  among  Christians  (Ars  Dictaminis)  and  Muslims  (Inshâ?)  –  going  back  to  its  Classical  roots  –  and  to  the  practice  of  scribes  to  use  Formularies.  It  will  eventually  lead  to  a  new  understanding  of  the  mechanics  behind  the  rise  of  Hebrew  as  a  shared,  unified,  lingua  franca  among  Jews  in  the  medieval  world.  

 

Edna  Engel,  The  Hebrew  Palaeography  Project,  Israel  

Title:   The   "Afgan   Geniza"   and   the   Cairo   Geniza   Documents:   a   Comparative   Study   of   Diplomatic  Characteristics  

Abstract:   Discovered   in   caves   in   the   Smangan   region   of   north   Afganistan,   the   Afgan   Genizah   includes  fragments  dated   to   the  11th   century,   carrying   texts   in   Judeo-­‐Persian  or  Persian   in  Arabic   letters.  Among  those  is  founde  a  lot  of  documentary  material  including  commercial  documents;  personal  and  commercial  correspondence.  Its  importance  lies  in  enriching  our  knowledge  of  medieval  Jewery  in  Afganistan.  As  such,  

the   comparison  of  diplomatic   characteristics  of   the  documents  with   those  of   contemporary  Cairo  Geniza  documents   may   contribute   to   the   research   of   Judeo-­‐Persian   culture,   concerning   its   affinity   with  Mediterranean   Jewish   culture   as  well.   In   this   presentation,   I  will   discuss   the  Hebrew   script   of   the  Afgan  documents,  juxtaposing  it  with  the  script  of  the  Jewish-­‐Persian  manuscripts  in  the  Cairo  Geniza  on  the  one  hand,  and  with  stone  inscriptions  of  the  same  region,  on  the  other.  I  will  also  analize  the  codicology  of  the  Afgan  documents  according  to  codicological  parameters  (such  as  layout  of  the  text  and  folds)  of  the  Cairo  Geniza  documents.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  03  

 

Session:  001:  

Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Studies  in  Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  in  Memoriam  Professor  Ezra  Fleischer  

 

Chair:  Tova  Beeri  

 

Yosef  Tobi,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  Rav  Sa'adia  Gaon's  Verse  in  the  Scholarly  Work  of  Professor  Ezra  Fleischer  

Abstract:  It  may  be  unknown,  but  my  research  on  Rav  Saadia  Gaon  as  a  poet  had  been  initiated  by  the  late  Prof.   Ezra   Fleischer,   by   choosing   this   subject   for  me,   as   his   first   doctoral   student   in   1975.  Moreover,   he  provided  me  with  a  detailed  and  well  thought-­‐out  program  for  the  research.  By  that,  I  believe,  he  expressed  his  conception  about  Saadia  the  poet  as  an  intermediary  link  in  the  long  chain  of  Hebrew  poetry,  from  the  Eastern  paytanic  school  to  Spain.  This  was  explicitly  shown  in  his  seminal  paper  about  Saadia’s  place  in  the  history  of  the  Hebrew  poetry.  It  should  be  admitted  that  Prof.  Fleischer  published  only  a  few  studies  whose  main   subject   was   Saadia’s   verse.   However,   a   quick   glance   at   the   entry   Saadia   in   the   indices   of   both  magnificent  collections  of  his  articles  made  by  Prof.  Shulamit  Elitzur  and  Prof.  Tova  Beeri  will  easily  prove  that   Saadia’s   verse   was   an   important   and   frequent   referential   material   in   his   research.   The   paper   is  intended,   then,   to  sum  up  Prof.  Fleischer’s  conception   in   regard   to  Saadia’s  verse  as  a  mark  stone   in   the  history  of  medieval  Hebrew  poetry.  

 

Elisabeth  Hollender,  Goethe  University  Frankfurt,  Germany  

Title:  Italian  and  Ashkenazic  Ofanim:  Forms  and  Content  Models  

Abstract:  The   study  of  poetic   forms  and   their  development  was  one  of   the   important   fields  of  Prof.   Ezra  Fleischer's  work.  Among  the  genres  he  studied  in  depth  were  all  parts  of  the  Yotser  composition.  Focusing  on  the  early  development  of  the  genre,  he  also  analyzed  the  later  developments  of  the  forms  in  Sepharad,  Italy,   and   Ashkenaz.   The   paper   will   investigate   the   medieval   developments   of   one   part   of   the   Yotser  composition   for   which   the   European   authors   had   only   a   limited   selection   of   classical   models:   Ofanim.  Medieval   Italian   and   Ashkenazic   authors   composed   many   Ofanim,   developing   models   for   form   and  contents  that  expressed  their  high  regard  for  this   liturgical  position.  Based  on  the  selection  of  Ofanim  for  (special)  shabbatot  transmitted  in  medieval  Ashkenazic  liturgical  manuscripts,  preferences  for  the  different  poetic   forms  and  the  content  models  will  be  traced,  showing  the   interdependences  between  payyetanim  from  different  times  and  different  places  within  the  Italo-­‐Ashkenazic  school  of  liturgical  poetry.  

 

Avi  Shmidman,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   Identifying   Joins   of   Cairo   Genizah   Fragments:   Traditional   Methods   versus   Artificial   Intelligence   (A  Tribute  to  Ezra  Fleischer)  

Abstract:  One  of  Prof.  Fleischer’s  primary  research  accomplishments  was  the  foundation  of  the  Institute  for  the   Research   of   Hebrew   Poetry   in   the   Genizah   and   the   comprehensive   cataloging   of   Cairo   Genizah  fragments   containing   piyyut  material.   Although   the   Institute   itself   does   not   pursue   the   identification   of  fragment   joins   per   se,   the   raw   data   that   it   provides   forms   a   basis   from  which   scholars   can   quickly   and  efficiently   identify   relevant   joins.   In   contrast,   a   completely   different   approach   is   suggested   by   Nachum  Dershowitz  and  Leor  Wolf,  two  computer  science  researchers  from  Tel  Aviv  University  who  have  devised  a  method  to  identify  Cairo  Genizah  joins  by  the  use  of  artificial  intelligence.  In  this  lecture  I  shall  compare  and  contrast   these   two   approaches   towards   the   identification   of   Genizah   joins.   My   comparison   of   the   two  methods   will   demonstrate,   on   the   one   hand,   that   in   a   number   of   cases   the   mechanism   provided   by  Dershowitz   and  Wolf   succeeds   in   identifying   joins   that  would  have  been   impossible   to   identify  using   the  Institute’s  data  alone.  On  the  other  hand,  however,   I  will  demonstrate  that   in  many  additional  cases,   it   is  only  by  appealing  to  the  databases  of  the  Institute  that  we  are  able  to  identify  the  relevant  joins.  Thus,  far  from  being  obsoleted  by   the  new   technology,   Fleischer’s   uniquely   comprehensive  database   continues   to  remain  essential  in  the  field.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry,  Parody,  and  Parable  in  Provence  

 

Chair:  Tova  Rosen  

 

Uriah  Kfir,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  The  Construction  of  Space  in  Isaac  HaGorni's  Poetry  

Abstract:  The   thirteenth  century  Hebrew  poet   Isaac  HaGorni   is   considered   to  be   the  most  gifted  Hebrew  poet  of  Medieval  Provence.  This   lecture   is  based  on  my  forthcoming  critical  edition  of  his  poetry  and  the  poems   he   received   from   his   counterparts   in   Provence.   Not   much   is   known   about   HaGorni.   He   himself  stated   that   he  wrote   hundreds   of   poems;   however,   only   19   have   been   preserved   in  manuscripts.   These  poems  tell  of  his  travels  between  the  cities  of  Provence  and  his  encounters  –  for  the  good  or  more  often  for  the  bad  –  with  Provençal  Jewish  communities  and  fellow  poets.  Wandering,  landscape  and  space  are  major  themes  in  the  poetry  of  this  roaming  poet.  However  I  will  show  that  these  themes  are  not  used  solely  as  a  window  onto  HaGorni's  life;  rather  they  are  also  poetic  constructions  in  which  HaGorni  carefully  shapes  and  presents  his  self-­‐perception  as  THE  Hebrew  poet  of  Provence  as  a  whole.  

 

Aurora  Salvatierra,  University  of  Granada,  Spain  

Title:  Oheb  Nashim  by  Yedayah  ha-­‐Penini:  A  Debate  about  Women?  

Abstract:  Since  it  was  edited  by  Adolf  Neubauer  in  1884,  this  text,  preserved  in  only  two  manuscripts,  has  received   little   attention.   The   work   has   been   considered   a   continuation   of   the   debate   on   women   (and  marriage)   that  began  with  Minhat  Yehudah  Soné  ha-­‐Nashim  by  Yehudah   Ibn  Shabbetay   in   the   thirteenth  century.  However,  in  my  opinion,  this  text  is  not  merely  one  more  example  of  the  development  of  a  literary  modality   structured   around   the   attack   on   and   defence   of   women   in   the   Middle   Ages.   It   also   includes  valuable  considerations  regarding  the  conception  of  poetic  discourse,  especially  in  the  words  that  ha-­‐Penini  (13th-­‐15th   c.)   dedicates   at   the   beginning   and   the   end   of   In   Defense   of   Women   to   the   work   by   his  predecessor   Ibn   Shabbetay.   The   analysis   of   this   discourse   contributes   to   a   better   understanding   of   the  poetics  of  the  period  and  the  evolution  of  the  debate  in  medieval  Hebrew  literature.  

 

Nili  Shalev,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  "To  Understand  a  Proverb  and  a  Parable":  R.  Joseph  Qimhi's  Poems  in  His  Commentaries  on  Proverbs  

Abstract:  R.  Yosef  Qimhi  was  one  of   the  Jewish  scholars  of  Muslim  Spain  who   immigrated  to  Provence   in  the   twelfth   century   and   brought   about   an   impressive   transformation   in   the   spiritual   life   of   the   Jewish  community  there.   In  his  new  place  of  residence  Qimhi  engaged   in  a  variety  of  activities,   including  biblical  exegesis.   He  was   undoubtedly   a   distinguished   representative   of   the   unique   Jewish   biblical   exegesis   that  developed  in  Provence.  In  his  commentary  on  Proverbs  he  made  use  of  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  maxims  and  epigrams   in   the  manner  of   the   adab   style.   Thus  he   also   included,   anonymously,   rhymed  moral   epigrams  from   his   Sheqel   HaQodesh,   which   was   also   composed   in   Provence.   Almost   forty   poems   from   Sheqel  HaQodesh  were   inserted  by  Qimhi   into   his   commentaries   in  order   to   enrich   the   text,   put   its  message   in  greater   focus,   and   provide   help   in   understanding   it.   Conversely,   the   insertion   of   epigrams   from   Sheqel  HaQodesh  into  the  commentaries  can  also  be  helpful  in  the  opposite  direction:  It  makes  it  possible  in  some  cases   to   clarify   certain   obscure   passages   in   the   epigrams   in   light   of   the   associated   biblical   verse,   and   in  others   to   illuminate   a   certain   perspective   in   the   epigrams'   interpretation.   In   this   lecture   I   would   like   to  demonstrate  Qimhi's  unique  method  for   integrating  his  gnomic  rhymed  epigrams   into  his  explanations  of  the  verses  in  Proverbs.  At  the  same  time,  I  will  try  to  illuminate  the  interrelationship  between  the  biblical  verses  and  the  poems,  while  attempting  to  expose  the  message  at  their  core.  

 

Peter  Sh.  Lehnardt,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Literary  Historical  Reconsiderations  to  the  Emergence  of  Hebrew  Parody  

Abstract:   Reading  Medieval   Parody   is   a   unique   kind   of   challenge   for  modern   readers.   On   the   one   hand  similar  to  allegory  as  an  extended  metaphor  parody  is  an  extended  event  of  intertextuality  which  has  to  be  carefully  expounded,  on  the  other  hand  parody  breaks  off  the  boundaries  of  the  autonomy  of  the  text  as  its  depends  on  the  assumption  of   intention  by  the  author  to  exclude  an  accidently  mishap  of   intertextuality.  The  paper  is  intended  to  offer  a  model  of  reading,  understanding  and  interpretation  of  literary  parodies  in  the   pre-­‐romantic   age   with   the   help   of   examples   from   the   cradle   of   Hebrew   parody   in   13th   century  Catalunya  and  Provence:  Medieval  parody  was  not  intended  to  scrape  off  and  overwrite  the  parodied  text,  to   ridicule   and   exchange   it   with   a   'new'   one,   but   to   live   with   a   text   identified   with   cultural   or   social  authority  from  now  on  contaminated  by  the  perspective  offered  by  the  author  of  the  medieval  parody.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Studies  in  Medieval  Arabic  and  Hebrew  Panegyric  Poetry  

 

Chair:  Aurora  Salvatierra  

 

Jonathan  Decter,  Brandeis  University,  USA  

Title:  In  Praise  of  God,  In  Praise  of  Man:  a  Problem  of  “Political  Theology”  in  Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  

Abstract:  In  both  medieval  Hebrew  and  Arabic  poetry,  panegyrics  directed  toward  men  sometimes  draw  on  scriptural  formulae  originally  found  within  praises  for  God.  The  inter-­‐textual  technique  is  a  variety  of  what  was   called   “al-­‐iqtibas”   (kindling   one   flame   with   another)   in   Arabic   literary   criticism,   a   variety   that   was  sometimes  critiqued  as  theologically  reprehensible.   In  this  paper,   I  will  consider  many  examples  from  the  medieval  Hebrew  corpus  alongside  examples   from  the  Arabic  corpus  and  discussions   from  Arabic   literary  criticism.  I  will  also  discuss  the  literary  phenomenon  as  a  problem  of  “political-­‐theology”  by  considering  the  ways  in  which  human  subjects  are  made  to  mimic,  or  intermingle,  with  the  divine.  

 

Uri  Melammed,  Academy  of  the  Hebrew  Language,  Israel  

Title:  The  Genre  of  Hallel  in  the  Diwan  Poetry  of  the  Jews  of  Yemen  

Abstract:  Yemenite  Poetry  throughout  the  generations  distinguishes  between  six  kinds  of  genres  of  songs  and  poems:  Nashid,  Shira,  Hallel,  Hidduya,  Zaffah  and  Qatsid.  All  of  them  are  included  in  manuscripts  of  the  oldest   diwans   and   printed   editions.   One   of   the   oldest   types   of   this   poetry,   that   survived   only   in   the  Yemenite   Jewish   community,   is   the   Hallel;   it   can   be   found   in   every   Yemenite   diwan   in   separate   called  Halleloth.  This  term  was  chosen  because  each  Hallel  starts  and  ends  with  the  word  Wehaleluya  ["and  praise  God"].  Here  one  encounters  a  set  structure  non-­‐metred  rhymed  verses  (pizmonim  or  hymns).  They  have  very  short  and  rather  few  hemistitches  and  have  a  fixed  melody,   in  contrast  to  the  other  genres  like  the  Nashid  and  Shira.   These   hymns   are   recited   and   sung   as   choral   poetry.   Their   purpose   is   to   praise   and   laud  God,   the  people  of  Israel,  or  various  other  participants  in  any  given  occasion  for  celebration:  the  host  of  the  event,  the  bride  and  the  groom,  the  circumciszed  newborn  son,  the  ransomed  son,  etc.  The  Hallel  can  be  written  in  one  of  three  Semitic  languages:  Hebrew,  Aramaic  or  Arabic.  During  my  presentation,   I  will  elaborate  upon  the  traditional-­‐historical  structure  of  the  Hallel;   its  use  and  transfer   from  a   liturgical   into  para-­‐liturgical   framework;  the  way   it  has  developed  since  the  17th  century;  and  its  use  today  in  Yemenite  Jewish  singing.  I  will  present  a  few  of  the  Halleloth  as  eamples  for  analysis  as  well   as   compare   this   genre   toan   ancient   Hebrew   Palestinian   type   of   piyyut   in   order   to   emphasize   my  conclusions.  

 

Joachim  Yeshaya,  Goethe  University  Frankfurt,  Germany  

Title:   Hebrew   Poems   in   Praise   of   Moses   and   the   Arabic   Genre   of   al-­‐mada’ih   al-­‐nabawiyya   (Prophetic  Eulogies)  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  examine  the  Hebrew  poems  which  the  Karaite  poet  Moses  Dar‘i  composed  in  mid-­‐twelfth-­‐century   Egypt   in   praise   of  Moses,   and  which   recall   the   Arabic   genre   of   al-­‐mada’ih   al-­‐nabawiyya  (“Prophetic  Eulogies”),  i.e.,  qasidas  in  praise  of  Muhammad  that  became  popular  in  his  time.  In  this  paper,  I  will  give  an  overview  of  the  literary  history  of  the  genre  of  Arabic  poems  in  praise  of  Muhammad,  with  the  aim  of  attempting  to  determine  to  what  extent  Moses  Dar‘i  may  have  been  familiar  with  this  genre,  even  though   he   chose   to   write   Hebrew   poems   in   praise   of   Moses.   I   will   primarily   consider   examples   from  manuscript  NLR  Evr.  I  802  (fol.  69a-­‐71a)  devoted  to  the  praise  of  Moses  (and  Aaron  in  the  case  of  nr.  231;  nrs.  232-­‐233  are  devoted  entirely  to  Moses)  but  also  call  attention  to  other  examples  from  manuscript  NLR  Evr.  I  803.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Arabic  and  Romance  Models  in  Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  in  Memoriam  Professor  Angel  Sáenz-­‐Badillos  

 

Chair:  Masha  Itzhaki  

 

Haviva  Ishay,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Abraham  Ibn  Ezra  and  the  Classic  Qasida—War  or  Peace?  

Abstract:   Abraham   Ibn   Ezra  was   the   first   to   produce   in  Hebrew  poetry   a   poem  with   a   formal  mannerist  structure.  He  introduced  arrangement  of  meters  that  were  unknown  in  the  poetry  of  his  predecessors.  He  displayed  virtuosity  in  designing  complex  Muwashat.  On  the  one  hand,  he  challenged  the  classical  tradition  that  was  based  on  the  model  of  the  prestigious  qasida,  while  on  the  other,  he  yielded  to  the  authority  of  that  ancient  model  when  he  sought  to   introduce  new  topics  to  Hebrew  poetry.  The   lecture  will   treat  the  debate  Abraham  Ibn  Ezra  waged  with  the  model  of  the  qasida  as  an  individual  case  of  his  debate  with  the  Andalusian  poetic  tradition.  

 

Arie  Schippers,  University  of  Amsterdam,  Netherlands  

Title:  Jewish  literature  as  a  Link  between  Arabic  and  Romance  Poetry  and  Narrative:  The  case  of  Immanuel  of  Rome  and  his  Mahbarot  (Cantos)    

Abstract:  Immanuel  of  Rome  (1261-­‐1328),  a  poet  contemporary  of  the  famous  Italian  poet  Dante  Alighieri  (1265-­‐1321),   was   an   Italian   poet   as   well   as   a   poet   in   the   Hebrew   poetic   tradition.   This   Hebrew   secular  poetic   tradition  originated  from  Muslim  Spain  under  the   influence  of  Arabic  prosody  and  grammar   in  the  tenth  century,  due  to  the  results  of  the  study  of  the  Hebrew  language  in  Muslim  Spain  and  North  Africa.    In  the  sixth  Mahberet     (Canto)   Immanuel  of  Rome  alluded  to   the  different  Hebrew  poetic  schools  which  he  

supposed   to  have  existed   since   then,   leading   to   the  production  of   rivaling  Spanish,  Provençal   and   Italian  Hebrew  poetry  parallel  to  the  development  of  the  different  Romance  poetry  schools  in  Occitan,  Italian  and  French.   Immanuel's   other   Cantos   contain   narratives   in   rhymed   prose   with  many   poems   inserted.   These  poems  can  be  sometimes  metrically   read  according   to   the  Arabic  and  Hebrew  metrical   system  as  well  as  according  to  the  rules  of  Romance  genres  as  for  instance  the  sonnet.    We  will  especially  concentrate  upon  the   introductory   passages   of   Immanuel's   Cantos,   in  which   the   narrator,   in   the   company   of   his   Prince   or  Maecenas,   often   refers   to   the  beginning  of   an   event   in   the  days   of   his   youth  which   is   a  motif   known   in  Eastern  Arabic  Maqamah  literature  and  Hebrew  Andalusian  rhymed  prose  narratives.  

 

Tsuji  Yoshiaki,  Doshisha  University,  Graduate  School  of  Theology  

Title:  The  "Jawab"  in  Jewish  Yemenite  Poertry  -­‐  its  character  and  technic  

Abstract:   The   "Jawab"   (in  Arabic)  or   in  Hebrew  "Shir  ha-­‐maaneh",  both  mean   "an  answer",   is   a   genre  of  Jewish   Yemenite   Poetry   through   ages.   Usually   those   who   make   a   poem   in   this   genre,   for   example   16  century's   Rabbi   Zacharia   al-­‐Dahri,   combine   original   verses   with   a   well-­‐known   poem   which   already   had    been  made  before,  and  create  new  one,  changing  original  meanings  the  antecedent  poem  had.  Yemenite  Jewish  poets,  who  loved  this  technic,  had  made  many  poems  in  this  genre,  most  of  the  cases  using  poems  of  The  Golden  Age  of  Spain,   like  Yehuda  Ha-­‐Levi  and  so  on.  However  this   interesting  phenomenon  hasn't  attracted  scholars'  attention,  and  has  been  neglected  so  far  except  for  some  small  but  important  studies.  In  this  paper  I  exhibit  some  instances  and  analyze  how  the  technic  works,  in  other  words  how  the  new  poem  changes  the  meaning  of  the  original  poem.  

 

Amina  Boukail,  Université  de  Jijel-­‐Algérie  

Title  :  La  représentation  de  l’Autre  dans  les  Maqamat  de  Judah  AlHarizi  (Tehkimoni)  

Abstract  :  Les  textes  de  Judah  AlHarizi  présente  un  champ  riche  d’étude  et  qui  reflète  bien  la  situation  des  Juifs  dans  le  monde  arabe  médiéval  et  leur  rôle  culturel  entre  de  différentes  cultures.  Notre  propos  est  de  mettre  d’approfondir  l’appréhension  de  l’altérité  dans  la  littérature  hébraïque  médiévale  à  travers  les  textes  narratifs  de  Judah  Alharizi.  Nous  envisagerons  l’«  Autre  »  qui  est  surtout  l’arabe  ou  l’islam  par  trois  axes  :    1-­‐  Les  référents  de  l’Autre  dans  la  littérature  hébraïque  médiévale  2-­‐  Les  personnages  arabes  dans  les  Maqamat  de  Alharizi  3-­‐  L’image  de  la  littérature  arabe  dans  les  Maqamat  de  Judah  AlHarizi.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  04  

 

Session:  001:  

Hebrew  Language  and  Linguistics  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Samuel  Blapp,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:  The  Diversity  of  the  So-­‐called  Non-­‐standard  Tiberian  Vocalisation  Tradition  of  Biblical  Hebrew  

Abstract:   The   paper   will  make   a   contribution   to   the   study   of   the  medieval   reading   traditions   of   Biblical  Hebrew.  I  shall  present  samples  of  vocalisation  and  accentuation  that  can  be  found  in  manuscripts,  which  have   been   classified   by  Davis   as   belonging   to   the   non-­‐standard   Tiberian   vocalisation   tradition   of   Biblical  Hebrew.  This  data  will  be  compared  to  the  Codex  Leningradensis  B19a  (L)  and  the  Aleppo  Codex  in  order  to  highlight  the  differences.  Furthermore,   I  shall  attempt  to  organize  them  to  show  the  diversity  of   features  occurring   within   this   tradition.   Thus,   I   will   subsequently   suggest   that   there   is   a   multitude   of   traditions  rather  than  only  just  one.  Although,  they  share  some  features,  they  also  show  important  differences,  which  make  it  impossible  to  claim  only  one  category.  For  instance,  one  can  find  evidence  for  the  standard  Tiberian  vocalisation   in   these  non-­‐standard  manuscripts  but  one  can  also   find  differences   in  vocalisation   in   L   that  deviate   from   the   standard   Tiberian   tradition.   Hence,   the   terminology   used   to   describe   the   different  vocalisation  traditions  and  the  diversity  of  these  traditions  should  be  reconsidered.  

 

David  Prebor,  The  Academy  of  the  Hebrew  Language,  Israel  

Title:  Singular  and  Plural  Hebrew  Forms  in  the  Commentary  of  Hizkuni  to  Genesis  

Abstract:   The   northern   French   school   of   Jewish   biblical   exegesis   is   one   of   the   most   celebrated   that  developed  during  the  medieval  period.  Rashi,  the  great  scholar  of  Troyes,  is  the  best  known  of  this  school.  His  biblical   commentaries  were  even  studied  by  Christian  scholars.  A   few  generations   later  Hezekiah  ben  Manoah  (fl.  13th  century  in  northern  France)  wrote  his  commentary  to  the  Pentateuch,  known  as  Hizquni.  The   publication   of   Chavel's   edition   of   Hizquni   (1981)   contributed   to   the   increased   popularity   of   this  commentary.  However,  the  commentary  of  Hizquni  has  not  received  sufficient  attention  by  scholars.  One  of  the  areas  not  yet  studied  is  the  many  linguistic  comments  in  Hizquni.  In  addition  to  his  comments  on  the  Hebrew  and  Aramaic  languages,  he  brings  many  leazim  (Old  French  glosses),  distinguishes  between  French  and  Latin  (see  Chavel's  edition  page  521)  and  even  brings  a  Greek  term  (comment  to  Genesis  40:1).  In  this  paper  I  will  examine  the  use  of  singular  and  plural  Hebrew  grammatical  forms  in  the  book  of  Genesis  and  analyze   Hizquni's   explanations   of   them.   There   are   eight   comments   in   Hizquni   to   Genesis   dealing   with  singular   and  plural   forms.   Sometimes  his   comments   reflect  well   known  usage   such   as   pluralis  majestatis  and  pluralis  tantum.  Other  comments  are  quite  original.  All  of  these  linguistic  comments  will  be  presented,  explained  and  examined  in  light  of  other  commentaries  and  in  light  of  modern  day  knowledge  of  linguistics.  

 

Adel  Shakour,  Al-­‐Qasemi  Academic  College  of  Education  and  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Use  of  Arabic  Words  in  the  Hebrew  of  Arab  Authors  Writing  in  Israel  

Abstract:  The  main  subject  of  my  lecture  is  to  examine  the  impact  of  Arabic  on  the  Arab  authors  writing  in  Hebrew.  Specifically  it  examines  their  use  of  words  and  phrases  borrowed  from  Arabic  in  literary  works  that  they  wrote   in  Hebrew   and   their   literary   translation   from  Arabic   into  Hebrew.   These  words   and   phrases,  which  are  mostly   from  spoken  Arabic,   serve   to   increase   the  authentic   sense  of   the  Arab  culture   that   the  text  depicts.  Two  methods  are  used   to  convey   the   flavor  of  Arabic   culture   in  Hebrew  texts:  one   involves  using  Arabic  words   and  phrases  without   quotation  mark,   the  other   technique   is   less   subtle   and   involves  placing  quotation  marks   around   the  Arabic  words   and  phrases.   I  will   report   also  on   the  phenomenon  of  Arab  authors   in  Israel  writing  in  Hebrew.  "Writing  in  Hebrew"  refers  to   literary  works  originally  written  in  Hebrew   or   translated   from   Arabic   to   Hebrew,   the   scale   of   the   phenomenon   of   writing   in   Hebrew,   the  bilingual  literary  works  of  Arab  authors  in  Israel,  and  Israeli  society's  acceptance  of  Arab  authors  writing  in  Hebrew.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Hebrew  linguistics  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Covert  Hybridity  in  the  Language  of  Israel  

Organizers:  Nurit  Dekel  and  Gil’ad  Zuckermann  

Chair:  Nurit  Dekel  and  Gil’ad  Zuckermann  

 

Ghil'ad  Zuckermann,  University  of  Adelaide,  Australia  

Title:  Universal  Constraints   in  Language  Revival:   Lessons   from   Israeli  and  Other  Hybrid  Tongues  Resulting  from  Reclamation  

Abstract:   After   a   brief   analysis   of   the   ethical,   aesthetic   and   utilitarian   benefits   of   language   revival,   this  trailblazing  paper  will   propose   the  establishment  of  Revivalistics,   a   new   trans-­‐disciplinary   field  of   inquiry  studying   systematically   and   comparatively   the   universal   constraints   and   global   mechanisms   on   the   one  hand,   and   local   peculiarities   and   cultural   relative   idiosyncracies  on   the  other  hand,   apparent   in   linguistic  revitalizations  across  various  sociological  backgrounds.  With  coca-­‐colonization  and  homogenization  there  will  be  more  and  more  groups  added  to  the  forlorn  club  of   the   lost-­‐heritage   peoples.   Language   reclamation   will   become   increasingly   relevant   as   people   seek   to  recover   their   cultural   autonomy,   empower   their   spiritual   and   intellectual   sovereignty,   and   improve   their  wellbeing.  There   is  an  urgent  need   to  offer  perspicacious  comparative   insights,  eviscerated  of   ideological  bias,  e.g.  from  the  so  far  most  famous  language  reclamation  movement:  the  Hebrew  revival  in  Israel,  which  resulted   in   the   hybridic   Israeli   language.   This   paper   will   also   provide   perspicacious   insights   from   the  Barngarla,  Kaurna  and  Ngarrindjeri   revivals   in  South  Australia,  and  from  many  other  revival  cases  such  as  Maori  in  New  Zealand  and  Hawai’i  in  the  United  States.  

 

Nurit  Dekel,  NSC  -­‐  Natural  Speech  Communication,  Israel  

Title:  The  European  Elements  of  the  Israeli  Verbal  System  

Abstract:  The  verbal  system  of  spoken  Israeli  Hebrew  (Israeli  hereafter;  see  Zuckermann  2006)  is  perceived  as  a  Semitic   root-­‐pattern   formation  system.   In   this   lecture   I  will   show  that   this  core  system   in   Israeli   is  a  hybrid  system  that  contains  both  Semitic  and  European  elements;  I  will  concentrate  in  many  European-­‐like  elements   that   are   the   basis   of   this   system.   I  will   review   the   following   fundamentals   of   the   Israeli   verbal  system:   1.   the   verbal   system   internal  morpho-­‐semantic   interface.   The  morpho-­‐semantic   structure  of   the  Israeli  verbal  system  is  based  on  aspectual  (and  minor  modal)  properties,  similarly  to  European  languages:  aspect   and   modality   are   grammaticalized   and   correspond   to   constant   morphological   forms.   The   Israeli  verbal  system  is  commonly  perceived  as  tense-­‐based  (Coffin  &  Bolozky  2005);  in  this  lecture  I  will  show  that  time  is  not  grammaticalized  in  the  verb  system,  but  is  expressed  by  independent  lexemes,  as  in  European  languages.  2.  The  formation  of  new  verbs,  having  Israeli  origins  I  will  bring  examples  of  a  new  strategy  for  the  formation  of  verbs  that  is  used  by  the  speakers,  which  is  based  on  a  noun  +  a  verbal  suffix,  and  not  on  a  root-­‐pattern   formation.  3.   The   formation  of  new  verbs,  having   foreign  origin   I  will   show   that  new  verbs,  originating   in   foreign   words,   preserve   their   original   phonological   distribution   when   becoming   an   Israeli  verb;  they  are  not  automatically  adjusted  to  a  common  pattern  selected  by  the  speakers.  All  these  features  of   the   Israeli   verbal   system   make   this   system   uniquely   hybrid,   having   both   European   and   Semitic  properties.   References:   Coffin-­‐Amir,   E.   and   S.   Bolozky.   2005.   A   Reference   Grammar   of  Modern   Hebrew.  Cambridge:   Cambridge   University   Press   Zuckermann,   G.   2006.   A   New   Vision   for   "Israeli   Hebrew":  Theoretical   and   Practical   Implications   of   Analysing   Israel's  Main   Language   as   a   Semi-­‐Engineered   Semito-­‐European  Hybrid  Language.  Journal  of  Modern  Jewish  Studies  Vol  5,  No.  1.  57-­‐71.  

 

Gitit  Holzman,  Levinsky  College  of  Education,  Tel  Aviv,  Israel  

Title:   Monotheism   versus   Hybridity:   Clandestine   Religious   Mythology   as   Infrastructure   for   Allegedly  Scientific  &  Impartial  Linguistic  

Abstract:   Jewish   religion   is   characterized   by   unique   monotheistic   faith   as   well   as   by   peculiar   set   of  commandments,  aiming  at  distinguishing  its  adherents  from  other  people  and  defining  them  as  Jews.  Many  of  these  commandments  deal  with  creating  strict  borders  between  different  categories,  such  as  between  sacred  and  profane,  pure  and  impure,  allowed  and  forbidden,  human  and  divine.  In  addition,  large  portion  of  the  Jewish  law  is  dedicated  to  defying  mixture  or  hybridity  as  such  -­‐  these  are  the  famous  Shaatnez  laws.  Judaism   thus  admires  purity,   regarding   its   concept  of  deity  and   its  adherents'  daily   conduct  alike.   It  may  very  well  be  that  this  influential  Jewish  tradition  resulted  in  typically  perceiving  'hybridity'  as  being  by  and  large  an  inferior  quality,  while  'purity'  is  a  desirable  one.  The  end  of  the  nineteenth  century  and  beginning  of   the   twentieth  witnessed   the   foundation   of  modern   Jewish   community   in   the   land   of   Israel.   The   new  settlers   invested  much  time  and  effort  not  only   in  working  the  land  and  in   its  corporeal  construction,  but  they   also   labored   on   creating   Modern   Hebrew   culture.   Eliezer   Ben-­‐Yehuda   and   other   political   activists,  writers   and   intellectuals,   insisted   that   this   new   culture  would  be  Hebrew   speaking,   striving   to   transform  Biblical  Hebrew   into  a  modern  vernacular.  This  heroic  effort  seemed  to  be  miraculously  successful  as  the  Israeli  Jewish  community  deserted  diverse  Diasporic  tongues  and  adopted  what  is  believed  to  be  Hebrew.  However,   Ghil’ad   Zuckermann’s   recent   studies   demonstrate   that   this   ‘Modern   Hebrew’   is   in   reality   a  Semito-­‐European  hybrid.  Its  grammar  relies  on  Hebrew,  as  well  on  Yiddish,  the  revivalists’  mother  tongue,  and   on   a   plethora   of   other   languages   spoken   by   its   founders,   e.g.   Polish,   Russian,   German,   Arabic   and  Ladino.   Despite   hard   evidence   proving   the   hybrid   nature   of   ‘Modern   Hebrew’,   Israelis   believe   they   use  revived  Biblical  Hebrew.  This  paper  will  claim  that  this  stance  is  not  objective  &  scientific  one,  but  rather  a  religious  myth  in  disguise.  The  seemingly  secular  modern  Israeli  culture  has  allegedly  detached  itself  from  the   ancient   monotheistic   belief.   However,   religious   monotheism   is   alive   and   kicking   within   this   culture,  

preventing   scholars   and   laymen   alike   to   acknowledge   the   Semito-­‐European   hybrid   character   of  modern  Israeli  language.  The  Zionist  secular,  anti-­‐religious  movement  has  actually  shifted  from  worship  of  one  God  to  worshiping  the  concept  of  one  language,  professing  the  unity  of  biblical  Hebrew  and  modern  Israeli.  

 

Malka  Muchnik,  Bar-­‐Ilan  Universiry,  Israel  

Title:  Did  Gender  Change  from  Classical  to  Modern  Hebrew?    

Abstract:  Over  the  course  of  the  long  history  of  Hebrew,  there  have  been  many  significant  changes  in  the  language.   However,   the   grammatical   structure,   including   gender   restrictions,   has   survived   virtually  unchanged  since  the  classical  periods.  Even  the  fact  that  Hebrew  was  not  spoken  for  close  to  1700  years  did  not   cause   radical   changes   in   its  morphology.   In   recent   decades,   some   changes   have   been   introduced   in  Hebrew,  reflecting  a  more  egalitarian  attitude  concerning  gender.  Nonetheless,  despite  the  efforts  made,  the   change   achieved  with   respect   to   sexist   language   has   been   insufficient,   as  many   attempts   at   change  were  rejected  or  at  least  ignored  (Muchnik  2013,  in  pressa,  b).  The  fact  that  Hebrew  presents  a  very  rigid  grammatical   structure   could   be   viewed   as   a   positive   characteristic.   The   speakers   are   aware   of   the   large  number   of   gender   markers   in   the   language,   and   therefore,   any   change,   and   particularly   grammatical  changes,  cannot  go  unnoticed.  While  this  awareness  frequently  leads  to  negative  reactions,  it  may  also  lead  to  a  better  understanding  of  the  problem  and  to  selection  of  a  method  for  solving  it.  Although  some  gender  differentiations  have  almost  disappeared,   and  original  masculine  and   feminine   forms   for   the   second  and  third  person  were  unified,  they  did  not  develop  into  gender  neutrality.  The  clear  direction  is  for  masculine  forms  to  assume  the  feminine  meaning  as  well,  but  not  the  inverse.  This  change  leads  towards  a  wider  use  of  generic  forms,  which  in  reality  presents  an  androcentric  bias,  and  makes  women  less  visible.  As  Cameron  (1996)   and   Romaine   (1999)   asserted,   nonsexist   language   cannot   evolve   naturally  without   social   changes  and   commitment   to  equality.   Linguistic   reforms   can  only   succeed   if   they   are   accepted  by   the  public   and  officially  published  by  authorities  and  institutions,  but  this  is  not  the  case  with  Hebrew.  Of  course,  gender  changes   in   the   language  are  only  one  element  of  a  more  general   social  and   ideological   change.  Eckert  &  McConnel-­‐Ginet  (2003)  show  that  changes  occur  as  an  interruption  of  patterns  set  down  over  generations  and   throughout  our   own  development.  However,   such   sorts   of   interruptions  do  not   come   suddenly,   but  rather  as  small  intentional  or  unintentional  events.  The  lexicon  is  the  part  of  the  language  that  is  the  most  likely  to  be  changed,  and  this  is  important  for  the  introduction  of  new  ideas.  In  contrast,  grammatical  items  are  more  stable,  and  although  they  may  change,  this  occurs  very  slowly.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Hebrew  Book  History  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Annett  Martini,  Institut  für  Judaistik,  Free  University  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  The  Work  of  Heaven:  Transcultural  Oscillations  within  Ritual  Writing  in  Judaism  

Abstract:  Looking  at  the  material  features  of  Torah  scrolls  and  the  small  pieces  of  written  parchment  within  the  Mezuzot  and  Tefillin  one  immediately  becomes  aware  of  the  serious  endeavour  of  the  scribes  to  avoid  any  kind  of  modifications.  The  quality  of  the  parchment,  the  colour  of  the  ink,  the  layout  and  the  forms  of  letters  remained  unchanged  during  more  than  two  thousand  years  except  for  slight  variations.  Apparently,  the  different  cultural  environments  of  the  Jewish  communities   in  the  diaspora  did  not  touch  the  world  of  Soferim  STaM  who  were  entrusted  with  passing  on  the  holy  scrolls  within  very  tight  halachic  boundaries.  However,  the  multifaceted  scribal  literature  behind  the  written  artefacts  shows  a  different  picture.  Here  we  find   reflections   not   only   of   internal   Jewish   tensions,   halachical   and   philosophical   trends,   or   mystical  movements,  but  also  of  the  cultural  surrounding  in  terms  of  social,  political,  ritual,  and  aesthetical   issues.  The  objective  of  this  paper  is  to  outline  the  most  important  facets  of  these  reflections  by  means  of  almost  unexplored  sources  of  scribal  literature  written  in  Christian  and  Muslim  contexts.  It  will  be  argued  that,  on  the  one  hand,  the  engagement  of  Jewish  halachists  and  scribes  in  their  cultural  environment  resulted  from  the   necessity   to   exclude   non-­‐Jewish   influences   from   a   religious   realm   that   plays   such   a   crucial   role   for  preserving  Jewish  identity.  On  the  other  hand  one  can  determine  remarkable  shifts  with  respect  to  ritual  or  performative   aspects   of   the   process   of   writing,   to   the   reputation   of   the   scribe   in   society,   and   to   the  circumstances   of   life   of   the   scribes,   which   in   some   regions   are   reminiscent   of   Christian   and   Muslim  scriptoriums  and  thus  can  be  read  as  transcultural  oscillations  between  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  cultures.  

 

Rahel  Fronda,  The  Bodleian  Libraries,  University  of  Oxford,  UK  

Title:   Contacts   between   Jewish   and   Non-­‐Jewish   Cultures   to   do   with   Medieval   Ashkenazi   Bibles   with  Micrography  

Abstract:   The   many   ways   in   which   non-­‐Jewish   culture   has   influenced   the   production   of   medieval  illuminated   Hebrew   manuscripts   are   known   and   have   also   been   studied   recently.   These   include  iconographical  appropriations  of  non-­‐Jewish  models  and  involvement  of  Gentile  artists.  On  the  other  hand,  the  relation  of  manuscripts  with  Hebrew  micrography  —  that  is  a  uniquely  Jewish  art  form  —  to  non-­‐Jewish  environment  in  13th  century  Ashkenaz  has  not  been  dealt  with.  Hebrew  manuscripts  are  known  to  reflect  the   practices   of   the   places   where   they   have   been   produced   and   so,   even   in   the   case   of   Hebrew  micrography  it  is  perhaps  not  surprising  that  13th  century  Ashkenazi  Bibles  with  micrography  are  in  many  ways   closer   to   their   local   Latin  manuscripts   than   to   Sephardi  Bibles  with  micrography.   Talking   about   the  making  of  medieval  Hebrew  manuscripts,   it   is   crucial   not   to  underestimate   the   role  of   their   surrounding  non-­‐Jewish   milieu.   In   my   paper   I   shall   describe   a   variety   of   contacts   between   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish  cultures  to  do  with  medieval  Ashkenazi  Bibles  with  micrography.  These   include  their   formats,  codicology,  contents  and  also  contemporary  historical  events.  As  an  example,  the  layout  of  Latin  manuscripts  has  had  an  important  influence  on  the  legibility  and  arrangement  of  early  13th  century  micrographed  Hebrew  Bible  manuscripts   that  were  produced   in  Germany.  New  codicological  practices   and   innovative  methods   to  do  with  treating  parchment  that   the  producers  of  Hebrew  manuscripts  had  borrowed  from  their  non-­‐Jewish  colleagues  are  witnessed  by  an  important  dated  manuscript  of  1264  with  micrographic  decorations.  Apart  from  these  technical  details,  some  13th  century  Ashkenazi  Bibles  with  micrography  contain  linguistic  clues  that  reveal  not  only  sporadic  or  professional  contact  with  the  non-­‐Jewish  culture  but  prove  how  well  some  patrons   and   scribes-­‐artists   were   culturally   integrated   in   their   non-­‐Jewish   environment.   Besides   the  progressive  developments   in  the  making  of   the  medieval  Hebrew  book  that  are  a  result  of  direct  contact  between   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish   cultures,   some   manuscripts   bear   historical   events   of   hostility   and  persecution.  Such  an  extraordinary  chronicle   is  codex  Hebr.  16   in  Vienna  —  a  13th  century  micrographed  Hebrew  Bible  —  where  the  masorete  Abraham  tells  the  story  of  Rintfleisch  massacre  of  1298  in  Franconia  by  writing  it  in  large  letters  formed  by  micrography.  

 

Ilana  Tahan,  The  British  Library,  UK  

Title:  Matters  of  provenance:  Hebrew  manuscripts  from  the  library  of  a  distinguished  French  Archbishop  

Abstract:   In  1946  the  British  Museum  acquired  six   important  Hebrew  manuscripts  which  are  now  part  of  the   British   Library's   manuscript   collection.   All   six   manuscripts   were   copied   in   the   15th   century   most  probably   in   Italy.  Among  them  are   found:   Ibn  Pakudah's  philosophical  work   'Hovot  ha-­‐Levavot'   (Duties  of  the   heart)   and   Joseph   Gikatilla's   kabbalistic   treatise   'Sh'are   orah'   (The   gates   of   light).   This   paper   will  explore:   a)   the  manuscripts  and   the  background   to   their   acquisition;  b)   their   fascinating  provenance  and  their  illustrious  former  non-­‐Jewish  owners.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Masora/Bible  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Elodie  Attia  

 

Elvira  Martín-­‐Contreras,  CSIC,  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  The  Image  to  the  Service  of  the  Text:  Ornamental  Masorah  in  the  Manuscript  118-­‐Z-­‐42  (M1)  from  the  Complutense  University  Library  

Abstract:  The  codex  M1  consists  of  340  unpaged  folios  and  contains  the  whole  Hebrew  Bible  except  for  the  folios  which  contained  Exod.  IX  33b-­‐  XXIV  7b.  According  to  its  colophon  it  was  bought  by  R.  Yishaq  and  R.  Abraham,   doctors,   in   Toledo   in   1280.   This   manuscript   has   been   considered   by   Ch.   Ginsburg   as   “a  magnificent   codex”   and   one   of   the   codices   which   served   as   a   model   for   the   Hebrew   text   of   the  Complutensian  Polyglot  edited  by  Ximenez  de  Cisneros  in  the  16th  century.  The  Mm  is  given  in  three  lines  in   the   upper  margin   and   in   four   lines   in   the   lower  margin   of   each   folio,   and   the  Mp  occupies   the   outer  margins  and  the  margins  between  the  columns.  Besides  the  Mm,  a  number  of  lengthy  Massoretic  Rubrics  are  given  as  Appendices  at   the  end  of   the  Pentateuch,  Former  Prophets,   Latter  Prophets  and  Chronicles.  The  upper  Mm   is  mainly  written   in  straight   lines,   sometimes  combined  with  geometric  patterns;  and   the  lower  Mm  can  be  written  in  straight  lines  or  in  waves  or  in  circles  or  in  zigzag  lines.  In  some  cases,  the  Mm  can  continue  on  the  left  or  right  margins  of  the  page  in  ornamental  shape.  This  paper  offers  the  localization  and  description  of  all  the  masorot  in  ornamental  shape  and  those  written  in  geometric  patterns.  The  study  of  all  of  them  allows  me  to  formulate  the  following  hypothesis:  the  form  of  the  masorot  is  determined  by  their  content.  

 

Yosef  Ofer,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Acrostics  in  Masoretic  Notes  

Abstract:  Acrostics  are  common  in  medieval   literature,  where  they  usually  serve  to  highlight  the  name  of  the  poet  or  his  patron,  or  to  offer  a  prayer  to  a  saint.  The  use  of  an  acrostic  to  indicate  authorship  of  a  work  

is  widespread  in  many  cultures  and  in  different  languages.  In  Hebrew,  the  practice  of  creating  an  acrostic  to  spell  out  the  name  of  the  author  of  a  liturgical  poem  started  in  the  classical  period  (5th  or  6th  century),  and  the   earliest   poets   to   do   so   were   Yanai   and   Hadwata.   The   liturgical   acrostic   served   to   assert   the   poet's  ownership  of  his  work  and  protect  his  rights.  The  integration  of  his  name  as  part  of  the  work  itself  offered  far  better  durability   than  an  external  notation  of  his  authorship.  An  acrostic  may  sometimes   indicate   the  name  of  the  scribe  who  copied  the  manuscript:  the  highlighting  of  certain  words  in  the  text  might  allude  to  his  name,  or  the  structure  of  the  copied  text  might  be  planned  in  such  a  way  that  the  first  letters  of  each  line  form  an  acrostic  of  his  name.  In  recent  years  some  examples  of  such  acrostics  have  been  discovered  in  the  Masoretic  notes  accompanying  ancient  manuscripts  of  the  Bible.  (The  Masora  is  a  system  of  comments  and  rules  established  by  the  Masoretes  to  determine  and  preserve  the  precise  text  of  the  Hebrew  Bible.)  Dr.  David  Lyons  exposed  three  acrostic  signatures  in  MS  British  Library  Or.  4445,  which  is  a  manuscript  of  the  Pentateuch.  I  have  discovered  two  further  acrostics:  one  in  a  biblical  manuscript,  the  other  on  a  page  of  a  Masoretic  work.  The  lecture  will  address  the  ways  in  which  the  Masoretes  create  their  acrostic  signatures,  and   what   we  may   deduce   from   these   acrostics   concerning   the   location   of   the  manuscripts   in   time   and  place.  All  of  this  will  be  compared  with  acrostic  signatures  of  liturgical  poets  and  scribes.  

 

Viktor  Golinets,  Hoschule  für  Jüdische  Studien  Heidelberg,  Germany  

Title:  Editing  the  Text  of  the  Leningrad  Codex  of  the  Hebrew  Bible  

Abstract:   The   text   of   the   Leningrad   Codex   of   the   Hebrew   Bible   has   been   printed   in   several   scholarly  editions.   A   new   edition,   the   Biblia   Hebraica  Quinta,   is   under  way.   There   are  many   features   of   the   hand  written  text  that  complicate  making  a  diplomatic  text  edition.  On  many  pages  of  the  codex,  the  original  text  is   worn   out,   and   it   has   been   re-­‐inked   sometime   later.   Because   of   this   feature,   the   first   hand   of   the  manuscript   is  sometimes  difficult  to  decipher,  and  the  whole   idea  of  a  diplomatic   text  edition  comes  into  question.   In   many   places   there   are   omissions   of   text   signs   due   to   the   negligence   of   a   scribe.   These  omissions  often  occur  at  the  end  of  a  word,  and  there  are  many  cases  of  omissions  of  the  same  kind.  The  question   arises,   if   it   is   useful   to   mention   all   such   cases   in   the   textual   apparatus.   There   are   also   many  morphological   forms   in   the   Leningrad   codex   that   “contradict”   some   rules   of   the   Masoretic   grammar.  However,  contrary  to  the  judgments  of  modern  text  editions,  such  forms  are  no  mistakes  but  conditioned  realizations.  This  lecture  attempts  to  classify  difficulties  of  editing  the  Leningrad  Codex  and  to  suggest  new  solutions.  

 

Elodie  Attia,  Heidelberg  University,  Germany  

Title:  New  Hebrew  Documents  from  Southern  France:  an  Overview  

Abstract:  In  the  last  years,  the  discoveries  in  Archives  and  Libraries  of  new  Hebrew  Documents  coming  from  restored   old   book   bindings   have   increased.   In   this   presentation,   a   new   corpus   of   documents   (register,  account  books,  lists,  letters,  acts)  originating  from  Southern  France  and  Comtat  Venaissin  will  be  presented  and  analyzed,  taking  in  account  the  recent  researches  made  in  this  dynamic  field  of  Jewish  Studies.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  05  

 

Session:  001:  

Kabala  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Ronit  Meroz  /  Tzahi  Weiss  

Sefer  Yetsirah:  Content,  Context,  Interpretation  

 

Chair:  Ronith  Meroz  

 

Ronit  Meroz,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Abraham  in  the  Bosom  of  God  

Abstract:  Sefer  Yezira  ends  with  a  poetic,  though  perplexing,  description  of  God's  love  to  Abraham,  how  He  put  him  in  His  bosom  and  kissed  him  on  his  head.    In  this  lecture  I  will  discuss  the  possible  sources  of  this  image  and  their  implication  for  a  new  understanding  of  the  book's  message.  

 

Tzahi  Weiss,  The  Open  University,  Israel  

Title:  Some  New  Observations  Concerning  the  Context  of  Sefer  Yetsirah  

Abstract:   The   lecture   will   investigate   the   nature   of   the   attitudes   toward   alphabetical   letters   in   Syrian-­‐Aramaic   texts   which   were   written   between   the   4th   and   the   8th   century   C.E.   by   Syrian   church   fathers.  Following  previous   research  which  discussed   the  emergence  of   linguistic   schools   in  Nisibis   as  well   as   the  attitude   of   the   Syrian   church   fathers   to   the   holiness   of   the   Aramaic   language,   the   lecture   will   point   to  parallels   existing   between   Sefer   Yetsirah   and   the   atmosphere  which   existed   in   this   unique   cultural   area.  During   the   lecture   I  will   also  present   a  new  possible   attitude   towards   the   complicated  way   in  which   the  three  main  versions  of  Sefer  Yetsirah  were  edited.  

 

Klaus  Herrmann,  Free  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:   How   is   the   Text   of   Sefer   Yezirah   Connected   with   the   Lost   Commentary   by   Isaac   Israeli?   Some  Speculations  on  a  Highly  Speculative  Treatise  

Abstract:  There  is  no  question  about  it:  the  text  tradition  of  the  Sefer  Yezirah  (SY)  is  downright  complex  and  difficult.   Nevertheless,   in   view   of   the   oldest   extant   manuscript   text-­‐witnesses,   it   appears   to   be   far   less  dramatic   than   scholars   usually   assume.   Therefore   the   task   of   the   present   paper   lies   in   reflecting   on   this  oldest  available  text  tradition  of  the  SY  and  confronting  it  with  the  medieval  commentaries.  The  no  longer  extant   commentary   by   Isaac   Israeli,   Dunash   ibn   Tamim’s   teacher,   seems   to   play   an   important   role   in  answering  these  questions.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002  :    

Kabala  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Mysticism,  Sabbatai  Tzvi  

 

Chair:  Giacomo  Corazzol  

 

Annelies  Kuyt,  Goethe-­‐University,  Frankfurt,  Germany  

Title:  Unravelling  the  Divine  Message:  Shlomo  Almoli  on  Dreams  and  their  Interpreters  

Abstract:   In   his   sixteenth-­‐century   Pitron   Halomot,   Almoli   tries   to   establish   the   criteria   for   a   correct  interpretation   of   dreams,   the   dream   comprising   a   small   prophecy.   He   does   so   by  means   of   his   sources:  Jewish   -­‐   ranging   from   the  Hebrew  Bible   to  his   contemporaries,   incorporating  halakhic,   philosophical   and  kabbalistic  genres  -­‐  as  well  as  non-­‐Jewish  sources.  

 

José  Alberto  Rodrigues  da  Silva  Tavim,  Instituto  de  Investigação  Científica  Tropical,  Lisboa;  CIDEHUS,  Universidade  de  Évora;  CITCEM,  Universidade  do  Porto,  Portugal  

Title:  Sabbatai  Zvi  in  motion  

Abstract:   The   famous  Sabbatai   Zvi,   the  Mystical  Messiah  as  his   greatest   scholar  Gershom  Scholem  called  him,   was   born   in   Smyrna   in   1626.   Scholem   and   other   more   recent   scholars,   who   continue   to   keep   an  interest   in   this  character  and  on  his   followers,   see   the  unfolding  of  his  movement  as   the   typical  produce  Smyrna,  a  town  where  European  commercial  investment  and  the  market  dynamics  implemented  by  Jews  of  Iberian  origin  helped  to  shape  its  cosmopolitan  outlook.  This  multifaceted  cosmopolitanism  is  perhaps  one  of  the  great  dimensions  of  the  mystical  movement  around  Sabbatai  Zvi,  which  make  this  the  major  episode  of  Jewish  mysticism  in  the  Modern  Age.  However,  this  movement  spread  beyond  the  narrowly  defined  but  permeable   Jewish   universe   into   the   European   "Republic   of   Letters",   influencing,   for   example,   certain  English  millenarian  millieu  and  absorbing  elements  of  the  Iberian  millenarianism.  Even  in  Islamic  contexts,  particularly  in  Morocco,  this  movement  of  the  "Mystical  Messiah"  would  be  "integrated"  and  "interpreted"  in   the   context  of   the   local   Jewish  environment,  but  evolved   into  other  dimensions   transcending   the   real  Sabbatai,  though  much  of  this  information  was  spread  via  the  Netherlands.  We  are  primarily  concerned  to  consider   this   movement   around   the   "Mystical   Messiah"   as   a   major   moment   in   the   encounter   between  Islam  and  Christian  Europe  (to  which  the  Jewish  communities  of  Iberian  origin  were  part),  whose  messianic  dimension  transcends  the  Jewish  world,  though  the  Jews  are  its  leadings  characters.  In  this  context  several  questions  arise:  1   -­‐  How   to  understand   the  development  of   Sabbatai’s  movement   in   the   Islamic   context,  more   specifically   in   the   Ottoman   Empire   (Sabbatai   eventually   converted   to   Islam   keeping   his   messianic  proposals)?  2  -­‐  How  does  the  West  understands  this  Islamic  context?  3  -­‐  How  is  regarded  or  absorbed  in  the  West  (by  its  supporters  and  detractors)  the  development  of  a  movement  which  initially  occurs  in  an  Islamic  context  (Ottoman  and  North  African)?  4  -­‐  How  is  reflected  in  Sabbatai’s  movement  the  Messianic  queries  of  

the  West  (as  exemplified  in  the  case  of  the  English  millenarians  and  the  Iberian  messianism)?  The  answers  to   these   questions   will   attempt   to   unravel   the   veil   hanging   over   a   huge   volume   of   beliefs,   riddles   and  emotions  that  characterized  this  movement  that  spread  from  the  Mediterranean  to  Northern  Europe  in  the  Modern  Age.  

 

Shinichi  Yamamoto,  Graduate  School  of  Human  and  Environmental  Studies,  Kyoto  University,  Japan  

Title:  Turban  and  Tefillin  in  an  Anonimous  Sabbatean  Text  

Abstract:  Turban,  a   symbolic   term   in  Sabbateanism,   signifies   the  sacred  conversion   to   Islam.  As   the  well-­‐known  portrat  of  Sabbatai  Tzevi  shows,  he  as  well  as  some  of  his  followers  apostatized  and  actually  put  on  the  turbans  on  their  heads.  However  it  does  not  mean  their  unconditional  adoption  of  Islam.  They  changed  a   couple   of   Jewish   mourning   days   such   as   the   17th   of   Tammuz   and   the   9th   of   Av   into   feast-­‐days   and  created  an  idiosyncratic  calendar  to  commemorate  the  messianic  events.  Forming  some  clandestine  groups  with  such  unique  customs  resulted  in  so-­‐called  Dönme  sects,  the  members  of  which  intermarried  within  the  believers’  descendants.  Their  identity  gradually  turned  into  the  indigenous  ethnicity,  which  is  different  both  from   Judaism   and   from   Islam.   The   origin   of   Dönme   obviously   has   their   root   in   the   trial   of   1666,  where  Sabbatai   Tzevi   put   on   the   turban   and   became   a   cross-­‐boundary   redeemer.   On   the   other   hand,   some  testimonies   have   it   that   Sabbatai   Tzevi   put   on   tallith   and   tefillin   even   after   his   conversion   to   Islam.  Considering  his  antinomistic   inclination,  his  observance  of   the   Jewish  commandments  seemingly  deviates  from   the   anticipated   heretical   behavior.   It   is   noteworthy   that   at   the   early   stage   the   number   of   the  Sabbatean  converts  who   took   the   same  path  as   their  messiah  was   relatively   small.  The  main  disciples  of  Sabbatai   Tzevi   such   as   Nathan   of   Gaza,   Samuel   Primo   and   Abraham   Cardozo   remained   Jewish   and   kept  away  from  the  apostate  followers.  For  instance,  the  group  of  Nathan  lived  a  devotional   life  in  accordance  with   kabbalistic   customs.  What   is   obvious   is   that   there  was   also   a   conventional   aspect   in   Sabbateanism.  And  from  this  vantage  point  it  is  possible  to  know  why  Sabbatai  Tzevi  still  put  on  tallith  and  tefillin  after  the  conversion.  In  my  paper,  an  impressive  Sabbatean  interpretation  of  turban  and  tefillin  will  be  focused  on  in  order  to  clarify  the  twofold  meaning.  The  anonimous  text  appears   in  Torat  ha-­‐Qenaot,  an  anti-­‐Sabbatean  book,  which  R.  Jacob  Emden  published  in  1752.  According  to  the  text,  even  the  messeiah,  putting  on  tefillin,  were  supposed  to  observe  the  Jewish  commandments  on  weekdays.  They  play  a  redemptive  role  to  purify  the  demonic  elements  before  the  holiest  phase  of  Sabbath.  On  Sabbath,  receiving  the  heavenly  radiance,  tefillin  in  turn  envelop  his  head  as  Muslim’s  turban.  The  text,  referring  to  a  rabbinical  phrase  “the  Holy  One  blessed  be  He  put  tefillin”,   lays  an  emphasis  on  observing  the  commandments  as  a  preparatory  stage  for  the  true  redemption,  though  it  avoids  giving  a  clear  determination  about  the  nature  of  the  status  quo.  I  will  analyze   the   perspective   the   text   shows   by   comparing   it  with   two   other   Sabbatean   sources.   First,   as   the  most  eloquent  source  about  putting  on  turban,  the  commentary  of  Psalms   Israel  Hazan  wrote   in  1678  or  1679  is  to  be  examined.  Israel  Hazan  belonged  to  quite  a  radical  group  which  seems  to  have  been  close  to  Dönme  in  the  messianic  discipline.  His  focal  point  is  on  the  mystery  of  turban  possibly  open  to  the  followers  of  Sabbatai  Tzevi.  The  second  source   is  Sefer  ha-­‐Beriah,  which  was  written  by  Nathan  of  Gaza   in  1670  to  explain  the  substance  of  the  messianic  frustration.  He  elucidates  the  inevitable  nexus  between  the  messiah  and  tefillin,  and  his  core  belief  seems  more  or  less  similar  to  that  of  the  anonymous  text  in  question.  There  is  no  asserting   that   it  was  based  on  Nathan’s   theory,  but   this   comparison  might   shed   light  on   the  binary  function  of  turban  and  tefillin  in  Sabbateanism.  

 

Georges   Koutzakiotis,   Institut   de   Recherches   Historiques   /   Fondation   Nationale   de   la   Recherche  Scientifique,  Grèce.  

Title:  La  kabbale  et  l’érudition  grecque  (XVIIe-­‐XIXe  siècles)  

Abstract:  Alors  que  l’intérêt  porté  à  la  kabbale  par  les  érudits  catholiques  et  protestants  d’Europe  au  cours  de  l’époque  moderne  a  été  étudié  exhaustivement,  la  relation  des  érudits  chrétiens  orthodoxes  avec  cette  tradition  ésotérique  du   judaïsme  demeure   terra   incognita.   En  examinant  pour   les  besoins  de  mon  étude  intitulée  "Attendre  la  fin  du  monde  au  XVIIe  siècle.  Le  messie  juif  et  le  grand  interprète"  (Athènes  2011  en  grec,  publication   française  en   cours)   la  perception  du  mouvement  messianique  de  Sabbataï   Tsevi  par   les  érudits   grecs  du  XVIIe   siècle,   j’ai   également  été  amené  à  me  pencher   sur   l’attention  qu’ils  portaient  à   la  kabbale.   La   présente   communication   a   donc   pour   objet   d’explorer   la   perception   de   la   kabbale   par  l’érudition   grecque   au   cours   d’une   période   plus   longue,   s’étendant   du   XVIIe   au   XIXe   siècle,   afin   de  distinguer  l’existence  de  continuités  ou  de  discontinuations  dans  la  longue  durée.  Parallèlement,  elle  vise  à  retracer   les   limites   des   connaissances   kabbalistiques   des   érudits   grecs   de   cette   période   et   le   cadre   dans  lequel  s’inscrit  cet  intérêt.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Kabala  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:    Emergence  of  Medieval  Kabbalah  in  Intercultural  Contexts  

Organizer:  Sandra  Valabregue  

Chair:  Elke  Morlok  

 

Sandra  Valabregue,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Faith  and  Philosophical  Heresy  in  early  Kabbalah  

Abstract:   In  this  paper   I  propose  to  present  some  aspect  of  Kabbalah's  theological  renewal;  that  renewal,  which   I   will   present   as   counter-­‐theology,   was   the   result   of   the   acceptance,   struggle   and   rewriting   of  philosophical   ideas.   This   counter-­‐theology   adopts   philosophical   models,   albeit   with   major   amendments,  and  molds  them  into  a  theosophical  theology.  Different  test  cases  of  heresy  exemplify  this  ambivalence  of  Kabbalah   toward   philosophy.   In   this   paper   I   will   discuss   mainly   the   categories   of   faith   and   heresy   in  Kabbalah  and  philosophy  and  more  specifically  the  status  of  philosophical  heresy  in  Kabbalah.  This  will  help  to  exemplify  that  the  tremendous  influence  of  philosophy  on  Kabbalah  was  not  merely  in  the  reception  of  philosophical  ideas,  but  philosophy  also  served  as  a  catalyst  for  Kabbalah’s  own  theological  renewal.  

 

Adam  Afterman,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Maimonides  and  the  Emergence  of  Kabbalah  

Abstract:  The  paper  will  address  the  impact  of  Moses  Maimonides  on  the  emergence  of  early  kabbalah  in  Provence  and  Catalonia  (up  until  1270).  The  extent  of  the  impact  of  Maimonides  on  the  development  and  the  emergence  of  early  kabbalah  has  been  at  the  focus  of  several  studies  in  recent  years.  In  my  talk  I  will  reexamine  the  textual  evidence  of  such  impact  in  the  writings  of  several  of  the  key  kabbalist  writing  up  until  

1270.  My  examination  will  address  in  addition  the  broader  impact  of  Twelve  century  Jewish  philosophy  on  the  emergence  of  kabbalah  and  its  significance  in  the  articulation  of  key  ideas  and  practices.  

 

Yisraeli  Oded,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  The  Myths  on  the  Origin  of  the  Kabbalah  in  the  Middle  Ages  –  From  Particular  to  Universal  Stance  

Abstract:   The   Questions   where   the   Kabbalah   came   from,   how   does   it   appear   and   under   what  circumstances,   bothered   the   scholars   of   the   Kabbalah   ,   but   no   less   the   Kabbalists   in   the   Middle   Ages  themselves  .  In  this  paper  I  would  like  to  signify  three  types  of  traditions  in  the  thirteenth  century  Kabbalah,  each  of  which  reflects  a  unique  stance  concerning  this  topic.  The  first  stance  attributes  the  emergence  of  the  Kabbalah  to  mystical  revelation  of  Elijah  to  the  ancestors  of  the  first  Kabbalistic  circles  in  Provence.  The  other  sees  the  Kabbalistic  truths  as  part  of  the  Torah  of  Moses  and  therefore  as  a  national  heritage.  A  third  tradition  however  attributes  the  Kabbalah  to  Adam,  the  first  person  and  the  ancestor  of  mankind  at  whole.  In   this  paper   I  would   like   to  point  out   the  self-­‐consciousness  behind  each  myth,   the  differences  between  them  and  the  hidden  discourse  between  these  traditions  regarding  the  notion  of  the  Kabbalah  as  universal  wisdom  and  its  cultural  context  in  general.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Kabbalah  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Emergence  of  Medieval  Kabbalah  in  Intercultural  Contexts  

Organizer:  Sandra  Valabregue  

Chair:  

 

Uri  Safrai,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  'Metaphors  we  pray  by'  -­‐  Images  of  Prayer  in  Early  Modern  Kabbalah  

Abstract:  The  sixteenth  century  is  known  for  the  emergence  of  Kabalistic  prayer  intentions  literature  (Sifrut  Ha'kavanot).  Many   books  were  written   in   order   to   explain   the   technique   in  which   prayer   activates  God.  Research   regarding   these   writings   faces   a   challenge   since   they   are   written   in   great   detail,   and   are   very  difficult   to  understand.   In   this   paper,   I  wish   to  offer   a  new  method   to   approach   this   unique   issue  which  explores  the  metaphors  the  kabbalists  used  in  order  to  describe  the  way  prayer  works  upon  divine  worlds.  Focusing  on  these  metaphors  reveals  the  cultural,  philosophical  and  scientific  background  from  which  they  emerged  and  shows  that  despite  the  esoteric  impression  of  the  Kabbalist  literature  it  corresponded  to  the  evolving  environment  in  which  the  Kabbalist  lived.  

 

Mor  Altshuler,  Kibbutzim  College,  Israel  

Title:  The  Messianic  Image  of  the  Ottoman  Emperor  Sultan  Suleiman  in  the  Writings  of  R.  Joseph  Karo  

Abstract:   Sixteenth   century   Ottoman   emperor   Sultan   Suleiman   I   (1494-­‐1566)   was   known   as   "The  Magnificent"   in   the   West   and   “El   Kanuni”   (The   Lawgiver)   in   the   East.   The   most   successful   military  commander   of   his   time,   Sultan   Suleiman's   army   conquered   the   Balkans   and   threatened   the   Christian  coalition  led  by  Charles  V,  emperor  of  the  Holy  Roman  Empire.  Suleiman  was  also  a  patron  of  fine  arts  and  grandiose  architecture.  His   canonical   law,  The  Kanuns,  was  perceived  as  a  divine   law  and  a   testimony  of  God's   support   of   his   realm.   As   Cornell   Fleischer   pointed   out,   Sultan   Suleiman's   "legislative   persona  constituted   an   apocalyptic   gesture   intended   to   show   that   his   age…   was   in   fact   the   Millennium   and   to  suggest  that  he  himself  was  the  messianic  ruler  who  would  fill  the  world  with  justice  as   it  had  been  filled  with  injustice."  (Cornell  Fleischer,  The  Lawgiver  as  Messiah,  p.  164).  The  proposed  lecture  will  discuss  the  influence  of  Sultan  Suleiman's  messianic  image  on  the  views  of  R.  Joseph  Karo  (1488-­‐1575).  The  author  of  Shulchan   Aruch   and   the   most   prominent   Hallachic   legislator   after   Mainonides,   Karo   was   educated   in  Sephardic  Yeshivot  that  had  been  reestablished  in  the  Ottoman  Empire  after  the  expulsion  from  Spain.  His  view  of  Sultan  Suleiman  reveals  his  generation's  interpretation  of  their  situation  in  the  midst  of  an  ongoing  power  struggle  between  the  Muslim  Ottomans  and  the  European  Christian  realms.  The   lecture  will  begin  with   a   presentation   of   Sultan   Suleiman's   influence   on   Joseph   Karo's   Hallachic   perceptions.   The   Kanuns  affect  on  Karo's  motivation  to  compose  an  obligatory  canonical  law,  which  would  function  as  the  ultimate  authorized   codex  will   be   examined.   Similarly,   the   influence   of   Suleiman's   "legislative   persona"   on   Karo's  self-­‐image   as   a   divine   legislator  will   be   presented.   The   second   part   of   the   lecture  will   delve   into   Sultan  Suleiman's  messianic  image  in  Joseph  Karo's  mystical  diary,  Maggid  Mesharim.    In  particular,  the  image  of  Suleiman,  "The  King  of  Tugar",  as  the  contemporary  "Ishmael"  –  the  embodiment  of  God's  Rage  that  had  been   sent   to  eliminate   the   satanic  power  of  Christian   "Edom"  –  will   be  analyzed.  The  apocalyptic  drama  continues  with  the  image  of  the  Ottoman  triumphant  army  as  the  army  of  the  Ten  Tribes,  whose  temporary  occupation   of   Jerusalem   was   a   stage   in   the   divine   messianic   plan   that   would   dialectically   enable   the  appearance  of  the  Messiah  Son  of  David.  The  lecture  will  conclude  with  a  reflection  on  Joseph  Karo  and  his  contemporary   Sephardic   intellectuals'   re-­‐evaluation   of   the   antagonism   between   Christians   and  Muslims.  Their   interpretation   of   the   profound   hostility   as   an   apocalyptic   struggle   between   mythical   entities  "Ishmael"  and  "Edom,"  which  would  clear  the  way  for  the  true  redeemer  to  appear  will  be  clarified.  

 

James  Diamond,  University  of  Waterloo,  Canada  

Title:  Kabbalistic  Reinventions  of  Maimonides'  Apples  of  Gold  Esotericism  

Abstract:  Many  subsequent  Jewish  thinkers  were  compelled,  due  to  the  power  of  Maimonides’  reputation  to  forge  their  own  direction  through  some  type  of  engagement  with  him.  This   includes  most  prominently  those   drawn   to   the   kabbalistic   tradition  who  were   particularly   threatened   by  Maimonides'   philosophical  esotericism.    Never  again  could  they  cite  the  biblical  apothegm,  “A  word  fitly  spoken  is  like  apples  of  gold  in  silver   filigree”   (Prov.   25:11),   without   Maimonides’   hermeneutical   use   of   it   as   a   metaphor   for   the  multilayered  messaging  of  biblical  writing  hovering  somewhere  in  the  background.  Its  connotations  of  the  external  silver,  the  internal  gold,  the  size  of  the  filigree’s  apertures  that  allow  the  internal  meaning  to  peek  through  the  external   filter,  and  the   intellectual  distance  between  the  reader  and  the  text,  all  continue  to  inhere  in  kabbalistic,  or  really  any,    post-­‐Maimonidean  referencing  of  it.  As  such  it  could  be  examined  in  its  role   as   a   new   intertext   for   later   thinkers.   What   particularly   irked   kabbalists   was   that   Maimonides’  hermeneutical   “apples   of   gold”   strategy   of   reading   the   bible   and   the   rabbis   raised   the   specter   of   their  redundancy  once  their  philosophical  kernel  was  retrieved.  Thus,  what  empowered  the  text  and  the  reader  with  the  interpretive  latitude  to  survive  the  challenges  posed  by  historical  evolution,  and  philosophical  and  scientific   progress,   also   endangered   its   authority   and   integrity.   At   the   heart   of   the   kabbalistic  appropriations  and  engagements  with  Maimonides  is  this  danger,  which  can  be  viewed  as  an  interpretive  irritant   inspiring   the   recasting   and   reconfiguring   of   new   apples   of   gold.   This   paper   will   trace   these  engagements  with   the  very  “apples  of  gold”  metaphor   itself  beginning  with   the  Zohar  and  on  to  modern  

Jewish   thinkers   such   as   R.   Abraham   Isaac   Kook.   Maimonides   is   either   adopted,   opposed,   reread,   or  subverted,  but  never  ignored.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  06  

 

Session:  001:  

Qumran  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  Daniel  Stoekl  Ben  Ezra  

 

Steven  Fraade,  Yale  University,  USA  

Title:   “If   a   Case   is   Too   Baffling   for   You   to  Decide...”   (Deuteronomy   17:   8-­‐13):   Between   Constraining   and  Expanding  Judicial  Autonomy  

Abstract:  An  analysis  of  the  law  of  the  high  court  of  Deuteronomy  17:8-­‐13,  as  inner-­‐scriptural  interpretation  and   as   interpreted   by   the   Temple   Scroll   from   Qumran   and   the   early   rabbinic   commentary   Sifre   to  Deuteronomy.  The  TS  and  Sifre  are  strikingly  different  in  their  understandings  of  the  high  court,  especially  with  respect  to  the  truthfulness  of  its  decisions.    Previous  scholars  have  viewed  this  difference  in  terms  of  a  polemic  between  the  Temple  Scroll  and  the  Pharisees,  as  the   latter  are  understood  to  be  represented  by  the  Sifre  and  other  rabbinic  texts.    The  present  paper  presents  a  more  hermeneutical  explanation  for  the  differences  and  seeks  to  uncover  the  implications  for  conflicting  views  of  judicial  authority.  

 

Antony  Perrot,  EPHE,  Paris,  France  

Title:  «  La  mise  en  page  des  titres  des  Psaumes  dans  les  manuscrits  de  la  Mer  Morte  »  

Abstract:  Le  but  de  cette  contribution  serait  de  donner  une  vue  d’ensemble  de  la  mise  en  page  des  titres  des   Psaumes   dans   les  manuscrits   de   la  Mer  Morte   et   d’en   comprendre   le   sens.   Nous   chercherons   tout  d’abord  à  repérer  des  différences  de  mise  en  page  au  sein  des  manuscrits  contenant  des  titres  de  Psaumes  :  2QPs,  4QPs,  11Q5,  5/6Ḥev.  En  effet,  on  constate  plusieurs  schémas  dans  la  mise  en  page  des  titres,  définis  par  trois  paramètres  :  la  position  du  titre  lui-­‐même  (gauche,  droite  ou  centré),  sa  démarcation  du  reste  du  contenu   des   Psaumes   (simple   retour   à   la   ligne,   vacat   en   début   de   ligne,   etc.)   et   sa   typographie   (l’usage  d’encre   de   couleur   différente).   Nous   tenterons   de   comprendre   ces   divergences   dans   l’histoire   de   la  tradition   manuscrite   des   différents   témoins   de   la   Mer   Morte   et   les   mettrons   en   perspective   avec   les  méthodes  anciennes  de  mise  en  page  utilisées  dans   le  monde  gréco-­‐égyptien   (y   compris   les  mss  anciens  chrétiens).   Nous   effectuerons   un   survol   rapide   des   différents   procédés   attestés   au   sein   des   manuscrits  hébraïques   médiévaux   (manuscrits   de   la   Genizah   du   Caire,   le   codex   d’Alep,   etc.).   Finalement,   nous  confrontons  nos  résultats  avec  l’histoire  de  la  recherche  et,  plus  précisément,  avec  les  thèses  d’Emmanuel  TOV  sur  le  sujet.  

 

Roman  Schuetz,  Max  Planck  Institute  of  Colloids  and  Interfaces,  Germany  

Title:  Analytical  study  of  the  Temple  Scroll  

Abstract:   Some   of   the  Dead   Sea   Scrolls,  mostly  written   on   treated   animal   skins,   reached   us   in   relatively  good  conditions,  others  were  -­‐  or  meanwhile  are  -­‐  badly  damaged.  No  doubt,  the  most  important  source  of  the   message   that   was   transferred   to   us   by   the   scrolls   over   centuries   is   the   textual   content.   However,  another  very  important  source  of  knowledge  is  still  hidden  in  the  physical  material  itself  that  will  probably  be  more  accessible  and  implementable  for  the  generations  after  us.  It  belongs  to  our  responsibilities  today  to  prepare  the  way  in  “reading  the  information  from  the  material”  and  on  the  other  hand  to  preserve  the  treasure   that  was   entrusted   to   us   for   the   generations   coming   after   us.   The  majority   of   the   scrolls   has   a  darkish  brown  hue  and  is  written  on  the  hair  side  of  the  skins.  Not  so  the  Temple  scroll  (11Q19)  called  so  by  Yigael  Yadin  since  its  text  is  dedicated  to  the  Temple.  The  longest  of  all  the  scrolls  it  has  white  to  yellowish  hew;  it  is  written  on  the  flesh  side  of  the  very  thin  parchment.  Moreover,  the  writing  surface  was  specially  prepared.   In   this   work   we   addressed   two   issues   concerning   the   Temple   Scroll:   reconstruction   of   the  preparation   technique   and   assessment   of   the   preservation   state.   For   the   reconstruction   of   the   layered  structure  of  the  parchment  we  studied  the  elemental  distributions  using  complementary  techniques  such  as   microXRF   and   EDX-­‐mapping   accompanied   by   FT-­‐   and   confocal   Raman   spectroscopy.   Additionally,   we  developed   a   quantitative   assessment   for   damage   monitoring   of   collagen   fibers   on   molecular   scale   by  means  of  polarized  Raman  Spectroscopy.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Second  Temple  

11.00-­‐13.00  

The  Books  of  the  Maccabees  and  the  Seleucid-­‐Hasmonean  Encounter  

Chair:  Sylvie  Honigman  

 

Jan  Willem  Van  Henten,  University  of  Amsterdam,  Netherlands  

Title:  Space,  Body  and  Meaning  in  2  Maccabees  

Abstract:  Many  scholars  have  studied  the  first  two  Maccabean  books  as  a  primary  source  for  reconstructing  the  history  of  the  Jews  before  and  during  the  Antiochean  persecution  as  well  as  the  Maccabean  revolt  and  its  aftermath.  Few  scholars  focus  on  how  the  history  of  the  Jews  during  this  period  is  told  in  these  books.  This  contribution  is  an  attempt  to  explore  this  second  avenue  by  reading  2  Maccabees  from  a  narratological  perspective.  I  will  discuss  especially  how  the  narrator  of  2  Maccabees  has  used  space  as  a  narratorial  tool  to  articulate  his  story.  Because  space  foregrounds  the  body  of  the  protagonists  of  the  story,  I  will  also  discuss  sections   of   the   narrative   that   highlight   bodies   as   a   focal   point   of   space   within   the   story.   Following   the  observation  of   Jonathan  Smith   that   the   relationship   to   the  human  body   confers  meaning   to  place,   I   also  intend  to  analyze  how  the  nexus  of  body  and  space  contributes  to  meaning,  i.e.,  the  message  of  the  story.  

 

Katell  Berthelot,  CNRS,  Université  d’Aix  Marseille,  France  

Title:   Judas   Maccabeus’   Wars   against   Judaea’s   Neighbours   in   1   Maccabees   5:   A   Reassessment   of   the  Evidence  

Abstract:  The  5th  chapter  of  the  First  Book  of  Maccabees  recounts  a  whole  range  of  wars  waged  by  Judas  Maccabeus  against  Judaea’s  neighbours,  who  are  depicted  as  threatening  the  lives  of  the  Jews  living  in  their  midst.  The  account  of  these  punitive  expeditions  contains  the  only  explicit  reference  found  in  the  book  to  an  anathema  (herem)  against  a  foreign  people,  a  reference  which  has  led  some  scholars  to  see  Judas  as  re-­‐enacting  the  biblical  prescription  of  the  herem  against  the  Canaanites.  In  contrast  with  this  interpretation,  I  shall  argue  that  the  description  in  1  Maccabees  5  is  highly  literary  and  rhetorical,  that  it  is  part  of  a  strategy  which  aims  at  presenting  Judas  as  the  heir  of  the  first  kings  of  Israel,  especially  Saul,  and  that  the  historicity  of  these  wars  should  therefore  be  re-­‐assessed.  

 

Kenneth  Atkinson,  University  of  Northern  Iowa,  USA  

Title:  The  Hasmonean  State  and  the  Seleucid  Empire:  Jewish  and  Non-­‐Jewish  Cultures  in  Contact  During  the  Second-­‐First  Centuries  B.C.E.  

Abstract:   The  Hasmonean   family  was   a   dynasty   of   Jewish   kings  whose   ancestors,   the   famed  Maccabees,  fought  to  liberate  Judea  from  Seleucid  rule  and  create  an  independent  state.  What  is  not  widely  recognized  is   the   extent   to  which   the   Seleucid  monarchs   of   present-­‐day   Syria   and   Lebanon   shaped   Jewish   religion,  culture,   and   politics   following   the   creation   of   the   Hasmonean   state.   This   presentation   explores   the  encounters  between  the  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  cultures  of  the  Hasmonean  state  and  the  Seleucid  Empire,  and   how   the   Seleucids   affected   Judaism   as   reflected   in   the   Qumran   texts.   It   suggests   that   the   Qumran  writings  show  that  contacts  between  the  Hasmoneans  and  the  Seleucids  contributed  to  the  rise  of  Jewish  sectarianism,   a   period   of   messianic   expectations   during   the   reigns   of   John   Hyrcanus   and   Alexander  Jannaeus,   and   resulted   in   the   creation   of   apocalyptic   literature.   The   first   section   of   this   presentation  examines   relevant   historical   evidence   to   suggest   that   the   Hasmoneans   never   achieved   full   political   and  cultural   independence   from   the   Seleucid   Empire.   The   second  portion   explores   how  encounters   between  the   Hasmoneans   and   the   Seleucids   contributed   to   the   rise   of   Jewish   sectarianism,   messianism,   and  apocalyptic   beliefs.   It   examines   the   pesharim   and   4QApocryphon   of   Jeremiah   Ce   (4Q390),   which   either  refer   or   allude   to   contacts   between   the   Hasmoneans   and   the   Seleucids,   and   which   contain   unique  theological   interpretations   of   these   encounters.   It   suggests   that   the   Qumran   texts   show   that   contacts  between   the   Seleucids   and   the   Hasmoneans   contributed   to   Jewish   sectarianism,   and   encouraged   the  development  of  messianic  and  apocalyptic  literature  that  sought  to  determine  the  final  days  of  Hasmonean  and   Seleucid   rule.   This   presentation  proposes   that   the  historical   and   theological   development  of   Second  Temple   Judaism  cannot  be  understood  without   studying   the  unique  encounters  between   the   Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  cultures  of  the  Hasmonean  state  and  the  Seleucid  Empire,  and  that  the  Qumran  writings  remain  a  primary  witness  to  these  encounters.  

 

Linda  Zollschan  

Title:  First  Impressions  of  Roman  Politics  from  I  Macc.  8.15-­‐16  

Abstract:  The  “Eulogy   to   the  Romans”   is  generally   considered   to  be   riddled  with  errors  and  verses  15-­‐16  have  not   escaped   this   criticism.   In   this   passage   four   errors   appear   so   grave   and   so   contrary   to  what  we  know  about  Roman  politics  in  the  mid  second  century  BCE.  We  are  told  that  the  senate  met  each  day,  that  it  consisted  of  320  members,   that   the  Romans  had  one  man  who  ruled  over   them  for  a  year  whom  they  obeyed  without  envy  or  jealousy.  All  these  errors  strike  a  discordant  note  and  at  first  glance  seem  patently  wrong.   This   paper   proposes   to   show   how   these   errors   are   in   fact   an   accurate   reflection   of   unusual  circumstances  in  Rome  that  can  only  refer  to  events  in  the  year  162  BCE.  The  information  in  verses  15-­‐16  bears  all  the  hallmarks  of  a  report  by  a  witness  to  the  tumultuous  politics  of  that  year.  The  only  error  the  

writer  made  was  in  failing  to  understand  that  what  he  saw  was  not  typical  of  the  way  Roman  politics  was  usually  conducted.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Second  Temple  

  14.00-­‐15.30    

Panel:  The  Causes  of  the  Maccabean  Revolt:  

New  Perspectives  from  the  Seleukid  Imperial  Centre,  Babylonia  and  Egypt  

Organizer:  Sylvie  Honigman    

 

Chair:  Katell  Berthelot  

 

Sylvie  Honigman,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Causes  of  the  Maccabean  Revolt:  New  Perspective  from  Ptolemaic  Egypt    

Abstract:  The  paper  draws  a  comparison  between  administrative  and  fiscal  reforms  that  were  carried  on  by  the   Ptolemies,   and   which   included   changes   in   the   priestly   personnel   of   Egyptian   temples,   and   the  circumstances  that  led  to  the  deposition  of  Onias  III,  the  high  priest  of  Jerusalem,  under  and  at  the  initiative  of  Antiochos  IV.  

 

Philippe  Clancier,  Université  Paris  1  Panthéon-­‐Sorbonne,  Paris  

Title:  A  new  Seleukid  Policy?  How  Babylon  and  Uruk  became  Poleis  

Abstract:  It  is  well  known  that  Babylon  became  a  “polis”  during  the  very  first  part  of  the  second  century  BC.  There  are  some  clues  that  Uruk  followed  the  same  way.  Before  that,  the  two  main  cities  of  Babylonia  were  lead  by  their  local  notability  working  for  the  main  Assyro-­‐Babylonian  sanctuaries:  the  Esagil  at  Babylon  and  the   Resh   Temple   at   Uruk.  When,   how   and  why   Babylon   and   Uruk  were   funded   as   poleis   are   important  Historiographical  questions  which  received  many  answers:  from  a  violent  royal  act  showing  ethnic  tensions  between  “Greeks”  and  “Non  Greeks”;  to  a  complete  local  will.  In  the  panel  organized  by  Sylvie  Honigman,  this  paper  will  focus  on  the  first  part  of  the  second  century  BC  (at  the  exact  time  of  the  Maccabean  revolt)  in  Babylonia.  We  will  have  a  first  look  on  the  different  theories  concerning  the  “poliadisations”  of  Babylon  and   Uruk,   and   then   we   will   propose   a   new   chronology   of   the   events   and   try   to   see   what   happened,  afterwards,   for  the  old  Babylonian  and  Urukean  notabilities.  For  that  purpose,  we  will  especially   insist  on  the  evolutions  of   the  political,   judicial   and   religious   responsibilities   of   the   sanctuaries   and   try   to   see   the  different  local  actors  of  those  evolutions.  

 

Hannah  Cotton  &  Avner  Ecker,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  The  Causes  of  the  Maccabean  Revolt:  New  Perspectives  from  the  Seleukid  Imperial  Centre,  Babylonia  and  Egypt  

Abstract:  Aspects  of  Seleucid  Administration  in  the  Light  of  the  So-­‐called  Heliodoros  Stele.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Hellenistic  Judaism  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Jan  Willem  Van  Henten  

 

René  Bloch,  University  of  Bern,  Switzerland  

Title:  Mythical  Footprints  in  Jewish-­‐Hellenistic  Literature  

Abstract:   In   the   Greco-­‐Roman   period,   both   Jews   and   pagans   had   their   showcases   where   objects   from  mythical  times  could  be  observed  and  visited:  in  Hebron  bones  of  the  Biblical  giants  were  shown  (Josephus,  Jewish  Antiquities  5.125),  and  the  emperor  Augustus  placed  the  weapons  of  ancient  heroes  on  display   in  his   villa   on   the   island  of   Capri   (Suetonius,  Augustus   72).  On  Crete   locals   showed   visitors   the   cave  where  Zeus   was   born,   and   ashes   from   the   destroyed   city   of   Sodom   provided   Jews   with   vivid   evidence   of   the  biblical  narrative.  In  this  paper  I  will  discuss  a  number  of  such  “show  and  tell”  passages  in  Jewish-­‐Hellenistic  literature.  A  particularly  telling  example  is  the  myth  of  Andromeda  which  lent  itself  to  displays  in  Rome  as  well  as  in  Palestine:  The  Romans  recovered  what  they  took  to  be  the  bones  of  the  monster  killed  by  Perseus  and  brought   them  home.  Other   visual   traces  of   the  myth,   however,   remained   in   situ   in   Joppe  and  were  shown   to   the   public   there.   Already   in   the   Bible,   there   are   a   few   hints   of   visual   evidence   for  miraculous  events,  but  we  usually  do  not  read  about  traces  of  key  events  being  exhibited  on  location.  Why  do  Jewish-­‐Hellenistic  authors  show  a  conspicuous  interest  in  the  visual  remnants  of  Israel’s  mythical  past?  What  might  be  at  stake  when  remains  of  wondrous  stories  are  showcased?  And  how  does  this  concur  with  the  often  fierce   denial   of   myth   in   Jewish-­‐Hellenistic   literature?   I   would   like   to   argue   that   mythical   footprints  constituted  contact  zones  where  the  past  and  the  present,  the  real  and  the  imagined  convened.  

 

Pieter  B.  Hartog,  KU  Leuven,  Belgium  

Title:  Commentaries  as  Cultural  Contacts?  The  Pesharim  and  Hypomnemata  on  Homer  

Abstract:  The  relationship  between  the  Pesharim  from  Qumran  and  commentary  writing  in  the  Greek  world  has  only  recently  been  subjected  to  scholarly  investigation.  Up  to  now,  only  a  few  scholars  have  examined  the  similarities  and  differences  between  in  these  two  traditions  of  commentary  writing  and  attempted  to  explain  them.  A  definite  answer  to  how  these  traditions  are  related,  is  still  lacking.  In  an  attempt  to  proceed  in  the  discussion  and  shed  further  light  on  the  extent  and  the  nature  of  the  cultural  contacts  between  these  two  traditions,  this  paper  compares  the  Qumran  commentaries  with  Alexandrian  hypomnemata  on  Homer.  Three   features   of   these   corpora   are   taken   into   account   in   this   comparison,   namely:   (1)   their   scribal  

‘construction’   and   transmission   (that   is,   their   materiality);   (2)   their   form   and   structure;   (3)   their  hermeneutics  and  exegesis.   In  this  paper,   the  similarities  and  differences  between  these  two  corpora  are  discussed  and  categorized.  The   three-­‐fold   investigation  enables  an  exact  pinpointing  of  both   the  areas   in  which   these   corpora   are   similar   to   and   those   in   which   they   are   different   from   one   another.   This  comparison,   in   turn,   leads   to   a   discussion   of   the   connections   and   cultural   contacts   between   these   two  corpora  and  their  composers.  

 

Ashley  Bacchi,  Graduate  Theological  Union,  USA  

Title:  Jewish  Appropriation  of  Pagan  Authority:  The  Case  of  the  Sibylline  Oracles  

Abstract:  The  pseudepigrapha  consist  of  texts  that  were  attributed  to  famous  figures  from  the  distant  past,  but  were  written  by  anonymous  Jewish  and  later  Christian  authors  dating  from  the  second  century  BCE  to  the  second  century  CE.  This  paper  demonstrates   the  unique  nature  of   the  Sibylline  Oracles  within   Jewish  pseudepigrapha  as  not  only  deriving  authority  from  a  pagan  corpus,  but  also  choosing  a  female  voice  as  a  conduit   for   prophecy.   The   Sibylline   Oracles   are   a  masterful   appropriation   of   Greek   style   in   service   to   a  monotheistic   expression   of   the   writer’s   political   views   on   contemporary   power   structures.   Sibylline  literature   was   written   in   epic   Greek   hexameter   verse   and   the   use   of   this   genre   reveals   a   writer   with   a  mastery  of  Greek  language,  style,  and  cultural  allusions  that  is  not  a  superficial  masking  of  biblical  motifs.  The   resulting  work   is   a   strong  message  with  an  authoritative  voice   rooted   in  both  Hellenistic   and   Jewish  traditions.   By   establishing   how   the   Jewish   authors   utilized   the   Greek   oracular   form,   it   is   possible   to  question   the   elusive   nature   of   identity   constructions   and   what   primary   sources   reveal   about   boundary  formations  and  the  complex  spectrum  between  cultural  acceptance  and  rejection.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  07  

 

Session:  001:  

Talmudic  and  Rabbinic  Literature  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Stefan  Goltzberg,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:  Literal  Meaning  in  Talmud  Literature  

Abstract:  The   literal  meaning   is  a  central  notion   in  any   legal   system.  This   is  why  many  scholars,   from  the  Middle  Ages  up  to  now,  perceived  a  need  to  develop  a  distinctive  theory  of  literal  meaning.  My  purpose  is  to  examine  that  notion  in  Jewish  law  (from  the  Mishna  to  late  Medieval  materials),  as  well  as  in  the  various  legal   systems   that   had   an   influence   on   it,   namely   Roman   law   and  Muslim   law.   Although   the   notion   of  peshat  has  been  examined  by  at  least  two  important  authors  (Weiss  Halivni  and  Cohen),  its  history  is  yet  to  be  comprehensively  addressed.  In  this  paper,  I  plan  to  suggest  that  the  various  theories  of  literal  meaning,  dependent  upon  the  differents  meaning  of  the  concept  of  peshat  sit  easily  with  modern  theories  of  literal  meaning  (Searle,  Recanati,  Bach).  Robert  Gleave  has  analyzed  the  status  of  literal  meaning  in  Islamic  legal  thought   in  the   light  of   these  modern  theories.   I  would   like  to  analyze  the  status  of   literal  meaning   in  the  light  of  both  Muslim  hermeneutics  of  literal  meaning  as  well  as  through  more  modern  concepts  in  linguistic  pragmatics.  

 

Farina  Marx,  Institute  for  Jewish  Studies,  Germany  

Title:  The  “Compilation”  of  Yalkut  Shimoni  on  the  Minor  Prophets  

Abstract:  The  “Yalkut  Shimoni“compiles  important  annotations  from  rabbinic  literature  to  each  book  of  the  Hebrew  Bible.  The  voluminous  commentary  cites  more  than  50  traditional  rabbinic  texts  including  sources  which  have  been  lost.  Most  academic  research  on  the  Yalkut  Shimoni  has  focused  on  reconstructing  these  lost   sources   such   as   “Midrash   Jelamdenu”,   other   research   issues   about   Yalkut   Shimoni   have   been  neglected.  In  my  paper  I  will  focus  on  the  Yalkut  Shimoni  on  the  Minor  Prophets.  The  author  of  the  Yalkut  Shimoni  was  not  able  to  rely  on  consecutively  commentaries  on  the  Minor  Prophets  such  as   for  example  the   commentaries   on   the   book   of   Numbers.   In   my   paper   I   will   therefore   focus   on   the   question   of  compilation  techniques.  Consequently,  the  author  had  to  use  pieces  of  commentaries  on  the  Torah  or  other  biblical   books   where   Minor   Prophets   are   cited   and   then   he   compiles   them   to   a   new   commentary.  Furthermore,   he   puts   these   fragments   together  without   naming   the   sources   or   introducing   them   to   the  text.  The  question  is:  Which  sources  does  the  author  use?  Is  it  a  mainly  Palestinian  or  Babylonian  embossed  commentary?   Which   key   notes   does   the   author   employ   for   his   new   commentaries?   Which   association  techniques  does  the  author  use  and  why  does  he  sometimes  just  list  rabbinic  techniques  of  exegesis?  In  my  paper   I   will   analyze   the   techniques   the   author   uses   to   compile   these   sources.   By   the   help   of   selected  examples   I  will   point   out   how   the   author  writes   his   own   commentary  which   can   be   read   independently  

from   the   commentary   of   the   used   source.   Consequently,   the   Yalkut   text   cannot   be   seen   as   a   „just   /  mere“compiled  text.  Part  of  the  discussion  is  if  and  how  sources  were  changed  to  fit  the  exegesis.  I  will  put  the   question   up   for   discussion   how   the   composed   text   functions   in   general   and   as   how   it   functions   as  independent  commentary.  

 

Dagmar  Boerner-­‐Klein,  Jewish  Studies,  Heinrich  Heine  University,  Germany  

Title:  Israel  are  those  who  observe  Tora:  Yalkut  Shim´oni  Numbers  on  Proselytes  

Abstract:   Yalkut   Shim´oni   is   a   commentary   on   every   book   of   the   Hebrew   bible   based   on   quotes   of   the  Talmudim  and  Midrashim.  The  anonymous  redactor   is  on  the  one  hand   interested   in  solving  grammatical  inconsistencies   of   the   Hebrew   bible.   On   the   other   hand,   he   focuses   on   theological   problems   which   he  embeds   into   his   commentary   like   a  musician  who   composes   a  melody   (solving   textual   problems)  with   a  counterpoint  (solving  theological  problems).  In  Yalkut  Shim´oni’s  commentary  on  the  book  of  Numbers,  the  anonymous   compiler   included   several   annotations  on  how   to  deal  with  proselytes.  On   the  one  hand,  he  quotes   from   Sifre   on   Numbers   that   God   loves   Israel   -­‐   “and   whenever   he   renames   Israel   he   calls   them  priests”.  On  the  other  hand,  he  points  to  the  fact  that  after  the  destruction  of  the  temple,  priests  do  not  longer  perform  their  services.  These  services  are  replaced  by  the  study  of  the  Tora.  Hence,  everybody  who  studies  Tora  can  be  considered  to  be  a  priest,  even  a  person  who  is  not  a  member  of  Israel.  In  my  paper  I  will  present  the  commentaries  of  Yalkut  Shim´oni  Numbers  on  proselytes  in  order  to  show  how  the  Yalkut  Shim´oni  deals  with  the  reassessment  of  persons  who  study  Tora  and  do  not  belong  to  the  group  of  “native  Israel”.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Talmudic  and  Rabbinic  Literature  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair  :  

 

Mireille  Hadas  Lebel,  Université  Paris  4,  France  

Title:  Mashiah  Ben  Joseph.  A  Reconsideration  

Abstract  :  L'apparition  dans  la  tradition  juive  d'un  Messie  fils  de  Joseph  dont  la  venue  doit  précéder  celle  du  Messie   fils   de   David   a   donné   lieu   à   diverses   hypothèses.   La   plus   fréquemment   retenue   rattache   ce  personnage   à   la   figure   de   Bar   Kokhba   car   il   est   censé   mourir   au   combat   au   cours   de   la   guerre  eschatologique  qui  sera  suivie  de  l'ère  messianique.  Un  examen  de  la  première  mention  du  Messie  fils  de  Joseph  dans   le  Talmud  (Sukka  52  a)  et  des  citations  bibliques  qui   lui  sont  associées  (sans  rapport  avec  un  quelconque  combat)  nous  font  totalement  remettre  en  question  les  explications  proposées  jusqu'ici.  

 

Avigail  Ohali,  Université  Paris  3,  France  

Title:  Les  rabbins  et  les  autres  :  à  propos  de  l’humour  dans  les  anecdotes  tannaïtiques  

Abstract:  Depuis   les  années  1970,  différentes  sociétés  savantes  se  sont  consacrées  à  l’étude  de  l’humour.  Les  recherches  pluridisciplinaires  qui  relèvent  de  ce  vaste  domaine  ont  tendance  à  englober  dans  la  notion  d’humour   toutes   les   nuances   des   expressions   qui   relèvent   du   non-­‐sérieux.   J’adopte   cette   définition   très  large  du  terme  humour.  Les   théories  anciennes  et  plus   récentes   (voir  Arie  Sover,  Humor,   the  Pathway  to  human  laughter,  2009)  qui  expliquent  les  origines,  les  mécanismes  et  les  fonctions  du  phénomène  du  rire  et  de  l’humour  s'accordent  sur  un  point  essentiel  :  l’humour  est  révélateur  de  vérité.  En  ce  qui  concerne  les  écrits   rabbiniques  anciens,   ce  domaine   reste  encore  aujourd’hui  peu  exploré.   Les  écrits   rabbiniques   sont  des   ouvrages   sérieux.   L’objectif   des   rabbins   n’est   pas   de   faire   rire,   cette   idée   semble   faire   l’unanimité.  Cependant,   plusieurs   savants   ont   déjà   repéré   et   étudié   les   expressions   de   l’humour   dans   la   littérature  rabbinique   classique   (à   commencer   par   A.   Kohut   en   1886).   Les   rabbins   avaient   bel   et   bien   le   sens   de  l’humour,   comme   le   montrent   D.   Lifshitz   (articles   divers,   2000-­‐2002)   et   B.   Engelman   («Humor   in   the  Babylonian  Talmud  »,  1998),  en  soulignant  leurs  moqueries,   jeux  de  mots  et  autres  mots  d’esprit.  En  tant  que  rédacteurs,   l’humour  était  pour  eux  un  outil   littéraire  comme   le  montre  Rella  Kushelevsky   («  Humor  and   it’s   functions   in   the   stories   of   R.   Yehushua  ben   Levi»,   1998)   ou   encore  un   vecteur   idéologique  dans  leurs   diverses   polémiques   externes   et   internes   et   un  moyen   d’interrogation   épistémologique   comme   le  montrent   les  études  de  D.  Boyarin  (Socrates  and  the  Fat  Rabbis,  2009),  H.  Zellentin  (Rabbinic  Parodies  …,  2011)   et   A.   Kovelman   («   Farce   in   the   Talmud   »,   2002).   Ces   études,   pour   certaines   très   intéressantes   du  point  de  vue  de  la  méthode,  restent  peu  nombreuses  et  n’ont  aucun  caractère  exhaustif.  Le  champ  couvert  par  le  sujet  est  actuellement  en  plein  renouvellement,  mais  aucun  des  auteurs  ne  met  vraiment  au  centre  de  ses  préoccupations  l’humour  rabbinique  en  tant  que  tel,  dans  son  unité  mais  aussi  dans  la  pluralité  de  ses  manifestations.  Aussi,   les   corpus   tannaïtiques  n’ont   jamais  été  explorés  dans   ce   sens,  et  à   tort.  Dans  cette  communication  J’examinerai  une  sélection  de  récits   tirés  des  recueils   tannaïtiques,  à   la   lumière  des  théories   élaborées   notamment   par   R.   Kushelevsky,   H.   Zellentin   et   D.   Boyarin.   Je  montrerai   d’abord   que  malgré   l’austérité   apparente   des   textes   tannaïtiques,   l’humour   n’y   est   pas   moins   présent,   et   que   si  l’humour  était  pour  les  amora'im  de  Palestine  et  de  Babylonie,  à  la  fois  un  moyen  de  s’affirmer  et  de  douter  de  soi,  c’était  également  le  cas  pour  les  tanna'im.  

 

Shai  Wozner,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Faculty  of  Law,  Israel  

Title:  Theology  and  Law:  on  Providence  and  Talmudic  Law  

Abstract:   The   aim   of   modern   criminal   law   is   to   prevent   harmful   consequences   that   may   result   from  forbidden   activities.   Almost   all   felonies   are   perpetrated   against   a   victim   and   the   primary   aim   of   the  legislator  is  to  protect  the  victim.  However,  rabbinic  literature  assumes  that  Divine  Providence  controls  all  events   occurring   to   a   person   even   if   the   occurrence   depended   on   the   choice   of   another   person.   This  assumption  limits  the  freedom  of  choice  in  the  behavior  of  one  person  to  another.  A  could  not  possible  kill  or  rob  B  if  B  was  not  destined  to  be  killed  or  lose  his  property  in  any  case.  Hence,  A  has  the  choice  to  kill  or  rob   B   only   if   the   harm   to   B   was   predestined.   This   concept   appears   in   various   sources   in   Talmudic   and  medieval   literature.   I  would   like   to  mention   here   only   the  well-­‐known   exegesis   on   the   law  of   building   a  parapet:   The   School   of   R.   Ishmael   taught:   "If   any   man   (lit.   faller)   fall   from   thence"   –   this   man   was  predestined  to  fall  since  the  six  days  of  Creation,  for  he  has  not  yet  fallen,  and  Scripture  calls  him  a  faller.  However,   reward   is   brought   through   a   person   of  merit,   and   punishment   through   a   person   of-­‐   guilt.   (BT  Sabbath  32a)  So,  the  obligation  to  fence  in  one's  roof  was  not  intended  to  protect  the  would  be  faller,  who  would  fall  one  way  or  another  in  any  case,  but  to  protect  the  morality  of  the  roof's  owner,  and  to  redeem  him   from   the   responsibility   of   causing   harm.   So   the   focus   moves   from   outcome-­‐orientated   morality   to  deontological  morality,   stressing   individual's   responsibility   for   his   choices,   even   though   they   had   no   real  influence   on   the   outcome.   I   would   like   to   examine   how   this  move   affects   the   aims   of   the   law   and   the  

concept  of  legal  responsibility  of  felons  in  the  criminal  and  civil  spheres.  The  aim  of  the  law  is  no  longer  to  protect   'victims',   since   it   is  assumed  that   the  Divinity,  who  takes  care  of   the  whole  world,  protects   these  interests.  Hence,  the  focal  point  of  the  law  is  to  offer  guidance  for  moral  conduct.  The  emphasis  is  on  the  action  rather  than  the  outcome.  The  deterrence  of  punishment  is  not  for  the  protection  of  victims  but  for  the  benefit  of  felons  –  to  prevent  them  from  immoral  conduct.  Similarly,  the  law  of  the  pursuer  (i.e.,  if  one  was   about   to   kill   another   person,   he   may   be   forcible   prevented   by   anyone)   was   intended   to   save   the  pursuer  from  sinning  and  not  to  protect  the  pursued  (Rashi.  Sanhedrin.  73a)  so,  the  role  of  law  is  limited  to  enforce  personal  morality.  

