Upload
osu-ru
View
34
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
TRUST AND SAFETY IN THE PERSON-CENTERED APPROACH IN THEEDUCATION SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
(Research report, Orenburg State University, Russia.)
CONFIANZA Y SEGURIDAD EN EL ENFOQUE CENTRADO EN LA PERSONA EN EL SISTEMAEDUCATIVO DE LA FEDERACIÓN DE RUSIA
(Reporte de Investigación, Universidad del Estado de Orenburg, Rusia).
CONFIANÇA E SEGURANÇA NO ABORDAGEM CENTRADA NA PESSOA NO SISTEMA DEEDUCAÇÃO DA FEDERAÇÃO DA RÚSSIA
(Relatório de pesquisa, Orenburg State University, Rússia.)
Iakimanskaia Irina, Head of the Department of Social Psychology
of the Orenburg State University, Ph.D., Associate Professor
[email protected] article presents the author's approach to the definition of trust and
safety in relationships of people as the basis for a person-centered
approach. Understanding trust and safety is determined theoretically and
empirically, using a survey of schoolchildren, parents and teachers regarding
trust and safety in the educational system of the Russian Federation. It was
found that the relationship between students, teachers, parents, violated
boundaries of trust and safety, making it difficult to match the capabilities
of interaction and person-centered approach. Pupils see the danger in the
pressure of teachers, at the same time help and support is received from the
parents and friends who are very afraid to leave, they find it difficult to
build confidence in their own borders and safety, are oriented in the adults,
which require them to self-sufficiency and responsible behavior .
Keywords: trust, safety, interpersonal relationships.
El artículo presenta el enfoque del autor a la definición de la confianza y
la seguridad en las relaciones de las personas como la base de un enfoque
centrado en el estudiante. Comprender la confianza y la seguridad se
determina teórica y empíricamente, mediante una encuesta de escolares, padres
y maestros sobre la confianza y la seguridad en el sistema educativo de la
Federación de Rusia. Se encontró que la relación entre los estudiantes, los
profesores, los padres, violaron los límites de la confianza y la seguridad,
por lo que es difícil de igualar las capacidades de interacción y el enfoque
centrado en el estudiante. Los alumnos ven el peligro de la presión de los
docentes, en el mismo tiempo, ayudar y apoyo que se recibe de los padres y
amigos que son muy miedo de salir, les resulta difícil construir confianza en
sus propias fronteras y la seguridad, se orientan en los adultos, que les
obligan a la autosuficiencia y el comportamiento responsable .
Palabras clave: la confianza, la seguridad, las relaciones interpersonales.
O artigo apresenta a abordagem do autor para a definição de confiança e
segurança nas relações de pessoas como a base para uma abordagem centrada no
aluno. Compreender a confiança ea segurança é determinada teórica e
empiricamente, usando uma pesquisa de alunos, pais e professores sobre a
confiança ea segurança no sistema educacional da Federação Russa. Verificou-
se que a relação entre alunos, professores, pais, violaram os limites de
confiança e segurança, tornando-o difícil de igualar as capacidades de
interação e centrado no aluno abordagem. Os alunos vêem o perigo da pressão
dos professores, na ajuda mesmo tempo e apoio é recebida dos pais e amigos
que estão com muito medo de sair, eles têm dificuldade para construir a
confiança em suas próprias fronteiras e segurança, são orientados nos
adultos, que os obrigam a auto-suficiência e um comportamento responsável .
Palavras-chave: confiança, segurança, relações interpessoais.
Methodology
We often hear about the importance of trust for life
(Barber B.(1983). But clearly define this phenomenon no one
has, and it has been repeatedly emphasized. Such a variety of
interpretations of trust demonstrates the complexity of the
phenomenon and its importance for the person-centered approach.
Trust is defined as the condition for the existence of man's
relations to the world (Chua R.Y.J., Ingram P., Morris M.
