234
EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION OF A NUMERICAL PCM MODEL FOR BUILDING ENERGY PROGRAMS by Wijesuriya Arachchige Sajith Indika Wijesuriya

Wijesuriya_mines_0052E_11907.pdf - Mountain Scholar

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION OF A NUMERICAL PCM MODEL FOR

BUILDING ENERGY PROGRAMS

by

Wijesuriya Arachchige Sajith Indika Wijesuriya

ii

A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of

Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

(Mechanical Engineering).

Golden, Colorado

Date ---------------------------------------------------

Signed: ------------------------------------------------- Wijesuriya Wijesuriya

Signed: ------------------------------------------------- Dr. Paulo Tabares-Velasco

Thesis Advisor

Golden, Colorado

Date ---------------------------------------------------

Signed: ------------------------------------------------- Dr. John Berger

Professor and Department Head Department of Mechanical Engineering

iii

ABSTRACT

The increase in peak electricity demand in recent years has stressed the importance of peak

electricity demand shifting technologies. Phase Change Materials (PCMs) have a potential to

improve the building envelope by increasing the thermal mass as well as contribute to a significant

peak shift in whole building power demand. Therefore, special attention is given to properly

capture the thermal behavior of PCMs in advanced building energy modeling software. Design of

effective PCM thermal storage systems requires accurate energy modeling. There are analytical

and numerical models developed during last few decades for this purpose, many have not been

fully validated. Based on the current status of literature, the study identifies the limitations and

drawbacks of existing methods. A parametric study is conducted to identify the optimum PCM

thermo-physical properties, PCM locations in building envelope, under forced convection and a 5

hour pre-cooling strategy. Furthermore, an improved advanced numerical building envelope model

is created in MATLAB to simulate the PCM performance in building envelope and an

experimental apparatus is constructed to obtain useful experimental data for PCM included wall

assemblies for validation purposes. This thesis also uses two datasets from laboratory studies of

shape-stabilized and field studies Nano-PCMs to validate and compare PCM modelling algorithms

of 6 modules in 5 building energy modelling software. Finally, two macroencapsulated PCMs (Bio

based PCM and hydrate salts) are tested using the experimental apparatus to obtain data for

validation purposes. To approximate the heat transfer through a wall assembly with PCM pouches

several techniques are investigated that can capture 3D heat transfer characteristics. Method with

the highest agreement is used to validate and compare the developed MATLAB algorithm and

different building energy modelling software.

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... ix

LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... xviii

LIST OF SYMBOLS ................................................................................................................... xxi

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1

CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE ...............................................................5

2.1. Phenomena of Phase Change of PCMs ................................................................................ 6

2.2. PCM encapsulation methods ................................................................................................ 7

2.3. Thermal characteristics and properties of PCMs ............................................................... 10

โ€œMushyโ€ region of Phase Change ................................................................................ 10

Phase separation of the material .................................................................................. 12

Subcooling/supercooling effect and Hysteresis ........................................................... 12

PCM Thermal conductivity ......................................................................................... 14

PCM phase-change temperature range ........................................................................ 14

2.4. Types of PCMs ................................................................................................................... 15

Analyzed PCMs ........................................................................................................... 16

CHAPTER 3 MODELING PCMS IN BUILDING ENVELOPE ...............................................19

3.1. Analytical Models .............................................................................................................. 20

3.2. Numerical Models .............................................................................................................. 20

Numerical models: Simulation methods ...................................................................... 20

Numerical Models: Grid and boundary considerations. .............................................. 23

Numerical Models: Discrete forms and solution schemes .......................................... 23

Numerical Models: In building energy modeling platforms ....................................... 24

v

CHAPTER 4 EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON PCM INCLUSION IN BUILDING ENVELOPE .........................................................................................................26

4.1. Scale of experimental studies ............................................................................................. 26

4.2. PCM characterization methods .......................................................................................... 26

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) ................................................................... 27

T-history method ......................................................................................................... 28

Thermogravimetric analyses (TG) ............................................................................... 29

Dynamic Hot Box Method ........................................................................................... 29

Heat Flow Meter Apparatus (HFMA) methods ........................................................... 30

Other methods .............................................................................................................. 32

4.3.Experimental studies on macroencapsulated and microencapsulated PCMs ...................... 32

CHAPTER 5 PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH PHASE CHANGE MATERIAL (PCM)-ENHANCED DRYWALL, PRE-COOLING, AND VARIABLE ELECTRIC RATES IN A HOT AND DRY CLIMATE .........34

5.1. Approach ............................................................................................................................ 36

Building Description .................................................................................................... 37

Precooling Strategy ...................................................................................................... 42

Convection Heat Transfer ............................................................................................ 43

Mechanical Ventilation and Fan Selection .................................................................. 44

5.2. Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................... 45

Parametric analysis results ........................................................................................... 45

Hourly Results ............................................................................................................. 48

5.3. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 60

CHAPTER 6 NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER MODEL FOR OPAQUE WALLS AND DESCRIPTION OF LABORATORY FACILITY FOR EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................................62

6.1. 1D heat transfer algorithm to model building walls with PCM ......................................... 63

6.2. Modeling of PCM inclusions in the thesis model .............................................................. 66

vi

Modeling hysteresis in the thesis model ...................................................................... 67

6.3. PCM modeling objects in building energy modeling software .......................................... 71

EnergyPlus PCM modules ........................................................................................... 71

WUFI PCM module ..................................................................................................... 72

6.4. Numerical PCM building envelope model verification ..................................................... 73

Analytical Verification ................................................................................................ 73

Numerical Verification ................................................................................................ 78

6.5. State-of-the-art Laboratory for full-scale experimental studies of PCMs .......................... 81

Wall Assembly Tests ................................................................................................... 81

Environmental Chamber and the HVAC System ........................................................ 82

HVAC and Chamber Instrumentation System ............................................................ 84

Control and Data Acquisition ...................................................................................... 86

Construction of Building Envelope Assemblies within the Chamber ......................... 91

CHAPTER 7 EMPIRICAL VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF PCM MODELING ALGORITHEMS COMMONLY USED IN BUILDING ENERGY AND HYGROTHERMAL SOFTWARE ......................................................................93

7.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 93

7.2. Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 95

Validation .................................................................................................................... 99

Enthalpy-temperature curves of PCMs ...................................................................... 102

Numerical modeling considerations .......................................................................... 103

Shape-stabilized PCM wall data ................................................................................ 106

Nano-encapsulated wallboard data ............................................................................ 107

7.3. Results and Discussion ..................................................................................................... 109

NTNU shape-stabilized PCM .................................................................................... 109

Nano-encapsulated PCM wall ................................................................................... 113

vii

7.4. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 118

CHAPTER 8 EMPIRICAL VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF PCM ALGORITHMS MODELING MACRO-ENCAPSULATED PCMS IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE ....................................................................................................... 119

8.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 119

8.2. Methodology .................................................................................................................... 122

Macroencapsulated Phase Change Materials ............................................................. 122

Full scale testing environment ................................................................................... 127

Envelope assemblies .................................................................................................. 129

Cooling and heating temperature set-points for full-cycle tests ................................ 133

Heat transfer modeling of macroencapsulated PCMs................................................ 134

Using the simplified methods in the 1D thesis model ............................................... 142

PCM models used in Building energy and hygrothermal software ........................... 144

Validation .................................................................................................................. 144

8.3. Results and Discussion ..................................................................................................... 145

Temperature variation on the surfaces of the panels ................................................. 145

Temperature variation of the PCMs behind drywall ................................................. 147

Comparison of heat transfer approaches for PCM macroencapsulation ................... 148

Comparison of EnergyPlus, thesis model, and WUFI software ................................ 155

Validation study with hysteresis characteristic data .................................................. 158

8.4.Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 162

CHAPTER 9 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK ............................................................164

9.1. Summary of significant results ......................................................................................... 164

9.2. Potential for Future Work ................................................................................................. 166

Further development of the building envelope model ............................................... 166

Laboratory experiments of different PCMs ............................................................... 166

viii

REFERENCES CITED ................................................................................................................168

APPENDIX A. DISCRETE FORMS PREVIOUSELY USED IN NUMERICALLY MODELLING PCMS .........................................................................................199

APPENDIX B. SUMMERY OF WHERE WHOLE BUILDING ENERGY MODELING PLATFORMS WITH PCM MODELS ARE USED ..........................................200

APPENDIX C. COST CALCULATION PROCEDURES OF BEOPT ......................................204

APPENDIX D. SENSOR INFORMATION OF THE CHAMBER, HVAC SYSTEM, AND OUTSIDE ...........................................................................................................206

APPENDIX E. SENSOR INFORMATION OF THE CHAMBER, HVAC SYSTEM, AND OUTSIDE ...........................................................................................................209

ix

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2-1 Different PCM encapsulation types: (a) microencapsulated PCMs embedded in drywall, (b) Shape-stabilized PCMs: thin PCM layers enclosed between aluminum foil sheets, and (c) Macroencapsulated PCMs: PCMs enclosed in pouches. Figure shows the dimensions of the single PCM included unit and the commercially available dimensions. ..................................................................... 9

Figure 2-2 Enthalpy variation across the mushy region and deviation observed in PCMs used in building applications (Real PCM) in contrast to an ideal PCM. Graph shows the melting temperature range, melting latent heat, and melting sensible heat of the PCM. Graph constructed based on the data provided by [14]. ................ 10

Figure 2-3 Sensible heat and latent heat in the enthalpy change during the melting process. Graph constructed based on the data provided by [14]. .............................................11

Figure 2-4 Enhanced view of different PCM enthalpy curve combinations showing hysteresis (a) Subcooling effect and freezing temperature curve comes back and overlay on the melting curve, (b) subcooling causing separate curves for melting and freezing (c) hysteresis due to slow latent heat release, (d) apparent hysteresis due to non-isothermal conditions in measurements (Enthalpy data available at [53] and the curve concept inspired by [54]). ................ 13

Figure 2-5 Melting enthalpy and melting temperature (๐‘‡๐‘š)โ€“ for different PCMs, An important criterion in selecting PCMs for building envelope applications: .. .... 15

Figure 2-6 Visualization of PCM packing in pouches once heated to a temperature of ~90 หšC. . 18

Figure 3-1 Different scales of building energy modeling considered in the current study are at building scale, envelope scale. The PCM modeling algorithm incorporates PCM characteristics in the envelope modeling algorithm. ........................................ 19

Figure 5-1 View of the simulated house, orientation and, and its neighboring buildings. .......... 37

Figure 5-2 Enthalpy curves showcasing 1) Real PCM data from BioPCMTM Q23ยบ obtained from DSC test and 2) Ideal PCM curves with thermal properties similar to the real PCM. ............................................................................................ 39

Figure 5-3 Multilayer envelope constructions of the evaluated home indicating the location of the PCM-drywall. The interior environment is on the right and the exterior environment is on the left for all cases (the layer thicknesses does not represent the actual scale). ........................................................................................................ 41

x

Figure 5-4 Precooling strategy with 25.6 ยฐC setback temperature. The peach-shaded rectangle indicates peak hours while the blue shaded-region indicates precooling. ................................................................................................................. 42

Figure 5-5 Heat transfer coefficient values used next to the ceiling and exterior wall within the living zone for, (i) forced convection model (FC), (ii) CeilingDiffuser convection model (CeilingDiffuser) and (iii) natural convection model (NC). ........ 44

Figure 5-6 BEopt parametric results, where each point represents a simulated home with a different combination of PCM properties and locations. The point close to the upper right corner and in red color represents the home with no PCM or pre-cooling. Point closest to the lower left corner in black color represents a home with precooling but no PCMs. ...................................................................... 45

Figure 5-7 BEopt parametric results for the cases with lowest energy related costs, where each point represents a simulated home with a different combination of PCM properties and locations. The point close to the upper right corner represents the home with no PCM. ........................................................................... 46

Figure 5-8 Selection of optimum points for each PCM location and envelope condition: PCMs in all three locations (3 Different PCMs optimized), single/same type of PCMs in three locations (A single PCM) and PCMs only in the ceiling (PCMs in ceiling only). Each of these points are the lowest annualized energy related cost (AERC) points for each category above. ........................................................... 47

Figure 5-9 Annual variation of temperatures for the forced convection mode for PCMsoptimized for all locations. 0 indicates the start of the month January and the time is shown for the calendar year of 12 months. .............................................. 48

Figure 5-10 Annual variation of temperatures for the natural convection mode for PCMs optimized for all locations. X-axis represent the months of the year. 0 indicates the start of the month January and the time is shown for the calendar year of 12 months. ...................................................................................................................... 49

Figure 5-11 Average indoor air temperature within the living zone for forced convection model for all envelope types. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day. .............. 50

Figure 5-12 Average indoor air temperature for the natural convection model for all envelope types. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day. .................................... 50

Figure 5-13 Average indoor air temperature for homes with pre-cooling only and forced convection mode, and three setback temperatures (Tr): 24.4, 25.5 and 26.7หšC. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day. .............................................................. 51

Figure 5-14 Averaged indoor air temperature for homes with PCMs optimized in each location, with forced convection mode, three setback temperatures (Tr): 24.4, 25.5 and 26.7หšC. Indoor air temperature for Tr: 25.5 หšC and 26.7 หšC perform the same. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day. ................................ 52

xi

Figure 5-15 Averaged PCM-drywall temperature in external wall for homes with PCMs optimized in each location, with forced convection mode, three setback temperatures (Tr): 24.4, 25.56 and 26.67หšC. Average drywall temperature (at ceiling) for Tr: 25.5 หšC and 26.7 หšC. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day. ..................................................................................................................... 53

Figure 5-16 Averaged PCM-drywall temperature in the external wall for the PCM optimized and installed in all drywall (PCM optimized) case: A comparison between the forced convection model and natural convection models. ........................................ 53

Figure 5-17 Average drywall temperature of the exterior wall under forced convection (FC) and natural convection (NC) model for, PCM optimized and installed in all drywall (PCM optimized case) and regular drywall (No PCM case). Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day. .......................................................................... 54

Figure 5-18 Average drywall temperature of the ceiling under forced convection (FC) and natural convection (NC) models for, PCM optimized and installed in all drywall (PCM optimized case) and regular drywall (No PCM case). Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day. ........................................................................................... 54

Figure 5-19 Heat gain rates per unit area of the ceiling drywall for forced and natural convection models for cases: (i) No-PCM and precooling only (ii) PCMs included in the ceiling only. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day. ................ 55

Figure 5-20 Cooling electricity power consumption variations for all cases with the forced convection model for July 22. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day. ............. 56

Figure 5-21 Cooling electricity power consumption for all analyzed cases with the natural convection mode for July 22. .................................................................................... 56

Figure 5-22 Cost variations through the day when TOU rates are applied during the peak time for July 22 for all analyzed cases and with the forced convection. ................... 57

Figure 5-23 Cost variations through the day when TOU rates are applied during the peak time for July 22 for all analyzed cases and with the natural convection. .................. 57

Figure 5-24 Aggregated cooling and ventilation related electricity consumption in the precooling months (May-Oct), assuming the fan power is 25W for each fan. ......... 58

Figure 5-25 Aggregated cooling and ventilation related electricity consumption in the precooling months (May-Oct), assuming the fan power is 2 W for each fan............ 58

Figure 5-26 Seasonal cooling electricity energy cost for May-Oct period for each analyzed case with natural and forced convection assuming the fan power is 25W for each fan. ...................................................................................................... 59

Figure 5-27 Seasonal cooling electricity energy cost for May-Oct period for each analyzed case with natural and forced convection assuming the fan power is 2W for

xii

each fan. ..................................................................................................................... 60

Figure 6-1 Structure of the full validation study includes analytical verification, comparative testing, and empirical validation. .......................................................... 62

Figure 6-2 Structure of interior and interface nodes, space and time discretization of the 1D algorithm. ............................................................................................................. 64

Figure 6-3 Structure of the functions in the numerical envelope model. ..................................... 65

Figure 6-4 Manufacturer provided melting curve data and melting and freezing curves obtained from the Dynamic Heat Flux Meter Apparatus (DHFMA) method for the hydrate-salts PCM of InfiniteRTM (Nominal melting temperature =23 ยบC). .. 68

Figure 6-5 Approximated melting curve for the PCM hydrate-salts from DSC data. ................. 69

Figure 6-6 Approximated melting curve for the PCM hydrate-salts from DHFMA data. ........... 69

Figure 6-7 Approximated freezing curve for the PCM hydrate-salts from DHFMA data. .......... 70

Figure 6-8 EnergyPlus original PCM model data input interface. ............................................... 71

Figure 6-9 EnergyPlus Hysteresis PCM model data input interface to define PCM properties for melting and freezing curves separately. .............................................. 72

Figure 6-10 WUFI PCM model data input interface indicating the enthalpy curve input............ 73

Figure 6-11 Cross section temperature variation of the semi-infinite material layer after 24h period for the PCM drywall case. .............................................................................. 77

Figure 6-12 Transient temperature variation at a location 0.021m in the material layer for (i) Analytical solution (ii) thesis model, and (iii) EnergyPlus solutions (๐›ฅ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ๐ถ of 0.2 ยบC is implemented in the numerical solutions). .................................. 77

Figure 6-13 Heat flux at the exterior surface of the PCM layer. .................................................. 78

Figure 6-14 West facing wall of the residential building evaluated for numerical verification. .. 80

Figure 6-15 External and internal surface temperatures of the examined exterior wall without PCM inclusions from the thesis model and EnergyPlus. ............................. 80

Figure 6-16 Verification of temperature variations on the internal and external; surfaces of the wall examined. ................................................................................................ 81

Figure 6-17 Overview of the air handling unit and the chamber, Section A: AHU Main Duct, Section B: AHU Return Duct, and Section C: Chamber .............. 82

Figure 6-18 Plan View of the Ceiling Setup of the Chamber including the inlet diffuser, lights, and exhaust diffuser. ....................................................................................... 83

xiii

Figure 6-19 SkylineTM Outdoor AHU by DAIKIN, Group: Applied Air systems, Part Number: IM 770 houses the heating and cooling elements, filters, humidifier to condition the air. .................................................................................. 84

Figure 6-20 Sensor locations in the AHU and other components of the HVAC system describes the sensors in each section, section A: Main AHU enclosure and the connection to the supply air duct and the return air duct, section B: Return air duct. ........................................................................................................................... 85

Figure 6-21 The ABB control unit consists of a (i) C1867 - MODBUS TCP Interface, (ii) PM 851 Processor UNIT, (III) 3 Analog Input Units, (iv) 1 Analog Output Unit, (v) 1 Digital Input Unit, and (vi) 1 Digital Output Unit. ......................................................................................... 86

Figure 6-22 Instrunet data acquisition unit with connections linked to the experimental apparatus sensors and some ABB main system sensors also linked to the Instrunet system to verify readings. .......................................................................... 87

Figure 6-23 Hydraulic radiant wall heating and cooling apparatus. ............................................. 87

Figure 6-24 Radiant wall flow control apparatus includes the primary flow sensor, 3 speed flow pump, temperature sensors to measure inlet and outlet temperatures of the fluid flow to the radiant wall heat exchanger. ........................... 89

Figure 6-25 Flow control valve apparatus indicates the process of flow from the boiler and flow from the chiller is mixed. The flow measurements through the radiant wall heat exchanger are also taken using the unit. ........................................ 89

Figure 6-26 PLC Control flow chart for the radiant wall control PID settings for the mixing valve operation is indicated in the Figure 6-25. ............................................ 90

Figure 6-27 Current PID settings for the mixing valve for the setpoint of 120 ยบF. ....................... 90

Figure 6-28 Radiant wall location within the environmental chamber and the locations of wall assembly panels relative to the radiant wall. ................................................. 92

Figure 7-1 (a) Enthalpy-Temperature (h-T) curves for shape-stabilized PCM, (b) and nano-encapsulated PCM. .................................................................................. 102

Figure 7-2 Non-uniform finite volume mesh implemented in COMSOL simulate the Nano-PCM layer in ORNL field test data. Nano-PCM layer comprises of two elements. ...................................................................................................... 103

Figure 7-3 Non-uniform finite volume mesh implemented in WUFI to simulate the Nano-PCM layer in ORNL field test data. Nano-PCM layer comprises of 24 volumes. .................................................................................................................. 103

Figure 7-4 Uniform finite difference mesh implemented in thesis model to simulate the

xiv

Nano-PCM layer in ORNL field test data. Nano-PCM layer comprises of 4 points. ...................................................................................................................... 104

Figure 7-5 Analyzed wall assembly using shape-stabalize PCMs. Red dots represent temperature measurement points, while black hollow circles represent WUFI monitoring locations. PCMs are located in the white layer (between Point 2 and 3). .......................................................................................... 107

Figure 7-6 Analyzed wall assembly using nano-encapsulated PCMs. Red dots represent temperature measurement points, while black hollow circles represent WUFI monitoring locations. PCMs are located in the white layer (between Point 5 and 6). .......................................................................................... 108

Figure 7-7 Temperature at Point (2): between the gypsum and PCM wallboard, and measured temperature at the boundary: Point (1). Simulated data for COMSOL, ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown.......................................................................... 109

Figure 7-8 Temperature at the Point (3): between the PCM wallboard and mineral wool insulation. Simulated data for COMSOL, ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown...........................................................................110

Figure 7-9 Heat flux at the Point (1): Hot-side boundary surface. Simulated data for COMSOL, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown. ..............112

Figure 7-10 Heat flux at the Point (3): Interface of the PCM wallboard and mineral wool insulation. Simulated data for COMSOL, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown...........................................................................112

Figure 7-11 Temperature at the Point (2): interface of OSB and cellulose insulation Simulated data for COMSOL, ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown. .................................................................................................114

Figure 7-12 Temperature at the Point (3): middle of cellulose insulation. Simulated data for COMSOL, ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown. ........................................................................................................115

Figure 7-13 Model results at the Point (4), Point (5): interface of the cellulose insulation and the PCM wallboard. Simulated data for ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown...........................................................................115

Figure 7-14 Heat flux at the Point (5): interface of the cellulose cavity and the Nano PCM wallboard. Simulated data for COMSOL, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown...........................................................................117

Figure 8-1 Dimensions of analyzed PCM pouches: (a) BioPCM, (b) hydrate-salts. ................. 122

Figure 8-2 Enthalpy-temperature melting curves obtained using DSC characterization

xv

method for BioPCM. ............................................................................................... 125

Figure 8-3 Enthalpy-temperature curves obtained using DSC and DHFMA characterization methods for PCM hydrate-salts. ................................................... 126

Figure 8-4 Schematic overview of, Section A: Air handling unit (AHU), Section B: return duct of the air to the AHU, Section C: Environmental chamber. ........................................................................ 127

Figure 8-5 Front view and the key dimensions of how the 4 panels constructed. The exposed radiant wall in the right end is insulated with 5.08 cm (2 in) of R-10 insulation. Panel 3 and 4 are shown here with the front drywall layer removed to showcase the PCM pouch mats arrangement. ...................................... 130

Figure 8-6 Front view of the PCM pouches and the sensor locations of the interface with the drywall layer removed. ............................................................................. 131

Figure 8-7 Top view of the core section with each material layers and the sensor locations (split view) (a) wall panels with just regular drywall (b) wall panels with PCM pouches and regular drywall. ........................................ 132

Figure 8-8 Radiant wall supply fluid temperature setpoint and chamber air temperature......... 133

Figure 8-9 PCM inclusion in pouches (BioPCM case is shown here) (a) front view of the uneven PCM distribution (BioPCM) (b) schematic of the side view when PCM mats are placed between plywood and the drywall. ........................................................................................ 134

Figure 8-10 Considered heat transfer simplification methods: (a) PCM distributed as a thin continuous layer, (b) PCM layer as a parallel path heat transfer, and (c) PCM as a porous material and parallel path ................................................ 135

Figure 8-11 Parallel path heat transfer across the wall assemblies with PCM pouches. This method assumes two paths across the entire assembly and assumes surfaces parallel to the heat transfer process are adiabatic. Here temperature at surface 1 and 5/ 4 and 8 are different. ................................................................. 136

Figure 8-12 Parallel path heat transfer across the wall assemblies with PCM pouches. This method assumes two paths across only the PCM layer and the nodes on the interfaces are isothermal (temperature at surface 1 and 5/ 4 and 8 are same). ...................................................................................................................... 137

Figure 8-13 Geometry based dimension reductions used in the study (a) actual view of the pouch with 3D characteristics, (b) adjusted 3D view based on PCM volume and geometry, (c) reduced 2D view with the parallel path methods, (d) using the thermal resistance values temperature dependent effective conductivity is calculated and applied for 1D thesis model. .................... 143

xvi

Figure 8-14 Boundary and interface temperatures of the wall assembly with BioPCM. Lines, 1. Exterior surface temperature, 2. Plywood-pouches interface temperature, 3. Pouches-drywall interface temperature, 4. Exterior surface temperature. .............................................................................. 146

Figure 8-15 Boundary and interface temperatures of the wall assembly with PCM hydrate salts. Lines, 1. Exterior surface temperature, 2. Plywood-pouches interface temperature, 3. Pouches-drywall interface temperature, 4. Exterior surface temperature. ......................................................... 146

Figure 8-16 Surface temperature recorded and visualized through the Infrared Camera measured every 2 hour intervals after radiant wall setpoint is increase from 40 ยบC to 140 ยบC. ....................................................................................................... 147

Figure 8-17 Average core surface temperature (panel 3): The temperatures at every 2 hour period is mapped with the figure Figure 8-16. ................................................ 148

Figure 8-18 Temperature at the interface of plywood and PCM of BioPCM wall panel. Lines, 1. Experimental data. 5 simplification methods: 2. Effective thickness 3. Full parallel path, solid PCM, 4. Partial parallel path, solid PCM, 5. Full parallel path, porous PCM, 6. Partial parallel path, porous PCM, and 7. Partial parallel path, without PCM (no-latent heat). ..................................... 149

Figure 8-19 Temperature at the interface of PCM and drywall of BioPCM wall panel. Lines, 1. Experimental data. 5 simplification methods: 2. Effective thickness 3. Full parallel path, solid PCM, 4. Partial parallel path, solid PCM, 5. Full parallel path, porous PCM, 6. Partial parallel path, porous PCM, and 7. Partial parallel path, without PCM (no-latent heat). ..................................... 150

Figure 8-20 Heat-flux calculations of BioPCMs panel, 1. Using heat released or absorbed by the fluid, 2. Heat flux meter measurements, and 3. Using thesis model and partial parallel path, solid PCM method. ...................... 151

Figure 8-21 Cross section temperature plot of the BioPCM panel comparing the experimental data at the beginning of the heating cycle (t=0h) and at the end of the heating cycle (t=16h) for the modeled data with the thesis model for c=1 and c=0.5 discretization constants. .......................... 152

Figure 8-22 Temperature at the interface of plywood and pouches of hydrate-salt wall panel. Lines, 1. Experimental data. 5 simplification methods: 2. Effective thickness 3. Full parallel path, solid PCM, 4. Partial parallel path, solid PCM, 5. Full parallel path, porous PCM, 6. Partial parallel path, porous PCM, and 7. Partial parallel path, without PCM (no-latent heat). ................................................................................. 153

Figure 8-23 Temperature at the interface of pouches and drywall of hydrate-salt wall panel Lines, 1. Experimental data. 5 simplification methods: 2. Effective thickness 3. Full parallel path, solid PCM,

xvii

4. Partial parallel path, solid PCM, 5. Full parallel path, porous PCM, 6. Partial parallel path, porous PCM, and 7. Partial parallel path, without PCM (no-latent heat). ................................................................................. 153

Figure 8-24 Plywood-pouches interface temperature compared with the E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI for BioPCM. ........................................... 155

Figure 8-25 Pouches-drywall interface temperature compared with the E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI for BioPCM. ........................................... 156

Figure 8-26 Plywood-pouches interface temperature compared with the E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI for hydrate-salts. ............................... 157

Figure 8-27 Pouches-drywall interface temperature compared with the E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI for hydrate-salts. ..................................... 157

Figure 8-28 Graphical comparison of interface temperature with and without the consideration of hysteresis for BioPCM simulated in EnergyPlus (a) plywood-pouches interface and (b) pouches-drywall interface. ........................ 159

Figure 8-29 Graphical comparison of interface temperature with and without the consideration of hysteresis for BioPCM simulated in the thesis model (a) plywood-pouches interface and (b) pouches-drywall interface. Hysteresis data show an improved graphical comparison. ...................................... 159

Figure 8-30 Graphical comparison of interface temperature with and without the consideration of hysteresis for PCM hydrate-salts simulated in EnergyPlus (a) plywood-pouches interface and (b) pouches-drywall interface. ........................ 161

Figure 8-31 Graphical comparison of interface temperature with and without the consideration of hysteresis for PCM hydrate-salts simulated in thesis model (a) plywood-pouches interface and (b) pouches-drywall interface. ........................ 161

xviii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2-1 Properties of the PCM products used in the building envelope testing ...................... 17

Table 2-2 Physical properties of the National Gypsum ThermalCOREยฎ gypsum board containing PCM ................................................................................................ 17

Table 3-1 Coefficients of the mathematical formulation to capture the phase change effects in numerical models. ...................................................................................... 22

Table 3-2 Latent heat methods, discretization and time integration computation methods used in this study with different PCM modelling software .......................... 25

Table 4-1 PCM characterization methods for PCMs used in building envelope applications ................................................................................................................. 27

Table 5-1 Annualized TOU rate, E-21 Super Peak TOU Rate [216] .......................................... 38

Table 5-2 Range of analyzed theoretical PCM properties and locations in parametric study .......................................................................................................... 39

Table 5-3 Specific Latent Heat and Costs of PCM Enhanced Drywall ...................................... 40

Table 5-4 Economic factors used in the 30-year parametric analysis ......................................... 41

Table 5-5 Optimal PCM properties for each location of application: Ceiling, external wall, partition wall ........................................................................................ 48

Table 6-1 Definitions of the exterior heat transfer for the numerical verification study using the thesis algorithm ........................................................................................... 65

Table 6-2 Phase change characterization data approximated by the simplified curves to implement in the PCM modeling algorithms .............................................................. 70

Table 6-3 Thermal conditions used in the analytical verification cases ..................................... 75

Table 6-4 Material properties for the analytical verification with PCM (inspired by [247]) ...................................................................................................... 76

Table 6-5 Material properties for the numerical verification with PCM .................................... 79

Table 6-6 Dimensions of the environmental chamber, H= height, L= length, and W= width. ... 83

Table 6-7 Summary of radiant wall heating and cooling system apparatus ............................... 88

xix

Table 7-1 Numerical modeling methods used in PCM models .................................................. 97

Table 7-2 Properties of Analyzed PCMs ................................................................................... 101

Table 7-3 Numerical discretization considered in modeling the material layers with PCM inclusions. ................................................................................................ 104

Table 7-4 Material properties of the wall assembly used in the NTNU controlled hot-box experiments.................................................................................................. 106

Table 7-5 Material properties of the wall assembly used in Nano-encapsulated wallboard................................................................................................................... 108

Table 7-6 Calculated Temperature RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE for all analyzed PCM models at material interfaces ............................................................ 111

Table 7-7 Temperature RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE at: (i) exterior surface of the hot-side (Point 1), (ii) Interface between the PCM wallboard and the mineral wool insulation (Point 5) ............................................................................................113

Table 7-8 Surface temperature RMSE, CV(RMSE) and NMBE values at (i) Interface of OSB and the cellulose filled cavity (point 2), (ii) Middle of the cellulose filled cavity (point 3) ..........................................................................................................116

Table 7-9 RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE calculations of the heat flux variations at the interface of cellulose cavity and the Nano PCM wallboard .............................117

Table 8-1 Thermo-physical properties of analyzed macroencapsulated PCMs. ....................... 123

Table 8-2 Sensor type, purpose, uncertainty, and quantity of the sensors used in the experimental analysis. ............................................................................................... 128

Table 8-3 Thermo-physical properties and dimensions of the material used in the wall panels. ....................................................................................................................... 130

Table 8-4 Accuracy analysis for the comparison of two interface temperatures for BioPCM .................................................................................................................... 150

Table 8-5 RMSE, CV(RMSE), NMBE values for the comparison of two interface temperatures for hydrate-salts ................................................................................... 154

Table 8-6 RMSE, CV(RMSE), NMBE calculations of temperatures at each interface for EnergyPlus, thesis model, and WUFI for BioPCM............................................. 156

Table 8-7 RMSE, CV(RMSE), NMBE calculations comparisons of temperatures at each interface for EnergyPlus, thesis model, and WUFI for hydrate-salts panel ..... 158

Table 8-8 RMSE, CV(RMSE), NMBE calculations of temperatures at each interface for EnergyPlus, thesis model for the simulations applying thermal hysteresis

xx

characteristics for BioPCM panel. ............................................................................ 160

Table 8-9 Accuracy analysis of comparisons of temperatures at each interface for EnergyPlus, and thesis model for the simulations applying thermal hysteresis characteristics for PCM hydrate-salts ....................................................................... 162

xxi

LIST OF SYMBOLS

Nomenclature Meaning

ฮ”TPC Phase Change Temperature Range

ฮ”H Enthalpy Difference

ฮ”t Time step/ time discretization

ฮ”x Space step/ time discretization

A Area

A/C Air Conditioning

AirDistSys Air Distribution Measuring System

BioPCM TM Bio based PCM type

c Discretization constant

COMSOL Cross-platform finite element analysis, solver and Multiphysics simulation software ๐ถ๐‘‚๐‘†๐‘‡๐‘–๐‘›๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘–๐‘Ž๐‘™ Cost at the beginning of the evaluation period $ ๐ถ๐‘‚๐‘†๐‘‡๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ=๐‘˜ Cost within the year k ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘” Averaged heat capacity ๐‘๐‘ƒ Specific heat capacity ๐ถ๐ด(๐‘‡) Heat capacity term as a function of temperature

DAQ Data Acquisition Unit

dh/dT Specific enthalpy change per unit temperature ๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘ก Real discount rate

dw Drywall

E+ EnergyPlus

EnergyPlus Energy Plus whole building energy modeling platform

ESP-r A whole-building energy simulation tool

F0 Grid Fourier number ๐น12 View factor from surface 1 to 2 FLIR ResearchIR Infrared camera data acquisition interface

xxii

h Enthalpy (J/kg)

Hydrate-salts PCM hydrate-salts

i Inflation rate %

L Thickness of layers

m Mass

N Number of mortgage years

k Thermal conductivity

Leff Effective thickness

ky kth year

MATLAB A multi-paradigm numerical computing environment

N Number of data points

t Time

t2 Time 2 (at end)

Tr Set Point Set Back/ Relaxation Temperature

Subscripts

hpc Higher phase change

m Melting

lpc Lower phase change

PARDISO A software for solving large sparse symmetric and nonsymmetrical linear systems of equations

PC Phase Change

proto Protocol

R Relaxation

ref Reference

Rt Rate ๐‘…๐‘ก๐‘œ๐‘ก Total resistance

V&V Verification and validation ๐‘ฆ๐‘– Measured data ๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘– Predicted/simulated data ๐‘ฆ๐‘šฬ…ฬ… ฬ…ฬ… Mean of measured data

VPCM PCM volume in a pouch

xxiii

ys Simulated data

Acronyms

ACH Air Changes per Hour

ADI Alternating Direction Implicit

AERC Annualized Energy Related Costs AEU Annual Energy Use ๐ด๐ธ๐‘ˆ๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘“ Annual Energy Use (Reference) ๐ด๐ธ๐‘ˆ๐‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘œ๐‘ก๐‘œ Annual Energy Use (Protocol) ๐ด๐‘†๐ธ๐‘† Average Source Energy Savings

ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers

BEopt Building Energy Optimization

CondFD Conduction Finite Difference

CTF Conduction Transfer Function

CV(RMSE) Coefficient of Variance of Root Mean Square Error

DHFMA Dynamic Heat Flux Meter Apparatus

DSC Differential Scanning Calorimetry

dw Drywall

EMS Energy Management System ๐ธ๐‘ˆ๐‘˜ Energy use in the current year k

FC Forced Convection

HAMT Heat and Mass Transfer

HFT Heat Flux Transducers

HFM Heat Flux Meter

IEA International Energy Agency

IBP Institute for Building Physics

IECC International Energy Conservation Code

InfiniteRTM PCM manufacturer

LH Latent Heat

NC Natural Convection

NET Natural Exposure Test

xxiv

NMBE Normalized Mean Biased Error

NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology

ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory

OSB Oriented Strand Board

Out Opening of the mixing valve (%)

PCM Phase Change Material

pcm Phase Change Material

PW Present Worth

Pv Actual Temperature (หšF)

RMSE Root Mean Square Error

Sp Setpoint Temperature (หšF)

TARP Thermal Analysis Research Program ๐‘‡๐ถ๐‘‚๐‘†๐‘‡๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ=๐‘˜ Total cost within the year k

Td(S) Derivative Time

TES Thermal Energy Storage

Ti(S) Integrator Time

TMY3 Typical Meteorological Year 3rd update

TOU Time of Use

USD United States Dollar

WUFI "Wรคrme Und Feuchtetransport Instationรคr" ("Transient Heat and Moisture Transport").

Greek letters

ฮฑ Thermal diffusivity

ฯ Density

ฮปcav, ฮปpcm Area ratios for cavity path and pcm path

ิ Emissivity ๐œ™ Porosity

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

Buildings account for about 40% of the global energy consumption and contribute over

30% of the CO2 emissions and a considerable proportion of this energy is used for thermal comfort

in buildings [1]. In the United States, buildings use about 41% of primary energy (manual

electricity from nuclear, hydro, wind and geothermal sources). This energy consumption

contributes to the peak energy demand and increases the need for more fossil fuel based peaking

power plants [2]. Climate change, which in part is the result of increased energy related greenhouse

gas (GHG) emissions, mostly from fossil fuels, has become a major environmental issue

worldwide [3]. United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) reports on the contribution that

buildings have on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions [4].

Peak electricity energy demand consists of several elements such as energy demand for

industrial operations, energy demand of electric appliances including lighting and energy demand

for space conditioning. In the research discussed here, the main focus is energy demanded for

space conditioning i.e. heating and cooling of living spaces. In USA, around 32 % of the building

energy in the commercial sector is consumed for space conditioning, and 53.1% for space

conditioning in residential sector [5]. Air conditioning is an important component of this

consumption, as more than 95% of the space cooling is generated using site electricity therefore

increasing the electricity demand significantly during the peak. During the summer the building

cooling related non coincident peak demand can be as high as 50%.

There are different strategies to reduce peak building power demand and overall reduction

of building space conditioning energy such as: on site generation [6], smart controls [7] and

distributed energy storage [8]. Many studies have been conducted in incorporating renewable

energy sources through demand response (DR) and smart grid strategies as discussed by Aghaei

and Alizadeh [9]. Sun et al. [10] defines and compares different conclude that PCMs require

sophisticated control strategies to achieve maximum cost saving.

2

Nowadays, there are several advanced TES systems integrated into the building envelope.

These materials need to store and release energy within desired time periods for demand response

purposes. However, this requires adequate design and controls to optimal dispatch. The application

of PCMs in building applications depends on the ability to accurately predict the heat transfer

characteristics of the improved envelope. Therefore, PCM modeling techniques have become a

critical component within the building energy modeling platforms and it is the focus on this Thesis.

Al-Saadi and Zhai [11] in their review of PCM modeling techniques, show many modeling

approaches that attempt to recognize the PCM behavior in building envelope applications.

However, these models fail to capture advanced thermal characteristics of PCMs that contribute

to successful predictions of PCM included building envelope heat transfer. Therefore, the overall

goals of the proposed research is to: (1) identify important variables and find optimal PCM

properties (2) test different PCMs encapsulation types (3) develop, verify, and validate a heat

transfer PCM model that can simulate different PCMs applications in the building envelope. This

is done through investigation and comparison of different whole building energy modeling

software that can model PCMs, experimental investigations using a state-of-the art experimental

chamber, development of a numerical model which includes a numerical solution to represent

advanced thermal behaviors of PCM like hysteresis and sub-cooling observed in PCM

applications.

The overall objectives of this research are to,

i. Identify important variables and find optimal PCM properties for building envelope

applications.

ii. Develop a numerical model which utilizes effective numerical techniques to solve a

building envelope assembly with PCM inclusions.

iii. Design and build experimental apparatus inside controlled environment to test different

PCMs.

iv. Conduct laboratory research to validate the numerical model and identify PCMs

characteristics that could further improve the numerical solution.

v. Verify and validate different PCM models in software like EnergyPlus and WUFI.

The following steps summarize the technical approach of the proposed project:

3

I. Parametric analysis of a residential building with phase change material (PCM)-

enhanced drywall, precooling, and variable electric rates in a hot and dry climate to

investigate potential cost savings and energy savings for the consumer.

II. Verification and validation of different PCM models available in whole building

energy models such as, EnergyPlus, ESP-r, MATLAB (Thesis model), and WUFI.

III. Laboratory experiments to test different PCMs and develop data to validate the

building envelope studies.

This thesis is divided in the following chapters:

Chapter 2 reviews the characteristics and thermo-physical properties of PCMs to

gain knowledge on thermal characteristics and influence of properties associated

with phase change phenomena. This chapter also highlights the significance of the

PCMs and lays a background on why further research is required.

Chapter 3 evaluates the existing analytical solutions and numerical modeling

techniques used to model PCMs in building applications. The analysis of

numerical studies includes, methods used to capture the thermal characteristics,

grid considerations for numerical PCM models, and properties of existing

numerical PCM models. The most suitable numerical techniques for the current

research are established using this evaluation.

Chapter 4 looks into current state of experimental studies which uses the PCM

types used in the experimental and numerical analysis in different scales of

experiments. It also discusses the PCM characterization methods.

Chapter 5 conducts a parametric study using an existing whole building energy

modeling platform to identify the optimum PCM properties to shift and reduce

peak cooling power demand with pre-cooling, ToU electricity rates, and different

convection modes. Mr. Matthew Brandt at Colorado School of Mines has

contributed to the research discussed in this chapter to construct EnergyPlus input

files used in the parametric analysis. This work has been published in the journal

of Applied Energy [12].

4

Chapter 6 describes the multilayer building envelope algorithm and also discusses

the experimental facility located at the Department of Mechanical Engineering of

Colorado School of Mines which facilitates system scale experiments of wall

assemblies.

Chapter 7 conducts validation study using data obtained from laboratory studies

and field experiments. Data for the validation study on shape-stabilized PCMs is

granted from Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) [13]. The

experimental data for the validation studies on Nano-PCMs comes from the Oak

Ridge National Laboratory [14]. Dr. Kaushik Biswas provided latent heat curve

for the analyzed PCM hydrate salts using Dynamic Heat Flux Meter Apparatus

(DHFMA) method and also developed a 2D model of a wood stud wall with the

Nano-PCMs and the 1D model for shape-stabilized PCM wall in COMSOL used

in chapter 7. ESP-r simulations presented in this thesis were done by Dr. Dariuz

Heim from Lodz University of Technology in Poland.

Chapter 8 conducts a validation study using in-house experiments of two

macroencapsulated PCMs in full-scale. These experimental are conducted at the

environmental chamber discussed in the chapter 8. It also introduces 5 simplified

techniques to calculate heat transfer through pouched PCMs.

Finally, chapter 9 discusses the summary of significant results and the future

research based on this work.

Chapters 5, 7 and 8 include the introduction, methodology, results, and conclusions of each

step.

5

CHAPTER 2

BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE

PCMs can store energy in two forms, latent heat and sensible heat. The magnitude and the

rate of latent heat absorbed and released depends on material properties [15]. Therefore, the

advantage of using PCMs lies in the amount of latent heat a small amount of PCM can store under

different storage techniques compared to that in a sensible heat storage material of the same

volume. For an instance, a 25 mm thick PCM layer can hold same amount of energy as a 420 mm

concrete wall as long as the PCM layer changes phase [11]. Therefore, PCMs can shift peak time

periods based on the latent heat capacity, and other physical parameters related to the application

of PCMs [10].

PCMs can also reduce or delay external fluctuations in temperatures, solar load, and

heating or cooling needs. There are several modeling methods that are used to simulate the PCM

behavior in building envelope applications [11, 16]. More detailed evaluation of available

numerical models indicates both advantages and disadvantages of these modeling approaches [17].

The main concern highlighted in the above work is that these models fail to capture advanced

thermal characteristics of PCMs which is essential for successful predictions of PCM included

building envelope heat transfer. PCMs used in building applications deviate from the ideal

behavior displaying these advanced thermal characteristics. One way of mitigating these behaviors

is by reducing hysteresis effects, increasing latent capacity by increasing the density of the PCMs

within the PCM product [18], improving conduction properties to increase the rate of heat storage

and release [19, 20], chemical construction by including additives [21], and encapsulation methods

like shape stabilization and microencapsulation [22, 23]. However, it is important to note that

these methods should be employed without increasing the building mass because the current

construction market prefer lightweight structures while improving the energy usage characteristics

within the structure (wallboard types instead of masonry or concrete).

Heat transfer through many PCMs is complex because of the nonlinear behavior of thermal

characteristics. Kosny [15] explains how the solid phase and the liquid phase of a PCM has

6

different thermo-physical characteristics while they co-exist within the enclosure.