 

Yoel  Kretzmer-­‐Raziel,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  The  Imperialism  of  Purity  Laws  in  Amoraic  Legal  Discourse    

Abstract:   The   centrality   of   purity   laws   in   Tannaitic   literature   is   self-­‐evident.   The   Tannaitic   discussions   of  purity   laws   exceed   discussions   of   other   fields   of   law   both   in   the   quantity   and   the   level   of   conceptual  development.  It  is  widely  accepted  that  the  Amoraic  period  saw  a  reduction  in  the  attention  given  to  purity  law,   leading   to   the   absence   of   the  Order   of   Purities   from  both   the   Palestinian   and   Babylonian   Talmuds.  Although  numerous  Amoraic  discussions  are  devoted   to   the  purity   laws,  Talmudic   scholarship  has   shown  that   for   the  most   part   these   discussions   are   the   fruit   of   the   early   Amoraic   period.   This   paper  wishes   to  demonstrate  that  concurrently  with  the  decline  of  purity  laws  another  phenomenon  arose  in  the  Amoraic  discourse,   namely   the   influence   of   purity   laws   on   other   fields   of   rabbinic   law.   The   textual   legacy   of   the  Tannaitic  purity  laws,  it  shall  be  argued,  played  a  pivotal  role  in  the  development  of  other  fields  of  Amoraic  law.  The  intertextual  character  of  Amoraic  hermeneutics  and  legal  reasoning  allowed  for  the  utilization  of  the  highly  developed  and  detailed  purity  laws  in  the  expansion  of  other,  less  developed,  fields  of  law.  The  influence   of   purity   laws   shall   be   demonstrated   three-­‐fold,   through   the   laws   of   muqṣe   –   the   rulings  pertaining  to  the  usage  and  handling  of  various  objects  on  the  Sabbath.  Firstly,  I  shall  show  that  quite  often  the  subject  matter  tested  in  these  discussions  are  borrowed  from  the  Tannaitic  corpus  of  purity  laws.  For  example,  the  Amoraic  rulings  regarding  handling  of  a  pile  of  beams  (s’var  shel  korot  –  PT  Sab.  4:2;  BT  Sab.  125a)   can  be   textually   traced   to   the  discussion   regarding   the   same  object   in  M  Oh.  3:7.   Secondly,   I   shall  describe   various   Amoraic   legal   concepts   in   the   field   of   the   Sabbath   laws   as   stemming   from   linguistically  similar  concepts   in  the  Tanaitic  realm  of  purity   laws.  Thus,  the  roots  of  the  antonymic  concepts  (1)  “Base  for   a   forbidden   object”   (basis   le’davar   ha’asur)   and   (2)   “Forget”   (shoche’aḥ)   can   be   traced   to   similar  distinctions   in   the   Tannaitic   system  of   purity.   Thirdly,   I   shall   claim   that   novel   legal   principles   in   Amoraic  Sabbatical   laws   were   based   on   similar   principles   in   the   Tanaitic   purity   laws.   A   striking   example   is   the  appearance  of  “thought”  (maḥashava)  –  active  human  conscience  –  as  a  determining  factor  in  the  laws  of  muqṣe   in  both  Talmuds.  Textual  and   linguistic  evidence  can  be  provided  to   link   this   innovation   to  similar  principles   in   Tanaitic   laws   of   purity.   In   conclusion,   the   paper   shall   suggest   hermeneutic   and   cultural  explanations  for  the  above  mentioned  process.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Comparative  Halakha  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Marton  Ribary,  The  University  of  Manchester,  UK  

Title:  Imposing  Order  on  the  World  in  Rabbinic  and  Roman  Legal  Thought  

Abstract:   Imposing   order   on   the   world:   A   study   of   classifying   “damages”   (neziqin)   and   “obligations”  (obligationes)  in  Rabbinic  and  Roman  legal  thought.  Based  on  a  parallel   reading  of  passages  relating  to  the  taxonomy  of   legal  obligations,  my  paper  offers  an  insight  into  the  development  of  abstract  thinking  in  Roman  and  Rabbinic  law  in  Late  Antiquity.  The  paper’s  case-­‐study  analyses  the  classification  of  “damages”  (neziqin)  in  the  opening  passage  of  tractate  Bava  Qama  in  the  Talmud  Yerushalmi  (ca.  425  CE)  which  is  juxtaposed  by  the  exposition  of  “obligations”  (obligationes)  in  Book  3  of   Justinian’s   Institutes   (533  CE).   This   case-­‐study   investigates  whether   taxonomic   thinking  was  present   in   these   legal   cultures   of   antiquity   and   if   so,   to   what   extent   it   contributed   to   the   systematic  exposition  of   law.  With  reference  to  the  relevant  passages   in  the  Mishnah-­‐Tosefta  (early  3rd  century  CE),  the  Institutes  of  Gaius  (ca.  165  CE)  and  the  juristic  commentaries  collected  in  Justinian’s  Digest  (533  CE),  the  paper  investigates  how  preceding  materials  have  been  adapted  to  the  logical,  rhetorical  and  legal  patterns  peculiar   to   the   Yerushalmi   and   Justinian’s   Institutes.   Reconstructing   the   literary-­‐legal   evolution   of   the  classification   of   neziqin   and   obligationes   will   allow   a   preliminary   comparison   concerning   developmental  models  of  Roman  and  Rabbinic  legal  abstraction.  The  paper  seeks  to  highlight  common  features  as  well  as  significant  differences  of  conceptualisation  in  Rabbinic  and  Roman  law,  and  explores  whether  these  can  be  explained   solely   by   differences   in   the   social,   institutional   and   political   settings   (relativist   approach)   or  whether  they  reveal  some  inherent  characteristics  of  the  Roman  and  Rabbinic  mind  (essentialist  approach).  

 

Barak  Cohen,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  R.  Nahman  and  Sasanian  Law:  Some  Further  Observations    

Abstract:   Rav   Nahman   b.   Yaakov   is   a   late   third   and   early   fourth   century   Amora   and   one   of   the   most  dominant  halakhic  figures  among  Babylonian  amoraim.  R.  Nahman  is  closely  associated  with  Mahoza,  the  Jewish  and  Christian  suburb  near  the  Persian  capitol  of  Ctesiphon.  In  a  series  of  papers,  Yaakov  Elman  has  shown  R.  Naman's  high  degree  of  acculturation  in  Persian  culture.  Elman  characterized  R.  Nahman  as  the  most  "Persianized"  of  Babylonian  Rabbis,  and  demonstrated  how  external  factors  such  as  the  Manichaean  polemics   in   Mahoza   in   the   fourth   century,   and   the   religious   atmosphere   of   the   surrounding   culture  permeated  the  statements  of  R.  Nahman  and  his  pupil  –  Rava.  My  aim  in  this  lecture  is  to  continue  this  line  of  inquiry  from  a  different  standpoint.  I  will  argue  the  following:  (a)  A  systematic  analysis  of  Rav  Nahman's  halakhic  rulings  and  legal  interpretation  leads  to  the  conclusion  that  this  is  part  of  a  broader  phenomenon  which   characterizes   his   personality   and   legal   methodology   in   the   Talmudim.   R.   Nahman   tends   to   rule  against   the   tannaitic   halakha   found   in   the  Mishna   and   Baraita,   on   the   basis   of   Sasanian   Law.   This   legal  methodology  proves  to  be  unique  in  comparison  with  and  late  Nehardean  sages  in  the  Sasanian  period.  (b)  Occasionally  scholars  have  been  so  stunned  by  Rav  Nahman’s  forced  interpretation  and  Legal  rulings  that  they  have  discounted  these  interpretations  as  actually  being  those  of  Rav  Nahman  and  have  ascribed  them  to  the  literary  interpolations  of  later  editors,  conventionally  called  “stammaim”  —  the  anonymous  voice  in  the  Talmud.  In  my  opinion,  the  large  number  of  such  interpretations  which  are  ascribed  to  Rav  Nahman  in  comparison   to   the   sages   of   his   generation   -­‐   do   indicate   something   about   his   unique  methodology.   I  will  demonstrate  how  R.  Nahman's  statements  based  on  Sasanian  law  transforms  tannaitic  halakha  in  Sasanian  Babylonia.  Our  study  into  amoraic   interpretation,  halakhah  and  discourse  reveals  that  the  tendency  of  an  amora  to  offer  a  strained  interpretation  to  a  tannaitic  text,  or  a  tendency  to  rule  in  opposition  to  tannaitic  

tradition,   is   an   individual   matter,   and   does   not   characterize   all   Babylonian   amoraim   or   the   entire  Babylonian  Talmud.  

 

Monika  Amsler,  University  of  Zurich,  Switzerland  

Title:  "What  Can  I  Do  to  You?"  Rabbis  and  Non-­‐Rabbis  Competing  with  Knowledge.    

Abstract:   It   is   within   fictitious   encounters   between   rabbis   and   non-­‐rabbis   that   we   learn   about   the  competitive   situation   between   proponents   of   rabbinic   vs.   such   of   non-­‐rabbinic   traditional   knowledge.   It  seems  that  the  rabbis  were  as  much  impressed  by  and  attracted  to  the  age-­‐old  wisdom  of  others  as  they  may  have  been  threatened  by  it.  Focusing  on  the  Bavli,  the  paper  will  examine  some  of  these  cross-­‐cultural  encounters  and  ask  for  possible  ways  of  classifying  the  knowledge  at  stake.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Late  Midrash  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  

 

Gilad  Shapira,  Haifa  University,  Israel  

Title:  Midrash  in  Yemen:  between  Aesthetic  and  Struggle  

Abstract:   We   can   look   Midrash   Hagadol   and   Meor   Haafela   as   a   paradigm   of   Contrasts   concerning   the  context   of   living   under   a   Muslim   authority.   Although   these   two  Midrashim   Organized   according   to   the  Torah   portions,   we   can   identify   basic   differences   between   theirs   prefaces   in   some   Aspects:   structure,  texture,  styles  and  themes.  The  Comparison  between  them  may  characterize  the  double  rule  of  poetic   in  Midrash  literature  looking  inside  and  outside.  

 

Yehudah  Cohn,  EPHE  Paris,  France,  and  Institute  for  the  Study  of  the  Ancient  World,  New  York,  USA  

Title:  Divine  Inspiration  as  a  Source  for  Rashi's  Cosmogony  

Abstract:   In  his  books  The  Anxiety  of   Influence  and  A  Map  of  Misreading,   the   literary  critic  Harold  Bloom  introduced  the  idea  of  creative  misreading,  which  is  perhaps  most  simply  summed  up  in  his  statement  that  “great  writing  is  always  at  work.  misreading  previous  writing”.  He  described  a  swerve  by  writers  away  from  the  work  of  their  precursors  as  “a  corrective  movement  which  implies  that  the  precursor  went  accurately  up  to  a  certain  point,  but  then  should  have  swerved,  precisely  in  the  direction  that  the  new  poem  moves”.  According  to  this  conception  –  which  has  proven  to  be  useful  far  beyond  Bloom’s  original  context  of  poetry  criticism  –  a  successful  misreading  of  great  predecessors  allows  the  voice  of  later  writers  to  be  heard,  and  to   surpass   what   came   before.   My   research   proposal   entails   using   this   lens   to   investigate   Rashi’s  commentary   on   the   Pentateuch,   as   it   relates   to   his   late-­‐Antique   sources.   As   such   it   reassesses   literary  

entanglements  and  processes  of  canonization  between  Europe  and  the  Middle  East.  Rashi  of  Troyes  (Rabbi  Salomon  Yitshaqi,  1040-­‐1105)   is  the  towering  figure  of  medieval  French  Jewry,  and  is  best  known  for  two  works  –  his  commentaries  to  the  Pentateuch  and  the  Babylonian  Talmud  –  both  of  which  assumed  unique  importance   for   Jews   in   Europe   and   beyond.   Christian   exegetes,   from   the   school   of   St.   Victor   in   Paris  (founded  by  Pierre  Abélard’s  teacher  Guillaume  de  Champeaux)  were  already  using  his  interpretation  of  the  Pentateuch   in   the   twelfth  century,  and   the  great  Nicolas  de  Lyre  drew  on   it  extensively   in   the   thirteenth  century.  Rashi’s  was   the   first  Hebrew  Bible   commentary   to  be  written   in   the  Ashkenazi   (Franco-­‐German)  Jewish  center,  and  his  comments  on  the  Pentateuch  were  largely  based  on  several  discrete  Midrashic  texts  that   originated   in   Roman   Palestine,   as   well   as   on  Midrashic   elements   found   in   the   Babylonian   Talmud.  (Loosely   speaking,  Midrash   is   a   process   that   elaborates   on   the   Hebrew   Bible,   and   refashions   it   into   the  canonical  source  for  rabbinic  legend  and  law).  Taken  together  with  the  Palestinian  Talmud  –  to  which  Rashi  had   only   incomplete   access   –   these   late-­‐Antique   works   constituted   classical   rabbinic   literature,   which  represents  a  significant  element  of  the   literary  record  of  the  Roman  and  Sassanian  empires.  Rashi’s  work  has   played   an   unparalleled   role   in   the   reception   history   of   this   literature,   and   during   the   course   of  my  research   I   will   try   to   demonstrate   the   pervasive   extent   of   Rashi’s   creative   misreadings,   and   provide   a  typology  for  them.   In   light  of  the  considerable   interest   in  appropriation  /  détournement   in  contemporary  culture,  such  an  analysis  of  one  of  its  great  past  masters  seems  particularly  timely.  I  would  like  to  bring  to  the   fore   the   frequent   unspoken   disagreements   with   his   precursors   that   are   embedded   in   Rashi’s  commentary,  as  well   as  other  ways   in  which  he  may  be  creatively   improving   if  not   subverting   the  above  sources,  while  seemingly  incorporating  their  content,  if  not  their  precise  language.  To  a  far  greater  extent  than  has  been  realized,   it   seems  to  me  that  Rashi’s  commentary  consists  of  such  quiet  engagement  with  these  sources,  rather  than  merely  the  selective  transmittal  of  their  substance  in  a  succinct  and  stylized  form  (merged,  as  is  universally  acknowledged,  with  a  measure  of  explicit  disagreement).  Given  that  some  three-­‐quarters  of  the  commentary  consists  of  material  that  has  been  viewed  in  this  latter  light,  both  by  traditional  and  modern  scholars,  the  proposed  approach  is  designed  to  provide  a  new  perspective  for  Rashi  studies.    

 

Shana  Strauch  Schick,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  Images  of  Pregnancy  in  Rabbinic  Literature:  The  Innovation  of  Midrash  Reishit  ha-­‐Parshiyot,  a  Geniza  Fragment  

Abstract:  This  paper  examines  how  pregnancy  and  childbirth  have  been  represented  in  rabbinic  literature,  and   how   these   depictions   reflect   the   wider   cultural   and   intellectual   contexts   in   which   these   texts  developed.   While   pregnancy   and   childbirth   have   been   subject   to   lengthy   discussions   in   terms   of   the  halakhic   ramifications   for   the   laws  of  purity  as  well   as   for   the   theological   and  philosophical   issues  which  they   generate,   the   rabbis   of   late   antique   literature   generally   subscribed   to   the   prevailing   Greco-­‐Roman  scientific   understandings   of   pregnancy   and   childbirth   and   in   turn   described   them   in   both   objective   and  scientific  terms.  Not  surprisingly,  there  is  no  attempt  to  depict  the  subjective  experience  of  what  a  laboring  woman   might   feel.   An   exception   to   this   picture   can   be   found   in   a   Medieval   midrashic   compilation  discovered   at   the   Cairo   Geniza   termed   “Midrash   Reishit   HaParshiyot   (MRhP)   in   the   section   on   parshat  Toldot.  MRhP  on  parshat  Toldot  is  of  particular  importance  because  of  its  state  of  preservation  as  well  as  the  thematic  and  literary  unity  which  it  displays.  More  significantly,  almost  all  of  the  midrashim  presented  therein  are  consistently  female-­‐centric-­‐  a  true  novelty  in  rabbinic  literature.  While  most  of  these  traditions  may  be  found  in  other  collections,  only  in  MRhP  have  they  been  collated  together  in  one  passage,  with  the  redactor  of  MRhP  amending  some  of  the  sources  so  that  they  all  convey  this  consistent  message.  Among  these  traditions  is  a  midrash  of  unknown  origin,  which  uses  vivid  imagery  to  describe  the  contractions  felt  by  Rebecca  in  the  biblical  account  of  her  unborn  babies  fighting  inside  her.  What  is  truly  fascinating  about  this  passage  is  that  not  only  does  it  feign  to  describe  the  sensations  that  women  experience  and  feel,  but  it  is  accurate  as  well.  We  will  explore  what  may  account  for  this  shift,  considering  whether  it  may  be  located  

within   the   time  and  culture   that   this   late  midrash  developed.  MRhP   thus  offers  a   refreshing  depiction  of  labor   as   actually   experienced   by   women,   and   underscores   the   suppressed   voices   of   women   in   rabbinic  literature  writ  large  in  describing  the  distinctly  female  experiences  of  pregnancy  and  labor.  

 

Lennart  Lehmhaus,  Free  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  Late  Midrashic  Texts  as  Terra  Incognita?  –  A  Second  Look  on  Literary  Strategies  and  Developments  in  Jewish  Traditions  in  in  the  Geonic  Period  

Abstract:  In  early  scholarship  the  late  midrashic  traditions  were  often  presented  as  governed  solely  by  their  anthological  interest  in  as  well  as  eclectic  and  narrative  usage  of  older  rabbinic  traditions  of  all  sort.  While  these   observations   hold   true   for   parts   of   those  midrashic   texts,   one   also   has   to   consider   other   complex  strategies   of   literary   transmission,   adaptation,   and   innovation   in   order   to   grasp   their   transformative  function  as  link  between  late  antique  and  early  medieval  times.  I  would  like  to  study  such  developments  in  late  Midrash  with  a  special  focus  on  the  texts  of  Pirqe  de  rabbi  Eliezer  (PRE),  Seder  Eliyahu  Rabba  (SER)  and  Zuta   (SEZ).   Those   multifarious   works,   most   probably   to   be   dated   in   early   geonic   times,   are   mainly  concerned  with  questions  of  ethical  lifestyle  and  righteous  conduct.  Seder  Eliyahu  Zuta  (SEZ),  as  well  as  its  fellow-­‐text   called   Seder   Eliyahu   Rabba   (SER)   combines   with   literary   skilfulness   different   genres,   literary  structures   and   strategies   which   could   have   make   the   texts   function   for   different   audiences.   The   text  integrates   ethical   and   religious   concepts   with   a   complex   discourses   on   Jewish   or   rabbinic   identity   and  culture,   against   the   backdrop   of   an   emerging   rabbinic   Judaism   within   a   context   of   Karaite,   Roman-­‐Byzantine,  Christian,  Persian  and  Islamic   influences.  The  paper  will  address  complex  interactions  with  and  modification  of  biblical  and  rabbinic  traditions,  hermeneutics  and  rhetoric  in  later  midrashic  texts  in  order  to  convey  particular  messages  or  pursue  specific  goals.  Which  intertextual  references  to  religious  narratives  and   figures   are   actualized?  How  were   literary   structures   (genres)   as  well   as   hermeneutic   and   exegetical  methods  adopted  and  adapted  to  the  thematic  frame  of  the  text?  The  answer  to  these  questions  will  help  to   deepen   our   understanding   of   the   similarities   and   differences   vis   à   vis   other   rabbinic   discourses   (e.g.  Mishnah,   Talmud,   Midrash)   and   to   allocate   these   traditions   within   the   framework   of   ancient   Jewish  literature.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  08  

 

Session:  001:  

Early  Modern  History  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Travel  and  Cultural  Interchange  in  Pre-­‐Modern  Jewry  

Organizer:  David  Malkiel  

 

 

Chair:  

 

David  Malkiel,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Rabbi  and  the  Crocodile:  Nature,  Empiricism  and  the  Hermeneutics  of  Observation  in  the  Age  of  Discoveries.    

Abstract:  Rabbi  Ovadia  of  Bertinoro's   journey   to   the  Holy  Land  brought  him  to  Egypt,  where  as  he  sailed  down   the   Nile,   he   observed   a   crocodile.   Reflecting   upon   this   experience,   the   rabbi   referred   to   the  crocodile's  relationship  with  the  "trochilus,"  the  bird  which  according  to  an  age-­‐old  tradition  eats  detritus  from   the   crocodile's   mouth.   Ovadia   also   cited   the   rabbinic   tradition   that   identifies   the   crocodile   as   the  "zepharde'a"  of  the  Second  Plague.  This  paper  will  trace  the  history  of  these  two  traditions  from  Antiquity  to  the  15th  century.  The  discussion  will  present  Ovadia's  encounter  with  the  crocodile  as  a  classic  example  of  the  confluence  of  rabbinic  tradition  with  the  Italian  Renaissance  and  the  Age  of  Discoveries.  

 

Ilaria  Sabbatini,  Ex-­‐SUM,  Istituto  Italiano  di  Scienze  Umane,  Italy  

Title:  In  terram  quam  mostrabo.  L’itinérance  de  dévotion  dans  les  religions  d’Abraham.  

Abstract:  Le  voyage  est  le  mouvement  d’un  point  à  un  autre  de  tout  sujet.  En  tant  que  tel,  ce  mouvement  comporte  l’implication  des  dimensions  de  l’espace  et  du  temps.  Le  voyage  est  la  métaphore  par  excellence  de  l’existence  qui  se  manifeste  sous  une  durée  et  sous  un  parcours.  Le  vivant  vit  en  mouvement  et  pour  le  mouvement   de   sorte   que   rien  plus   que   le   voyage  dans   toutes   ses   formes  peut   exprimer   la   condition  de  l’être   humain.   La   question   du   pèlerinage   est   fortement   ancrée   dans   la   tradition   biblique   bien   avant   que  dans  les  rituels  coutumiers  respectifs  pour   les  religions  du  Livre.   Il  est  possible  de  repérer   les  modèles  du  pèlerinage   dans   les   personnages   d’Abraham   et   de   Caïn.   Le   premier,   le   père   de   la   foi,   en   quittant  Ur   de  Chaldée  pour  gagner  la  terre  qui  lui  est  indiquée,  s’élève  au  rang  d’exemple  du  parfait  croyant.  Le  dernier,  renié  et  sans  paix,  est  éloigné  de  l’Eden  et  destiné  à  une  vaine  errance  qui  n’est  que  perte  de  soi-­‐même.  Les  deux   personnages   sont   deux   prototypes   de   voyage   irréconciliables   qui   représentent   deux   parcours,   l’un  étant  l’opposé  de  l’autre.  Abraham  part  d’un  lieu  sur  Terre  et  se  dirige  vers  une  destination  qui  préfigure  la  promesse  eschatologique.  Caïn  quitte  l’Eden  pour  s’égarer  au  milieu  de  la  Terre  des  hommes.  D’une  part,  Abraham  quitte  sa  terre  d’origine  avec  une  bénédiction.  D’autre  part,  Caïn  est  exilé  avec  une  malédiction  (Gen  XII,  1  ;  IV,  12).  Cette  tension  se  manifeste  non  seulement  dans  les  histoires  des  protagonistes  bibliques  

mais  aussi  dans  les  différentes  attitudes  à  l’égard  de  la  pratique  du  pèlerinage.  Dès  le  VIIIe  siècle  av.  J.-­‐C.,  les  prophètes  Amos  et  Osée  réprimandent  durement  cette  pratique  qu’ils  estiment  comme  inutile  (Am  5,  4-­‐5   ;  Os  12,  12).  Les  premières  destinations  sont  corrélées  avec   les   figures  des  patriarches  et  des  chefs  des  Israélites:  mémoires  d’Abraham,  de   Jacob  et  de   Josué.  Le  pèlerinage   juif  qui  est  à   l’origine  du  pèlerinage  chrétien,  sera  réglementé  par  la  suite  et  codifié  entre  le  Ve  et  le  VIe  siècle  av.  J.-­‐C.  Cette  codification  est  à  repérer  dans  l’Exode  et  dans  le  Deutéronome  (Ex  23,  14-­‐17  ;  34,  23-­‐24  et  Dt  16,  16).  Pour  finir,  la  réforme  de  Josias  a  tenté  de  supprimer  tous  les  sanctuaires  locaux  et  de  diriger  les  pèlerinages  vers  le  seul  lieu  de  culte  :  Jérusalem  (1Rois  23,  23  ;  Dt  12).  À  travers  les  siècles,  cette  centralisation  a  fait  ainsi  que  Jérusalem  devienne   la   ville   trois   fois   sainte.   Le   judaïsme,   le   christianisme  et   l’islam,   tous   vénèrent   Jérusalem  car   ils  reconnaissent  leur  racine  commune  dans  la  souche  d’Abraham,  le  plus  grand  voyageur,  pèlerin  et  déraciné  de  la  tradition  biblique.  Quel  est  donc  le  lien  que  ces  religions  entretiennent  entre  elles  en  ce  qui  concerne  la   pratique   du   voyage   de   dévotion   ?   Quelles   sont   les   différences   et   quelles   les   similitudes   ?   De   façon  différente  par  rapport  au  judaïsme  et  à  l’islam,  le  christianisme  ne  reconnaît  pas  au  pèlerinage  une  valeur  fondamentale  dans  la  vie  spirituelle  des  fidèles.  Le  pèlerinage  acquiert  un  caractère  sacré  contraignant  dans  l’Islam   qui   n’est   pas   propre   au   christianisme,   alors   qu’elle   prend   un   sens   totalement   différent   dans   le  judaïsme.   Pour   le   premier,   le   hajj   islamique   adopte   et   modernise   les   pratiques   existantes   d’un   peuple  nomade   pour   les   réglementer   à   la   lumière   du   Livre.   En   revanche,   l’aliyah   juive   est   la   traduction  métaphorique  d’une  perspective  de  sédentarisation  qui   implique   la  dimension  nationale.  Tant   le  hajj  que  l’aliyah  jouent  un  rôle  identitaire  que  le  pèlerinage  chrétien  ignore.  Né  au  sein  d’une  société  sédentarisée  et  enraciné  dans  un  monde  romain  axé  sur  l’institution  de  la  ville,  le  christianisme  reflète  plutôt  une  nature  urbaine  qui  influe  profondément  sa  relation  avec  la  mobilité.  Le  rapport  entre  l’expérience  religieuse  et  la  valeur  sociale  du  pèlerinage  est  donc  le  même  dans  le  judaïsme,  le  christianisme  et  l’islam  ?  Quel  rapport  ont  ces  différentes  cultures  religieuses  avec   la  dimension  du  voyage  ?  C’est  à  ces  questions  de  recherche  que  je  vais  essayer  de  répondre  dans  mon  étude.  

 

Nils  Roemer,  University  of  Texas  at  Dallas,  USA  

Title:  Jewish  Travelers  and  Christian  Interlocutors  During  the  Early  Modern  Period  in  Ashkenaz  

Abstract:  My   paper   aims   to   analyze   the   interaction   between   Jewish   travelers   and   Christian   scholars   and  authors   of   travelogues.   During   the   early  modern   period,   Jews   visited   various   local   communities   both   as  pious  travelers  making  pilgrimages  to  revered  graves  before  the  High  Holidays  and  also  as  curious  travelers.  Although   less   visited   than   Italy   and  France,  German  cities   in   the  Rhineland  attracted  numerous  Christian  travelers,   who   inspected   and   debated   Jewish   historical   sites   and   their   meaning.   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish  travelers  interacted  in  varied  ways  that  ultimately  shaped  their  respective  traveling  cultures  as  I  will  argue  in  my  paper.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Yiddish  Literature  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Yiddish,  the  Language  of  Love:    

Isaac  Wetzlar's  "Libes  Briv"  in  the  Context  of  Pietism,  Enlightenment  and  Ethical  Literature  

Orgnaizer:  Avraham  Siluk  

 

 

Chair:  Shmuel  Fiener  

 

Rebekka  Voß,  Goethe  University,  Frankfurt  Main,  Germany  

Title:  A  Carrot  in  Lieu  of  the  Stick:  A  Yiddish  Love  Letter  in  the  Context  of  Pietist  Missionizing  

Abstract:   Isaac  Wetzlar's   only   authored   book,   the   ‘Libes   Briv’   (Love   Letter   1748/49)   is   a   religious-­‐ethical  work   that   sharply   criticizes   contemporary   Jewish   society   and   offers   ideas   for   social   improvement   and  ethical-­‐religious  renewal.  While  Libes  briv  has  to  date  been  placed  between  the  traditional  genre  of  ethical  Mussar  literature  and  the  early  Haskalah,  our  project  will  focus  on  its  relationship  to  German  Pietism  that  deserves  further  investigation.  This  paper  will  in  particular  introduce  a  new  aspect  into  the  discussion  about  the  relationship  of  Wetzlar's  Libes  briv  to  Pietism:  that   is,  the  Pietist  missionizing  of  the  Jews.   It  seems  to  have   served   as   a   framework   for   Wetzlar's   involvement   with   the   Christian   movement   and   its   ideals.  Wetzlar's  Libes  briv  in  fact  seems  to  have  been  influenced  in  form  and  content  by  the  Pietist  “love  letter,”  that  Pietist  missionaries  addressed  –  often  in  Yiddish  –  to  the  Jews  of  Europe  they  wished  to  win  over  with  a  carrot  in  lieu  of  the  stick.  

 

Avraham  Siluk,  Goethe  University,  Frankfurt  Main,  Germany  

Title:  Isaac  Wetzlar's  Pietist  Surrounding  

Abstract:  The  author  of   the   ‘Libes  Briv’,   Isaac  Wetzlar,  not  only  claims  to  have  met  with  and  to  have  had  discussions  with  Pietist,  to  whom  he  refers  to  as  Christian  Chassidim,  but  he  also  asserts  his  readers  that  he  has  read  some  of  their  works.  Furthermore,  he  seems  to  adopt  Pietist  critics,  ideas  and  concepts  of  social  reform  in  his  work  (in  detail  on  this  subject  see  the  paper  of  Mrs.  Voss).  What  brought  the  Jewish  merchant  to  deal  so  extensively  with  this  particular  Christian  religious  movement?  What  could  he  have  known  about  it,   and   wherefrom?   The   paper   will   illuminate   the   Pietist   surrounding   of   Isaac  Wetzlar   and   the   possible  encounter   points   and   sources   of   information,   he   might   have   had,   as   he   was   sitting   to   write   his   “Love  Letter”.   By   doing   so,   the   paper   would   present   an   approach   to   the   examination   of   Jewish-­‐Christian  interaction,  which  focuses  on  reciprocal  impulses,  rather  than  on  immediate  interreligious  contacts.  

 

Marion  Aptroot,  Heinrich-­‐Heine-­‐Universität  Düsseldorf,  Germany  

Title:  The  Manuscripts  of  Isaac  Wetzlar’s  Libes  Briv  

Abstract:   There   are   nine   extant   manuscripts   of   (parts   of)   Isaac  Wetzlar’s   Libes   briv.   In   this   paper   I   will  discuss   the   different  manuscripts,   their   form   and   their   language.  Not   only   the   number  manuscripts   that  have  come  down  to  us  is  significant:  from  their  physical  format,  the  changes  the  scribes  made  in  spelling,  vocabulary   and   content,   and   dedications   in   two   of   the  manuscripts   information   about   the   reception   of  Libes   briv   by   those   who   had   the   text   copied   and   those   who   made   the   copies   can   be   gleaned.   This  information  can  be  useful  –  to  a  certain  extent  –  in  answering  the  following  questions:    What  motivated  the  changes   which   were  made   to   the   text   and   what   do   they   tell   us?   For   whom  were   the   individual   copies  intended?  How  were  these  copies  used?  To  which  extent  are  they  related  to  the  Christian  genre  of  religious  ethical  ‘love  letters’?  

 

Noa  Sophie  Kohler  &  Ephraim  Sicher,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  “The  Jew’s  Daughter  in  Germany  in  the  Early  Modern  Period:  Between  Jews  and  Christians,  History  and  Imagination”  

Abstract:  The  13th  century  Caesarius  von  Heisterbach,  the  Christian  chronicler  from  Cologne,  tells  the  story  of  a  Jewish  daughter  who  was  seduced  by  a  Christian  man.  The  punch  line  of  the  story  is  that  the  Christian  man  convinces  her  parents  that  she  is  pregnant  with  the  future  Messiah,  while  in  the  end  she  gives  birth  to  a  daughter.  Thus  the  Jewish  community  is  being  ridiculed  and  punished  for  its  stubbornness.  Later,  in  early  modern   German   literature,   we   find   a   series   of   tales,   adventure   stories   or   farces,   dramatizing   the   love  between   a   beautiful   Jewess   and   a   Christian   man,   ending   oftentimes   in   the   conversion   and   subsequent  marriage  of   the   Jewess.  Not  only   is   this   literary  motif  of   the  daughter  of   the   Jew  connected  to   the  more  general  motif  of  the  beautiful  Jewess,  but  the  pairing  of  the  Jewish  father,  representing  the  Jewish  Law  and  Jewish  refusal  to  accept  the  Christian  messiah,  with  his  beautiful  Jewish  daughter  who  can  be  converted  to  Christianity,   allegorizes   the   tension   between  Old   and  New  Testaments,   law   and   dispensation,   obedience  and   rebellion,   but   alas,   in   problematic  way,   Christian  morality   and   erotic   desire.     Yet,   in   fact,   this  motif,  repeated  in  a  number  of  medieval  exempla  and  oral  tales,  hardly  represents  the  reality  of  social  relations  between  Jews  and  Christians.  Interestingly,  the  actual  number  of  conversions  in  German  lands  in  the  early  modern  period  was  very  low  (D.S.  Hertz  estimates  from  1600-­‐1650,  there  were  two  cases  of  conversion  to  Protestantism  per   year,   from  1671-­‐1708  approx.   four,   and   from  1700-­‐1750  around   six).  Additionally   one  has  to  take  into  account  that  it  was  common  practice  to  offer  Jewish  delinquents  conversion  to  Christianity  to  escape  capital  punishment,  and  that  also  the  several  cases  of  insincere  conversions  must  be  considered,  where   Jews   later   returned   to   Judaism  without  approbation.  Only   in   the   late  18th   century,   several  of   the  Jewish  “Salon  Women”  seemingly  lived  the  literary  motif  of  being  beautiful  Jewish  daughters  of  observant  Jewish  men,   who   emancipate   themselves   from   their   fathers   by   converting   and  marrying   Christian  men.  Against  the  backdrop  of  the  development  of  the  beautiful  Jewish  daughter  in  German  literature,  the  paper  will   ask   to  what  extent   Jewish  “Salon  Women”  used   their   conversion   in  order   to  emancipate   themselves  from  their  fathers  and  their  former  religious  beliefs.  We  will  argue  that  their  disengagement  from  Judaism  was   less  sensational  than  reflected  by  the   literary  motif,  even  considering  their  parents’  reservations  and  hurt  feelings.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Early  Modern  History  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:    Crossing  Cultural  Borders  in  Early  Modern  Europe  

Organizer:  Shlomo  Berger  

 

Chair:  Shlomo  Berger  

 

 

Irene  Zwiep,  University  of  Amsterdam,  Netherlands  

Title:  On  Culture,  Borders  and  Crossings  in  Early  Modern  Judaism  

Abstract:   In   my   contribution   I   would   like   to   contribute   to   the   panel   by   addressing   two   methodological  aspects   of   studying   early   modern   Jewish-­‐non-­‐Jewish   cultural   transfer.   Firstly,   we   should   ask   ourselves  precisely  what   is   the  significance  of   the  metaphor  of   'border  crossing'?  What  basic  conception  of  culture  does   it   imply,   and  what  does   this  mean   for   our   evaluation  of   early  modern   Jewish   culture   in   particular?  Secondly,   we   should   explore   how   the   very   idea   of   cultural   transfer   (and   related   categories   such   as  brokerage   and  entangled  history)   affect   our   interpretations  of   historical   processes   and   the  dynamic   that  shaped   them.  Both   issues  will  be   illustrated  by  examples   from  early  modern   Jewish  biblical   literacy   in   its  complex   Jewish-­‐gentile   context.  How  much   (or  how   little)   'transfer'   should  we  allow   into  our  analyses  of  Jewish  biblical  culture,  and  on  what  grounds?  

 

Shmuel  Feiner,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  A  Fire  in  the  Theater  and  the  Anxiety  of  the  “New  World”  in  1772  Amsterdam    

Abstract:   On  May   11,   1772,   a   fire   broke   out   during   a   theater   performance   in   Amsterdam,   killing   a   few,  including   Jews.   That   disaster   encouraged   Israel   ben   Issachar   Baer   to   compose   one   of   the   most   critical  essays  against  Jewish  acculturation.  His  Hebrew  manuscript,  Olam  Chadash  (“New  World”),  parodic  in  style  and   full   of   anger,  was  written   by   a  member   of   the  Ashkenazi   religious   elite,  who   came   to  Holland   from  Poland  and  regarded  himself  as  a  guardian  of  the  norms  of  Judaism.  It  is  a  rare  document  that  describes  the  encounters  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews,  particularly  wherever  the  city’s  residents  attended  cultural  events  and  spent  their   leisure  time:  the  theater,  the  opera  and  the  coffee  house.  Baer  emphasizes  the  profound  involvement  of  Jewish  women  in  these  practices  (“they  read  books  in  French  and  other  foreign  languages  and  never  set  their  eyes  on  Tze’ena  ure’enai)  and  describes  the  open  nature  of  the  relations  between  the  sexes  and  the  power  of  Eros.   If  one  listens  attentively  to  Baer’s  voice,  the  existence  of  an  unprecedented  cultural  and  religious  conflict   is  revealed.  “New  World”  not  only  identifies  the  temptations  of  the  modern  city,   but   also   finds   that   the   individual’s   self-­‐confidence   is   a   major   cause   of   the   collapse   of   traditional  authority.  It  is  the  individualistic  ethos  that  enables  Jews  to  rebel  against  religion,  Jewish  solidarity  and  the  collective  memory,   and   to   relegate   the   religious  elite   to   the   sidelines  even  before   the  emergence  of   the  Haskalah  and  without  the  direct  influence  of  its  values.  

 

Zohar  Shavit,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Jewish  Networking  in  the  European  Enlightenment:  The  Case  of  Shimon  ben  Zcharia    

Abstract:   This   paper   discusses   the   extent   of   Jewish   networking   –   mainly   of   members   of   the   Haskala  movement   –   in   the   European   Enlightenment.   This   networking   included   acquaintance   with   several  Enlightenment   texts,  with   the   common  methods   of   publications   and  publishing   houses   that   brought   out  Enlightenment  writings,  and  even  with  a  few  key  Enlightenment  figures.  The  paper  analyzes  the  uses  Jews  made  of  this  networking  to  introduce  and  disseminate  Enlightenment  values  and  ideas  in  Central  European  Jewish  society.  The  paper  also  deals  with  the  strategies  they  employed  for  that  purpose.  I  maintain  that  the  members  of   the  Haskala  movement  were  much  more  versed   in  European  Enlightenment  writings   than   is  generally  assumed.  True,  texts  written  in   languages  other  than  German  were  very  often  not  accessible  to  them   in   the   original   language.   They   read   them   with   the   help   of   intermediate   translations,   mainly   into  German;   the   use   of   German   intermediate   translations   entailed   adopting   the   German   Enlightenment’s  

interpretation  of  enlightened  French  or  English   texts.   In  several  cases,  however,  members  of   the  Haskala  movement  did  have  full  or  partial  access  to  texts  in  English  or  French.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Early  Modern  History  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:    Crossing  Cultural  Borders  in  Early  Modern  Europe  

Organizer:  Shlomo  Berger  

 

Chair:    Shlomo  Berger  

 

 

Natalie  Naimark-­‐Goldberg,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Crossing  Cultural  Borders  in  Breslau:  Interreligious  Sociability  in  the  Late  Eighteenth  Century  

Abstract:   In   an   oft-­‐quoted   letter,   written   during   a   trip   to   Silesia   in1794,   Rahel   Levin   (later   Varnhagen)  describes   the   cultural   shock   of   a   young,   acculturated   Jewish   woman   upon   her   encounter   with   the  "backward",  unrefined  sights  of  Breslau.  True,  the  Silesian  relatives  of  this  young  Jewish  woman  lived  in  a  more   traditional  environment   than  her  own   family   in  Berlin.  But  how  accurate   is   the   image  conveyed  by  Levin,   that   when   travelling   to   the   Silesian   capital,   a   German   Jew   –   particularly   from   Berlin   –   would   be  moving   into   a   totally   different  world?   This   lecture  will   examine   this   question  by   focusing  on  one   central  aspect:  the  social  and  intellectual  encounters  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  that  took  place  in  Breslau.  This  phenomenon  will  be  analyzed  based  on  data  collected  from  various  sources,  which  points  at  an  unexpected  scope  of   interfaith  sociability  and  makes  one  wonder  how  exceptional   the  case  of  Berlin  –  and  especially  the  Jewish  salons  in  this  city  –  really  was.  This  evidence  will  be  contrasted  with  a  different  type  of  source  –  an   anti-­‐Jewish   farce  written   by   a   Breslau   physician   and   premiered   there   in   in1813:   Unser   Verkehr.   This  mocking   depiction   of   Jewish   attempts   at   integration   and   acculturation   –   which   came   to   symbolize   the  futility  of  Jewish  hopes  of  integration  –  precludes  an  idyllic  interpretation  of  Jewish-­‐non-­‐Jewish  encounters  and  compels  us  to  reassess  the  extent  and  the  prospects  of  interfaith  sociability.  

 

Avriel  Bar-­‐Levav,  The  Open  University  of  Israel  

Title:  Crossing  Bibliographic  Borders:  Shabtai  Meshorer  Bas  and  European  Bibliographic  Tradition  

Abstract:   It   is   known   that  Shabtai  Meshorer  Bas,  author  of   the   first  Hebrew  biblography,  Siftei  Yeshenim  (Amsterdam   1680),   used   previous   Christian   bibliographies   and   was   also   influenced   by   them.   Yet,   the  cultural  meaning  of  this  relationship  was  not  yet  studied.  In  my  lecture  I  will  examine  the  structure  of  the  bibliography  as  well  as  some  of  its  categories,  in  order  to  present  the  text  as  an  attempt  to  build  a  unique  Jewish  literary  identity.  

 

Bart  Wallet,  VU  University  Amsterdam,  Netherlands  

Title:   ‘Our   Whole   Nation   is   in   Favour   of   the   Prince’:   Ashkenazim,   Sephardim   and   Dutch   Politics   in   the  Eighteenth  Century    

Abstract:  The  two  ‘Jewish  Nations’  in  the  Dutch  Republic  had  their  own,  autonomous  position  in  society.  In  the  course  of  the  eighteenth  century,  however,  they  increasingly  became  involved  in  the  internal  political  tensions  that  eventually  resulted  in  a  civil  war  in  1787.  This  paper  will  trace  Dutch  Jewry’s  changing  attitude  towards  (local  and  national)  politics  and  explain  why  Sephardim  and  Ashkenazim  overwhelmingly  started  to  participate  in  one  of  the  rivaling  political  factions,  namely  the  orangists.  This  early  ‘politicization’  of  Dutch  Jewry   will,   finally,   be   linked   to   Dutch   Jews’   attitudes   after   the   1791   French   invasion,   the   start   of   the  Batavian  Republic  and  the  formal  1796  emancipation.  

 

Joshua  Teplitsky,  University  of  Oxford,  UK  

Title:  Scribes,  Scholars,  and  Social  Ties:  David  Oppenheim  and  the  library  of  the  eighteenth  century  

Abstract:   Over   the   course   of   the   eighteenth   century,   traditional   Jewish   study   underwent   subtle   but  significant   changes,   as   previously   un-­‐studied   medieval   books   (especially   Sefardic   works)   penetrated   the  Ashkenazic   yeshiva.  Whereas   scholars   have   dedicated   attention   to   the   impact   of   these   works   and   their  reshaping   the   curriculum   of   the   study   house,   the   means   by   which   they   began   to   circulate   is   no   less  significant,  but  often  overlooked.  This  paper  examines  that  circulation  and  its  hub  in  the  formidable  book  and   manuscript   collection   of   David   Oppenheim   (1664-­‐1736)   of   Prague.   More   than   a   private   collector,  Oppenheim  operated  as  a  facilitator  and  patron  of  the  book  trade.    With  his  sights  set  on  the  acquisition  of  new  material,  Oppenheim  stood  astride  multiple  Jewish  worlds  of  the  eighteenth  century:  the  opulence  of  the   Court   Jews,   the   controversies   of   rabbinic   courts,   approbata   and   copyright,   the   threats   and   allure   of  crypto-­‐Sabbatianism,  and  charity  to  the  Holy  Land.  Situating  Oppenheim  against  these  wider  currents,  this  paper  examines  his  activities  in  these  networks  of  exchange,  and  uncovers  his  crucial  role  in  reshaping  the  Jewish  canon  both  for  the  traditional  yeshiva  and  later  for  the  Haskalah.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  09  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  Languages  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Alexia  Duchowny,  Universidade  Federal  de  Minas  Gerais,  Brasil  

Title:  The  Judeo-­‐Portuguese  Lexicon  of  Magia  (Ms.  Laud  Or.  282,  Bodleian  Library)  

Abstract:  This  is  a  presentation  of  the  lexicon  from  Duchowny  (2007)  edition  of  De  magia  (Ms.  Laud  Or.  282,  Bodleian   Library),   a   Jewish   manuscript   of   Portuguese   origin,   dating   from   the   fifteenth   century.   It   was  elaborated  at  the  College  of  Language  and  Literature  at  the  Universidade  Federal  de  Minas  Gerais  (UFMG),  Brazil.  The  format  of  the  resulting  product  will  be  on  line,  on  the  Internet,  to  make  the  access  easier,  and  it  should  be  published  by  the  end  of  2014.  The  target  audience  of  this   lexicon   is  mainly  diachronic   linguists  interested   in   the   History   and   characterization   of   Iberian   languages,   especially   Judeo-­‐Portuguese.  Nonetheless,   it   is  also  very  useful  for  linguists  and  other  scholars  from  other  fields  of  knowledge:  History,  Sociology,  Anthropology,  Physics,  Astronomy  and  Astrology.  To  analyze  the  lexicon  of  De  magia,  the  words  were  collected  and  organized  in  alphabetical  order  by  WordSmith  Tools  (Oxford  University  Press),  and  then  classified  and  characterized.  The  theoretical  and  methodological  basis  of  this  research  is  Lexicography  and  Terminology.   The   development   of   this   lexicon   is   an   important   contribution   to   better   understanding   not  only  of  Medieval  Judeo-­‐Portuguese,  but  also  of  the  components  of  other   languages  -­‐  such  as  Portuguese,  Catalan,  Spanish  and  Galician.  It  also  provides  a  reliable  corpus  for  authors  of  historical  dictionaries.  

 

Valentina  Fedchenko,  State  University  of  Saint-­‐Petersburg,  Russia  

Title:  Periphrastic  Constructions  with  the  Verb  "ton"  in  Yiddish  

Abstract:  Periphrastic  “do”-­‐constructions  is  a  quite  widespread  phenomenon  in  the  languages  of  the  world.  Yiddish  presents  an  interesting  linguistic  material  in  this  field.  In  comparison  with  its  host-­‐language  (German)  the  Yiddish  verb  system  has  been  exposed  to  certain  general  changes  as,  from  one  side,  the  reduction  of  the  grammatical  forms  of  the  host-­‐language  and,  from  the  other  side,  the  emergence  of  new  grammaticalized  constructions  and  new  grammatical  meanings  due  to  language  contacts.  A  diachronic  development  of  a  number  of  models  with  the  Yiddish  periphrastic  “ton”  auxiliary  will  be  studied  in  the  present  paper.  The  constructions  to  be  studied  are  the  following:  1)   ton  +  INF.  di  levone  tut  shajnen  

“The  moon  shines”  2)   hobn  +  ton  +  INF.  

in  lejen  shrajbn  hat  er  tun  shtudirn  

“he  has  learnt  to  read  and  to  write”  

3)   ton  +  INDEF.ART.  +  SUB.  

ix  tu  a  kuk  

“I  look”  

These  constructions  will  be  analyzed  as  tense  and  aspect  markers,  their  emphatic  functions  will  be  presented  as  well.  Different  grammaticalization  paths  of  the  verb  “ton”  in  Yiddish  will  be  revealed  and  compared  with  similar  cases  in  Germanic  languages  with  special  attention  to  contact-­‐induced  grammaticalization  phenomena.  

 

Ori  Shachmon,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Non-­‐Jews  writing  in  Hebrew  characters:  Christian  Minorities  in  Israel  on  the  seam-­‐line  between  language  and  culture  

Abstract:   The   offered   lecture   will   explore   the   linguistic   hybridity   which   characterizes   some   of   the  Palestinian-­‐Christian  communities,  which  prefer  to  send  their  children  to  Jewish-­‐Israeli  schools  where  they  are  taught  in  Hebrew.  As  an  outcome,  these  Christian  Arab  children  speak  and  write  Hebrew  fluently,  but  -­‐  while   Arabic   is   their   mother   tongue,   some   of   them   are   completely   incapable   of   reading   and   writing   it.  When   they   need   to   write   in   Arabic   (names,   notes,   text-­‐messages   -­‐   but   also   religious   prayers!)   they  transliterate  the  Arabic  words  using  Hebrew  characters.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:    

Jewish  Languages  Medieval  Europe  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  

 

Uličná  Lenka,  Charles  University  Prague,  Czech  Republic  

Title:  Judeo-­‐Czech  

Abstract:   In   the  paper   I  will  present   the   findings  of   the   three-­‐year  project  Canaanite  Glosses   in  Medieval  Hebrew  Manuscripts  with  a  Bond  to  the  Czech  Lands  which  ended   last  year.  The  research   in  manuscripts  helped  to  correct  some  errors  of  the  editions  (ʿArugat  ha-­‐Bośem,  Or  zaruaʿ)  and  clarify  the  overall  view  of  the  so-­‐called  Knaanic  language  or  medieval  Judeo-­‐Czech.  

 

Ilil  Baum,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:   Judeo-­‐Catalan   or   Catalan   of   Jewish   Use?   Linguistic   Integration   vs.   Differentiation   of   Catalonian  Medieval  Jewry  

Abstract:  Much  has  been  written  about  Judeo-­‐Spanish,  but  research  of  the  other  dialects  spoken  by  Jews  of  the  Iberian  Peninsula  is  very  limited.  In  fact,  there  is  no  comprehensive  research  describing  the  language  of  the   Jews  of   Catalonia.   The  Catalonian   Jewish   community  had   yielded  during   its  Golden  Age   some  of   the  greatest   Jewish   sages,   such   as   Ramba"n   (or  Nachmanides).   It   gradually   declined   during   the  Middle   Ages  until   its   final   destruction   in   the   Expulsion   of   1492.   After   the   expulsion,   the   Jews   of   Catalonia   were  assimilated  among  the  Sephardi  Jews  and  traces  of  their  language  can  only  be  found  in  the  Judeo-­‐Spanish  within  the  Ottoman  Empire.  Precisely  because  of  that,  it  is  of  great  importance  to  examine  texts  that  reflect  the  distinctive  Catalan  characteristics  of  these  Jewish  communities  based  a  on  a  less  familiar  and  not-­‐well-­‐researched  corpus.    "Judeo-­‐Catalan"?  Whether  the  Jews  of  medieval  Catalonia  had  their  own  language  or  dialect,   or   did   "Judeo-­‐Catalan"   ever   exist,   is   a   question   that   requires   a   discussion   on   the   term   "Jewish  languages"  in  general  and  "Judeo-­‐Catalan"  in  particular.  Researchers  have  argued  that  the  Jews  of  medieval  Catalonia  spoke  the  same   language  as  their  Christian  neighbors,  but,   in   fact,  so  far   Jewish-­‐Catalan,  hasn't  been   described.   This   paper  will   demonstrate   some   of   the   parameters   that  may   distinguish   between   the  language  of  the  Jews  from  that  of  the  Christians.  Such  as:  the  sophisticated  use  of  the  Hebrew  component  when  in  contact  with  the  La’az  (or  Jewish  Romance)  of  Medieval  Catalonia;  the  use  of  Hebrew  characters;  the  existence  of  unique  phonetic,  morphological,  and  lexical  variants  that  are  not  or  are  rarely  documented  in  Medieval  Catalan.  These  would  be  demonstrated  on  examples  from  five  rare  wedding  songs  written   in  Hebrew   characters   from   the   XIV-­‐XV   century.   These   examples   can   attest   to   the   degree   of   linguistic  integration  or  differentiation  of  Catalonian  Jews  in  the  Middle  Ages,  serving  as  a  great  contribution  to  the  research  of  Catalonian-­‐Jewish  community  and  its  language.  

 

Michael  Ryzhik,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   Basilisk,   Deaf   Aspid   (Aspido   Sordo)   and   Dragon:   the   Reptile   Names   in   the   Judeo-­‐Italian   Biblical  Translations  

Abstract:  There  are  six  (or  five)  snake  species  that  are  named  in  the  Bible  and  some  other  reptiles,  such  as  crocodiles  and  varans.  These  names  seem  to  be  names  of  concrete  really  existing  species  living  in  the  Land  of  Israel.  The  Judeo-­‐Italian  translations  of  the  Bible  have  clear  tendency  to  translate  them  with  the  names  of   fantastic   creatures,   taken   probably   from   the  medieval   Bestiaries.   This   tendency   exists   already   in   the  Vulgate  (and  may  be  in  the  Septuaginta,  it  will  be  shortly  discussed  in  the  paper),  but  it  is  much  enforced  in  the   Judeo-­‐Italian   medieval   and   early   Renaissance   translations   even   when   compared   with   the   Italian  Christian  biblical   translations,  such  as  Bibbia  Volgare  or  Diodati.  The  same  tendency  we  see   in  the  Jewish  Hebrew-­‐Italian  dictionaries  of  the  Biblical  Hebrew,  such  as  Maqre  Dardeqe  or  Semah  David.  It  may  reflect  some  more  general  linguistic  approaches  in  the  culture  of  the  Jews  of  Italy.  

 

Julia  Krivoruchko,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:  Hebrew/Aramaic  Component  in  Secret  Languages:  the  Case  of  Greek  

Abstract:  The  use  of  Hebrew/Aramaic  loanwords  in  argotic  language  varieties  is  a  well-­‐known  phenomenon  that  has  been  sufficiently  studied  for  many  European  languages.  Recently,  the  use  of  the  Hebrew/Aramaic  component  was  highlighted  in  the  articles  of  the  ‘Encyclopedia  of  Hebrew  Language  and  Linguistics’  (Brill,  2013).  However,  Greek  material  was  not   included   in  EHLL  and   remains   largely  unknown   to   scholars.   The  paper   examines   selected   examples   of   Hebrew   loanwords   in   the   sociolect   of   Greek   underworld.   It   is  envisaged   that   these   loanwords   have   been   adopted   into   the   argot   varieties   from   the   Judeo-­‐Greek  

sociolect(s).  The  data  are  sourced  from  the  records  of  anthropologists  researching  Greek  underworld,  the  author’s  own  field  work,  and  internet.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:    

Medieval  Rabbinic  Literature  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Exegesis  in  Northern  France  

 

Chair:  Judith  Kogel  

 

Léa  Himmelfarb,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Ethical-­‐Religious  Perspective  for  Miracle  Performance  in  Rashbam`s  Biblical  Commentary  

Abstract:   This   lecture   is   devoted   to   Rashbam`s   attitude   towards   miracles.   I   present   examples   from  Rashbam’s   commentary  which   illustrate  his   tendency   to   the   theological   perspective   for  G-­‐d’s  miraculous  intervention.   Each   example   is   preceded   by   the   narrative   background   necessary   to   understand   it   and  Rashbam’s  commentary  in  each  case  is  delineated,  with  emphasis  placed  upon  the  philosophical  principle  he  introduces.  

 

Nava  Cohen,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Rashbam's  View  of  the  Worldly  Good  in  Qoheleth    

Abstract:  The  "calls   to  hedonism"   in   the  Book  of  Qoheleth   (2:24-­‐26;  3:12-­‐13;  5:17-­‐19;  8:15;  9:7-­‐10;  11:7-­‐10),  in  which  the  author  encourages  man  to  "live  the  moment",  to  eat,  drink,  rejoice  in  his  labor,  and  make  the   most   of   what   the   present   has   to   offer,   caused   discomfort   and   presented   considerable   difficulty   to  Medieval   Jewish   and   Christian   commentators.   These   scholars   wondered   how   the   "good"   that   Qoheleth  endorses   could   be   such   a   material,   bodily,   hedonistic   good.   The   conventional   religious   view   is   that   a  material   focus  draws  a  person   to   regions   from  which   the  spirit   is  excluded,  and   that  an  emphasis  on   the  value   of   material   life   may   become   an   obstacle   to   proper   conduct.   My   lecture   will   analyze   the   unique  exegetical  approach  to  these  calls  to  hedonism  adopted  by  Rashbam  (Samuel  ben  Meir),  and  show  how  he  integrates   them  within  his  overall   literary  perception  of  Qoheleth  and   its  messages.   In   contrast   to   those  commentators   who   reject   these   calls   or   express   their   reservations,   Rashbam   does   not   shun   these  recommendations,  nor  does  he  discount  the  pleasures  that  they  entail,  and  he  seeks  no  interpretation  of  them  that  avoids  their  plain  sense.  On  the  contrary,  he  views  these  calls  as  expressing  a  person's  obligation  to  enjoy  and  rejoice  in  life  in  this  world.  His  comments  here  are  a  good  example  of  his  unique  approach  in  which  the  plain  meaning  of  the  text,  as  arrived  at  through  linguistic  and  textual  analysis,  merges  with  the  biblical  world-­‐view.  Rashbam's  position  is  that  not  only  are  these  two  spheres  not  mutually  exclusive,  but  they  nourish  and  complement  one  another.  

 

Ingeborg  Lederer-­‐Brüchner,  Hochschule  für  Jüdische  Studien  Heidelberg,  Germany  

Title:  R.  Josef  Kara's  Commentary  Versions  on  the  Book  of  Ruth  

Abstract:   At   least   three   versions   of   commentaries   on   the   Book   or   Ruth   are   attributed   to   R.   Josef   ben  Shim'on   Kara   (ca.   1055-­‐1125)   in   medieval   Hebrew   manuscripts.   All   of   them   convey   features   that   are  exemplary  for  the  exegesis  of  the  Northern  French  School  in  the  footsteps  of  Rashi.  Like  the  latter,  Kara  is  known   for   interpreting  biblical   texts   according   to   their   literal  meaning   and  peshaṭ   exegesis.  However,   at  least  one  commentary  on  the  Book  of  Ruth  ascribed  to  Kara  presents  a  broad  usage  of  midrashic  literature.  As  this  is  quite  unusual  for  Kara's  approach  to  biblical  analysis,  the  phenomenon  of  citing  various  traditional  literature  is  the  main  topic  of  my  remarks.  In  addition  to  that,  a  choice  of  Kara's  illustrations  on  the  Book  of  Ruth  by  comparing  his  different  commentary  versions  shall  be  discussed.  

 

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Shorashim  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Roots  on  the  Net:  Towards  a  Digital  Edition  of  Kimhi's  Sefer  ha-­‐Shorashim  and  its  Latin  Translation(s)  

Organizer:  Judith  Kogel  

 

Chair:  Judith  Kogel  

 

Judith  Kogel,  Institut  de  recherche  et  d'historie  des  textes/CNRS,  France  

Title:  How  is  Qimḥī’s  Shorashim  different  from  the  other?  

Abstract:   Less   than   forty   years   after   Judah   ibn   Tibbon   translated   Ibn   Janāḥ’s   Kitāb   al-­‐Uṣūl   into   Hebrew,  David  Qimḥī  availed  himself  to  write  a  new  dictionary  of  Hebrew  roots,  known  as  Sefer  ha-­‐Shorashim.  This  book   achieved   great   success   and   consequently   overshadowed   the   work   of   his   predecessor   which  nevertheless  served  as  a  model  to  Qimḥī.  A  preliminary  research  based  on  the  roots  starting  by  the  letter  ṭeth  seems  to  constitute  a  representative  sample  for  the  history  of  the  text.  First  of  all,  it  allows  to  better  grasp  Qimḥī’s  motivation  for  writing  a  new  dictionary.  Further,   the  analysis  of   this  relatively  small  corpus  gives   us   clues   to   understand   Qimḥī’s   lexicological   approach   to   the   Hebrew   root   and   his   strategy   in   the  organization   of   each   entry.   This   corpus   also   includes   genealogical   variants   allowing   us   to   divide   the  manuscripts   into   two   major   families   in   the   prospect   of   establishing   a   stemma   codicum   and   therefore,  contributes   to   understand   better   the   methods   of   dissemination   of   this   work   in   the   medieval   Jewish  communities.  

 

Saverio  Campanini,  Institut  de  recherche  et  d'historie  des  textes/CNRS,  France  

Title:  “Thou  bearest  not  the  root,  but  the  root  thee”.  On  the  reception  of  the  Sefer  ha-­‐Shorashim  in  Latin  

Abstract:  Within  the  panel  presenting  the  research  project  dedicated  to  the  digital  edition  of  David  Kimchi’s  Sefer  ha-­‐Shorashim,   its  transmission  and  translation,  my  communication  will  be  concerned  with  the  main  chapters   of   its   reception   within   the   Christian   world   during   the   Renaissance:   from   Johannes   Reuchlin  adaptation  of  the   lexicon   in  the  books   II  and   III  of  his  De  rudimentis  hebraicis   (1506)  through  the  various  adaptations  of   Sebastian  Münster   (1523,  1525;  1535;  1539)   to   the   complete,   largely  augmented,   version  offered  in  print  by  Sante  Pagnini   in  his  Thesaurus   linguae  sanctae  (1529),  the  Biblical  dictionary  had  been  the  object  of  an  intense  confrontation,  on  the  grammatical  no  less  than  on  the  exegetical  and  theological  level,   from   the   leading   figures   of   Christian   Hebraism   in   the   first   half   of   the   XVI   century.   A   less   known  testimony  of  this   interest,  blending  critical  examination  and  appropriation   is   the   integral  Latin  translation  made  by,  or  rather  for,  Cardinal  Giles  of  Viterbo  preserved  in  two  mss.  (at  the  Biblioteca  Angelica  in  Rome  and   at   the  University   Library   of   St.   Andrews   in   Scotland),   probably   during   the   second  decade  of   the   XVI  century.  The  paper  will  offer,  beside  a  rapid  presentation  of  the  situation  of  Hebrew  lexicography  in  Latin  at  the  beginning  of  the  Renaissance  and  its  deep  change  through  the  contested  adoption  of  Kimchi’s  model,  a  synthetic   view   of   the   principal   features   of   the   various   approaches   to   Kimchi’s   dictionary,   from   simple  adaptation  to  the  rather  complex  moulding  of  a  bilingual  dictionary  of  Biblical  Hebrew,  to  the  paradoxical  phenomenon   of   the   translation   of   a   monolingual   lexicon   (with   the   notable   exception   of   its   numerous  Provencal   glosses)   in   a   different   language.   In   the   latter   case,   represented   by   Giles’   of   Viterbo’s   Liber  radicum,  the  semantic  loss  is  evident:  what  remains  worth  investigating  is  the  expected  exegetical  gain  for  the  Humanistic  understanding  of  the  Bible  in  an  age  of  upheavals.  

 

Sonia  Fellous,  Institut  de  recherche  et  d'historie  des  textes/CNRS,  France  

Title:  Kimhian  Elements  in  Arragel's  Bible  

Abstract:  The  Biblia  de  Alba  is  an  illuminated  manuscript  containing  a  translation  of  the  Old  Testament   in  romance  from  the  Hebrew  and  Latin.  The  biblical  text  and  its  very  rich  iconography  are  enriched  by  many  rabbinic  commentaries  sometimes  followed  by  Christian  glosses.  Rabbi  Moses  Arragel  Guadalajara  is  the  author  of  this  huge  compilation.  He  works  for  the  Grand  Master  of  the   Order   of   Calatrava,   Don   Luys   de   Guzman   which   imposes   the   control   of   two   Christian   supervisors  Brother  Enzinas  Arias,  a  Franciscan,  and  Don  Vasco  de  Guzman,  a  Dominican.  Identification  of  the  literary  sources  presented  by  the  Rabbi  is  made  difficult  by  the  fact  that  they  are  often  anonymous.  However  Moses  Arragel  mentions  the  name  of  the  most  famous  authors;  some  are  Christians,  but   the   others   are  mostly   Iberian   Jews.   Among   them  he   quotes   "Rabbi   Joseph   el   Camhy",   Rabbi   Joseph  Kimhi,   but   also  Rabbi  David  Kimhi,   although  he  does  not  mention  his   name.  Nevertheless,  David  Kimhi‘s  biblical   comments   and   Sefer   ha-­‐   Shorashim   are   often   used   in   polemics   passages   and   enlighten   Moses  Arragel’s  choices  both  in  the  field  of  translation  and  of  iconography.  

 

Naomi  Grunhaus,  Yeshiva  University,  Israel  

Title:  Radak’s  Lexical  Shorashim  and  his  Biblical  Commentaries:  A  Comparison  of  his  Biblical  Interpretations  between  the  Two  Works  

Abstract:  Radak’s   lexical  Shorashim  and  his   later  biblical  commentaries  belong  to  distinct,  yet  overlapping  genres.   It   would   be   expected   that   in   writing   his   commentaries,   he   would   refer   at   times   to   his   earlier  linguistic   work.   While   it   is   true   that   in   the   commentaries   he   does   often   rely   on   or   even   reiterate  interpretations  he  had  presented  earlier,  in  many  cases  he  actually  contradicts  explanations  he  had  offered  previously.     This   paper   assesses   the   relationship   between   Radak’s   approaches   in   the   two   works,   by  analyzing  differences  in  actual  interpretations  of  individual  verses  between  the  linguistic  Shorashim  and  the  

commentaries.  Some  of  the  contradictions  in  interpretation  can  be  attributed  to  the  difference  in  genres.  However,  in  a  considerable  number  of  cases  the  most  plausible  explanation  for  the  rejection  of  his  earlier  interpretation  would  appear   to  be  a  change   in  his  own  views.    The  paper  confirms   that  when  writing  his  commentaries,  Radak  did  not   feel  constrained  by  the  biblical   interpretations  he  had  offered  previously   in  his   linguistic  Shorashim.  These  self-­‐contradictions  demonstrate  his  development  over  time  as  an  exegete,  as  well  as  his   flexibility  and  adaptability   in  being  open  to  new   interpretations—a  tendency   that  may  well  have  fostered  his  success  as  an  exegete.  

 

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  10  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  Literature    

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:    

 

Sarit  Cofman-­‐Simhon,  Kibbutzim  College,  Tel-­‐Aviv  /  Emunah  College,  Jerusalem  

Title:   Avraham   Goldfaden   and   Vasile   Alecsandri:   Two   Theatre   Entrepeneurs   in   Iaşi   (Romania)   in   the  Nineteenth  Century    

Abstract:  An   innocent   remark,   reiterated   in  a  number  of   sources   regarding  Goldfaden’s   initial   impetus   to  stage  plays,   has   caught  my  attention  and   constitutes   the  basis   for   this   presentation:   "Goldfadn   [sic]  was  staying  at  [Librescu’s]  house,  having  just  arrived  in  Jassy,  and  one  day,  all  dressed  up,  walking  stick  in  hand,  he  was   on   his  way   out   to   start  making   contacts   for   the   newspaper,  when   the   friend’s  wife   blurted   out,  “What   do   you   need   a   newspaper   for?   There’s   already   a   Yiddish   newspaper   in   Rumania,   and   the   editor  starves  to  death  seven  times  a  day.  [...]  Listen  to  me:  the  Jews  need  a  theater”  (Nahma  Sandrow,  Vagabond  Stars.  A  World  History  of  Yiddish  Theater,  Harper  &  Row,  New  York,  1977,  p.  42).   I  would   like  to  propose  that   the   idea  which  Madame   Librescu  mentioned   in  passing  did  not   appear   in   a   vacuum.   Instead,   it   had  everything  to  do  with  the  cultural  atmosphere  of  her  surroundings.  She  lived  in  Iaşi  at  a  time  of  a  nascent  theatrical  activity,   led  by  Vasile  Alecsandri.  This  may  have  formed  the  background  for  her  suggestion  that  an  equivalent  Yiddish  theatre  would  be  warmly  welcomed.  Alecsandri  was  to  the  Romanian  theatre  what  Goldfaden  was   to   the   Jewish   theatre:   the   founder  of   a  new  national   tradition.   The   two   remarkable  men  have   in   common   theatrical   endeavours   in   close   temporal   and   spatial   proximity   to   each   other,   and   both  were  active  in  Europe’s  geographic  and  cultural  periphery,  near  the  gate  to  the  Orient,  in  languages  which  lacked  Western   theatre   tradition.   Vasile   Alecsandri   –   journalist,   poet,   and   prolific   playwright   –   was   the  manager  of  the  National  Theatre  of  Iaşi  from  1840  to  1842,  and  continued  to  write  plays  that  were  staged  there  much  later.  Avraham  Goldfaden  –  also  a  journalist,  poet,  prolific  playwright,  lyricist  and  composer  –  launched  the  Yiddish  theatre  in  1876  in  Iaşi,  at  Grădina  Pomul  Verde,  next  to  the  National  Theatre  where  Alecsandri’s  plays  were  performed.  I  find  some  poetic   justice  in  the  fact  that,  almost  a  century  and  a  half  later,  each  man’s  statue  stands  in  Iaşi  just  a  few  hundred  meters  from  the  other.  

 

Rachel  Burdin  Steindel,  The  Ohio  State  University,  USA  

Title:  List  Intonation  in  Jewish  English  

Abstract:  Jewish  speech  has  been  stereotyped  as  being  “sing-­‐songy”  compared  non-­‐Jewish  speech,  pointing  to  a  potential  difference   in   intonation.   In  American   Jewish  English,  Yiddish  has  been   identified  as  a   likely  source  of  this  difference;  one  contour  in  particular,  a  rise-­‐fall  contour,  has  been  identified  as  distinctive  as  far  back  as  1956  by  U.  Weinreich.  However,  this  distinctiveness,  for  this  contour,  and  for  others,  likely  lies  in  the  details  of  the  production  of  this  contour  and  in  its  use,  rather  than  in  the  shape  of  the  contour  itself,  as  

a   phonologically   equivalent   rise-­‐fall   contour   does   exist   in   Standard   American   English   (SAE).   This   paper  concentrates  on  the  use  of  this  rise-­‐fall  contour,  and  others,  in  the  production  of  lists  by  American  Jewish  women.   Yiddish   speakers   from   the   Archives   of   Historical   and   Ethnographic   Yiddish  Memories   used   both  falling  and  rise-­‐fall  contours  on  lists,  while  descriptions  of  SAE  intonation  indicate  that  a  flat  plateau  is  used  on   lists.  This  provides  a  possible  point  of  differentiation   in   speakers  whose   first   language   is  Yiddish,  who  may  carry  over  their  native  patterns  of   intonation   into  their  English.  Lists  were  extracted  from  interviews  with   Jewish   women   from   the   New   York   City   metropolitan   area,   who   were   divided   into   three   groups:  Yiddish/English  bilinguals,  monolinguals  with  some  exposure  to  Yiddish  prosody,  and  “pure”  monolinguals.  The  list  items  were  then  prosodically  annotated  using  Tone  and  Break  Indices  (ToBI)  guidelines.  While  there  were   no   significant   differences   between   the   three   groups   in   the   use   of   the   rise-­‐fall   contour   noted   by  Weinreich  (ToBI  transcribed  as  L+H*  !H-­‐L%),  the  bilinguals  were  more  likely  to  use  another  rise-­‐fall  contour  (L+H*  L-­‐L%)  than  the  other  two  groups,  and  less  likely  to  use  the  contour  that  had  been  previously  noted  for  standard  American  

English  lists  (H*  H-­‐L%).  

 

Michaela  Mudure,  Babes-­‐Bolyai  University,  Romania  

Title:  Adriana  Bittel:  Writing  Jewish,  Writing  Woman    

Abstract:  According  to  Radu  Cosaşu,  Adriana  Bittel  (born  31  mai  1946,  Bucharest)  is  one  of  the  few  Jewish  fiction  authors  still  active  in  Romania.  Extremely  discreet  about  her  Jewish  origins  –  one  of  the  few  proofs  in   this   respect   –   is   the   obituary   she   wrote   for   Amelia   Pavel,   the   mother   of   the   Romania   born   literary  theorists  Toma  Pavel,  Bittel  is  one  of  the  best  short  story  authors  in  contemporary  Romanian  literature.  The  present  paper  analyzes  her  best  collections  of  short  stories  Întâlnire  la  Paris  (Meeting  in  Paris),  which  was  published  in  Bucharest,   in  2001.  The  short  stories  focus  on  women’s  lives  during  the  Communist  regimes.  Ethnic   indications  relating  the  stories  to  the  author’s  Jewishness  are  rare  but  eloquent.  They  point  to  the  survival   of   a   minority   group   that   suffered   the   imposition   of   totalitarianism   and   victimization   as   the  “favourite”  Other  of  the  Romanian  xenophobes.  Bittel  focuses  on  women  and  the  way  they  are  devoured  in  a  petty  domestic  inferno  created  by  the  needs,  the  cares,  and  the  claims  of  their  family.  Woman  sacrifices  herself  both  for  her  household  and  for  her   job.  Without  any  exaggeration,  woman   is  a  martyr  of  a  world  (the  Communist  one)  which  pretends  to  have  emancipated  woman.  Working  hard  from  morning  till  evening  she  makes   the  domestic   ship   sail   onwards   and  onwards.   Bittel   focuses   on   those   everyday   sacrifices   that  make   life   possible,   the   anonymity   of   female   heroism,   the   few   and   petty   joys   of   a   life   without   any  perspective   in  spite  of   ideological  pretense  that  this   is  the  best  possible  world.  Still,  we  must  not  valorize  Bittel’s  fiction  only  as  a  sociological  document  about  life  under  the  Communist  regime.  On  the  contrary,  in  her   short   stories   the   grey   of   everyday   life   gets   the   irisations   of   rich   psychological   life.   Without   any  exaggeration,   Adrian   Bittel   belongs   to   that   great   family   of   women   writers   that   includes   Virginia  Woolf,  Katherine  Mansfield,  Alice  Munro,  Elizabeth  Strout  and  who  are  able  to  express  the  superb  incompleteness  of  life  and  enjoy  life  in  spite  of  everything.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002:  

Jewish  Literature    

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:    Recovering  Eastern  Europe  in  Modern  Jewish  Literature  

Chair:  Justin  Cammy  

 

Organizer:  Justin  Cammy  

 

Justin  Cammy,  Smith  College,  Northampton,  MA,  USA  

Title:  Between  Languages:  Régine  Robin’s  La  Québecoite  

Abstract:   In   Régine   Robin’s   La   Québecoite   (1983;   trans.   The  Wanderer)   language   -­‐-­‐   or   existing   between  languages   -­‐-­‐   simultaneously   performs   and   interrogates   contemporary   Quebec   identity   through   the  destabilizing  presence  of  the  immigrant,  Jewish  presence.  Robin’s  interest  in  the  possibility  of  existing  both  “dedans  et  dehors”   (inside  and  outside)  helps   to  explain  her  hyperconscious  employment  of  postmodern  metafictions  to  interrogate  fixed  categories  of  national  and  ethnic  identity,  and  Yiddish  (functioning  as  both  language  and  as  Jew)  as  the  agent  and  embodiment  of  this  challenge.  My  paper  argues  that  Robin  inscribes  texts   by   Yiddish   writers   (Hoftshteyn,   Bergelson,   Kulbak,   Glatshteiyn,   folktales,   not   to   mention   the   neo-­‐Yiddish  Babel)  alongside  lists  of  French-­‐Québecois  words  and  expressions  that  her  protagonist  encounters  as  a  new  immigrant  in  order  to  explore  a  more  hybrid,  cosmopolitan,  multilingual  Québecois  identity  that  puts   to   rest   the   traditional  binary  of   the   “two   solitudes”  of  English  and  French  Canada.  The   conspicuous  presence  of  Yiddish  inter-­‐texts  (more  than  just  a  Yiddish  trace)  in  the  heart  of  a  Québecois  novel  suggests  that   collective   memory   is   never   really   remembered   (despite   nativist   arguments)   and   is   always   up   for  renegotiation   and   expansion.   Yiddish   performs   not   only   the   possibility   of   transnational   escape,   but   also  serves  as  the  haunting  golem  of  messianic  narratives.  

 

Kata  Gellen,  Duke  University,  USA  

Title:   Telling   Jewish   Stories   in   German?  Mixed   Temporalities   and   Literary   Tradition   in   Edgar   Hilsenrath’s  Shtetl  Novel  

Abstract:   Jossel   Wassermanns   Heimkehr   (1993),   by   the   controversial   German-­‐Jewish   writer   Edgar  Hilsenrath   (b.   1926),   is   a   novel   that   depicts   traditional   early   20th-­‐century   East   European   Jewish   life.   Its  narrator   is  a  rich  Jew,  Jossel  Wassermann,  dying   in  Switzerland   in  1939,  who  recalls  a  visit   to  his  Galician  homeland   in  1932,  which   inspires  him  to  tell   the  story  of  his  ancestors  and  childhood.  At   the  same  time,  Jossel’s  nephew  Jankl  is  in  a  train  being  deported  to  a  concentration  camp  in  the  East,  though  he  has  just  received   notice   of   his   impending   inheritance   from  his   rich   uncle.   I   propose   to   read   Jossel  Wassermanns  Heimkehr  as  a  novel  that  is  “passing”  for  a  1930s-­‐40s  East  European  German-­‐Jewish  Shtetlroman  –  in  the  vein  of  Joseph  Roth,  Soma  Morgenstern,  and  H.  W.  Katz  –  at  the  same  time  that  it  adapts  itself  thoroughly  to  a  non-­‐Jewish  contemporary  German  readership.  Hilsenrath  taps  into  what  was  already,  in  the  novels  of  Roth,   Morgenstern,   and   Katz,   a   complex   belatedness:   this   includes   nostalgia   for   the   monarchy   and  traditional   Jewish   life,  as  well  as  depictions  of   Jewish  suffering   in  pogroms  and  WWI   filtered  through  the  experience  of   the  Nazi   seizure  of  power.  Hilsenrath   thus   reproduces  what  was  already,   60   years  prior,   a  mixed   temporality,   but   at   the   same   time   thoroughly   revises   it   so   as   to  make   this   experience   –   and   this  literary   tradition   –   accessible   to   a   non-­‐Jewish   German-­‐speaking   audience   in   the   1990s.   He   achieves   this  through  a  narrative  conceit:  Jossel  Wassermann  is  not  telling  his  story  directly  to  the  reader,  but  dictating  his  testament  to  a  lawyer  and  notary,  the  latter  of  whom  is  not  Jewish.  Consequently,  each  use  of  a  Hebrew  or  Yiddish  word  or  mention  of  a  Jewish  holiday  or  custom  requires  a  clear  explanation  for  the  benefit  of  the  notary,  and  non-­‐Jewish  readers.  There  is  a  further  narrative  complication,  which  is  that  the  person  charged  

with  writing  Jossel  Wassermann’s  life  story  –  as  a  narrative,  not  simply  as  a  legal  record  –  is  the  Torah  scribe  Eisik   from  Galicia,  who  we  know  will  perish   in   the   impending  war,  meaning  he  will  never   in   fact  write   it.  What  are  we  to  do  with  the  knowledge  that  Hilsenrath,  a  Jew,  writes  it  instead  of  Eisik?  To  what  extent  can  we  understand  the  presence  of  a  Jewish  author  as  a  redemptive  strike  against  the  silencing  of  the  German-­‐Jewish   literary   voice?   Hilsenrath   employs   complex   narrative   temporalities   and   recycles   rich   traditions   of  German-­‐Jewish  writing  in  order  to  reveal  the  tragic  irony  of  his  own  uncommon  literary  identity:  the  only  people   left   to   read  German-­‐Jewish   stories   are   non-­‐Jewish  Germans,   but  who   exactly   can   still   tell   them?  Hilsenrath’s  novel  bears  witness  to  the  struggle  to  produce  literature  that  is  authentically  Jewish  and  at  the  same  time  legible  to  non-­‐Jewish  readers.  More  than  merely  an  autobiographical  reflection  of  Hilsenrath’s  own  Jewish  childhood  in  the  East,  Jossel  Wasssermanns  Heimkehr  is  a  subtle  and  painful  reckoning  with  the  limits  and  possibilities  of  Jewish  writing  in  postwar  Germany.  

 

Marc  Caplan,  The  Johns  Hopkins  University,  USA  

Title:   “A  Disenchanted   Elijah:   Language,   Voice,   and   the  Dissimulation   of   Self   in   S.   Ansky’s  Destruction   of  Galicia”  

Abstract:  Among  the  many  achievements  in  the  career  of  S.  Ansky  (Shloyme-­‐Zaynvl  Rapoport,  1863-­‐1920),  his   1920   account   of   the   anti-­‐Jewish   pogroms   at   the   border   of   the   Russian   and   Austrian   empires   during  World   War   I,   Khurbn   galitsye   (“The   Destruction   of   Galicia,”   translated   in   English   as   The   Enemy   at   His  Pleasure,  2003),  stands  as  one  of  his  most  complex  publications.  While  focusing  on  the  physical  destruction  of   Jewish   communities   and   the   variety   of   duplicitous,   hostile,   or   ineffectual   responses   from  non-­‐Jews   in  both  official  and  informal  capacities  toward  this  violence,  Ansky’s  first-­‐person  narrative  deploys  numerous  literary  strategies  and  embedded  narratives  that  trespass  the  borders  separating  conventions  of  journalism,  political   propaganda,   or   fiction.   Though   written   in   Yiddish,   the   welter   of   languages   out   of   which   it   is  constructed   further   contributes   to   the   book’s   unstable   narrative   voice.   The   author’s   unsteady   position  within   the   contradictory   social   networks   through   which   he   moves   conveys   the   extent   to   which   his  witnessing  of  anti-­‐Semitic  violence  undermines  his  ability  to   locate  himself  as  a  political  representative,  a  writer,  and  a  Jew.  The  strangeness  of  this  work  is  understandable,  given  its  origins:  as  a  political  radical  and  official   representative   of   Russian   relief   agencies,   the   author   technically   served   as   an   officer   in   the  government  he  wished  to  overthrow,   in   territories  caught   in  a  struggle  among   four  warring  powers—the  old  Austrian  and  Czarist  empires,  as  well  as  the  emerging  Soviet  and  independent  Polish  regimes—none  of  which  he  identified  with.  Strategically,  the  narrator  in  Khurbn  galitsye  presents  himself  to  his  interlocutors  alternately   as   a   non-­‐Jewish   Russian,   an   observant   Jew,   a   military   officer,   an   aid   worker,   or   a   neutral  observer.   Like   the   rumors   he   records   of  mythical   Jewish   treachery   and  magical   gadgets   causing   Russia’s  defeat—both  of  which  provide  pretexts  for  pogroms  in  town  after  town—the  narrator  functions  as  a  cipher  for   the   intersection   of  mobility,   technology,   and   stealth   that   constitute   the   new   dislocations   of  modern  warfare.   In   his   earlier   ethnographic  work,   Ansky   recorded   legends   about   the   prophet   Elijah,   performing  inscrutable  deeds  of  kindness  for  pious  Jews  in  the  guise  of  a  non-­‐Jew.  In  Khurbn  galitsye,  Ansky  presents  himself  as  a  disenchanted  Elijah,  whose  presence  signifies  not  the  coming  redemption  of  the  Jewish  people,  but  its  imminent  dissolution.  

 

Rachel  Seelig,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Relocating  the  Center:  The  Berlin  Literary  Journal  'Die  Freistatt:  Alljüdische  Revue'  (1912-­‐1914)  

Abstract:   In   April   1913   Fritz   Mordechai   Kaufmann   inaugurated   his   Berlin-­‐based   journal,   Die   Freistatt:  Alljüdische  Revue  (Sanctuary:  Pan-­‐Jewish  Revue),  with  an  essay  proclaiming  the  desire  to  “blaze  new  paths  

for  western  Jewry  to  a  stronger  Jewishness  that  encompasses  the  entire  nation.”    The  only  way  to  attain  this   goal,   he  maintained,  was   to   “establish   unmediated   contact   between   the  western   periphery   and   the  central   national   components.”   Kaufmann’s   mission   statement   was   predicated   on   a   new   conception   of  Jewish  geography  according  to  which  the  center  of  European  Jewish  culture  was   located  not   in  Germany,  long  held  as   the  hub  of   reform  and  enlightenment,  but   in  Eastern  Europe.  Appearing  between  1912  and  1914,  Die  Freistatt  reflected  a  serious  reevaluation  of  the  image  of  the  so-­‐called  “Ostjuden”  (Eastern  Jews)  on  the  eve  of  World  War  I.  Long  maligned  as  primitive  and  parochial,  East  European  Jews  were  now  lionized  as   the   torchbearers   of   a   pristine   tradition   that   had   been   threatened   and   suppressed   by   ongoing  secularization  and  assimilation  in  Germany.  The  only  periodical  of  its  kind  to  feature  German,  Hebrew,  and  Yiddish   writing   within   a   single   forum,   Die   Freistatt   promoted   the   vision   of   a   unified   Alljudentum   (pan-­‐Judaism)   unobstructed   by   barriers   between   East   and   West.   This   paper   traces   the   origins,   goals,   and  achievements   of   this   robust   yet   short-­‐lived   enterprise,   and   considers   the   ways   in   which   the   concept   of  Alljudentum  contended  with  the  existing  German  discourse  on  the  language  of  the  Jews.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003:  

Jewish  Literature  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Jewish  and  Non-­‐Jewish  Cultures  in  Eastern  Europe  in  the  Age  of  (Post-­‐)  Modernity  

Organizers:  Klavdia  Smola  &  Sabine  Koller  

Chair:  Klavdia  Smola  &  Sabine  Koller  

 

Olaf  Terpitz,  University  of  Wien,  Austria  

Title:  Russian  as  Jewish  Language.  Cultural  Transformations  and  Transgressions  in  (Post-­‐)Imperial  Times  

Abstract:  Literature  produced  by  Jews  in  the  Russian  Empire   is  often  (until  today)  described  and  analysed  along  notions  and  concepts  such  as  assimilation,  acculturation,  change  of  generations  etc.  Those  categories  are   usually   historically   and   result   orientated.   But   how   to   explain   in   this   vein   e.g.   that   the   later   Zionist  Jabotinsky   still   wrote   in   Russian,   that   the   Russian   poetry   of   Semen   Frug   sounded   to   contemporaries   as  Hebrew,   that   Dubnov,   finally,   developed   his   ideas   on   history   and   historiography   in   dealing   with   ideas  developed   by   German   Jewish   historiography,  mainly   Heinrich   Graetz.   The   concept   of   „language   culture“  attempts  to  cover  the  dynamics  of  interaction  among  various  groups,  literature  and  society.  Culturally  and  process   orientated   it   allows   for   a   more   nuanced   view   on   the   position   of   writers   and   their   texts,   on  encounters   that  encompass  processes  of   reception,  perception  and  translation.  Complying  with  demands  of   the   Haskalah   a   central   issue   in   Jewish   Modernity   was   the   canonisation   (or   re-­‐conceptualisation)   of  knowledge,  historical  and   literary   likewise,  based  on  a  professionalisation  of   literary  criticism  and   literary  history.   In   my   talk   I   will   analyse   various   literary   volumes,   edited   by   the   Zionist   Leib   Iaffe   and   the   poet  Vladislav  Khodasevich,  which  represent  metaphorically  speaking  a  hub  of  cultural  exchange.  They   include  Hebrew  poetry   and  prose   in  Russian   translation,   a   task  undertaken  by   renowned  and   less   known   Jewish  and   non-­‐Jewish  writers,   but   also   texts   of   Russian   contemporaries   and   of   European   literature.   They   thus  form  a  meeting  space  for  various  spheres  of  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  cultural  production.  In  its  semantic  and  aesthetic  scope  Russian  had  become  a  Jewish  language.  

 

Sabine  Koller,  Regensburg  University,  Germany  

Title:  The  Death  of  King  Lir:  Salomon  Michoels  and  Stalin  

Abstract:   In   January   1948,   the   Jewish   actor,   stage   director   and   leading   figure   of   Soviet   Jewry   Salomon  Michoels   was   killed   on   Stalin’s   personal   order.   Because   of   his   support   of   Yury   Erenburg’s   and   Vasily  Grossman’s   Black   Book   about   Hitler’s   genocide   in   the   area   of   the   Soviet   Union   and   his   permanent  commitment  to  the  Jewish  cause,  he  had  to  be  eliminated.  As  a  result  of  his  death,  bemoaned  by  thousands  of  Jews  at  his  funeral  in  Moscow,  a  couple  of  texts  in  Russian  and  Yiddish  were  composed.  They  function  as  dirge  and,  partly,   as   inofficial   testimony  of  his  murder  which  was  disguised  as  a   car  accident.  Along  with  Perets  Markish’s  famous  A  ner  tomed  bayn  orn  (An  Eternal  Flame  at  the  Coffin),  the  Yiddish  author  Mendl  Man  wrote  the  short  story  „Der  toyt  fun  King  Lir“  (The  Death  of  King  Lear),  published  in  1957.  In  my  close  reading  of  the  text,  I  will  examine  the  aesthetic  devices  Mendl  Man  makes  use  of  in  „Der  toyt  fun  King  Lir“  to   fictionalize  Michoels’   last  days  before  his  murder.  Techniques  of  montages,  polyphony,   rhythmization,  and  combinations  of  sobre  descriptions  and  streams  of  consciousness  give  a  close-­‐up  of  the  actor  who  has  become  a  pawn  in  the  hands  of  the  powerful.  A  complex  intertextual  net  with  Shakespeare  and  Chekhov  at  its   center   shows   the   enormous   aspirations   of   participating   in   Russian   and  world   culture,   and   in   shaping  Yiddish  culture.  At  the  same  time,  it  gradually  reveals  the  semantic  shift  in  Soviet  culture  from  interaction  and   inclusion  of   Jewishness   to   ideological  exclusion.  The   line  between   reality  and   (theatrical)   fiction  gets  blurred  –  with  Stalin  as  the  stage  director  of  Michoel’s  final  act.  

 

Klavdia  Smola,  University  Greifswald,  Department  of  Slavic  Studies,  Germany  

Title:  Russian,  Jewish,  (anti-­‐)Soviet:  Jewish  Underground  Literature  in  the  Late  Soviet  Union  

Abstract:   In   the   Soviet   Union   the   beginning   of   the   Jewish   national   renaissance   coincided   with   Israel’s  victory  in  the  1967  Six-­‐Day  War.  This  rebirth  was  inspired  by  the  broadening  struggle  of  Soviet  Jews  for  the  Aliyah.  The  emergence  of  a   Jewish  underground  subculture  resulted  from  this  new  Exodus  movement.   In  the  self-­‐concept  of  the  highly  assimilated,  ethnically  de-­‐rooted,  nonconformist  Jewish   intelligentsia  of  the  1970s  and  80s,  this  led  to  the  gradual  reintegration  of  the  Jewish  cultural  heritage.  The  return  to  Judaism  and   the   eastern   Jewish   tradition   in   the   late-­‐communist   era   led   however   inevitably   to   the   reinvention   of  Jewish  culture,  which,  after  decades  of  uprooting  and  almost  complete  Russification  –  or  Sovietisation,  had  to  be  created  from  almost  nothing.  The   focus   of   my   lecture   will   be   on   Jewish   literature   written   in   Russian   which   appeared   in   the   late-­‐communist   period   in   the   Soviet   Union   and   after   emigration   to   Israel   (David   Markish,   Efrem   Bauch,   Eli  Luxemburg,  Efraim  Sevela).   I  will  examine  the   link  between  the  Russian  (or  Soviet)  dualistic,  mythological  patterns  of  thought  and  the  new  meaning  of  Jewishness  in  the  situation  of  political,  ideological  and  cultural  conflict.  My   thesis   is   that   the   new   Zionist   literature   created   a  mirror-­‐inverted   concept/   structure   of   the  Socialist  Realism  literary  canon.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Jewish  Literature  and  art  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  

 

Luis  Krausz,  Universidade  de  São  Paulo,  Brasil  

Title:  David  Vogel  and  Austrian  Novels:  a  Comparative  Approach  

Abstract:  Just  like  Robert  Musil’s  Der  Mann  ohne  Eigenschaften;  Joseph  Roth’s  Zipper  und  sein  Vater  or  Die  Flucht  ohne  Ende,  and  many  of  Arthur  Schnitzler´s  novellas,  David  Vogel’s  Viennese  Romance  addresses  the  issue  of  what  Carl  Shorske  calls  „the  amoral  Gefühlskultur“  of  fin-­‐de-­‐siècle  Vienna.  And  yet  this  novel  has  been  written  by  an  author  who  received  a  traditional  Jewish  education  in  his  native  Satanov,  in  Russia,  in  a  very  delicate  and  refined  Hebrew  that  points  towards  a  deep  knowledge  of  traditional  texts.  The  theme  of  a  young  man  being  lost  in  the  sensuous  and  decadent  Austrian  capital  during  the  final  years  of  the  Habsburg  Empire  or  during   the  early  days  of   the  First  Republic   is  ubiquitous  and  already  appears   in   several  novels  pertaining  to  the  genre  of  Ghettoliteratur,  which  flourished  during  the  19th  and  early  20th.  Centuries.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  Ghettoliteratur  mostly  deals  with  the  theme  of  the  decline  of  traditional  moral  values  as  a  consequence  of   the  passage   from   the  Ghetto   to   the  metropolis,   and  with   the  moral   bankrupcy  of   those  who  are  caught  in  a  limbo  between  two  worlds.  My  aim  with  this  presentation  is  to  confront  Vogel’s  novel  with   some   of   those   written   by   the   authors   mentioned   above   as   well   as   with   exponents   of   the   later  Ghettoliteratur  such  as  Jakob  Julius  David,  Leopold  Kompert  and  Leopold  von  Sacher-­‐Masoch,   in  order  to  situate  his  work  within  the  context  of  Austrian-­‐Jewish  literature,  to  which  I  claim  it  belongs  in  spite  of  the  fact  it  that  it  has  been  written  in  Hebrew.  Furthermore,  I  intend  to  investigate  how  the  Freudian  concept  of  moral  masochism   plays   a   key-­‐role   not   only   in   this   novel   by   David   Vogel,   but   in   the   turn-­‐of-­‐the   century  Austrian   novel   in   general.   I   argue   that   the   Austrian   idea   of   virtue   imbedded   in   those   novels   involves   a  deeply  engrained  notion  of  duty  and  submission,  of  which  the  amorality  and  aestheticism  of  social  life  are  a  counterpoint.   In   David   Vogel’s   Married   Life   this   contradiction   appears   in   the   disturbed   relationship  between   the   baroness   Thea   von   Takow   and   Gurdweill;   in   Viennese   Romance   it   appears   in   the   abject  realtionship  between  Rost  and  a  woman  and  her  daughter.  These  same  contradictions  between  sense  of  duty   and   perverse   sexual   impulses   still   seems   to   appear,   in   another   guise,   in   works   of   contemporary  Austrian  literature,  such  as  those  by  Elfriede  Jelinek,  author  of  Die  Klavierspielerin  and  Lust.  

 

Natascha  Drubek,  U.S  Holocaust  Museum  (Wash.  DC)  

Title:  Schooling  Jewish  Actors  for  "Ethnic"  Leads  in  1930  and  1940s  Hollywood  Films  

Abstract:   In  my   talk   I   am   aiming   to   reassess   the   significance   of   Eastern   Europe   theatre   tradition   for   the  Manhattan  Yiddish  theatre  district,  and  the  presence  of  its  actors  on  Hollywood  pictures  of  the  1930s  and  1940s.  An  important  aspect  is  the  influence  of  the  Russian  MKHAT  emigration  onto  Method  Acting  (Russia  -­‐  NY   –   USSR)   and   its   Jewish   representatives.   I   shall   present   questions   of   masking   Jewishness   and   Jewish  masks   in   the   classical   Hollywood   film,   mainly   by   the  Warner   Bros.   studio.   This   is   also   the   story   of   the  development   of   roles   played   by   Jewish   actors   moving   from   the   Golden   Boychiks   to   Prestige   Picture  character  actors  with  an  “ethnic”  touch  –  mostly  playing  Europeans.  

 

Alexander  Shapiro,   Institute  of  Psychological  and  Educational  Problems  of  Childhood,  Russian  Academy  of  Education  

Title:  The  Yiddish  Language:  Psychological  Aspects  of  its  Modern  Revitalization.  

Abstract:   The   Yiddish   language   today   is   usually   referred   to   in   negative,   even   depressive   ways,   or  alternatively   with   superficial   optimism   and   sentimentality.   I   propose   in   this   paper   that   modern  psychological  knowledge,  theories  and  practices  can  provide  a  deep  analysis  of  the  interactions  of  Yiddish  with  other  languages  and  cultures  (Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish).  Recent  developments  in  the  various  sections  of  modern  psychology,  in  particular  “trauma  psychology”,  “family  psychology”,  “personality  psychology”  were  a  significant  help  to  my  research.  The  first  psychological  dimension  of  the  intercultural  position  of  Yiddish  is  its  deep  connections  with  the  Holocaust  as  the  most  people  who  died  in  the  Holocaust  spoke  Yiddish,  which  leads   us   to   the   memories   being   consciously   or   unconsciously   connected   with   considerable   grief,  ambivalence  and  guilt  among  survivors  and  their  descendants.  I  believe  that  Yiddish  revival  is  not  the  task  of   a   particular   country   (U.S.,   Israel   or   Russia),   and   may   not   even   be   a   task   for   the   Worldwide   Jewish  community.   Rather,   perhaps   a   problem   for   humanity.   However,   my   researcher   focus   must   be   my   own  experience,  i.e.  Russian-­‐speaking  individuals,  families  and  communities  and  they  were  as  such  in  my  study  of   the   psychological   potential   of   modern   Yiddish   including   psychological   factors   favoring   its   positive  functioning   and   development.   The   preliminary   results   of   this   study   I   am   going   to   present   at   the   EAJS  Congress.  During  my  presentations  I  will  try  to  answer  the  question  whether  Yiddish  can  help  to  establish  a  positive  bridge  between  generations  in  families  and  communities  and  what  are  the  limitations  in  this?  

 

Marcin  Wołk,  Nicolaus  Copernicus  University,  Torun,  Poland  

Title:  The  structuring  of  Jewish-­‐Polish  Identity  in  Autobiographical  Fiction  by  Artur  Sandauer,  Ida  Fink,  and  Hanna  Krall  

Abstract:  Artur  Sandauer  (1913–1989),   Ida  Fink  (1921–2011)  and  Hanna  Krall   (born  1935)  represent  three  literary   generations   of   modern   Polish-­‐Jewish   authors,   three   different   paths   of   life   and   three   various  attitudes  to  writing.  Nevertheless,  their  autobiographical  fiction  shares  an  important  common  feature:  they  alternate   the   first-­‐   and   third-­‐person  narration   in   the  process  of   creating   the  author’s   self-­‐portrait.   These  changes  of  perspective  seem  to  constitute  a  textual  representation  of  the  complex  Jewish-­‐Polish  (or  Polish-­‐Jewish)   cultural   and   ethnic   identities   of   the   writers.   In   Artur   Sandauer’s   writings   they   also   reflect   the  author’s  tendency  to  look  at  himself  from  without,  the  tendency  stemming  both  from  his  situation  of  a  Jew  assimilated   into  Polish  culture  and  of  his  critical  approach   towards  what  he  considered   the  “inauthentic”  identity  of  a  Jew-­‐Pole.   In   Ida  Fink’s  autobiographical  novel  The  Journey  (1990)  extensive  use  of  the  third-­‐person  narration   (interchanging  with   the   first-­‐person  one)   reflects   the   situation  of   someone  hiding   their  identity   during   the   Holocaust,   forcing   alien,   non-­‐Jewish   identities   on   themselves   as   the   only   chance   to  survive.  Finally,  in  the  autobiographical  novel  by  Hanna  Krall  The  Subtenant  (1985)  the  identity  of  the  main  character,  who  had  lived  through  the  Holocaust  as  a  child,  remains  split  into  two  conflicting  personalities,  thus   showing   far-­‐reaching   aftermath   of   the   Shoah.   Here,   the   alternation   of   the   first-­‐,   third-­‐,   and  occasionally  also  second-­‐person  narration   is  a  textual  representation  of   the  psychical   trauma  as  well  as  a  metaphor  of  the  ambivalent  attitude  towards  Jews  and  the  Holocaust  in  the  post-­‐war  Polish  culture.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  11  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  History  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Assimilation,  Acculturation  and  Conceptualizing  the  Jewish  19th  Century  

 

Chair:  Mordechai  Zalkin  

 

Tadas  Janusauskas,  Central  European  University,  Budapest,  Hungary  

Title:  “Filled  with  statehood  awareness  and  love  for  the  fatherland”:  Jewish  Veterans  in  Bridging  Jews  and  Lithuanians  in  the  1930s  

Abstract:  Willful  Jewish  participation  in  the  Lithuanian  Independence  Wars  in  1919-­‐1923  is  usually  depicted  as  the  perfect  example  of  cooperation  between  Lithuanians  and  Jews.  Idealization  of  that  cooperation  was  established   by   The   Jewish   Soldiers   Union   (1933-­‐1940)   and   carried   on   into   today's   historiography.   In  my  presentation   I   would   firstly   like   to   question   this   narrative   as   there   is   ample   evidence   to   doubt   the  willingness   of   the   Jews   to   join   the   newly   established   Lithuanian   army   after   1918.   Such   doubt   can   open  possibilities  to  speculate  on  what  were  the  reasons  behind  this  conscious  choice  of  the  Union  to  propose  this  narrative;   in   fact,   the  proclamations  of   Jewish  willingness   to   fight   for   the  newly  established  and   still  very  unstable   state   is  only  one  of  many  ways   in  which   the  Union  propoted   its   agenda.   This  organization  became   the  most   prominent   in   "bridging   the   two   communities",   the   objective   that  was   declared   as   the  main  one  by  the  organization  in  the  1930s.  I  would  venture  to  explain  the  not  at  all  obvious  reasons  behind  the  choice  of  the  Union  to  promote  the  "Lithuanianness",  or  in  other  words,  acculturation  among  the  Jews.  

 

Elena  Keidosiute,  Vilnius  University,  Lithuania  

Title:  Lithuanian  Jewish  Converts  in  the  Interwar  Period:  Inherited  and  Transformed  Patterns  of  Belonging  

Abstract:  The  issue  of  the  radical  transformation  of  identity  of  a  convert  and  the  ambivalence  of  the  act  of  conversion  has  always  been  framed  within  broader  questions  of  identity  politics,  issues  of  social  integration  and   assimilation.   Employing   previously   unexamined   baptism   files   from   Lithuanian   Catholic   Curias   of   the  interwar  period  this  paper  will  consider  what  were  the  specificities  of  Jewish  conversions  to  Catholicism  in  the  interwar  Lithuania.  One’s  involvement  in  the  process  of  religious  conversion,  positioning  when  dealing  with  the  Church  representatives  and  means  employed  to  bring  the  newly  created  self-­‐image  across  will  be  as  assessed  by  scrutinizing  catechumens’  statements  and  ontological  narratives.  Simplistic  at  first  sight  they  tend   to   reflect   a   more   complex   origin,   unveiling   a   complicated   relation   between   a   Jew   and   his   or   her  presupposed   “Jewishness”   which   was   revoked   or   transformed   in   the   rhetoric   employed.   The   paper   will  address  such  questions  as  what  social  entity  did  converts  want  to  be  a  part  of  and  how  (or  whether)  radical  religious  conversion  actually  was?  By  the  beginning  of  the  20th  century  the  local  Jewish  community  ended  up   in   new   nation   states   and   thus   the   trends   of   their   sociocultural   orientation   acquired   entirely   new  elements   defined   by   escalated   modernization,   nationalism   and   greater   knowability   of   the   Christian  

surroundings.  Nonetheless,  at  the  same  time  some  of  the  conversional  patterns  where  inherited  from  the  century   long  existence  under   the   rule  of   the  Russian  empire  and  modes  of   integration  maintained   in   the  end  of  the  19th  century,  defined  by  a  more  traditional  background.  

 

Anika  Reichwald,  ETH  Zurich,  Switzerland  

Title:  “Overcoming  Jewishness”  –  Assimilation  and  its  Representation  in  German  Literature  

Abstract:  While   in   France   and   England   the   emancipation   of   the   Jews  was   accomplished  without   further  legal  restrictions,   in  the  German  countries  the  process  of  Emancipation  proceeded  differently.  Opponents  as  well  as  some  supporters  of  Jewish  Emancipation  claimed  that  the  Jews  themselves  had  to  earn  the  right  to  become  citizens.  Therefore,   they  had  to  assimilate  themselves  with  German  culture,  namely   language,  behaviour   and   common  habits.   Although   in   various  German   states   at   the   beginning   of   the   19th   century  Jews  received  the  full  rights  as  citizens  and  were  emancipated,  the  period  of  Restoration  withdrew  existing  legislations  that  confirmed  political  equality  for  the  Jews.  Since  the  political  decisions  suggest  that  the  task  of  modernity  was  to  claim  national  unity  and  uniformity,  it  was  the  political  ideal  to  integrate  Jews  into  the  major  society.  Literature  in  the  first  half  of  the  19th  century,  as  a  presentation  of  the  common  perception,  points  out   the  gap   in  policy.  German  Romantic  authors,   such  as  Achim  von  Arnim  or  Wilhelm  Hauff,  use  anti-­‐Jewish  stereotypes  in  their  works  to  describe  the  inherent  difference  between  ›Germans‹  and  ›Jews‹.  Especially   in   taking   up   the   question   of   Jewish   assimilation   their   texts   demonstrate   the   persisting  ›otherness‹   of   the   Jews.   By   way   of   example,   Achim   von   Arnim’s   Über   die   Kennzeichen   des   Judentums  (1811)   illustrates   the   idea  of  a  backwards  proceeding  assimilation  by   revealing   the   true  characteristics  of  the   assimilated   Jew.   The   paper   reveals   this   process   of   assimilation   and   retraces   how   the   text   discloses  German  characteristics  adopted  by  the  Jews  as  their  act  of  mimicry;  still,  concealed  by  the  masquerade  of  assimilation  the  ›real  nature‹  of  the  Jew  is  more  than  evident  and  manifest.  Arnim  clearly  makes  reference  to   the   inherent   ambivalence   of   assimilation,   namely   the   challenge   of   assimilation   can   neither   overcome  Jewish  identity  nor  Jewish›otherness‹.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002:  

Jewish  History  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Converts,  Missionaries  and  Jewish-­‐Christian  Relations  

 

Chair:  

 

Agnieszka  Jagodzińska,  Department  of  Jewish  Studies,  The  University  of  Wrocław,  Poland  

Title:  Missionary  Reports:  Genre  and  Context  

Abstract:   The   London   Society   for   Promoting   Christianity   amongst   the   Jews   was   established   in   1809   in  London.   It  was   the  oldest  and  the   largest  society   in   field  of  nineteenth-­‐century  British  “Jewish  missions.”  

Seeking   Jewish   conversion,   it   operated   not   only   among   Jews   in   British   colonial   spaces   but   also   beyond  them.  The  Society  expected   its  missionaries  to  write  detailed  reports  concerning  their  activity  among  the  Jews.   These   reports  were   sent   to   the   Society’s   headquarter   in   London  where   they  were   first   edited   and  then  published   in   the  missionary  press.   In   this  paper   I  wish   to  discuss   the  missionary   reports  as  a  genre,  determining   its   general   characteristics,   its   function   and   style.   The   analysis   will   be   based   on   the   reports  written  by  missionaries  working  among  Polish  Jews  in  the  19th  and  early  20th  century.  Apart  from  defining  the   genre,   I   will   also   attempt   to   answer   more   particular   questions,   for   example:   how   did   a   missionary  journal  become  a  printed  report?,  how  were  reports  changed  in  this  process?,  how  many  “authors”  did  one  missionary   report   have?,   is   there   a   difference   between   reports   prepared   by   missionaries   who   were  “Christians   from   birth”   and   those   by   Jewish   converts?,   how   did   reports   written   by   male   and   female  missionaries  differ?  The  paper  will  be  accompanied  by  a  ppt  presentation.  

 

Ekaterina  Norkina,  Petersburg  Institute  of  Jewish  Studies,  Russia  

Title:  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  in  the  Caucasus  in  the  XIX  –  the  beginning  of  the  XXth  centuries.  

Abstract:   From   the   prism   of   the   individual   relations   between   Jews   and   local   bureaucrats/non-­‐Jewish  population  we  research  the  machanisms  of  socio-­‐cultural  adaptation  of  the  Jews  of  the  Caucasus  in  the  XIX-­‐beginning  XXth.  The  Caucasus  was  the  region  of  the  Russian  Empire  ruled  by  governor.   It  was  also  one  of  the  multinational  outskirts  of  the  Russian  Empire  on  level  with  West  outskirts  of  the  state.  Specific  feature  of   the   Caucasian   region   was   poly-­‐confessional   population.   Before   the   Caucasus   became   a   part   of   the  Russian  Empire,  the  most  of  the  population  was  Moslems.  After  the  Caucasus  was  included  in  the  Russian  Empire   as   special   region,   the   Christian   population   began   settling.   The   Russian   government   formulated  different   directions   of   the   national   policy   towards   the   local   population  which   changed   because   of   some  socio-­‐economical  and  political  situations  and  other  problems.  By  the  middle  of  the  XIX  century  some  groups  of  the  Jewish  population  lived  in  the  Caucasian  region.  The  first  group  was  Mountain  Jews  (they  appeared  a  long  before  Russians).  The  second  one  was  Jews  in  Dagestan  –  special  province  of  the  Caucasus.  The  third  one  was  Ashkenazi  Jews  (most  of  them  Jews  from  the  Russian  Empire).  The  fourth  is  the  Georgian  Jews.  We  search   the   mechanisms   of   the   socio-­‐cultural   adaptation   of   all   groups   of   the   Jewish   population   of   the  Caucasus.  