(2005), the people themselves as a social resource identity,
allowing it to interact in a fairly wide range(Luhman N.(2000),
as the expectation of the obligations on the part of others
(Lewicki R.J., Mcallister D.J., Bies R.J.(1998), as an
indicator of success factors and partnership strategy in the
implementation of human activity (Mollering G.(2006). Trust is
defined as a psychological attitude, which includes interest
for the partner (Molm L, Takashi N., Peterson G.(2000),
expectations of satisfaction from working with partners, the
emotions that accompany these expectations(Rempel J.K., Holmes
J.G., Zanna M.P.(1985), positive emotional expectations from
the partner(Weber L.R., Carter A.I.(2002), and the general
state of tranquility due to the relationship with the partner,
the experience of successful interaction expectations. Trust
also is respected, built in the end based on the proven results
of the objective assessment of people and objects of the world
as a worthy, deserving of respect.
Safety associated with the notion of a social
environment, the possibilities of creativity and self-
realization. The experience of safety, according to many
researchers, is a basic human need, and at the same time,
arrangements for ensuring effective personal development and
change (Slovic P.(1993). Healthy sense of safety is based on
three categories of basic beliefs that make up the core of the
subjective world of the individual: 1) the belief that the
world is better than evil, and 2) the belief that the world is
full of meaning, and 3) the belief in the value of own "self."
Psychological safety is defined as the state of public
consciousness in which society as a whole and each individual
person perceive the existing quality of life as an adequate and
reliable (Molm L, Takashi N., Peterson G.(2000). The experience
of psychological safety is tiered nature; complete safety is
the state of boredom, sleepiness, for optimum life of a person
needs a certain amount of predictable risk for each person that
risk has an individual nature. Unpredictable risk, or a state
of uncertainty, is the experience of danger, stress,
accompanied with anger and aggression to the world.
Trust and safety are linked through the sensual sphere of
a person(Rogers C.R.(1957). The combination of the pole - the
trust-distrust and safety - risk generates four types of roles
that can be traced from clients with complex emotions
associated with these components – «traitor», « our », «alien»,
«orphan». The main driving force behind these changes in social
roles - feelings of guilt and resentment and acts of violence
and dependency. Customer experience difficulties in confidence
and security falls into the cycle, change one social role to
another in interpersonal relationships, cannot build a
constructive taking of relations with other people. Experience
of taking a relationship that he suffers consultation with the
psychologist is his unique resource in the output from the "us
and them" and to build relationships with the people around
him.
trust
ourtraitor
resentmacts ofviolenc
dependency safetyrisk
guilt
orphaalien
distrust
Figure 1. Model of interpersonal relations in the "trust- distrust"and "risk-safety."
Procedure
Changes in the social environment, most of all projected on the
education sector, it is in it, in our opinion, shows the cycle of
relations related to safety and trust. In the school there is an
interaction of teachers, students, parents, it is necessary that
these relationships were found confidence and security in the
optimal forms. Our study was conducted in schools in the Orenburg
region in describing appearances, opinions and behaviors related
to trust and safety in the face of changes in the school system in
Russia.
The achievement of the objectives of the solution of a number
of basic research tasks.
a) to examine the safety status of the educational environment
in the views of the Orenburg school students;
b) to describe the presentation of adolescent value priorities;
c) to analyze the role and the place of parents and teachers in
opportunities Assistance in schools;
d) to evaluate the capacity of parents and their ideas about
the interaction with the school;
e) give a general description of professional and innovative
capacity of teachers;
In the framework of the research program has been on a number
of hypotheses, socio-economic and socio-psychological
characteristics. We believe that the factors that determine the
general characteristics of the manifestation of trust and safety
in the Orenburg region and are now as follows:
- The fact that many young people a clear confidence in
possibility of parents to help in difficult situations, similar to
the views of parents;
- Not safe learning environment in the home and in the
educational institution;
- Lack of coordination in the organization of training,
education, support the development of children and adolescents;
Goals and objectives we have undertaken extensive research has
its main subject. As such, the act:
- Value-orientation orientation of behavior Orenburg students;
- Motives and acts committed by teenagers;
- The content and direction of the expectations of the
different forms of assistance;
- Presentation of the parents of the opportunities the school
content, interaction with it;
- The expectations of teachers and set against innovation;
The main objects of our study are:
- Teenagers, students 7-11th grade schools in the city of
Orenburg and the region;
- Their parents and teachers.