Enclosure/encapsulation is how the PCM is packed in the particular application. During the phase

transition of the PCMs, the liquid state and the solid state are separated by a moving interface.

Considering the basic physics, the energy and mass balances should be satisfied in either side of

this moving boundary which makes it difficult to model. Either side of this moving boundary is

also called two phase/ โ€œmushyโ€ region. The enthalpy change which occurs across this region is

quite complex and dependent upon the material properties of the PCMs such as the latent heat,

expansion coefficient, melting range and rate of heat transfer [17].

Latent heat of the PCMs defines the heat storage capability of the PCMs. When compared

with other building envelope materials like stone, wood, brick and gypsum, PCMs present more

attractive thermal storage characteristics. To indicate the importance of the latent heat, Zhang et

al. [24] discuss how in order to keep the indoor air in the comfort range for a longer period without

heating or cooling load, the heat of fusion of a PCM should be high enough to keep the inner

surface of the wall at the melting temperature. This refers to having high latent heat next to the

inner surface of the wall so the PCM are not fully melted nor frozen. Furthermore, the latent heat

capacity of the material determines the weight/volume fraction of the PCMs required for the

optimum performance of the building envelope.

Melting temperature of the PCM is another important property. Melting temperature is

usually selected to fall within the comfort range of the occupants and are researched in the existing

standards [25]. The exact value of the optimum melting temperature required depends on the

building, climate, and the application [24]. Furthermore, a study of a PCM wall in a passive solar

house indicates that heat storage occurs with a melting temperature of 1-3 หšC above the average

room temperature [26]. This section discusses these attractive characteristics of PCM in detail.

2.1. Phenomena of Phase Change of PCMs

Generally, phase change/ phase transition happens from solid to solid, solid to liquid, from

solid to air, liquid to vapor and even solid to solid (restructuring of bonds at atomic level). In

building applications mostly Solid-Liquid [27, 28], and Solid-Solid phase change [29, 30] is used.

The material can be a pure substance, eutectic mixture, or non-eutectic mixture. Eutectic mixtures

7

change the phase at a constant temperature but, non-eutectic mixtures change the phase during a

temperature interval.

PCMs used in real world applications are not usually pure substances and therefore,

temperature interval in which the phase change becomes an important factor [31]. This temperature

interval is called the melting range. Kuznik et al. [27] review the phase change process in a multi

component mixture of PCMs in great detail. This study indicates that behavior of the system

becomes more complex with the presence of multiple melting points from eutectic to non-eutectic

mixtures.

Using the phase change behavior, PCM-enhanced building envelopes gain the ability to

manipulate the thermal response. They can delay the effects of external thermal excitations

reaching the interior of the building [15]. At a warmer exterior weather the interior is kept cooler

and at cooler exterior weather the interior is kept relatively warmer. A high thermal conductivity

is not required for these applications because the design expectations of the thermal system are

peak load reduction and time shift of thermal response. But, there can be other building

applications where the enhanced envelope is required to absorb and release heat faster. When fast

absorption and release of latent heat is required, PCM properties need to be enhanced. Kosny [15]

highlights that, most of the applications seem to use low conductive organic PCMs. Due to thermal

comfort considerations the operating temperature of these PCMs are low. Kosny [15] further

suggests switching from organic PCMs inorganic PCMs that have 4-5 times higher thermal

conductivities would be advisable. This research therefore investigates hydrate-salt inorganic

PCMs and is discussed in the later sections.

It is evident that the exact thermal performances expected need to be achieved by carefully

managing the contributing characteristics. Parametric and optimization studies help determine

these optimum combination of characteristics and properties.

2.2. PCM encapsulation methods

Encapsulation contains the PCM inside a coating or shell material to hold the PCM and to

keep it separated from the surrounding material. Separation of PCMs helps to monitor the

composition of liquid/solid phases as well as avoids reactions with surroundings. The

encapsulation method,

8

Offer corrosion resistance, thermal stability, strength, and flexibility.

Offer an adequate heat transfer surface.

Ensure structural stability and offer easy handling.

Encapsulation methods may change with the PCM based on the chemical characteristics. PCM

applications in building envelope commonly uses shape stabilization, nano/microencapsulation,

and macroencapsulation [32]:

โ€ข Shape stabilization: Shape-stabilized PCMs (also referred to as ss-PCMs), are prepared by

impregnating the PCMs within a supporting material. The PCM takes the form or the shape of

the enclosure. They can be composites and microencapsulated [33]. Shape-stabilized PCMs

are also available in larger areas like thin sheets/plates [34-36].

โ€ข Microencapsulation: Microencapsulation is a type of shape-stabilization. It is generally a

polymer/inorganic shell [37], having a diameter in the range of 1ฮผmโ€“1000ฮผm.

Microencapsulation assists adding organic PCMs safely in to the building envelope layers.

Micro-PCMs have a core-shell structure that can prevent the interior PCMs from leaking

during its solidโ€“liquid phase change procedure. Qiu et al. [38] indicates the ability to withstand

volume change during phase transition and significant increase of heat transfer area as featured

advantages of microencapsulated PCMs. Improvements in heat transfer results from the latent

heat absorption by the PCM in the suspended MEPCM (Micro Encapsulated Phase Change

Material) particles during the melting process. Karkri al. [39] highlights the importance of

microencapsulation in widening the scope of PCM applications for instance, by preventing

leakage of molding paraffin during phase transition. Microencapsulated PCMs have been

applied in concrete/mortar [40-42], wall boards, and gypsum plaster or implemented as

sandwich panels or slabs [43]. Konuklu et al. [44] discusses the mechanical and thermal

improvements in the material due to the addition of microencapsulated PCMs. Micro

encapsulation can help increase the latent capacity of gypsum dry wall around 10 times [45].

However, microencapsulation is the more expensive than macroencapsulation and

microencapsulation of salt hydrates is a difficult task due to their hydrophilic nature. Figure

2-1a shows a microencapsulated PCM embedded gypsum wallboard. Figure 2-1(c) shows the

panel is used in the wall construction.

9

โ€ข Macroencapsulation: A common way of encapsulating the PCM in a spherical, tubular,

cylindrical or rectangular container having milliliters to several liters of PCM and t serving

directly as heat exchangers (usually 1-10 cm in size). Wei et al. [46] investigates several types

of encapsulation shapes and indicate that, from the heat release point of view, spherical PCM

capsules show the highest thermal performance. The skin of the container acts as a self โ€“

supporting structure isolating PCM from the surrounding environment. For building envelope

applications, plastics (polyethylene [47], formed white poly-film and heavy-duty nylon [48])

films are commonly used as the container materials. Metallic encapsulates can increase the

heat transfer due to the high conductivity. However, metal vessels are not suitable to

encapsulate PCM hydrate-salts due to corrosion and degradation [49]. PCM leakage can be a

challenge in macroencapsulation in pouches and to prevent that techniques like improved

formed poly-film for encapsulation and mixing PCMs with thickening agents are used [50].

Macroencapsulation is the least complex encapsulation method due to simplicity of containers

and the low production costs of the containers.

Figure 2-1a shows microencapsulated PCMs embedded in drywall. This drywall is

available in 1.2m x 1.2 m (4ft x 4ft) PCM panels. Figure 2-1b shows the shape stabilized PCMs in

thin aluminum foil. This product is further discussed in the validation study in chapter 7. Figure

2-1c shows the macroencapsulated BioPCM mats used in the experimental analysis of this research

and described further in the chapter 8.

Figure 2-1 Different PCM encapsulation types: (a) microencapsulated PCMs embedded in drywall, (b) Shape-stabilized PCMs: thin PCM layers enclosed between aluminum foil sheets, and (c) Macroencapsulated PCMs: PCMs enclosed in pouches. Figure shows the dimensions of

the single PCM included unit and the commercially available dimensions.

10

2.3. Thermal characteristics and properties of PCMs

Phase change phenomena and heat transfer characteristics discussed in the previous section

is highly influenced by complex behavior observed in PCMs used in building applications. These

characteristics are observed in experimental PCM studies and have presented problems in attempts

to model PCMs. Therefore, this section looks into these complex characteristics.

โ€œMushyโ€ region of Phase Change

Figure 2-2 shows the temperature-enthalpy curve of a Bio based PCM comprising of fatty

acids, fatty alcohols, esters, emulsifiers, and thickening/ gelling agents. PCMs used in building

applications are usually not pure substances and therefore indicate a melting temperature range.

The red shaded area shows the melting temperature range of the material approximated by the

author using the starting point and the end point of the melting. This temperature interval is also

referred to as the โ€œmushyโ€ region of melting.

Figure 2-2 Enthalpy variation across the mushy region and deviation observed in PCMs used in building applications (Real PCM) in contrast to an ideal PCM. Graph shows the melting

temperature range, melting latent heat, and melting sensible heat of the PCM. Graph constructed based on the data provided by [14].

11

The total enthalpy difference during the phase change comprises of the sensible heat and

the latent heat. The sensible heat calculation for each phase is defined in the equation 2-1. Tm,low

is low bound of the melting temperature range and then Tm,high is the higher bound of the melting

temperature range.

๐‘ž๐‘ ๐‘’๐‘›๐‘ ๐‘–๐‘๐‘™๐‘’,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ = { ๐‘ž = ๐‘๐‘ ,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€๐›ฅ๐‘‡, ๐‘‡ โ‰ค ๐‘‡๐‘š,๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘ค ๐‘ž = ๐‘๐‘ ,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ + ๐‘๐‘™,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€2 ๐›ฅ๐‘‡, ๐‘‡๐‘š,๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘ค < ๐‘‡ < ๐‘‡๐‘š,โ„Ž๐‘–๐‘”โ„Ž ๐‘ž = ๐‘๐‘™,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€๐›ฅ๐‘‡, ๐‘‡ โ‰ฅ ๐‘‡๐‘š,โ„Ž๐‘–๐‘”โ„Ž (2-1)

Figure 2-3 shows the sensible heat and latent heat contributions to the enthalpy change

during the melting process for the Bio-based PCM in Figure 2-2. The cream color shared enthalpy

difference is the melting latent heat and green color shaded enthalpy difference is the sensible heat.

Figure 2-3 Sensible heat and latent heat in the enthalpy change during the melting process. Graph constructed based on the data provided by [14].

There are many complex thermal behaviors observed for PCMs within the โ€œmushyโ€ region

and are discussed in the next sections.

12

Phase separation of the material

Phase separation of the material takes place within this โ€œmushyโ€ region of phase change.

This phenomenon usually occurs when there is more than one constituent in the substance, which

is common practice in commercial PCMs. Kosny [15] discusses how the melting/solidifying

temperature of each component might also be influenced by the composition of each constituent

of the mixture.

Subcooling/supercooling effect and Hysteresis

Hysteresis PCMs are categorized as real hysteresis and apparent hysteresis. Real hysteresis

occurs due to material properties and apparent hysteresis is independent of the material properties.

The most common form of real hysteresis is Subcooling. Many PCMs do not freeze at the melting

temperature and start crystallization only after a temperature below the nominal melting

temperature [31]. Solidification/ freezing of the PCM happens where the solid phase grows with

the liquid layer at the interface. As the temperature decreases this interface should occur at a certain

point. At the initiation, there is no or only a small solid particle. This solid particle is also called

the nucleus. At the surface of the nucleus there occurs an instance where energy released by

crystallization at the surface is lesser than that of surface energy gained. This energy flow barrier

exists until the nucleus grow satisfactorily. If this nucleation is delayed to occur with the

temperature decreases below the melting point the Subcooling occurs. Due to this the freezing

curve indicates a delay in initiation of solidification. This is shown in the figures Figure 2-4a and

Figure 2-4b by the blue line continuing towards the left showing decrease of temperature and again

turning towards increasing temperature in the figures [31]. Subcooling is more visible in hydrate

salts but can be reduced using additives [15]. A recent study by Li et al. [51] discusses the sub-

cooling effects of PCMs and how the effect can vary with different additives.

Real hysteresis can occur as a result of slow latent heat release. Mehling and Cabeza [31]

discusses the reason for the slow heat release being slow formation of the crystal lattice or diffusion

processes are necessary to homogenize the sample. The temperature of the sample then drops

below the cooling heating temperature. This is not observed in the melting process since the

kinetics process occurs much faster [52]. These conditions can separate melting and freezing curve

and is shown in Figure 2-4c.

13

Apparent hysteresis occurs due to non-isothermal conditions at measurement for the

characterization. This can be caused by the heating rates used in the characterization in melting if

high heating rates. If the heating rates are high thermal equilibrium of the specimen could not be

reached and the melting curve could be pushed further right in the graph and fro freezing curve it

could be pushed to further left. This could cause curves shown in Figure 2-4d. Careful calibration

of the instrumentation can minimize the effects of the apparent hysteresis which occurs due to the

instrumentation in methods of characterization. The magnitude of the separation of the curves can

depend on the heating rates used, sample size used in the tests, and the data acquisition steps used.

All four curves in Figure 2-4 shows effects of hysteresis while only Figure 2-4a and Figure 2-4b

showing Subcooling effect.

Figure 2-4 Enhanced view of different PCM enthalpy curve combinations showing hysteresis (a) Subcooling effect and freezing temperature curve comes back and overlay on the melting curve, (b) subcooling causing separate curves for melting and freezing (c) hysteresis due to slow latent

heat release, (d) apparent hysteresis due to non-isothermal conditions in measurements (Enthalpy data available at [53] and the curve concept inspired by [54]).

14

There are several methods used to characterize PCM: Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC),

Twin bath method, T-history, Dynamic Hot-Box method, Heat Flow Meter Apparatus (HFMA)

methods are some of these tests. These are discussed in detail in chapter 4.

PCM Thermal conductivity

PCM thermal conductivity can differ between liquid and solid phases [55]. Low

conductivity is typically undesirable and is observed in PCMs like Paraffins [15]. Thus, there are

efforts to increase the thermal conductivity of PCMs using composites, graphite, aluminum

powder, copper, and microencapsulation techniques [56-59] [15].

Thermal conductivity of PCMs also has an impact on the PCM characterization results.

High temperature gradients created within the PCM samples due to low conductivity can cause

inaccuracies in estimations of the heat storage capacity with respect to temperature when using

PCM characterization methods.

PCM phase-change temperature range

Selection of a particular PCM depends on the application (envelope, HVAC), location

inside the building envelope (exterior/interior, wall, ceiling, floor) and the geographical location

(weather data) of the implementation. Because PCMs have a melting/freezing temperature range,

many studies have optimized this temperature range for the particular application.

For: different PCM products [60], for different locations in the residential buildings [61],

related to layer thicknesses [62], and PCM use in different climates/climate zone

classifications [63, 64]. The objective of some of these optimizations are either, cooling/heating

load reduction, energy savings, comfort, cost savings, or a combination of these objectives.

Once a suitable phase-change temperature and the phase-change temperature range is

selected for the application, further selections can be carried out for other important properties

like, conductivity, durability, melting and freezing behaviors, energy density (important factor

when designing lightweight structures).

15

Figure 2-5 Melting enthalpy and melting temperature (๐‘‡๐‘š)โ€“ for different PCMs, An important criterion in selecting PCMs for building envelope applications

2.4. Types of PCMs

Identifying suitable material and thermal characteristics of PCMs is a priority of this

project. The first criteria to consider in selecting a material is the melting temperature range. Each

selection must have a melting temperature range falling within the temperature variation of the

environment they are used in. Several PCM types are explored in this section.

โ€ข Paraffinic organic PCMs

Organic PCMs are primarily categorized as paraffins and non-paraffins [65]. Organic

PCMs crystallize with little or no subcooling [66]. Paraffins consist of chain n-alkanes. The

crystallization of the โ€“CH3 chain releases a high amount of latent heat [67]. However, Paraffins

have low thermal conductivity, relatively high flammability, and might generate toxic smoke and

fumes when wet burning [68]. Paraffin PCMs are studied in the validation study in chapter 7 of

this thesis.

โ€ข Non-Paraffinic Bio-based organic PCMs

Non-Paraffinic organic PCMs include a highly diversified group of chemical compounds

[15]. Unlike Paraffins, each of these bio-based compounds display their own unique physical

characteristics. This category of PCMs include the largest collection of potential future PCMs.

Bio-based PCMs are obtained from animal fat and vegetation such as beef tallow, lard, palm,

16

coconut, and soybean. The fatty acids, esters and fatty alcohols also belongs to non-paraffinic

PCMs family has a wide range of properties as described by Tyagi and Buddhi [69] and therefore,

fatty acids have high heat of fusion and also a reliable melting and solidifying behavior with no

subcooling. Sugar acids are not useful in building envelope applications as they have high melting

points in the range of 90-200 หšC [15].

โ€ข Inorganic Phase Change Materials

Inorganic PCMs can be either salt hydrates or metallics [69]. Metallics have very high

melting temperatures and therefore, are not suitable for building envelope applications. Salts

however, have suitable melting ranges for building PCM applications with latent heat around 200

kJ/kg and a thermal conductivity around 0.5 W/m-K [15] [70]. Salt hydrates are alloys of inorganic

salts and water combined to form crystalline solids and are non-toxic, non-flammable, and

moderately corrosive properties, low environmental impact, and possibility of recycling is another

advantage of inorganic PCMs [71]. However, inorganic PCMs undergo Subcooling during the

solidification process and might exhibit phase segregation during transition irritancy, variable

chemical stability, non-stability upon cycling [72]. Abhat [73] indicates that there instability upon

cycling due the separation of water and salt can cause decrease latent heat with time.

โ€ข Eutectics and PCM Mixtures

Eutectic PCMs are a mixture of two or more chemical components that solidify

simultaneously at a minimum freezing point and when melting, the components liquefy

simultaneously [15, 74, 75]. Eutectics are known for their sharp melting temperature and high

volumetric thermal storage density [71, 75]. Mixtures of fatty acids and fatty-acid esters have

shown suitable thermal characteristics for building envelope applications [15]. Eutectic mixtures

of capric acid and lauric acid applied in the wall-board applications are suitable for applications in

the building envelopes [76]. The BiPCM PCM used in this research is an example of a PCM

mixture of bio-based PCMs and used experimental analysis in chapter 3.

Analyzed PCMs

This study tests two PCM encapsulation types: macro and microencapsulated PCMs.

Microencapsulated PCM are integrated in drywall and macroencapsulated PCM pouches comes

17

from two manufacturers. Table 2-1 lists the PCM products used in this research and they are of

three brand types and acquired from ENRG BlanketTM, ThermalCORETM, and INSOLCORP.

Table 2-1 Properties of the PCM products used in the building envelope testing Manufacturer Product

trade name/s Types Encapsulation Peak melting

temperature (๐‘‡๐‘š) Nominal

latent heat capacity (kJ/kg)

Phase Change Energy Solutions

BioPCM TM Organic

Macro 23 หšC/73หšF ~230

ThermalCORE Micronalยฎ Organic

Micro 23 หšC/73 หšF ~110

INSOLCORP Infinite RTM Inorganic

Macro 23หšC/73 หšF ~200

โ€ข ThermalCORETM

National Gypsum was the first company to introduce the PCM-enhanced gypsum boards

to the North American construction material market in 2009. ThermalCORETM PCM drywall has

the same appearance as regular drywall using PCM with melting pint of 23 ยบC. Table 2-2 shows

the physical properties of the ThermalCORETM PCM product in detail.

Table 2-2 Physical properties of the National Gypsum ThermalCOREยฎ gypsum board containing PCM

Property Value

Specific heat 1.2 kJ/kg K

Board density 800 kg/m3

Enthalpy of fusion of the PCM ~110 J/g

Latent heat capacity (ฮ”H) 251 kJ/m2

18

โ€ข BioPCMTM

BioPCMTM is a macroencapsulated that transition from solid gel to a softened gel. The

product is includes a mixture of fatty acids [77], fatty alcohols [78], esters [79], emulsifiers, and

thickening/ gelling agents [80]. The exact fractions of the additives are not known. This PCM

product is biodegradable and has a neutral carbon footprint [81]. Manufactures produces multiples

melting temperatures and heat capacities: M27 (307kJ/m2), M51 (580 kJ/m2), and M91 (1033

kJ/m2) and the current research uses M51. Figure shows the how the PCM in pouches are observed

once BioPCMs are heated to ~90 ยบC.

Figure 2-6 Visualization of PCM packing in pouches once heated to a temperature of ~90 หšC.

โ€ข Infinite RTM

Macroencapsulated PCM based on hydrate salts developed by Applied Innovation Group

available from the melting temperatures between 18ยบC-28ยบC. This PCM is encapsulated in pouches

in multilayer, heavy-duty nylon/PE foil [15].

All the PCM products discussed above are recommended for residential and industrial

applications in building walls. The products are already implemented in real life applications in

field studies.

19

CHAPTER 3

MODELING PCMS IN BUILDING ENVELOPE

Energy consumption estimation is highly important when designing sustainable and high

efficiency buildings. Therefore, engineers, architects, and researchers seek robust, fast, and

accurate whole building modeling techniques that can simulate state-of-the art technologies.

Hence, this chapter looks into existing PCM modeling techniques and software.

Building energy modeling is conducted in district, building, and envelope scale. The

current research focuses on the building scale, and the envelope scale heat transfer modeling.

Figure 3-1 shows different scales of heat transfer modeling considered in this work and where

PCM modeling algorithms apply.

Figure 3-1 Different scales of building energy modeling considered in the current study are at building scale, envelope scale. The PCM modeling algorithm incorporates PCM characteristics

in the envelope modeling algorithm.

20

3.1. Analytical Models

Stefan problem defines the temperature distribution u (x, t) that yields an explicit type

solution for freezing/melting of a semi-infinite PCM- layer initially at a constant temperature in a

homogenous phase, with a constant temperature at the surface [82]. The analytical solution for the

case of heat transfer in a PCM in a 1-dimensional semi-infinite layer is used for our baseline

verification purposes and has been used in previous research [83, 84]. Furthermore, recent studies

discuss analytical solutions for solid-liquid phase transition of pure PCMs [85-87]. However, most

PCMs do not demonstrate isothermal phase change process and the complex behavior of PCMs

have led to more advanced analytical methods. Generally, analytical solutions have drawbacks

when capturing dynamic behavior of PCMs with their complex thermal characteristics. For that

reason, whole building energy modeling platforms use comprehensive numerical methods.

3.2. Numerical Models

Approximate numerical models constructed during last several decades use many

mathematical methods to recognize PCM behavior. ANSYS Fluent, BSim, COMSOL, DeST,

EnergyPlus, HEATING, IDA ICE, , PCMexpress, PowerDomus, RADCOOL, SUNREL, and

WUFI are software are capable of modeling PCMs [15]. Among these software, EnergyPlus, ESP-

r, and WUFI are considered in this study based on their popularity, key recent applications in

literature, and the potential for future research. In addition, an additional model is developed in

MATLAB some results are compared to a 2-Dimensional model in COMSOL. This section

discusses how these methods are integrated to modeling PCMs and specifically in building

applications.

Numerical models: Simulation methods

Heat Source Method

Heat source method splits the enthalpy in to sensible heat and latent heat. Latent heat

portion is defined as the heat source [88]. This has been used for different PCM applications

designed to take advantage of the off-peak electrical energy for space heating [89-91].

21

Heat capacity method

The heat capacity method describes the temperature change T(x, t) using the heat capacity

cp(T). Within the temperature range of a phase transition, this method deals with heat capacity as

a function of temperature. Heat capacity method has been used to evaluate phase change in liquid

metals in recent studies [92, 93]. Most of the modelling algorithms using heat capacity method are

built for 1D heat transfer studies [83]. A 3D study by Sa et al. [94] numerically compares two

PCM-enhanced wallboards with heat capacity defined to vary with the temperature and a

Gaussian-type equation and expresses the capacitance-temperature relationship. Heat capacity

method shows low accuracy with high temperature gradients in the mushy region [95]. It is

suggested in literature that application of heat capacity method in numerical solutions for real

PCMs needs further evaluation. TRNSYS software uses heat capacity method to model PCMs in

building applications.

Enthalpy Method

Eyres et al. [96] introduces enthalpy method, and uses this technique to demonstrate the

variations of thermal properties with time (enthalpy change with time). The enthalpy method deals

with a total amount of energy required during the phase-change. This includes both sensible and

latent heat. It is one of the most commonly used fixed-domain methods for solving the moving

boundary problem, Voller and Swaminathan [97] Studies a general implicit source based enthalpy

model. The consistent linearization of the discretized source is a highlighted feature in this study.

In using enthalpy method the conductivity and the density is considered to be temperature

dependent. The key feature of the outcomes of the above studies is eliminating the need of

accurately track the phase change boundary.

The enthalpy method used in this study includes subsets of both apparent heat capacity and

source based methods. TRNSYS Type-241 [98], PCM Express โ€“ ESP-r [99], and EnergyPlus [100]

utilizes different versions of the enthalpy method. These applications indicate the applicability of

the enthalpy model to approximate PCM behavior. Gรผnther et al. [101] discusses the ability of

enthalpy method to correctly account for the subcooling effect.

22

Apparent heat capacity and combined methods

Apparent heat capacity method increases the heat capacity at the mushy region directly

proportional to the latent heat and inversely proportional to the temperature difference. This

method is also one of the extensively studied method alongside enthalpy method says Kuznik. et

al. [55], but when the phase change happens without the mushy region, the solutions of this method

may not be accurate as shown by Tenchev, R. and P. Purnell [102] or produces an error with large

time steps [103, 104].

A recent study incorporates a similar enthalpy method implemented by Swaminathan, C.

and V. Voller [105] where the PCM model is represented by a nonlinear source term in the

governing equation [106]. Within the source term the authors take into account the liquid phase

fraction and it is set to vary with the temperature. Therefore, this approach is called a quasi-

enthalpy method. TRNSYS Type-204 and TRANSYS Type-260 uses effective heat capacity

method [55].

Table 3-1 compares the analyzed methods in terms of how they solve transient heat transfer

equation. Each of these methods are solved using different numerical solvers such as G-S (Gauss

Seidel) or TDMA (Tri-Diagonal Matrix Algorithm) [17]. Equation 3-1 shows the generalized form

of the heat equation. In summary, (i) heat source method: latent heat is treated as a source term (ii)

heat capacity method: heat capacity term accounts for both sensible and latent heat (iii) enthalpy

method: enthalpy term accounts for sensible and latent heat.

Aโˆ‚ฯ•โˆ‚t = โˆ‚โˆ‚x (ฮ“ฯ• โˆ‚ฯ•โˆ‚x) + R (3-1)

Table 3-1 Coefficients of the mathematical formulation to capture the phase change effects in numerical models.

Mathematical method

Values of the coefficients in the order as they appear in the formulation

A ๐œ™ ฮ“๐œ™ ๐‘… Heat source method ฯ ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘” T k - ฯL๐œ•๐‘“๐‘™๐œ•๐‘ก

Heat capacity method

ฯ๐ถ๐ด(๐‘‡) T k 0

Enthalpy method ฮก h k/๐ถ๐‘ƒ 0

23

Here, ๐ถ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘” = averaged heat capacity ๐ถ๐‘ƒ = specific heat capacity ๐ถ๐ด(๐‘‡) = heat capacity term as a function of temperature ฯ = density

h = enthalpy ๐‘˜ = thermal conductivity ๐‘‡ = temperature ๐ฟ = latent heat ๐‘ก = time ๐œ•๐‘“๐‘™๐œ•t = liquid fraction gradient Numerical Models: Grid and boundary considerations.

PCM modeling must solve the moving boundary problem because, in addition to the fixed

boundaries which define the computational domain, there is a boundary across which the phase

change takes place (the โ€œmushyโ€ region). Thermodynamic equilibrium conditions should be

satisfied on this time dependent moving boundary. Literature looks into several grid methods for

numerical solutions. There are three main methods: fixed grid method [105], front tracking method

[107], and hybrid method [108]. Fixed grid method is commonly used in building envelope

problems with PCMs due to the complex nature of implementing a moving grid method. The

complexities of front tracking and moving mesh methods can lead to significantly increased

computational time [11]. All PCM algorithms used in this research use fixed grid methods.

Numerical Models: Discrete forms and solution schemes

Finite element method, finite difference method and finite volume method are frequently used

modeling formulations used in PCM modeling. Discrete forms used in literature when numerically

modeling PCMs are shown in detail in Appendix A.

24

Numerical Models: In building energy modeling platforms

Building energy modeling programs include numerical solutions for building envelope

with PCMs. However, most of these programs consider convenience over accuracy and therefore,

make assumptions to simplify the algorithm when implemented in the models [17]. A PCM study

which uses COMSOL to simulate PCMs and discusses how the 3D/2D models [109]. Several

studies use in-house whole building energy models implementing numerical solutions for PCM

inclusions which are verified with existing numerical solutions or validated with experimental data

[103, 110, 111]. However, the commercial whole building energy modeling platforms are more

comprehensive and are updated frequently with more effective PCM models. Therefore, the PCMs

modeling algorithms require frequent validation.

Commercially available building simulation platforms are useful in evaluating annual

energy simulations for PCM included building models [112]. The following software is among

mostly referenced and have some type of PCM mod

ESP-r: Tool developed by University of Strathclyde and commonly used in Europe that

has couple of PCM models [113-115]. PCMs are introduced as special materials and

defined as active building elements that have the ability to change their thermo-physical

properties. Fallahi et al. [116] Proposes a numerical solution for ESP-r. The solution is

based on a finite difference method. The program simulates and predicts temperature

profiles and heat fluxes for different configurations of PCM inclusion. ESP-r is used by

Koล›ny et al. [117] due to its built in ability to model PCM sub-cooling effect.

TRNSYS: Tool Developed by University of Wisconsin-Madison. Earlier TRNSYS

models use enthalpy method and solved using explicit schemes [118, 119]. However, later

TRNSYS models do not use enthalpy method and use heat capacity/ heat source methods

[120]. Castellรณn, et al.[121] compares, but does not offer proper validation results. There

are other TRNSYS PCM models for building wall PCM applications [55, 122].

Implements TRNSYS Type-1270 PCM model which assumes that the PCM undergoes its

phase transition at a constant temperature and the specific heat capacity of the two phases

are constant. TRNSYS Type-285 uses the boundary temperature concept through a

massless dummy layer with a small resistance [16]. Validation is done in small scale tests

[55].

25

EnergyPlus: Tool developed by Department of Energy [123] that has a finite difference

algorithm (CondFD) method coupled with an enthalpy temperature function to simulate

PCM that has been verified and validated [100] [124, 125].

WUFI: Tool developed by the Fraunhofer IBP, Holzkirc.hen, Germany [126] presents

numerical tools for modeling the heat and moisture transfer within building structures.

WUFI, which in German stands for โ€œWรคrme und Feuchte instationรคrโ€. WUFI can perform

coupled transient heat and moisture transport simulations user-defined time steps using

Finite-volume method and is able to simulate PCMs as illustrated by previous studies

[127-129].

Table 3-2 summarizes Latent heat methods, discretization and time integration

computation methods used in this study with different PCM modelling software. PCM modeling

modules used in whole building energy modeling software and studies which have added

corrections to the existing methods and added techniques to address the complex PCM behaviors

are shown in Appendix B. Based on this analysis we select the enthalpy method to model latent

heat, finite difference method for discretization, and fully implicit method for time integral

computations in the 1D heat transfer modelling algorithm to model building walls with PCM

presented in this thesis. This heat transfer modelling algorithm is modeled using MATLAB

modelling language.

Table 3-2 Latent heat methods, discretization and time integration computation methods used in this study with different PCM modelling software

Software Latent heat method Discretization Time integration computations

COMSOL Enthalpy Finite element Implicit

ESP-r Effective heat capacity Finite volume Explicit

EnergyPlus Enthalpy Finite difference Implicit

TRNSYS Effective heat capacity or Enthalpy

Finite difference /Finite element

Implicit: Crankโ€“Nicholson

WUFI Enthalpy Finite volume Implicit

26

CHAPTER 4

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON PCM INCLUSION IN BUILDING ENVELOPE

Laboratory studies are used to characterize PCMs and to collect data for validating different

numerical PCM models. This chapter discusses the literature of experimental PCM

characterization, PCM inclusion methods, and the experimental methods to improve the numerical

solutions.

4.1. Scale of experimental studies

PCM are characterized by thermal properties (density, thermal conductivity, specific heat)

that might change in liquid phase and solid phase. Additional properties are latent heat and melting

temperature Tm. Latent heat is typically represented by the temperature dependent enthalpy curve

h(T). PCM calorimetric measurement are used to determine h(T) curve for PCMs. Kosny [15]

indicates that theoretical and experimental analyses of building technologies is performed at three

levels.

โ€ข Material scale

โ€ข System scale

โ€ข Whole building scale

Material scale occurs when only the PCMs performance is examined. System scale relates

to are applications in exterior/interior wall, ceiling, and floor envelope assemblies. PCM

characterization studies are conducted in material scale.

4.2. PCM characterization methods

PCM characterization methods quantify the phase melting and freezing enthalpy of PCMs as

well as its melting and crystallization behaviour. The sample sizes used and the final output of the

thermal property after processing the data from some commonly used methods are shown in Table

4-1. These methods are discussed in detail in the following section.

27

Table 4-1 PCM characterization methods for PCMs used in building envelope applications

Method Sample size

(mass or area)

Thermo-physical Property output calculated

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) 0.5-100 mg [31] cp f(T)

T-history method 10-15 g [15] cp f(T)

Heat Flow Meter Apparatus (HFMA) 0.25 m ร— 0.25 m [130] h f(T)

Dynamic Hot Box Method 2.4 m ร— 2.4 m [15] h f(T)

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC is a standard tool for the measurement of latent heat of PCMs and, is widely used,

accessible and versatile [131]. DSC detects difference in the thermal response that a reference and

evaluated sample indicate when simultaneously subjected to a temperature program [132]. Outputs

of the tests are calculations of thermo-physical properties like Cp(T), H(T), melting temperature

(Tm), freezing temperature (Tf).

There are two methods of DSC used in characterizing PCMs used in building applications,

heat-flux DSC and power compensation DSC. Heat-flux DSC method is used in the data obtained

for validation studies in this research. This apparatus is a heat-exchanging calorimeter where

measurement of the heat flow rate between test sample and surroundings is conducted. Heart with

the environment takes place via a well-defined heat conduction path with known thermal

resistance.

This method measures the difference of temperature between the reference material and

the PCM sample tested with equal heat input. The heat flux is measured indirectly in this method.

The test obtains cp(T) function of temperature. The enthalpy or the storage capacity ฮ”h is then

calculated by integration over temperature. This is shown in equation 4-1. The start point of

integration is usually chosen by the researcher conducting the tests observing the output data.

h(T) = โˆซ cpTT0 (ฯ„) d ฯ„ (4-1)

28

Here, the rate of heat-flux (dH/dt) is proportional the specific heat capacity (cp) of the

sample. Therefore cp can be calculated via equation 4-2. Here the m is the mass of the sample.

โ„Ž(๐‘‡) = 1๐‘š (๐‘‘๐ป๐‘‘๐‘ก ) : (๐‘‘๐‘‡๐‘‘๐‘ก): (4-2)

Furthermore, DSC tests are conducted in isothermal step-testing mode, or dynamic ramp

mode and discussed by Kosny [15]. Dynamic ramp mode is used for the data obtained in the current

research.

DSC uses a small PCM sample size in the range of 10-100 mg. Lรกzaro et al. [132] highlight

how the small sample size may not be a representative of the subcooling effects of the larger PCM

storage. Another drawback of this method is the variation of the results with sample sizes tested

under same heating rates as most PCMs have poor thermal conductivities. Therefore, in a large

sample of PCM, the temperature gradients observed are steeper than that for a smaller sample

tested with the same heating rate. There are studies that looks into using different experimental

apparatus to minimize the inaccuracies observed in DSC measures [133]. However, many studies

use DSC method to characterize PCMs used in wall assembly applications [134]. Therefore, a

conventional measurement method with the use of DSC as specified in ASTM E793 Standard

[135] is used by the manufacturers for the PCM products used in this study. The DSC

characterization data used in the validation studies are obtained from the experimental studies

conducted by Cao et al. [136] for the shape-stabilized PCM and conducted by Biswas et al.[14] for

the Nano-PCM used in the chapter 7 of this research. For the shape-stabilized PCM heating rate

of 0.05 ยบC/min and for Nano-PCM heating rate of 1.0 ยบC/min was used. DSC data is provided by

the manufacturers for BioPCM (the heating rate was not available), and PCM hydrate-salts (1.0

ยบC/min rate) [48] used in the validation studies in chapter 8 this research.

T-history method

T-history method records temperature changes of the specimen during the time of phase

transition. The experimental device usually consists of the heating equipment that provides a

constant temperature water bath to absorb heat from, or release heat to the test PCM samples.

29

Tested materials are placed in laboratory glass tubes. At least one glass test tube is filled with

tested PCM, while a second one contains a reference material (distilled water is commonly used

as a reference material). Temperature of the PCM) is suddenly exposed to an atmosphere whose

temperature is Tโˆž, the temperature versus time curve of the PCM, the T -history curve is then

obtained. This method is mainly used to determine the PCM freezing point, specific heat, latent

heat, thermal conductivity, and heat diffusion coefficient. More information about the T-history

method and the improved T-history method approaches re found in the literature [31, 137, 138].

Advantages of this method can be listed as follows,

Uses a simple experimental setup

Facilitates testing of larger samples than DSC

Measures heat of fusion, specific heat and thermal conductivity of several samples PCMs

simultaneously

Accepts PCM hydrate-salts, paraffins and custom made PCM blends.

Facilitates exploration of new PCM types

However the uneven temperature distribution and temperature stratification across the

material sample could still restrict the T-history method results [15].

Thermogravimetric analyses (TG)

Thermogravimetric analysis measures the thermal stability of PCM products [139]. This

technique monitors the mass of a substance as a function of temperature or time as the sample

specimen is subjected to a controlled temperature program in a controlled atmosphere. The TGA

curve therefore, expresses time or temperature on the x-axis and weight or weight percent (%) in

the y axis. Literature discusses this method in detail [15].

Dynamic Hot Box Method

Dynamic hot-box method facilitates the full scale building envelope experimental analysis.

PCM characterization via Dynamic hot-box method is defined in ASTM C1363: hot-box apparatus

to generate dynamic thermal characterization of full size building envelope assemblies [140]. Hot-

box methods can be guarded hot-box method or calibrated hot-box. Guarded hot-box method is

discussed here and used in generation of experimental data discussed in chapter 7.

30

The test apparatus of the hotโ€“box method includes two compartments: box 1 and box 2.

The test specimen is placed between the surfaces of the two boxes (vertical or horizontal apparatus

is used) [15]. Box 2 is referred to as the Cold box or the climatic chamber and has cooling systems

connected and additional with fans to provide the low temperature setpoint. During the testing, the

temperature in the cold box is kept at a constant value. The Hot box (Box 1) includes a metering

box and a thermal guard. Main test chamber of the hot side is the metering box. This chamber is

also equipped with heaters and fans. Measures are taken to maintain the temperatures of the

metering box above a defined temperature. Additional electrical heater provides heating power to

heat up the chamber beyond the controlled value.

The thermal guard surrounds the metering box and the temperature in the thermal guard is

also controlled by the heating elements. This guard is applied to no or limited heat flux occurs

from the metering box towards the thermal guard. Therefore, the heat generated within the

metering box is made sure to flow through the test specimen. Hot-box measurements can be used

to measure the thermal performance of opaque and transparent building envelope elements (walls,

roofs, and windows). Specimen sizes can be ~ 2.4 m x 2.4 m in size. This method is used to measure

either U-value (the overall heat transfer through the tested structure) or the thermal resistance to

heat flux within the structure. Kosny et al. [141] uses the heat flows measured on the PCM and

non-PCM sides of the wood-framed test wall of dynamic hot-box testing to evaluate the

performance of the PCMs.

Heat Flow Meter Apparatus (HFMA) methods

Kosny et al. [142] introduces this HFMA test method. This test is done utilizing

temperature and heat flux instrumentation. There are commercial HFMA apparatus available in

the market today. Conventional HFMA instrument measures temperature and heat flux at a

specified time interval, and uses the data to determine steady state and thermal transmission

properties of a test specimen. ASTM C518 Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal

Transmission Properties specifications are used in this test method. This method is further

discussed in recent studies by Koล›ny et al. [143].

DHFMA method uses similar step-method as in DSC that can be applied to larger scale

specimens (~0.25 m x 0.25 m). DHFMA uses the HFMA instruments for its measurements. The

apparatus consists of two isothermal plates with heat-flux transducers (one or more) attached to

31

each plate. The plate temperatures are controlled by using electric heating elements and water

based chillers. The top and bottom plates are set to different temperatures to apply a temperature

gradient on the sample. Then, the temperature of a PCM included specimen is changed by a small

step. The resulting heat flow in or out of the specimen is measured during this process. The heat

capacity of the specimen is then determined at the mean temperature. This is described in the

equation 4-3. Here, Cp is heat capacity, H is enthalpy, T is temperature, Q is the heat flow out or

heat flow in from the specimen. This method assumes a linear relationship between enthalpy and

temperature for small temperature increments used.

๐ถ๐‘ = ๐‘‘๐ป๐‘‘๐‘‡ โ‰ˆ โˆ†๐ปโˆ†๐‘‡ = โˆ†๐‘„โˆ†๐‘‡ (4-3)

To describe the apparatus, there is a heat flow sensor on each of the upper and lower

isothermal plates. The specimen is placed between these plates. The sides are designed to be

adiabatic. The upper and lower isothermal plate assemblies are kept at the same temperature to

impose a uniform temperature across the specimen. Following this, a temperature change is then

introduced on both plates. Heat flows through the plates are measured until equilibrium is reached.

Equilibrium is assumed when the heat flow values become negligible. The enthalpy per unit

surface area for each step temperature change of the specimen is calculated by integrating the heat

flow rate measurements over time. This data is used to construct the temperature-enthalpy curve

for the PCM specimen tested.

The characterization data used for PCM salt-hydrates in the validation study of

macroencapsulated PCMs in this research uses DHFMA characterization data and is measured and

processed by Dr. Kaushik Biswas at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Enthalpy (kJ/kg)-

Temperature (ยบC) data gathered in ~1 ยบC intervals are provided for the analysis in current research.

Biswas et al. [144] states that HFMA instruments have poor accuracy for temperature steps smaller

than 1ยบC. Detailed experimental approach of this characterization method is described by Shukla

and Kosny [145].

32

Other methods

In addition to above characterization methods, DSC Step-Testing method and DSC

Dynamic Ramp Mode [146], Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) [147] are some methods that

have been used to characterize PCMs in material scale. These methods are mostly examines to

improve the results of DSC method.

There are some studies which compare different characterization methods. A recent study

compares DSC and improved DHFMA methods and concludes that at very low heating rates for

DSC method both methods showed same sub-cooling effects therefore, indicating that DHFMA

method is effective to test PCM wallboards [148].

4.3. Experimental studies on macroencapsulated and microencapsulated PCMs

This research focuses on the use of PCMs in the whole building scale and system scale

applications. System scale tests are conducted in test huts designed to conduct field studies,

envelope of existing buildings, or specialized chambers constructed for the testing of wall

assemblies.

PCM wall assemblies are tested in dynamic hot-box apparatus to examine shape-stabilized

PCM behind drywall to gather experimental data to investigate the impact of PCMs in reducing

temperature fluctuation [136]. PCM-enhanced foams are tested at the Oak Ridge National

Laboratory using a hot-box apparatus [15]. Same facility is used to test wood-framed wall

containing blown PCM-enhanced fiberglass insulation [149].

Test cubicles are used to examine macro encapsulated PCMs in free-floating conditions in

a recent study with the PCM containers are attached to polyurethane foam wall [150]. System scale

tests are conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to analyze Nano-PCMs and a wall of

existing building was used to construct the experimental apparatus [14]. Wall structures are made

of OSB, cellulose insulation in addition to the Nano-PCM embedded gypsum and the heat transfer

study using this assembly is used to gather data for validation purposes. Kosny et al. [151] tested

a retrofit strategy for masonry walls using inorganic PCM-enhanced foam insulation using the

walls and roof of an existing building. Another study conducted field testing of walls side-by-side

to evaluate Phase Change Frame Wall (PCFW)s and examined lower peak heat transfer rates across

the walls and gathered data for validation purposes [152]. Muruganantham et al. [153] tested

33

macroencapsulated PCM pouches arrays covering the ceiling to investigate cooling load reductions

of the interior environment. Allqallaf et al. [154] tested a concrete slab with vertical cylindrical

holes to examine the effect of the geometry of macroencapsulation for PCM use in roofs.

Whole building scale tests apply PCMs in multiple components like exterior/interior walls,

slabs, ceilings, and floors. An 82-m2 single-family home is used in a study at the university campus

in Nottingham, England to implement PCM wallboards with microencapsulated PCM. A

commercial building at Charles Sturt University (CSU) located in New South Wales, Victoria,

Australia is used to implement microencapsulated PCM in floors and ceilings. This building has

880-m2 floor area and was constructed using lightweight steel framing technology [15]. A two

story PCM house is constructed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory [155]. This construction had a

with total floor area of 253-m2. Then floor of this house is insulated with 10.2-cm-thick layer of

PCM-enhanced cellulose insulation and 9 cm of PCM-enhanced cellulose insulation is installed

on the attic gable walls. Furthermore, A 20 % by weight of microencapsulated bio-based PCM is

also added to blown cellulose fibers in the exterior framed cavity of this house enabling a whole

building PCM application. All the above whole building level studies are used to assess the impact

of PCMs on the interior temperature profiles and heat transfer across the envelope.