 

Paola  Ferruta,  Université  Paris-­‐Sorbonne,  France  

Title:   Thinking   by   Cases.   Conversions   to   Christianity   and   reversion   to   Judaism   in   Trieste   between   the  Eighteenth  and  Nineteenth  Century  

Abstract:  The  paper  explores  how  in  late  eighteenth  and  early  nineteenth-­‐century  Trieste  the  “interstices”  (Homi   Bhabha)   between   Jewish   and   Christian   society   overlapped   with   heterogeneous   spaces   of   “semi-­‐neutral  society”,  as  Jacob  Katz  defined  it.  Within  this  context,  the  dialogue  between  the  Jewish  world  and  the  majority  society  can  be  considered  an   infinitesimally  small   segment  which  belonged  to   the  sphere  of  everyday  life,  outside  the  control  of  state  institutions  and  religious  establishments.  By  way  of  the  historical  anthropological   analysis,   the   female   presence   of   converts   “out   of   control”,   which   shaped   daily   life,  becomes   relevant.   It   is   about   case   studies   of   failed   conversion   to   the   Christian   fold   as   well   as   about  attempts   to   revert   to   Judaism  by  women  who  belonged   to   the  multitude  of   the   “ordinary  people”.  Men  take  the  step  of  conversion  to  Christianity   in  a  more   indifferent  way  or  at   least  their  conversion  tends  to  create   less   problems   of   responsibility   within   the   Jewish   community   and   the   larger   society,   as   a   less  disturbing   circumstance.   The   conflict   and   the   dramatic   tension   would   increase   in   the   case   of   male  conversions   if   a   woman   intervened.   It   seems   that   the   difficulties   created   by   the   Laws   of   Tolerance  

(1781/1782)  and  in  some  cases  by  the  Jewish  law  would  become  particularly  acute  in  relation  to  the  fate  of  women  who  entered  such  “semi-­‐neutral  society”.  These  women's  destinies,  which  remained  in  the  shade  for  a  long  time,  have  been  at  present  uncovered  by  historical  circumstances,  becoming  truly  complicated.  Drawing  upon  State  archive  files,  the  paper  aims  to  bring  out  the  negative  impact  of  the  ambiguity  inherent  to  tolerance  –  as  to  emancipation  –  on  female  cases.  

 

Rumyana  Marinova-­‐Christidi,  Sofia  University  "St.  Kliment  Ohridski",  Faculty  of  History,  Bulgaria  

Title:  Bulgarians  and  Jews  through  the  Ages  -­‐  an  Example  of  Tolerance  

Abstract:   Bulgarians   and   Jews   live   side   by   side   for   centuries   providing   a   model   of   ethnic   and   religious  tolerance.   Looking   for   the   roots   of   such   tolerance,   historical   retrospection   takes   us   back   to   the  establishment   of   the   Bulgarian   state   in   the   7th   century   AD,   when   we   already   have   reports   of   Jewish  communities  –  initially  Romaniotes  Jews  from  Byzantium.  Later  and  more  important  migrations  of  Jews  in  present-­‐day   Bulgarian   lands,   begins   following   their   expulsion   from   Spain   and   Portugal   at   the   end   of   the  15th  century.  Jews  found  tolerance  in  the  Ottoman  Empire  and  the  exchange  of  cultural  and  trade  relations  between   them   and   the   Bulgarians   began   to   intensify.   In   the   newly   liberated   Bulgarian   state   (1878)   the  rights   and   political   equality   of   religious   minorities   was   guaranteed   by   the   state,   and   the   Jews   actively  participated   in   the   social,   economic,   political   and   cultural   life   of   the   country.   Bulgarian   Jews   became  famous   world-­‐wide,   like   the   painter   Jules   Pascin,   the   Nobel   laureate   Elias   Canetti   and   many   other  representatives  of   the  Bulgarian   intelligence.   Since  1880,   the   Jewish  community  has   its  own  Chief  Rabbi,  while  in  1909  the  Bulgarian  Tsar  participated  in  the  opening  celebrations  of  the  new,  impressive  synagogue  in   Sofia   -­‐   the   third   largest   and  one  of   the  most   beautiful   ones   in   Europe.  While   the  Bulgarian   state  was  tolerant  towards  them,  Bulgarian  Jews  proved  to  be  loyal  citizens,  fighting  side  by  side  with  the  Bulgarians  in   all   the   wars   of   national   liberation.   The   centuries-­‐old   co-­‐existence   and   lack   of   animosity   between  Bulgarians  and  Jews  manifested  itself   in  the  most  dramatic  way  during  the  Holocaust.  Although  an  ally  of  Germany,  Bulgaria  did  not  surrender  its  Jews  to  the  Nazis,  as  Bulgarian  society  rose  in  defense  of  its  Jewish  compatriots,  and  as  a  result  not  even  one  Jew  from  the  territories  of  the  “old-­‐Bulgarian  Kingdom”  was  sent  to  the  death  camps.  This  noble  example  of  compassion  and  solidarity  made  the  salvation  of  the  Bulgarian  Jews  a  European  exception.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003:  

Jewish  History  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Revolutionaries,  Activists  and  Fighters  

 

Chair:  

 

Magdalena  Kozłowska,  Jagiellonian  University,  Poland  

Title:  Troubled  Future?  Bundist  Youth  Movement  in  the  Late  Thirties  

Abstract:   Second-­‐republic   Poland   witnessed   a   veritable   flourishing   of   youth   movements,   with   social,  political,  and  confessional  goals  and  agendas.  While  most  scholarship  has  focused  on  the  Bund,  communists  or  the  zionists  —  and  how  these  movements  could  or  could  not  have  had  an  effect  on  government  —  my  research  centers  on  Tsukunft,  the  main  Bundist  youth  organization  in  interwar  Poland.  Tsukunft  grew  into  one   of   the   most   active   and   dynamic   organizations   within   the   Bundist   movement.   Its   members  (“Tsukunftistn”)  were   grouped   in   “circles”   (krayzn).   After   age   18,   participants  were   expected   to   join   the  Bund.   Thus,   not   only   did   Tsukunft   help   the   Polish   Bund   in   its   political   campaigns,   in   particular   during  elections,  but   it  also  provided  a  constant  source  of  new  members   for   the  party.   In  my  presentation   I  will  elucidate  the  approach  of  Tsukunft  towards  political  and  social  landscape  of  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  Poland  in  the  late  30's.  By  placing  Tsukunft  in  the  greater  context  of  the  Bund,  Jewish  tradition,  and  other  political  youth  movements  of  the  period,  I  will  show  how  political  youth  movements  —  and  Tsukunft  in  particular  —  wanted  to  shape  the  social  and  political  life  of  Poland  in  the  30's.  My  paper  shows  the  benefit  in  focusing  on  "smaller"  organizations  to  present  the  varied  and  chaotic  Polish  political  landscape.  Most  Jewish  history  is   occupied   with   the   notion   of   Jewish   modernity   and   the   specific   Jewish   experience.   Polish   history,  however,   shows   how  we   cannot   examine   the   Jewish   experience   apart   from   the   Polish   experience,   writ  large.  Tsukunft  offers  a  unique  lens  on  this  problem  of  intertwined  history  because  its  activists  and  youth  were   themselves   struggling   with   Jewish   identity,   with   Polish   identity,   and   with   the   possibilities   and  limitations   of   activist   politics   in   a   multi-­‐ethnic   state.   I   will   mainly   focus   on   the   press   and   brochures  published   by   the   organization   in   the   late   30's   (in   different   languages)   to   argue   about   the   role   of   youth  organizations  in  the  search  for  Jewish  modernity  in  the  troubled  reality.  

 

Mariusz  Kałczewiak,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Israel  /  University  of  Giessen,  Germany  

Title:  Jewish  Travelers  in  Argentina  –  Exploring  the  Unknown,  Presenting  it  to  Jewish  Masses  

Abstract:  At  the  very  beginning  of  20th  century  Perets  Hirschebein  and  Hersh  Dovid  Nomberg,  two  Eastern  European   Jewish   writers,   set   out   across   Atlantic   to   explore   Jewish   life   of   rapidly   growing   Argentinean  diaspora.  They  boarded  the  same  steamships  as  did  thousands  of  their  fellow  Jews  in  search  of  economic  opportunities   and   freedom.   They   traveled   to   Buenos   Aires   and   visited   Jewish   farming   colonies,   carefully  observing   local   society,   nature   and   culture.   Their   travelogues,   published   respectively   in   1916   and   1924,  have   circulated   among   Eastern   European   Yiddish   speaking   Jews,   being   at   the   moment   one   of   few  comprehensive   accounts   on   Jewish   life   in   Argentina.   Their   travelogues   (along   Jewish   press   personal  correspondence)   have   been   possibly   influencing   their   image   of   Argentina   and   discouraging   against   /  encouraging  to  immigration.  In  my  paper  I  examine  the  picture  of  Argentina  presented  in  the  travelogues  of  Nomberg   and   Hirschbeyn,   critically   looking   at   their   narration   about   various   aspects   of   Jewish   life   in  Argentina:   immigration,  prostitution,   farming  colonies,  and  relations  with  non-­‐Jews  and  with  Argentinean  state.   I  portray  how  European   Jewish   intellectuals  describe  “exotic”  Argentina  and   the  emergence  of   the  largest   Jewish   Diasporas.   I   analyze   what   picture   of   Argentina   Nomberg   and   Hirschbein   present   to   the  Eastern   European   Jewish   readers.   I   embed  my   paper   in   the   broader   discussion   on   travelling   and   Jewish  migration.  

 

Gerben  Zaagsma,  Georg-­‐August-­‐Universität  Göttingen,  Germany  

Title:   In  Search  of  the  Jewish  Freedom  Fighter:  Jewish  Volunteers   in  the  International  Brigades  during  the  Spanish  Civil  War  &  the  Myth  of  Jewish  Cowardice  

Abstract:  During  the  Spanish  Civil  War  (1936-­‐1939)  around  35000  volunteers  from  many  countries  fought  in  the   so-­‐called   International   Brigades   that   were   created   and   organised   by   the   Communist   International.  

Roughly   5000   of   these   volunteers  were   of   Jewish   descent.   In   December   1937   the   Jewish  Naftali   Botwin  Company   was   created   within   the   13th   Polish   Dombrowski   Brigade   creating   an   explicitly   Jewish   military  symbol   on   the   Spanish   battlefields.   In   much   post-­‐war   historiography   the   participation   of   Jewish-­‐born  volunteers  in  the  International  Brigades,  often  symbolised  by  the  Botwin  Company,  is  inscribed  in  a  broader  narrative  of  Jewish  resistance  that  aims  to  counter  the  myth  of  Jewish  non-­‐resistance  in  the  face  of  the  Nazi  onslaught.  To  put  it  bluntly:  ‘Spain’  serves  to  prove  that  Jews  did  not  go  like  “sheep  to  the  slaughter”  but  already  resisted  Hitler  in  Spain  (the  German  government,  after  all,  actively  supported  Franco).  Yet  to  what  extent   do   post-­‐war   representations   of   Jewish   volunteers   as   Jewish   resistance   fighters   correspond   to   the  intentions  with  which  the  Jewish  Left  engaged  itself  with  Spain  in  the  period  of  the  SCW  itself?  And  how  do  such  post-­‐war  commemorations  relate  to  representations  of  Jewish  volunteers  that  were  forwarded  during  the   Spanish   Civil  War?     The   aim  of   this   paper   is   to   put   the   history   of   Jewish   volunteers,   particularly   the  Botwin  Company,  back  in  the  context  of  the  history  of  Jews  in  the  Left.  The  Botwin  Company  was  created  after   lobbying   of   Polish-­‐Jewish  migrant   communists   in   Paris.   In   their   newspaper,   the   Yiddish   daily   Naye  Prese,  its  existence  became  an  important  part  of  the  propaganda  battle  they  waged  on  the‚  Jewish  street’  in  support  of  the  Communist  International’s  post-­‐1935  Popular  Front  tactic.  But  while  the  propaganda  was  unmistakably  communist,  the  subtext  became  increasingly  Jewish  in  the  course  of  the  war:  the  editors  and  journalists  of  Naye  Prese  consistently  emphasised  that  the  fight  of  Jewish  volunteers  in  Spain,  symbolised  by   the   Botwin   Company,   disproved   age   old   allegations   of   Jewish   cowardice.   Linked   to   growing   Jewish  communist   concerns   about   the   position   of   Jewish   immigrants   in   late   1930s   France,   the   discursive  construction   of   Jewish   volunteers   as   Jewish   freedom   fighters   in   Naye   Prese   also   served   to   propose   and  legitimize  a  model  of  Jewish  action  and  thus  provide  an  emancipatory  example  for  Jewish  migrants.    This  paper  will   thus   argue   that   Spain  might   not   have   been   the   site  where   Jewish   volunteers   fought   a   battle  against   the   future   murderers   of   their   people,   yet   it   became   the   site   where   Polish-­‐Jewish   communists  confronted  a  classic  anti-­‐Semitic  stereotype:  that  of  the  Jew  as  a  coward,  dodging  the  fight  and  shying  away  from  action  when  called  upon.  This  micro-­‐study  ultimately  problematises  the  often-­‐heard  contention  that  Jewish   communists   forsook   Jewish   for   political   concerns   and   instead   underscores   the   complex   and  multifaceted  history  of  Jews  in  the  Left  in  the  interwar  period.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Jewish  History  

16.00-­‐18.00  

East  European  Soviet  and  ex-­‐Soviet  Contemporary  Jewry  

 

Chair:  Elena  Nosenko-­‐Stein  

 

Audrey  Kichelewski,  University  of  Strasbourg,  Austria  

Title:  Last  of  the  Mohicans  ou  New  Marranos?  Being  a  Jew  in  Catholic  and  Communist  Poland,  1945-­‐1989    

Abstract:   In   the   aftermath   of   the   Second   World   War,   the   non-­‐Roman   Catholic   religious   minorities   had  dropped  from  more  than  one  third  in  1939  to  a  mere  2  percent  of  the  overall  population  in  Poland’s  new  borders.  Within   the   Jewish   community,   90   percent   of   which   had   been   annihilated,   the   religious   people  

were   the   less   likely   to   survive.   In  1945,   the   revival  of   Jewish   life,   including   the   religious   life,   could  hence  only   stem   from   thoroughly   new   foundations.   Structurally,   the   Jewish   population   was   not   the   same  sociologically,  physically   and  mentally  while   socio-­‐political   landscape  had  profoundly   changed  due   to   the  forced   imposition  of   a   communist   regime   in   a   country   that   had  become  predominantly   Roman  Catholic.  Circumstantially,   the   Jewish   survivors   were   faced   with   the   dilemma   of   staying   in   the   cemetery   of   their  beloved   ones   or   leave   a   country   that   had   welcomed   them  with   open   hostility.  While   a  majority   of   the  approximately   200,000   Polish   Jews   chose   emigration,   how   did   the   "last   of   the   Mohicans"   adapted  themselves   in   a   community   life   firmly   state   controlled,   yet  while   living   in   an   essentially   Catholic   nation?  Why  did  the  strategy  often  adopted  of  living  like  a  "Marrano"  fail  to  protect  those  Polish  citizens  of  Jewish  descent   from  being   scapegoated  each   time   the   "Jewish  question"  emerged   in  every  political   crisis  of   the  regime,  from  its  establishment  until  its  fall  in  1989?  

 

Zsofia  Kata  Vincze,  Institution:  ELTE  University  Budapest,  Hungary  

Title:  Socio  Political  Changes  in  the  Self-­‐Definition  of  the  Jewish  Communities  in  Post  Socialist  Hungary  

Abstract:   After   the   fall   of   communism   the   Hungarian   religious   and   secular   Jewish   communities   got   re-­‐established  and   reorganised  with   the  help  of   Israeli   and  American   institutional   support.  My  presentation  will   analyse   in  an  anthropological   and   sociological   framework  how   this   communities,   and   individual   Jews  reacted  to  the  outreach  in  the  last  two  decades.  My  paper  will  present  the  major  trend  shifts  in  changing  concepts  of  what  "real  Jewishness"  meant  at  different  stages  in  post  socialist  Hungary.  (After  an  intellectual  discovery  of  one’s  own  Jewish  identity,  a  trend  of  religious  return  happened  until  the  mid-­‐1990,  what  was  followed  by  an  ethnic/cultural  self-­‐definition  of  Jewish  identity  until  approximately  2000,  resulting  slowly  in  a  symbolic  ethnic  representations  or  festivalisation  of  Jewishness  in  the  era  of  social  media.  Today  -­‐  in  the  midst   of   the   raise   of   the   openly   political   anti-­‐Semitism   -­‐   we   can   witness   a   slightly   more   defined   socio-­‐political   Jewish   behavior.   As   I   will   build   a   theory   of   social   dynamics   and   tendencies   of   collective   self-­‐definition  of  Hungarian   Jews,   I  will  also  present   illustrative  case  studies  of  people  who  went   through   the  baal  teshuva  or  born  again  Jewish  identity  and  later  on  they  discovered  that  there  are  secular  ways  to  be  Jewish  and  after   they  grew  out  of   the  hip,   fun   Jewish  underground  and  "alternative"   festival   crowd   they  construct  a  left  liberal  politically  Jewish  identity  to  themselves.  

 

Elena  Nosenko-­‐Stein,  Institute  of  Oriental  Studies,  Russian  Academy  of  Sciences  

Title:   Social   and   Cultural   Portrait   of   Reform   Jew   in   Contemporary   Russia:   Identity,  Memory,   Non-­‐Jewish  Environment    

Abstract:   Reform   Judaism   has   a   relatively   short   history   in   Russia.   It   spread   in   the   Russian   Empire   from  abroad  in  late  19th  c.;  it  did  not  practically  exist  in  the  USSR;  it  is  newly  built  in  today’s  Russian.  Drawing  on  both   qualitative   (texts   of   in-­‐depth   and   expert   interviews   as   well   as   on   participant   observation)   and  qualitative  (data  of  a  survey)  approaches  I  explore  various  aspects  of  constructing  a  new  –  new  –  for  Russia  –   Jewish   identity   and   cultural   memory   in   Russian   Reform   community.   I   briefly   examine   its  sociodemographic  profile   (age,  gender,  education,  and  ethnic  origins,   social  and  professional   statuses)  as  well  as  reasons  of  its  members’  attachment  to  Reform  Judaism.  Analyzing  patterns  of  constructing  Jewish  identity  among  Russian  Reform  Jews  I  also  investigate  the  impact  of  their  involvement  into  Reform  Jewish  life   on   Jewish   cultural  memory   -­‐   events,   persons,   dates,   texts,   etc.,   which   Reform   Jews   in   Russia   prefer  either  to  remember  or  to  forget.  I  also  suppose  to  examine  contacts  of  Reform  Jews  with  their  cultural  non-­‐Jewish  (Russian)  environment  in  terms  of  their  attitudes  towards  Russian  culture.  

 

Ildikó  Barna,  Eötvös  Loránd  University,  Hungary  

Title:  Jewish  Identity  in  Transition:  Changing  Strength  and  Content  

Abstract:  This  talk  analyses  the  differences  of  Jewish  identity  among  the  generations  of  Holocaust  survivors.  It   focuses  on  the  dissimilarities  and  changes  not  only   in   its  strength  but  also   in  the  content  of   it.  The   last  representative   survey   on   Hungarian   Jewry   was   conducted   in   1999.   It   embraced   three   generations   of  Holocaust  survivors.  Hungarian  Jewry  went  through  sweeping  changes  in  the  lifetimes  of  these  groups.  The  socialization  of  the  first  generation  started  before  the  Second  World  War  and  Judaism  played  an  important  role:  in  their  early  life  Jewish  identity  was  taken  for  granted.  Then  they  experienced  the  Holocaust  and  this  itself  elicited  a  desire  to  be  freed  from  the  burden  of  Jewish   identity.   In  Hungary,  however,  such  a  desire  was  strengthened  by  the  social  and  political  milieu.  Among  the  second  generation,  in  many  cases,  parents  concealed  their  Jewishness  and  many  members  of  this  age-­‐group  were  raised  without  any  Jewish  identity  whatsoever.   Additionally,   many   Jews   from   these   two   generations   found   themselves   in   a   paradoxical  situation:   although   they   had   lost   their   feeling   of   belonging   to   the   Jewish   people,   nevertheless   other  Hungarians  continued  to  view  them  as  “a  separate  group,”  as  Jews.  Thus,  for  many  of  them,  Jewish  identity  took  on  a  certain  reactive  nature.  That  is  to  say,  many  felt  that  it  was  the  reaction  of  the  majority  that  was  forcing   them   to   regard   themselves   as   Jews.   The   main   identity-­‐forming   element   of   these   Jews'   identity  became  the  awareness  of  wartime  persecution,  i.e.  the  Holocaust.  This  was  not  the  case  for  many  members  of   the   third   generation.   After   the   transition   in   1990   among   many   of   these   third   generation   Holocaust  survivors  the  reactive  nature  of  Jewish  identity  weakened  and  it  started  to  be  filled  with  positive  feelings.  This   phenomenon   was   often   described   as   Jewish   Renaissance,   but   the   focus   remained   mainly   on   the  changing   strength   of   Jewish   identity.   My   hypothesis   is   that   according   to   the   different   socio-­‐historical  context  also  the  content  of  Jewish  identity  has  changed.  However  with  ordinary  quantitative  methodology  these  differences  could  not  be  explored.  Using  structural  equation  modelling,  a  complex  multidimensional  statistical  technique,  these  differences  in  the  content  could  also  be  analysed.  This  was  measured  by  three  dimensions:  religious,  ethno-­‐cultural  and  affective.  The  results  show  that  there  are  major  differences  in  the  content   of   identity   among   the   three   generations   of   Holocaust   survivors,   i.e.   the   mixture   of   the   above  dimensions  is  different.  This  can  be  seen  mainly  in  the  relative  weight  of  the  religious  and  affective  aspects.  The  analysis  also  revealed  that  in  the  case  of  the  second  generation  two  subgroups  should  be  distinguished:  those  having  reactive  and  those  with  some  kind  of  positive  Jewish  identity.  The  aim  of  this  talk  is  to  show  the  detailed  results  of  these  analyses.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  12  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  History  

Antisemitism  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Coming  to  Terms  with  Postwar  Antisemitism:  Changing  Patterns  and  Changing  Jewish  Responses  1  

Organizer:  Susan  Glenn  

Chair:  Susan  Glenn  

 

Susan  Glenn,  University  of  Washington,  USA  

Title:  “American  Jews,  the  ‘Swastika  Epidemic,’  and  Politics  of  Interpretation”  

Abstract:  This  paper  examines  the  responses  of  the  major  American  Jewish  defense  groups  to  the  upsurge  in  antisemitism   in   the  1950s  and  early  1960s.   It   focuses   in  particular  on  the  pivotal  events  of  1959-­‐1960,  when   the   so-­‐called   “Swastika   Epidemic”-­‐-­‐a   worldwide   cycle   of   vandalism   targeting   Jewish   cemeteries,  synagogues,   and   public   buildings   at  more   than   2,000   sites   in   over   400   cities   and   towns,  mainly   in  West  Germany   and   the   United   States-­‐-­‐provoked   a   crisis   on   both   sides   of   the   Atlantic.   In  West   Germany,   the  “epidemic”   became   a   Cold  War   story   played   out   against   the   backdrop   of   Eastern   bloc   tensions   and   the  Adenauer   government’s   efforts   to   convince   American   Jewish   defense   groups   that   it   was   committed   to  eliminating   the   vestiges   of   National   Socialism.   In   the   United   States,   where   the   major   Jewish   defense  organizations  had  already  embarked  upon  an  attempt   to  normalize   the   image  and  status  of   Jews   though  new   strategic   efforts   in   intergroup   relations,   media   campaigns,   social   scientific   investigations,   and   legal  challenges   to   discriminatory   practices,   the   “Swastika   Epidemic,”   coming   on   the   heels   of   synagogue  bombings  in  the  American  south  and  a  nationwide  upsurge  in  antisemitic  and  neo-­‐Nazi  activity,  contributed  new   sources   of   anxiety   about   the   problem   of   Jewish   security.   The   various   stakeholders—the   press,   the  politicians,   Jewish   defense   groups,   and   even   antisemitic   ideologues   in   the   U.S—produced   competing  interpretations   that   reflected   and   mobilized   Cold   War   era   political   anxieties,   prevailing   theoretical  assumptions,  contemporary  preoccupations  with  the  problem  of  juvenile  delinquency,  and  postwar  efforts  to   fit   Jews   into  a  narrative  of  democratic   inclusion  and   tolerance   that  did  not   comport  with   facts  on   the  ground.  

 

Evelien  Gans,  Netherlands  Institute  for  War-­‐  Holocaust  and  Genocide  Studies  (Niod)  &  University  of  Amsterdam,  Dpt.  of  History  

Title:  Giving  Antisemitism  the  Cold-­‐shoulder  or  Fighting  it  till  the  Bitter  End.  Shifts  in  Postwar  Dutch-­‐Jewish  Attitudes.  

Abstract:  During  Christmas  Eve  1959  the  newly  opened  synagogue  in  Cologne  (Germany)  was  plastered  by  German  neo-­‐Nazi’s  with  swastika’s  and  the  like.  A  wave  of  similar  incidents  –  referred  to  as  Schmierwelle  -­‐  spread  throughout  Western  Germany.  From  there  the  antisemitic  aggression  fanned  out  all  over  the  world.  

To  Austria,   Italy,  Australia,  England,  Belgium,  Denmark,  South-­‐Africa,  Belgium  -­‐  to  Sweden  and  the  United  States.   And   also   to   Germanys’   neighbor   country   the   Netherlands   where,   among   others,   an   old   Jewish  cemetery   was   destroyed.   Then,   in   1962,   one   year   after   the   proceedings   against   Adolf   Eichmann   had  confronted  the  world  with  many  details  of   the  Holocaust,   the  ragging   in   the  Amsterdam  Student’s  Union  developed   into   a   national   scandal.   The   so-­‐called   freshmen   had   been,   as   usual,   herded   into   one   room,  stripped  to  the  waist,  and  heads  shaved.  One  member  of  the  ragging  commission  had  told  them:  ‘We  are  going  to  play  Dachau’.  When  one  of  the  freshmen  protested,  he  was  snapped  at:   ‘Keep  your  mouth  shut,  you  fucking   Jew.’  The   incident  was  made  public,   there  were  reports  and   letters   to  the  editor  all  over   the  press,   it   came   to   questions   in   Parliament   and   some   (modest)   disciplinary  measures   were   taken.     In  my  paper  I  will  elaborate  on  the  question  how  Dutch  Jews  dealt  with  post-­‐war  antisemitism,  and  what  changes  occurred  in  their  attitude.  Because  of  an  accumulation  of  incidents  in  1962  of  which  ‘playing  Dachau’  was  the   most   serious   the   Jewish   weekly   Nieuw   Israelietisch   Weekblad   (NIW)   organised   a   debate.   The  participants  ranged  from  49  to  69  of  age.  Their  discussion  provides  a  fascinating  insight  into  how  those  very  self-­‐conscious   Jews   dealt   with   antisemitism.   They   agreed   at   least   on   one   big   issue:   antisemitism   was   a  ‘problem  of  civilisation’  of  Gentiles.  To  preoccupy  oneself  with  it  as  a  Jew  was  below  Jewish  dignity.  If  one  couldn’t  stand   it:  go  and   live   in   Israel.    After   the  Six  Day  War   in  1967  and  the   Jom  Kippur  War  of  1973  –  when  the  Netherlands  were  struck  by  an  Arab  oil  boycott  because  of  its  pro-­‐Israel  stance  -­‐  things  gradually  started  to  change.  The  Dutch  government  decided  to  follow  a  more  balanced  policy  in  the  Middle  East;  the  position  and  aspirations  of  the  Palestinians  became  a  political  issue.  From  a  Jewish  perspective  the  fact  that  Israel   had  proved   strong   enough   to   survive,  meant   a   boost   to   Jewish   self-­‐confidence.  At   the   same   time,  however,   there  was   cause   for   concern:   Israel   became  more   controversial.   This   led   to   the   foundation   of  several  pro-­‐Israel  committees.  All  of  them  were  confronted  with  the  question  when  criticism  of  Israel  and  antizionism  turn  into  antisemitism  –  for  some  it  was  all  one  and  the  same  -­‐  and  more  generally:  how  to  deal  with   antisemitism.   New   established   organizations   came  with  widely   divergent   approaches,   varying   from  explicitly  militant,   violent   action   to   publications,   campaigns   and   legal   proceedings.   All   of   them   took   the  position  that  ‘Jews  cán,  máy  and  shóúld  take  action  against  antisemitism’.  And  then  there  were  still  those  Jews  who  thought  one  shouldn’t  make  a  mountain  out  of  a  molehill.  One  could  say  that,  while  antisemitism  is  a  flexible  phenomenon  which  grafts  novel  stereotypes  onto  old  ones,  and  finds  new  points  of  attachment  in  changing  historical  contexts,  it  is  per  definition  accompanied  by  differing  approaches  to  its  character  and  how  to  handle  or  combat  it.  

 

Helga  Embacher,  Fachbereich  Geschichte,  Germany  

Title:  Promoting  the  Ideal  Jew  (Idealtypischen  Juden):  Jewish  Reactions  to  Antisemitism  in  Austria    

Abstract:  In  this  paper,  I  will  analyze  how  the  Israelitische  Kultursgemeinde  (Jewish  Community,  IKG)  as  the  official  representative  of  the  approximately  10,000  Austrian  Jews  reacted  to  Antisemitism  and  Antizionism  after  the  Holocaust.  How  were  Antisemitism  and  Antizionism  defined  and  did  discussions  take  place  within  the   Jewish  community  about   the  character  and  dimensions  of  Austrian  Antisemitism?  Another  question   I  will   deal   with   is   how   the   Austrian   Erinnerungskultur   (culture   of   commemoration   of   Austria’s   Nazi   past)  influenced  Jewish  reactions.  Since  reactions  by  international  Jewish  organizations  and  Israeli  politicians  to  Austrian   Antisemitism   frequently   led   to   outbreaks   of   new   waves   of   Antisemitism,   I   will   further   analyze  which   international   Jewish   organizations   (e.g.   WJC,   Simon   Wiesenthal   Center,   the   State   of   Israel)  supported—and  also   instrumentalized—the   IKG   in   its   fight   against  Antisemitism.   The   final   question   I  will  address   is  the  extent  to  which  Antisemitism  and  Antizionism  influenced  the  process  of  forming  a  postwar  Austrian-­‐Jewish   identity.   In  going  about   this,   I  will  concentrate  on  three  phases  of   the  history  of  postwar  Austrian  Antisemitism:  1)  the  immediate  postwar  period,  when  Antisemitism  was  discussed  in  connection  with   restitution   negotiations   that,   in   contrast   to   the   BRD,   lasted   until   the   early   1960s.   I   will   argue   that,  especially  in  the  postwar  period,  Jewish  representatives  created  the  “ideal  Jew”—a  Jewish  stereotype  they  

assumed  would  be  accepted  by  Austrians.  2)  The  so-­‐called  Waldheim  Affair,  when  Austrian  Jews  were  not  only   among   the  most   vocal   opponents   of  Waldheim  but   also   staunch  defenders   of   Austria   at   home   and  abroad,   especially  when   the   country  was  being   criticized  by   the  WJC.   3)  Reactions  of   the   IKG  during   the  Intifada  (2000-­‐02)  and  after  9/11,  when  representatives  of  the  IKG  frequently  accused  Austrian  politicians  and  newspapers  of  Antisemitism  in  light  of  their  statements  concerning  the  Intifada  and  reporting  about  it.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002:  

Jewish  History  

Antisemitism  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Coming  to  Terms  with  Postwar  Antisemitism:  Changing  Patterns  and  Changing  Jewish  Responses  1  

Organizer:  Susan  Glenn  

Chair:  Susan  Glenn  

Eva  Maria  Ziege,  Universität  Bayreuth,  Germany  

Title:  Public  Intellectuals  and  Antisemitism  in  the  Federal  Republic  of  Germany  

Abstract:   In   the  course  of   the  1950s,  an  uneasy  cooperation  existed  between  the  public   intellectuals  and  scholars  of  the  Federal  Republic  of  Germany.  While  some  of  them  had  been  in  exile  and  returned,  others  had   been   part   of   national   socialist   society.   Particularly   in   the   social   sciences,   in   political   philosophy   and  sociology   these  matters  were  kept  more  or   less   latent,  with  prominent   Jewish   thinkers  preferring  not   to  address  the  rift  too  directly.  Ex-­‐Nazis  were  teaching  at  the  same  universities  as  the  few  Jews  who  had  been  expropriated,   persecuted,   forced   out   of   the   country   and   had   yet   returned   to  West   Germany.  With   the  eruption  of  violence  against  Jews  and  Jewish  institutions  in  1959/1960,  this  reality  became  hard  to  ignore.  This   paper   looks   at   the   interaction   of   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish   intellectuals   in   the   public   as   well   as   the  scholarly  field  in  the  context  of  the  exile’s  allegiance  to  the  United  States  in  the  context  of  the  Cold  War  and  the  debates  emerging  since.  

 

François  Guesnet,  University  College  London,  UK  

Title:  Comparing  Antisemitism  in  Post-­‐communist  Poland  and  Hungary  -­‐  Theoretical  Implications  

Abstract:   This   paper   will   discuss   the   potential   benefits   of   a   comparative   approach   to   the   study   of  antisemitism,   based   on   a   collaborative   research   project   investigating   antisemitic   attitudes   in   post-­‐communist  Hungary  and  Poland.  The  project  combined  an  assessment  of  the  'longue  durée'  of  antisemitic  movements   and   their   constituencies   in   these   two   cases,   and   compared   the   different   trajectories   of  antisemitic  organisations  after  the  fall  of  communism.  It  will  be  argued  that  differences  in  political  culture  and  economic  development  have  a  greater  impact  on  the  attraction  of  antisemitic  attitudes  and  ideologies  than  possible  responses  from  the  Jewish  communities  confronted  with  hostility  and  rejection.  

 

Robert  Fine,  University  of  Warwick,  UK  

Title:  The  Two  Faces  of  Universalism:  Emancipation  and  the  Jewish  Question  

Abstract:   Universalism   shows   two   faces   to   Jews:   an   emancipatory   face  manifest   in  movements   for   legal  recognition  of  Jews  as  equal  citizens  and  for  social  recognition  of  Jews  as  equal  human  beings;  a  repressive  face  manifest   in  a  reading  of  the  ‘Jewish  question’  as  the  question  of  what   is  to  be  done  about  the  harm  Jews  do   to  humanity  at   large.  While   the   former  declares   that  human  beings  count  as   such,   regardless  of  whether  they  are  Jewish  or  not,  and  demands  that  all  exclusions  be  contested,  the  latter  turns  ‘the  Jews’  into  a  unitary  category  incapable  of  meeting  the  universal  standards  of  humankind.  This  paper  explores  the  intimate  relation  between  Jewish  emancipation  and  the  Jewish  question  at  three  historical  moments:  18th  century   Enlightenment,   19th   century   revolutionary   thought,   and   20th   century   cosmopolitanism.   It  addresses   in  particular   the  difficulties   that   the  ambivalence  of  universalism  has  posed   for   Jewish   radicals  through  a  focus  on  the  Jewish  writings  of  Hannah  Arendt.  

 

Wassilis  Kassis,  University  of  Osnabrueck,  Germany  

Title:   The   Grey   Zone   of   Antisemitism:   An   Empirical   and   Theoretical   Analysis   for   Considering   a   Zero  Tolerance  Approach  on  Antisemitism  

Abstract:  To  date,  most  quantitative  field  studies  examining  antisemitism  in  the  EU  and   in  North  America  identify   antisemitic   attitudes  within   narrowly   confined   survey   categories,   e.g.   “agree   somewhat,”   “agree  fully”.   By   contrast,   the   huge   amount   of   participants’   answers   on   antisemitism   which   are   not   fully  contradicting  as,  e.g.   “disagree  somewhat”  or  “somewhat  unfavorable”  are  hastily   summarized   to  a  non-­‐antisemitic   attitudes   pattern   together   with   the   distinctive   “totally   disagree”   answers.   The   aim   of   this  presentation  is  to  test  by  two  empirical  studies  if  the  “gray  answer  area”  of  participants’  answers  which  are  not   fully   antisemitic   have   to   be   considered   as   non-­‐antisemitic   attitudes   or   more   as   a   proliferation  ingredient  of  the  still  wide-­‐spread  acceptance  of  antisemitism.  The  first  study  is  “Formation  of  non-­‐violent  behaviour   in   school   and   during   leisure   time   among   young   adults   from   violent   families”,   the   STAMINA-­‐project,  funded  from  2009-­‐2011  by  the  European  Commission  Daphne  III  Program.  The  data  were  collected  in  the  spring  of  2009  from  a  random  sample  of  N=5’149  8th  grade  students   in  four  EU-­‐countries  (Austria,  Germany,  Slovenia  and  Spain)  who  completed  a  questionnaire  anonymously.  The  data  for  the  second  study,  “Public  Opinions  and  Attitudes   in  Post-­‐Secondary   Institutions   in  Germany  and  Canada”,  were  collected   in  2013  in  Canada  and  Germany  (n  =  796  Canadian;  n  =  1,004  German).  This  is  one  of  the  largest  studies  with  university  students  on  antisemitism  to  date   (N  =  1,800).  The  core  purpose  of   this   survey  was   to  examine  how   undergraduate   students   respond   to   the   perceived   offensiveness   of   social,   cultural,   and   religious  prejudice.   We   examined   different   forms   and   expressions   of   prejudice   among   post-­‐secondary   students  within   an   intercultural   cross-­‐disciplinary   framework.   By   both   quantitative   studies,   even   if   samples   and  students’   ages   differed,   we’re   able   to   show   by   multinomial   regression   analysis   that   even   a   vaguer  acceptance   of   antisemitism   (e.g.   “disagree   somewhat”   or   “somewhat   unfavorable”)   is   highly   increasing  (from   5x   to   20x)   the   odds   of   approving   additional   group-­‐focused   enmities   as   e.g.   xenophobia,   violence  acceptance  against  minorities,  gender  role  stereotypes.  Due  to  that  we  state  that  only  a  zero  tolerance  of  antisemitism  should  be  accepted  and  this  not  just  because  of  the  prediction  strength  of  antisemitism  for  a  bright  variety  of  additional  group-­‐focused  enmities  but  also  due  to  the  proliferation  of  antisemitic  prejudice  and  stereotypes  among  secondary  and  post-­‐secondary  students  in  the  EU  and  in  North  America.  Especially  the  noticed  “gray  area”  on  antisemitism  was  used  in  the  past  and  will  doubtlessly  be  used  in  the  future  as  a  misanthropic  fishpond  for  the  very  active  antisemitic  demagogues,  and  not  just  in  the  EU.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003:  

Jewish  History  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Memory  and  Remembrance  

 

Chair:  Carolyn  Dean  

 

Martina  Steer,  University  of  Vienna,  Austria  

Title:  The  Memory  of  Moses  Mendelsohn  in  Poland  and  Germany  in  1929  and  1936    

Abstract:   This  paper   seeks   to   compare  and  examine   the  entanglements  between   the   commemoration  of  Moses  Mendelssohn  in  Poland  and  Germany  in  1929  and  1936  and  hence  sheds  light  on  the  commonalities,  differences   and   interdependence   of   modern   Jewish   collective   memories   shortly   before   the   Shoah.   The  destruction   of   European   Jewry   irreversibly   changed   the   very   basics   of   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish   collective  memory.  In  order  to  conceive  the  dimension  of  that  profound  transformation  it  is  necessary  to  examine  the  collective  memory  of  communities  which  were  –  albeit  under  severe  siege  –  still  unaware  of  and  unaffected  by  the  catastrophe  which  befell  them  shortly  later.  In  this  context  a  comparative  case  study  with  regards  to  cultural   transfers   on   the   memory   of   Mendelssohn   can   be   viewed   as   paradigmatic,   since   the   Jewish  communities   of   Poland   and   Germany   differed   significantly   in   sheer   numbers,   socially,   religiously   and  culturally.  The  commemoration  of  Mendelsohn  in  both  countries  was  the  result  of  reciprocal  processes  of  communication,   acculturation,   demarcation   and   migration   between   these   two   countries.   The   Jewish  enlightenment  philosopher  was  among  the  first  intellectuals  who  were  commemorated  in  such  an  intensive  and   variegated   way.   Since   its   emergence   at   the   end   of   the   18th   century,   the   commemoration   of  Mendelssohn  did  not  only  reflect  the  grade  of  secularization  of  Jewish  identities,  but  was  also  an  indicator  for  the  relationship  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews.  It  became  a  cultural  instrument  by  which  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  postulated  and  established  their  fundamental  principles  and  values  concerning  their  relationship,  and  inscribed  them  permanently   in  the  collective  memory  of   following  generations.  Mendelssohn  can  also  be  regarded  as  a  parameter   for  conflicts  within  various   strands  of   Judaism   (orthodox  vs.   liberal,  western  vs.  eastern  etc.,  Bundist  vs.  Zionist),  and  for  contested  attempts  of   Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  for  emancipation  and  assimilation.   Therefore,   a   comparative   analysis   of   the   lieu   de   mémoire   Mendelssohn   in   Poland   and  Germany,   its   images   and   instrumentalization  with   an   emphasis   on   entanglements   can   contribute   to   the  conceptualization  of  a  modern  transnational  Jewish  collective  memory  which  emerged  before  the  Shoah.  

 

Małgorzata  (Gosia)  Włoszycka,  University  of  Southampton,  UK  

Title:  Remembering  the  Jews  of  Mszana  Dolna:    memory  of  the  dead  or  the  memory  of  the  living?  

Abstract:  A  case  study  of  a  small  town  in  Southern  Poland,  Mszana  Dolna,  shows  how  people  from  the  town  deal  with   the  memory  of   its   Jewish  neighbours.   In  1942  around  900   Jews  were   led   through   the   town  by  German  soldiers  and  shot  in  a  meadow  on  the  outskirts  of  Mszana.  This  traumatic  event  raises  a  question  of  whether  the  Jews  are  remembered  by  the   inhabitants  of  Mszana  and  whether  the  physical  absence  of  Jews  has  been  compensated  by  the  memory  of  them.  The  paper  argues  that  although  the  memory  of  Jews  

is  present  among  the  inhabitants  of  Mszana,  it  is  dominated  by  the  memory  of  the  victims  of  the  Holocaust,  not   the  memory   of   the   people   who   once   were  members   of   the   community.   This   is   represented   in   the  physical   space   of   Mszana,   in   the   stories   remembered   by   people   from   town,   as   well   as   the   forms   of  commemorations  the  Jews  by  contemporary  population  of  the  town.  An  attempt  will  be  made  to  show  that  the  memory  of  Jews  is  not  incorporated  into  the  history  of  Mszana,  but  exists  as  a  parallel  one.  

 

Agnieszka  Alston,  Jagiellonian  University,  Krakow,  Poland  

Title:  Plunder  of  Jewish  Cultural  Assets  in  Kraków  within  the  Context  of  Nazi  Material  Exploitation  during  WWII  

Abstract:   The   presented   paper   confines   to   the   time   frame   of   1867-­‐1918,   as   the   year   of   the   December  Constitution   that  brought  political   and   social   changes   to   Jews  of   Krakow  and  Galicja.   This   new  period  of  great  and  rapid  changes  created  a  new  stature  to  Krakow  society  -­‐  Jewish  plutocracy  and  intelligentsia.  The  end   of   the   Great  War,   1918,   gave   even   more   opportunities   to   Galician   Jewry,   especially   to   the   rapidly  growing   Jewish   intelligentsia,   their   involvement   in   new   county   politics,   economy   and   culture.   The   years  after  the  World  War  I  brought  an  overwhelming  bloom  of  this  social  group,  whose  patronage  in  culture  was  different  due  to  advanced  political  and  social  modifications,  but  also  to  changes  within  the  artistic  scene  in  Krakow.  While  it  was  not  likely  to  hear  in  Krakow  about  great  collectors  of  the  caliber  of  the  Rothschilds  or  of  benefactors  as  existed  among  the  Warsaw  or  Lodz   Jewish  bourgeoisie   (L.  Kronenberg,   J.  Nathanson,   J.  Bloch,  I.  Poznański),  Krakow  was  not  lacking  for  there  was  a  small  but  growing  group  of  Jewish  plutocracy  and  intelligentsia  who  took  significant  part  in  patronizing  the  local  culture.  Additionally,  Krakowian  cultural  institutions  were  benefited  by   Jewry   from  Warsaw   (M.  Bersohn,   F.  Gebethner),   Lvov   (M.  Goldstein),   and  elsewhere.     The   wide   autonomy   of   the   Grossherzgtum   Krakau   during   the   changes   within   the   Austro-­‐Hungarian  Empire  with  the  proclamation  of  equality  of  all  citizens  of  Galicja  and  thus  gave  the  opportunity  to   Jews   to   enter   actively   into   the   cultural   scene   of   Krakow.   The   Krakow   Jewish   plutocracy:   bankers,  financiers,  capitalists   (rich  members  of   the  Chamber  of  Commerce  and   Industry)  and  Jewish   intelligentsia  (medical   doctors,   architects,   and   scholars)   modeled   their   cultural   patronage   on   the   old   aristocratic  tradition.  In  other  words  they  ordered  family  portraits  (St.  Feintuch,  J.  Oettinger,  H.  Rozenzwieg,  J.  Sare,  A.  Schwartz,  H.  Szarski,  and  others)  from  the  renowned  establish  painters’  ateliers  of  T.  Axentowicz,  J.  Fałat,  J.  Marczewski,  L.  Wyczółkowski,  St.  Wyspiański.  Furtherer  they  created  collections  of  fine  arts  that  reflected  accumulated  wealth   and  which  was   also   a   financial   investment   (E.   Beres,   Blumenfeld,   Z.   Ehrenpreis,  W.  Fränkel,  L.  Holzer,  S.  Tiles).    Having  a  distinguished  collection  it  was  highly  regarded  to  be  seen  to  loan  or  to  donate   art   pieces  or   collections   to   the  museum   (F.  Gebethner,  M.  Berson,  Glicenstein,  A.   Sternschuss,   J.  Judkiewicz  and  others).   In  Kraków,  artistic  patronage  was  centered  on   the  Society  of  Friends  of  Fine  Arts  (1854)   and   the   National   Museum   (1879).   Members   of   Krakow   Jewry   were   chosen   as   distinguished  members   of   exhibitions’   committees.   They   were   frequent   purchasers   of   exhibited   works   of   talented  students  of  the  Krakow  Fine  Art  Academy.  In  Krakow,  unlike  in  Warsaw,  there  were  not  so  many  residential  art  salons  belonging  to  Jewish  collectors  whose  goals  were  to  improve  the  prestige  via  presence  of  artists  and  cultural  elite,  again  activity  based  on  the  Polish  aristocracy.  However,   there  was  one  such  salon  that  was  led  by  Henryk  Frist  (1875  Salon  of  Polish  Painters).  Additionally,  a  new  to  Krakow  phenomena  were  art  dealers   like:     Adolf   Schwartz   and   Marcus   Szwarc,   who   were   active   in   cultural   patronage.   It   must   be  mentioned  that  Jewish  collectors  not  only  focused  on  Polish  artists,  firstly  they  cherished  Jewish  artists  such  as   M.   Gottlieb,   or   Samuel   Hirszenberg   (E.   Beres,   M.   Feldman).   Most   of   all   they   paid   homage   to   their  heritage  in  preserving  and  collecting  precious  Jewish  ritual  objects,  which  often  were  on  loan  to  the  Krakow  National  Museum.  Most   of   all   they   paid   homage   to   their   heritage   in   preserving   and   collecting   precious  Jewish  ritual  objects,  which  often  were  on  loan  to  the  Krakow  National  Museum  (J.  Judkiewicz,  M.  Szwarc).  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Jewish  History  

Antisemitism  and  Jewish/non-­‐Jewish  Relations  throughout  the  Ages  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  The  Parkes  Institute's  approach  to  Jewish/non-­‐Jewish  relations,  models  for  the  future?  

Organizers:  Tony  Kushner  &  James  Jordan  

 

Chair:  Tony  Kushner  

 

James  Jordan,  Parkes  Institute,  University  of  Southampton,  UK  

Title:  Dr  Who  and  Jewish/non-­‐Jewish  Relations  on  British  Television  

Abstract:   In  a   recent  article   for  Tabletmag.com,  Liel   Leibovitz  has   suggested   that   the  central   character  of  the  BBC's  long-­‐running  television  series  Doctor  Who  is  in  fact  ‘the  most  compelling  Jewish  character  in  the  history   of   television.’   In   his   article   Leibovitz   situates   the   character   of   the   Doctor   as   Jewish   through   an  argument  which  is  partly  historical,  partly   interpretative,  through,  that  is,  both  the  off-­‐screen  story  of  the  Doctor’s  creation  and  his  on-­‐screen  appearance,  attitudes  and  enemies.  This  paper  will  look  more  closely  at  the   show’s  origins   and   content,   arguing   that   the  Doctor’s   position  and  articulation  of   Jewishness   is   both  more  rooted  and  more  ambivalent  than  Leibovitz  suggests,  and  that  the  relationship  between  the  Doctor  and  his  Jewishness  -­‐  and  indeed  that  between  the  Daleks  and  the  Master  and  their  Jewishness  -­‐  is  revealing  in  terms  of  Jewish/non-­‐Jewish  relations  more  generally.  

 

Tony  Kushner,  Parkes  Institute,  University  of  Southampton,  UK  

Title:  The  British  in  Auschwitz  

Abstract:  1500  British  prisoners  of  war  were  held   in  a   sub-­‐camp  of   the  Auschwitz   complex   from  1943   to  1945.   Until   recently   their   experiences   have   been   forgotten,   but   in   the   past   few   years   their   stories   have  been  rediscovered  and  reinterpreted.  Once  placed  within  a  prisoner  of  war  narrative,  they  are  now  placed  within   the   context  of   the  Holocaust.   Indeed,   they   are   increasingly   regarded  as   'Heroes  of   the  Holocaust'  This   paper  will   explore   the   implications  when  melding   the  British  war   effort  with   the  plight  of   the   Jews,  especially   with   regard   to   the   key   categories   that   have   been   developed   to   explain   the   Holocaust:  perpetrator,  victim,  bystander.  The  Holocaust  becoming  increasingly  the  most  important  morality  story  of  modern   times.   This  paper  will   ask  whether   the  Reverened  Dr   James  Parkes'   (the  pioneer  of   the   study  of  Jewish/non-­‐Jewish  relations)  concern  over  the  development  of  Holocaust  studies  was   justified.  Using  this  case  study,  it  will  ask  whether  the  attention  given  to  the  Holocaust  is  leading  to  dangerous  simplifications  in  our  understanding  of  the  broader  field  of  Jewish/non-­‐Jewish  relations.  

 

Claire  Le  Foll,  Parkes  Institute,  University  of  Southampton,  UK  

Title:  Jews  and  Small  Nations  in  Eastern  Europe  

Abstract:  The  relations  between  Jews  and  the  other  national  minorities  among  which  they  lived  in  Eastern  Europe  have  not  yet  been  extensively  researched,  being  overshadowed  by  works  on  the  relations  between  Jews  and  Russians  or  Poles.   In   the   framework  of  a  panel  discussion  on   relations  between   Jews  and  non-­‐Jews,   I  would   like   to  present  my   research  project   focused  on   relations  between   Jews  and  other  national  groups   (Belorussian,   Ukrainian   and   Lithuanian  mostly)   before   and   after   the   creation   of   the   Belorussian,  Ukrainian   and   Lithuanian   republics   (1905-­‐1939),   with   a   comparative   analysis   of   the   implementation   of  cultural   national   autonomy   in   the   new   states   (Soviet   and   non-­‐Soviet).   Using   more   specifically   the  Belorussian   case,   I   will   argue   that   the   cultural   transfers,   social   interactions   and   political   cooperation  between  Jews  and  these   'small  nations'  had  no   less   impact,   if  not  more,  on  the  Jewish  collective   identity  and  history  than  the  well-­‐studied  strategy  of  integration  into  the  dominant  society.  

 

Helen  Spurling,  Parkes  Institute,  University  of  Southampton,  UK  

Title:  Jewish  and  Christian  Apocalyptic  Traditions  in  Late  Antiquity  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  examine  contacts  between  rabbinic  and  patristic  writings  in  Late  Antiquity  through  the  medium   of   biblical   exegesis   and   the   concept   of   'exegetical   encounter'   (Spurling   and   Grypeou   2009,  2013).   The   importance   of   apocalyptic   and   eschatological   traditions   within   both   Jewish   and   Christian  literature  as  a  response  to  historical  events  and  a  means  of  revealing  attitudes  to  events  is  widely  accepted  (Alexander   1978,   Reeves   2006,   Bockmuehl   and   Carleton   Paget   2009).   By   focusing   on   apocalyptic   and  eschatological  traditions  from  select  midrashic  and  patristic  sources  from  Late  Antiquity,  the  possibilities  of  contact  and  conflict  over  the   interpretation  of  biblical  motifs  will  be  examined.  The  paper  will   investigate  any   possible   theological   relationship   between   different   traditions,   and   highlight   the   development   of  eschatological   thought   in   Late   Antiquity   in   the   context   of   Jewish-­‐Christian   relations.   This   contribution   is  part  of  a  panel  from  the  Parkes  Institute  for  the  Study  of  Jewish/non-­‐Jewish  Relations,  which  will  highlight  the  work  of  the  Institute  and  its  interdisciplinary  approaches  as  a  model  for  future  research  on  Jewish/non-­‐Jewish  relations.  

 

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  13  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  Literature  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Modern  Jewish  Spaces  

Organizer:  Murray  Baumgarten  

Chair:  Murray  Baumgarten  

 

Murray  Baumgarten,  University  of  California,  Santa  Cruz  

Title:  Israel  Zangwill  and  the  Afterlife  of  the  Ghetto  

Abstract:  Almost  a  century  after  the  dissolution  of  the  Ghetto,  and  just  about  30  years  after  the  unification  of  Italy  into  a  modern  nation  state  and  the  Jewish  Emancipation  that  included  the  Jews  among  its  citizens  —  Israel  Zangwill  published  a  novel  about  the  Jewish  immigrants  flooding  into  London’s  East  End.  Children  of  the  Ghetto:  a  study  of  a  peculiar  people  (1892),  was  at  once  fiction,  social  critique,  and  ethnography.  In  its  title  Zangwill  underlined  the  relationship  of  the  experience  of  these  new  inhabitants  of  England  to  their  Italian  ancestors,  who  in  1516  had  been  segregated  in  a  Venetian  campo  that  had  once  served  as  the  city’s  foundry.  As  we  read  this  novel  today,  we  can  see  Zangwill  at  the  end  of  the  nineteenth  century  using  the  Ghetto’s   history   to   help   him   think   through   the   spaces   in   which   Jews   live.   As   he   traces   the   lives   of   this  “peculiar  people,”   in  his   fiction,  he  brings   the  question  of  what  constitutes  Modern   Jewish  Spaces   to   the  forefront.   Children   of   the   Ghetto:   Zangwill’s   title   announced   his   intention   to   explore   how   the   Ghetto  experience  had  shaped  these  new  English  residents,  who  came  from  Eastern  Europe  and  Russia.  Instead  of  “Pale  of   Settlement,”   the   term   for   the   residence  of   the   Jews   in  Eastern  Europe  and  Russia,  he   turned   to  Venetian  Jewish  history  and  the  Venetian/Italian  language  to  designate  what  the  Jews  had  become  in  their  long   European   exile.   In   Zangwill’s   view,   the  Ghetto  —   the   defining   space   of  Modern   Jewish   life   and   the  psychological  power  to  dream  it  generated  -­‐-­‐  was  the  key  to  the  possibilities  of  modern  Jewish  experience.  “People  who  have  been  living  in  a  Ghetto  for  a  couple  of  centuries,”  Zangwill  points  out,  “are  not  able  to  step  outside  merely  because  the  gates  are  thrown  down,  nor  to  efface  the  brands  on  their  souls  by  putting  off  the  yellow  badges.  The  isolation  imposed  from  without  will  have  come  to  seem  the  law  of  their  being.”  (Proem,  Children  of  the  Ghetto,  p.  x.)  The  Jews  have  been  made  other  by  the  Ghetto:  the  consequences  of  the  Venice  Ghetto,  devised   in  1516  and  mostly   still   in   force   till   the  unification  of   Italy   in  1870   (and  even  after  in  Rome)  continue  to  define  them.  

 

Lee  Jaffe,  University  of  California  at  Santa  Cruz,  USA  

Title:  The  Jewish  Anthology  As  A  Jewish  Place:  Creating  a  Forum  for  Negotiating  Jewish  Identity    

Abstract:   Based   on   a   comprehensive   study   of   the   contents   of   more   than   300   anthologies   of   Jewish  literature  in  English,  this  presentation  will  explore  the  role  of  literary  collections  in  the  process  of  identity  formation,   with   a   focus   on   how   the   genre   has   evolved   in   response   to   historical   developments   and   the  needs  of  the  community.  Starting  with  the  earliest  appearance  of  Jewish  literary  anthologies   in  English  at  

the  turn  of  the  20th  century,  this  paper  will  highlight  milestones  in  the  development  of  the  genre  and  share  findings   about   their   correspondence   to   the   historical  moments   that   shaped   them.   The   presentation  will  discuss   the  different   functions  anthology   fills  –   rescue  and   revival,  pedagogic  and  archival,   canonical  and  existential  –  and,  finally,  will  draw  conclusions  about  the  special  role  the  Jewish  anthology  plays  in  creating  a  forum  for  the  contemporary  Jewish  discourse  about  identity.  

 

Dianne  Harris,  University  of  Illinois  at  Urbana-­‐Champaign,  USA  

Title:  Little  White  Houses:  Displaying  Jewish  Identity  in  the  Postwar  American  Home    

Abstract:   In   1959,   the   sociologist   and   rabbi   Albert   I.   Gordon   published   Jews   In   Suburbia,   a   book   that  endeavored   to   help   readers   understand   the   nature   of   Jewish   life   in   the   postwar   United   States.   Gordon  investigated   the   lives   his   subjects   increasingly   led   outside   of   the   cities   that   had   been   home   to   previous  generations  of  U.   S.   Jews.   In   shifting  his   focus   to   the  metropolitan   fringes,  Gordon  was  not   alone.  Many  sociologists  of  the  period  focused  their  studies  on  examinations  of  the  newly  built  suburbs  that  seemed  to  appear  almost  overnight  in  locations  across  the  United  States  after  1945.  What  did  it  mean,  they  all  asked,  to  leave  behind  extended  families   living  in   inner-­‐city  brownstones  and  apartment  buildings  for  a   life   lived  without  in-­‐laws  in  a  house  of  one’s  own?  What  did  it  mean  to  leave  ethnically-­‐identified  neighborhoods  in  favor  of  suburbs  that  were  often  restricted—through  a  variety  of  practices—to  whites  alone?  In  this  paper,  as   in   my   recently   published   book,     Little   White   Houses:   How   the   Postwar   Home   Constructed   Race   in  America,   I   study   the   relationships   that   existed   between   various   forms   of   whiteness—including   that  formulated   in  connection  to  Jews—and  ordinary  houses.  Following  Stuart  Hall’s  assertion  that  racism   is  a  “structure  of  knowledge  and  representations”  that  are  based  on  ideas  about  and  that  are  used  to  generate  understandings  of  a   fixed   ‘us’   in  opposition   to  and   in  a   separate   space   from   ‘them,”   I   examine   the  ways  textual   and   visual   representations   of   ordinary   postwar   houses   continuously   and   reflexively   created,   re-­‐created,   and   reinforced   midcentury   notions   about   racial,   ethnic,   and   class   identities—specifically,   the  rightness  of  associating  white  identities  with  homeownership  and  citizenship.  By  looking  carefully  at  house  form,   the  material   culture   of   postwar   domesticity,   and   at   representations   of   house   form,   I   examine   the  ways   in   which   postwar   domestic   environments   became   powerful   ciphers   for   whiteness,   affluence,  belonging,  and  a  sense  of  permanent  stability  in  the  years  between  1945  and  1960.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002:  

Jewish  Literature  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Modern  Jewish  Spaces  2  

Organizer:  Murray  Baumgarten  

Chair:  Murray  Baumgarten  

 

Lisa  Silverman,  University  of  Wisconsin-­‐Milwaukee,  USA  

Title:  Vienna’s  Jewish  Geography:  Imagining  the  Leopoldstadt  

Abstract:  The  Jewish  population  was  never  evenly  distributed  throughout  Vienna,  but  by  1934,  when  Jews  inhabited  nearly  every  one  of  interwar  Vienna’s  21  districts,  nearly  half  of  the  city’s  Jewish  population  still  resided   in  only   three  of   them.   In   the   Leopoldstadt,  however,   they   formed  almost  30%  of   the  population  before   1938   –   and   the   persistence   of   the   Leopoldstadt   as   Vienna’s   “Jewish   space”   served   a   purpose   for  both   Jews   and   non-­‐Jews,   then   as   now.   Through   analysis   of   the   oral   and   written   testimony   of   Austrian  Jewish  émigrés,  this  paper  explores  Jews’  affective  responses  to  the  city  in  response  to  their  historical  –  and  personal  –  exclusion   from   it.  Recognizing   their  deep   investment  not  only   in   the  city’s  history,  but  also   its  geography,   can   help   us   draw   a  map   of   Jewish   Vienna   that   includes   not   only  where   Jews   lived,   but   also  points   to   its   “Jewish-­‐coded”  physical   spaces  and  how   these   shaped   its   legibility   to  both   Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  Austrians.  Focusing  on  how  Jews  remember  past  experiences  in  relationship  to  the  city’s  geography  renders   visible   the   contours   of   the   Jewish   and   other   social   codings   that   ordered   the   city’s   districts,   the  exclusionary  practices  that  shaped  Vienna’s  urban  landscape,  and  the  power  relationships   involved  in  the  development  of  Vienna’s  built  environment.  As  this  presentation  will  demonstrate,  it  was  not  only  Vienna’s  cultural  heritage  that  formed  the  basis  of  Jews’  attachment  to  the  city,  but  also  its  geography.  

 

Peter  Kenez,  University  of  California,  Santa  Cruz,  USA  

Title:  Jewish  Budapest,  1900  

Abstract:  Visitors  to  Budapest  are  sometimes  surprised  that  the  city  that  has  probably  fewer  than  80,000  Jews  also  contains  the  largest  synagogue  in  Europe  and  one  of  the  largest  in  the  world.  The  explanation  can  be  found  in  history.  This  building,  constructed  in  the  middle  of  the  19th  century,  and  seats  3000  people,  is  a  memorial   to   the  enormously  successful  and  optimistic   Jewry  of  19th  century  Hungary.  At   the   turn  of   the  19th  and  20th  centuries  Budapest  was  the  fastest  growing  city  in  Europe  and  one  quarter  of  the  population  was  Jewish.   Jews   lived   in  distinct  parts  of  the  city:   the  richest  among  them  in  the  5th  district,   the  middle  classes  around  the  largest  boulevard  in  the  7th  district  and  the  poorest,  mostly  Orthodox  around  Sip,  utca,  Dob   utca   and   Weselenyi   utca.   The   Budapest   Jewry   was   unique;   its   history   was   full   of   paradoxes   and  contradictions.   Nowhere   did   Jews   come   closer   to   dominating   the   economy   and   cultural   life   of   a   nation,  nowhere  did  Jews  play  a  more  crucial  role  in  the  leadership  of  Marxist  socialism  and  nowhere  was  the  gap  wider  between  the  assimilated  and  the  Orthodox.  It   is  precisely  this  uniqueness  that  makes  the  Budapest  Jewry   an   excellent   case   study,   for   here   in   a   particularly   clear   form  we   can   see   the   different   sources   of  resurgent  20th  century  antisemitism.  The  explanation   for   the  uniqueness  of   the  Budapest   Jewry  must  be  sought   at   the   peculiarities   of   19th   century   Hungarian   society.   The   country,   a   part   of   the   Habsburg  Monarchy,  was  dominated  by  Hungarian  feudal  nobility,  ruling  over  a  multinational  peasantry.  The  nobles,  unwilling  and  unable  to  take  the  building  of   industry  and  commerce   in  their  own  hands  but   interested   in  modernization,   were   glad   to   leave   to   the   Jews   that   task.   Since   the   Jews   were   happy   to   use   the  opportunities  offered,  they  came  to  be  enthusiastic  Hungarians  Nationalists,  unlike  anywhere  in  the  world,  were   glad   to   have   the   Jews   as   allies.   The   Budapest   Jewry,   highly   acculturated,   was   different   from   their  Western  European  coreligionists.  In  Western  Europe  the  native  middle  classes  were  quite  able  to  carry  out  the  various  tasks  that  we  associate  with  modernization.  The  Jews  nowhere  in  Western  Europe  dominated  the   economy.   Those   who   came   to   be   acculturated   thought   of   themselves   as   belonging   to   the   sizeable  middle   classes.   In   Hungary   there   was   no   native  middle   class.   The   Jews   came   to   think   of   themselves   as  Jewish   Hungarians   rather   than  Hungarian   Jews.   Yet,   they   remained   distinct.   The   opportunity   to   join   the  feudal   aristocracy   did   not   exist,   and   to   assimilate   to   the   peasantry   was   not   an   option.   Jews   thought   of  themselves  as  patriotic  Hungarians,  and  yet  they  remained  distict.  

 

Michael  Shapiro,  Loyola  University  of  Chicago,  USA  

Title:  Shylock's  House:  Theatrical  Representations  of  Jewish  Space  

Abstract:   In   Shakespeare's   time,   before   the   introduction   of   scenic   design,   interior   spaces   were   usually  indicated   by   portable   properties,   language,   activity,   and   perhaps  music.   Even   after   the   heyday   of   scenic  design,   the   two   short   scenes   in   the  Merchant   of   Venice   which   are   set   inside   Shylock's   house   were   not  enough   to   justify   elaborate   scenic,   although   the   exterior   of   his   house   could   be   so   represented.   More  recently,   in   filmed  and  televised  productions,   the   inside  of  Shylock's  house   is  seen,  and  thus  needs  to  be  marked  in  some  way  as  Jewish  space,  as  can  be  seen  in  several  recent  productions,  such  as  those  starring  Pacino,  Olivier  and  Goodman.  

 

Noam  Gil,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Burden  of  Identity  -­‐  On  Holocaust  Survivors  in  the  City  

Abstract:   In  my  paper   I   intend   to  discuss   the  cultural   significance  of   the   Jewish  Holocaust   survivor   in   the  reshaping   of   postmodern   identity   in   post   Holocaust   urban   America.   By   discussing   two   novels   by   two  European  emigrants,   Isaac  Bashevis   Singer's   "Enemies,   a   Love  Story"   (1966)  and  Edgar  Hilsenrath's   "Fuck  America"  (1980),  I  will  examine  the  survivor’s  gradual  subversion  of  his  per-­‐determined  national,  religious  and  communal  identities.  In  each  one  of  the  texts  the  city  and  the  urban  environment  have  a  double  and  seemingly  contradictory  effect  on  the  survivors’  lives:  as  an  obstacle  and  an  opportunity  at  the  same  time.  The  multiplying  sounds,  languages,  faces  and  architectures  seem  at  first  to  be  a  threat  to  the  protagonist’s  existence  but   later  on  provide   the  means   for   the  survivor’s   radical   liberation.  As  an  eternal  outsider,   the  survivor's  past  experiences  correlate   to   the  current  urban   life  as   these  two  periods  and  surroundings  are  constantly   juxtaposed.   This   juxtaposition   creates   a   conscious   desire   in   the   protagonist’s   psyche   for  anonymity,  as  an   immediate   reaction   to   the  unavoidable   identity  which  was   forced  upon  him  during   the  war  in  Europe,  identity  which  was  tattooed  on  Jewish  arms,  marked  on  Jewish  clothes,  painted  on  Jewish  shops   and   embedded   on   Jewish   lives.   In   reading   the   two   narratives   in   relation   to   the  writings   of   urban  theorists   such  as  Edward  Soja   and  Richard  Sennet,   I  will   examine   the  American   city   in   correlation   to   the  Jewish   survivor.  My  main   claim   is   that   the   protagonists   I   am  writing   about,   Singer's  Herman  Broder   and  Hilsenrath's   Jakob   Bronsky,   are   literary   models   that   offer,   in   their   life   stories,   a   new   set   of   human  relationships,  personal  behavioral  characteristics  and  private  day  to  day  procedures  that  are  emblematic  to  the  deviant  city’s  schizoid  features.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003:  

Book  History:  Post-­‐Medieval  Manuscripts  and  Printing  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Gila  Prebor,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   Post-­‐Medieval   Hebrew   Manuscripts   –   A   Case   Study:   The   Manuscript   Collection   of   the   Séminaire  Israélite  de  France  

Abstract:  It  is  noteworthy  that  most  of  the  research  into  Hebrew  manuscripts  has  focused  on  manuscripts  written  until  1540.  The  Hebrew  Palaeography  Project,  which  has  been  active   for  approximately  50  years,  has   produced   a   typology   of  Hebrew  manuscripts.   This   immense   project   has   only   dealt  with  manuscripts  written  until  1540.  It  is  difficult  to  give  a  precise  figure  of  the  number  of  surviving  Hebrew  manuscripts,  but  it   is   estimated   to   be   between   seventy   and   eighty   thousand   volumes.   Approximately   half   of   these  manuscripts   were   written   in   the   Middle   Ages,   while   the   remainder   date   from   the   17th   to   the   20th  centuries.   Research   into   post-­‐medieval   manuscripts   could   open   a   new   world   of   manuscripts   that   has  hitherto   not   been   systematically   researched   as   a   corpus,   with   only   individual   manuscripts   having   been  examined  on  a  limited  basis.  How  many  works  were  composed  in  this  period?  Are  these  original  works  or  copies   of   older   works   from   other  manuscripts   or   even   from   printed   books?  What   types   of   works   were  hand-­‐written   in   this   period   and   for   what   purpose?   To   these   questions   and   others   we   do   not   yet   have  answers.  The  manuscript  collection  of  the  Séminaire  Israélite  de  France  includes  a  number  of  manuscripts  from  the  Middle  Ages  but  most  of  the  collection  consists  of  relatively  later  manuscripts  from  the  17th,  18th,  19th,  and  even  20th  centuries.  This  collection  can  be  used  as  a  case  study  to  demonstrate  the  importance  of   post-­‐medieval   manuscripts   and   stress   the   need   to   continue   the   work   of   the   Hebrew   Palaeography  Project.  

 

Vered  Tohar,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   The  Contribution  of   the  Portuguese  Printer,  Avraham  Usque,   to   the  Production   and  Distribution  of  Hebrew  Books  in  the  16th  Century  

Abstract:  Although  the  printing  shop  of  Avraham  Usque  in  Ferrara,  Italy  operated  for  only  five  years,  1553-­‐1558,   his  workshop   published   important  works   that   had   a  major   impact   on   the   Jewish  world   and   left   a  literary   mark   on   later   collections.   Usque   came   to   Ferrara   from   Portugal,   and   according   to   scholars’  assumptions,  he  was  a  converso  who  fled  the  horrors  of  the  Inquisition,  and  like  many  other  Anusim  in  his  day,  managed  to  build  a  new  life  in  Italy.  Usque’s  most  important  publishing  venture,  the  one  that  brought  him  fame,  was  the  translation  of  the  Bible  into  Spanish  for  the  use  of  Spanish  speakers,  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  alike.   Ironically,  although  he  saw  himself  as   serving  both   Jews  and  Gentiles,  his  printing   shop  was  closed  down  when  someone  informed  on  him  for  printing  an  elegy  composed  by  Jacob  of  Fano  to  commemorate  the  tragic  burning  of  the  twenty-­‐four  Anusim  of  Ancona  in  1555.  The  purpose  of  the  lecture  is  to  present  Usque's  achievements  and  his  contribution  to  the  world  of  the  Hebrew  book  in  light  of  the  fact  that  he  was  a   multicultural   person   who   travelled   between   the   Christian   and   the   Jewish   worlds,   and   Between   the  Ashkenazi   and   the   Sephardi   Jewish   Cultures.   His   literary   works,   especially   his   well-­‐known   Hebrew   story  anthology   called   'Hibbur   ha-­‐Ma'asiot'   demonstrate   the   contacts   between   the   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish  cultures  and  present  Usque's  influence  on  the  conservation  and  dissemination  of  the  Hebrew  story.  

 

Chanan  Yitzchaki,  Efrata  Academic  College  for  Teacher  Training  

Title:  Printing  Jewish  Books  during  the  Printing  Dacree  in  Russia  

Abstract:  One   of   the  most   famous   commentaries   on   the   "Shulchan  Aruch"   is   'Pitchey   Teshuva'   by   Rabbi  Avraham   Tzvi   Eisenstat   (Lithuania,   1815-­‐1868).   The   second   part   of   the   book   (Even   Ha'ezer)  was   printed  without  mentioning  the  publisher's  name,  printing  place  or  printing  date.  At  the  first  part  of  the  lecture  we  will  try  to  find  out  who  the  publisher  was,  and  when  and  where  the  book  was  published.    The  second  part  

will   deal   with  more   important   question:  What   was   the   part   of   the   Russian   censor   on   the   fact   that   the  publisher  had  to  hide  his  name,  address  and  the  date  of  printing.  

 

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

The  Arab  in  Israeli  Literature  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  

 

Geula  Elimelekh,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Exile  in  the  Works  of  a  Muslim  Writer  and  a  Jewish  One:  'Abd  Al-­‐Rahman  Munif  and  Samir  Naqqash  

Abstract:   "Exile"   is   an   ancient   word   evoking   harsh   connotations   of   suffering,   anxiety,   uprootedness,  alienation,   dislocation,   etc.   Human   history   shows   that   exile   –   voluntary   or   imposed   –   is   not   limited   to  individuals   from  particular  national  or   religious  communities,  but   is  a   fate   that   can  befall   all  humans,   for  various   reasons   –   social,   political,   cultural   or   economic.   Exiles   from   all   backgrounds   undergo   similar  experiences  and   suffer   similar  anguish.  This   lecture  will   deal  with   the   theme  of  exile   in   the  works  of   the  Saudi  writer   'Abd   Al-­‐Rahman  Munif   (1933-­‐2004)   and   the   Iraqi-­‐born   Jewish  writer   Samir   Naqqash   (1938-­‐2004),  both  of  whom  wrote   in  Arabic.   I  will   show  that  exile  has   similar  meanings  and   implications   in   the  works  of  both  these  writers.  Naqqash,  who  immigrated  to  Israel  in  1951,  describes  the  trauma  experienced  by  himself,  his  family  and  many  other  Iraqi  Jews  who  emigrated  from  Iraq  to  the  state  of  Israel  shortly  after  its   establishment.   These   Jews   left   Iraq   and   gave   up   their   Iraqi   citizenship   in   order   to   realize   the   dream  shared   by   every   Diaspora   Jew   for   almost   2,000   years,   namely   to   live   in   the   Promised   Land.   Tragically,  however,  many   of   them  discovered   that   assimilating   into   Israeli   society  meant   giving   up   their   language,  culture  and  their  traditional  Jewish  way  of  life.  Torn  from  their  roots,  they  found  life  in  Israel  to  be  nothing  but  a  new  form  of  exile,  much  worse  than  their  "exile"  in  Iraq.  Naqqash's  decision  to  write  in  Arabic,  rather  than   Hebrew,   indicates   how   deeply   connected   he   was   to   the   Arab   and   Iraqi   culture,   and   reflects   the  alienation  he  felt  in  his  new  homeland.  Naqqash,  then,  describes  a  situation  of  exile  within  exile,  namely  a  situation  of  complete  hopelessness,  with  no  way  out.  I  focus  on  Naqqash's  stories  from  the  anthologies  “I”  and   “They”   and   “Ambivalence”   and   “The   Day   the   World   Became   Pregnant“   and   “Miscarried”.   'Abd   Al-­‐Rahman  Munif  was  also  an  exiled   intellectual,   and  many  of  his  protagonists  are  exiles  as  well.  His  works  present  the  theme  of  exile   from  a  somewhat  different  perspective  than  those  of  Naqqash:  he  focuses  on  the  persecution,  oppression  and   lack  of   freedom  in  the  Arab  world,  which  drive  his  protagonists   to   leave  their  homeland.  (It  should  be  mentioned  that  the  Iraqi  Jews  suffered  persecution  and  oppression  as  well  in  the   years   preceding   their   emigration   to   Israel,   especially   in   the   1940s;   however,   that   is   not   the   focus   of  Naqqash's  works).  Like  Naqqash's  protagonists,  many  of  Munif's  characters  try  to  settle  in  other  countries,  but   often   fail   to   assimilate,   because   the   host   society   refuses   to   accept   them   and/or   because   they  themselves   feel   a   constant   sense   of   alienation.   I   focus   on   three   of   Munif's   novels:   The   Trees   and   the  Murder  of  Marzouq,  East  of  the  Mediterranean,  and  Here  and  Now  or  East  of  the  Mediterranean  Revisited.  Like  Munif  himself,  the  protagonists  of  these  novels  are  all  exiles  in  some  sense:  all  of  them  are  on  the  run,  

either  from  their  homeland  or  within  it,  and  they  are  constantly  on  the  move,  whether  by  choice  or  out  of  coercion.   Their   sense  of  dislocation  and  homelessness   is   accompanied  by   feelings  of   fear   and  alienation,  estrangement  and   isolation,  which  afflict   them  even  within   the  confines  of   their   community,   their   family  and   their   own   souls.   They   suffer   from   a   lack   of   inner   calm,   since   dislocation   and   homelessness   are   the  antithesis  of  wholeness  and  harmony.  This  sense  of  dislocation   is  a  universal  condition  that  characterizes  not  only  Munif's  and  Naqqash's  characters  but  modern  man  at  large.  

 

Heidy-­‐Margrit  Müller,  Vrije  Universiteit  Brussel  (VUB),  Brussels,  Belgium  

Title:  Re-­‐Interpreting  Trauma  in  Literary  Memoirs  Written  by  Jewish  Authors  from  Egypt  

Abstract:   Decennia   after   leaving   Egypt,   Jewish   writers   started   to   write   down   their   memoirs   about   their  childhood  and  youth.  Though  each  author  has  his  or  her  own  stylistic  and  topical  preferences,  there  are  a  few  central  problems  that  are  dealt  with  in  all  of  these  autobiographical  novels:  Alterity,  Loneliness,  Fear,  Forced  Exile,  Deprivation,  Pain  and  Trauma.  A  comparative  approach  can  unveil,  what  mental  strategies  and  ideological   constructions   help   the   fictional   storytellers   to   cope   with   their   multi-­‐layered   traumatic  experience  of  uprooting,  displacement  or  exile.  

 

Èlia  Romo-­‐Terol,  Universitat  de  Barcelona,  Spain  

Title:  Shlomo  Alkurdi:  Samir  Naqqash's  Struggle  with  Identity  in  a  Convergence  of  Cultures  

Abstract:  Samir  Naqqash  was  an  interesting  author  from  the  perspective  of  the  cultural  studies  and  also  an  example  of  how  initially  confronted  elements  can  conform  an  identity.  In  his  last  novel  he  presented  the  life  of   Shlomo  Alkurdi,   a   Jewish   Kurd,   throughout   the   political   and   historical   developments   of   the   twentieth  century   in   the  Asia  Minor   region.  The  novel,   although   it   is  not  autobiographical,  expresses  Naqqash  own  struggles  and  the  main  subjects  of  identity  he  had  to  deal  with  in  a  personal  and  a  professional  way.  In  his  work,  both  the  form  and  the  content  are  telling  us  about  these  political  struggles,  for  he  made  the  choice  of  writing  in  Arabic  language,  a  choice  that  would  lead  to  his  own  alienation  in  Israel.  The  transformation  and  tagging   of   a   person   through   the   constant   changes   of   the   surrounding   political   power   is   the   lead   of   this  novel  that  does  not  only  shows  us  the  construction  of  the  identity  of  the  main  character  but  what  concerns  Samir  Naqqash,  that  is  the  idea  of  losing  the  identity.    In  this  paper  we  will  focus  our  analysis  on  how  Samir  Naqqash  expresses  the  elements  of  the  loss  of  the  identity  throughout  complex  political  scenarios,  nations  fighting   against   nations,   different   languages,   the   identification   with   the   others   and   the   distinction   from  them.  

 

Jordi  Casals,  Universitat  de  Barcelona,  Spain  

Title:  Aharon  Almog:  Oriental  Aspects  of  the  Literary  Production  of  a  Third-­‐Generation  Israeli  

Abstract:  Our   author,   Aharon  Almog,   a   third-­‐generation   Israeli   from   a   Yemeni   family,   saw   a   great  world  changes  and  he  hadn't  the  perception  of  identification  to  that  modern  society.  Through  his  literary  talent,  the   author   turns   into   a   tool   that   adapts  his   cultural  world   to  his   literary  necessities.  He   took  part   in   the  movement  of  young  Yemenite  Hebrew  poetry  in  Israel  and  the  way  to  write  his  protest  writings  against  the  injusticies  was  the  poetry.  However,  at  the  end  of  his  career  he  left  it  aside  because  it  lost  its  efficacy.  The  objective  of   this   session   is   to   know  how  Almog   reflects   the   social   group  of   the   "mizrahim"   in  his   literary  production,  if  their  presence  is  implicit  or  explicit  in  his  work  and  what  the  vision  of  the  author  was  towards  his  own  group  of  oriental  Jews  in  Israel.  

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  14  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  From  the  Synagogue  to  the  Market  Place:  Aspects  of  Medieval  Jewish  Piety  in  Christian  Europe  

Organizer:  Judah  Galinsky  

 

Chair:  Susan  Einbinder  

 

Judah  Galinsky,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Between  the  Shma  and  the  Credo:  Understanding  Jewish  Religious  Practice  in  Medieval  Ashkenaz  

Abstract:  One  of  the  more  difficult   tasks  of  the  historian  studying  earlier  societies   is   trying  to  understand  the   basic   beliefs   and   ideals   that   inspired   the   religious   devotion   of   the   people.   Much   of   the   surviving  materials   from   medieval   times   reflect   the   belief   systems   of   the   elite   but   rarely   those   of   the   common  person,  man  and  woman.  One  possible  avenue  to  explore   in  attempting  to  get  at  the  central  beliefs   is  to  examine  the  basic  prayers  of  the  religion.  It  was  the  liturgy,  especially  those  prayers  that  were  formulated  in   a   straightforward  manner,   which   bound   the   learned   and   unlearned   together   and   created   a   common  religious   language.   In  my  paper   I  will   suggest   that   the   three   sections  of   the  Shma,   as  understood  by   the  medieval  commentators,  allow  us  to  better  understand  the  medieval  religious  world  view  of  French  Jews  and  help  us  to  identify  the  ideological  roots  of  their  piety.  

 

Sarit  Shalev-­‐Eyni,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Between  Synagogue  and  Church:  The  Aural-­‐Visual  Prayer  Experience  in  Medieval  Ashkenaz  

Abstract:  The  general  construction  boom  in  the  Rhine  valley  and  other  German  areas  led  to  the  erection  of  stone  synagogues   .These  were  built   in  close  proximity   to   local  churches   in   the  town  centers,  where   Jews  habitually   lived  at   that   time.  Although   these   structures  were  always  modest   in   size  and  shape  compared  with  the  magnificent  contemporary  cathedrals  and  churches,  they  shared  similar  architectonic  values.  And  yet,  as  we  shall  see,  their  inner  design  was  based  on  an  ancient  Jewish  tradition,  which  was  foreign  to  local  schemes  and  befitted  a  different  aural-­‐visual  prayer  experience,  rooted   in  a  non-­‐Western  worldview.  The  contrast   between   the   plans   of   the   interiors   of   Christian   and   Jewish  worship   spaces   reflects   an   essential  difference   in   the   nature   of   the   prayer   service   and   its   vocal   results,   though   the   diffusion   of   attitude  prevalent  in  the  general  society  had  also  an  effect.  This  paper  strives  to  combine  some  sparse  testimonies  left  in  written  and  visual  sources,  together  with  a  few  remnants  of  synagogue  architecture  of  the  time,  into  a  mosaic  of  spoken  words,  voices,  and  sights  that  will  enable  us  to  suggest  a  partial  reconstruction  of  the  aural-­‐visual  experience   that   comprised   the   ritual  domain  of  medieval  Ashkenaz  between   the   twelfth  and  mid-­‐fourteenth  centuries  

 

Adam  Davis,  Denison  University,  USA  

Title:  Comparing  the  Charitable  Impulse  of  Medieval  Jews  and  Christians  in  Northern  Europe  

Abstract:   During   the   12th   and   13th   centuries,   Latin   Christendom  experienced   a   charitable   revolution,   as  new  charitable  religious  orders  were  established  and  hundreds  of  leprosaria  and  hospitals  were  founded  to  house  the  sick  and  poor.  There  remains  a  need  to  examine  how  medieval  Jews  experienced  and  responded  to   this  new  charitable  activity  among  the  Christian   laity  and   flowering  of  Christian  charitable   institutions.  This   paper   will   explore   the   religious   and   cultural   meaning   of   charitable   giving   for   medieval   Jews   and  Christians   in   12th   and   13th-­‐century   northern   Europe.   How   familiar   were   Jews   and   Christians   with   each  other’s'   charitable   practices,   and   how   did   these   two   religious   cultures   of   charity   compare   with   one  another?  In  particular,  this  paper  will  address  Jewish  and  Christian  perspectives  on  coerced  charity,  on  the  categories   of   the   "deserving   and   undeserving   poor,"   and   on   the   relative   importance   of   a   giver's   reward  (including  the  role  of  the  giver's  intentions)  versus  a  gift's  impact  on  its  recipient.  This  comparative  analysis  will  be  based  on  a  close  reading  of  medieval  rabbinic  responsa  and  the  writings  of  Christian  theologians  and  canon   lawyers,   as  well   as   Christian   and   Jewish   exempla   (Jacques   de  Vitry,   Caesarius   of  Heisterbach,   and  material  from  Sefer  Hasidim).  

 

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Jews  in  the  City,  Three  Case  Studies  from  Late  Medieval  Regensburg  

Organizer:  Eva  Haverkamp  

 

Chair:  Eva  Haverkamp  

 

Eva  Haverkamp,  Ludwig-­‐Maximilians-­‐University  Munich,  Germany  

Title:  Introduction  into  the  Panel  "Jews  in  the  City,  Three  Case  Studies  from  Late  Medieval  Regensburg"  

Abstract:   The   introduction   into   the   panel   "Jews   in   the   City,   three   case   studies   from   late   medieval  Regensburg"  will  provide  the  questions  about  the  different  realms  of  communications  between  Jews  and  Christians  in  the  city  of  Regensburg,  and  in  their  larger  contexts  in  medieval  Bavaria  and  the  Empire.  

 

M.A.  Astrid  Riedler-­‐Pohlers,  Ludwig-­‐Maximilians-­‐University  Munich,  Germany  

Title:  Jewish  and  Christian  Physicians  in  Late  Medieval  Regensburg  

Abstract:   The   relationship   between   Jewish   and   Christian   physicians   will   be   discussed   regarding   central  questions  as   for   instance   the  knowledge  each  group  had  about   the  other.  How  was   this  knowledge  used  

and  applied   to   in  everyday   life?  Are   there   topics  both  groups  had   in   common,  did   they  differ   in   treating  them?  Other  aspects  which  sources  reveal  concern  medical  fees,  patients,  medical  qualifications,  patients  and  treatments.  

 

Sophia  Schmitt,  Ludwig-­‐Maximilians-­‐University  Munich,  Germany  

Title:  Networks  in  Regensburg  around  1476  

Abstract:   Evoked  by   the   ritual  murder   trial   in  Trent   in  1475   the   city   council  of  Regensburg   tried   to  press  similar  charges  against  their  Jewish  community  in  1476  which  led  to  years  of  trial   involving  different  local  powers   such   as   the  bishop,   the   city   council   and   the  duke  of  Bavaria   as  well   as   the  emperor.   The  events  following   the   accusations   reveal   the   complex   relationships   between   and   among   Jews   and   Christians   on  different  levels  and  intensity  also  in  wider  geographic  dimensions.  These  formal  and  informal  networks  will  be   analysed,   their   connection   will   be   emphasized   and   evaluated   with   regard   to   the   ritual   murder  accusations.  Conclusions  can  be  drawn  concerning  these  networks  in  general  and  regarding  the  integration  of  Jews  in  these  structures.  

 

Veronika  Nickel,  Ludwig-­‐Maximilians-­‐University  Munich,  Germany  

Title:  The  expulsion  of  the  Jews  from  Regensburg  in  1519  

Abstract:  The  expulsion  of  the  Jews  from  Regensburg  -­‐  starting  on  February  the  21st  1519  and  accomplished  within  a  few  days  -­‐  marked  the  end  of  one  of  the  oldest  medieval  kehillot  in  Germany.    

In   contrast   to  most  other   communities,   the  Regensburg  kehilla  had  never  experienced  any  eviction   from  the   city   before.   The   decision   of   the   Regensburg   city   council   to   expel   the   Jews   was   in   a   way   abrupt.  Nevertheless,  over  several  years  the  town  councils  had  undertaken  various  efforts  to  diminish  the  Jewish  community  or  force  them  to  leave.  Most  of  these  efforts  were  carried  out  on  a  judicial  basis,  more  precisely  before  the  imperial  courts  which  at  the  end  of  1519  declared  the  expulsion  illegal.  This  long-­‐winded  process  opens  not  only  a  deep  insight  into  the  relations  between  Jews  and  Christians  in  Regensburg  but  also  in  to  the  ways  of  juridical  interaction  between  city  council,  Jews  and  the  emperor.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session:  003:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Rethinking  the  Boundaries  of  the  Jewish  Neighborhood:  Medieval  and  Early  Modern  Times  

Organizer:  Simha  Goldin,  The  Goldstein-­‐Goren  Diaspora  Research  Center,  Tel  Aviv  University  

 

Chair:  john  Tolan  

 

Simha  Goldin,  The  Goldstein-­‐Goren  Diaspora  Research  Center,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Boundaries  of  the  Jewish  Community:  Jewish  Perceptions  of  their  Environment  

Abstract:  My  lecture  will  focus  on  the  question  of  the  manner  in  which  Jews  perceived  the  Christian  cities  in  which   they   lived.  A   traditional   view   is   that   Jews  of   the  Diaspora   longed   for   the   Land  of   Israel,   saw   their  sojourn   in   exile   as   a   decree   from   Heaven,   and   of   a   temporary   nature,   and   therefore   may   not   have  established  a  deep  connection  with  the  city  and  its  space.  In  reality,  the  Jews  of  medieval  Europe  were  very  firmly  rooted  in  the  physical  and  social  fabric  of  the  Christian  towns  in  which  they  lived.  While  I  am  by  no  means   trying   to   claim   that   the   Jews   identified   only   with   their   physical   surroundings   and   forgot   their  yearnings  for  the  Land  of  Israel,  there  are  nevertheless  many  expressions  of  propinquity  between  the  Jews  and  their  physical  surroundings,  and  my  lecture  will  explore  and  analyze  them.  

 

Merav  Schnitzer,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Jewelry  Connection:  Tracing  Jewish  Women  in  the  Medieval  City.  

Abstract:   Jewish  women's   practices   of   adornments   in  Medieval   Ashkenaz  were   debated   by   the   Halachic  sages   of   the   period;   these   debates   provide   us   a   new   perspective   on  women's   daily   life   in   the  medieval  cities.   In   my   lecture   I   will   follow   these   new   perspectives:   the   role   of   jewelry   and   ornaments   in   Jewish  women's  life,  the  influence  of  their  Christian  neighbors  and  the  conflicts  between  the  role  of  Fashion  and  the  role  of  Halacha.  

 

Naomi  Feuchtwanger-­‐Sarig,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Wedding  Rites  and  Customs  in  Ashkenaz:  The  Christian  Perspective  

Abstract:  Jewish  life  in  the  urban  setting  in  Europe  offered  daily  interaction  between  Jews  and  Christians  on  every  level,  resulting  in  mutual  exposure  to  rites  and  customs.  This  paper  will  examine  these  interactions  as  seen   from   the   Christian   prism   through   the   Middle   Ages   and   Early   Modern   period,   taking   the   Jewish  wedding  as  a  point-­‐in-­‐case.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Rethinking  the  Boundaries  of  the  Jewish  Neighborhood:  Medieval  and  Early  Modern  Times  2  

Organizer:  Simha  Goldin,  The  Goldstein-­‐Goren  Diaspora  Research  Center,  Tel  Aviv  University  

 

Chair:  john  Tolan  

 

Joseph  Isaac  Lifshitz,  Tel  Aviv  University  and  the  Shalem  College,  Israel  

Title:   The   Church   and   Laws   of   Jewish   Ritual   in   the   Development   of   the   Jewish   Street:   A   Symbiotic  Relationship  

Abstract:  The  symbiotic   relationship  between  Jews  and  the  German  society   is  evident,   though  we  do  not  know  the  extent  of   that   interdependence.  Regardless  of  difference  of   lifestyle  and  religion,   the  mundane  and   the  necessities  of   life  created   friendships.  But  as  Yaakov  Katz  has  claimed,  difference  of   religion  was  not  always  strictly  an  obstacle  between  the  two  groups.  Laws  of  the  Sabbath  were  also  an  influence  on  the  relationship.   In  my  paper   I  will   show  how   laws  of  Mezuzah   (a  piece  of  parchment   inscribed  with  a  verse  from   the   Torah   and   placed   on   the   side   of   the   door),   and   laws   of   Eruvin   (a   ritual   enclosure   that   Jewish  communities  construct  as  a  way  to  permit  the  carrying  of  objects  outside  the  house  during  the  Sabbath  and  holy   days),   serve   as   a   catalyst   of   symbiosis   between   the   Jews   and   the   non-­‐Jews.   The   Jewish   street  was  actually  property  of  the  bishop,  a  fact  that  was  used  for  leniencies  regarding  laws  of  Mezuzah  and  Eruvin.  

 

Ephraim  Shoham-­‐Steiner,  Ben  Gurion  University,  Israel  

Title:  Reevaluating  the  Role  of  Cologne  in  Medieval  Ashkenaz  

Abstract:  Most  of  the  textbooks  and  most  of  the  scholars  that  have  discussed  medieval  Ashkenaz  tended  to  focus  on  the  SHUM  communities  of  Speyer  Worms  and  Mainz.  With  a  textual  legacy  in  the  forefront,  and  in  the  case  of  Worms  and  Speyer  with  actual  buildings  and   tangible   remains   like   the   famous   "heilige   sand"  cemetery   in   Worms   and   the   remains   of   the   synagogue   and   mikvah   accompanying   the   impressive   and  ancient   literary   legacy   this   scholarly   and   popular   tradition   was,   and   still   is,   followed   by   many.   Cologne  however  is  another  matter  altogether.  Although  it  is  almost  always  referred  to  as  the  older  community,  the  one  with  an  impressive  Roman  legacy  "the  oldest  Jewish  community  north  of  the  Alps"  it  is  nevertheless  in  the   shadow   of   the   SHUM   communities   especially   due   to   the   absence   of   positive   evidence   to   suggest   a  vibrant   intellectual   network   the   like   of   which   we   find   with   regard   to   Mainz   Worms   and   subsequently  Speyer.  Even  once  Cologne  eventually  does  "catch  up"  in  the  thirteenth  century  it  is  quite  clear  that  it  is  an  orbiter  around  the  heavier  and  more  powerful  center  in  the  SHUM  communities.  In  the  proposed  lecture,  reflecting  work   in  progress  based  on  a  collaboration  between  Prof.  Dr.  Elisabeth  Hollender  of  the  Goethe  University  in  Frankfurt  and  Dr.Ephraim  Shoham-­‐Steiner  of  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev  in  Beersheva,  some  preliminary  results  and  some  questions  based  on  textual  research  will  be  made.  These  finds  suggests  that  the  Cologne  Jewish  community  is  indeed  more  ancient  than  the  SHUM  communities  and  is  probably  of  a  different  nature  as  well.  Recent  archeological   finds  have  brought   these  questions   to   the   forefront  of   a  scholarly   debate.   Without   making   a   clear   statement   at   this   point   about   the   controversial   "question   of  continuity"  of  Jewish  life  in  Cologne  from  late  antiquity  and  into  the  middle  ages  it  seems  however  that  the  new  findings  may  indeed  shed  new  light  on  texts  that  have  been  on  scholar's  desktops  from  the  early  days  of  the  Wissenschaft  das  Judentums  and  who  may  now  be  read  differently.  Can  it  be  that  when  the  SHUM  communities  were   first   settled   there  was  already  a   Jewish  community   in  Cologne?   Is   it  possible   that   this  community  was  different  in  nature,  less  scholarly  and  more  layman  in  its  orientation?  Did  it  follow  a  more  northern  French-­‐Lotharingen  tradition  rather  than  a  middle  Rhine  SHUM  based  tradition.  These  are  some  of  the  questions  raised  and  the  suggestions  that  will  be  made  in  the  lecture.  

 

Christoph  Cluse,  Universität  Trier,  Arye  Maimon-­‐Institut  für  Geschichte  der  Juden,  Germany  

Title:  Arithmetics  and  the  Image  of  'Jewish  Usury'  in  Late  Medieval  Germany  

Abstract:   The   paper   will   take   a   fresh   look   at   the   tables   of   compound   interest,   spread   in   south-­‐western  Germany  since  about  the  1460s  both  in  manuscript  and  print,  in  which  the  adverse  effects  of  taking  out  a  loan   from  a   Jewish  moneylender  are  displayed   in  a  drastic   imagery  of  exponentially   growing  amounts  of  

interest.   Its   particular   concern   will   be   about   their   relation   to   the   spread   of   numeracy   and   practical  mathematics  in  this  period.  The  paper  will  present  some  of  these  tables  and  explain  their  imagery  as  well  as  the  arithmetic  behind  them.  In  a  second  step,  I  will   look  at  various  primers  of  reckoning  that  appeared  in  print   during   the   late-­‐15th   through  mid-­‐16th   centuries   and   describe   the  way   in  which   they   taught   about  compound  interest.  Finally,  I  will  consider  whether  these  arithmetic  exempla  were  in  any  way  related  to  the  social  reality  of  the  Jewish  loan  business  in  late-­‐medieval  Germany  (and  propose  that  in  fact  they  were).  

 

Rella  Kushelevsky,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Sefer  ha-­‐Ma'asim  and  the  Medieval  Renaissance:  The  Case  of  'R.  Meir  and  Yehuda  of  Anatot'  

Abstract:  'R.  Meir  and  Yehuda  of  Anatot'  is  one  of  66  tales  in  Sefer  ha  Ma'asim,  an  impressive  and  unique  story  collection  from  13th  c.  France,  still  unpublished.   (A  critical  edition   is  now  being  prepared  by  me  for  publication.)  While  many  of  its  tales  are  known  from  Earlier  Jewish  sources  in  the  Talmud  and  Midrash,  this  one   was   probably   composed   or   at   least   re-­‐worked   in   Medieval   Europe.   Inter-­‐textual   clues   suggest   an  influence  of  Marie  de  France's  fables,  specifically  the  tale  of  the  'Goat  and  the  Wolf'  (no.  89/90),  which  was  probably  mediated  to  the  Jews  through  the  Hebrew  fables  of  her  contemporary,  Berekhyah  ha-­‐Naqdan  (the  Punctuator).   'Beware'  warns  mamma  goat   her   kid.   'Don't   dare   to   open   the  door   for   any   one  while   I   am  away  to  fetch  some  food'.  Her  warning  was  tested  soon  enough,  as  the  wolf  hurried  to  the  house,  trying  to  tempt  the  kid  to   let  him  in.  This  episode  of  Marie  de  France  and  of  Berekhyah  was  reworked  as  a  Jewish  narrative  in  'R.  Meir  and  Yehuda  of  Anatot'  of  Sefer  ha-­‐  Ma'asim,  carrying  a  different  moral.  In  my  talk  I  will  deal  with  these  inter-­‐textuality  affinities  from  the  broader  perspectives  of  the  story  compilation  as  a  whole  and  its  cultural  dialogue  with  the  surrounding  vernacular  literature  in  France.  I  claim  that  sefer  ha-­‐ma'asim  takes  part   in   the  medieval   renaissance   in  Western  Europe,  by  appropriating  this   literature,   responding  to  and  negotiating  with  it  through  two  main  techniques  which  I  intend  to  elaborate  on  and  exemplify.  

 

   

Tuesday  22nd  July  

Room:  15  

 

Session:  001:  

Byzantine  Jewish  Life    

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Jewish  Life  in  Early  Byzantium  

    Organizer:  Nicholas  de  Lange  

 

Chair:  Nicholas  de  Lange  

 

Anastasia  Loudarou,  The  Jewish  Museum  of  Greece,    

Title:   Jews,   Christians   and   Pagans   in   Early   Byzantine   Greece:   Exploring   the   Interrelations   through  Inscriptions:  The  Current  State  of  Research  and  New  Perspectives  

Abstract:   Inscriptions  are  an  important  –  if  not  the  only  –  available  source  of   information  for  the  study  of  the  Jewish  communities  of  Greece  in  the  early  Byzantine  period  (4th  –  6th  c.),  revealing  significant  data  as  to  the  everyday  use  of  the  Greek  language  among  Jews,  their  nomenclature  and  their  religious  and  social  concepts,  reflecting  to  a  greater  or  lesser  extent  the  impact  of  the  external  environment.  This  presentation  examines   and   highlights   briefly   the   available   archaeological   data,   sets   them   in   relation   with   the   legal  documents  of   the  period  and  makes  a   first  attempt  to  draw  some  general  conclusions  on  the   interaction  between  Jews  and  their  external  environment,  while  also  raising  new  research  questions.  

 

Alexander  Panayotov,  Independent  researcher  

Title:  Jewish  Everyday  Life  in  Early  Byzantine  Asia  Minor  and  the  Balkans  

Abstract:  My  paper  will   investigate  the  social,  economic  and  political  developments  in  the  early  Byzantine  Empire   that   influenced   the   structure  of  everyday   life  of   the   Jewish   communities   in  Byzantine  Asia  Minor  and  the  Balkans.  The  scope  of  the  paper  is  defined  temporally  and  spatially.  It  is  proposed  to  begin  in  the  fourth   century   CE   and   end   in   the   eighth   century   CE.   This  will   allow   the   inclusion   of   the  widest   possible  selection   of   epigraphical,   literary   and   archaeological   sources.   I   aim   to   clarify   the   place   the   Jewish  community   occupied  within   the   social   structures   of   Byzantine   society   and  will   focus  my   investigation  on  several   aspects   of   Jewish   everyday   life   such   as   communal   organisation   and   leadership   of   the   Jewish  community,   the   social   status,   occupation   and   cultural   concerns   of   its   members.   Evidence   for   everyday  contacts  between  Jews,  Christians  and  other  religious  and  ethnic  minorities  in  the  areas  concerned  will  also  be  presented.  I  plan  to  go  beyond  the  published  record  and  investigate  unpublished  sources  with  particular  focus   on   the   epigraphical   and   archaeological   evidence.   A   number   of   unpublished   inscriptions   and  archaeological   data   from  Heraklion,   Priene,   Thessalonica,   Corinth,   Argos,   Sparta,   Stobi   and   Chios  will   be  analysed.   Data   from   the   recently   excavated   synagogues   in   Andriake,   the   ancient   port   of   Myra   (Demre,  Turkey),   and  possibly   Limyra   (near  Turunçova,  Turkey),   Saranda   (Albania)   and  Chios   (Greece)  will   also  be  included.  

 

Nicholas  de  Lange,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:  The  Greek  Bible  in  the  Early  Byzantine  Synagogue:  Justinian's  Novella  146  Reconsidered  

Abstract:  Novella  146  of  Justinian  (553  CE)  is  a  key  document  for  studying  various  aspects  of  Jewish  belief  and   practice   in   the   early   Byzantine   period.   However  many   problems   persist.   This   paper   focuses   on   the  vexed   issue   of   the   language   of   scriptural   readings   in   the   synagogue.  We   shall   analyse   the   very   different  interpretations   that   have   been   proposed,   and   offer   an   interpretation   based   on   the  wider   history   of   the  Kulturkampf  between  Greek  and  Hebrew  in  the  Byzantine  synagogue.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session:  002:  

Byzantine  Jewish  Life    

11.00-­‐13.00,  14.00-­‐14.30  

Panel:  Byzantine  Karaite  Culture  

    Organizer:  Nicholas  de  Lange  

 

Chair:  Nicholas  de  Lange  

 

Julia  Krivoruchko,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:  Studying  Hebrew  Bible  in  the  Fourteenth-­‐Century  Byzantium:  New  manuscript  Evidence  

Abstract:   The   paper   aims   to   introduce   to   the   scholarly   public   a   little   known   manuscript   containing   an  anonymous   Hebrew-­‐Greek   glossary   to   Prophets.   The   manuscript   is   severely   damaged   and   contains   no  explicit  data  about  the  provenance  of  the  text  or  its  author(s).  The  analysis  shows  that  the  glosses  originate  from   a   number   of   sources,   from   traditional   Hebrew   biblical   commentaries   to   highly   individualized  reflections   on   local   historical   context.   The   Greek   glosses   are   equally   inhomogeneous,   with   some  continuing\inspired   by   Aquila   and   others   reflecting   contemporaneous   Greek.   On   the   basis   of   the  palaeography  and  codicology  of  the  manuscript,  the  reconstruction  of  the  dialect  and  analysis  of  its  content  it   is   argued   that   the  work,   to   all   probability,   has   been   compiled   by   a   Byzantine   Karaite   that   lived   in   the  Northern   part   of   Asia  Minor.   Thus,   it   provides   valuable   data   about   the   lower-­‐level   Biblical   study   in   the  region.  

 

Ofer  Elior,  University  of  Geneva,  Switzerland  

Title:   Attitudes   towards   the   Study   of   Science   in   the   Fifteenth-­‐Century   Jewish   Constantinopolitan   School:  The  Testimony  of  Joseph  Baghi's  Keter  Kehuna    

Abstract:   In   the  course  of  history,   Jewish  cultures  have  evinced  contrasting  attitudes   towards  non-­‐Jewish  cultures:  some  advocated  openness,  while  others   insisted  on  maximal  closure.  The  alternations  of   Jewish  

cultural   centers   between   these   two   basic   attitudes   are   arguably   one   of   the   most   significant   aspects   in  understanding  Jewish  cultural  dynamics.  The  primary  aim  of  this  paper  is  to  shed  light  on  attitudes  towards  a  non-­‐Jewish  body  of  knowledge,  namely   science,   in   the   Jewish  community  of  Constantinople  during   the  fifteenth  century.  As  shown  in  several  studies,  in  this  geo-­‐cultural  environment  developed  and  flourished  a  school   of   learned  men,   both   Rabbanite   and   Karaite,   who   read,   penned,   and   taught   scientific   texts.   The  proposed  paper  will  uncover  some  of  the  ideological  stances  on  which  this  scientific  activity  was  founded.  It  will  examine  several  passages   in  Keter  Kehuna,  a  treatise  co-­‐authored  by  a  scholar  who  was  a  product  of  the   Jewish   Constantinopolitan   school,   the   Karaite   Joseph   ben   Moses   Baghi   (born   ca.   1490).   In   these  passages  Baghi,  relying  on  Rabbanite  and  Karaite  authorities,  emphasized  the  necessity  and  explained  the  benefits   of   learning   science.   The   main   part   of   the   paper   will   be   devoted   to   an   examination   of   Baghi's  arguments.   Additionally,   I  will   discuss   Baghi’s  motivations   for   advancing   these   arguments.   I  will   point   to  statements  where  Baghi  confronts  unnamed  adversaries  who  allegedly  opposed  to   teaching  and   learning  sciences.  I  will  suggest  that  these  statements  constitute  an  evidence  for  disagreements,  hitherto  unknown,  on  the  legitimacy  and  proper  place  of  the  study  of  science,  among  contemporary  Karaite  and  perhaps  also  Rabbanite  scholars.  