The study used the following main methods of data collection,
processing and interpretation of the results:
a) Work with the objective information:
- Analysis of official documents, judgments, orders, decrees,
laws, central and local, related to the problem being studied;
- Analysis of current and historical records of urban
educational organizations;
b) Work with the subjective nature of information:
- A questionnaire survey of young people, parents and teachers;
The following table presents the total sample (of 6239 studied
people) group of respondents (number of people).
Respondents students
by sex - boys-861, girls-1192
Age (years) - 13-14 - 552. 15 - 16 - 1070, 17-18 years - 354,
Respondents parents
gender male-258, female-1860
by years - 17-20 years - 10. 21 - 30 - 175, 31-40 years - 1245,
41-50 years - 653, 51-60 - 81.
Classes in which children learn respondent’s parents
Grades - 1-2 class - 224, 3-4 class - 275,5-6 class -549,7-8
class - 494,9-10 class - class 452.11 class - 142.
Respondents teachers
gender - male-278, female-1790
Age (years) -17-20 years - 19.21 - 30 - 271, 31-40 years -
803,41-50 years - 663, 51-60 - 373.
Type of educational institution
Secondary School - 1671, School - 231, Gymnasium - 233.
Results and data discussion
Preliminary conclusions about the overall safety evaluation
of the educational environment and its dynamics in the
detection of positive attitudes and loyalty of young people in
relation to their own institution. Given the choice, most teens
are tempted to study in school. Many who want to attend school
and high schools, about the same number are choosing evening
school, want to study at home, in a private school, or
somewhere else. Of the overall results in 2009 also found that
the majority of students believe that the school give what
useful in life, but there are doubters. Can state conflict -
the desire to learn in their own school against assessment of
its work as part inadequate. This contradiction is resolved by
an increase in self-study students. That school is preparing
for a successful life, it turns out that this important
function is performed only partially. It is important to
saturate schooling additional features in the manifestation of
self-learners, practical value in terms of school experience in
public life.
Pupils had good relationships with teachers, classmates,
plenty of opportunities to take the initiative and activity,
less than meets the students degree of preservation of personal
dignity in the school and educational institution account of
their personal problems and difficulties. In contrast to the
results of previous measurements, we can see an increase in
satisfaction of communicating with teachers. These results
indirectly suggest that, in the school setting, there are risks
of infringement of the personal dignity of students, their
humiliation, and these risks are more pronounced for boys than
for girls. Perhaps as a result, it is useful to introduce a
program of Teacher Training courses on gender psychology and
pedagogy.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
0.050.1
0.150.2
0.250.3
0.350.4
Hazards in the school environment
1 - Public humiliation / insult classmates, 2 - Public
humiliation / insult teachers, 3 - Threats classmates 4 - Threats to
teachers, 5 - Forced to do anything against the wishes of his
classmates, 6 - Forced to do anything against the wishes of
teachers, 7 - ignoring classmates, 8 - ignoring teachers, 9 -
Unfriendly attitude classmates, 10 - Unfriendly attitude of
teachers.
Figure 2. The balance of opinions teens on dangers in the
educational institution.
Pupils assessed as the strongest safety risk - forced to do
anything against the wishes of teachers. Next level of hazard -
negative attitude classmates. And only then - negative attitude
of teachers. The main sources of security breaches of the
educational environment, according to the students, is a
classmate, he publicly humiliated, force to do something, is
unfriendly, the students see it, naturally react anxiety,
protest, alarm. Risks in relationships with teachers are more
connected with the fact that they are forced to do anything
against the will. Least expressed in the opinion of children as
a source of danger - danger classmates and teachers, negative
attitude of teachers. Compared with previous studies of the
negative impact of teachers decreased, and classmates -
increased. In this connection it is useful to teach children
constructive ways of resolving conflicts and solving conflicts
in interpersonal contacts not through pressure and by seeking
mutually acceptable solutions.