To date, there has not been a study that investigates multiple wall panels in parallel in a controlled

environment. The experimental facility discussed in this study facilitates experimental

investigation multiple wall panels with PCMs.

34

CHAPTER 5

PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH PHASE CHANGE

MATERIAL (PCM)-ENHANCED DRYWALL, PRE-COOLING, AND VARIABLE

ELECTRIC RATES IN A HOT AND DRY CLIMATE

This section contributes to the fulfillment of the following objectives of this research: (i)

identify important variables and find optimal PCM properties for building envelope applications.

This study was published in the journal of Applied Energy, 15 July 2018: 497-514 [12].

Buildings account for about 75% of U.S. electricity consumption and 40% of total U.S.

energy consumption [156]. Nearly 15% of U.S. electricity use comes from building cooling

systems, and it can be as high as 50% in summer when considering non-coincident peak demand

[157]. Peak loads can cause difficulties for electric companies because the power generation

capacity must be equal to peak demand [158], which may result in electric companies significantly

increasing their production rates during peak hours. Shifting demand away from peak hours (i.e.,

reducing the total peak demand) is therefore a viable solution for utilities as well as building

owners. Therefore, many potential technologies, such as batteries and thermal storage, are being

considered to help reduce peak demand and also improve thermal comfort [159-161].

Building thermal storage has the potential to rely on the innate building mass; however,

U.S. homes typically have low thermal mass [162, 163], thus one option is to use phase change

materials (PCMs) to increase homesโ€™ thermal mass. PCMs may be combined with precooling,

where smart programmable thermostats cool the house during off-peak time and increase the set

point at peak time [164-167]. Although the overall benefits of PCMs and precooling are well

known from several decades of research [69, 168-170], few studies examine the process of

optimizing various PCM properties and concentrations with specific precooling strategies.

Previous PCM studies have analyzed different applications, encapsulation techniques, and

locations within buildings. The location of PCMs in buildings varies widely in the literature,

including micro- and macro-encapsulation in or behind drywall [69, 171-176], concrete [177, 178],

fiber insulation [141, 179], or other systems, such as hot water systems, floor heating systems [25,

35

69, 180] and storage tanks [181, 182]. Wallboard applications have been studied extensively [69,

168-170, 183-185]. Early studies focused primarily on drywall impregnated with PCMs [186, 187]

and later on micro- and macro-encapsulation of PCMs [172, 173, 185]. Studies indicate that PCM-

enhanced drywall can improve thermal comfort by reducing thermal stratification due to natural

convective air mixing [184], and can help mitigate effects of extreme events like heat waves [188].

PCM performance in different applications heavily depends on proper PCM selection

based on their properties: melting temperature, melting temperature range, latent heat, thermal

conductivity, and others. However, few studies have looked into different combinations of PCM

inclusion [189-195]; some optimized the PCM thickness [196] or examined the effects of PCMs

on interior partition walls [183], ceilings, and exterior walls [197]. Others looked at increasing

heat transfer between the indoor environment and the walls [198, 199] or explored the optimum

PCM melting temperature in different cities [200] according to the outdoor boundary conditions,

which showed that the use of passive PCM systems in the building envelope with optimized peak

melting temperature for each climate zone can yield energy savings [201]. However, no study has

analyzed synergies between PCMs with programmable thermostats and variable electric rates

(Time-Of-Use Rates or TOU), as precooling has been used previously to reduce peak demand.

When PCMs are embedded in the drywall or behind the drywall, effective heat transfer

depends on several parameters, one of which is the convection heat transfer between the indoor air

and the interior wall surfaces. Under regular indoor conditions, natural convection is present,

resulting in low heat transfer coefficients between the indoor air and inside wall surfaces of the

building envelope (1-6 W/m2-K). A couple of studies suggest that natural convection cannot

adequately transfer heat towards the envelope to store a high amount of thermal energy in the PCM

wallboard [198, 202]. Thus, this study addresses the current gaps on PCM performance when

combined with precooling in a home subjected to TOU pricing and with a variable set point. It

also addresses the gaps on the role convection has on PCM performance by focusing on optimizing

PCM embedded in drywall using parametric analysis. The contributions of this study are: (1) to

analyze the impact indoor natural and forced convection have on the effectiveness to reduce peak

demand in a home with a precooling schedule with and without PCMs and (2) to inform engineers,

architects, and PCMโ€™s manufacturers about the optimal PCM properties used when PCMs are

embedded in drywall. No previous study has analyzed this important issue in residential buildings.

36

In addition, one interest in this study is to look further than annualized energy related costs and

investigate the cooling related costs.

5.1. Approach

This study uses Building Energy Optimization (BEopt) Version 2.3 and EnergyPlus

Version 8.1 to perform all energy and cost analysis associated in the parametric analysis. BEopt

performs annual building energy simulations using EnergyPlus as the background simulation

engine. BEopt can perform parametric or optimization analyses based on monetary savings, energy

savings, or a combination of both using a sequential search optimization technique to find different

energy packages [203]. BEopt optimization algorithm identifies the least-cost approach to achieve

minimal whole-house energy use involving different combinations of discrete residential system

equipment and material options. BEopt can find intermediate optimal points all along the least-

cost curve minimum-cost building designs at different target energy savings levels [203].

However, BEoptโ€™s sequential optimization algorithm has the objective function to minimize

energy use and the optimization mode only keeps the most cost effective points and few near

optimum points which eliminates the combinations that are required to the next stage of the study.

Therefore, all cases are evaluated using parametric analysis, where every single combination is

analyzed, allowing us to study how all the different PCM combinations (cost, location, and PCM

concentration) perform. After analysis of the entire results, subsequent post-processing finds

optimal solutions, as the study focuses on the cases with lowest energy cost and perform hourly

comparisons.

EnergyPlus is a whole building energy simulation program, which uses an integrated,

simultaneous solution approach to solve for different heat transfers processed in and out of the

built environment. Both BEopt and EnergyPlus have been validated for residential peak reduction

using the building envelope and electric bill calibration [204-206]. The default conduction heat

transfer algorithm in EnergyPlus is Conduction Transfer Function (CTF). This method is efficient

because it calculates the current surface temperature and heat fluxes with a limited number of

previous surface temperatures and fluxes [207]. However, BEopt uses a hybrid approach in PCM

modeling: SurfaceProperty:HeatTransferAlgorithm. Any construction assembly with PCMs is

modeled with the conduction finite difference (CondFD) algorithm while all others surfaces use

37

CTF to reduce simulation runtime. Both algorithms have been verified or validated previously and

used in different PCM studies [208, 209].

Building Description

The analyzed house represents a relatively new home located in Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

The view of the house and the neighboring buildings are shown in the Figure 5-1. Phoenix is

located in climate region Hot-Dry (2B), according to Building America [210]; IECC Zone 2 in

[211]; and BWk (Arid, desert hot arid) according to the Kรถppen-Geiger climate classification

[212]. This study uses typical meteorological year (TMY3) weather data for Phoenix. The house

has a conditioned area of 231 m2, a garage, slab-on-grade, and an unconditioned attic [213]. It

follows the 2014 House Simulation Protocols [214], except for: a variable cooling set point

schedule (compared with the prescribed flat setpoint of 24.4 ยฐC); more frequent natural ventilation,

when weather allows it; and drywall with micro-encapsulated PCMs.

Figure 5-1 View of the simulated house, orientation and, and its neighboring buildings.

The parametric analysis uses a project analysis period of 30 years and 3% inflation rate.

Electric rates are defined by the Salt River Project E-21 Super Peak Time-Of-Use (TOU) Rates

with a fixed service cost of USD 17/month and electric rates shown in Table 5-1. Other energy

38

costs, such as natural gas, oil, and propane use state averages. Table 5-1 indicates peak rates are

about 4 times higher than off-peak during the summer and about 60% higher in winter. Thus, this

study only uses precooling from May to October. Using these rates, the baseline home has an

annual cooling energy cost of about USD 480.

Table 5-1 Annualized TOU rate, E-21 Super Peak TOU Rate [215].

Months Regular Rate

(USD/kWh)

Peak Rate

(3:00 โ€“ 6:00 P.M.) (USD/kWh)

Jan-April 0.075 0.123

May-June 0.082 0.297

July-Aug 0.084 0.350

Sept-Oct 0.082 0.297

Nov-Dec 0.075 0.123

โ€ข PCM Parametric Analysis

The goal of this study is to find the optimal PCMs that minimize cooling electricity energy

costs for the analyzed home. The choice of PCM properties defined in BEopt are based on

simplified latent heat profiles. Real PCMs generally have a non-linear enthalpy-temperature curve

[216], and will have hysteresis and sub-cooling effects. In this study, simplifications include

assuming a linear behavior during phase change and neglecting the effects of hysteresis and sub-

cooling. Although the PCMs in this study do not reflect any PCM on the market, the simplified

PCM model has similar characteristics to actual PCMs. For example, Figure 5-2 shows the latent

heat curve of an existing PCM (BioPCMTM Q23) [217].

This particular PCM has a melting/freezing temperature around 23 หšC. Table 5-2 also

shows the linearized latent heat profiles used in this study with the same melting temperature of

23 หšC. Each of the three ideal PCM curves represents properties of an ideal PCM with the same

melting temperature and latent heat, but with a different melting temperature range. This approach

simplifies the analysis and provides an appropriate approximation as validated in previous studies

[213, 218].

39

Figure 5-2 Enthalpy curves showcasing 1) Real PCM data from BioPCMTM Q23ยบ obtained from

DSC test and 2) Ideal PCM curves with thermal properties similar to the real PCM.

The analyzed PCM properties are: (1) latent heat of PCM-enhanced drywall, (2) melting

temperature, and (3) melting temperature range. Other drywall/PCM properties such as density,

specific heat, thickness, and thermal conductivity are kept constant for all analyzed PCMs, based

on previous work by the author [213]. For example, previous work shows increasing the thermal

conductivity of the PMC-drywall did not affect the performance of the drywall, thus this study

does not optimize thermal conductivity.

Table 5-2 provides a summary of all properties, and the number of properties considered

for this study. Note that this study focuses on reduction of energy costs using PCM in drywall in

three main locations in homes: exterior walls (walls exposed to the outdoor environment), partition

walls (walls between zones), and ceilings. In all cases, the PCM-enhanced drywall is in direct

contact with the indoor environment.

Table 5-2 Range of analyzed theoretical PCM properties and locations in parametric study.

Property Number Analyzed

Values

Latent Heat of PCM embedded in drywall (kJ/kg)

4 0, 23, 47, 70

Melting Temperature (ยฐC) 4 22.2, 23.3, 24.4, 25.5

Melting Temperature Range (ยฐC) 3 1.11, 3.33, 5.55

Density (kg/m3) 1 801

40

Table 5-2 continued Specific Heat (kJ/kg-K) 1 0.837

Thickness (m) 1 0.0127

Thermal Conductivity (W/m-K) 1 0.157

Locations 3 Exterior Wall, Partition Walls Ceilings

Early analysis showed that using the actual current cost for micro-encapsulated PCMs

produce no savings over a 30-year period, as the current PCM price is considerably high. Thus,

this study uses a PCM-drywall cost of USD 1.76/ft2 or USD18.9/m2 (by comparison, the total cost

of regular drywall is about USD 7.0/m2, on average). This price assumes the future price of PCMs

will decrease as manufacturing technology improves with increased adoption. This estimation is

based on the actual cost of paraffin wax (about USD 1.8 โ€“ 2.0/kg as raw materials), with an

additional cost of ~50% for the micro-encapsulation process [219], labor, and future reductions

due to manufacturing improvements. Therefore, this study uses a USD 2.0/kg rate for cost

calculations. The analyzed PCM has a specific latent heat of 115 kJ/kg (pure PCM) with

concentration varying from 20-60% that results in drywall with a latent heat of 23-70 kJ/kg

(assuming a thickness of 0.0127 m). Although 60% PCMs by weight is unrealistic for

commercialized products [124], a similar total latent heat for the drywall with concentrations lower

than ~30% can be achieved with PCMs having a latent heat around 200 kJ/kg. Table 5-3 shows

the specific latent heat of PCMs, cost by mass of PCMs, concentration by percent weight, resulting

total latent heat, and total cost of the enhanced drywall (including installation costs).

Table 5-3 Specific Latent Heat and Costs of PCM Enhanced Drywall. Type of Drywall Normal PCM-Enhanced

Specific Latent Heat of pure PCM (kJ/kg) -- 115 115 115

Cost of PCM (USD/kg) -- 2 2 2

Amount of PCM in Drywall (Weight %) 0 20 40 60

Total Latent Heat of PCM/Drywall (kJ/kg) 0 23 47 70

Total Latent Storage PCM/Drywall (kJ/m2) 0 237 473 710

Total Cost (USD/m2) 7.00 11.00 15.00 19.00

41

These multilayer envelope constructions used in the current study are shown in the Figure 5-3.

Figure 5-3 Multilayer envelope constructions of the evaluated home indicating the location of the PCM-drywall. The interior environment is on the right and the exterior environment is on the left

for all cases (the layer thicknesses does not represent the actual scale).

After adjusting for the PCM costs and PCM application options in the drywall the study

seeks the most cost-effective PCM combination from the values shown in Table 5-2. Table 5-4

shows some of the economic assumptions used in the current 30-year parametric analysis.

Table 5-4 Economic factors used in the 30-year parametric analysis. Down Payment 4%

Mortgage interest rate 5%

Mortgage period 30

Project analysis period 30

Inflation rate 3%

Discount rate (dr) 3%

Marginal and Labor Costs Multiplier

1

Marginal Income Tax Rate Federal 28%

Marginal Income Tax Rate State 0%

Natural Gas

(Utility)

USD 1.3314 /therm

42

Precooling Strategy

Studies have explored the possibility of electric load shifting with precooling of both

commercial and residential buildings [164, 220, 221] [222]. This study uses a cooling set point

schedule based on previous work which concluded that precooling strategies for a new Phoenix

home with PCMs require at least 5 hours of precooling [164, 223, 224]. Therefore, this study

analyzes a set point schedule with five hours of precooling at 20 ยฐC with different setback (or

relaxation) temperatures: 24.4 ยฐC (76 ยบF), 25.5 ยฐC (78 ยบF), and 26.6 ยฐC (80 ยบ F). Cost savings are

calculated based on a reference home using a constant set point (24.4 ยฐC). Figure 5-4 indicates the

precooling strategy with a setback temperature of 25.6 ยฐC. The precooling and relaxation schedule

is not used on weekends as most TOU rates apply only on weekdays (i.e., the home has a constant

set point of 24.4 ยฐC on weekends). The peach-shaded rectangle indicates peak hours, while the

blue-shaded region is the precooling period. Recall that the annualized TOU rates are provided in

Table 1.

Figure 5-4 Precooling strategy with 25.6 ยฐC setback temperature. The peach-shaded rectangle indicates peak hours while the blue shaded-region indicates precooling.

43

Convection Heat Transfer

A previous study analyzing the same house showed that PCMs in the drywall cannot fully

freeze after 5 hours of precooling. This is potentially due to weak heat transfer between the inside

wall surface and the indoor air, with natural convection coefficients of about 1 - 6 W/m2-K [198,

213]. This study implements a forced convection mode with up to four ceiling fans in the living

space operating during the entire period of precooling and peak hours (from 10 A.M. to 6 P.M.).

The fans are implemented in EnergyPlus by adding (1) additional electric loads from each fan, (2)

additional internal gains that represent the heat generated by the fan motors, and (3) by using a

forced convection algorithm when the fans are on.

EnergyPlus has a natural and forced convection model, TARP and CeilingDiffuser,

respectively. TARP is the default model. In this study, we implemented a schedule that turns the

fan on/off at the appropriate time and switches the model to use convection coefficients from

natural to forced convection in the same period. The CeilingDiffuser model deviates from the

actual expected performance of a ceiling fan because the CeilingDiffuser model in EnergyPlus is

defined using empirical studies which used diffuser types other than typical ceiling fans [225].

However, it is the closest built-in model we can use to interpolate for coefficient values for a fan-

based forced convection regime.

The CeilingDiffuser convection model calculates the convection coefficients at walls,

ceilings, and floors based on Air Changes per Hour (ACH) [226] and has actual room convection

coefficients up to 20 times higher than natural convection coefficients [226, 227]. Thus, this study

implements average values from these two models (CeilingDiffuser and TARP) as shown in Figure

5-5 which are similar to another study looking at forced convection [198]. These are implemented

in EnergyPlus using a schedule and the SurfaceConvectionAlgortihm:Inside:UserCurve object. An

assumption in this study is that ceiling fans would provide similar air mixing as the A/C system.

The studies indicate that radial ceiling diffusers used for the empirical studies in [225] are

of practical importance with better mixing due to use of radial ceiling diffusers [228]. This study

assumes the convection coefficients are constant for the forced convection condition during the

fan operation. Here the combined TARP and CeilingDiffuser coefficient are referred to as forced

convection. The study assumes that the convection coefficient is constant for the forced

convection case.

44

Figure 5-5 Heat transfer coefficient values used next to the ceiling and exterior wall within the living zone for, (i) forced convection model (FC), (ii) CeilingDiffuser convection model

(CeilingDiffuser) and (iii) natural convection model (NC).

Mechanical Ventilation and Fan Selection

The use of mechanical ventilation adds additional cooling electricity use which can

potentially decrease the cost savings. Fan costs range from lower than USD 100/unit to USD

1,000/unit with an expected lifetime of 11 years. Fan electric energy use ranges from 2-100W in

current products in demand. For example, Big Ass Fans has ultra-energy efficient fans [229] with

power ratings between 2-30 W [230], [231]. Energy Star rated fans generally have power

consumption range of 20-100 W with an average of 65 W [232]. Therefore, the parametric analysis

uses a value of USD 400/unit and a default fan energy use of 25 W.

An ultra-energy efficient fan with 2 W electricity use is also included in the simulations to

demonstrate the impact of fan efficiency in the performance of the PCMs. When on, the fan motors

generate heat with a sensible radiant fraction of 0.7. Overall, the baseline home has the natural

convection model (TARP) and no fans operating. The forced convection cases use the custom

model described above, in which a natural convection model is used when the fans are off and a

forced convection model is used when the fans are on; it also takes into account the thermal load

added by the fan and motor electricity consumption.

45

5.2. Results and Discussion

Parametric analysis results

In total, more than 20,000 simulated homes are simulated in the parametric analysis and

included in Figure 5-6. Close evaluation of Figure 5-6 indicates that sections with higher

annualized energy related costs are formed due to the high percentage of PCMs included in the

drywall. Since higher cost cases are undesirable for further evaluation, the next step of the

parametric study only includes the 0 kJ/kg and 23 kJ/kg PCM drywall configurations and Figure

5-7 shows the values from this step Figure 5-7 shows the output from a subset of the total

parametric results. Each point represents a simulated home with a combination of PCM properties.

The y-axis shows the Annualized Energy Related Costs (AERC). The x-axis shows Average

Source Energy Savings (ASES) considering default energy conversions from BEopt to compare

site electric and gas savings [203]. Appendix 3 explains the costing procedure in detail.

Interestingly, there are three main clusters and two points that stand apart. The two points

away from the clusters are (i) the reference case with no PCMs and no precooling and (ii) the case

with precooling only and no PCM inclusions. The reference corresponds to the maximum AERC,

while the case with precooling only has the highest energy use (lowest ASES).

Figure 5-6 BEopt parametric results, where each point represents a simulated home with a different combination of PCM properties and locations. The point close to the upper right corner and in red color represents the home with no PCM or pre-cooling. Point closest to the lower left

corner in black color represents a home with precooling but no PCMs.

46

Figure 5-7 BEopt parametric results for the cases with lowest energy related costs, where each point represents a simulated home with a different combination of PCM properties and locations.

The point close to the upper right corner represents the home with no PCM.

In all cases, precooling decreases energy costs, but increases energy use (negative energy

savings) as also shown in the literature [213]. The clustering of other points relates to the location

of PCMs and the latent heat. Cases with 60% and 40% PCM inclusion still show high cost, thus

are not shown in Figure 5-7. The lower cost points indicated above have a 20% PCM inclusion

corresponding to an effective latent heat of 23 kJ/kg. PCMs included in the ceiling-only cases have

a higher energy penalty and lower AERC. PCMs installed in all three locations (ceilings, exterior

walls, interior walls) tend to have lower energy penalties but higher annualized energy related

costs due to the greater quantity of PCMs in use (higher initial costs).

For each of these option classes (PCMs in all three locations, PCMs in two locations, PCMs

in ceilings only), there is a case with the lowest annualized energy cost. For further analysis, these

optimum points are considered in greater detail. Table 5-5 shows the optimal PCM properties for

each case as indicated also in Figure 5-8, where the rest of the simulated homes are removed. One

interest in this study is to look further than annualized energy related costs and investigate the

cooling related costs.

47

The five selected cases are:

Baseline: Includes no precooling and no PCMs

Precooling, no PCMs: Includes five-hour precooling strategy indicated in Figure 5-4 and

no PCMs

Precooling, PCMs in ceilings only: Includes five-hour precooling strategy indicated in

Figure 5-4 and PCMs only in the ceilings

Precooling, different PCMs: Includes five-hour precooling strategy indicated in Figure 5-4

and the most optimal PCMs of any properties in all three locations (exterior walls, internal

walls, and ceilings)

Precooling, same PCM: Includes five-hour precooling strategy indicated in Figure 5-4 and

a same type of PCM of one set of properties in all three locations (exterior walls, internal

walls, and ceilings)

Figure 5-8 Selection of optimum points for each PCM location and envelope condition: PCMs in all three locations (3 Different PCMs optimized), single/same type of PCMs in three locations (A single PCM) and PCMs only in the ceiling (PCMs in ceiling only). Each of these points are the

lowest annualized energy related cost (AERC) points for each category above.

Table 5-5 shows the optimal PCM properties for each location selected from the parametric

analysis. The same PCM types are observed as the optimum (lowest energy costs) under the two

convection models. In all cases, the parametric study output selections show the lowest latent heat

48

(23 kJ/kg) to minimize the costs. This is mainly due to the ability to fully utilize the latent heat

during the pre-cooling time interval.

Table 5-5 Optimal PCM properties for each location of application: Ceiling, external wall, partition wall

Ceiling Melting temperature (ยบC)

Melting temperature range(ยบC)

Latent Heat(kJ/kg)

Ceiling 24.4 1.11 23

External Wall 25.5 1.11 23

Partition wall 22.2 5.55 23

Hourly Results

โ€ข Indoor Air Temperature

Figure 5-9 and Figure 5-10 show hourly temperature values for the exterior wall inside

surface, ceiling inside surface, and indoor air temperature for the entire year with forced and

natural convection, respectively. The PCM application depicted here is the case which has the most

optimal PCMs of any properties in all three locations.

Figure 5-9 Annual variation of temperatures for the forced convection mode for PCMs optimized for all locations. 0 indicates the start of the month January and the time is shown for the calendar

year of 12 months.

49

The cream-colored region represents the melting region of the PCM included in the ceiling

and external walls selected as one of the optimal properties obtained from the parametric analysis.

In all cases with forced convection, the inside surface and indoor air temperatures oscillate less

and remain closer to the PCM melting range during the May-October period. All else being equal,

the same case with the natural convection model shows significantly higher fluctuations of ceiling

inside surface and exterior wall inside surface temperatures. This is an indication that the PCM is

experiencing a more complete phase change with the forced convection model.

Figure 5-10 Annual variation of temperatures for the natural convection mode for PCMs optimized for all locations. X-axis represent the months of the year. 0 indicates the start of the

month January and the time is shown for the calendar year of 12 months.

Figure 5-11 and Figure 5-12 focus on two arbitrary, typical summer days (July 21st and

22nd), showing the indoor air temperature for all the analyzed cases with forced and natural

convection and a setback temperature (Tr) of 25.6 ยบC during the peak hours. All cases with natural

convection show the room air temperature rapidly reaching the setback set point as the PCMs do

not store enough energy to meet the cooling demand during on-peak hours.

In contrast, all cases with PCM inclusions with forced convection show reduced indoor air

temperature fluctuations, and the time required for the temperature to reach the setback

temperature is delayed. This indicates that enhancing the convective heat transfer increases the

50

rate of heat exchange between the indoor air and the PCMs, thus effectively storing and releasing

more thermal energy.

Figure 5-11 Average indoor air temperature within the living zone for forced convection model for all envelope types. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day.

Figure 5-12 Average indoor air temperature for the natural convection model for all envelope types. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day.

51

โ€ข Setpoint Setback (Tr)

Set point setback, or relaxation temperature, plays a role in reducing on-peak energy use.

Figure 5-13 shows hourly results for indoor air temperature with three different setbacksโ€”24.4

หšC, 25.5 หšC, and 26.7 หšCโ€”for the precooling only case. Figure 5-14 shows same setback

temperatures used when PCMs are optimized for each location. When the temperature is relaxed

to 24.4 หšC all homes (even with PCMs) require additional cooling.

However, if the set point is increased to 25.5 หšC the homes with PCMs optimized for each

location can last the entire three-hour peak period without any cooling. This increase of relaxation

temperature is acceptable assuming the ceiling fans will improve air motion, thus increasing the

temperature range which is expected to be reasonably comfortable for the occupants.

Figure 5-13 Average indoor air temperature for homes with pre-cooling only and forced convection mode, and three setback temperatures (Tr): 24.4, 25.5 and 26.7หšC. Hour 0 represents

midnight of the first day.

52

Figure 5-14 Averaged indoor air temperature for homes with PCMs optimized in each location, with forced convection mode, three setback temperatures (Tr): 24.4, 25.5 and 26.7หšC. Indoor air

temperature for Tr: 25.5 หšC and 26.7 หšC perform the same. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day.

โ€ข Average Drywall Temperature

The average drywall temperature is the average temperature of the two nodes that

discretized the drywall at the interior living zone surface. Average drywall temperature analysis in

this subsection is done for ceiling, external wall or partition wall. Figure 5-15 shows the average

PCM-drywall temperature in an external wall for the case with PCMs included and optimized for

all three locations (PCM optimized case), forced convection, and with the same three setback

temperatures.

Although a setback of 24.4 ยบC shows a closer fit to the PCM melting temperature range, it

requires cooling during the peak time for all three PCM inclusion cases. Therefore, our analysis

focuses on the setback temperature of 25.6 ยบC and the results below are presented relative to the

selected setpoint. Setback temperatures 25.6 ยบC (black line) and 26.7 ยบC perform the same.

Therefore, further increase of the setback temperature would not affect the temperature variation.

53

Figure 5-15 Averaged PCM-drywall temperature in external wall for homes with PCMs optimized in each location, with forced convection mode, three setback temperatures (Tr): 24.4, 25.56 and 26.67หšC. Average drywall temperature (at ceiling) for Tr: 25.5 หšC and 26.7 หšC. Hour 0

represents midnight of the first day.

Figure 5-16 shows the average PCM-drywall temperature in the external wall for the PCMs

optimized in all locations with either natural or forced convection. The house with forced

convection can freeze the PCMs during the precooling period and almost melt the PCMs during

the setback period. In contrast, the house with natural convection does not freeze/melt the PCMs

during the precooling/setback periods, while suffering from higher temperature variations.

`

Figure 5-16 Averaged PCM-drywall temperature in the external wall for the PCM optimized and installed in all drywall (PCM optimized) case: A comparison between the forced convection

model and natural convection models.

54

Figure 5-17 shows the average PCM-drywall temperature in the external wall for the case

with optimized PCMs in all three locations (Table 5-5). Furthermore, all cases use the fan/forced

convection model. The wall with lowest temperature oscillations has optimal PCM with forced

convection. This indicates the positive effect of PCMs being optimized for each location in the

envelope.

Figure 5-17 Average drywall temperature of the exterior wall under forced convection (FC) and natural convection (NC) model for, PCM optimized and installed in all drywall (PCM optimized

case) and regular drywall (No PCM case). Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day.

Figure 5-18 shows the average PCM-drywall temperature in the ceiling for case with PCMs

installed only on the ceiling with the forced convection and natural convection models. As with

Figure 5-17, the lowest temperature fluctuation is observed for the case with PCM and forced

convection.

Figure 5-18 Average drywall temperature of the ceiling under forced convection (FC) and natural convection (NC) models for, PCM optimized and installed in all drywall (PCM optimized

case) and regular drywall (No PCM case). Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day.

55

โ€ข Heat Transfer across the Building Envelope

Figure 5-19 shows heat fluxes at the ceiling surface for the two cases: (i) with PCMs in the

ceiling only and (ii) with precooling and no PCMs. These cases are assessed for both natural

convection and forced convection modes. Negative values indicate heat flux leaving the ceiling to

the indoor air (freezing the PCM) and positive values indicate heat flux going from the indoor air

into the ceiling (melting the PCM).

Figure 5-19 Heat gain rates per unit area of the ceiling drywall for forced and natural convection models for cases: (i) No-PCM and precooling only (ii) PCMs included in the ceiling only. Hour

0 represents midnight of the first day.

Implementing forced convection increases heat transfer by at least 40% during the

precooling period and even higher in the setback period. The case with PCMs and forced

convection has significant positive heat flux during on-peak hours. This indicates that the PCM

melts during the peak time by absorbing heat within the living zone, which keeps the living zone

temperature at or below the setback temperature.

โ€ข Energy and Cost Savings

Cooling energy consumption shifted away from peak hours drives the cooling electricity

cost savings. Therefore, Figure 5-20 and Figure 5-21 show cooling power consumption for all

analyzed cases in one day, July 22 with natural and forced convection. The baseline home without

precooling and no PCMs consumes the largest amount of electric energy during the peak time.

56

Figure 5-21 also shows that cooling energy is not zero during on-peak hours since the fans still

operate during this period.

Figure 5-20 Cooling electricity power consumption variations for all cases with the forced convection model for July 22. Hour 0 represents midnight of the first day.

Figure 5-21 Cooling electricity power consumption for all analyzed cases with the natural convection mode for July 22.

Figure 5-22 and Figure 5-23 show hourly cooling electricity cost variation during a day for

all cases with forced and natural convection. As observed from previous figures, the baseline house

uses the highest energy during the peak time, thus having higher energy costs. All cases with PCMs

57

and forced convection have the lowest energy cost, and only the case with PCMs optimized for all

locations fully shifts cooling electric energy (not considering fan motor electricity) out of the peak

time when the setback is at 25.6 ยบC.

Figure 5-22 Cost variations through the day when TOU rates are applied during the peak time for July 22 for all analyzed cases and with the forced convection.

Figure 5-23 Cost variations through the day when TOU rates are applied during the peak time for July 22 for all analyzed cases and with the natural convection.

58

Seasonal Cooling Electricity Consumption and Cost

Figure 5-24 and Figure 5-25 show the aggregated cooling electricity consumption over the

cooling season (May-October). Note that these graphs show only energy use above 4600 kWh to

highlight the differences between cases. All cases with precooling have an energy penalty of about

4% or 6.0% when forced convection is present.

Figure 5-24 Aggregated cooling and ventilation related electricity consumption in the precooling months (May-Oct), assuming the fan power is 25W for each fan.

This is an expected result as additional electricity is used to precool the home as well as to

operate ceiling fans in the forced convection cases. Interestingly, when precooling is used with

forced convection but without PCMs, the energy penalty is the highest. Therefore, PCMs improve

the performance of precooling.

Figure 5-25 Aggregated cooling and ventilation related electricity consumption in the precooling months (May-Oct), assuming the fan power is 2 W for each fan.

59

Besides comfort, energy cost saving is also an important factor to consider. The maximum

cost savings possible with any energy storage system (with regards to peak electric costs) is

calculated by assuming all energy use during on-peak hours is shifted without energy penalties.

These results assume three hours of peak cooling energy are evenly shifted to the rest of the day

resulting in the maximum cooling energy cost savings of USD 190, or a reduction of 39.5%. This

defines the upper limit of savings for the current study. All cases analyzed in this study have energy

cost savings that range from 21.9% to 29.4%.

Figure 5-26 shows the aggregated energy costs for the May-October period for all five

envelope conditions with natural and forced convection assuming the fan energy use is 25 W. Fan

energy use increases the cooling electricity energy cost by 2-5%. The aggregated costs are higher

for each case than with natural convection. Hence, the fan power and efficiency plays a role in

determining the cost effectiveness of the proposed system.

Figure 5-26 Seasonal cooling electricity energy cost for May-Oct period for each analyzed case with natural and forced convection assuming the fan power is 25W for each fan.

Figure 5-27 shows the same case assuming four fans with a rated energy use of 2 W. Due

to the high efficient fans, differences in energy use between forced and natural convection are

minimal. Hence, the fan power and efficiency plays a role in determining the cost effectiveness of

the proposed system.

60

Figure 5-27 Seasonal cooling electricity energy cost for May-Oct period for each analyzed case with natural and forced convection assuming the fan power is 2W for each fan.

5.3. Conclusions

This study uses parametric analysis to study and optimizes PCM properties and location

for a new home in Phoenix with time-of-use electric rates and two different interior convection

modes. Annual building energy simulations are conducted using EnergyPlus and BEopt with an

emphasis on summer precooling to evaluate the thermal behaviors, energy consumption patterns,

and cost savings. The selection of the right PCM properties, PCM location, and proper convection

mode is important to achieve the optimal PCM performance in different locations in the building

envelope. Therefore, forced convection and a natural convection models are used in the current

study.

Based on the analyzed home and climatic region, this study shows forced convection

improves the heat transfer between the walls and indoor air, keeping the living zones cooler and

with less temperature fluctuations during the precooling stage and the peak time, although there is

an energy penalty associated with precooling. However, shifting the electricity consumption from

the peak time through precooling causes a prominent reduction of cooling electricity costs. When

the PCMs are used in the envelope, the costs are reduced and with the use of forced convection

mode this improves further based on the fan efficiency. The highest cost savings are observed

when the PCMs are optimized for all locations under the forced convection mode using high-

efficiency fans; the maximum cost savings observed are 29.4%. Other scenarios yield around 25%

61

savings. Under these conditions, cooling-related energy can be shifted up to 99.98% for a design

day. These potential savings, along with the increased thermal comfort while precooling, will be

beneficial to the homeowner and provide relief to the electric grid during peak hours. The results

in this section sets-up important inputs for the work described in the next 2 chapters.

62

CHAPTER 6

NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER MODEL FOR OPAQUE WALLS AND DESCRIPTION

OF LABORATORY FACILITY FOR EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS

This section contributes to the fulfillment of the following objectives of this research: (ii)

develop a numerical model which utilizes effective numerical techniques to solve a building

envelope assembly with PCM inclusions and (iii) design and build experimental apparatus and a

suitable controlled environment to test different PCMs. Verification and validation (V&V) are

important steps in any model development to ensure desired and accurate performance [233].

ASHRAE standard 140 defines three main approaches for V&V: (1) analytical verification, (2)

empirical validation and (3) comparative testing [234]. There have been attempts to verify and

validate numerical building envelope models, Appendix E summarizes studies in recent literature

and their key findings. This research conducts a full validation study of a building envelope model

with the ability to model PCMs. Figure 6-1 shows a flow chart of the verification and validation

studies conducted in this study. It conducts analytical verification, numerical comparison, and

finally empirical validation using data from laboratory experiments, field-experiments, and

experimental tests conducted in-house controlled environmental chamber.

Figure 6-1 Structure of the full validation study includes analytical verification, comparative testing, and empirical validation.

63

This research uses MATLAB as its numerical modeling language to build a heat transfer

algorithm for building walls. MATLAB has been used for building modeling in several prior

studies [235-238]. MATLAB has also been the modeling platform for other parallel published

work in the research group of the author [239]. Analytical verification and the comparative testing

of this algorithm is discussed in this chapter. Empirical validation of the algorithm is discussed in

chapter 7 and 8.

6.1. 1D heat transfer algorithm to model building walls with PCM

The developed mathematical algorithm is a finite difference numerical model inspired by

the EnergyPlus Conduction Finite Difference (CondFD) model that can simulate PCMs [103]. The

numerical solution uses Gauss-Seidel scheme as its solver. The discretized 1D heat transfer

equation is shown in equation 6-1.

๐ถ๐‘ƒ โˆ— ๐œŒ โˆ— ๐›ฅ๐‘ฅ ๐‘‡๐‘–๐‘—+1 โˆ’ ๐‘‡๐‘–๐‘—๐›ฅ๐‘ก = ๐‘˜๐‘Š โˆ— (๐‘‡๐‘–+1๐‘—+1 โˆ’ ๐‘‡๐‘–๐‘—+1)๐›ฅ๐‘ฅ + ๐‘˜๐ธ โˆ— (๐‘‡๐‘–โˆ’1๐‘—+1 โˆ’ ๐‘‡๐‘–๐‘—+1)๐›ฅ๐‘ฅ (6-1)

Where, ๐‘‡๐‘—+1 ๐‘– = Temperature of node i being modeled at new time step (๐‘— + 1) ๐‘‡๐‘—๐‘– = Temperature of node i being modeled at previous time step ๐‘— ๐‘‡๐‘–+1 = Temperature of adjacent node (๐‘– + 1)to interior of construction ๐‘‡ ๐‘–โˆ’1 = Temperature of adjacent node (๐‘– โˆ’ 1) ๐›ฅ๐‘ก = Timestep ๐›ฅ๐‘ฅ = Finite difference space discretization ๐ถ๐‘ = Specific heat of material ๐œŒ = Density of material ๐‘˜๐‘–๐‘—+1 = Thermal conductivity of node I being modelled at new time step ๐‘— + 1

Equation 6.1 is defined for four different node types,

i. Exterior surface node exposed to the outdoor conditions (half-node)

ii. Internal nodes within same layer/material

iii. Interface nodes at the interface between two different layers/materials (half-node)

64

iv. Interior surface node exposed to the interior conditions (half-node)

Nodes (i) and (iv) considers the convection and radiation heat transfer while node type (iii)

uses averages thermo-physical properties conductivity, specific heat, and density from materials

either side of the node and calculates the node temperature. Therefore, these nodes are modeled as

half-nodes. The algorithm then solves the equations at each node while iterating through each

material layer of the wall. The structure of interface nodes and interior nodes are shown in Figure

6-2. Uniform mesh size is used for each layer in the algorithm. x1, x2, x3 are three interior nodes of

the current layer and ฮ”x is the space discretization based on the equation 6-2. ฮ”t is the time

discretization.

Figure 6-2 Structure of interior and interface nodes, space and time discretization of the 1D algorithm.

Figure 6-3 is a flow chart of the functions contributing to the main function of the thesis

algorithm: (i) material properties and PCMs recognition function includes the logical flow of

reading the material and PCM properties and defining the discretization used in the finite

difference algorithm. Furthermore, this function reads the PCM enthalpy curve data inputs and

defines the enthalpy function that includes the PCM properties in the building envelope simulation;

(ii) weather information and temporal information function reads the TMY3 weather file and

calculates the external convection and radiation heat-fluxes. It also assists running the model for

65

the defined number of time steps or the time period of the year. If the boundaries are defined by

the boundary temperature for validation purposes, the exterior and interior node temperatures are

read from files through this module; (iii) coefficient function calculates the convection and

radiation heat transfer coefficients. Main function houses the finite difference algorithm described

above.

Figure 6-3 Structure of the functions in the numerical envelope model.

Exterior surface node interacts with the outside air by convection the sky and sun by

radiation heat transfer. Similarly, the interior surface node interacts with the inside air and the

radiation effects from within the zone. For the verification purposes, the developed (thesis)

algorithm, uses the convection and radiation models from EnergyPlus as shown in Table 6-1.

Table 6-1 Definitions of the exterior heat transfer for the numerical verification study using the thesis algorithm

Boundary Mechanism Model

Exterior Convection DOE-2 [240, 241]

Longwave Radiation EnergyPlus documentation [242]

Shortwave radiation EnergyPlus documentation [243, 244]

Interior Convection TARP model [245]

Longwave Radiation EnergyPlus documentation [243]

Shortwave radiation EnergyPlus documentation [243]

66

6.2. Modeling of PCM inclusions in the thesis model

When the thesis algorithm identifies the material layer and the thermos-physical properties,

the space discretization for each layer is calculated using equation 6.2. Space discretization is a

function of the thermal diffusivity of the material (๐›ผ), a space discretization constant (๐‘), and the

time step (ฮ”๐‘ก). The user inputs the space discretization constant, with a default value of 1. This is

the same as the inverse of Fourier number (F0). The time step used in all simulations using the

algorithm is 1 minute. Thesis model uses fully implicit time integration scheme that is

unconditionally stable and does not have a stability criterion.

Therefore, the Fourier number is defined arbitrarily. The variable c is the inverse of the

grid Fourier number. Cases c=0.5, 1, 2, were investigated to find changes in results less than 0.1%.

Therefore, a grid Fourier number (F0) of 1 used in this thesis. After calculating the ฮ”x, the number

of nodes for each layer was calculated by dividing the layer thickness by ฮ”x and rounding up the

resultant value. The thickness of the layer is then divided again with this rounded up number of

nodes to find the final ฮ”x used in the algorithm. The timestep and special discretization

considerations of 1D heat transfer in opaque building walls with PCMs are further discussed in

detail by Tabares-Velasco and Griffith [233] and taken into consideration in the simulations used

in the chapter 7 and chapter 8.

๐›ฅ๐‘ฅ = โˆš๐‘๐›ผ ๐›ฅ๐‘ก = โˆš๐›ผ๐›ฅ๐‘ก๐น๐‘œ (6-2)

PCMs are included in the finite difference approach by coupling it with a single enthalpy-

temperature โ„Ž(๐‘‡) function (equation 6-3) and is used to calculate an equivalent specific heat ๐ถ๐‘โˆ—(๐‘‡) at each time step (equation 6-4). This enthalpy function accounts for both the latent heat and the

sensible heat. Enthalpy curve is defined by using the total enthalpy and the melting/ freezing

temperature range.

โ„Ž = โ„Ž(๐‘‡) (6-3)

67

๐ถ๐‘โˆ—(๐‘‡) = โ„Ž๐‘–๐‘— โˆ’ โ„Ž๐‘–๐‘—โˆ’1๐‘‡๐‘–๐‘— โˆ’ ๐‘‡๐‘–๐‘—โˆ’1 (6-4)

For the simulation of PCMs, this algorithm uses the enthalpy method implemented with a

fixed uniform grid. Furthermore, finite difference discretization technique is implicitly solved

using fully implicit method.

Modeling hysteresis in the thesis model

The thesis model does not simulate the subcooling characteristics discussed in the chapter

2 (section 2.3.3). It simulates the real and apparent hysteresis when two curve data is available.

The simplification methods used in modelling enthalpy curves is discussed in this section. The

thesis algorithm has a built in function to recognize the PCM included layer. Once the PCM layer

is recognized the algorithm needs effective heat capacity and conductivity values to dynamically

implement at each time step through the phase change temperature range.

Figure 6-4 shows all available PCM curves for the InfiniteRTM hydrate-salt PCM with

nominal melting temperature of 23 ยบC based on the commercial rating by the manufacturer. The

manufacturer has provided PCM characteristics data and has only the melting curve. This is shown

in black color. The hysteresis curves were provided for this PCM by Dr. Kaushik Biswas from the

Oak Ridge National Laboratory who used DHFMA tests. There are two distinct curves in this data

for melting and freezing and shown in yellow and blue.

The circles in the curves represent discrete data points provided. Note that within the

temperature range the phase change occurs the data is recorded every 1 ยบC and outside this range

the points temperature is recorded are more relaxed. The frequency of reporting data is determined

by the researcher who conducts the characterization study. The curves are drawn linking these data

points. The peak melting/ freezing temperature for each curve is suggested by the

manufacturer/researchers who provided the data. Based on this information further approximations

are made to obtain the enthalpy data to include in the algorithms.

68

Figure 6-4 Manufacturer provided melting curve data and melting and freezing curves obtained from the Dynamic Heat Flux Meter Apparatus (DHFMA) method for the hydrate-salts PCM of

InfiniteRTM (Nominal melting temperature =23 ยบC).

To include latent heat and the sensible heat in the algorithm the temperature enthalpy

curves are approximated with straight lines. The lower and higher limits of phase change are

determined by the author by observing the graph. This may lead to some inaccuracies and should

be taken into account. These approximations assist to include enthalpy data of the PCMs to the

different PCM modelling algorithms investigated in this research such as; (i) melting temperature

range of the PCM (ii) freezing temperature range (iii) peak melting temperature, (iv) peak freezing

temperature (v) latent heat during the phase change (vi) sensible heat during the phase change.

Approximated melting curve for the PCM hydrate-salts for the DSC data is shown in the

Figure 6-5. The peak melting temperature is 23 ยบC. Lower bound of melting temperature range is

20 ยบC, and upper bound of melting temperature range is 25 ยบC. Latent heat of melting is ~190

kJ/kg. Sensible heat of melting is ~15 kJ/kg.