 

Golda  Akhiezer,  Ariel  University  of  Samaria,  Israel  

Title:  The  Historiography  and  Historical  Consciousness  of  Byzantine  Karaites  

Abstract:  Karaites  settled  in  Byzantine  in  the  10th  century  and  were  a  minority  among  numerous  rabbinic  communities.  Rabbanite  leaders  characterized  Karaites  as  strangers  who  came  from  Muslim  lands,  studied  from   Muslims,   and   introduced   innovations   in   Jewish   tradition   in   an   arbitrary   way.   These   Rabbinic  accusations   served   as   a   catalyst   for   the   development   of   Karaite   historiography.   Byzantine   Karaite  historiographical  literature  tried  to  demonstrate  the  continuity  and  authenticity  of  their  tradition  by  means  of  historical  arguments,  although  these  arguments  were  mostly  of  ahistorical  nature.  The  paper  focuses  on  two  Byzantine  Karaite  treatises  of  different  genres:  The  Cluster  of  Henna  by  Judah  Hadassi  (12th  century)  and   especially   on   The   Schism  between  Karaites   and  Rabbanites   by   Elijah   ben  Abraham   (the   late   11th   to  early  12th  century).  Both  scholars  tried  in  completely  different  ways  to  define  Karaism,  outline  its  tradition,  and   interpret   the   schism   between   Karaites   and   Rabbanites.   Their   historical   and   ahistorical   arguments  reflect  certain  tendencies  of  their  historical  thought  and  self-­‐perception.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Bertram  Schwarzbach,  Independent  scholar,  France  

Title:  The  Exegesis  of  Dr  Aharon  ben  Yosef  the  Karaite  

Abstract:  As  a  medical  man,  R.  Aharon  had  many  difficulties  with  the  Biblical  texts,  some  of  which  he  was  able   to   resolve   by   recognizing   the   rhetorical   elements   in   the   texts.   He   was   nearly   a   man   of   the  Enlightenment  centuries  before  Richard  Simon  and  Mendelssohn.  

 

 

Session:  003:  

Byzantine  Jewish  Life    

14.30-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Crete  

Organizer:  Nicholas  de  Lange  

Chair:  Nicholas  de  Lange  

 

Martin  Borysek,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:   Jewish   Self-­‐Government   and  Mechanisms   of   Power   of   the   Jewish   Authorities   in   Venetian   Crete   as  Documented  in  Takkanot  Kandiyah  

Abstract:   Takkanot   Kandiyah   is   a   collection   of   legislative   texts   regarding   the   leadership   of   the   Jewish  community   in  Candia,   the   capital  of   the  Venetian  colony  of  Crete   in  early  13th   to  mid-­‐17th  century.  The  documents,   most   of   which   belong   to   the   “para-­‐halakhic”   genre   of   takkanot   kahal   (communal   statutes),  were   written   by   the   successive   generations   of   the   leaders   of   the   Jewish   community   and   edited   in   a  comprehensive   collection   in   the   16th   century   by   the   prominent   Jewish   historian   and   Candiot   communal  leader  Elijah  Capsali  (ca.  1485-­‐ca.  1550).  Communal  statutes  of  the  takkanot  kahal  genre  are  not  an  integral  part  of  the  canon  of  the  halakhic  law.  Its  specificity  consists  in  the  fact  that  the  authority  of  the  statutes  is  not  derived  from  the  Bible  or  the  basic  canonical  text  of  Rabbinic  Judaism  (especially  Mishnah  and  Talmud),  but   rather   from   the   authority   of   the   elected   communal   leaders   themselves.   As   such,   the   statutes   were  legally   binding   only   for   the   members   of   the   community   for   which   they   were   issued.   In   the   pre-­‐Enlightenment   Jewish   society,   the   takkanot   kahal   texts   serve   as   an   instrument   of   legal   control   both   in  respect   to   the   principles   of   halakhic   rules   and   the   laws   enforced   by   the   non-­‐Jewish   ruling   power.   The  statutes  and  ordinances  collected  in  Takkanot  Kandiyah  regulate  activities  relating  to  all  areas  of  Jewish  life  in   Medieval   and   Early   Modern   Crete,   covering   halakhic   topics   as   well   as   more   general   problems   of  economic   and   inter-­‐personal   relations   within   the   community   and   between   the   Jews   and   non-­‐Jews   of  Candia.   Some   of   the   texts   address   also   the   administrative   questions   and   organisation   of   the   communal  politics.  Thus,  Takkanot  Kandiyah  provides  a  uniquely  detailed  insight  in  to  the  history  of  Jewish  everyday  life  in  Venetian  Crete.  As  well  as  an  historical  source,  Takkanot  Kandiyah  is  also  an  important  testimony  on  the   functioning   of   Jewish   communal   administration   and   self-­‐government   in   the   Middle   Ages   and   Early  Modern   period.   This   paper   will   address   those   passages   of   the   collection   in   which   the   authors   present  themselves,  directly  or  indirectly,  as  the  rightful  leaders  of  their  community  and  defend  the  system  of  inner  Jewish  autonomy  which  gradually  evolved  in  the  Candia  community,  as  the  ideal  way  of  life  under  the  rule  of   law,  properly   interpreted  and  wisely  enforced  by  the  communal  elders.   It  will  be  argued  that  Takkanot  Kandiyah  can  be  read  as  coherent  “communal  constitution”,  a  legal  code  with  a  unifying  argument  and  an  important  moral  dimension.  This  argument  consists  in  the  double  role  of  the  collection:  its  task  was  to  be  both  a  practical  source  of  communal  rules  valid  for  the  needs  of  the  present  day,  and  a  reminder  of  former  glory  of  the  past  times,  with  the  potential  to  inspire  and  lead  the  future  generations.  

 

Giacomo  Corazzol,  University  of  Bologna,  Italy  

Title:  The  Judeo-­‐Greek  Translation  of  the  Book  of  Jonah:  A  Custom  from  Medieval  Candia  

Abstract:   In   1885   Adolf   Neubauer   announced   a   surprising   discovery:   the   presence,   within   a   «Corfu  Mahazor»,  of  what   in  his  opinion  was  to  be  considered  as  «the  earliest  modern  Greek  text  we  possess   in  prose».  Neubauer   referred   to   the  well-­‐known   Judeo-­‐Greek   translation  of   the  Book  of   Jonah  contained   in  ms.  Add.  oct.  19  (Neubauer  1144)  of  the  Bodleian  Library,  another  version  of  which  is  found  in  ms.  Bologna,  Biblioteca  Universitaria,  3574  A,  which  was  produced  in  Candia  (Crete).  The  two  texts  are  slightly  different  

versions   of   a   calque-­‐translation   of   the   Book   of   Jonah   of   the   type   used   in   classrooms   (and   usually  transmitted   in  oral   form)   for   the  education  of  children.   In  the  following  years,  partly   through  Neubauer’s  personal   efforts,   the   news   of   the   finding   speedily   spread.   One   hundred   years   later   Malachi   bet-­‐Arié  (immediately   followed   by   Nicholas   de   Lange)   pointed   out   that   Neubauer’s   assumption   concerning   the  ancientness  of  this  translation  was  based  on  a  misinterpretation  of  a  date  found  in  a  deed  of  sale  at  the  end  of  the  manuscript  possessed  by  the  Bodleian  Library.  Still,  despite  the  doubts  already  expressed  by  Lazaros  Belleli  and  Dirk  C.  Hesseling  in  the  years  1901-­‐1904,  the  assumption  according  to  which  this  translation  was  read  on  the  afternoon-­‐prayer  of  Yom  Kippur  in  the  synagogues  not  only  of  Candia,  as  can  be  safely  stated  on  the  basis  of  a  responsum  by  Me’ir  Katzenellenbogen  of  Padua  to  Rabbi  Eliyyahu  Capsali  of  Candia  (who  had   turned   to   his   colleague   for   an   opinion   as   to   the   lawfulness   of   the   custom),   but   also   of   Corfu   and  throughout  the  Byzantine  world  at   large  has  developed  into  a  common-­‐place  in  Judeo-­‐Greek  studies.  The  paper   shows   that   Neubauer   never   produced   any   evidence   demonstrating   the   Corfiote   origins   of   the  translation  and  its  use  on  Yom  Kippur  in  the  Greek  Synagogue  of  Corfu  and  that  this  notion,  handed  down  and  repeated  uncritically,  has  risen  to  the  status  of  an  accepted  truth  despite  all  evidence  point  to  the  fact  that  the  custom  of  reciting  this  translation  of  the  Book  of  Jonah  on  Yom  Kippur  was  limited  to  Candia  alone,  where,  according  to  the  testimony  of  Katzenellenbogen,  it  was  an  “ancient  custom”.  Only  in  a  place  where  the  use  of  such  a  translation  had  become  integral  part  of  the  rite,  could  its  text  leap  out  of  the  classroom,  as   it   were,   and   find   its   way   into   prayer-­‐books.   The   only   element   that   may   have   driven   Neubauer   to  convince   himself   that   the   translation   originated   in   Corfu   is   that   he   knew   that   the  manuscript   had   been  bought  in  Corfu:  he  did  not  consider  that  after  the  loss  of  Crete  by  the  Venetians  (1669),  many  members  of  the   Jewish   population   had   left   the   island   and   settled   in   Corfu   and   Zante.   To   conclude   with,   the   paper  explores  the  cultural  and  political  reasons  that  may  have  led  a  Romaniote  Jew  like  Capsali  to  promote  the  abolition  of  a  peculiarly  Romaniote  custom.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:    

Byzantine  Jewish  Life    

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Judah  Hadassi's  "Eshkol  ha-­‐kofer"  in  its  Karaite  and  Byzantine  Contexts    

Organizer:    

Chair:  Daniel  Lasker  

 

Daniel  J.  Lasker,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  The  Karaite  Context  of  Judah  Hadassi's  Eshkol  ha-­‐Kofer  

Abstract:   The  most   prominent   literary   remain   of   Byzantine   Karaism   in   the   twelfth   century   is   Judah   ben  Elijah   Hadassi’s   Eshkol   ha-­‐kofer   (“Cluster   of   Henna”;   cf.   Canticles   1:14),   a   Hebrew   repository   of   Karaite  learning,  law  and  lore  which  marks  the  end  of  the  classical  period  of  Karaism  of  the  Golden  Age  of  the  tenth  and  eleventh  centuries  and  the  beginning  of  new  Byzantine  directions  for  the  sectarian  group.  The  German-­‐Israel   Fund   is   sponsoring   a   project   which   will   produce   a   new   partial   edition   (based   on   uncensored  manuscripts)  and  studies  describing  the  book's  Karaite  and  Byzantine  contexts.  This  lecture  will  discuss  the  Karaite  context.  

 

Saskia  Doenitz  &  Sandra  Goergen,  Freie  Universitaet  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  Greek  in  Eshkol  ha-­‐Kofer:  How  to  deal  with  Greek  in  Hebrew  Letters?    

Abstract:  The   intention  of  our   lecture   is   to  show  a  work   in  progress:  We  will  show  how  we  deal  with  the  Greek   that   appears   in   the   Hebrew   manuscripts   of   Eshkol   ha-­‐Kofer.   Our   main   task   is   to   transcribe   and  translate   the   Greek  words.   But   there   is  more   than  meets   the   eye:   How   to   deal  with   different   language  Levels  and  difficult  readings  in  the  framework  of  the  History  of  the  Greek  language?  How  does  the  Greek  fit  into   the   Hebrew   context?  What   can   be   learnt   from   vocalization   about   the   pronounciation   of   the   Greek  words?  We  will   give   an   insight   into  our  work   in   the   joint   project   between   the  Byzantine   Institute   at   the  Freie  Universitaet  Berlin  and  the  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev.  

 

Jannis  Niehoff-­‐Panagiotidis,  Free  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  Hokhma  mi-­‐Yavan:  Access  to  Greek  Education  for  Byzantine  Jews  

Abstract:   It   is   evident   that   Yehuda   Hadassi   had   access   to   Greek   philosophical   teaching,   and   this   in   the  original   language.   Since   his   Eshkol   ha   -­‐   Kofer   is   dated   to   1148   Constantinople,   it   should   be   investigated  which  were  the  possibilities  of  learning  philosophy  there,  and  which  kind  of  philosophy.  Since  our  sources  are,  as  the  Byzantine  part  is  concerned,  quite  good,  a  tentative  sketch  for  a  public  consisting  of  specialists  in  Jewish   studies  will  be  presented   -­‐   in  Byzantium,   the   teaching  of  philosophy  was  quite  different   from   the  Latin  West.  But  the  main  question  to  be  investigated  is:  How  could  a  Jew,  and  a  Karaite,  have  access  to  this  learning?  Were   there   not   restrictions   for   non   -­‐Christians   to   do   so?   Far   from   being   conclusive,   a   kind   of  preliminary  result  will  be  presented.  

 

   

 

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  01  

 

Session:  001:  

Discussion  Group    

Organized  by  Daniel  Langton  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  Philip  Alexander  

 

Miri  Freud-­‐Kandel,  University  of  Oxford  /  OCHJS,  UK  

Title:  Jews  and  Judaism  in  the  United  Kingdom:  Developments,  Directions,  and  Threats  

Abstract:  A  short  contribution  to  a  wider  discussion  designed  to  begin  the  process  of  establishing  a  strategic  overview  on  the  European  situation.  The  focus  of  this  contribution  will  be  the  UK.  

 

Zsofia  Kata  Vincze,  ELTE  University  Budapest,  Hungary  

Title:  Jews  and  Judaism  in  Hungary:  Developments,  Directions,  and  Threats  

Abstract:   After   the   fall   of   communism   the   Hungarian   religious   and   secular   Jewish   communities   got   re-­‐established  and   reorganised  with   the  help  of   Israeli   and  American   institutional   support.  My  presentation  will   analyse   in  an  anthropological   and   sociological   framework  how   this   communities,   and   individual   Jews  reacted  to  the  outreach  in  the  last  two  decades.  My  paper  will  present  the  major  trend  shifts  in  changing  concepts  of  what  "real  Jewishness"  meant  at  different  stages  in  post  socialist  Hungary.  (After  an  intellectual  discovery  of  ones  own  Jewish  identity,  a  trend  of  religious  return  happened  until  the  mid  1990's,  what  was  followed  by  an  ethnic/cultural  self-­‐definition  of  Jewish  identity  until  approximately  2000,  resulting  slowly  in  a  symbolic  ethnic  representations  or  festivalisation  of  Jewishness  in  the  era  of  social  media.  Today  -­‐  in  the  midst   of   the   raise   of   the   openly   political   anti-­‐semitism   -­‐   we   can   witness   a   slightly   more   defined   socio-­‐political   Jewish   behavior.   As   I   will   build   a   theory   of   social   dynamics   and   tendencies   of   collective   self  definition  of  Hungarian   Jews,   I  will  also  present   illustrative  case  studies  of  people  who  went   through   the  baal  teshuva  or  born  again  Jewish  identity  and  later  on  they  discovered  that  there  are  secular  ways  to  be  Jewish  and  after   they  grew  out  of   the  hip,   fun   Jewish  underground  and  "alternative"   festival   crowd   they  construct  a  left  liberal  politically  Jewish  identity  to  themselves.  

 

Pavel  Sládek,  Charles  University,  Prague,  Czech  Republic  

Title:  Jews  and  Judaism  in  Czech  Republic:  Developments,  Directions,  and  Threats  

Abstract:  The  Jewish  community  of  the  Czech  Republic  belongs  to  those  demographically  most  affected  by  the  Holocaust  and  the  subsequent  Communist  persecution.  Counting  118,000  members  at   its  peak   in  the  late-­‐1930´s,   it   has   been   reduced   to   the   current   3,000   people,   not   counting   an   unknown   number   of  unaffiliated   persons   with   Jewish   heritage.   In   the   1990´s,   a   temporary   popular   fashion   of   Jewish   culture  

resulted   in   a   number   of   conversions   to   Judaism,   not   all   the   converts   having   had   Jewish   heritage.  More  importantly,   some   of   those   who   preferred   not   to   be   affiliated   during   the   Communist   regime,   became  members  of  the  Jewish  communities.  Despite  the  small  numbers,  the  renewal  of  Jewish  life  is  apparent  not  only  in  Prague  but  also  in  nine  other  towns  which  have  an  organized  Jewish  life.  The  following  institutions  have   crucial   role   in   securing   the   future   of   this   tiny   but   vibrant   community:   the   Lauder   Schools   provide  Jewish   education   from   pre-­‐school   to   high-­‐school   level,   the   Federation   of   the   Jewish   Communities   in   CR  takes  care  of  the  Jewish  monuments  throughout  the  country,  especially  in  places  with  no  Jewish  presence,  and   the   Jewish  Museum   in   Prague   organizes   numerous   educational   programs   both   for   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish  public.  While  the  Czech  foreign  policy  is  vehemently  pro-­‐Israeli  in  the  long  term,  we  simultaneously  witness   the   growing   presence   of   explicitly   anti-­‐Semitic   and   generally   racist   or   xenophobic   groups   in   the  public  sphere,  especially  by  the  means  of  Internet.  The  mounting  public  acceptance  of  anti-­‐Tsiganism  in  the  Czech  society  appears  to  be  also  alarming,  as   it  enables  expressing  racist  sentiments  without  referring  to  Jews  and  thus  creating  collectively  shared  mental  structures  that  can  be  easily  translated  into  the  language  of  Jew-­‐hatred.  The  Jewish  institutions  in  the  Czech  Republic  are  well  aware  of  this  threat  and  monitor  not  only  the  manifestations  of  anti-­‐Jewish  but  also  anti-­‐Roma  xenophobia.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Jewish  Theological  Thought  in  Modern  Times    

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  What  is  Jewish  Theology?  

Organizers:  Miri  Freud-­‐Kandel  and  Daniel  H.  Weiss  

Chair:  Miri  Freud-­‐Kandel  

 

Miri  Freud-­‐Kandel,  University  of  Oxford,  OCHJS,  UK  

Title:  Louis  Jacobs  and  the  Development  of  Postmodern  Approaches  to  Jewish  Theology  

Abstract:  Louis  Jacobs  came  to  write  his  *A  Jewish  Theology*  and  indeed  to  examine  and  seek  to  interpret  his  Jewish  faith  primarily  as  a  product  of  his  engagement  with  "non-­‐Jewish  cultures",  through  his  university  studies.  His  encounter  with  an  academic  approach  to  the  study  of  Judaism  led  him  to  question  the  beliefs  and  teachings  he  had  imbibed  in  the  yeshiva  world.  As  the  title  of  his  seminal  work  indicated,  his  sense  of  a  clash  between  two  seemingly  opposing  cultures  led  him  to  seek  continuing  "reason  to  believe".  This  search  for   reason  and  rationality   reflected   the  modernist   focus  and   influence   that  came  to  shape  his   thought   in  response  to  the  academic  ideas  he  encountered.  The  proposed  paper  will  consider  the  potential  benefits  of  certain   postmodernist   approaches   to   the   questions   Jacobs   faced   and   sought   to   address.   In   doing   so,  broader  questions  about  the  nature  and  role  of  theology  in  contemporary  Judaism  will  be  assessed.  

 

David  Pruwer,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:  Alexander  Altmann  and  the  Construction  of  an  Orthodox  Jewish  Theology  

Abstract:   Jewish   Orthodoxy   is   often   thought   to   be   a   movement   which   developed   internally   and   in  opposition  to  the  external  forces  of  change,  be  it  from  other  strands  of  Judaism  or  from  the  outside  non-­‐Jewish  world.  It  is  also  often  claimed  that  Orthodoxy  focuses  uniquely  on  Halakhah  and  praxis  rather  than  attempting  to  erect  a  constructive  theology.  This  paper  will  challenge  both  these  assumptions  by  focusing  on   an   understudied   persona   in   the   history   of   Jewish   Orthodoxy,   Alexander   Altmann.   This   paper   will  illustrate  that  Orthodoxy,  specifically   in   its  Weimar  variant,  was  not  as   insulated  as   is  often  characterised  and  that  it  also  was  particularly  concerned  with  the  question  of  Theology.  The  Theology  that  Altmann,  and  indeed   many   of   his   Orthodox   contemporaries,   would   construct   had   a   uniquely   Jewish   character.   In   his  Weimar  years,  Altmann  developed  a  radically  novel  form  of  Jewish  theology  which  attempted  to  combine  revelation   and   Halakhah,   as   found   in   the   Bible,   with   Jewish   nationhood.   Both   these   elements  merge   in  Altmann’s   thought   to   forge   a   specifically   particular   Jewish   theology   which   also   contained   universal  messages   for   humanity.   This   paper   will   show   how   Altmann   engaged   with   the   various   theological  movements   of   the   twentieth   Century,  most   crucially   with   Karl   Barth   and  Martin   Heidegger,   to   create   a  novel  and  fascinating  form  of  Jewish  Orthodox  Theology.  

 

Daniel  H.  Weiss,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:  Formal  Multiplicity  and  Conceptual  Unity  in  Jewish  Theology  

Abstract:   Since   Moses   Mendelssohn,   academic   scholars   have   frequently   called   into   question   the   very  notion  of   ‘Jewish   theology.’  One   factor   that  has   contributed   to   such   skepticism  has  been   the  apparently  ‘unsystematic’  character  of  classical  Jewish  texts,  as  exemplified  most  strikingly  by  the  Babylonian  Talmud.  Such  texts  are  very  often  characterized  by  a  multiplicity  of  different  voices  and  opinions,  with  no  apparent  effort   to   come   to   a   definitive   unitary   opinion   or   doctrine.     This   is   particularly   the   case   with   haggadic  material,  which  might  otherwise  seem  a  natural  setting  in  which  to  put  forth  theological  content.  This  lack  of  systematic  presentation,  moreover,  contrasts  sharply  with  the  deliberate  effort  in  Christian  texts  to  put  forth  consistent  and  unitary   theological-­‐doctrinal  views,  and  so   it  easily   could  seem  (and  has   seemed)   to  many   scholars   that   classical   rabbinic   literature  was   simply   unconcerned  with   formulating   a   theologically  unified  position.  In  this  paper,  however,  I  argue  that  this  modern  scholarly  judgment  may  be  influenced  by  an  externally-­‐imposed  and  Christian-­‐centric  notion  of  *where  to  look  for*  theological  unity.    Instead,  I  aim  to  demonstrate,  through  an  examination  of  Babylonian  Talmud  Sanhedrin  97b-­‐98a  (concerning  theological  reflections   on   the   messianic   future),   that   the   redactorial   level   of   the   Talmud   can   be   understood  *deliberately  employing*  multiple  ‘competing’  voices  in  order  to  put  forth  a  unified  and  specific  theological  conception.   In   other   words,   the   formal   multiplicity   is   crucial   and   necessary   for   conveying   the   unified  concept  properly,  whereas,  for  these  particular   ideas,  an  outward  formal  unity  would  end  up  conveying  a  one-­‐sided   and   distorted   theological   concept.   This   examination   will   thus   provide   contemporary   scholars  with   new  methodological   tools,   enabling   greater   recognition   of   ways   in   which   the   absence   the   type   of  systematic   presentation   characteristic   of   Christian   theology   need   not   automatically   imply   an   absence   of  theological  specificity  and  unity.  

 

Waldemar  Szczerbiński,  Institute  of  European  Culture  of  the  Adam  Mickiewicz  University  in  Poznan,  Poland  

Title:  Mordecai  M.  Kaplan’s  Proposal  of  Judaism’s  Renewal.  Reconstrution  or  Deconstruction?    

Abstract:  Contemporary  Judaism  is  not  a  monolith.  Amidst  all  trends  present  nowadays,  the  latest  and  the  most   controversial   appears   to   be   the   Jewish   Reconstructionism,  which  was   established   by  Mordecai  M.  Kaplan.   Every   other   (Orthodox,   Reformed,   Conservative)   varieties   represent   Jewish   theism,  which   in   the  most   crucial  matters   is   faithful   to   the   tradition.   This   is  why   in   the   Judaism  we   can   speak   of   the   theistic  

conception  of  God,  which  in  different  shapes  mirrors  the  heritage  of  the  past.  In  the  meantime,  the  starting  point   for   the   reconstructionist   involves   indeed   the   reconstruction  of   the   traditional   Judaism,  which   takes  place  basing  on  ideas  taken  from  social  and  natural  sciences.  With  such  an  approach  it  is  not  the  faith,  but  the  knowledge  which  provides  the  criterion  of  truthfulness  of  the  concept  of  the  God.  Without  a  doubt,  the  Reconstructionism  crossed  the  borders  of  Jewish  theism  and  placed  itself  in  opposition  to  it.  The  Judaism  in  the  Kaplan's  understanding  is  a  civilization  and  not  a  religion,  as  it  has  been  held  up  till  now.  The  religion  is  only   one   of   many   elements   of   a   civilization   and   it   is   not   the   most   important,   most   significant   and  unconditional  one.  The  concept  of  God  in  Reconstructionism  not  only  may  change,  but  has  to  be  changing  like  other  elements  of  the  Jewish  civilization.  From  now  on,  one  does  not  have  to  be  a  theist  to  remain  a  believer  in  Judaism  .  This  is  an  absolute  novelty  in  the  Jewish  world.  A  reconstructionist  does  not  accept  the  supernaturalism   and,   thus,   he   does   not   believe   in   divine   origin   of   the   Tora,   nor   the   theory   of   creation,  miracles,  eternal  life  in  the  other  world.  The  postulate  of  a  non-­‐personal  God  is  a  result  of  the  negation  of  the  supernaturalism  and  of   the  traditional   Jewish  soteriology.  For  some  the  Judaism  created  by  Kaplan   is  absolutely  unacceptable,  for  others  it  is  possible  to  accept  and  even  represents  the  only  acceptable  way  of  renessaince   and   strengthening   of   the   contemporary   Judaism.   It   is   difficult   to   resolve   the   problem   in   the  situation,  when  no  authority  can  delineate  limits  of  Judaism.  The  performed  analyses  permit  to  state  (but  not   to   conclude   firmly),   that   Jewish   reconstructionism   is   a   specific   Jewish   theory,   a   way   of   living   for   a  certain  group  of  Jews,  but   it   is  not  a  Judaism.  The  transnatural  conception  of  God,  although  Jewish,  does  not   conform   to   the   Jewish  concept  of  God,  moreover,  nor   it  does   conform   to  monotheistic   faith   in  God.  Such  vision  of  God  leads  to  a  modern  Jewish  religion  of  a  faithless  character,  in  which  every  Jew  will  be  able  to  identify  himself/herself.  The  Kaplan's  system,  which  represents  a  result  of  an  intentional  reconstruction  and  revaluation  of  the  traditional  Judaism,  in  fact  becomes  a  deconstruction  and  a  devaluation  of  Judaism.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

 

Semi-­‐Plenary  Lectures  and  Workshops  

Musée  d'Art  et  d'Histoire  du  Judaïsme  

13.30-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Teaching  Jewish  Studies:  Issues,  Challenges  and  Solutions  

Organizer:  Alberdina  Houtman  

 

Chair:  

 

Alberdina  Houtman,  Protestant  Theological  University,  Netherlands  

Introduction:  The  situation  of  Jewish  Studies  is  changing  fast  in  Europe  due  to  new  developments  in  Eastern  Europe,  the  changing  interests  of  students,  the  introduction  of  new  media,  drastic  budget  cuts  and  more.  Consequently,  there  is  a  need  for  educational  support.  Teachers  have  to  adapt  to  new  student  populations  and  to  the  use  of  new  media,  and  they  are  often  forced  to  teach  subjects  that  are  outside  their  own  field  of  expertise.  In  this  panel  we  will  investigate  the  situation  in  different  fields  and  in  different  parts  of  Europe.  We   will   discuss   the   development   of   curricula   and   new  ways   of   learning,   and   we   will   try   to   initiate   the  formation  of  a   ‘community  of  teachers’,  who  can  help  and  advise  each  other.  Following  on  from  this,  the  

EAJS  will  facilitate  in  the  coming  years  workshops  in  different  parts  of  Europe  to  support  the  development  of  new  teaching  material  and  methods.  

 

Sacha  Stern,  University  College  London,  UK  

Introducing  Judaism  

 

Andres  Piquer  Otero,  Universidad  Complutense  de  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  Teaching  Jewish  Studies:  Languages  

Abstract:   The   teaching   of   languages   related   to   Jewish   studies   is   a   particularly   challenging   realm,   given   a  hardly  avoidable  academic  fragmentation  which  appears  in  different  but  complementary  levels:  1)  tuition  in  very   different   programs   and   departments   (e.g.   Jewish   Studies;   Semitic   Studies;   Theology;   Near  Eastern/Oriental   Studies;   Religious   Studies;   Modern   Languages);   2)   different   layers   of   centrality   of   a  language   for   Jewish   Studies   (from   the   centrality   of   Hebrew   and   Aramaic,   through   distinctly   Jewish  languages   or   linguistic   varieties   such   as   Yiddish   or   Ladino,   to   languages   and   dialects   of   a  more   complex  academic   definition   (e.g.   Judaeo-­‐Arabic);   and,   finally,   to   languages   highly   relevant   for   cultural  contextualization  of   the   Jewish  people   in  different  phases   and   locations  of   their   history   (to  name  a   few,  Ancient  Near  Eastern  languages  such  as  Akkadian  and  Ugaritic,  Classical  Arabic,  or  Greek.)  Finally,  teaching  of  Hebrew  in  particular  presents  a  dichotomy  of  its  own,  as  it  is  both  a  classical  language  in  the  history  of  Judaism  and  a  modern,   spoken  and   literary   language   (thus   integrated   into   the  EU   standards  of   language  learning  and  levels  of  proficiency.)  This  paper  will  try  to  present  these  challenges  for  reflection  and  propose  some   ideas   or   guidelines  which   imply   flexibility,   eclecticism,   and   the   encouragement   of   interdisciplinary  collaboration   and   structuring   in   the   development   of   language   curricula   for   Jewish   Studies.   All   in   all,   the  option  taken  in  the  syllabus  and  in  the  classroom  should  cater  for  vast  scope  of  our  discipline,  but  also  for  the  equally  rich  and  variegated  interests  and  priorities  of  our  students.    

 

Pavel  Sládek,  Charles  University,  Prague,  Czech  Republic  

Title:  Teaching  Jewish  Religion  and  Jewish  Thought  in  Prague  

Abstract:   Since   the   end   of   the   dictatorship   of   the   Communist   Party   in   1989,   we   witness   an   important  growth   of   humanities   in   Czech   academic   institutions,   including   the   emergence   of   programs   of   Jewish  Studies  of  all  levels.  The  present  paper  will  address  critically  select  problems  of  teaching  Jewish  religion  and  Jewish  thought,  concentrating  chiefly  on  the  following  issues,  some  of  which  are  not  specifically  related  to  the   conditions   of   Czech   academia:   1)   Studentsʼ   access   to   primary   sources   and   the   knowledge   of   Jewish  languages:  how  much  philology  do  we  need?  2)  Studentsʼ  reading  habits  and  the  limitations  imposed  by  the  local   intellectual   canon:   go   local   or   global?   3)   Teaching   Jewish   thought   and   culture   out   of   the   broader  general  context:  the  pros  and  cons  of  double-­‐majors.  4)  Teaching  Judaism  as  an  “extinct”  culture:  shouldn’t  our   students  meet   real   Jews?   5)   Encyclopaedic   demand   and   curricular   rigidity   –   Czech   and   Anglo-­‐Saxon  models  compared:  can  we  avoid  teaching  outside  our  fields  of  expertise?  

 

Bart  Wallet,  VU  University  Amsterdam,  Netherlands  

Title:  Teaching  Jewish  History:  Contexts,  Methods,  Materials  

Abstract:  All  over  Europe  universities  are  offering  courses  in  Jewish  history,  both  ‘grand  narratives’  and  in-­‐depth   courses   focusing   on   specific   topics,   periods,   countries   etc.   The   contexts   in  which   Jewish   history   is  being  taught  –  departments,  audiences  –  differ  greatly.  Teaching  a  course  in  a  history  department  demands  another  arrangement  of  the  material  than  teaching  in  a  Jewish  studies  context.  Having  rabbinical  students  challenges   a   professor   in   a   different   way   than   dealing   with   Christian   theology   students.   This   paper   will  analyse   the   main   trends   in   teaching   Jewish   history,   draw   up   an   inventory   of   the   existing   methods   and  materials,   offer   best   practices   and   articulate   desiderata.   It   will   e.g.   discuss   structuring   Jewish   history  classes,  relating  Jewish  history  to  general  history,  using  the  various  textbooks,  sourcebooks,  working  with  new   media   etc.   The   presentation   invites   all   who   teach   Jewish   history   to   participate   in   the   discussion,  sharing  their  own  experiences  and  reflect  on  how  the  EAJS  and  we  as  colleagues  can  help  each  other  to  stay  updated  and  to  respond  to  changing  intellectual,  pedagogical  and  academic  conditions.  

 

15.30-­‐16.30  

 

David  Fishman,  Jewish  Theological  Seminary,  USA  

Title:  Launching  'Yerusha'  Program  of  the  RFE;  Our  Inheritance.    

Our  "Yerusha":  Securing  the  Jewish  Documentary  Legacy  in  Europe  

 

16.30-­‐17.30  

 

Francesca  Trivellato,  Yale  University,  USA  

Title:  Jewish-­‐Christian  Credit  Relations  and  the  Economic  History  of  Early  Modern  Europe    

 

17.30-­‐18.30  

 

Yaakov  Shavit,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Hebrew  Bible  and  the  Christian  Bible:  Worlds  Apart?  

 

18.30-­‐20.30:  Cocktail  Party  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  02  

 

Session:  001:  

Magic  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Jewish  Magic  from  Antiquity  to  the  Modern  World  

Organizers:  Emma  Abate  &  Gideon  Bohak  

Chair:  Gideon  Bohak  

 

Bill  Rebiger,  Johannes  Gutenberg  University  Mainz,  Germany  

Title:  Midrashic  Motifs  in  Magical  Fragments  from  the  Cairo  Genizah  

Abstract:  The  Cairo  Genizah  provides  the  research  on  Jewish  magic  with  thousands  of  fragments  stemming  from   the  Middle   Ages.   But,   the   texts   in   these   fragments   show   very   often   clear   evidence   of  much   older  traditions  as  well.  The  paper  focuses  on  midrashic  motifs  in  magical  fragments  from  the  Cairo  Genizah  and  tries   to   analyze   their   function   in   the   magical   framework   and   the   relationship   between   midrashic   and  magical  texts.  

 

Blanca  Villuendas  Sabaté,  CSIC,  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  Geomancy  in  the  Cairo  Genizah:  The  Beginnings  of  an  Enduring  Tradition  

Abstract:  The  divinatory  technique  known  as  Geomancy,  or  Sand  Science,  consists  of  answering  questions  by  means  of  symbolic  figures.  The  number  of  these  figures  is  sixteen,  since  they  are  the  result  of  combining  within  groups  of  four  two  values,  odd  and  even,  that  are  represented  with  one  and  two  dots,  respectively.  The  dots  are  placed  in  columns  of  four  lines,  and  usually  are  drawn  using  a  surface  of  sand  or  paper.  The  origins  of  this  technique  are  still  under  discussion,  but  the  earliest  codifiers  (circa  11th  c.  CE)  are  related  to  North  Africa.  After   its   transmission,  Geomancy  also  became  very  popular   in  different  places  of   the  world  and  it  has  been  practiced  to  the  present  day.  The  research  I  would  like  to  present  is  based  on  the  analysis  of  the  geomantic  manuscripts  preserved,  from  the  Middle-­‐Ages,  in  the  Genizah  of  the  Ben  Ezra  Synagogue  in  Cairo.   Special   attention   is   given   to   the   Judaeo-­‐Arabic   examples,   being   the   best   represented  with   a   total  amount   of   24   fragments.   For   this   study,   I   completed   the   edition   and   translation   of   the  most   significant  ones.   These  writings   are   of   relevant   importance,   because   they   allow   us   to   become   acquainted  with   the  formative  stage  of  a  science  and  its  literature,  the  history  of  which  has  been  scarcely  studied.  At  the  same  time,   they   indicate,   from  an  early  beginning,   the  participation  of   Jews   in  Geomancy,  where  they  had  and  still  have  a  notorious  activity.  However,  only  exceptionally  it  has  been  of  interest  to  the  scholars  dedicated  to  the  intellectual  traditions  performed  by  Jews.  The  talk   I  would  like  to  give  at  the  magic-­‐sessions  of  the  Xth  congress  of  the  EAJS,  will  consist  of  three  parts:  first,  a  summary  of  the  particularities  of  this  divinatory  art  and  how  they  are  attested  in  the  Genizah  manuscripts;  second,  a  short   introduction  to   its  history  and  the  role  of  these  manuscripts  within  it;  and,  finally,  a  brief  account  on  later  representations.  

 

Yuval  Harari,  Ben  Gurion  University,  Israel  

Title:  Practical  Kabbalah  -­‐  Between  Emic  and  Etic  Perspectives  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  deal  with  the  term  "Practical  Kabbalah"  and  the  phenomenon  denoted  by  it.  I  will  first  survey  the  emic  use  of  "practical  Kabbalah"  from  its  very  beginning  until  today,  and  then  suggest  etic  indicators   that  may   serve   us   in   order   to   detect   practical   Kabbalah,   in   a   strict   sense   of   the   term,  within  Jewish  tradition  of  magic.  

 

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Magic  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Jewish  Magic,  later  period  

Organizers:  Emma  Abate  &  Gideon  Bohak  

Chair:  Gideon  Bohak  

 

Agata  Paluch,  The  British  Library,  UK  

Title:  ‘The  Use  of  Divine  and  Angelic  Names  in  the  Early  Modern  Ashkenazi  Kabbalah’  

Abstract:  It  has  already  been  claimed  by  scholars  that  in  16th  and  17th  century  Ashkenaz  and  Poland,  the  kabbalah  became  part  and  parcel  of   the  educational   curriculum  of   the   intellectual  elite,  even  among  the  adversaries   of   kabbalah,   whose   critique   often   reveals   extensive   knowledge   of   the   subject.   At   the   same  time,  and  especially   in  the  course  of  the  17th  century,  the  so-­‐called  ‘practical  kabbalah’,  often  associated  with  magic  and  a   talismanic  approach   to   ritual,  was  attracting  numerous   followers.  These   two  strands  of  the   mystical   tradition   permeated   early   modern   Ashkenaz,   but   while   the   sophisticated   theosophical  kabbalah  of  the  elites  did  not  exert  much  influence  on  the  Jewish  masses,  popular  magical  traditions  and  practices  did  infiltrate  the  elitist  speculative  kabbalah,  at  least  to  some  extent.  What  had  been  interpreted  by   scholars   as   the  universal   spread  of   Lurianic   kabbalistic   rituals  may  well   be   accounted   for  by   the  wide  dissemination   of   much   simpler   magico-­‐mystical   practices,   drawn   out   of   an   old   stock   of   religious  performance   techniques,   such   as   the   invocation   of   angelic   names,   manipulation   of   the   divine   name,  talismanic  divinatory  practices  and  the  like.  This  magico-­‐mystical  kabbalistic  strand,  with  its  special  interest  in   the   mystical   dimension   of   language   –   so   clearly   observable   in   some   parts   of   the   so-­‐called   Lurianic  kabbalah  –  might  in  fact  be  a  continuation  of  a  much  earlier  tradition,  first  cultivated  in  medieval  Ashkenaz  and  later  on  in  early  modern  Ashkenaz  and  Poland.  My  presentation  will  aim  to  tackle  the  penetration  of  the  medieval  magical   Ashkenazi   tradition   on   divine   and   angelic   names   into   the   early  modern   Ashkenazi  kabbalah,   as   represented   in   some   writings   of   Moshe   Zacuto,   Nathan   Neta   Shapira   or   Shimshon   of  Ostropole.  

 

Marina  Caffiero,  Università  di  Roma  “La  Sapienza”,  Italy  

Title:  Juifs  et  Chrétiens  entre  Magie,  Démonologie  et  Kabbala  

Abstract:   Mon   intervention   vise   à   comparer   les   limites   et   les   intersections   entre   les   pratiques   et   les  croyances  de  la  magie  et  de  la  démonologie  juives  et  celles  des  chrétiens,  en  Italie,  entre  les  siècles  XVIIe  et  XVIIIe.   Á   partir   des   sources   documentaires   des   procédures   de   l'Inquisition   romaine   et   des   traités   sur   les  anges  et   les  démons,   je  vais  examiner   les  croyances  et   les  comportements  qui  étaient  en  commun  et   les  relations   entre   les   rabbins   et   les   autorités   religieuses   catholiques   au   sujet   des   doctrines   kabbalistiques.  Enfin,  j’analyserais  la  manière  par  laquelle  ces  relations  et  allégations  ont  exercé  une  influence  sur  l'identité  juive,   en   la   forçant   à   des   justifications   et   des   transformations.   En   particulier   je   traiterais   les   positions  ambigües  du  rabbin  et  médecin  romain  Tranquillo  Vita  Corcos  (1659-­‐1730).  

 

Alexey  Lyavdansky,  Russian  State  University  for  the  Humanities  

Title:  Lilith  in  Kurdistan:  Jewish  and  Christian  Folk  Traditions  

Abstract:   It   appears   that   Lilith   is   known   to   the   world   as   primarily   Jewish   mythological   personage.  Nevertheless  Lilith  is  also  found  in  the  folk  traditions  of  Aramaic-­‐speaking  Christians  who  lived  in  Kurdistan  side  by  side  with  the  Jews.  The  paper  will  discuss  points  of  contact  between  Kurdistan  Jewish  and  Christian  folk  traditions  concerning  Lilith.  In  the  focus  of  the  paper  will  be  the  oral  Neo-­‐Aramaic  text  from  Betanure  (province   of   Dihok)   in   Northern   Iraq,   recorded   by   Hezy  Mutzafi.   The   text   is   unique   because   the   Jewish  informant  combines  Jewish  and  Christian  traditions  in  his  story  about  Lilith.  The  contacts  between  Christian  and   Jewish   folk   traditions   in  Kurdistan  are  exemplified  by  another  mythological   creature,   cyclopean  ogre  Hambušaya,  who  appears  in  the  story  told  by  the  same  Jewish  informant  from  Betanure  and  in  a  fairy  tale,  recorded  from  a  Christian  informant.  

 

Maria  Kaspina,  Museum  of  the  Jewish  History  in  Russia,  Russian  State  University  for  Humanities  

Title:  Ashkenazic  Amulets  against  Lilith:  Texts  and  Images  

Abstract:   The   paper   will   discuss   the   texts   and   illustrations   on   the   Hebrew   amulets   from   Germany   and  Eastern  Europe  of  XVIII  –  XX  cc.  The  distinctive  combination  of  magic   incantation,   images  and  apotropaic  features  makes  these  Hebrew  amulets  very  special  for  the  scholars  of  Jewish  Folklore  and  Art.  In  the  focus  of  the  study  will  be  the  story-­‐incantation  of  a  meeting  of  Lilith  and  Prophet  Elijah  which  is  a  Jewish  variation  of   Byzantine   legend   about   St.   Sysinios.   The   magic   formula   and   Biblical   abbreviations   and   quotations  together  with  different  images  on  numerous  amulets  will  also  be  studied.  The  special  accent  will  be  done  on  the  analysis  of  the  usage  of  the  Names  of  Demons  and  Angels  in  the  studied  amulets.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  03  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  Minorities  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Samaritan  Studies  

Organizer  :  Arnaud  Sérandour  

 

Chair:  Arnaud  Sérandour  

 

Arnaud  Sérandour,  EPHE,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Un  Pentateuque  pour  deux  nations,  Judéens  et  Samaritains.  Pourquoi,  comment?  

Abstract:   Ensemble   hétéroclite   de   règles   coutumières   présentées   de   manière   partielle   au   fil   d'un   récit  légendaire,   voire   mythique,   le   Pentateuque   dessine   l'organisation   politico-­‐religieuse   d'un   peuple   dit  d'"Israël"  du  nom  d'un  ancien  royaume  sur  les  décombres  duquel  étaient  apparues  deux  entités  politiques  distinctes:  les  provinces  de  Samarie  puis  de  Judée.  D'abord  unies,  à  l'époque  perse,  sous  la  même  "politeia  de  Moïse",  qui  fait  d'un  temple  et  de  ses  prêtres  le  centre  institutionnel  de  chacune  des  deux  provinces,  les  autorités  religieuses  des  deux  provinces  sont  devenues  rivales  vers   la   fin  du   IIIe  siècle  av.  notre  ère  et  se  sont  déchirées  au   IIe   siècle  avant  que   les  deux   systèmes   religieux  ne  devinssent  deux  branches   séparées  issues  du  même  tronc  commun,  évoluant  chacun  de  son  côté,  tout  en  entretenant  avec  l'autre  des  rapports  dialectiques.  

 

Etienne  Nodet,  Ecole  Biblique,  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Sanballat  and  his  Gerizim  Temple  

Abstract:  There  was  only  one  Sanballat,  and   the  Gerizim  Samaritans  were   in   fact   Israelites  of  old.  Such  a  conclusion,  which   is   the   best   hypothesis   (Occam's   Razor),   involves   a   study   of   specific   sources:   Josephus'  biases,  the  weakness  of  Ezra-­‐Nehemiah,  archeology  (Elephantine,  Gerizim,  W.  Dalieh).  

 

Christophe  Bonnard,  Faculté  de  Théologie  protestante,  Université  de  Strasbourg,  France  

Title:  "Les  commentaires  de  l'Asâtîr  et  les  traditions  juives  et  musulmanes"  

Abstract:   L'Asfar   Asâtîr,   "le   Livre   des   Légendes",   est   une   chronique   en   araméen   samaritain   décrivant  l'histoire  du  monde,  et  centrée  sur  quatre   figures   :  Adam,  Noé,  Abraham  et  Moïse.  Datable  du  Xè  siècle,  l'oeuvre   est   connue   par   quelques  manuscrits   dont   le   plus   ancien   est   du   XVIIè   siècle.   Le   récit   de   l'Asâtîr,  souvent  obscur,  est   surtout  compréhensible  grâce  à  des  commentaires  et  des   traductions.   Il   s'agit,  d'une  part,  de  trois  traductions  en  arabe  de  l'oeuvre,  non  datées,  ainsi  que  d'un  groupe  de  trois  commentaires,  dont   l'un,   rédigé   en   arabe   et   vraisemblablement   post-­‐médiéval,   a   inspiré   les   deux   autres,   écrits   en   néo-­‐

hébreu   samaritain   du   début   du   XXè   siècle.   Ces   six   commentaires   présentent   de   précieuses   expansions  quant   au   texte   de   l'Asâtîr.   Celles-­‐ci   témoignent   de   la   circulation   de   traditions   sur   les   générations  antédiluviennes,   les   Patriarches   et  Moïse,   analogues   aux   haggadoth   de   la   littérature   intertestamentaire,  des   sources   rabbiniques   et   médiévales   juives,   ainsi   qu'aux   Histoires   musulmanes   des   Prophètes.   Ces  traditions   (devenus   canoniques   chez   les   Samaritains)   sont   ici   exposées   dans   leur   développement  chronologique  et  selon  une  typologie.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Middle  Ages  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  The  Bible  in  Arabic  among  Jews,  Christians  and  Muslims  

Organizer:  Meira  Polliack  

 

Chair:  Ronny  Vollandt  

 

Meira  Polliack,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Medieval  Jewish  and  Christian  Arabic  translations  of  the  Bible:  Common  Trends  and  Differences    

Abstract:  The  paper  focuses  on  common  motives  for  Arabic  Bible  translation  that  lay  behind  the  medieval  Jewish   and   Christian   enterprises,   as   well   as   the   differences   that   can   be   perceived   at   this   stage   in   their  function   and  methodology.   The   purpose   is   to   present   these   enterprises   side   by   side   and   underline   the  cultural  and  linguistic  significance  of  this  common  venture  as  well  as  its  idiosyncratic  features.  

 

Ilana  Sasson,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  On  Creation,  Wisdom,  and  Angelology:  A  Karaite  Commentary  on  Proverbs  8  

Abstract:   Karaism  was   a   sectarian  movement   that   originated   in   the  ninth   century   in   the  midst   of   Jewish  communities  under  Islam.  Yefet  ben  Eli,  a  member  of  the  Karaite  movement,  lived  and  wrote  in  Jerusalem  in   the   tenth   century,   the   golden   age   of   Karaite   intellectual   activity.   He  was   an   authoritative   and   prolific  exegete  who  translated  the  entire  Bible   into  Judaeo-­‐Arabic  and  wrote  a  commentary  on  the  entire  Bible.    Only  a   few  commentaries  were  written  on   the  Book  of  Proverbs  by   Jews  who   lived  under   Islam.    Yefet’s  commentary  on  Proverbs  provides  not  only  a  unique  Karaite  perspective,  but  a  unique  work  on  Proverbs  in  its   own   right.     It   is   a   valuable   source   for   the   study   of   Yefet’s   world   views,   theology   and   ethics.     In   his  commentary   on   Proverbs   8   Yefet   grapples   with   three   fundamental   theological   maters,   creation   of   the  world,  the  existence  of  wisdom  in  this  world,  and  the  rank  and  role  of  angels  in  the  world.  In  this  paper  we  will   take  a  close   look  at  Yefet’s  commentary  on  Proverbs  8  and  learn  about  his  position  concerning  these  major  issues.  

 

Marzena  Zawanowska,  University  of  Warsaw,  Poland  

Title:  The  Bible  Read  through  the  Prism  of  Theology:  Spiritual  Anthropomorphism  among  the  Early  Karaites  Abstract:  One  of  the  crucial  problems  the  Bible  has  posed  over  the  centuries  for  its  believing  readers  is  its  numerous   boldly   anthropomorphic   descriptions   of   the   Deity—God’s   actions   and   interactions   with   “the  crown   of   Creation,”   direct   references   to   the   divine   body,   its   organs,   and   parts,   and   anthropopathic  depictions  of  His  emotions.  For  many  rationally  oriented  religious  thinkers,  philosophers,  and  exegetes,  this  constituted   a   major   problem   which   called   for   a   systematic   and   consistent   solution.   Jewish   Hellenist  philosophers,  the  Rabbanite  authors  of  the  Aramaic  Targums,  and  some  of  the  great  medieval  thinkers  and  Bible   interpreters,   such   as   Saadyah   Gaon,   all   shared   the   same   obsession   with   banishing  anthropomorphisms   and   anthropopathisms   from   the   Holy   Scriptures,   though   they   reached   different  conceptual   solutions.   The  medieval   Karaite   exegetes   are   known   for   their   overall   adherence   to   the   literal  meaning  of  the  Bible  and  presumably  valued  fidelity  to  the  source  verses  above  all.  It  has  been  suggested  that  they  could  allow  themselves  to  faithfully  adhere  to  the  original  words  of  the  source  text—even  at  the  expense  of  the  theological  appropriateness,   let  alone  the  linguistic  correctness  or  stylistic  beauty,  of  their  renderings—insofar   as   their   translations   were   intended   to   be   read   in   conjunction   with,   and   not  independently  of  commentary,  as  was  the  case  with  the  rabbinic  Targums  or  the  famous  Arabic  translation  of  the  Torah  authored  by  Saadyah  Gaon,  known  simply  as  the  Tafsir.  In  the  proposed  paper,  I  would  like  to  investigate  whether  the  medieval  Karaite  exegetes  were  indeed  so  much  more  literalistic  in  their  dealings  with  explicitly  anthropomorphic  and  anthropopathic  verses  than  were  their  Rabbanite  counterparts.  

 

Miriam  Lindgren  Hjälm,  Uppsala  University,  Sweden  

Title:  Early  (9th-­‐13th  c.)  Christian  Arabic  Translations  of  the  Book  of  Daniel    

Abstract:  The  Book  of  Daniel  was  translated  into  Arabic  by  and  for  Near  Eastern  Christians  around  the  ninth  century,   as   evident   from   extant   manuscript   sources.   Approximately   a   dozen   early   (9th-­‐13th   centuries)  Christian  Arabic  Daniel  translations  have  survived  until  today.  The  majority  of  these  are  independent  of  one  another  and  are  all  characterized  by  many  non-­‐literal  translational  features.   It  appears  therefore  that  the  early  Christian  Arabic  Daniel   translations  were  never   standardized  nor  authorized   (this   in   contrast   to   the  development   in  many   other   Christian   areas).  We  may   surmise   that   they  were   not   furnished   in   order   to  replace  the  traditional  Greek  and  Syriac  Bible  texts  but  to  explain  them  and  make  the  main  events  of  the  biblical  narrative  available  to  the  Arabic-­‐speaking  audience  while  the  traditional  texts  were  still  in  use  and  served  as  the  measuring-­‐standard.  This  function  of  the  translations,  i.e.  to  transmit  into  Arabic  the  biblical  narrative  of  Daniel   in  a   clear  and  concise  manner,  explains  why  we   in   the   target   texts  encounter  a   large  amount  of  omissions  of  repetitive   information  and  explications  of  elliptic  material   in  the  source  text.  The  Arabic  translated  texts  are  further  subjected  to  an  adjusting  process  wherein  source  units  are  sporadically  altered   in   the   target   texts   and   brought   in   line   with   liturgical   material,   Bible   commentaries,   and   wider  cultural  settings.  They  are  written  in  clear  and  idiomatic  Arabic,  exhibit  many  Middle  Arabic  traits,  and  the  vocabulary   has   an   ‘Islamic   cast’   to   it.   Should   the   preferences   of   style   differ   between   source   and   target  language,   the   former   is   normally   opted   for.   The   student   of   Judaeo-­‐Arabic   translations   immediately  recognizes  many  of  the  translational  features  identified  in  these  texts.  Especially  interesting  is  the  relation  between  these  Christian-­‐Arabic  versions  and  Saadiah  Gaon’s  tafsīr  on  Daniel.  Just  like  Saadiah,  the  Christian  Arabic  translators  aimed  at  producing  translations  that  were  suitable  for  an  audience  acquainted  with  the  norms  of  Classical  Arabic  and  their  interpretational  framework  was  not  confined  to  the  biblical  corpus  itself  but  took  into  consideration  the  larger  scope  of  the  Orthodox/Oriental  Tradition.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  04  

 

Session:  001:  

Talmud  and  Philosophy  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Maria  Sokolskaya,  University  of  Bern,  Switzerland  

Title:  Philon,  Platon  et  les  Rabbins  :  Adam  ha-­‐richon  et  les  Androgynes  

Abstract:  Dès   lors  que   l’on  considère   le   récit  de   la  création  de   l’Homme,  en  Genèse  1-­‐2,   comme  un  récit  suivi,  certaines   incohérences,  entre  autres  en  ce  qui  concerne   les  origines  de   la   femme,  ne  sont  pas  sans  poser   des   difficultés.   L’exégèse   rabbinique   ancienne   a   cherché   à   résoudre   celles-­‐ci,   notamment   en  recourant   au  mythe   platonicien   des   Androgynes.   Le  mot   grec   «   androgynos   »   (sous   la   forme (אנדרגינוס   apparaît   d’ailleurs   dans   la   littérature   rabbinique   ancienne.   Il   a   été   proposé,   de   manière   toutefois   peu  concluante,  de  considérer  Philon  d’Alexandrie,  le  célèbre  philosophe  platonicien  juif,  comme  un  relai  entre  Platon   et   les   Rabbins.   Si   l’on   observe   bien   les   textes,   toutefois,   la   chose   paraît   tout   à   fait   impossible.   Je  chercherai  à  démontrer  ici,  en  analysant  les  emplois  du  mot  «  androgynos  »  chez  Philon,  que  les  Rabbins  ne  peuvent   lui   avoir   emprunté   ce   concept.   Je   montrerai   aussi   que   difficultés   spécifiques   du   texte   biblique  déterminent  l'exégèse  philonienne  de  l’histoire  d'Adam,  et  donc  que  celle-­‐ci,  quand  bien  même  elle  utilise  des  notions  platoniciennes,  s’enracine  d’abord  dans  une  tradition  exégétique  juive.  

 

Arkady  Kovelman,  Lomonosov  Moscow  State  Univeristy,  Russia  

Title:  Pleroma  and  Kenosis  in  Bavli  Hagigah  

Abstract:   The   notions   of   pleroma   and   kenosis   are   generally   associated   with   Christian   theology   and  Gnosticism.   I  suggest  that  these  notions  derive  from  Plato  and  appear  both   in  Philo  and   in  early  Rabbinic  Literature.   Mishnah   Hagiga   and   Bavli   Hagiga   provide   clear   examples   of   their   usage   in   connection   with  epistemological   and   eschatological   matters.   Israel   is   both   full   of   religious   duties   and   empty,   as   a  pomegranate   is   full   of   seeds   and   a   vessel   empty   of   sacred   liquids.   In   another   metaphoric   twist,   the  righteous  of  Israel  are  full  of  good  deeds  while  the  sinners  are  empty.  God  loves  the  emptiness  of  Israel,  but  at  the  same  time  the  emptiness  prevents  Israel  from  completing  an  eschatological  pilgrimage,  the  latter  a  metaphor   for   the   sacred   rendezvous   between   God   and   Israel.   Both   tractates   are   utterly   aporetic.   They  combine   positive   and   negative   understandings   of   fullness   and   emptiness.   The   salvation   of   all   Israel  (including  the  disciples  of  the  sages)  depends  on  the  fullness  and  emptiness  of  the  people.  Moreover,  these  notions  play  a  major  role  in  the  esoteric  adventure  of  the  four  who  entered  Paradise.  

 

Lorena  Miralles-­‐Maciá,  University  of  Granada,  Spain  

Title:  Midrashic  Traditions  through  a  Platonic  Lens  

Abstract:  It  is  well  known  that  Hellenistic  culture  had  a  deep  influence  on  rabbinic  Judaism,  and  played  an  important   role   as   a   source   of   inspiration   in   elaborating   some   of   the  midrashic   and   Talmudic   narratives.  Greek  folklore,  motifs  and  tales  were  included,  after  adapting  them,  in  the  writings  of  Classical  Judaism.  As  part  of   this  background,  philosophy,  or   rather  some  philosophic  conceptions,   could  be  used  as   resources  for   explaining   biblical   passages   midrashically.   How   much   rabbis   directly   or   indirectly   knew   Greek  philosophical  ideas  about  the  world  and  the  human  being  is  a  highly  disputed  question.  This  lecture  aims  at  tracing  a  connection  between  rabbinic  traditions  and  some  platonic  features  to  enlighten  certain  midrashic  passages,  mainly  from  Leviticus  Rabbah,  on  the  work  of  creation  and  the  role  of  the  soul.  

 

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Liturgy  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  Uri  Ehrlich  

 

Vered  Raziel  Kretzmer,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Mystery  of  Pesukei-­‐DeZimrah  in  the  Palestinian  Rite  according  to  an  Ancient  Scroll  from  the  Cairo  Genizah  

Abstract:  The  liturgical  fragments  found  in  the  Cairo  Genizah  enlighten  us  with  a  whole  new  world  of  early  medieval   liturgy.   The   Palestinian   rite,   non-­‐extant   since   the   13th   century,   is   rediscovered   piece   by   piece,  uncovering   a   unique   liturgical   world,   different   in  many   ways   from   the   known   Jewish   prayer   books   that  follow  the  Babylonian  rite.  One  of  the  interesting  questions  arising  since  the  early  days  of  Genizah  liturgical  research  deals  with  the  construction  of  the  Pesukei-­‐deZimrah  unit  in  the  Palestinian  siddur.  Jacob  Mann,  in  his   important  study  from  1925,  was  the  first  to  claim  that  the  Palestinian  morning  service  did  not   include  the  Babylonian  unit  of  Pesukei-­‐deZimrah,  namely  the  last  6  chapters  of  Psalms.  Instead,  he  concluded,  the  ancient   worshipers   recited   a   selection   of   verses   and   not   whole   chapters,   while   one   of   the   Genizah  fragments   published   by   him   records   yet   a   different   custom   of   reciting   a   longer   version   of   30   chapters,  Psalms   120-­‐150.   In   his   footsteps,   Ezra   Fleischer,   the   leading   contemporary   scholar   of   Genizah   liturgy,  claimed   that   the   Psalms   unit   in   the   Palestinian   morning   service   for   weekdays   was   originally   based   on  Psalms   120-­‐134,   known   as   'Songs   of   Ascents'.   According   to   Fleischer,   any   reciting   of   the   last   6   psalms  mentioned   in  Palestinian  prayer  books   should  be   considered  as   a  Babylonian   influence,  while   the   longer  version  containing  30  psalms  is  considered  a  special  custom  for  Sabbath  and  holidays.  In  this  paper  I  would  like   to  challenge  these  assumptions,  based  on  a   few  new  findings.  These  unpublished  Genizah   fragments  clearly   show   that   the   old   Palestinian   rite   for   the  weekdays'  morning   service  was   not   homogeneous,   but  held   two   main   customs,   a   shorter   unit   of   psalms   consisting   of   the   last   7   psalms   (differed   from   the  Babylonian   rite   which   held   6   psalms)   and   a   longer   version   of   30   psalms.   The  most   fascinating   finding   I  intend  to  present  is  a  rotulus  (a  scroll  rolled  up  vertically)  which  originally  contained  the  weekdays'  services  according   to   the  Palestinian   rite.   Four   fragments  of   this   rotulus  have  been   found  by  now,   revealing   long  parts  of  the  morning  service.  The  unique  custom  presented  in  this  scroll  can  create  a  better  understanding  

of   the   developments   in   the   Palestinian   unit   of   Pesukei-­‐deZimrah   and  will   hopefully   shed   light   upon   the  roots  of  the  long  forgotten  Palestinian  rite.  

 

Luba  Charlap  &  Yaakov  Charlap,  Lifshitz  College  of  Education  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  A  Prayer  in  any  Language?  –  The  Prayer's  Language  in  Light  of  Talmudic  Law  and  Rabbinical  Rulings  in  Ashkenaz  during  the  19th  Century  

Abstract:  Tannaitic  and  Amoraic  literature  emphasized  the  importance  of  the  Hebrew  language  in  matters  of  sanctity,  such  as  in  the  declaration  of  the  first  fruits  (Miqra  Bikurim)  and  in  the  priestly  blessing  (Birkat  kohanim).  However   some   rituals  and  Prayers,   for  example,  Qeri'at   Shema   ("Hear  O   Israel"   ritual),   can  be  recited   in   any   language,   not   only   in   Hebrew   (Mishna   Sota,   7,   a-­‐b;   Palestinian   Talmud,   Sota,   chap.   7,   5;  Babylonian  Talmud,   Sota  32,   b–33,   a).   Indeed,   those  were   the  halachic   rulings  of  Maimonides   in  Mishne  Tora  and  of  Rabbi  Yoseph  Qaro  in  Shulhan  Arux.  Despite  these  rulings,  Jewish  religious  authorities  sided,  for  generations,  with   reciting   the  Prayer  only   in  Hebrew,   the  Holy  Language.   In  early  19th  century   in  central  Europe,  a  genuine  debate  has  developed  among  the  various  streams  of  Judaism.  Reform  leadership  relied  on  the  Mishne  Tora  and  the  Shulhan  Arux  rulings,  while  Orthodox  rabbis  uploaded  halakhic  arguments  to  prohibit   this   practice   in   order   to   support   the   supremacy   of   the   Hebrew   language.   For   example,   Rabbi  Shmuel  Eager  (1768–1842),  from  Braunschweig,  Germany,  claimed  that  the  Holy  Language  is  the  common  thread   that   binds   Jews   in   the   Diaspora,   emphasizing   the   necessity   of   Hebrew   as   the   sole   language   for  Jewish   Prayer.   Rabbi   Shmuel   Landau   from   Prague   (d.   1834),   emphasized   in   his   book   "Shivat   Zion"   (The  Return  to  Zion)  that  the  Holy  Language  is  used  as  a  shield  against  assimilation  and  contributes  to  preserving  Jewish  existence,  therefore   it  must  remain  the  only   language  of  the  Jewish  Prayer.   In  this  current   lecture  we  will  discuss  ancient  law  sources  and  analyze  the  various  aspects  of  the  arguments  that  played  a  role  in  establishing  Hebrew  as  the  exclusive  language  of  the  Prayer.  We  will  focus  on  the  halakhic  views  of  Rabbi  Moshe  Sofer,  known  as  "Hatam  Sofer"  (1762–1839)  as  were  published  by  him  in  the  pamphlet  "Ele  Divrei  Ha-­‐brit"   (These   are   the   words   of   the   covenant)   (Altuna,   1819).   To   our   opinion   his   views   reflect   a   new  halakhic   vision   in   regards   to   these   conflicted   points   of   views.   We   believe   that   shedding   a   light   on   this  powerful  halakhic  debate  may  contribute  to  a  better  understanding  of  the  role  of  Hebrew  language,  as  an  existential  value,  in  both  the  Halakhic  world  and  Jewish  society.  

 

Jeffrey  Hoffman,  The  Academy  for  Jewish  Religion,  New  York,  USA  

Title:  The  Image  of  the  Other  in  Jewish  Interpretations  of  Alenu  

Abstract:  The  superiority  of  the  Jewish  people's  worship  of  God  and  the  inferiority  of  non-­‐Jewish  worship  is  at  the  heart  of  the  prayer  "Alenu."  Interpreters  of  this  prayer  over  the  centuries  have  engaged  this  theme  in  various  ways  from  denial  to  reinterpretation  to  emphasizing   it  with  a  vengeance.  The  particular  stance  taken  in  a  commentary  on  this  prayer  is  an  important  indicator  of  the  view  of  the  Other  of  that  particular  writer,  and  possibly  as  well,  of  that  writer's  milieu  and  era.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  05  

 

Session:  001:  

Early  Modern  Jewish  History  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Implementing  the  "Economic  Turn":  New  Sources  and  Approaches    

for  the  Economic  History  of  Early  Modern  Jews  

Organizer:  Evelyne  Oliel-­‐Grausz  

Chair:  Jean  Baumgarten  

 

Evelyne  Oliel-­‐Grausz,  Université  Paris  1  /  EHESS,  Paris,  France  

Title:  «  Between  Trade,  Finance  and  Community:  Community  Agents  in  the  Western  Sephardic  Diaspora  »  

Abstract:  Within   a   panel   intent   on   bringing   to   light   new   sources   and   approaches   for   the   writing   of   the  economic  history  of  early  modern  Jewry,   this  paper   intends  to  revisit   the  nexus  between  community  and  economy   in   the   Western   Sephardic   diaspora   in   the   18th   century.   Both   objects   are   rarely   considered  together  as  economic  historiography  of  early  modern   Jews  and   the  historiography  of   the  kehillah  usually  operate   in   distinct   spheres.   A   heuritistic   approach     based   on   archival  material   stemming   primarily   from  Amsterdam,   Curaçao,   Surinam   and   London,   that   partition   will   be   challenged,   and   it   will   be   argued   that  community   sources   and   funds   may   be   used   to   write   economic   history   of   the  Western   Sephardim,   and  conversely,  that  mercantile  sources  may  be  of  great  interest  for  writing  a  history  of  the  kehillah.  The  little  known  figure  of   the  community  agent,  at   the   intersection  between  mercantile  and  community  networks,  will  be  analyzed  :  it  allows  for  a  new  understanding  of  the  way  communal  and  merchant  networks  intersect  and   are   intertwined,   and   constitutes   a   chapter   in   the   still   to   be   written   economic   history   of   the   early  modern  kehillah.  

 

Ingrid  Houssaye,  Université  Paris  Diderot,  France  

Title:  Jewish  Merchant  Networks  in  Early  Modern  Mediterranean  as  Perceived  through  Florentine  Business  Archives  

Abstract:  Correspondences  and  account  books  left  by  Florentine  merchants  established  in  different  places  of   the   Mediterranean   area   in   Early   Modern   time,   such   as   Majorca   or   Constantinople,   give   a   lot   of  information   about   their   Jewish   economic   partners   or   clients.   Sometimes   containing   some   writings   in  Hebrew   letters,   the   documents   that   I  will   present   allow   to   identify   Jewish   people   and   networks,   and   to  understand  their  spatial  configuration.  

 

Tirtsah  Levie  Bernfeld,  Independent  scholar  

Title:  Making   Ends  meet   in   Early  Modern  Amsterdam:   People   and  Pawns   at   the   Portuguese   Jewish   Loan  Bank  

Abstract:   Following   examples   set   among   Jews   and   non-­‐Jews   throughout   European   history,   a   pawn   bank  was   established   within   the   Amsterdam   Portuguese   community   in   1624,   meant   to   give   loans   without  interest  to  Jewish  poor,   later  specified  as  Portuguese  poor.  The  Portuguese   loan  bank  grew   in  reputation  since  it  was  the  only  one  in  town  to  provide  –  albeit  relatively  small-­‐  loans  without  interest  as  opposed  to  the   non-­‐Jewish   ‘Bank   van   Lening’   of   Amsterdam,   to   which   Jews   could   turn   to   as   well.   The   Portuguese  Jewish   bank   apparently   only   served   the   genteel   poor   if   we   consider   the   pawns   given   to   the   bank.   New  findings   in   the   Amsterdam   City   Archives   give   us   a   possibility,   not   only   to   specify   into   detail   the   pawns  handed  in  but  also  to  provide  a  more  accurate  picture  of  the  people  in  need  of  cash  who  turned  to  the  loan  bank   for   help.   This   way,   new   insights   are   given   into   the   financial   strength   of   a  marginal   group   and   the  economic   crises   they  were   confronted  with.   At   the   same   time,   research   into   the   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish  financial   institutions  offers  new  economic  data   relating   to   the   (Portuguese)   Jewish  clients  of  both  banks.  Finally   seeing   the   nature   of   the   pawns,   new   light   is   shed  on   aspects   of  material   and   religious   culture   of  Dutch  Sephardim  in  early  modern  Amsterdam.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Modern  Jewish  History  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Implementing  the  "Economic  Turn":  New  Sources  and  Approaches    

for  the  Economic  History  of  Early  Modern  Jews  2  

Organizer:  Evelyne  Oliel-­‐Grausz  

 

Chair:  Evelyne  Oliel-­‐Grausz  

 

Jean  Baumgarten,  CNRS-­‐EHESS,  France  

Title:  Solomon  Hyman,  un  marchand  juif  à  Paris  (Fin  du  XVIIIe  siècle)  :  Etude  sociolinguistique  de  son  livre  de  comptes.    

Abstract:   Solomon   est   un   commerçant   juif   résidant   à   Paris   à   la   fin   du   XVIIIe   siècle.   Spécialisé   dans   les  articles  de   luxe,   il  commerce  principalement  avec   l'Angleterre.  Ses  correspondants  se  trouvent  à  Londres,  Birmingham,  Manchester,  notamment  la  manufacture  de  Matthew  Boulton.  En  raison  de  sa  faillite  en  1756,  des  papiers,  dont  son   livre  de  comptes,  sont  déposés  aux  archives  de  Paris   (D5B6  4376  ;  D4B6  57  3493.).  Dans   cette   communication,   nous   étudierons   les   traits   linguistiques   de   ce   document   en   relation   avec   les  pratiques   négociantes   de   Hyman.   Caractérisé   par   le   bilinguisme   interne   (Hébreu-­‐yiddish)   et   externe  (yiddish  -­‐   langues  majoritaires,  soit   l'anglais  et   le   français),   l'allophonie,   l'alternance  des  codes,   le   livre  de  comptes  de  Solomon  Hyman  est  un   intéressant  exemple  de   la   langue  marchande  qu'utilisaient   les   juifs  à  Paris   au  XVIIIe   siècle.   Le   texte   fournit   un   grand  nombre  de  données,   entre   autres,   sur   son  éducation,   sa  personnalité,   ses   habitudes   comptables,   les   articles   manufacturés,   les   réseaux   commerciaux,   les   modes  d'acheminement   des   marchandises   qui   nécessitent   de   combiner   l'étude   historique,   économique   et  linguistique.  Ce  qui  caractérise  le  plus  cette  langue,  c’est   la  tension  entre,  d’un  côté,   le  système  de  règles  économiques,  sociales,  langagières  auxquelles  il  doit  se  plier  et,  de  l’autre,  la  manière  singulière  dont  il  se  

situe,   se   meut   à   l’intérieur   de   ce   système   de   normes   contraignantes.   D’où   la   production   d’une   langue  (propre   à   nombre   de   minorités   émigrées)   qui   oscille   entre   la   difficulté   à   maîtriser   les   règles  orthographiques,   phonétiques,   voire   une   résistance   à   la   norme   et,   de   l’autre,   la   volonté   d’ajustement,  d’accommodement,  d’adaptation  de  Hyman.  Une   langue  de  négociants  et  de  négociations.  Cette   tension  explique   les   disfonctionnements,   les   hésitations,   propres   à   la   langue   de   Hyman,   marquée   par   un   désir  d’intégration,   des   obstacles   qui   gênent,   contrarient   sa   pleine   adaptation   et   la   persistance   d’une   identité  socioreligieuse  forte.  La  langue  oscille  entre  ces  différentes  polarités,  depuis  l’intériorisation  des  exigences  /   restrictions  structurelles  de   la  société,  de   l’économie,  de   la   langue,  une  évidente  capacité  d’adaptation,  jusqu’à   la   créativité,   l’inventivité   à   l’intérieur   des   normes   langagières,   les   interférences   entre   sa   langue  première  et  les  langues  d’adoption  et  une  forme  de  résistance  à  l’assimilation.  La  commercialisation  fondée  sur   la   recherche   de   débouchés   européens   est   favorisée   par   l'insertion   ans   des   réseaux   transnationaux  composés  soit  de  parents,  soit  de  courtiers,  d'agents   installés  près  des  ateliers  de  fabrication.  La  mobilité  marchande  des  artisans  juifs  travaillant  au  sein  de  réseaux  familiaux  et  commerciaux  européens  explique  la  nature  composite  de  leur  langue  commerciale  qui  constitue  un  aspect  peu  étudiée  de  l'histoire  de  la  langue  yiddish.  

 

Isabelle  Bretthauer,  Labex  Hastec  /  Université  Paris  Diderot,  France,  &  Liliane  Hilaire-­‐Perez,  University  Paris  7,  France  

Title:  The  Jews  and  the  Making  of  the  Metropolis:  Jewish  Trade  in  Paris  in  the  XVIIIth  Century  

Abstract:  Whereas  studies  on  Jewish  business  in  Paris  in  the  XVIIIth  century  are  scarce,  the  archival  sources  are  numerous,  such  as  bankruptcies  held   in  the  Paris  Archives  (debt  and  credit   lists,  account   ledgers)  and  reports   established   by   Parisian   police   officers   (National   Library,   Arsenal).   The   interest   for   research   is  twofold.  First,  these  records  provide  a  thorough  picture  of  international  Jewish  networks  in  Paris,  especially  in  the  trade  for  consumer  goods  ranging  from  haberdashery  to  hardware  and  toyware  –  trades  that  were  highly   connected   to   industrious   areas   and   to  manufactures,   as   we   will   detail   in   the   case   of   one   Anglo-­‐French  network.  Second,  the  Jewish  merchants  involved  in  these  transactions  proved  very  much  connected  to  non-­‐Jewish  partners  and  extremely  well  integrated  into  the  Parisian  trades.  As  these  Jewish  actors  were  mainly   Ashkenazim   whom   the   historiography   as   long   described   as   marginal   and   non-­‐integrated   in   the  Parisian  society,  these  archives  can  help  open  new  paths  for  understanding  the  part  played  by  Jews  in  the  French  metropolis  which  also  was  the  European  capital  of  fashion  and  of  the  Enlightenment.  

 

Orit  Ramon,  The  Open  University  of  Israel  

Title:  Maharal  of  Prague  on  Gentile  Wine  and  Jewish  Confessionalization  

Abstract:  One  of   the  main   issues   that  concerned  Maharal   throughout  his   life,   to  which  he  devoted  many  references   in   his   various   writings,   is   the   use   of   wine   produced   by   Christians   –   'Gentile   wine'   -­‐   by   Jews.  Maharal  not  only  opposed  drinking  the  wine  by  Jews,  often  in  company  of  Christians,  but  also  Jewish  trade  of   that   wine   and   the   benefits   derived   from   it.   Chaim   Soloveitchik   in   his   book,   Principles   and   Pressures:  Jewish  Trade  in  Gentile  Wine  in  the  Middle  Ages  (2003),  wondered  about   'Maharal's  straggle  to  give  new  flavor  to  a  prohibition  that  in  the  eyes  of  others  already  seemed  devoid  of  taste  and  reason'.  Jacob  Katz  and  Chaim-­‐Hilel   Ben-­‐Sasson   debated   on   the   meaning   of   Maharal's   strong   stance   against   this   practice   that  prevailed   especially   in  Moravia.   Katz's   interpretation   emphasized   the  mystical   significance  Maharal   gave  the  nature  of   Israel  and  argued   that  Maharal's   thought,   in  general,  was   formulated   in  a   reality  of   Jewish  seclusion  and  apathy.  Ben–Sasson,  on  the  other  hand,  emphasized  the  significance  Maharal  gave  the  wine  and  claimed  that  Maharal's  stance  was  a  Jewish  scholar's  sharp  and  aware  response  to  the  reality  of  exile.  

In  the  paper  proposed,  I  intend  to  suggest  that  the  explanation  of  Maharal's  fierce  opposition  to  the  Jewish  custom   of   using   Gentile   wine   arises   from   the   special   historical   context   of   the   Czech   lands   in   the   16th  century.  Except  for  the  developing  wine  culture  in  Moravia,  and  the  spiritual  qualities  attributed  to  wine  by  the   new   science,   especially   wine-­‐spirits,   important   to   this   discussion   is   the   confessionalization   process  experienced  by  the  many  and  varied  religious  communities  in  these  areas,  ruled  by  the  Catholic  Habsburgs.  Wine,   especially   the   liturgical   use  of   it   and   the   theological   significance   tied   to   it   in   each  of   the  Christian  churches,  was   one  of   the  unique   features   of   each  of   the   confessions   and   an   important   tool   for   defining  confessional  identity.  I  will  argue  that  the  desire  to  redefine  the  boundaries  of  Jewish  identity  in  the  multi-­‐confessional  environment,  made  Maharal  revive  the  old  Jewish  prohibition  that  enabled  him  to  define  the  Jewish  community  as  a  confession  -­‐  one  of  many.  This  definition  made  possible  a  continuation  of  a  distinct  Jewish  communal  existence  in  exile,  while  integrating  as  a  Jewish  confession  in  the  Habsburg  lands.  

 

Orly  C.  Meron,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  “And  They  also  Took  Possession?”  Jewish  Businesses  in  Northern  Greece  during  World  War  II,  1943–1945    

Abstract:   The   proposed   lecture   presents   a   conceptualization   of   the   Hellenization   process   of   Sephardic  Jewish-­‐owned  businesses  that  took  place  in  northern  Greece,  where  most  of  the  Jewish  community  (about  80  percent)  settled,  particularly  in  the  densely  populated  metropolis  of  Macedonian  Salonika.  The  study  is  a  continuation  of  extensive  work  I  have  conducted  and  been  involved  with,  that   is,  creating  a  retrospective  picture  of   Salonika’s   Jewish  business   activities   between   the   two  World  Wars.   In  my   lecture   I   propose   to  trace  the  Jewish-­‐owned  businesses  from  their  establishment  to  their  final  transfer  into  Greek  hands.    Based  on  a  range  of  unpublished  archival  sources,  the  lecture  reflects  the  Arianization  procedure  of  the  transfer  of  Jewish   businesses   through   the   German   occupation   regime   into   Greek   possession.   The   documentation   I  have   uncovered   sheds   new   light   on   the   eve   of   the   destruction   of   Jewish   businesses   and   provides   the  opportunity  to  trace  the  Jewish-­‐owned  businesses  to  their  destruction.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  06  

 

Session:  001:  

Childhood  and  Education  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  Ephraim  Kanarfogel  

 

Hagith  Sivan,  University  of  Kansas,  USA  

Title:  Jewish  Childhood  in  Antiquity-­‐how  Jewish?  

Abstract:  Amidst  the  plethora  of  studies  on  the  family,  gender,  and  childhood  in  history,  the  absence  of  a  full  study  devoted  to  Jewish  childhood  in  antiquity  is  striking.  I  have  set  out  to  fill  the  gap  with  the  following  questions   that   I  will  be   raising   in  my  presentation:  Can  we  speak  of  any  kind  of  universal   Jewish  child  or  childhood  in  antiquity  (or,  for  that  matter,  in  modernity)?  What  were  the  components  of  Jewish  identity  in  antiquity  and  how  did  family  practices  convey  it?  Were  there  communal  institutions  that  contributed  to  the  formation  of  Jewish  identity?  Were  these  strategies  of  identity  formation  in  any  way  different  from  that  of  Greeks,  Romans,  and  other  peoples  of  antiquity  of  equivalent  classes?  Were  boy  and  girls’  identities  formed  differently?  

 

Shaul  Regev,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Attitude  to  Education  in  the  Rabbinical  Literature  of  the  Babylonian  Jews    

Abstract:  From  the  middle  of  the  19th  century,  schools  were  developing  at  the  same  time  as  Talmud  Torahs  and  Yeshivahs,  which  were  the  backbone  of  the  educational  system  until  then.  There  were  general  studies  in   these   schools,   as  well   as   languages   and   Jewish   studies.   The  Rabbinical   establishment  welcomed   these  programs   and   saw   them   as   a   continuation   and   development   of   the   educational   system,   to   prepare   the  students  for  a  better  economic  and  cultural   life  and  thereby  promote  the  advancement  of  Jewish  society.  However,  when  they  discovered  the  secular   influence  of  this  system  on  the  students,  the  rabbis  began  to  speak  out  against  it.  

 

Joseph  Levi,  Jewish  Community  of  Florence,  Italy  

Title:  The  Rabbinical  Seminars  in  19th  Century  Europe-­‐  Models  of  Cultural  Integration  

Abstract:  The  Rabbinical  Seminars  in  19th  Century  Europe  –  Models  of  cultural  integration.    The  history  of  the   different   rabbinical   seminars   established   in   Europe   between   1823   and   1893   reflects   the   social   and  cultural   changes   European   Judaism  went   through   from   the   early  modern   to  modern   Jewish   period.   The  French  revolution  and  the  emancipation  changed  the  political  and  social  reality  of  Jewish  life  determining  also   profound   cultural   changes.   The   process   of   integrating   new   scientific   and   cultural   values   from   the  environment   was   slow   and   varied   from   country   to   country.  While   in   France   and   Italy   the   institution   of  

rabbinic   seminars   advanced   by   civil   authorities   was   basically   welcomed   by   the   rabbinic   community,   the  process   in   Germany   Russia   and   East   European   countries   was   an   argument   of   strong   internal   polemics  between   moderns   and   traditionalists.   The   idea   of   a   new   type   of   educated   Rabbi   was   conceived   as   an  external   imposition   and   the   integration   between   traditional   Jewish   ways   of   learning   and   teaching   and  modern   scientific   sensitivities   to   textual   and   historical   study,   was   not   accepted   by   various   traditional  religious  leaders.  A  strong  tension  between  assimilation  or  integration  reading  of  the  modern  process  was  felt   and   debated.   Yet,   the   internal   ideological   fight   for   a   cultural   change   was   related   to   a   parallel   but  different   process   in   the   non   Jewish   civil   society   concerning   the   acceptance   and   recognition   of   Jewish  culture  as  a  particular  cultural  history  with  a  distinctive  characteristics  of  its  own.  The  creation  of  Rabbinic  seminars   thus   served   a   double   bind   purpose:   integrating   new   cultural   and   scientific   models   from   the  developing  local  national  countries  on  the  one  hand  and  promoting  recognition  in  the  general  society  of  the  specific  values  of  Jewish  culture  and  history  on  the  other.  The  lecture  will  aim  at  presenting  the  particular  lines  of  cultural  development  of  Italian  and  French  Jewish  culture  which  facilitated  the  creation  of  the  first  rabbinic  seminars  in  Metz  (and  then  Paris)  and  Padova  on  1829  and  1827  respectively.  A  process  of  change  prepared  already  by   the  French  revolution  and  the  creation  of   the  Napoleonic  Sanhedrin,  as  well  as  by  a  long   process   of   integrating   early   modern   Humanism   and   scientific   positions   in   the   Italian   case.   Special  attention  will  be  given  to  the  history  of  the  Italian  Rabbinic  Seminar  and  its  different  periods  and  location  in  Padova   Florence   and   Rome.   As   for   Germany   and   East   European   Judaism   the   double   fold   function   of  separation   and   integration   of   the   new   Seminars  will   be   discussed,   exposing   the   gap   between   two   basic  positions:  those  who  negated  the  need  for  a  new  type  of  a  Rabbinic  Seminars  to  mediate  between  the  old  and   the   new   cultures,   versus   those  who   privileged   the   creation   of   academic   Jewish   studies   programs   in  national   universities   rather   than   creating   a   distinctive   rabbinic   seminars.  We  will   try   to   show  how   these  different   positions   influenced   and   were   reflected   in   the   study   program   of   the   different   seminars.     In   a  conclusive   remark   we  will   argue   that   the   debate   between   these   distinctive   positions   concerning   Jewish  culture,  its  relation  to  other  national  cultures  as  well  as  its  development  and  preservation  is  still  reflected  in  the  cultural  debate  between  different  groups  in  present  day  Jewish  culture  and  the  flourishing  of  new  Batei  Midrash  and  educational  institutions.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

 

11.00-­‐13.00  

TItle  

Chair:  

 

Yotam  Cohen,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  The  Hebrew  Reception  of  Homer:  An  Example  of  Adopting  of  Non-­‐Jewish  Culture  

Abstract:   Since   ancient   times   Homer,   the   great   Greek   poet,   symbolized   Jewish   segregation   from   the  surrounding   culture.   While   the   Christian   ecclesia   found   a   way   to   continue   the   reading   of   his   Pagan  literature,  Homer  was  the  only  author  whom  the  Jewish  Sages  mentioned  by  name,  regarding  a  prohibition  on   reading   books.   In   my   opinion,   this   negative   attitude   towards   Homer   was   retained   for   thousands   of  

years.   Only   with   the   nascent   ideology   of   the   Jewish   Haskalah,   which   believed   in   exposure   to   the  surrounding  culture,  was  Homer  introduced  to  the  Hebrew  reader  in  a  positive  way,  and  presented  as  the  Parent  of  poetry.  In  my  paper  I  will  argue  that  in  the  late  18th  to  early  20th  centuries  Homer  underwent  a  new  and  prolonged  process  of   reception   into   the  Hebrew  culture.   I  will   follow  the  changes   in  attitude  of  Hebrew  literature  towards  Homer  commencing  with  Ha’Measef,  the  first  periodical  journal  in  Hebrew  that  was  published  in  1783,  and  closing  with  the  first  complete  translation  of  the  Iliad  by  Shaul  Tchernichovsky  at  1934.  As   I  will   show,   in  order   to  be  accepted   into  non-­‐Jewish   society,   the  Haskalah  movement  had   to  demonstrate   initially   to   the   Jewish   community   that   the   Greco-­‐Roman   culture   in   general,   and   Homer   in  particular,  were   the  basis  of  European  civilization.  Acquaintance  with   the  classical  world,   in   this  manner,  contributes  to  acquaintance  with  their  contemporary  Christian  culture  and  because  of  that  was  considered  as   appropriate   and   even   necessary.   In   a   similar   way,   in   order   to   become   a   Nation   like   all   nations,   the  National  Jews  tried  to  create  role  models  for  their  new  culture,  models  which  included  classical  literature  in  general,  and  Homer  in  particular.  

 

Cyril  Grange,  CNRS/Université  de  Paris  IV  Sorbonne,  Paris,  France  

Title:   The  Choice  of  Given  Names   in   the  Parisian   Jewish  Bourgeoisie   (1840-­‐1940):  Between  Tradition  and  Assimilation  

Abstract:  Unlike  Christian  populations,  Jewish  communities  in  Old  Regime  France  did  not  use  a  first  name  followed  by  a  family  name.  The  emergence  of  a  public  birth  registry  composed  of  one  or  more  given  names  followed   by   a   patronymic   transmitted   through   the  male   line   dates   to   the  Napoleonic   decree   of   1808.   It  instituted  a  stable  civil  registry  for  the  Jews  of  France.  This   paper  will   use   given  names   as   a  means   of  measuring   the  degree  of   social   assimilation  of   Jews.   The  source   base   is   a   corpus   of   nearly   10,000   first   names   given   between   1840   and   1940   by   families   of   the  Parisian  bourgeoisie.  We  will  begin  with  a  chart  of  the  major  evolutions  in  the  pool  of  first  names.  In  particular,  we  will  focus  on  the  dispersion  and  the  pace  of  renewal.  Then  we  will  consider  whether  the  Jewish  bourgeoisie  sought  to  follow  trends  among  the  upper  classes  or   if,  on  the  contrary,   it  considered  the  first  name  to  be  part  of  a  private   space   in   which   its   Judaism   could   be   fully   expressed.   Did   its   members   take   advantage   of   the  opportunity   to  give  multiple   first  names  by   choosing  a   “neutral”  name,  placing  a   Jewish  name   in   second  place  on  the  civil  registry,  or  did  it  abandon  it  entirely?  Taking  account  of  successive  cohorts,  place  of  birth  and  professional  status  of  the  parents  will  allow  nuanced  responses  to  these  questions.  

 

Roni  Be'er-­‐Marx,  Open  University  of  Israel  

Title:  Tradition  within  a  Changing  Reality:  The  Case  of  Reformed  Talmud  Torah  in  Imperial  Russia  

Abstract:   During   the   eighteen-­‐seventies,   a   new   form   of   educational   institution   emerged   in   Jewish  communities  in  Imperial  Russia:  Reformed  Talmud-­‐Torah.  Talmud-­‐Torah  is  the  term  for  a  public  Heder  that  was  managed  and  funded  by  the  community  for  the  benefit  of  poor  students.  The  Heder,   inclusive  of  the  Talmud-­‐Torah,   was   the   primary   educational   institution   of   East   European   Jewry.   At   the   Heder,   children  acquired  essential   skills  and  ethics   for   integrating   into  a   traditional   society.  For  years,   the  Heder  was   the  stronghold   of   traditionalist   Jewish   society.   But,   since   the   end   of   the   eighteenth-­‐century,   and   with   the  intensification  of  processes  of  Modernity,  including  Enlightenment  and  secularism,  it  was  a  fighting  ground  between   traditionalists   and   reformers.   The   more   the   authorities   tried   to   change   it   and   the   more  Enlighteners  tried  to  bring  it  up-­‐to-­‐date,  the  more  did  Orthodox  Jewry  insist  on  preserving  it  as  it  was.  And  yet,  during  the  eighteen-­‐seventies,  several  dozens  of  reformed  religious-­‐schools  were  created  throughout  

the   pale-­‐of-­‐settlement   under   Orthodox   auspices   and   leadership.     These   traditional   institutions,   which  adopted   reforms   in   the   spirit   of   Enlightenment,  were   never   censored   by   the   Jewish  Orthodox   elite,   and  even  enjoyed  its  support.  Furthermore,  The  Jewish-­‐Orthodox  newspaper,  Ha-­‐Levanon,  played  a  major  part  in   leading   this  new   trend  and   in  promoting   its  acceptance  among   the   traditional   society.   In   this   lecture   I  would   like   to   examine   these   reformed   institutions   and   to   show  how   these   reforms  –   aiming   at   the   very  heart  of   the  traditional   Jewish  society  –  were  derived  from  the  political,  social  and  cultural   tendencies  of  the  Russian  society  of  the  time  and  especially  from  the  policy  of  Tsar  Alexander  II.  

 

Shlomit  Landman,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Cultural  Interaction:  Israeli  Given  Names  in  the  Jewish  Sector  during  1948-­‐2007    

Abstract:  In  this  study  we  analyze  three  thousand  of  the  most  popular  names  and  six  thousand  rare  names  given  between  1948  to  2007  to  Jewish  newborns  in  the  State  of  Israel.  The  data  was  taken  from  the  records  of   the  Ministry  of   Internal  Affairs.  The  majority  of   the  popular  given  names  are  Hebrew  names  and  their  meaning  is  therefore  transparent  for  the  speakers  of  the  language.  Examples  include  Biblical  names  such  as  Rachel  (Lamb)  and  Daniel  (God  judged)  and  modern  names  such  as  Batel  (daughter  of  God),  Gai  (valley)  and  Ron  (singing).   In  contrast,   the  majority  of   the  rare  names  are  non-­‐Hebrew  and  therefore  not   transparent  for  the  Hebrew  speakers.  That  applies  also  to  non-­‐Hebrew  names  whose  origin  from  Hebrew  such  as  John  and   Ivan   derived   from   the   Hebrew   name   Yochanan,   Elizabeth   or   Isabella   originating   from   Elisheva   and  Dawud  from  David   (Collins  1967).  Anderson  (2007)  noted  that  names  assume  a  cultural  significance,   that  observation  may  be  even  more  pertinent  in  a  multicultural  society.  Israel  is  a  melting  pot  society  in  which  numerous  migrations  from  around  the  world  have  their  own  names  and  naming  habits.  Uniquely  in  Israel,  compared  to  other  melting  pot  nations,  the  common  Jewish  background  of  the  majority  of  the  immigrants  is  creating  a  similarity  in  naming  habits  among  different  immigrant  groups.  The  historic  line  of  the  Hebrew  onomastic  began  with  the  bible.  Biblical  Hebrew  names  are  characterized  by  containing  a  component  of  the  name   of   some   God   implying   Divine   providence   over   the   child's   fate.   The   Israelites   used   the   naming  components   "ya"   and   "el"   referring   to   the  God  of   Israel   (Ilan   1984).   Some   examples   include   the   names:  Avia,  Yocheved,  Yehonatan  and  Netanel.  Nowadays  Israelis  still  create  similar  names,  as  in  the  examples  of  the  popular  names:  Odelia  and  Eliran,  and  the  rare  names:  Eldan  and  Tsurya.  In  Second  Temple  era  Jewish  names   involved   ancestors   exemplifies   by   Hilel's   dynasty  whose   son  was   Shimon,   grand-­‐son   Gamliel   and  great   grand-­‐son   Shimon   (Hachlili   1984).   Such   naming   habits   where   preserved   until   the   late   nineteenth  century   for   Jewish   boys,   most   of   whom   carried   at   least   one   Hebrew   name   (Clar   1950).  Whereas   many  Jewish  girls  had  non-­‐Hebrew  names  borrowed  from  local  cultures  (Gomperts  1956).  The  surprising  results  of   this   study   is   that   since   1948   Hebrew   names   replaced   traditional   non-­‐Hebrew   names.   In   this  manner  names  such  as   the  Ethiopian  Asrasa  and  Adana,  Persian  Shahrazad  and  Damuz,  Russian  Yelena  and  Oleg,  and  Hungarians  Aniko  and  Atila  were  preserved  as  rare  names  in  Israel  but  did  not  gain  popular  appeal.  The  few  exceptions   (non  Hebrew  popular  names)  are  girl’s  names  of  European  origins   including  Lian,  Natalie,  Maya.  This  phenomena  implies  the  remarkable  influence  of  western  cultures  upon  Israel,  more  important  it  shows  the  preference  of  Hebrew  names  for  the  boys  as  in  the  past.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  07  

 

Session:  001:  

New  Technologies:  Cairo  Genizah,  Talmud  and  the  Dead  Sea  Scrolls  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Cutting-­‐Edge  Computer  Applications  for  Jewish  Heritage  Research  

Organizer:  Roni  Shweka  -­‐  Friedberg  Genizah  Project  

 

Chair:  Roni  Shweka  

 

Roni  Shweka,  Friedberg  Genizah  Project,  Israel  

Title:  Joining  the  Cairo  Genizah  Fragments:  Project  Report    

Abstract:  One  of  the  main  obstacles  which  stand  in  the  way  of  every  Genizah  researcher  is  the  fragmentary  state   of   the   manuscripts.   A   typical   Genizah   fragment   is   no   more   than   a   single   leaf,   usually   torn   and  damaged.  Moreover,  the  scattering  of  more  than  300,000  Genizah  fragments  in  some  60  different  libraries  around  the  world  adds  another  significant  difficulty.  A  researcher  studying  a  given  fragment  can  never  tell  if  there  are  some  other  fragments  in  the  same  library  or  in  another  collection,  which  either  complements  the  missing  parts  of  this  fragment  or  represent  other  folios  from  the  original  manuscript.  In  the  last  three  years  a   research   group   composed   of   researchers   from   Genazim,   the   Computerization   Unit   of   the   Friedberg  Genizah  Project,  cooperating  with  colleagues  from  the  School  of  Computer  Science  of  Tel  Aviv  University,  has   been   involved   in   a   research   which   is   addressing   this   problem   of   finding   "joins"   by   computational  means.  A  complex  computer  program  was  developed  which  compares  pairs  of  fragments  and  mark  every  pair  with  a  similarity  grade  based  on  the  fragments'  handwriting.  In  this  presentation  I  shall  report  on  the  results   of   running   this   system   on   160,000   fragments   that   were   found   suitable   for   such   a   comparison,  comparing  every  possible  pair  of  them,  altogether  about  12.4  billion  comparisons.  I  believe  that  the  results  we  have  obtained  will  open  a  new  era  in  the  field  of  Genizah  study,  and  may  help  us  recovering  the  original  state  of  the  "Genizah  Archive".  

 

Yaacov  Choueka,  The  Friedberg  Genizah  Project,  Israel  

Title:  The  Friedberg  Project  for  Variant  Readings  of  the  Babylonian  Talmud    

Abstract:   Establishing   and   effectively   displaying   the   reading   variants   of   the   Babylonian   Talmud   is   the  mission   of   the   project   presented   in   this   talk.   The   aim   is   to   build   a  website   freely   accessible  where   high  quality  digital   images,   as  well   as   their   carefully   checked   transcriptions,  of   all  manuscripts,   fragments  and  first   editions   of   the   Talmud,   available   anywhere,   as  well   as   various   and  novel  ways   for   presenting   these  variants,  including  new  formats  of  synopsis  that  can  be  dynamically  tailored  to  the  needs  of  every  user,  will  be  available  in  the  website.  

 

Lior  Wolf,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  From  Caves  to  Cyberspace:  AI  Aids  in  the  Study  of  the  Dead  Sea  Scrolls  

Abstract:  We  have  developed  several  computerized  tools  for  the  analysis  of  the  new  multispectral  images  of  the  Dead  Sea  Scrolls.  Using  multiple  wavelengths  from  old  and  new  images  allows  us  to  produce  a  more  informative  binary   image.  Combining  results  of  several  different  binarization  methods  helps  build  a  more  accurate  separator  of  text  from  background.  We  adapted  a  key  point  detection  method  based  on  the  black  regions   in   the  binarized   image   to   locate   letters   and   then   character   spotting   is   used   to   search   for   similar  letters   to  a  given  character   image.  Our  approach   is   capable  of  distinguishing  between  different   scripts   in  the  scrolls  and  may  help  identify  fragments  written  in  the  same  hand.  Another  important  challenge  is  that  of   aligning   transcript   letters   to   their   coordinates   in  manuscript   images.  We   directly  match   the   historical  image  with  a  synthetic  one  created  from  a  transcript,  rather  than  attempting  to  recognize  individual  letters  using  OCR.  This  method   is  robust  with  respect  to  document  degradation,  variations  between  script  styles  and  non-­‐linear  image  transformations.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

New  Technologies  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Chemical  and  Physical  Analysis  of  Writing  Materials  

 

Chair:  Ira  Rabin  

 

Ira  Rabin  &  Zina  Cohen,  BAM  Federal  Institute  for  Materials  Research  and  Testing,  Germany    

Title:   Towards   a   Unified   Database   of   the   Writing   Materials   used   in   Ancient   and   Medieval   Hebrew  Manuscripts.  

Abstract:  BAM  material  studies  of  the  Dead  Sea  Scrolls  led  to  the  establishment  of  a  methodology  for  the  investigation  of  manuscripts  written  on  parchment.  Currently  we  are  working  on  other  types  of  the  writing  supports   such   as   paper,   papyrus,   and   palm   leaves.   Combining   this   methodology   with   the   previously  developed  fingerprint  model  for  iron  gall  inks  characterization  opens  the  door  for  a  routine  onsite  analysis  of  the  manuscripts.  The  results  of  the  standard  measurements  conducted  with  mobile  equipment  (µ-­‐XRF,  µ-­‐Raman,   FTIR,   NIR-­‐reflectography   and  microcsopy)   collected   in   one   database   would   provide   additional  criteria  for  joining  and  grouping  of  the  manuscripts.  

 

Oliver  Hahn,  BAM  Federal  Institute  for  Materials  Research  and  Testing  

Title:  X-­‐ray  Spectroscopy  in  the  Analytic  Studies  of  Historical  Iron  Gall  Inks:  the  Erfurt  Hebrew  Giant  Bible  

Abstract:   This   contribution   presents   quantitative   analysis   of   historical   iron   gall   inks   using   micro-­‐XRF  spectrometry.  Iron  gall   inks,  the  most  commonly  used  writing  materials  of  the  Middle  Ages,  are  produced  

by  mixing  natural  iron  vitriol  with  gall  nut  extracts.  Natural  vitriol  consists  of  a  mixture  of  metallic  sulphates  (such   as   iron   sulphate,   copper   sulphate,   manganese   sulphate,   and   zinc   sulphate)   with   relative   weight  contributions  characteristic  of   the  source  or  purification  procedure.  We  use   this  property  of   the   iron  gall  inks   to   compare   and   to   distinguish   between   them.   To   this   aim   we   developed   a   model   that   takes   into  account   the   heterogeneity   and   the   layer   structure   of   the  writing  material   and   the  writing   supports.  We  used   composition   fingerprints   to   characterize   distinguishable   inks   in   the   Erfurt   Hebrew   Giant   Bible,   to  establish  the  chronology  in  this  composite  manuscript  and  to  reconstruct  the  production  process.  The  study  of   the   Bible   demonstrates   how   such   technique   provides   corroboration,   contradiction   or   clarification   for  codicological  observation.  

 

Michael  E.  Stone,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  The  Study  of  Ancient  Books:  From  Text  to  Technology  in  the  Digital  Age  

Abstract:  This  paper  discusses  the  multiple  dimensions  of  the  ancient  book:  considering  some  issues  in  the  study   of   the   text   in   its   various   aspects   -­‐-­‐   content,  meaning   and   significance;   language   and   orthography;  paleography;  condicological  techniques  and  dimensions  (pricking,  mis-­‐en-­‐page,  etc).  Equally,  its  artefactual  character   must   be   exploited   to   the   full,   including   investigation   of   the   material,   ink,   techniques   of  preparation,  chemical  composition  and  evidences,  etc.   It  will  be  held   that  while   the  stress  on  the  textual  character  of  the  book  is  completely  appropriate,  the  study  of  its  material  aspects  -­‐-­‐  in  particular  codicology,  paleography,  and  material  studies  -­‐-­‐  have  not  been  exploited  adequately  in  the  full  for  the  understanding  of  the  ancient  book  as  a  cultural  product.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

 

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  08  

 

Session:  001:  

Contemporary  Jewish  History  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Interactions  and  Contacts  across  Cultures  and  Politics  

 

Chair:  Michal  Galas  

 

Victoria  Khiterer,  Millersville  University,  USA  

Title:  How  Jewish  was  Jewish  Culture  in  Kiev  before  World  War  I?  

Abstract:  Exploring  the  question  raised  by  Moshe  Rosman  in  his  book  How  Jewish  is  Jewish  History?  I  will  analyze  in  my  presentation  how  Jewish  was  Jewish  culture  in  Kiev  before  World  War  I.  I  will  show  that  the  concept   about   “Jews   in   intimate   interaction  with   surrounding   cultures   to   the   point   where   they  may   be  considered  to  be  embedded  in  them”  works  only  for  the  Russified  Jewish  elite  in  Kiev.  Wealthy  Jews  in  Kiev  educated   their   children   in   Russian   schools   and   universities   or   European   universities,   so   they  were   quite  embedded   in  Russian  and  European  cultures.  However   the  poor   Jews,  who  made  up   the  majority  of   the  Kiev   Jewish  population,  were   completely  embedded   in  Yiddish   culture.  They  generally   could  not   study   in  gymnasiums  and  universities,  not  only  because  of  the  percentage  quota  for  Jewish  students  in  the  Russian  Empire,  but  also  due  to  the  high  tuition,  which  these  schools  charged.  Many  poor  Jews  in  Kiev  barely  spoke  Russian  and  did  not  know  any  Ukrainian.  So  they  could  not  be  embedded  in  surrounding  cultures,  instead  they   had   their   own   Yiddish   culture.   Kiev   Jewish   writers   and   poets   quite   well   understood   this,   and  consciously  chose  Yiddish  for  their  literary  works  as  the  language  of  the  Jewish  masses.  Often  the  cultural  views  of  Kievan  Jews  were  influenced  by  various  ideologies.  Kiev  in  the  beginning  of  the  twentieth  century  became  an  arena  of  heated  debates  between  Yiddishists  and  Hebraists.  Vladimir  Jabotinsky  delivered  in  the  Kiev  Literary  Society  a  lecture  in  February  1911  where  he  argued  that  only  Hebrew  should  be  considered  as  the  Jewish  national  language.  So  in  the  turn  of  the  twentieth  century  Kievan  Jewry  was  split  in  its  cultural  orientations  between  Russian,  European,  Yiddish  and  Hebrew  cultures.  

 

Nino  Gude,  University  of  Wien,  Austria  

Title:  Assimilation  or  Segregation:  The  Galician  Jews  and  Ukrainians  in  contact  

Abstract:   Jews  and  Ukrainians   lived   for   centuries  on   the  same   territory,  but  yet   there   is  a   lack  of   studies  which   focus   on   the   process   of   assimilation   among   Jews   toward   the   Ukrainian   culture.   Instead,   the  international  research  environment  dealt  mostly  with  those  Jews,  who  assimilated  toward  the  majority  or  dominated  groups  like  Germans,  Poles  or  Russians.  However,  looking  at  possible  tendencies  to  Ukrainians,  Czech  or  other  historical  minorities  seemed  to  be  out  of  importance  in  the  past  by  not  taking  it  seriously.  Due  to  the  lack  of  such  examinations  we  quickly  get  the  impression  that  there  was  no  alternative  to  be  a  “German”  or   “Russian”   Jew.  For  a   long   time   it  was  unthinkable   that   Jews  perceived   themselves  as  being  “Ukrainian”.   One   reason   why   such   tendencies   among   the   Jewish   people   took   little   or   no   attention   in  

science  and  research  was  due  to  the  fact  that  assimilation   is  closely  associated  with  the  term  nation,  but  Ukrainian   as   nation   was   more   a   new   phenomenon   that   only   emerged   and   arose   in   the   19th   century.  Furthermore  Ukrainian  was  more   considered   as   a   peasant   dialect   instead   as   a   literary   language   such   as  German.   Therefore   any   Jewish-­‐Ukrainian   rapprochement   has   been   ruled   out   as   unattractive.   However,  Yohanan  Petrovsky-­‐Shtern  introduced  in  his  book  entitled  “The  Making  of  the  Ukrainian  Jew”  five  people  of  Jewish  descent  who  wrote  poetic  verses  in  Ukrainian  and  embodied  in  that  case  so-­‐called  “Ukrainian  Jews”  on   literary   level.   In   fact,   there  were  a   lot  of  those  Jews  who  spoke  Ukrainian,  used   it  as   literary   language  and  were  convinced  of  cooperation   in  political  matters.  At   this  point  one  can  mention  among  others   the  positive   attitude   among   Galician   Jews   toward   the   proclamation   of  West   Ukrainian   National   Republic   in  November  1918.  Understanding  that  Ukrainians  could  guarantee  broad  national  cultural  autonomy  to  the  Jews,  they  helped  to  establish  West  Ukrainian  National  Republic  and  supported  its  army  as  well  in  the  hope  that   they   get   a   real   equality   only  when  Ukraine  will   become   independent.   At   the   beginning   of   the   20th  century  the  Galician  Jews  were  far  from  identifying  themselves  with  the  predominant  Ukrainian  nationality,  but   it  did  not  prevent  them  actively  to  support  the  Ukrainian  cause.   In  this  context   I’d   like  to  discuss  the  question  to  which  extend  the  Jews  on  the  historical  Galicia  were  willing  to  turn  their  back  on  their  fate  and  people   and   ready   to   adopt   elements   of   Ukrainian   culture.   What   role   does   intermarriages   play   to   be   a  “Ukrainian  Jew”  and  does  exist  such  an  assimilation  process  among  Galician  Jews  apart  from  literature,  are  questions  which  I  deal  in  my  dissertation  with.  