1 2 3 4 5 60
0.050.1
0.150.2
0.250.3
0.35
concerns in the life 2011
concerns in the life 2009
1 - I'm afraid of homelessness, 2 - I'm afraid of the new and unexpected after school, 3 - I'm afraid to go into a new life, to become useless, 4-I am afraid to get into the army, 5 - I'm afraid to meet with bad people, 6 - I am afraid that I will have a bad life.
Figure 3. The balance of opinions teenagers about the dangers in the next life.
Basic fears pupils outside the school associated with
unexpected events to which they are not prepared, as well as
with the expectation of meeting with the bad people. Such fears
were more pronounced in girls and senior classes is increasing.
Compared with studies in 2009 decreased fear a bad life,
children have become more confident about their prospects, but
remained high values of fear of the new and unexpected, and bad
people. Thus, already noted, the setting changes from the fear
of failure in life, she goes to the inability to build positive
and constructive relationships with different people react to
unexpected situations. Pupils increase their fears of
unexpected changes; they want predictability and measured life.
Most hinder adjustment to life outside the school longing
for old friends. The second reason for the children to specify
their own emotional stress and aggression that hinder social
relationships, and the third - the expectation that access
them, and they do not come into the conversation. This type of
reaction shows poor social activity in contacts inherent to our
students. Compared with previous studies of this plant has
shown a tendency to increase.
Perhaps in response to such results is urgently needed in
the implementation of school events (through extracurricular
activities, through elective courses) to increase social
competence and social activities of students, which not only
helps to build social ties in the new conditions of life, but
also to address for help with difficult feelings and are close
connections among the people around them.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.7
adaptation difficulties outside school
1 - Do not know how to effectively communicate, 2 - I do not know
what they think, feel, experience other people, 3 - and I'm afraid I
do not like strangers, 4 - Longing for the old friends, 5 - My
emotional stress, anxiety, aggressiveness, 6 - Waiting that will
appeal to me, not I join in the conversation, 7 - Lack of social
experience with other people, 8 - Limited personal choice, lack of
initiative and independence, 9-passivity, finding approval, failure
to plan ahead.
Figure 4. The balance of opinions on the causes of the low teens
to adapt for the future.
When describing the failure to adapt to student life
teenagers are the following qualities - hope to help others,
the inability to invest wisely, to realize their own desires,
difficulties in communication, inability to build relationships
with others. A contradiction: students realize their own
difficulties in communicating with others, and, at the same
time want to be perfectionists, to achieve the ideal in life.
When comparing data from different studies can observe an
increase in the choice of quality misfit schoolboy related to
incompetence in the field of finance and communication,
inability to choose their actions, which may indicate a
deepening of the above controversy, and, as a consequence,
lower self-esteem and self-esteem of adolescents. In connection
with these results, we can recommend teacher training
techniques and methods of self-esteem and self-esteem
adolescents, teaching accounting errors, adoption failure in
life, setting real goals in life.
In adolescents, the results of our study, is dominated by
adequate forms of reactions - they take responsibility for
their actions, look for the cause in their behavior, are
grateful for the experience. Inadequate forms of reaction
produces reactions associated with shyness, shy teenagers.
Girls also characterized by a passive protest reactions, they
are also characterized for pupils aged 15-16. That is, the most
common barriers to the development of social experience related
to the personal qualities of teenagers - shyness, shy, passive
protest reactions. Compared with the previous study found
reduced active-aggressive reactions, they are replaced by
passive. You can suggest a trend of aggression transition from
external to internal forms, students react own negative
feelings with you, alone, from whom little divided.
One can assume that since 2004 there has been some increase
in aggressive, hostile reactions from the children, they have
become not only sanctions, but also for promotions, which
generally made it difficult to control the behavior of adults
and reflected in the system of self-regulation. Currently,
aggressive reactions are falling, there is an increase of
adequate and passive-aggressive reactions, that is, and there
is a shift in the internal form. In this case, there is a high
probability of auto-aggressive tendencies, which need to be
prevented.