69

Figure 6-5 Approximated melting curve for the PCM hydrate-salts from DSC data.

Approximated melting curve for the PCM hydrate-salts for the DHFMA data is shown in

the Figure 6-6. The peak melting temperature is 26 ยบC. Lower bound of melting temperature range

is 20 ยบC, and upper bound of melting temperature range is 28 ยบC. Latent heat of melting is ~150

kJ/kg. Sensible heat of melting is ~24 kJ/kg.

Figure 6-6 Approximated melting curve for the PCM hydrate-salts from DHFMA data.

70

Approximated freezing curve for the PCM hydrate-salts for the DHFMA data is shown in

the Figure 6-7. The peak freezing temperature is 25 ยบC. Lower bound of freezing temperature range

is 18 ยบC, and upper bound of freezing temperature range is 26 ยบC. Latent heat of freezing is ~150

kJ/kg. Sensible heat of freezing is ~24 kJ/kg.

Figure 6-7 Approximated freezing curve for the PCM hydrate-salts from DHFMA data.

The summary of the phase change characterization data approximated by the simplified

curves to implement in the PCM modeling algorithms are shown in the Table 6-2.

Table 6-2 Phase change characterization data approximated by the simplified curves to implement in the PCM modeling algorithms

Curve Peak phase change temperature (ยบC)

Phase change temperature range(ยบC)

Latent heat

(kJ/kg)

Sensible heat

(kJ/kg)

Melting (DSC) 23 5 190 15

Melting (DHFMA) 26 8 150 24

Freezing (DHFMA) 25 8 150 24

71

The approximated curve data is used for the PCM simulations of heat transfer across

building envelopes modeled in this research in chapter 7 and chapter 8. To include the hysteresis

characteristics observed in the PCMs the melting and freezing status should be recognized in the

algorithm. A variable is defined (a marker) which can have โ€˜0โ€™or โ€˜1โ€™ discrete values based on the

freezing or melting curve applies in relevant cycle. If the marker values is โ€˜1โ€™ the melting curve

data is considered. If the marker is โ€˜0โ€™ freezing curve data is considered.

6.3. PCM modeling objects in building energy modeling software

Verification and validation studies in this research uses several building energy modeling

software with PCM computational models. This section describes how the PCM characteristics

and thermo-physical properties are included in these modules.

EnergyPlus PCM modules

EnergyPlus has two PCM numerical models. The original PCM model which is still

available in the platform uses the above mentioned enthalpy function method where enthalpy-

temperature data is input for discrete points within the melting temperature range. This is shown

in the Figure 6-8. Temperature Coefficient for Thermal Conductivity is 0. Corresponding enthalpy

(Enthalpy 1, 2โ€ฆ) value for a selected temperature (Temperature 1, 2โ€ฆ) value of the curve is

entered in the table 16 discrete entries can be used in this module. If the enthalpy change in the

melting/ freezing temperature range is simplified with a straight line the curve can be defined with

4 points.

Figure 6-8 EnergyPlus original PCM model data input interface.

72

A recent update of the software includes a PCM model which can simulate hysteresis

effects of the PCMs. This new module addresses the asymmetry observed in the PCM melting

and solidifying and therefore, introduces separate data entries to define melting and freezing

processes. This is reflected in the data inputs required for the melting curve and the freezing curve

as indicated in Figure 6-9. The liquid and solid state thermo-physical properties are input

separately. The latent heat and specific heat are separately input. Low and high temperature

differences based on the phase change temperature interval and peak phase change temperatures

discussed in the section 6.2.1 are used as inputs for this module.

Figure 6-9 EnergyPlus Hysteresis PCM model data input interface to define PCM properties for melting and freezing curves separately.

WUFI PCM module

Verification and validation studies also consider the techniques used in WUFI

hygrothermal numerical modeling software discussed in the chapter 3. The interface of

hygrothermal functions object in WUFI to input PCM characteristics and thermo-physical data is

shown in Figure 6-10. The enthalpy function is defined same as in original PCM model discussed

above in section 6.3.1. This interface facilitates the input of the enthalpy curve data using the

hygrothermal functions object. The enthalpy-temperature data is input in the yellow shaded area.

73

Figure 6-10 WUFI PCM model data input interface indicating the enthalpy curve input.

6.4. Numerical PCM building envelope model verification

This section uses analytical and numerical solvers to verify the numerical envelop model.

These steps assure that the model: (i) is able to solve analytical problems correctly, (ii) is able to

solve simple tests that allow to identify potential bugs in the code and (iii) is stable.

Analytical Verification

Analytical verification is conducted a PCM included envelope. For this the study assumes

a single layer of material. This method that considers a front tracking method is considered only

for the verification purposes of the thesis model.

Analysis of PCM envelope using Stefan problem:

The Stefan problem introduced in the analytical models in chapter 3 is used for the

analytical verification. using the following assumptions: [82].

1. Heat is stored only as latent heat. The sensible heat stored is negligible compared to the

phase change enthalpy and therefore only latent heat at the phase change temperature is

considered in heat transfer.

2. Heat transfer is only by conduction (no convection). Then, the temperature profiles are

linear and the heat flux is proportional to the temperature gradient.

74

3. At the beginning, at t = 0, the PCM is liquid and its temperature is the phase change

temperature Tm [246].

4. Temperature at x = 0 is changed to T0= 0 and kept constant at that level for the simulation

time.

Equation 6-5 describes the analytical solution for the 1D heat equation [247]. The author

defines a parameter M to determine the position of the phase change front. Each elements of the

equation 6-5 is described below.

๐œ†๐‘–๐‘“๐‘” ๐‘๐‘–0.5๐ถ๐‘๐‘ ๐‘‡๐‘š = exp (โˆ’๐œ†2)๐ธ๐‘Ÿ๐‘“(๐œ†) โˆ’ ๐‘˜๐‘™โˆš๐›ผ๐‘ (๐‘‡๐‘‚ โˆ’ ๐‘‡๐‘š)exp (โˆ’๐œ†2 ๐›ผ๐‘ ๐›ผ๐‘™) ๐‘˜๐‘ โˆš๐›ผ๐‘™๐‘‡๐‘š๐ธ๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘ (๐œ†(๐›ผ๐‘ ๐›ผ๐‘™)0.5) (6-5)

๐›ผ๐‘  = thermal diffusivity of the solid ๐›ผ๐‘™ = thermal diffusivity of the solid ๐‘˜๐‘  = thermal conductivity of the solid ๐‘˜๐‘™ = thermal conductivity of the liquid ๐‘‡๐‘š = melting temperature of the PCM ๐‘‡๐‘‚ = initial homogenous temperature across the layer ๐œ† = the root of the transcendental equation ๐‘–๐‘“๐‘” = latent heat ๐‘ก = time ๐ถ๐‘๐‘  = specific heat of the solid phase Here, the Stefan Number (St) is defined in equation 6-6. The position of the phase change

front at time t is described in equation 6-7.

๐‘†๐‘ก = ๐‘๐‘(๐‘‡๐‘œ โˆ’ ๐‘‡๐‘š)๐‘–๐‘“๐‘” (6-6)

๐‘€(๐‘ก) = 2๐œ†โˆš๐›ผ๐‘™๐‘ก (6-7)

75

Based on the value of M, ๐‘‡๐‘  and ๐‘‡๐‘™ relationships can be defined for each x location. The

equation 6.8 and equation 6.9 define the temperature distribution. Ts is the solid state temperature

and Tl is the liquid state temperature.

๐‘‡๐‘  = ๐‘‡๐‘š๐ธ๐‘Ÿ๐‘“(๐œ†) ๐‘ฅ2(๐›ผ๐‘ ๐‘ก)0.5 (6-8)

๐‘‡๐‘™ = ๐‘‡๐‘œ โˆ’ ๐‘‡๐‘š๐ธ๐‘Ÿ๐‘“๐‘ (๐œ†)(๐›ผ๐‘ ๐›ผ๐‘™)0.5 ๐ธ๐‘Ÿ๐‘“ ๐‘ ( ๐‘ฅ2โˆš๐›ผ๐‘™๐‘ก) (6-9)

Table 6-3 shows the initial conditions used in this study. Initial homogenous temperature

across the layer is the initial temperature across the entire material layer.

Table 6-3 Thermal conditions used in the analytical verification cases Condition Value

Initial homogenous temperature across the layer (๐‘‡0) 50 ยบC

Exterior surface temperature 0 ยบC

Tm 29.5 ยบC

ฮ”Tpc 0ยบC

Table 6-4 describes the inputs to the thesis model and EnergyPlus models to create the

same problem in each platform. A single material layer is considered for the thesis model. For

EnergyPlus a zone with one wall was used. The walls were initially at a homogenous temperature

of 50 ยฐC and had a melting temperature range of 29.4โ€“29.6 ยฐC (this approximates the fixed melting

temperature assumption in the Stefan Problem.). A semi-infinite wall was simulated by a thick

wall in both software.

For EnergyPlus, the โ€œOtherSideCoefficientโ€ feature; the indoor air temperature was set to

the desired temperature and the inside convective heat coefficient was set to 1000 W/m2-หšC to

assign the temperature to the boundary node. Same was done for the thesis model. These

76

techniques are discussed in a study that discusses diagnostic test cases to verify heat transfer

algorithms in building energy simulation programs [233].

Table 6-4 Material properties for the analytical verification with PCM (inspired by [246]) Property Units PCM inclusion 1

Material /Equivalent Application - PCM-drywall

Thermal Conductivity kl and ks W/m-หšC 0.23

Specific Heat Capacity (Cpl and Cps) J/kg- หšC 1400

Density kg/m3 1000

Evaluated thickness m 0.020

Simulated thickness (semi-infinite consideration) m 0.3

% PCM in the layer - 30%

Equivalent Latent heat in the layer based on the above f. Kg/kg 33 ๐›ฅ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ๐ถ(To approximate the Stefan problem) ยบC 0.2

Same material properties, boundary and initial conditions indicated here are applied in the

thesis model for the verification purposes. For each PCM inclusion cases,

1. Distributed PCM in drywall represents a 0.02 m layer. A 0.3 m layer is evaluated to meet

the semi-infinite condition was implemented in the analytical solution. Therefore, the first

0.02m is considered when comparing results to best represent the PCM enhanced thickness.

Results of the Analysis of PCM envelope using Stefan problem:

Figure 6-11 shows the temperature distribution along the cross section of the material layer

for the PCM drywall which also demonstrates the position of the phase change front. Shaded darker

is the solidified region and the lighter shade is the liquid region. The first ~ 0.02m distance from

the left edge is evaluated. This figure shows a snapshot where the melting front is at x=0.107 m

and after and evaluation time of 24h.

77

Figure 6-11 Cross section temperature variation of the semi-infinite material layer after 24h period for the PCM drywall case.

Figure 6-12 compares the thesis model results with the Stefan Problem solution and

showcases the transient temperature of the sixth node into the material layer to represent 0.02 m

length. Results from the same problem simulated in EnergyPlus platform is also included here.

The two simulations of EnergyPlus and thesis model behaves the same in graphical comparison

and RMSE values show agreement for both.

Figure 6-12 Transient temperature variation at a location 0.021m in the material layer for (i) Analytical solution (ii) thesis model, and (iii) EnergyPlus solutions (๐›ฅ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ๐ถ of 0.2 ยบC is

implemented in the numerical solutions).

78

Figure 6-13 compares the transient heat flux at the exterior surface. Results from the same

problem simulated in EnergyPlus platform is also included here.

Figure 6-13 Heat flux at the exterior surface of the PCM layer.

After the analytical verification, the author conducts the numerical verification of the thesis

model.

Numerical Verification

This section discusses the verification of the numerical algorithm with EnergyPlus version

8.4. A series of diagnostic test cases for verification of conductive heat transfer algorithms and

boundary conditions in building energy simulation programs are introduced in ASHRAE 1052-RP

[248] and used for EnergyPlus model verification in [233] [246].

First, a multilayer assembly with the same properties as in the exterior wall described in

the chapter 6 is verified using the diagnostic test cases. The multilayer tests help verify the behavior

of the intermediate nodes of the layers and response from materials with different properties. The

layer properties are listed in the Table 6-5.

79

Table 6-5 Material properties for the numerical verification with PCM

Property Units Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3

a. Material - Plywood Stud and

Cavity

Gypsum

b. Thermal

Conductivity

W/m-หšC 0.115 0.054 0.1603

c. Density Kg/m^3 512.64 162.40 801

d. Specific Heat

Capacity

J/k-ยบC 1214.23 1178.9 837.4

e. Thickness m 0.0127 0.0889 0.0127

Numerical verification using a previously evaluated envelope assembly:

This section looks at a more comprehensive verification with the residential home

discussed in chapter 5. After considering several key assumptions, temperature and heat flux from

exterior wall described in the study is compared with the thesis model.

Assumptions:

a. Only the object โ€œWall 13โ€ is considered (west facing exterior wall attached to the living

zone as indicated in the Figure 6-14) for the analysis.

b. Internal loads contributions from people, lights, and other equipment are not included

considered in the EnergyPlus model.

c. For the PCM inclusion case, only the evaluated wall includes PCMs and the other walls

remain without TES.

d. Solar and wind exposure on the other exterior walls are made negligible.

Same weather file and other simulation conditions used in the chapter 6 are used here

except for the above mentioned assumptions. The current work evaluates the envelope assembly

for (i) non-PCM and (ii) PCM included cases. Simulations are conducted for the month of July.

80

Figure 6-14 West facing wall of the residential building evaluated for numerical verification.

โ€ข Results: Numerical Verification:

This section presents the results from the comparison of the single-wall study extended

from the case discussed in the Figure 6-15 shows the graphical comparison of the external and

internal surface temperatures of the examined exterior wall without PCM inclusions.

Figure 6-15 External and internal surface temperatures of the examined exterior wall without PCM inclusions from the thesis model and EnergyPlus.

Numerical envelope model agree with the RMSE for the external surface temperature is

0.0096 ยบC and RMSE for internal surface temperature is 0.0127 ยบC.

81

Figure 6-16 shows graphical comparison for the external and internal boundary surface

temperatures for 5 days in the month of July. Numerical envelope model with the PCM model

agree with RMSE for the external surface temperature is 0.6562 ยบC and RMSE for internal surface

temperature is 0.5236 ยบC.

Figure 6-16 Verification of temperature variations on the internal and external; surfaces of the wall examined.

6.5. State-of-the-art Laboratory for full-scale experimental studies of PCMs

After the analytical and numerical verification of the thesis model, the author conducts

laboratory tests of wall assemblies with PCMs to: (i) create experimental data collected under

different environmental conditions to validate the PCM models (ii) compare performance of PCM

models with different PCMs (iii) understand and quantify the current differences between building

envelope PCM modeling tools and actual field data from PCMs customers. The proposed

experimental work of the current research is conducted in a 27.8m2 (300ft2) state-of-the-art

environmental chamber.

Wall Assembly Tests

Wall assembly tests investigate the thermal behaviors of the PCM inclusions in different

building envelope assemblies. These experiments bring together several facilities to establish the

82

expected enclosure and the environmental conditions. This section describes the organization of

facilities, test procedures so far carried out, and experimental plan for the proposed research.

Environmental Chamber and the HVAC System

Full scale experience will be performance in an enclosure with a carefully controlled

environment. Overview of the AHU and the environmental chamber is shown in the Figure 6-17.

Figure 6-18 shows a sketch of the top view of the chamber that has dimensions of 5.38m (length)

X 4.46m (width) X 2.67m (height) and can accommodate full size drywall panels vertically. The

environmental chamber used in the current study has the ability to control: (i) supply and return

air flow rate (ii) supply and return relative humidity, (iii) supply and return dry bulb temperature

and (iv) outmost of outdoor air supply to chamber. It has a dedicated air handling unit (AHU)

located on the roof of Mechanical Engineering Department building of the Colorado School of

Mines.

Figure 6-17 Overview of the air handling unit and the chamber, Section A: AHU Main Duct, Section B: AHU Return Duct, and Section C: Chamber.

83

Table 6-6 shows the dimensions of different components in the environmental chamber.

Ventilation system of the chamber is such that both supply and return air ducts are connected to

the movable ceiling. Room and the diffuser dimensions are showcased in the Table 6-6.

Table 6-6 Dimensions of the environmental chamber, H= height, L= length, and W= width.

Part Dimensions (m)

Room 5.38(L) X 4.46(W) X 2.67(H)

Door 1.5(W) X 2.12(H)

Inlet Diffusers 0.58(L) X 0.58(W)

Exhaust Diffusers 1.17(L) X 0.58(W)

Light 1.17(L) X 0.55(W)

Lights and supply ducts, and the return vents are arranged symmetrically. The return duct

is located near south-west corner of the chamber. Lights, diffuser locations are shown in the Figure

6-18.

Figure 6-18 Plan View of the Ceiling Setup of the Chamber including the inlet diffuser, lights, and exhaust diffuser.

84

Sensors placed inside the chamber monitor temperature, humidity, CO2, VOC, particulate,

and static pressure. Appendix 4 describes all sensors used, their functions, and locations. Sensors,

their locations in the AHU, chamber, and outside are described in detail in the Figure 6-20.

Chamber is also equipped with a hydronic radiant wall that has the ability to maintain a

constant and variable surface temperature independent of the indoor air temperature to mimic

external boundary conditions such as an exterior wall subject to solar radiation. Radiant wall setup

will be discussed in detail in later sections.

HVAC and Chamber Instrumentation System

The AHU shown in Figure 6-20, consists of:

Outdoor AHU shell: unit encloses the air conditioning elements (Figure 6-19)

Filter bank: two air filters that removes the particles in air to maintain clean heating and

cooling coils and improve indoor air quality

Pre-heat coil: heat coil after mixing chamber that makes sure the mixed air temperature is

always higher than 45 หšF to avoid risk of freezing during winter.

Chilled water coil: 10-row cooling coil

Re- heating coil: re-heats the air if needed when dehumidification is needed

Supply and return side fans: fans with variable frequency drives that allow flow rate to go

from 1-20ACH. Regulates the airflow speeds within the AHU

Steam humidifier: Humidifies supply air

Figure 6-19 SkylineTM Outdoor AHU by DAIKIN, Group: Applied Air systems, Part Number:

IM 770 houses the heating and cooling elements, filters, humidifier to condition the air.

85

Figure 6-20 Sensor locations in the AHU and other components of the HVAC system describes the sensors in each section, section A: Main AHU enclosure and the connection to the supply air

duct and the return air duct, section B: Return air duct.

86

Control and Data Acquisition

Data acquisition (DAQ) system collects data to facilitate the systematic changes of set

points required for the experiments. There are two main DAQ units which the sensors

communicate with in the current experimental set up, (i) ABB control unit (ii) InstrunetTM DAQ

apparatus.

ABB main control unit monitors information related to the chamber control system and the

air handling unit (AHU). It receives information from temperature, humidity, and flow

sensors located within AHU and the ducts and sends information back to different

actuators. Figure 6-21 shows the hardware components of the ABB DAQ unit. This unit

consists of a (i) C1867 - MODBUS TCP Interface, (ii) PM 851 Processor UNIT, (III) 3

Analog Input Units, (iv) 1 Analog Output Unit, (v) 1 Digital Input Unit, and (vi) 1 Digital

Output Unit.

Instrunet DAQ (captures data from all sensors needed for heat transfer experiments. It

communicates with the sensors used in experiments and also monitor few of the main

system sensor inputs to assure smooth and accurate control. Figure 6-22 shows the

hardware components of the Instrunet DAQ unit.

The next section looks closely into the both DAQ components and related control mechanisms.

Figure 6-21 The ABB control unit consists of a (i) C1867 - MODBUS TCP Interface, (ii) PM 851 Processor UNIT, (III) 3 Analog Input Units, (iv) 1 Analog Output Unit, (v) 1 Digital Input

Unit, and (vi) 1 Digital Output Unit.

87

Figure 6-22 Instrunet data acquisition unit with connections linked to the experimental apparatus sensors and some ABB main system sensors also linked to the Instrunet system to verify

readings.

โ€ข Hydronic Radiant Wall Temperature Control

The hydronic radiant wall is used to set-up the outside boundary conditions in the chamber.

The system consists of a three-speed pump, a mini boiler, control valve and chiller located outside

of the chamber as shown in Figure 6-23. Table 6-7 shows the heating and cooling apparatus of the

radiant wall system.

Figure 6-23 Hydraulic radiant wall heating and cooling apparatus.

88

Table 6-7 Summary of radiant wall heating and cooling system apparatus Unit Performance indicators Notes

Mini Boiler Volts: 120,

Power: 2.5 kW

Set Temp.: 150 ยบF

Expected flow: 0.11 m3/h (1.89

L/min)

Make: Electro Industries

Model: EMB-S-2

Chiller Volts:115

Refrigerant: 134a

Max. Fluid Temp.: 230 ยบF

Max. Fluid Supply:

0.2916 m3/h (4.86 L/min)

Make: Perlick Corporation

Model: 4414QC

Motor: 1/3 HP Split-Phase

Carbonator Pump Motor

Heat Exchanger Operating pressure: 150 psig

Max. operating temp: 365 ยบF

Make: TriangleTube

3 speed pump Volts:115 v

Frequency: 60 Hz

Max. Flow(designed): 7.5 mยณ/h

Flow at max. speed(observed):

0.29 m3/h

Make: Groundfos

Model: UPS26-99FC

Figure 6-24 shows the flow and temperature monitoring devices which assist to regulate

the temperature setpoint to the radiant wall. The temperatures are monitored at the supply and

return lines. Radiant wall temperature control is achieved by a three-way mixing valve and a

pressure independent control valve as shown in Figure 6-25.

89

Figure 6-24 Radiant wall flow control apparatus includes the primary flow sensor, e speed flow pump, temperature sensors to measure inlet and outlet temperatures of the fluid flow to the

radiant wall heat exchanger.

Figure 6-25 Flow control valve apparatus indicates the process of flow from the boiler and flow from the chiller is mixed. The flow measurements through the radiant wall heat exchanger are

also taken using the unit.

90

โ€ข PLC Control and PID setup

This subsection looks into the radiant wall controller program and the PID parameters. PID

control flow chart is shown in the Figure 6-26.

Figure 6-26 PLC Control flow chart for the radiant wall control PID settings for the mixing valve operation is indicated in the Figure 6-25.

Figure 6-27 Current PID settings for the mixing valve for the setpoint of 120 ยบF.

Here, ๐‘†๐‘ = Setpoint Temperature (หšF) ๐‘ƒ๐‘ฃ = Actual Temperature (หšF) ๐‘‚๐‘ข๐‘ก = Opening of the mixing valve (%) ๐บ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘› = Proportional Gain ๐‘‡๐‘–(๐‘†) = Integrator Time ๐‘‡๐‘‘(๐‘†) = Derivative Time

91

PID control parameter values are first set using a trial and error method under the original

system (where the boiler was activated upon meeting the setpoint and vice versa). This was due to

the fact that the temperature response from the chiller was slow. However, after implementing the

mixing valve, the auto tuning for the PID control was used which gave highly improved control

over the setpoint. Here we use the Relay-based auto tuning. Relay-based auto tuning is a simple

way to tune PID controllers [249]. The method includes temporarily swapping a simple relay for

the PID controller in the feedback loop [250].

โ€ข Chamber Environment Control

Approach for the chamber control is similar to the above. However, due to the significant

volume of the chamber and the different thermal properties to be controlled, the calibration takes

more effort. Chamber has three main control modes, (i) Supply Air Temperature based (DAT), (ii)

Room Air Temperature based (RAT), (iii) Multi-Variable based (VAV). Each of the modes have

PID controller units.

Construction of Building Envelope Assemblies within the Chamber

The structure of the multilayer panels in the proposed research are different from an actual

residential building envelope. Actual envelope consists of a 2x4โ€™โ€™ stud and cavity as discussed in

chapter 5. The analyzed structures do not have studs, water retardant layers, and the finishing

coatings. There are few reasons for this:

One of the main objectives of the study is to validate a numerical model and therefore, to

reduce the possible 2D/3D effects of the heat of heat transfer.

Current research plans to switch the panels to test different combinations and therefore, to

efficiently move the apparatus.

Test surface area for the current research is approximately 1.2 m x 2.4 m (4 ft. x 8 ft.) per

panel and therefore, facilitates tests in the system scale. First stage of the experimental studies

implements an experimental method inspired by DHFMA and Dynamic Hot-Box methods

discussed above. The sample sizes used in the DHFMA method is usually of ~ 0.3 m x 0.3 m (2

ft. x 2 ft.) for ambient conditions of 10ยฐC โ€“ 40 ยฐC [145]. In contrast, Dynamic Hot-Box method

uses larger samples of around 2 m x 2 m. Approximately 2.4 m x 2.4 m (8 ft. x 8 ft.) or larger cross

section of the clear wall area of the enclosure is used to determine its thermal performance by

92

Fazio et al.[251]. Martin et al.[252] used a frame of 2.0 m x 2.0 m (8 ft. x 8 ft.) for their specimens

in a dynamic hot-box apparatus. The current experimental setup can test multiple panels across

the radiant wall surface as shown in Figure 6-28. Therefore, the experimental apparatus and the

sensor system for the apparatus is inspired by these studies and will be discussed in detail in chapter

8.

Figure 6-28 Radiant wall location within the environmental chamber and the locations of wall assembly panels relative to the radiant wall.

93

CHAPTER 7

EMPIRICAL VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF PCM MODELING ALGORITHEMS

COMMONLY USED IN BUILDING ENERGY AND HYGROTHERMAL SOFTWARE

This section contributes to the fulfillment of the following objectives of this research: (v)

Verify (using the numerical model) and validate (using the experimental data from laboratory

experiments and field experiments) different PCM models in software platforms like EnergyPlus

and WUFI. This study is under review in the journal of Building and Environment. Dr. Kaushik

Biswas of Oak Ridge National Laboratory conducted the COMSOL simulations and the PCM

characterization for the Nano-PCMs. Dr. Dariuz Heim at Lodz University of Technology

conducted the ESP-r simulations of this study.

7.1. Introduction

Buildings are responsible for nearly 40% of the total energy consumed in United States

[253]. A large portion of this energy consumption is used for space-conditioning, up to 50% during

peak time [254]. Therefore, there is an interest to increase the energy efficiency in buildings and

energy storage potential to reduce peak demand and potential energy use. Innovative sustainable

design, materials with improved thermal properties, and integration of thermal energy storage are

some of the methods used in the industry today.

Thermal energy storage (TES) is used in buildings due to its capacity to shift loads [255,

256]. TES can make buildings more grid friendly and energy or cost efficient [257, 258]. TES can

be either sensible storage or a combination of latent and sensible storage. Interest and products

using latent heat storage in building envelopes has increased and have regained interest of

researchers during the last decades due its high capacity to store energy per mas [15]. In buildings

TES can be applied in passive systems, which utilizes building envelope components to store and

release energy, or in active systems, which tend to be integrated with building heating, ventilation,

and air conditioning (HVAC) systems [259]. Passive PCM storage has become a popular research

topic due to building envelope large surface area and the ability to add latent heat storage into light

94

mass buildings [260-263] and is also the focus on this study: PCMs uses in the building envelope

[264, 265].

Due to their variable properties, design of PCM inclusions in buildings require careful and

accurate energy analysis as it is important to maximize the number of times PCMs cycle between

solid and liquid phases to utilize its latent heat. For this and other reasons, several PCM heat

transfer models have been implemented in different building energy modeling tools [266-272].

However, an IEA Annex 23 surveyed over 250 research publications concluding that the general

confidence in currently used numerical models is still too low to use them for designing and code

purposes [266, 273]. Another article analyzes several modeling tools capable of simulating PCMs

and supports the need for extensive model validation and comparison of the different numerical

tools available today using a standardized procedure for PCM model validation [274]. These

studies show validation has an important role in model development but previous work has been

limited in range, applications, and conditions. For example: EnergyPlus PCM model was validated

using PCM shape-stabilized experimental data [246, 275], COMSOL 2D PCM model was

validated using PCM enhanced drywall with field data [14], ESP-r PCM model was validated for

microencapsulated PCM [276], and WUFI PCM model was validated with data from Dynamic

Heat Flux Meter Apparatus (DHFMA) [277]. These studies did not consider hysteresis in their

models. Recent studies have implemented different PCM models in EnergyPlus using Energy

Management System (EMS) and also as part of the source code with no clear validation with

hysteresis [277]. The thermal hysteresis in PCMs occur due to PCM characterization test method

and type of equipment used, and impaired PCM nucleation during the freezing process which is

also known as sub-cooling [15]. Thus, there is a need for a careful validation and comparison for

different PCM applications in the building envelope.

Additionally, it is important to consider the computational runtime and the performance

limitations of building energy modeling, PCM models included in whole building energy modeling

platforms tend to simplify the use of temperature dependent PCM properties like specific heat,

thermal conductivity, and melting points [120]. The temperature dependent properties of PCMs

should be obtained from characterization methods [15], but often it is not possible to use properties

obtained from small samples (such from differential scanning calorimetry, DSC). The sample size

of the PCM used in the characterization influences the measured values of the thermal properties

and may not reflect the thermal behavior for different encapsulation methods accurately [278, 279].

95

Finally, materials that exhibit two or three dimensional behavior, hysteresis, and subcooling [277,

280-283], have been difficult to incorporate into the PCM models without compromising the

computational runtime. Therefore, assessment and comparison of the different PCM modeling

software is required.

While there has been studies comparing the thermal load modeling capabilities of different

building energy modeling programs (BEMPs) using ASHRAE Standard 140 tests [284] or doing

broad simulation engine comparison [285], there are no previous efforts comparing specifically

PCMs models using laboratory and field data to understand and quantify the limitations of

modeling techniques used in each numerical tool for an specific application (e.g. PCMs micro/nano

encapsulated in drywall). Given the need for validated models that can accurately model PCMs,

this study compares and validates PCM models that are part of popular building energy and

hygrothermal software commonly used in building industry [286-297]: EnergyPlus, ESP-r, and

WUFI. WUFI is compared here since building designers and modelers commonly use it for energy

and hygrothermal performance assessments. It also compares COMSOL, a specialized numerical

modeling software, using a more detailed two-dimensional heat transfer model and finally an

algorithm developed in MATLAB (Thesis algorithm). PCM applications analyzed are Nano-PCM

in drywall and shape-stabilized PCM layer behind drywall.

7.2. Methodology

Validation data used in this study uses experimental data from two independent PCM

studies and compares PCM models implemented in different energy modeling software. The

analyzed PCM heat and mass transfer models in this study are part of the following software:

(i) ESP-r: Building energy simulation tool commonly used in Europe that has two PCM models

introduced as special material (PCM_Cap, model no. 53) and defined as an active building

elements with variable thermo-physical properties (spmatl subroutine) [113, 298]. The latent heat

is calculated based on effective heat capacity which is a linear function of temperature.

Temperature dependence conductivity (linearly) can be also taken into account during simulation.

ESP-r has developed sub-routines to model hysteresis in PCMs.

(ii) WUFI v6.1: Heat and mass transfer (HAMT) software for building structures [127, 129, 299-

301]. WUFI has the ability to define temperature dependent input functions via โ€˜Hygrothermal

96

Functionsโ€™ object set and โ€˜Enthalpy, temperature dependentโ€™ object [302]. WUFI also has the

ability to define temperature dependent conductivity via โ€˜Thermal Conductivity, temperature-

dependentโ€™ object. This study uses these two objects to define the temperature dependent functions

of PCM properties. WUFI uses coupled heat and mass transfer equations to model heat and

moisture transfer. The moisture transfer modeling component of this program is turned off in the

current study to exclusively model just the heat transfer as rest of considered models only capture

heat transfer phenomena.

(iii) COMSOL: The heat transfer module of COMSOL Multiphysicsยฎ

(https://www.comsol.com/heat-transfer-module) is used for the simulations presented here.

Temperature-dependent material properties are incorporated in COMSOL using the โ€˜interpolationโ€™

function. For PCMs, the measured enthalpy as a function of temperature is provided as input and

the specific heat is defined as the slope of the enthalpy vs. temperature curve, the latter is calculated

as part of the solution routine [14] [144]. Biswas et al. [130] developed an algorithm using the

โ€˜previous solutionโ€™ operator of COMSOL to capture the hysteresis in PCM and evaluated the

differences in energy saving estimates with and without considering the impacts of hysteresis.

(iv) EnergyPlus v9.0: Building energy simulation software that models PCMs with a finite

difference algorithm (CondFD) coupled with an enthalpy temperature function [100, 123, 246,

289]. EnergyPlus has two PCM models: with and without hysteresis. Hysteresis model uses

polynomial fitting curves to describe the properties of PCM adapted from the Ginzburg-Landau

theory of phase transitions [277]. EnergyPlusโ€™ original PCM model object is

MaterialProperty:PhaseChange. The object requests the inputs, (i) temperature dependent

coefficient for thermal conductivity, and (ii) temperature-enthalpy data points to define the

enthalpy curve. The recently introduced PCM model object named is MaterialProperty:

PhaseChangeHysteresis. For both EnergyPlus PCM models, temperature dependent thermal

conductivity is defined with the MaterialProperty: VariableThermalConductivity object.

(v) MATLAB: A multi-paradigm numerical computing environment and proprietary

programming language [303]. MATLAB is used to model PCM inclusions in the building

envelope in literature [111, 216, 297, 304]. Thesis model (in MATLAB) has been analytically

verified using Stefan problem, and numerically verified with the PCM model in EnergyPlus in the

97

chapter 6. This model is used in this validation study to give the author more flexibility to further

evaluate the model performance

Table 7-1 compares the above PCM models based on numerical formulation (numerical

methods), solver type, method of latent heat input, and the input parameters to define the latent

heat in the โ€œmushyโ€ region. All models assume one-dimensional (1D) conduction heat transfer

with exception of COMSOL that uses 2D conduction heat transfer for ORNL Nano-PCM case.

This also compares the additional accuracy gain when going from 1D to 2D heat transfer in

building assemblies. These characteristics of PCM models in building energy modeling software

are discussed in detail in recent literature [15, 120].

Table 7-1 Numerical modeling methods used in PCM models Model Numerical

formulation Solution schemes Latent

heat algorithm

Latent heat data incorporation from the curves

COMSOL Finite element method [305, 306]

Direct solver PARDISO based on lower-upper decomposition [307]:

(matrix form of Gaussian Elimination)

Enthalpy method

Interpolated h-T curves

ESP-r Finite Volume Method, Implicit, Explicit and Crank Nicholson. [297]

Direct solution method, semi-implicit scheme, iteration employed for the case of non-linearity [308]

Effective heat capacity method

Linear function of effective heat capacity versus temperature

EnergyPlus PCM model

Finite Difference Method: Fully Implicit and Crank Nicholson [269]

Gaussโ€“Seidel iterative scheme

Heat capacity method/ Enthalpy Method

Enthalpy curve with maximum of 16 temperature-enthalpy data points.

98

Table 7-1 continued EnergyPlus hysteresis PCM model

Finite Difference Method: Fully Implicit and Crank Nicholson

Gaussโ€“Seidel iterative scheme

Enthalpy Method

Enthalpy curves approximated based on the heating and cooling curves by curve fitting

(inputs: peak phase change temperature, lower and higher temperature ranges of phase change for melting and freezing)

Thesis algorithm

Finite Difference Method: Fully Implicit (current study)

Gaussโ€“Seidel iterative scheme

Enthalpy Method

Simplified PCM curve with maximum 16 data points

WUFI Finite Volume Method: Implicit

Matrix solver: Thomas-algorithm in (1D) [309], or ADI in (2D) simulations [310].

Enthalpy Method

Simplified temperature-enthalpy curve with 32 points (higher number of points is possible)

The two main PCM models shown in Table 7-1 are the enthalpy method and the heat

capacity method. Enthalpy method considers the total amount of energy, which includes both

sensible and latent heat. This method presents heat capacity in terms of its integral form, H (T).

The effective specific heat capacity (๐‘๐‘) is obtained as the gradient (dh/dT) of the enthalpy curves.

Heat capacity method deals with heat capacity as a function of temperature within the temperature

range of the phase transition. It numerically imitates the effect of enthalpy by controlling the heat

capacity value during the phase change. ๐ถ๐ด(๐‘‡) Value considers both the latent heat and the

sensible heat. Equations 7-1 to 7-3 show the mathematical formulation for enthalpy method,

effective specific heat capacity, and heat capacity method.

๐œŒ โˆ‚hโˆ‚t = ๐œ•๐œ•๐‘ฅ ( ๐‘˜๐‘๐‘ ๐œ•โ„Ž๐œ•๐‘ฅ) (7-1)

99

๐‘๐‘ = ๐‘‘โ„Ž๐‘‘๐‘‡ (7-2)

๐œŒ โˆ— ๐‘๐ด(๐‘‡) โˆ‚Tโˆ‚t = ๐œ•๐œ•๐‘ฅ (๐‘˜ ๐œ•๐‘‡๐œ•๐‘ฅ) (7-3)

Among analyzed models, Finite difference method is the most common heat transfer

algorithm due to its simplicity to code [15], followed by finite volume and finite volume numerical

schemes. EnergyPlus has the simplest (to code) but slowest solution scheme (Gauss-Seidel) while

WUFI and ESP-r has more complex and faster schemes. All models require either enthalpy-

temperature data or heat capacity- temperature data to include phase change effects.

Validation

Verification and validation (V&V) are important steps in numerical model development to

ensure desired performance and accuracy [311]. ASHRAE standard 140 defines three main

approaches for V&V: (1) analytical verification, (2) empirical validation, and (3) comparative

testing [312]. Verification of the analyzed PCM models have been partially documented in

literature, some have use analytical solution of Stefan Problem or lab data [233, 246, 313].

However, these studies have not followed the same protocols or boundary conditions, making it

impossible to compare. This study uses Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) calculated in equation

7-4, Coefficient of Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CV (RMSE)) and Normalized Mean

Biased Error (NMBE) as the accuracy analysis indices to compare the data, which is suggested by

different validation guidelines and studies [314-319].

NMBE and CV (RMSE) have been specifically used together to compare simulated and

measured temperature data in previous studies [173, 320]. Here, ๐‘ฆ๐‘– is the actual measured value, ๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘– is the predicted value. NMBE is the average of the errors of a sample space (๐‘ฆ๐‘– โˆ’ ๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘–) divided

by the mean of measured values ๐‘ฆ๐‘šฬ…ฬ… ฬ…ฬ… . It indicates the global difference between the real values and

the predicted ones as shown in the equation 7-5. NMBE is subjected to the cancellation errors and

therefore not recommended to be used alone [318]. Therefore, the current study also uses CV

(RMSE). CV (RMSE) is the average of the square of the errors of a sample space (๐‘ฆ๐‘– โˆ’ ๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘–)2 divided by the mean of measured values ๐‘ฆ๐‘šฬ…ฬ… ฬ…ฬ… as shown in the equation 7-6. ASHRAE

100

Guideline 14 considers NMBE ยฑ 10 % and CV (RMSE) ยฑ 30 % as the acceptable calibration

criteria for the hourly data (ASHRAE guideline 14).

Guideline 14 was developed for measurements of actual buildings where there are

uncertainties in occupancy, internal loads, and materials properties. Since the two validation cases

have well-defined boundary conditions and many properties are known, one should expect high

accuracy or use a higher standards. Thus, this study uses higher standard using NMBE ยฑ 5% and

CV (RMSE) ยฑ 15%. In addition, the use of RMSE provides an absolute measure that is also

accessed.

๐‘…๐‘€๐‘†๐ธ = โˆš โˆ‘ (๐‘ฆ๐‘– โˆ’ ๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘–)2๐‘๐‘–=1 ๐‘ (7-4)

๐‘๐‘€๐ต๐ธ = 1๐‘ฆ๐‘šฬ…ฬ… ฬ…ฬ… (โˆ‘ (๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘– โˆ’ ๐‘ฆ๐‘–)๐‘๐‘–=1 ๐‘ ) ร— 100 (7-5)

๐ถ๐‘‰ (๐‘…๐‘€๐‘†๐ธ) = 1๐‘ฆ๐‘šฬ…ฬ… ฬ…ฬ…ฬ…โˆš โˆ‘ (๐‘ฆ๐‘–โˆ’๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘–)2๐‘๐‘–=1 ๐‘ ร— 100 (7-6)

This validation study uses experimental data from two experiments: laboratory data from

Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) using Hot-Box tests [13], and field test

data from ORNLโ€™s Natural Exposure Test (NET) facility at, Charleston, South Carolina, USA [14].

NTNU study uses shape-stabilize (DupontTM Energainยฎ) PCM that has been well characterized

enthalpy curve [321]. DupontTM Energainยฎ PCM panel is a mixture of ethylene based polymer

and paraffin wax laminated on both sides with an aluminum sheet [322]. The ORNL field study

uses a paraffin based nano-PCM and characterized the PCM and performed field measurements

over several months with the goal to evaluate the performance of nano-PCM enhanced gypsum

board [14]. Thesis model was also verified using the same methodology as for the EnergyPlus

model [246].

Table 7-2 compares the two analyzed PCMs. The enthalpy curves are determined using

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). Temperature gradient used in the DSC method can

influence the enthalpy curve results [216]. Both PCMs are tested using a slow heating rate (low

101

temperature gradient) to minimize any measurement error/noise. In addition, PCM percentage,

distribution, and nano capsule material can also affect the thermal properties. Shape-stabilized

PCM has a greater storage capacity since it is not mixed with drywall. However, both products

suffer from low thermal conductivity.

Table 7-2 Properties of Analyzed PCMs Laboratory work with shape-

stabilize PCM Field experiments with Nano-PCM wallboard

PCM type Paraffin

n-heptadecane (C17H36)

Encapsulation laminated by aluminum sheets included in graphite nano-sheets

PCM percentage in the wallboard by weight (%)

60 20

Wall type Flexible sheet

(5.26mm/0.2 inch)

Gypsum board

(13 mm/0.5 inch)

Latent heat (kJ/kg) >70.1 26.2

Total heat storage capacity (kJ/kg)

>170 (14ยฐC - 30ยฐC) 50 (15ยฐC - 25ยฐC)

Peak melting temperature (ยบC) 21.7 21.4

Thermal conductivity in liquid phase (W/m-K)

0.22 0.43

Thermal conductivity in solid phase (W/m-K)

0.18 0.41

Specific heat capacity in liquid phase (kJ/kg-K)

3.00 2.24

Specific heat capacity in in solid phase (kJ/kg-K)

4.50 2.31

Characterization method and heating rate

DSC, 0.05 ยบC/min DSC, 1.0 ยฐC/min

Latent storage capacity (kJ/m2)

428 770

102

Enthalpy-temperature curves of PCMs

Figure 7-1 shows the enthalpy curve for the analyzed PCMs: shape-stabilized PCMs

(Figure 7-1a) and Nano-PCM (Figure 7-1b). Figure 7-1a shows a slow enthalpy increase in the

โ€œmushyโ€ region (or wide melting range), while Figure 7-1b with the Nano-PCMs shows a

prominent enthalpy gradient (or short melting temperature range).

As shown in Table 7-1, COMSOL uses an enthalpy-temperature (h-T) curve that

interpolates within the available enthalpy-temperature values. Thesis algorithm uses 4 points,

EnergyPlus (No hysteresis model) uses up to 16 discreet points, and WUFI uses 32 discrete points

to approximate the entire curve within the temperature range of the curve. EnergyPlus hysteresis

model requires, (i) peak phase change temperature, (ii) low temperature difference, and (iii) high

temperature difference of phase change curves to fit curves within the phase change region. ESP-

r uses linear function that relates effective heat capacity with temperature. These specific input

data is obtained from Figure 7-1. The shape-stabilized PCM melting temperature ranges from 18.6

ยบC to 25 ยบC with the peak melting temperature at 21.7 ยบC, while the Nano-PCM phase change

ranges from 20.4 ยบC to 21.8 ยบC, with the peak melting temperature at 21.4 ยบC.

Figure 7-1 (a) Enthalpy-Temperature (h-T) curves for shape-stabilized PCM, (b) and nano-encapsulated PCM.

103

Numerical modeling considerations

Table 7-3 shows how each model discretizes the analyzed PCM layer. COMSOL model

uses a 2D model with a mesh made using the โ€˜physics-controlledโ€™ option of COMSOL and element

size set to โ€œNormalโ€ to model the Nano-PCM. This created a non-uniform mesh. The number of

discretized elements in the PCM-gypsum board are determined by the physics controlled mesh

algorithm and are about 2-6 with the highest count in drywall section closest to the stud and only

2 across the thickness of the PCM-gypsum board in most places along the drywall. This is shown

in the Figure 7-2. A 1D COMSOL model is used to simulate shape-stabilized PCM. This too

considered a non-uniform mesh.

Figure 7-2 Non-uniform finite volume mesh implemented in COMSOL simulate the Nano-PCM layer in ORNL field test data. Nano-PCM layer comprises of two elements.

For WUFI, Fine grid with Automatic (II) option is used for the discretization. The non-

uniform finite volume mesh created through this method is shown in Figure 7-3 for ORNL field

study Nano-PCM layer.

Figure 7-3 Non-uniform finite volume mesh implemented in WUFI to simulate the Nano-PCM layer in ORNL field test data. Nano-PCM layer comprises of 24 volumes.