 

Miri  Freilich,  Beit  Berl  College,  Israel  

Title:  Jew  and  non  Jews  in  the  Polish  Freethinkers'  Movement  

Abstract:   The   FreeThinkers  masonic  movement   in   interwar   Poland   (1918   -­‐   1935)   advocated   freedom   of  thought  and  anti  religious  ideas.  Regarding  religion,  freethinkers  hold  that  there  is  insufficient  evidence  to  support   the   existence   of   god.   The   leader   of   the  movement   in   Poland  was   the   linguist   Jan   Baudouin   de  Courtenay   (1845   -­‐   1929)   who   objected   to   any   form   of   national   exclusiveness   and   earned   himself   the  reputation   of   a   spokesman   for   peaceful   and   brotherly   coexistence,   cooperation   and   development   of   all  ethnic   groups,   nations   and   nationalities,   and   in   particular   Poles,   Russians,   Belarusians,   Ukrainians,  Lithuanians,  Germans,  and  Jews.  The  Movement  attracted  Jewish  Intellectuals  and  scholars  in  Poland's  big  cities   (especially   Warsaw)   and   enabled   them   to   create   social   contacts   with   non   Jewish   Intellectuals.  Although  the  Jews  were  equal  members  in  the  Polish  branch,  they  fulfilled  a  unique  role  and  accepted  the  role  of  those  members  who  criticized  the  historical  and  religious  characteristics  of  Judaism.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Enlightement  and  Discontent  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  

 

Evgenia  Pevzner,  The  City  Arbitration  Court  of  St.-­‐Petersbourg  and  Leningrad  area,  Russia  

Title:  About  the  Work  of  the  Moscow  Committee  of  the  Society  for  spreading  of  Enlightenment  between  Jews  in  Russia  

Abstract:   The   Society   for   spreading   of   Enlightenment   between   Jews   in   Russia   (OPE)   was   opened   in   St.-­‐Petersbourg   in   1863   year.   Student’s   circles   began   already   to   appear   in   Moscow   in   1864   year,   who  collaborated  with  OPE  and  gave  benefits  and  loans  to  students.  The  group  of  Moscow  students  decided  to  involve  by   spreading  of  enlightenment  between  children   in   the  Pale  of   Settlement   in  1894  year.   For   this  matter,  the  Committee  was  elected  in  1896  year,  in  which  entered,  except  students,  famous  public  leaders.  The   Moscow   Committee   gave   subsidies   schools,   ensured   them   by   teaching   aids,   books.   The   Moscow  Committee  sent  for  the  first  time  its  authorized  persons  to  subsidized  schools  for  the  inspection  of  schools  and  rendering  methodical  assistance  in  1901  year.  The  circle  “The  Jewish  School”  was  founded  in  1903  year  for  the  publication  of  popular  books  and  booklets.  This  circle  founded  the  first  monthly  pedagogical  journal  “The  Jewish  School”  in  1904  year.  This  journal  existed  from  1904  to  1905  year.  It  was  closed  in  connection  with  the  revolution  events  of  the  1905  year.  The  journal  elucidated  the  problems  of  the  national  education  and  methods  of  teaching.  The  works  about  Jewish  libraries  appeared  for  the  first  time  at  this  journal,  was  begun  publication  the  standard  catalogues  etc.  The  Moscow  Committee  began  to  involve  by  issues  of  the  out-­‐of   school  education,  particularly,  organization  of   libraries.  The  Moscow  Committee  was   registered  as  the  branch  office  of  OPE.  During  the  years  of  the  First  World  War,  the  Committee  conducted  the  intensive  work   on   opening   of   schools   for   refugees.   Thereby,   the   Moscow   Committee   involved   not   only   by   the  payment   benefits   to   students,   but   rendered   assistance   to   schools   in   the   form   of   grants   and  methodical  support,   for   the   first   time   began   to   send   authorized   persons   to   subsidized   schools   for   clarification   of  condition  of  schools  and  rendering  methodical  assistance,  published  the  first  in  Russia  Jewish  pedagogical  journal   “The   Jewish   School”,   organized   libraries.   During   the   First   World  War,   the   Committee   organized  schools  for  refugees.  

 

Olga  Potap,  Boston  University,  USA  

Title:  The  Society  for  the  Protection  of  the  Health  of  the  Jewish  Population  (OSE):  Social  Integration  into  non-­‐Jewish  Society  

Abstract:  OSE  was  a   Jewish  Medico-­‐social  organization,  which  was   founded   in  Saint  Petersburg,  Russia   in  1912.  OSE   is   the   abbreviation   for   the  name  of   the  organization,   and   it   is   translated   into   English   as   “The  Society   for   the  Protection  of   the  Health  of   the   Jewish  Population.”   The   society   changed   in   its   scope  and  mission   throughout   the   early   20th   century   but   its   major   transformation   occurred   during  World  War   II,  when  the  lives  of  Jews  throughout  Eastern  and  Western  Europe  were  threatened.  In  her  memoirs,  Vivette  Samuel  comments  on  the  transformation  of  OSE:    “A  large  number  of  people  were  now  ready  to  contribute,  to  resist  in  their  own  way.  The  deportation  of  children,  arousing  popular  indignation,  led  the  people  to  take  action.  The  moment  seemed  favorable  to  mobilize  non-­‐Jewish   in  favor  of  the  rescue  of  children.”  Samuel  calls  the  period  of  1942-­‐1944  a  turning  point  in  the  chronicle  of  rescuing  the  children  and  she  stated  that  after   1942   rescuing   the   Jewish   children   ceased   to   be   only   a   Jewish   problem.     People   had   different  motivations  driving  them  to  take  part  in  rescuing  children,  such  as:  religion,  politics,  personal,  idealistic,  and  humanitarian.   It   is  my   goal,   therefore,   to   highlight   the   participation   of   Catholic,   Protestant,   and   Secular  non-­‐Jewish  organizations   in  the  work  of  Society  for  the  Protection  of  the  Health  of  the  Jewish  Population  (OSE)  during  World  War  II  and  after  the  war.  

 

Rachel  Manekin,  University  of  Maryland  College  Park,  USA  

Title:  Regulating  Jewish  Marriage  and  Divorce  in  Habsburg  Galicia  

Abstract:  On  January  16,  1783,  a  new  law  was  promulgated  in  Austria,  the  Ehepatent,  or  the  Marriage  Law,  which   defined  marriage   in   its   opening   paragraph   as   a   civil   contract   and   regulated   the   required   steps   to  make  a  marriage  legally  valid.  The  application  of  the  law  for  the  Jewish  society  included  such  procedures  as  defining  the  role  of  the  state  in  a  Jewish  divorce,  and  the  question  of  divorce  in  case  of  conversion  of  one  spouse.  While  being  aware  of  the  legal  requirements,  Galician  Jews  married  in  large  numbers  clandestinely  and  in  violation  of  the  law.  In  my  talk  I  will  discuss  the  development  of  marriage  and  divorce  laws  in  regard  to  Galician  Jews  and  offer  some  explanations  on  the  Galician  Jewish  defiance.  

 

Aleksandra  Oniszczuk,  Historical  Institute,  University  of  Wroclaw,  Poland  

Title:  Policy  of  the  Duchy  of  Warsaw  (1807-­‐1815)  towards  Jews:  Borrowed  Solutions  and  Their  Grounds  

Abstract:   The   author   aims   to   present   the   variety   of   models   used   by   the   government   of   the   Duchy   of  Warsaw   in   its  policy   towards   Jews.  During   the  short  existence  of   the  state   (1807-­‐1815),   few  decrees  and  thousands  of  administrative  decisions  shaping  the  particular  Jewish  legal  status  were  issued.  Although  the  Duchy  was  established  by  Napoleon  and   the   legal   order  was   to  be   a   copy  of   the   French  one,   those   acts  were  not  solely  based  on  Napoleonic  model.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  in  some  cases  the  French  model  was  not  sufficient,   and   in   others   Duchy’s   government  was   trying   to   avoid   its   full   implementation   and   looked   for  different   solutions.   Thus,   regulations   of   Jewish   life   had   various   roots:   some   were   based   on   old   Polish-­‐Lithuanian  Commonwealth  law,  while  others  were  taken  from  foreign  legal  orders  (mainly  Prussian,  locally  also   Austrian).   Until   now,   the   historiography   has   merely   noticed   this   melange   of   models   in   the   policy.  However,   the   surviving   archival   material,   used   only   partially   by   the   previous   historiography,   makes   it  possible   to:  1)  specify,   in  which  cases  solutions  were  borrowed,  2)  define  the  scope  of   ‘originality’  of   the  Duchy’s  policy  towards  the  Jewish  population  and  3)  answer  the  question  why  the  government  decided  to  borrow   some   solutions.   As   far   as   the   third   issue   is   concerned,   already   analysed   sources   lead   to   the  following  hypothesis:  the  legislation  imposed  by  Napoleon  was  introduced  without  any  ‘vacatio  legis’,  that  would   enable   adjusting   social   reality   (still   largely   feudal)   to   the   legislative   order.   Any   attempts   by   the  government   to   carry   out   revolutionary   changes,   as   envisioned  by   the   constitution   and  Napoleon’s   Code,  would  have  spawned  a  very  real  threat  of  discontent  on  the  side  of  the  elites.  Thus,  the  ministers  decided  to   suspend   the   introduction   of   equality   of   Jews   (as   well   as   peasants).   In   order   to   avoid   the   monarch’s  opposition  (as  he  was  a  legalist  attached  to  the  order  imposed  by  Napoleon  and  refused  to  approve  some  projects   contradictory   to   the   Constitution   and   Civil   Code)   they   prolonged   validity   of   some   Prussian   and  Austrian  acts,  copied  an  internal  French  decree  (‘décret  infâme’)  or  took  into  consideration  some  old  Polish  regulations.   As   a   result,   the   responsibility   for   their   policy   was   diminished,   as   foreign   or   old   acts   were  borrowed  only  ‘temporarily’.  It  was  also  a  pragmatic  solution;  as  it  is  testified  in  the  sources,  very  often  the  ministers   themselves   did   not   know  which   general   rule   should   be   introduced  or  what   decision   should   be  issued   in   an   individual   case.   Creating   new   acts   would   have   taken   more   time   and   the   government   was  preoccupied  with  a  permanent  financial  and  organisational  crisis.  The  author  will  present  findings  from  her  PhD   thesis,   based   on   archival   material   partly   unused   in   previous   historiography   (collections   Rada  Ministrów,  Rada  Stanu  Księstwa  Warszawskiego  and  Komisja  Rządząca  Spraw  Wewnętrznych,  stored  in  the  Central  Archives  of  Historical  Records,  Warsaw).  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  09  

 

Session:  001:  

Modern  and  Contemporary  Jewish  History    

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  The  Jews'  Admittance  into  the  Liberal  Institutions  of  Post-­‐unification  Italy:  New  Perspectives  

 

Chair:  Marco  di  Giulio  

 

Elizabeth  Schächter-­‐Cheshire,  University  of  Kent,  UK  

Title:  ‘The  “Jewish  Question”  in  Post-­‐Emancipation  Italy’  

Abstract:   This   paper   explores   the   consequences   of   emancipation   in   the   newly   unified   Italy.   The   Jewish  minority   contributed   to   the   creation   of   a   national   identity   and   considered   themselves   to   be   among   the  founders  of  the  nation  state.  Current  consensus  in  Italian  historiography  argues  that  in  nineteenth-­‐century  Italy  there  were  only  a  few,  insignificant  episodes  of  ‘liberal  anti-­‐semitism’  in  contrast  to  the  political  anti-­‐semitism   in   other   European   countries.   I   challenge   this   view   of   a   ‘harmonious   integration’   of   Jews   and  Italians  through  the  examination  of  contemporary  sources.  150  years  after  the  Unification  of  Italy,  there  are  still  secrets  and  issues  within  the  nation  which  have  not  been  addressed,  discussed  or  thought  about.  Public  discourse  today  does  not  acknowledge  that  the  Racial  Laws  of  1938  were  not  an  aberration  and  a  rupture  with   a   past   of   harmonious   integration   of   the   Jewish  minority,   but   that   they   had   their   roots   not   only   in  centuries-­‐old   Catholic   anti-­‐semitism   but   also   in   the   discrimination   against   the   Jews   that   lay   at   the   very  centre  of  political  and  public  life  of  the  new  Italy.  

 

David  Lebovitch  Dahl,  The  Vienna  Wiesenthal  Institute  for  Holocaust  Studies,  Austria  

Title:  The  Roman  Catholic  Church,  Education  and  the  Entrance  of  Jews  in  Italian  Academia  after  Unification  

Abstract:  This  paper  addresses  the  views  regarding  education  of  the  Roman  Catholic  Church  in  Italy  in  the  second  half  of  the  nineteenth  century  and  the  implications  of  these  views  for  the  attitudes  of  the  Catholics  to   the   entrance   of   Jews   into   Italian   academia   after   unification.   The   national   unification   and   the   final  emancipation  of  the  Italian  Jews  happened  concomitantly  with  the  loss  of  temporal  power  of  the  Catholic  Church  when  the  Italian  army  invaded  the  Vatican  State  in  1870.  Hence  Jewish  emancipation  was  seen  by  the   Catholic   establishment   as   a   symbol   of   the   anti-­‐clerical   policy   of   the   liberal   Italian   governments.   The  Church  reacted  to  the  loss  of  temporal  power  and  the  advance  of  the  liberal  secular  state  by  strengthening  and   unifying   its   structure   and   doctrine.   This   resulted   in   the   adaptation   of   neo-­‐scholasticism   within  philosophy  and  was  accompanied  by  a  gradual  acceptance  of  antisemitism  during   the   second  half  of   the  nineteenth   century.   The   paper   analyzes   how   the   clerical   attitudes   to   Italy’s   Jews   were   related   to   the  developments  in  Catholic  philosophy  and  educational  policy   in  the  second  half  of  the  nineteenth  century,  discussing   concrete   examples   of   how   the   Roman   Catholics   debated   the   entrance   of   Jews   in   Italian  academia.  

 

Marco  Di  Giulio,  Franklin  and  Marshall  College,  Lancaster,  PA,  USA  

Title:  Jewish  Academics  and  Cultural  Politics  in  Post-­‐Unification  Italy  

Abstract:  The  political  unification  of  Italy  coincided  with  a  reform  of  its  institutions  of  higher  education,  as  these  were  assembled  into  a  national  system.  The  secretaries  of  education  recognized  that  the  educational  reform  provided   an  opportunity   to   integrate   figures  who  had  been   instrumental   in   securing   the  political  reform   into   the   university   system.   Since   the   campaign   for   unification   had   long   been   identified  with   the  campaign   for   Jewish   emancipation,   the   educational   reform   also   provided   a   way   to   introduce   Jews   into  university   faculties.   How   did   the   first   Jews   to   receive   academic   appointments   in   Italy   address   their  Jewishness?   Jews   seeking   academic   positions   could   not   simply   treat   their   Jewishness   as   an   incidental   or  ethnic   characteristic;   rather,   they   felt   that   they  had   to  give   some  account  of   it   in   their   self-­‐presentation,  both  as  a  candidate  for  academic  office  and  as  a  practicing  professor.  Focusing  on  the  first  few  years  after  unification,   this   paper   discusses   the   recruitment   of   Jewish   intellectuals   for   university   positions,   and   the  ways  in  which  they  presented  themselves  as  suitable  candidates.  Three  scholars  working  in  different  fields  are   examined.   In   combination   with   an   analysis   of   unpublished   sources,   their   inaugural   adddresses   as      professors  are  compared  as  examples  of  how  they  acknowledged  their  Jewish  identity  as  well  as  the  way  in  which  it  contributed  to  their  identity  as  Italian  citizens.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Modern  and  Contemporary  Jewish  History    

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  The  Jews'  Admittance  into  the  Liberal  Institutions  of  Post-­‐unification  Italy:  New  Perspectives  2  

 

Chair:  Marco  di  Giulio  

 

Carlotta  Ferrara  degli  Uberti,  Università  di  Pisa,  Italy  /Hadassah  Brandeis  Institute,  USA  

Title:  Integration  in  the  Political  Sphere:  Multiple  Representations.  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  investigate  the  careers,  at  a  local  and  national  level,  of  a  handful  of  Italian  Jewish  politicians.  In  particular,  it  will  explore  the  relation  between  their  Jewish  identity  and  their  political  activity,  how  it  was  depicted  in  Jewish  periodicals,  and  how  it  was  presented  in  the  local  and  national  press.  From  a  methodological   perspective,   it   will   focus   on   the   advantage   of   analyzing   and   comparing   multiple  representations,  to  expand  our  understanding  of  the  integration  of  the  Jewish  minority  in  Italy  and  also  our  research  on  the  diffusion  of  anti-­‐Semitic  stereotypes  in  the  liberal  period.  

 

Adam  Sutcliffe,  King's  College  London,  UK  

Title:   Response:   'The   Jews'   Admittance   into   the   Liberal   Institutions   of   Post-­‐Unification   Italy:   New  Perspectives'  

 

Giuseppe  Prigiotti,  Duke  University,  Durham  USA  

Title:  Challenged  by  Secularism:  A  Comparative  Approach  to  Judaism  and  Catholicism  in  the  Italian  Liberal  age  (1870-­‐1914)  

Abstract:   From   Italian   unification   to   the   eve   of   the   First  War  World,   liberal   politics   and   secular   culture  impacted   Italian   Catholicism   and   Jewry,   provoking   outcomes   that,   I   argue,   are   the   result   of   common  challenges.  The  emancipation  of  the  Jews  and  the  contemporary  end  of  the  temporal  power  of  the  Popes  offered  agency  to  individual  Jews  and  Catholics,  to  the  detriment  of  ancient  corporate  privileges.  I  want  to  emphasize  these  trends  through  a  close  analysis  of  a  number  of  articles  and  essays  from  the  Jewish  journal  Il  Vessillo  Israelitico,  the  Jesuit  La  Civiltà  Cattolica,  and  the  satirical  and  anticlerical   journal  L’Asino.  Jewish  journals   insisted  on  the  full   integration  of   the  Jews   in  the  national  State.  While  reporting  on  examples  of  good  relations  among  Jews  and  Catholics,  they  also  complained,  at  times,  of  Catholic  interference  in  Jewish  spiritual   life.  La  Civiltà  Cattolica,   instead,  was   largely  engaged   in  a  strategy  of  defensive  modernization:   it  made   great   use   of   modern   media   and   literary   genres,   such   as   serial   novels,   to   advance   the   Catholic  worldview   for   the   edification   of   Catholics   and   non-­‐Catholics   alike.   L’Asino,   in   turn,   promoted   forms   of  radical   secularization   by   fighting   all   residues   of   religious   views   in   the  modern   State,   and   by  making   the  Catholic  Church   the  object  of   its   bitter   anticlerical   cartoons.   Eventually,   in  order   to   avoid  defections   and  become  more  appealing,  both  Jewish  and  Catholic  institutions  were  obliged  to  capture  the  esteem  of  both  their  members  and  civil  society  as  a  whole.   In  that  way,  they  contributed  to  redefine  the  space  of  Jewish  and  Catholic  identities  in  Liberal  Italy.  

 

Alessandro  Grazi,  Independent  Scholar  

Title:   Encounters  with   Secular   Cultures:   Jewish   Secularization  Modes   and  Nation-­‐Building   in   Nineteenth-­‐century  Italy  

Abstract:  The  present  paper  will  illustrate  the  main  elements  of  my  ongoing  post-­‐doctoral  project  on  Jewish  secularization   modes   in   Nineteenth-­‐century   Italy.   The   aim   of   this   project   is   to   explore   the   nineteenth-­‐century   Jewish   transition   from   a   traditional   to   a   (secular)   modern   identity,   with   particular   attention   to  secularization  processes.  The  approaches  to  this  transition  were  of  course  numerous  and  diverse.  Hitherto,  the   predominant   view   has   been   to   consider   only   two   possible   outcomes   for   the   Jewish   encounter  with  modernity:   either   from   within   tradition   and   religion,   thus   maintaining   a   strong   attachment   to   Jewish  identity,  or,  alternatively,  full  assimilation  in  the  hosting  society  with  a  total  rejection  of  Jewish  identity.  My  post-­‐doctoral  project  starts  from  a  different  assumption:  there  has  been  an  alternative  approach,  which,  in  spite  of  its  secular  path  leading  to  rejection  of  religion  and  tradition,  entailed  a  strong  attachment  to  both  Jewish   identity   and   Italian   nationalism.   Thus,   the   project’s   importance   lies   in   the   study   of   this  intertwinement  between   the  secularization  process  and  nineteenth-­‐century  nationalism.  An   ideal   subject  for  this  exploration  is  the  Italian  Jewish  writer  David  Levi  (1816-­‐1898).  Levi  was  from  Turin,  Piedmont,  and  has   been   defined   as   “poet   and   patriot”,   as   he   was   both   a   writer   and   an   active   protagonist   of   the  Risorgimento.   His   great   importance   lies   in   his   constant   effort   to   amalgamate   Italian   and   Jewish   identity  through  a  secularization  process.  Intriguing  elements  of  his  biography  are  his  affiliation  with  Freemasonry  and  belief   in  the  Saint-­‐Simon’s  doctrines.  Due  to  the  universalistic  values  of  both  Freemasonry  and  Saint-­‐Simonism,   it   has   been   suggested   that   they   functioned   as   a   sort   of   secular   substitution   for   Levi’s  relinquished  religious  Judaism  (Sofia,  2011).  Hence,  some  of  the  questions  the  project  will  address  are  the  

following:  which  role  did  Freemasonry  and  Saint-­‐Simonism  play  in  Levi’s  secularization  process?  How  did  he  manage   to   fuse  his   strong   feelings   for   Italian  and   Jewish   identity,   yet  abandoning  his   religious  practices?  The  wealth  of  unstudied  material  I  retrieved  in  his  private  archive  at  the  National  Museum  of  Risorgimento  in  Turin  allows  for  a  deep  exploration  of  these  themes.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break    

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  10  

 

Session:  001:  

Modern  Genizot  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Genisa  –  Genizah  

Organizer:  Martina  Edelman  

Chair:  

 

Martina  Edelman,  Jüdisches  Kulturmuseum  Veitshöchheim,  Germany  

Title:  The  Genisaprojekt  Veitshöchheim:  Providing  Access  to  New  Sources  of  Jewish  History  in  Franconia  

Abstract:   In   1998   the   Genisaprojekt   Veitshöchheim   was   founded   to   establish   a   database   for   Genizah  fragments  of  Bavaria  (mostly  Franconia).  About  40  places  of  remaining  genizoth   in  the  Northern  Bavarian  region   are   known,   one   of   them   the   large   genizah   of   Veitshöchheim.   After   finishing   the   inventory   of   15  genizoth  the  database  now  provides  accessible  information  about  authentic  Jewish  historic  sources  of  live  and  culture.  The  lecture  will  give  an  impression  of  the  functioning  of  the  Genisaprojekt  Veitshöchheim  and  will  point  out  conclusions  concerning  the  inventory  of  a  genizah.  

 

Linda  Wiesner,  University  for  Jewish  Studies  Heidelberg,  Germany  

Title:  Textile  Stories  -­‐  The  Textiles  of  the  Genizah  of  Niederzissen  

Abstract:   In  2010,  while  examining  the  former  synagogue  of  Niederzissen,  (Rhineland-­‐Palatinate)  amateur  historians   found   an   extraordinary   and   well   preserved   Genizah.   Besides   numerous   scripts,   the   Genizah  contained  nearly  300  textiles.  The  textiles  are  dated  from  the  17th  to  early  20th  century,  with  most  findings  originating   in   the  19th   century.  With  pieces   for   personal   use   (Tallith   katan,   bag   for   the   Tefillin)   and   also  pieces  for  synagogical  use  (Torah  curtain,  Torah  mantle,  Torah  binder),  the  textiles  allows  us  an  insight  to  the  way  of  life  of  a  rural  community  in  the  Rhinelande.  In  my  talk  I  would  like  to  focus  on  the  textiles,  an  otherwise   little   considered   field   of   research.  With   using   only   a   small   subset   of   the   found   objects   I   will  demonstrate   how   textiles   can   be   used   to   show   specific   aspects   (exchange   with   the   non-­‐Jewish   society,  social   standing   of   the   Jewish   community   and   other   aspects)   of   everyday   life   of   this   rural   Rhinelande  community  and  I  will  expose  the  limits  of  research  in  the  context  of  material  culture.  

 

Claire  Decomps,  Région  Lorraine  /  Service  de  l'Inventaire  général  du  patrimoine  culturel,  France  

Title:  La  genizah  de  Dambach-­‐la-­‐Ville,  une  découverte  inestimable  pour  la  connaissance  de  la  vie  juive  dans  communauté  rurale  alsacienne  

Abstract:  Présentation  de  l'opération  de  sauvetage  et  analyse  des  éléments  découverts  fin  16e-­‐1894  (250  mappot,  livres,  parchemins,  objets.  

 

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Jewish  Heritage  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Creating  and  Using  Collections  

 

Chair:  Anna  Lebet-­‐Minakowska  

 

Anna  Lebet-­‐Minakowska,  National  Museum,  The  Czartoryski  Museum  Kraków,  Poland  

Title:  Not  only  the  Lady  

Abstract:  The  Princes  Czartoryski  Museum  in  Krakow  is  usually  known  as  the  home  of  Leonardo  da  Vinci's  Lady  with  an  Ermine.  However,  the  collection  contains  also  numerous  precious  Jewish  objects.  Judaica  from  the   Czartoryskis   Collection   were   acquired   in   19th   century,   when   the   collection   was   managed   by   Prince  Władysław  Czartosyki,  grandson  of  the  foundress,  Princess  Izabella  Czartoryski,  née  Fleming.  Some  of  them  took  a  long  way  from  Poland  to  France  and  back.  After  the  1830-­‐31  Polish-­‐Russian  War,  the  collection  was  evacuated   from   Puławy   (then   Russian   Poland)   to   Sieniawa   (then   Austrian   Poland)   and   settled   in   Hotel  Lambert,  Paris.  Traces  of  the  voyage  can  still  be  seen  on  the  sephardic  amulet  case,  Megilat  Ester  bound  or  besamin   -­‐   they   still   bore  French   import   stamps   from   the  years  1864-­‐93.  The   Jewish  museum  objects  are  already  mentioned   in   the   first   catallogue  of  Czartoryski   Collection   (written   in  1869).  A   silver,   gold-­‐plated  filigree  binding   for  Megilat  Esther  was  purchased  on   the  brink  of  18th  and  19th  century,  we  can  assume  therefore  that  it  was  Izabella  Czartoryska  herself  who  done  it.  The  binding  is  made  with  great  precision  and  it   is  an  example  of   supreme  goldsmith  craftsmanship.  Austrian   tax   stamps   from  1806/7  point   that   it  was  made  before   that  date.  Another   judaica  went   to  collections   in   subsequent  years:  bonnets  and  "załóżkas"  (women's  clothing  accessories)  in  1882,  the  Jewish  woman  dress  in  1888,  and  embroidered  collars  for  Yom  Kippur  kittel  in  1892  .  It  is  therefore  the  oldest  recorded  collection  of  Judaica  in  Poland.  

 

John  Champagne,  Penn  State  Erie,  the  Behrend  College,  USA  

Title:  Explaining  Judaism  to  the  Goyim:  The  Jewish  Museum  of  Rome  

Abstract:   In   2005,   the   Jewish   Museum   of   Rome   specifically   undertook   a   project   of   renovation   and  reorganization,   the   goals   of   which   were,   as   the   museum's   website   suggests,   to   “interpret”   the   works  displayed,   “translating   them   into   effective   experiences   from   an   educational,   intellectual,   cultural   and  aesthetic  point  of  view  for  an  audience  as  wide  as  possible.”  This  paper  will  examine  the  ways  in  which  the  museum  explains   Italian/Roman   Judaism   to   non-­‐Jews   in   particular.   It  will   argue   that,   caught   between   at  least  three  competing  agendas  –  the  preservation  of  the  Community's  artifacts;  the  education  of  non-­‐Jews  in   the   religious  practices  of  Orthodox   Judaism  and   the  history  of   Jewish  Rome;   a   specifically   twenty-­‐first  

century  museological  agenda  of  inviting  commentary  and  controversy  –  the  museum  is  necessarily  marked  by  contradictions  that  constitute  its  very  conditions  of  possibility.  

 

Agnieszka  Alston,  Jagiellonian  University,  Krakow,  Poland  

Title:  Jewish  Cultural  Patronage  and  Collections  in  Krakow  at  the  Turn  of  the  19th  and  the  20th  Centuries    

Abstract:   The   presented   paper   confines   to   the   time   frame   of   1867-­‐1918,   as   the   year   of   the   December  Constitution   that  brought  political   and   social   changes   to   Jews  of   Krakow  and  Galicja.   This   new  period  of  great  and  rapid  changes  created  a  new  stature  to  Krakow  society  -­‐  Jewish  plutocracy  and  intelligentsia.  The  end   of   the   Great  War,   1918,   gave   even   more   opportunities   to   Galician   Jewry,   especially   to   the   rapidly  growing   Jewish   intelligentsia,   their   involvement   in   new   county   politics,   economy   and   culture.   The   years  after  the  World  War  I  brought  an  overwhelming  bloom  of  this  social  group,  whose  patronage  in  culture  was  different  due  to  advanced  political  and  social  modifications,  but  also  to  changes  within  the  artistic  scene  in  Krakow.  While  it  was  not  likely  to  hear  in  Krakow  about  great  collectors  of  the  caliber  of  the  Rothschilds  or  of  benefactors  as  existed  among  the  Warsaw  or  Lodz   Jewish  bourgeoisie   (L.  Kronenberg,   J.  Nathanson,   J.  Bloch,  I.  Poznański),  Krakow  was  not  lacking  for  there  was  a  small  but  growing  group  of  Jewish  plutocracy  and  intelligentsia  who  took  significant  part  in  patronizing  the  local  culture.  Additionally,  Krakowian  cultural  institutions  were  benefited  by   Jewry   from  Warsaw   (M.  Bersohn,   F.  Gebethner),   Lvov   (M.  Goldstein),   and  elsewhere.     The   wide   autonomy   of   the   Grossherzgtum   Krakau   during   the   changes   within   the   Austro-­‐Hungarian  Empire  with  the  proclamation  of  equality  of  all  citizens  of  Galicja  and  thus  gave  the  opportunity  to   Jews   to   enter   actively   into   the   cultural   scene   of   Krakow.   The   Krakow   Jewish   plutocracy:   bankers,  financiers,  capitalists   (rich  members  of   the  Chamber  of  Commerce  and   Industry)  and  Jewish   intelligentsia  (medical   doctors,   architects,   and   scholars)   modeled   their   cultural   patronage   on   the   old   aristocratic  tradition.  In  other  words  they  ordered  family  portraits  (St.  Feintuch,  J.  Oettinger,  H.  Rozenzwieg,  J.  Sare,  A.  Schwartz,  H.  Szarski,  and  others)  from  the  renowned  establish  painters’  ateliers  of  T.  Axentowicz,  J.  Fałat,  J.  Marczewski,  L.  Wyczółkowski,  St.  Wyspiański.  Furtherer  they  created  collections  of  fine  arts  that  reflected  accumulated  wealth   and  which  was   also   a   financial   investment   (E.   Beres,   Blumenfeld,   Z.   Ehrenpreis,  W.  Fränkel,  L.  Holzer,  S.  Tiles).    Having  a  distinguished  collection  it  was  highly  regarded  to  be  seen  to  loan  or  to  donate   art   pieces  or   collections   to   the  museum   (F.  Gebethner,  M.  Berson,  Glicenstein,  A.   Sternschuss,   J.  Judkiewicz  and  others).   In  Kraków,  artistic  patronage  was  centered  on   the  Society  of  Friends  of  Fine  Arts  (1854)   and   the   National   Museum   (1879).   Members   of   Krakow   Jewry   were   chosen   as   distinguished  members   of   exhibitions’   committees.   They   were   frequent   purchasers   of   exhibited   works   of   talented  students  of  the  Krakow  Fine  Art  Academy.  In  Krakow,  unlike  in  Warsaw,  there  were  not  so  many  residential  art  salons  belonging  to  Jewish  collectors  whose  goals  were  to  improve  the  prestige  via  presence  of  artists  and  cultural  elite,  again  activity  based  on  the  Polish  aristocracy.  However,   there  was  one  such  salon  that  was  led  by  Henryk  Frist  (1875  Salon  of  Polish  Painters).  Additionally,  a  new  to  Krakow  phenomena  were  art  dealers   like:     Adolf   Schwartz   and   Marcus   Szwarc,   who   were   active   in   cultural   patronage.   It   must   be  mentioned  that  Jewish  collectors  not  only  focused  on  Polish  artists,  firstly  they  cherished  Jewish  artists  such  as   M.   Gottlieb,   or   Samuel   Hirszenberg   (E.   Beres,   M.   Feldman).   Most   of   all   they   paid   homage   to   their  heritage  in  preserving  and  collecting  precious  Jewish  ritual  objects,  which  often  were  on  loan  to  the  Krakow  National  Museum.  Most   of   all   they   paid   homage   to   their   heritage   in   preserving   and   collecting   precious  Jewish  ritual  objects,  which  often  were  on  loan  to  the  Krakow  National  Museum  (J.  Judkiewicz,  M.  Szwarc).  

 

Max  Polonovski,  Ministry  of  Culture,  France  

Title:  Artistes  juifs  en  France  au  19e  siècle,  entre  assimilation  et  revendication  communautaire.  

Abstract:  La  revue  Archives  Israélites,  fondée  en  1840,  instaura,  à  partir  de  la  seconde  moitié  du  19e  siècle,  une  chronique  artistique  lors  des  salons  de  peintures  annuels,  prétexte  à  évaluer  le  succès  de  l’intégration  des   juifs   dans   la   société   française.   A   la   fois   signe   de   la   volonté   de   s’assimiler,   dans   la   droite   ligne   de   la  régénération  opérée   lors  de   la  Révolution   française,  mais   aussi   témoignage  de   la   contribution  bénéfique  des  Juifs  à  la  société,  tant  sur  le  plan  de  la  participation  des  artistes  à  la  création,  que  par  les  thèmes  juifs  et  surtout   bibliques.   L’ethnicité   des   artistes   ainsi  mise   en   avant   et   différenciée   dans   un   but   positif   semble  contenir  une  contradiction  interne  avec  le  principe  même  de  l’intégration.  Cette  ambigüité  a  perduré,  tout  au  long  du  19e  siècle,  puis  du  siècle  suivant,  lorsque  la  distinction  des  artistes  juifs  par  rapport  aux  autres  a  changé   de   point   de   vue,   pour   tendre   vers   une   revendication   identitaire   ou   une   stigmatisation.   Une  appropriation   parfois   abusive   amoindrit   la   portée   du   discours.   La   volonté   d’identifier   l’apport   des   Juifs  comme   un   phénomène   lié   à   une   appartenance   ou   une   origine   communautaire   et   non   comme   une  expression   individuelle   fausse   les   tentatives  de  définir  un  art   juif.  L’origine  des  artistes  par  rapport  à   leur  œuvre   pose   la   question   du   point   de   vue   auquel   se   place   l’observateur.   Elle   interroge   aussi   sur   la  représentativité  des  artistes  dans  les  musées  d’art  juif.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  11  

 

Session:  001:  

Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Continuity  and  Creative  Response  in  an  Age  of  Upheaval:    

The  New  Edition  of  the  Liturgical  Poetry  of  Samuel  the  Third  

 

Chair:  Peter  Lehnardt    

 

Naoya  Katsumata,  Kyoto  University,  Japan  

Title:  The  Research  History  of  Samuel  the  Third’s  Poetry  

Abstract:  Some  of   the  poems  and  writings  actually  belonging   to  our  poet  were  published  during   the   first  half  of  the  20th  century  by  Jacob  Mann,  Meir  Zvi  Weiss,  Israel  Davidson,  and  Menachem  Zulay.  It  was  Zulay,  however,  who  figured  out  in  1949  that  the  different  names  found  in  the  above  publications  (shemuel  yizke,  shemuel  he-­‐haver,  shemuel  ha-­‐revi‘i,  and  shemuel  ha-­‐shelishi)  actually  referred  to  a  single  individual.  Zulay  and  others  also  understood   the  high   literary  quality  of   Samuel’s  poetry.   Ezra  Fleischer,   for  example,  was  surprised   by   the   extraordinary   beauty   of   some   of   Samuel’s   poems   and   claimed   that   Samuel   the   Third  reaches  heights  which   few  Hebrew  poets   in   the  Middle  Ages  ever   reached.  Over   thirty  years  ago,   Joseph  Yahalom  first  took  upon  himself  the  task  of  preparing  a  critical  edition  of  Samuel’s  poetry.  In  this  lecture,  I  will  describe  how  Yahalom  and  I  carried  out  the  making  of  this  edition.  We  are  dedicating  this  book  to  the  blessed  memory  of  Zulay,  who,  had  he  been  able,  would  have  published  all  of  Samuel’s  poems  in  a  deluxe  edition.  

 

Joseph  Yahalom,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Eastern  Predecessors  of  the  Great  Andalusian  School  

Abstract:  The  paper  deals  with  liturgical  poetry  located  in  the  Genizah  and  written  by  leading  figures  such  as  Shmu'el  ben  Hosha"na  from  Jerusalem  and  Yosef  Ibn  Abitur  which  were  active  at  the  turn  of  the  tenth  century   amongst   Eastern   communities.   Questions   of   poetic   style   and   figurative   language   form   the  main  points  of  comparison  between  these  poets  and  their  Spanish  Contemporaries.  

 

Wout  Van  Bekkum,  Center  of  Middle  East  Studies,  Groningen  University,  Netherlands  

Title:  Lyrical  Aspects  of  Samuel  the  Thirds'  Poetry  

Abstract:   Samuel   the   Third   is   an   outstanding   and   important   poet   whose   entire   oeuvre   has   now   been  collected  and  edited  by  Joseph  Yahalom  and  Naoya  Katsumata,  reclaiming  a  tradition  of  synagogue  poetry  which   for   a   major   part   had   lapsed   into   the   obscurities   of   medieval   Jewish   literary   history.   The  

reintroduction   of   Samuel   the   Third   by   Yahalom   and   Katsumata   enables   researchers   of   Piyyut   to   read  Samuel's  hymns  anew  and  to  (re-­‐)discover  their  richness  and  diversity.  This  contribution  will  focus  on  lyrical  aspects   representative   of   Samuel's   personal   creativity   by   which   he   brings   Jewish   religious   themes   into  visibility.   A   study   of   Samuel's   lyrical   potential   will   demonstrate   that   he   views   Piyyut   as   an   innovated  prestige  medium  rather  than  a  number  of  conventional  synagogue  repertoires.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Medieval  Hebrew  Poetry  on  the  Move:    

From  the  Cairo  Genizah  to  Eastern  Europe  

 

Chair:  Wout  Van  Bekkum  

 

Sarah  J.  Pearce,  New  York  University,  USA  

Title:   Remembering   the   Handsome   Doe’s   Beloved:   Rethinking   Dunash’s   Wife   in   Light   of   Documentary  Sources  in  the  Genizah  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  offer  a  reconsideration  of  the  Hebrew  poem  attributed  to  the  wife  of  Dunash  ben  Labrat  in  light  of  documentary  evidence  in  the  Cairo  Genizah  pertaining  to  the  lives  of  women  abandoned  by  or  living  separately  from  their  husbands.  Rather  than  representing  a  solely  sentimental  farewell  between  husband  and  wife,  the  exchange  of  personal  adornments  and  cloaks  between  the  male  and  female  figures  in   the   poem,   often   read   as   the   literary   avatars   of   Dunash   and   his   wife,   in   fact   represents   a   concrete  economic  transaction  that  would  have  been  readily  recognizable  to  the  medieval  readers  of  the  poem.  The  specific  details  of  the  items  exchanged  in  the  poem  —  a  wife’s  silver  bracelet  for  her  husband’s  signet  ring  and  the  cloak  of  each  spouse  for  the  other’s  —  are  evocative  of  the  description  of  the  economic  value  and  practical  usage  of  those  same  types  of  objects  documented  in   in  personal  and  business-­‐related  epistolary  found   in   the   Genizah   cache.   This   proposed   reading   of   the   poem,   then,   seeks   both   to   contextualize   the  poem   in   its   historical   setting   and   to   draw   down   the   gulfs   between   literature   and   history   and   between  practical  and  sentimental  interpretations  of  objects  and  acts  represented  in  literary  texts.  

 

Riikka  Tuori,  University  of  Helsinki,  Finland  

Title:  The  Ten  Principles  of  Karaite  Faith  in  East  European  Karaite  poetry  

Abstract:  The  Karaite  scholar  Yehuda  Hadassi  (12th  c.,  Constantinople)  elaborated  ten  principles  of  Karaite  faith   a   century   before   the   more   famous   thirteen   ones   of   Moshe   Maimonides.   The   Byzantine   Karaite  scholars   Elijah   Bashyachi   and   Kaleb   Afendopolo   (15th   c.)   issued   their   version   of   the   principles   (in  Bashyachi’s  Adderet  eliyahu  (1532:  25a–30a).  These  principles  became  a  major  theme  discussed  extensively  in  later  East  European  Karaite  commentaries.  Furthermore,  while  Maimonidean  principles  were  a  popular  

theme  for  Rabbanite  poets,  Karaites,  as  well,  wrote  poems  concerning  the  subject.  Davidson  (1970,  Vol.  IV:  493),  for  example,   lists  five  East  European  Karaite  poems  written  about  the  ten  principles.   In  this  paper,   I  will   discuss   poems   dedicated   to   these   principles   written   by   East   European   Karaites   in   the   16th-­‐18th-­‐century.   The  poems  have  been   culled   from  East   European  manuscripts   and   from  various  printed  Karaite  works.  

 

Gabriel  Wasserman,  Yeshiva  University,  USA  

Title:  From  Shené  Zetím  to  Shnei  Zeísim,  and  Beyond:  A  Sephardic  Me'ora  in  Its  Travels  and  Imitations  

Abstract:   This   paper  will   examine   the   reception-­‐history   of   the  Me'ora   "Shene   Zetim"   by   R.   Solomon   ibn  Gabirol,   a   poem   for  Hanukkah,  which  made   its  way   not   only   into   the   Catalonian/Provençal   Rite   and   the  Cairo  Geniza  (our  two  main  sources  for  most  Sephardic  piyyutim  for  occasions  other  than  the  Days  of  Awe  and  the  period  of  the  Ninth  of  Av),  but  also   into  the   liturgy  of  Northern  France,  Ashkenaz  (both  East  and  West),  and  the  various  Greek  Rites  (Romania,  Corfu,  and  Candia).  This  is  especially  astonishing  for  a  Me'ora,  a  poem  to  be  inserted  right  before  the  conclusion  of  the  blessing  "who  fashions  the  luminaries"  (yotzer  ha-­‐me'oroth)  in  the  morning  service  -­‐-­‐  a  genre  of  piyyut  that  was  virtually  unknown  in  France,  Ashkenaz,  and  Greece.   In  some  of  the  Greek  rites,   the  genre  of  the  piyyut  was  misunderstood  (or  consciously  changed),  and   it  was  adopted  as  an  Ofan,   to  be   recited   in   the  Qedusha  section  of   the  same  blessing.  On   the  other  hand,  in  France  and  Ashkenaz  it  was  retained  as  a  Me'ora,  and  we  know  of  three  Ashkenazic  imitations  of  it,  which  all  deal  with  the  same  theme  (the  Menorah  of  the  Temple),   for  the  same  slot   in  the   liturgy,   in  the  same  meter  -­‐-­‐  yet  using  Ashkenazic  conventions,  such  as  incorporating  material  from  midrashim.  Finally,  we  shall  see  how  in  the  Modern  Era,  if  not  earlier,  the  original  piyyut  "Shene  Zetim"  became  very  important  in  the  Ashkenazic   consciousness,   possibly  because  of   the   tunes  associated  with   it,   and  became  known  as   a  quintessentially  Ashkenazic  piyyut,  retained  in  Ashkenazic  communities  that  had  dropped  virtually  all  other  piyyutim,  and  even  became  the  subject  of  a  Yiddish  joke.  

 

Ophir  Münz–Manor,  The  Open  University  of  Israel  

Title:  Jewish  and  Christian  Liturgical  Poems  on  the  Dispute  of  the  Months    

Abstract:  The  paper  will  be  devoted  to  an  examination  of  several   Jewish  and  Christian   liturgical  poems   in  Jewish  Aramaic,  Syriac  and  Hebrew  that  narrate  a  dispute  between  the  months  of  the  year;  each  contender  claims  for   its  superiority.  The  poems  under  discussion  represent  an   interesting  case  study  of   intercultural  dynamics  between  the  Jewish  and  Christian  cultures  in  Late  Antiquity  and  the  early  middle  Ages.  The  paper  will  begin  with  a  survey  of  the  dispute  poem  genre  in  general  and  the  disputes  between  the  months  of  the  year   in  particular.  Then  various  themes  concerning  the  dispute  are  explored   in  detail  such  as  the  relation  between  the  verse  compositions  and  prose  version,  the  liturgical  context  of  the  poems  and  the  relation  of  the  poems  to  disputes  concerning  various  calendric   issues.  The  poems  that  will  be  discussed  in  the  paper  derive  from  the  Syriac  Christian  tradition,  while  the  Jewish  examples  are  based,  in  part,  on  poems  that  were  discovered  in  the  Cairo  Genizah  and  will  be  presented  for  the  first  time.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  12  

 

Session:  001:  

History  of  Hebrew  Linguistics  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  The  Hebrew  Grammatical  Tradition  and  its  Interactions  with  Other  schools  of  Grammar  

Organizers:  Nadia  Vidro  &  Maria  Angeles  Gallego  

Chair:  Aharon  Maman  

 

Geoffrey  Khan,  University  of  Cambridge,  UK  

Title:  Parallels  between  Medieval  Jewish  and  Muslim  Treatises  on  the  Recitation  of  Scripture  

Abstract:  During  the  Masoretic  period  in  the  Middle  Ages  a  number  of  treatises  were  composed  concerning  the  vocalization  and  accents  of  the  standard  Tiberian  reading  tradition  of  the  Hebrew  Bible.  In  some  cases  they   go   beyond   description   and   offer   explanatory   rules   for   differences   based   on   their   context   of  occurrence.  Many  of   the  early   treatises  of   this  nature  were  written   in  Hebrew.  By   the   tenth  century   the  treatises  began  to  be  written   in  Judaeo-­‐Arabic.  A  focus   in  many  of  these  treatises   is  the  pronunciation  of  the  shewa  and  some  treatises  are  devoted  entirely  to  this.  The  treatises  concerning  biblical  recitation  stood  in  a  complementary  relationship  to  the  early  grammatical  tradition  that  was  developed  in  the  10th  century  by   the   Karaites,   since   the   Karaite   grammatical   texts   related   only   to   morphology   and   syntax.   The   most  comprehensive  treatise  on  recitation  was  Hidāyat  al-­‐Qāri’  ‘Guide  for  the  Reader’,  which  was  written  in  the  first  half  of  the  eleventh  century  by  the  Karaite  Abū  al-­‐Faraj  Hārūn.  A  tradition  of  treatises  on  the  correction  recitation   of   Qur’ān,   known   as   tajwīd,   developed   in   the   early   Islamic   period.   These   treatises   exhibit   a  number  of  parallels  with  the  treatises  on  Hebrew  recitation.  There  are  particularly  close  parallels  between  the  tajwīd  literature  and  the  ‘Guide  for  the  Reader’  of  Abū  al-­‐Faraj  Hārūn.  These  parallels  will  be  examined  in  the  paper.  

 

Nadia  Vidro,  University  College  London,  UK    

Title:  Grammars  of  Classical  Arabic  in  Judaeo-­‐Arabic:  an  overview  

Abstract:  Medieval  Jews  in  Islamic  lands  spoke  and  wrote  Arabic.  The  majority  of  literary  texts  in  medieval  Judaeo-­‐Arabic  are  in  more  or  less  strict  accord  with  grammatical  rules  and  stylistic  requirements  of  Classical  Arabic.   Yet   did   Jews   study   Arabic   grammar   as   a   discipline?   Although   Jewish   grammarians   were   clearly  familiar   with   works   on   Arabic   grammar   and   borrowed   concepts,   terminology   and   entire   book   passages  from  Muslim  linguists,  knowledge  of  Arabic  grammatical  theory  does  not  seem  to  have  been  wide-­‐spread.  Indeed,   in   the   introduction  to  his  main  work  Kitab  al-­‐Luma‘   (first  half  of   the  11th  century),  a  preeminent  Hebrew   grammarian   Yona   ibn   Janah   complained   that   Jews   “conversant   and   skilled”   in   Arabic   grammar  were   few.   Moreover,   book   lists   discovered   in   the   Cairo   Genizah   do   not   mention   grammars   of   Arabic.  However,  a  number  of  grammars  of  Classical  Arabic   copied   in   Judaeo-­‐Arabic  were   recently  discovered   in  the  Cairo  Genizah  Collection.  In  this  paper  will  survey  the  small  corpus  of  Judaeo-­‐Arabic  grammars  of  Arabic  and   will   address   some   general   questions   posed   by   these   works   e.g.:   1)   are   the   preserved   grammars  

independent  compositions,  adaptations  of  a  single  Muslim  grammar,  or  compilations  of  Muslim  grammars?  2)  Whether  independent  compositions  or  adaptations,  were  the  grammars  produced  by  Jews,  or  by  Arabs  and  then  copied  in  Hebrew  characters  by  Jews?  3)  What  was  the  target  audience  of  the  grammars?  

 

Maria  Angeles  Gallego,  CSIC,  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  Jewish  Reception  and  Transmission  of  Arabic  Linguistic  Ideas  

Abstract:  The  main  developments  of  Jewish  linguistic  ideas  in  the  Middle  Ages  are  generally  connected  and  explained  in  the  light  of  Arabic  linguistic  theories.  In  this  paper  I  intend  to  explore  and  analyse  this  process  by   focusing   on   the   literature   that   Jews   seem   to   be   especially   interested   in   including   the   works   of   the  Muslim  Andalusi  scholar  al-­‐Zubaydi.  

 

Avi  Tal,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Comparison  to  Arabic  as  an  Exegetical  Method  in  the  Writhings  of  Tanḥūm  ha-­‐Yerūšalmī  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  discuss   the  comparison  between  Hebrew  and  Arabic  as  an  exegetical  method   in  the  writings  of  Rabbi  Tanḥūm  ha-­‐Yerušalmi,  an   important  biblical  commentator  and   lexicographer  (Egypt,  1219–1291).   I  will   argue   that   it   constitutes  an  example  of   the   symbiotic   relationship  between   the  Arabic  and   Judaeo-­‐Arabic   cultures   in   the   field   of   linguistics   (for   which   Hava   Lazarus-­‐Yafeh   coined   the   term  Intertwined  Worlds).   It   should   be   noticed   that   this  method  was   rather   controversial   and   some   linguists  criticized  and  condemned  its  very  use.  In   addition,   I   will   point   out   that   Tanḥūm's   commentary   reflects   an   assimilation   or   an   absorption   of  advanced   linguistic   knowledge,   to  which  he  was  exposed   to  as  an  eclectic  exegete  knowledgeable   in   the  Arabic   grammatical   tradition   as  well   as   in   techniques   from  Quranic   exegesis   (for   example,   the   extensive  usage  of  ideas  and  technical  terms,  such  as  badal  [=  permutation  of  letters],  taqlib  or  Qalb  [=  metathesis]  and  ḥaḍf  [=  elision  of  letters  or  words]).  As  I  will  show,  Tanḥūm  did  not  hesitate  to  adopt  and  even  improve  notions  and  insights  that  he  had  found  in  writings  of  Arab  grammarians  –  ideas  and  terminology  that  he  applied  later  on  in  his  own  works.  It  seems  therefore  that  one  should  refer  to  him  as  an  eclectic  exegete  who  succeeded   in   innovating  by  suggesting  some  original  commentaries,  in  a  period  which  has  been  defined  in  the  research  as  a  period  of  stagnation  (from  1250  to  1550  CE).  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

History  of  Hebrew  Linguistics  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  The  Hebrew  Grammatical  Tradition    

And  its  Interactions  with  Other  schools  of  Grammar  

 

Chair:  Geoffrey  Khan  

 

Aharon  Maman,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  The  Adaptation  of  Semitic  and  Latin  Grammatical  Theories  and  its  Furtherance  in  the  Study  of  Biblical  Hebrew    

Abstract:   Major   trends   of   Biblical   Hebrew   studies   in   the   Middle-­‐Ages   consisted   in   adapting   existing  grammatical   theories,   initially   developed   for   Semitic   languages   (Syriac,   then   Arabic)   or   for   Latin.   These  theories  were  applied  as  far  as  possible  -­‐-­‐  i.e.  for  those  parts  of  Hebrew  which  were  suitable  to  fit  into  the  existing  'foreign'  paradigms  -­‐-­‐  for  the  description  of  Biblical  Hebrew  (to  some  extent  in  a  speculative  way).  Hebrew   philologists,   however,   made   their   own   contributions,   not   only   by   fitting   Hebrew   into   those  paradigms,  but  by  adding  innovations  and  building  other  layers  thus  enhancing  both  the  Study  of  Hebrew  and   the   Bible   in   particular,   and   the   study   of   comparative   philology   in   general.   In   terms   of   historical  judgement,  large  parts  of  those  old  studies  lasted  up  to  our  time,  whereas  others  where  experimental  and  temporary  only.  Many  names  of  great  contributors  to  this  process  will  be  mentioned,  such  as,  Saadia  Gaon,  Hai  Gaon,  Ibn  Janah,  Abu-­‐l-­‐Faraj  Harun,  Abraham  de  Balmes,  to  mention  but  a  few.  

 

José  Martínez  Delgado,  Universidad  de  Granada,  Spain  

Title:  The  Isagoge  by  Porphyry  and  the  Andalusi  Hebrew  Lexycography  (10th-­‐11th  centuries)  

Abstract:   I   shall   show   how   the   first   Andalusi   Hebrew   lexicographers   used   the   tree   of   live   displayed   by  Porphyry  in  his  Isagoge  to  the  Biblical  Hebrew  in  order  to  catalogue  and  rebuilt  this  branch  of  the  Hebrew  Language.  

 

Jesús  de  Prado  Plumed,  EPHE,  Paris,  France  /  Universidad  Complutense  de  Madrid,  Spain  /  Herbert  D.  Katz  for  Advanced  Judaic  Studies,  University  of  Pennsylvania,  USA  

Title:  When   in  Rome,  do  as   the  Latins   learn   (Hebrew):  Alfonso  de  Zamora’s   ‘Epistle   to   the  Jews  of  Rome’  (1526)  

Abstract:  The  converso  Hebrew  professor  Alfonso  de  Zamora  (ca.  1474-­‐ca.  1545)  published  what  became  a  popular   Latin   grammar   of   Hebrew   in   Alcalá   de   Henares   (Spain)   in   1526.   These   Introductiones   artis  grammatice   hebraice   nunc   recenter   edite   rely   on   and   expand   the   Hebrew  manual   included   in   the   sixth  volume  of   the  monumental   Complutensian  Polyglot   (1515),   probably   authored  by   Zamora   as  well.   In   his  pedagogically   oriented   grammar,   Zamora   interweaves   Jewish   medieval   philological   traditions   with   an  exposition  structured   following   the   rules  of   Latinate  grammatical   conventions  and  a  punctual  anti-­‐Jewish  polemical   tone.   Humanism   has   traditionally   been   single-­‐handedly   as   the   right   angle   to   tackle   Zamora’s  long-­‐lasting   contributions.   “Humanism”,   too   often   an   ideologically   loaded   term,   can   fail   to   ascertain   the  richness  and  the  ambiguities  of  the  work  of  early  modern  Iberian  scholars,  of  whom  Zamora  was  one.  In  my  paper,   I   will   examine   one   of   the   several   texts   included   by   Zamora   in   his   1526   expanded   and   refined  grammar:   his   במשובתם אתם לתפוש רומה במדינת אשר היהודים אל ספרד ממכלות המחבר ששלח אגרת ,  alternatively  known  in  Latin  as  Epistola  autoris  ad  infideles  Hebraeos  vrbis  Romae,  qua  manifeste  redarguit  eorum  perfidiam.   It   is  a  48  pages   long  Hebrew  epistle   that  Zamora  says  he  had  sent  before   (olim)   to   the  Jews  of  Rome  and  which  might  have  been  circulating  as  a  manuscript.  Zamora’s  argument  is  sustained  by  a  consistent  appeal  to  properly  learning  Hebrew  by  having  recourse  to  the  conventions  of  Latin  grammatical  tradition—a  claim  that  is  otherwise  contradicted  by  the  corpus  of  30  manuscripts  that  he  copied,  restored  or  used,  mostly  made  up  by   Jewish  grammatical  classics   (the  Qamhis,   Ibn  Caspi,   Ibn  Ezra),  generally  with  accompanying   Latin   or   Spanish   translations.   As   it   has   been   argued   by   recent   scholarship,   the   Iberian  

contribution   to   Christian   Hebraism   is   a   particularly   neglected   chapter   of   the   history   of   early   modern  scholarship  in  Europe.  In  my  paper,  I  will  address  whether  a  humanistic  standpoint  conveniently  describes  the   work   carried   upon   by   early   modern   Hebraists,   namely   Alfonso   de   Zamora.   I   will   also   address   the  question   of   how   interreligious   polemics   fruitfully   and   paradoxically   pushed   the   interest   in   learning   and  teaching  Hebrew  and  how  teaching  was  shaped  by  this  polemical   interest.  These  are  questions  that  seem  relevant  to  ask  in  order  to  reassess  the  interactions  between  the  Hebrew  grammatical  tradition  and  other  grammatical   traditions   and   to   evaluate   the   role   of   Spanish   Hebrew   scholars   in   a   Spain   deprived   of   her  (legal)  Jews.  

 

Yehonatan  Wormser,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  New  Ideas  in  the  Traditional  Hebrew  Grammar:  The  Grammatical  Theory  of  Rabbi  Zalman  Hanau  

Abstract:  Solomon  Zalman  Hanau  (Germany,  1687-­‐1756),  was  an  important  Jewish  Hebrew  grammarian.  He  wrote  a   few  grammatical   treatises,  and  he  had  a  very  brave  and  original   ideas.  He   introduced  many  new  grammatical  methods  and  original  points  of  view,  which  had  a  great  influence  on  the  grammatical  ways  of  thinking  of  the  scholars  of  his  period  and  after.  In  the  fore  coming  congress  I  would  like  to  introduce  a  few  of  his  grammatical  innovations  and  their  influence  on  later  grammarian's  way  of  thinking.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  13  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Jewish-­‐Christian  /  Christian-­‐Jewish  Polemics  in  the  Middle  Ages  

Organizer:  Ursula  Ragacs  

Chair:  Piero  Capelli  

 

Ursula  Ragacs,  Universität  Wien,  Austria  

Title:  Paris  1240:  Christians  and  Jews  defining  Talmudic  Aggadot  

Abstract:  Whenever  referring  to  Jewish  traditional   literature   in  his  Dialogus  contra   Iudaeos  Petrus  Alfonsi  used   the  words   doctrina   doctorum   vestrorum.   The   texts   Petrus   Alfonsi   quoted   under   this   heading  were  taken   out   of   the   Talmud   and   they  were   always   aggadic   ones.   Petrus   Alfonsi   surely  wanted   his   Christian  readers   to   perceive   the   Talmud   as   the   authoritative   religious   Jewish   book   per   se.   The   translation   of   the  Hebrew  word  Talmud  with  the  Latin  doctrina  on  the  one  hand  transported  this  picture,  while  on  the  other  hand   fitted   the   need   of   a   verbatim   translation,   as   both   words   can   be   understood   as   simply   meaning  "teaching".  But  according  to  this  we  have  to  state,  that,  aside  from  translating  the  word  Talmud  as  he  did,  Petrus   Alfonsi   never   used   the   words   halakhah   or   aggadah   or   translations   of   them.   In   the   frame   of   the  Christian-­‐Jewish  controversy  the  concepts  of  halakha  and  aggada  were  an  issue  for  the  first  time  in  the  so  called   first   disputation   on   the   Talmud   in   Paris   1240.   As   the   encounter   was   carefully   planned   by   the  Christians  it  was  more  than  likely  that  they  must  have  dealt  in  some  way  with  the  terms  Talmud,  halakhah  and  aggadah  before   the  debate   really   happened.   I   asked  myself   how   this   had  been  done  and   if   it  might  have  had  any  impact  on  their  Jewish  counterparts.  My  paper  is  an  answer  to  this  question.  

 

Alexander  Fidora,  ICREA,  Barcelona,  Spain  

Title:  The  Latin  Talmud  and  Christian-­‐Jewish  Polemic  

Abstract:   The   Latin   Talmud   is   indisputably   a   landmark   in   the   history   of   Christian-­‐Jewish   relations   in   the  Middle  Ages.  This  paper  will  briefly  present  our  edition  project  of   the  so-­‐called  "Extractiones  de  Talmud"  along  with  problems  and  first  findings.  

 

Harvey  Hames,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Was  Conversion  on  the  Agenda?  Reconsidering  Barcelona  1263  

Abstract:  Was  the  famous  disputation  between  Friar  Paul  and  Nahmanides  for  the  purpose  of  achieving  the  latter's  conversion?  Based  on  a  re-­‐reading  of  the  Latin  and  Hebrew  texts,  I  will  suggest  that  the  purpose  of  the   disputation   was   not   conversion,   but   the   first   significant   attempt   to   use   Rabbinic   texts   to   bolster  Christian  faith  and  identity.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Jewish-­‐Christian  /  Christian-­‐Jewish  Polemics  in  the  Middle  Ages  

 

Chair:  Ursula  Ragacs  

 

Piero  Capelli,  Università  Ca'  Foscari  Venezia,  Italy  

Title:  Editing  Thirteenth-­‐century  Polemical  Texts  

Abstract:  Many  Hebrew  literary  sources  for  both  the  history  and  the  intellectual  history  of  the  Jews  in  the  Middle   Ages   are   still   utilized,   translated   and   interpreted   based   on   nineteenth-­‐century   editions.   In  most  cases,  these  are  methodologically  outdated  and  based  on  incomplete  surveys  of  the  manuscript  evidence.  This  mars  our  understanding  of  the  fortune  and  reuse  of  such  literary  documents  by  the  Jews  themselves  during   the   late  Middle   Ages   and   throughout   the  modern   era;   it   also   prevents   a   full   appreciation   of   the  interpretive  prisms   through  which   the   Jews   read  key  historical  events   in   their   immediate  aftermath.  This  paper  will  discuss  two  cases  from  the  thirteenth  century:  the  Hebrew  account  of  the  Paris  trial  against  the  Talmud  and  the  letter  of  Ya'aqov  ben  Eliyyah  to  the  convert  Pablo  Cristiani.  

 

Görge  Hasselhoff,  Käte  Hamburger  Kolleg,  Ruhr-­‐Universität  Bochum,  Germany    

Title:  The  Parisian  Talmud  Trials  and  the  Translations  of  Rashi's  Bibel  Commentaries  

Abstract:  Before  or  in  the  aftermath  of  the  Talmud  disputations  of  1239  an  anonymous  translator  (perhaps  Theobaldus   de   Saxonnia   OP)   provided   Latin   translations   of   excerpts   of   the   Talmud.   These   excerpts   are  accompanied  by  a  list  of  160  excerpts  taken  from  Rashi’s  Bible  commentaries.  The  oldest  extant  manuscript  known  (13th  CE)  is  kept  in  Paris,  but  there  are  at  least  two  further  mediaeval  and  one  early  modern  copies.  In  my  talk  I  will   introduce  into  the  content  of  the  translations.  In  a  second  step  I  will  show  which  texts  by  Rashi  are  contained   in  the  manuscript  and  how  the  translator  translated.  Although  at   first  sight   the  texts  seem  to  be  rather  free  translations  that  have  little  in  common  with  Rashi  I  will  show  that  the  translator  was  close  to  his  'Vorlage'  which  he  abbreviated  in  many  cases.  

 

Alexandra  Cuffel,  Ruhr  Universitaet,  Germany  

Title:  Jesus,  the  Misguided  Magician:  The  (Re-­‐)emergence  of  the  Toledot  Yeshu  in  Thirteenth-­‐Century  Iberia  and  its  Uses  

Abstract:  In  both  Mafteah  ha-­‐Shemot  by  the  Jewish  mystic,  Abraham  Abulafia  (1240-­‐post-­‐1291  CE)  and  the  Pugio  Fidei  by  the  Dominican  Friar  Ramon  Martí  (d.  post-­‐1284),  full  versions  or  elements  of  the  Jewish  anti-­‐gospel,  known  as  the  Toledot  Yeshu  are  clearly  recounted  for  the  first  time  in  European  sources  since  the  

description  by  Agobard  of  Lyons  in  De  Judaicis  superstionibus  in  the  ninth  century.  Passages  linking  straying  Jews,   Christianity,   Egypt,   menstruation   and   magic   in   other   thirteenth-­‐century   Iberian   kabbalistic   and  literary  texts,  such  as  the  Zohar  or  Ibn  Sahula’s  Mashal  ha-­‐  Qadmoni  provide  less  definitive  but  nevertheless  tantalizing   hints   that   some   version(s)   of   the   Toledot   Yeshu   were   circulating   among   Jews   in   Iberia   and  gaining   popularity   there   as   a   polemical   tool   to   denigrate   Jesus   and   those   who   might   be   tempted   by  Christianity,  and  as  an  entertaining   tale,  which  portrayed   Jesus,  at  best,  as  a  pathetic,  often   impure,  and  ultimately  unsuccessful  magician.  I  will  argue  that  versions  of  the  Toledot  Yeshu  started  appearing  in  Iberia  because  of  the  circulation  and  translations  of  Judeo-­‐Arabic  versions  of  the  story.  Jews  in  Iberia,  having  close  contact   with   or   being   part   of   Arabic-­‐speaking   Jewish   communities   in   Al-­‐Andalus,   the   Maghreb,   or   the  Middle   East,   were   familiar  with   both   oral   and  written   (Judeo-­‐)   Arabic   polemic   against   Christianity.   They  adopted   and   adapted   such   traditions   in   their   search   for   effective   polemic   against   Christianity,   even   as  individual   Christian   polemicists,   like   Ramon  Martí,   devoted   to   the   study   of   Hebrew   and   Arabic   sources  learned  of  these  arguments  and  attempted  to  refute  them.  The  case  of  the  translation  of  a  version  of  Qiṣṣat  mujādalat  al-­‐‘usquf  from  Judeo-­‐Arabic  into  the  Hebrew  Nestor  ha-­‐Komer  in  the  late  twelfth  century  is  well  known.   The   emergence   of   the   Toledot   Yeshu   in   the   following   century   is   part   of   the   same   impulse.     Yet  Iberian   Jews   adopted   or   emphasized   different   narrative   sequences   in   the   Toledot   to   suit   their   needs.  Variations   in  what  version  of  the  Toledot  Yeshu  was  known  or  used  by   individual  authors  may  have  been  due   to   their   knowing   different   version   of   the   Toledot,   however,   I   will   suggest   that   the   Toledot   Yeshu  tradition’s   primarily   oral   nature   made   it   extremely   malleable   and   therefore   appealing   because   of   its  adaptability.     Jews  chose  elements  based  on  what  aspect  of  Christian  anti-­‐Jewish  rhetoric  they  wished  to  refute:  the  anti-­‐Jewish  elements  of  the  story  of  the  true  cross  (the  version  in  Pugio  Fidei);  Christian  claims  about   Mary’s   and   therefore   Jesus’   special   purity   (Abraham   Abulafia);   or   Jesus’s   capacity   to   perform  miracles  (all,  but  especially  Ibn  Sahula).  

 

Liubov  Chernin,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  The  Jews  Who  Sold  Spain:  Image  of  the  Jew  in  the  Medieval  Conception  of  Arabic  Conquest  of  Spain  

Abstract:  Arabic  conquest  of  711  was  a  major  event  in  the  medieval  Spanish  history.  It  was  more  than  once  interpreted  by  the  authors  of  all  three  denominations,  inhabiting  the  Iberian  Peninsula.  Chroniclers  and  folk  tradition  elaborated  several  more  or  less  “creative”  versions  of  how  and  why  it  happened.  One  of  them  was  related  with  the  traditional  image  of  Jews  as  traitors  –  the  Jews  allegedly  made  a  complot  with  Moors  and  helped   them   to   conquer   Visigothic   kingdom.   This   motive   grew   up   from   the   accusation   of   Jews   in   the  conspiracy  with  their  transmarine  co-­‐religionists  in  694  and  from  the  reports  of  some  Arab  chroniclers  that  Jews  collaborated  with  conquerors  in  some  cities.  Most  of  texts  regarding  this  subject  understandably  were  composed  by  Christian  authors.  The  first  references  of  these  events  in  the  Jewish  literature  appear  only  in  the  chronicles  of  Late  Middle  Ages,  and  their  authors  took  them  from  Christian  sources.  We  shall  revise  the  roots  of  this  story,  which  lie  in  the  Visigothic  tradition,  how  it  was  rethought  in  the  popular  romances  and  Christian  chronicles,  why  it  was  revived  in  the  Late  Middle  Ages,  and  how  the  “Jewish”  line  was  interlaced  with  other  popular  plots  about  Moorish  conquest,   first  of  all  with   the   famous   story  about  king  Rodrigo’s  seduction  of  the  count  Julian’s  daughter.  These  considerations  can  help  to  propose  some  new  variants  of  solving   of   an   old   problem   –   why   was   Visigothic   period   “forgotten”   in   the   historical   memory   of   Jewish  people.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break    

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  14  

 

Session:  001:  

Shoah  and  Antisemitism  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Jewish  Responses  to  the  Blood  Libel  through  the  Centuries  

Organizer:  Elissa  Bemporad  

Chair:  Elissa  Bemporad  

 

Magda  Teter,  Wesleyan  University,  USA  

Title:  Between  Ashkenaz  and  Sepharad:  Jewish  Responses  to  Blood  Libels  in  Premodern  Europe  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  discuss  the  different  responses  by  Ashkenazi,  Sephardi,  and  Italian  Jews  to  blood  accusations   in   premodern   Europe.   While   Sephardic   and   Italian   Jews   were   not   shy   to   respond   to   blood  accusations   in   print,   Ashkenazi,   and   in   particular   Polish   Jews,   focused   on   political   interventions.   Indeed,  Polish  Jews  did  not  respond  in  print  until  the  second  half  of  the  18th  century,  and  then  it  was  by  publishing  legal  documents  rather  than  apologetic  and  polemical  treatises.  

 

Emanuele  D'Antonio,  University  of  Udine,  Italy  

Title:  Responding  to  the  Myth  of  'Ritual  Murder'  in  1850s'  Italy.  Jews  of  the  Venetian  and  the  Blood  Libel  of  Badia  Polesine.  

Abstract:  Proposal:  Emerged  from  a  periphereal  area  of  Venetian  in  1855,  the  blood  libel  of  Badia  Polesine  is  generally  considered  the  last  one  in  the  history  of  Italian  society.  My  contribution  aims  to  reconstruct  this  case  that  took  place  in  the  age  of  Emancipation,  focussing  on  Jewish  responses  to  the  spread  of  the  myth  of  'ritual  murder'  in  Gentile  society.  I  would  like  to  analyze  the  (successful)  defensive  strategies  undertaken  by  Jewish  Communities  of  the  Venetian  area,  -­‐  their  heads,  rabbis  and  intellectuals,  -­‐   in  their   legal,  religious,  cultural  and  political  aspects.  

 

Elissa  Bemporad,  Queens  College  at  The  City  University  of  New  York,  USA  

Title:   Confronting   Blood:   Jewish   Responses   to   the   Ritual  Murder   Accusation   in   Interwar   Poland   and   the  Soviet  Union  

Abstract:  By  focusing  on  Poland  and  the  Soviet  Union  -­‐  home  to  the  two  largest  Jewish  communities  in  pre-­‐Holocaust  Europe  –  this  paper  will  take  a  new  look  at  the  ways  in  which  Jews  challenged  the  ritual  murder  charge,  wrote  about  it,  openly  confronted  the  accusers,  and  turned  to  local  and  central  authorities  seeking  justice   and  asserting   their   role   as   Polish   and   Soviet   citizens.   This   study  will   examine   the  extent   to  which  Jews  living  in  two  very  dissimilar  geopolitical  systems  felt  empowered  to  act  upon  their  rights  as  citizens  by  the  new  socio-­‐political  reality  that  followed  World  War  I.  In  some  cases  Soviet  Jews  displayed  a  higher  level  

of  assertiveness  and  self-­‐confidence   in  demanding  that  fomenters  of  the  blood   libel  be  punished,  unseen  before  in  Russia,  or  elsewhere  in  Europe  at  the  time.  

 

Cristiana  Facchini,  University  of  Bologna,  Italy  

Title:  Early  Modern  Jewish  Responses  to  Blood  Libel  Allegations.  Patterns  and  Models  

Abstract:  My  paper  aims  to  offer  some  new   insights   to  the  problem  of  blood   libel   in  Europe,   focusing  on  Jewish  responses  from  the  17th  century  to  the  19th  century,  claiming  that  these  defenses  provided  a  multi-­‐layered  model  for  defenses  against  other  accusations  as  well,  which  comprises  historical  modes  of  thought  and  legal  practices.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Contemporary  Israel  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Chaim  Weizman:  between  Britain,  Germany  and  Palestine/Israel  

Organizer:  Meir  Chazan  

 

Chair:  Meir  Chazan  

 

Naama  Sheffi,  Sapir  College,  Israel  

Title:  "Something  close  to  miserable  love":  Weizmann  and  German  Jewry  

Abstract:  Chaim  Weizmann's  contacts  with  German  Jewry  and  German  concepts  are  the  focus  of  this  talk,  which  will   analyze  Weizmann's   studies   period   in   Germany   as   the   source   of   his   intellectual   and   national  thought  and  a  significant  influence  upon  his  activities  in  the  academy  and  his  involvement  in  the  efforts  to  rescue  German  Jews.  

 

Uri  Cohen,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:   From   Political   Rejection   to   Scientific   Renewal:   Chaim  Weizmann   and   Founding   the   Sieff   Research  Institute  in  Mandatory  Palestine  

Abstract:  The  establishment  of   the  Daniel  Sieff   Institute   in  Rehovoth   in  1934  was  a  project  of  one  man  –  Chaim  Weizmann.   It  was  a  chemistry   institute  dedicated  to  scientific  research  only,  with  neither  teaching  nor  granting  academic  degrees.  That  was  its  uniqueness  in  comparison  to  contemporary  higher  education  institutes  at  that  time  in  Palestine  –  The  Hebrew  University  in  Jerusalem  (1925)  and  The  Technion  in  Haifa  (1924).  The  Institute  was  based  on  the  assumption  that  only  basic  research  can  lead  to  significant  scientific  results,   which   in   turn   can   lead   to   valuable   applicable   results.   Some   questions   arise   here,   such   as:  Who  supported   the   Research   Institute,   and   who   objected   to   it,   and   what   were   the   motives?   All   along   this  

discussion  I  am  fascinated  by  the  trials  of  the  Jewish  community  in  Palestine  to  copy  the  models  of  leading  scientific   institutes   in   Europe.   This   desire   to   raise   scientific   institutes   is   not   taken   for   granted  when   one  considers  the  local  needs  of  a  comparatively  small  population  with  limited  resources  and  poorly  developed  industry.  The  main  argument  in  this  essay  is  that  establishing  a  chemistry  Institute  was  not  limited  only  to  the   work   of   the   scientist   in   his   laboratory.   The   new   institute   was   part   of   a   political   project   which   was  founded   on   the   background   of   harsh   conflicts   between  Weizmann   the   politician   and   key   people   at   the  Hebrew  University  on  the  background  of  his  rejection  from  the  leadership  of  the  Zionist  Organization.  

 

Meir  Chazan,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  First  President  of  the  State  of  Israel  

Abstract:   The   First   President   of   the   State   of   Israel   In   1948–1952,   Chaim   Weizmann   served   as   the   first  President  of  the  State  of   Israel.  He  came  to  this  position  flush  with  disappointments  and  bitterness,  after  having   been   unseated   as   president   of   the   Zionist   Organization   at   the   twenty-­‐second   Zionist   Congress  (December  1946)  and  deprived  of  much  of  his  political  influence  at  the  initiative  of  David  Ben-­‐Gurion,  head  of  Mapai  and   first  Prime  Minister  of   the  State  of   Israel.  His  health  problems  overshadowed  his  ability   to  function  and  burdened  his  capacity  to  handle  the  duties  of  the  presidential  office.  In  historiography,  it  has  become  conventional  wisdom  to  describe  Weizmann  at  this  stage  of  his  life  as  a  “lion  in  winter,”  cloistered  most   of   the   time   in   his   home   at   the   eponymous   institute   in   Rehovot,   occasionally   receiving   guests  who  visited   him   chiefly   for   reasons   of   politeness   and  honor,   and   largely   uninvolved   in   the   fledgling   country’s  public  and  political  life.  My  lecture  challenges  this  convention  and  examines,  on  the  basis  of  recent  findings,  Weizmann’s   real   contribution   in   his   last   years   and   the  ways   in   which   his   persona   filled   the   presidential  function  with  content.  

 

Glenda  Abramson,  University  of  Oxford,  UK  

Title:  Ottomanisation  and  the  Jews  of  Palestine  in  the  First  World  War  

Abstract:  In  1909  military  service  was  made  compulsory  for  all  Ottoman  male  subjects  of  a  certain  age.  For  the  Ottoman  Jewish  communities  before  the  First  World  War  this  universal  conscription  became  a  token  of  support  for  the  Empire.  In  the  Jewish  Settlement  in  Palestine  (yishuv)  compulsory  conscription  also  applied  to   foreign   Jews   who   were   forced   to   become   Ottoman   citizens   in   order   to   be   allowed   to   remain   in   the  country   and   avoid   military   service   in   their   home   countries.   Other   Jews,   encouraged   by   the   Zionist  leadership,  chose  to  enlist   into  the  Turkish  army  in  the  belief  that  this  would  affect  the  political  future  of  the  Jews  in  Palestine.  Yet  for  many,  idealism  could  not  withstand  the  brutal  realities  of  army  service,  which  often  led  to  desertion  and,  consequently,  severe  punishment.  Many  men  were  sent  to  the  dreaded  Labour  Battalions   (tawabeer-­‐al-­‐amale),   leaving   their   families   to   suffer   the   privations   of   the  war   in   the   yishuv.   A  large   proportion   of   foreign   Jews   left   to   go   into   voluntary   exile   in   Egypt.   This   paper   will   discuss   the  implications   of   Ottomanisation,   which   were   far-­‐reaching   and   which   affected   the   entire   social,   political,  economic  and  literary  fabric  of  the  yishuv.  

 

13.00-­‐13.30:  Lunch  Break  

   

Wednesday  23rd  July  

Room:  15  

 

Session:  001:  

 

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:    Jewish  Reception  of  Josephus  since  c.1750  

Organizer:  Martin  Goodman  

Chair:  Irene  Zwiep  

 

Martin  Goodman,  Oxford  University,  UK  

Title:  Themes,  Problems  and  Issues  in  Jewish  Reception  of  Josephus  

Abstract:   The   paper   will   examine   the   themes   and   problems   which   have   emerged   during   the   research  project  and  will  indicate  some  of  the  remaining  areas  which  would  benefit  from  further  research.  

 

Tessa  Rajak,  Somerville  College,  University  of  Oxford,  UK  

Title:  The  AHRC  Josephus  Project:  New  Interpretations  and  New  Findings.  

Abstract:   As   of   July   2014,   our   AHRC-­‐funded   Project   on   the   Post-­‐Enlightenment   Jewish   Reception   of  Josephus  will  have  completed  its  programme  of  four  International  Workshops  held  at  the  Yarnton  premises  of  the  Oxford  Centre  for  Hebrew  and  Jewish  Studies.  It  is  a  pleasure  to  share  with  the  members  of  the  EAJS  Congress  our   first   review  of   the  outcomes  of   this   part   of   our   activities.   The   remit  of   the  Workshops  has  been   broad,   including,   in   the   first  Workshop,   the   indispensable   background,   both   Jewish   and   Christian,  going   back   to   late   antiquity,   and   covering   also   the  Middle  Ages,   the  Renaissance,   and   the   Early  Modern  Period.   Among   the   topics   about   which   much   has   been   learned,   is,   indeed,   the   inextricable   connection  between  the  Jewish  and  the  Christian  Josephus.  Morevover,  from  the  beginning  and  right  down  to  our  own  time,  the  fate  and  the  understanding  of  the  enduringly  popular  Mediaeval  Hebrew,  Josephus-­‐based  history  of  Yosippon  has  been  intertwined  to  a  surprising  extent  with  that  of  the  ‘real’  Josephus.  The  rediscovery  of  Josephus   among   Jews   has   been   an   important   part   of   the   unfolding   of   the   Enlightenment:   he   has   been  indispensable   in  providing  Jews  with  a  history  that  could  both  be  seen  as  their  own  and  connect  them  to  the   wider   world   of   the   classical   part.   The   labours   of   a   small   number   of   scholars   and   interpreters   who  engaged  particularly  closely  with  Josephus  were  crucial  in  his  dissemination,  notably  Heinrich  Graetz,  in  his  histories,  and  Kalman  Schulman,  through  his  Hebrew  translations,  published  in  Vilna  from  1859  onwards.  It  is  an  achievement  for  which  appreciation  is  due  to  the  participants  and  discussants  in  our  Workshops  that  the  role  of  these  individual  protagonists,  in  their  cultural  contexts,  can  now  much  better  understood.  

 

Saskia  Dönitz,  Free  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  Sefer  Yosippon’s  Reception  in  Medieval  Hebrew  Literature    

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

Session  002:  

Funding  for  Jewish  Studies  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Round  Table  

Organizers:  Philip  Alexander  /  Jonathan  Starbrook  

   

 

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  01  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  Philosophy  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Long  Term  Evolution  in  Jewish  Theology  

 

Chair:  

 

Abraham  Melamed,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  From  Law  to  Religion:  The  Evolution  of  the  Term  'Dat'  in  the  History  of  Jewish  Culture  

Abstract:  My  paper  will  outline  the  main  findings  of  a  book  on  this  subject,  which  is  due  to  be  published  in  Hebrew  in  early  2014.  It  traces  the  manner  by  which  the  term  'dat',  originally  a  Persian  word,  which  means  'law',   was   adopted   in   the   late   biblical   period,   and   the  manner   by  which   its   usage   and  meaning   evolved  throughout  the  ages,  always  adopting  to  changing  historical  and  cultural  circumstances.  In  the  late  middle  ages,  it  denoted  law,  even  human  law  in  particular;  therefore,  many  scholars  refused  to  use  it  in  connection  with  divine  law  and  the  Mosaic  constitution.  With  the  advent  of  modernity,  however,  the  meaning  of  this  term  radically  changed,  due  to  Christian  -­‐  mostly  Protestant  -­‐  influences,  and  now  denotes  'religion',  in  the  meaning   this   term  acquired   in  modern   times.  The  meaning  of   the   term   'dat',   thus,   radically   shifted   from  law,  even  human  law,  into  a  set  of  theological  beliefs.  My  paper  will  concentrate  on  the  modern  shift  of  the  meaning  of  this  term,  its  causes  and  implications.  

 

Harry  Fox,  University  of  Toronto,  Canada  

Title:  A  Theology  of  Climate  Change  in  Jewish  Sources  

Abstract:  In  this  paper  I  shall  demonstrate  that  in  antiquity  causes  for  global  warming  were  considered  to  be   sin   and   response   to   sin   in   the   divine   scheme   of   retribution.   This,   of   course,   is   a   highly   violent  understanding   of   the   world   and   this   theological   construct   is   a   far   cry   from   the   secularist   response   and  discourse  available  today.  Nonetheless,  they  do  share  certain  surprising  affinities.  First  and  foremost  is  the  belief  buttressed  by  the  best  scientific  assessment  available  that  climate  change  is  indeed  caused  by  human  beings  who  must  take  responsibility  for  their  actions  so  as  not  to  suffer  the  consequences  of  their  behavior.  Second  these  activities  in  either  scenario,  that  is,  whether  good  or  bad,  are  considered  to  contribute  to  the  welfare   or   detriment   of   the   environment.   Third,   the   suffering   that   results   in   relation   to   such   may   be  widespread   and   go  well   beyond   self-­‐harm   to   the   individual   so   as   to   affect   all   of   humanity.   Though   not  explicit   in   Scripture,   the   rabbis   (commenting   on   Genesis   18:16   in   bBaba   Metzia   86b)   see   God   as   the  controller  of  nature  who  lets  the  sun  out  of  its  sheath  in  order  to  increase  the  effectiveness  of  its  heat  now  raised   to   full   blast.  With  our   secularly  attenuated  ears  believing  natural  phenomena  govern   the  weather  obeying   natural   laws,   it   is   strange   to   hear   how  God   is   considered  by   the   rabbinic   sages   to   be   the  direct  cause   of   this   depicted   heat   source.   Yet   this   control   over   nature   is   precisely   the   one  made   explicit   also  within  Scripture  itself  well  before  the  idea  gets  poetically  rendered  by  the  rabbinic  sages.  The  expectation  

for   sinful   behavior   in   Judaism   as   a   fiery   hell   which   receives   its   best   depiction   in   a   visitation   to   hell   and  Paradise   by   Moses   in   a   midrash   based   on   Song   of   Songs   (2:3).   Frymer-­‐Kensky   comments   on   this  environmental  tension:  "Humans  depend  on  the  earth's  creative  powers  and  the  fate  of  the  earth  depends  on  human  behavior."  Frymer-­‐Kensky  sees  the  biblical  response  given  in  Isaiah  66:22  "a  new  heaven  and  a  new  earth"  as  a  message  of  hope  for  Israel  and  humankind.  Indeed  Isaiah's  vision  of  an  apocalyptic  end-­‐of-­‐days   meaning   is   imbued   with   special   significance   in   Jewish   and   Christian   millinarianism.   Unfortunately,  however,  this  has  led  to  a  degree  of  anti-­‐environmentalism  in  all  three  major  monotheistic  religions.  

 

Jerzy  Ochman,  Jagiellonian  University,  Krakow,  Poland  

Title:  Les  transpositions  du  sacre  dans  le  judaïsme  du  XXe  siècle  

Abstract:  Au  XX  siècle  il  y  avait  dans  le  judaïsme  quatre  transpositions  du  sacré  –  du  super-­‐naturalisme  aux  thèmes   importants   pour   la   mentalité   juive   ou   universelle.   La   première   transposition   a   été   faite   par   les  sionistes,   qui   ont   substitué   à   la   religion   –   l’idée   de   la   nation   ou   de   la   nouvelle   patrie.   Dans   le   sionisme  politique,   ce   changement   a   été   fait   par   Th.   Herzl;   Dans   le   sionisme   socialiste   –   par   A.D.   Gordon,   Ch.  Zydlowski  et  J.Ch.  Brenner.  Dans  le  sionisme  spirituel  par  S.  Czernikowski,  Achad  Haam  et  S.  Dubnow.  Dans  le  sionisme  culturel  par  M.  Nordau  et  Eliezer  ben  Jehuda.  Dans  le  sionisme  pratique  par  M.  J.  Berdyczewski  et   A.   Ruppin.   Dans   le   sionisme   israélien   –par   Z.   Sh.   Szazar   et   le   courant   sabra   (J.   Ratosz).   La   deuxième  réinterprétation  du   judaïsme  a  été   faite   au  nom  du  naturalisme.  Ce  processus  a  été   commencé  dans   les  siècles   précédents   (B.Spinoza)   et   a   eu   son   cime   dans   l’œuvre   de   rabbin  M.  M.   Kaplan   Judaism  without  supernaturalism   (1958).   La   troisième   réinterprétation   a   été   par   les   idées   de   l’humanisme.   Le   rabbin   T.  Sherwin  Wine  l’a  fait  dans  l’œuvre  Humanistic  Judaism  (1958).  La  quatrième  réinterprétation  a  été  faite  par  le  rabbin  M.  M.Kaplan  dans  l’œuvre  Judaism  as  a  civilization  (1934).  Cette  œuvre,  outre  qu’elle  représente  une  “reconstruction”  du   judaïsme,  propage   la  mise  au  point  de   l’idée  de   la  civilisation  et   incite  au  travail  pour  la  civilisation.  Chaque  transposition  a  été  faite  selon  une  méthode  bien  pensée.  La  méthode  opérative  de   chaque   opération   a   commencée   par   le   changement   de   l’imagination   religieuse   en   l’imagination  (patriotique,   naturaliste,   humaniste   et   civilisatrice)   proposée   par   les   psychologues,   qui   disaient   que   tout  changement   d’idées   doit   être   anticipé   et   préparé   par   un   changement   de   l’imagination   comme   base   des  idées  et  des  notions.  Cette  méthode  a  été  proposée  par  le  rabin  R.  L.  Rubenstein  dans  l’œuvre  The  religious  imagination.  A  study   in  Psychoanalysis  and  Jewish  Theology  (1971,  1985).  Au  début  du  XXe  siècle,  c’est   la  transposition  “réconstructioniste”  qui  est  en  vogue  et  qui  se  répand  chez  les  juifs  et  remplace  les  notions  d’au-­‐delà   (par  ex.  Dieu)  par   les  notions  de   la   civilisation.  C’est  elle  qui   stimule   les   Juifs  au   travail  pour   la  civilisation.  Ils  en  résultent  des  grands  succès  des  Juifs  dans  les  inventions  et  dans  le  domaine  de  la  culture  contemporaine  et  les  présente  comme  une  “nation  élue”  pour  le  développement  de  la  civilisation  mondiale  contemporaine.   Là   où   l’imagination   des   Juifs   n’était   pas   changée   et   là   où   la   vie   religieuse   perdure,   les  nouvelles  idées  (patrie,  nature,  humanisme  et  civilisation)  n’ont  qu’une  valeur  théorique  et  restent  à  coté  de  leur  religiosité.  Là  où  ça  a  réussi,  le  travail  et  le  dévouement  pour  la  patrie,  de  la  nature,  de  l’humanité  et  de  la  civilisation  devient  un  sacrum  des  Juifs.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Philosohy,  Religion  and  Politics  I  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Chair:  

 

Ottfried  Fraisse,  Goethe  University  Frankfurt,  Germany  

Title:   Martin   Schreiner's   Unpublished   "Systematic   Philosophy   of   Religion"   –   Continuity   and   Innovation  Concerning  Ignác  Goldziher's  Method  of  Researching  Religion  

Abstract:   Martin   Schreiner   (1863-­‐1926)   came   to   Budapest   in   1881   and   registered   at   the  Landesrabbinerschule  and  at  the  University  Budapest.  At  the  latter  institution  Ignác  Goldziher  was  teaching  Arabic.  Martin  Schreiner  became  a  close  pupil  of  Goldziher  and  from  him  he  received  decisive  impulses  and  orientation   for  his   later  scientific  work.  They  were  even   linked  by  a   lifelong   friendship  as  proven  by  their  personal  correspondence.  Although  educated  as  a  rabbi  Martin  Schreiner  felt  more  attracted  by  (medieval)  Jewish   thinking   especially   its   dependence   from  Muslim   thought.   This   interested  was   heavily   inspired   by  Ignác  Goldziher.   Like  Goldziher  Schreiner   located  his   research  on   the  development  of   Judaism  within   the  discipline  and  methodology  of  religious  science.  Like  Goldziher  he  regarded  the  development  of  Judaism  as  being   dependent   on   its   surrounding   cultures.   However,   while   Goldziher   was   stressing   the   cultural-­‐anthropological  aspects  of  development  Schreiner  believed  in  the  possibility  to  proof  its  underlying  ideas.  Therefore,   he   argued   for   the   necessity   to   elaborate   a   comprehensive   system   of   Jewish   theology.   The  lecture  wants   to   show  how  Schreiner   in   his   (unpublished)   "Systematic   philosophy  of   religion"  developed  further   Goldziher's   notion   of   Jewish   religion   as   outlined   in   his   lecture   series   "Essence   and   Evolution   of  Judaism".  

 

Daniel  Conway,  Texas  A&M  University,  USA  

Title:  Arendt  in  Jerusalem:  Plurality  and  the  Future  of  Evil  

Abstract:   Largely   overshadowed   by   the   controversies   surrounding   Hannah   Arendt’s   reference   to   the  banality  of   evil   is   her   signal   insight   into   the   failure  of  modern  morality   to   instill   in  human  beings   a   fixed  sense  of  personal   responsibility.   In  an  effort   to   retrieve   this   insight,   I   characterize  banality  as  a  condition  marked   by   a   socially   useful   but   morally   irresponsible   self-­‐division.   As   exemplified   by   Adolf   Eichmann,  banality  thus  suggests  a  semi-­‐permanent  condition  of  arrested  moral  development,  wherein  agents  escape  the  full  implications  of  the  moral  responsibility  they  apportion  to  themselves.  They  do  so,  moreover,  while  claiming,  much  as  Eichmann  did   in   Jerusalem,   that   they  harbor  no   ill  will   toward   those  whom   they  have  harmed  in  the  process  of  honoring  (what  they  take  to  be)  their  moral  obligations.  I  thus  aim  to  demonstrate  that   banality   names   a   (defective)   moral   condition,   wherein   agents   may   assert   their   capacity   for  autonomous   self-­‐determination   while   simultaneously   refusing   any   specific   assignment   of   moral  responsibility.  Evil  is  banal,  that  is,  in  the  event  that  agents  hold  (and  understand)  themselves  to  be  morally  responsible  in  a  general,  abstract  sense—able,   like  Eichmann,  to  enumerate  their  good  deeds  while  citing  relevant  moral   authorities   and   duties—and  morally   irresponsible  when   urged   to   consider   their   concrete  obligations   to   identifiable   others.   Evil   is   banal,   that   is,   in   the   event   that   it   is   caused,   furthered,   or  proliferated   by   professed   creatures   of   conscience,   i.e.,   agents   who   know   and   respect   the   difference  between  good  and  evil  but  who  have  been  persuaded  to  reverse  the  customary  valence  assigned  to  these  terms.  As  described,  the  banality  of  evil  poses  a  formidable  challenge  to  those  of  us  who  follow  in  Arendt’s  footsteps.   By   presenting   banality   as   potentially   emblematic   of   late  modern  moral   life,   Arendt   effectively  exposes  our  regnant  systems  of  law  and  morality  as  inadequate  to  the  task  of  rendering  a  just  verdict  of  the  evils   that   may   be   traced   to   agents   who,   like   Eichmann,   are   devoid   of   malevolence.   Out   of   sheer  thoughtlessness,   Arendt   contends,   Eichmann   committed   a   crime   against   humanity,   which   she   elects   to  characterize  as  a  crime  against  human  plurality.  Indeed,  this  is  the  precise  sense  in  which  Eichmann’s  crime  

may  be  said  to  be  unprecedented:  Never  before  has  the  plurality  of   the  human  condition  been  placed  at  mortal   risk.   Owing   to   the   emergence   of   this   new   species   of   criminal,   in   fact,   we   late   moderns   have  contracted  a  new,  and  heretofore  unknown,   responsibility:  We  are  pledged   to  guard   the  plurality   that   is  predicated  of  our  worldly  existence.  In  the  case  of  Eichmann,  Arendt  believes,  we  have  honored  this  new  responsibility,   albeit   imperfectly.   Despite   her  withering   criticisms   of   the   prosecution,   in   fact,   she   objects  neither   to   the   verdict   pronounced   in   Jerusalem  nor   to   the   death   sentence   handed   down   by   the   judges.  Justice,  she  avers,  was  served.  At  the  same  time,  however,  she  believes  that  we  late  moderns  are  not  yet  in  full,  conscious  possession  of  this  new  responsibility.  The  task  she  bequeaths  to  us,  or  so  I  wish  to  maintain,  is  to  reform  our  laws  and  norms  to  accommodate  this  new  responsibility,  and  to  remake  ourselves  in  the  process.   It   now   falls   to   us,   in   short,   to   become   the   legitimate   guardians   of   human   plurality,   even   after  performing  the  signal  act  that  reflects  our  accession  to  this  exalted  station.    

 

George  Y.  Kohler,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Jewish-­‐Christian  Debates  on  Theology  in  Germany  between  1830-­‐1870  

Abstract:  It  is  commonly  assumed  that  intellectual  Christian  anti-­‐Semitism  reached  the  level  of  19th  century  German  universities  only  with  the  published  views  of  the  Berlin  historian  Heinrich  von  Treitschke  and  the  subsequent   great   public   debate   that   evolved   in   1880   about   the   “Jewish   Question”.   It   can   be   shown,  however,   that   controversies   about   religiously   motivated   anti-­‐Judaism   between   Jewish   and   Christian  intellectuals  were  widespread   during   at   least   half   a   century   before   the   Treitschke-­‐debate.   Almost   every  important  German  Jewish  scholar  of  the  period  was  at  some  point   in  his   life  engaged  in  often  unpleasant  arguments  with  different  Christian  politicians  or  academics  who  had,  from  a  Jewish  point  of  view,  spread  slander   and   deprecation   of   specific   theological   aspects   or   of   parts   of   the   religious   literature   of   Judaism.  Jewish  thinkers  such  as  Abraham  Geiger   (against  Heinrich   Julius  Holtzmann),  Samuel  Hirsch  and  Gotthold  Salomon  (against  Bruno  Bauer),  Samuel  Holdheim  (against  Friedrich  Julius  Stahl),  Ludwig  Philippson  (against  David   Friedrich   Strauss)   and   many   others   took   up   the   challenge   against   these   supposed   attacks   as  volunteer  defenders  of  the  Jewish  religion.  The  paper  proposes  to  follow  the  argumentation  of  both  sides  as   interesting   and   so   far   almost   un-­‐discovered   expressions   of   Jewish-­‐Christian   academic   debates   about  theology  in  19th  century  Germany.   It  soon  turns  out  that  we  encounter  here  a  new  and  highly   influential  phenomenon:  While  the  Middle  Ages  were  still  characterized  by  often  ugly  and  simple  polemics  between  the   two   religions,   the   modern   age   of   reason   and   tolerance   brought   philosophical   seriousness   to   these  discussions   –  without   that   fundamental   theological   differences  would   in   any  way  be  diminished.   For   the  first  time  Jewish  thinkers  now  tried  to  find  a  universal,  cultural  justification  for  the  continued  existence  of  Judaism,  positioning  their  religion  within  the  history  of  world  civilization  as  an  important  factor  of  general  ethical   and   religious   progress.   Christian   theologians,   meanwhile,   were   forced   to   adapt   their   views   on  Judaism   to   their   own   new   rational   (Kant/Hegel)   or   emotional   (Schleiermacher)   concept   of   religion   that  would   demand   a   re-­‐interpretation   of   the   traditional   supersession-­‐theory.   Both   sides,   however,   worked  hard   to   strictly   differentiate   their   respective  modern   and   liberal   theologies   from  each  other,   particularly  because  they  had  come  so  very  close.    

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Philosophy,  Religion  and  Politics  II  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Silvia  Cresti,  School  of  Jewish  Theology,  University  of  Potsdam,  Germany  

Title:  The  Ghetto  of  Rome:  Topography  of  Images  and  Relations  

Abstract:  My  paper  aims  at  analyzing  how  the  Jewish  ghetto  of  Rome  has  been  represented  by  Jewish  and  Non-­‐Jewish  writers   and   intellectuals   such   as,   for   example,   Ferdinand  Gregorovius   and  Abraham  Berliner,  Leo  Baeck,  Cecil  Roth  or  Elsa  Morante  and  Giacomo  Debenedetti  during  the  19th  and  20th  century.   I  will  interpret   these   accounts   first   as   historical   sources   on   specific   social   relations   and  historical   events.   I  will  then  draw  inferences  from  these  accounts  about  the  writers  themselves,  questioning  issues  such  as:  can  we  speak  about  a  Jewish  as  opposed  or  differentiated  to  a  non-­‐Jewish  narrative?  Where  are  the  encounters,  where  the  similarities  and  where  the  differences?  

 

Benjamin  Brown,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  The  Platonic  Republic  of  Da'at  Torah  

Abstract:  The  Ultra-­‐Orthodox  doctrine  of  Da'at  Torah  –  that  positions  the  'the  great  Torah  scholars'  as  the  supreme  political  leaders  of  the  community  –  is  not  only  a  political  product  of  social  circumstances:  It  is  also  one  of  the  very  few  political  theologies  that  were  developed  in  20th  century  Judaism.  Even  if   it  has  never  been   formulated   systematically   (as   is   often   the   case   in   Haredi   thought),   its   proponents   give   it   various  explanations  that  amount  to  full-­‐fledged  theory  with  a  number  of  variants.  The  doctrine  was  developed  in  the  Litvish  (Lithuanian)  circles  of  Agudat  Israel,  and  therefore  we  can  see  it  as  a  culmination  of  the  Litvish  ideal   of   the   Torah   scholar,   or   as   a   as   a   Litvish   version   of   the   Hasidic   Tzaddik.   However,   besides   these  "internal"  developments,  we  cannot  ignore  the  basic  resemblance  between  the  doctrine  of  Da'at  Torah  and  the  Platonic  vision  of  a  republic  ruled  by  the  philosophers.  Indeed,  while  the  ultra-­‐orthodox  rabbis  do  not  look  like  Greek  philosophers  and  do  not  engage  in  philosophy,  both  of  the  doctrines  share  the  nuclear  idea  is  that  the  intellectual  prodigies  of  the  society  are  those  who  should  rule.  In  my  paper  I  will  claim  that  this  proximity  is  not  altogether  coincidental.  Indeed,  Da'at  Torah  developed  from  a  the  Litvish  ideal  of  the  Torah  scholar,  but  that  ideal  in  turn  is  not  only  an  extrapolation  of  the  Talmudic  ideal  of  the  Talmid  Hakham,  but  also   a   late   transformation   of  Maimonides'   ideal   of   the   philosopher.   This   is   manifested   by   the   fact   that  Litvish  authors  often  use  Maimonidean  terms  referring  to  philosophers  in  order  to  explain  the  work  of  the  Torah  scholars.  Indeed,  Maimonides  himself  left  the  ideal  of  the  philosopher-­‐king  to  the  messianic  utopia,  but  the  Ultra-­‐Orthodox  thinkers  did  not  base  themselves  on  this  vision  but  rather  on  the  idealization  of  the  Torah  scholars  as  paragons  of  wisdom  and  integrity,  who  therefore  deserve  to  govern  the  community.  The  post  of   the  supreme  Torah  scholar  was  never   institutionalized,  but   in  spite  of   that,  and  maybe   thanks   to  that,  it  gained  considerable  social  and  moral  power.  And  so,  2,200  after  Plato's  death,  the  current  political  model  that  may  be  considered  as  the  one  of  the  closest  to  his  "republic"  lives  and  operates  in  Bnei  Brak  and  Jerusalem.  

 

Uriel  Barak,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Rabbi  A.  Y.  Kook’s  Attitude  toward  Jesus  and  toward  Interest   in  his  Figure  in  Contemporary  Hebrew  Literature  

Abstract:   Several   papers   have   been   written   about   twentieth   century   Jewish   philosophy’s   attitudes   and  connections   to   Christianity,   but   the   attitude  of   religious   Zionist   thinkers   to   Christianity   has   not   yet   been  addressed  with  the  scope  and  depth  it  deserves.  Similarly,  there  has  been  no  study  on  this  issue  comparing  the  responses  of  religious  Zionist  thinkers  to  those  of  other  Jewish  thinkers  of  that  time  period  who  did  not  belong  to  this  particular  theological  trend.  The  purpose  of  this  lecture  is  to  show  that  studying  the  attitudes  toward  Christianity  within  religious  Zionist  thought  discloses  bold  and  novel  approaches,  uncommon  within  twentieth   century  Orthodox   Jewish   thinking.   In   this   lecture,   I  will   focus  on  elucidating  Rabbi  A.  Y.  Kook’s  views   on   Christianity   and   the   linkage   of   these   views   to   his   conception   of   the   people   of   Israel’s   fate   and  destiny  in  the  world.  I  will  also  point  out  the  philosophical  and  kabbalistic  sources  and  theological  roots  of  R.   Kook’s   positions.   I   claim   that   R.   Kook’s   thought   oscillated   between   two   poles:   the   first   reflects   the  traditional  Jewish  view  of  Christianity,  which  already  existed  within  earlier  Jewish  thought,  and  the  second  expresses   a   novel   and   even   bold   approach   in   kabbalistic-­‐mystical   grappling  with   Christianity.   During   this  lecture  I  will  examine  the  extent  to  which  this  intellectual  tension  influenced  his  conceptions  by  examining  several  theoretical  components  of  his  conception  of  Christianity:  his  attitudes  toward  Jesus,  the  theological  approach  of  Christianity,   etc.   I  will   also  broadly  examine  his  unique   reaction   to   the   sympathetic   attitude  and  interest  that  contemporary  Jewish  writers  had  toward  the  figure  of  Jesus.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Orthodoxy  and  Identity  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  

 

David  Sorotzkin,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Jewish  Orthodoxy  in  Modern  Europe:  New  Perspectives  on  Its  Meaning,  Periodization  and  Relation  to  Modernization  and  Secularization  

Abstract:   In   this  paper,   I  will  attempt  to  provide  a  new  explanation   for   the  development  of  Orthodoxy   in  Judaism.   I  will  present  orthodoxy  as  a  key  and  formative  element  of   Jewish  modernization  that  preceded  and  effected  modern  secular  movements  in  various  ways.  Instead  of  portraying  religion  and  secularization  in   Judaism  as   opposing   poles,   I  will   present   them  as   two   sides   of   a   single   process,   i.e.:  Modernity   itself,  which   was   formed   primarily   by   new   configurations   of   religious   tradition.   I   will   question   the   common  understanding   of   secularization,   in   Jewish   historiography,   as   an   autonomous   agent   that   threatened  authoritarian  religion,  and  led  to  its  fortification  by  those  responsible  for  safeguarding  it.  

 

Yosef  Salmon,  Ben-­‐Gurion,  Israel  

Title:  The  Attitude  of  Orthodoxy  to  Christianity  

Abstract:  In  the  middle  ages  the  general  attitude  of  Judaism  to  Christianity  was  negative,  where  they  were  considered  as  idolatrous.  Some  changes  in  this  stance  is  being  introduced  in  the  Halakhic  literature  in  case  

of  practical  issue,  which  had  to  do  with  practical  matters,  connected  to  making  a  living.  Radical  changes  in  this  principle  can  be  found  in  the  rabbinical   literature  since  the  late  17th  century  and  more  so  during  the  18th  century.  This  trend  stopped  in  the  years  1815-­‐1816.  The  attitude  to  Christianity  became  again  full  of  animosity   in   the  rabbinical  Pesiqa,  more  so   in  middle  Europe.  The  purpose  of   this  paper   is   to   follow  that  trend   and   to   try   explaining   the   motives   and   the   historical   circumstances   that   played   a   role   in   those  movements.  