1 2 3 4 50
0.050.1
0.150.2
0.250.3
0.35
General feeling of security 2011General feeling of security 2009
1 - Nothing and no one is afraid, 2 - have never faced this
danger, and 3 - Dangerous situations arise, but I deal with them, 4
- Quite often faced with danger, 5 - In the evening I prefer to stay
home.
Figure 5. Rating teenagers general feeling of safety.
In assessing the overall safety status of the two groups of
children were found, about equal to the amount which, according
to them, to cope with the dangers or do not meet. And among the
first big boys, and among the latter - girls. Among those who
have to cope with the dangers of more younger teens and older
say that have never faced this danger. When comparing the
results from 2009 can be seen an increase in the "alarming"
teenagers. More and more students are often faced with the
danger, while somewhat less preferred to stay home.
1 2 3 40
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
level of independence in learning 2011level of independence in learning 2009
1 - I go to school, I try to learn everything, and 2 - I try to
understand what is being offered, and 3 - to study independently
additional materials, 4 - to take an extra teacher.
Figure 6. Rating adolescents level of autonomy in learning.
In determining the degree of independence of teenagers often
choose the way when you need to understand what is offered in
school, this is what you need to learn. Much less frequently
selected answers related to the manifestation of self-learning,
such as doing additional himself or with the teacher. And in
2009, more independent students were more.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.7
The most importanteasy to reach
1 - Active, active life, and 2 - Health 3 - Interesting work, 4 - The
beauty of nature and art (the experience of beauty in nature and art), 5
- Love, 6 - Material and secure life, 7 - Availability of good and loyal
friends; 8 - Self-confidence (no doubt), 9 - Knowledge (ability to expand
their educational horizons) 10 - Freedom of independence in the behavior
and actions, 11 - happy family life, 12 - Creativity
Figure 7. Representations of teenagers about the most important and
easy to reach values.
Pupils appreciate how important these values - health,
availability of trusted friends, happy family life. Less
important values - the beauty of nature and art, freedom and
independence in the behavior and actions. Perhaps more important
values associated with social relationships, less important differ
individualistic nature. But more important is the presence of
individual values - health, it should be noted that such
priorities are characteristic of the Russian sample for a long
time, it is important to build a quality educational environment
for them to navigate.
The most easy to reach values - active, active life, there are
good and true friends, confident, interesting work, cognition.
Less appears easy to achieve in the values of "beauty of nature
and art", "material and prosperous life." You can see that some
aspects of the quality of life for students considered easily
achievable, and may, therefore, their value decreases.
The most important characteristics are close and attainable
only for the value of "the existence of good and loyal friends"
and other important values often are not defined as easy to reach.
It's interesting that the value associated with this strong fear
of schoolchildren, it easy to reach important, but losing friends,
to part with them after school.
Boys identified as an important and easy to reach active work
life and work as an important value - a happy family life, as well
as easy to reach - the presence of good and loyal friends. Girls
identified as an important value health, the presence of good and
loyal friends, a happy family life, and as achievable - active
work life, self-confidence. You can see that for boys and girls is
important to the creation and support of the family, but it is
difficult to reach, it is interesting that it is not related to
the value of friendship, though more often she is the basis for
the construction of high-quality family relationships.
It should be noted that the importance of health admits
students of all ages, family life as more important release 13-16
year, the value of "true friends" stands out in 15-16 years. Easy
to reach in the 13-14 years of active life, 15-16 - self-
confidence and knowledge, in the 17-18 - all three values.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Referrals
1 - Cool heads, 2 - A school psychologist, 3 - school teachers, 4
- Psychotherapist, 5 - juvenile inspectors, 6 - Doctors, 7 - Parents,
8 - Friends, 9 - call the helpline, 10 - for adults, The Trusted, 11 -
mastering yourself, 12 - Do not know
Figure 8. Recipients seeking care for adolescents.
Found that the system of care in adolescents is still quite
scarce. The main destinations are accessed by teenagers -
parents and friends, in second place - the class teacher, adult,
trusted himself schoolboy. The system of professional support
for school psychologists and other specialists, less in demand.