104

For thesis model and EnergyPlus the grid size is uniform for each layer but each layer has

different grid size which depends on the thermal properties as defined in equation 6.2. Nano-PCM

layer has 4 nodes uniformly across the layer. This is shown in Figure 7-4.

Figure 7-4 Uniform finite difference mesh implemented in thesis model to simulate the Nano-PCM layer in ORNL field test data. Nano-PCM layer comprises of 4 points.

The number of discretized cells is actually an input as shown in Table 7-3. For all the

models, the case indicating the grid independence was considered to show the data below.

Table 7-3 Numerical discretization considered in modeling the material layers with PCM inclusions.

Spatial discretization

method

Discretization settings PCM layer discretized

SS PCM NE-PCM

COMSOL Finite Element Method

Maximum element size specification (1D)

11 elements

Physics controlled mesh, normal element size (2D)

2 elements

EnergyPlus PCM model

Finite Difference Method

Space discretization constant (c)=1 Relaxation factor = 1

3 nodes 4 nodes

EnergyPlus hysteresis model

Finite Element Method

c=1 Relaxation factor =1

3 nodes 4 nodes

ESP-r Control Volume Method

3 nodes 3 nodes*

Thesis model Finite Difference Method

c=1 3 nodes 4 nodes

WUFI Finite Volume Method

Fine (with Automatic (II) option enabled)

14 volumes 24 volumes

*nodes were increased from 4-8 with no significant difference in results

105

For EnergyPlus hysteresis PCM model and the thesis model that are based on the enthalpy

method, solid and liquid state cp values are used outside the phase change interval. For both

datasets, temperature dependent thermal conductivity information is available and used in this

study. For the PCM mixed or embedded in construction materials such as drywall (Nano-PCM),

this study assumes PCMs are evenly distributed across the layer and therefore, uses equivalent

physical and thermal properties across the material layer (e.g. drywall). Although both PCMs

exhibit little hysteresis, this is not modeled since the NTNU shape-stabilized PCM only contained

melting curve and the hysteresis information was not available.

Both lab and field studies measure wall inner and outer surface temperature and this is used

as the boundary conditions: surface temperature (Dirichlet boundary condition). However, this

boundary condition is implemented differently using workarounds in each modeling software as

most cannot accommodate fixing a surface temperature:

COMSOL: either inner or outer surface temperatures directly or heat flux boundary

conditions can be assigned at the inner and outer surfaces. Biswas et al. [14, 144] utilized

both temperature and heat flux boundary conditions. Biswas et al. used heat flux boundary

conditions for annual performance evaluations of PCMs using typical weather data and

used temperature boundary conditions for model validation using measured temperature

data. Thus, this study also uses temperature boundary conditions for both analyzed cases

in COMSOL.

EnergyPlus: exterior surface temperature is set using โ€˜SurfaceProperty

OtherSideCoefficientsโ€™ that allows users to specify a surface temperature. This can only be

used on one side of a wall, so the interior surface temperature is set by increasing

convection heat transfer coefficient to 1,000 W/m2-K (โ€˜SurfaceProperty

ConvectionCoefficientsโ€™) and setting the indoor air temperature to the actual surface

temperature.

ESP-r: the ideal control of temperature on both sides of the test sample was assumed and

convection heat transfer coefficient was set to 500 W/ (m2-K).

Thesis model: boundary temperature values are directly assigned.

WUFI: the interior and exterior temperature values are assigned, and a convective heat

resistance of 0.001 m2-K/W was used on the both surfaces.

106

Timestep used in all simulation programs is one minute but the experimental data from

NTNU experiments was recorded every 10 minute and the ORNL field study data every hour.

Therefore, the boundary condition data is interpolated to 1 minute from the recorded data.

Moreover, moisture transfer is not considered in the PCM models (including WUFI and

EnergyPlus) to ensure only the heat transfer phenomena is captured throughout all programs for

the validation purposes. Moisture transport is analyzed in more detail in a subsequent publication

[323].

Shape-stabilized PCM wall data

Table 7-4 shows material used and their properties for the NTNU wall assembly. PCM

panels used in the study have 1000 mm width and 1198 mm length [13]. These PCM panels are

tested with a wood frame wall construction.

Table 7-4 Material properties of the wall assembly used in the NTNU controlled hot-box experiments

Layer Material Conductivity (W/m-K)

Density (kg/m3)

Specific heat capacity (J/kg-K)

Thickness (m)

1 (exterior BC)

Gypsum wallboard

0.21 700 1000 0.013

2 PCM DuPont 0.22 (liquid)

0.18 (solid)

855 2250 (liquid)

3250 (solid)

0.0053

3 Mineral wool insulation

0.033 29 1030 0.296

4 (interior BC)

Gypsum wallboard

0.21 700 1000 0.009

Figure 7-5 indicates the layer structure of the wall assembly for this dataset. The

thermocouples used in the study are type T30/2/506 made by Gordon with an accuracy of ยฑ0.1 K

and the heat flux meters are type PU_43T made by Hukseflux with an accuracy of ยฑ5%. The tests

are performed in a hot box apparatus, where initially the cold box side was kept at โˆ’20 ยฐC and the

hot side was kept at 20 ยฐC. At t = 0, a heater in the hot box started heating the air temperature

inside the hot box for 7 hours (heating stage). The final inside wall temperature reached an upper

107

limit of ~24 ยฐC [324]. This indicates that the PCMs within the panels would not have fully melted.

After that, the heater was turned off and the hot box slowly cooled to initial temperature, 20 ยฐC

(cooling stage).

Figure 7-5 Analyzed wall assembly using shape-stabalize PCMs. Red dots represent temperature measurement points, while black hollow circles represent WUFI monitoring locations. PCMs are

located in the white layer (between Point 2 and 3).

Nano-encapsulated wallboard data

Table 7-5 shows material properties used by Biswas et al. [14] to model the test wall with

the Nano-PCM wallboard. The conductivities of the cellulose insulation and Nano-PCM wallboard

are measured in a heat flow meter following ASTM C518.1 The density of cellulose was based on

the volume of the test wall cavity and mass of insulation added, and the conductivity of cellulose

was measured at the same density as the test wall cavity insulation. The specific heats of the Nano-

PCM wallboard are based on the DSC data provided by the manufacturer, as the slopes of the

temperature-dependent enthalpy function in the fully-frozen and fully-molten regimes. Remaining

material properties are obtained from published literature. These PCM panels are also tested with

a wood frame wall construction.

1 ASTM C518-17, Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat

Flow Meter Apparatus, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, www.astm.org

108

Table 7-5 Material properties of the wall assembly used in Nano-encapsulated wallboard Layer Material Thermal

Conductivity

(W/m-K)

Density (kg/m3)

Specific heat capacity

(kJ/kg-K)

Thickness (m)

1 OSB 0.13 650 1410 0.013

2 Cellulose cavity 0.042 40.8 1420 0.14

3 Nano-PCM wallboard

0.427 (liquid)

0.41 (solid)

658 2240 (liquid)

2310 (solid)

0.013

Figure 7-6 shows the layer structure of the wall assembly used in the experiments and

location of the heat flux and temperature sensors. Surface temperature data at the exterior and

interior surfaces and three locations within the wall panel was monitored in this study. Although

the heat flux transducer was placed at the interface of the cellulose insulation and the PCM

wallboard (point 5), the temperature sensor was located at point 4 in the cellulose insulation layer

but its exact location is not reported. Thus, point 4 is not used for validation. 10 K ohm thermistor

used in the study had an accuracy of ยฑ0.2 ยฐC and the heat flux transducer had an accuracy of ยฑ5%.

Figure 7-6 Analyzed wall assembly using nano-encapsulated PCMs. Red dots represent temperature measurement points, while black hollow circles represent WUFI monitoring

locations. PCMs are located in the white layer (between Point 5 and 6).

109

7.3. Results and Discussion

NTNU shape-stabilized PCM

Figure 7-7 and Figure 7-8 show temperature at the interface between the gypsum and PCM

wallboard (point 2 in Figure 7-5) and between the PCM wallboard and mineral wool insulation for

(point 3 in Figure 7-5) respectively. Both figures show results from: experimental data, COMSOL,

ESP-r, E+ (no hysteresis model), E+ (hysteresis model with just the melting curve), Thesis model,

and WUFI. The horizontal line in yellow shows the peak melting temperature of the PCM and the

horizontal shaded area indicates the melting temperature range. The peak melting temperature of

the PCM is 21.7 ยบC and the highest and lowest temperatures observed at the point 2 is 22.7 ยบC and

19.4 ยบC. The highest and lowest temperatures observed at the point 3 is 22.6 ยบC and 19.3 ยบC.

Figure 7-7 shows the temperature at the point 1 to indicate the maximum temperature of

the heated boundary surface. Therefore, the PCM did not transition fully from melting to freezing.

However, the results are important as the PCM is still changing phase, not fully, but going from

almost frozen to almost melt. In fact, it also helps to test ability of models to simulate partial phase

change, which it has been shown to be challenging to simulate [325].

Figure 7-7 Temperature at Point (2): between the gypsum and PCM wallboard, and measured temperature at the boundary: Point (1). Simulated data for COMSOL, ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2

modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown.

110

Figure 7-8 also includes the line showing the temperature variation at the hot side boundary

to see maximum and minimum temperatures observed at the hot-surface for this experiment. All

results from the analyzed software are within the uncertainty of the measurements and follow the

same trend indicating the models ability to capture partial phase change.

Figure 7-8 Temperature at the Point (3): between the PCM wallboard and mineral wool insulation. Simulated data for COMSOL, ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and

WUFI is shown.

Table 7-6 summarizes the performance of all PCM models based on RMSE, CV (RMSE)

and NMBE values. RMSE values show agreement of all models. All values fall well within the

accepted tolerances for the NMBE and CV (RMSE).

Although not shown in Figure 4 modeling the walls without PCMs gives a CV(RMSE)

value of 0.92 % at the interface between gypsum and PCM wallboard and 1.03 % at the interface

of PCM wallboard and mineral wool insulation which indicates the deviation from the PCM cases.

All values are well below the recommended ranges of 5% (NMBE) and 15% (CV(RMSE)).

111

Table 7-6 Calculated Temperature RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE for all analyzed PCM models at material interfaces

Point 2 of Figure 2 Point 3 of Figure 2

Model RMSE (ยบC)

CV(RMSE) (%)

NMBE (%)

RMSE (ยบC)

CV(RMSE)

(%)

NMBE (%)

COMSOL 0.08 0.37 0.19 0.12 0.56 0.34

ESP-r 0.14 0.64 -0.38 0.11 0.52 -0.19

E+ PCM model 0.08 0.39 0.17 0.13 0.64 0.37

E+ hysteresis PCM model 0.08 0.58 0.17 0.13 0.61 0.37

Thesis model 0.07 0.34 0.15 0.12 0.58 0.34

WUFI 0.08 0.39 0.06 0.12 0.56 0.32

No-PCM - 0.92 0.17 - 1.03 0.38

Figure 7-9 shows the heat flux measured at the surface of the high temperature side of the

envelope assembly (point 1 in Figure 7-5). During both the heating up and cooling down processes

differences are observed between modeled heat fluxes and the experimental data. These

differences are potentially caused by the method of setting the exterior boundary condition and

how the heat flux is calculated in the software. The boundaries are defined as temperature boundary

conditions in the software.

The heat fluxes calculated from simulations relate to the heat flux in the material layer

which is subjected to the thermal properties of the material whereas the heat flux meter captures

the heat flux at the surface which is subjected to the uncertainty of the sensors and measurement

errors related to sensor placement. Note that ESP-r heat-flux results are not shown as they are not

typically reported from the software. For the experimental measurements, heat flux meters had an

accuracy of ยฑ5%. This uncertainty level is displayed with the experimental data lines in Figure 7-9

and Figure 7-10.

112

Figure 7-9 Heat flux at the Point (1): Hot-side boundary surface. Simulated data for COMSOL, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown.

Figure 7-10 shows the heat flux measured at the interface between the shape-stabilized

PCM layer and the mineral wool insulation layer. Interior heat fluxes (Point 3 in figure 2) are

calculated using the temperature gradient between the interface node and the immediate node to

the left. Modeled results are within ยฑ10% of each other.

Figure 7-10 Heat flux at the Point (3): Interface of the PCM wallboard and mineral wool

insulation. Simulated data for COMSOL, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown.

113

Both EnergyPlus models produce very close values since no hysteresis is modeled. The

finite volume model of WUFI, and finite element model of COMSOL are observed together.

Thesis model stands below both these sets of data. All models follow the same trend but with

different slopes with thesis model having the closest agreement with the experimental data.

Table 7-7 shows the RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE values for the heat flux. At the

exterior surface (Point 1 in Figure 7-5) RMSE values are all above ยฑ 1.5 tolerance and all CV

(RMSE) values are above 40%. Surface heat flux is challenging to measure and typically heat flux

is accurately recorded in between layers. The heat fluxes at the interface of the PCM wallboard

and mineral wool insulation (point 3) show RMSE values below ยฑ 1.0 and CV (RMSE) values

between 5.5 - 12.2 % and fall within the acceptable tolerances. All models over-estimate the heat

flux values based on the NMBE calculations, but are still within the recommended ranges of 15%

(CV(RMSE)).

Table 7-7 Temperature RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE at: (i) exterior surface of the hot-side (Point 1), (ii) Interface between the PCM wallboard and the mineral wool insulation (Point 5)

Point 2 of Figure 2 Point 3 of Figure 2

Software RMSE (W/m2)

CV(RMSE) (%)

NMBE (%)

RMSE (W/m2)

CV(RMSE)

(%)

NMBE (%)

COMSOL 1.92 43.4 0.85 0.48 12.1 11.3

E+ PCM model 1.79 45.6 0.86 0.33 8.4 7.1

E+ hysteresis PCM model 1.82 41.3 0.96 0.33 8.4 7.1

Thesis model 1.59 36.1 1.13 0.22 5.5 3.1

WUFI 1.96 44.5 0.97 0.48 12.2 11.5

Nano-encapsulated PCM wall

Figure 7-11 shows the temperature at the interface between the OSB layer and the cellulose

cavity layer (point 2 in Figure 7-6) for all analyzed software. Three summer days, July 20-22 are

selected to display the results. The temperature variations observed in this field study represent

realistic boundary conditions in contrast with the laboratory study. The horizontal dash-line

114

represents the peak melting temperature of the PCM and the horizontal shaded gray area indicates

the melting temperature range.

All models follow the same trend except for ESP-r because of the different boundary

condition implemented. In ESP-r, it is not possible to just assign a surface temperature because

this is a state variable as well as air temperature inside any thermal zone. The only possibility is to

define the control function for heating/cooling to maintain indoor air temperature as close as

possible to assumed surface temperature changes. Additionally, the heat transfer coefficient should

be maximized to decrease internal surface resistance. ESP-r, the model author used had the

maximum number of 12 periods for 24 hours to control indoor air temperature and assumed

convection heat transfer coefficient equal to 500 W/m2-K. Even then the temperature profiles differ

between models with direct surface temperature definition (1-minute frequency) and ESP-r model.

Figure 7-11 Temperature at the Point (2): interface of OSB and cellulose insulation Simulated data for COMSOL, ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown.

Figure 7-12 shows the temperature at the middle of the cavity. Temperature fluctuations

are reduced compared to Figure 7-11 due to the insulation. All models predict the PCM behavior

very closely. In both Figure 7-11 and Figure 7-12 COMSOL, two E+ models, Thesis model, and

WUFI lines are together hence might not be visible separately.

115

Figure 7-12 Temperature at the Point (3): middle of cellulose insulation. Simulated data for COMSOL, ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is shown.

Figure 7-13 shows the experimental temperature at point 4 and point 6. However, point 6

is the boundary condition and point 4 location was not exactly measured. Thus, we show simulated

values at point 5 (between point 4 and point 6). As expected from the results from Figure 7-9 to

Figure 7-13, all models obtain similar temperature values with ESP-r having lower surface

temperature. Considering the second day of the displayed results, the highest and lowest

temperatures measured at the left to the interface of cellulose cavity and the PCM wallboard (point

4 of Figure 7-6) are 23 ยบC and 20.6 ยบC. The highest and lowest temperatures observed at the

interior surface (point 6 of Figure 7-6) are 21.5 ยบC and 20.2 ยบC. The peak melting temperature of

the PCM is 21.4 ยบC. Therefore, the PCM does not fully change phase from melting to freezing and

vice versa in the analyzed period of time.

Figure 7-13 Model results at the Point (4), Point (5): interface of the cellulose insulation and the PCM wallboard. Simulated data for ESP-r, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is

shown.

116

RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE calculations related to comparisons in Figure 7-11 and

Figure 7-12 are indicated in Table 7-8. All models show RMSE values below 1 except for ESP-r.

All models also show NMBE and CV (RMSE) values below the recommended ranges with

exception of ESP-r as explained previously. NMBE values give a sense of the total difference

between models predicted. The negative values are an indication that models show less values in

magnitude and therefore under-predicted.

Table 7-8 Surface temperature RMSE, CV(RMSE) and NMBE values at (i) Interface of OSB and the cellulose filled cavity (point 2), (ii) Middle of the cellulose filled cavity (point 3)

Point 2 of Figure 3 Point 3 of Figure 3

Software RMSE (ยบC)

CV (RMSE) (%)

NMBE (%)

RMSE (ยบC)

CV(RMSE)

(%)

NMBE (%)

COMSOL 0.30 1.04 -0.58 0.12 0.97 -0.85

ESP-r 2.91 9.97 -7.77 0.11 6.06 -5.45

E+ PCM model 0.03 1.02 -0.59 0.13 0.93 -0.81

E+ hysteresis PCM model 0.03 1.02 -0.59 0.13 0.93 -0.81

Thesis model 0.28 0.98 -0.58 0.12 0.95 -0.81

WUFI 0.30 1.02 -0.60 0.12 0.94 -0.83

Figure 7-14 shows the heat fluxes at the interface of the cellulose cavity and Nano-PCM

wallboard (point 5 of Figure 7-6). For the modeled results, the heat flux is calculated using the

temperature gradient between the interface node of the cellulose cavity and the Nano-PCM

wallboard and the immediate next node modeled in the cellulose cavity.

The heat flux meters used in this experiment also had an accuracy tolerance of ยฑ5% and

this uncertainty is shown in the experimental data line of the Figure 7-14.

117

Figure 7-14 Heat flux at the Point (5): interface of the cellulose cavity and the Nano PCM wallboard. Simulated data for COMSOL, EnergyPlus (2 modules), Thesis model, and WUFI is

shown.

RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE values for heat fluxes in Figure 7-14 are given in Table

7-9. All RMSE values are below 1 and show agreement. All values fall within the accepted

tolerances for the NMBE and CV (RMSE). All models produce very similar results CV (RMSE)

values between 16.27 - 17.55 %, and under-estimate heat flux peak by about 20 %.

Table 7-9 RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE calculations of the heat flux variations at the interface of cellulose cavity and the Nano PCM wallboard

Point 2 of Figure 3

Software RMSE (W/m2)

CV(RMSE) (%)

NMBE (%)

COMSOL 0.42 17.55 0.07

E+ PCM model 0.41 17.27 -0.20

E+ hysteresis PCM model 0.41 17.27 -0.20

Thesis model 0.41 17.33 -0.16

WUFI 0.39 16.27 -0.13

In all the temperature comparisons, the differences between the measured and modelled

values are within the uncertainty range for all cases. Differences could be due to the positioning

of sensors, hygrothermal effects, and hysteresis. This indicates confidence that the models can

118

predict temperature values along similar walls. In contrast, there is greater disagreement with heat

flux data, as this is typically harder to measure and compute. Interestingly, COMSOL 2D model

show similar results to rest of the PCM models that used 1D heat transfer models. Therefore, for

the measured locations, 2D calculation did not produce more accurate results.

7.4. Conclusions

This study empirically validates and compares 6 PCM models implemented in different

building energy (EnergyPlus, ESP-r), hygrothermal (WUFI) and heat transfer (COMSOL)

software, and mathematical programming language (MATLAB)/ Thesis model using data from

two independent experimental studies with Nano-PCM embedded in drywall and shape-stabilized

PCM behind the drywall construction material. This is a unique study that compares several up to

date PCM numerical modeling software commonly used in the field with two different PCM types

commonly used. The author conducts an extensive accuracy analysis of the compared results using

RMSE, CV (RMSE) and NMBE calculations. Based on the analyzed PCMs, all the evaluated

software tools demonstrate their ability to accurately model shape-stabilized PCM behind drywall.

However, heat flux predictions show greater deviation from than surface measurements. All

models agree also with the Nano-PCM experiments but ESP-r has the lowest convergence due to

less precise definition of boundary conditions. Interestingly, this study shows no additional gains

in accuracy when comparing a 2D heat transfer model with 1D modeling for Nano-PCM and

shape-stabilized PCMs. Study affirms that this numerical modeling software can be used to model

PCMs and extend the studies to evaluate unique behaviors like hygrothermal performance (WUFI,

EnergyPlus). However, more work is needed to evaluate PCM in macroencapsulated applications

when 2D/3D heat transfer hysteresis can have stronger effects.

119

CHAPTER 8

EMPIRICAL VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF PCM ALGORITHMS MODELING

MACRO-ENCAPSULATED PCMS IN THE BUILDING ENVELOPE

This section contributes to the fulfillment of the following objectives of this research: (iii)

Design and build experimental apparatus and a suitable controlled environment to test different

PCMs, (iv) Conduct laboratory research to validate the numerical model and identify PCMs

characteristics that could further improve the numerical solution, (v) Verify (using the numerical

model) and validate (using data from laboratory experiments, field experiments, and experimental

data from the in-house test apparatus) different PCM models in software platforms like EnergyPlus

and WUFI. The Dynamic Heat Flux Meter Apparatus characterization of PCM hydrate salts in this

study is conducted by Dr. Kaushik Biswas at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

8.1. Introduction

Reducing electricity demand during peak period decreases the stress on the electricity grid

[326]. Specifically, electricity used for space cooling has a significant contribution to peak

electricity demand as residential cooling drives electric peak demand in summer [327, 328].

Energy storage is one of the potential solutions to shave and shift building energy demand [329,

330]. Building thermal mass can be used as thermal energy storage (TES) due to the variability

of heating and cooling energy demand of the buildings [15, 331]. However, most residential

buildings in the U.S. tend to have low thermal mass [135], thus PCMs used in building envelope

can increase the thermal mass of the building envelope, shift peak demand of HVAC system, and

improve thermal comfort [332, 333]. In current research projects performed in the United States,

PCMs are often used as an integral part of the building thermal envelope [219].

Due to its variable thermal properties, PCM heat transfer modeling requires algorithms that

allow for variable properties, such as finite different approach. Although there are studies

proposing conduction transfer function (CTF), this approach has some limitations and has not been

adopted in any building energy simulation programs [334]. Most PCMs models used in building

energy simulation tools use either finite different of finite volume method [15]. The design and

120

operation of PCMs requires accurate energy modeling, which in turn requires validation of these

modeling approaches.

A recent IEA survey that looked into 250 publications states that the general confidence in

currently used numerical models is still too low to use them for designing and code purposes [266].

A recent study validated and compared 6 PCM models used in 5 energy modeling software [335].

However, this study is focused only on Paraffins PCMs nano-encapsulated and shape-stabilized

behind the drywall, but there are no current efforts for validating other PCMs or encapsulation

types. Recent reviews of PCMs show that solid phase and the liquid phase of a PCM has different

thermo-physical characteristics while they co-exist within the inclusion [15, 336]. PCM

encapsulation also influences heat transfer as macroencapsulated applications might be subject to

2D or 3D heat transfer phenomena and movement inside PCM encapsulation.

PCMs can be either organic, inorganic, or eutectic compounds [73, 219]. Organic PCMs

consist of fatty acids, fatty alcohols, esters, emulsifiers, and thickening agents [278, 337].

Inorganic PCMs are mostly made of hydrate-salts or metallics [338]. Both organic and inorganic

PCMs have been used in building applications [136, 137, 337, 339-343]. PCMs are typically

encapsulated either at micro or macro scale to contain PCM to hold the PCM and keep it separated

from the surrounding material [15, 344, 345]. Macroencapsulated PCMs avoid additional costs

related to microencapsulation [346]. There are few studies in literature which implements

macroencapsulated PCM pouches in the building envelope [153, 347-351]. Macroencapsulated

PCM implementation in the wall are passive or active [265, 352-354], static or dynamic [355].

Most popular PCM application is to use macro-encapsulated PCM in pouches behind drywall or

above false ceiling [136, 342, 343, 356-360]. PCMs have low thermal conductivity [361], [362],

with the container/pouch material can be selected to enhance the thermal conductivity [363]. This

study focuses on macroencapsulated PCMs in pouches placed behind drywall.

Macroencapsulated PCMs experimental studies are done at material scale [364], system

scale [365], and whole building scale [366]. Previous studies with macroencapsulated Bio-based

PCM (BioPCM) at system scale level investigate the impact of the PCMs on the temperature

oscillations in the building [340, 341], and the impact PCMs have on the operative temperature

and cooling power demand of an office cubicle in a full-scale test room [337]. These studies

conclude that macroencapsulated PCMs have greater ability to reduce indoor air temperature

121

oscillations compared with a non-PCM envelope. Another study compares field indoor air

temperature against EnergyPlus with macroencapsulated PCMs to find PCM in wall and ceiling is

shown to be the most suitable options in terms of increased thermal comfort and peak daytime

temperature reduction [197] and with no complete validation. Biswas [367] performs a partial

validation of EnergyPlus using data from BioPCM applications in a metal roof but only focusing

on the attic with no clear description on how to simulate plastic pouches in a 1D model. Another

study implements BioPCM behind the drywall in the exterior walls of a test hut to record PCM

performance data to apply in a numerical PCM algorithm and used the inverse method to analyze

PCM performance but did not conduct a validation study [80]. Muruganantham [356] implemented

BioPCMs as a retrofitted mock up building and simulated the PCM as thin layer in EnergPlus to

conduct a whole building energy analysis but did not validate their approach. PCM salts (calcium

chloride hydrate) pouches have been implemented in a metal roof in a study to quantify the

residential attic performance but does not validate the approach [340]. Therefore, these studies do

not conduct validation and comparison of the heat transfer across the building envelope and also

do not consider hysteresis effects.

Literature shows that macroencapsulated PCMs show 2D heat transfer effects due to the

pouches or containing devices [368]. However, since most building energy modeling software

assumes 1D heat transfer, it is important to develop, validate, and document a methodology to

simplify this complex heat transfer and include the challenging thermal behaviors of

macroencapsulated PCMs into these models.

Thus, this study validates and compares PCM algorithms in energy modeling software such

as EnergyPlus, thesis model and WUFI to quantify their accuracy when modeling PCMs in

building envelopes. No previous study has validated this software with different

macroencapsulated PCMs. Thus, the objectives and contributions of this study are: (1) show full-

scale wall experimental data from two walls with macroencapsulated PCMs, (2) validate and

compare different PCM models used in building simulation programs and (3) develop a

methodology to simplify 2D/3D heat transfer from the macroencapsulated system to a 1D heat

transfer.

122

8.2. Methodology

This study validates and compares 4 PCM models using in-house laboratory data from two

macroencapsulated PCMs: a BioPCM in plastic foil/white plastic sheeting pouches and PCM

hydrateโ€“salts (hydrate-salts) encapsulated in thermoplastic foil/ multilayer white polyfilm

pouches. As a reference an additional wall is also tested without PCMs. The analyzed PCMs

models are EnergyPlus hysteresis PCM model [369], EnergyPlus regular (without hysteresis)

PCM model [233], thesis model, and WUFI. These computational approach of these PCM models

are compared and fully described in a previous publication [335](chapter 7 of the thesis). The

experimental work in this study is conducted in a state-of-the-art experimental chamber located at

the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Colorado School of Mines that facilitates testing of

full scale wall panels under controlled conditions. Wall panels are constructed inside the chamber

and placed against a radiant wall to control the exterior boundary conditions and conduct full cycle

melting and freezing tests of the PCM products. Collected data is then used to validate and compare

PCM modeling software.

Macroencapsulated Phase Change Materials

Figure 8-1 shows the analyzed PCMs which are commercially available and contained in

pouches [370]. Figure 8-1a shows BioPCM contained in pouches made of plastic foil /white plastic

sheeting. These sheets are available in 0.42 m wide mats that come in lengths of 1.22 m or 2.44 m.

Figure 8-1b shows hydrate-salts contained in heavy-duty nylon/PE foil sheets. The average

thickness of the pouches is 6.4 mm for the BioPCM and 6.0 mm for the hydrate-salts. The pouch

thickness is not consistent over the surface area as the PCM is loosely packed.

Figure 8-1 Dimensions of analyzed PCM pouches: (a) BioPCM, (b) hydrate-salts.

123

As shown in the figure, these sheets are not uniform since there is 6-21 mm gap between

pouches. Therefore, extra attention is given to evaluate the impact of the presence of air with the

PCM layer

Table 8-1 shows thermo-physical properties of the analyzed PCMs. Typical PCM melting

temperatures used in the envelope applications are 19-27 ยบC [353]. All PCMs used in the current

study have a nominal melting point of 23 ยบC. Hydrate-salts have higher density and thermal

conductivity than the BioPCM. Therefore, for a given storage capacity, hydrate-salts add more

weight to the building. Hydrate-salts are also about 4 times more conductive than the BioPCM.

Table 8-1 Thermo-physical properties of analyzed macroencapsulated PCMs.

BioPCM Hydrate-salts

Product name M-51 BioPCM TM InfiniteRTM

Peak nominal melting temperature 23หšC/73หšF 23หšC/73หšF

Latent heat capacity (kJ/kg) ~230 ~200

Specific heat capacity (J/kg-K) 1,970 3,140

Thermal conductivity (W/m-K) Liquid: ~ 0.15

Solid: ~ 0.25

Liquid: ~0.54

Solid: ~1.09

Density (kg/m3) 860 3,420

Average thickness of the pouch โ€“ L

pouch (m) 0.0064 0.0060

Latent heat (kJ/m2) ~580 ~684

Pouch material Plastic foil / white plastic sheeting.

Thermos-plastic foil/ multilayer white heavy-duty nylon/PE foil bags

Pouch material thickness between the pouches (mm)

0.508 1.118

โ€ข Characterization curves of PCMs

Material characterization method is important in determining the thermal characteristics of

the PCMs. There are several methods used in literature and the accuracy of the characteristic data

depends on the method used [15, 278, 371]. Commonly used methods of characterization are:

124

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) [372], T-history [137], guarded Hot-Box [339], and Heat

Flow Meter Apparatus (HFMA) methods [130, 373]. Among these methods, Dynamic HFMA

method is the more suitable method to characterize PCMs in full scale as it is used to characterize

PCMs in conditions closer to the actual use of the product in buildings [80, 374]. However,

manufacturers usually used DSC to characterize PCMs. The reported latent heat of the BioPCM is

~230 kJ/kg and. ~200 kJ/kg for hydrate-salts.

Recent experimental work on macroencapsulated PCMs has shown complex PCM

behaviors like hysteresis and sub-cooling [340, 341, 359, 375]. The sub-cooling/ supercooling and

slow heat release can cause real hysteresis. Non-isothermal conditions of the measurements can

cause apparent hysteresis [278]. Sub-cooling effects are commonly seen in the hydrate-salts [376].

To obtain more reliable information on the complex behaviors of PCMs like hysteresis, author has

obtained DHFMA tests to characterize the PCMs latent heat curve.

Figure 8-2 shows enthalpy curves for BioPCM obtained from DSC method and provided

by the manufacturer. Melting starts at 20 ยบC and finishes at 26 ยบC. Freezing starts at 25 ยบC and

finishes at 19 ยบC. Therefore, melting and freezing temperature range of ~6 ยบC is observed. Peak

melting temperature of 23 ยบC (the rated melting temperature for the product), peak freezing

temperature of 22 ยบC, latent heat of 220 kJ/kg, and sensible heat of 12 kJ/kg are considered. The

enthalpy change for two curves show same values. Hysteresis is defined considering the difference

between the peak melting and freezing temperatures and observed a difference of 1 ยบC (23 ยบC peak

melting temperature and 22 ยบC peak freezing temperature). How these values are used to determine

the simplified curves to implement in PCM modelling software is discussed in detail in chapter 6

(section 6.21). No Subcooling is observed for the BioPCM.

The source of the hysteresis of DSC characterization results could be the non-homogenous

nature of the material as BioPCM product used in this study is a mixture of multiple organic

materials, emulsifiers, and thickening/ gelling agents and apparent hysteresis driven by the testing

method.

125

Figure 8-2 Enthalpy-temperature melting curves obtained using DSC characterization method for BioPCM.

Figure 8-3 shows the hydrate salt enthalpy curve obtained from the DSC and DHFMA.

DSC results shows a peak melting temperature of 23 ยบC (rated melting temperature for the

product), melting temperature range of ~5 ยบC, latent heat of 190 kJ/kg and sensible heat of 15

kJ/kg. Compared to DSC, DHFMA shows that peak melting temperature shifts from 23 ยบC to 26

ยบC. Peak temperature of freezing is around 25 ยบC. Melting starts at 20 ยบC and finishes at 28 ยบC.

Freezing starts at 27 ยบC and finishes at 19 ยบC. Therefore, melting and freezing temperature range

of ~8 ยบC is measured. DHFMA results showed latent heat of 150 kJ/kg, and sensible heat of 24

kJ/kg for both melting and heating, hysteresis is defined considering the difference between the

peak melting and freezing temperatures and observed a difference of 1 ยบC (26 ยบC peak melting

temperature and 25 ยบC peak freezing temperature), minimal subcooling. How these values are used

to determine the simplified curves to implement in PCM modelling software is discussed in detail

in chapter 6 (section 6.21). These characteristics data is used with the hysteresis PCM algorithms

in EnergyPlus and thesis model.

The difference between the DSC and DHFMA results could be attributed to the test

method. DSC test uses a dynamic ramp method of 1.0 ยบC/min of heating rate and the DHFMA

method uses a step method of heating and cooling. The step method allows for the specimen to

come to the equilibrium state whereas the dynamic ramp method yield more uncertainties of the

thermal equilibrium of the specimen relative to the step method. The length of the timestep is

126

determined by the signal generated after the temperature increment is taken [146]. After the

temperature step (increment/decrement) is taken, time is allowed until the detected signal to come

back to zero and then the next step is taken. For DHFMA method used in this study timestep is 60

minutes and temperature increment is ~1 ยบC. DSC method uses a test sample of mass ~10-30 mg

whereas the DHFMA method uses ~ 25 cm x 25 cm pouched PCM sample for the tests and the

data is area-averaged over several pouches and could lead to difference against DSC data. This

also relates to reason for reduced latent heat observed in the DHFMA results compared to the DSC

data. Furthermore, achieving the thermal equilibrium for non-uniform large samples can be

difficult and should be considered. The differences of DSC and DHFMA test methods used are

further discussed in detail in the chapter 4 (section 4.2). The source of the hysteresis of DHFMA

characterization results could be the non-homogenous nature of the material as salt-hydrate

product used in this study is a mixture of salts and thickening/ gelling agents. The errors attributing

to the measuring process can also further contribute to the differences observed.

Therefore, this study uses the enthalpy curve from DSC method for both PCMs when

comparing the simplified heat transfer methods using the thesis model and to compare between

other modelling software like EnergyPlus, and WUFI. DHFMA hysteresis results are only used in

final analysis with EnergyPlus hysteresis model and the thesis model in the section 8.35.

Figure 8-3 Enthalpy-temperature curves obtained using DSC and DHFMA characterization methods for PCM hydrate-salts.

127

Full scale testing environment

The laboratory consists of an environmental chamber made of stainless steel walls, a

dedicated air handling unit (AHU), and a radiant wall. Figure 8-4 shows a sketch of the top view

of the chamber and the dedicated heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system.

Cooling is provided by a 5 Ton chiller and a 10 row deep cooling coil. Heating is provided through

the campus heating system. The chamber interior dimensions are 5.38 m (17.65 ft.) length ร—4.46

m (14.63 ft.) width ร— 2.67 m (8.76 ft.). Ceiling height is variable from 2.67 to 3m and is able to

accommodate full scale wall assemblies vertically. Chamber has the ability to control: (i) supply

and return air flow rate, (ii) supply and return air relative humidity, (iii) supply and return dry bulb

temperature, and (iv) the percentage of outdoor air.

The north-west wall is equipped with a hydronic radiant wall that can simulate an exterior

wall subjected to solar radiation and/or drive heat transfer by applying a temperature difference

across a wall assembly as it has its dedicated water (water and 30% glycol mixture) heater and

chiller. The radiant wall has a surface temperature range of 4 - 60 ยบC (40 - 140 ยบF)

Figure 8-4 Schematic overview of, Section A: Air handling unit (AHU), Section B: return duct of the air to the AHU, Section C: Environmental chamber.

128

Instrumentation and system control is done using multiple sensors and four main data

acquisition (DAQ) units are used,

1. ABB PLC system (Custom interface): This system is dedicated to control purposes HVAC

system and to measure supply and return air temperature, humidity, air flow rate, VOC and

CO2.

2. Instrunet: This DAQ logs main experimental data such as wall surface and interface

temperatures, heat flux, VOC and CO2 in the supply and return ducts, flow temperature

sensors of the radiant wall.

3. Air Distribution Measuring System (AirDistSys 5000): This DAQ collects air temperature

and air velocity at different locations inside the chamber.

4. FLIR T630 Infrared Camera (FLIR ResearchIR): Infrared camera to measure average

interior wall surface temperature.

Table 8-2 shows instrumentation (and its uncertainty) used in this study. Thermistors are

used to measure all surface temperatures all surface. Interior wall surface temperature is

additionally measured by infrared thermal camera and values. Radiant wall water supply and return

temperature is measured using two sets of sensors in (and on) the pipes.

Table 8-2 Sensor type, purpose, uncertainty, and quantity of the sensors used in the experimental analysis.

Sensor type Purpose Uncertainty Number of sensors

Heat flux meters Measure heat flux between PCM and

adjacent external layer.

ยฑ3% 1 per measuring area

(each panel)

Thermistors/ Surface

Thermistors

Measure surface temperature at all

surfaces

ยฑ0.1ยบC 1/5/7 per measuring area

Omni-directional hot-sphere

Anemometers

Measure air speed near wall or above PCM

ยฑ2% 3/4 per measuring area

FLIR T630s Infrared Camera

Measure the surface temperatures of the wall

ยฑ2ยบC Covers area of the panels 3 and 4

BELIMO LRX24-

EP flow meter Measure radiant wall

water flow rate ยฑ 2% 1 unit leading the

flow pump.

129

Inside air temperature and air speed is measured with omni-directional hot-sphere

anemometers at different locations near the walls. Heat fluxes through the wall panels are

measured/calculated using two methods for redundancy purposes: (i) using heat flux meters

located behind the PCM layer (interface between PCM and plywood) and (ii) measuring the water

flow rate and supply and return air temperature.

Envelope assemblies

Multilayer 1D walls are constructed without a stud in order to: (i) eliminate the 2D/3D

effects around studs and cavities since the study is focused on validating the 1D PCM models, and

(ii) focus on macroencapsulated PCM heat transfer rather than whole wall with 2D/3D phenomena.

Each wall is 2.44 m x 1.22 m (8 ft. x 4 ft.) and the size is selected to: eliminate any edge effects,

select the typical wall size, and cover complete radiant wall. The wall panels however does not

cover the entire chamber wall. Any remaining exposed surfaces of the heat exchanger surface and

the north-west wall is insulated using R-10 XPS insulation panels to minimize heat losses. Figure

8-5 shows the walls analyzed and installed against the on the radiant wall (north-west wall).

Panel 1 is the reference panel with no PCMs. PCM pouch mats are fastened to the plywood

in the panels 3 and 4. Panel 3 and 4 are shown here without drywall layer to show the pouches.

Each 1.22 m x 2.44 m /1.22 m x 2.44 m (4 ft. x 4 ft. / 4 ft. x 8 ft.) drywall panels are fastened with

stainless steel fasteners from ~10 cm from the edge of the panels to minimize thermal bridging

effects. Finally, two bars across all walls horizontally are installed to avoid bending of the panels

to increase surface contact and reduce constant resistance. However, there was a slight bending

mostly on the drywall, which does not affect the PCMs surfaces.

Each PCM pouch panel has 4 mats. To avoid edges or overlaps within the center of panel

area a single mat is first placed in the center and the other 3 mats are cut in half and fastened around

the central PCM mat. In addition, the 0.4 m x 0.4 m core area considered to place sensors are

shown for both panel 3 (green) and panel 4 (orange). All wall assemblies have: (1) 0.019 m (0.75

inch) plywood as the layer exposed to the radiant wall, (2) a thin copper layer to improve the heat

transfer and fire safety at the interface of plywood and drywall, and (3) 0.0127 m (0.5 inch) drywall

layer exposed to the interior of the chamber. Panel 3 includes the BioPCMs and the Panel 4

includes the Hydrate-salts.

130

Figure 8-5 Front view and the key dimensions of how the 4 panels constructed. The exposed radiant wall in the right end is insulated with 5.08 cm (2 in) of R-10 insulation. Panel 3 and 4 are shown here with the front drywall layer removed to showcase the PCM pouch mats arrangement.

Table 8-3 indicates the thermo-physical properties and dimensions of the materials used to

construct the wall assemblies. These property values are obtained from the ASHRAE handbook of

fundamentals and the manufacturers [377].

Table 8-3 Thermo-physical properties and dimensions of the material used in the wall panels.

Material ฯ (kg/m3)

Conductivity (W/m-K)

Specific Heat Capacity (J/kg-K)

Effective Latent Heat (kJ/kg)

Effective Thickness (m)

Plywood (5-ply) 470 0.10 1880 0 0.0191

Regular drywall 800 0.16 1200 0 0.0127

PCM drywall 800 0.16 1200 110 0.0127

BioPCM pouch material (pm)

850 0.25 1500 0 0.000508

hydrate-salt pm 925 0.50 1500 0 0.001118

Air 1.225 0.0248 1005 0 N/A

131

Figure 8-6 shows the front-view of the PCM mats behind the drywall. Large surface areas

(compared to wall thickness) produce a one-dimensional heat flux (ASTM C 1363-97 [378],

ASTM C 177-97 [379]). In addition, only the center part of the walls (shaded region) is used for

thermal measurements as the outer part is used as a buffer zone where 1-dimensional flux cannot

be safely assumed. All sensors are placed within this shaded core area of 0.4mร—0.4m. The seven

thermistors are placed to obtain average surface temperature from each interface.

Heat flux meter has an area of 0.1mร—0.1m and is placed at the center of the core area to

capture maximum pouch area. Four Thermistors are placed aligned the middle of the pouch on the

plywood surface (T1, T3, T4, T5) and the drywall surface (two sensors either side of the pouch).

Two Thermistors are placed aligning the top and the bottom of the pouch (T2, T7). One thermistor

is placed aligning the gap in between the pouches T6. The sensors are placed in this order on both

side of the pouches. Given similar dimensions of both PCM macroencapsulation systems, both

walls have the same sensor arrangement.

Figure 8-6 Front view of the PCM pouches and the sensor locations of the interface with the drywall layer removed.

132

Figure 8-7 shows the top view of each assembly layers of the core area wall panels

investigated. For the regular drywall at each interface 5 thermistors are used. There are two

interfaces, behind the pouches and in front of the pouches for macroencapsulated PCM cases. Each

interface has 7 thermistors and the heat flux meter is placed behind the PCM layer in parallel to

the copper layer. Thermistors in the plywood-pouches interface are placed on the plywood surface

slightly carved in (shown here in the plywood layer). Similarly, thermistors in the pouches-drywall

interface are placed on the drywall surface slightly carved in (shown here in the drywall layer).

When averaging the temperature measured at interface sensors later in the study, the T2 and T6 are

assumed to be located across the air cavity and other thermistors to be located either side of PCMs.

A surface thermistor is placed on the interior surface TS(in) and the exterior surface TS(ext) to

measure surface temperatures. Two thermistors are placed on the hydronic wall fluid pipes where

the flow enters the panel area Trw,inl and flow exits the panel area, Trw,oul. The interface temperature

sensors (T1-T7) as seen from above is also shown here.

Figure 8-7 Top view of the core section with each material layers and the sensor locations (split view) (a) wall panels with just regular drywall (b) wall panels with PCM pouches and regular

drywall.

133

Cooling and heating temperature set-points for full-cycle tests

Figure 8-8 shows the radiant wall supply fluid temperature and chamber supply air

temperature setpoints. These are selected not to represent actual wall temperatures but to allow the

PCMs to fully cycle from solid to liquid and vice-versa with semi-realistic temperature rates: heat

up rate of about 0.35 ยบC/min. Literature shows temperature gradients in the range of 0.05 ยบC/min

[136] to 10.0 ยบC/min [380] are used in characterizing PCMs in building envelope applications.

Usually slower heating rates can capture the characteristics better as they allow test sample more

time to reach thermal equilibrium [381].