 

Arye  Edrei,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  From  'Who  is  a  Jew',  To  'Who  should  be  a  Jew':  The  Current  Debate  on  Giyur  (conversion)  in  Israel  

Abstract:  The  question  of  "who  is  a  Jew"  has  been  at  the  heart  of  the  public  discourse  from  the  early  days  of  the  State  of  Israel.  The  Law  of  Return  –  one  of  the  most  important  and  fundamental  law  of  the  State  of  Israel-­‐  establishes  that  every  Jew  has  the  right  to   immigrate  to  the  State  of   Israel  and  receive  citizenship.  Yet,  the  legislator  refrained  from  identifying  the  Jew  who  is  entitled  to  benefit  from  this  law.  The  question  of   "who   is  a   Jew"   ignited   the  public  and  became   the  most  profound  and  divisive   controversy  among   the  issues  of   religion  and   state   in   Israeli   society.   This  was   true  despite   the   fact   that   its  practical   implications  were   rather  peripheral,  particularly   relative   to  other  more   imminent  questions,   such  as   those   relating   to  Sabbath  observance  and  to   issues  of   family  status.   Indeed,  the   importance  and  centrality  of  the  question  derived  from  its  symbolic  and  declarative  significance,  as   it  touched  a  most  sensitive  nerve  –  defining  the  essence   of   Israeli   identity.  Would   the   State   of   Israel   define   its   identity   in   religious   terms   related   to   the  halakhah  and  the  tradition  of  the  Middle  Ages,  or  in  modern  terms  related  to  the  ideas  of  nationalism  and  the   enlightened   ideas   of   the  Haskalah.   The  height   of   the  polemic   and   the   transition   to   its   second  phase  came  in  response  to  the  Shalit  ruling  of  the  Israeli  Supreme  Court  (March  1970),  and  the  amendments  to  the  Law  of  Return   that  were  adopted   in   its  wake.  The  change   in   the   law  –  accepting  objective  standards  inherently  connected  to  the  halakhic  Jewish  tradition  ,   i.e.  lineage  from  a  Jewish  mother  and  conversion  -­‐  was  the  first  shot  in  the  second  stage  of  the  polemic  on  the  "who  is  a  Jew"  question:  "who  is  a  convert?"  In  addition,  there  was  another  change  in  the  Law  of  Return,  which  established  that  a  family  member  of  a  Jew  has  the  right  of  return  even  if  he  is  not  a  Jew.  The  purpose  of  this  article  was  to  allow  for  the  immigration  to  Israel   of  mixed   families,  which  was   particularly   needed   in   light   of   the   newly   ratified   definition   of   "Jew".  Despite   the   fact   that   this   change   in   the   law  was   unrelated   to   the   question   of   identity   or   conversion,   it  significantly   impacted   the   controversy   over   conversion   that   intensified   in   the  wake   of   the   large  wave   of  immigration  from  the  former  Soviet  Union.  Until  this  last  wave  of  immigration,  the  various  religious  parties  and  the  varied  streams  within  orthodoxy  –  haredi  and  religious  Zionist  -­‐  stood  united  in  the  opinion  that  the  halakhic  standards  of  conversion  should  be  adopted  by  Israeli  law.  It  goes  without  saying  that  this  was  the  attitude   of   the   entire   Orthodox   rabbinic   world.   This   dynamic   has   changed   radically   in   recent   years,  however,  as  a  fascinating  and  stormy  controversy  over  conversion  has  erupted  within  religious  society  and  among  the  rabbis  themselves.  This  controversy  has  divided  the  religious  world  in  Israel  into  two  camps.  In  this   lecture,   I   intend  to  describe  the  current  conversion  controversy   in   Israel.   I  will   focus  primarily  on  the  internal  halakhic  arguments  by  analyzing  the  positions  of  the  more  prominent  rabbis  who  have  participated  in   the   debate.   I  wish   to   show   that   the   ideas   that   are   presented   in   contemporary   halakhic   literature   are  rooted   in   19th   century   halakhic   literature   of   Europe   that   debated   conversion   in   the   instance   of   mixed  marriages  that  occurred  in  light  of  the  emancipation.  Then  as  now,  the  debate  centered  around  ideological  positions  relating  to  inclusion  and  exclusion.  

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  02  

 

Session:  001:  

Kabbalah  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  Jean-­‐Pierre  Rothschild  

 

Miquel  Beltrán,  University  of  the  Balearic  Islands  

Title:  The  Instrumentalization  of  Christian  Theology  in  Abraham  Cohen  de  Herrera's  Puerta  del  Cielo  

Abstract:   Puerta   del   Cielo,   the   Kabbalistic   treatise  written   by   Abraham  Cohen   de  Herrera   in   Amsterdam  between   1620   and   1632,   contains   many   references   to   philosophical   arguments   found   in   the   works   of  Christian  scholastic  and  neoscholastic  theologians.  For  this  reason,  Puerta  del  Cielo  has  been  considered  by  some   scholars   as   the   epigone   of   the   exacerbated   syncretism   between   Christian   and   Jewish   religions  vindicated  by  supporters  of  prisca  theologia  in  Renaissance  Italy.  To  the  contrary,  the  aim  of  the  paper  is  to  prove  that,  through  this  syncretism,  Herrera  did  not  try  to  argue  in  favor  of  an  ultimate  unique  truth  from  which  every  religion  sprouts,  but  that  he  used  Christian  philosophy  as  a  mere  instrument  in  order  to  prove  the  highest   truth  of   Jewish  Kabbalah,   as   he  himself   confessed   in   some  passages  of   Puerta  del   Cielo.  We  shall  also  try  to  demonstrate  that  one  of  the  reasons  for  Herrera’s  resorting  to  Christian  theology  was  his  intention  to  show  before  the  Protestant  leaders  of  Holland  that  his  Kabbalistic  account  of  the  emanation  of  the   worlds   was   compatible   with   the   doctrinal   tenets   considered   by   them   as   fundamental   truths   of  Christianity.  Beyond  the  notorious  similarity  between  the  definition  of  First  Cause  –the  Infinite  or  Ein-­‐Sof-­‐  in  Puerta  del  Cielo,  and  that  of  the  God-­‐Substance  in  the  first  part  of  Spinoza’s  Ethics,  the  aim  of  this  project  is  to  demonstrate  that   the  entire  ontological  system  built  by  Spinoza  can  be  defined  as   the   last  step  of   the  attempt  of  syncretism  between  philosophy  and  kabbalah  carried  out  by  Herrera   in  his  main  work.  Puerta  del  cielo  is  unique  in  its  extreme  pretension  to  reconcile  philosophical  traits  of  the  Neoplatonic  Renaissance  and  Hebrew  mystic,  particularly   the  Lurianic  system.  The  singularity  of   this  attempt  converted  him   into  a  more  original  thinker  than  what  has  been  thought  during  the  last  decades.  His  work  constitutes  a  sublime  epigone  of  the  syncretism  between  knowledges  founded  in  the  Italian  Renaissance,  on  a  prisca  theological  whose   nature  was   unveiled   by   such   Jewish   thinkers   as   Alemanno,   Yagel,   Kaufmann,   or  Moscato,   among  others,  whose  texts  contained  many  of  the  topics  later  developed  in  Puerta  del  Cielo.  As  it   is  well  known,  Herrera  also  cites  many  Christian  works,  particularly  those  of  kabbalists  like  Pico  della  Mirandola,  and  other  Renaissance   thinkers   as   Marsilio   Ficino,   Patrizi,   etc.   Their   influence   is   also   perceptible   in   the   other  kabbalistic  work  by  Herrera,  La  casa  de  la  divinidad.  We  are  interested  in  proving,  however,  that  Herrera  is  more   inclined   to  use  philosophical   arguments  as   intruments   to  prove   the  highest   truth  or   kabbalah,   and  that  philosophy  has  a  mere  subsidiary  role  in  order  to  arrive  to  the  understanding  of  the  nature  of  Ein  Sof  and  of  the  emanative  process  which  concludes  in  this  world,  something  that  could  lead  Spinoza  to  consider  that  philosophical  terminology  was  the  idoneous  tool  to  propagate  the  ultimate  truth  of  Hebrew  mystical  thought.   We   want   to   introduce   historiographical   and   literal   proofs   that   the   capital   topics   that   Spinoza  affirms   in   the   Ethics   and   his   other   works   are   the   same   that   kabbalists   maintained,   and   that   they   are,  inversely,  different  of  the  ones  which.  

 

Hernán  Matzkevich,  Universidad  Complutense  de  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  Abraham  Cohen  de  Herrera's  Porta  Coelorum  and  its  Anti-­‐Cartesian  Readers  

Abstract:   Around   1675,   Francis   Mercury   van   Helmont   and   Christian   Knorr   von   Rosenroth   worked   on   a  colossal  proyect:   the   translation,   study  and  editing  of   the   fundamental   texts  of   the   Jewish  Kabbalah.  The  former   had   established   his   residence   in   Ragley   Hill,   property   of   the   Conway   family,   where   he   practiced  medicine   and   acted   as   the   intellectual   tutor   of   Lady   Conway,   who   would   be   in   direct   contact   with   the  aforementioned   works.   Van   Helmont's   and   von   Rosenroth's   editorial   proyect   is   placed   in   the   interest  which,  since  the  16th  century,  the  educated  European  elites  had  shown  towards  the  Hebrew  studies,  was  it  from   the   context   of   humanist   erudition   or   the   neoplatonic   currents   from   the   renaissance.   These  intellectuals  believed  that  Jewish  tradition  had  the  key  to  every  theological  matter  around  the  meaning  of  the  scriptures.  This  way,  the  duet  conformed  by  van  Helmont  and  von  Rosenroth  was  convinced  of  having  found  the  key  to  accessing  the  knowledge  of  the  divine  and  natural  truth.  Within  the  texts  included  in  the  compendium  which  was  finally  published  in  1677  under  the  title  Kabbala  Denudata  was  one  which  specially  caught  the  attention  of  Conway,  disciple,  patient  and  patron  of  van  Helmont.  This  was  the  Porta  Coelorum  by  Abraham  Cohen  de  Herrera,  originally  written  in  Spanish  in  the  first  decades  of  the  17th  Century.  In  the  only   work   we   keep   from   Conway,   she   develops   a   Vitalistic   manifest   against   mechanistic   materialism.  Hobbes,  Descartes  and  Spinoza  are  the  target  of  her  attacks.  Conway's  antimechanistic  spirituality,  which  echoes  that  of  van  Helmont  and  von  Rosenroth,  but  also  on  those  of  Leibniz  and  Newton,  drinks  directly  from   the   fountains   of   Cohen   de   Herrera.  We  will   put   on   display   those   elements   of   Cohen   de   Herrera's  philosophy  which  were  included  in  the  scientific-­‐philosophic  debates  of  the  17th  Century  through  Conway's  opuscule,  related  to  the  theory  of  mater,  the  body-­‐mind  relationship  and  the  nature  of  space.  

 

Angela  Guidi,  Paris,  France  

Title:  "Recondita  theologia"  et  "perniciosa  ars":  cabale  et  cabalistes  dans  la  Bibliotheca  magna  rabbinica  de  Giulio  Bartolocci  

Abstract:  Un  réseau  complexe  d’échanges  et  de  médiations  a  contribué  à  façonner,  de  part  et  d’autre,  les  relations  judéo-­‐chrétiennes  entre  Renaissance  et  Réforme  catholique.  Le  retour  à  l’hebraica  veritas  promu  à  partir  de  la  fin  du  XVe  siècle  avait  ouvert  la  voie  à  la  naissance  de  la  méthode  historico-­‐critique  et  de  la  science   des   religions   et   alimenté   le   discours   théologico-­‐politique   de   la   modernité   naissante,   tout   en  fournissant   à   l’ancien   antagonisme   à   l’égard   des   Juifs   et   de   leurs   textes   des   sources   et   des   arguments  nouveaux.   Au   XVIIe   siècle,   dans   le   contexte   de   la   Réforme   catholique,   les   outils   de   l’érudition   et   de   la  philologie  sont  systématiquement  mis  au  service  du  programme  missionnaire  de  l’Eglise  romaine  :  dès  lors,  les   paradoxes   théologiques   et   herméneutiques   se   multiplient   et   la   production   des   polémistes   chrétiens  devient   le  théâtre  privilégié  des  tensions  et  des  contradictions  qui  caractérisent   le  discours  savant  sur   les  Juifs   et   le   judaïsme.   Ces   problématiques   rejoignent   celles   abordées   par   le   congrès   2014   de   l’EAJS.   On  souhaiterait  ainsi  participer  au  débat  en  proposant  une  réflexion  sur  la  réception  des  sources  et  des  thèmes  cabalistiques  en  milieu  contre-­‐reformé.  Dans  notre  exposé,  on  se  propose  notamment  d’examiner  la  place  et   le   statut   de   la   qabbalah   dans   la   Bibliotheca   Magna   Rabbinica   du   moine   cistercien   Giulio   Bartolocci  (Celleno   1613-­‐Rome   1687)   ainsi   que   l’apport   de   ces   sources   cabalistiques   dans   la   construction   des  représentations  des  Juifs  et  du  judaïsme  véhiculées  par  cet  ouvrage.  Publiée,  et  conçue,  au  cœur  même  de  l’Église  baroque  post-­‐tridentine,  la  Bibliotheca  se  présente  sous  la  forme  d’un  dictionnaire  encyclopédique  bilingue  latin-­‐hébreu  qui  range  par  ordre  alphabétique  les  auteurs  et  leurs  ouvrages,  de  l’antiquité  biblique  à   l’époque   moderne,   en   passant   en   revue   l’ensemble   des   pratiques   religieuses   et   des   rites   propres   au  monde  juif.  D’après  son  auteur,  ce  texte  monumentale  devait  notamment  fournir  des  outils  efficaces  dans  

le  combat  que  l’Église  contre-­‐reformée  menait  contre  les  juifs,  «  christianæ  religionis  hostes  ».  L’adhésion  à  cette   idéologie   militante   et   ouvertement   antijuive   n’empêche   pas   Bartolocci   d’opérer,   en   matière   de  cabale,   des   choix   qui   revêtent   une   signification   culturelle   tout   à   tour   différente   et   qui   relèvent   d’une  pluralité   de   tendances   et   d’approches   qu’il   convient   d’examiner.   A   la   différence   du   Talmud,   objet   d’une  hostilité   plus   marquée,   les   sources   cabalistiques   ont   revêtu   aux   yeux   des   savants   et   des   théologiens  chrétiens   un   statut   complexe   et   souvent   ambigu:   on   pouvait   les   réfuter   et   les   condamner;   on   pouvait  trouver   les   démonstrations   les   plus   convaincantes   en   faveur   des   dogmes   chrétiens,   ou   encore   voir   un  moyen   d’enrichir   l’interprétation   chrétienne   des   textes   sacrés;   on   pouvait   enfin   considérer   la   cabale  comme   un   outil   missionnaire   en   tant   qu’elle   offrait   un   riche   arsenal   d’arguments   exégétiques   pour  convaincre  les  juifs  de  leur  aveuglement.  Héritière  de  toutes  ces  approches,  l’attitude  de  Bartolocci  envers  la  cabale  demeure  fondamentalement  ambivalente.  Dans  la  Bibliothèque,  le  mot  qabbalah  est  ainsi  associé  à   l’idée  de   tradition   véritable,   transmise  depuis  Moïse   jusqu’à   l’avènement   du  Christ   –   c’est   le   cas   de   la  qabbalah  dont   il  est  question  dans   les  ouvrages  historiques  de   Ibn  Daud,  de  Zacuto,  ou  de  Ganz.   Il   s’agit  alors   d’une   tradition   vénérable   et   digne   de   respect,   dont   l’Eglise   catholique   reprendrait   le   flambeau,   en  opposition  à  la  Reforme,  assimilée  aux  «  hérésies  »  karaïtes.  La  qabbalah  est  également  considérée  comme  une   «   théologie   élevée   »   et   subtile   qui   traite   de   Dieu   et   de   ses   attributs.   Influencé   par   les   écrits   du  théologien   dominicain   Ciantes,   Bartolocci   l’identifie   notamment   à   la   cabale   séfirotique   de   Moshe  Cordovero.   D’après   Bartolocci   encore,   la   qabbalah   est   une   méthode   d’exégèse   des   textes   bibliques   -­‐  méthode   douteuse   qui   s’approcherait   dangereusement   de   la   numérologie   et   de   la   magie.   Or,   c’est  précisément  à  ce  type  de  cabale,  rabaissée  au  rang  d’art  manipulatoire  et  trompeur,  que  revient  la  tâche  de  convaincre  les  Juifs  de  la  vérité  des  dogmes  chrétiens.  On  pourrait  alors  dire  que  dans  le  discours  antijuif  de  Bartolocci,   les   juifs   ont   l’exégèse   qu’ils  méritent   :   une   cabala   superstitiosa,   que   Bartolocci   évoque   aussi  comme   étant   pratiquée   par   certains   convertis.   La   plupart   des   matériaux   cabalistiques   cité   dans   la  Bibliotheca   sont  par  ailleurs  de   ce   troisième   type   :   amulettes,   listes  d’anges   cabalistiques   condamnés   (et  pourtant  détaillés),  applications  de  la  gematria  à   la  Bible,  etc.  Une  partie  de  ces  spéculations  proviennent  non   des   sources   juives   ni   des   textes   des   hébraïsants   chrétiens,   mais   des   traités   réalisés   par   les   Juifs  convertis  qui  ont   fourni  à   l’Eglise   romaine  un   répertoire   important  de  «  preuves  »  cabalistiques   relatives  aux  dogmes  chrétiens.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Kabbalah  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  Elke  Morlok  

 

Elke  Morlok,  University  of  Mainz,  Germany  

Title:  Context  and  Content:  Isaac  Satanow  in  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  perspectives  

Abstract:   Isaac   Satanow   (1732-­‐1804)   is   counted   among   among   the   few   Jewish   maskilim   who   tried   to  integrate  kabbalisitic   thought   into   their  philosophical  and  scientific   framework   in  a   religious  context.  The  paper   will   analyse   the   influence   of   both   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish   approaches   towards   such   concepts   of  

harmonization  between  rational  and  esoteric  ideas  and  the  consequences  for  the  methodological  organon  such   intellectuals   require   as   an   adequate   method   of   research.   As   an   underlying   matrix   Habermas'  conception   of   "Lebenswelt"   and   its   consequences   for   processes   in   building   innovative   Jewish   traditions  within  a  non-­‐Jewish  environment  will  be  applied  also  with   regard   to   the  vital   interactions  between  West  European  and  East  European  Jewry  of  the  maskilic  and  hasidic  period.  

 

Katharina  Koch,  Free  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  Franz  Joseph  Molitor's  Kabbalistic  Legacy  

Abstract:  Studying  kabbalistic  texts  and  integrating  them  in  his  philosophy,  the  German  Christian  kabbalist  F.J.   Molitor   (1779-­‐1860)   pursued   the   project   of   establishing   theology   as   the   queen   of   all   sciences  (Wissenschaften).  Moreover  he  set  out,  with  the  help  of  kabbalistic  insights,  to  integrate  and  regulate  the  new  scientific  discoveries,  be  it  in  the  domain  of  nature  or  of  social  sciences  and  to  prove  the  harmony  of  Judaism  and  Christianity.  Among  his   legacy  one   finds   three  extensive   translations   from  kabbalistic  works,  namely   parts   of   the   commentary   on   the   Torah   by   Bahya   ben  Asher,   the   translation   of   Joseph  Giqatilla's  Sha'are  Orah  and  Horowitz's  Shefa  tal.  It  is  my  aim  to  examine  closely  these  three  German  translations  and  demonstrate  their  importance  for  Molitor's  Philosophy  of  History  or  Concerning  Tradition.  

 

Andrea  Gondos,  Concordia  University  /  Katz  Center,  University  of  Pennsylvania,  USA  

Title:  Authorship  and  the  Encyclopedic  Mentality  in  Pre-­‐Modern  Kabbalah  

Abstract:  The  printing  of  three  systematic  works  of  Kabbalah,  the  anonymous  Ma’arekhet  ha-­‐Elohut,  Meir  Ibn   Gabbai’s   Avodat   ha-­‐Kodesh,   and   Moses   Cordovero’s   Pardes   Rimonim,   in   the   second   half   of   the  sixteenth   century   signaled   a   new   direction   in   the   organization   of   kabbalistic   knowledge.   Expansive   in  content,  they  constituted  costly   investments  for  consumers  and  addressed  primarily  professional  scholars  and  wealthy  patrons.  Moreover,  in  terms  of  their  thematic  organization,  the  three  works  closely  resembled  the  encyclopedic   style   that   characterized   Jewish   scientific  and  philosophic  works  arising   from  the  Middle  Ages.   In   this   paper,   I   argue   that   Ma’arekhet   ha-­‐Elohut,   Avodat   ha-­‐Kodesh   and   Pardes   Rimonim   clearly  display  an  “encyclopedic  mentality”  and  as  such  they  reflect  a  strategic  choice  on  the  part  of  the  printers  and   disseminators   of   Kabbalah   in   the   early  modern   period   to   delineate   the   boundaries   of   authoritative  kabbalistic  knowledge  and  establish  the  proper  order  for  its  study.  In  other  words,  the  encyclopedia  in  the  field   of   Jewish   mysticism   as   in   other   fields   of   inquiry   was   a   way   to   establish   and   reinforce   scholarly  authority.   The   encyclopedic   impulse   has   four   distinct  manifestations   in   the  works   I   examine.   First,   their  writing   style   adopts   the   rigorous   methods   characteristic   of   encyclopedic   writing   with   an   emphasis   on  creating  order  in  the  vast  array  of  kabbalistic  knowledge  available  at  the  time  by  organizing  their  material  into   carefully   constructed   topical   divisions.   Second,   while   these   kabbalistic   works   do   not   present   great  breadth  of  subject  matter  as  some  of  their  philosophic  and  scientific  varieties  do,  they  do  excel  in  the  detail  and  depth   they  provide  on   the   topics   they  engage,   for   instance   in   regard   to   theories  of   the  essence  and  function  of  the  sefirot.  Third,  the  arrangement  of  these  systematic  treatises   is  predicated  on  the  reader’s  close  reading  of  the  text.  The  reader  is  entreated  not  to  jump  from  one  topic  and  chapter  to  another,  but  rather  read  it  in  sequential  form  as  each  chapter  is  built  upon  familiarity  with,  and  clear  comprehension  of,  the   previous   one.   Fourth,   repetitive   reading   is   emphatically   encouraged   as   the   most   effective   tool   for  optimal  understanding  this  type  of  wisdom  and  as  an  effective  safeguard  against  theological  confusion  and  religious  doubt.  In  this  paper,  I  will  trace  these  modalities  in  Moses  Cordovero’s  Pardes  Rimonim.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Jewish  Heritage:  Synagogues  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  Vladimir  Levin  

 

Daniel  Muñoz  Garrido,  University  of  Granada,  Spain  

Title:  There  is  no  greater  pleasure  that  to  wait  at  your  gates,  Jerusalem!  

Abstract:  The  decoration  of   the  14th-­‐century  synagogue  of  Cordoba   (Spain)  shows  a   taste   for  Andalusian  style.  What   is  more,   the   inscriptions   and   decorative   panels   of   the   synagogue   bear   a   strong   influence   of  Nazari   art.   As   in   the   Alhambra,   decoration   and   epigraphy   were   selected   to   provide   the   place   with  simbology.  Read  together,  they  evoke  images  and  meanings  to  the  mind  of  the  educated  Jewish  spectator.  In  this  paper,   I   intend  to  show  that  behind  the  decoration  of  this  sinagogue  is  hidden  a  representation  of  the  gate  of  heavenly   Jerusalem,  a   representation  of   the  desired  and  expected  city   that   filled  of  pleasure  and  joy  the  hearts  of  those  attending  the  synagogue.  

 

Anastasia  Felcher,  IMT  Institute  for  Advanced  Studies  Lucca,  Italy  

Title:  Immovable  Jewish  Heritage  in  Eastern  Europe:  an  Asset  or  a  Trouble?  

Abstract:   The   paper   discusses   current   condition   of   Jewish   architectural   heritage   in   post-­‐Soviet   Eastern  Europe   from  an  academic  and  a  practical  point  of   view.  Conservation  or   reconstruction  of  buildings   that  formerly  belonged  to  Jewish  community  has  not  yet  become  a  trend  in  Ukraine,  Belarus  or  Moldova  as   it  has  happened,  for  instance,  in  Poland.  One  may  still  meet  traces  of  Jewish  presence  in  post-­‐Soviet  countries  lying  in  ruins,  be  it  buildings  of  former  synagogues,  buildings  that  once  belonged  to  Jewish  community  or  old   Jewish   cemeteries.   The   paper   looks   at   this   situation   taking   into   account   objectives   of   stakeholders  involved,  be  it  state  institutions  of  heritage  protection,  ministries  of  culture,  Jewish  communities  or  NGOs  and  discusses  the  potential  of   immovable  Jewish  heritage   in  post-­‐Communist  Eastern  European  countries  to  become  an  asset  for  tourism  attraction  rather  than  evidence  of  neglect.  

 

Eszter  Gantner,  Institute  for  European  Ethnology,  Humboldt  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:   “Who´s   Heritage?   Jewish   Tangible   Heritage   as   a   Space   of   Conflict”   –The   Case   of   Budapest   Jewish  Quarter  

Abstract:  After  the  changes  of  1989/90  a  process  of  reconstruction  of  the  national  consciousness  started,  in  which  the  (re)discovery  of  the  culture  and  the  cultural  especially  -­‐  architectural  -­‐  heritage  of  the  European  Jews  can  also  be   integrated.  The  ways  of  discovering  the  Jewish  heritage  and   its   institutionalization—just  think   of   the   scientific   institutes   in   the   ex-­‐socialist   countries   for   the   research   of   the   Jewry,   or   of   the  institutions  of  the  Holocaust’s  national  reception,  like  Holocaust  memorials—was,  and  still  is  defined  by  the  non-­‐Jewish  society.  This  phenomenon  is  clearly  characteristic  in  the  case  of  Jewish  architectural  heritage.  In  

many   European   cities   Jewish   quarters,   synagogues,   previous   bathhouses   (mikwot)   legitimize   with   their  “Jewishness”   the   cultural   and   touristic   space   created   around   them   by   various   agents   like  municipalities,  heritage  managements  etc.  But  there  is  a  danger,  that  the  created  homogenous  image  of  the  Jews  and  the  constructed   pseudo-­‐Jewish   culture   around   these   sites   not   only   oppose   the   process   of   Jewish   self-­‐interpretation  but  also  obstruct   the  development  of  an  authentic  and  plural   Jewish  cultural   space.   In   the  proposed  lecture  I  would  introduce  the  European  Jewish  architectural  sites  as  spaces  for  interest  collisions  by  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  with  a  special  focus  on  the  case  of  the  Budapest  Jewish  Quarter.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Jewish  Heritage:  Synagogues  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Max  Polonovski  

 

Shulamit  Laderman,  Schechter  Institute  of  Jewish  Studies,  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  The  “Memory  of  the  Temple”  as  the  Central  Idea  Behind  Symbols  of  Early  Jewish  Art  and  as  a  Possible  Polemical  Tool  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  Christianity  

Abstract:   The   proposed   lecture   will   discuss   the   idea   known   as   zecher   ha-­‐mikdash   “the   memory   of   the  Temple”   as   a   central   idea   behind   the   choice   of   symbols   in   early   Jewish   Art   and   the   possible   polemical  ramifications   of   those   symbols   vis-­‐à-­‐vis   the   Christian   attitude   toward   the   destroyed   Jewish   Temple.   To  understand  why   certain   symbols   appear   in   early   Jewish   art,   such   as   is   found   in   ancient   synagogues   and  burial   art,   I  will   focus   on   an   ancient   scroll,  Megillat   Ta’anit,   a   short   Aramaic   document   from   the   Second  Temple  period,  which  discusses  the  holiday  of  Hanukkah.  As  the  name  indicates,  Hanukkah  commemorates  the  dedication  of  the  Temple  after  it  was  defiled  by  the  Greeks  and  cleaned  by  the  Hasmoneans,  who  freed  Jerusalem  in  the  year  165  BCE.  Several  explanations  for  Hanukkah  are  found  in  non-­‐Rabbinic  sources  such  as  First  and  Second  Maccabees  and  in  the  works  of  Josephus.  But  the  earliest  Rabbinic  source  concerning  this  holiday  –  Megillat  Ta’anit  with  its  Hebrew  translation  and  commentary  known  as  Scholium  –  describes  the  reasons  for  the  celebration  in  terms  of  the  “memory  of  the  Temple.”  My  talk  will  relate  to  the  various  ideas  found  in  Megillat  Ta’anit  and  compare  them  to  symbols  in  early  Jewish  art.  Included  are  notions  such  as  Hanukkah  paralleling  the  dedication  of  the  Tabernacle  and  Temple  in  the  days  of  Moses  and  of  Solomon,  the  idea  that  Hanukkah  celebrates  the  building  and  dedicating  of  the  altar  in  the  Temple  or  the  making  of  a  new  menorah   to   kindle   the   lights,   and   that   the   holiday  was   ordained   to   give   praise   and   thanks   to   God  through   reciting   the   Hallel   as   is   done   on   the   eight   days   of   Sukkot   because   the   festival   had   not   been  celebrated   during   the   years   that   the   Temple  was   in   the   hands   of   the   enemy.   Discussing   examples   from  ancient   Jewish   art,   I   will   try   to   demonstrate   the   Rabbis’   concern   for   maintaining   the   centrality   of   the  Temple  and  its  memory.  At  the  same  time  I  will  reflect  on  the  possibility  that  these  Temple  symbols  were  also   used   as   a   polemical   tool   vis-­‐à-­‐vis   the   Christian   attitude   toward   the   destroyed   Jewish   Temple,   as   in  Christian  eyes  it  was  proof  of  Jesus’  prophecy.  I  will  argue  that  by  using  the  symbols  of  the  Temple  in  their  art,  Jews  demonstrated  that  even  though  the  physical  structure  no  longer  existed,  its  memory  was  alive  in  their  minds,  hearts  and  lives.  

 

Vladimir  Levin,  Center  for  Jewish  Art,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Synagogues  in  Eastern  Europe:  Christian  Middle  Ages  in  Jewish  Modern  Times?  

Abstract:  Quite  surprisingly,  Jewish  traditional  society  in  Eastern  Europe  in  the  eighteenth  and  nineteenth  centuries   preserved   or   reinvented  many   practices   and   features   characteristic   for   the   Christian   society   in  medieval  Western  Europe.  Like  medieval  churches,  the  synagogues  and  synagogue’s  courtyards  (shulhoyfn)  were  in  fact  the  main  public  space  available  for  the  community.  They  not  only  served  as  the  place  of  social  interaction  between  the  members  of  a  community,  both  in  sacred  and  profane  context,  but  the  courtyards  of  synagogues  housed  such  facilities  as  a  communal  well,  communal  outhouse,  meat  shops,  shelter  for   ill  and   itinerant   poor,   and   so   on.   Another   Medieval   feature   is   the   emergence   of   Jewish   artisans   guilds  (havarot),  which  were  not  only  professional  but  also  (or  even  mainly)  religious  associations.  Their  members  united   for   performing   religious   rites   together,   donated   collectively   sacred   objects   to   the   communal  synagogues,  cared  for  proper  burials  of  their  members  and  for  the  fulfillment  of  rituals  before  and  after  the  burials,   etc.   Initially   such   guilds   received   privileges   in   communal   synagogues,   in   the   next   stage   they  established  their  own  prayer  houses,  usually  situated  in  one  of  the  rooms  in  the  communal  synagogue  and  later   built   their   own   edifices.   This   phenomenon   clearly   resembles  medieval   guilds   which   had   their   own  saints,  performed  religious  rites,  erected  their  own  altars  in  city  cathedrals  and  sometimes  even  built  their  own  churches.  The  proposed  paper  will  discuss   the   resemblance  between   the  abovementioned  medieval  patterns,  which  disappeared  from  Christian  society  in  Western  Europe  during  the  Early  Modern  Period,  but  reemerged  among  East-­‐European  Jews  in  the  eighteenth  and  nineteenth  century.  

 

Valeria  Rainoldi,  University  of  Verona,  Italy  

Title:  Verona  and  its  Synagogue  between  the  Nineteenth  and  Twentieth  Centuries    

Abstract:   The   research   analyses   the   building   of   a   new   synagogue   in   Verona   (Italy)   and   the   urban  organization  of   the   local   Jewish  Community   between   the   second  half   of   the  nineteenth   century   and   the  first   decades   of   the   twentieth   century.   In   that   period,   the   Veronese   Jewish   Community,   constituted   by  1,400   members,   was   in   its   greatest   splendor.   Among   those   members,   we   could   find   lawyers,   doctors,  engineers  and  members  of  a  new  intellectual,  economic  and  social  élite.  In  1864,  after  some  solid  problems  which  imposed  the  closing  of  the  building  used  until  that  moment,  the  Veronese  Jewish  Community  began  to  build  “a  new,  sumptuous  temple  in  contrada  Ghetto”,  whose  plan  was  signed  by  the  architect  Giacomo  Franco  and  the  engineer  Gaetano  Mantovanelli.  The  new  Jewish  temple  was  developed  along  a  rectangular  hall,  with  a  restricted  area  for  the  leader  of  the  prayer  above  the  floor  accessed  by  four  stairs  and  Aron  ha-­‐qodesh   overlapped   to   the   perimeter   wall   and   emphasized   by   an   architectural   framework   of   two   wings  ending   with   three   quasi   columns.   Plans   found   in   the   State   Archive   reveal   the   magnificence   and   the  sumptuous  decorations  inserted  in  the  former  planning  stage,  with  clear  references  to  Romanesque  and  a  European  layout  which  recalls  the  Synagogue  de  la  Victoire  in  Paris.  Works  finished  in  1868  with  a  drastic  reduction  of  the  decorative  elements  and  the  abolition  of  the  architectural  dome  originally  planned.  After  the  partial  demolition  of  the  Ghetto,  started  in  1926,  the  synagogue  was  planned  again  and  placed  in  the  new   town   layout   by   Ettore   Fagiuoli,   appreciate   and   active   Veronese   architect,   who   changed   the  nineteenth-­‐century  synagogue  into  a  rationalistic  temple,  squared  in  shapes  and  volumes.  Fagiuoli  deeply  changed  the  general  structure  of  the  worship  hall,  moving  the  women's  gallery,  raising  the  barrel  vault,  and  changing   the  entrances.  The  new  Jewish   temple,  assimilated   to  a  Christian  church   for  many  architectural  and  functional  points  of  view,  was  inaugurated  in  1929.  A  great  main  entrance,  emphasized  by  a  couple  of  pilasters  and  bas-­‐relief  panels  shows  into  a  monumental  and  of  great  value  temple,  with  a  frescoed  vault  enriched  by  big  decorative  and  symbolic  elements  like  seven-­‐branched  candelabra  and  Maghen  David.  The  

architect  Fagiuoli  was   involved  even   in   the  plan  of   two  pyramid-­‐shape  graves   for   the   Jewish  cemetery   in  Verona,  characterized  by  strict  and  linear  shapes.  The  ambiguity  of  the  architecture,  which  was  expressed  by   a   harmonic   and   authoritative   language,   permitted   to   the   Jewish   Community   in   Verona   to   build   near  Piazza  Erbe,  trading  and  representative  heart  of  the  city,  a  temple  of  prayer,  in  opposition  to  the  not  so  far  Christian  cathedral.  The  research  of  a  social  and  religious  acceptance   is,  however,  perceptible   in   the   thin  architectural  changes  to  which  the  new  synagogue  have  to  suit  in  Franco's  plan  and  in  Fagiuoli's  work.  The  studies,  in  spite  of  some  difficulties  found  for  the  lack  of  preservation  of  the  archive  in  the  Jewish  Veronese  community,  were  treated  on  unpublished  documents  kept  in  the  State  Archive  and  in  the  town  hall  Archive,  giving  a  new  interpretative  dimension  to  the  synagogue  architecture  and  to  the  working  of  Ettore  Fagiuoli,  for  a  long  time  underestimated  by  history.    

 

Jean  Passini,  CNRS,  Paris,  France  

Title:  De  quelques  synagogues  pour  les  conversos  à  Tolède  au  XIV  et  XVe  siècle  

Abstract:  L'étude  des  documents  écrits  entre   le  XIIe  et   le  XVe  siècle  a   fait  apparaître   l'existence,  dans   les  maisons  médiévales  de  la  ville  de  Tolède,  de  caves  soit  sous  les  "palacio",  soit  sous  les  cours.  Ces  dernières  caractérisent  les  maisons  de  la  Juiverie.  Les  caves  sous  "patio"  de  la  Juiverie  médiévale  sont  couvertes  soit  d'une  coupole  octogonale  à  pendentifs,   soit  d'une  voûte  surbaissée  à  pilier  central   si   le  patio  s'étend  sur  une   grande   surface.   La   lecture   d'une   chronique   postérieure   au   XVIe   siècle   nous   conduit   à   rattacher   les  caves  sous  patio  de  la  Juiverie  tolédane  à  la  pratique  du  culte  et  de  la  vie  des  juifs,  rendue  difficile  par  les  contraintes  exercées  par  la  religion  dominante.  

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  03  

 

Session:  001:  

History  of  Sciences  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Jewish  Medical  Discourse(s)  and  Cultural  Context(s)  

Organizers:  Lennart  Lehmhaus  &  Matteo  Martelli  

 

Chair:  

 

Federico  Dal  Bo,  Free  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  A  Fetus  Shaped  like  a  “Sandal”:  Metaphors,  Morphology,  and  Embryology  in  the  Babylonian  Talmud  

Abstract:  Rabbinic  and  Talmudic   literature  does  not  usually  manifest  theoretical   interest   in  medicine.   It   is  rather   concerned   with   the   juridical   issues   that   may   be   affected   by   specific   medical   conditions.   As   a  consequence  of  this,  medical  conditions  are  usually  described  with  a  para-­‐medical  vocabulary  that  largely  describes   human  morphology   in   metaphorical   terms.   The   case   of   a   fetus   “shaped   like   a   ‘sandal’”   is   an  excellent   example   for   understanding   Talmudic   medical   language.   This   enigmatic   expression   occurs   in  several  passages  of  Tractates  Yebamot  and  Keritot  and  apparently  describes  the  irregular  morphology  of  a  fetus  that  was  miscarried.  In  my  paper  I  intend  to  discuss  the  semantics  of  the  expression  “a  fetus  shaped  like  a   ‘sandal’”  with   respect   to   its   literal  and  metaphorical  meaning.  On   the  one  hand,   classical  Talmudic  commentaries   tend   to   interpret   the   term   “sandal”   as   a   literal   description   of   a  malformed   fetus.   On   the  other  hand,   they  assume  that   the   term   is  metaphorical  and   therefore   try   to  come  to   terms  with   it.  With  respect   to   this,   classical   Talmudic   commentaries   are   unable   to   understand   the   original   meaning   of   this  expression  and  fail  to  provide  a  rigorous  interpretation  of  the  case  of  “a  fetus  shaped  like  a  ‘sandal’”.  My  assumption   is   that   this   expression   should   rather   be   interpreted   in   a   broader   anthropological   and  comparative   perspective.   Namely,   Talmud   editors   would   implicitly   have   referred   to   some   non-­‐-­‐Jewish  sources  from  Near  Middle  East  in  order  to  describe  a  fatal  syndrome  that  might  affect  embryos.  On  account  of  this,  the  term  “sandal”  would  not  simply  be  a  metaphorical  description  a  malformed  human  morphology.  On  the  contrary,  it  would  rather  provide  an  actual  “embryology”.  

 

Reuven  Kiperwasser,  Open  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Cure  of  Amnesia  and  the  Metaphoric  Physiology  of  Memory  

Abstract:  In  this  presentation  I  will  analyze  stories  from  Rabbinic  Literature  about  late-­‐antiquity  Palestinian  Rabbis  who  forget  their  knowledge.  Talmudic  sages  shared  the  views  of  the  ancient  Greeks  that  memory  is  an  integral  part  of  wisdom.  Therefore  its   loss  leads  to  flawed  wisdom.  The  narrators  of  tales  about  sages,  who   forgot   their   knowledge,   usually   tend   to   see   in   loss   of  memory   the   consequences   of   something   not  quite  right  in  the  behavior  of  the  sage.  Nevertheless,  on  the  marginalia  of  rabbinic  literature,  one  can  find  opinions  that  forgetting  is  a  benefit.  Thus,  stories  regarding  forgetting  and  the  remembering,  which  I  shall  

analyze,  are  very  revealing  about  the  self-­‐reflection  Talmudic  culture,  busily  debating  what  is  allowed  to  its  members,  and  what   is   forbidden.  Some  of   these  stories,   from  the   relatively   later   layers  of   the   literature,  indicate   the  participation  of   certain   sensitive  organs,   in   particular   the   ears,   in   the  processes  of  memory.  Rather  unexpectedly,   literary  parallels  outside  rabbinic   literature  shed  light  on  the  cultural  nexus  of  these  texts.  

 

Kenneth  Collins,  University  of  Glasgow,  UK  /  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  The  Fever  that  Nourishes:  the  Purpose  of  Fever  in  Rabbinic  Texts  

Abstract:  Types  of  fever  were  mentioned  in  the  Bible  and  there  is  a  considerable  rabbinic  literature  in  the  Talmud  on   the   possible   causes   of   fever   and   its   treatments.   The   existence   of   different   biblical   names   for  fever   suggests   that   it   could   be   a   symptom   of   different   illnesses.   The   rabbis   knew   of   fevers,   possibly  malarial,  that  occurred  daily  or  less  frequently,  and  described  the  symptoms  of  rigors.  This  study  considers  the  Talmudic  view  that  as  febrile  patients  have  a  reduced  food  intake  there  is  something  in  the  fever  which  provides   the  missing   nourishment.   This   was   assumed   as   the   patient  was   able   to   survive   and   to   excrete  urine  and  faeces.  The  Talmud  also  mentions  that  the  warmth  of  the  mother’s  body  provides  nutrition  to  the  baby   if   there   is  delay   in   the  delivery  and  only   the  head   is  born.  The   rabbis  understood   that   some   fevers  were   relatively   benign   and   might   even   prove   to   be   beneficial   to   the   body.   This   possibly   indicated   an  understanding  that  body  defense  mechanisms  were  involved.  Other  fevers  carried  a  higher  degree  of  risk  and  could  even  indicate  the  presence  of  life  threatening  disease.  This  paper  will  also  consider  the  Kitab  al-­‐Hummayat,  the  Book  of  Fevers  of  Isaac  Israeli  (c845-­‐c945)  of  Kairouan,  which  has  been  described  as  one  of  the  best  medical  works  available  in  the  Middle  Ages.  This  work  provided  a  comprehensive  guide  to  fevers  based   on   Galenic   traditions   and   his   own   observations,   including   clear   guidance   on   possible   treatments.  Israeli’s   influence  was   considerable.   His   outstanding  Muslim   pupil   Ibn   al-­‐Jazzar   also   composed   a   text   on  fevers  and  Israeli  was  widely  quoted  by  Arab  physicians  such  as  Rhazes  and  Ali  Ibn  Ridwan.  Israeli’s  writings  on   fevers,   in   Latin   translation,  were  also   studied   for   some  centuries   in   the  mediaeval  medical   schools  of  Christian  Europe.  Contemporary  physicians  have  attempted  to  identify  the  mechanisms  controlling  appetite  suppression  and   the   role  of   fever   in   illness.  There  may  be  value   in   the  mediaeval  adage   that  one   should  feed  a  cold  but  starve  a  fever.  The  fever  that  nourishes  may  again  claim  its  place  in  modern  medicine.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

History  of  Sciences  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Jewish  Medical  Discourse(s)  and  Cultural  Context(s)  

 

Chair:  Danielle  Jacquart  

 

Samuel  Kottek,  Hadassah-­‐Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Caesarean  Section  in  the  Talmud  and  in  Greco-­‐Roman  Culture:  a  renewed  Examination.  

Abstract:  In  the  Talmud,  a  child  born  through  caesarean  section  is  called  yotsē  dôfen-­‐  "one  who  came  out  through   the  wall   (of   the  abdomen).   In  ancient   times,   caesarean  section  was   indeed  practiced  on  women  who   died   in   childbirth.   This   is   documented   in   the   Talmud   and   in   the   Graeco-­‐Roman  medical   literature.  However,   there   are   no   references   on   such   operations   practiced   on   living   women.   The   Talmudists  nevertheless  discuss  caesarean  section  on  living  women,  as  if  it  were  a  factual  case,  although  never  stating  that  they  witnessed  such  a  case.  This  historical  problem  has  been  discussed  in  the  past,  however  a  renewed  examination  of  the  question  seemed  to  us  worthy  to  be  undertaken,  while  considering  previous  opinions.  We  shall  refer  to  other  ancient  and  primitive  cultures,  where  such  interventions  were  mentioned,  however  primarily  in  mythology.  

 

Estēe  Dvorjetski,  Oxford  Brookes  University,  UK  

Title:  Public  Health  in  Jerusalem  according  to  the  Talmudic  Literature:  Reality  or  Vision?  

Abstract:   Special   attention  was  paid   to   Jerusalem  and   to   the   Temple  Mount   in   the  urban  by-­‐laws   in   the  Talmudic   Corpus   dealing  with   environmental   pollution,  which  were  meant   to   improve   the   health   of   the  public.  The  city  was  highly  estimated  by  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  authors,  and  was  said  to  serve  as  a  model  both  for   the   citizens,   the   pilgrims,   and   for   all   the   nations:   ‘God  will   make   Jerusalem   a  metropolis   for   all   the  nations’.   The  Talmudic   literature  demonstrates  how   the  halakha  was   applied   in   Jerusalem   in   the   Second  Temple   period:   moderation   of   the   odours   from   the   animal   sacrifices   in   the   Temple;   the   possibility   of  pollution  by  the  wind;  the  location  of  the  outflow  of  the  sacrificial  ashes;  the  Dung  Gate  and  its  place  in  the  ecological  awareness  of   the  people  of   the  period;   the  concentration  of  craftsmen   in  special  quarters;   the  attention  paid  by  the  authorities  to  upkeep,  repair  and  cleanliness  of  the  sewage  system  and  reservoirs;  the  construction   of   synagogues   for   craftsmen   whose   odour   was   intolerable;   and   the   public   lavatory,   a   rare  phenomenon   in   Jewish   towns.   It   is   natural   that   over   the   generations   Jerusalem's   special   status   as   the  location   of   the   Temple   led   to   its   being   particularly   revered   as   a   place   whose   exemplary   purity   was  meticulously   preserved,   and   impure   elements   excluded.   The   ecological   reasons   for   dealing   with   such  matters  as  sewage,  refuse,  air  pollution,  smoke,  noise,  and  water  pollution  in  the  ‘ten  maxims  concerning  Jerusalem’  and  in  other  municipal  by-­‐laws,  are  part  and  parcel  of  the  Talmudic  literature.  They  prove  that  public  health  was  a  central  concern  of  those  who  formulated  the  ancient  precepts,  a  great  many  of  which  were  crystallised  into  a  body  of  compulsory  law  at  the  time  of  the  Hasmoneans.  The  precepts  and  laws  of  Jerusalem,  which  constitute  an  ecological  prototype,  served  as  a  classical  model  for  urban  laws  in  the  Land  of  Israel,  which  were  aimed  at  preserving  the  lives  and  health  of  its  citizens  and  visitors.  The  purpose  of  this  study  is  both  to  illustrate  the  way  in  which  this  matter  was  dealt  with  in  daily  life  and  to  consider  the  ways  in  which  the  halakha  was  applied  in  the  municipal  planning  of  the  city  of  Jerusalem,  in  which  strict  attention  was  paid  to  public  health  –  the  preservation  of  human  life,  which  is  a  supreme  value  in  the  scale  of  values  of  Jewish  law.  

 

Aviad  Recht,  Inalco,  Paris,  France  

Title:  'The  Regimens  of  Health  of  the  Sages'  –  A  Hellenistic  Medical  Genre  as  Processed  by  the  Sages  

Abstract:  Within   the   literary   material   of   the   Rabbinic   Sages   that   relate   to   medicine,   one   can   identify   a  distinct   literary   category,   “Regimens   of   Health.”     This   genre   of   literature   is   characterized   by   medical  aphorisms,   the  curative  substances   that  are  mentioned,  and  the  audience   it  addresses.   'The  Regimens  of  Health  of  the  Sages'  genre  is  characterized  by  aphorisms  that  teach  medical  knowledge  in  a  direct  way  (as  opposed   to   medical   knowledge   gleaned   from   halakhic   or   moral   material)   and   are   short   and   concise.  Analysis   of   these   aphorisms   suggests   the   following:   a.   they   do   not   include   magical   medical   indications  

(many  of  those  are  found  in  the  Babylonian  Talmud).  b.  the  medical   indications  that  appear  are  based  on  diet  and  exercise  alone.  Although   these  are  medical   indications   they  do  not   include  medication   (in  other  words,  medication  that  is  not  food  is  not  included  in  them).  These  characteristics  are  the  characteristics  of  the   genre  of   the   regimen  of   health   in   the  Hippocratic   Corpus.   In   “Regimen   in  Health”,   ”Regimen   II”   and  “Regimen  III”,  the  author  teaches  people  who  wish  to  preserve  their  health  and  avoid  illness  how  to  do  so.  There  is  no  magic  in  his  indications  and  they  are  based  on  nutrition  and  physical  exercise.  Galen,  in  his  "On  Hygiene"   speaks   of   keeping   healthy   as   the   result   of   physical   exercise   and   nourishment.   It   appears   that  there  is  a  connection  between  the  aforementioned  aphorisms  of  the  sages  and  the  classical  writings  in  the  genre  of  regimen  of  health  (characteristics  that  do  not  exist  in  other  neighboring  medical  cultures).  In  spite  of  its  major  affinity  to  Hellenistic  medical  literature,  the  'Regimen  of  Health  of  the  Sages'  has  undergone  a  process   of   change   and   adaptation.   Reading   the   aforementioned   Hippocratic   works,   and   especially   the  Galenial  ones,  it  can  be  seen  that  a  person's  day  consists  of  physical  exercise  in  the  gymnasium,  massage,  sleep  and  proper  food.  It  does  not  include  work.  The  audience  to  whom  these  works  were  addressed  were  probably  the  society's  elite,  who  did  not  work  anyway.  In  contrast,  'The  Regimen  of  Health  of  the  Sages'  is  completely   different.   It   mentions   simple   foods   of   the   kind   found   in   an   ordinary   person's   kitchen.   The  exercise   recommended   is   not   physical   exercise   in   the   gymnasium,   but   basic   everyday   actions,   such   as  walking,   sitting,   sleeping,   sexual   intercourse   etc.   –   in   the   correct   and   healthy  manner.   It   seems   that   the  sages  adopted  the  classical  method,  but  adapted  it  to  the  wider  audience  of  their  followers,  an  audience  of  working  people.  This  phenomenon  of  The  Regimen  of  Health  of  the  Sages  can  be  dated  and  geographically  placed  by  using  details   that  are  known  about  their  creators.  While  approximately  half  of   the  regimens  of  health  are  anonymous,   the   remainder   is  ascribed   to   specific   sages,  which  allows   the   identification  of   the  time  and  place  of   the   regimen,   (of   course,   nothing   is   completely   certain).  Most  of   them,   some  70%,   are  brought  in  the  names  of  sages  in  the  Land  of  Israel  (this  fact  is  not  so  significant  if  we  take  into  account  that  some  30%  of  the  regimens  are  brought  in  the  names  of  Babylonian  sages,  and,  that  half  of  the  regimens  are  anonymous  and  are  not   included   in  the  analysis,  and  these  could  tip  the  scale).  Another  fact  to  take   into  consideration   is   that   the   sages   who   composed   these   regimens   are   only   early   Tana'im   or   late   Amora'im  (mainly   from   the  middle   of   the   second   to   the   beginning   of   the   fourth   centuries).   This   fact   is   even  more  significant  than  the  previous  one,  since  the  anonymous  aphorisms  are  also  dated  to  this  period.  From  this  time  onwards  this  literary  phenomenon  fades  away  quickly  and  then  disappears  (there  only  a  few  examples  from   the  mid-­‐fourth   century  onwards).   The   fact   that   the  boundaries  of   the  phenomenon  are   clearer   cut  chronologically   rather   than   geographically,   and   the   genre   appears   mainly   in   the   Babylonian   Talmud,  undermines  the  automatic  dichotomy:  Israeli  Jews  -­‐  Hellenistic  culture  versus  Babylonian  Jews  –  Babylonian  culture.  I  would  like  to  propose  an  explanation  for  the  phenomenon  of  The  Regimen  of  Health  of  the  Sages,  and  its  unexpected  chronological  and  geographical  characteristics  by  examining  internal  Jewish  processes  in  the  relationships  of  the  communities  in  Israel  and  Babylon,  as  well  as  the  non-­‐Jewish  cultural  processes  that  occurred   in   the   Roman-­‐Byzantine   empire   and   throughout   the   Sassanian   empire,   and   seeing   how   they  apparently  influenced  the  medical  culture  in  the  Jewish  community  as  reflected  in  the  Babylonian  Talmud.  

 

Matteo   Martelli,   Humboldt   University   Berlin,   Germany,   &   Lennart   Lehmhaus,   Free   University   of   Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  Transfer  of  Medical  Knowledge  in  Late  Antique  Encyclopedic  Traditions  –  a  Preliminary  Survey.  

Abstract:   Preliminary   survey   on   the   relationships   between   Byzantine  medical   encyclopaedias   (Oribasius,  Aetius,  and  Paul  of  Aegina)  and  the  medical  knowledge  encapsulated  in  the  Talmudic  tradition.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

History  of  Sciences  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Jewish  Medical  Discourse(s)  and  Cultural  Context(s)  

 

Chair:  

 

Ronit  Yoeli-­‐Tlalim,  Goldsmiths,  University  of  London,  UK  

Title:  Asian  Lore  in  the  Hebrew  Book  of  Asaf  

Abstract:  The  Hebrew  Book  of  Asaf  (also  known  as  Sefer  Refu’ot,  the  Book  of  Medicines),  is  considered  one  of  the  earliest  Hebrew  medical  texts.  The  text  has  numerous  references  to  India  and  Persia.  This  paper  will  contextualize  some  of  these  references  and  discuss  their  significance.  

 

Tamás  Visi,  Palacky  University,  Olomouc,  Czech  Republic  

Title:  Uroscopy  in  Sefer  Asaf  

Abstract:  The  Book  of  Remedies  attributed   to  Assaf   (Sefer  Refuot  or  Sefer  Assaf)   includes   five   shorter  or  longer  sections  on  uroscopy,  that   is,  prognostic  and  diagnostic  rules  on  the  basis  of  urine.  Three  of  these  collections   are   based   on   the   uroscopic   passages   in   Hippocrates'   Aphorisms   and   Prognostics.   A   fourth  collection   is  based  on  a  pseudo-­‐Galenic  uroscopic   compendium  which   can  be   traced  back   to  a  uroscopic  treatise  by  Magnus  of  Emessa.  The  Hebrew  paraphrases  reveal  the  competences  of  the  authors  in  utilizing  Greek  (and  possibly  Syriac)  medical  writings  as  well  as  the  difficulties  they  encountered.  

 

Carmen  Caballero-­‐Navas,  University  of  Granada,  Spain  

Title:  Women’s  Secrets:  An  Assessment  of  the  Early  Stage  of  the  Foundation  of  Hebrew  Gynaecology  

Abstract:   This   paper   focuses   on   the   early   stage   of   the   reception   and   accommodation   of   gynecological  literature  by  Jewish  authors  and  translators  during  the  Middle  Ages.  Its  aim  is  twofold:  a.  to  probe  into  the  factors  that  led  to  the  incorporation  of  gynaecological  texts,  unlikely  intended  for  male  medical  practice  (at  least  at  this  early  stage),  to  the  incipient  Hebrew  medical  corpus;  b.  and  to  analyse  the  Hebrew  production  and  transmission  of   texts  on  women’s  health  care   from  the  end  of   the   twelfth  and  during   the   thirteenth  century,   with   a   focus   on   textual   choices   and   their   (un)popularity   amongst   Jewish   medical   writers   and  readers.  To  assess  the  later  idea  –(un)popularity  of  first  Hebrew  gynaecological  texts–,  I  will  particularly  rely  on  Sefer  ha-­‐yošer.  This  is  a  comprehensive  encyclopaedia  of  medical  knowledge  written  in  Provence  in  the  last   decades   of   the   thirteenth   century   by   a   so   far   unknown,   but   very   learned   medical   author   and  practitioner.   The  book   is   also   one  of   the   first   and  not   very   abundant  medical  works  written  originally   in  Hebrew,   which   reflects   the   perception   of   a   Jewish   physician   during   the   early   stages   of   the   process   of  professionalization   of   medicine.   In   a   very   comprehensive   section   devoted   to   women’s   conditions,   the  author   quotes   profusely   other  medical   authors   and  works.   An   analysis   of   the   quotations   will   offer   us   a  glimpse  to  the  gynaecological  literature  available  in  Hebrew  to  a  learned  Provencal  physician,  as  well  as  the  

preferences  of  this  particular  author.  It  is  relevant  to  this  paper  to  mention  that  he  often  uses  the  generic  label  “secrets  of  women”  to  refer  to  works  or  parts  of  works  devoted  to  women’s  health  care,  which  point  to   the   possibility   and   he   and   his   audience   perceived   the   Hebrew   texts   devoted   to   women’s   conditions  circulating  at  the  time  as  a  genre  of  medical  literature.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

History  of  Sciences  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Jewish  Medical  Discourse(s)  and  Cultural  Context(s)  

 

Chair:  

 

Shulamit  Shinnar,  Columbia  University,  New  York,  USA  

Title:  The  Experiments  of  Cleopatra:  Rabbinic  Attitudes  towards  Other  Ancient  Medical  Traditions  

Abstract:  In  Talmudic  literature,  there  are  many  passages  in  which  the  rabbis  show  an  interest  in  topics  that  we   might   classify   as   “medical.”   The   Rabbis   describe   anatomical   features   of   the   human   body,   detail   its  physiological   functions,  and  prescribe  treatments  to  maintain  health.   In   the  modern  world,  knowledge  of  the   human   body   comes   from   a   set   of   established   accepted   methodologies   of   inquiry   such   as   scientific  research,   experimentation,   and   observation   of   the   human   body.   The   field   of   the   history   of   science   has  repeatedly   argued   that   knowledge   of   the   natural   world   and   the   methods   by   which   it   is   obtained   are  contingent   upon   and   constructed   within   particular   communities   and   specific   social   and   intellectual  structures.  Therefore,  when  we  approach  rabbinic  texts  discussing  medical  facts,  it  is  crucial  to  explore  both  their   sources   for   this  knowledge  and  what   they  considered   the  acceptable  methods  of  obtaining  medical  knowledge.   In   this   paper   I   will   focus   on   a   series   of   texts   from   the   Babylonian   Talmud  m.   Niddah  which  describe   the   development   of   the   fetus   in   the   womb.   I   will   examine   how   the   rabbinic   texts   themselves  debate   the   appropriate   sources   of   knowledge,   specifically   addressing   the   validity   of   other   ancient,   non-­‐Jewish   medical   traditions.   Through   my   inquiry,   I   hope   to   shed   light   on   the   epistemological   framework  through  which  the  Rabbis  approached  the  natural  world.  

 

Tirzah  Meacham,  University  of  Toronto,  Canada  

Title:  Physicians,  Expertise  and  Halakha:  are  Purity  Issues  Different?  

Abstract:   Rabbinic   literature   has   a   somewhat   ambivalent   relationship   to   physicians.   According   to  mQiddushin,   Pirqei   Avot,   Pirqei   de   Rabbi   Natan   and   parallels   "the   best   of   the   physicians   to  Geheinom."  Medicine   apparently   was   not   considered   the   most   honorable   profession.   The   reasons   for   this   attitude  ranged   from   considering   that   physicians   did   not   exert   themselves   in   their   labor,   or   lacked   sufficient  expertise,   or   despite   expertise   were   still   prone   to   error.   Nevertheless   the   sages   relied   on   the   medical  expertise  of  physicians  when  they  needed  help  to  make  a  medical-­‐legal  decision.  This  paper  will  trace  cases  

where  tannaitic  material  seems  to  rely  on  the  statements  of  the  physicians  while  the  later  Yerushalmi  and  the  even   later  Bavli   limit  considerably  the   impact  of   the  words  of   the  physicians  on  the  halakhic  decision  making  process.  We  shall  especially  examine  the  case  of  tNiddah  4:3-­‐4,  yNiddah  3:2  (50c)  and  bNiddah  22b  where   the   physicians’   statement   is   not   only   limited   in   the   Yerushalmi   but   additional   proof   is   required  before  it  can  be  accepted  even  in  a  more  limited  way  by  the  Bavli.  We  shall  also  investigate  other  instances  where  physicians  make  medical   statements   impacting  on  purity   issues  which  demonstrate   that   the  sages  either  do  not  accept   their  words  or  establish  additional   criteria  which  essentially  push  aside   the  medical  expertise  and  create  more  stringent  halakhic  decisions.    

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  04  

 

Session:  001:  

Second  Temple  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  Katell  Berthelot  

 

Pieter  Van  der  Horst,  Netherlands  

Title:  Saxa  judaica  loquuntur:  What  can  we  learn  from  Ancient  Jewish  Inscriptions?  

Abstract:   In   this   paper   the   relevance   of   the   study   of   early   Jewish   epigraphy   for   the   history   of   ancient  Judaism  will  be  discussed.  The   focus  will  be  on  what   information  we  can  retrieve   from  these   inscriptions  that  the  literary  sources  do  not  yield.    

 

Michael  Avioz,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Josephus'  Use  of  the  Book  of  Chronicles  

Abstract:   The   Book   of   Chronicles   posed   a   great   challenge   for   interpreters   through   the   ages.  On   the   one  hand,   it   repeats  much  of   the  material   contained   in  earlier  biblical   sources,   and   the  question  arises   as   to  what  purpose  it  serves.  On  the  other  hand,  it  diverges  from  these  sources  by  means  of  omitting  and  adding  materials.  Thus,  contradictions  and  discrepancies  between  the  biblical  texts  are  inevitable.  Flavius  Josephus  makes  constant  use  of   the  Book  of  Chronicles   in  his  Antiquities  of   the   Jews.  He  does  not   retell   this  book  separately,  but  rather  incorporates  the  material  from  Chronicles  in  his  retelling  of  the  books  of  Samuel  and  Kings.  The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to  examine  the  various  ways  in  which  Josephus'  makes  use  of  the  Book  of  Chronicles  in  his  writings.  The  various  uses  may  be  classified  into  four  categories:  a.  Josephus  prefers  the  version  of  Chronicles  over  Samuel–Kings.  b.  Josephus  prefers  the  version  of  Samuel–Kings  over  Chronicles.  c.   Josephus   harmonizes   the   texts   of   Chronicles   and   Samuel–Kings.   d.   Josephus'   account   ignores   both  Samuel–Kings  and  Chronicles.  I  will  analyze  various  cases  from  the  books  of  Samuel–Kings  and  try  to  show  how  Josephus  employs  these  categories.  The  analysis  will  also  try  to  answer  the  following  questions:  Which  text  form  did  Josephus  use:  was  it  a  text  similar  to  the  LXX  or  the  MT?  Were  Josephus'  motives  exegetical  or  apologetic?    

 

Carol  Bakhos,  UCLA,  USA  

Title:  Transmitting  Early  Jewish  Literature:  The  Case  of  Jubilees  in  Medieval  Jewish  and  Islamic  Sources  

Abstract:   In   this   paper,   I   will   explore   the   appearance   of   early   Jewish   traditions,   especially   Jubilees,   in  medieval   literature  such  as  Pirke  de  Rabbi  Eliezer,   the  Qur'an  and   the  Stories  of   the  Prophets.  How  does  one   account   for   the   appearance   of   Second   Temple   sources   in   medieval   Jewish,   Christian   and   Muslim  sources?  While  the  details  of  a  complex  Near  Eastern  circulatory  system  of  stories,  maxims,  prayers,   inter  

alia,   are   impossible   to   detect,   it   is   nonetheless   worthwhile   to   interrogate   the   ways   in   which   Jubilees  traditions  are  retailored  in  later  literary  sources.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Late  Antiquity  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Jews  in  the  Roman  Empire:  New  Research  Perspectives  

Organizer:  Katell  Berthelot  

Chair:  Martin  Goodman  

 

Gil  Gambash,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  Roman  Policy  in  the  Aftermath  of  the  Great  Jewish  Revolt:  a  Reconsideration  in  Light  of  New  Evidence    

Abstract:  Available  evidence  has  thus  far  suggested  that  the  actions  of  Vespasian  and  Titus  with  regard  to  the  first  Jewish  revolt  proceeded  uninterrupted  from  conducting  the  campaign  for  the  conquest  of  Judea  to  commemorating   it   appropriately,   in   grand  manner.   Such   a   run   of   events   does   not   contradict   any   of   the  theories  which  have  been  suggested  for  the  Flavian  conduct  after  the  conclusion  of  the  war,  be  it  imagined  to  have  been  guided  by  private  dynastic  requirements  (Goodman  2007);  by  the  needs  of  a  state  torn  until  recently   by   civil   war   (Yakobson   forthcoming);   or,   finally,   by   routine   protocol   in   the   aftermath   of   great  campaigns  of  conquest  (Gambash  2013).  A  newly  discovered  Flavian  aureus,  however,  carrying  the  unique  legend   Iudaea  recepta  on   its  reverse,  has  been   interpreted  recently  as  undermining  this  assumed  flow  of  events,   presenting   us   with   a   brief   moment   of   different   Flavian   policy,   when   a   line   of   commemoration  completely   opposed   to   the  one  eventually   adopted  was   considered   and  even   initiated   (Gambash,  Gitler,  and  Cotton  2013).  The  coin  presents   Judea  as  a   former  province  which  had   temporarily  been   lost   to   the  empire   and  was   now   reintegrated   into   the   provincial   system.   This  would   have   been   in   line  with   Rome’s  normal  practice,  which,  in  the  aftermath  of  provincial  unrest,  sought  to  return  as  quickly  as  possible  to  the  antequam  situation  (Gambash  2012).  The  suggested  paper  aims  to  reevaluate  the  circumstances  in  late  70  in  light  of  the  new  coin  and  the  policy  it  denotes,  examining  such  aspects  as  the  official  status  of  Judea;  the  rank  of   its  governor  and  the  nature  of   its  administration;   the  garrisoning  of   the  province;  and  retributive  measures  taken  against  the  Jews  in  the  province  and  elsewhere.    

 

Samuele  Rocca,  The  Neri  Bloomfield  School  of  Design  &  Education,  Haifa  -­‐  Ariel  University  of  Samaria,  Israel  

Title:  Researching  the  Impact  of  the  Barbarian  Invasions  on  the  Jews  of  Roman  Italy:  New  Perspectives  

Abstract:  For  various  reasons,  there  is  no  discussion  of  the  impact  of  the  Barbarian  invasions  on  the  Jewish  communities  of  Roman   Italy.   Indeed,  Roman   Italy   fall   victim  to  a   series  of   invasions.  First   the   invasion  of  Alaric’s  Visigoths  in  410  C.E.,  and  then  that  of  Genseric’s  Vandals  in  455  C.E.,  which  culminated  in  the  sack  of  Rome.  These  were  followed  by  the  establishment  of  the  Roman-­‐Barbaric  kingdom  of  the  Ostrogoths,  and  the   successive   disastrous   Gothic   War,   which   brought   back   Italy   under   Justinian   rule.   The   Barbarian  

conquest   of   Italy   ended  with   the   Lombard   invasion   in   the   second   half   of   the   sixth   century.   In   this   short  lecture,  I  shall  argue  first  that  the  barbaric   invasions  much  influenced  the  geographic  distribution  and  the  demographic  development  of  the  Jews  living  in  Roman  Italy.  Indeed,  a  close  look  at  epigraphic  data,  shows  that   the   destruction   that   came   in   the   wake   of   the   Barbarian   invasions   probably   resulted   in   the   total  destruction  of  the  Jewish  communities  established  in  Northern  Italy,  a  substantial  decrease,  even  decline  in  the  Jewish  population  of  Rome,  sacked  twice  by  the  Barbarians  during  the  fifth  century,  and  much  damaged  by  Justinian’  Gothic  wars   in  the  middle  of  the  sixth  century.  On  the  other  side,   it   is  possible  to  assist  to  a  slow  demographic  and  geographic  increase,  albeit  difficult  to  measure,  of  the  Jews  living  in  southern  Italy,  as   this   part   of   the   peninsula   was   much   less   damaged   than   the   rest   of   the   peninsula   by   the   Barbarian  invasions,   as   the   epigraphic   evidence   from   Venosa   indeed   attest.   No   less   important   is   the   influence   of  Barbarian   legislation   on   the   relationship   between   the   Jews   and   the   surrounding   population.   Barbarian  legislation,   contrary   to   Roman   law,   created   for   the   first   time   a   well-­‐defined,   clear   cut   ethnic   boundary  between  the  Jews  and  the  rest  of  the  population.  This  ethnic  discrimination,  evident  in  the  Lombard  legal  code,  defined  anew  the  legal  position  of  the  Jews  adding  a  racial  overtone,  which  was  totally  absent  in  Late  Roman   Christian   legislation,   even   in   its   discriminatory   laws.   Jews   under   the   Barbarian   overlords   lost  completely  their  status  of  Roman  citizens,  albeit  second-­‐class  citizens,  to  become  completely  dependents  from  the  whims  of  the  Lombard  overlord.  The  background  was  set  for  Medieval  legislation  on  Jews.  

 

Capucine  Nemo-­‐Pekelman,  Université  Paris  Ouest  Nanterre  La  Défense,  France  

Title:  The  non-­‐rabbinical  Jews  according  to  the  Codex  Theodosianus  

Abstract:  The  Jewish  populations   living   in  the  end  of  the  Western  Roman  Empire  outside  the   influence  of  the   rabbis   of   Palestine   have   let   too   few   documents   about   their   internal   organizations   and   their   legal  practices.  That  is  why  the  Legal  documentation  furnished  by  the  imperial  laws  should  be  used  as  a  valuable  source.   Indeed,  Roman  laws  shed   light  on  many  aspects  of  the  Jewish  world   in  the  Roman  provinces.  For  instance,  they  show  that  the  Jews  were  far  from  presenting  a  unique  face  in  front  of  the  sovereign  power,  and  that  the  internal  instances  of  government  sometimes  had  difficulties  to  impose  their  jurisdiction  over  their  own  community.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Late  Antiquity  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Public  Spectacles  in  Roman  and  Late  Antique  Palestine  (Zeev  Weiss,  Harvard  UP,  2014):  

A  Book  Review  Session  

Organizer:  Daniel  Stökl  Ben  Ezra  

Chair:  Daniel  Stökl  Ben  Ezra  

 

Nicole  Belayche,  EPHE,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Jews,  Christians  and  Spectacles:  a  Focus  on  Archaeological  and  Epigraphic  Data  

Abstract:   Rabbinical   and   patristic   texts   were   unanimous   for   condemning   officially   spectacles   as   being  ‘pagan’  demonstrations.  And  yet  spectacles  were  a  central  part  of  social  life  in  the  Roman  Empire,  in  Roman  Judaea/Palestine   as   in   any   province.   Thus   all   big   cities   were   equipped   with   spectacles   buildings   from  Herodian  time  onwards,  and  the  ‘paganization’  (in  terms  of  demography  at  least)  of  Syria-­‐Palaestina  after  the  second  revolt  increased  the  movement,  even  in  cities  with  a  large  component  of  Jewish  population  like  Sepphoris.   The   new   Z.  Weiss’   book   on   "Public   Spectacles   in   Roman   and   Late  Antique   Palestine"   offers   a  good   opportunity   for   discussing   the   possible   gap   between   normative   positions   and   historical   realities   as  reflected   in   archeological   and   epigraphic   data   and   for   enlightening   religious   relationships   between   the  various  communities  (pagans,  Jews  and  Christians)  in  the  mirror  of  public  entertainments.  

 

René  Bloch,  University  of  Bern,  Switzerland  

Title:  Jewish-­‐Hellenistic  and  Christian  Discourses  on  the  Theatre    

Abstract:  In  encyclopedias,  ancient  Judaism  and  theatre  are  often  presented  as  an  oxymoron:  "Das  jüdische  Altertum  kannte  kein  Theater"  (Neues  Lexikon  des  Judentums);  "Until  quite  recent  times,  the  Jew  has  never  been   homo   theatralis"   (The   Oxford   Handbook   of   Jewish   Studies),   "Le   théâtre   apparaît   très   tardivement  dans  la  civilisation  juive"  (Histoire  des  spectacles).  Yet  a  closer  reading  of  the  evidence  suggests  that  in  the  Greco-­‐Roman  period  Jews  visited  the  theatre,  performed  on  stage,  and  wrote  plays.  With  the  new  book  by  Zeev  Weiss  on  "Public  Spectacles  in  Roman  and  Late  Antique  Palestine”  as  a  starting  point  I  will  discuss  the  discourses  on  the  theatre  in  Jewish-­‐Hellenistic  and  Christian  literature.  

 

Günter  Stemberger,  University  of  Vienna,  Austria  

Title:  Jews  and  Spectacles.  The  Rabbinic  Data  

Abstract:  The  generally  negative  attitude  of  the  rabbis  regarding  theatres  and  spectacles  is  well  known.  But  rabbinic  texts  also  frequently  use  topoi  and  images  derived  from  the  world  of  the  theatre,  thus  creating  an  ambiguous   impression.  Since  the  theatre   is   foreign  to   the  cultural  world  of   the  Babylonian  rabbis,   it   is  of  interest   how   Palestinian   traditions   in   this   regard   are   used   and   transformed   in   the   Bavli.   The   paper   will  critically  discuss  Weiss’  new  book  on  theatres  in  Palestine  with  special  attention  on  the  rabbinic  sources.  

 

Zeev  Weiss,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Book  Review:  Public  Spectacles  in  Roman  and  Late  Antique  Palestine,  by  Zeev  Weiss.  Scholarly  Reactions  and  Author’s  Response  

Abstract:   The   session   will   review   my   forthcoming   book,   Public   Spectacles   in   Roman   and   Late   Antique  Palestine,  which  reconstructs   the  role  of  Roman  entertainment   in  Palestine   from  the   first  century  BCE  to  the   sixth   century   CE.   It   describes   a   world   in   which   Romans,   Jews,   and   Christians   intermingled   amidst   a  heady   brew   of   shouts,   roars,   and   applause   while   watching   a   variety   of   typically   pagan   spectacles.   The  invited   reviewers   will   analyze   the   volume’s   new   insights,   strengths,   and   weaknesses   from   three  perspectives:   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish   Graeco-­‐Roman   literature;   archaeology   and   epigraphy;   and   Rabbinic  literature.   Following   their   presentations,   I  will   respond   accordingly   and  offer  my  point   of   view   regarding  various  dimensions  presented  in  the  book.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

   

 

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  05  

 

Session:  001:  

Rabbinic  Literature  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Late  Midrash  between  Islam  and  Byzantium  

Organizers:  Ronit  Nikolsky  and  Arnon  Atzmon  

Chair:  Ronit  Nikolsky  and  Arnon  Atzmon  

 

Marc  Bregman,  The  University  of  North  Carolina  at  Greensboro,  USA  

Title:  Tanhuma-­‐Yelammedenu  Literature.  Contacts  with  Non-­‐Jewish  Cultures  

Tanhuma-­‐Yelammedenu   midrash   emerged   at   the   end   of   the   classical   rabbinic   period   and   continued   to  evolve  well   into   the  middle   ages   in   a   broad   spectrum   of   geographical   areas   dominated   by   various   non-­‐Jewish  cultures,  including  Zoroastrianism,  Christianity  and  Islam.  This  presentation  briefly  surveys  a  number  of   indications   of   contacts   with   these   religious   traditions   in   the   extensive   and   multifaceted   Tanhuma-­‐Yelammedenu  literature.  

 

Ulrich  Berzbach,  Otto-­‐Hahn-­‐Gymnasium  Bensberg,  Germany  

Title:  “and  Rabba  has  3  gates  and  30  chapters  and  Zuta  12  chapters”  :  Chapter  divisions  and  larger  units  in  “Seder  Eliyahu”  

Abstract:  In  his  “Arukh”  -­‐  using  a  responsum  of  Natronai  Gaon  -­‐  Nathan  b.  Yehiel  of  Rome  comments  on  the  scarce   details   that   bT   Ket   106a   offers   on   the   two   parts   of   “Seder   Eliyahu”   (SE),   namely   “Seder   Eliyahu  Rabba”   (SER)  and  “Seder  Eliyahu  Zuta”   (SEZ):  He   tells  his  11th  century   readers   that  SER  consists  of   three  “gates”   and   30   chapter   while   SEZ   consists   of   twelve   chapters.   The   paper   will   use   this   description   as   a  starting   point   to   discuss   the   role   and   character   of   chapter   divisions   and   larger   units   in   SE   based   on   the  manuscript   evidence.   Textual   divisions   in   SE   will   be   discussed   as   a   representative   example   of   late  midrashim   that   do   not   base   their   own   structure   directly   on   a   given   textual   structure   of   the   biblical   text  commented  on.  

 

Constanza  Cordoni,  University  of  Vienna,  Austria  

Title:  The  Seder  Eliyahu  and  Karaism  

Abstract:   In  1874  Wilhelm  Bacher  stated  that  an   important  feature  of  the   late  midrash  Seder  Eliyahu  was  the   fact   that   in   two  passages   the   “author”   depicts   himself   as   a   defender   of   rabbinic   Judaism  before   the  challenge   Karaite   antagonists.   My   paper   is   an   attempt   to   critically   re-­‐examine   this   alleged   response   to  

Karaism  in  selected  passages  of  first  person  narratives  of  the  Seder  Eliyahu.  Field:  Talmud,  Midrash  Rabbinic  Literature  

 

Amos  Geula,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  On  the  Question  of  the  Cultural  Context  of  'Seder  Eliyahu  Rabba'    

Abstract:   Scholars   opinions   regarding   the   question   of   the   historical   and   cultural   background   of   the  enigmatic  composition  "Seder  Eliyahu"  are  varied.  This  lecture  will  not  be  able  to  solve  all  questions  related  to  this  work.  The  purpose  of  this  lecture  is  to  present  new  findings  on  this  issue  and  solve  some  riddles  in  this  composition,  according  to  which  rule  out  some  of   the  opinions  offered  and  suggest  a  way  to  resolve  the  problem.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Rabbinic  Literature  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Late  Midrash  between  Islam  and  Byzantium  

Organizers:  Ronit  Nikolsky  and  Arnon  Atzmon  

 

Chair:  Ronit  Nikolsky  and  Arnon  Atzmon  

 

Sacha  Stern,  University  College  London,  UK  

Title:  Pirqei  deRabbi  Eliezer  and  the  19-­‐year  Cycle  

Abstract:   The   earliest   evidence   of   a   19-­‐year   cycle   in   the   Jewish   calendar   appears   in   a   passage   of   Pirqei  deRabbi   Eliezer   (c.8th   century),   of  which   a   parallel   source   is   cited   as   a   baraita   in   various   later  medieval  manuscripts  as  well  as   in   Isaac   Israeli’s  Yesod  Olam.  This  baraita  presents  a  difference  of  opinions  on  the  cycle  and  on  when  to  make  intercalations.  In  this  paper,  I  shall  argue  that  the  earliest  version  of  the  cycle,  as  preserved  in  the  best  manuscripts  of  Pirqei  deRabbi  Eliezer,  corresponds  exactly  to  the  Byzantine  Easter  cycle  which  was  instituted  sometime  in  the  7th  century,  and  which  was  in  use  by  Palestinian  Christians.  This  suggests  that  the  institution  of  a  19-­‐year  cycle  in  the  Jewish  calendar  was  the  result  of  borrowing  from  the  Christians.  The  Byzantine  Christian  origins  of   the   Jewish  19-­‐year  cycle  may  also  explain   the  origins  of   the  Palestinian  era  of  Creation  which  has  become  dominant  today,  in  the  year  5774  (=  2013/14  CE).  

 

Arnon  Atzmon,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   Editing   and  Meaning   in   Pesikta   Rabbati   and   Tanhuma  Midrash   on   "Vayehi   Beyom   Chalot   Moshe"  (num.  7:1)  

Abstract:   One   of   the  most   fascinating   issues   in   the   study   of  Midrash   is   the   creation   and   editing   of   the  Tanhuma  corpus.  In  this  paper  I  present  a  comparative  analysis  of  the  midrashic  material  found  in  Pesikta  Rabbati   [PR]   with   that   found   in   Tanhuma   on   the   verse,   "And   it   came   to   pass   on   the   day   that   Moses  completed  building  the  Tabernacle."  The  overall  picture  that  emerges  is  that  although  the  piska  in  PR  and  the  Tanhuma  passage  are  stylistically  similar,  they  are  dissimilar  in  terms  of  content,  and  occasionally  even  ideologically   contradict   one   another.   While   PR   adheres   closely   to   interpreting   the   "local"   verses   from  Numbers,   Tanhuma   more   freely   interprets   verses   from   other   passages   concerning   the   building   of   the  Tabernacle,   mainly   those   from   Exodus.   In   its   totality,   it   seems   that   PR   remains   closer   to   the   earlier  midrashic  base,  that  which  is  found  also  in  Pesikta  De-­‐Rav  Kahana,  whereas  the  passage  in  the  Tanhuma  is  slightly  more  removed.  At  times  it  even  seems  that  the  editor  of  this  passage  in  Tanhuma  responded  in  a  certain,  albeit  restrained,  manner  to  derashot  that  seem  to  him  overly  radical  in  PR.  

 

Eric  Ottenheijm,  Utrecht  University,  Netherlands  

Title:  Punishing  the  Nations:  the  Tanhuma  on  the  revelation  of  the  Torah  

Abstract:  A  famous  midrashic  exposition  on  Deut.  33:2  in  the  Mekhilta  R.  Ishmael  explains  the  revelation  of  the  Torah  as  a  result  of  the  moral  incompetence  of  the  nations.  The  nations  are  hampered  in  holding  even  those  Ten  Commandments  that  are  part  of  the  seven  Noahide  ones.  A  midrash  on  Hab  3:6  teaches  that  God  released  the  nations  after  this  ‘fact’  but  a  parable  underlines  the  respective  responsibilities  even  in  the  face  of  the  alleged  lesser  value  of  the  nations’  obligations.  The  Tanhuma  (Tanhuma  Buber,  Devarim,  Berakha  3)  reworking   of   this   tradition   shows   some   remarkable   changes.   Firstly,   it   accuses   the   nations   of   outright  unwillingness  to  accept  or  ‘hear’  the  Torah.  Secondly,  it  does  not  discuss  the  specific  immorality  accredited  to  them  by  the  Torah  nor  their  obligation  to  hold  the  Noahide  commandments.  Moreover,  Hab  3:6  is  read  as   proving   that   the   nations   are   punished   to   hell   for   their   unwillingness.   Finally,   the   Tanhuma   adds   a  prolonged  midrashic  exposition  with  a  parable  that  ‘proves’  that  the  nations  indeed  did  not  want  to  ‘hear’  and  God,  who   dies   not   act   as   a   tyran,   is   justified   in   executing   His   judgment.   This   paper   seeks   to   assess  possible   cultural   conditions   that   may   explain   for   these   differences   and   the   Tanhuma   reworking   of   the  tradition.  

 

Lieve  Teugels,  University  of  Amsterdam,  Netherlands  

Title:  Babylon  and  Byzantium,  but  no  Islam  in  Aggadat  Bereshit.  

Abstract:  Midrash  Aggadat  Bereshit  (AB)  has  been  dated  to  the  9th  or  10th  century  by  several  scholars   in  the  past.  As  to  it’s  place  of  origin,  Jacob  Mann  suggested  the  Byzantine  Empire  outside  Palestine.  I  further  specified   this   to   Southern   Italy1   and   more   recently   Ezra   Kahalani   has   confirmed   this   location.2   These  hypotheses  are  based,  among  other  things,  on  the  sources  used  by  AB,  later  works  that  quote  AB,  the  use  of   foreign,   especially   Greek   words,   the   type   of   Hebrew   used,   and   historical   events   that   point   in   this  direction.  The  use  of  some  explicit  anti-­‐Christian  polemic  has  also  been  brought  to  the  fore  as  an  argument.  In  an  earlier  study,   in  which  I  analyzed  the  three  most  obvious  anti-­‐Christian  passages  in  AB,  I  stated  that  this  polemic  is  indeed  more  explicit  than  in  the  older  rabbinic  sources,  yet  in  terms  of  its  contents,  nothing  in  these  texts  refers  to  a  specific  medieval  situation.3  In  the  present  paper  I  will  analyze  the  last  chapters  of  AB  which,  in  addition  to  general  rabbinic  sayings  against  ‘Esau’  and  ‘the  Nations’,  do  contain,  in  the  form  of  midrash,   explicit   references   to   the   persecution   and   killing   of   Jews   and   kiddush   ha-­‐shem   (martyrdom).4  These  data  will  be  put  against  what  is  known  of  the  history  of  southern  Italy  in  the  9th-­‐10th  century,  among  others  through  the  Ahimaaz  Chronicle.  The  outcome  will  bring  us  closer  to  an  answer  to  the  question  as  to  

why  Islam  seems  to  be  a  non-­‐existing  factor  in  this  medieval  work,  whereas  Christianity  appears  as  a  major  enemy.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Rabbinic  Traditions  between  Palestine  and  Babylonia  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Klaus  Herrmann,  Free  University  of  Berlin  

Discussant  

 

Meir  Ben  Shahar,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Discussant  

 

Tal  Ilan,  Free  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:   The   Bavli   as   a   Historian:   Historical   Traditions   from   the   Second   Temple   Period   and   their  Transformation  in  Babylonia  

Abstract:  The  Bavli   cites  many  traditions  about   the  Second  Temple  period  that  have  parallels  both   in   the  writings  of  Josephus  and  in  tannaitic  and  Palestinian  literature.  In  this  paper  I  will  examine  what  happens  to  these   traditions   when   they   reach   the   Bavli.   Are   they   more   or   less   like   Josephus'   version   than   their  Palestinian  parallels?  

 

Ronit  Nikolsky,  Rijksuniversiteit  Groningen,  Netherlands  

Title:  Tracing  Tanhuma  in  Europe    

Abstract:  My   paper  will   concentrate   on   the   cultural   context   of   the   Tanhuma   as   late  midrash,   and   study  some  characteristics  of  the  midrash.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Rabbinic  Literature  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Pirqe  de-­‐Rabbi  Eliezer  at  the  Crossroads  of  Cultures  

Organizer:  Gavin  McDowell    

 

Chair:  Gavin  McDowell    

 

 

Rachel  Adelman,  Hebrew  College,  Boston,  USA  

Title:  The  Fate  of  the  First  Clothing  

Abstract:   Before   Adam   and   Eve   were   banished   from   Eden,   God   clothed   them   in   “cloaks   of   skin”   (Gen.  3:21).In  this  paper  I  compare  three  different  midrashic  texts  –  Genesis  Rabbah  (18:6  and  20:12),  Pirqe  de-­‐Rabbi  Eliezer  (14  and  24)  and  the  Tanhuma  (ed.  Buber,  Toledot  12)  and  suggest  that  each  midrash  must  be  understood   in   terms  of   the  distinct  characteristics  of   its  genre  –  exegetical,  narrative,  and  homiletic.  The  earlier  exegetical  midrash  (Gen.  Rab.,  redacted  in  5th  c.  CE)  realigns  the  chronology  of  the  biblical  text  and  presupposes   that   these  garments  were  pre-­‐lapsarian,  worn   in  Eden  before   the   sin.  Pirqe  deRabbi  Eliezer  (8th  c.  CE),  on  the  other  hand,  adheres  to  the  original  sequence  but  audaciously  rewrites  the  story  as  it  fills  in   the  gap  –  where  did   the  skins  come   from?  From  the  skin   that   the  snake  sloughed  off.  The  question   is  whether  these  cloaks  of  skin  are  an  extension  of  the  “fig  leaves”,  sewn  of  shame,  after  the  transgression,  or  whether  they  are  a  gesture  of  amelioration  to  soften  the  consequences  of  exile.  I  discuss  the  nature  of  the  first   clothing   in   terms  of   embodiment   and   sexuality,   in   conversation  with  early  Christian  exegesis  on   the  'garments  of  skin"   (Gary  Anderson).  However,  as  narrative  midrash,   the  author  of  PRE  extends  the   life  of  the  Adam  and   Eve's   "tunics   of   skin”   even   East   of   Eden.   As   in   the   “preservation   of   biblical   personalities”  (Heinemann)  applied   to  sacred  objects,  PRE  expands   the  bearer  of   the  garments   from  Adam  to  Noah,   to  Nimrod,  to  Esau,  and  even  to  Jacob.  I  analyze  the  narrative  expansion  in  mythic  terms  as  an  expression  of  the   opposition   between   Nature   and   Culture   (Lévi-­‐Strauss),   between   primordial   man   and   his   civilized  counter-­‐part.  

 

Emmanouela  Grypeou,  Humboldt-­‐University  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:   Apocalyptic   Motifs   in   Pirqe   de   Rabbi   Eliezer   against   the   Background   of   the   Christian   Apocalyptic  Tradition  

Abstract:   Pirqe   de   Rabbi   Eliezer   is   known   as   one   of   the   few   rabbinic   texts   that   develop   an   apocalyptic  response   to   the  Muslim   rule.   This  paper   intends   to  analyse   the  apocalyptic  motifs  of  PRE  with   regard   to  early  Islam  in  the  context  of  contemporary  Christian  apocalyptic  reactions  to  the  emergence  and  expansion  of  Islam.  Accordingly,  the  paper  will  address  the  question  of  commonalities  and  discrepancies  in  the  Jewish  and  Christian  reactions  to  early  Islamic  rule  as  reflected  in  their  use  of  shared  apocalyptic  imagery.  

 

Philip  Alexander  and  Katharina  Keim,  University  of  Manchester,  UK  

Title:  Pirqei  de  Rabbi  Eliezer  and  Bere'shit  Rabbah:  Intertextual  Relations?  

Abstract:  The  paper  will  be  jointly  written  by  myself  and  my  doctoral  student  Katharina  Keim,  who  is  about  to  complete  a  doctorate  on  PRE  under  my  supervision  at  Manchester.  Pirqei  deRabbi  Eliezer  and  Bere’shit  Rabbah:   Intertextual   Relations?   Prima   facie   it   would   seem   likely   that   PRE,   composed   in   Palestine   in   the  early   Islamic   period,  would   have   known  and  used  Bere’shit   Rabbah,   a  much   earlier   text,   and  one  of   the  most  impressive  midrashic  compositions  of  the  school  of  Tiberias  that  covers  much  of  the  same  ground.  If  it  did   not,   then   this   in   itself   would   be   a   significant   piece   of   evidence   regarding   the   reception   of   Bere’shit  Rabbah.  That  there  is  some  inter-­‐textual  relationship  between  the  two  works  is  borne  out  by  the  thematic  and   sometimes   verbal   overlaps   between   them.  Our   purpose  will   be   to   survey   these   overlaps   and   try   to  establish  the  precise  nature  of  this  relationship.  We  will  argue  that  it  is  more  complicated  and  oblique  than  one  might  at  first  sight  suppose.  On  the  one  hand  the  overlaps  are  never  such  as  to  establish  beyond  doubt  direct  literary  dependence.  On  the  other  hand  there  are  grounds  for  thinking  that  at  certain  crucial  points,  notably   in   its   exposition   of   the   account   of   creation,   PRE   is   quite   deliberately   reading   against   Bere’shit  Rabbah,   and   offering   a   revisionist   reinterpretation   of   the   biblical   text.   PRE   expects   us   to   know   at   least  Bere’shit  Rabbah’s  general  approach  to  Genesis,  and  so  to  pick  up  its  “correction”  of  it.  We  will  suggest  that  this  analysis  throws  light  on  the  vexed  question  of  PRE’s  “sources”  and  is  paradigmatic  of  its  relationship  to  antecedent   Rabbinic   tradition   in   general.   PRE   marks   a   new   turn   in   Rabbinic   midrash:   while   loudly  proclaiming  its  fidelity  to  Rabbinic  tradition  it,  at  the  same  time,  is  prepared  to  subvert  it  and  “misprise”  it  for  its  own  ends.  

 

Gavin  McDowell,  Ecole  Pratique  des  Hautes  Etudes,  France  

Title:  Christian  Legend  and  Anti-­‐Christian  Polemic  in  the  Pirqe  de-­‐Rabbi  Eliezer  

Abstract:   The   death   of  Haman   in   the   book   of   Esther   has   a   curious   exegetical   afterlife.   In   ancient   Jewish  interpretation,  the  hanging  of  Haman  on  the  gallows  becomes  a  polemical  “type”  of  the  crucifixion  of  Jesus.  This  identification,  already  explicit  in  Aramaic  piyyutim  of  the  6th-­‐7th  century,  is  hinted  at  obliquely  in  the  Pirqe  de-­‐Rabbi  Eliezer  (8th  or  9th  century):  Haman’s  gallows  are  constructed  from  a  beam  that  belonged  to  the   Temple   of   Solomon.   Jesus   was   also   believed   to   have   been   crucified   on   part   of   the   original   Temple  complex,  a  motif   that  predates   the  Pirqe  but  did  not  become  widespread   in  Christian   literature  until   the  Middle   Ages.   The   implications   of   this   apparent   anti-­‐Christian  motif   in   the   Pirqe   have   not   yet   been   fully  explored.   I   argue   that   the  Pirqe   is   referring  not  only   to   the   crucifixion  of   Jesus,  but   to   the   legend  of   the  Wood  of  the  Cross.  It  could  be  that  the  Pirqe,  though  Jewish,  is  an  early  written  witness  to  one  of  the  key  legends  of  Latin  Christianity.  

 

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  06  

 

Session:  001:  

Early  Modern  History  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Early  Modern  Poland  

 

Chair:  Michal  Galas  

 

Anat  Vaturi,  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Beyond  Theology:  Jewish-­‐Protestant  Encounters  in  Early  Modern  Cracow  

Abstract:  "Despite  the  importance  and  the  central  character  of  the  topic  of  the  relations  between  the  Jews  and   various   churches   in   the   Polish-­‐Lithuanian   Kingdom   in   understanding   the   history   of   the   Jews   in   this  country   and   in   understanding   the   history   of   the   Polish-­‐Lithuanian   Kingdom,   the   research   in   this   field  doesn't   exist,"  wrote   Yehudit   Kalik.  Although   some  years  have  passed   since   these   appealing  words  were  published,   there  has  been  no  research  giving  a  comprehensive  picture  of   Jewish  –  Protestant  relations   in  Polish-­‐Lithuanian  Commonwealth  or  even  parts  thereof.  In  the  proposed  lecture,  I  would  like  to  take  up  this  challenge  and   suggest  a   typology  of  probable  every-­‐day  encounters  between   Jews  and  Protestants   living  among   the   Catholic   majority   in   early   modern   Cracow.   Sine   theological   encounters   between   the   two  religions   have   already   been   touched   upon,   in   the   proposed   lecture   I   will   examine   meetings   of   other  character  (e.g.  economic,  legal  and  social)  with  special  focus  on  their  nature  and  context.  Although  limited  due  to  the  status  of  available  sources,  the  presented  typology  of  contact-­‐patterns  will  hopefully  shed  some  light   on   the   nature   of   interreligious   relations,   suggest   new   paths   of   research,   and   offer   an   important  contribution  to  our  knowledge  and  understanding  of  Jewish  and  Protestant  history  in  early  modern  Cracow  and  in  Poland.  

 

Arvydas  Maciulevicius,  Vilnius  University,  Lithuania  

Title:  Christians  and  Jews:  Members  of  One  City?  Jewish  Legal  Status  on  the  Radziwiłł  Estates  in  the  17th  to  the  late  18th  Century    

Abstract:   In   the  privilege  of   the   year  1607   to   the   Jews  of  Biržai,   Krzysztof  Radziwiłł   has  declared   that  he  “hereby  guarantees  and  demands  the  arrangements  under  which,  where  Jews  face  any  threat   in  the  city,  Christians  shall  defend  them  as  equals,  for  Jews  are  members  of  the  city  as  well.”  In  the  order  of  1668  to  the   commissioners   appointed   by   Ludwika   Karolina   Radziwiłł,   the   idea   of   both   Christians   and   Jews   being  citizens   of   Biržai   was   even  more   pronounced.   This   attests   to   the   existence   of   a   tendentious   policy   of   a  unified   community   in   the   city   of   the   Radziwiłł   s.   In   this   context,   the   Jews,   just   like   their   neighbours,  Christians,  were  treated  by  the  Radziwiłłs  as  citizens  of  equal  rights.  Compared  to  the  legal  and  social  status  of  the  Jews  in  the  state-­‐owned  (royal)  cities  of  the  Grand  Duchy  of  Lithuania,  the  case  of  the  Radziwiłłs   is  unique,   yet   it   has   never   been   analysed   throughout   historiography.   In   his   study   conducted   on   the   legal  status  of   the   Jews   residing   in   the  domains  of  Polish  and  Lithuanian  magnates   in   the  18th  century,  Adam  

Teller   discerns   three   aspects   concerning   the   legal   status  of   the   Jews,   namely,   the   legal   regulation  of   the  settlement  of  the  Jews  in  the  domains  of  the  aristocracy,  the  legal  and  social  status  of  individuals  granted  a  privilege   of   the   Radziwiłłs,   and   the   legal   system   of   Jewish   communities   themselves.   The   present   paper,  therefore,   seeks   to   reconstruct   the  model  of   the   creation  of   the   society   in   the   city  of   the  Radziwiłłs   and  distinguish  the  ways  which  were  implored  to  unite  the  Jews  and  Christians  into  a  civic  society  functioning  in  unison.  For  this  purpose,  the  paper  investigates  the  legal  sources  that  reflect  the  existence  of  such  a  policy  of   the   Radziwiłłs,   as   well   as   the   requests   of   citizens   and   Jews   to   the   owners   of   a   domain   (‘suppliki’),  inventories,   and   correspondence   reflecting   the   steps   of   the   practical   application   of   the   politics   of   the  unification  of  the  city.  Notably,  nearly  neither  of  them  has  been  employed  in  historical  research  yet.  

 

Anna  Jakimyszyn,  Jagiellonian  University  in  Krakow,  Poland  

Title:  Jewish  Community  in  Krakow  and  Kazimierz  in  the  Light  of  Pinkasim  (18th-­‐19th  Centuries)  

Abstract:  In  my  paper  I  will  present  one  of  the  type  of  "internal  sources"  -­‐  pinkas  of  Jewish  community  from  Krakow  with  records  dating  from  1762:  history  of  this  court  book  (today  this  book  is  in  National  Archive  in  Krakow),   information  about   community   and   the  members,  which  we   can   find   in   this  book.   I  will   present  differents  aspects  of  this  book  (history,  topography,  urbanistic  etc.)  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Early  Modern  History  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Readmission  and  Legal  Status  

 

Chair:  

 

Anna  Lissa,  Martin  Luther  Universitat  Halle-­‐Wittenberg,  Germany  

Title:  The  Conference  for  the  Readmission  of  the  Jews  in  the  Kingdoms  of  Naples  and  Sicily  (1740)  

Abstract:  There  and  Back  again:  the  Concept  of  Utility  of  the  Jews  for  the  Commerce  and  the  Affirming  of  Secularism  in  Simone  Luzzatto’  Discorso  (1638)  and  in  the  Dossier  of  the  Conference  for  the  Readmission  of  the  Jews  in  the  Kingdoms  of  Naples  and  Sicily  (1740)  This  paper  aims  at  retracing  the  ‘wanderings’  of  some  ideas  of  Simone  Luzzatto.  These  ideas  arrived  to  England  from  Venice  and  then  possibly  came  back  to  Italy  and   namely   to   Naples.   Possibly   written   in   order   to   avoid   a   pending   expulsion   of   the   Jews   from   Venice,  Simone   Luzzatto’s   Discorso   focuses   on   the   economic   role   of   the   Jews   in   the   city   of   Venice   and   on   their  utility  for  the  commerce  of  the  Serenissima.  Most  striking  and  relevant  is  however  Luzzatto’s  approach  to  Jewish   identity   founded   on   the   Jews   political   and   economic   role,   while   leaving   aside   the   theological  element.  As   it   is  known,   these  concepts   resurfaced   in   John  Toland’s  Reasons   for  Naturalising   the   Jews   in  Great  Britain  and  Ireland  on  the  same  foot  with  all  Other  Nations  (1714).  Later  on,  in  1740,  Charles  III  king  of  Sicily  and  Naples,  issued  a  decree  allowing  the  Jews  to  come  back  to  his  kingdom.  The  concepts  stated  by  

Simone   Luzzatto   resurfaced  again,   for   the  decree  was   the   result  of   a   conference  held   in  Naples   in  1739,  where  the  readmission  of   the   Jews  was  discussed  mainly  on  the  basis  of   their   talent  and  utility   for   trade  and  economy.  At  the  same  time  was  affirmed  the  urge  to  challenge  ecclesiastical  authority  where  the  Jews  were  concerned.  The  challenge  to  ecclesiastical  authority,  spreading  superstition  and  hate  against  the  Jews,  and  the  seminal  role  of  secular  authorities  as  far  as  the  Jews  were  concerned  where  mainly  stated  in  Pietro  Contegna,  Nota  per  l’introduzione  degli  ebrei  nelli  regni  di  Napoli  e  di  Sicilia  (Note  for  the  Introduction  of  the  Jews  in  the  Kingdoms  of  Naples  and  Sicily)  and  in  Celestino  Galiani,  Parere  teologico  sopra  alcuni  punti  appartenenti  alla  reammissione  degli  ebrei  nei  due  regni  di  Napoli  e  Sicilia  (Theological  Advice  about  some  points  concerning  the  readmission  of  the  Jews  in  the  two  Kingdoms  od  Naples  and  Sicily).  Both  texts  have  never   been   published   and   are   only   available   as   manuscripts.   At   the   current   stage   of   the   research   it   is  difficult   to  positively   state  whether   the   intellectuals,  politicians  and   reformist  Catholics   such  as  Celestino  Galiani  read  Luzzatto’s  Discorso  or  whether  they  became  familiar  with  these  concepts  by  reading  Toland’s  Reasons.   They   were,   however,   familiar   with   John   Toland   writings.   The   retracing   of   the   itinerary   of   this  ideas,  resurfacing   in  the  reformist  milieu  of  Neapolitan   intellectuals,   is  vital  because  this  contribution  will  help  to  shed  light  on  the  history  of  political  thought  both  in  a  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  context.  

 

Jonathan  Immanuel,  Van  Leer  Jerusalem  Institute,  Israel  

Title:  James  Harrington,  the  Land  Question  and  the  Jews  

Abstract:   This   paper  will   examine   the  use  made  of   the  Hebrew  Bible  primarily   by  political   thinker   James  Harrington,   his   followers   such   as   John   Toland,   and   its   influence   on   the   evolution   of   thinking   in   England  concerning  the  establishment  of  a  Jewish  state.  In  1656,  shortly  after  Oliver  Cromwell  failed  to  win  support  from  London's  merchants   for   Jewish  readmission  to  England,  Harrington  suggested   in   the   introduction  to  his  Utopian  work  'Oceana'  that  had  Jews  been  admitted  to  Ireland  to  govern  and  farm  it  under  their  own  laws  forever,  they  could  have  ended  their  homelessness,  enriched  England's  treasury  and  left  trade  in  the  hands   of   London's   jealous   merchants   -­‐   a   win-­‐win   situation   for   all   concerned.   Expecting   skepticism,   he  pointed  out  that  Jews  had  been  great  farmers  and  legislators  in  Canaan  and  could  be  so  again.  Harrington  hoped  his  out-­‐of-­‐the-­‐box  proposal  would  facilitate  appointment  as  Cromwell's  chief  political  adviser.  It  did  not.  It  must  have  seemed  impious  to  ignore  the  fact  that  many  Englishmen,  including  Cromwell,  claimed  to  support   Jewish   admission   to   England   to   facilitate   their   conversion   which   would   be   followed   by   English  assistance   in  restoring  them  to  Palestine.  Harrington,  a  secular  republican,   ignored  the  conversionists.  He  also  thought  Jews  could  not  be  assimilated  in  England,  but  yet  was  no  less  fascinated  than  millennialists  by  the  Hebrew  Bible's  potential  political   impact  on  England's  future,  as  Eric  Nelson  has  recently  pointed  out.  However  Harrington's   biblical   analysis   closely   followed   the  method   introduced  by  Machiavelli  who,   after  blaming  the  Roman  church  for  Italian  decadence,  had  convinced  many  anti-­‐Catholic  English  thinkers  that  it  was  appropriate  to  compare  Moses'  political  accomplishments  with  those  of  pagan  legislators  despite  their  divine   origin.   Harrington   himself   enhanced   the   political   prestige   of   Moses   in   this   pagan   company   and  thought  that  had  Jews  maintained  Moses'  property  laws  their  republic  might  have  lasted  forever.  And  so,  in  modified  form,  he  implied,  might  the  budding  English  republic.  The  supporters  of  land  redistribution  which  Harrington  proposed  also  tended  to  be  more  supportive  of  the  idea  of  a  Jewish  restoration.  The  paper  will  therefore   attempt   to   show   that   Puritan   fascination   with   Mosaic   Law   had   political   as   well   as   religious  aspects  which  the  Hebrew  Bible  was  thought  to  reinforce  without  prejudicing  their  true  Christian  faith  as  Puritans  saw  it.  This  invited  intense  curiosity  in  the  idea  of  a  Jewish  national  revival  and  in  what  Jews  at  the  time  had  to  say  about  it.  

 

Davide  Mano,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Jewish  Petitioning  in  the  Age  of  Enlightened  Reforms  (late  18th  century).  The  Case  of  Pitigliano  in  the  Grand-­‐Duchy  of  Tuscany  

Abstract:  My  paper  is  based  on  a  repertory  of  petitions  submitted  by  the  Jewish  University  of  Pitigliano  to  the  Grand-­‐duke  of  Tuscany  Peter  Leopold.  These  records  help  explain  the  characters  of  the  Jewish  political  struggle  during  the  Tuscan  age  of  enlightened  reforms  (1765-­‐1790).  Even  more,  they  shed  light  on  some  of  the  specificities  of  the  Jewish  communitarian  attitude  toward  Christian  power.  In  this  paper  I  will  consider  Jewish  petitioners  as  political  actors  and  their  claims  as  essential  tools  for  legal  argument  and  negotiation,  aimed  at  the  abrogation  of  anti-­‐Jewish  discriminations.  The  communication  between  the  emissaries  of  the  “Jewish  Nation”  and  the  Grand-­‐ducal  authorities  summarizes  the  history  of  the  Jewish-­‐Christian  argument  in  its  religious,   juridical,  socio-­‐economic  and  political  aspects.  A  closer  approach  to  local  sources  calls   into  question  the  pertinence  of  those  historiographical  paradigms  implicitly  assuming  Jewish  inaction  or  political  ineptitude  along  the  early-­‐modern  age.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Early  Modern  History  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Ottoman  [World]  

 

Chair:  

 

Ruth  Lamdan,  Tel-­‐Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Jewish  Women  Turning  to  Muslim  Courts  (16th-­‐18th  Centuries)  

Abstract:  Resort  of  Jewish  subjects  to  Muslim  courts  in  the  Ottoman  Empire  was  far  more  prevalent  than  is  generally   believed.   The   practice   was   condemned   by   rabbis   and   community   leaders,   who   tried   –unsuccessfully   -­‐   to   curtail   its   prevalence   through   regulations.  Not   only  men  but   also  women   resorted   to  Muslim  courts  on  various  matters,  but  primarily   in  order   to  circumvent   the  strict  marital  and   inheritance  laws  laid  down  in  Jewish  halakha.  This  paper  will  review  the  main  actions  women  brought  before  qadis  in  various  Jewish  centers  in  the  Empire,  discuss  their  motives  and  society’s  reaction  to  this  phenomenon.  My  conclusion   is   that   despite   social   and   rabbinical   disapproval   women   were   not   totally   powerless,   and  frequently  found  sympathetic  ears  in  gentile  courts.  

 

Daria  Shapira  Vasyutinsky,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Moshe  b.  Yitzhak  Çelebi  Sinani:  a  18th  Century  Saray  Jew  

Abstract:  The  paper  presents  results  of  the  research  work  on  the  documents  from  First  Firkowicz  collection  of  manuscripts  and  is  based  on  unpublished  manuscripts.  Moshe  Çelebi  Sinani  (1665-­‐1726)  was  a  famous  head  of  the  Chufut-­‐Qaleh  Karaite  community  at  the  beginning  of  the  18th  century.  Chufut-­‐Qaleh  made  part  of   the  Crimean  Khanate  which   itself  was   a   vassal   of   the  Osman   Sultanate.  Moshe   acted   as   a  Hofjude  of  

Devlet   II  Giray  Khan  (the  Crimean  Khan  in  1699–1702  and  1709–1713)  and  even  accompanied  him  during  his  exile  to  Rhodes  in  1702.  A  balk  of  previously  unpublished  manuscripts  from  the  First  Firkowicz  collection  (F   946   op.   1   No   1064,   the   so-­‐called   Ravrebe   catalogue)   shed   light   on   this   outstanding   figure,   on   the  relations  between  the  Karaites  and  the  Ottomans  and  between  the  Karaite  and  the  Rabbanite  Jews  (in  the  Crimea  the  Rabbanite  community  was  subordinate  to  the  wealthier  and  more  numerous  Karaites).  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Early  Modern  History    

16.00-­‐18.00  

Religious  Contacts  between  Christian  and  Jews  

 

Chair:  

 

Lucia  Raspe,  Johann  Wolfgang  Goethe-­‐Universität  Frankfurt  am  Main,  Germany  

Title:  Between  Christians  and  Jews:  Yuzpa  Shammes  and  the  Antiquity  of  Jewish  Worms  

Abstract:  “Mayse  nissim”,  the  Yiddish  collection  of  some  twenty-­‐five  tales  relating  to  the  history  of  Jewish  Worms   that   was   put   together   by   the   community’s   sexton   in   the   mid-­‐seventeenth   century   and   printed  posthumously   in  Amsterdam   in  1696,  opens  with   two  complementary   tales   that   recount  how  the   Jewish  community  in  the  city  came  into  being.  According  to  the  first  narrative  in  the  collection,  the  Jews  of  Worms  refused  to  return  to  the  Holy  Land  when  Cyrus  put  an  end  to  the  Babylonian  Exile  because  they  considered  Worms  a  Jerusalem  of  their  own.  The  second  tale  then  fills  in  the  details  of  how  they  had  come  to  Worms  in  the  first  place  when  a  member  of  the  local  nobility,  who  had  taken  part  in  the  destruction  of  the  Temple,  brought   them   home  with   him   because   an   ancestor   stranded   in   Jerusalem  many   years   earlier   had   been  helped  by  a  Jew.  While  similar  narratives  of  the  pre-­‐Christian  origins  of  a  given  Jewish  community  appear  to  have   circulated   elsewhere,   testifying   more   often   than   not   to   the   attempt   of   local   Jews   to   avert   an  immenent   expulsion,   a   particularly   rich   array   of   sources   has   been   preserved   in   Worms.   Drawing   on   a  variety  of  Christian  parallels  to  Yuzpa’s  tales,  my  presentation  will  show  that  while  the  belief   in  the  great  antiquity   of   the   local   community   was   shared   by   Jews   and   non-­‐Jews   alike,   opinions   on   the   exact  circumstances  of  their  arrival  varied  greatly.  I  will  argue  that  Yuzpa’s  account,  often  taken  as  an  expression  of   a   somewhat  naïve   local  patriotism,   itself   reacts   to  a   far   less   flattering   variant;   in   fact,   it  may   reflect   a  dialogue   on   the   Jews’   place   within   the   late   medieval   German   city   that   can   tell   us   much   about   Jewish-­‐Christian  relations  at  the  time.  