It often answers: he can handle, hard to answer. They show that
in a difficult situation, it is likely that the adolescent will
be left alone, without the help and support of friends and
family. That is why it is important to pay attention to
informing young people about the system of professional help
from psychologists, social workers and other professionals, as
well as essential to pay attention to special training for
teachers and class teachers to provide personal care and support
to adolescents. For this to work requires special skills.
It should be noted that boys and girls have the same orientation
on the support of friends and family, to self-support problems,
girls differ somewhat greater support from the class teacher. In
a more younger and older systems support more poor - friends and
parents, aged 15-16 students but friends and parents support the
class teacher and the adult they trust.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 140
0.050.1
0.150.2
0.250.3
0.350.4
Sources of personal change for teens
1 - Serious illness, 2 - Life Crisis 3 - General poor condition, 4 -
The failure in the making, 5 - Example of a healthy lifestyle
authoritative person, 6 - Love 7 - Reading the literature, 8 -
Participation in lectures and seminars on the topic 9 - Participation
in psychological training, 10 - Counseling Psychologist, 11 - The
death of a loved one, 12 - a big win in the lottery, 13 - An
unexpected inheritance, 14 - a new school or place of work.
Figure 9. Sources of personal change for teenagers.
Personality changes, according to the teenagers associated with
difficult life events - the death of a loved one, a new school
or place of work. The same sources of changes in personal
characteristics are the general poor condition, failure in
business, an example of a healthy way of life respected man in
love. You can see the internal and external factors, factors
associated with consciousness, self-esteem and his contumacious
teenager. The least impact on the personality changes involved
in lectures and seminars on the subject and winning the lottery.
Apparently, hose events are regarded as affecting the changes in
life by adults.
2011
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
2009
Group 1 - indecisiveness antisocial, non-anxious;
Group 2 - dependent, pro-social, non-anxious;
Group 3 - dependent, pro-social, anxiety;
Group 4 - independent, pro-social, anxiety;
Group 5 - independent, asocial, non-anxious;
Group 6 - independent, antisocial, anxious;
Group 7 - independent, pro-social, non-anxious;
Group 8 - dependent, antisocial, anxious.
Figure 10. Distribution groups typology teenagers
In our research, we consider features related directly to
the characteristics of adolescence. For the analysis, we chose
the most important of them - the level of independent study,
the characteristics of the emotional sphere, in particular
anxiety, and social orientation. That adolescence - activation
time individual to start an independent, demands for freedom in
various areas.
We are particularly interested in the level of
independence in such an important area for teenagers, as
training. The level of independence we have provisionally
identified two groups of adolescents, and conditionally call
them - on their own students (these teens do in addition to the
school program with teachers, either on their additional
material) and non-self-learners (such teenagers trying to learn
that offer teachers in the school, understand the material in
the school curriculum).
The peculiarities of the emotional sphere, we also
provisionally identified two groups of teenagers and
conditionally call them anxious and non-anxious. Troubled teens
are often in their daily lives are at risk and prefer to sit in
the evening at home, and non-anxious - afraid of nothing, and
never faced a real danger. Since the tasks of research, for a
brighter display researched trends, we were excluded from the
analysis of a group of adolescents with moderate anxiety that
meet dangerous situation, but to cope with them.
According to the social orientation we arbitrarily
identified two groups of teenagers, tentatively called
antisocial and pro-social. Antisocial adolescents believe that
deviant behavior no one will notice, and you can get an
interesting experience, and pro-social believe that aberrant
act necessarily lead to punishment for an unsuccessful life in
the future.
In the process, we have a combination of eight teenage
groups.
In general, the distribution of adolescent groups is
presented in Figure 10. Found in comparison with 2009 the
increase of non-automatic, prosocial, anxiety and a decrease in
the group of independent, anti-social, non-anxious.
Most educators region is divided into two groups - one
(smaller) monitor innovation and strives to implement them, and
the other - very - little use in their classes innovation.