The radiant wall supply temperature cycles from 5 ยบC to 60 ยบC while the chamber supply

air temperature setpoint is maintained at 12.8 ยบC. Chamber interior air temperature is allowed to

float by 4-7 ยบC. These experiments are repeated 5 times for repeatability purposes. The time

interval between the setpoint changes are determined based on (ii) when the interface temperatures

come to a steady state, (ii) and both sides of the PCM layer reach beyond the phase change

temperature interval. A range of 12-24 hour time intervals are examined to find cycling period that

allows for PCM to fully change phase. It is determined to cycle 16 hours to allow temperatures to

get to steady state at each cycle and shown in blue shaded range in Figure 8-8. Data is obtained

for 100 hours allowing for 3 full cycles of phase change for the analysis purposes.

Figure 8-8 Radiant wall supply fluid temperature setpoint and chamber air temperature.

134

Heat transfer modeling of macroencapsulated PCMs

PCM encapsulation influences the PCM melting and freezing processes. PCM pouches in

the building envelope create air voids due to the gaps between the pouches as well as the uneven

distribution of the PCMs in the pouches. PCMs in the pouches are concentrated towards the

middle/lower of the pouch due to gravity effects and melting. These voids can hinder the heat

transfer across the PCM layer. Figure 8-9a shows the gaps between the pouches on the vertical

direction and horizontal direction (๐ด1). Furthermore, it shows how the distribution within the

BioPCM leading to empty pockets within the pouch as well as air gaps due to the uneven thickness

of the pouch. Figure 8-9b shows a schematic of the cross section of macroencapsulation to

visualize the airgaps and PCM distribution. The rated average thickness of the PCM pouch layer

is 6.4mm for the BioPCM and 6 mm for hydrate salts. To find the average PCM volume of a pouch

a fluid displacement test is used by removing the PCMs from the pouches and completely

submerging the PCM in olive oil (hydrate-salts has a water content) and the volumes for 5 pouches

are averaged for each pouch type. The measuring devices has a ยฑ 5% uncertainty. BioPCM

measured average value is 19.6 cm3 and PCM-salts is 14.5 cm3 of PCM per pouch.

Figure 8-9 PCM inclusion in pouches (BioPCM case is shown here) (a) front view of the uneven PCM distribution (BioPCM) (b) schematic of the side view when PCM mats are placed between

plywood and the drywall.

135

To simplify heat transfer process through the pouches with minimal accuracy losses, three

methods are considered and are summarized in Figure 8-10. Figure 8-10a shows an effective

thickness approach, Figure 8-10 b considers parallel path heat transfer approach and Figure 8-10

c also considers parallel path heat transfer and treats the PCMs as a porous media. For these

calculations the reference cross sectional area A is the aggregate of A1 and A2 indicated in the

above. PCM pouch layer comprises of repetition of โ€˜Aโ€™ units across the surface. For BioPCM

A=77.2 cm2 and for hydrate-salts A=54, 0 cm2.

Figure 8-10 Considered heat transfer simplification methods: (a) PCM distributed as a thin continuous layer, (b) PCM layer as a parallel path heat transfer, and (c) PCM as a porous

material and parallel path

1. Effective thickness approach: This method defines an effective thickness assuming PCM is

evenly distributed as a thin layer as shown in Figure 8-10a [153]. It ignores the void section

between (or inside) pouches, and assumes nominal PCM density, specific heat capacity, and latent

heat of PCM. Equation 8-1 and Equation 8-2 shows the calculation of the effective thickness Leff.

136

๐ด = ๐ด1 + ๐ด2 (8-1)

๐ฟ๐‘’๐‘“๐‘“ = ๐‘‰๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€๐ด (8-2)

2. Parallel path with continuous PCM: This method simulates PCM pouches using parallel path

thermal network to calculate an effective thermal conductivity that includes PCM and void spaces.

This is done in two approaches as discussed by Bergman et al. [382] to model heat transfer across

a composite wall.

2(a): The parallel network analysis considers also the drywall and plywood (Figure

8-11).Therefore, is termed โ€œfullโ€ parallel path. Thus, one serial network consist of

plywood-air-pouch-air-drywall (network cavity) and another serial network consist of

plywood-pouch material-PCM-pouch-drywall (network pcm). Acav and Apcm are cavity path

area and PCM path area.

Figure 8-11 Parallel path heat transfer across the wall assemblies with PCM pouches. This method assumes two paths across the entire assembly and assumes surfaces parallel to the heat

transfer process are adiabatic. Here temperature at surface 1 and 5/ 4 and 8 are different.

137

2(b): The parallel network analysis considers only the PCM layer (Figure 8-12). Therefore,

a single node temperature is implemented with the assumption of interfaces (surfaces

normal to the heat transfer direction) are isothermal. This is termed โ€œpartialโ€ parallel path

moving forward.

Figure 8-12 Parallel path heat transfer across the wall assemblies with PCM pouches. This method assumes two paths across only the PCM layer and the nodes on the interfaces are

isothermal (temperature at surface 1 and 5/ 4 and 8 are same).

Equation 8-3 shows the total thermal resistance (Rtot) for parallel heat transfer, this equation

is the same for 2(a) and 2(b).

๐‘…๐‘ก๐‘œ๐‘ก = ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ โˆ— ๐‘…๐‘๐‘๐‘š๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ + ๐‘…๐‘๐‘๐‘š (8-3)

For 2(a), resistances through first serial path (Rcav) includes resistances of drywall, air,

pouch material air, drywall as shown in equations 8-4 and 8-5. Pouch thickness value values (Lpm)

for the pouch gaps are given by the manufacturer (Lpm).

๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ = ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘‘๐‘ค + ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ1 + ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘๐‘š + ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ, ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ2+ ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘๐‘™๐‘ฆ (8-4)

138

๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ = 1๐ด๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ (๐ฟ๐‘‘๐‘ค๐‘˜๐‘‘๐‘ค + ๐ฟ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ๐‘˜๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ โˆ— 1โ„Ž๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘ 1โˆ’2(๐ฟ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ๐‘˜๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ + 1โ„Ž๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘ 1โˆ’2) + ๐ฟ๐‘๐‘š๐‘˜๐‘๐‘š + ๐ฟ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ๐‘˜๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ โˆ— 1โ„Ž๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘ 3โˆ’4(๐ฟ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ๐‘˜๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ + 1โ„Ž๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘ 3โˆ’4) + ๐ฟ๐‘๐‘™๐‘ฆ๐‘˜๐‘๐‘™๐‘ฆ) (8-5)

Resistances through second serial path (Rpcm), through plywood, pouch material, PCM,

pouch material, drywall is shown in equation 8-6.

๐‘…๐‘๐‘๐‘š = ๐‘…๐‘๐‘๐‘š,๐‘‘๐‘ค + ๐‘…๐‘๐‘๐‘š,๐‘๐‘š1 + ๐‘…๐‘๐‘๐‘š,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ + ๐‘…๐‘๐‘๐‘š,๐‘๐‘š2+ ๐‘…๐‘๐‘๐‘š,๐‘๐‘™๐‘ฆ (8-6)

๐‘…๐‘๐‘๐‘š = 1๐ด๐‘๐‘๐‘š (๐ฟ๐‘‘๐‘ค๐‘˜๐‘‘๐‘ค + ๐ฟ๐‘๐‘š 2โ„๐‘˜๐‘๐‘š + ๐ฟ๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€๐‘˜๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€(๐‘‡) + ๐ฟ๐‘๐‘š 2โ„๐‘˜๐‘๐‘š + ๐ฟ๐‘๐‘™๐‘ฆ๐‘˜๐‘๐‘™๐‘ฆ) (8-7)

The effective area of PCM serial network (Apcm) is based on the PCM occupied volume

(VPCM) and thickness LPCM as shown equation 8-8. Pouch material thickness Lpm and the average

pouch thickness Lpouch is used to calculate the PCM thickness LPCM (equation 8-9). Ap2 and Ap1 are

determined as shown in equation 8-10 and the area ratios (ฮปcav, ฮปpcm) for parallel heat transfer are

defined in equation 8-11 and equation 8-12.

๐ด๐‘๐‘๐‘š = ๐‘‰๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€๐ฟ๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ (8-8)

๐ฟ ๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ = ๐ฟ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘โ„Žโˆ’๐ฟ๐‘๐‘š (8-9)

๐ด๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ = ๐ด โˆ’ ๐ด๐‘2 (8-10)

139

๐œ†๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ = ๐ด๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐ด (8-11)

๐œ†๐‘๐‘๐‘š = ๐ด๐‘๐‘๐‘š๐ด (8-12)

Heat transfer through the pouches is only due to conduction and radiation heat transfer as

the PCM pouches are very thin, and are actually in a gel state due to gelling agents added to PCMs.

The gel state was also confirmed by visual inspection. Recent analysis of PCMs in pouches has

also confirms these assumptions [80]. Therefore, conduction and radiation heat transfer resistances

are used to calculate the total resistance through the air gaps and shown in equation 8-13 and

equation 8-14.

๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ1 = ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ, ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ1(๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘‘) โˆ— ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ (๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘1โˆ’2 )๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ, ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ1(๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘‘) + ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ (๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘1โˆ’2 ) (8-13)

๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ2 = ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ, ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ1(๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘‘) โˆ— ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ (๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘ 3โˆ’4 )๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ, ๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ1(๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘‘) + ๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ (๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘ 3โˆ’4 ) (8-14)

The radiative heat transfer between surface 1-2 and 3-4 (Figure 8-11) are shown in equation

8-15 and equation 8-16. Here, Tave (1, 4) is the average temperature is calculated using temperatures

of surface 1 and 4 (equation 8-17). In calculating the radiation heat transfer coefficient Tave (1, 4) is

used in place for T2 and T3 because the simulations showed these values showed less than 0.10

RMSE when comparing due to the high relative conductivity of the pouch material to air. The

view factors between the surfaces, F12 and F34 are calculated using the radiation exchange equation

for two rectangular plates and are 0.85 for each surface [383]. Emissivity of each surface is

obtained through ASHRAE handbook of fundamentals and published databases (ิplywood=0.95,

ิcopper=0.07, ิdrywall=0.85, BioPCM pouches (cream surface plastic pouches) ิBioPCM,pm =0.8,

Hydrate salt pouches (nylon foil with painting coat): ิsalts,pm=0.80)[377, 384]. For the plywood

layer surface the emissivity of the copper is assumed when calculating radiative heat transfer even

140

if the copper layer is not modelled as a separate layer. Thermal conductivity resistance in all

opaque layers is calculated using equation 8-18.

๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ (๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘1โˆ’2 ) = ((1 โˆ’ ๐œ€1๐œ€1 )+ ( 1๐น12)+ (1 โˆ’ ๐œ€2๐œ€2 ))๐ด๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ(๐‘‡12 + ๐‘‡๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’(1,4)2 )(๐‘‡1 + ๐‘‡๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’(1,4)) (8-15)

๐‘…๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ,๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ (๐‘Ÿ๐‘Ž๐‘‘ 3โˆ’4 ) = ((1 โˆ’ ๐œ€3๐œ€3 ) + ( 1๐น34) + (1 โˆ’ ๐œ€4๐œ€4 ))๐ด๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ(๐‘‡๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’(1,4)2 + ๐‘‡42)(๐‘‡๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’(1,4) + ๐‘‡4) (8-16)

๐‘‡๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘’(1,4) = ๐‘‡1 + ๐‘‡42 (8-17)

๐‘…๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘‘ = ๐ฟ๐‘™๐‘Ž๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐ด๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘กโ„Ž โˆ— ๐‘˜๐‘™๐‘Ž๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘Ÿ (8-18)

Thermal conductivity of the PCM layer is defined in three stages of phase change, solid, liquid

and the โ€œmushy regionโ€. The mushy region considers the temperature dependent conductivity

show in equation 8-19. Tm, low is low bound of the melting temperature range and then Tm, high is the

higher bound of the melting temperature range. ks, PCM is solid state PCM thermal conductivity and

kl, PCM is liquid state PCM thermal conductivity.

๐‘˜๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ = { ๐‘˜๐‘ ,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€, ๐‘‡ โ‰ค ๐‘‡๐‘š,๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘ค ๐‘˜๐‘™,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ + ((๐‘˜๐‘ ,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ โˆ’ ๐‘˜๐‘™,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€)๐‘‡๐‘š,โ„Ž๐‘–๐‘”โ„Ž โˆ’ ๐‘‡๐‘š,๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘ค (๐‘‡ โˆ’ ๐‘‡๐‘š,๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘ค) ) ๐‘‡๐‘š,๐‘™๐‘œ๐‘ค < ๐‘‡ < ๐‘‡๐‘š,โ„Ž๐‘–๐‘”โ„Ž ๐‘˜๐‘™,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€, ๐‘‡ โ‰ฅ ๐‘‡๐‘š,โ„Ž๐‘–๐‘”โ„Ž (8-19)

The effective density (ฯ), specific heat (cp), and latent heat (LH) are calculated based on

mass basis following equations 8-20 to 8-22 [375].

141

๐œŒ๐‘š,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ = ๐œŒ๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ โˆ— ( ๐‘š๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€๐‘š๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ + ๐‘š๐‘๐‘š+ ๐‘š๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ) (8-20)

๐‘๐‘๐‘š,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ = ๐‘๐‘๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ โˆ— ( ๐‘š๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€๐‘š๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ + ๐‘š๐‘๐‘š+ ๐‘š๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ) (8-21)

๐ฟ๐ป๐‘š,๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ = ๐ฟ๐ป๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ โˆ— ( ๐‘š๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€๐‘š๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ + ๐‘š๐‘๐‘š+ ๐‘š๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ) (8-22)

3. Parallel path method assuming PCMs are porous: Same as 2 (โ€œfullโ€ parallel path and โ€œpartialโ€

parallel path) but considers the PCMs as a soft porous permeable solid matrix, [385-388]. The

effective conductivity kPCM, porous is calculated using equation 8-23 [389-391] for heat transfer

through porous media, where kPCM is the PCM conductivity in continuous media and kair is the

thermal conductivity of air surrounding the PCM. Conductive heat transfer is assumed through the

pore structure within the PCMs due to thin layers considered. ิ is the porosity and defined in

equation 8-24. The inter-particle porosity data is not available for the PCMs investigated.

Porosities are therefore approximated by values obtained from literature for the components that

PCMs comprises of, ๐œ™=0.3 for BioPCM (esters, fatty acids, fatty alcohols) [392], and ๐œ™ =0.1 for

PCM hydrate-salts [386, 393]). After the conductivity is calculated, the resistance of the PCM

layer is defined in equation 8-25.

๐‘˜๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€,๐‘๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘  = ๐‘˜๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ โˆ— (1 + (๐œ™ โˆ— ( ๐‘˜๐‘Ž๐‘–๐‘Ÿ๐‘˜๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ โˆ’ 1))) (8-23)

๐œ™ = ๐‘‰๐‘ฃ๐‘œ๐‘–๐‘‘๐‘‰๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€ (8-24)

๐‘…๐‘๐‘œ๐‘›๐‘‘,๐‘๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘  = ๐ฟ๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€๐ด๐‘2 โˆ— ๐‘˜๐‘ƒ๐ถ๐‘€,๐‘๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘  (8-25)

142

Using the simplified methods in the 1D thesis model

Thesis model is a 1D heat transfer model. Therefore, above discussed parallel path resistor

methods should be implemented to calculate the temperatures at each node to compare with the

experimental data for the validation study. Parallel path thermal resistance values are used to

calculate the effective conductivity of the layer nodes.

For full parallel path method, the heat transfer is calculated for the cavity path and pcm

path using the thesis model separately since the exterior and interior boundary temperatures are

the same for the two paths. Effective conductivity is calculated through the air layer of the cavity

path since both conduction and radiative heat transfer is considered. The resultant heat fluxes are

then averaged weighted based on the area of each path. This helps to calculate the node

temperature values for drywall-pouches and pouches-plywood interfaces.

For the partial parallel path method, the effective conductivity values are dynamically

calculated since the interface temperatures are assumed the same for the both paths. Area weight

is also used in this method to calculate total resistance value. keff, pouch values are calculated for the

PCM pouch layer using the equation 8-26. Reff, pouch is the total R value across the PCM pouches

layer. The keff, pouch values are calculated for each timestep and are dependent on the temperature

since the conductivity of the PCM (kPCM) is temperature dependent.

๐‘˜๐‘’๐‘“๐‘“,๐‘๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘โ„Ž = ๐ฟ๐‘๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘โ„Ž๐ด โˆ— ๐‘…๐‘’๐‘“๐‘“,๐‘๐‘œ๐‘ข๐‘โ„Ž (8-26)

Figure 8-13 summarizes how the heat transfer across pouches with 3D heat transfer

characteristics is simplified using the geometry of the pouches and parallel path thermal resistance

methods. Figure 8-13a shows the actual pouch indicating non-homogenous PCM distribution.

Figure 8-13b shows the reduced 3D view based on PCM distribution and geometry. Figure 8-13c

shows the 2D view of the parallel path method applied to calculate the heat transfer and Figure

8-13d shows how the current timestep keff values calculated using resistor methods are used in the

1D heat transfer thesis model using the current timestep temperatures.

143

Figure 8-13 Geometry based dimension reductions used in the study (a) actual view of the pouch with 3D characteristics, (b) adjusted 3D view based on PCM volume and geometry, (c) reduced

2D view with the parallel path methods, (d) using the thermal resistance values temperature dependent effective conductivity is calculated and applied for 1D thesis model.

For the thesis model, a uniform mesh size is used across the PCM pouches layer. Average

of the effective conductivities of the liquid phase and the solid phase is used to set the space

discretization ฮ”x using the equation 6-2. ฮ”t used throughout this study is 1 minute.

These simplifications and assumptions are built and compared validated the thesis model

due to programming flexibility. After this, the simplification with the closest agreement is

implement in EnergyPlus, thesis model and WUFI.

144

PCM models used in Building energy and hygrothermal software

This study compares PCM models from EnergyPlus (2 modules), and WUFI in addition to

a customized validated PCM model in thesis model previously validated with analytical and

empirical data. A detailed description and comparison between these models is described in a

recent study [335]. The comparison of the different heat transfer methods and validation study of

EnergyPlus, thesis model and WUFI are conducted without hysteresis data. Hysteresis data of

PCMs are used in the final section of the study to compare the simulations of EnergyPlus and

thesis model with and without hysteresis.

Validation

ASHRAE standard 140 defines three main approaches for V&V: (1) analytical verification,

(2) empirical validation, and (3) comparative testing [394]. Verification and validation (V&V) are

important steps in numerical model development to ensure desired performance and accuracy

[233]. Tabares et al. discusses an approach to validate PCM models with experimental data. The

empirical validation of the PCM modeling software has not been done for PCM pouches using the

system scale implementation.

RMSE, NMBE and CV (RMSE) are recommended for error evaluation of energy, heat-

flux and temperature [317]. This study uses graphical comparison, Root Mean Square Error

(RMSE), Coefficient of Variation of the Root Mean Square Error (CV (RMSE)), and Normalized

Mean Biased Error (NMBE) as the indices to validate the models and are used together in several

recent studies [320, 395]. The recommended ranges of (NMBE) and (CV (RMSE)) are ยฑ 10%

and 30% according to the ASHRAE guideline14.

The thesis tolerances considered are NMBE of ยฑ 5% and CV(RMSE) of ยฑ 15%. These

measures are calculated using equations 8-27 to 8-29. Here, ๐‘ฆ๐‘– represents measured values and ๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘– represents simulated values. N is number of data points. ๐‘ฆ๐‘šฬ…ฬ… ฬ…ฬ… is the mean of the measured values.

๐‘…๐‘€๐‘†๐ธ = โˆš โˆ‘ (๐‘ฆ๐‘– โˆ’ ๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘–)2๐‘๐‘–=1 ๐‘ (8-27)

145

๐‘๐‘€๐ต๐ธ = 1๐‘ฆ๐‘šฬ…ฬ… ฬ…ฬ… (โˆ‘ (๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘–โˆ’๐‘ฆ๐‘–)๐‘๐‘–=1 ๐‘ ) ร— 100 (8-28)

๐ถ๐‘‰ (๐‘…๐‘€๐‘†๐ธ) = 1๐‘ฆ๐‘šฬ…ฬ… ฬ…ฬ…ฬ…โˆš โˆ‘ (๐‘ฆ๐‘–โˆ’๏ฟฝฬ‚๏ฟฝ๐‘–)2๐‘๐‘–=1 ๐‘ ร— 100 (8-29)

As similar temperature variations are observed in the 3 melting and freezing cycles in the

considered time interval, the author zoomed into of 32-hour window for the graphical comparison

and the accuracy analysis. Differences due to the positioning of sensors, hygrothermal effects are

not taken into account in this analysis.

8.3. Results and Discussion

Temperature variation on the surfaces of the panels

Figure 8-14 and Figure 8-15 show the surface temperatures for all the panels investigated

for a 4-day (96 hour) test. Blue shaded area indicates allowed half-cycle time of 16 hours. The

dashed horizontal line shows the nominal PCM melting temperature of the PCM of 23 ยบC. Cream

color shaded area indicates the phase change interval obtained from the manufacturer provided

PCM data. For BioPCM the value is 6 ยบC and for the PCM hydrate-salts the value is 5 ยบC. Both

figures show the exterior (Exterior surface) temperature and interior (Interior surface) temperature

measurements. These temperatures are input as temperature boundary condition for the thesis

model and other software used in the validation study.

Average interface temperatures between plywood and pouches interface (Experimental

(ply-pou)) and average temperature at the across pouches and the drywall (Experimental (pou-

dry)) are also shown for both panels. These averaged values are calculated by taking the location

of each interface thermistor in the interface and are described above. Actual heating rates observed

across the PCM pouches are 0.11 ยบC/min at the interface of plywood-pouches pouches and 0.05

ยบC /min at the interface of PCM pouches-drywall for both heating and cooling for both BioPCMs

and Hydrate-salts.

146

Figure 8-14 Boundary and interface temperatures of the wall assembly with BioPCM. Lines, 1. Exterior surface temperature, 2. Plywood-pouches interface temperature, 3. Pouches-drywall

interface temperature, 4. Exterior surface temperature.

Figure 8-15 Boundary and interface temperatures of the wall assembly with PCM hydrate salts. Lines, 1. Exterior surface temperature, 2. Plywood-pouches interface temperature, 3. Pouches-

drywall interface temperature, 4. Exterior surface temperature.

6 ยบC

5 ยบC

147

Temperature variation of the PCMs behind drywall

Figure 8-16 shows the temperature variations observed on the surface of the drywall

exposed to the interior of the chamber. The core area is represented by the box, and the surface

temperature sensor is located at the โ€œcurserโ€. The figure also shows that the temperature

distribution is influenced by the PCM pouch mats. Maximum temperature differences observed

across the core measuring area is ~1.2 ยบC. This is less than the rated uncertainty of the IR camera

surface temperature measurements.

Figure 8-16 Surface temperature recorded and visualized through the Infrared Camera measured every 2 hour intervals after radiant wall setpoint is increase from 40 ยบC to 140 ยบC.

148

Figure 8-17 maps the discrete temperature measurements shown in the above Figure 8-16

to the temperatures measured from the in surface thermistor at the surface of the BioPCM panel.

Figure 8-17 Average core surface temperature (panel 3): The temperatures at every 2 hour period is mapped with the figure Figure 8-16.

Comparison of heat transfer approaches for PCM macroencapsulation

This section conducts a graphical comparison and accuracy analysis of interface

temperatures to select a method that shows the closest agreement with the experimental data.

โ€ข BioPCM

Figure 8-18 graphically compares temperature at the plywood-pouches interface for

BioPCM. Averaged temperature of the 7 interface sensors are used for experimental temperature.

The average temperature is calculated taking into consideration the location of the temperature

sensors on the pouch mat. The sensors at the top of the pouch and the gap in-between pouches are

considered to be placed at air-pouch material-air path of heat transfer, and the sensors at the middle

of the pouch and bottom of the pouch are considered to be placed at pouch material-PCM-pouch

material path of the heat transfer.

149

Data is shown for 32 hours (the second full cycle of melting and freezing of the data shown

above). The average temperatures for plywood-pouches interface and pouches-drywall interface

for the full parallel path method are calculated using the weights of the areas Acav and Apcm of each

path. The interface temperatures for the partial parallel path are directly output in the thesis model.

Blue shaded area shows the cooling cycle of 16 hours. Methods (i) effective thickness, (ii) full

parallel path, solid PCM, (iii) partial parallel path, solid PCM, (iv) full parallel path, porous PCM,

and (v) partial parallel path, porous PCM are compared with the experimental data. Lines 4 (partial

parallel path, solid PCM and line 6 (partial parallel path, porous PCM show closest agreement in

graphical comparison. Full parallel path method with no latent heat is also shown in figure to

indicate the influence of the latent heat on the curves.

Figure 8-18 Temperature at the interface of plywood and PCM of BioPCM wall panel. Lines, 1. Experimental data. 5 simplification methods: 2. Effective thickness 3. Full parallel path, solid PCM, 4. Partial parallel path, solid PCM, 5. Full parallel path, porous PCM, 6. Partial parallel

path, porous PCM, and 7. Partial parallel path, without PCM (no-latent heat).

Figure 8-19 shows the graphical comparison of temperature at the pouches-drywall

interface for BioPCM. Methods, (i) effective thickness, (ii) full parallel path, solid PCM, (iii)

partial parallel path, solid PCM, (iv) full parallel path, porous PCM, and (v) partial parallel path,

porous PCM are compared with the experimental data.

150

Area averaged temperature of the 7 interface sensors are used for experimental

temperature.

Figure 8-19 Temperature at the interface of PCM and drywall of BioPCM wall panel. Lines, 1. Experimental data. 5 simplification methods: 2. Effective thickness 3. Full parallel path, solid PCM, 4. Partial parallel path, solid PCM, 5. Full parallel path, porous PCM, 6. Partial parallel

path, porous PCM, and 7. Partial parallel path, without PCM (no-latent heat).

Table 8-4 shows the accuracy analysis related to the above comparisons. While CV(RMSE)

values and NMBE values fall within the guideline the RMSE values are lowest for partial parallel

path, solid PCM method. From the graphical comparison and the accuracy analysis, the partial

parallel path, solid PCM method is the method with least disagreement for the BioPCM simulation.

Table 8-4 Accuracy analysis for the comparison of two interface temperatures for BioPCM. Software

Interface: plywood-pouches

Interface: pouches-drywall

RMSE

(ยบC)

CV (RMSE)

(%)

NMBE

(%)

RMSE

(ยบC)

CV (RMSE)

(%)

NMBE

(%)

Effective thickness

1.31 5.0 -3.5 2.57 9.8 3.2

151

Table 8-4 continued Full parallel path, solid PCM

3.11 11.9 5.3 2.52 9.7 4.3

Partial parallel path, solid PCM

0.97 3.7 -0.02 1.76 6.7 2.6

Full parallel path, porous PCM

2.94 11.2 5.4 2.34 8.9 4.3

Partial parallel path, porous PCM

1.14 4.4 1.1 1.67 6.9 2.2

Figure 8-20 shows the heat flux through the wall assembly with BioPCM. The line 1

represents heat flux calculated the heat flux at the radiant wall based on inlet and outlet fluid

temperatures. The line 2 represents heat flux calculated using Heat Flux Meter data. The line 3

represents heat flux at the plywood-pouches interface calculated using thesis model, partial parallel

path solid PCM above.

Figure 8-20 Heat-flux calculations of BioPCMs panel, 1. Using heat released or absorbed by the fluid, 2. Heat flux meter measurements, and 3. Using thesis model and partial parallel path, solid

PCM method.

Figure 8-21 shows the temperature plot through the cross section of the wall panel using

the partial parallel path, solid PCM method for BioPCM. Temperatures are plotted at two times.

t=0h corresponds to the starting point of heating cycle in Figure 8-18. t=16h corresponds to the

152

end point of heating cycle in Figure 8-18. The simulations are done for c=1 and c=0.5 discretization

constants for the PCM pouches layer for the equation 6.2 which models 5 nodes and 7 nodes.

Plywood-pouches interface temperature shows that model overestimates temperature at the end of

the heating cycle.

Figure 8-21 Cross section temperature plot of the BioPCM panel comparing the experimental data at the beginning of the heating cycle (t=0h) and at the end of the heating cycle (t=16h) for

the modeled data with the thesis model for c=1 and c=0.5 discretization constants.

โ€ข PCM hydrate salts

Figure 8-22 shows the graphical comparison of temperature at the plywood-pouches

interface for hydrate-salts. Similar to the BioPCM case, average temperature is calculated taking

into consideration the location of the temperature sensors on the pouch mat. Data is shown for 32

hours (for the same time period used for the BioPCM). Methods (i) effective thickness, (ii) full

parallel path, solid PCM, (iii) partial parallel path, solid PCM, (iv) full parallel path, porous PCM,

and (v) partial parallel path, porous PCM are compared with the experimental data. Lines 4 (full

parallel path, solid PCM) and line 6 (full parallel path, porous PCM) show closest agreement in

graphical comparison. Averaged temperature of the 7 interface sensors are used for experimental

temperature. Full parallel path method with no latent heat is also shown in figure to indicate the

influence of the latent heat on the curves.

153

Figure 8-22 Temperature at the interface of plywood and pouches of hydrate-salt wall panel. Lines, 1. Experimental data. 5 simplification methods: 2. Effective thickness 3. Full parallel path,

solid PCM, 4. Partial parallel path, solid PCM, 5. Full parallel path, porous PCM, 6. Partial parallel path, porous PCM, and 7. Partial parallel path, without PCM (no-latent heat).

Figure 8-23 shows the graphical comparison of temperature at the Pouches-drywall

interface for Hydrate-salts. Methods i) effective thickness, (ii) full parallel path, solid PCM, (iii)

partial parallel path, solid PCM, (iv) full parallel path, porous PCM, and (v) partial parallel path,

porous PCM are compared with the experimental data.

Figure 8-23 Temperature at the interface of pouches and drywall of hydrate-salt wall panel Lines, 1. Experimental data. 5 simplification methods: 2. Effective thickness 3. Full parallel path,

solid PCM, 4. Partial parallel path, solid PCM, 5. Full parallel path, porous PCM, 6. Partial parallel path, porous PCM, and 7. Partial parallel path, without PCM (no-latent heat).

154

Lines 4 (full parallel path, solid PCM) and line 6 (full parallel path, porous PCM) show

closest agreement in graphical comparison. Averaged temperature of the 7 interface sensors are

used for experimental temperature.

Table 8-5 shows the accuracy analysis for the above comparisons. While CV(RMSE)

values and NMBE values fall within the guideline the RMSE values are lowest for method full

parallel path porous PCM. From the graphical comparison and the accuracy analysis, the full

parallel path, porous PCM method is the method with the least disagreement for the hydrate-salts

PCM simulation.

Table 8-5 RMSE, CV(RMSE), NMBE values for the comparison of two interface temperatures for hydrate-salts.

Interface: plywood-pouches

Interface: pouches-drywall

Software RMSE

(ยบC)

CV (RMSE)

(%)

NMBE (%)

RMSE (ยบC)

CV (RMSE) (%)

NMBE (%)

Effective thickness 2.30 8.9 -5.9 2.85 11.1 3.5

Full parallel path, solid PCM

1.47 5.7 3.6 1.46 5.7 4.1

Partial parallel path, solid PCM

4.06 15.6 -2.7 2.5 9.6 4.7

Full parallel path, porous PCM

1.44 5.6 3.5 1.43 5.3 4.0

Partial parallel path, porous PCM

3.90 15.0 -2.4 2.47 9.5 4.5

Based on this analysis, method 2(b) for the BioPCM and method 3(a) for the Hydrate-salts

are selected for further analysis. Adjusted porosity value for BioPCM yielded no improved results

and adjusted porosity for Hydrate-salts yielded improved results. The approaches full parallel path

and partial parallel path showed contrasting results for the two PCMs. The contrasting thermal

resistances through the PCM layer due to 4 times higher conductivity of PCM-hydrate salts can be

a cause of two different approaches of thermal networks used resulting in the choices with least

155

disagreement for BioPCM and hydrate-salts. The increasing difference between effective

conductivity values across the PCM pouches layer can lead to different resistance.

Comparison of EnergyPlus, thesis model, and WUFI software

After selecting the methods with lowest RSME and NMBE (partial parallel path, solid

PCM for the BioPCM and full parallel path porous PCM, for the hydrate-salts) from the above

comparisons, the thermo-physical properties and dimensions considered in the selected method

are implemented in the EnergyPlus and WUFI software. Both modules (with and without the

ability to model hysteresis are used for EnergyPlus). Total thermal resistance (R value) across the

PCM layer obtained from the thesis model simulations are used to determine the effective

conductivity across PCM layer and implemented for both selected methods. Simulated data is then

compared with the experimental data at the each interface. For EnergyPlus hysteresis model and

the thesis model, only the melting curve obtained from DSC characterization considered at this

stage of the analysis for both PCMs.

โ€ข BioPCM

Figure 8-24 shows the plywood-pouches interface temperature for E+ (two modules),

thesis model, and WUFI simulated data compared with the experimental data. Graphical

comparison shows agreement of the simulated curves with the experimental data.

Figure 8-24 Plywood-pouches interface temperature compared with the E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI for BioPCM.

156

Figure 8-25 shows the pouches-drywall interface temperature for E+ (two modules), thesis

model, and WUFI simulated data compared with the experimental data. All the models

overestimate the temperatures after the PCMs.

Figure 8-25 Pouches-drywall interface temperature compared with the E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI for BioPCM.

Table 8-6 shows the accuracy analysis of the above graphical comparisons. CV(RMSE)

values and NMBE values fall within the guideline. All models show agreement with tolerances of

ยฑ 1.79 ยบC for the plywood- pouches interface and ยฑ 1.63 ยบC for Pouches-drywall interface.

Table 8-6 RMSE, CV(RMSE), NMBE calculations of temperatures at each interface for EnergyPlus, thesis model, and WUFI for BioPCM.

Interface: plywood- pouches Interface: Pouches-drywall

Software RMSE (ยบC)

CV (RMSE) (%)

NMBE (%)

RMSE (ยบC)

CV(RMSE) (%)

NMBE (%)

E+ PCM model 1.66 6.4 1.7 1.63 6.2 2.9

E+ Hysteresis model

1.57 6.0 0.5 1.61 6.1 3.0

Thesis model 0.97 3.7 -0.02 1.76 6.7 2.6

WUFI 1.79 5.1 3.0 1.57 6.0 2.9

157

โ€ข PCM hydrate-salts

Figure 8-26 shows the graphical comparison of plywood-pouches interface temperature for

E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI.

Figure 8-26 Plywood-pouches interface temperature compared with the E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI for hydrate-salts.

Figure 8-27 shows graphical comparison of the plywood-pouches interface temperature

for E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI for hydrate-salts.

Figure 8-27 Pouches-drywall interface temperature compared with the E+ (two modules), thesis model, and WUFI for hydrate-salts.

158

Table 8-7 shows the accuracy analysis for the above comparisons. CV(RMSE) values and

NMBE values fall within the guideline. All models show agreement with tolerances of ยฑ 1.47 ยบC

for the plywood-pouches interface and ยฑ 1.49 ยบC for Pouches-drywall interface.

Table 8-7 RMSE, CV(RMSE), NMBE calculations comparisons of temperatures at each interface for EnergyPlus, thesis model, and WUFI for hydrate-salts panel

Interface: plywood-pouches

Interface: Pouches-drywall

Software RMSE

(ยบC)

CV (RMSE)

(%)

NMBE

(%)

RMSE

(ยบC)

CV (RMSE)

(%)

NMBE

(%)

E+ PCM model 1.32 5.1 3.0 1.37 5.3 3.7

E+ Hysteresis model

1.47 5.7 3.5 1.49 5.7 4.0

Thesis model 1.43 5.6 3.5 1.43 5.5 4.0

WUFI 1.34 5.2 3.0 1.36 5.3 3.7

Validation study with hysteresis characteristic data

Up to this point of the analysis, the hysteresis data was not implemented in the algorithms.

This section compares the EnergyPlus and thesis model simulations including the hysteresis

characteristics discussed in the section 8.21. For all figures showing results in this section peak

temperature of the melting is shown in light blue dashed lines and peak temperature of the freezing

is shown in dark blue dotted lines. The blue shaded area indicates the freezing cycle time interval

of 16 hours.

โ€ข BioPCM

Figure 8-28 shows the interface temperature of the BioPCM panel simulated in EnergyPlus

hysteresis model with and without hysteresis data. Figure 8-28a shows the plywood and pouches

interface temperature and Figure 8-28b shows the pouches and drywall interface temperature. No

hysteresis data means that the single DSC curve data is used and with hysteresis means that 2

curves for melting and freezing are used. The graphical comparison shows that during the phase

change, the curves are relatively closer to the experimental data curve when the hysteresis is

considered.

159

Figure 8-28 Graphical comparison of interface temperature with and without the consideration of hysteresis for BioPCM simulated in EnergyPlus (a) plywood-pouches interface and (b) pouches-

drywall interface.

Figure 8-29 shows the interface temperature of the BioPCM panel simulated in thesis

model with hysteresis and without hysteresis data. Graphical comparison shows that during phase

change the curve with hysteresis moves further leftward.

Figure 8-29 Graphical comparison of interface temperature with and without the consideration of hysteresis for BioPCM simulated in the thesis model (a) plywood-pouches interface and (b)

pouches-drywall interface. Hysteresis data show an improved graphical comparison.

160

Table 8-8 shows the accuracy analysis for the above comparisons for the cases graphically

compared in the Figure 8-28 and Figure 8-29. CV(RMSE) values and NMBE values fall within

the thesis guideline. EnergyPlus and the thesis model show improved biased error when the

hysteresis data is considered.

Table 8-8 RMSE, CV(RMSE), NMBE calculations of temperatures at each interface for EnergyPlus, thesis model for the simulations applying thermal hysteresis characteristics for

BioPCM panel.

Interface: plywood-pouches

Interface: Pouches-drywall

Software RMSE

(ยบC)

CV (RMSE)

(%)

NMBE

(%)

RMSE

(ยบC)

CV (RMSE)

(%)

NMBE

(%)

E+ Hysteresis melting curve only

1.57 6.0 0.5 1.61 6.1 3.0

E+ Hysteresis both curves

1.17 4.5 0.5 1.55 6.0 2.9

Thesis model melting curve only

0.97 3.7 0.02 1.76 6.7 2.6

Thesis model Hysteresis both curves

1.24 4.7 0.5 1.56 6.0 2.9

โ€ข Hydrate-salts

Figure 8-30 shows the interface temperature of the PCM hydrate-salts panel simulated in

EnergyPlus hysteresis model with and without hysteresis data. The graphical comparison shows

similar to the BioPCMs, that during the phase change the curves are relatively closer to the

experimental results when the hysteresis is considered. This is observed more during the freezing

process. Figure 8-31 shows the interface temperature of the PCM hydrate-salts panel simulated in

thesis model with and without hysteresis data.

161

Figure 8-30 Graphical comparison of interface temperature with and without the consideration of hysteresis for PCM hydrate-salts simulated in EnergyPlus (a) plywood-pouches interface and (b)

pouches-drywall interface.

Figure 8-31 Graphical comparison of interface temperature with and without the consideration of hysteresis for PCM hydrate-salts simulated in thesis model (a) plywood-pouches interface and

(b) pouches-drywall interface.

162

Table 8-9 shows the accuracy analysis for the cases graphically compared in the Figure

8-30 and Figure 8-31. CV(RMSE) values and NMBE values fall within the thesis guideline.

Similar to the BioPCM case, EnergyPlus and the thesis model show improved biased error when

the hysteresis data is considered.

Table 8-9 Accuracy analysis of comparisons of temperatures at each interface for EnergyPlus, and thesis model for the simulations applying thermal hysteresis characteristics for PCM

hydrate-salts

Interface: plywood-pouches

Interface: Pouches-drywall

Software RMSE

(ยบC)

CV (RMSE)

(%)

NMBE

(%)

RMSE

(ยบC)

CV (RMSE)

(%)

NMBE

(%)

E+ Hysteresis melting curve only

1.47 5.7 -3.5 1.49 5.7 -4.0

E+ Hysteresis both curves

1.41 5.5 -0.5 1.55 5.9 -2.9

Thesis model melting curve only

1.43 5.6 -3.5 1.43 5.5 -4.0

Thesis model Hysteresis both curves

1.24 4.7 -0.4 1.56 6.0 -2.9

Consideration of hysteresis in PCM modelling showed impact in graphical comparison and

accuracy analysis of the results, specifically the biased error is improved.

8.4. Conclusions

This study conducted experimental analysis of macroencapsulated PCMs (encapsulated in

pouches) with a nominal melting temperature of 23 ยบC. Two PCMs (BioPCM and PCM hydrate-

salts) are tested in full scale (2.4m ร— 1.2 m (8ftร—4ft)) wall assemblies inside an environmental

chamber. Data from 3 full melting and freezing cycles gathered across 100 hours are used for the

validation study.

163

Several heat transfer methods are proposed to simplify 3D heat transfer into a 2D model in

PCM algorithm developed in MATLAB (thesis model) which was previously verified and

validated. These methods capture 2D heat transfer effects due to the presence of different materials,

voids between material interfaces, uneven and lose packaging of the PCMs in pouches. In total, 5

different methods are compared using laboratory data and the methods with lowest disagreement

are implemented in the two wall panels with EnergyPlus (2 PCM modules), and WUFI. The

comparison of the different software shows agreement for temperature comparisons of the both

interfaces for both PCMs with. Temperature tolerances of ยฑ 1.79 ยบC for the plywood-pouches

interface and ยฑ 1.63 ยบC for Pouches-drywall interface are observed for BioPCM and tolerances of

ยฑ 1.47 ยบC for the plywood-pouches interface and ยฑ 1.49 ยบC for pouches-drywall interface are

observed for the hydrate-salts. Application of hysteresis data showed improvements in the

comparison of EnergyPlus and thesis model simulation results. However, heat flux predictions

showed greater deviation from than surface measurements indicating additional measures must be

taken to implement further instrumentation for reliable heat flux measurements.

In conclusion, EnergyPlus, thesis model, and WUFI software show capability of simulating

the heat transfer across the wall assemblies with macroencapsulated PCMs in pouches with

additional simplifications and assumptions discussed in this research. Engineers and researchers

can adopt the simplification approaches of heat transfer across the PCM pouches (Partial parallel

path, solid PCM for BioPCM pouches and Full parallel path, porous PCM for PCM hydrate-salt

pouches) to improve the heat transfer predictions of building walls of whole building energy

modeling software. These methods can be included in the PCM modeling algorithms with the

modules to enter thermo-physical and dimensions data of the PCM pouches.

164

CHAPTER 9

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK

The research conducted in this thesis has been motivated by the need to (i) investigate

optimum PCM properties and application types in building envelopes, (ii) verify and validate PCM

modeling algorithms with experimental data with different PCM encapsulations, (iii) generate

experimental data for validation purposes of different PCM encapsulations, and (iv) develop

accurate numerical algorithms to simulate the heat transfer process associated with phase change

for building envelope applications.

The main tasks of this research has been to (i) conduct a parametric analysis of a residential

building with phase change material (PCM)-enhanced drywall, pre-cooling, and variable electric

rates in a hot and dry climate to investigate potential cost savings and energy savings for the

consumer, (ii) conduct verification and validation of different PCM models available in whole

building energy modeling software like EnergyPlus, ESP-r and WUFI, (iii) design, implement,

and conduct laboratory experiments to test different PCM products and develop data to validate

the PCM modeling algorithms of building energy modeling software.

The research presented in this thesis the author constructed a numerical algorithm in

MATLAB (thesis model) to simulate opaque building envelope with passive PCM applications.

Furthermore, a state of the art environmental chamber is used to construct and implement

experimental apparatus to test the heat transfer across multilayer wall assemblies with

microencapsulated and macroencapsulated PCM.

The following section summarizes the significant results from this research work.

9.1. Summary of significant results

A parametric study of a residential building located in hot-and dry climate was

conducted using a pre-cooling of 5 hours, with different PCM latent heats, melting

temperatures, melting temperature ranges, PCM conductivities, and locations of

application and the author found the optimum PCM applications can shift the

165

cooling electricity demand ~99.9% from the peak time with forced convection

during precooling using high-efficiency fans.

When the Time of Use (ToU) electricity rates are implemented (Arizona Salt River

project), highest cost savings are observed when the PCMs are optimized for all

locations of the envelope (ceiling, exterior opaque walls, and interior partition

walls) under the forced convection mode using high-efficiency fans; the maximum

cost savings observed are 29.4%. Other scenarios yield around 25% savings.

6 PCM modeling algorithms implemented in different building energy and

hygrothermal modeling software (EnergyPlus, ESP-r, and WUFI) and heat transfer

(COMSOL) software, and math thesis model are validated and compared using data

from two independent experimental studies with and shape-stabilized PCM behind

the drywall and Nano-PCM embedded in gypsum wallboards. Based on the

analyzed PCMs, all the evaluated software tools demonstrate their ability to

accurately model shape-stabilized PCM behind drywall. All modeling software

agreed with the Nano-PCM experiments but ESP-r had the lowest convergence due

to less precise definition of boundary conditions. Interestingly, this study showed

no additional gains in accuracy when comparing a 2D heat transfer model with 1D

modeling for Nano-PCM and shape-stabilized PCMs.