 

Daniel  Dobos  Karoly,  Pazmany  Peter  Catholic  University  of  Hungary  

Title:   "De-­‐mythologizing   the   Religious   Other":   Yehuda   Aryeh   me-­‐Modena   on   the   Acceptability   of   Some  Christian  Dogmas  

Abstract:   Three   years   before   his   death,   in   1645,   the   great   Venetian   Rabbi,   Yehuda   Aryeh   (Leone)   me-­‐Modena   (1571–1648)   composed  a  polemical  work   against   the  basic   theological   principles   of   Christianity,  entitled   Magen   wa-­‐Hereb   (Shield   and   sword).   The   book   belongs   to   a   long-­‐established   genre   of   Jewish  literature,  however,   it   is  a  very  special   representative  of   the   literary  genre.  To   illustrate,   first,  our  author  tried  to  liberate  Jesus  from  the  legendary  materials,  which  emerged  around  his  person  in  the  Talmud  and  the  midrashim,  by  portraying  the  founder  of  the  new  religion  as  a  positive  character  of  the  past,  differing  from  the  Pharisees  of  the  Second  Temple  period  only  in  minor  questions.  Second,  delving  into  his  analysis  of  different  Christian  dogmas,  in  two  chapters  of  his  book  our  author  attempted  to  make  the  dogma  under  attack   comprehensible   for   his   Jewish   readers.   Speaking   on   the   original   sin   and   on   the   Trinity,   he  endeavored   to   find   an   understanding   of   the   concepts,   which   seemed   to   be   acceptable   from   a   Jewish  perspective,  too.  A  really  strange  thing  to  find  in  a  polemical  writing!  In  the  following  lecture  I  would  like  to  demonstrate  how  Modena's  understanding  of  Christian  theological  principles  was  shaped,  on  the  one  hand,  by   his   native   Jewish   tradition,   and,   on   the   other   hand,   by   the   influence   of   his   Christian   environment.   In  addition   an   attempt   is   made   to   answer   the   most   important   question:   what   kind   of   motivation   can   be  detected  behind  his  really  unusual  attitude?  

 

Emmanuel  Bloch,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Rabbi  David  Tsvi  Hoffmann's  Response  to  a  19th  Century  New  Form  of  Anti-­‐Semitism  

Abstract:  In  19th  century  Germany,  the  Emancipation  did  not  only  change  the  status  of  the  Jews,  but  it  also  marked  the  beginning  of  profound  transformations  in  the  modes  of  expression  of  anti-­‐Semitic  sentiments  toward   them.  Old   preconceptions  were  dressed   in   a   new,   pseudo-­‐scientific   garb,   and  were   expressed   in  congruence  with   the   rationalistic   spirit  of   the   times  –   the  ontological  divide  between   Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  was  thus  explained  as  a  result  of  a  different  biology,  or  as  the  expression  of  different  racial  characteristics.  The   same   phenomenon   manifested   itself   in   yet   another   way:   a   number   of   German   orientalists   gave  expression  to  their  anti-­‐Jewish  feelings  by  studying  the  classical  halakhic  Codes,  with  the  express  intention  of  showing  that  the  Jewish  Law  had  largely  adopted  very  discriminatory  positions,  favoring  in  multiple  ways  Jews  over  non-­‐Jews.  This  argument  was  presented  as  a  serious  impediment  to  the  integration  of  Jews  into  German  society  at  large.  This  paper  will  address  how  Rabbi  David  Tsvi  Hoffmann  (1843  –  1921),  German’s  uncontested  halakhic  authority  at  the  time  and  Head  of  the  Berlin  Rabbinical  Seminary,  tackled  this  issue  in  his  book  “Der  Schulchan-­‐Aruch  und  die  Rabbinen  über  das  Verhältniss  der  Juden  zu  Andersgläubigen”  [the  Shulchan-­‐Arukh   and   the   Rabbis   on   the   Relationship   of   Jews   to   other   Faiths].   Hoffmann’s   presentation   is  apologetic   in  essence  but   is  marked  by  several  unique   features.  His  public   stance  will  be  contrasted  with  the  very  different  overtones  discernible  in  his  more  private  writings  in  Hebrew,  as  well  as  with  the  differing  tactics  used  by  his  successor  at  the  Seminary,  Rabbi  Yehiel  Yaakov  Weinberg  (1884-­‐1966).  

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  07  

 

Session:  001:  

Middle  Ages  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Documentary  Sources  on  Jewish-­‐Christian  Interaction  from  Western  and  Central  Europe  

Organizer:  Birgit  Wiedl  

Chair:  Birgit  Wiedl  

 

Eveline  Brugger,  Institute  for  Jewish  History  in  Austria  

Title:  "Sealed  with  our  Jewish  signature"  -­‐  Jewish-­‐Christian  interaction  in  Austrian  business  charters  

Abstract:  Business  charters  are  among  the  most   important  sources  on  Jewish-­‐Christian   interaction   in   late  medieval  Austria  –  both  because  a  great  number  of   them  has  been  preserved,  and  because  they  cover  a  wide   variety   of   economic,   social   and   legal   contacts   between   Jews   and   Christians   that   range   from   close  cooperation   to   grave   conflict.   This   paper   will   analyse   these   contacts   as   they   present   themselves   in   the  charters,   and   the   way   in   which   the   legal   and   cultural   needs   of   both   sides   influenced   the   formal  development  of  Jewish-­‐Christian  business  documents.  

 

Jörn  R.  Christophersen,  Arye  Maimon-­‐Institut,  Universität  Trier,  Germany  

Title:  Municipal  Records  in  Late  Medieval  Germany.  Cartularies  and  "Serial  Sources"  as  a  Means  of  Tracking  the  Jews  in  Middle  European  Urban  Contexts.  

Abstract:  The  paper  examines  the  particular  importance  of  cartularies  and  “serial  sources”  for  research  on  the  history  of  the  Jews  in  northern  and  north-­‐eastern  territories  of  the  Holy  Roman  Empire.  The  paper  will  focus  on  both  the  unusual  features  of  the  tradition  and  the  level  of  Jewish  involvement  in  the  creation  of  known  sources.  Analysing  these  possibilities  of  the  participation  of  Jews  in  the  production  or  motivation  of  non-­‐Hebrew  written   evidences   in   the   urban   context   can   only   be   successful   when  we   take   into   account  Jewish-­‐Christian   relations   and   the   Jews’   relations   to   Christian   administration.   The   phenomena   to   be  examined   are   therefore   closely   connected   with   1)   the   promotion   of   writing   by   religious   institutions,  particularly   the   clergy’s  exercising  of   secular   rule  and  2)   the  ways  Christian  municipalities  managed   their  own  self-­‐administration  according  to  or  contrary  to  the  claim  to  power  by  princes  or  noblemen.  Beyond  the  conurbation  of  Jewish  settlement  on  the  Rhine  and  Main  rivers  or  in  southern  Germany,  Jews  lived  in  the  towns   of   different   territories   and   left   traces   in   the  municipal   documentation.   Because   of   a   rather  weak  documentation  in  the  area  under  investigation  we  have  to  use  much  more  than  charters  only.  An  essential  feature  of   the  analysis  of  northern  Ashkenas   is   the   integration  of   serial   sources   containing   references   to  Jews.  This  rather  diverse  type  of  documentation  includes  –  e.g.  –  account  books,  council  and  guild  meeting  minutes,  citizen  rolls,  tax  rolls,  and  court  registers.  In  the  latest  research,  working  with  these  sources  led  to  numerous  new  insights   into  Jewish  everyday   life  and  the  basic  conditions  of  Jewish   life  within  a  Christian  environment.  Using  examples  from  the  eastern  parts  of  the  Holy  Roman  Empire  and  –  though  it  will  also  be  necessary   at   times   –   drawing   on   comparative  material   from  other   regions,   the   presentation   is   aimed   at  

figuring  out  the  Jews  having  a  specific  stake  in  causing  the  production  of  written  source  material  in  urban  provenances.  

 

Birgit  Wiedl,  Institute  for  Jewish  History  in  Austria  

Title:   Finding   Jews   in   Unexpected   Places:   Rent-­‐rolls,   Land   Registers,   and   Account   Books   from   Southern  Germany  

Abstract:  My  paper  will  examine  the  appearance  of  Jews  in  serial  sources  such  as  rent-­‐rolls,  account  books  and  land  registers  from  late  medieval  Southern  Germany.  Although  predominantly  economic  sources,  these  source   types   nevertheless   shed   light   on  many   different   aspects   of   Jewish-­‐Christian   everyday   interaction,  allowing   not   only   to   trace   Jewish-­‐Christian   cooperation   but   also   Jewish   landownership   as  well   as   Jewish  involvement  in  administrative  procedures.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Middle  Ages  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Documentary  Sources  on  Jewish-­‐Christian  Interaction  from  Western  and  Central  Europe  2  

Organizer:  Birgit  Wiedl  

 

Chair:  

 

Juliette  Sibon,  Centre  Universitaire  d'Albi,  France  

Title:  Legal  Rule  vs  Practice?  Reflections  on  the  Presentation  of  the  14th-­‐Century  Provençal  Jews'  Sources  

Abstract:  Jews  of  Provence's  sources  during  the  Late  Middle  Ages  are  rich  and  diverse.  This  communication  aims   at   presenting   the   nature   of   the   Latin   documents   through   the   14th-­‐Century  Marseilles'   example,   in  order  to  compare  them  with  the  documents  concerning  other  contemporary  spaces.  

 

Claire  Soussen,  Université  de  Cergy-­‐Pontoise,  France  

Title:   Religious   and   Legal   Frames   of   Jewish-­‐Christian   Economic   Relationship   in   the   Medieval   Crown   of  Aragon.  

Abstract:   The   paper   will   examine   the   relationships   between   Jews   and   Christians   through   the   normative  frames  of  Jewish  and  Christian  authorities.  The  documentation  in  Latin  and  in  Hebrew  will  provide  elements  to  understand  the  nature  and  quality  of  the  links  between  them.  Exegetical  and  theological  texts,  rabbinical  responsa,  will  be  examined.  

 

Judith  Olszowy-­‐Schlanger,  EPHE,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Hebrew  Documents  from  England  and  their  Role  as  a  Source  for  Neighbourly  Contacts  between  Jews  and  Christians  

Abstract:  The  corpus  of  over  250  Hebrew  and  Hebrew-­‐Latin  legal  and  administrative  documents  written  in  England  before  the  expulsion  in  1290  contains  a  wealth  of  information  about  neighbourly  contacts.  Deeds  of  conveyance  and  other  documents  concerning  real  estate  issues  are  particularly  informative  about  spacial  distribution   in   particular   quarters   of   English   medieval   towns   and   about   the   structure   and   relationships  within  neighbourhoods.  Some  examples  of  such  relationships  will  be  studied  in  this  paper.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Credit  and  usury.  Jews  and  Christians  against  incertitude  

Organizers:  Javier  Castaño  and  Claude  Denjean  

 

Chair:  Javier  Castaño  

 

Javier  Castaño,  CSIC,  Spain  

Title:  Translating  Hebrew  Documents  in  a  Litigation  Culture  (Late  Medieval  Iberia)  

Abstract:   This   paper   will   explore   the   practices   of   translating   Jewish   documents   from   Hebrew   into  vernacular   in   late  Medieval   Iberia   in   relation   to   court   procedures,   as  well   as   the   notarial   legalization   of  these   documents.   The   main   purpose   is   to   shift   the   focus   from   the   analysis   of   formal   documentary  typologies  to  the  uses  of  these  documents  and  the  practice  at  court,  showing  the  interaction  between  Jews  and   Christian   institutions.   Attention   will   be   devoted   to   instances   where   differences   can   be   observed  between  the  original  document  (in  the  cases  when  these  were  preserved)  and  its  translation.  Preference  is  given  to  Aragonese  and  Castilian  15th  century  examples  (one  of  the  results  of  the  project  Ginze  Sefarad).  Several  explanations  will  be  provided  concerning  the   increasing  practice  of  translating  documents  related  to   intergenerational   transmission   of   properties,   sometimes   attesting   to   the   existence   of   multirreligious  familial  structures  and  the  presence  of  converts.  On  the  other  hand,  this  analysis  may  be  instrumental  for  exploring  the  evolving  notarial  practices  shared  by  Jews  and  Christians  in  the  urban  context,  that  have  been  the  subject  of  study  with  varying  scope  and  fortune.  

 

Asunción  Blasco,  Universidad  de  Zaragoza,  Spain  

Title:  The  Long  Road  from  the  Scribe  to  the  Notary  among  Jews  in  the  Kingdom  of  Aragon  

Abstract:   I  have  been  studying   the   figure  of   the   scribe/notary,  among  Christians  and   Jews,   for  which   the  documentary  evidence  is  neither  clear  nor  abundant.  Early  results  of  my  research  were  published  in  1993  

(EAJS  Troyes  Congress).  Since  then,  I  have  continued  collecting  additional  information,  both  taken  from  the  Chancery  registers  of  the  Archives  of  the  Crown  of  Aragon,  in  Barcelona,  as  well  as  from  Aragonese  notarial  records.  Now,  time  has  arrived  to  clarify  some  aspects,  such  as  the  process  of  transformation  experienced  by   some   Jewish   communities   in   Aragon   (the   most   important   and   populated)   along   the   14th   and   15th  centuries,   concerning   the   system   of   writing   juridical   acts   made   by,   and   among   Jews.   This   is   a   process  similar,  though  on  a  lesser  scale,  to  that  experienced  by  Christians.  In  an  early  period,  there  were  scribes  of  territorial   character,   appointed  by   the  King,   lord  or   Jewish   community.   The  beneficiary   could  pursue   the  office   himself   or   through   a   surrogate.   They  were  mere   scribes.   Some   have   been   identified   and   it   is   still  difficult   to   determine   when   they   started.   From   the   late   14th   century,   documents   start   mentioning  “notaries”  appointed  by   the  king,   that  draw  up  Hebrew  documents  according   to   the   Jewish  calendar   (up  until  now,  we  only  knew  two,  1391  and  1424).  From  now  on,  these  Jewish  “notaries”  are  qualified  by  the  king  to  draw  up  wills,  sentences,  attestations,  minutes,  and  all  kind  of  documents  carried  out  among  Jews  (“quorumcumque   contractum   fuerint   per   et   inter   judeos   dicte   aliame   fienda   et   quavis   alias   scripturas  autenticas   et   pubicas   easque   scribere   seu   scribi   facere   per   substitutum   aut   substitutos   a   te   juratos   de  quibusquidem  prothocollum  sive  capibrevia  factas  ut  eterne  memorie  comendentur,”  as  attested  by  a  1424  document).  According  to  the  auctoritas  conferred  by  the  king,  the  documents  drawn  out  by  them,  will  serve  as   legal   evidence   “in   judicio   et   extra   inter   nostros   judices   fides   plenaria   adhibeatur   et   omnimodam  obtineant  roboris   firmitatem  tanquam  publica  manu  facta  dum  tamen  subsriptionem  tuam  apposueriis   in  eisdem.”   The   figure   becomes   professionalized,   and   the,   until   then,   scribe,   becomes   a   notary.   The  appointment   of   the   new   notary   was   done   by   the   royal   (or   seigniorial)   chancery   through   a   document  including  several  clauses.  The  adoption  of  the  notarial  practice  by  Aragonese  Jews,  though  less   important  than  among  Christians,  becomes  an  important  feature  in  the  development  of  Aragonese  Jewry.  

 

Claude  Denjean,  Université  de  Toulouse-­‐le  Mirail,  France  

Title:  Propter  incertitudo.  Jews  and  Christians  on  Medieval  Markets.  

Abstract:  Ce  travail  s’appuie  sur  l’étude  des  pratiques  scripturaires  de  gestion  et  de  légalisation  des  juifs  et  des   chrétiens   catalans,   majorquins   et   aragonais   aux   XIIIe   et   XIVe   siècles   jointe   à   l’analyse   des   sources  judiciaires.   Il   s’agit  de  s’interroger  sur   la  manière  d’aborder   l’incertitude  sur   les  marchés  par   les  hommes  d’affaires,  à  l’époque  où  la  notion  de  bon  citoyen  bon  chrétien  ou  bon  juif  se  construit.  Dans  cette  société  du  tout  à  crédit,  juifs  et  chrétiens  sont  liés  par  la  fides,  voire  par  l’amicitia.  Ils  s’associent  ou  se  trainent  en  justice.   Cette   convergence   ne   présume   pas   d’influences   religieuses   destructrices   pour   la   communauté  minoritaire,  au  contraire.  Les  contextes  légaux  et  familiaux  restent  parfaitement  distincts  entre  prêteurs  et  courtiers   de   religions   différentes   ;   ils   dessinent   un   système   d’influences   et   de   choix   qui   renforcent   les  communautés,  au  sein  d’une  société  où  l‘échange  marchand  tend  à  l’uniformisation  et  la  globalisation  des  valeurs.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

  16.00-­‐18.00    

Panel:  Credit  and  usury.  Jews  and  Christians  against  incertitude  2  

Organizers:  Javier  Castaño  and  Claude  Denjean  

 

Chair:  

 

Juan  Vicente  Garcia  Marsilla,  Université  de  Valencia,  Spain  

Title:  The  Movement  of  Capital  and  Goods  between  Jews  and  Christians  in  Late  Medieval  Valencia  

Abstract:  Although  many  publications  have  already  shown  the   importance  of  medieval  credit   in  Valencia,  the   large   number   of   unstudied   notary,   legal   and   accounting   records   helps   to   provide   new   light   to   the  subject  of  the  second  hand  market,  implying  Jewish,  and  after  Convert,  brokers  working  by  Christians.  The  role  of  these  market  brokers  is  essential  in  the  fixation  of  prices  and  in  the  establishment  of  confidence.  We  can  see  the  specialization  for  the  members  of  two  religions,  but  also  a  complex  relationship  between  them,  that   break   the   traditional   image   of   the  wandering   Jewish.   Specially,   the   valencian   case   let   to   propose   a  synthesis  on  the  scale  of  a  major  international  port,  including  its  agrarian  hinterland,  where  the  Jewish  play  an  important  role  within  the  merchant  class,  as  pawnbrokers  or  commercial  agents.  

 

David  Carvajal,  University  of  Valladolid,  Spain  

Title:  Agreements  and  Conflicts:  Credit  Relations  between  Jews  and  Christians  (Castile,  ca.  1492).  

Abstract:   During   the   last   50   years   before   the   expulsion   in   1492,   Jews   and   Christians   strengthened   their  economic   and   financial   relations.   Despite   important   problems   –the   riots   in   1449,   for   example–,   the  coexistence   and   the   cooperation   between   both   communities   was   intense   until   the   Catholic   Kings  resolution.  Traditional  works  about  Castilian   Jews  have   shown  a  well-­‐known   role,   their  business  on   royal  taxation.   However,   the  most   recent   studies   from   civil   lawsuits,   notary   registries   and   other   sources   have  opened  new  perspectives   and   fields   of   study   such   as   the   analysis   of   the   social   and   economic   ties  which  arose  from  credit  relations.  The  aim  of  this  paper  is  to  study  the  importance  of  credit  relations  -­‐understood  as  an  agreement  between   Jews  and  Christians,  which  made  possible   their   integration   in  networks  and   in  the   village   economy,   the   conflicts   and   trials   about   arrears   and   the   consequences   of   the   expulsion   in  Castilian  urban  and  country  markets.  

 

Ricardo  Muñoz  Solla,  Salamanca  University,  Spain  

Title:  On  a  new  Castilian  Ketubbah  from  XVth.  Century  Spain:  Texts  and  Contexts  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  present  the  results  of  a  research  regarding  a  marriage  contract  or  ketubbah  from  the   Castilian   village   of   Valencia   de   don   Juan   (León)   conserved   in   the   Manuscripts   Section   of   the   Real  Chancillería  of  Valladolid  Archive.  It  will  analyze  the  key  features  of  the  text  and  its  social  context  where  it  has  been  produced.  

 

María  Gloria  de  Antonio  Rubio,  CSIC,  Spain  

Title:   Notarial   Documentation   as   a   Source   of   Knowledge   about   Judaeo-­‐Christian   Relationships:   Loans   in  Medieval  Galicia  

Abstract:  Galicia  is  one  of  the  autonomous  community  that  form  the  current  map  of  Spain.  Located  in  the  Northwest  of   the  country,   throughout   the  Middle  Ages   it  has  counted  with   the  presence  of   small   Jewish  communities,   from   which   very   few   documents   have   been   kept,   most   of   them   from   the   15th   century.  Among  these  documents,  the  most  numerous  are  the  ones  that  are  related  to  economic  issues,  especially  the   ones   that   are   about   loans.   All   loan   contracts,   except   the   ones   made   by   people   with   a   familiar   or  friendship  relationship,  are  commercial  in  nature,  that  is,  they  pursue  some  profit  for  the  loaner  on  account  of  the  risk  he  takes  by  giving  certain  amount  of  money.  Such  activity  between  co-­‐religionists  was  forbidden  by   either   the   Jewish   or   Christian   culture.   However,   in   adverse   circumstances,   both   of   them   resorted   to  loans,  therefore,  loans  became  a  meeting  point  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews.  In  Galicia,  loan  documents  are  mainly   kept   in   notaries   ´notebooks,   so,   as   a   consequence   the   aim   of   this   paper   is   the   analysis   of   those  books  in  order  to  know  the  type  of  loan  contracts  made  between  Jews  and  Christians  and  the  way  to  elude  the  prohibition  of  charging  interests  (including  the  profits  in  the  amount  of  money  lent  that  is  agreed  to  be  given  back  by  the  borrower,  or  giving  back  the  money  lent  with  some  property  or  the  value  of  that  property  in  the  financial  market  but  not  the  money)-­‐  from  the  Galician  notarial  documentation  of  late  Middle  Ages.  

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  08  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Borrowing  from  One’s  Opponent:    

Transmission  and  Appropriation  of  Polemical  Motifs  in  Medieval  Judaism,  Christianity  and  Islam  

Organizer:  Pavel  Sládek:    

 

Chair:  Dita  Valova  Rukriglová  

 

Daniel  Boušek,  Charles  University  in  Prague,  Czech  Republic  

Title:  The  Transfer  of  Muslim  anti-­‐Talmudism  to  Christian  Polemic  against  Judaism  

Abstract:   The   paper   focuses   on   the   problem   of   transmission   of   polemical   motifs   from   Karaite   polemic  against  Rabbanite  writings   to  Muslim  and  subsequently  Christian  polemic  against   Judaism,  Hebrew  Bible,  and  rabbinical  literature.  Muslim  Ibn  Hazm  of  Andalusia  (d.  1064)  in  his  polemic  against  Judaism  draws  from  Karaite   polemic   against   rabbinical   literature   and   especially   Shiur   Qomah   in   order   to   expose  anthropomorphic   notions   of   Judaism.   He   is   the   first   Muslim   polemicist   who   in   this   context   mentions  Talmud,   Mishnah,   or   Shiur   Qomah.   The   same   polemical   motifs   occur   subsequently   in   Petrus   Alphonsi  Dialogue  against  the  Jews.  The  paper  suggests  the  possibility  of  transfer  of  Muslim  anti-­‐Talmudic  rhetoric  to  Christian  polemic  against  Judaism  in  the  12th  century  Spain.  

 

Daniel  Soukup,  Institute  of  Czech  Literature  AS  CR,  Czech  Republic  

Title:  Host  Desecration   Legends   in  Czech  Medieval   Literature   -­‐  Violence  against   Judaism,  Polemic  against  Hussitism  

Abstract:   The  paper   focuses  on   the  group  of  medieval   texts   related   to   the  cases  of   the  Host  desecration  accusation  in  the  Czech  lands  and  surrounding  regions.  In  the  15th  century  the  narrative  of  Jews  torturing  Eucharist  functioned  on  the  one  hand  as  a  traditional  tool  of  the  legitimization  of  anti-­‐Jewish  persecutions,  and  on  the  other  hand  as  a  widely  comprehensible  theological  abbreviation  defining  the  Catholic  doctrine  against  Hussitism  and  heresy   in   general.  Although   the   Jewish  elements  of   these  profanation   legends   are  largely  topical  and  hagiographic,  the  essence  of  these  stories  is  based  on  the  real  events  of  the  anti-­‐Jewish  violence.  The  bleeding  Host  itself  served  as  a  symbol  of  the  Catholic  attitude  to  the  theological  definition  of  Eucharist,  and  controversy  with  the  Hussite  movement.  

 

Milan  Žonca,  University  of  London,  UK  

Title:  The  Discourses  of  Heresy  in  Yom  Tov  Lipman  Mühlhausen’s  Sefer  nizahon  

Abstract:  Yom  Tov  Lipman  Mühlhausen  (d.  1421)  was  one  of  the  most  important  Ashkenazic  scholars  of  the  late  Middle  Ages.  His  works  show  remarkable  openness  to  new  intellectual  trends  flowing  to  Ashkenaz  –  he  was   influenced  by  the  philosophical  writings  of  Maimonides  as  well  as  by  Sephardic  Kabbalah  –  but  he   is  best   remembered  as  a  polemist   and  apologist.  His  highly  popular   Sefer  Nizahon,  probably  written  at   the  beginning   of   the   fifteenth   century   in   Prague,   is   directed   not   only   against   Christians,   but   also   against  different  other  groups  of  dissenters.  Lipman’s  emphasis  on  the  rationalistic  dimension  of  the  Jewish  faith  and   his   attempt   to   re-­‐fashion   the   intellectual   image   of   the   Jewish   community   is   unique   in   Ashkenazic  context.   In   this   paper   I   explore   the   reception   of   Christian   discourses   of   heresy,   especially   anti-­‐Hussite  polemic,   and   inquisitorial   practices   in   Lipman’s   work.   I   suggest   that   Lipman   articulated   the   need   for   a  rational   reappraisal   of   Jewish   tradition   in   a   manner   that   was   shaped   by   contemporary   Christian  preoccupation  with   the   influence  of   theological   ideas   among   the   laity   and  with  orthodox   and  heterodox  identities.  He  also  responded  to  the  challenges  posed  by  the  cases  of  Jewish  conversion  to  Christianity  and  associated   the   liminal  position  of   the   converts   in   Jewish  and  Christian   societies  with  Christian  notions  of  heresy.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Jewish  Languages  Literature  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Modern  Yiddish  Literature  I  

 

Chair:  

 

Adi  Mahalel,  Columbia  University  \  University  of  Maryland  College  Park,  USA  

Title:  Heine's  Political  Influence  on  I.L.  Peretz  

Abstract:  According  to  his  own  account,  the  Yiddish  and  Hebrew  writer  I.  L.  Peretz  (1851-­‐1915)  was  deeply  influenced   by   the   work   of   the   German   poet   of   Jewish   descent,   Heinrich   Heine   (1797-­‐1856).   The   great  influence   of   Heine   on   Peretz's   poetry   is   widely   acknowledged,   especially   the   influence   of   Heine's   love  poetry.   In   fact   it   was   Peretz's   collection   of   Hebrew   poetry   "The   Organ"   that   sparked   the   debate   in   the  second  half  of  the  1890's  over  Heine's  place  in  Hebrew  literature.  But  Heine's  influence  on  Peretz  extended  beyond   his   poetry   to   include   his   views   on   Marx   and   the   socialist   movement,   and   his   writings   in   edgy  feuilletons.  Heine's  political   influence  on  Peretz   is  not  often  discussed.  This  omission   is   strange  given   the  fact  that  both  authors  were  deeply  involved  in  the  social-­‐political  currents  and  issues  of  their  time.  Heine  knew  the  young  Marx  personally  when  they  were  both   in  Paris,  and  was  exposed  directly   to  his  evolving  mindset.  Peretz  became  deeply   involved  with   Jewish   labor   circles   including   the  nascent  Bund  movement  during   the   1890's.   Heine   extensively   discussed   various   socialist   platforms   and   thinkers   in   his   journalistic  writings.   He   was   a   cultural   hero   not   only   to   Peretz,   but   also   to   many   Europeans   of   Jewish   descent,  particularly  as  more  and  more  Jews  joined  the  ranks  of  the  European  middle  and  upper-­‐classes.  My  paper  will  discuss  Heine's  influence  on  Peretz,  emphasizing  the  often  neglected  political  aspects  of  its  significance.  

 

Laetitia  Tordjman,  Sorbonne  Nouvelle  -­‐  Paris  III,  France  

Title:  L'avant-­‐garde  yiddish,  une  littérature  transnationale  et  transculturelle  :  l'exemple  d'Oser  Warszawski  

Abstract:   Penser   l'avant-­‐garde   littéraire   yiddish   en   termes   d'échanges,   de   transferts   et   d'appropriations  permet  de   sortir   des  oppositions   traditionnelles   entre   centre  et  périphérie  ou  modernité  et   tradition.   La  critique  récente  sur  les  avant-­‐gardes  [David  Cottington,  Benedikt  Hjartarson,  Harri  Veivo,  Lidia  Gluchowska]  s'est  justement  attachée  à  questionner  ces  cadres,  et  la  littérature  yiddish  d'avant-­‐garde  tend  à  constituer  une   des   figures   paradigmatiques   pour   envisager   ces   nouvelles   perspectives   de   recherche.   L'expérience  diasporique   est   au   fondement   des   expérimentations   littéraires   d'un   grand   nombre   d'écrivains   yiddish  d'avant-­‐garde.  Chez  Oser  Warszawski  et  Lamed  Shapiro  par  exemple,  les  contacts  culturels  et  linguistiques  ont  amené  à  l'élaboration  d'œuvres  éminemment  hétérolingues,  qu'il  soit  fait  un  usage  important  de  mots  et  d'expressions  en  anglais  dans  Der  amerikaner  shed  (Le  Démon  américain)  de  Shapiro  ou  en  polonais  et  en   russe   dans   Shmuglers   (Les   Contrebandiers)   de   Warszawski.   Ces   constructions   de   langues   littéraires  singulières  mettent  en  question  le  statut  à  accorder  au  yiddish,  à  la  fois  mame-­‐loshn  et  langue  subversive,  transgressive  –  tout  autant  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  des  langues  dominantes  que  du  yiddish  lui-­‐même,  (re)devenu  hybride  et   syncrétique,   porteur   des   traits   définitoires   du   langage   de   la   modernité.  Mais   envisager   l'avant-­‐garde  yiddish  dans  ses  contacts  interculturels  contribue  également  à  inscrire  ce  mouvement  dans  le  champ  plus  vaste  de  la  littérature  non  seulement  européenne,  mais  aussi  mondiale.  L'enjeu  n'est  plus  de  se  situer  entre  un   centre   et   une   périphérie,   mais   plutôt   de   repenser   (en   s'inspirant   notamment   des   essais   d'Edouard  Glissant)   la  notion  de  «   local  »  comme  une  ouverture  dynamique  au  «  nous  »,  et  partant  à   l'universalité.  Ainsi,  les  revues  comme  Khaliastra  pour  Warszawski  ou  Studio  pour  Shapiro,  participent  à  l'invention  de  ce  que   Benedict   Anderson   appelle   une   «   communauté   imaginée   »,   en   l'occurrence   la   construction   d'une  identité  collective  plurielle  dans  un  réseau  transnational.   Il  devient  alors  possible  de  penser   l'avant-­‐garde  yiddish  comme  un  mouvement  plus  global  qui  inclurait  les  autres  avant-­‐gardes  diasporiques,  et  notamment  celles  de  la  diaspora  africaine.  

 

Ephraim  Sicher,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Babel's  Cultural  Identity  

Abstract:   Isaak  Babel  (1894-­‐1940),  the  well-­‐known  Soviet  Jewish  writer,  wrote   in  Russian,  but  his  prose   is  thick   with   Yiddish   linguistic   interference   and   intertextual   references   to   Jewish   texts,   including   Haim  Nahman  Bialik.  This  paper  discusses  the  case  of  a  write  who  grew  up  in  Jewish  Odessa  and  spoke  Yiddish,  but,  like  many  Russian  Jews  of  his  generation,  acculturated  naturally  to  a  Russian  literary  and  social  milieu  before   the   Revolution   and  was   accepted   into   Soviet   literature   of   the   twenties.   Is   he   to   be   considered   a  Jewish,  Russian,  or  Russian  Jewish  writer?  

 

Judith  Lindenberg,  EHESS,  Paris,  France  

Titre:  Du  témoignage  yiddish  au  «  témoignage  de  la  Shoah  »  :  deux  cas  de  transfert  au  milieu  des  années  cinquante.    

Yiddish  and  non-­‐Yiddish  Testimony  in  the  Aftermath  of  the  “Hurbn”  

Abstract:  En  1946,  Marc  Turkow   fonde  à  Buenos  Aires   la   collection  d’ouvrages  en  yiddish   intitulée  «  Dos  poylishe   yidntum   »,   qui   fut   publiée   de   1946   à   1966   et   comprend   175   volumes.   La   collection,   qui   fut  inaugurée   au   lendemain   de   la   Seconde   guerre   mondiale,   contient   une   grande   variété   d’écrits   qui  témoignent   de   l’Histoire   de   la   judéité   polonaise   avant   et   pendant   la   Catastrophe.   Jusqu’à   1950,   le   «  document   sur   le   khurbn   »   (du   nom   yiddish   de   la   Catastrophe)   domine   et   inclut   parmi   les   premiers  

témoignages   sur   le   génocide,   pour   quasiment   disparaître   par   la   suite.   Alors   que   le   procès   Eichmann  marque,  en  1961,  l’avènement  du  témoin  sur  la  scène  publique  occidentale,  la  collection  de  Marc  Turkow  collecte  des  témoignages  dans  l’immédiat  après-­‐guerre,  dans  lesquels  le  témoin  qui  raconte  est  distinct  de  celui  qui  recueille,  écrit  et  édite   le  témoignage.  Ainsi,   la  forme  de  ces  premiers  «  documents  »  modifie   la  notion  de  témoignage  telle  qu’on  l’entend  aujourd’hui.  La  collection  contient  en  outre  deux  écrits,  publiés  quelques   années   plus   tard   (et   constituant   en   cela   une   exception   dans   son   évolution   générique   et  thématique),  qui  deviendront  des  écrits  fondateurs  de  la  «  littérature  de  la  Shoah  »  :  La  maison  de  poupées  de  Katzetnik  (1955)  et  la  première  version  de  La  Nuit  d’Élie  Wiesel  (1956).  Dans  les  deux  cas,  à  travers  des  différences  dans  l’écriture  et  dans  les  stratégies  éditoriales,  les  versions  yiddish  et  non  yiddish  de  ces  écrits  (respectivement  en  hébreu  pour  La  maison  de  poupées  et  en  français  pour  La  Nuit)  offrent  des  visions  très  éloignées  de  l’expérience  du  témoin.  En  comparant  les  réceptions  de  ces  ouvrages  dans  les  mondes  juifs  et  non-­‐juifs,   je   vais   tenter   d’expliquer   le   décalage   entre   ces   différentes   versions.   Ces   deux   œuvres   sont  devenus,  dans  le  monde  non-­‐juif,  chacune  à  leur  manière,  les  modèles  d’un  nouveau  genre  de  littérature.  Quels  modèles  de  «  témoignages  de  la  Shoah  »  offrent-­‐ils  et  à  quels  types  d’écrits  vont-­‐ils  ouvrir  la  voie  ?  Je  voudrais  montrer,  en   inscrivant  ces  écrits  dans   leur  contexte  d’origine,  de  quel  contexte  historique  et  de  quelles   traditions   d’écriture   ils   proviennent.   Ces   premiers   écrits,   qui   ont   été   gommées   par   la   suite,  permettent  de  remonter  aux  sources  des  «   témoignages  de   la  Shoah  »  et  d’en  restituer   la  généalogie.   In  1946,  Mark  Turkov  founded  in  Buenos  Aires  the  Yiddish  book  series  Dos  poylishe  yidntum  which  spanned  more   than   two   decades   and   comprised   one   hundred   and   seventy-­‐five   volumes.   Thus   initiated   in   the  immediate   postwar   period,   this   collection   drew   on   a   variety   of   genres   to   bear  witness   to   the   history   of  Polish  Jewry  both  before  and  during  the  Holocaust.  Until  1950,  the  “documents  on  the  Hurbn”  prevail  and  include   some   of   the   first   testimonies   of   the   Holocaust.   While   the   Eichmann   Trial   in   1961   supposedly  marked  the  advent  of  the  witness,  Mark  Turkov’s  book  series  sought  to  collect  eyewitness  accounts  in  the  immediate  postwar  period—a  singular  endeavor  perfectly  embodied  in  the  first  volume  of  the  series,  which  is  a  Holocaust  testimony  by  a  woman  survivor.  Yet,  beyond  providing  a  window  into  some  of  the  earliest  representations   of   the  Holocaust,   the   form  of   these   “documents   on   the  Hurbn”   alter   the   very   notion  of  testimony  as  we  understand  it  today.  The  series  also  contains  two  texts,  published  a  few  years  later,  which  became  founding  texts  of  the  literature  of  the  holocaust:  Katzetnik’s  Yiddish  version  of  The  house  of  dolls  (1955)   and   Elie   Wiesel’s   first   version   of   The   Night   (1956)   were   published   in   this   series.   In   both   cases,  through  differences  in  the  writing  itself,  and  through  different  editorial  strategies,  the  Yiddish  and  the  non-­‐Yiddish   versions   give   a   very   different   image   of   the   witness   experience.   By   comparing   the   respective  receptions  of  these  books  in  the  Jewish  and  the  non-­‐Jewish  world,  I  will  try  to  see  what  happened,  and,  in  both  cases,  explain  the  gap  between  the  Yiddish  and  non  Yiddish  versions.  These  two  texts  became,  in  the  non-­‐Jewish  World,  models   of   a   new   kind   of   literature.  What  model   does   each   book   offer   for   Holocaust  testimony,  and  which  were  the  respective  genres  which  followed  them  ?  I  will  show,  in  putting  these  works  in  their  original  context,  in  which  historical  context  and  in  which  tradition  of  writing  they  emerged.  This  first  situation,  later  forgotten,  allows  us  to  go  back  to  the  beginning  of  the  writing  of  Holocaust  testimonies,  and  to  restore  their  genealogy.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Jewish  Languages  Literature  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Modern  Yiddish  Literature  II  

 

Chair:  

 

Saul  Zaritt,  The  Jewish  Theological  Seminary,  USA  

Title:  Sholem  Asch’s  Universal  Tzaddik:  Jewish  Writing,  World  Literature  and  World  Redemption  

Abstract:  By  1933,   the  Yiddish  writer  Sholem  Asch  was  truly  an   international  celebrity.  Beyond  success   in  the   circumscribed  world  of   Yiddish   literature,  Asch  had  made  a  name   for  himself   in   the  world:  he  was  a  prominent   member   of   PEN   International;   his   plays   on   American   and   German   stages   had   drawn   rave  reviews;   and   his   sprawling   epic   novel   (Three   Cities),   which   documented   the   Bolshevik   Revolution   in   St.  Petersburg,  Warsaw   and  Moscow,   had   been  widely   translated   and   compared   favorably   to   the  works   of  Balzac   and   Tolstoy.   It   appeared   that  Asch  had   achieved  universal   acclaim  by   embracing  Western   literary  models  and  institutions.  However,  Asch  never  remained  satisfied  with  such  acclaim  and  instead  sought  to  turn  his  universalism  into  a  form  of  activism.  Beginning  in  1933  with  his  novel  Der  tehilim-­‐yid  (The  Psalm-­‐Jew),  translated  into  English  as  Salvation,  Asch  confronted  the  political  pressures  of  the  period  by  imagining  a   Jewish   spiritual   tradition   that   could   be   universalized   and   globalized   in   order   to   bring   about   world  redemption.  Returning   to   the  neo-­‐romanticism  of  his   early  works,  Asch  aimed,   ambitiously,   to   achieve  a  synthesis   between   the   Jewish   and   Christian   foundations   of   western   civilization.   This   paper   argues   that  while  such  universalism  has  been  considered  simplistic  and  naïve  by  Asch’s  many  critics,  Asch’s  work  from  this  period   represents  an  essential  model   for   theorizing   the  global  dimensions  of  modern   Jewish  writing.  This   paper  will   analyze  Asch’s   attempt   to  propose   the   tzaddik   as   the   foundation  of   the  world  while   also  underscoring  the  conflicts  and  incongruities  that  come  with  translation  and  cross-­‐cultural  transmission.  

 

Alexandra  Herzog,  Brandeis  University,  USA  

Title:  Queering  the  Shtetl:  The  Androgyne  and  the  Cross-­‐Dresser  in  the  work  of  Isaac  Bashevis  Singer  

Abstract:  In  «  Queering  the  Shtetl,  »  I  examine  the  interplay  between  sexuality  and  religion  in  the  work  of  the  Yiddish  writer   Isaac  Bashevis  Singer   (1902-­‐1991).  Though  Singer  himself  came  from  a  religious  Jewish  family,  much  of  his  literary  corpus  focuses  on  the  subject  of  sexuality  and  its  deviations.  Analyzing  selected  pieces  of  fiction,  I  attend  to  Singer’s  recreation  of  an  erotic,  subversive  “underworld”  in  the  Eastern  Europe  of  his  writings  —  one  permeated  with  mysticism,  magic,  demons,  and  antinomianism.  This  paper  analyzes  Singer’s   exploration   of   gender   roles   and   looks   at   questions   of   androgyny,   cross-­‐dressing   and   same-­‐sex  relationships.   In   contrast   to   many   Yiddish   writers,   Singer   did   not   view   himself   as   the   legitimate   heir   of  traditional   Judaism,   but   he   rather   adopted   a   diametrically   opposed   attitude;   for   him,   modern   Yiddish  literature  became  the  vector  to  oppose  traditional  Jewish  values.  My  argument  in  «  Queering  the  Shtetl  »  is  that   Singer’s   use   of   sexual   imagery,   despite   its   defiance   of   religious   norms,   paradoxically   draws   on  traditional   Eastern   European   Jewish   —   especially   Hasidic   —   religious   theologies.   In   Singer’s   writing,   it  becomes  evident   that   the  pleasures  of   sex  are   in   fact  mixed  with   the   terrors  of  guilt  and  sin  with,   in   the  background,   an   omniscient   God   who   is   watching   from   afar.   Although   sexuality   represents   a   force   for  rebellion,  Singer’s  obsession  with  sexuality  cannot  be  separated  from  the  religious  world  he  seeks  to  rebel  against.   In  «  Queering  the  Shtetl,  »   I  argue  that  Singer  uses  the  Talmudic  definitions  of  gender  categories  and   does   not   consider   same-­‐sex   attraction   unusual.   For   him,   the   world   of   the   Yeshiva   scholars   was   a  homoerotic   space;  however,  while  he  does  not   condemn  gender   fluidity,  he  does  not  encourage  gay   sex  and  often  punishes  his  gay  characters.  I  argue  that  while  Singer’s  writing  invokes  a  certain  cultural  nostalgia  for  the  shtetl,  it  simultaneously  subverts  normative  concepts  of  gender  and  sexuality  through  its  fascination  with  cross-­‐dressing,  androgyny  and  sexual  deviances.  Analyzing  the  original  Yiddish  texts,  I  propose  a  fresh  

reading  of  selected  short  stories,  illustrating  the  depth  of  his  gender  spectrum  and  the  fact  that  the  Talmud  actually  has  a  much  more  developed  vocabulary  than  we  have   in  English  to  talk  about  gender  and  sexual  categories.  

 

Khayke  Beruriah  Wiegand,  Oxford  Centre  for  Hebrew  and  Jewish  Studies,  UK  

Title:  Jewish-­‐Polish  Love,  Jewish  Popes  and  Post-­‐Holocaust  Jewish  Demons  in  Isaac  Bashevis  Singer’s  Works  

Abstract:  Although  the  majority  of  Isaac  Bashevis  Singer’s  works  are  set  in  Poland,  they  are  almost  entirely  populated  by  Jewish  characters,  and  very  few  of  them  deal  with  Jewish-­‐Polish  relations.  However,  there  is  one  novel,  _Der  knekht_  (_The  Slave_),  which  has  a  17th  century  love  story  between  a  Jewish  slave  and  the  daughter  of  his  Polish  master  at  its  core  and  which  reveals  much  about  the  difficult  relations  between  Jews  and  Poles  at  the  time.  It  is  significant  to  note  that  out  of  her  love  for  the  Jewish  slave,  the  Polish  heroine  of  the  novel   converts   to   Judaism  at  a   time  when   it   is   forbidden  by  Polish   law  to  do  so,  and   the  couple   find  themselves  in  the  position  of  complete  outsiders  both  in  the  Polish  and  in  the  Jewish  community.  Jewish-­‐Christian  relations  are  often  dealt  with  mockingly  in  Bashevis’s  works,  and  in  his  Yiddish  originals,  Bashevis  tends   to   employ   what   is   known   as   ‘lehavdil-­‐loshn’   (‘not-­‐in-­‐the-­‐same-­‐breath   language’)   to   distinguish   all  things  Jewish  from  all   things  Christian.  This   technique   is  particularly  prominent   in  his  short  story   ‘Zeydlus  der  ershter’   (“Zeidlus  the  Pope’),  which  features  the   ‘Evil  One’  tempting  a  Talmudic  scholar  to  convert  to  Christianity  and  to  become  the  first  Jewish  Pope.  Of  course,  the  situation  becomes  much  more  sinister  after  the   Holocaust   in   Poland,  when   even   the   last   Jewish   demon,  who   proudly   distinguishes   himself   from   his  non-­‐Jewish  counterparts,  has  no  more  Jews  left  to  lead  into  temptation  in  a  former  Polish-­‐Jewish  shtetl  like  Tishevits,  as  in  Bashevis’s  story  ‘Mayse  Tishevits’  (‘The  Last  Demon’).  At  the  end  of  the  story,  the  demonic  storyteller   realises   that   all   that   is   left   of   Jewish   life   in   Poland   after   the   Holocaust   are   the   letters   of   the  Hebrew   alphabet   and   Yiddish   words,   from   which   a   Jewish   demon   can   draw   his   sustenance   –   just   as   a  Yiddish  writer  like  Bashevis.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Contemporary  Israel  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Zionism,  Immigration,  Integration  

 

Chair:  

 

Alexander  Alon,  Swiss  Federal  Institute  of  Technology  Zurich,  Switzerland  

Title:  “A  very  Tasteful  Scene”.  The  6th  Zionist  Congress  as  a  Drama  of  Knowledge-­‐Production  

Abstract:   The   sixth   Zionist   Congress  which   took   place   in   1903   has   been   described   as   “the   stormiest   and  most  tragic“   (Getzel  Kressel/Misha  Louvish/Amnon  Hadaryl)   in  Zionist  history.  “Tragic”  being  a  term  from  aesthetic   theory,   namely   the   theory   of   drama,   in   my   presentation   I   intend   to   highlight   the   aesthetic  

dimension  of  this  perspective.  During  the  sixth  Zionist  Congress,  the  „El-­‐Arish-­‐Project“,  a  secret  emergency  plan  that  had  aimed  at  directing  the  Jewish  mass  emigration   from  Eastern  Europe  to  El  Arish,  Egypt,  was  publicly  discarded  by   the  board  of   the  World  Zionist  Organisation,  despite  a  surge  of  pogroms   in  Eastern  Europe,  most  notably   the  Kishinev  pogrom  that  had  taken  place   in   the  same  year  and  had  pressured  the  WZO  into  action.  In  his  opening  speech,  Herzl  argued  that  a  scientific  expedition  to  El  Arish  had  found  the  land  unsuitable   for  mass   settlement  –   a  premise   that  was   challenged  by  Davis   Trietsch,   an  expert  on  El-­‐Arish-­‐settlement  who  had  not  been  considered  by  Herzl.  This  opposition  by  Trietsch  led  to  a  fierce  response  by  Herzl:  The  ‚Stenographic  Protocols‘  of  the  Congress  show,  how  Herzl  showered  Trietsch  with  scorn  and  depicted  him  with  great  rhetoric  effort  –  and  in  front  of  a  cheering  crowd  –  as  a  person  lacking  the  moral  integrity  to  be  entrusted  with  the  a  responsibility  that  goes  with  the  task  of  acting  as  a  scientific  expert  for  the  Zionist  cause,  thereby  legitimating  his  own  choice  of  experts  and  the  decision  to  abandon  the  El-­‐Arish-­‐plan.  Almost  less  than  the  bare  argument,  it  was  the  form  of  Herzl’s  speech  that  gave  rise  to  fierce  debates:  Opponents   like  Alfred  Nossig  brought   forward  that  Herzl  had  enacted   ‚I  would   like  to  say  a  tasteless,  but  this  might   be  un-­‐parlamentary,   so   I   should   say:   a   very   tasteful   scene   that  would  be  of   great   effect   on   a  provincial   stage‘   in   which   Trietsch   had   been   ‚murdered‘   [„abgemurkst“]   (Ephraim   Moses   Lilien).  Conspicuously,   this   debate   was   not   only   led   by   Zionist   functionaries   who   were   also   dramatists   (Herzl,  Nossig)  or  theoreticians  of  drama  or  culture  (Nossig,  Martin  Buber)  or  artists  (Lilien);  moreover,  as  I  intend  to   show,   it   widely   employed   concepts   of   aesthetics   (e.g.   „taste“)   and   thereby   referred   to   theoretical  debates   led   in   the   history   of   European   drama   –   namely,   to   debates   on   the   choice   and   depiction   of  characters  and  on  the  role  of  drama  in  society.  Considering  this,  my  presentation  aims  at  two  goals:  On  the  one   side,   I  wish   to   show,   how   the   Zionist   discourse   around   the   production   of   knowledge   for   the   Zionist  cause  was   at   the   same   time   a   discourse   on   the   characterization  of   a   Zionist   ‚type‘   and   thusly   on   Zionist  culture.  On  the  other  hand,  I  wish  to  show  how  this  process  is  prefigured  by  a  European  cultural  discourse  around  the  tasks  and  the  essence  of  drama  in  society.  

 

Daniel  Mahla,  Columbia  University,  USA  

Title:  Nationalizing  Orthodoxy:  The  Religious  Zionist  Movement  and  its  Struggle  with  Non-­‐Zionist  Orthodoxy  

Abstract:  The  first  decades  of  the  twentieth  century  witnessed  the  emergence  of  Orthodox  Jewish  politics,  marked   by   the   foundation   of   Mizrachi   in   Vilna   in   1901,   and   the   non-­‐Zionist   Orthodox   Agudat   Yisrael  (Aguda)  in  Kattowitz  in  1911.  The  struggles  between  religious  Zionists  and  the  Aguda  are  often  analyzed  on  the  background  of   their   ideological   conflicts  about   Jewish  aspirations   to  build  a   Jewish   state   in  Palestine  (“Zionist   vs.   Anti-­‐Zionist”).   In   contrast,   I   conceptualize   the   relations   between   the   two   movements   as  struggles   for  power  and   leadership  among  Orthodox   Jews.  Based  on  a  quantitative  analysis  of  over  1300  short   biographies   featured   in   the   Encyclopedia   of   Religious   Zionism,  my   paper  will   uncover   the  ways   in  which   Mizrahi   activists   tried   to   fashion   themselves   as   the   ideal   leaders   vis-­‐à-­‐vis   their   main   political  opponent   in  the  Orthodox  field,  the  Agudat  Yisrael.  While  Agudat  Yisrael  comprised  many  of  the  spiritual  authorities  of  the  interwar  period,  Mizrahi  leaders  defined  and  distinguished  themselves  by  their  social  and  political   activism.   Time   and   again,   they   stressed   the   significance   of   community   work.   In   this   context,   I  argue,   nationalism   served   an   important   function.   It   helped   the  Mizrahi   leaders   in   their   political   struggle  against  Agudat  Yisrael  and  backed  their  own  claims  to  leadership  and  authority.  Thus,  my  analysis  tries  to  uncover   the   political   and   socio-­‐economic   frictions   that   lay   behind   the   ideological   battles   about   Zionism.  This,   in   turn,   helps   me   to   contextualize   Orthodox   political   movements   in   their   wider   European   and  Palestinian  contexts.  Their  struggle,  I  argue,  was  essentially  a  conflict  between  different  forms  of  authority,  comparable  in  many  ways  to  struggles  between  spiritual  leaders  and  political  activists  in  other  societies  and  groups,  such  as  Catholic  clerics  and  Polish  nationalists.  As  such,  their  contentions  have  to  be  understood  as  part  of  wider  secularization  processes  in  early  20th  century  Europe.  

 

Sara  Airoldi,  University  of  Milan,  Italy  -­‐  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  The  Kibbutz  of  the  Sun.  Enzo  Sereni  reads  the  Dominician  Tommaso  Campanella  

Abstract:  The  paper  aims  to  present  the  re-­‐reading  of  the  thought  of  the  Dominician  friar  and  theologian  Tommaso  Campanella  as  it  was  elaborated  by  the  Italian  Socialist  Zionist  Enzo  Sereni.  The  analysis  is  based  on  an  unpublished  manuscript  written  in  1919  where,  clearly  basing  on  Campanella's  utopian  essay  "Civitas  Soli"   (1602),   the   young   Zionist   from   Rome   portrayed   the   advent   of   a   new   social   and   political   order  apparently  depicted   for  humanity  after  World  War   I.   It  may  be  suggested  that   the  archetypal  model  was  actually  conceived  in  order  to  flawlessly  foresee  the  socialistic,  democratic  and  egalitarian  reality  embodied  by  the  kibbutz-­‐system,  of  which  Sereni  himself  was  one  of  the  most  prominent  souls  in  Italy  and  one  among  its  first  agents  in  Eretz  Israel.  As  such  the  paper  will  tackle  the  issue  of  the  contact  between  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish   cultures   from   the   point   of   view   of   the   history   of   ideas.   It   illustrates   how,   in   that   specific   case,  Zionism   applied   to   and   stroke   up   strong   ties   with   the   theoretical   repertoire   formulated   in   the   peculiar  frame   of   a   heterodox   wing   of   Catholicism,   suggesting   a   possible   reading   of   social   utopias   as   field   of  intellectual  encounter  and  exchange  beyond,  and  at  the  same  time  within,  cultures  and  religions.  

 

Rachel  Suranyi,  former  (CEU)  and  future  (ELTE)  student  

Title:  “If  you  want  to  adjust   Israel   to  yourself,  you  will  be  disappointed.”   Identification  and   Integration  of  Hungarian  Jews  in  Israel  

Abstract:  The  goal  of  this  paper  is  to  see  how  Hungarian  Jews  living  in  Israel  identify  themselves  and  what  the   level   of   their   integration   is.   The   Russian-­‐speaking   Jewish   community   is   the   reference   group   for   the  comparison   in  which   the  Hungarians   are   the   focus.  As   a   group  of   comparison,   I   picked  Russian-­‐speaking  Jews   because   they   arrived   in   several   waves   and   by   now  make   up   20%   of   the   Israeli   Jewish   population.  Concisely,  my  goal  was  to  choose  two  groups  that  are  essentially  different  regarding  their  situation  in  Israel.  Regarding  the  methodology,  there  are  17  interviews  conducted  with  Hungarian  Jews  who  left  in  the  1990s  for  Israel.  In  order  to  be  able  to  situate  them  within  the  Israeli  context  they  will  be  set  against  the  Russian-­‐speaker  immigrants  who  were  thoroughly  analyzed  by  other  scholars  thus  serving  as  a  meaningful  control  group.  Hence,  the  goal  is  to  see  how  the  Hungarians  differ  from  them.  The  importance  of  this  project  lies  in  the  fact  that  Hungarians   in   Israel  were  not  studied  yet.  The  findings  concerning   integration  will  show  the  success  or   failure  of   these   two  particular  migration   flows.  Answering   the  question  about   the   reasons   for  migrating,   it   will   be   clearer   whether   Israel   is   pulling   the   immigrants   for   ideological   reasons   or   it   starts  resembling   other   receiving   countries.   The   results   suggest   that   Hungarians   are   more   advanced   in   their  integration   than   the   Russian-­‐speakers   but  maintaining   their   Hungarianness   also   plays   an   important   role.  This  manifests  on  the  individual  level  as  opposed  to  the  Russians  where  both  the  community  and  individual  level  are  important  in  maintaining  Russian  culture.  What  is  striking,  is  that  the  phenomenon  that  instead  of  becoming   part   of   the   majority   as   Jews,   they   become   from   minority   members   (of   a   religious   group   in  Hungary)  to  minority  members  (of  an  ethnicity  in  Israel).  

 

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  09  

 

Session:  001:  

History  of  the  Jewish  Book  (Manuscript  and  Print)  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Legacy  of  Sepharad  

Intellectual  and  Material  Legacy  of  Late  Medieval  Sephardic  Judaism  

Organizer:  Javier  del  Barco  

Chair:  Javier  del  Barco  

 

Javier  Del  Barco,  CSIC,  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  The  Poetic  Sections  in  Late  Medieval  Hebrew  Bibles:  A  Preliminary  Study  on  Page  Layout  

Abstract:  The  poetic  sections  of  the  Hebrew  Bible  (Exodus  15,  Deuteronomy  32,  Judges  5,  2  Samuel  22)  are  clearly   differentiated   sections   in   all   medieval   codices   of   the   Hebrew   Bible.   They   present   a   page   layout  which  continues  and  develops  a  textual  disposition  already  known  in  Rabbinic  sources  and  always  followed  in   the   liturgical   copy  of  Torah  Scrolls,   as   far   as  Exodus  15  and  Deuteronomy  32  are   concerned.  Yet,   very  little  is  known  about  their  actual  page  layout  in  Late  Medieval  Hebrew  Bibles  in  particular.  To  what  extent  do   they   follow   the   Rabbinic   and  Maimonidean   legislation   on   this  matter?   Are   there   different   traditions  which   follow   different   models   of   page   layout?   Is   there   a   difference   between   the   different   medieval  Western   traditions—Ashkenazi,   Sephardi,   Italian?   What   is   the   relationship,   concerning   layout,   between  these  poetic  sections  and  the  surrounding  text?  How  does  the  presence  of  the  Aramaic  text  of  the  Targum  affect   the   general   layout   of   these   sections?   This   paper   will   deal   with   these   questions   by   offering   the  preliminary  results  of  a  much  broader  project  concerning  typology,   text   function  and  page   layout  of  Late  Medieval  Hebrew  Bibles.  

 

Maria  Teresa  Ortega-­‐Monasterio,  CSIC,  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  The  Hebrew  Bible  of  the  Royal  Palace  in  Madrid:  A  Sephardi  Bible  from  the  15th  Century  

Abstract:  The  Royal  Palace  Library  in  Madrid  keeps  a  single  Hebrew  manuscript.  This  is  a  bible  dated  1487.  The   fifteenth   century   Sephardic   Bibles   share   some   characteristics   that   differ   from   those   of   previous  centuries.   And   this   particular   Bible   has   a   number   of   features   that   give   it   a   unique   character.   This   paper  discusses  some  of  these  details,  especially  their  micrographies  and  the  masoretic  information  provided.  

 

David  Torollo,  University  of  Salamanca,  Spain  

Title:  The  story  of  a  Jewish  Female  Wineseller:  an  Example  of  Cultural  Translation  in  Medieval  Iberia    

Abstract:  Three  men  gather  in  a  house  to  eat  and  drink.  When  they  find  themselves  completely  drunk  and  the  wine  is  over,  they  decide  to  look  for  more  from  the  house  of  a  Jewish  female  wineseller.  After  obtaining  

the   wine,   they   kill   the   woman   and   kidnap   her   daughter,   who   is   raped   by   the   men   in   the   house.   Next  morning  and  fearing  the  girl’s  accusatory  testimony,  they  kill  her  and  run  away  from  the  town.  This  story  appears  in  a  chapter  of  the  Mishle  he-­‐‘Arav,  a  Hebrew  work  on  ethical  and  wisdom  motifs  by  an  unknown  author  who  claims  to  be  translating  from  the  Arabic.  The  work  has  remained  relatively  marginal  to  modern  scholarship  and  its  importance  lies  in  the  fact  that  it  is  one  of  the  first  Hebrew  works  on  its  theme  written  sometime  between   the   twelfth   and   thirteenth   centuries   in   the   Iberian  Peninsula.   The   significance  of   the  story  is  that  it  constitutes  the  only  occasion  in  the  book  when  the  author/translator  of  the  work  depicts  a  character  as  a  Jew.  In  this  paper  I  intend  to  take  the  story  of  the  Jewish  female  wineseller  as  a  witness  to  the   language   translation   phenomenon  which  was   being   carried   out   both   in   the   Christian   courts   and   the  Jewish  communities,  and  as  a  vantage  point  from  which  to  raise  broader  questions  on  processes  of  cultural  contact.   I   will   examine   the   motivations   that   led   the   author   of   the   work   to   stress   the   religion   of   the  wineseller  and  the  consequences  this  fact  may  have  from  a  cultural  translation  perspective.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

History  of  the  Jewish  Book  (Manuscript  and  Print)  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Sephardic  Book  Art  of  the  Late  15th  Century:  Tradition,  Adaptation,  Innovation  

Organizer:  Luís  Afonso  

Chair:  Luís  Afonso  

 

Luís  Afonso,  University  of  Lisbon,  Portugal  

Title:  The  Cultural  Meaning  of  Portuguese  and  Andalusian  Sephardic  Book  Decoration  

Abstract:  If  we  compare  two  manuscripts  produced  around  the  same  time  in  Lisbon  and  Seville  we  notice  immediately   the   difference   is   outstanding.   One   is   carefully   decorated   with   coloured   frames   filled   with  exquisite   vegetation   and   animals,   has   coloured   filigree  word   panels   and   has   a   reasonable   use   of   golden  words   and   filets.   The   other   is   almost  monochromatic,   it   does   not   have   any   figurative   reference   besides  some  vegetation,  and  is  mainly  decorated  with  geometric  patterns  and  forms  derived  from  Islamic  artistic  traditions,   particularly   seen   in   some   exquisite   micrographic   exercises.   In   this   paper   the   meaning   of   the  Portuguese   and   the   Andalusian   different   artistic   solutions   is   addressed   and   their  meaning   is   explored   in  order   to   understand   what   they   can   tell   us   regarding   the   relations   between   Jews   and   Christians   in   Late  Medieval  Iberia.  

 

Debora  Marques  de  Matos,  King’s  College,  London,  UK  

Title:  Mobility  and  Adaptability  of  Sephardic  Book-­‐makers  in  the  Late  Fifteenth  century  

Abstract:   Notwithstanding   the   historical   circumstances,   there   is   a   new   dynamic   in   the   production   of  Hebrew  books  in  the  Iberian  Peninsula  during  the  last  decades  of  the  fifteenth  century.  This  was  mostly  due  to   the   development   of   the   printing   press   with   Hebrew   characters   but   also   to   a   widespread   interest   in  

luxuriously   decorated  manuscripts.   The  way  Hebrew   books  were   produced   inevitably   changed:   jobs   and  tasks   had   to   be   restructured   or   created,   and   to   a   certain   extent   books   begin   to   be   produced   ‘in  mass’.  Although  it  does  not  abandon  completely  the  familiar  and  religious  environment  where  it  was  prepared  for  centuries,   the  Hebrew  book  slowly  moves  to  a  new  space  —  the  workshop.  While  the  mobility  of  scribes  and  other  craftsmen  as  a  consequence  of  persecution  or  expulsion  has  been  amply  explored  in  scholarship,  the  fact  that  they  often  moved  in  search  for  new  opportunities  has  often  been  disregarded.  However,  it  is  possible   to   trace   the  work  of   scribes  across   several   regions,   in   some  cases   taking  new  roles  and   learning  new  crafts.  The  following  presentation  intends  to  explore  concrete  examples  of  scribes  and  other  craftsmen  who  can  be   linked  to  more  than  one  area  or  production  or  workshop,  and  consider  how  they  adapted  to  new  roles  and  new  ‘audiences’,  to  what  extent  they  assimilated  new  styles,  and  what  remained  as  the  core  of  their  work.  

 

Tiago  Moita,  University  of  Lisbon,  Portugal  

Title:  The  Hebrew  Bible  from  Moura.  A  Testimony  of  Mudéjar  Art  in  Portugal  

Abstract:  There   is  no  doubt  that   in  the   last  decades  of  the  15th  century  Lisbon  becomes  one  of  the  main  Iberian   centres   for   the   copy   and   illumination   of   Hebrew   manuscripts.   However,   this   craft   was   not  necessarily   restricted   to   the   capital   and   several   examples   attest   the   same   activity   in   other   parts   of   the  country,   at   least   since   the   late   1300s.  Within   the   group  of   Portuguese  Hebrew  manuscripts   there   is   one  manuscript   that   deserves   our   attention,   a   lesser-­‐known   Bible   copied   in   1470   by   Samuel   ben   Abraham  Altires,   in   the   small   village   of  Moura   (south   of   Portugal),   for   the   renowned   Lisbon  merchant,   Isaac   ben  Gabbay   (Oxford,  Bodleian  Library,  Ms.  Can.  Or.  42).   Its  copious  micrographic  decoration,  with  a  grammar  that   is  essentially  mudéjar,  establishes  a  connection  with   the   ‘Andalusian  school’,  where   the   influence  of  Islamic  art  is  more  strongly  felt  (not  only  in  manuscripts,  but  also  in  synagogal  architecture);  on  the  other  hand,  the  decoration  of  this  Bible  is  open  to  colour,  particularly  gold,  a  frequent  feature  of  the  manuscripts  from  Lisbon  produced  in  the  next  decades.  The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  the  analysis  of  this  manuscript  by  considering   its  historical,  codicological  and  artistic  aspects,   in  order  to  underline   its  cultural  meaning  as  a  link  between  the  Andalusian  and  Portuguese  production.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Jewish  Art  I  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  Liya  Chechik  

 

Katrin  Kogman-­‐Appel,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Jewish  Pilgrimage  in  the  Middle  Ages  and  the  Representation  of  the  Holy  Land  in  the  Farhi  Bible  (Mallorca,  1366-­‐83)  

Abstract:  The  Farhi  Bible   in   the   former  Sassoon  collection   includes  a  detailed  colophon  by  the  scribe  and  illuminator  Elisha  Bevenisti  Cresques  informing  us  that  he  produced  the  book  for  his  own  use.  Apart  from  the   biblical   text   the   Farhi   Bible   contains   200   pages   of  what   can   be   defined   as   Elisha   Cresques’   personal  library.   As   part   of   this   “library”  we   find   a   group   of  miniatures   that   refer   to   the   Temple   of   Jerusalem,   a  representation   of   Jacob’s   tents,   the   City   of   Jericho   as   labyrinth   and   more.   These   images   can,   in   many  senses,   be   read   as   an   itinerary  of   the  Holy   Land.   Several   iconographic   links   to   the   imagery   in   pilgrimage  itineraries  from  the  16th  c.  On  can,  in  fact,  support  that  interpretation.  

 

Aleksandra  Buncic,  University  of  Zagreb,  Croatia  

Title:  Medieval  Workshop  as  a  Place  of  Encounter  between  Jews  and  Christians  

Abstract:  Through  a  careful  analysis  of  miniatures  from  the  medieval  illuminated  manuscript  known  as  the  Sarajevo  Haggadah,  my  paper  will  explore  the  ways  in  which  the  medieval  book  workshop  served  as  a  locus  of   intense   Jewish-­‐Christian   dialogue   and   debate.   The   miniatures   of   the   Sarajevo   Haggadah   are   the  witnesses   of   this   encounter   and   artistic   and   intellectual   exchange.  My   paper   will   focus   in   particular   on  medieval  Jewish  and  Christian  interpretations  on  the  Second  Commandment  against  making  images  which  were  a  topic  of  inter-­‐religious  debate  since  ancient  times.  By  examining  the  extraordinary  range  of  ways  in  which   God’s   presence   is   depicted   in   the   Sarajevo   Haggadah   in   light   of   contemporaneous   Jewish   and  Christian   iconography,   it   will   seek   to   establish   the   origins   of   the   Sarajevo   Haggadah   in   mid-­‐fourteenth  century  Catalonia,   shed  new   light   on   the   state  of   the   Jewish-­‐Christian   relations   in   this   turbulent   context  and,  finally,  suggest  how  the  upheavals  of  this  period  in  northeastern  Spain  may,  in  turn,  provide  the  key  to  unlocking  some  of  the  Sarajevo  Haggadah’s  most  intractable  iconographic  mysteries.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Jewish  Art  II  

16.00-­‐18.00  

 

Chair:  Katrin  Kogman  Appel  

 

Gerbern  Oegema,  McGill  University,  Montreal,  Canada  

Title:  The  Apocryphal  Book  'Judith'  in  the  Renaissance  

Abstract:  This  paper  will   analyze  and   reflect  on   the  portrayal  of  one  key   female   figure   in   the  Apocrypha,  namely  Judith,  and  how  she  has  been  portrayed  by  some  of  the  most  famous  renaissance  painters,  namely,  apart  from  Jan  Sanders  van  Hemessen’s  Judith  of  ca.  1540,  which  is  kept  in  The  Art  Institute  in  Chicago,  by  Botticelli  (The  Return  of  Judith;  1470);  Giorgione  (Judith;  1504);  Caravaggio  (Judith  Beheading  Holofernes;  1598-­‐99);   Artemisia   Gentileschi   (Judith   Slaying   Holofernes;   ca.   1620);   Valentin   de   Boulogne   (Judith   and  Holofernes;  ca.  1626),  and  Johann  Liss  (Judith  and  Holofernes;  1628).  

 

Guadalupe  Seijas,  Universidad  Complutense  de  Madrid,  Spain  

Title:  The  Iconographic  Representation  of  the  Book  of  Ruth  

Abstract:   Contrary   to  biblical  women   such   as   Esther  or   Judith,   artists   paid   less   attention   to   the   figure  of  Ruth.  In  my  paper  I  will  analyze  the  iconography  of  this  book  of  Ruth  in  Europe  from  Renaissance  until  our  days.   The   focus   of  my   research  will   be   on   chosen   scenes,   the   representation   of   the   characters   and   the  political,  social  and  cultural  context.  

 

Liya  Chechik,  Jewish  Museum  and  Tolerance  Centre,  Moscow,  Russia  

Title:  Hebrew  Inscriptions  in  the  Religious  Paintings  of  the  Venetian  Renaissance  

Abstract:  When   a  work  of   art   gets   its   individual   value,   as   it   happened   in   15th   century   Italy,   the  need  of  specifying  the  meaning  of  a  visual  image  with  inscriptions  and  commentaries  becomes  obsolete.  During  the  late  Middle  Ages  a  new  quality  of  religious  art  is  found  with  an  increasing  information  capability,  which  did  not  need  verbal  concretization,  and  yet  we  find  in  it  the  presence  of  Hebrew  inscriptions  that  consequently  needs   to   be   taken   into   account  when   analyzing   the   religious   compositions   of   Italian   Renaissance   artists  (Vittore   Carpaccio,   Cima   da   Conegliano,   Giovanni   Bellini,   Rocco   Marconi   etc).   The   presence   of   Hebrew  inscriptions   in  Renaissance  paintings  can  be  explained  not  only  by  a  continuation  or  a   reminiscence   from  the  Middle  Ages,  but  rather  should  also  be  connected  with  a  change  in  the  attitude  of  the  humanistic  milieu  toward  Jews  during  that  period,  the  acknowledgement  of  their  contribution  to  the  system  of  book-­‐making  and  diffusion  of  printed  production,  and  the  scientific  collaboration  between  Catholic  and  Jewish  scribes.  As  Robert   Bonfil   pointed   out,   the   Jewish   thinkers   of   this   period,   educated   through   rabbinates,   became   a  natural  part  of  the  general  cultural  milieu  of  the  regions  of  their  residence  along  with  Christian  intellectuals.  One   of   the   features   of   this   phenomenon   is   the   high   participation   of   Jews   in   the   training   of   Christian  scholars,   interested  in  theology  and  the  language  of  the  Bible.  Since  there  exists  the  point  of  view  that   in  the   art   of   the   Renaissance   inscriptions   are   traditionally   given   only   in   Latin   (in   contrast   to   the   Counter-­‐Reformation),  the  examples  where  Hebrew  writings  are  used  are  particularly  worthy  of  attention.  

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  10  

 

Session:  001:  

Contemporary  Jewish  History  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Interactions  and  Contacts  across  Culture  and  Politics  II  

 

Chair:  

 

Eugenia  Prokop-­‐Janiec,  Jagiellonian  University,  Krakow,  Poland  

Title:  Modern  Polish-­‐Jewish  Cultural  Contacts  

Abstract:   The   aim   of   the   paper   will   be   to   characterize   modern   Polish-­‐Jewish   cultural   contacts   and   to  describe  the  topography  of  the  resultant  cultural  frontier.  The  frontier  will  be  definied  here  as  a  network  of  places,   institutions,  and   texts,  organized  by   the  multifarious   relations  of   influence,  exchange,   translation,  interference,   negotiation,   and   conflict.   It  will   also  be   regarded  as   a   sphere  of   inclusion   and  exclusion,   of  bonding  and  separation.  The  description  will  focus  on  selected  phenomena  of  inter-­‐group  contacts.  These  will   include   places,   such   as   the   classroom-­‐   Berek   Mathias   (Institute   for   the   Study   of   Culture,   Leipzig  University,  Germany),  institutions,  such  as  the  modern  Jewish  press  in  Polish,  and  texts,  such  as  textbooks  for  Polish-­‐language  Jewish  schools.  

 

Mathias  Berek,  Institute  for  the  Study  of  Culture,  Leipzig  University,  Germany  

Title:  “And  then  he  hugged  and  kissed  him”.  A  Jewish  Prussian  and  Swiss  Professor  speaks  in  Vienna  about  the  German  Nation    

Abstract:   In   1865   the   University   of   Vienna   celebrated   its   500-­‐year-­‐anniversary.   During   the   event,  particularly   the   delegate   of   the   University   of   Bern,   Switzerland,   Professor   Moritz   Lazarus,   a   Jewish  philosopher   and   psychologist   from   Berlin,   elated   his   audience  with   his   speeches   about   the   unity   of   the  "German   spirit"   and   the   progress   of   academia.   Enthused   by   the   speaker,   the   president   of   the   Viennese  university,   Hyrtl,   even   hugged   and   kissed   him.   But   while   the   press   coverage   about   that   event   was  unanimously  reporting  the  applause,  later  on  the  papers  diverged  on  who  had  been  carried  on  shoulders  at  the  evening  banquet  -­‐  Lazarus  or  Hyrtl?  At  the  same  time  his  Jewishness  had  been  mentioned  in  only  very  few  articles.  Why  -­‐  and  why  not?  And  how  did  the  Swiss  press  react  on  his  thesis  that  the  Swiss  universities  would  be  part  of  the  "German  spirit"?  The  paper  deals  with  the  public  coverage  of  the  anniversary  in  regard  to   Lazarus   in   German,   Austrian   and   Swiss   dailies   and   discusses   it   against   the   context   of   Central   Europe  during   the   forming   stage  of   the  German  Empire,   the   conflict   between  Prussia   and  Austria,   the  discourse  about  the  nation  and  how  it  would  be  defined.  It  asks  what  part  the  Jewish  intellectual  Lazarus  played  as  a  public   figure   in   these   processes.   Like   other   Jewish   thinkers   of   his   time   he   promoted   a   combination   of  particularism   and   universalism   that   saw   no   contradiction   between   being   patriotic   and   humanistic.   And  already  the  interpretations  of  what  he  said  in  Vienna  show  how  his  public  picked  just  the  patriotic  part  and  overlooked  the  universalist.  

 

Alex  Valdman,  Ben-­‐Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  The  University  of  Tartu  and  the  Origins  of  the  Jewish-­‐Russian  Public  Sphere  

Abstract:  It  is  widely  accepted  that  the  university  –  as  a  source  of  education  and  as  a  social  environment  –  played  a  significant   role   in   the  shaping  of   the   Jewish  society   in  Late   Imperial  Russia.  However,  even  with  important   works   such   as   Benjamin   Natans’   Beyond   the   Pale,   relatively   little   is   known   about   the   Jewish  students  and  Jewish  student   life   in  Russia.   It   is  not  always  clear  which   ideological  and  social   factors  have  turned  some  of  these  students  into  socially  and  politically  committed  intellectuals.  In  my  paper,  I  examine  the   thriving   hub   of   Jewish   student   activities,   which   had   developed   in   the   1880s   and   the   1890s   in   the  University  of  Tartu  (then  –  Dorpat,  or  Derpt),  where,  unusually  for  the  Tsarist  Empire,  student  unions  and  fraternities  were  legally  permitted.  Due  to  their  legal  status,  the  Jewish  student  unions  in  Tartu  were  able  to  make   and   keep   the   records  of   their   activities.   Consequently,   nowadays   the   archives   in   Estonia  hold   a  substantial  body  of  materials  on  these  organizations.  Drawing  on  these  materials,  I  demonstrate  how  in  the  multiethnic  and  multilingual  environment  of  late  19th  century  Tartu,  the  Jewish  students  developed  various  modes  of  self-­‐identification  and  collective   identity.  The  examining  of  these  archival  collections  sheds  new  light   on   the   student   life   in   Tartu,   but   more   importantly,   it   allows   an   intimate   glance   into   a   scene   of  ideological  strife,  where  concepts  of  social  activity  and  social  commitment,  which  shaped  the  Jewish  public  sphere  in  early  20th  century  Russia,  were  conceived,  debated  and  refined.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

History  of  Sciences  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  History  of  Contemporary  Medicine  

Organizer:  Rakefet  Zalashik  

Chair:  Rakefet  Zalashik  

 

Rakefet  Zalashik,  Moses  Mendelssohn  Center,  Germany  

Title:  Jewish  Medical  Refugees  in  Turkey    

Abstract:   The   persecution   of   Jewish   physicians   in   Nazi   Germany   and   the  migration   of   some   of   them   to  England   and   the   U.S.   was   widely   studied.   However,   little   attention   was   given   to   Jewish   medical  professionals  who  managed  to  emigrate   from  German-­‐speaking  countries   to  Turkey.  The  paper  examines  the  migration  and  absorption  of  Jewish  medical  refugees  from  German-­‐speaking  countries  to  Turkey  with  the  emphasis  on  the  uniqueness  of  this  case.  Due  to  the  nation  building  project  of  the  new  republic  and  the  reform  in  high  education,  Turkey  was  in  a  great  need  for  Western  academics  exactly  at  a  time  when  Jewish  academics  were   persecuted   in   Europe   and   needed   a   safe   haven.   This   special   conditions   have   created   a  unique  constellation  of  absorption  and  transfer  of  medical  knowledge  and  its  implementation  in  Turkey.  

 

Michael  Tal,  Yad  Vashem,  Israel  

Title:  Personal  Items  that  belonged  to  Professor  Hermann  Zondek:  A  Means  of  preserving  his  Persona  in  the  Collective  Memory  and  an  Exam  

Abstract:  Changing  historical  perspective  in  the  1990’s  made  the  curators  of  Yad  Vashem’s  new  Holocaust  History  Museum  opened  in  2005  feel  it  essential  to  begin  the  exhibition  narrative  with  the  story  of  German  Jewry.  Central  to  this  idea  was  to  highlight  the  persona  of  a  key  individual  from  the  Weimar  Republic  period  who  was  forced  to  leave  solely  because  of  his  Judaism  in  spite  of  his  contribution  to  German  society.  This  new   frame  of   reference  brought  with   it  an  urgent  need   to  expand   the  number  of   items   in   the  collection  connected   to   German   Jews   and   with   this   in   mind,   the   community   of   ex-­‐German   Jews   in   Israel   was  contacted.  This  was  not  a  simple  change,  because  German  Jews  who  had  left  Germany  before  the  war  were  convinced  that  they  were  not  part  of  the  narrative.  It  was,  therefore,  not  clear  to  them  what  place  artifacts  from   before   the   war   in   Germany   had   in   Yad   Vashem.   The   figure   of   Professor   Hermann   Zondek   was  proposed  in  one  of  the  curatorial  discussions  and  a  decision  was  made  to  contact  his  family  and  ask  them  to  donate  artifacts   that  could  present  his  personality,  background  and   fate  with   the  rise  of  Hitler.  Professor  Hermann  Zondek  was  one  of  the  most  senior  physicians  in  Germany  in  the  Weimar  Republic.  He  was  born  in  1887   in  Posen  and   though  he  originally  had  plans   to  become  a  Rabbi,   influenced  by  his  uncle  Dr.  Max  Zondek,  he  studied  medicine.  He  studied  in  Berlin  and  continued  in  Freiburg  and  Göttingen.  Certified  as  a  doctor  in  1912,  he  served  in  the  German  army  during  World  War  I.  In  1921  he  received  a  professorship  in  endocrinology  and  advanced  quickly  in  the  hospital  hierarchy.  Professor  Zondek  received  many  awards  for  his  research  and  served  as  professor  of  medicine  at  the  Charité  hospital  in  Berlin.  In  1926  he  was  appointed  head   of   the  municipal   hospital   "am  Urban”   in   Berlin.   A   long   and   respected   list   of   renowned   patients   is  further  evidence  of  his  outstanding  stature.  At  the  Paris  conference  of  1929  that  culminated  in  the  Kellogg-­‐Briand  Pact  he   served  as   the  personal  physician  of   the  German  Chancellor   Streseman.   Later,   he  was   the  physician  of  Chancellor  Kurt  von  Schleicher.  Professor  Zondek‘s   research  brought  him  to   the  attention  of  various  world   leaders,   among   them   Josef   Stalin,  who   had   him   brought   secretly   to  Moscow   to   attend   to  senior  Politburo  members.   Professor   Zondek‘s  high   standing   in  public  medicine  was  a   factor   in  his  being  among  the  elite  among  German  Jews  who  was  directly  and  immediately  affected  by  the  Nazi  measures.  In  March  of  1933  Nazi   storm  troopers  entered  Prof.  Zondek’s  hospital,   locked  him  and  other  doctors   “Jews  and  Communists”   in  a   room  and  proceeded  to   inform  the  Professor   that  he  was  relieved  of  his  duties  as  director  of  the  hospital.  Prof.  Zondek  left  Germany  for  Zurich  that  same  day,  never  to  return.  His  wife  and  two  children  Birgit  and  Bernard  remained  in  Berlin  for  a  time.  After  a  short  stay   in  Switzerland,  Professor  Zondek  traveled  to  Manchester,  England  where  he  found  employment  in  the  local  Jewish  hospital  and  his  family   joined  him   there.  While   in  Manchester,  Zondek  was  approached  by  Chaim  Weizmann  who   invited  him  to  Jerusalem.  So  it  came  to  pass  that  Prof.  Zondek  took  on  the  challenge  of  directing  the  Bikur  Cholim  hospital  in  Jerusalem.  Prof.  Hermann  Zondek  was  one  among  the  masses  of  German  immigrants  who  were  crucial   in   the   advance   of   science   and   culture   in   Jerusalem   and   Israel   at   large.   Gerda   Zondek,   Professor  Zondek’s  widow  who  still  lived  in  her  home  in  Jerusalem  –  a  home  whose  furnishings  continued  to  be  those  that  had  been  brought  from  Berlin  in  the  30’s  -­‐  was  a  valuable  contact  and  her  cooperation  was  crucial  in  enabling   Yad   Vashem   to   obtain   assorted   items   from   their   home.   The   artifacts,   now   displayed   in   the  Holocaust  History  Museum  at  Yad  Vashem,  highlight  an  outstanding  personality  whose  character  and  major  achievements  were  forgotten  over  time.  Only  this  display  decision  brought  them  to  the  public’s  awareness  and  to  the  forefront  of  collective  memory.  The  display  of  Professor  Zondek’s  personal  items  along  with  his  life   story   highlights,   not   only   his   personality,   but   in   the   context   of   the  museum   exhibition,   it  makes   his  persona  part  of  the  collective  memory  of  the  rise  of  Nazi  Germany,  the  crisis  of  German  Jewry  that  followed  in  its  wake,  with  its  final  chapter,  the  Holocaust  of  European  Jewry.  

 

Susanne  Doetz,  Moses  Mendelssohn  Center,  Germany  

Title:  Flight  and  Emigration  of  Jewish  Female  Physicians  of  the  Berlin  Public  Health  System    

Abstract:  Out  of  450  physicians  that  were  expelled  during  National  Socialism  from  the  Berlin  public  health  system  due   to   "racial"   and/or   political   reasons,   6  were   females,  who  were   defined   by   the  NS-­‐diction   as  "not-­‐Ariyan".  They  shared  some  characteristics:  they  were  so  called  a  second  generation  female  physicians,  receiving   their   license   to   practice   in   period   of   the  Weimar   Republic;   they   worked   in   typical   "feminine"  medical  fields  such  as  infants,  school  medicine  or  pediatrics;  many  were  members  of  the  Association  of  the  Socialists  Physicians  and  were  preoccupied  with  social-­‐hygiene.  What  was  the  fate  of  these  "New  Weimar  Women"  in  exile?  To  what  extent  could  they  continue  with  their  profession?  Were  there  differences  in  the  migration  process  between  female  and  male  physicians?  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Contemporary  Jewish  History  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Jewish  Studies  in  America  

Organizer:  Rona  Sheramy  

Chair:  Rona  Sheramy  

 

Pamela  Nadell,  American  University,  USA  

Title:  American  Jewish  Studies:  The  State  of  the  Field  

Abstract:  In  October  2013,  Forward  columnist  Jenna  Weissman  Joselit  bemoaned  the  second-­‐class  status  of  American   Jewish   studies   in   the   world   of   Judaic   studies   writ   large.   While   this   field   was   indeed   once  marginalized   both   within   Jewish   studies   and   within   American   Studies,   it   has,   especially   within   the   past  decade,  taken  an  important  turn  towards  moving  its  scholarship  and  research  closer  to  the  center  of  Judaic  studies,   at   least   in   settings   within   the   United   States.   In   1954,   the   momentum   from   the   tercentenary  celebrations  marking  three  hundred  years  of  Jewish  life  in  America  carried  over  into  the  academic  pursuit  of   American   Jewish   studies.   In   2004,   energy   from   the   celebrations   surrounding   350   years   of   American  Jewish   life   also   spiraled   outward.   This   paper   surveys   these   developments   both  within   the   academy   and  beyond  to  argue  that  American  Jewish  studies  has  come  of  age  in  the  wider  world  of  Judaic  studies.  Field:  Contemporary  Jewish  History:  Western  World  

 

Rona  Sheramy,  Association  for  Jewish  Studies,  NY,  USA  

Title:  Jewish  Studies  at  a  Turning  Point:  The  Shifting  Landscape  of  Jewish  Studies  in  the  U.S.  Post-­‐2008  

Abstract:   The   field   of   Jewish   Studies   has   experienced   phenomenal   growth   in   North   America   since   the  founding  of  the  Association  for  Jewish  Studies  in  1969.  There  are  more  than  170  colleges  and  universities  in  North  America  offering  some  type  of  undergraduate  or  graduate  certificate  or  degree  program  in  the  field,  as   well   as   more   than   1800   individual   members   of   the   AJS,   drawn   from   the   ranks   of   Jewish   Studies  professors  and  graduate  students.  Since  the  economic  crisis  of  2008,  though,  Jewish  Studies  has  witnessed  

a   slow   down   in   hirings   and   in   course   enrollments.   Some   of   these   changes   can   be   attributed   to   broader  challenges   to   the   humanities   on   college   and   university   campuses,   while   others   to   the   changing  demographic   of   students   interested   in   such   courses.   This   paper   will   examine   the   challenges   and  opportunities  facing  the  field  of  Jewish  Studies  in  North  America  over  the  past  half  decade,  and  offer  some  suggestions  as  to  how  the  field  may  take  shape  in  the  coming  years.  

 

Jeffrey  Veidlinger,  University  of  Michigan,  USA  

Title:  European  Jewish  History  in  the  Digital  Age  

Abstract:   This   paper  will   discuss   some   of   the  ways   in  which   collaborative  work   in   Jewish   Studies,  made  possible   by   emerging   digital   and   technological   innovations,   is   changing   the   ways   that   scholars   study  different  types  of  texts  and  expanding  cooperation  between  European  and  American  scholars  and  publics.  In  particular,   the  author  will   discuss  his  own  project,   the  Archives  of  Historical   and  Ethnographic   Yiddish  Memories,  which  conducts  videotaped  life  story  and  linguistic  interviews  with  Yiddish-­‐speakers  throughout  Eastern   Europe.   The  project   utilizing  digital   video   in   the   field   and  presents   its   findings   through   the  web,  drawing  upon  the  theoretical  and  practical  knowledge  of  the  "digital  humanities."  This  collaborative  project  has   allowed   for   historians,   linguists,   folklorists,   ethnomusicologists,   technical   experts,   and   the   general  public  in  Ukraine,  Moldova,  Romania,  Slovakia,  Hungary,  Poland,  Lithuania,  Israel,  and  the  United  States  to  communicate,  share  expertise,  and  construct  shared  narratives  of  the  past.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Contemporary  Jewish  History  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Jews  Seeking  Justice  in  the  Wake  of  the  Holocaust  

Organizer:  Lisa  Leff  

 

Chair:  Annette  Wieviorka  

 

Ari  Joskowicz,  Vanderbilt  University,  Nashville,  Tennessee,  USA  

Title:  Jews  and  the  Romani  Holocaust:  Post-­‐War  Justice  and  Memory  Politics  

Abstract:   In  various  European  countries,   Jews’   struggle   for  post-­‐war   justice   shaped   the   representation  of  the  murder  of  Europe’s  Roma  (or  Gypsies).  Jewish  efforts  often  indirectly  and  inadvertently  reinforced  the  exclusion   of   Roma   from   efforts   to   document   and   compensate   victims.   As   Jews   successfully   fought   for  inclusion  in  post-­‐war  compensation  schemes,  for  example,  their  case  became  the  legal  benchmark  for  the  discussion   of   Romani   claims.   In   Germany,   restitution   courts   regularly   rejected   the   claims   of   Romani  deportees   to   Poland   in   1940   by   showing   how   their   persecution   differed   from   that   of   Jewish   deportees.  Jewish  victims  also  became  privileged  sources  of  knowledge  about   racial  persecution.   In   the  early  1950s,  Belgian   government   officials   sought   to   reconstruct   the   experiences   of   people   deported   as   tziganes   by  

asking   only   Jewish   survivors   about   their   fellow   sufferers’   fate.   Yet,   while   efforts   at   compensation   and  commemoration   for   Jewish   suffering   could  have  negative  effects  on  Roma  claims,   the  work  of   individual  Jews  and  the  example  of  Jewish  victimhood  were  also  crucial  for  the  establishment  of  knowledge  about  the  Roma   genocide.   The   efforts   of   various   Jewish   activists,   lawyers,   and   scholars  were   crucial   in   putting   the  Romani   Holocaust   on   the   agenda   —from   Raphael   Lemkin’s   attempt   to   define   Nazi   genocide   in   the  Nuremberg  trials  as  the  murder  of  “Jews,  Poles,  and  gypsies”  to  the  inspiration  that  the  Eichmann  trial  gave  to   later   investigations   of   crimes   against   Roma.   Drawing   on   examples   from   Germany,   France,   Belgium,  Austria,  and  the  Netherlands,  my  presentation  will  explore  this  complicated  story  of  inclusion  and  exclusion  emerging  from  experiences  of  parallel  victimhood.  

 

Lisa  Leff,  American  University,  Washington  DC,  USA  

Title:  Postwar  Book  Restitutions  and  the  Return  of  Republican  Franco-­‐Judaism  

Abstract:  During  the  Nazi  occupation  of  France,  millions  of  books  and  archival  documents  were  looted  from  Jewish  individuals  and  institutions  in  France.    In  the  aftermath  of  the  war,  many  of  these  books  were  found  in  Germany  and  the  Allies  embarked  on  the  largest  restitution  project  in  history,  endeavoring  to  return  as  many  of  the  materials  as  possible  to  their  original  owners.    This  paper  examines  how  the  French  authorities  handled   these   restitution   efforts.     The   French   adopted   a   “republican”   mentality,   treated   the   returned  books  as  “French”   rather   than  particularly   Jewish   (and   therefore,   for  example,   if  an  original  owner  could  not   be   found,   a   volume  would   be   donated   to   a   public   library   rather   than   a   Jewish   library).     This   is   not  particularly  surprising  given  what  we  know  of  the  political  climate  for  Jews  in  the  immediate  aftermath  of  the   war.     Although   persecution   of   the   Jews   had   come   to   an   end,   the   government   (and   even   Jewish  communal   leaders)  was   reticent   to  address  problems  particular   to   the   Jews,   leading   to  many  difficulties.    And  yet  nevertheless,  as  my  paper  will  also  show,  the  way  restitution  authorities  enlisted  the  help  of  Jewish  institutions  and  communal  leaders  in  their  efforts  had  an  important  effect  on  the  re-­‐emergence  of  Jewish  cultural  life  later  on,  beginning  in  the  1960s.  

 

Simon  Perego,  Institut  d'études  politiques  de  Paris  /  Centre  d'histoire  de  Sciences  Po,  Paris,  France  

Title:  Rebuilding  through  Purges?  Communal  Jurys  d'honneur  within  French  Jewry  after  Liberation  

Abstract:  Despite   the  wealth  of  academic  publications  dedicated  to  postwar  purges   in  France,   the   Jewish  dimension  of  this  subject  has  hardly  attracted  the  attention  of  historians.  And  yet  the  confrontation  in  the  Jewish   community   after   Liberation   pitted   those   considered   to   have   behaved   with   dignity   and   altruism  during   the  war   against   those   deemed   to   have   acted   dishonorably   and   to   have   caused   direct   or   indirect  harm  to   their  co-­‐religionists.   Indeed,  when   liberation  came,  a  number  of   Jewish  groups  and  personalities  called  for  an   internal  purge  of  the  community.   In  particular  some  actors   in  the  French  Jewish  community  took   it   upon   themselves   to   evaluate   the   conduct   of   other   Jews   under   the   occupation   in   the   context   of  various   proceedings   that   had   no   official   status   whatsoever.   These   proceedings   were   for   the   most   part  conducted  by   committees   –  often   called   “jury  of   honor”   (“jury  d’honneur”)   –   that   various   Jewish  bodies  created  specifically   for   this  purpose.  They  addressed  difficult   cases   in  which   it  was   felt   that  although   the  persons   implicated   might   have   acted   dishonorably,   the   gravity   of   their   offense   did   not   justify   their  automatic  referral  to  the  legal  authorities.  Tackling  this  subject  will  lead  us  to  the  intersection  of  two  bodies  of  history  that  have  not  yet  come  together:  studies  of  the  liberation  and  purges  in  France  [Novick,  1968  ;  Rousso,  1992   ;  Baruch,  2003]  and  studies  of   the  revival  of   Jewish   life   in   the  country  after   the  occupation  [Weinberg,  1990  ;  Wieviorka,  1995  ;  Grynberg,  1998].  Although,  as  a  political  phenomenon,  the  purges   in  France  were  not  limited  to  the  postwar  period,  the  process,  which  began  in  the  summer  of  1944,  was  the  

first  time  that  the  purges  involved  both  the  Jews  and  French  society  at  large,  albeit  with  different  levels  of  intensity.  So  when  we  analyze  the  full  complexity  of  the  internal  purges  in  the  Jewish  community  we  must  inscribe   them   in   the   general   context   of   the   purges   in   French   society,   while   trying   to   understand   the  functions  they  may  have  played  in  the  fabric  of  the  group  in  question.  To  do  this,  I  will  look  first  of  all  at  the  strong   inclination  among  French   Jews   to  purge  alleged   Jewish  collaborators  with   the  Nazis  and  the  Vichy  regime  from  their  midst.  Next,  I  will  consider  the  models  and  forms  of  the  internal  purges.  Finally,  I  will  try  to   evaluate   the   limits   that   marked   Jewish   initiatives   to   expel   those   considered   to   have   been   guilty   of  misconduct   under   the   occupation.   This   will   allow   us   to   study   an   important—and   yet   underestimated—aspect  of  the  reconstruction  of  the  Jewish  community  in  the  specific  context  of  the  immediate  aftermath  of  the  war  in  France.  

 

Sarah   Federman,  George  Mason  University   School   of   Conflict  Analysis   and  Resolution,  Arlington,  Virgina,  USA  

Title:  Aller  Simple:  Restoring  Justice  and  the  French  Railroads  -­‐  SNCF  vs.  USA  

Abstract:   Case   Summary:   Between   1941-­‐44,   the   French   state-­‐owned   train   company,   the   SNCF   (Société  Nationale  des  Chemins  de  Fer  Francais)  under  the  direction  of  the  Vichy  Regime  deported  75,721  Jews  to  the   German   border   where   they   were   then   taken   to   Auschwitz.   The   deportees   traveled   thirty-­‐six   hours  packed   in   cattle   cars  with  no   food,  water,   light  and   sanitation.   Few   returned.  The  company  continues   to  work   in   and   outside   of   France   to   clear   its   name   and   make   amends   with   survivors   and   Jewish   groups.  Archives   have   been   opened   to   the   public;   the   company   contributes   to   commemorative   efforts,   and  participates  in  other  activities  that  could  be  considered  transitional  justice  initiatives.  A  class  action  lawsuit  based  in  New  York  has  been  in  process  for  over  ten  years  and  legislation  continues  to  be  drafted  within  the  United   States   to   create   barriers   for   the   train   company   to   bid   for   U.S.   high-­‐speed   rail   and   commuter  contracts.  The  most  recent  bill,  sponsored  by  New  York  Senator  Charles  Schumer,  reached  the  Senate  floor  this   September.   Based   on   over   three   years   of   research,   this   paper   examines   the   case   from   a   conflict  resolution  standpoint.  Firstly,  the  paper  examines  why  the  French  Jewish  community  seems  to  believe  the  company  has  made  amends  while   some  of   the  diaspora   feels   the  company  has  not  done  nearly  enough.  The  paper  also  explores  the  ways  in  which  the  on-­‐going  U.S.  based  lawsuit  constrains  productive  dialogues  between  the  SNCF  and  survivor  diaspora.  This  case  serves  as  a  valuable  opportunity  to  consider  the  ways  in  which  corporations  can  make  amends  in  post-­‐conflict  environments.  

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  11  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Economies  and  Images  of  Jewish-­‐Christian  Relations  in  the  later  Middle  Ages  

Organizers:  Eva  Frojmovic  and  Diane  Wolfthal  

Chair:  Eva  Frojmovic  and  Diane  Wolfthal  

 

Eva  Frojmovic,  University  of  Leeds,  UK  

Title:   Feasting   at   the   Lord's   Table?   The   Economy   of   Salvation   in   the   "Feast   of   the   Tzadiqim"   in   the  Ambrosian  Bible    

Abstract:   The  painted   "Feast  of   the  Tzadiqim",   together  with  other  eschatological   images,   completes   the  Ambrosian  Bible   (1236-­‐8,   South  Germany)  with  a  messianic   conclusion  based  on   rabbinic   traditions.   This  banquet   has   been   compared   to   Last   Supper   scenes   without   much   thought   for   other   than   "artistic  influence".   I   would   like   to   argue   for   much   more   complex   relationship   between   minority   and   majority  culture.  Yes,  the  painted  "Feast  of  the  Righteous"  may  reference  (polemically)  the  Last  Supper;  but  beyond  that,   we   need   to   attend   to   the   social  meanings   of   banquets   as   constitutive   of   a   fragile   social   order,   as  witnessed   in   the   role  of   banquets   in   secular   literature.  Norbert  Ott   noted   that   almost  no  matter  what   a  secular  book  is  about  (Tristan,  Parsifal,  you  name  it),  illuminated  versions  will  inevitably  feature  a  banquet.  But  of  course  in  the  case  of  the  Jewish  messianic  banquet  there  is  a  twist,  as  the  belonging  of  Jews  to  that  society   is   debated,   and   this   banquet,   as   secular   as   it   looks,   is   not.  Nevertheless,   I  will   argue   that   like   its  secular  counterparts,  the  Jewish  "Feast  of  the  Righteous"  encodes  an  ideal  social  order  which  can  stand  in  for  messianic  re-­‐ordering  of  society.  

 

Diane  Wolfthal,  Rice  University,  Houston,  Texas,  USA  

Title:  Complicating  Medieval  Anti-­‐Semitism:  Class  as  a  Category  of  Analysis  in  Images  of  Christian  Violence  against  Jews  

Abstract:   Miri   Rubin   justly   concluded   that   “most   remaining   traces”   of   medieval   atrocities   against   Jews  “represent  the  position  of  Christian  authorities  –  chroniclers,  preachers,  town  officials  –  who  were  almost  always  writing  in  defense  or  celebration  of  the  events.”But  the  exceptions  to  this  rule  are  illuminating.  This  paper  will  explore  images  in  chronicles  and  fable  books  produced  for  Christians  that  neither  celebrate  nor  defend  Christian  acts  of  violence  against  Jews,  and,  indeed  sometimes  condemn  them.  These  are  certainly  few   in  number,  yet   their  existence  complicates  our  understanding  of  medieval  anti-­‐Semitism.In  exploring  these  images,  my  paper  will  suggest  that  sometimes  class  conflict  trumps  religious  conflict.  

 

Maya  Irish,  Rice  University,  Houston,  Texas,  USA  

Title:  Ferrán  Martínez  and  the  Social  Anti-­‐Judaism  of  Fourteenth-­‐Century  Castile  

Abstract:  The  devastating  pogroms  of  1391  in  the  kingdoms  of  Castile  and  Aragon  permanently  altered  the  physical  and  spiritual  landscape  of  Jewish  life  in  Spain.  The  massacres  took  place  in  the  midst  of  economic  and   political   changes   accompanied   by   social   unrest   and   violence.   The   talk   will   argue   that   the   crisis  of  political  authority  in  the  kingdom  of  Castile  fostered  the  growth  of  social  anti-­‐Judaism,  which  built  on  the  traditional   themes   of   doctrinal   anti-­‐Judaism,   but   had   an   important   social   dimension:   it   firmly   linked   the  Jews  with  the  established  order  and  its  many  failures,  and  aimed  to  change  society  by  ridding  it  of  the  Jews.  This  ideology  is  most  apparent  in  the  preaching  of  Ferrán  Martínez,  the  archdeacon  of  Ecija  and  a  canon  of  the  Cathedral  of  Seville,  who  for  at  least  two  decades  prior  to  the  attacks  advocated  strict  social  separation  between   Jews   and   Christians   and   confidently   asserted   that   the   king   and   queen   of   Castile   would   be  “pleased”   if   the   Jews  were  to  be  killed.  Although  Martínez’s   impassioned  preaching   is   rightly  seen  as   the  catalyst  for  the  attacks   in  Seville  that  triggered  a  chain  reaction  of  anti-­‐Jewish  violence  throughout  Spain,  much  about  his  life  and  career  remains  poorly  understood.  Was  he  a  rogue  priest,  or  a  respectable  member  of   the   ecclesiastical   hierarchy?   How   much   did   his   preaching   owe   to   the   ideas   already   in   circulation  throughout  Castile?  By  exploring   the  connection  between  Martínez’s  preaching  and  the  kingdom’s  public  discourse   on   the   Jews,   the   talk   will   attempt   to   show   how   the   idea   of   the   Jews’   responsibility   for   the  society’s   troubles   became   entrenched   in   the   Castilian   political   discourse,   and   why   radical   solutions   –  separating  Jews  from  Christians,  forcibly  converting  the  Jews  or  killing  them  –  came  to  be  seen  as  the  best  remedy  for  ameliorating  the  ills  plaguing  the  realm.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Jewish  Middle  Ages  

11.00-­‐12.00  

Panel:  Economies  and  Images  of  Jewish-­‐Christian  Relations  in  the  later  Middle  Ages  

Organizers:  Eva  Frojmovic  and  Diane  Wolfthal  

Chair:  Eva  Frojmovic  and  Diane  Wolfthal  

 

Aron  Sterk,  Manchester  University,  UK  

Title:  The  Jew   in   the  Polyptych:  The   image  of  a   Jewish  Courtier   in   late  15th  c.  Portugal  on  the  Eve  of   the  Expulsions  in  Nuno  Gonçalves  

Abstract:  The  Saint  Vincent  Panels  are  a  masterpiece  of  the  Portuguese  Renaissance.  Only  rediscovered  in  the  late  1880s  they  have  been  attributed  to  the  little-­‐known  artist  Nuno  Gonçalves  (active  c.1450-­‐90?).  The  panels  depict  members  of  the  Portuguese  royal  house  of  Aviz  and  the  various  orders  of  Portuguese  society;  nobility,  knightly  orders,  burghers,  peasantry,  and  the  church,  both  secular  and  religious.   It  also  depicts  a  scholarly  figure  who  is  clearly  Jewish,  marked  with  a  red  star  and  holding  a  book  with  fake  Hebrew  writing.  The  exact  identity  of  this  figure  depends  on  the  identity  of  the  royal  figures  depicted  and  there  have  been  many   theories   as   to  who   these   are.   Influenced   by   the   resemblance   between   the   central   figure   and   the  famous  portrait,  popularly  but,  probably  erroneously,  taken  to  be  a  portrait  of  Henry  the  Navigator,  most  interpreters  have  identified  the  central  figures  as  members  of  the  Ínclita  generação  (illustrious  generation),  

the  children  of   João   I  and  his  wife  Philippa  of  Lancaster.  The  many  difficulties  posed  by  all   these  theories  are  overcome  if,  as  I  propose,  the  central  figures  are  interpreted  as  representing  the  later  Afonso  V  (1432-­‐1481)  and  his  children  the  infantes  Joana  and  João  (later  João  II  (1455-­‐1495)).  If  this  is  accepted  with  a  date  c.  1469-­‐70  then  the  Jewish  figure  may  probably  be  identified  as  Joseph  ibn  Yahya,  a  confidant  of  Afonso  V  who   called   him   as   ‘the  wise   Jew.’   A   courtier   and   patron   of   the   renowned  Hebrew  manuscript   school   of  Lisbon,   Ibn  Yahya  fell   foul  of  Afonso’s  successor,  João  II  and  was  forced  to  flee  from  forced  conversion   in  1495,   two   years   before   the  mass   forced   conversions   ordered   by   João’s   successor  Manuel   I.   The   panels  therefore  not  only  have  the  earliest  humanist  portrait  of  a  European  Jew,  but  are  also  an  important  image  through  which  we   can  understand   the   close  dependency  of   Jews   in   Iberia   on   the  monarch   and  on   royal  domestic  and  foreign  policies  in  the  period  leading  up  to  the  expulsions  from  Spain  and  Portugal.  

 

Anthony  Bale,  University  of  London,  UK  

Title:  Documentary  Culture  and  the  Limits  of  Iconography  in  the  1233  Norwich  Tallage  Roll  

Abstract:   The   image   at   the   head   of   the   1233   Norwich   tallage   roll,   now   held   in   the   National   Archives,  London,  is  one  of  the  earliest  and  most  forceful  representations  of  the  medieval  English  Jewish  community.  It   shows  Moses,   Isaac   and   Abigail,   Jews   of   Norwich,   with   various   other   figures.   Previous   studies   of   the  image  have  focused  on  the  iconography  of  the  image,  as  if  it  narrates  an  iconographic  'story'  amenable  to  art-­‐historical   interpretation.   In  my  paper   I  will   propose   a   different  way  of   reading   the   image   through   its  material   form.   Scholars   have   little   considered   the   context   of   the   drawing,   or   the   documentary,   scribal  culture  which  engendered  it.  In  my  paper  I  approach  the  image  through  this  scribal  culture  and  offer  new  ways  of  thinking  about  its  origins  and  public  purposes.  