Accordingly, the first group - often conducts innovative classes,
the second group - rarely. There is a relatively small part of the
teachers, not knowing about the new forms of organization of
training and deploying them. Teachers 17-20 years, most often
conduct innovative activities, 21-30 - almost non-existent, 31-50
divided into three equal groups, often rare and not conducting
innovative classes, teachers over 50 are divided into two groups -
often conducting and conducting innovative activities. In groups
of teachers and administrators as well see the difference -
teachers differentiate the groups conducting and non-conducting
innovative activities, and the administration - on teams
conducting such studies often rare. Thus, the more loyal to
innovate and use them in their work of young teachers and school
administrators, other teachers differentiated by loyalty to the
restructuring in education rather harshly. In general, we can say
that in most cases the teachers' staff polarized adoption of
innovation, which is the basis for the conflict in the educational
activity. In connection with this state of affairs may recommend a
specific activity administration to discuss innovations in
education, mentoring, implementation of various approval
procedures within schools that will creatively to resolve the
conflict between the host and the host innovation in teacher
education.
1 2 3 40
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
frequency of occurrence
1 - very often, 2 - rarely, 3 - do not spend, because I do not
know what it takoe.4-better answer
Figure 11. Experience of innovative activities
In assessing the extent of training school students for
independent living parents' opinions were divided into two almost
equal groups - one of them believed that the school provides
students with the skills needed for independent living, and the
other - that it is more concerned with the family. It should be
noted that the number of parents who expressed an opinion, almost
equal. We can make the assumption that it is in the subject
highlighted above contradiction appears more. Parents and teachers
need to harmonize the position that it is in the skills that are
important for independent living raising a family, that - the
school, as they cannot compete, but complement each other.
1 2 3 4 50
0.050.1
0.150.2
0.250.3
0.35
frequency of occurrence
1 - The school provides students with all the important skills
for independent living, 2 - School teaches only partly, but
mostly trained for independent living, and 3 - School is only
partially gives children important skills for independent
living, 4 - School provides knowledge, and is engaged in raising
a family, 5 - schools are not ready for independent living, and
provides the knowledge and values their
Figure 12. The degree of training school students for
independent living
Thus, trust and safety are linked differently from students,
teachers and parents. For high school students experience a
focused priority of trust and inadequate understanding of their
own safety, that is, actively experienced social positions
"traitor-victim" and "orphan-thrown," parents and teachers
observed the position of "us and them". Perhaps, the students
noticed the prevalence in the pedagogical environment effects of
coercion and pressure. According to the study, we plan to create
discussion groups in schools issues together with students,
parents and teachers may jointly discuss the content of the
interactions will help to establish harmonious relations with
their trust and safety.
1. Barber B. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ:
Rutgers Univ. Press, 1983. 310 p.
2. Chua R.Y.J., Ingram P., Morris M. Whom in our network do we
trust?: Cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’
professional networks. Working Paper. Columbia University.
2005.
3. Lewicki R.J., Mcallister D.J., Bies R.J. Trust and
distrust: New relationships and realities // Academy of
Management Review. 1998. V. 23. Is. 3. P. 438-459.
4. Luhman N. Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and
Alternatives // Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative
Relations (electronic edition) / Ed. by D. Gambetta.
Oxford: University of Oxford, 2000. Ch. 6. P. 94–107.
5. Molm L, Takashi N., Peterson G. Risk and Trust in Social
Exchange: An Experimental Test of a Classical
Proposition // American Journal of Sociology. 2000. V. 105.
P. 1396-1427.
6. Mollering G. Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity. Oxford:
Elsevier, 2006. 230 p.
7. Rempel J.K., Holmes J.G., Zanna M.P. Trust in close
relationships //Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology. 1985, V. 49. Is. 1. P. 95-112.
8. Rogers C.R. The necessary and sufficient conditions of
therapeutic personality change//Journal of Consulting
Psychology. 1957, 21(2). P. 95-103.
9. Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy // Risk
Anal. 1993. V. 13. P. 675-682.
10. Weber L.R., Carter A.I. Social Construction of Trust.
The Kluwer Academic. Plenum Publishers, 2002.184 p.