An experimental analysis of macroencapsulated PCMs encapsulated in pouches

with a nominal phase change temperature of 23 ยบC is conducted. Two PCMs

(BioPCM and PCM hydrate-salts) are tested in full scale: 2.4m ร— 1.2 m (8ft ร— 4ft)

wall assemblies in a controlled environment. Five simplification steps are

evaluated using the thesis model to simulate the heat transfer across the PCM

pouches layer. These methods showed improved accuracy.

After the comparison, the methods with closest accuracy agreement are

implemented in E+ (2 PCM modules), thesis model, and WUFI. Temperature

tolerances of ยฑ 1.79 ยบC for the plywood-pouches interface and ยฑ 1.63 ยบC for

Pouches-drywall interface are observed for BioPCM and tolerances of ยฑ 1.47 ยบC

for the plywood-pouches interface and ยฑ 1.49 ยบC for pouches-drywall interface are

observed for the hydrate-salts for this validation study.

166

Application of hysteresis data obtained from the manufacturer (for BioPCM) and

Dynamic Heat Flux Meter Apparatus (DHFMA) tests (for hydrate-salts) improved

the bias error of EnergyPlus and thesis model results.

EnergyPlus, thesis model, and WUFI show capability of simulating the heat transfer

across the wall assemblies with pouched macro encapsulated PCMs with additional

simplifications and assumptions discussed in this research.

9.2. Potential for Future Work

Future work of this research falls into two sections: (i) further development of the building

envelope model and (ii) laboratory experiments on different PCMs for validation purposes.

Further development of the building envelope model

Thesis model developed here to evaluate PCMs in building envelope can be

implemented in a whole building energy modeling platform like EnergyPlus to conduct

whole building energy analysis and the simplification methods used can be used in

modelling PCM pouches in future research.

There are several parameters considered in modeling PCM pouches. Dimensions like

thickness of the air layer, PCM volume, thermo-physical properties like variable

conductivity of the PCMs, approximated PCM enthalpy data are a few. Therefore, this

research can be extended to conduct sensitivity analysis of these parameters and how

they influence the accuracy of the model.

This research did not analyze the efficiency of the methods used to evaluate heat

transfer across PCM pouches layer. Therefore, the current model can be made faster

solving and more robust by

Laboratory experiments of different PCMs

Macroencapsulated PCM products vary with the material type, pouch sizes, pouch

material. There are products with increased PCM mass (2x mass BioPCM inside

pouches), increased conductivity (3x conductivity BioPCM). Therefore, the current

167

facility will be used to test these PCMs in parallel and create data for validation

purposes.

Full scale apparatus discussed here can be improved to quick switching of PCM mats.

This would enable the researchers to test multiple PCMs parallel and quickly and create

experimental databases for validation purposes of PCM modelling algorithms.

Hygrothermal effects can also influence the heat transfer across the building envelope

in realistic applications. Using the ability of the chamber to control interior relative

humidity, the experimental hygrothermal analysis of PCM included building envelopes

can be conducted.

168

REFERENCES CITED

1. Yang, L., H. Yan, and J.C. Lam, Thermal comfort and building energy consumption

implicationsโ€“a review. Applied Energy, 2014. 115: p. 164-173.

2. Hadjipaschalis, I., A. Poullikkas, and V. Efthimiou, Overview of current and future energy

storage technologies for electric power applications. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2009. 13(6-7): p. 1513-1522.

3. Davis, S.J., K. Caldeira, and H.D. Matthews, Future CO2 emissions and climate change

from existing energy infrastructure. Science, 2010. 329(5997): p. 1330-1333.

4. Sbci, U., Buildings and climate change: Summary for decision-makers. United Nations Environmental Programme, Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative, Paris, 2009: p. 1-62.

5. Deru, M., et al., US Department of Energy commercial reference building models of the

national building stock. 2011.

6. Bahaj, A. and P. James, Urban energy generation: the added value of photovoltaics in

social housing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2007. 11(9): p. 2121-2136.

7. Tabares-Velasco, P.C., et al., A modeling framework for optimization-based control of a

residential building thermostat for time-of-use pricing. Applied Energy, 2019. 242: p. 1346-1357.

8. Tabbone, L., et al. Energy in the city: how residential location is linked to energy

consumption. in BEHAVE Energy Conference. 2014.

9. Aghaei, J. and M.-I. Alizadeh, Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with

renewable energy sources: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013. 18: p. 64-72.

10. Sun, Y., et al., Peak load shifting control using different cold thermal energy storage

facilities in commercial buildings: a review. Energy conversion and management, 2013. 71: p. 101-114.

11. Al-Saadi, S.N. and Z.Q. Zhai, Modeling phase change materials embedded in building

enclosure: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013. 21: p. 659-673.

12. Wijesuriya, S., M. Brandt, and P.C. Tabares-Velasco, Parametric analysis of a residential

building with phase change material (PCM)-enhanced drywall, precooling, and variable

electric rates in a hot and dry climate. Applied Energy, 2018. 222: p. 497-514.

169

13. Cao, S., State of the art thermal energy storage solutions for high performance buildings. 2010.

14. Biswas, K., et al., Combined experimental and numerical evaluation of a prototype nano-

PCM enhanced wallboard. Applied energy, 2014. 131: p. 517-529.

15. Koล›ny, J., Short history of PCM applications in building envelopes, in PCM-Enhanced

Building Components. 2015, Springer. p. 21-59.

16. Al-Saadi, S.N. and Z.Q. Zhai, A new validated TRNSYS module for simulating latent heat

storage walls. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 109: p. 274-290.

17. Al-Saadi, S.N. and Z. Zhai, Systematic evaluation of mathematical methods and numerical

schemes for modeling PCM-enhanced building enclosure. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 92: p. 374-388.

18. Tyagi, V., et al., Thermal performance assessment of encapsulated PCM based thermal

management system to reduce peak energy demand in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2016. 117: p. 44-52.

19. Jeon, J., et al., High thermal performance composite PCMs loading xGnP for application

to building using radiant floor heating system. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2012. 101: p. 51-56.

20. Jeong, S.-G., et al., Improvement of the thermal properties of Bio-based PCM using

exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2013. 117: p. 87-92.

21. Akbari, A., et al., Quantum mechanical study on the mechanism and kinetics of the cis-to-

trans isomerization of [Pd (C6Cl2F3) I (PH3) 2]. Inorganica Chimica Acta, 2013. 394: p. 423-429.

22. Borreguero, A.M., et al., Improvement of the thermal behaviour of gypsum blocks by the

incorporation of microcapsules containing PCMS obtained by suspension polymerization

with an optimal core/coating mass ratio. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010. 30(10): p. 1164-1169.

23. Tyagi, V., et al., Development of phase change materials based microencapsulated

technology for buildings: a review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2011. 15(2): p. 1373-1391.

24. Zhang, Y.P., et al., Application of latent heat thermal energy storage in buildings: State-

of-the-art and outlook. Building and Environment, 2007. 42(6): p. 2197-2209.

25. Zhang, Y., et al., Preparation, thermal performance and application of shape-stabilized

PCM in energy efficient buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2006. 38(10): p. 1262-1269.

170

26. Peippo, K., P. Kauranen, and P. Lund, A multicomponent PCM wall optimized for passive

solar heating. Energy and buildings, 1991. 17(4): p. 259-270.

27. Kuznik, F., et al., A review on phase change materials integrated in building walls. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011. 15(1): p. 379-391.

28. Zalba, B., et al., Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat

transfer analysis and applications. Applied thermal engineering, 2003. 23(3): p. 251-283.

29. Zhou, D., C.-Y. Zhao, and Y. Tian, Review on thermal energy storage with phase change

materials (PCMs) in building applications. Applied energy, 2012. 92: p. 593-605.

30. Su, J.-C. and P.-S. Liu, A novel solidโ€“solid phase change heat storage material with

polyurethane block copolymer structure. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006. 47(18-19): p. 3185-3191.

31. Mehling, H. and L.F. Cabeza, Heat and cold storage with PCM. 2008: Springer.

32. Salunkhe, P.B. and P.S. Shembekar, A review on effect of phase change material

encapsulation on the thermal performance of a system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012. 16(8): p. 5603-5616.

33. Fang, G., F. Tang, and L. Cao, Preparation, thermal properties and applications of shape-

stabilized thermal energy storage materials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014. 40: p. 237-259.

34. Zhou, G., et al., Thermal analysis of a direct-gain room with shape-stabilized PCM plates. Renewable Energy, 2008. 33(6): p. 1228-1236.

35. Ye, H., et al., The performance evaluation of shape-stabilized phase change materials in

building applications using energy saving index. Applied energy, 2014. 113: p. 1118-1126.

36. Kuznik, F. and J. Virgone, Experimental investigation of wallboard containing phase

change material: Data for validation of numerical modeling. Energy and Buildings, 2009. 41(5): p. 561-570.

37. Giro-Paloma, J., et al., Types, methods, techniques, and applications for

microencapsulated phase change materials (MPCM): A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016. 53: p. 1059-1075.

38. Qiu, X., et al., Microencapsulated n-octadecane with different methylmethacrylate-based

copolymer shells as phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Energy, 2012. 46(1): p. 188-199.

39. Karkri, M., et al., Thermal properties of phase-change materials based on high-density

polyethylene filled with micro-encapsulated paraffin wax for thermal energy storage. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 88: p. 144-152.

171

40. Kheradmand, M., et al., Assessing the feasibility of impregnating phase change materials

in lightweight aggregate for development of thermal energy storage systems. Construction and Building Materials, 2015. 89: p. 48-59.

41. Ye, R.D., et al., Preparation, Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Cement Board with

Expanded Perlite Based Composite Phase Change Material for Improving Buildings

Thermal Behavior. Materials, 2015. 8(11): p. 7702-7713.

42. Sun, D. and L.J. Wang, Utilization of paraffin/expanded perlite materials to improve

mechanical and thermal properties of cement mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 2015. 101: p. 791-796.

43. Konuklu, Y., et al., Review on using microencapsulated phase change materials (PCM) in

building applications. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 106: p. 134-155.

44. Figueiredo, A., et al., Mechanical and thermal characterization of concrete with

incorporation of microencapsulated PCM for applications in thermally activated slabs. Construction and Building Materials, 2016. 112: p. 639-647.

45. Wiser, R.H. and M. Bolinger, 2017 Wind Technologies Market Report. 2018: United States.

46. Wei, J., et al., Study on a PCM heat storage system for rapid heat supply. Applied thermal engineering, 2005. 25(17-18): p. 2903-2920.

47. Zukowski, M., Experimental study of short term thermal energy storage unit based on

enclosed phase change material in polyethylene film bag. Energy Conversion and Management, 2007. 48(1): p. 166-173.

48. InfiniteR, 23 Cโฐ Infinite R Energy Sheet. InfiniteR.

49. Solรฉ, A., et al., Corrosion of metals and salt hydrates used for thermochemical energy

storage. Renewable Energy, 2015. 75: p. 519-523.

50. Formato, R.M., The Advantages & Challenges of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) In

Thermal Packaging, in White papers and presentations on PCMs and thermal energy

storage. 2013, Cold Chain Technology. p. 1-8.

51. Li, X., et al., Advanced nanocomposite phase change material based on calcium chloride

hexahydrate with aluminum oxide nanoparticles for thermal energy storage. Energy & Fuels, 2017. 31(6): p. 6560-6567.

52. Mandilaras, I., D. Kontogeorgos, and M. Founti, A hybrid methodology for the

determination of the effective heat capacity of PCM enhanced building components. Renewable Energy, 2015. 76: p. 790-804.

53. Solutions, P.C. ENRG Blanket Specifications. 2019 [cited 2019; Available from: phasechange.com/products/enrg-blanket/.

172

54. Soares, N.M.L., Thermal energy storage with phase change materials (PCMs) for the

improvement of the energy performance of buildings. 2016.

55. Kuznik, F., J. Virgone, and K. Johannes, Development and validation of a new TRNSYS

type for the simulation of external building walls containing PCM. Energy and Buildings, 2010. 42(7): p. 1004-1009.

56. Knowles, T., Proportioning composites for efficient thermal storage walls. Solar Energy, 1983. 31(3): p. 319-326.

57. Kim, S. and L.T. Drzal, High latent heat storage and high thermal conductive phase

change materials using exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2009. 93(1): p. 136-142.

58. Darkwa, J. and T. Zhou, Enhanced laminated composite phase change material for energy

storage. Energy conversion and management, 2011. 52(2): p. 810-815.

59. Koizumi, H., Time and spatial heat transfer performance around an isothermally heated

sphere placed in a uniform, downwardly directed flow (in relation to the enhancement of

latent heat storage rate in a spherical capsule). Applied thermal engineering, 2004. 24(17-18): p. 2583-2600.

60. Ezra, M., et al., Analysis and optimization of melting temperature span for a multiple-PCM

latent heat thermal energy storage unit. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016. 93: p. 315-329.

61. Ascione, F., et al., Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean

climate: Performance analysis of residential case study. Applied energy, 2016. 183: p. 938-957.

62. Baniassadi, A., et al., Economic optimization of PCM and insulation layer thickness in

residential buildings. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2016. 14: p. 92-99.

63. Saffari, M., et al., Simulation-based optimization of PCM melting temperature to improve

the energy performance in buildings. Applied Energy, 2017. 202: p. 420-434.

64. Soares, N., et al., Multi-dimensional optimization of the incorporation of PCM-drywalls in

lightweight steel-framed residential buildings in different climates. Energy and buildings, 2014. 70: p. 411-421.

65. Baetens, R., B.P. Jelle, and A. Gustavsen, Phase change materials for building

applications: a state-of-the-art review. Energy and buildings, 2010. 42(9): p. 1361-1368.

66. Hasnain, S., Review on sustainable thermal energy storage technologies, Part I: heat

storage materials and techniques. Energy conversion and management, 1998. 39(11): p. 1127-1138.

173

67. Lingayat, A.B. and Y.R. Suple, Review on phase change material as thermal energy

storage medium: materials, application. Int J Eng Res Appl, 2013. 3: p. 916-21.

68. Warzoha, R.J., R.M. Weigand, and A.S. Fleischer, Temperature-dependent thermal

properties of a paraffin phase change material embedded with herringbone style graphite

nanofibers. Applied Energy, 2015. 137: p. 716-725.

69. Tyagi, V.V. and D. Buddhi, PCM thermal storage in buildings: a state of art. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2007. 11(6): p. 1146-1166.

70. Jeon, J., et al., Application of PCM thermal energy storage system to reduce building

energy consumption. Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry, 2013. 111(1): p. 279-288.

71. Memon, S.A., Phase change materials integrated in building walls: A state of the art

review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2014. 31: p. 870-906.

72. Cantor, S., DSC study of melting and solidification of salt hydrates. Thermochimica Acta, 1979. 33: p. 69-86.

73. Abhat, A., Low temperature latent heat thermal energy storage: heat storage materials. Solar energy, 1983. 30(4): p. 313-332.

74. Feldman, D., D. Banu, and D. Hawes, Development and application of organic phase

change mixtures in thermal storage gypsum wallboard. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 1995. 36(2): p. 147-157.

75. Karaipekli, A. and A. Sarฤฑ, Capricโ€“myristic acid/vermiculite composite as form-stable

phase change material for thermal energy storage. Solar Energy, 2009. 83(3): p. 323-332.

76. Shilei, L., Z. Neng, and F. Guohui, Eutectic mixtures of capric acid and lauric acid applied

in building wallboards for heat energy storage. Energy and Buildings, 2006. 38(6): p. 708-711.

77. Yuan, Y., et al., Fatty acids as phase change materials: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014. 29: p. 482-498.

78. Ghadim, H.B., et al., Binary mixtures of fatty alcohols and fatty acid esters as novel solidโ€liquid phase change materials. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019.

79. Ravotti, R., et al., Analysis of Bio-Based Fatty Esters PCMโ€™s Thermal Properties and Investigation of Trends in Relation to Chemical Structures. Applied Sciences, 2019. 9(2): p. 225.

80. Delcroix, B., Modeling of thermal mass energy storage in buildings with phase change

materials. 2015, ร‰cole Polytechnique de Montrรฉal.

174

81. Lassandro, P. and T. Cosola. Innovative flat roof solutions for existing buildings: from

energy efficiency to impacts mitigation. in Proceeding of the 41st IAHS World Congress

on Sustainability and Innovation for the Future. Albufeira (Portugal). 2016.

82. Carslaw, H.S. and J.C. Jaeger, Conduction of heat in solids. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959, 2nd ed., 1959.

83. Ogoh, W. and D. Groulx. Stefanโ€™s Problem: Validation of a One-Dimensional Solid-Liquid

Phase Change Heat Transfer Process. in Comsol Conference 2010. 2010.

84. Solomon, A., Melt time and heat flux for a simple PCM body. Solar Energy, 1979. 22(3): p. 251-257.

85. EVANS, R.S., et al., Primary thrombocytopenic purpura and acquired hemolytic anemia:

evidence for a common etiology. AMA archives of internal medicine, 1951. 87(1): p. 48-65.

86. Friedman, H.L. Kinetics of thermal degradation of charโ€forming plastics from

thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. in Journal of Polymer Science:

Polymer Symposia. 1964. Wiley Online Library.

87. Crank, J., Free and moving boundary problems. 1984. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

88. NR Eyres, M., et al., The calculation of variable heat flow in solids. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 1946. 240(813): p. 1-57.

89. Costa, M., D. Buddhi, and A. Oliva, Numerical simulation of a latent heat thermal energy

storage system with enhanced heat conduction. Energy Conversion and Management, 1998. 39(3-4): p. 319-330.

90. Arnault, A., F. Mathieu-Potvin, and L. Gosselin, Internal surfaces including phase change

materials for passive optimal shift of solar heat gain. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2010. 49(11): p. 2148-2156.

91. Joulin, A., et al., A numerical study of the melting of phase change material heated from a

vertical wall of a rectangular enclosure. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2009. 23(7): p. 553-566.

92. Salcudean, M. and Z. Abdullah, On the numerical modelling of heat transfer during

solidification processes. International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 1988. 25(2): p. 445-473.

93. Crivelli, L.A. and S.R. Idelsohn, A temperatureโ€based finite element solution for phaseโ€change problems. International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 1986. 23(1): p. 99-119.

94. Sa, A.V., et al., Thermal enhancement of plastering mortars with Phase Change Materials:

Experimental and numerical approach. Energy and Buildings, 2012. 49: p. 16-27.

175

95. Blank, M., P. Nair, and T. Pรถschel, Influence of capillary viscous flow on melting dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06307, 2018.

96. Eyres, N., et al., The calculation of variable heat flow in solids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1946. 240(813): p. 1-57.

97. Voller, V. and C. Swaminathan, ERAL Source-based method for solidification phase

change. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B Fundamentals, 1991. 19(2): p. 175-189.

98. Schranzhofer, H., et al. Validation of a trnsys simulation model for pcm energy storages

and pcm wall construction elements,โ€. in Ecostock conference. 2006.

99. Schossig, P., et al., Micro-encapsulated phase-change materials integrated into

construction materials. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2005. 89(2-3): p. 297-306.

100. Pedersen, C.O., Advanced zone simulation in energyplus: Incorporation of variable

properties and phase change material (PCM) capability. Building Simulation 2007, Vols 1-3, Proceedings, 2007: p. 1341-1345.

101. Gรผnther, E., H. Mehling, and S. Hiebler, Modeling of subcooling and solidification of

phase change materials. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2007. 15(8): p. 879.

102. Tenchev, R. and P. Purnell, An application of a damage constitutive model to concrete at

high temperature and prediction of spalling. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2005. 42(26): p. 6550-6565.

103. Sadasivam, S., et al., An Iterative Enthalpy Method to Overcome the Limitations in ESP-

r's PCM Solution Algorithm. Ashrae Transactions 2011, Vol 117, Pt 2, 2011. 117: p. 100-107.

104. El Mankibi, M., et al., Optimization of an Air-PCM heat exchanger and elaboration of

peak power reduction strategies. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 106: p. 74-86.

105. Swaminathan, C. and V. Voller, On the enthalpy method. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 1993. 3(3): p. 233-244.

106. Zwanzig, S.D., Y. Lian, and E.G. Brehob, Numerical simulation of phase change material

composite wallboard in a multi-layered building envelope. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013. 69: p. 27-40.

107. Alexiades, V., Mathematical modeling of melting and freezing processes. 1992: CRC Press.

108. Voller, V., et al., An enthalpy method for moving boundary problems on the earth's surface. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 2006. 16(5): p. 641-654.

176

109. Lamberg, P., R. Lehtiniemi, and A.M. Henell, Numerical and experimental investigation

of melting and freezing processes in phase change material storage. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2004. 43(3): p. 277-287.

110. Mirzaei, P.A. and F. Haghighat, Modeling of phase change materials for applications in

whole building simulation. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012. 16(7): p. 5355-5362.

111. Bastani, A., F. Haghighat, and J. Kozinski, Designing building envelope with PCM

wallboards: design tool development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014. 31: p. 554-562.

112. Eisenhower, B., I. Mezic, and Asme, EXTRACTING DYNAMIC INFORMATION FROM

WHOLE-BUILDING ENERGY MODELS. Proceedings of the Asme International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol 6, 2012: p. 3-10.

113. Manual, E., U02/1. The ESP-r System for Building Energy Simulation, User Guide Version

10 Series, University of Strathclyde. Energy Systems Research Unit, Glasgow, 2002.

114. Heim, D. and J.A. Clarke, Numerical modelling and thermal simulation of PCM-gypsum

composites with ESP-r. Energy and Buildings, 2004. 36(8): p. 795-805.

115. Gelissier, A., SPMCMP56 subroutine in ESP-r Source Standard Code. 2008.

116. Fallahi, A., N. Shukla, and J. Kosny, Numerical thermal performance analysis of PCMs

integrated with residential attics. Proceedings of SimBuild, 2012. 5(1): p. 431-439.

117. Koล›ny, J., et al., Thermal load mitigation and passive cooling in residential attics

containing PCM-enhanced insulations. Solar Energy, 2014. 108: p. 164-177.

118. Ghoneim, A.A., S.A. Klein, and J.A. Duffie, ANALYSIS OF COLLECTOR-STORAGE

BUILDING WALLS USING PHASE-CHANGE MATERIALS. Solar Energy, 1991. 47(3): p. 237-242.

119. Stritih, U. and P. Novak, Solar heat storage wall for building ventilation. Renewable Energy, 1996. 8(1-4): p. 268-271.

120. Al-Saadi, S.N. and Z.J. Zhai, Modeling phase change materials embedded in building

enclosure: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013. 21: p. 659-673.

121. Castellรณn, C., et al., Experimental study of PCM inclusion in different building envelopes. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2009. 131(4): p. 041006.

122. Jayalath, A., et al., Effects of phase change material roof layers on thermal performance

of a residential building in Melbourne and Sydney. Energy and Buildings, 2016. 121: p. 152-158.

177

123. Crawley, D.B., et al., EnergyPlus: Energy simulation program. Ashrae Journal, 2000. 42(4): p. 49-56.

124. Tabares-Velasco, P.C., C. Christensen, and M. Bianchi, Verification and validation of

EnergyPlus phase change material model for opaque wall assemblies. Building and Environment, 2012. 54(0): p. 186-196.

125. Lee, K.O., M.A. Medina, and X.Q. Sun, Development and verification of an EnergyPlus-

based algorithm to predict heat transfer through building walls integrated with phase

change materials. Journal of Building Physics, 2016. 40(1): p. 77-95.

126. Kunzel, R., Pulp fictions and problem girls: Reading and rewriting single pregnancy in

the postwar United States. The American Historical Review, 1995: p. 1465-1487.

127. Spaeh, P., et al., Manufacturing studies of double wall components for the ITER EC H&CD

upper launcher. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2012. 87(7-8): p. 956-960.

128. Korjakins, A., et al. Simulation of PCM behaviour in buildings for latvia climate

conditions. in Proceedings of sustainable energy storage in buildings conference:

sustainable energy storage in buildings, Ireland, Dublin. 2013.

129. Chang, S.J., et al., Hygrothermal performance improvement of the Korean wood frame

walls using macro-packed phase change materials (MPPCM). Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017. 114: p. 457-465.

130. Biswas, K., et al., Thermal characterization of full-scale PCM products and numerical

simulations, including hysteresis, to evaluate energy impacts in an envelope application. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018. 138: p. 501-512.

131. Barreneche, C., et al., Study on differential scanning calorimetry analysis with two

operation modes and organic and inorganic phase change material (PCM). Thermochimica Acta, 2013. 553: p. 23-26.

132. Lรกzaro, A., et al., Verification of a T-history installation to measure enthalpy versus

temperature curves of phase change materials. Measurement Science and Technology, 2006. 17(8): p. 2168.

133. Gschwander, S., et al., Development of a Test Standard for PCM and TCM

Characterization Part 1: Characterization of Phase Change Materials. IEA Report A, 2011. 2.

134. Delcroix, B., et al., Experimental assessment of a phase change material in walls for

heating and cooling applications. Proceedings of eSim, International Building Performance Simulation Association,(Ottawa, Canada), 2014.

135. E793, A., Standard Test Method for Enthalpies of Fusion and Crystallization by

Differential Scanning Calorimetry. ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

178

136. Cao, S., et al., The effect of wall-integrated phase change material panels on the indoor

air and wall temperature-Hot box experiments. Zero Emission Buildings, 2010: p. 15-26.

137. Solรฉ, A., et al., Review of the T-history method to determine thermophysical properties of

phase change materials (PCM). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013. 26: p. 425-436.

138. Barreneche, C., et al., Improvement of the thermal inertia of building materials

incorporating PCM. Evaluation in the macroscale. Applied energy, 2013. 109: p. 428-432.

139. Sarฤฑ, A., Thermal Energy Storage Properties and Laboratory-Scale Thermoregulation

Performance of Bentonite/Paraffin Composite Phase Change Material for Energy-

Efficient Buildings. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2017. 29(6): p. 04017001.

140. ASTM, C., 1363, Standard test method for thermal performance of building materials and

envelope assemblies by means of a hot box apparatus. ASTM C, 2005. 1363.

141. Kosny, J., et al., 2006/07 Field Testing of Cellulose Fiber Insulation Enhanced with Phase

Change Material. 2008, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL); Building Technologies Research and Integration Center.

142. Kosny, J., et al. Thermal performance of PCM-enhanced building envelope systems. in Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings X, Proceedings of the

ASHRAE/DOE/BTECC Conference. 2007.

143. Koล›ny, J., et al., Development and testing of ignition resistant microencapsulated phase

change material. Proceedings of effstock, 2009.

144. Biswas, K. and R. Abhari, Low-cost phase change material as an energy storage medium

in building envelopes: experimental and numerical analyses. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014. 88: p. 1020-1031.

145. Shukla, N. and J. Kosny, DHFMA Method for Dynamic Thermal Property Measurement

of PCM-integrated Building Materials. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 2015. 2(2): p. 41-46.

146. Gรผnther, E., et al., Enthalpy of phase change materials as a function of temperature:

required accuracy and suitable measurement methods. International Journal of Thermophysics, 2009. 30(4): p. 1257-1269.

147. Xie, J., et al., Comments on thermal physical properties testing methods of phase change

materials. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2013. 5: p. 695762.

148. Shukla, N., A. Fallahi, and J. Kosny, Performance characterization of PCM impregnated

gypsum board for building applications. Energy Procedia, 2012. 30: p. 370-379.

179

149. DOE, A., Theoretical and experimental thermal performance analysis of building shell

components containing blown fiber glass insulation enhanced with phase change material

(PCM). 2010.

150. Castell, A., et al. Analysis of the simulation models for the use of PCM in buildings. in the

11th Effstock Conference Proceedings, Thermal Energy Storage for Efficiency and

Sustainability. 2009.

151. Koล›ny, J., W. Miller, and A. Zaltash. Dynamic thermally-disconnected building

envelopesโ€”a new paradigm for walls and roofs in low energy buildings. in Proceedings

of DOE, ASHRAE, ORNL conferenceโ€”thermal envelopes XIโ€”thermal performance of the

exterior envelopes of buildings, Clearwater, Florida. 2010.

152. Medina, M. and R. Stewart, Phase-change frame walls (PCFWs) for peak demand

reduction, load shifting, energy conservation and comfort. 2008.

153. Muruganantham, K., Application of phase change material in buildings: field data vs.

EnergyPlus simulation. 2010: Arizona State University.

154. Alqallaf, H.J. and E.M. Alawadhi, Concrete roof with cylindrical holes containing PCM

to reduce the heat gain. Energy and Buildings, 2013. 61: p. 73-80.

155. Miller, W., et al. Advanced residential envelopes for two pair of energy-saver homes. in Proceedings of ACEEE summer study on energy efficiency in buildings. 2010.

156. EIA, U., How much energy is consumed in residential and commercial buildings in the

United States. 2014.

157. Denholm, P., S. Ong, and C. Booten, Using utility load data to estimate demand for space

cooling and potential for shiftable loads. 2012, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO.

158. Doorman, G.L., Capacity subscription: solving the peak demand challenge in electricity

markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2005. 20(1): p. 239-245.

159. Jin, X., et al. User-preference-driven model predictive control of residential building loads

and battery storage for demand response. in American Control Conference (ACC), 2017. 2017. IEEE.

160. Karaipekli, A. and A. Sarฤฑ, Development and thermal performance of pumice/organic

PCM/gypsum composite plasters for thermal energy storage in buildings. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2016. 149: p. 19-28.

161. Alam, M., et al., Evaluating the passive and free cooling application methods of phase

change materials in residential buildings: A comparative study. Energy and Buildings, 2017. 148: p. 238-256.

180

162. Burch, D., et al. A Field study of the effect of wall mass on the Heating and cooling loads

of residential buildings. in Proceedings of the Building Thermal Mass Seminar, Knoxville,

TN. 1982.

163. Dexter, M.E., Energy conservation design guidelines: including mass and insulation in

building walls. ASHRAE Journal, 1980. 22(3): p. 35-38.

164. Turner, W.J.N., I.S. Walker, and J. Roux, Peak load reductions: Electric load shifting with

mechanical pre-cooling of residential buildings with low thermal mass. Energy, 2015. 82: p. 1057-1067.

165. German, A., et al. Maximizing the Benefits of Residential Pre-Cooling. in EEBA Excellence

in Building. 2014. St. Louis, MO: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

166. German, A., M. Hoeschele, and Alliance for Residential Building Innovation, Residential

Mechanical Precooling. 2014, NREL and U.S. Department of Energy's Building America Program: Davis, CA.

167. Booten, C. and P.C. Tabares-Velasco, Using EnergyPlus to Simulate the Dynamic

Response of a Residential Building to Advanced Cooling Strategies, in Presented at the

2nd International Conference an Building Energy and Environment. 2012: Boulder, CO.

168. Farid, M.M., et al., A review on phase change energy storage: materials and applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 2004. 45(9โ€“10): p. 1597-1615.

169. Zhu, N., Z. Ma, and S. Wang, Dynamic characteristics and energy performance of

buildings using phase change materials: a review. Energy Conversion and Management, 2009. 50(12): p. 3169-3181.

170. Cui, Y., et al., Review of phase change materials integrated in building walls for energy

saving. Procedia Engineering, 2015. 121: p. 763-770.

171. Karkri, M., et al., Thermal properties of smart microencapsulated paraffin/plaster

composites for the thermal regulation of buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 88: p. 183-192.

172. Eddhahak-Ouni, A., J. Colin, and D. Bruneau, On an experimental innovative setup for the

macro scale thermal analysis of materials: Application to the Phase Change Material

(PCM) wallboards. Energy and Buildings, 2013. 64: p. 231-238.

173. Akeiber, H., et al., A review on phase change material (PCM) for sustainable passive

cooling in building envelopes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016. 60: p. 1470-1497.

174. Biswas, K., et al., Combined experimental and numerical evaluation of a prototype nano-

PCM enhanced wallboard. Applied Energy, 2014. 131(Supplement C): p. 517-529.

181

175. Biswas, K., P. Childs, and A. J, Testing of Nano-PCM-Enhanced Building Envelope

Components in a Warm-Humid Climate. 2013, Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge

176. Lee, K.O., et al., Assessing the integration of a thin phase change material (PCM) layer in

a residential building wall for heat transfer reduction and management. Applied Energy, 2015. 137(Supplement C): p. 699-706.

177. Cabeza, L.F., et al., Use of microencapsulated PCM in concrete walls for energy savings. Energy and Buildings, 2007. 39(2): p. 113-119.

178. Khudhair, A.M. and M.M. Farid, A review on energy conservation in building applications

with thermal storage by latent heat using phase change materials. Energy conversion and management, 2004. 45(2): p. 263-275.

179. Miller, W.A., et al., Theoretical and Experimental Thermal Performance Analysis of

Building Shell Components Containing Blown Fiber Glass Insulation Enhanced with

Phase Change Material (PCM). 2010, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL); Building Technologies Research and Integration Center.

180. Sharif, M.A., et al., Review of the application of phase change material for heating and

domestic hot water systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015. 42: p. 557-568.

181. Moreno, P., et al., PCM thermal energy storage tanks in heat pump system for space

cooling. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 82: p. 399-405.

182. Real, A., et al., Improvement of a heat pump based HVAC system with PCM thermal

storage for cold accumulation and heat dissipation. Energy and buildings, 2014. 83: p. 108-116.

183. Kuznik, F., J. Virgone, and J.-J. Roux, Energetic efficiency of room wall containing PCM

wallboard: A full-scale experimental investigation. Energy and buildings, 2008. 40(2): p. 148-156.

184. Kuznik, F. and J. Virgone, Experimental assessment of a phase change material for wall

building use. Applied Energy, 2009. 86(10): p. 2038-2046.

185. Stovall, T. and J. Tomlinson, What are the potential benefits of including latent storage in

common wallboard? Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 1995. 117(4): p. 318-325.

186. Solomon, A., Design criteria in PCM wall thermal storage. Energy, 1979. 4(4): p. 701-709.

187. Benard, C., Y. Body, and A. Zanoli, Experimental comparison of latent and sensible heat

thermal walls. Solar Energy, 1985. 34(6): p. 475-487.

182

188. Ramakrishnan, S., et al., Thermal performance of buildings integrated with phase change

materials to reduce heat stress risks during extreme heatwave events. Applied Energy, 2017. 194(Supplement C): p. 410-421.

189. Cascone, Y., A. Capozzoli, and M. Perino, Optimisation analysis of PCM-enhanced

opaque building envelope components for the energy retrofitting of office buildings in

Mediterranean climates. Applied Energy, 2018. 211: p. 929-953.

190. Figueiredo, A., et al., Indoor thermal comfort assessment using different constructive

solutions incorporating PCM. Applied Energy, 2017. 208(Supplement C): p. 1208-1221.

191. Jin, X., M.A. Medina, and X. Zhang, On the importance of the location of PCMs in building

walls for enhanced thermal performance. Applied Energy, 2013. 106(Supplement C): p. 72-78.

192. Saffari, M., et al., Simulation-based optimization of PCM melting temperature to improve

the energy performance in buildings. Applied Energy, 2017. 202(Supplement C): p. 420-434.

193. Xiao, W., X. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Analytical optimization of interior PCM for energy

storage in a lightweight passive solar room. Applied Energy, 2009. 86(10): p. 2013-2018.

194. Ascione, F., et al., Optimization of building envelope design for nZEBs in Mediterranean

climate: Performance analysis of residential case study. Applied Energy, 2016. 183(Supplement C): p. 938-957.

195. Shafie-khah, M., et al., Optimal behavior of responsive residential demand considering

hybrid phase change materials. Applied Energy, 2016. 163(Supplement C): p. 81-92.

196. Kuznik, F., J. Virgone, and J. Noel, Optimization of a phase change material wallboard

for building use. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2008. 28(11): p. 1291-1298.

197. Jamil, H., et al., Investigation of PCM as retrofitting option to enhance occupant thermal

comfort in a modern residential building. Energy and Buildings, 2016. 133: p. 217-229.

198. รlvarez, S., et al., Building integration of PCM for natural cooling of buildings. Applied Energy, 2013. 109(Supplement C): p. 514-522.

199. Ramakrishnan, S., et al., Parametric analysis for performance enhancement of phase

change materials in naturally ventilated buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2016. 124: p. 35-45.

200. Alam, M., et al., Energy saving potential of phase change materials in major Australian

cities. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 78: p. 192-201.

201. Saffari, M., et al., Passive cooling of buildings with phase change materials using whole-

building energy simulation tools: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 80: p. 1239-1255.

183

202. Evola, G., L. Marletta, and F. Sicurella, A methodology for investigating the effectiveness

of PCM wallboards for summer thermal comfort in buildings. Building and Environment, 2013. 59: p. 517-527.

203. Christensen, C., et al., BEoptโ„ข Software for Building Energy Optimization: Features and

Capabilities. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Technical Report, 2006.

204. Booten, C. and P.C. Tabares-Velasco. Using EnergyPlus to Simulate the Dynamic

Response of a Residential Building to Advanced Cooling Strategies. in The Second

International Conference on Building Energy and Environment,. 2012. Boulder, CO.

205. Robertson, J.J., B.J. Polly, and J.M. Collis, Reduced-order modeling and simulated

annealing optimization for efficient residential building utility bill calibration. Applied Energy, 2015. 148(Supplement C): p. 169-177.

206. Rhodes, J.D., et al., Using BEopt (EnergyPlus) with energy audits and surveys to predict

actual residential energy usage. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 86(Supplement C): p. 808-816.

207. Crawley, D.B., et al., EnergyPlus: energy simulation program. ASHRAE journal, 2000. 42(4): p. 49.

208. Tabares-Velasco, P.C., Energy Impacts of Nonlinear Behavior of Phase Change Materials

When Applied to Opaque Building Envelopes. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2014. 136(1): p. 011013.

209. Christensen, C., Validation methodology to allow simulated peak reduction and energy

performance analysis of residential building envelope with phase change materials. ASHRAE Transactions, 2012. 118: p. 90.

210. Baechler, M., et al., Guide to Determining Climate Regions by County (No. PNNL-17211).

Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. 2010.

211. Program, B., Residential Prescriptive Requirements IECC, D.o. Energy, Editor. 2009.

212. Kottek, M., et al., World map of the Kรถppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 2006. 15(3): p. 259-263.

213. M. Brandt, S.W., P. C. Tabares-Velasco, . Optimization of PCM-Enhanced Drywall

Installed in Walls and Ceilings for Light-Weight Residential Buildings. in Advanced

Building Skins. 2015. Golden, CO.

214. Wilson, E., et al., 2014 Building America House Simulation Protocols. 2014, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO.

215. Project, S.R., Standard Electric Price Plans, S.R. Project, Editor. 2015.

184

216. Koล›ny, J., PCM-enhanced building components: an application of phase change materials

in building envelopes and internal structures. 2015: Springer.

217. PhaseChangeEnergySolutions, BioPCM Q23 Tunable Physical and Chemical Properties. Phase Change Energy Solutions.

218. Mi, X., et al., Energy and economic analysis of building integrated with PCM in different

cities of China. Applied Energy, 2016. 175(Supplement C): p. 324-336.

219. Kosny, J., N. Shukla, and A. Fallahi, Cost analysis of simple phase change material-

enhanced building envelopes in southern US climates. 2013, Fraunhofer CSE, Cambridge, MA (United States).

220. Chandan, V., et al. Short Paper: Data Driven Pre-cooling for Peak Demand Reduction in

Commercial Buildings. in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on

Embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments. 2015. ACM.

221. Solgi, E., R. Fayaz, and B.M. Kari, Cooling load reduction in office buildings of hot-arid

climate, combining phase change materials and night purge ventilation. Renewable Energy, 2016. 85: p. 725-731.

222. Santamouris, M. and D. Kolokotsa, Passive cooling dissipation techniques for buildings

and other structures: The state of the art. Energy and Buildings, 2013. 57: p. 74-94.

223. Brandt, M., S. Wijesuriya, and P.C. Tabares-Velasco, Optimization of PCM-Enhanced

Drywall Installed in Walls and Ceilings for Light-Weight Residential Buildings. 2015.

224. Arababadi, R. and K. Parrish, Modeling and testing multiple precooling strategies in three

residential building types in the Phoenix climate, in 2016 ASHRAE Annual Conference. 2016, ASHRAE: St. Louis, MO. p. 202-214.

225. Fisher, D.E. and C.O. Pedersen, Heat Transfer Thermal Load. 1997.

226. Fisher, D.E. and C.O. Pedersen, Convective heat transfer in building energy and thermal

load calculations. 1997, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA (United States).

227. Walton, I., The onset of cellular convection in a shallow two-dimensional container of fluid

heated non-uniformly from below. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1983. 131: p. 455-470.

228. Nielsen, P.V., T. Heby, and B. Moeller-Jensen, Air Distribution in a Room with Ceiling-

Mounted Diffusers--Comparison with Wall-Mounted Diffuser, Vertical Ventilation, and

Displacement Ventilation. ASHRAE transactions, 2006. 112(2).

229. Noble, E.J., Fan. 2010, Google Patents.

230. Gao, Y., et al., Ceiling fan air speeds around desks and office partitions. Building and Environment, 2017. 124: p. 412-440.

185

231. Samuelson, H.W., Comparing Modes of Operation for Residential Ceiling Fans to Achieve

Thermal Destratification. 2016.

232. Sanchez, M.C., et al., Savings estimates for the United States Environmental Protection

Agency's ENERGY STAR voluntary product labeling program. Energy policy, 2008. 36(6): p. 2098-2108.

233. Tabares-Velasco, P.C. and B. Griffith, Diagnostic test cases for verifying surface heat

transfer algorithms and boundary conditions in building energy simulation programs. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2012. 5(5): p. 329-346.

234. Standard, A., Standard 140-2001,โ€œ. ASHRAE Standard Method of Test for the Evaluation of Building Energy Analysis Computer Programs, 2011.

235. Mendes, N., G.H. Oliveira, and H.X. De Araรบjo. Building thermal performance analysis

by using matlab/simulink. in Seventh International IBPSA Conference, Rio de Janeiro,

Brazil. 2001.

236. Swaminathan, C.R. and V.R. Voller, ON THE ENTHALPY METHOD. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 1993. 3(1): p. 233-244.

237. ล krjanc, I., et al., Theoretical and experimental fuzzy modelling of building thermal

dynamic response. Building and Environment, 2001. 36(9): p. 1023-1038.

238. Ascione, F., et al., Dynamic insulation of the building envelope: Numerical modeling under

transient conditions and coupling with nocturnal free cooling. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015. 84: p. 1-14.

239. Harris, M., Robust Rapid Prototyping System for Model Predictive Control of Single Zone

Residential Buildings, in Mechanical Engineering. 2016, Colorado School of Mines, Mechanical Engineering Dept.

240. Arasteh, D., E. Finlayson, and C. Huizenga, Window 4. I: Program Description, Lawrence

Berkeley National Laboratory, report no LBL-35298. Berkeley, California: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1994.

241. Crawley, D.B., et al., EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation

program. Energy and buildings, 2001. 33(4): p. 319-331.

242. Evins, R., V. Dorer, and J. Carmeliet, Simulating external longwave radiation exchange

for buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 75: p. 472-482.

243. DOE, U., EnergyPlus Documentation. US Department of Energy, 2010.

244. Threlkeld, J. and R. Jordan, Direct radiation available on clear days. ASHRAE Trans.;(United States), 1958. 64.

186

245. Walton, G.N., Thermal analysis research program reference manual. National Bureau of Standards, March, 1983.

246. Tabares-Velasco, P.C., C. Christensen, and M. Bianchi, Verification and validation of

EnergyPlus phase change material model for opaque wall assemblies. Building and Environment, 2012. 54: p. 186-196.

247. Solomon, A., An easily computable solution to a two-phase Stefan problem. Solar Energy, 1979. 23(6): p. 525-528.

248. Rees, S.J., D. Xiao, and J.D. Spitler, An analytical verification test suite for building fabric

models in whole building energy simulation programs. ASHRAE Transactions, 2002. 108: p. 30.

249. Wilson, D.I., Relay-based PID tuning. Automation and Control, 2005. 2005: p. 10-11.

250. ร…strรถm, K.J. and T. Hรคgglund, PID controllers: theory, design, and tuning. Vol. 2. 1995: Instrument society of America Research Triangle Park, NC.

251. Fazio, P., et al., Environmental chamber for investigation of building envelope

performance. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 1997. 3(2): p. 97-102.

252. Martin, K., et al., Analysis of a thermal bridge in a guarded hot box testing facility. Energy and Buildings, 2012. 50: p. 139-149.

253. Kamel, E. and A.M. Memari, Automated Building Energy Modeling and Assessment Tool

(ABEMAT). Energy, 2018. 147: p. 15-24.

254. Sieminski, A., Annual energy outlook 2015. US Energy Information Administration, 2015.

255. de Gracia, A. and L.F. Cabeza, Phase change materials and thermal energy storage for

buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 103: p. 414-419.

256. Heim, D. and M. Pawล‚owski, The The Methodology of Thermal Energy Management for

Nearly Zero Energy Buildings. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 2017.

257. Mehling, H. and L.F. Cabeza, Heat and cold storage with PCM. Vol. 308. 2008: Springer.

258. Heier, J., C. Bales, and V. Martin, Combining thermal energy storage with buildingsโ€“a

review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015. 42: p. 1305-1325.