 

12.00-­‐13.00  

Status  of  the  Jews  in  Medieval  Italy  

 

Chair:  

 

Pierre  Savy,  Université  Paris-­‐Est  -­‐  Marne-­‐la-­‐Vallée,  France  

Title:  Jewish  Particularism  and  Princely  States  in  Renaissance  Italy  

Abstract:  In  Renaissance  Northern  Italy,  princely  states  tended  to  be  rather  benevolent  towards  Jews,  while  surprisingly  Republican  regimes  were  more  reluctant  and  sometimes  clearly  hostile  to  that  presence.   It   is  now   admitted   that   princely   states   relied   on   various   entities   (universitates,   "separate   lands"   and   fiefs),  which  were  an  instrument  much  more  than  a  limit  to  their  powers.  Can  we  conceive  the  Jewish  presence  as  one  of   these  particularisms?   If   so,  one  would  understand  better  why   Jews  were  more  easily  accepted  by  princely  regimes,  while  Republics  perhaps  had  more  difficulty  envisioning  such  a  limit  to  the  political  body.  A  number  of  documents  produced  by  the  central  authorities  -­‐condotte,  privileges,  and  jurisdictions-­‐  in  the  14th  and  15th  centuries  lend  support  to  this  contention.  

 

Miriam  Davide,  Università  di  Trieste,  Italy  

Title:  Types  of  Citizenship  and  Mode  of  Integration  of  the  Jewish  Minority   in  the  North-­‐east  of  Italy,   Istria  and  Carniola  between  the  Middle  of  the  Thirteenth  and  Beginning  of  the  Sixteenth  Century.  

Abstract:  In  my  contribution  I  will  examine  the  citizenship  granted  to  Jews.  Citizenship  does  not  end  in  the  territories   in   question   to   the   one   obtained   in   exchange   for   the   loan   interest.   There   are,   in   fact,   tied   to  specific  cases  of  citizenship  "status"  as  the  condition  of  the  Jews  imperial.  I  will  examine  the  difficulties  of  understanding   the   Jewish   communal   organization   on   the   part   of   contemporary   society   by   analyzing   the  terminology  used  by  notaries  and  public  administrations.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Middle  Ages  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  Biblical  Study  in  late  Middle  Ages:  between  Jews  and  Christians  

Organizer:  Ari  Geiger  

 

Chair:  Ari  Geiger  

 

Jonathan  Jacobs,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  The  Contribution  of  R.  Tuvia  ben  Eliezer  ("Lekaḥ  Tov")  to  the  Judeo-­‐Christian  Polemic  

Abstract:  R.  Tuvia  ben  Eliezer  ("Leka?  Tov")  was  active  during  the  second  half  of  the  11th  century  in  Greece.  His   exegesis   has   not   been  widely   researched,   and   to   date   no   scholarship   at   all   has   been   devoted   to   his  commentary  on  Song  of  Songs,  which  presents  a  systematic  commentary  on  every  verse  of  the  text,  mostly  based  on  rabbinic  midrashic  teachings.  However,  his  commentary   is  not  a  random  collection  of  midrashic  material,  but  rather  a  composition  constructed  in  a  manner  unprecedented  in  the  rabbinic  tradition  of  his  time  or  of  earlier  periods.  In  the  lecture  I  shall  examine  its  contribution  to  the  Judeo-­‐Christian  polemic,  in  comparison  with  Rashi's  exegesis.  I  will  show  that  He  focuses  on  one  main  theme  throughout  his  allegorical  commentary:  most  of  his  teachings  deal  with  the  situation  of  the  Jewish  People  in  exile,  the  memory  of  the  past,   and   anticipation   of   the   future.   We   may   say   that   although   R.   Tuvia   and   Rashi   lived   in   different  geographical   regions  and   in  different  cultural  environments,   there   is  considerable  similarity   in   the  way   in  which  each  of  them  addresses  the  events  of  their  time.  

 

Robert  Harris,  Jewish  Theological  Seminary,  USA  

Title:   ‘Writing   About   Reading   and   Reading   About   Writing’:   The   Twelfth   Century   Renaissance   and   the  Emergence  of  Peshat  and  Ad  Litteram  as  Methods  of  Encountering  the  Bible  

Abstract:  During  the  20th  Century,  scholars  who  wished  to  investigate  the  interrelationship  among  Jewish  and   Christian   biblical   exegesis   most   often   did   so   by   comparing   and   contrasting   exegesis   of   identical   or  closely-­‐related   biblical   passages,   and  would   frequently   seek   out   sources   and   influences.   This  worthwhile  

and  yet  ongoing  project   is  essentially  exegetical   in  orientation.  The  present   study,  by   contrast,  will   focus  instead  on  hermeneutics.  My  paper  will  examine  the  ways  in  which  Jewish  and  Christian  biblical  exegetes,  contemporary   during   the   Renaissance   of   the   Twelfth   Century,   incorporate   discursive   comments   about  reading,  by  which  I  mean  the  process  of  reading  qua  reading,  and  not  necessarily  approaching  the  Bible,  in  the   time-­‐honored   ways   and   authoritative   ways   that   both   traditions   had   developed   over   centuries   to  discover  or  uncover   religious  Truth.   I  will  evaluate   those  points  of  contact  and  contrast   that  exist  among  them.  The  Jewish  scholars  whom  I  research  be  include  such  “contextual,  literary”  exegetes  (pashtanim)  as  Rashi,   Rashbam,   R.   Joseph   Kara   and   R.   Eliezer   of   Beaugency,  while   among   Churchmen  who   focussed   on  “literal   exegesis”   (ad   litteram)   I   will   examine   the   Victorines,   in   particular.  My   presentation  will   draw   on  recent  scholarship  that  addresses  emerging  trends  in  12th  century  literacy.  

 

Gad  Freudenthal,  University  of  Geneva,  Switzerland  

Title:  Jacob  ben  Reuben  and  the  Introduction  of  Philosophy  into  Jewish  Provence  in  the  Second  Half  of  the  12th  Century  

Abstract:   In  my   paper   I  will   argue   for   a   precise   identification   of   the   place  where   Jacob   encountered   his  Christian   interlocutor,   show   that   he   depended   only   on   Hebrew   sources,   and   explain  what  we   can   learn  from  his   book   about   the   introduction  of   Jewish  philosophy   into  Provence   in   the   second  half   of   the  12th  century.  Jacob  ben  Reuben  completed  his  *Milhamot  ha-­‐Shem*,  an  account  of  his  polemics  with  a  friendly  priest,   in   1170.   It   is   the   first   work   that   engages   in   a   philosophically-­‐informed   discussion   of   theological  subjects  and  also  the  first  work  to  include  Hebrew  translations  of  passages  from  the  New  Testament.  Jacob  also  was  acquainted  with  contemporary  Christian  theological  works.  What  is  the  cultural  context  in  which  Jacob   wrote   his   work?   Two   answers   have   been   offered:   that   he   lived   in   Christian   Spain   and   was  knowledgeable  in  Arabic;  and  that  he  lived  in  Gascogne  (southern  France)  and  had  access  to  Hebrew  works  only.  The  issue  is  important,  because  Jacob  is  contemporary  with  the  beginning  of  the  Tibbonid  translations  of   the   works   of   Judeo-­‐Arabic   philosophy,   so   that   he   is   an   important   witness   to   the   penetration   of  philosophical  lore  into  the  thought  of  an  "average"  Jewish  intellectual.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Middle  Ages  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  Biblical  Study  in  late  Middle  Ages:  between  Jews  and  Christians  

 

Chair:  Gad  Freudenthal  

 

Ari  Geiger,  Bar  Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Brain  Challenging  or  Religious  Activity?  Jewish  and  Christian  Criticism  of  the  Study  of  Religious  Texts  in  Scientific  Methods  in  12th-­‐13th  Centuries.    

Abstract:  Scholarly  research  in  recent  decades  has  endeavored  to  examine  the  existence  and  the  extent  of  a   linkage   between   cultural   trends   in   the   Ashkenazic   world   (mainly   in   its   two   centers   –   Germany   and  northern   France)   in   the   12th-­‐13th   centuries   and   the   intellectual   currents   that   were   dominant   in   the  Christian  sphere  which  surrounded   it.  Scholars  who  took  part   in   this  effort  discussed  the   literal   school  of  northern  France  (11th-­‐12th  century)  as  a  cultural  phenomenon  influenced  by  the  spirit  of  the  12th  century  Renaissance   (see,  e.g.   studies  by  Elazar  Touitou  and  Sara   Japhet),  a  possible  Christian   impact  on  German  pietism  (a  thesis  supported  by  Yitzhak  Baer),  and  methods  of  learning  and  interpretation  used  both  by  the  Tosafists   and   contemporary   scholars   of   the  prominent  Christian   schools   (an   issue  discussed  by   Israel   Ta-­‐Shma  and  Efraim  Kanarfogel).   In  this  paper,   I   intend  to  explore  another  aspect  of   the  Ashkenazic  cultural  scene,   namely   the   criticism   leveled   against   the   schools   of   the   Tosafists,   probably   by   German   pietists,   a  phenomenon   reviewed   by   Ta-­‐Shma.   I   will   present   similar   criticism   that   was   leveled   against   the   use   of  dialectics  and  philosophical   logic   in   the  study  of  Christian   theology   (by  scholars   such  as   John  of  Salisbury  [12th   Century]   and   Bonaventure   [13th   Century]).   In   addition,   I   will   compare   the   arguments   made   by  conservative  circles  of  both  religions,  examining  the  time  and  region   in  which  they  were  made.  Based  on  that  information  I  will  try  to  evaluate  the  level  of  similarity  between  these  two  acts  of  protest,  taking  into  consideration  their  arguments,   their  motives,  and  the  change  sought  by   them.  Finally,   I  will  establish   the  historical  context  of  Jewish  criticism  of  the  “scientific”  study  of  Torah  –  whether  it  was  a  result  of  Christian  influence,  or  a  typical  reaction  to  an  innovative  stream  in  a  religious  world.  

 

David  Rotman,  Tel  Aviv  University  and  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:   Author,   Fiction,   a   Lamb   and   a  Wolf:   Hebrew  Adaptations   of   “Aesop”   Fables   from   the  Middle-­‐Ages  through  the  Early  Modern  Era  

Abstract:  In  Latin,  as  well  as  in  vernacular  corpora  of  the  high  middle-­‐ages,  one  may  find  several  versions,  under   different   titles,   of   “Aesop”   and   “Aesop-­‐like”   fables.   These   tales   stood   as   a   cultural   foundation   of  European  heritage,  second  only  to  the  Holy  Scriptures.  In  fact,  the  “Aesop”  collections  were  an  identifying  mark  of  the  literate  culture  from  the  high-­‐middle  ages  onward  that  many  children  from  certain  classes  and  circles   were   exposed   to   it   from   an   early   age.   The   popularity   of   the   fables   is   reflected   in   the   multiple  versions  in  which  they  appeared  -­‐  in  rhymed  and  metered  forms  as  well  as  in  prose.  In  Jewish  literature,  the  presence  of  Aesop-­‐like  fables  goes  back  to  the  Rabbinic  literature  of  the  late-­‐antiquity.  Some  of  them  were  integrated  into  the  Talmudic  and  Midrashic  narratives  and  appeared  to  be  an  important  part  of  the  sages’  cultural  tool  box.  Considering  that,  the  relative  absence  of  the  genre  from  the  medieval  Hebrew  narrative  is  somewhat  surprising.  In  fact,  except  for  the  famous  poetic  work  of  Berechiah  Ben  Natronai  ha-­‐Nakdan  (end  of  12th–13th  century)  there  are  almost  no  echoes  to  the  presence  of  Aesop  fables  in  the  medieval  Hebrew  literature   in  general  and   the  medieval  Hebrew  prose-­‐narrative   in  particular.  Only   in   the  beginning  of   the  age  of  Hebrew-­‐print,   in   an  anthology  of   folk-­‐narratives   first  published   in  1516/17   in  Constantinople,  one  can  find  the  first  Hebrew  translation  of  the  collection  of  “Ysopet”,  transmitted  in  prose-­‐narrative  form,  and  presented  as  “The  fables  of  Ysopeto”  ( איזופטו חידות ).  In  the  proposed  paper,  I  would  suggest  that  the  late  appearance  of  the  Aesop-­‐like  collections  reflects  a  change  in  the  status  of  two  components  of  the  Hebrew  literature:  Legitimization  of  the  concept  of  “Fiction”  transmitted  in  the  form  of  prose  narrative,  and  the  rise  of  new  concept  of  an  “Author”  of  literary  works  in  that  same  form.  I  would  also  like  to  examine  the  function  and   influence  of  the  new  technology  of  print  as  one  of  the  possible  causes   for  these   literary  and  cultural  changes.  

 

Noga  Cohen,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  The  Gentile  "Hangman"  as  a  Symbol:  Jewish  Attitudes  to  Gentiles  as  reflected  in  the  Medieval  Hebrew  Versions  of  the  Judith  Story  

Abstract:  The  presentation  will  focus  on  the  complexity  of  the  relationship  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  in  the  period  of   the  11th-­‐16th  centuries,  as  reflected   in  a  Hebrew  Medieval   folk  story  –  the  Story  of   Judith.  The  Medieval   Judith  Story  deals  with  a  pious  and  beautiful   Jewish  woman  from  Jerusalem  who  saves  her  city   –   and   thus   all   the   Jews   living   in   the   kingdom  of   Judah  –   from   the   threats   of   the  Greek   enemy.   The  source  of  the  story  lies  in  'The  Book  of  Judith',  an  apocryphal  Jewish  book  that  was  written  in  the  Second  Temple   period.   Surprisingly,   even   though   the   book   was   excluded   from   the   Jewish   Canon,   the   story  reappeared  in  the  middle  Ages  in  various  Hebrew  versions.  As  I  will  argue,  some  of  the  medieval  versions  are  direct  translations  from  the  Latin  version  of  the  story  that  is  to  be  found  in  the  Vulgate,  and  others  are  folk  variations.  Hence  The  Judith  Story  teaches  us  about  the  relationship  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  in  the  middle  ages.  As  my  paper  will  show,  not  just  that  the  excluded  book  returned  to  the  Jewish  tradition  thanks  to  the  cultural  exchanges  between  Jews  and  Christians,  but  the  account  even  became  a  popular  story  and  acquired  the  status  of  an  old  "Midrash".  Furthermore,  I  would  like  to  show  that  The  Judith  story  expresses  the   collective   conscious   of   the   Jews   of   that   era,   when   contending   with   a   minority   status   and   suffering  hatred  and  murdered.  The   story   that  deals  with  a  war  between   two  ancient   cultures,   the  Greek  and   the  Jewish,  provides  the  medieval  Jews  with  a  way  to  enunciate  their  own  feelings  and  their  own  struggle  on  keeping   to   retain   their   Jewish   identity   in   a   hostile   environment.   At   the   center   of   the   discussion  will   be  presented   the   way   in   which   the   Jews   perceived   the   gentiles   in   the   Middle   Ages,   and   especially   the  collective   Jewish  hidden   ideas  and  wishful   thinking  about   their   enemy's   fate   –   as   reflected  by   the   Judith  Story.  These  topics  will  be  examined  through  several  issues  in  the  story,  such  it's  link  to  the  Jewish  festival  of  Hanukkah  and  the  Hasmoneans  rebellion;  the  depiction  of  the  Jewish  neighborhoods,  and  the  status  of  gentiles  who  believed  in  the  verity  of  the  Jewish  religion.  

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  12  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  History  and  Heritage  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  Jewish  Heritage  Tourism  Rediscovering  Jewish  Past    

and  Encountering  Jewish  Presence  in  Europe  and  Beyond  

Organizer:  Magdalena  Waligorska  

Chair:  

 

Magdalena  Waligorska,  University  of  Bremen,  Germany  

Title:  Destination  Belarus:  Factoring  Jewish  Past  into  the  Narrative  of  Belorussian  Heritage  

Abstract:  Despite  the  fact  that  vestiges  of  Jewish  heritage  are   impossible  to  overlook  throughout  Belarus,  Jewish  past   is   rarely  being  acknowledged   in  public   spaces  of   the  country  deemed  the   last  dictatorship  of  Europe.  Once   home   to   a   vibrant   Jewish   community   but   today   still   off   the   track   of   the   organized   Jewish  heritage   tourism,  Belarus   struggles   to   factor   its   Jewish  history   into  a  new  vision  of   the  national  heritage.  This  paper  explores  a   few  official  and  grassroots   initiatives  that  attempt  to  bring  Jewish  heritage  back  on  the  map  of  Belarus:  the  Jewish  Museum  in  Minsk,  Ada  Raychonok’s  private  museum  of  regional  heritage  in  Germanovichi,   the   interethnic   “Walk   of   Fame”   in   Glubokoe,   featuring   the   monument   of   Eliezer   Ben-­‐Yehuda,  and  the  ongoing  project  of  the  central  Belorussian  Holocaust  memorial  in  Trostenets.  Coordinated  both  by   Jews   and  non-­‐Jews   and   launched  both   as   official   projects   of   state   authorities   and   as   subversive  oppositional  activities,  new  museums  and  monuments  devoted  to  Jewish  culture  are  not  only  an  attempt  to   create   tourist   destinations   that   are  meant   to   educate   the   local   population   about   the   historic   Jewish  presence  in  Belarus,  but  also  a  negotiation  terrain  where  different  actors  (local  Jewish  communities,  state  authorities,  political  opposition,  foreign  NGOs)  try  to  find  an  appropriate  form  to  exhibit  Jewish  culture  and  commemorate  Jews  in  the  conditions  of  an  authoritarian  regime.  Framing  Belorussian  heritage  in  terms  of  ethnic   pluralism,   the   initiatives   devoted   to   rediscovering   Jewish   culture   in   Belarus   both   challenge   and  instrumentalise  the  dominant  nationalist  narratives  and  can  be  seen  as  part  of  a  more  wide-­‐ranging  project  of   acknowledging   the   “other”   legacies   of   Belarus.   Incorporating   the  multicultural   heritage   of   the   Polish-­‐Lithuanian  Commonwealth  and  recognizing  the  contribution  of  ethnic  minorities  into  the  cultural  landscape  of  Belarus,  the  project  of  regaining  the  Jewish  past  is  also  one  of  renegotiating  the  Belorussian  identity.  

 

Magdalena  Zatorska,  University  of  Warsaw,  Poland  

Title:  Hasidic  Visitors  to  Ukraine  and  Poland:  Space  and  Memory  in  the  Jewish-­‐Ukrainian  and  Jewish-­‐Polish  Encounters  

Abstract:   The   rise   of   Hasidic   pilgrimage   to   Poland   and   Ukraine   in   the   last   decade   of   the   20th   century  challenged   the  way   the   local   residents   came   to   formulate   their   attitudes   towards   the   visiting   Jews.   The  memory  of  the  pre-­‐Holocaust  local  Jewish  communities  and  the  often  repressed  memory  of  the  Holocaust  

itself  became  confronted  with  the  real  presence  of  Hasidim,  who  have  transformed  the  cultural  landscape  of   the   towns   they  visit,   and   influenced   in   important  way   the  everyday   life  of   their   inhabitants.  Based  on  ethnographic  material  collected  in  Uman  in  Ukraine  and  Lizhensk  in  Poland,  this  paper  addresses  the  way  Hassidic  pilgrimage  affects  not  only  the  economy,  but  also  the  memory,  identity  and  political  strategies  and  tactics  (DeCerteau)  of  the  local  communities  vis-­‐à-­‐vis  the  visiting  ‘Others’.  This  paper  discusses  these  issues  in  a  performative  perspective,   taking   into  account   that   social  phenomena  exist  and  change  as  a   result  of  social  action,  that  is,  they  are  produced,  processed  and  reproduced  through  the  physical,  symbolic,  ritual,  etc.   practices.   The   performative   dimension   of   the   Ukrainian-­‐Jewish   and   Polish-­‐Jewish   encounters   in   the  context   of   the   researched   phenomenon   is   manifested   most   clearly   in   the   spatial   practices.   The   public  spaces   of   Uman   and   Lizhensk,   physically   shared   by   visitors   and   residents,   on   the   one   hand,   enable   the  encounter  and  determine  the  forms  of  contact  and  interaction,  such  as  spontaneous  conversations,  taking  photos  together,  drinking  alcohol.  On  the  other  hand,  because  the  same  places  become  crucial  reference  points   for   the   construction  of   collective   identities  of  both   the   local  populations  and   the   Jewish  visitors  –  they   constitute   a   contested   terrain,   where   symbolic,   or   sometimes   physical,   struggle   take   place,   as  competing  identities,  economic  and  political  strategies  become  articulated.  

 

Katka  Reszke,  Independent  Scholar,  USA  

Title:  In  Search  of  the  'Real'  Jew:  Jewish  Heritage  Tourists  and  their  Encounters  with  Young  Jews  in  Poland  

Abstract:  A  new,  “unexpected”  generation  of  Jews  made  an  appearance  in  Poland  following  the  fall  of  the  communist   regime.   The   pursuit   of   Jewish   identity   among   representatives   of   this   third   post-­‐Holocaust  generation   takes   place   after   decades   of   oppression   and   accounts   for   an   exceptionally   poignant  phenomenon   in   that   part   of   Europe.   These   new   Jewish   identities   are   fluctuating   and   continuously  dialogically   reconstructed   against   the   outside   world.   The   idea   of   being   'authentically'   Jewish   in   today's  Poland   is  met  with   skepticism  and  confusion  of   the  outside  world.  My  analysis  of  50   in-­‐depth   interviews  reveals  a  peculiar  rhetoric  among  young  Polish  Jews  employed  as  a  defense  mechanism  against  accusations  of   inauthenticity.   In   this   paper,   I   present   some   of   the   patters   which   emerge   in   how   they   narrate   their  experience   maneuvering   between   the   primordial   and   the   constructed.   Their   'uncertain'   identities   are  confronted  by  multiple  'others',  but  perhaps  most  distinctively  by  Jewish  North  Americans  and  Israelis  who  visit  Poland  on  heritage  or  Holocaust  tours.  In  response  to  'threats  to  identity',  a  unique  self-­‐authenticating  rhetoric   is   applied.   In   other   words,   the   narrative   construction   of   identity   among   young   Jews   in  contemporary   Poland   is   greatly   conditioned   by   their   encounters  with   foreign   visitors.   Identity   narratives  constructed  by  representatives  of  the  third  post-­‐Holocaust  generation  of  Jews  in  Poland  illuminate  both  the  perceived   “essence”   of   Jewishness,   and   its   perceived   periphery   and   boundaries.   They   call   for   a  reexamination  of   the  question  of   “Who   is   a   Jew?”  and   they  question   the   seemingly  most  obvious   truths  about  what  it  means  to  be  a  'real'  Jew.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Jewish  History  and  Heritage  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  Jewish  Heritage  Tourism  Rediscovering  Jewish  Past  

and  Encountering  Jewish  Presence  in  Europe  and  Beyond  2  

Organizer:  Magdalena  Waligorska  

 

Chair:  

 

Sophie  Wagenhofer,  Walter  De  Gruyter  Edition  

Title:  Jewish  Heritage  Tourism  in  Morocco:  Changing  Perceptions  of  ‘the  Jew’?  

Abstract:   The   last   three  decades  have   seen  a   significant   increase   in   Jewish  heritage   tourism   in  Morocco.  Various   institutions  and  actors  with  different  economic,  political  and  biographical   interests   influence  and  shape  this  trend.  The  initial  impact  for  the  emergence  of  Jewish  heritage  tourism  came  from  the  Moroccan  Jewish  diaspora,  from  Jews  of  Moroccan  origin  who  rediscovered  their  ‘homeland’.  In  the  early  1990s  also  the  Moroccan   government   began   using   the   potential   of   Jewish   heritage   tourism   as   significant   economic  factor  but  also  as  a  means  to  promote  the   image  of  an  open,  tolerant,  and  divers  society.  The   increasing  number  of  tourists  interested  in  Jewish  heritage  has  an  impact  on  actors  and  institutions  within  the  tourist  sector.  Tour-­‐operators  offer  special  Jewish  heritage  tours  with  a  very  standardized  itinerary,   including  the  Jewish  Museum   in  Casablanca  and  various   former   Jewish  quarters  with  synagogues  and  cemeteries.  Also  local  –  predominantly  Muslim  –  business-­‐people,  artisans,  shopkeepers  and  restaurateurs  try  to  cater  the  demands   of   this   specific   clientele.   They   provide   kosher   food   and   menus   written   in   Hebrew,   fabricate  Judaica   such   as   Hanukkah-­‐lamps   and   Passover   Seder   Plates   and   sometimes   even   learn   some   Hebrew  phrases  to  target   Israeli  customers.   In  my  presentation   I   look  at   Jewish  heritage  tourism   in  Morocco  as  a  kind  of  ‘contact  zone’  (Mary  Louise  Pratt)  for  Muslims  and  Jews  in  Morocco.  In  so  doing  I  trace  the  question  to  what  extent  this  new  ‘contact  zone’  is  shaping  and  changing  perceptions  of  ‘the  Jew’  among  Moroccan  Muslims  against  the  background  of  the  Middle  East  conflict.  

 

Maria  Giuseppina  Mascolo,  Università  degli  Studi  di  Bari  Aldo  Moro,  Italy  

Title:   Jewish   Itineraries   in   Apulia   and   Basilicata:   History,   Ethno-­‐anthropology,   Architectures,   Epigraphs,  Documents  and  Archives.  

Abstract:  The  project  “Itineraries  amongst  Jewish  traces:  architectures,  monuments,  epigraphs,  documents  (Apulia  and  Basilicata)”  starts  from  the  identification  of  sources  and  traces  concerning  the  Jewish  presence  in   the   Mediterranean   using   a   multidisciplinary   approach   by   means   of   technology   (digitization   and  computerized  consultation),  so  experimenting  with  innovative  strategies  in  the  application  of  the  research  results  to  cultural  tourism.  The  project   is   inspired  by  the  census,  cataloguing  and  digitizing  of  the  cultural  heritage   documenting   the   Jewish   presence   in   Apulia   and   Basilicata,   with   the   purpose   of   suggesting  itineraries  and  a  sustainable  utilization  through  consultable  data  bases,  virtual  visits  and  more  traditional  kinds  of  museum-­‐type  displays  reappraised   in  contemporary  terms.   It  concerns  an   immense  material  and  immaterial   patrimony   –   unknown   to  most   people   –   composed   of   very   heterogeneous   cultural   pieces   of  work  (monuments,  epigraphs,  documents,  but  also   immaterial   traditions)  whose  scientific  analysis  should  move  along  a  double  path.  On  the  one  hand,  the  humanities,  historiography  and  ethno-­‐anthropology;  on  the  other  hand,   the   technical  aspect   (with  digitization,   laser   scanning  of  epigraphs  and  photogrammetric  surveys   of   monuments).   The   fabric   of   the   historic   centers   is   strewn   with   toponyms   referring   to  “disappeared”   giudeccas   and   synagogues   which   can   be   traced   through   cartography   and   documents.  Besides  the  great  amount  of  epigraphs  which  have  been  found,  Basilicata  (and  neighbouring  regions)  is  rich  in   traces   of   Jewish   culture,   and   literary   and   poetic   sources.   The   research   could   be   extended   to  

contemporary  times,  taking  a  census  in  the  municipal  archives  of  the  Jews  interned  in  Apulia  and  Basilicata  because  of  the  racial  laws.  

 

Carol  Zemel,  York  University,  Toronto,  Canada  

Title:  New  Diasporas:  Image  and  Imagination  of  Jewish  Return  in  Poland  and  Germany  

Abstract:   Jewish   return   to   Poland   and   Germany,   the   most   conceptually   potent   sites   of   the   Shoah,   has  gathered  in  speed  and  numbers  in  the  last  decade  and  a  half.  The  phenomenon  has  not  gone  unnoticed  in  these  countries  or  in  the  Jewish  world  generally.  This  paper  considers  the  response  to  this  Return  in  both  countries   through   its   visual   and   museological   representation.   Israeli   artist   Yael   Bartana’s   Polish   Trilogy  (2006-­‐11)  frames  what  some  have  seen  as  a  startling  call  for  Jewish  return  to  Poland.  The  three-­‐part  work  begins   with   a   young   leader’s   dream   (or   nightmare-­‐-­‐Mary   Koszmary),   goes   on   to   picture   a   Polish-­‐Israeli  kibbutz  on  the  site  of  the  Warsaw  Ghetto,  and  culminates  in  a  ceremonial  pledge  to  the  assassinated  leader  to  build  a  multi-­‐cultural  society  that  will   leave  Europe  “stunned.”  On  the  same  ghetto  site  in  Warsaw,  the  new   state-­‐supported  Museum  of   the  History   of   Jews   in   Poland,   encourages   a   new   Jewish   consciousness  with  a  non-­‐lachrymose  account  of  centuries  of  Jewish  settlement  and  achievement  in  Poland.  In  Germany,  artist   Anna   Adam   uses   humour   and   mass-­‐cultural   tokens—buttons,   postcards,   and   mock-­‐souvenirs-­‐-­‐to  assert   a   renewed   German-­‐Jewish   presence.   And   the   2012   exhibition   The   Whole   Truth,   Everything   you  wanted  to  know  about  Jews…at  Berlin’s  Jewish  Museum  provoked  pleasure  and  some  indignation  (largely  outside  of  Germany)  with  its  direct  and  candid  approach  to  presumed  Jewish  difference.  In  both  countries,  these   works   and   cultural   events   signal   efforts   to   move   beyond   Shoah   melancholy   and   construction   of  memorials.   Relinquishing   grief   without   abandoning   memory,   they   affirm   a   vital   new   form   of   Jewish  Diaspora.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Hebrew  and  Jewish  Studies  and  its  Teaching  

14.00-­‐15.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Maddalena  Schiavo,  Pontifical  Gregorian  University,  Italy  

Title:  Hebrew  Studies  at  the  Pontifical  Gregorian  University  in  Rome  

Abstract:  The  aim  of  my  paper  is  to  tell  about  my  experience  as  a  teacher  of  Modern  Hebrew  language  at  the   Cardinal   Bea   Centre   for   Judaic   Studies   of   the   Pontifical   Gregorian   University.   Born   from   a   project  started   in   1978,   the   Centre   takes   its   name   and   inspiration   from   the   Cardinal   Augustin   Bea,   the   major  architect   of   the   Declaration   of   Nostra   Aetate,   whose   aim   was   to   promote   a   better   understanding   of  Judaism  and  to  foster  the  dialogue  between  the  Catholic  Church  and  the  Jewish  People.  Today  the  Cardinal  Bea   Centre   proposes   a   number   of   courses   and   seminars   for   students   who   intend   to   deepen   their  knowledge  of  Judaism  or  to  specialize  in  the  history  of  Jewish-­‐Christian  relations.  The  Centre  is  involved  in  

research  programs  and  academic  exchanges  with  prestigious  institutions  in  Israel,  Europe  and  United  States  and   organizes   meetings   and   international   events   to   increase   the   dialogue   among   different   cultures.   In  order   to  offer  a  complete  preparation   in   the   field  of   Judaism,   it  also  organizes  Modern  Hebrew   language  courses.  My  aim   is   to  describe   the  activities  of   the  Centre  with  a  particular  attention   to  Hebrew  studies,  analyzing  the  method  of  teaching  and  exploring  the  reasons  that  encourage  students  to  undertake  this  kind  of  studies  and  their  purposes.  

 

Mehmet  Kalkan,  Bozok  University  Faculty  of  Theology,  Turkey  

Title:  Past  and  Future  of  the  Master’s  and  the  Doctoral  Dissertation  about  Judaism  in  Turkey  (from  Ideology  to  Phenomenology)  

Abstract:  Interfaith  relations  have  had  an  important  place  in  the  academic  circles  of  Islamic  societies  since  early  Islam.  Polemical  language  has  dominant  in  these  academic  environments,  without  being  independent  from   the   socio-­‐political   context.   Today   this   polemical   language   is   gradually   replaced   to   mutual  understanding.   It   cannot   be   claimed   that   the   historical   polemics   of   Muslim   thinkers   were   worse   than  members  of  other  religions.  However,  nowadays  it  can  be  said  that  the  major  studies  carried  out  in  Turkey  about  other  religions  are  being  made  within  the  framework  of  academic  methodology.  Moreover,  analyses  and  evaluations  are  made  without  exceeding  the  limits  of  academic  ethics.  The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to  present   statics   of   the   ongoing   and   completed   master's   and   doctoral   dissertations   in   Turkey   in   the  Department   of   History   of   Religions   between   1990-­‐2011   and   to   offer   suggestions   for   the   future   studies  within   the   framework   of   the   data   of   the   research.   For   the   research,   database   of   the   Higher   Education  Institution  of   Turkey   (YÖK)   is   explored,   and  dissertations  made  and   approved   in   1990-­‐2011  dissertations  were   examined   to   turn   into   statistical   data   as   author,   supervisor,   dissertation   type,   name   and   year   of  dissertation.   Moreover,   by   comparing   them   with   the   database   of   the   Islamic   Research   Center   (ISAM)  differences  and  inaccuracies  have  been  largely  eliminated.  As  a  result,  more  than  650  master's  and  doctoral  dissertations,  which   are   about   the   study   of   Jewish   history   and   faith,  were   determined   for   our   research,  which   are   based   on   the   scanned  database   of   libraries   of   YÖK   and   the   ISAM.   Since   1900’s   the  History   of  Religions,  as  an  academic  discipline,  developed  into  an  important  position  in  the  Western  academia  and  the  chairs  were  found  about  this  academic  discipline.  In  terms  of  studying  Judaism  in  Turkey,  unfortunately,  it  is  impossible   to   bring   back   the   history   of   religions   with   Western   perspective   before   1950s.   In   the   study,  primarily,  the  demographic  distribution  of  the  work  will  be  presented.   In  the  next  section,  analysis  of  the  thesis  will  be  made,  and,  in  the  last  section  the  possible  contribution  of  research  for  future  studies  will  be  discussed.  This  study  is  based  on  the  analysis  of  statistical  data  in  Turkey  about  the  studies  on  Judaism  in  1990-­‐2012   in   terms   of   following   measures:   dates,   universities,   degree   (master’s-­‐doctorate),   dialogue,  comparative   religions,   gender,   subject,   Islam   –   Jewish   relations   and   so   on.   This   analysis   shows   that  dissertations   made   in   Turkey   about   Judaism   move   away   from   an   apologetic   or   ideological   to   more  phenomenological  tendency.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Jewish  History  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Historiography  

 

Chair:  Sylvie-­‐Anne  Goldberg  

 

Eva  Tyrell,  University  of  Bern,  Switzerland  /  Tel  Aviv  University,  Israel  

Title:  Literary  Truth-­‐Claims  in  Herodotus'  Histories  and  the  Hebrew  Bible  -­‐  a  Comparative  Study  

Abstract:   Herodotus´   Histories   and   narrative   history   in   the   Hebrew   Bible   are   rarely   studied   together,   at  least   in  Classics  and  Ancient  History.  A  common  assumption   is   that   the  ways   in  which   those   two  ancient  pieces  of  literature  represent  the  past  are  fundamentally  different.  For  a  more  nuanced  view  of  these  two  sources,  my  research  uses  the  comparisons  of  literary  truth-­‐claims  as  implied  reasons  for  belief.  A  detailed  analysis  will   show  how   the   two  narrative  histories   compare  and   contrast   in   their   communicative   setting,  the   relationship   they   establish   between   truth   and   types   of   knowledge,   and   the   extent   to   which   the  narrators  apply  innovative  ideas  in  philosophy  and  theology.  Claims  to  truth  are  common  both  in  what  we  today  call  fiction  and  factual  texts;  they  can  be  made  explicitly  (e.g.  claim  to  special  sources  of  knowledge,  use  of  the  first  person,  showing  a  constant  stream  of  reasoning,  discourse  based  on  accessible  features  of  reality)  and  implicitly  (e.g.  unadorned  style,  text  plays  to  reader’s  experiences,  narrator  shapes  the  text  in  such   a   way   that   the   audience   does   not   think   of   asking   the   question   ‘how   does   he   know?’).   For   my  contribution,   I   propose   to   present   how   a   selection   of   literary   truth-­‐claims   in   a   few   samples   of   the   two  sources   compare,   and   what   this   implies   for   their   status   as   history   writing.   Herodotus   does   not   make  recourse  to  the  Muses  as  a  source  of  authoritative  knowledge  but  rather  to  his  own  observation,  research  and   reasoning.   On   the   other   hand,   he   at   times   displays  more   knowledge   than   his   constrained   empirical  license   would   allow   for.   The   Hebrew   Bible   implicitly   derives   its   authority   from   divine   inspiration,   but  nevertheless  makes  use  of  empirical  truth  claims  at  the  same  time.  

 

Naoki  Mukai,  Kyoto  University,  Japan  

Title:  Heinrich  Graetz’s  Kohelet.  Historiography,  Translation  and  Commentary.  

Abstract:   In   this   paper   I  will   deal  with   the   attitude   of  Heinrich  Graetz,   the   prominent   historiographer   of  Wissenschaft   des   Judentums,   towards   the   book   Kohelet.   From   his   biography   written   by   Marcus   Pyka  (2009),   we   learn   the   construction   of   the   master   narrative   in   his   Jewish   history   and   the   methods   and  strategies   for   its   popularization.   As   Pyka   has   shown,   the  main   text   of   his   opus  magnum  was   consistent  among  various  editions,  while  the  notes  appended  to  each  volumes  were  repeatedly  revised  and  enlarged  according   to   proceedings   in   studies   in   his   days.   Keeping   his   narrative   steady   was   the   strategy   for  popularization,  however,  with  two  exceptions:  A  chapter  for  Jesus  and  early  Christianity  on  the  one  hand,  some   excursive   paragraphs   for   the   composition   of   Kohelet   and   its   inclusion   in   the   Hagiography   on   the  other.  Which  cause  changed  his  otherwise  firm  strategy?  In  the  latter  case,  there  was  a  modification  of  his  concept   of   Judaism.   As   he   confessed   in   preface   for   a   work   published   in   1871,   Kohelet   imposed   an  unsolvable  problem  upon  Graetz.  Until  he  came  to  a  hypothesis  that  it  had  been  composed  as  satire  against  Herod   the   Great,   he   could   not   understand   its   religious   value   and   the   reason   for   its   inclusion   into   the  Hagiography.  Although  the  hypothesis  was  supported  solely  by  himself,  he  insisted  on  his  new  ‘finding’  and  inserted   the   some   paragraphs   for   Kohelet   into   the   Chapter   “Antigonus   and   Herod”.   Apart   from   the  question  about  accuracy  in  his  philological  analysis,  his  translation  of  and  commentary  on  Kohelet  shows  us  some  interesting  aspects.  Through  the  analysis  of  “Kohélet  oder  der  Salomonische  Prediger”,  I  will  point  out  some  characteristics  of  Graetz’s  concept  of   Judaism,  which  was   to   found  a  modern  self-­‐understanding  of  the  Jews  throughout  the  world.  

 

Bernard  D.  Cooperman,  University  of  Maryland,  USA  

Title:  The  Shift  in  Authority  Paradigms  among  Jewish  Historians  

Abstract:   There   has   been  much   discussion   of   the   review   by   Haym   Soloveitchik   in   the   Jewish   Review   of  Books  3:4  (2013)  of  Talya  Fishman’s  Becoming  the  People  of  the  Talmud  (University  of  Pennsylvania  Press,  2013),  discussion  that  has  tended  to  focus  on  whether  the  review’s  strident  rhetoric  was  ill-­‐mannered  and  whether  its  harsh  criticisms  were  justified.  I  would  like  to  broaden  the  topic  to  explore  the  central  claim  to  intellectual  authority  implicit  in  the  review  and  defended  by  its  author.  This  claim,  I  would  like  to  argue,  is  a  reflection  of  a  very  specific  moment  in  Jewish  intellectual  and  religious  history  and  helps  us  to  understand  the  underlying  metanarratives   that   informed   the   rapidly  developing   field  of   Jewish  Studies   in   the  United  States,  (as  well  as  in  Israel  and  Europe)  in  the  second  half  of  the  last  century.  The  nature  of  this  claim  and  its  special  valence  in  the  American  Jewish  university  context  can  be  fruitfully  explored  by  rethinking  Yosef  Yerushalmi’s  Zakhor,  a  personal  mapping  of  the  author’s  location  in  the  territory  of  Jewish  knowledge.  That  slim  volume  makes  some  quite  astonishing  claims  about  the  nature  of  Jewish  historical  thought,  claims  that  deserve  serious  examination.  But  it  also  helps  us  to  understand  the  kind  of  identity  issues  that  were  being  debated  by  American  Jewish  historians  as  they  strove  to  carve  out  a  place  for  themselves  in  both  the  Jewish  and   the   academic   communities.   Finally,   I   will   argue   that   tracing   shifts   in   the   paradigm   of   authoritative  knowledge   allows  us   to   understand  better   the   continuities   and   ruptures   of   Jewish   knowledge   in   general  over   the   ages,   and   to   assess   the   constant   collection,   rediscovery,   and   redefinition   of   Jewish   scholarly  knowledge  since  at  least  the  Renaissance.  The  paper  is  meant  as  a  contribution  both  to  intellectual  history  and  to  the  sociology  of  knowledge.  

 

Daniel  Langton,  University  of  Manchester,  UK  

Title:   Jewish   Interest   in  Questions  of  Racial  Superiority  and  Evolutionary  Theory   in   the  Late  19th  Century  England  

Abstract:  Among  English  proponents  of  Wissenschaft  des  Judentums  in  the  1880s  were  three  with  interests  in  the  question  of  Jewish  racial  typing  and  evolutionary  theory:  the  journalist  and  historian  Lucien  Wolf,  the  Oxford  bibliographer  Adolf  Neubauer,  and  the  folklorist  Joseph  Jacobs.  This  paper  will  attempt  to  compare  and   contextualise   their   respective   views   in   relation   to  Anglo-­‐Jewish   scholarship   in   general   and   to   Jewish  engagement  with  evolutionary  theory  in  particular.  

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  13  

 

Session:  001:  

Shoah  and  Antisemitism  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Germany  

 

Chair:  

 

Anna  Ullrich,  Institut  für  Zeitgeschichte  München,  Germany  

Title:  Reflecting  the  End  of  Jewish  and  Non-­‐Jewish  Friendship  in  the  Late  1930s  

Abstract:  My  paper  will   focus  on   the  question  of  who  German   Jews  dealt  with  and   judged   the   fact,   that  from  1933  on  they  lost  more  and  more  contact  to  their  non-­‐Jewish  surroundings.  Much  has  been  written  on   how   Jews  were   crowed   out   of   the   professional   and   the   everyday   life   in  Germany.  However,  when   it  comes   to   the   questions   of   how   Jews   handled   these   situations   and   experiences,   how   they   explained   to  themselves  and  their  familymembers  why  they  were  treated  that  way,  we  are  stuck  with  isolated  cases  like  the  diaries  of  Victor  Klemperer  or  Hertha  Nathorff.   In  my   talk   I  want   to   choose  a  different  approach.  By  analysing  the  manuscripts  who  were  send  in  for  the  Harvard  Library  Competition  in  1940,  I  want  to  carve  out  patterns  of  explanation  who  were  choosen  by  German  Jews  to  interpret  –  and  often  enough  defend  –  the  behaviour  of  their  non-­‐Jewish  friends  and  acquaintances  throughout  the  1930s.  In  1940  the  sociology  department  of  the  Harvard  University  had  called  for  auto-­‐biographical  notes  under  the  headline  ‘My  Life  in  Germany  before  and  after  January  30th’.  The  majority  of  the  some  250  papers  that  were  send  came  from  Jewish  women  and  men  who  had  only   left  Germany   in   the  aftermath  of   the  November  pogrom   in  1938.  These  notes  are  a  rich  source  and  a  necessity  when  we  want  to  take  a  closer  look  at  the  Jewish  perspective  of  the  developments  in  Germany  during  the  1920s  and  1930s.  Without  the  knowledge  of  the  yet  to  come  Second  World  War  and  the  Holocaust  it  shows  how  German  Jews  tried  to  find  explanations,  interpretations  and  excuses   for   the  way   the  non-­‐Jewish  Germans  acted.   The   recuring  argumentations  –   like   the   fear   for  discrimination  and  the  spying  of  children  on  their  parents  –  was  frequently  used  to  transfrom  the  average  German  population  into  victims  of  the  National  Socialists  as  well.  This  argumentation  functioned  as  a  moral  backup  for  the  German  Jews  who  clinged  to  the  ideal  of  the  continuity  of  German  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  friendship  –  and  tradition.  

 

Amir  Teicher,  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:  Searching  for  Common  Roots:  Jewish  Genealogy  in  Germany,  1890-­‐1938  

Abstract:  The  paper  examines   the  scholarly  collaboration  between  Jewish  and  non-­‐Jewish  genealogists   in  Germany   from   the   late  nineteenth   century   to  1938.  No   special   clauses  excluding   Jews   from  genealogical  societies  existed  before  1933.  Nevertheless,  cooperation  between  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  in  the  field  of  family  history   research  was   infrequent,   in   large  part   due   to   a   differentiation   in   the   studied   sources   themselves  (parish  registers  vs.  Jewish  sources).  However,   it   is  the  areas  where   interaction  and  scientific  cooperation  

did   exist   which   will   stand   and   the   center   of   the   paper.   How   did   anti-­‐Semitic   tones   impact   the   general  reception   of   innovative   methods   for   genealogical   inquiry   offered   by   Jewish   scholars?   What   kind   of  arguments  did  Jews  and  non-­‐Jews  raise  for  advancing  scientific  cooperation,  and  how  did  they  explain  away  the   relative   lack   of   teamwork?   How   were   Jewish   genealogical   societies   and   Journals   treated   by   their  Christian  peers?  And   finally,  what   role  did   Jewish  genealogists   take   in  projects  of   racial  mapping  of   local  communities  and  in  racial  diagnosis  after  the  Nazis’  rise  to  power?  On  the  basis  of  exhaustive  examination  of   the   professional   publications   of   Jewish   and   non-­‐Jewish   genealogists   alike,   the   paper   brings   to   light  curious  points  of  alliance,  and  exposes  the  futile  attempts  of  Jews  to  become  part  and  parcel  of  the  German  community  of  scholars  in  the  face  of  ever  growing  anti-­‐Semitic  policies.  

 

Doris  Maja  Krueger,  Free  University  of  Berlin,  Germany  

Title:  Turning  to  Judaism  as  an  Early-­‐onset  of  Self-­‐Assertion  

Abstract:   The   German-­‐Jewish   Critical   Theorist   Leo   Lowenthal   grew   up   in   an   assimilated,   anti-­‐religious  home.  Due   to   the  anti-­‐Semitism  and  anti-­‐intellectualism  he  experienced   in  World  War   I   as   a   soldier   in   a  Railway  Regiment   in  Hanau,  Germany  he   turned   to   Judaism.  Retrospectively,   he   justified   this   turn  by   an  anti-­‐assimilative,  zionist  impulse;  in  his  understanding,  a  Zionist  is  someone  who  faces  the  problem  of  being  a  Jew.  Lowenthal  did  not  differentiate  between  socialist,  zionist  and  anti-­‐assimilative  ideas  and  interpreted  his  turn  to  Judaism  as  political,  or  more  specifically:  as  oppositional  to  the  status  quo,  as  being  on  the  side  of  the  “losers   in  world  process”  (Walter  Benjamin).  Hence,  the  paper  wants  to  point  out  how  the  turn  to  Judaism  of  Lowenthal  and  other  German  Jews  of  his  generation  is  an  early-­‐onset  of  self-­‐assertion.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Shoah  and  Antisemitism  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Europe  

 

Chair:  

 

Sam  Johnson,  Manchester  Metropolitan  University,  UK  

Title:  Seeing  “the  Jew”:  French  and  Russian  Antisemitic  Caricature  before  the  First  World  War  

Abstract:  This  paper  compares  manifestations  of  antisemitic  caricature  in  the  French  and  imperial  Russian  press  before  the  First  World  War.  Such  an  exploration  will  be  considered   in   light  of  recent  approaches  to  visual  culture,  positioning  caricature  within  the  mass  of  visual  images  that  deluged  the  public  imagination  in  this  period  -­‐  such  as  advertising,  photojournalism  and  the  cinema.  It  will  explore  how  antisemitic  caricature  reflected   other   visual   discourses,   such   as   medicalised   representations,   those   concerned   with   racial  difference,   and   aspects   of   criminality.   In   addition,   by   comparing   France   and   Russia,   it   will   assess   the  

universality   of   antisemitic   visual   culture,   and   the   extent   to   which   it   functioned   in   different   linguistic,  cultural  and  political  contexts.  

 

Małgorzata  Domagalska,  University  of  Lodz,  Poland  

Title:  Somewhere  means  nowhere.  The  Idea  of  Jewish  Emigration  in  Polish  Antisemitic  Press  and  Popular  Novels  at  the  turn  of  the  19th  and  the  20th  centuries  

Abstract:  At  the  beginning  of  20th  century  Zionism  as  an  idea  appears  in  the  antisemitic  press  and  popular  novels   in   Poland.   Firstly   anti-­‐semities   support   the   idea   in   their   writings   and   they   treat   it   as   a   potential  solution  of  „Jewish  issue”  in  Poland.  But  soon  they  get  disappointed  and  start  to  present  Zionism  in  satirical  and  deformative  way.  They  try  to  proof  that  Jews  are  not  able  to  establish  a  country  and  create  a  „healthy”  society,  because  they  cannot  be  productive.  In  their  novels  anti-­‐Semitic  writers  create  a  phantasmagoria  of  „Jewish  land”  and  present  it  as  a  caricature.  This  kind  of  novels  are  also  lampoons  for  baron  Hirsch  idea  of  Jewish  settlement  in  Argentina.  If  emigration  does  not  work,  the  different  solution  is  needed.  That  is  why  slogan  „bread  for  fellow  countrymen”  is  spread  by  antisemitic  press  and  novels.  Instead  of  emigration  the  idea  of   separation  Poles   from   Jews   is  popularized.   It  has  a   connection  with  emigration,  because,   as   they  argue,  if  there  is  no  work  for  Jews,  there  is  also  no  place  for  them.  That  is  why  the  short  –story  of  Antoni  Skrzynecki  is  titled  „The  de-­‐Jewed  Homeland.  Pictures  of  a  Future  that  We  Create”.  The  idea  of  emigration  created   in  this  „postitive  utopia”   is   the  most  desirable  dream  of  all  anti-­‐semites  expressed  by  Skrzynecki.  But  at  the  turn  of  the  19th  and  20th  centuries  anti-­‐semites  know,  that  it  is  only  a  phantasmagoria  and  Jews  treated  as  a  scapegoat  are  useful  for  them  and  still  within  an  arm’s  reach.  

 

Simon  Mayers,  Independent  Researcher  –  doing  research  with  aVidal  Sassoon  International  Center  for  the  Study  of  Antisemitism  

Title:  Myths  and  Stereotypes  of  “the  Jew”  in  English  Catholic  Discourses  (1850-­‐1929)  

Abstract:  My  recently  completed  PhD  thesis  (2012)  examined  the  myths  and  stereotypes  of  “the  Jew”  that  were   present   in   English   Catholic   discourses   at   the   end   of   the   nineteenth   century   and   during   the   early  twentieth   century   (1895   -­‐   1929).  With   the  help  of   a   research  grant   from   the  Vidal   Sassoon   International  Center   for   the   Study   of   Antisemitism,   I   am   currently   extending   this   research   to   look   at   how   Jews  were  portrayed  in  English  Catholic  discourses  during  the  second  half  of  the  nineteenth  century  (1850  to  1895).  In  these  discourses,   Jews  were  often  stereotyped  as  greedy,  cowardly,  unpatriotic,  secretive  and  bolshevist.  Constructions  of  “the  Jew”  derived  from  biblical  and  medieval  myths  were  also  pervasive.  Jews  continued  to  be  cast  in  the  role  of  the  intransigent  Pharisee,  the  Christ-­‐killer,  the  ritual  murderer,  the  sorcerer  and  the  Antichrist.   Jews  were   often   portrayed   in   conjunction  with   Freemasons,   and   together   vilified   as   secretive  anti-­‐Christian  revolutionaries,  and  diabolized  as  Satanists  and  Luciferians.  In  some  cases  the  language  used  to  describe  “the  Jew”  (and  “the  Freemason”)  drew  upon  a  vocabulary  which  suggested  an  apocalyptic  war  between  the  forces  of  good  and  evil.  My  paper  will  examine  theses  myths  and  stereotypes,  discussing  the  form  they  took,  comparing  their  prevalence,  and  the  types  of  text  in  which  they  were  found  (as  some  were  more  prevalent   in  sermons  and  pastoral   letters,  others   in  communal  newspapers,  and  some  by  particular  organisations  and  individuals).  

 

Hilda  Nissimi,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:  Caught  between  Conflicting  Components:  English  Identity  and  Antisemitism  1870-­‐1914  

Abstract:   The   period   between   1870   and   1914   is   widely   accepted   to   be   a  moment   of   "Englishness",   the  heyday  of  empire  and  the  age  of  liberalism.  This  period  is  also  a  moment  of  recurring  virulent  Antisemitic  attacks   on   the   Jewish   community   in   Britain.   This   paper   suggests   Antisemitism   as   a   connecting   point  between  the  apparently  different  phenomena.  Protestantism,  liberalism  and  empire,  ingrained  tensions  not  withstanding,   are   accepted   components   of   British   national   identity.   At   the   turn   of   the   19th   century  Liberalism   seemed   to   attack   the   very   legitimacy  of   the  other   two.   Liberal   ideas  were   at   the   basis   of   the  more  inclusive  political  entity  that  was  appearing  by  eliminating  first  the  protestant  and  then  the  Christian  exclusivity  of  British  citizenship.  Liberal   ideals  were  also  striking  at   the  empire  calling   for  more   liberty   for  colonized   peoples.   And   yet   both   empire   and   religion,   although   more   precarious   than   before,   were   still  central   for   national   identity.   The   major   political   crises   of   the   time   seemed   to   cut   through   these   three  themes:   the  Eastern  question,   the  Boer  War,   the  Aliens  Act,   the  Marconi   scandal  and   the   Indian  money.  The  upsurges  of  Antisemitism  during   these  crises  were  usually  devoid  of  ostensible  demands   for  political  repercussions.  Drawing  on  a   longstanding   tradition,   they   could   serve  as   a  pseudo-­‐religious  denominator,  intuitively  providing  a  bridge  over  the  rift.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Shoah  and  Antisemitism  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Post  Second  World  War  

 

Chair:  

 

Rachel  Brenner,  University  of  Wisconsin-­‐Madison,  USA  

Title:  The  Ethics  of  Witnessing  the  Holocaust:  Polish  Diaries  from  Occupied  Warsaw,  1939-­‐1945  

Abstract:  So  far,  studies  of  personal  experiences  recorded  at  the  time  of  the  Holocaust  have  focused  on  the  diaries  of  the  Jewish  victims.  This  paper  focuses  on  the  responses  of  non-­‐Jewish  witnesses  of  the  Holocaust  to   the   annihilation   of   the   Jews   in   the   Ghetto   and   to   Jews   in   hiding.   The   diaristic   perspective   of   Jewish  victimization   by   outsiders,   which   has   received   practically   no   attention,   illuminates   the   authors’   evolving  consciousness  of   the  genocide  and  sheds   light  on   its  moral  and  psychological  effect.  The  paper  discusses  the   response   to   Jewish   extermination   in   the   diaries   of   the   noted   Polish   Gentile   writers   –   Jarosław  Iwaszkiewicz,   Maria   Dąbrowska,   Stanisław   Rembek,   Zofia   Nałkowska,   and   Aurelia   Wyleżyńska   –   who  witnessed  the  Holocaust  evolving  in  their  city,  Warsaw.  Despite  the  similarities  of  age,  social  position,  and  progressive   Weltanschauung,   the   spectrum   of   the   diarists’   reactions   to   the   Holocaust   extended   from  insistence   on   empathic   interaction   with   the   victims   to   resentful   detachment   from   the   Jewish   suffering.  Whereas   some   defied   the   dehumanization   of   the   Jews   and   insisted   on   relationships   of   affinity   and  friendship   with   the   victims   they   were   striving   to   rescue,   others   evinced   deliberate   insensitivity   to   the  Jewish   plight.   The   paper   examines   the   extent   to   which   the   ideologies   of   humanism   and   nationalism  informed   the  perceptions  of   the  diarists,   and  proposes   that   the   reality  of   the  Final   Solution  exposed   the  limits  of  both  orientations.  The  world  in  which  a  group  of  human  beings  was  declared  subhuman  and  was  sentenced   to   extermination   transformed   the   ethical   landscape   shaped   by   the   tradition   of   the  

Enlightenment,  which  premised   the  equality  and   the   fellowship  of  all  human  beings.   In  a  variety  of  ways  and   in   differing   degrees   of   intensity,   the   diaries   expose   the   authors’   evolving   realization   that   the  unprecedented  event  of  the  Jewish  genocide  brought  about  a  transformation  of  their  deepest  beliefs.  

 

Ana  Bărbulescu,  The  Elie  Wiesel  National  Institute  for  the  Study  of  the  Holocaust  in  Romania  

Title:   The   Holocaust   as   reflected   in   Romanian   Post-­‐communist   Textbooks:   Competitive   Identities   and  Dangerous  Memories  

Abstract:  Until  August  23,  1944  Romania  was  a  loyal  ally  of  Nazi  Germany  and  an  active  participant  in  the  process   of   solving   the   ‘Jewish   problem’.   During   these   years   between   180000   and   300000   Jewish   men,  women   and   children   were   killed   or   died   by   illness,   hunger   and/or   cold   in   the   territories   found   under  Romanian   authority.   After   1948   the   communist   regime  was   established   in   Romania   and   for   the   next   50  years  the  Holocaust  became  a  taboo  topic:  nothing  happened  to  the  Romanian  Jews  during  the  war  and  we  even  forget  that  not  so  long  ago  in  our  past,  800000  Jews  were  our  neighbors  and  co-­‐citizens.  Starting  from  here   and   given   the   silence   of   our   textbooks   during   the   communist   era  we   are   interested   to   reconstruct  different  models  of   remembering   the  Holocaust   in  post-­‐communist  Romanian   textbooks   and  more   so   to  unveil   the   strong   connection   that   exists   between   constructing  memory   and   constructing   identity   as   the  answer  to  the  question:  How  we  chose  to  remember  our  past  and  what  we  agree  to  include  as  part  of  it?  is  determined  by  the  answer  to  the  question:  How  we  chose  to  describe  us  as  people?  From  this  perspective,  our   analysis  will   focus  on  what  we  may   call   ‘competitive  memories   and   competitive   identity  models’,   as  what  we  are  looking  for  is  to  reconstruct  the  determination  that  might  exist  between  different  manners  of  reconstruction   our   past   (heroic   or   not,   important/not   important   on   the   historic   scale,   etc)   and   different  manners  of  remembering  the  Holocaust  (categories  of  victims,  categories  of  perpetrators,  the  involvement/  non-­‐involvement  of  the  Romanian  authorities,  number  of  victims,  etc).  The  analysis  will  be  focused  on  the  Romanian  History  textbooks  edited  after  1989  while  the  methodological  approach  will  be  a  qualitative  one.  

 

Joelle  Hecker,  IEP  de  Paris,  France  

Title:  Times  and  Modes  of  Recognition.  German  Reparations  to  the  Jews,  1950  –  1990  

Abstract:  This  paper  explores  the  impact  reparations  have  on  groups  by  focusing  on  the  question  of  time.  When  works  on  reparations  deal  with  the  topic  of  time,  they  do  merely  take  it  as  a  fixed  variable  that  has  no  need  for  further  clarification.  Here  we  intend,  to  the  contrary,  to  deepen  our  understanding  of  the  reach  of   reparations   by   applying   Paul   Ricœur's   distinctions   made   between   objective,   narrated   and   perceived  time.   Thus   we   can   show   that   reparations   function   as   the   primary   vehicle   for   recognition   due   to   their  rephrasing  power.  Though  they  cannot  undo  the  irreparable,  they  are  capable  to  change  the  narrative  and  through  this  the  perception  of  time.  The  case  study  chosen  to  prove  this  point  are  the  German  reparations  to  Israel  and  to  the  Claims  Conference  from  1950  to  1990.    The  German  reparations  are  first  related  to  the  theories   of   recognition.   The   claims   of   the   victims   are   identified   as   a   struggle   for   recognition,   while   the  reactions  of  the  perpetrators  are  described  as  a  journey  towards  the  recognition  of  responsibility.  Then  the  functioning  of  recognition  is  specified  through  a  detailed  study  of  the  different  forms  that  reparations  have  taken  over   time.  The  1950s  were   the  years  of   civil   justice,   taking   the   form  of  monetary   reparations.  This  form  of  recognition  was  characterized  by  an  elliptic  way  of  telling  the  events.  In  the  1960s,  criminal  justice  took   the   place,   and  made   a  more   specific   narration   of   the   past   possible   thanks   to   the   testimonies   and  verdicts.  In  the  1970s  and  the  1980s,  symbolic  acts,  essentially  narrative,  predominated.  To  sum  up,  every  form   of   recognition   constitutes   its   distinct  mode   of   telling   the   past   and  modifies   as   a   consequence   the  perception  of  time.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Shoah  and  Antisemitism  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Post  Second  World  War  

 

Chair:  

 

Daniel  Lemler,  psychoanalyst  

Title:  Tous  des  survivants:  De  l’héritage  subjectif  de  la  Shoah  

Abstract:  La  pratique  de  la  psychanalyse  confronte  parfois  le  praticien  à  une  situation  singulière  :  l’irruption  brutale  chez  un  sujet  de  graves  pathologies  organiques  qui  sont  immédiatement  associées  par  ce  dernier  à  un  non-­‐dit  dans  la  transmission  concernant  la  Shoah.  Cette  situation  trouve  sa  pleine  expression  lorsque  le  psychanalyste   est   lui-­‐même   juif,   le   plus   souvent   de   la   deuxième   génération,   parfois   de   la   troisième.  L'héritage   de   la   Shoah   chez   l'être   humain   est   un   aboutissement,   mais   aussi   une   introduction.   C'est  évidemment   par   cette   voie   que   la   plupart   d'entre   nous   en   sont   venus   à   travailler   cette   question.   En   en  étant  plus  ou  moins  conscient,  en  le  découvrant,  après  des  années  d'exercice,  en  s'y  trouvant  confronté  par  une  parole  d'autres  qui  a  eu  valeur  d'interprétation...  Mais  aussi  par  la  voie  du  symptôme  qui  fait  plus  ou  moins  bruyamment  irruption  dans  la  sphère  subjective.  Cette  question  se  pose  et  se  traduit  différemment  selon  les  générations.  L’impact  de  cet  héritage,  ses  enjeux,  ne  sont  pas  les  mêmes  selon  que  l’on  soit  de  la  deuxième  génération  ou  des  suivantes.  Elle  est  affectivement  et  émotionnellement  plus  sensible  pour  ceux  de   la   deuxième   génération.   Alors   que   pour   la   troisième   génération,   elle   est   soit   plus   intellectuelle,   soit  apparemment   silencieuse,   absente,   et   fait   irruption   par   la   voie   de   symptômes   physiques   bruyants   et  souvent   inquiétants.   Comment   interpréter   ce   retour   dans   le   réel   du   corps   d’un   sujet   de   la   troisième  génération  d’un  non-­‐dit,  d’un  silence  ?  

 

Cristina  Spinei,  "Alexandru  Ioan  Cuza"  University  of  Iasi,  Romania  

Title:   Doron   Rabinovici's   "Suche   nach  M."   and  Marcel   Beyer's   "Flughunde":   a   Transcending   Bond   in   the  Narrations  of  Collective  Terror  

Abstract:   Doron   Rabinovici   and  Marcel   Beyer   dare   the   huge   risk   of   facing   the  woebegone   past   and   the  confrontation   with   National   Socialism   and   to   tackle   it   narratively.     Rabinovicis   novel   "Suche   nach   M."  speaks  about  the  fate  of  those  who  survived  the  Holocaust  and  of  the  generation  of  their  children.   It   is  a  matter  of  overcoming  a  narrative  inhibition.  Rabinovici  is  mainly  concerned  with  the  idea  of  sacrifice  -­‐  the  younger  generation  is  doomed  to  continue  their  parents'  lives  in  a  more  insightful  variation:  the  acceptance  of  the  guilty  plea  and  the  overcoming  of  the  narrative  inhibition.  Rabinovici  has  captured  concisely  not  only  the  problem  of  his  generation,  but  also  that  of  his  parents'  generation,  and  on  the  backdrop  of  awareness  of  these  survivors  from  Krakow  who  do  not  speak  about  the  past  from  an  excess  of  memory,  he  has  thus  rendered  a  verdict  on  those  whose  virtue  requires  memory  and  who  are  still  veterans  in  oblivion.    Marcel  

Beyer  also  explores  the  pain  points  of  the  history:  In  the  center  stands  also  the  question  on  how  history  can  be   narrated   in   the   first   place,   even   if   from   a   diametrical   opposite   perspective.   It   is   about   the   history   of  those  who  were  near  the  Nazis.  Beyer  counts  on  a  special  form  of  authenticity,  which  is  produced  mainly  by  the   voice.  We   are   brought   very   close   to   the   Goebbels   family,  we   are   in   the   heart   of   darkest   crime   and  experience  an  increasingly  endangered  family  idyll.  It  is  with  this  tension  that  the  novel  calculates  its  effect.  We  are  witnessing  the  horror  from  the  voice  of  Goebbels'  children.  Thus  we  are  the  informed  readers  that  can   learn  the  history  of   the   individual   from  the  bigger  history.  With  the  discovery  of  the  voice,  especially  with   their   reproducibility,   the   author   provides   his   own   view   on   history,   and   creates   a   completely   new  ground  of  authenticity.    Beyer  and  Rabinovici  have  both  taken  the  risk  upon  themselves  of  telling  the  story  of  an  era  that  seemed  to  have  made  the  telling  impossible  for  many.  The  two  different  stories  report  on  an  unimaginable   horror,   for   which   the   language   fails;   their   solution   attempts   deserve   nevertheless   our  attention  and  a  more  intrusive  analysis.  

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  14  

 

Session:  001:  

Gender  Studies  

9.00-­‐10.30  

 

Chair:  

 

Jennifer  Langer,  SOAS  Centres  for  Jewish  and  Iranian  Studies,  London,  UK    

Title:  The  Struggle  for  an  Iranian  Jewish  Female  Identity  

Abstract:  My  paper  is  set  within  the  question  of  alienation  and  belonging  in  Iran  and  in  exile  as  it  arises  in  the  representation  of  cultural  memory  in  contemporary  literary  texts  by  exiled  Iranian  Jewish  women.  The  protagonists,  who   fled   from   Iran   to  America   and  Belgium,  before,   during   and  after   the  1979  Revolution,  were   members   of   the   Jewish   community   established   in   Iran   for   2,700   years.   I   establish   a   contestation  between   the   protagonists’   Jewish,   Iranian   and   female   identities   and   exile   as   a   mnemonic   site   for  attempting  to  negotiate  a  fusion  of   identities.  Yet  belonging   is  elusive   in   Iran  and  in  exile  and  involves  an  exploration  of  multiple,  layered  home  and  exilic  spaces.  A  perpetual  conflict  exists  between  self-­‐definition  and  definition  by  individuals  and  various  collectives,  Jewish,  Muslim,  Iranian,  American  and  Belgian.  Given  the  Iranian  Jewish  protagonists’  ambivalence  of  identity  in  exile,  the  two  buried  layers  of  Jewish  and  Iranian  memory  represented  by  palimpsests,  provide   insights   into  the  protagonists’   Jewish  and   Iranian   identities.  These  layers  underlying  the  literary  texts,  reveal  the  complex,  agonistic  relationship  of  my  authors  to  their  homeland.   Through   the   dimension   of   palimpsests,   I   explore   Iranian   Jewish   female   identity   through   the  authors’  embedded  Jewish  and  Iranian  religious  and  cultural  sources  represented  by  the  Hebrew  Bible  and  Holocaust,   and   the   Iranian   literary   tradition.   Although   Harold   Bloom   claims   that   the   presence   of   the  Hebrew   Bible   is   palpable   in   work   by   Jewish   writers,   the   literary   texts   reveal   the   ambivalence   of   Jewish  identity  and  Jewish  female  identity  which  adds  to  the  critical  question  as  to  what  in  fact  constitutes  Iranian  Jewish   identity.   I   investigate   whether   the   ambivalent   relationship   to   the   Jewish   palimpsest   is   similarly  represented  in  the  relationship  to  the  Iranian  literary  palimpsest.  I  highlight  the  important  conflict  between  personal  and  collective  memory  through  recourse  to  intertextuality,  critical  theory  and  interviews.  

 

Haya  Bar-­‐Itzhak,  University  of  Haifa,  Israel  

Title:  Women  in  Times  of  Persecution  in  Jewish  Folk  Legends  

Abstract:  Many  Jewish  folk  legends  are  set  in  times  of  persecution  due  to  the  history  of  the  Jewish  people.  In  some  of  these  legends  women  act  as  heroines.  In  this  lecture  I  will  discuss  Jewish  legends  from  Eastern  Europe  since  the  17th  century  until  the  Holocaust.  Although  we  could  assume  that  women  in  these  legends  will   be   passive   victims,   the   opposite   is   true.   In   the   lecture,   I   will   discuss   the   reasons   behind   the  phenomenon  of  the  Jewish  patriarchal  society  legitimizing  women  acting  in  the  public  sphere  as  active  and  brave  heroines  precisely  in  legends  set  in  times  of  persecution.  

 

Claire  Katz,  Texas  A&M  University,  USA  

Title:  “…until  water  fell  down  on  the  corpses”  Gender  and  Forgiveness  in  2  Samuel  

Abstract:   In   the   1986   film,   The   Mission,   set   in   mid-­‐18th   century   South   America,   the   slave-­‐trader,   José  Mendoza,  seeks  penance  for  the  murder  of  his  brother.  Having  been  legally  acquitted,  he   is  not  absolved  nor  does  he  feel  himself  to  be  absolved  of  the  moral  transgression.    He  joins  the  Jesuits  on  their  trek  back  to  the  mission.  In  this  scene  we  see  Mendoza  acting  out  a  physical  response  to  the  moral  crime:  he  has  set  for  his  penance  the  task  of  carrying  an  extraordinary  load  on  his  back  up  the  falls.  After  collapsing  once,  one  of  the  Jesuit  priests  cuts  the  load  off  his  back.  He  returns  down  the  falls  to  reclaim  his  weight  and  continues  the   journey.  Having  reached  the  top,  Mendoza   is  now  face   to   face  with   the  very  people  he  spent  his   life  selling  into  slavery.  In  one  swift  moment,  a  Guarani  cuts  loose  the  bundle  from  Mendoza’s  back.  Mendoza  is  absolved  not  only  of  the   immediate  moral  violation  for  which  he  had  taken  on  the  penance   in  the  first  place  but  also  his  entire  previous  life  as  a  slave-­‐trader.  Is  absolution  this  easy?  These  individuals  Mendoza  murdered  or  enslaved  are  not  present  to  offer  forgiveness.  Can  one  “do  enough”  to  appease  a  moral  crime  and  can  a  perpetrator  make  amends  even  when  the  victim  will  not  acknowledge  these  amends  as  enough?  Where  does  justice  fit   into  these  questions?  This  essay  will  examine  these  questions  but  with  a  particular  eye  toward  the  two  intertwined  themes:  what  can  Jewish  philosophy  offer  us  in  thinking  about  forgiveness  and  what  role  does  gender  play  in  the  way  we  understand  the  act  of  forgiveness?    To  accomplish  this  task,  I  turn   to   Emmanuel   Levinas’s   Talmudic   commentary,   “Toward   the   Other.”   Presented   in   1963   to   the  Colloquium   of   Jewish   Intellectuals,   this   commentary   offers   an   analysis   of   repentance   and   forgiveness   in  response   to   the   question   of  German   guilt   for   the  Holocaust.   This   essay,   though   it   ostensibly   focused   on  Judaism's   views   of   atonement   and   forgiveness,   could   also   be   a   discussion   about   the   complexity   and  potential  horror  of  justice.  His  discussion  in  “Toward  the  Other,”  complicates  an  already  complex  Talmudic  passage  by   including  discussions  of  atonement  and  forgiveness   from  sources  that  are  not   included   in   the  Talmudic  conversation.  He  turns  to  2  Samuel,  which  tells  of  the  three-­‐year  famine  during  the  time  of  King  David.  David  finds  that  a  wrong  had  been  done  to  the  Gibeonites  by  Saul.  To  appease  them,  he  must  give  them  the  blood  they  demand.  He  has  seven  descendents  of  Saul  nailed  to  the  rocks.  Rizpah,  the  mother  of  two  sons,  watches  over  all  of  the  corpses,  covering  their  bodies  and  protecting  them  from  the  animals  that  would  attack  them.  Although  she  appears  a  minor  figure  in  the  story,  Levinas  sees  her  action  as  facilitating  the  resolution  to  a  cycle  of  justice  and  revenge  that  might  otherwise  not  see  an  end.  By  bringing  together  Christian  and  Jewish  readings  of  Rizpah,  my  paper  explores  the  role  of  gender  within  philosophical  accounts  of  forgiveness.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Gender  Studies  

11.00-­‐13.00  

 

Chair:  

 

Judith  L.  Goldstein,  Vassar  College,  New  York,  USA  

Title:  The  Traffic  in  Images:  Middle  Eastern  Jewish  Women  In  and  Out  of  Focus  

Abstract:  Photographs  of  Middle  Eastern  women  have  been  extensively  analyzed  as  visual  artefacts  central  to   colonial  Orientalist   constructions  of   the  Middle  East.   Following   in   the   footsteps  of  nineteenth   century  painters   such   as  Delacroix   and  Dehodencq   (and   for  mostly   similar   reasons   of   access),  many   of   the   early  twentieth   century   photographers   used   Jewish   women   as   models.   When   these   images   have   been   later  published  in  books  or  exhibited  in  shows,  the  same  images  of  the  same  women-­‐-­‐whether  studio  portraits,  postcards,  or  'ethnographic’  documents—appear  in  one  set  of  texts  and  venues  as  generically  local,  while  in  others  they  are  labeled  as  Jewish.  In  this  paper  I  will  present  and  analyze  images  that  have  been  captioned  differently:   images,   in   short,   that   appear   in   some   contexts   in   which   they   are  marked   as   Jewish,   and   in  others  in  which  they  are  unmarked  as  such,  representing  instead  a  generalized  exoticism.    In  The  Colonial  Harem  (1986),  Malek  Alloula  reproduced  three  postcard  pictures,  taken  of  the  same  model  in  the  same  outfit  and   location,  who  “represents   in  turn  a   ‘Young  beduin  woman,’  a   ‘young  woman  from  the  South,’  and  a  ‘young  Kabyl  Woman’”  (Alloula:  62).  The  photographer,  according  to  Alloula,  thus  located  the  model  geographically  wherever  he  chose.   I  will  argue   in  this  paper  that,   in  a  similar   fashion,  curators  and  writers  have  placed  the  Jewish  women  in  the  early  images  in  different  contemporary  discursive  sites.  I  will  explore  the  theoretical   implications  of  these  choices,   locating  them  in  ongoing  discussions  of  regional  histories  of  absence  and  presence.  

 

Lilach  Rosenberg-­‐Friedman,  Bar-­‐Ilan  University,  Israel  

Title:   The   Jewish   Society   in   Mandatory   Palestine   as   a   Junction   of   International   Cultures:   The   Issue   of  Abortions  

Abstract:   In  this   lecture,   I  want  to  discuss  the  characteristics  of  the  Jewish  society  in  mandatory  Palestine  (hereafter:   the   Yishuv),   as   a   meeting   place   of   international   cultures,   through   analysis   of   the   dominant  influences  which  shaped  the  abortions  phenomenon  that  was  prevalent   in   that  society.   Indeed,  although  the  Yishuv  was  a  nationalistic  community  in  which  birthrate  was  of  great  importance,  it  was  characterized  by  a  low  birthrate.  This  was  due,  mainly,  to  the  prevalence  of  abortions.  Factors  that  played  an  important  part  in  the  phenomenon  of  abortion  in  the  Yishuv  included  cultural  initiatives  and  modern  approaches  from  Western  European  countries;  socialist  and  traditional  gender  perceptions  from  Eastern  European  countries;  policies   of   the   British   mandate;   and   diverse   immigration   experiences.   The   Yishuv   was   a   society   of  immigrants.    Analysis  of  the  local  phenomenon  of  abortion  in  comparison  to  that  of  the  western  societies  (especially  France,  Germany,  Russia  and  the  United  States  (as  a  state  of  immigrants)),  provides  an  in-­‐depth  understanding  of  the  contact  and  the  relationships  between  cultures  of  Jewish  and  Non-­‐Jewish  as  a  main  factor  in  shaping  the  local  phenomenon.  

 

Evyatar  Marienberg,  The  University  of  North  Carolina  at  Chapel  Hill,  USA  

Title:  Marital  Sexuality  according  to  Contemporary  Modern  Orthodox  Manuals  

Abstract:  My  paper  will  examine  several  Modern  Orhodox  marital  manuals  published  in  Israel  and  in  the  US  in   the   last   thirty   years   (1983-­‐2013),   all   of  which   include   significant  discussions  on   sexual   relations.  Often  written  for  a  specific  audience  (men,  women,  sephardim,  ashkenazim,  etc),  some  of  these  guides  became  best  sellers  (and  common  wedding  or  engagement  gifts).  These  manuals  present  a  certain  view  of  the  way  marital   sexuality   is   prescribed   in   today’s  Modern  Orhodox  world.   Among   other   questions,  we  will   try   to  understand  what  made  some  of  these  specific  works  so  popular,  and  what  changed  in  the  style  and  content  of   these  manuals  over   the   last   three  decades.   Joining   the  general   theme  of   the   congress,   some  of   these  works  will  be  compared  to  contemporary  Christian  Evangelical  manuals  of  marital  sexuality.  

 

Taragin-­‐Zeller  Lea  (Lisa)  (Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel)  

Title:  Religious  Reproduction:  A  Sociological  Analysis  of  Orthodox  Fertility  Management  in  Israel  

Abstract:  My  study  discusses  the  contemporary  discourse  and  practices  about  family  planning  and  fertility  management   among  Ultra-­‐Orthodox   (Haredi)   Jews   in   Israel.   To   do   so,   I   have   been   conducting   extensive  research   in   the   Ultra-­‐Orthodox   community   through   fieldwork,   interviews   and   text   analysis.   Through   the  analysis  of  my  findings,  I  argue  that  Haredi  Jews  are  currently  reassessing  the  ideology,  norms  and  practices  that  are  accepted   in   their  world  about   fertility  and   family  planning.   Israel   is  an  exceptional   case-­‐study   in  which  Israeli-­‐Zionist  pro-­‐natalism  ideologies  are  intertwined  with  a  Jewish  tradition  which  posits  fertility  as  a  religious   ideal,  a   link  that   is  mirrored  in  government  and  medical  policy  as  well  as  through  the  religious  authorities  discourse  (Birenbaum-­‐Carmeli,  2003,  2004;  Gooldin,  2008;  Irshai,  2012;  Ivry,  2010;  Kahn,  2000;  Sered,   2000).   As   such,   the   average   of   total   fertility   rate   is   Israel   is   2.96,   about   50%   higher   than   that   of  European  women.  Also,  fertility  rates  are  consistent  with  religiosity  as  Haredi  woman  are  having  at  least  7  children,   while   increasing   proportions   of   secular   Jewish   women   are   childless   (Okun,   2013).   My   findings  show  how  Haredi  couples  are  currently  criticizing   the   ideology,  norms  and  practices   that  are  accepted   in  their  world.  They  disapprove  of  the  strict  religious  education  that  idealizes  unacheivable  levels  of  fertility  as  well   as   stringent   rulings   regarding   child   spacing,   and   permissible   contraceptives.   Thus,   this   research  will  examine  the  ways   in  which  members  of   this  group  adopt  modern  patterns  of  behavior,  on  the  one  hand  and   religious   innovation   on   the   other.   Whereas   the   basis   of   orthodox   society   revolves   around   the  commitment  to  the  commandment  to  “Be  Fruitful  and  Multiply”,  how  does  one  keep  this  commandment  while  also  holding  modern  ideas  like  rational  and  calculated  family  planning  and  modern  ideas  of  personal  growth   and   career   pursuit?   How   do   halachik   (Jewish   Law)   debates   about   contraception   deal   with  contemporary  ideals  of  a  balanced  society,  health,  nutrition,  as  well  as  economic  concerns  about  education  and  child  upbringing?  In  addition,  this  study  will  analyze  the  new  interpretations  of  religious  texts  that  are  part   of   the   contemporary   discourse   as   well   as   the   way   in   which   these   interpretations   are   forming   new  creative  practices.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Cosmopolis  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Panel:  The  Practice  of  Jewish  Cosmopolitanism  

Organizer:  Julia  Phillips  Cohen  

Chair:  Julia  Phillips  Cohen  

 

Julia  Phillips  Cohen,  Vanderbilt  University,  USA  

Title:  The  Bazaar  Identities  of  Ottoman  Jews:  Jewish  Merchants  of  Oriental  Goods  

Abstract:  During   the   second  half   of   the   nineteenth   century,   as   the   global  market   for   Eastern-­‐style   items  expanded,  Ottoman  merchants  began  to  reorient  their  business  to  buyers  abroad,  repackaging  wares  such  as   carpets,   tapestries,   jewelry,   lamps,   divans,   pillows,   tables,   armor,   and   later,   “Turkish”   tobacco   and  coffee,  as  Eastern  curiosities  and   luxury   items.  Trips   to  Ottoman  concessions  at  world’s   fairs  as  well  as  a  

growing  tourist  industry  within  the  empire  increasingly  brought  these  merchants  into  direct  contact  with  a  foreign   clientele.   Among   the   various   individuals   involved   in   the   selling   of   things   Oriental   in   the   late  Ottoman  world  were  a  number  of  Sephardic  Jewish  merchants  resident  in  the  Ottoman  capital,  as  well  as  the  Ottoman  port  cities  of  Izmir  and  Salonika.  This  paper  follows  these  late  Ottoman  Sephardic  merchants  from   their   native   cities   to   various   European   and  American  destinations.  While  many   initially   travelled   to  represent  their  empire  and  sell  their  wares  during  international  exhibitions,  some  decided  to  strike  roots  in  the  new   locales   they   visited,  making  homes   in   cities   such  as  Paris,  Berlin,   London,  Philadelphia,  Chicago,  New   York,   and   San   Francisco.   In   the   process,   these   late   nineteenth-­‐century   Ottoman   Jewish  merchants  became   part   of   new   global   networks,  with   family  members   and   business   partners   stationed   in   different  continents.  As  self-­‐declared  experts   in  Ottoman  and  Persian  art   forms,   these   individuals   represented  and  translated  Eastern  styles  for  Western  audiences.  Yet  even  as  they  acculturated  to  life  in  Europe  or  the  U.S.,  their   professional   profiles   also   required   that   they   remain   aloof   from   their   new   homes:   their   position   as  Oriental   ambassadors   and   cultural   translators   depended   on   their   continued   exoticism   and   links   to   the  Middle  East.  My  presentation  aims  to  understand  the  effects  that  these  networks  had  on  their   individual  members.  How  did  the  products  they  sold,  their  business  connections,  and  their  marketing  of  Orientalism  affect  the  self-­‐image  these  merchants  projected,  both  within  the  empire  and  abroad?  

 

Jonathan  Karp,  Binghamton  University,  SUNY,  USA  

Title:  Jewish  Émigré  Music  Publishers  and  the  Birth  of  Rock  ‘n’  Roll  

Abstract:   This   paper   shows   how   Jews   built   an   "ethnic   niche"   in   the   prewar   business   of   popular   music  publishing   in  both  continental  Europe  and   the  US  and   reconstituted   it   in   the   late  1940s  and  1950s  as  an  international  publishing  network  that  helped  lay  the  groundwork  for  the  global  emergence  of  rock  ‘n’  roll.  The  paper   first  examines   Jewish   involvement   in  New  York’s  Tin  Pan  Alley  publishing   industry   in   the  early  twentieth  century.  It  explains  why,  once  international  copyright  laws  were  established  and  accepted,  music  publishing  became  perforce   internationalized  to  a  high  degree.  The  paper  offers  a  case  study   in  why  and  how   Jews   developed   international   family   and   ethnic   networks   to   accommodate   and   facilitate   this  development.   The   focus   then   turns   to   the   spread   of   Jewish  music   publishing   firms   in   pre-­‐World  War   II  central   Europe   and   the   subsequent   movement   of   Jewish   refugee   and   Holocaust   survivor   music  entrepreneurs  to  the  UK  and  the  US  during  the  1930s  and  '40s,  including  such  notable  figures  as  Jean  and  Julian   Aberbach,   Freddie   Bienstock,   Eddie   Kasner   and   David   Platz.   With   this   background   in   mind,   the  remainder  of   the  paper  shows  how  Jewish  music  publishers   in   the  US  and  UK   (as  well  as  a  smattering  of  others   in   France   and   West   Germany)   helped   supply   the   musical   repertoire   utilized   by   musicians   and  recording  artists  like  the  Coasters  and  Elvis  Presley,  and  in  England  the  Beatles,  the  Rolling  Stones  and  the  Kinks,   pioneers   of   hugely   influential   new   popular   musical   styles.  While   “cosmopolitan”   may   not   be   the  obvious  word  associated  with  rock   ‘n’  roll,   these  Jewish  publishers  seem  to  have  been  especially  open  to  gambling  on  new  genres  and  styles.  They  understood  the  dynamic  between  exploration  and  formulization  that   was   key   to   creating   new   pop   music   markets.   This   openness,   I   argue,   reflected   in   part   their   own  personal   experiences  moving  between  different   cultures   and   subcultures,   brokering   and   accommodating  shifting  environments  and  cultural  trends.  

 

Allison  Schachter,  Vanderbilt  University,  USA  

Title:  Conversion,  Cosmopolitanism,  and  Hebrew  Modernism:  Elisheva  Bikhovsky  

Abstract:   My   talk   examines   the   appeal   of   Jewish   cosmopolitanism,   or   a   certain   substrate   of   that  cosmopolitanism,  for  a  non-­‐Jewish  artist  and  intellectual,  Elisheva  Bikhovsky.  Elisheva  is  a  singular  figure  of  

Jewish  literary  modernity.  Born  Elizaveta  Zhirkova  in  Riazan  in  1889  to  a  Russian  Orthodox  father  and  Irish  Catholic  mother,  she  studied  Yiddish  and  then  Hebrew,  and  transformed  herself  from  a  minor  Russian  poet  to  a  major   figure  of  Hebrew   literary  modernism.  She   later  married   the  Zionist   thinker  and  writer  Shimon  Bikhovsky  and  emigrated  with  him  to  Palestine  in  1925.  Although,  or  perhaps  because  she  was  an  outsider  to  Jewish  culture  and  Hebrew,  she  became  the  first  woman  to  publish  a  Hebrew  poetry  collection  Palestine.  Although   Elisheva   identified   herself   primarily   as   a   poet,   it   is   in   her   novel,   Simta’ot   (Alleyways)   that   she  grapples  with  her   strange  position   as   an  outsider   to   a   literary   culture   in  which   she   thrived.   Through  her  novee,  I  argue,  we  can  understand  her  choice  to  embrace  the  marginality  of  Jewish  literary  culture  as  both  a  cosmopolitan  practice  and  a  gesture  of  self-­‐marginalization.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Cosmopolis  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Panel:  The  Practice  of  Jewish  Cosmopolitanism  

Organizer:  Julia  Phillips  Cohen  

Chair:  Julia  Phillips  Cohen  

 

Sasha  Goldstein-­‐Sabbah,  Leiden  University,  Netherlands  

Title:  Jewish  Cosmopolitanism  in  Baghdad  1921-­‐1951  

Abstract:  The  Jewish  community  of  Baghdad  is  unique  in  that,  up  until  its  dissolution  between  1948-­‐1951,  it  represented  the  oldest  Jewish  Diaspora  community.  Current  academic  literature  has  often  focused  on  the  process  by  which  the  Jewish  community  of  Baghdad  began  to  read  and  write  in  standard  Arabic  during  the  British  Mandate  and  early  years  of  the  Iraqi  State  whereby  they  became  more  integrated  into  the  general  Iraqi   society.  However   this  process  of  Arabization   is  only  one  part  of   the  metamorphosis   that   the   Jewish  community  of  Baghdad  underwent  in  the  post-­‐Ottoman  Middle  East.  My  research  discusses  this  process  of  Arabization   as   part   of   a   larger   phenomenon   of   cosmopolitanization  whereby   the   Jews   of   Baghdad  were  exposed  not  only  to  Arabic,  but  to  multiple  languages  becoming  comfortable  in  various  cultural  and  social  settings.   My   paper   compares   the   Arabizing   trends   encouraged   by   the   Iraqi   state   and   society   with   the  various   foreign   Jewish   channels   that   were   also   responsible   for   transforming   the   Jewish   community   of  Baghdad  from  a  largely   local  Jewish  community   in  the  19th  Century  to  a  cosmopolitan  Jewish  community  during  the  first  half  of  the  twentieth  century.  Key  factors  in  this  transformation  include  education,  foreign  philanthropy,   and   communication   with   Baghdadi   communities   in   the   Far   East.   These   foreign   Jewish  influences   coupled   with   the   Arabizing   tendencies   which   developed   during   the   British   Mandate   and   the  early  years  of  the  Iraqi  state  led  to  a  Jewish  community  which  could  negotiate  and  feel  part  of  the  new  Arab  Middle  East  in  addition  to  European  society  present  in  the  Middle  East,  and  Jewish  transnational  culture.  

 

Rina  Cohen-­‐Muller,  INALCO,  Paris  France  

Title:  L'école  de  Yosef  Krieger  à  Jérusalem  (1868-­‐1870)  –  une  tentative  de  modernité  non  conformiste  

Abstract:  Le  développement  du  réseau  scolaire  juif  en  Palestine  au  XIXe  siècle,  l'un  des  enjeux  essentiels  de  la  bataille  pour  la  modernisation  du  yishuv  et  de  son  positionnement  dans  un  contexte  de  rivalité  entre  les  grandes  puissances  et   l'empire  ottoman,  a  été   l'objet  de  nombreuses  monographies.  Elles  constituent  un  corpus  de  connaissance  de  l'ancien  et  du  nouveau  yishuv  et  sur  les  rapports  entre  eux,  qui  vont  déterminer  le  caractère  de  la  société  hébraïque  future.  Ce  développement  s'inscrit  aussi  dans  un  mouvement  plus  large  de   créations   d'écoles   modernes   par   des   intervenants   extérieurs   –   juifs   ou   chrétiens   –   en   faveur   des  minorités   non-­‐musulmanes.   Le   processus   est   facilité   par   les   réformes   ottomanes   et   se   situe   dans   un  contexte   d'ingérence   croissante   des   grandes   puissances.   Celles-­‐ci,   même   si   elles   n'ont   pas   de   visées  d'expansion   coloniale   immédiate,   cherchent   à   élargir   leur   influence   dans   la   région.   Nous   proposons  d'étudier   particulièrement   l'initiative   d'un   juif   local,   Yosef   Krieger.   Ce   drogman   du   gouverneur   ottoman  s'inspire   du   modèle   de   l'AIU   pour   l'école   qu'il   fonde   en   1868   à   Jérusalem   tout   en   l'intégrant   dans   la  modernité  ottomane.  Contrairement  au  sort  réservé  aux  autres  écoles  juives  fondées  par  des  étrangers,  il  parvient   à   résister   à   l'hostilité   souvent   violente   des   structures   communautaires   qui   refusent   tout  changement.  Krieger  bénéficie  du  soutien  du  consulat  de  France.  En  revanche  l'AIU  parviendra  à  mettre  fin  à  l'expérience,  l'école  n'étant  pas  son  œuvre  et,  de  ce  fait,  échappant  à  son  emprise.  Cette  étude  se  base,  of   course,   sur   les   études   déjà   réalisées   comme   sur   les   archives   de   l'AIU,   mais     aussi   et   surtout   sur   les  archives  du  ministère  des  Affaires  étrangères  français.  

   

Thursday  24th  July  

Room:  15  

 

Session:  001:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

9.00-­‐10.30  

Panel:  "Xarxa  de  Calls".  A  Macro-­‐research  Project  about  Medieval  Catalan  Jewish  Communities  

Organizer:  Esperança  Valls  Pujol  

Chair:  Esperança  Valls  Pujol  

 

Tessa  Calders  Artís,  University  of  Barcelona,  Spain  

Title:  The  'Xarxa  the  Calls'.  Description  of  the  Project  and  the  Objectives  

Abstract:  Presentation  of  the  project  ‘Xarxa  de  Calls’,  and  the  research  projects  they  form  integral  part  of  this,  dedicated  to  the  recovery,  transcription  and  regest  of  the  documents  relating  to  the  Jews  remaining  in  the  different  archives  of  the  Catalan  Countries.  

 

Clara  Jáuregui,  University  of  Barcelona,  Spain  

Title:  A  Tale  of  Two  Neighborhoods:  Being  a  Converso  in  14th-­‐century  Barcelona  

Abstract:   After   the   riot   of   1391   and   the   destruction   of   the   Jewish   quarter,   a   substantial   part   of   the   Jew  population  of   Barcelona   chose   to   be   baptised   as   a   strategy   in   order   to   avoid   death.  What  was   probably  considered  just  a  temporary  solution  at  the  moment,  soon  became?  More  permanent  than  it  seemed.  A  lot  of  those  Conversos  chose  to  adapt  in  their  new  Christian  condition,  but  they  obviously  kept  on  going  with  their   professional   lives   and   their   personal   relations   with   other   Conversos   as   they   usually   did,   mostly  echoing  the  same  Jewish  tradition.  Those  connexions  between  Conversos  were  as  common  as  those  of  the  Jews:  they  married  and  behaved  as  if  they  still  belonged  to  the  same?  Community  as  they  lived  together  in  a  new  neighborhood,  repeating  the  same  patterns  they  had  in  the  old  Jewish  quarter.  

 

Oriol  Saula,  Museu  Comarcal  de  l'Urgell,  Tàrrega,  Spain  

Title:  Tragedy  in  Tàrrega  (Catalonia)  during  the  Black  Death  

Abstract:   This   paper   deals   with   a   clear   example   of   interdisciplinary   work   between   documentary   and  archival   research,   archaeological   excavations   and   anthropological   studies,   which   has   produced   a   deeper  knowledge  of  a  fact  related  to  the  Black  Death:  the  pogrom  that  in  July  1348  suffered  the  then  flourishing  Jewish   community  of   Tàrrega.   It’s   true   that  news   from  medieval  pogroms   related   to   the  plague  are  well  known,   but   in   this   case   it’s   the   confirmation   through   archeology   and   anthropology   and   also   the   prior  discovery  of  the  Jewish  cemetery  owing  to  some  documents  no  related  at  all  to  Jews  or  Black  Death  what  makes  Tàrrega  so  exceptional.  

 

10.30-­‐11.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  002:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

11.00-­‐13.00  

Panel:  "Xarxa  de  Calls".  A  Macro-­‐research  Project  about  Medieval  Catalan  Jewish  Communities  

Organizer:  Esperança  Valls  Pujol  

Chair:  Esperança  Valls  Pujol  

 

Eulàlia  Vernet,  Museu  d'Història  de  Barcelona  /  Universitat  de  Barcelona,  Spain  

Title:   The   Medieval   Jewish   Quarter   of   Barcelona:   towards   a   New   Museography   (Museu   d'Història   de  Barcelona).  

Abstract:  The  purpose  of  this  communication  is  to  explain  the  new  project  that,  from  the  History  Museum  of  Barcelona,  has  been  designed  and  is  ready  to  implant  in  the  MUHBA  Jewish  medieval  quarter  Center  of  Barcelona  (Centre  MUHBA-­‐el  Call).  This  new  museography  aims  to  offer  visitors  a  historical,  topographical  and  cultural  travel  through  the  legacy  of  the  most  important  and  influential  Jewish  comunity  of  the  Catalan  Crown  of  Aragon.  

 

Josep  Xavier  Muntané,  Institut  d'Estudis  Món  Juïc,  Spain  

Title:  A  medieval  Jewish  community  recovered:  Verdú  (Catalonia)  

Abstract:  Most   of   the   studies   done   about   the   Jewish  medieval   past   of   Catalonia   have   focused   on   either  some   of   the   big   communities,   as   Girona   or   Barcelona,   or   in   one   of   its   most   prominent   members.   The  smaller   communities,   often   underrepresented   in   the   documents   preserved   in   the   central   archives,   have  been  outside  the  interest  of  historians.  Being  absent  in  royal  documentation  means  being  absent  in  modern  scientific  research.  This  paper  brings  the  results  of  the  first  year  and  a  half  of  research  in  the  parish  archive  of   the   small   town  of  Verdú,  which  has  uncovered  hundreds  of  documents   related   to   the   Jews  who  once  lived  there  or  went  there  for  business.  

 

Constantino  Vidal  Salmeron,  Institut  d'Estudis  Món  Juïc,  Spain  

Title:  Jews  Serving  Christian  Secular  Power  in  Terrassa  (Catalonia):  Shealtiel  Gracià  and  Maimon  Desforn  

Abstract:  This  paper  will  introduce  two  Jews  who  served  at  the  royal  and  lordly  administration  in  the  medieval  city  of  Terrassa  (Catalonia):  Shaltiel  Gracià  and  Maimon  Desforn.  Saltell  Gracià  was  "lloctinent"  (lieutenant)  of  Guillem  de  Cardona,  lord  of  the  castle  of  Terrassa  and  Maimon  Desforn  was  the  local  royal  "batlle"  (mayor).  It  will  deal  with  their  identity,  activities  and  family.  

 

13.00-­‐14.00:  Lunch  Break  

 

Session  003:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

14.00-­‐15.30  

Medieval  Ashkenaz  

 

Chair:  Sylvie-­‐Anne  Goldberg  

 

Josef  Barzen  Rainer,  The  Hebrew  University  of  Jerusalem,  Israel  

Title:   The   Dwelling   Places   of   the   "Sages   of   Lotir".   Hebrew   Terminology   and   Political   Geography   in   Latin  Europe  in  the  High  and  Late  Middle  Ages  

Abstract:   The   "land   of   Lotir"   is   known   from   medieval   Hebrew   literature   to   be   a   term   for   a   certain  geographical   area.   Since   the   beginnings   of   Jewish   studies   this   term   has   been   equated  with   the   German  "Lothringen"   and/or   its   French   counterpart   "Lorraine".   Nevertheless   the   term   "the   sages   of   Lotir"   was  especially   difficult   to   deal   with.   Where   should   they   be   looked   for?   With   the   limited   knowledge   from  Hebrew  sources  about  the  history  of  Jewish  settlement  and  Jewish  scholars  of  the  area,  the  tendency  has  been  since  the  19th  century  to  equate  the  sages  of  "Lotir"  with  the  as  yet  young  community  in  Mainz.  This  relationship  was  also  taken  into  account  even  though  Mainz  never  belonged  to  Lorraine.  But  what  do  we  mean  when  we  talk  about  "Lorraine",  or  "Lotir"  in  the  high  and  late  Middle  Ages?  Which  geographical  and  political  area  did  the  11th  and  12th  century  Hebrew  authors  have  in  mind  when  they  referred  to  "Lotir"?  Which  Jewish  communities  claimed  this  name  and  were  also  seen  from  outside  as  the  Jewish  inhabitants,  the  people  of  "Lotir"?  

 

Shmuel  Shepkaru,  The  University  of  Oklahoma,  USA  

Title:  Midrash  Lekah  Tov  and  the  Persecutions  of  1096    

Abstract:  Tuvia  ben  R.  Eliezer  of  Kastoria,  Greece,  concluded  his  Midrash  Lekah  Tov  (also  known  as  Pesiḳta  Zuṭarta)  by   the  early  12th  century.  The  midrash  makes  a   short   reference   to   the  massacre  of   the   Jews  of  Mainz   in   1096.   My   paper   will   examine   additional   references   and   allusions   to   the   1096-­‐events   in   the  Rhineland.   These   references   and   allusions   address   the   same   theological   issue   of   sin-­‐punishment-­‐miracle/salvation   that  appears   to  be  part  of   the  dialogue  between   the   Jewish  and  Christian  chronicles  of  the  First  Crusade.  With   respect   to   Judaism,  Christian  accounts  presented   the   “miraculous”   victory  of   the  First  Crusade  as  a  proof   that  Christianity   represented   the   chosen  people.  My  paper  will   show  how  Tuvia  refuted   some   of   these   Christian   theological   interpretations   to   alleviate   potential   Jewish   concerns   in   the  wake  of  the  First  Crusade.  This  attempt  was  part  of  his  comprehensive  message  of  hope.  His  refutation  of  Christian   arguments   and   the   encouragement   and   solace   that   he   provided   added   to   the   popularity   of  Midrash  Lekah  Tov  in  Ashkenaz.  

 

Ethan  Zadoff,  CUNY  Graduate  Center,  USA  

Title:  Public  Practice/Private  Law:  Marriage  Negotiations  in  Medieval  Ashkenaz  

Abstract:   Studies   of   the   convergences   between   the   composite   nature   of   medieval   Jewish   and   Christian  marriage   law,   practice,   and   custom   in   Ashkenaz   are   not   new   in   the   historiographical   consciousness.   But  their   recent   as   well   as   their   more   antiquated   confederations   and   entanglements   have   focused   on   the  “content   of   the   form”   eschewing   a   deeper   comparative  model   of   the   two   legal   cultures.   Consequently,  these  studies  have  been  generally  ineffective  in  imagining  new  possibilities  for  thinking  about  shared  legal  and  cultural  spaces,  the  dynamic  between   law  and  custom,  and  as  result  the  nature  of  the  “legal”  during  the   long   twelfth   century.     My   paper   seeks   to   draw   further   comparisons   between   medieval   Jewish   and  Christian   perceptions   of   marriage   by   examining   the   nature   of   the   public/private   dichotomy   concerning  marriage   negotiations   and   nuptial   engagement   and   its   consequences   for   the   ways   medieval   legalists  perceived   and   realized   the   nebulous   divide   between   law   and   customary   practice.   Beginning   in   the   early  twelfth   century,  Halakhists   in  Northern   France  and  Germany  negotiated   through  a   changing  emphasis   in  the   constitutive   nature   of   marriage,   articulating   a   transition   of   pre-­‐marital   negotiations   and   nuptial  engagements   to   a   public   forum,   while   solemnizing   marital   agreements   within   communally   sanctioned  public   contexts.   This   renewed   emphasis   developed   against   wider   debates   by   Italian   and   transmontane  canonists  and  Decretists,  begun  in  earnest  during  the  closing  decades  of  the  eleventh  century,  concerning  the  occasion  to  conduct  marital  negotiations  and  betrothals  in  public  and  'ritualistic'  settings,  questions  of  ecclesiastical  approval  of  marital  matches,  and  debates  concerning  the  nature  and  practice  of  clandestine  marriages.  Taking  into  consideration  the  shifting  perception  of  marriage  during  the  long  twelfth  century,  I  explore   the   ways   Halakhists   and   canon   lawyers   shaped,   negotiated,   and   perceived   the   dividing   lines  between   ‘law’   and   ‘customary   practices’   regarding   marriage   negotiations,   and   its   implications   for  understanding   the  nature  of   the   legal   in   the   long   twelfth   century.  By  examining   the  development  of   the  legal   as   a   negotiation   and   fluid   construct,   and   by   comparing   the   perspective   of   the   Halakhists   and  canonists,   I   hope   to   show   that  marriage   law   represents   a   site   of   negotiation   between   social   action   and  cultural  perceptions  on  the  one  hand,  and  inherited  traditions,  teachings,  and  norms  on  the  other.  

 

15.30-­‐16.00:  Coffee  Break  

 

Session  004:  

Jewish  History:  Middle  Ages  

16.00-­‐18.00  

Provence  

 

Chair:  

Susan  Einbinder,  University  of  Connecticut,  USA  

Title:  Piyyut  and  the  Pastoureaux:  A  New  Perspective  

Abstract:   Crusading   militias   bearing   shepherds’   insignia   and   referred   to   as   Pastoureaux   passed   through  France  and  Aragon  in  the  spring  through  late  summer  of  1320.    Georges  Passerat  has  recently  revisited  the  social   composition   (not   entirely   rural)   and   ideology   of   these   groups,   and   the   anti-­‐Jewish   violence   that  accompanied   them.   As   did   other   scholars,   his   study   relied   largely   on   the   evidence   of   contemporary  Christian   chroniclers   and   (much)   later   Jewish   ones.   The   work   of   Passerat,   Barber,   Simonsohn,   Wolff,  Nirenberg   and   others   leaves   a   combined   impression   of   the   chaos   and   terror   of   Pastoureaux   violence  against   local   Jewish   communities,   especially   in   the   region   of   Toulouse   (the   consensus   that   the   papal  

Comtat-­‐Venaissin  was  relatively  free  of  violence  may  be  overly  generous).  This  paper  proposes  to  examine  a  different  set  of  contemporary  sources  hitherto  ignored  by  scholars,  commemorative  laments  (qinot)  that  have  been  preserved  in  a  number  of  liturgies  from  Provence  and  the  Comtat.  In  particular,  I  am  interested  in  how  these   laments  present  and  preserve  the  historical  events   they  commemorate,  how  they   interpret  and   respond   to   them   in   theological   and   polemical   terms,   and   how   these   relatively   late   exemplars   of  martyrological  verse  adapt  or  adopt  existing  conventions  of  the  genre.  Two  laments  constitute  the  focus  of  this   study,   Shlomo  bar  Yosef’s   “Abi’ah  miqreh”  and  Emanuel’s   “Ez’aq  bemar,”  neither  of  which  has  been  properly  situated  in  the  historical  context  it  deserves  nor  examined  as  a  source  of  insight  into  the  historical  and  literary  questions  I  am  asking.  Additional  laments  may  become  part  of  this  study  as  I  locate  them.  

 

Pinchas  Roth,  Ben  Gurion  University  of  the  Negev,  Israel  

Title:  Medieval  Jewish  Mourning  and  Jewish-­‐Christian  Relations  in  the  Midi  

Abstract:   Death,   burial   and   mourning   are   ostensibly   universal   phenomena,   but   they   are   performed   in  culturally   specific   ways.   The   Jewish   communities   of   medieval   Provence   and   Languedoc   had   distinctive  practices  and  customs  regarding  death  and  burial,  some  of  which  reflect  their  complicated  relationship  with  their   Christian   neighbors.  My   paper  will   examine   these   customs,   based   on  manuscript   sources,   and  will  consider   their  historical   context  and   implications   for   Jewish-­‐Christian   relations   in  Southern  France  during  the  High  Middle  Ages.  

 

Masahiro  Shida,  University  of  Tokyo,  Japan  

Title:  Letter  to  Apostate:  Jacob  ben  Elijah  and  Profayt  Duran  

Abstract:   This   paper  will   discuss   two  polemical   letters   in   the  middle   ages.   The   first   is   “Letter  of  R.   Jacob  from  Venice”  written  by  Jacob  ben  Elijah,  probably  a  rabbi  from  Provence.  The  second  is  “Letter  ‘Do  not  be  like  unto  your  fathers’”  by  Profayt  Duran,  a  rabbi  from  Perpignan.  Both  of  them  were  sent  to  the  authors’  familiar   apostates,   the   former  was   to   Dominican   friar   Paulus   Christiani;   the   latter   to   David   Bonjorn.  My  point   of   view   is   on   the   images  of   apostate   in   these   letters.   Although   these   two   authors   refer   to   various  elements   in   the   Christendom,   such   as   legends   of   the   saints,   historical   changes   of   the   dynasties   in   the  Mediterranean  world  and  the  doctrine  of  the  Transubstantiation,  they  do  not  attack  Christianity  directly  for  themselves.   Instead,   they   give   this   role   to   their   addressees,   and   have   them   criticize   Christian   culture.  Therefore,  this  paper  will  clarify  the  tactical  discourses  on  apostate.