259. Lizana, J., et al., Advances in thermal energy storage materials and their applications

towards zero energy buildings: A critical review. Applied Energy, 2017. 203: p. 219-239.

260. Coppola, L., D. Coffetti, and S. Lorenzi, Cement-based renders manufactured with phase-

change materials: applications and feasibility. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016. 2016.

187

261. Kyriaki, E., et al., Life cycle analysis (LCA) and life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of phase

change materials (PCM) for thermal applications: A review. International Journal of Energy Research, 2018. 42(9): p. 3068-3077.

262. Wu, Z., M. Qin, and Z. Chen, Phase Change Humidity Control Material and its Application

in Buildings. Procedia Engineering, 2017. 205: p. 1011-1018.

263. Al-Jethelah, M., et al., Nano-PCM filled energy storage system for solar-thermal

applications. Renewable Energy, 2018. 126: p. 137-155.

264. Navarro, L., et al., Thermal energy storage in building integrated thermal systems: A

review. Part 2. Integration as passive system. Renewable Energy, 2016. 85: p. 1334-1356.

265. Saffari, M., et al., Passive cooling of buildings with phase change materials using whole-

building energy simulation tools: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 80: p. 1239-1255.

266. Judkoff, R. and J. Neymark, IEA SHC Task 34/ECBCS Annex 43, Testing and Validation

of Building Energy Simulation Tools. 2004, Annex Document. Paris, France: International Energy Agency: Solar Heating โ€ฆ.

267. Strachan, P., et al., Whole model empirical validation on a full-scale building. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2016. 9(4): p. 331-350.

268. Gerlich, V., K. Sulovskรก, and M. Zรกleลกรกk, COMSOL Multiphysics validation as simulation

software for heat transfer calculation in buildings: Building simulation software

validation. Measurement, 2013. 46(6): p. 2003-2012.

269. Pedersen, C.O. Advanced zone simulation in EnergyPlus: incorporation of variable

properties and phase change material (PCM) capability. in Building simulation. 2007.

270. Wetter, M. and C. Haugstetter, Modelica versus TRNSYSโ€“A comparison between an

equation-based and a procedural modeling language for building energy simulation. Proceedings of SimBuild, 2006. 2(1).

271. Shaikh, P.H., et al., A review on optimized control systems for building energy and comfort

management of smart sustainable buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014. 34: p. 409-429.

272. Harish, V. and A. Kumar, A review on modeling and simulation of building energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016. 56: p. 1272-1292.

273. Dutil, Y., et al. Modeling phase change materials behaviour in building applications:

selected comments. in World Renewable Energy Congress-Sweden; 8-13 May; 2011;

Linkรถping; Sweden. 2011. Linkรถping University Electronic Press.

188

274. Treado, S. and P. Delgoshaei. Agent-Based Approaches for Adaptive Building HVAC

System Control. in International High Performance Buildings. 2010. Purdue: Purdue e-Pubs.

275. Haavi, T., et al. Numerical simulations of a well-insulated wall assembly with integrated

phase change material panels eComparison with hot box experiments. in The international

conference on sustainable systems and the environment. 2011.

276. Heim, D. and A. Wieprzkowicz, Positioning of an isothermal heat storage layer in a

building wall exposed to the external environment. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2016. 9(5): p. 542-554.

277. Goia, F., G. Chaudhary, and S. Fantucci, Modeling and experimental validation of an

algorithm for simulation of hysteresis effects in phase change materials for building

components. Energy and Buildings, 2018.

278. Cabeza, L.F., et al., Unconventional experimental technologies available for phase change

materials (PCM) characterization. Part 1. Thermophysical properties. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015. 43: p. 1399-1414.

279. Matias, T., et al. Thermophysical characterization of commercial paraffin-based PCMs for

low temperature thermal energy storage applications. in Proc. of the Seminar

PCMs4Buildingsโ€“PCMs: Thermophysical characterization and buildings' applications. 2018.

280. Young, B.A., et al., Reduced-scale experiments to evaluate performance of composite

building envelopes containing phase change materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2018. 162: p. 584-595.

281. Navarro, L., et al., Thermal behaviour of insulation and phase change materials in

buildings with internal heat loads: experimental study. Energy Efficiency, 2015. 8(5): p. 895-904.

282. Fantucci, S., et al., Sinusoidal response measurement procedure for the thermal

performance assessment of PCM by means of Dynamic Heat Flow Meter Apparatus. Energy and Buildings, 2019. 183: p. 297-310.

283. Bony, J. and S. Citherlet, Numerical model and experimental validation of heat storage

with phase change materials. Energy and Buildings, 2007. 39(10): p. 1065-1072.

284. Zhu, D., et al. A detailed loads comparison of three building energy modeling programs:

EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1 E. in Building Simulation. 2013. Springer.

285. Crawley, D.B., et al., Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance

simulation programs. Building and environment, 2008. 43(4): p. 661-673.

189

286. Petrou, G., et al., Can the choice of building performance simulation tool significantly alter

the level of predicted indoor overheating risk in London flats? Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 2018: p. 0143624418792340.

287. Castell, A., M. Medrano, and S. Vall, 7 Computational performance prediction of phase

change materials in opaque components. Building Performance Simulation and Characterisation of Adaptive Facadesโ€“Adaptive Facade Network, 2017: p. 77.

288. Saffari, M., et al. Study on the optimum PCM melting temperature for energy savings in

residential buildings worldwide. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and

Engineering. 2017. IOP Publishing.

289. Lee, K.O., M.A. Medina, and X. Sun, Development and verification of an EnergyPlus-

based algorithm to predict heat transfer through building walls integrated with phase

change materials. Journal of Building Physics, 2016. 40(1): p. 77-95.

290. Ratnieks, J., et al., Experimental and numerical analysis of overheating in test houses with

PCM in Latvian climate conditions.

291. Kazjonovs, J., et al., Analysis of simulation models of PCM in buildings under Latviaโ€™s climate conditions. CIVIL ENGINEERINGโ€™13, 2013: p. 160.

292. Delcroix, B., M. Kummert, and A. Daoud, Development and numerical validation of a new

model for walls with phase change materials implemented in TRNSYS. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2017. 10(4): p. 422-437.

293. Konstantinidou, C.A., W. Lang, and A.M. Papadopoulos, Multiobjective optimization of a

building envelope with the use of phase change materials (PCMs) in Mediterranean

climates. International Journal of Energy Research, 2018.

294. Cetin, K.S., et al., Development and validation of an HVAC on/off controller in EnergyPlus

for energy simulation of residential and small commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2019. 183: p. 467-483.

295. Ye, R., et al., Experimental and numerical investigations on the thermal performance of

building plane containing CaCl2ยท 6H2O/expanded graphite composite phase change

material. Applied energy, 2017. 193: p. 325-335.

296. Errebai, F.B., S. Chikh, and L. Derradji, Experimental and numerical investigation for

improving the thermal performance of a microencapsulated phase change material

plasterboard. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018. 174: p. 309-321.

297. Sadasivam, S., et al., An iterative enthalpy method to overcome the limitations in ESP-r's

PCM solution algorithm. ASHRAE Transactions, 2011. 117(2): p. 100-108.

298. Heim, D. and J.A. Clarke, Numerical modelling and thermal simulation of PCMโ€“gypsum

composites with ESP-r. Energy and buildings, 2004. 36(8): p. 795-805.

190

299. HM, K. and J. Radoล„, Building envelope design by hygrothermal simulations-experience

and guidelines. Fizyka Budowli w Teorii i Praktyce, 2005. 1: p. 230-238.

300. Kรผnzel, H., WUFIยฎ PC-Program for calculating the coupled heat and moisture transfer

in buildings. Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics. Holzkirchen, Germany, 2002.

301. Korjakins, A., et al. Simulation of PCM behaviour in buildings for latvia climate

conditions. in Proceedings of sustainable energy storage in buildings conference:

sustainable energy storage in buildings, Ireland, Dublin. 2013.

302. Fraunhofer. WUFI Update Archive 2013 [cited 2018.

303. Kuncicky, D.C., Matlab programming. 2004: Pearson Education.

304. Chen, C., et al., A new kind of phase change material (PCM) for energy-storing wallboard. Energy and Buildings, 2008. 40(5): p. 882-890.

305. Lamberg, P., R. Lehtiniemi, and A.-M. Henell, Numerical and experimental investigation

of melting and freezing processes in phase change material storage. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2004. 43(3): p. 277-287.

306. Pepper, D.W. and J.C. Heinrich, The Finite Element Method: Basic Concepts and

Applications with MATLAB, MAPLE, and COMSOL. 2017: CRC Press.

307. Vanden, K.J. and D. Whitefield, Direct and iterative algorithms for the three-dimensional

Euler equations. AIAA journal, 1995. 33(5): p. 851-858.

308. Santamouris, M., Advances in building energy research. Vol. 1. 2012: Earthscan.

309. Lee, W., Tridiagonal matrices: Thomas algorithm. MS6021, Scientific Computation, University of Limerick, 2011.

310. Tian, Z. and Y. Ge, A fourth-order compact ADI method for solving two-dimensional

unsteady convectionโ€“diffusion problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2007. 198(1): p. 268-286.

311. 794, A.E., Standard Test Method for Melting and Crystallization Temperatures by Thermal

Analysis. ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

312. Judkoff, R. and J. Neymark, Model validation and testing: The methodological foundation

of ASHRAE Standard 140. Transactions-American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, 2006. 112(2): p. 367.

313. Sasic Kalagasidis, A., A multi-level modelling and evaluation of thermal performance of

phase-change materials in buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2014. 7(4): p. 289-308.

191

314. Vogt, M., et al., Selecting statistical indices for calibrating building energy models. Building and Environment, 2018. 144: p. 94-107.

315. Coakley, D., P. Raftery, and M. Keane, A review of methods to match building energy

simulation models to measured data. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2014. 37: p. 123-141.

316. Scofield, J.H., Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Not reallyโ€ฆ. Energy and Buildings, 2009. 41(12): p. 1386-1390.

317. Polly, B., N. Kruis, and D. Roberts, Assessing and improving the accuracy of energy

analysis for residential buildings. 2011, National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).

318. Ruiz, G. and C. Bandera, Validation of calibrated energy models: Common errors. Energies, 2017. 10(10): p. 1587.

319. Paliouras, P., et al., Using measured indoor environment parameters for calibration of

building simulation model-a passive house case study. Energy Procedia, 2015. 78: p. 1227-1232.

320. Amos-Abanyie, S., F. Akuffo, and V. Kutin-Sanwu, Effects of thermal mass, window size,

and night-time ventilation on peak indoor air temperature in the warm-humid climate of

ghana. The Scientific World Journal, 2013. 2013.

321. Sallee, H., Thermal characterization, before and after aging of DupontTM Energainยฎ

Panels. CSTB, Saint Martin dโ€™Hรจres, N/Rรฉf. CPM/09-035/HS/MLE, 2008.

322. Haavi, T., et al. Zero emission building envelopesโ€”numerical simulations of a Well-

insulated building with phase change material panels Integrated in the floor. in Proceedings of Building Simulation. 2011.

323. Wijesuriya, S. and P.C. Tabares - Velasco, Energy and Hygrothermal analysis of Phase

Change Materials (PCMs) in Exterior Wall Assemblies in ASHRAE Buildings XIV

International Conference 2019: Clearwater, Florida, USA.

324. Sunliang, C., State of the art thermal energy storage solutions for high performance

buildings. Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Jyvaskyla, 2010.

325. Shrestha, S., et al. Modeling PCM-enhanced insulation system and benchmarking

EnergyPlus against controlled field data. in Proceedings of building simulation. 2011.

326. Vazquez, S., et al., Energy storage systems for transport and grid applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2010. 57(12): p. 3881-3895.

327. Franco, G. and A.H. Sanstad, Climate change and electricity demand in California. Climatic Change, 2008. 87(1): p. 139-151.

192

328. Perez, K.X., et al., Nonintrusive disaggregation of residential air-conditioning loads from

sub-hourly smart meter data. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 81: p. 316-325.

329. Mohammadi, S. and A. Mohammadi, Stochastic scenario-based model and investigating

size of battery energy storage and thermal energy storage for micro-grid. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2014. 61: p. 531-546.

330. Wang, R., et al., The present and future of residential refrigeration, power generation and

energy storage. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2013. 53(2): p. 256-270.

331. Eyer, J. and G. Corey, Energy storage for the electricity grid: Benefits and market potential

assessment guide. Sandia National Laboratories, 2010. 20(10): p. 5.

332. Sadasivam, S., D. Zhang, and F. Almeida, An iterative enthalpy method to overcome the

limitations in ESP-r's PCM solution algorithm. ASHRAE Transactions, 2011. 117: p. 100.

333. Mostafaei, A., et al., Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems. 2019. 6(1): p. 47-51.

334. Hittle, D. and A. Lee, Tile structures having phase change material (PCM) component for

use in flooring and ceilings. 2004, Google Patents.

335. Wijesuriya, S., et al., Empirical validation and comparison of PCM modeling algorithms

commonly used in building energy and hygrothermal software. Building and Environment, 2020. (Under review).

336. Alexiades, V. and J. Koล›ny, F 3.4. 3 MELTING AND REEZING. CRC Handbook of Thermal Engineering, 2017: p. 393.

337. Gowreesunker, B., et al., Experimental and numerical investigations of the optical and

thermal aspects of a PCM-glazed unit. Energy and Buildings, 2013. 61: p. 239-249.

338. Sharma, A., et al., Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and

applications. Renewable and Sustainable energy reviews, 2009. 13(2): p. 318-345.

339. Gracia Cuesta, A.d., et al., New equipment for testing steady and transient thermal

performance of multilayered building envelopes with PCM. 2011.

340. Kosny, J., W. Miller, and A. Syed, Field testing of second-generation residential attic

using inorganic PCM thermal storage. Oak ridge national laboratory (ORNL), 2007.

341. Miller, W.A., J. Kosny, and A. Zaltash, DYNAMIC THERMALLY-DISCONNECTED

BUILDING ENVELOPES A NEW PARADIGM FOR WALLS AND ROOFS IN LOW

ENERGY BUILDINGS. 2010, Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Building โ€ฆ.

342. Mehling, H. and L.F. Cabeza, Phase change materials and their basic properties, in Thermal energy storage for sustainable energy consumption. 2007, Springer. p. 257-277.

193

343. Pendyala, S., Macroencapsulation of phase change materials for thermal energy storage. 2012.

344. Sun, X., et al., Use of encapsulated phase change materials in lightweight building walls

for annual thermal regulation. Energy, 2019. 180: p. 858-872.

345. Liu, Z., et al., A review on macro-encapsulated phase change material for building

envelope applications. Building and Environment, 2018. 144: p. 281-294.

346. Kosny, J., A. Fallahi, and N. Shukla, Cold climate building enclosure solutions. 2013, National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).

347. Kosny, J., et al., Theoretical and experimental thermal performance analysis of complex

thermal storage membrane containing bio-based phase change material (PCM). 2010, Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Building โ€ฆ.

348. Biswas, K., et al., A Study of the Energy-Saving Potential of Metal Roofs Incorporating

Dynamic Insulation Systems. 2013, Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Building โ€ฆ.

349. Jamil, H., Investigation of Passive Storage of Thermal Energy at Different Temperatures. 2016.

350. Lauck, J.S., Evaluation of phase change materials for cooling in a super-insulated passive

house. 2013.

351. Kรถse, E. and G. ManioฤŸlu. Evaluation of the Performance of a Building Envelope

Constructed with Phase-Change Materials in Relation to Orientation in Different Climatic

Regions. in E3S Web of Conferences. 2019. EDP Sciences.

352. Kong, X., et al., Experimental study on thermal performance of phase change material

passive and active combined using for building application in winter. Applied energy, 2017. 206: p. 293-302.

353. Wegmueller, R., et al. Controlled active thermal storage in smart PCM walls for energy

independent building applications. in 2018 5th International Conference on Renewable

Energy: Generation and Applications (ICREGA). 2018. IEEE.

354. Claros-Marfil, L., et al. Active and passive PCM walls simulationโ€“a new TRNSYS PCM-

Type. in Proceedings of the 1st international congress on research in construction and

architectural technologies. 2014.

355. de Gracia, A., Dynamic building envelope with PCM for cooling purposesโ€“Proof of

concept. Applied energy, 2019. 235: p. 1245-1253.

356. Muruganantham, K., et al. Experimental investigation of a bio-based phase change

material to improve building energy performance. in ASME 2010 4th international

conference on energy sustainability. 2010. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

194

357. Lee, K.O., et al., Assessing the integration of a thin phase change material (PCM) layer in

a residential building wall for heat transfer reduction and management. Applied Energy, 2015. 137: p. 699-706.

358. Weinlรคder, H., W. Kรถrner, and B. Strieder, A ventilated cooling ceiling with integrated

latent heat storageโ€”monitoring results. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 82: p. 65-72.

359. Berardi, U. and S. Soudian, Experimental investigation of latent heat thermal energy

storage using PCMs with different melting temperatures for building retrofit. Energy and Buildings, 2019. 185: p. 180-195.

360. Mathis, D., et al., Thermal characterization of bio-based phase changing materials in

decorative wood-based panels for thermal energy storage. Green Energy & Environment, 2019. 4(1): p. 56-65.

361. Sage-Lauck, J. and D. Sailor, Evaluation of phase change materials for improving thermal

comfort in a super-insulated residential building. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 79: p. 32-40.

362. Chiu, J.N., V. Martin, and F. Setterwall. A review of thermal energy storage systems with

salt hydrate phase change materials for comfort cooling. in EFFSTOCK 2009. 2009.

363. Saeed, R.M., et al., Preparation and enhanced thermal performance of novel (solid to gel)

form-stable eutectic PCM modified by nano-graphene platelets. Journal of Energy Storage, 2018. 15: p. 91-102.

364. DemirbaฤŸ, S. and S.A. Aksoy, Encapsulation of phase change materials by complex

coacervation to improve thermal performances and flame retardant properties of the

cotton fabrics. Fibers and Polymers, 2016. 17(3): p. 408-417.

365. Zhang, M., M.A. Medina, and J.B. King, Development of a thermally enhanced frame wall

with phaseโ€change materials for onโ€peak air conditioning demand reduction and energy

savings in residential buildings. International Journal of Energy Research, 2005. 29(9): p. 795-809.

366. Banu, D., D. Feldman, and D. Hawes, Evaluation of thermal storage as latent heat in phase

change material wallboard by differential scanning calorimetry and large scale thermal

testing. Thermochimica acta, 1998. 317(1): p. 39-45.

367. Biswas, K. Field Evaluation of Energy-Saving Technologies for Steep-Slope Roofs. 2017.

368. Duan, J., Y. Xiong, and D. Yang, Melting Behavior of Phase Change Material in

Honeycomb Structures with Different Geometrical Cores. Energies, 2019. 12(15): p. 2920.

369. Lee, E.S., EnergyPlus Hysteresis PCM Model: Cooperative Research and Development

Final Report, CRADA Number CRD-16-639. 2018, National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).

195

370. Vik, T.A., et al., Thermal Performance of an Office Cubicle Integrated with a Bio-based

PCM: Experimental Analyses. Energy Procedia, 2017. 111: p. 609-618.

371. Johansson, P., A.S. Kalagasidis, and H. Jansson, Investigating PCM activation using

transient plane source method. Energy Procedia, 2015. 78: p. 800-805.

372. Gschwander, S., et al. Standardization of PCM characterization via DSC. in Proceedings

of SHC 2015 International Conference on Solar Heating and Cooling for Buildings and

Industry. 2015.

373. Koล›ny, J., Laboratory Thermal Testing of PCM-Enhanced Building Products and

Envelope Systems, in PCM-Enhanced Building Components. 2015, Springer. p. 107-141.

374. Testing, A.S.f. and Materials, Standard test method for steady-state thermal transmission

properties by means of the heat flow meter apparatus. 2017: ASTM International.

375. Delcroix, B., M. Kummert, and A. Daoud, Thermal Behavior Mapping of a Phase Change

Material Between the Heating and Cooling Enthalpy-temperature Curves. Energy Procedia, 2015. 78: p. 225-230.

376. Lรกzaro, A., et al., Verification of a T-history installation to measure enthalpy versus

temperature curves of phase change materials. Measurement Science and Technology, 2006. 17(8): p. 2168.

377. Handbook-Fundamentals, A., In Chapter 25-Heat, Air and Moisture Control in Building

Assemblies-Fundamentals. ASHRAE. Atlanta, 2009.

378. ASTM, C., 1363-97. Standard Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Performance of Building Assemblies by Means of Guarded Hot Box, 1997. 4: p. 717-768.

379. Astm, C., 177-97, Standard test method for steady-state heat flux measurements and

thermal transmission properties by means of the guarded hot plate apparatus. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1997. 4(06): p. 21-42.

380. Feng, G., et al., DSC test error of phase change material (PCM) and its influence on the

simulation of the PCM floor. Renewable energy, 2016. 87: p. 1148-1153.

381. Shukla, N., et al., Lab-scale dynamic thermal testing of PCM-enhanced building materials. 2014.

382. Bergman, T.L., et al., Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 2011: John Wiley & Sons.

383. Hines, A.L. and R.N. Maddox, Mass transfer: fundamentals and applications. 1985: Prentice-Hall Englewood-Cliffs, NJ.

384. Modest, M.F., Radiative heat transfer. 2013: Academic press.

196

385. Misran, H., et al., Nonsurfactant synthesis and characterizations of metal-organic

framework MOF-5 materials using fatty alcohols. Science of Advanced Materials, 2014. 6(7): p. 1638-1644.

386. Balasubramanian, G., et al., Modeling of thermochemical energy storage by salt hydrates. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2010. 53(25-26): p. 5700-5706.

387. Kundu, S.K. and A. Bhaumik, Pyrene-based porous organic polymers as efficient catalytic

support for the synthesis of biodiesels at room temperature. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2015. 3(8): p. 1715-1723.

388. Ullah, R., et al., Investigation of ester-and amide-linker-based porous organic polymers

for carbon dioxide capture and separation at wide temperatures and pressures. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2016. 8(32): p. 20772-20785.

389. Sรถylemez, M.S., On the effective thermal conductivity of building bricks. Building and Environment, 1998. 34(1): p. 1-5.

390. Bauer, T., A general analytical approach toward the thermal conductivity of porous media. International journal of heat and mass transfer, 1993. 36(17): p. 4181-4191.

391. Wyrwal, J., A. Marynowicz, and J. Swirska, Effective thermal conductivity of porous

building materials-analysis and verification. Bauphysik, 2008. 30(6): p. 431.

392. Prouzet, E., et al., Assembly of mesoporous silica molecular sieves based on nonionic

ethoxylated sorbitan esters as structure directors. Chemistry of materials, 1999. 11(6): p. 1498-1503.

393. Ristiฤ‡, A. and N. Zabukovec Logar, New Composite Water Sorbents CaCl2-PHTS for Low-

Temperature Sorption Heat Storage: Determination of Structural Properties. Nanomaterials, 2019. 9(1): p. 27.

394. Judkoff, R.D. and J. Neymark, Standard method of test for the evaluation of building

energy analysis computer programs. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc, 2004.

395. Aird, G., D. Coakley, and R. Kerrigan, APPLICATION OF AN OPTIMISATION

APPROACH FOR THE CALIBRATION OF HIGH-FIDELITY BUILDING ENERGY

MODELS TO SUPPORT MODEL-2 PREDICTIVE CONTROL (MPC) OF HVAC

SYSTEMS 3.

396. Alawadhi, E.M., Using phase change materials in window shutter to reduce the solar heat

gain. Energy and Buildings, 2012. 47: p. 421-429.

397. Kalousck, M. and J. Hirs, Simulation of the summer indoor thermal comfort by using

wallboard with phase change material. Eurosun, Bologna, 2002. 19: p. 263-270.

197

398. Feulvarch, E. and J.-M. Bergheau, An implicit fixed-grid method for the finite-element

analysis of heat transfer involving phase changes. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 2007. 51(6): p. 585-610.

399. Gawlik, E.S. and A.J. Lew, High-order finite element methods for moving boundary

problems with prescribed boundary evolution. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2014. 278: p. 314-346.

400. Mirzaei, P.A. and F. Haghighat, Modeling of phase change materials for applications in

whole building simulation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012. 16(7): p. 5355-5362.

401. Hembade, L., N. Neithalath, and S.D. Rajan, Understanding the energy implications of

phase-change materials in concrete walls through finite-element analysis. Journal of Energy Engineering, 2013. 140(1): p. 04013009.

402. Hudobivnik, B., et al., FEM thermal performance analysis of multi-layer external walls

during typical summer conditions considering high intensity passive cooling. Applied Energy, 2016. 178: p. 363-375.

403. Kolokotsa, D., J. Yang, and L. Siew Eang, 5.20 Energy Management in University

Campuses A2 - Dincer, Ibrahim, in Comprehensive Energy Systems. 2018, Elsevier: Oxford. p. 808-826.

404. Younsi, Z., H. Naji, and M. Lachheb, Numerical investigation of transient thermal

behavior of a wall incorporating a phase change material via a hybrid scheme. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016. 78: p. 200-206.

405. Izquierdo-Barrientos, M.A., et al., A numerical study of external building walls containing

phase change materials (PCM). Applied Thermal Engineering, 2012. 47: p. 73-85.

406. Jin, X., M.A. Medina, and X.S. Zhang, Numerical analysis for the optimal location of a

thin PCM layer in frame walls. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016. 103: p. 1057-1063.

407. Heim, D. Two solution methods of heat transfer with phase change within whole building

dynamic simulation. in 9th International IBPSA Conference, Montrรฉal, Canada. 2005.

408. Heidarinejad, M., et al., Actual building energy use patterns and their implications for

predictive modeling. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017. 144: p. 164-180.

409. Almeida, F., et al. Comparison of corrective phase change material algorithm with ESP-r

simulation. in 12th Conference of IBPSA, Sydney. 2011.

410. Jokisalo, J., P. Lamberg, and K. Siren. Thermal simulation of PCM structures with

TRNSYS. 2000. Terrastock Stuttgart.

198

411. Lamberg, P., J. Jokisalo, and K. Sirรฉn. The effects on indoor comfort when using phase

change materials with building concrete products. in Proceedings of Healthy Buildings. 2000.

412. Ibanez, M., et al., An approach to the simulation of PCMs in building applications using

TRNSYS. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2005. 25(11-12): p. 1796-1807.

413. Kwiatkowski, J., M. Woloszyn, and J.-J. Roux, Influence of sorption isotherm hysteresis

effect on indoor climate and energy demand for heating. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011. 31(6-7): p. 1050-1057.

414. Delcroix, B., M. Kummert, and A. Daoud, Building-scale experimental validation of a new

model for walls with phase change materials. Science and Technology for the Built Environment, 2017. 23(6): p. 1049-1062.

415. Koehler, S. and F. Borrelli. Building temperature distributed control via explicit MPC and

"Trim and Respond"; methods. in Control Conference (ECC), 2013 European. 2013.

416. Zhuang, C.L., et al., Validation of Veracity on Simulating the Indoor Temperature in PCM

Light Weight Building by EnergyPlus. Life System Modeling and Intelligent Computing, Pt I, 2010. 6328: p. 486-496.

417. Shrestha, S.S., et al., Modeling PCM-enhanced insulation system and benchmarking

EnergyPlus against controlled field data. 2011, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL); Building Technologies Research and Integration Center.

418. Tardieu, A., et al. Computer simulation and experimental measurements for an

experimental PCM-impregnated office building. in Proceedings of the building simulation

2011: 12th conference of international building performance simulation association. 2011.

419. Kissock, J.K., et al., Testing and simulation of phase change wallboard for thermal storage

in buildings. Solar Engineering, 1998: p. 45-52.

420. De Gracia, A., et al., Life Cycle Assessment of the inclusion of phase change materials

(PCM) in experimental buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2010. 42(9): p. 1517-1523.

421. Childs, K., HEATING 7. 1 user's manual. 1991, Oak Ridge K-25 Site, TN (United States).

422. Lee, K.O. and M.A. Medina, Using phase change materials for residential air conditioning

peak demand reduction and energy conservation in coastal and transitional climates in the

State of California. Energy and Buildings, 2016. 116: p. 69-77.

423. El Mankibi, M., et al., Numerical modeling of thermal behaviors of active multi-layer living

wall. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 106: p. 96-110.

424. Multiphysics, C., Heat transfer module userโ€™s guide. COMSOL version, 2014. 4.

199

APPENDIX A. DISCRETE FORMS PREVIOUSELY USED IN NUMERICALLY

MODELLING PCMS

Table A-1 Discrete forms previously used in numerically modelling PCMs Discrete form Study Time integration Modeled object and the platform

Finite Element Method

[396] Implicit Multi-layer window shutter with PCM in CFD

[397] Implicit PCM wallboard in CFD

[398] Implicit PCMs in pipes (mathematical theory)

[399] Implicit and Explicit

Evaluation of a moving boundary problem solving (mathematical theory)

[400] Implicit PCM inclusions in walls in CFD implicitly.

[401] - Lightweight concrete and gypsum walls with PCM in ABAQUS

[402] - Wall thermal mass in HWC and LWC external wall types

Finite Volume Method

[403] - PCM composite wallboard in an in-house model

[90] 2-D PCM wall building model in an in-house model

[404] Implicit Mortar wall containing a microencapsulated (PCM)

Finite Difference Method

[405] Implicit PCM included external building walls in an in-house model

[406] Fully Implicit PCM included gypsum board in an in-house model

[80] Implicit and Explicit

Uses a Forward Time and Central Space (FTCS) [382]

[407] Explicit PCM-composite

layers built in multilayer constructions

200

APPENDIX B. SUMMERY OF WHERE WHOLE BUILDING ENERGY MODELING

PLATFORMS WITH PCM MODELS ARE USED

Table B-1 Summary of where whole building energy modeling platforms with PCM models are used in field studies and studies to upgrade/improve them

Software Tool or sub routine

(if named)

[408]

function

Simulation methods Identified in section 3.2.1.

Recognition, and remedial work on the complex PCM behavior

Discussed in chapter 2.

Observations, applications and references to additional case studies

ESP-r

[114, 407]

Introduction of a PCM model to ESP-r

Effective heat capacity method + Heat source method

Includes an additional heat source to the latent heat method

Conducts floating temperature applications

[121]

[103]

Overcome the Limitations in ESP-r's PCM Solution Algorithm

Effective heat capacity method

Introduces a temperature correction scheme to the latent heat method

Compares the BESTEST Case 600 model results with ESP-r simulation [409]

TRNSYS

Type 204 [410] Effective heat capacity method

- Evaluated indoor comfort with PCM applications in envelope

[411]

Type-222 [412]

Simulate characteristics of a wall with PCM as a standard active wall

Effective heat capacity method

-

201

Table B-1 continued

TRNSYS

Type-232 [412]

Models the solar collector field PCM applications

- - Studies the influence of sorption isotherm hysteresis effect on indoor climate and energy demand for heating [413]

Type-240 [98]

Model for storage tanks and experiments.

Enthalpy Method

Recognizes Subcooling and implements switching method of the curves. (two different material data files)

Type-241 [98]

Model for PCM walls and experiments

Enthalpy Method

Removes the Subcooling analysis in TRNSYS, Type-240 (storage tank application)

Conducts comparative simulation of the operative room temperature for a reference room using gypsum and PCM plasters

Type-285 [16]

Model for PCM walls and experiments

Enthalpy Method

Recognizes hysteresis and considers melting and solidification curves separately in validation.

Conducts building level tests

[55]

Conducts wall level tests

[17]

Type-399 [354]

PCM-Type (Type 399) and the building Type (Type 56) models

Effective heat capacity method

Implements different ๐ถ๐‘(๐‘‡) Curves to model hysteresis

202

Table B-1 continued

TRNSYS

[412]

Models the solar collector field PCM applications

- - Studies the influence of sorption isotherm hysteresis effect on indoor climate and energy demand for heating [413]

Type-240 [98]

Model for storage tanks and experiments.

Enthalpy Method

Recognizes Subcooling and implements switching method of the curves. (two different material data files)

Type-241 [98]

Model for PCM walls and experiments

Enthalpy Method

Removes the Subcooling analysis in TRNSYS, Type-240 (storage tank application)

Conducts comparative simulation of the operative room temperature for a reference room using gypsum and PCM plasters

Type-285 [16]

Model for PCM walls and experiments

Enthalpy Method

Recognizes hysteresis and considers melting and solidification curves separately in validation.

Conducts building level tests

[55]

Conducts wall level tests

[17]

Type-399 [354]

PCM-Type (Type 399) and the building Type (Type 56) models

Effective heat capacity method

Implements different ๐ถ๐‘(๐‘‡) Curves to model hysteresis

203

Table B-1 continued Type -

3258 [292] Enthalpy

Method Models hysteresis, Subcooling, and ๐‘˜(๐‘‡)

Tests two identical full-scale test-cells [80, 414]

E+

CondFD [100] Development of a thermal model of building surfaces.

Enthalpy Method

Implements a single curve method

CondFD [415]

Further simulations

Enthalpy Method

- Conducts floating and controlled temperature tests

CondFD [416] Enthalpy Method

Implements phase fraction as an invertible function of temperature.

Tests using BESTEST building specifications

CondFD [417] Enthalpy Method

Conducts field tests using a house and observes significant delays during cooling attributed to hysteresis.

CondFD [418] Enthalpy Method

- Field tests using identical cabins

CondFD [124] Enthalpy Method

Studies hysteresis conditions

CondFD [277] Enthalpy Method

Integrates a hysteresis model to EnergyPlus using the EMS group

204

APPENDIX C. COST CALCULATION PROCEDURES OF BEOPT

This section explains the cost calculations BEopt considers. AERC is calculated by taking into

account the cash flows generated by the principal portion of loan payments that are made for the

length of the loan period, loan interest, replacement costs (for the components that wear out), utility

bills, loan tax deductions, residual values, rebates (PV and whole house efficiency), federal and

non-federal tax credits, and the mortgage down payment. Equation 1 is used to inflate the sum of

these cash flows. ๐ถ๐‘‚๐‘†๐‘‡๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ=๐‘˜ = ๐ถ๐‘‚๐‘†๐‘‡๐‘–๐‘›๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘–๐‘Ž๐‘™ (1 + ๐‘–)๐‘˜ (C-1)

Here, the inflation rate is denoted by i. The initial cost is the cost at the beginning of the evaluation

period, and ๐ถ๐‘‚๐‘†๐‘‡๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ=๐‘˜ represents the cost at the end of the year ๐‘˜ which is annualized. The

method used here to annualize the composite cash flows is present worth (PW) of the cash flow,

as shown in equation 2. ๐‘ƒ๐‘Š =โˆ‘ (โˆ’๐‘‡๐ถ๐‘‚๐‘†๐‘‡๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ=๐‘˜)๐‘๐‘˜=0 (1 + ๐‘‘๐‘›)โˆ’๐‘˜ (C-2)

๐‘‡๐ถ๐‘‚๐‘†๐‘‡๐‘ฆ๐‘’๐‘Ž๐‘Ÿ=๐‘˜ is the total cost in the year while ๐‘‘๐‘› represents the nominal discount rate. Finally,

the annualized energy related cost is determined by annualizing the present worth using the real

discount rate, equation 3. ๐ด๐ธ๐‘…๐ถ = โˆ’๐‘ƒ๐‘Šโˆ—๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ1โˆ’ 1(1+๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ)๐‘ (C-3)

In a case where the real discount rate,๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ is zero, BEopt uses equation 4 which approximates

equation 3 for small values of ๐‘‘๐‘Ÿ, in order to avoid a 0/0 situation. ๐ด๐ธ๐‘…๐ถ = โˆ’๐‘ƒ๐‘Š๐‘ (C-4)

The x-axis shows Average Source Energy Savings (ASES) considering default energy conversions

from BEopt to compare site electric and gas savings [203] which is calculated using equation 5.

205

๐ด๐‘†๐ธ๐‘† = ๐ด๐ธ๐‘ˆ๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘“โˆ—๐ด๐ธ๐‘ˆ๐‘๐‘Ÿ๐‘œ๐‘ก๐‘œโˆ—100%๐ด๐ธ๐‘ˆ๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘“ (C-5)

Here, the average of annual energy use is denoted by AEU. Equation 6 is used to calculate AEU,

where ๐ธ๐‘ˆ๐‘˜ the energy is use in year ๐‘˜ and ๐‘ is the mortgage period.

AEU = โˆ‘ ๐ธ๐‘ˆ๐‘˜๐‘๐‘˜=0๐‘ (C-6)

206

APPENDIX D. SENSOR INFORMATION OF THE CHAMBER, HVAC SYSTEM, AND

OUTSIDE

Table D-1 Sensors implemented in the Air Handling Unit and the Chamber Unit at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Colorado School of Mines.

Model number Tag Description about the sensor

Physical location(inside/outside)

BA/T1K(20 TO 120F)-I-2"-BB2

TS-4JXX-1

Immersion Temperature Sensor (RTD Class A Pt1000), Nylon Fitting (2 sensors): 2โ€™โ€™ length

and ยผโ€™โ€™ diameter, stainless steel probe

Cooling coil supply line (outside)

BA/T1K(20 TO 120F)-I-2"-BB2

TS-4JXX-2

Immersion Temperature Sensor (RTD Class A Pt1000), Nylon Fitting (2 sensors): 2โ€™โ€™ length

and ยผโ€™โ€™ diameter, stainless steel probe

Cooling coil return line(outside)

BA/2"M304 TS4X-WEL-

1 Immersion well, Machined 304 Stainless Steel: BA/2โ€™โ€™M304

Cool Coil supply line(outside)

BA/2"M304 TS4X-WEL-

2 Immersion well, Machined 304 Stainless Steel: BA/2โ€™โ€™M304

Cool Coil return line(outside)

BA/T1K(-30 TO 130F)-A-8'-BB2

TS-2.8 JX-1

Duct Averaging Temp Sensor )(RTD Class A Pt1000),

Flexible, 8โ€™ J-Box Before first HC

(upstream)(outside)

BA/T1K(-30 TO 130F)-A-8'-BB2

TS-2.8 JX-2

Duct Averaging Temp Sensor )(RTD Class A Pt1000),

Flexible, 8โ€™ J-Box After first

HC(downstream)(outside)

BA/1K(A)-D-8"-BB2

TS-1.8 JX-1

Duct Temp Sensor(RTD Class A Pt1000): 8โ€™โ€™ length, ยผโ€™โ€™

diameter, BAPi Box 2 not included

BA/1K(A)-D-8"-BB2

TS-1.8 JX-2

Duct Temp Sensor(RTD Class A Pt1000): 8โ€™โ€™ length, ยผโ€™โ€™

diameter, BAPi Box 2 not included

BA/1K(A)-D-8"-BB2

TS-1.8 JX-3

Duct Temp Sensor(RTD Class A Pt1000): 8โ€™โ€™ length, ยผโ€™โ€™

diameter, BAPi Box 2 not included

ZPS-ACC10 OAP3

Outside Air Pressure Pickup Port ZPS โ€”ACC10, roof top

mount Roof(outside)

207

Table D-1 continued

BA/T1K(-30 T0 130F)-H200-O-BB

OATS-TO

OA Temp/Hum Sensor (1 sensor): H200 humidity transmitter, weather proof box

Roof/AHU /shaded(outside)

BA/T1K(-30 T0 130F)-H200-O-BB-2 DHTS-TS

Duct Hum Transmitter with Temp Sensor (2 sensors): H200 humidity transmitter, BAPI-box Supply duct (inside)

BA/T1K(-30 T0 130F)-H200-O-BB-2 DHTS-TR

Duct Hum Transmitter with Temp Sensor (2 sensors): H200 humidity transmitter, BAPI-box Return duct(inside)

BA/BS4XC-F-2-10G16-20M16-Z-WMW

RHTS-TRM

BAPI-Stat 2 โ€“ Room Hum Transmitter/Temp Sensor (1 sensor): (H205) humidity transmitter, LCD Display

Chamber Inside Wall(inside)

ZPS-SW1,2,3 DP-SW1,2,3

Differential Pressure Switch Chamber outside wall(inside)

BA/BS3F-DCD05-Z-LED

CD-TRM

Room CO2 Transmitter in BAPI-Stat 3 enclosure (1 sensor)

Chamber Inside Wall(inside)

BA/DCD05-D-BB-LED CD-TS

Duct Service CO2 Transmitter, Periodic Occupancy (1 sensor) Supply duct(inside)

BA/BS3F-VOC05-Z-LED

VOC-TRM

Room VOC Transmitter in BAPI-Stat 3 enclosure (1 sensor)

Chamber Inside Wall(inside)

BA/VOC05-D-BB VOC-TS

VOC โ€“ Duct Service VOC Transmitter (1 sensor) Supply duct(inside)

Ebtron SA Flow GP-P1 Flow rate sensor for supply air Supply duct(inside)

Ebtron SA Flow GP-P2

Flow rate sensor for supply air Supply duct (Perpendicular)

Ebtron RA Flow GP-P3 Flow rate sensor for return air Return duct

Ebtron RA Flow GP-P4

Flow rate sensor for return air Return duct (Perpendicular)

Ebtron OA Flow GP-P5 Flow rate sensor for outdoor air Outside: OA intake

Ebtron SA Transmitter GP-P1T

Transmitter Chamber external wall (already installed)

Ebtron RA Transmitter GP-P2T

Transmitter Chamber external wall (already installed)

208

Table D-1 continued

Ebtron OA Transmitter GP-P3T

Transmitter Chamber external wall (already installed)

ZPS-ACC-06 SPP-RM

Pressure pick up port for chamber Chamber false ceiling

ZPS-ACC-07 SPP-1 Pressure pick up port Supply duct

ZPS-ACC-07 SPP-2-4 Pressure pick up port Main AHU Duct downstream supply fan

ZPS-ACC-07 SPP-5 Pressure pick up port Main AHU Duct upstream filters

ZPS-ACC-07 SPP-6 Pressure pick up port Return duct

209

APPENDIX E. SENSOR INFORMATION OF THE CHAMBER, HVAC SYSTEM, AND

OUTSIDE

Table E-1 Verification and Validation studies of building envelope numerical models Study Model to Data Links/Highlights

[106] Verifies simulation constructed on STAR program (Simplified Transient Analysis of Roofs) and compares to analytical solutions from [84].

Neglects super-cooling effects since their objective is to simplify their model.

[419] Uses an In-house numerical model and compares with Paraffin PCM (K18)-enhanced concrete sandwiched wallboards.

Concludes that peak temperature in the phase change test cell was up to 10 ยฐC less than in the control test cell during sunny days.

[397] Compares the simulated thermal comfort in the two rooms at the attic house during the summer.

[36] Uses an in-house model developed in [183] and compares with a test cell, MICROBAT, to measure the temperatures and characterizes the phase change effects of a PCM composite.

Recommends investigation on hysteresis effects observed. [416]

Runs EnergyPlus PCM model and highlights the errors observed due to material thermal characteristics.

Takes phase transition occurring over a temperature range into account and introduces a phase fraction as an invertible function of temperature.

[420] Uses EcoIndicator 99 (EI99) and evaluates the environmental impact of including PCMs in a typical Mediterranean building (cubicles).

Discusses that PCMs must operate as long as possible during the year to reduce the operational impact

[417] Runs building simulations on EnergyPlus and compares the simulation results with a field measured data in a residential house.

[418] Runs building simulations on EnergyPlus and uses identical cabins built on the Tamaki Campus of the University of Auckland.

Focuses on the reduction of daily indoor temperature. [246] Runs building simulations on EnergyPlus and compares the simulation

results with an analytical solution in[82], and a numerical solution in[421] for verification and data from [275] for validation.

Uses an approach as dictated by ASHRAE Standard 140 to identify and resolve bugs in the EnergyPlus numerical model.

210

Table E-1 continued

[422] Uses an in-house model to extrapolate the results for walls outfitted with Phase change frame walls (PCFW) located in coastal and transitional climates in the State of California.

Concludes that PCFWs would produce better results in energy savings as the outdoor air temperature increased

[16] Tests a numerical module for TRNSYS developed FORTRAN and uses data from [36] to address hysteresis with validation.

Recommends charging and discharging process of PCMs to be evaluated under dynamic environmental conditions.

[423]

Models the thermal behaviors of multi-layer living wall in MATLAB/Simulink and experimental work from Sunliang [324] is used for validation.

Studies PCMs in different locations within the wall and the inclusion method and phase change properties which yield maximum savings.

[40]

Uses a MATLAB/Simulink based model and tests a multi-layer heat exchanger in the laboratory prototype level. [406]

Investigates the load shifting capacity considering the thermal comfort and indoor air quality.

[406] Estimates the optimal location of a thin PCM layer in the frame wall.

[292] Uses a TRNSYS Type 3285 module as the numerical model and uses experimental data[414]

Uses variable phase change materials thermal capacity. [130] Runs simulations on COMSOL Multiphysicsยฎ [424] for a wall model

previously validated with [14], [144 683] and compares experimental data obtained from DHFMA method.

Assumes that PCM state remained on the same enthalpy curve even if the melting or freezing was interrupted